ML23228A002
| ML23228A002 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/18/2023 |
| From: | Lauren Gibson NRC/NRR/DNRL/NLRP |
| To: | |
| References | |
| Download: ML23228A002 (1) | |
Text
Public meeting to discuss possible efficiencies on the Subsequent License Renewal review Lauren Gibson August 18, 2023
Possible ways to make
$10,000,000.00 Total Cost Subsequent and Hours over Time License Renewals 40,000 more efficient Indian Point
$9,000,000.00 IP SER Turkey Point SLR 35,000
$8,000,000.00 Seabrook 30,000 Seabrook
$7,000,000.00 SER w/ open items Surry SLR 25,000
$6,000,000.00
$5,000,000.00 20,000 Peach Riverbend, Bottom SLR Waterford
$4,000,000.00 Withdrawn 15,000 (CR) Byron & Braidwood Joint LRA & SER
$3,000,000.00 10,000
$2,000,000.00 5,000
reorg, NRR Waste Confidence Pause 10/17 Merge
$0.00 -
Total Cost Hours Linear (Total Cost) Linear (Hours)
Not adjusted for inflation. (Certain approximations were made for dates prior to 2015)
Hours Used by applications Hours used Applications in chronological order
- Not yet completed (North Anna, Point Beach, Oconee and St. Lucie have completed Safety Evaluations)
Possible ways to make Subsequent License Renewals more efficient
- Things NRC has already implemented
- Tiger team for acceptance review rather than all reviewers
- Eliminating the keyword list and report for Operating Experience Reviews
- Smaller scoping and screening audit
- One ACRS meeting
- Inspections not part of licensing decision
Possible ways to make Subsequent License Renewals more efficient
- Things we are currently working on
- Streamlining Safety Evaluation
- Streamlining audit report
- Modernizing the internal Technical Review Package (TRP) tool
- Revising generic documents (SRP-SLR, GALL-SLR, GEIS)
- Things we are discussing to improve efficiencies
- Reconsidering Peer reviews
- Reconsidering audit execution and time available
- Open to suggestions
Possible ways to make Subsequent License Renewals more efficient
- Things Industry could do to help make the NRC review more efficient
- Keep the GALL numbering in your application
- Review previous Audit Reports and Breakout questions
- Proactively communicate Late Breaking Operating Experiences
- Early communication of complex issues
- Early communication on Annual updates, especially if changes are expected
- Maintain a master copy of the application with all the changes
- What would be the implications of submitting this to NRC? (e.g. cost from applicants, NRC efforts to confirm the information etc.)
- Could NEI maintain the clean copies for future applications benefits
Questions?