ML23193A850
| ML23193A850 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 04/12/2022 |
| From: | Heather Gepford NRC/RGN-IV/DORS/OB |
| To: | Arizona Public Service Co |
| References | |
| Download: ML23193A850 (1) | |
Text
Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: PVNGS I Date of Examination: 5/2/2022 Item Task Description (Y)es / (N)o a
b*
c#
z The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the w
instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (KIA) categories JR
'fl'--
I-are aoorooriatelv sampled I-c2 The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics JR AM 4£--
s Justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are acceptable.
JR AM ~
Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity JR AM evolutions, instrument and component failures, manual control evolutions,
.p.-
0:::
technical specifications, and major transients.
0 There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of
~
applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation JR AM schedule without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be of"--
~
repeated on subseQuent davs.
ci5 Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-JR" AM" ~
3.4 and that no scenarios are duplicated from the aoolicants' audit test(s).
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative JR AM.p-and auantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2.
Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from JR" AM".p-the aoolicant's audit test(s).
en Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions
~
JR" AMA ~
a..
on Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the aoolicant's audit test(s).
Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that JR AM ~
no items are duplicated on subseQuent davs.
Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities JR AM,p:--
(includina probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insiahts).
Assess whether the 1 O CFR 55.41, 1 O CFR 55.43, and 1 O CFR 55.45 sampling is JR AM ifL-
....J aoorooriate.
ci Check whether KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are JR AM..pt w
greater than or equal to 2.5.
z Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC w
JR AM #-
C) exams.
Check the entire exam for balance of ~overage.
JR AM #-
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior JR
,p--
reactor operator).
AM Printed Name I Signature Date Dlgltally signed by John Rodgers
- a. Author John Rodgers DN:rn=John Rodgers, o-Exi.m Group, ou-9618, emalf=john.rodge~aps:.com. c=US Date: 2021.11.1711:35:19-07'00' O)gltally signed by ~
n Mar:sh
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) Allen Marsh ON: cn=Alen MaM, o-PVNGS,o~ratians,<ll!maif=a1len.mar:sh@aps.com. e=US Date: 2021.11.1913:35:S-4-07'00' C.
NRC Reviewer (#)
j Q~ "- \\L,,~ \\a"'ol ;</lL ~
l'l-/ I /z.J NRC Chief Examiner Jo"-V\\.
\\(,~ k_ I 11... cl{W ~
11-/t /21 NRC Supervisor u
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC developed tests
- An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column "c". This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review "The audit exam has not yet been developed but the instructions on the referenced forms and NUREG 1021 sections have been met Digitally signed by Heather J. Gepford Date: 2022.01.21 08:28:38 -06'00'