ML23076A240
| ML23076A240 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Triso-X |
| Issue date: | 02/10/2023 |
| From: | Marshalek T - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Administration |
| References | |
| NRC-2022-0201, 87FR77146 00781 | |
| Download: ML23076A240 (1) | |
Text
3/17/23, 10:44 AM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/9afc4a51-b89f-4036-b43a-4dd7da57e5d2 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/9afc4a51-b89f-4036-b43a-4dd7da57e5d2 1/1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 3/17/23, 10:44 AM Received: February 10, 2023 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. ldz-17qs-tj1p Comments Due: February 14, 2023 Submission Type: API Docket: NRC-2022-0201 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Supplement to Draft Environmental Impact Statement TRISO-X Fuel Fabrication Facility Comment On: NRC-2022-0201-0001 Notice of Intent To Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; TRISO-X Special Nuclear Material License Document: NRC-2022-0201-DRAFT-0781 Comment on FR Doc # 2022-27164 Submitter Information Name: Thomas Marshalek Email:tom@bloomingfun.com General Comment In addition to NIRS's letter on this topic, which I endorse but have removed due to the limit on characters, I would like to remind everyone that nuclear facilities, materials, and waste require stewardship for hundreds, maybe thousands, of years. Even if properly put into mothballs, things deteriorate and risks of contamination remain. Why would we want to selfishly leave behind such albatrosses and booby traps for future generations to wrestle with and perhaps lose to? Is this question satisfactorily addressed in any EIS pertaining to nuclear energy that is put into the service of making profits? Even if we are as responsible as we can be with these materials now, there are no guarantees and only risks, no returns, beyond the useful life of a nuclear facility.
SUNSI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Jill Caverly, Robert Sun, Antoinette Walker-Smith, Mary Neely Comment (781)
Publication Date: 12/16/2022 Citation: 87 FR 77146