ML23310A036
| ML23310A036 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Holtec |
| Issue date: | 11/09/2023 |
| From: | Aida Rivera-Varona NRC/NMSS/DFM/IOB |
| To: | Soler M Holtec |
| References | |
| IR 2023201 | |
| Download: ML23310A036 (17) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mark Soler, Vice President of Quality Holtec International, Inc.
Krishna P. Singh Technology Campus 1 Holtec Boulevard Camden, NJ 08104
SUBJECT:
HOLTEC INTERNATIONAL, INC. - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INSPECTION REPORT NO. 721014/2023201
Dear Mark Soler:
On September 26, 2023, through September 28, 2023, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff conducted an announced onsite inspection at Holtecs Orrvilon manufacturing facility in Orrville, Ohio. Orrvilon fabricates, inspects, tests, and assembles important to safety components of the Holtec HISTORM dry storage systems (DSSs).
The purpose of the inspection was to verify and assess the adequacy of Holtec's compliance with the NRC requirements for the design, modification, fabrication, assembly, testing, and procurement of HISTORM components. Holtec is the holder of the certificate of compliance (CoC) and designer of the HISTORM DSSs.
The inspection scope included observations of fabrication activities, reviews of records, and interviews with personnel to determine whether DSSs fabricated for use in an independent spent fuel storage installation, are constructed in accordance with the commitments and requirements specified in the safety analysis report, the NRCs corresponding safety evaluation report, Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 72 and the CoC and technical specifications; and to determine whether the fabricators activities are conducted in accordance with NRC-approved quality assurance program requirements. The enclosed report presents the results of this inspection, which were discussed with you and other members of your staff on September 28, 2023.
No violations of more than minor significance were identified during this inspection.
November 9, 2023
M. Soler 2
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) or from the Publicly Available Records component of the NRCs ADAMS. ADAMS is accessible from the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The PDR is open by appointment. To make an appointment to visit the PDR, please send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Sincerely, Aida Rivera-Varona, Chief Inspection and Oversight Branch Division of Fuel Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Docket No. 721014
Enclosure:
NRC Inspection Report No.
721014/2023201 Signed by Rivera-Varona, Aida on 11/09/23
ML23310A036 OFFICE NMSS/DFM NMSS/DFM NMSS/DFM NAME JTapp WWheatley ARivera-Varona DATE 11/06/23 11/07/23 11/09/23 Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Division of Fuel Management Docket:
721014 Report.:
721014/2023201 Enterprise Identifier: I20232010034 Certificate Holder:
Holtec International, Inc.
Facility:
Holtec Orrvilon Location:
Orrville, OH Inspection Dates:
September 26, 2023, through September 28, 2023 Inspection Team:
Jeremy Tapp, Transportation and Storage Safety Inspector, Team Leader Matthew Learn, Senior Reactor Engineer Azmi Djapari, Transportation and Storage Safety Inspector Zackery Helgert, General Engineer, NRAN (Observer)
Approved By:
Aida Rivera-Varona, Branch Chief Inspection and Oversight Branch Division of Fuel Management Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
2 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Division of Fuel Management EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
Holtec International, Inc.
NRC Inspection Report 721014/2023201 On September 26, 2023, through September 28, 2023, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff conducted an announced onsite inspection at Holtecs Orrvilon manufacturing facility in Orrville, Ohio. Orrvilon fabricates, inspects, tests, and assembles important to safety (ITS) components of the Holtec HISTORM dry storage systems.
The purpose of the inspection was to verify and assess the adequacy of Holtec's compliance with the NRC requirements for the design, modification, fabrication, assembly, testing, and procurement of HISTORM components related to the activities performed at Orrvilon. Holtec is the holder of the certificate of compliance (CoC) and designer of the HISTORM dry storage systems (DSSs). The inspection also included review of documents and observation of activities related to the multipurpose canister (MPC)-37CBS basket fabrication, assembly, inspection, and testing, which is separate from the potential design issues currently being evaluated by the NRC for the continuous basket shim (CBS) basket design documented in NRC Inspection Report 7201014/2022201 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML23145A175). Any findings, or lack thereof, documented in this inspection report does not represent NRC acceptance of the CBS basket designs as currently documented in the Holtec design and licensing basis.
Design Control The team determined, for the items selected for review that the fabrication specifications were consistent with the design commitments and requirements documented in the safety analysis report (SAR), CoC, and technical specifications (TS). (section 1.1)
Corrective Action and Nonconformance Reports The team determined that Holtec effectively implemented its nonconformance program and corrective action program (CAP) and has adequate procedures in place to ensure compliance with the applicable regulations and quality assurance (QA) requirements.
(section 1.2)
Personnel Training and Certifications The team determined that individuals performing quality-related activities were trained and certified as required. (section 1.3)
3 Human Performance The team determined that the fabrication personnel were familiar with the specified design, designated fabrication techniques, testing requirements, and quality control (QC) associated with the construction of the DSSs. (section 1.4)
Procurement The team determined that materials, components, and other equipment received by the fabricator met DSS design procurement specifications, and the procurement specifications conformed to the design commitments and requirements contained in the SAR, CoC, and TS. (section 1.5)
Implementing Procedures The team determined that DSS components were generally being fabricated and inspected per approved quality assurance and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
Part 21 implementing procedures and fabrication specifications. In addition, the team concluded that Orrvilon effectively implemented its measuring and test equipment (M&TE) control program and has adequate procedures in place to ensure compliance with the applicable regulations, industry standards and quality requirements. (section 1.6) 10 CFR Part 21 The team determined that: fabrication activities were conducted under an NRC-approved quality assurance program (QAP); the provisions of 10 CFR Part 21 were implemented; Orrvilon's personnel were familiar with the reporting requirements of 10 CFR Part 21; and Orrvilon complied with 10 CFR 21.6, "Posting requirements." (section 1.7)
Oversight and Audits The team determined, for the items selected for review that Holtec was performing oversight and audits in accordance with their QAP. (section 1.8)
4 REPORT DETAILS 1.0 ISFSI Component Fabrication by Outside Fabricators (Inspection Procedure (IP) 60852) 1.1 Design Control 1.1.1 Inspection Scope The team determined whether the fabrication specifications were consistent with the design commitments and requirements documented in the SAR, CoC, and TSs.
The team reviewed Holtec HISTORM flood and wind (FW) licensing drawings against the design and fabrication drawings to verify consistency of critical dimensions, material specifications, and testing and inspection requirements. Specifically, the team focused on design commitments and requirements for ITS category A and category B components of the Holtec MPC37CBS basket design from the HISTORM FW SAR to design and fabrication drawings, and subsequently shop manufacturing plans. The team reviewed the following drawings and procedures:
HQP3.0, Design Control, revision 29 HSP100301, Design Control, revision 6 HSP100302, Design Specifications and Design Criteria Documents, revision 0 HSP100501, Engineering Drawings, revision 8 Drawing No. 12329, MPC-37CBS (168) Basket Assembly, revision 6 Drawing No. 12124, MPC-37CBS Panel Details, revision 5 Drawing No. 12125, MPC-37CBS Shim Details & Common Parts, revision 9.2 Drawing No. 12330, MPC-37CBS (177 1/2) Basket Assembly, revision 6 Drawing No. 12348, MPC-37CBS (191) Enclosure Vessel Assembly for use with MPC37CBS 177 1/2 Basket, revision 2 1.1.2 Observation and Findings The team did not identify any discrepancies between the design and fabrication specifications and the SAR licensing drawings. The team noted that Holtec captured all requirements that were applicable to fabrication and that Holtec fabrication drawings contained the relevant information needed for fabrication. The team also noted that Holtec had adequate document control and storage of QA records. The team noted fabrication drawings, shop travelers, and procedures were adequately identified at various work locations with each component as necessary and that documents reflected the correct revisions, as applicable.
No findings of significance were identified.
1.1.3 Conclusions The team determined, for the items selected for review that the fabrication specifications were consistent with the design commitments and requirements documented in the SAR, CoC, and TS.
5 1.2 Corrective Action and Nonconformance Reports 1.2.1 Inspection Scope The team reviewed a sample of nonconformance records and corrective action reports to verify that Holtec effectively implemented a nonconformance program and CAP in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Parts 72. The team verified that Holtec completed corrective actions for identified deficiencies and nonconformances in a technically sound and timely manner. The team reviewed Holtec's Quality Assurance Manual (QAM) and the following implementing procedures for its nonconformance program, CAP, and 10 CFR Part 21 reporting:
HQP15.0, Control of Nonconforming Conditions, revision 3 HQP16.0, Corrective Actions, revision 24 HSP100204, Measurement and Analysis of QA Program Effectiveness, revision 2 HSP101502, "Nonconformances," revision 8 HSP101503, Manufacturing Condition Control, revision 9 HSP101601, "Conditions Adverse to Quality and Corrective Action," revision 4 The team reviewed Holtec's nonconformance program to assess the effectiveness of controls established for the processing of nonconforming materials, parts, or components. Holtec procedure HSP101503 provides instructions for documenting, processing, and reporting of manufacturing conditions. Conditions Reports (CR) are generated for potentially significant conditions adverse to quality. Nonconformance reports (NCRs) are generated for the most significant issues pertaining to safety significant items. Shop Fabrication Notes (SFNs) are used to document minor manufacturing related conditions. An electronic log is maintained for all SFNs, CRs, and NCRs The inspectors reviewed a sample of SFNs, CRs, and NCRs from the previous three years at Orrvilon and discussed these documents with Holtec personnel.
The team reviewed the Holtec CAP implementation at Orrvilon to assess the effectiveness of controls established for the processing of conditions adverse to quality.
Holtec in HSP101601 uses a three-tier process for categorizing and documenting conditions adverse to quality (CAQ). All issues defined as potential CAQs are entered as a Quality Issue (QI) on a Quality Issue Form (QIF) except for manufacturing deviations which use the NCR process. During the evaluation of the QI, the significance of the CAQ is determined as well as the risk and level of uncertainty. Based on this evaluation, the investigation class is determined, and the type of investigation (close to immediate action, apparent cause, or root cause) is performed and completed. Significance Levels range from 1 through 5 with 13 categorized as events or conditions that result in major, moderate, or minor impact; respectively. Significance level 4 is considered a low-level problem and 5 only a concern or recommendation.
The team reviewed a sampling of QI reports on QlFs for compliance to HSP101601.
6 1.2.2 Observation and Findings Overall, the team assessed that Holtec had an adequate nonconformance and CAP in place to resolve deficiencies. The team assessed that Holtec appropriately identified issues and implemented corrective actions in a time frame commensurate with their safety significance.
No findings of significance were identified.
1.2.3 Conclusions The team concluded that Holtec effectively implemented its nonconformance program and CAP and has adequate procedures in place to ensure compliance with the applicable regulations and QA requirements.
1.3 Personnel Training and Certifications 1.3.1 Inspection Scope The team determined whether individuals performing quality-related activities were trained and certified where required. Specifically, the team reviewed the qualifications and training for selected Orrvilon staff to determine if they met the requirements stated in the QAP including QA indoctrination. The team reviewed the records of two selected quality control personnel that performed nondestructive examination (NDE) and dimensional inspection activities. The team also reviewed the records of a laboratory technician. Personnel interviews were also performed. The following quality procedures were reviewed:
HSP100203, Training Program, revision 2 HSP100901, Written Practice for Qualification of NDE Personnel, revision 6 HSP101001, Qualification of Inspection Personnel, revision 2 1.3.2 Observation and Findings The team found that for each Orrvilon staff member's records reviewed, each had completed the required QA indoctrination training and attained the applicable qualifications to perform their duties.
The team also found that HSP100901 met the requirements of American Society for Nondestructive Testing Recommended Practice No. SNT-TC1A, which included the required training, experience, medical testing, and education. For the personnel reviewed that performed NDE at Orrvilon, the team found they were qualified in accordance with Holtec quality procedures.
No findings of significance were identified.
7 1.3.3 Conclusions The team determined that individuals performing quality-related activities were trained and certified as required.
1.4 Human Performance 1.4.1 Inspection Scope The team determined whether the fabricator's personnel were familiar with the specified design, designated fabrication techniques, testing requirements, and quality controls associated with the construction of the DSS.
The team evaluated Orrvilon's control of the fabrication process through observations, examinations of records, and personnel interviews in the areas of fabrication and assembly, test and inspection, and familiarity with tools and equipment.
The team observed/witnessed:
Free path testing of the MPC37CBS basket Assembly of basket shims on MPC37CBS basket Dimensional testing of the MPC37CBS basket Metamic HT chemical analysis Visual inspection of seal welds on MPC37CBS basket bolts The team also reviewed a selection of shop travelers for in process MPCs as a part of the review of a selection of final document packages to determine if the travelers were being completed adequately.
1.4.2 Observation and Findings The team noted that Orrvilon personnel adequately performed fabrication activities and that Orrvilon staff were knowledgeable about the specified design, designated fabrication techniques, testing requirements, and QC associated with the construction of the DSSs and MPCs. During the observations and reviews of fabrication and NDE activities the team determined that the work was well controlled, individuals were knowledgeable of the applicable fabrication process, and the work was being performed in accordance with the applicable fabrication procedures, shop travelers and inspection/testing procedures.
No findings of significance were identified.
8 1.4.3 Conclusions The team determined that the fabrication personnel were familiar with the specified design, designated fabrication techniques, testing requirements, and QC associated with the construction of the DSSs.
1.5 Procurement 1.5.1 Inspection Scope The team determined whether a) materials, components, and other equipment received by the fabricator meet DSS design procurement specifications, and b) the procurement specifications conform to the design commitments and requirements contained in the SAR, CoC, and TS.
The team reviewed Orrvilons processes that address procurement, including traceability and receipt inspection. The team reviewed selected drawings and records and interviewed selected personnel to verify that the procurement specifications for materials and services performed at Orrvilon met design requirements. The team verified that Holtec used a graded approach for identifying ITS components during the design process and applied this graded quality to components and material procurement documents. The team selected ITS components such as the MPC shims for review. The team reviewed the following implementing procedures, drawings, and procurement documents:
HSP100401, Processing of Purchase Orders, revision 6 HSP100402, Purchase Specifications, revision 4 HSP100701, Receipt Inspection, revision 8 HSP100704, Approved Vendor List, revision 5 HSP100705, Procurement of Items and Services When Commercial Grade Dedication, Upgrading or Utilization of Unqualified Source Material Applies, revision 8 Drawing No. 12125, MPC-37CBS Shim Details & Common Parts, revision 9.2 Purchase Order (PO) 131624 to Pennex Aluminum Co., revision 0 The team also reviewed the Holtec Approved Vendor List (AVL) dated 9/25/2023, certified material testing reports, and receipt inspection reports.
1.5.2 Observation and Findings The team observed that Holtec had adequate control of the procurement processes for the ITS materials and components reviewed. Overall, Holtec procured ITS materials and components consistent with design requirements. Further, Orrvilons material traceability, procurement, and receipt inspection controls were adequate. The team determined that the POs were adequate and specified the applicable material criteria and requirements including Part 21, as necessary. Additionally, Orrvilon verified and maintained the traceability throughout the procurement and receipt process.
9 The team determined that Orrvilon purchased the components from vendors on the AVL, as necessary.
No findings of significance were identified.
1.5.3 Conclusions The team determined that materials, components, and other equipment received by the fabricator met DSS design procurement specifications, and the procurement specifications conformed to the design commitments and requirements contained in the SAR, CoC and TS.
1.6 Implementing Procedures 1.6.1 Inspection Scope The team determined whether DSS components are being fabricated per approved QA and 10 CFR Part 21 implementing procedures and fabrication specifications. The team evaluated Orrvilon's control of the fabrication process through observations, examinations of records, and personnel interviews in the areas of fabrication and assembly, test and inspection, and tools and equipment.
The team reviewed the following procedures:
HSP100903, Control and Qualification of NDE Procedures, revision 0 HSP101002, Control of Inspection Activities, revision 1 HSP104, MPC Basket Plate Gage Test Procedure, revision 44 HSP690, Laboratory Manual, Appendix C.11, Metamic HT Chemical Analysis, revision 7 HSP1104, Visual Weld Examination, revision 8 As no welding was being performed for MPCs being fabricated during the time of the inspection, no welding information was reviewed.
The team reviewed the control of the M&TE program to evaluate how Orrvilon identified, specified, and controlled tools and equipment in accordance with applicable sections of the QAM, quality standard procedures, and regulatory requirements. Specifically, the team reviewed the following quality documents:
HQP12.0, Control of Measuring and Test Equipment, revision 29 HSP101201, Control of Measuring and Test Equipment, revision 7
10 The team selected a sample of the M&TE used during the fabrication of the MPC37CBS fuel baskets. The sample included a review of travelers that identified the use of specific M&TE that the team selected such as a scale/analytical balance, calipers, gage block, coating thickness probe, and plate gage. The team reviewed the calibration records to verify calibration dates, testing standards, and traceability of the associated M&TE. The team also reviewed the calibration records for three testing standards used for Orrvilons calibration of M&TE, which included gage blocks and a coordinate measuring machine.
1.6.2 Observation and Findings The team reviewed Holtec's QAM, Revision 15, implementing Holtec Quality Procedures and Holtec Standard Procedures and assessed the effectiveness of QAP implementation at Orrvilon. The team discussed portions of the reviewed documents with selected Orrvilon staff to determine whether activities subject to 10 CFR Part 71 and 72 were adequately controlled and implemented under Holtec's NRC-approved QAP.
Further, the team reviewed the Orrvilon quality organization chart and interviewed Holtec QA personnel to assess their organizational independence from cost, schedule, and production activities.
The team observed that DSS components were being fabricated to approved procedures. The inspectors observed that the procedures contained the appropriate quantitative and/or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that ITS activities have been satisfactorily accomplished. The inspectors observed that staff performing ITS activities were adequately following procedures during fabrication activities.
The team assessed that Orrvilon established controls on M&TE in accordance with their quality requirements, industry standards and regulatory requirements. The team assessed that Orrvilon personnel provided the appropriate information on shop travelers in accordance with approved procedures. The team verified that personnel used M&TE within their rated capacities and sensitivities as documented in calibration records.
No findings of significance were identified.
1.6.3 Conclusions The team determined that DSS components were generally being fabricated and inspected per approved QA and 10 CFR Part 21 implementing procedures and fabrication specifications. In addition, the team concluded that Orrvilon effectively implemented its M&TE control program and has adequate procedures in place to ensure compliance with the applicable regulations, industry standards and quality requirements.
1.7 10 CFR Part 21 1.7.1 Inspection Scope The team reviewed the 10 CFR Part 21 procedure HSP101501, "Reporting of Defects and Noncompliances per 10 CFR 21," revision 2, to verify if provisions were in place for reporting defects that could cause a substantial safety hazard and completed the required notification in a timely manner. The team verified that Holtec complied with 10 CFR 21.6, Posting requirements.
11 1.7.2 Observation and Findings The team assessed that Holtec has provisions in place for evaluating deviations and reporting defects that could cause a substantial safety hazard and for design or fabrication deficiencies that could affect the DSSs ITS structures, systems, and components to perform their intended safety function, as required by 10 CFR Part 21 and 72.242(d), respectively. The team noted that the 10 CFR Part 21 posting at the Orrvilon facility met the approved implementing procedure and the applicable requirements of 10 CFR Part 21.
No findings of significance were identified.
1.7.3 Conclusions The team determined that fabrication activities were conducted under an NRC-approved QAP (10 CFR 72.140); the provisions of 10 CFR Part 21 were implemented; Orrvilon's personnel were familiar with the reporting requirements of 10 CFR Part 21; and Orrvilon complied with 10 CFR 21.6, "Posting requirements."
1.8 Oversight and Audits 1.8.1 Inspection Scope With regard to QA activities, the team determined whether a) the fabricator has been audited by either the licensee or CoC holder, b) for selected audits and inspection findings from (as applicable) QA audit or surveillance and/or inspection reports issued since the last NRC inspection, the findings were appropriately handled with corrective actions implemented in a time frame commensurate with their safety significance, and c) supervision and QC/QA personnel perform appropriate oversight during fabrication activities.
The team reviewed the Holtec external audit program to determine if Holtec scheduled, planned, and performed audits or surveillances of their vendors in accordance with their QAP. The team selected a sample of audits and surveillance from the time of the last NRC inspection to the present. The team reviewed the results of external audits performed on ITS category A and B suppliers, which included suppliers of boron carbide powder and aluminum billets.
The team also reviewed Holtec audit program to determine if Holtec scheduled, planned, and performed internal audits in accordance with their QAP. The team selected a sample of internal audits from the time of the last NRC inspection to the present. This included a sample of lead auditor and auditor certifications and qualification. The team focused on activities related to Holtec fabrication of the MPC37 CBS baskets. The team reviewed the internal audit results to determine if Holtec identified deficiencies and addressed these deficiencies within their CAP. The team also evaluated whether Holtec provided adequate supervision with QC/QA personnel for appropriate oversight during fabrication activities.
12 The team also reviewed the last two management reviews of the Holtec QAP to determine whether they were performed in accordance with their procedures and were effective tools to assess the overall health of the QAP. The team reviewed the following QAM sections and quality procedures:
CD03, Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual, revision 15 CD03, Section 18, Audits HQP18.0, Audits, revision 0 HSP101801, Certification of Audit Personnel, revision 1 HSP101802, Audits, revision 7 HSP101803, Internal QA Surveillance and Document Reviews, revision 0 HSP100204, Measurement and Analysis of QA Program Effectiveness, revision 2 In addition, the team reviewed the Holtec management review program. The team reviewed the following QAM sections and quality procedure:
QAM Section M0401, Control of QA Manual, revision 4 QAM Section M901, Audits, revision 7 Q013, Audit Personnel Qualification Standard, revision 8 1.8.2 Observation and Findings Overall, the team assessed, for the audits and surveillances sampled that Holtec generally conducted oversight with qualified and certified personnel, scheduled and evaluated the applicable quality aspects of Holtecs QAP associated with fabrication activities. The team assessed that Holtec appropriately identified issues and implemented corrective actions in a time frame commensurate with their safety significance.
The team found that management review meetings of the QAP were being performed in accordance with HSP100204, occurring at least annually to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the QAP.
No findings of significance were identified.
1.8.3 Conclusions The team determined, for the items selected for review that Holtec was performing oversight and audits in accordance with their QAP.
2.0 Entrance and Exit Meeting On September 26, 2023, the NRC inspection team discussed the scope of the inspection during an entrance meeting with Mark Soler and other members of Holtec staff. On September 28, 2023, the NRC inspection team presented the inspection results and observations during an onsite exit meeting to Mark Soler and other members of Holtec staff. Section 1 of the attachment to this report shows the attendance for the entrance and exit meetings.
Attachment ATTACHMENT 1.
ENTRANCE/EXIT MEETING ATTENDEES AND INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED Name Title Affiliation Entrance Exit Jeremy Tapp Inspection Team Leader NRC X
X Azmi Djapari Inspector NRC X
X Matthew Learn Inspector NRC X
X Zackery Helgert Observer NRC X
X Mark Soler Vice President of Quality Holtec X
X Jay Martin Quality Engineer Holtec X
X Chris Hankin Quality Manager Holtec X
X Danielle Welsh Operations Manager Holtec X
X Andrew Christner Lab Supervisor Holtec X
Andrew Hayworth Inspection Supervisor Holtec X
X Dan Yillers General Manager Holtec X
Vaughn Curcio Director of Quality Holtec X
Rob Tindal Director of Projects Holtec X
Robert Mahorter Technical Sponsor Holtec X
2.
INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED IP 60852 ISFSI Component Fabrication by Outside Fabricators NUREG/CR6407 Classification of Transportation Packaging and Dry Spent Fuel Storage System Components According to Importance to Safety NUREG/CR6314 Quality Assurance Inspections for Shipping and Storage Containers 3.
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED Item Number Status Type Description None None None None 4.
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED 10 CFR Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System AVL Approved Vendors List CAP Corrective Action Program CAQ Condition Adverse to Quality CBS Continuous Basket Shim CoC Certificate of Compliance DSS Dry Storage System IMC Inspection Manual Chapter IP Inspection Procedure ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ITS Important to Safety M&TE Measuring and Test Equipment MPC Multipurpose Canister
2 NCR Nonconformance Report NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission PDR Public Document Room PO Purchase Order QA Quality Assurance QAM Quality Assurance Manual QAP Quality Assurance Program QC Quality Control QI Quality Issue QIF Quality Issue Form SAR Safety Analysis Report SFN Shop Fabrication Note TS Technical Specifications 5.
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED Certificate holder documents reviewed during the inspection were specifically identified in the Report Details above.