ML23074A146

NRC-2018-000513 - Resp 4 - Interim, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed, (Part 2 of 3)

ML23074A146
Person / Time
Issue date:	03/09/2023
From:	NRC/OCIO
To:
Shared Package
ML23074A142	List: ML23074A144 ML23074A145 ML23074A146 ML23074A147
References
NRC-2018-000513, FOIA
Download: ML23074A146 (1)

Text

From:

To:  ; see. Kenneth: Hall. Victor Cc:

Subject:

Externa en er DRAFT NR EPgMP UN IFIED Date: Friclay, September 25, 2015 3:40:10 PM Attachments: Draft NRC EPaMP -- 2015SEP25.pdf Classification: UNCLASS.IFIED Caveats: NONE NRCTeam, This is the PDF of the Draft NRC EPgMP that incorporates recent HQ USACE comments received from!...(b_.).._(6.._)_ _,

!(b)(6) !.

!Ifil@]- ls there a preference on signature of the document? As in NRC or HQUSACE first?

I battled with the page numbers and formatting of headers and footers this afternoon and I gave up to Microsoft Word!

The attachments are PDF files. Let me know if the links do not work.

!(b)(6)

HS Program Manager, Special Projects Branch USACE, Northwestern Division, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue, CENW0-PM-S Omaha, NE 68102 Desk: l'.b)(6)

Cell: =;:===::!--------,

l

• =

Email:l...(b_)(6_l_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __.

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE

m US Army Corps of Engineers"'

~ U.S.NR C Unht'd ~tatt1 NuclC'ar R,gul.uory Commlnlon Prott'1i11g J>eopl~ and tht Enviromntnt Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

Enterprise Program Management Plan (EPgMP)

Technical Assistance for Evaluation of Potential Flooding at Nuclear Power Plants Sites due to Dam Failure HQ US Army Corps of Engineers Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chief, Interagency and International Services Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Charles R. "Ray" Alexander, SES Regulation, William Dea n, SES Date: _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ _ _ _ _ __

Table of Contents

1. General

a. Purpose

b. Updates to the Program Management Plan

c. References

d. Program Goal

e. Program Risks

2. Program Team

a. Management Approach

b. Roles and Responsibilities

3. Program Management

a. Communications

b. Scope of management

c. Schedule Management

d. Risk Management

e. Acquisition Management

f. Management Information Systems

4. Program Governance

a. Authorizations and Appropriations

b. Levels of Engagement

5. Financial Management

a. Transfer of Funds

b. Design Budget

c. Operational Financial Management Annex A. Organizational Chart and Points of Contact list Annex B. Glossary Annex C. lnteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 Annex D. NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 Amendments Note: HQUSACE Divisions are responsible for preparation and updates .for their specific Annexes to each Enterprise Program Management Plan.

1.0 General

a. Purpose. This Enterprise Program Management Plan (EPgMP) establishes management concepts, principles, and procedures for successfully executing USACE national technical support programs and requirements for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR). This EPgMP applies to all Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements related to assessment of post-Fukushima flooding hazards at nuclear power plant sites due to the potential failure of upstream dams for a variety of reasons.

b. Updates and Termination of the Enterprise Program Management Plan. This EPgMP shall become effective when signed by both NRC and USA CE. Updates to the EPgMP will be managed by the HQUSACE National Program Manager (NPgM) to reflect significant changes in business processes, stakeholder requirements, internal and external factors, clarifications, and lessons learned. If required, the NPM will make updates to this EPgMP after coordinating with the appropriate proponent and stakeholders. Updates will be incorporated into the body of this EPgMP. Either party may terminate this EPgMP by providing written notice to the other party. The termination will be effective upon the ninetieth (90th) calendar day following the notice, unless a later date is set forth. In the event of termination, NRC will continue to be responsible for all costs incurred by the USACE under this EPgMP and for the costs of closing out or transferring any on-going contracts.

c. References. Following ru*e references that apply across all programs. Please refer to specific annexes or appendices for amendments to the Jnteragency Agreement.

I) Management, USACE Business Process, ER 5- 1-11 (PMBP). This regulation establishes policy and doctrine to accomplish all work performed by USACE.

https://team.usace.ru*my.mil/sites/HO-MP/milcon/Shared%20Documents/ER%205 1 I ;%20PMB P%20with%20 l 2%20Jan%202007%20Cover%20Letter%20Update.pdf

2) USACE Enterp1ise Lessons Learned (ELL) The Enterprise Lessons Learned (ELL) program consists of people, processes, and tools that support USACE's collection, analysis, and implementation of validated lessons learned. It will help manage institutional knowledge and improve services to our customers.

https://apps.usace.army.mil/sites/ELL/SitePages/Home.aspx

3) Mi litary Programs Operations Order ( MP OPORD}: This OPORD provides annual guidance for executing USACE Military Programs mission requirements.

https://team.usace.army.mi1/s ites/HO-MP/opord/default.aspx

4) Quality Management System (QMS): The Quality Management System is an enterprise-wide framework that describes USACE standard business processes.

https://apps.usace.army.mil/sites/OMS/default.aspx

5) USACE Command Consolidated Guidance (CCG). The CCG represents the cmTent blueprint for pursuing the USACE vision and strategy.

https://intranet.usace.army.mil/hg/rm/Pages/ccg.aspx

6) Engineer Regulation, ER 5-1-9, Management - Assignment and Transfer of Project Responsibilities, LS March 1996. This ER establishes project brokering policy, guidance, and procedures

for all proj ects assigned to the US Army Corps of Engineers (US ACE) consistent with USA CE management philosophy.

http:// 140.194.76.129/publicatio ns/eng-regs/ER 5-1 -9/toc.htm

7) Engineer Regulation, ER 5-1-10, Corps-wide Areas of Work Responsibility, 30 September 1997.

http:// I 40. 194.76.129/publicatio ns/eng-regs/ER 5 10/toc.htm

8) Engineer Regulation, ER 5 11, U.S. Army Corps of Eng ineers (USACE) Business Process

9) Memorandum (CEMP-ZB), Adherence to Mission Assignments and Alignment of Acquisitions with Missions- DIRECTORATE POLICY MEMORANDUM, 20 May 2013 https://team.usace.army.mil/sites/HO-MP/milcon/Shared%20Documents/Adherence%20to%20Mission%20Assignments--CEMP-ZB%2020%20May%202013 .pd f

10) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commjssion, Request for information letter to seismic, flooding and emergency preparedness (March 12, 2012) http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/flooding.html

11) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, prioritization of plants for completing flood hazard reevaluations (May 11 , 2012) http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/flooding.html

12) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, iss ued guidance for assessing flooding hazards due to dam fai lure (JLD-ISG-20 13-01) (July 29, 2013),

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/opcrating/ops-cxperiencc/japan-dashboard/flooding.html 13)Design-Basis Flood Estimation for Site Characterization at Nuclear Power Plants in the United States of America (NUREG/CR-7046) http://www.nrc. gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/ nuregs/contract/cr7046/

14) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800),

sections 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/

15) American Nuclear Society (ANSI/ANS -2.8 1992), Determining Design Basis Flooding at Power Reactor Sites

d. Program Goal: The goal of this program is for USACE efforts to allow NRC to plan and develop guidance for safe operation of downstream nuclear power plants (NPP) . Work will include screen river system dams to determine potential for significant impact to downstream NPP in event of failw-e or certain conditions, determine which failure modes are credible, evaluate fail ure modes for critical dams, develop hydrographs related to those dams and fai lure modes, estimate stage, velocity and discharge time-series in rivers near NPP under various flooding and failure scenarios, prepare an FOUO Technical Letter Report (TLR) for each NPP facility and brief findings to NRC and Licensee(s).

e. Program Risks: Risk associated with the execution of the project requirements as identified by the technical review will be ide ntified by the capabilities sourcing district and outlined on the District PMP.

2.0 Program Team.

a. Management Approach. USACE wi ll work closely with Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR) representatives and other stakeholders to and achieve a collaborative partnership at all levels. USACE and NRC/NRR will coordinate policy changes and process improvements that may impact program execution prior to issuance. USACE Program Management w ill be in accordance with USACE Proj ect Management Business Process, as described in ER-5 l 1 (Reference l .c. l ). USACE will execute the program through Major Subordinate Commands (MSCs) Centers, Geographic Districts and offices approved to support special initiatives. The Program Team approach is to embrace the goals and objectives stated in this EPgMP, establish a collaborative know ledge-sharing environmen t, and capture/apply lessons learned to the execution process.

b. Roles and Responsibilities.

1) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). USACE is a designated DoD Construction Agent per DoD 4270.5 for Military Construction (MlLCON) and has many technical capabilities that can support this partnership. Pursuant of the Econo my in Government Act (3 1 USC 1535) USACE w ill p rovide technical assistance to NRC/NRR to perform flood ing hazard reevaluations at the designated nuclear power plant (NPP) locations shown in Figure 1. USACE will employ capabilities not limited to; Technical Assistance and expertise in Dam assessments and safety. When exercising this agreement, the NRC/NRR will assume complete responsibi lities for evaluating the needs for and implementing any regulatory actions for its licensees based on the results of the flood hazard reevaluations being performed by USACE. Specific projects w ill be identified by NRC/NRR and requested in writing through the Natio nal Program Manager (NPgM). HQUSACE' s NPgM w ill coordinate with the appropriate MSC or district Programs Director for required project execution.

(a) Headquarters USACE is responsible for enterprise-wide program management, program integration, policy development, and performance assessment. HQUSACE assigns a USACE National Program Manager (NPgM) to serve as the primary point of con tact for program related issues, initiati ves, and reports on program status.

(b) The National Program Manager for this partnership is the O maha District. The National Program Manager is responsible for:

- Communicating w ith NRC/NRR and other national level stakeholders;

- Integrating the efforts of USACE Regional Business Centers and mission lines, a nd insure USACE business processes are followed;

- Integrating the development of program resource/funding requirements;

- Ensuring timely a nd proper authority for work undertaken by USACE Regional Business Centers and districts;

- Managing and fac ilitating resolution of program issues;

- Providing fin ancial management at the enterprise/program .level;

-Ensuring that proper funding is issued to the Geographic Districts;

-Ensuring programmatic financial tracking reports are provided to NRC/NRR o n a mo nthly basis, and provide other coordination as required for programmatic success.

Figure I - NPP Locations where USACE is Providing Technical Assistance to the NRC/NRR in Performing F looding Hazard Reevaluations (c) USACE Major Subordinate Commands. MSCs manage the Regional Business Centers (RBC) to faci litate program execution and uti lize technical resources and innovative practices through its districts. MSCs are responsible for vertical and horizontal coordination and integration, to drive reg ional excellence, and to ensure integration of Regional capability across Geographic Districts and centers of expertise is seamless. MSCs perform quality assurance of the geograph ic processes through periodic evaluations consistent with the USACE business process. This includes:

- Managing program execution and performance;

- Ensuring proper coordination between Geographic Districts and Centers of Expertise;

- Supporting resolution of programmatic issues among the vertical USACE team;

- Ensuring accurate and timely communication of program/project infonnation in W ebCMl, issues tracking, Current Working Estimates and d esign requests, and all upward reporting;

- Developing regional acquisition and execution plans, schedules, and resource req uirements;

- Coordinating regional funding/scheduling requirements.

(d) Geographic Districts. The USACE Geographic District wi ll normally be responsible for executing mission requirements within its area of responsibility. A mission requirement or project may be assigned to another district by the RBC in accordance with USACE policy ER 5 11 (reference paragraph 7.b.(l)), and ER 5-1-9, Assignment and Transfer of Project Responsibilities. PDTs may be made up of members from across multiple organizations. Geographic d istrict responsibilities typically include:

- Quality Management. The USACE Geographic District serves as the project manager and is responsible for day-to-day management of the technical assistance efforts including contract and quality administration and any other technical services provided.

- Project management including identification of requirements for execution;

- Coordination with the stakeholders, MSCs and HQUSACE with interface through the NRC/NRR assigned PM;

- Complying with project authorization and directives;

- Development of Project Budgets accounting for a ll PDT design;

- Financial management, metrics performance tracking and project reporting through established automated information systems such as P2, Resident Management System (RMS), Corps of Engineers Financial Management System (CEFMS).

The Geographic Districts wi ll execute all PM responsibilities, as well as the responsibility for the overall technical adequacy of the products produced as a result of the technical assistance for the proposed solutions to risk mitigation require ments. The distric t will conduct and document an independent technical review of all flooding hazard reevaluatio n and potential Dam fa ilures by location as appropriate within their distTict boundaries. The focus is to determine the maximum flood level at the site fro m dam failure and the pro bable maximum flood (PMF).

The Geographic District Project Manager (USACE PM) chairs the technical assistance PDT and is responsible for the successful execution of their projects in accordance with this EPgMP, specific project management plans and applicable po licies. The USACE PM will develop a Proj ect Management Plan (PMP) for each project in coordination with other me mbers of the PDT. The PMP establishes the goals for the project and identifies PDT members, their roles, and their decision-making authorities. The PMP also establishes approved budget, schedule, acquisitio n method, and any special project requirements, including as referenced, the applicable change order management plan, financial management plan, etc. and any waivers required by this EPgMP during the life cycle of the project. It is updated by the District PM throughout the life cycle of the project.

2) Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR).

(a) NRC/NRR is responsible for the prioritization of the Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) sites that will be assessed for potential flood hazard. NRC/NRR provides policy, resource advocacy, and financial management for execution of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation program requirements. This includes planning, programming, budgeting, and functional standards for Nuclear Power Plant faci lities at risk.

NRC/NRR will provide project scope, direction, and funding for individual proj ect sites and is the decision authority for program execution and for project decisions that may be elevated by the project teams.

(b) NRC/NRR is responsible for overseeing integration, and execution of public safety, rules, licensing, and oversight and inc ident response for the Nuclear Power Plants.

(c) NRC/NRR is responsible for defining the requirements yielded by the technical evaluations on potential dam failure and flooding at to the NPP, Environmental Analysis Impact Process (EAIP), wetlands, fl oodplain, e tc.

3) The Technical Assistance Proj ect Delivery Team (PDT): The TA PDT accomplishes all project executio n work that US ACE is assigned. The District PM is the sole lead fo r the USACE TA PDT members and is responsible for coordination and oversight of the project from inception to completion. The PDT is comprised of members from the project user's organization; NRC/NRR; and the associated district members as specified by geographical location.

. Program Management.

a. Communications. The following meetings and reports are key communication components in the program management process.

1) Senior Executive Re view Gro ups (SERGs): The intent of the SERG is to enhance national level communications, review program metrics, and discuss program issues and initiatives and areas for improvement. The NPgM will coordinate SERG meetings between HQUSACE and NRC/NRR senior representatives to review and discuss the Nuclear Regulatory Commission program requirements and as appropriate other mission lines. The SERG will be hosted by the HQUSACE Chief, Programs Integration Division. Participation includes representatives from HQUSACE, NRC/NRR, and others as required.

The SERG location will be at e ither HQUSACE or at NRC as coordinated before each SERG. Other program stakeholders may be called upon to participate as needed.

2) Line Item Reviews (LLRs): Requirements for LIRs wi ll be established in separate Annexes to outl ine requirements for respective mission as required.

3) HQUSACE will communicate openly and transparently with NRC on a regular basis. Ro utine coordination will include but not be limited to pho ne calls, emails, and face-to-face coordination meetings.

b. Scope of Management. The scope of this EPgMP includes a ll activity requirements deem necessary for strategic coord ination a nd program focus resolution in order to maintain the respective geographic MSC and project executing distric t timely w ith the delivery of the project(s).

c. Schedule Management. T he schedule of the required mitigation strategies eithe r in the form of project construction or simply an assessment will be determined by the project delivery team.

d. Risk Management. In coordination with the PDT the respective district PM will assess all risk associated with the nuclear power plant and project execution.

c. Acquisition Manageme nt. When required, the acquisition strategy will be defin ed by the project executing district.

f. Management Informati.o n Systems. The fo llowing systems will be used to compile, display and report program and project information.

1) Corps of Engineers F inanc ial Management System (CEFMS). CEFMS wil l be used for tracking, managing and reporting design and construction funds. USACE will use CEFMS to identify unobligated balances and expiring funding. To the extent practical, Nuclear Regulatory Commission project numbers will be included on all reports provided to the NRC/NRR.

2) Resident Management System (RMS). RMS is a USACE automated quality management and project contract administration system. The system provides tools to plan and manage a project by integrating work specific requirements, corporate technical knowledge, schedule of required events and actual placement, project documentation, quality assurance functions, and management policies. RMS feeds project contract data to Web CMI.

3) Web CMI. The USACE project management districts use Web CMI (P2) for the official proj ect record. The USACE PM uses this scheduling and funding tool to plan and record all milestones.

Web CMI is a USACE internet-based information source that provides current and detailed data for all projects. Web CMI interfaces directly with RMS. The Internet address for the Web CMI is https://ppds. us ace.army. mi1/ppds/home/

"* Program Governance.

a. Authorizations and Appropriations. The participation for this EPgMP between both agencies is pursuant the Econo my Act (3 1 USC§ 1535). All required fund ing is based on a reimbursable basis from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

b. Levels of Engagement l) HQ USACE Military Mission - Manages strategic communication with appropriate NRC designated officials in coordination with the National Program Manager.

2) National Program M anager - Manages the everyday interaction with NRC in order to ma intain clarity of intent and to further coordinate the planning and execution of requirements with the geographic district.

3) District Program Manager - Manages the everyday project tasks as required with NRC field contacts. Ensures that the projects or deliverables are provided timely and accurately.

5. Financial Management.

a. Transfer of Funds - All required funding will be provided in NRC Form 662 to the Omaha district. Fund ing will be disbursed appropriately to the geographically project management district.

b. Planning and Design !Budget - Any e ffort required for planning purposes as required by the technical assistance team will be funded on a reimbursable basis by NRC.

c. Operational Financial Management - All financial management required to meet this support task to NRC will be described in the project management district PMP. This plan will include but not limited to: C urrent Working Es timate, Contractor Claims, and Funds Revocation

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact a) The Director for the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will be Mr. B ill Dean effective October 1, 2014.

JU.S.NHC

\__ __,,.....,_.,c- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory !Commission

"-'A*,,,.,_*-' IWE,,,;.,,,.,,._

.,,._0.-.,.....cl.tv I

I

--- ~1,t--1-- i

.._..-~ ._, ..

-- . ,_-==-"~~

I

-e I _L. I o _I= _I__

- -*-- - i .J.t

- -- I I ri l

t.=..:.

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation BIii Dean, Director Jennifer Uhle, Deputy Director for Proor,m Man3gemem.

Reactor Safety Programs Brian Holllan, Deputy Director for

- ~Icy O.veloi>me.nt and An.,_

t v,is Stoff SUjM1 Abroh&m, OH'ector Engineering and Corporate Support I I I I OIVltlon Of Soft(Y Svstemt 01v1,100 or Eoglnttnno 01vtl10n of ()pefcmno

[)jvitk>n of Ucenst Renewal RNCIOf lk.~ltl1~

Timothy McG1nty, Otrector John LUbtnskl, Director Ctwlllloph8f Mille!, Director Mlehe.. Evans, Dlfect0i1 ROOffl l1ytor,Oepu1y Dir.c-10, M.wy Joo* RoH-Lff, fA.ctk1gJ Deputy Director 0tpu1v Director IV&eano LOI.lift Lund. DflMY Dittc:10f DtPUtv 01re<:tor ivec,nl)

I I I I OM1ton of Pe>ek:y 11ml OIVltlOn 01 Ritk Olvlt.00 or lntP &

Rulemakln~ J apan Ltuons L.a1ned Olvltloo Assessment Reaionill SOOPOrl Lowrttltt KokajkO, Dlftctor JKk OaVlt, DlftetOf (Acthlg)

Jonph GillHH' Dhclor Sc.oft Mouls, OMICIOf AOy Mons.01, Otl)UIY ~rt(h)f Dtl)Utv Olr+c:tor (\IIC14'10

$81Hon Lff, o.t>Uly DkKlOf A.11$1 HO'd, Otputy Dhctor Deputy Director (Vac.ntJ

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) b) HQ USACE Organjzational hierarchy for this requirement tlO a,

+-'

...re

+-' CMIWM:1 V)

Mt. S(ow SIOCkW.

a, u

C re S<<llhA11tll'IIIIC.

"""'w"' No!lhAll.8!1110

...a, C

OiviS;ion

°"""" OiYiliorl 0

l!J r- ____T____ -r---- _T ____ -r------T----

1 I I I

-, I C

0

i u

' "_""_°'_"_

""., ( T~OI-~ I(--~~I(~-~~'~'I' I STP*dOI~

a, X

LU Assigns projects based on geographic location Operational control

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) c) National Program Manager l nteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021: Evaluating the Potential for Floodine at Nuclear Power Plant Sites CUSTOMER Due to Dam Failure.

~uclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NWO - Program Manager - b 6 Maoalt::1i Oay--to-day Customer .,.

co""'

m""

m'"'

u-,

n..a

"""t ,,-

NWO - Program Technical Manager ~ (b)(~

Mana1es te-chnkal communications, Pr'ovldes ttdHFI guidance

! FORT CIAHOUN / COOPER NPPs NWO - Program Analy,q (h \(6)

M nage.s MIPRs, re-sourcing and fina1-,dal account ing

! NWO Project Manager STAKEHOLDERS Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensees NWO-Project Manager -l11,[.,.b)..f6

.._).___ _. NWO Technical Man"ller Manages ilte speciftt nudt-ar power pl:tnt pr'ojetU FARLEYNPP BEAVER VALLEY NPP SAM Pro eel Mana er b 6 SAM Technlc.il Manager b 6 PEAOI BOTTOM/ SUSQUEHANNA COLUMB IA GENERATING STATION

/THREE MILE ISIAND NPPS NWS Pro eel Mana er NMll'llljectMlnllll' (b)(6)

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) d) POC List NAME On!anization Phone Email Scott Flanders NRC/NRO 301-415-1634 Scott.Flanders@nrc.1.rnv Andy Campbell NRC/NRO 301-415-1634 Andv.Camobell@nrc.1mv Mahamed Shams NRC/JLD 301-415-0501 Mohamed.Shams@nrc.1.rnv Chris Cook NRC/NRO 301-415-6397 Christooher.Cook@nrc.2:ov Ken Erwin NRC/NRO 301-415-7559 Kenneth.Erwin(a)nrC,l!OV Brad Harvey NRC/NRO 301-415-4118 Brad.Harvev@Jnrc.2ov Ken See NRC/NRO 301-415-1508 Kenneth.See(a)nrc.2:ov Vic Hall NRC/JLD 301-415-2915 Victor.Hall@Jnrc.2ov (b)(6) USACENWD (b)(6) ... (b)(6)

USACENWD USACENWD -...

USACENWO USACENWO -...

USACENWO USACENWO -...

HQ USACE HQUSACE HQUSACE -

Annex B - Acronym Definition Acronym Definition AOR Area of Responsibility CCG Command Consolidated Guidance CEFMS Corps of Engineers Financial Management System COL Colonel COP Common Operating Picture CoP Community of Practice ELL Enterprise Lessons Learned EPgMP Enterprise Program Management Plan ER Engineer Regulation HQ Headquarters IAA lnteragency Agreement IIS lnteragency and International Support KO Contracting Officer LIR Line Item Review LTG Lieutenant General MILCON Military Construction MMC Modeling Mapping & Consequences Production Center MOU Memorandum of Understanding MP Military Programs MSC Major Subordinate Command NPP Nuclear Power Plant NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRO Office of New Reactors NRR Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NWD Northwestern Division NWO Omaha District OPORD Operations Order P.E. Registered Professional Engineer PDT Project Delivery Team PgMP Program Management Plan PM Project Manager PMF Probable Maximum Flood PMP Project Management Plan QMP Quality Management Plan RBC Regional Business Center RMC Risk Management Center RMS Regional Management System

Annex B - Acronym Definition (Continued)

SME Subject Matter Expert sow Statement of Work TBD To Be Determined TLR Technical Letter Report TO Task Order (amendment to Base IAA) us United States USAGE United States Army Corps of Engineers WBS Work Breakdown Structure WebCMI Web Corporate Management Information

Annex C- Interagency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 , MODIFICATION 1 Statement of Work Project

Title:

Potential for Nuclear Power Pl ant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams NRC Contracting Officer's Representative: Brad Harvey, Brad.Harvey@nrc.gov, (301) 415-4118 NRC Alternate Contracting Officer's Representative: Kenneth See, Kenneth.See@nrc.gov, (301) 415-1508 lnteragency Agreement No: NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Issuing Office: Office of Nuclear Reactor Reg1ulation Fee Recoverable: To be identified on specific task orders TAC No.: To be identified on specific task orders Docket Number: To be identified on specific task orders Agency: U.S. Army Core of Engineers Period of Performance: September 30, 2013 - September 29, 2017 BACKGROUND The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRA) is a major program office of the NRG that is responsible for the licensing and regulatory oversight of nuclear power reactors and nonpower research reactors in the civilian sector. NRR functions through a matrix organization which includes an Associate Directorate for Engineering and Safety Systems (ADES) made up of four divisions which provide technical expertise for the review of utility requested licensing actions and license amendments including quality assurance-related reviews; the development of generic communications to licensees and the nuclear industry which may take the form of generic letters, bulletins, or information notices; the development of regulatory bases for taking licensing actions and positions (e.g., providing input to regulations, regulatory guides , and industry codes and standards); the review of vendor topical reports that are not specifically linked to a licensing action; the resolution of generic technical issues that may form the regulatory bases for taking licensing actions; and positions and oversight of quality assurance at nuclear vendors and suppliers.

The Division of Engineering (DE), one of the divisions in Engineering and corporate Support, is responsible for performing safety reviews, evaluations and in-depth analyses of the civil, and mechanical aspects of licensees' applications for proposed nuclear power plant amendments and modifications to their operating license and for overseeing quality assurance at nuclear vendors and suppliers. The aforementioned reviews and analyses are performed under the cognizance of the Mechanical and Civil Engineering Branch.

The Mechanical and Civil Engineering Branch (EMCB) is responsible for evaluating issues and license amendments related to pressure boundary integrity as well as seismic qualification of piping, mechanical components and component supports. EMCB is also responsible for issues related to design and inspection of containments and safety related structures. EMC B's responsibilities also include geoscience

(geologic, seismologic, hydrolo,gic, meteorologic) as well as civil (geotechnical engineering and soil mechanics) issues.

The Hydrology and Metrology Branch (RHMB) in the Office of New Reactors is responsible for technical review of NRC's post-Fukushima activities related to flooding. By letter dated March 12, 2012 (ML12053A340), the NRG issued a request for information, hereafter referred to as the 50.54(1) letter.

The request was issued in connection with implementing so-called lessons-learned from the 2011 accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant (ML111861807). The NRG Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1, and subsequent Staff Requirements Memoranda associated with Commission Papers SECY 11-01 24 (ML11245A158) and SECY-11 -0137 (ML11272A111), inst ructed the NRG staff to issue requests for information to licensees pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). Enclosure 2 to the 50.54(1) letter requested licensees to perform , among other items, a flood hazard reevaluation using present-day methodologies and guidance. The flood hazard reevaluation report should contain, among other items, evaluation of the flood hazards from streams and rivers, including potential dam breaches and failures. Guidance for assessment of flooding hazards at nuclear power plants due to dam failure is discussed in JLD-ISG-2013-01 {ML13151A153), which was published on July 29, 2013.

JLD-ISG-2013-01 states that in the case of dams and levees owned or operated by U.S. Federal agencies, the Federal agency responsible for {owner or operator of) the dam should be involved in supporting the dam failure flood hazard evaluation. It is critical for the owner or operator of the dam to assist the NRG or its licensees when modifying the assumptions or methods used to develop the inundation maps for a specific area. If a Federally owned dam is identified as critical to the flooding reanalysis, the licensee should contact the NRG promptly. The NRG will act as the interface between these agencies and licensees.

EMCB and RHMB do not have trained specialists who possess the in-depth knowledge and highly specialized experience needed to deal with the highly complex issues associated with dams. Specifically most of the dams of concern are operated, regulated and built by USAGE. It is for this reason that the NRG entered into an lnteragency Agreement {IAA) No. NRC-HO-13-1-03-0021 with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) which has a staff of highly t rained specialists who possess the knowledge, skills and expertise to address a variety of hydrologic issues associated with their dams and the potential impacts of dam failure on nuclear power plants.

The NRG expects to receive requests for assistance from several of its licensees in obtaining information on dams upstream of their nuclear power plants to complete the flooding hazard reevaluations associated with Enclosure 2 of the 50.54(1) letter. As an alternative to providing the requested dam information directly to its licensees, the NRG intends to obtain technical expertise from USAGE in a series of Task Orders under IAA No. NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 to assist the NRC in determining if failure of these dams could potentially flood the nuclear power plant sites. lnteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 with the USAGE is for technical assistance on the Job Code J4631 for the project, Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. This IAA is entered into under the Economy Act authority. The Reimbursable Work (Support for Others (SFO)) performed under the Economy Act allows the USAGE to accept orders and transfer of funds from other agencies to do their work. When the USAGE performs work for other agencies, it relies on the ordering agency (NRG) for the authority to do the work and the funding to do the work.

Work under this contract will be performed under Task Orders which will be discussed; agreed upon; and authorized as such work is identified as needing expertise from the USAGE. The procedures for processing task orders are found in Attachment 1.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this contract is to obtain technical expertise from USAGE to assist the NRG in determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that may affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants.

KEY PERSONNEL r b)[6)

WORK REQUIREMENTS On a task order basis, USAGE shall provide the services of staff personnel to perform work similar to that described below. Specific requirements will be defined in the task order Statement of Work.

• Estimation of stage, velocity, and discharge time-series in rivers near nuclear power plants under various flooding and dam failure scenarios.

• Set up, host, and participate in meetings between the USAGE, NRC, NRC's licensee(s), and optionally, other Federal agencies and dam owners regulated by other Federal agencies to allow the attendees an opportunity to discuss the watershed, review assumptions, and confirm the strategy for satisfying the 50.54(f) reevaluation as it pertains to dam failure. These meetings may be held in the vicinity of a USAGE district office near the licensee.

• Travel to NRC Headquarters to present the results of the updates, as necessary.

The schedule for completing each work assignment, Tasks and Subtasks, will be provided in the task order Statement of Work.

PROCEDURES FOR PLACING TASK ORDERS UNDER THIS INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT See Attachment 1.

LEVEL OF EFFORT The estimated level of effort (in hours) in professional staff hours over a four-year period apportioned by fiscal year is as follows:

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 TOTAL 0 30,963 1,272 1,272 1,272 34,779 The level of effort to perform each task order will be specified in the individual task order SOW.

DELIVERABLES Technical Reporting Requirements All reports are to be prepared in Windows 7 or compatible software and submitted electronically to the COR, with a copy to the NRC Contracting Officer.

Technical reporting requirements, including the Technical Letter Report formats, will be specified in each individual task order issued under this agreement.

Monthly Business Letter Report See Attachment 3.

MEETINGS AND TRAVEL For budget proposal purposes, use the following travel estimates for each request for assistance the NRC receives from its licensees:

• Four, three-person, two-day trips to a USAGE district office

• Two, two-person , two-day trips to US NRC headquarters in Rockville , Maryland.

The NRC expects to receive at least eight requests for assistance from its licensees.

NRC FURNISHED MATERIALS NRC furnished materials will be provided under each task order. If any proprietary information is provided by NRC, it must be safeguarded against unauthorized disclosure; other instructions on how to handle proprietary information will be provided in the task order.

Attachment 1 PROCEDURES FOR PLACING ORDERS UNDER THIS CONTRACT

1. When the need for a task order arises, the COR will contact the USAGE Principal Investigator (Pl) or Project Manager to discuss the general scope of the work requirements and determine the availability of personnel recommended by USAGE. If qualified personnel are available to perform the work, the Contracting Officer will request a proposal providing the task order statement of work (SOW ) to the USAGE Program Administrator or USAGE Program Manager.

2 If USAGE intends to submit proposed changes to the Statement of Work, a technical proposal describing the changes is to be submitted prior to development of a cost proposal. The name(s) and resume(s) of the individual(s) who will perform the work must be included with the technical proposal which should normally be submitted within five working days. The technical proposal must contain a detail explanation of any proposed changes in technical approach , level of effort, schedules and any other changes that are necessary to successfully perform the work in a more timely and economical cost to the government.

3. After the parties have reached agreement on the scope of the work, the personnel to be assigned, the schedule(s) and the costs, USAGE will then submit the cost proposal, expected with five working days after agreement is reached.

4. The task order will be authorized in writing by the Contracting Officer. The task order will include the agreed-upon SOW, state the cost ceiling established to complete the task order and specify the amount of funds obligated, either in full or incrementally to authorized initiation or completion of the work.

5. Each task order will be consecutively numbered and will include the NRC Technical Assignment Control (TAC) number; this number is needed for license fee billing purposes and/or for budget accountability purposes.

6. Usually within five working days after receipt of the task order, the Contracting Officer at USAGE, will acknowledge receipt and acceptance of the task order by having the N RC Form 173 signed in the space designated, and returning the NRC Form 173 electronically to the NRC Contracting Officer. In the event that USAGE requests a change to the agreed-upon scope, level of effort, cost, or period of performance prior to the signing of the NRC Form 173, the USAGE Program Administrator or USAGE Pl shall initiate discussions with the NRC Contracting Officer to reach a mutual agreement on the change.

7. In the event that a work scope or cost ceiling modification is required after acceptance of the task order, the individual (NRC or USAGE) requesting the modification shall initiate contact with the other to discuss the modification. The procedures in Items 2 and 3 above will be used to process modifications.

8. If it becomes necessary to stop work or terminate a task order, the NRC Contracting Officer will notify the USAGE Pl and the USAGE Program Administrator in writing.

9. In urgent situations, the NRC may require USAGE to start work before receipt of a request for proposal and written authorization of the task order. In such cases, upon written authorization from the NRC Contracting Officer, USAGE may begin work on the task order, assuming availability of personnel, agreement on the SOW, and the availability of obligated funds. When this accelerated procedure is used , USAGE will begin negotiating the term of a definitive task order with the NRC Contracting Officer by the target date mutually agreed upon. The written task order will be issued by the NRC Contracting Officer within five working days of completion of the negotiations. The other terms of this section will apply.

Attachment 2 Deleted

Attachment 3 Monthly Letter Status Report A monthly letter status report (MLSR) will be submitted by the 20th of each month to the COR. Each task order will identify the COR for that task order.

Note: If no work was performed during the period, a report (via E-mail) so indicating is to be subm itted to the distribution instead of the full report.

State the period of the report in which funds were expended, i.e., the dates the report covers which may not necessarily correspond to the first and the last days of the month.

Each report will include Sections I and II for each task order, and Section IV as applicable.Section IV will apply to task orders $1 00K and above, or as otherwise specified in the task order statement of work.

I WORK PROGRESS STATUS 1.a. Identification Information

- The JCN and title

- The principal investigat or and telephone number

- The COR and telephone number

- The alternate COR and telephone number 1.b. The period of performance 1.c. Financial Summary

- The authorized ceiling amount for the task order

- The total amount of funds obligated to date

- The total cost for the period

- The total cost for the fiscal year

- The total cost cumulative to date

- Percent of funds expended against obligated funds

2. Schedule/Milestone Information in the following format:

Planned Revised Actual Tasks Completion Date Completion Date Date Provide a The day, month The revised day, The day, brief and year sche- month and year month and summary duled for com- based on a change. year all of the pletion, or time- The reason for the of the work work; in- frame if a date change must be giv- is actually elude any is not known or en in the "Problem/ completed.

report or projected. Resolution" section travel. Below.

3. Work Performed During the Period This section should contain a clear, succinct discussion of the work performed on each task order during the period. As a minimum , these discussions should support the costs reported for the

period. Wording such as "worked on all tasks ," or "continued to work on Task 1.a." is not particularly useful and reduces the effectiveness of the monthly report as a management tool and for historical documentation .

Any travel taken during the reporting period should also be summarized in this section of the report.

Each travel summary should identify the person traveling, the duration of the travel , the purpose of the travel, and any work/accomplishments not reflected elsewhere.

4. Problem/Resolution All problems encountered during the period should be clearly and succinctly identified and stated.

Then , the resolution or the proposed solution should be briefly described. It should be clearly evident, from a reading of the description, who is responsible for solving the problem , should it still exist at the time the report is written .

- Notwithstanding the status of the problem at the time the MLSR is written , all problems should be recorded in the "Problem/ Resolution" section of the MLSR for documentation/historical purposes.

If the problem still exists in a subsequent month, in whole or in part, it should be described as it currently exists ; otherwise, it should be deleted from the report.

- Problem or circumstances that require a change in the level of effort/costs , scope, or travel requ irements are to be described in the MLSRs for documentation purposes but are to be dealt with separately in a letter addressed and sent to the COR.

5. Plans for Next Period Provide a brief description of the work to be performed/accomplished during the next reporting period . If a milestone is expected to be completed during the next report period, so state.

II FINANCIAL STATUS

1. Provide the total direct staff use (including subcontractor hours) and the amount of funds expended (costed) during the period and total cumulative year to date in the following categories for each task order:!.

Current Fiscal Year Total Month to Date To Date

a. Direct Labor (hours)

(1) Management xx xx xx (2) Technical xx xx xx (3) Support xx xx xx Total xx xx xx

b. Costs Labor Costs (1) Direct Labor Costs xx xx xx (2) Indirect Labor Costs xx xx xx Subtotal xx xx xx Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost xx xx xx (2) Material and Services Costs xx xx xx (3) Computer Usage Costs xx xx xx (4) Travel (a) Domestic xx xx xx (b) Foreign xx xx xx Total Travel xx xx xx Subtotal Other Direct Costs xx xx xx G&A Costs xx xx xx DOE Fee xx xx xx Total Reimbursable Costs xx xx xx Ill. Provide a summary table by task order as follows:

Fiscal Year Total Authorized Obligations Obligations Costs to Costs Tasks Cost Ceiling to Date Balance Date To Date xx $ $ $ $ $

xx $ $ $ $ $

IV MONTHLY EXPENSE FORECAST

For task orders valued at $100,000 or more, a forecast by Task will be prepared and included in the first MLSR and updated as applicable, e.g. , on a fiscal year basis or when there is a change in funding authorization.

For each Task, a budget is to be developed based on the agreed upon allocation of the level of effort among the Tasks. Separate expenditures for each Task will be reported in the MLSR against the budget using the following format:

Authorized Cost Ceiling : $ Funds Obligated to date: $ __

Expenditures Task Expenditures Percentage Tasks Planned Budget for the Period Cumulative vs. Budget

1. $ $ $  %

2. $ $ $  %

3. $ $ $  %

4. $ $ $  %

5. $ $ $  %

6. $ $ $  %

7. $ $ $  %

Total $ $ $  %

A monthly expense variance greater than 15 percent must be explained in the "Problem/Resolution" section.

Annex D - Amendments to Interagency Agreement RC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 m

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 T001 Neither the Office of Administration ror the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation retained a copy of NRG-HQ-13-I-03-0021 T001 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-000 4

m NRC-HQ-25-14-T-002 6

m NRC-HQ-25-15-T-000 9

INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT r, IAANO.

I PA:E OF NRC- HQ 1 4- T- 000 4 I 2

2. ORDER NO. 13. REQUISITION NO. 14. SOLICITATION NO.

NR0 0035

5. EFFECTIVE DATE 16. AWARD DATE 7. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 12/l 7 /2013 12/17/2013 12/18/2013 TO 09/29/2017

8. SERVICING AGENCY 9. DELIVERTO ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BRAD HARVEY ALC : US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DUNS : +4 : TWFN 7 F27 CENWO-PM-S 161 6 CAPI TOL AVENUE l(b)(6)

I WASHINGTON DC 20005 OMAHA NE 68102-4901 POC TELEPHONE NO, :

r

10. REQUESTING AGENCY x6)

I 11. INVOICE OFFICE ADM US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ALC : 310 000 01 ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH DUNS : 040535809 +4 :

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 11555 ROCKVILLE PI KE ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH MAILSTOP 03 - El 7A 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE ROCKVILLE MD 20852-2738 ROCKVILLE MD 20852- 27 38 POC Valerie Whipple TELEPHONE NO. 301- 287- 0952

12. ISSUING OFFICE 13. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Economy Ac t US NRC - HQ ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION MAIL STOP 3WFN-05-C64MP

14. PROJECT ID WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001

15. PROJECT TITLE PREPARATION OF TO PROPOSALS FOR EVALUATING THE PO'

16. ACCOUNTING DATA 2014 - X020 0- FEEBASED 25D00 5 4- 212- 10 62- 251A 17, 18. 19. 20. 21 . 22.

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Inter Agency Agreement No . NRC- HQ I 002 1 Task Order: No . NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Tas k Or de r: Tit l e : " Pr eparati on of Task Order Prop osals under I nteragency Agreeme nt NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 for Evaluating t he Potential for Flood i ng at Nuc lear Power Plants . "

Enclosures :

(1) Stat ement of Work NRC-HQ-20-14-T-004

( 2 ) NRC Gene r a l Terms a nd Condi t i ons for IAAs Conti nued ...

23. PAYMENT PROVISIONS 124. TOTALAMOUNT

$89 , 959 . 00 25a. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE (SERVICING) 26a. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE (REQUESTING) v ~ ..-..-;;,, . e - c _ , . , . ~~

25b. NAME AND TITLE I25c. DATE 26b. CONTRACTING OFFICER I26c. DATE VALERIE M. WHIPPLE 01/17/201 4

IAANO IORDER NO PAGE OF NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 2 I2 Task Order Ceil ing : $113 , 296

!Obligated Amount : $89 , 959 Period of Performance : December , 18 , 2013 -

September 29 , 2017

!Master IAA : NRCHQ13I030021

STATEMENT OF WORK Task Order

Title:

Preparation of Task Order Proposals under lnteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at Nuclear Power Plants Type of Contract/Order: Task Order under lnteragency Agreement lnteragency Agreement No.: NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 Job Code: J4631 Task Order No.: NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)/Divisio n of Commission (NRC) Issuing Engineering/Mechanical and Civil Engineering Branch Office:

NRC Contracting Officer's Brad Harvey, Brad .Harvey@nrc.gov, (301) 415-4118 Representative:

Alternate NRC Contracting Ken See, Kenneth.See@nrc.gov, (301) 415-1508 Officer's Representative:

Contracting Officer: Valerie Whipple, Valerie.Whipple@nrc.gov, (301) 287-0952 License Fee Recoverable: Yes TAC: TBD Contractor: U.S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

Period of Performance: 12/18/2013 - 09/29/2017 Introduction The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to perform "Preparation of Task Order Proposals under lnteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at Nuclear Power Plants," as defined in this Statement of Work (SOW).

Background

The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) is a major program office of the NRC that is responsible for the licensing and regulatory oversight of nuclear power reactors and nonpower research reactors in the civil ian sector. NRR functions through a matrix organization which includes an Associate Directorate for Engineering and Safety Systems (ADES) made up of four

divisions which provide technical expertise for the review of utility requested licensing actions and license amendments including quality assurance-related reviews; the development of generic communications to l1icensees and the nuclear industry which may take the form of generic letters, bulletins, or information notices; the development of regulatory bases for taking licensing actions and positions (e.g., providing input to regulations, regulatory guides, and industry codes and standards); the review of vendor topical reports that are not specifically linked to a licensing action; the resolution of generic technical issues that may form the regulatory bases for taking licensing actions; and positions and oversight of quality assurance at nuclear vendors and suppliers.

The Division of Engineering (DE), one of the ADES divisions, is responsible for performing safety reviews, evaluations and in-depth analyses of the applications for proposed nuclear power plant amendments and modifications to their operating license.

The Mechanical and Civil Engineering Branch (EMCB) is responsible for evaluating issues and license amendments related to pressure boundary integrity as well as seismic qualification of piping, mechanical components and component supports. EMCB is also responsible for issues related to design and inspection of containments and safety related structures. EMCB's responsibilities also include geoscience (geologic, seismologic, hydrologic, meteorologic) as well as civil (geotechnical engineering and soil mechanics) issues.

The Hydrology and Metrology Branch (RHMB) in the Office of New Reactors is responsible for technical review of NRC's post-Fukushima activities related to flooding. By letter dated March 12, 2012 (ML12053A340), the NRC issued a request for information, hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter. The request was issued in connection with implementing so-called lessons-learned from the 2011 accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant (ML111861807).

The NRC Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2. 1, and subsequent Staff Requirements Memoranda associated with Commission Papers SECY 11-01 24 (ML11245A158) and SECY-11-0137 (ML11272A111 ), instructed the NRC staff to issue requests for information to licensees pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). Enclosure 2 to the 50.54(f) letter requested licensees to perform, among other items, a flood hazard reevaluation using present-day methodologies and guidance. The flood hazard reevaluation report should contain, among other items, evaluation of the flood hazards from streams and rivers, including potential dam breaches and failures. Guidance for assessment of flooding hazards at nuclear power plants due to dam failure is discussed in JLD-ISG-2013-01 (ML13151A153), which was published on July 29, 2013.

JLD-ISG-2013-01 states that in the case of dams and levees owned or operated by U.S.

Federal agencies, the Federal agency responsible for (owner or operator of) the dam should be involved in supporting the dam failure flood hazard evaluation. It is critical for the owner or operator of the dam to assist the NRC or its licensees when modifying the assumptions or methods used to develop the inundation maps for a specific area. If a Federally owned dam is identified as critical to the flooding reanalysis, the licensee should contact the NRC promptly.

The NRC will act as the interface between these agencies and licensees.

2

EMCB and RHMB do not have trained specialists who possess the in-depth knowledge and highly specialized experience needed to deal with the highly complex issues associated with dams. Specifically, most of the dams of concern are operated, regulated and built by USACE.

It is for this reason that the NRC entered into an lnteragency Agreement (IAA) No. NRC-HQ I-03-0021 with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) which has a staff of highly trained specialists who possess the knowledge, skills and expertise to address a variety of hydrologic issues associated with their dams and the potential impacts of dam failure on nuclear power plants.

The NRC expects to receive requests for assistance from several of its licensees in obtaining information on dams upstream of their nuclear power plants to complete the flooding hazard reevaluations associated with Enclosure 2 of the 50.54(f) letter. As an alternative to providing the requested dam information directly to its licensees, the NRC intends to obtain technical expertise from USACE in a series of Task Orders under IAA No. NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 to assist the NRC in determining if failure of these dams could potentially flood the nuclear power plant sites. lnteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 with the USACE is for technical assistance on the Job Code J4631 for the project, Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. This IAA is entered into under the Economy Act authority. The Reimbursable Work (Support for Others (SFO)) performed under the Economy Act allows the USACE to accept orders and transfer of funds from other agencies to do their work. When the USACE performs work for other agencies, it relies on the ordering agency (NRC) for the authority to do the work and the funding to do the work.

In order to ensure each agency is achieving the program objectives of IAA NRC-HQ-13-I 0021, the NRC intends to work collaboratively with the USACE in developing accurate SOWs and proposals that have level of efforts sufficient to meet the requirements and develop a schedule that is achievable. In order for the USACE to participate in this activity, the NRC needs to fund the USACE work effort to develop accurate SOWs and proposals.

Work under this IAA will be performed under task orders which will be discussed; agreed upon; and authorized as such work is identified as needing expertise from the USACE.

Objective The objective of this task order is to provide a mechanism for NRC to fund USACE's efforts collaborating on development of task order SOWs and developing definitive task order (technical and cost) proposals with realistic schedules. NRC continues to receive Licensee Request and Submission of Information from the various licensees-all with differing requests/issues/concerns. Based on the specific licensee and its specific request, the USACE will coordinate with local USACE district offices, participate in dialogue with NRC, the Licensee, and if required , other Federal Agencies that own, operate, or regulate dams in the watershed upstream of the nuclear power plant site to assess specific needs. This method will facilitate the USACE in providing definitive proposals with realistic schedules.

3

Technical and Other Special Qualifications Required Senior Hydrologic/Hydraulic Engineers (HE) on a part-time, intermittent basis with expertise in dam breach modeling and flood inundation analysis using the latest computer programs available in this field, such as the Hydrologic Engineering Center-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) and the Hydrologic Engineering Center-Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS).

Senior Geotechnical Engineers (GE) and Senior Structural Engineers (SE) on a part-time, intermittent basis with substantial experience in seismological engineering principles, to serve as the Principal Investigator, with expertise in seismically- induced liquefaction analysis of rock fill dams and in computer modeling techniques, including finite element analysis techniques. In addition, this individual should have experience with dynamic seismic slope stability analyses of embankment dams.

Program Manager (PM) and Programs Analyst (PA) on a part-time, intermittent basis to provide assistance in collaborating with the NRC in drafting the NRC's Statement of Work and USACE's technical and cost proposal.

List Services/Deliverables The series of tasks listed bellow should be repeated for each request for assistance the NRC receives from its licensees in obtaining information on dams upstream of their nuclear power plants. Letters of Technical Direction (LTD) will be issued to the USACE for each request for assistance the NRC receives from its licensees.

Tasks Deliverable & Due Dates

1. Preliminact Review of Licensee Reguest and Submission of Complete review within 10 working Information: days after receipt of Licensee request and submission information

• Review Licensee request and submission information to become familiar with the licensee's river basin and dam configuration, and prepare for the Technical Review Meeting outline in Task 2.

2. Technical Review Meeting Schedule TBD

• Set up, host, and participate in a meeting between the USACE, NRC, and the NRC's licensee(s) to allow the attendees an opportunity to discuss the watershed, review assumptions, and confirm the strategy for satisfying the 50.54(f) reevaluation as it pertains to dam failure. This meeting should be held in the vicinity of a USACE district office near the licensee.

NOTE: This meeting may be open to the public, requiring that the public be provided access to the meeting.

4

Tasks Deliverable & Due Dates

3. Statement of Work Develo12ment USACE proposal due 10 working days after the receipt of NRC's

• Collaborate with the NRC on NRC's draft Statement of request for task order proposal Work based on the licensee's request, submission of information, and information learned during the Technical Review Meeting with the licensee in Task 2.

Submit a task order cost and technical proposal.

7. Level of Effort The estimated level of effort in professional staff hours apportioned among the tasks by labor category is as follows:

LEVEL OF EFFORT TOTAL LEVEL FOR EACH NUMBER OF OF EFFORT TASK LABOR CATEGORY REQUEST (hours) REQUESTS (HOURS) 1 Sr. HE/GE/SE 80 2 160 1 PM/PA 32 2 64 2 Sr. HE/GE/ and PM 210 2 420 Sr. HE/GE/SE 3 80 2 160 and PM/PA TOTAL 402 808 Total Labor by Category Hours Sr. HE/GE/SE 624 Program Manager/Program Analyst 180 TOTAL 808 The level of effort assumption of this SOW is 808 hours0.00935 days <br />0.224 hours <br />0.00134 weeks <br />3.07444e-4 months <br />. This amount is based on the NRC receiving 2 requests for assistance from its licensees and tasks 1-3 are completed in response to each request for assistance.

• For Task 1, Preliminary Review of Licensee Request and Submission of Information 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> to review each licensee request and submission of information 32 hours3.703704e-4 days <br />0.00889 hours <br />5.291005e-5 weeks <br />1.2176e-5 months <br /> to establish work breakdown structure of the project

• For Task 2, Technical Review Meeting One two-day meeting at a USACE district office, attended by six USACE personnel, three of which need to travel to the local geographic district office. Each USACE person spends 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> at the meeting, plus another 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> for pre-meeting 5

preparation. An additional 18 hours2.083333e-4 days <br />0.005 hours <br />2.97619e-5 weeks <br />6.849e-6 months <br /> is requested for travel delays incurred traveling to the meeting.

• For Task 3, Statement of Work Development 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> to collaborate prepare the SOW and respond with a proposal Reporting Requirements Technical Letter Reports USACE is required to provide the technical letter report via electronically (by e-mail), using Windows 7 (Font Arial Regular 11 point) or compatible software program, to the NRC COR and the following NRC staff:

Brad Harvey, E-mail: Brad.Harvey@nrc.gov In all correspondence, include the following information : Job Code No., Task No. and NRC/NRR Branch: Mechanical and Civil Engineering Branch, DE, NRR. Please see Attachment 1 for additional guidance.

Financial Monthly Letter Status Reports (MLSR)

USACE shall provide a monthly letter status report summarizing accomplishments, expenditures, contractor staff hours expended, percent completed for each task under this task order, and any problems encountered by the contractor. The report shall be sent electronically (by e-mail) to the NRC COR, the alternate COR, the Contracting Officer, and the following NRC staff, by the 20th of the month, following the period reported.

Brad Harvey, E-mail: Brad.Harvey@nrc.gov Ken See, E-mail: Kenneth.See@nrc.gov Valerie Whipple, E-mail: Valerie.Whipple@nrc.gov Chris Cook, E-mail: Chrisopher.Cook@nrc.gov The format of this report is contained in Attachment 2.

The technical status section of the report shall contain a summary of the work performed under the Task Order during the reporting period; milestones reached, or if missed, an explanation why; any problems or delays encountered or anticipated with USACE's recommendations for resolution; and planned worl< for the next reporting period. The status shall include information on travel during the period (if any) to include trip start and end dates, destination, and travelers for each trip.

The financial status section of the report shall include the total award amount and funds obligated to date; total costs incurred in the reporting period, and total cumulative costs incurred 6

to date. The status shall also contain the balance of obligations remaining at the end of the period and balance of funds required to complete the task order.

Meetings and Travel For each request for assistance, three USACE personnel travel to a USACE district office for a two-day meeting. Depending upon the meeting location the local geographic district team members may necessitate local travel.

Publications Any reports generated by the contractor under this contract/order shall not be released for publication or dissemination without NRC written approval.

All information and data related to this project that the contractor gathers or obtains shall be both protected from unauthorized release and considered the property of the Government. The contracting officer will be the sole authorized official to release verbally or in writing , any data, the draft deliverables, the final deliverables, or any other written or printed materials pertaining to this contract/order. Press releases, marketing material, or any other printed or electronic documentation related to this project, must not be publicized without the written approval of the contracting officer.

Place of Performance The work to be performed under this task order will be primarily performed at the location of USACE technical staff's offices.

7

16. General Applicable Information Organizational Conflict of Interest Disclosure USAGE recognizes that Section 170A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, requires that NRG be provided with disclosures on potential conflicts when NRG obtains technical, consulting, research and other support services. USAGE further recognizes that the assignment of NRG work to USAGE must satisfy NRG's conflicts standards. Accordingly, when NRG enters into an agreement with USACE to perform work for NRG, and during the life of the agreement, USAGE shall review and promptly disclose its current work, planned work and where appropriate, past work for others (meaning, organizations, in the same/similar technical area as the NRG project scope of work, e.g. (included but not limited to), NRG licensees, vendors, industry groups or research institutes that represent or are substantially comprised of nuclear utilities) for work in the same or similar technical area as the proposed NRG Agreement.

Disclosures for current or planned work for others in the same or similar technical area as the proposed NRG work are to include (1) the name of organization; (2) dollar value; (3) period of performance of the work identified; and, (4) statements of work for the contract or agreement.

NRG shall then determine whether a conflict would result and, if one does, determine, after consultation with FERG, the appropriate action NRG or USAGE should take to avoid the conflict, or when appropriate under tlhe NRG procedures, waive the conflict. If USAGE determines there is no applicable work in the same or similar technical area, it should be stated in its proposal.

8

Attachment 1 Content, Outline, and Format for Technical Letter Report The final reports, to be performed for each of the four sites described in the task/deliverables section, will consolidate all of the results of the evaluations performed by USACE for that particular site. It should contain the following sections:

BACKGROUND (This section should provide a brief narrative/prospective of the scope of work performed under the scope of the work defined in the lnteragency Agreement (IM)).

II EVALUATION (This section should contain a detailed discussion of the work performed, and the results of the analyses obtained for the scope of the work defined in the IM.)

Ill

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS (After summarizing the work performed, USACE should provide its considered opinion about the structural integrity of the dam under different loading conditions discussed in the relevant Standard Review Plans).

IV REFERENCES All the documents reviewed by USACE should be listed along with its own information sources of relevant technical literature used in its work for this IM.

9

Attachment 2 Monthly Letter Status Report A monthly letter status report (MLSR) will be submitted by the 20th of each month to the COR, the alternate COR and the Contracting Officer. A copy will also be provided to: Chris Cook, Email: Chrisopher.Cook@nrc.gov Note: If no work was performed during the period, a report (via E-mail) so indicating is to be submitted to the distribution instead of the full report.

State the period of the report in which funds were expended, i.e., the dates the report covers which may not necessarily correspond to the first and the last days of the month.

Each report will include Sections I and II for each task order, and Section IV as applicable.

Section IV will apply to task orders $1OOK and above, or as otherwise specified in the task order statement of work.

I. WORK PROGRESS STATUS 1.a. Identification Information

• The JCN and title

• The principal investigator and telephone number

• The COR and telephone number

• The Alternate COR and telephone number(s) 1.b. The period of performance 1.c. Financial Summary

• The authorized ceiling amount for the task order

• The total amount of funds obligated to date

• The total cost for the period

• The total cost for the fiscal year

• The total cost cumulative to date

• Percent of funds expended against obligated funds 10

II. Schedule/Milestone Information:

Please use the following format:

TASKS Planned Completion Revise Completion Actual Date Date Date Provide a brief The day, month and The revised day, month The day, month and summary of the year scheduled for and year based on a year all that of the work; include any completion, or change. The reason for work is actually report or travel. timeframe if a date is the change must be completed not known or given in the projected. "Problem/Resolution" section described below.

Ill. Work Performed During the Period This section should contain a clear, succinct discussion of the work performed on each task order during the period. As a minimum, these discussions should support the costs reported for the period. Wording such as "worked on all tasks," or "continued to work on Task 1.a." is not particularly useful and reduces the effectiveness of the monthly report as a management tool and for historical documentation.

Any travel taken during the reporting period should also be summarized in this section of the report. Each travel summary should identify the person traveling, the duration of the travel, the purpose of the travel, and any work/accomplishments not reflected elsewhere.

IV. Problem/Resolution All problems encountered during the period should be clearly and succinctly identified and stated. Then, the resolution or the proposed solution should be briefly described. It should be clearly evident, from a reading of the description, who is responsible for solving the problem, should it still exist at the time the report is written.

• Notwithstanding the status of the problem at the time the MLSR is written, all problems should be recorded in the "Problem/ Resolution" section of the MLSR for documentation/historical purposes. If the problem still exists in a subsequent month, in whole or in part, it should be described as it currently exists; otherwise, it should be deleted from the report.

• Problem or circumstances that require a change in the level of effort/costs, scope, or travel requirements are to be described in the MLSRs for documentation purposes but are to be dealt with separately in a letter addressed and sent to the COR.

V. Plans for Next Period Provide a brief description of the work to be performed/accomplished during the next reporting period. If a milestone is expected to be completed during the next report period, so state.

11

VI. FINANCIAL STATUS Provide the total direct staff use (including subcontractor hours) and the amount of funds expended (costed) during the period and total cumulative year to date in the following categories for each task order:

Labor Costs:

( I) Direct Labor Costs xx xx xx 2 Indirect Labor Costs xx xx xx SUB-TOTAL Other Direct Costs

( I) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost xx xx xx (2) Material and Services Cost xx xx xx (3) Computer Usage Costs xx xx xx 4 T ravel Domestic xx xx xx SUB-TOTAL G & A Costs xx xx xx DOE Fee If A licable xx xx xx TOTAL VII. Task Order Summary Provide a summary table by task order as follows:

Task# Authorized Obligations to Obligations FY Costs to Total Costs to Cost Ceilin!! ($) Date($) Balance($) Date($) Date($)

xx xx TOTAL VIII. MONTHLY EXPENSE FORECAST For task orders valued at $100,000 or more, a forecast by Task will be prepared and included in the first MLSR and updated as applicable, e.g., on a fiscal year basis or when there is a change in funding authorization.

For each Task, a budget is to be developed based on the agreed upon allocation of the level of effort among the Tasks. Separate expenditures for each Task will be reported in the MLSR against the budget using the following format:

12

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $ _ __ Funds Obligated to date: $ _ _

Tasks Planned Budget ($) Expenditures for Task Expenditures Percentage vs.

the Period {$) Cumulative{$) Bud2et {%)

I.

2.

TOTAL A monthly expense variance greater than 15 percent must be explained in the "Problem/Resolution" section.

13

N RC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 ATTACHMENT 2 NRC GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR IAAS

1. Technical Direction The NRC Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and the NRC Alternate COR, as named in the NRC SOW, are responsible for ensuring that the services required under this project are delivered in accordance with the terms of the SOW. All technical direction instructions to the Servicing agency must be issued through the COR/Alternate COR.

Technical direction includes interpreting technical specifications, providing needed details, and suggesting possible lines of inquiry. Technical direction must not constitute new work or affect overall project cost or period of performance. Technical direction must be confirmed in writing to the Servicing agency and a copy placed in the NRC Program Office project file.

2. Key Personnel The individual(s) identified as key personnel in the NRC IAA Form 662, is (are) considered essential to the successful performance of the work. The servicing agency agrees that these personnel shall not be removed from the project or replaced without complying with the following:

If one or more of the key personnel, for whatever reason, becomes or is expected to become unavailable for work under this IAA Order for a continuous period exceeding 30 workdays, or is expected to devote substantially less effort to the work than indicated in the proposal or initially anticipated, the Servicing agency shall immediately notify the NRC Program Office of its intent to make key personnel replacements.

- All requests for approval of substitutions on a project shall be in writing and shall provide detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed substitutions. The request shall contain a complete resume for the proposed substitute and other information requested by the NRC COR to approve or disapprove the proposed substitution. The NRC will evaluate such requests and promptly notify the servicing agency of its approval or disapproval thereof in writing.

- The project may be terminated if the Office determines that:

o Suitable and timely replacements of key personnel who have been reassigned, terminated , or have otherwise become unavailable for the project is not reasonably forthcoming.

o The resultant reduction of effort or expertise would be so substantial as to impair the successful completion of the work order.

3. Billing Requirements Pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States Army Corps of Engineers dated December 20, 2006, ARTICLE VI-FUNDING, the NRC shall pay all actual costs associated with the provision of services and incidental supplies by USA CE under the MOU. By mutual agreement the Servicing agency shall bill and collect from NRC by an electronic transfer of funds through the U.S. Treasury Intergovernmental Payment and Collection System (IPAC).

Servicing agency shall bill N RC monthly for costs paid in support of NRC projects by the interagency agreement number. The servicing agency shall bill and collect from NRC by an electronic transfer of funds through the U.S. Treasury Intergovernmental Payment and Collection System (IPAC).

The servicing agency voucher shall identify the NRC job code, such as A 1001, 82001 , and so forth, the NRC and servicing agency budget and reporting (B&R) numbers on the Order.

The servicing agency voucher, as a minimum, shall indicate the month that costs were incurred and the dollar amount of these costs. In some instances because of accrual accounting and other adjustments, the amounts may differ slightly from the original accrual amount.

When the Status Report costs differ from the amount billed, servicing agency shall provide an explanation of the difference on the voucher.

The servicing agency voucher shall be sent to support the IPAC funds transfer. The instructions must identify the billable activities as specified by 10 CFR Part 170. The servicing agency voucher and other required documentation shall be submitted to-NRCPAYMENTS@nrc.gov Attn: NRC Payments, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Mailstop O3-E17 A, Rockville, MD 20852-2738

4. Status Reports The servicing agency shall submit a Status Report in accordance with the SOW and the Status Report Requirements, if attached to the SOW, to::

NRC Contracting Officer's Representative (COR)

With copies to the following:

Director of (Program Office), unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work

- Office of Administration/Division of Contracts (electronic copy only) to ContractsPOT.Resource@nrc.gov

5. Limitation of Funds NRC is not obligated to reimburse the servicing agency for costs incurred by its contractors in excess of the total amount obligated by an appropriately executed NRC IM Form 662. The NRC Program Office will formally notify the servicing agency of any projects that are intended to be phased out or terminated as soon as such intent is known, preferably at least 30 days before the proposed termination date. For Orders with fixed performance periods, the servicing agency should assume that the program will terminate on the last day of the period specified in the NRC IM Form 662.

If at any time the servicing agency has reason to believe that the costs will exceed the total amount authorized, the servicing agency must notify NRC. In the absence of formal NRC instructions to continue or to terminate a work order, the servicing agency will notify NRC by fax or other suitable written means when the accrued costs of any NRC Order approaches 75 percent of the authorized funding level provided on the N RC IM Form 662.

The notification should include the estimated date when the accrued costs will equal the authorized funds, and may, if appropriate, recommend or request the NRC action desired . The notification should be sent to the appropriate NRC Program Office. After this notification, the office will evaluate costs incurred against technical progress and, if necessary, will:

Increase funding authorization

- Change the scope of the work

- Change the period of performance

- Terminate the project The performance of work shall be completed within the period stated NRC IAA Form 662, Order. However, when the Servicing agency anticipates that the work cannot be completed within the fixed time period, 1it shall notify the office in writing. Notification shall be made in sufficient time to allow for the issuance of a NRC IM Form 662, Order modification authorizing an extension of the work period to the date necessary to complete the authorized work. If the period of performance is not extended, the office shall notify via issuance NRC IM Form 662, Order modification which should contain closeout instructions, including the reconciliation of any excess funds.

6. Incompatibility Between Regular Duties and Private Interests (a) Employees of the servicing agency's contractor shall not be permitted to make or influence any decision on behalf of the contractor which directly or indirectly affect the interest of the Government, if the employee's personal concern in the matter may be incompatible with the interest of the Government. For example: An employee of a contractor will not negotiate, or influence the award of, a subcontract with a company in which the individual has employment relationship or significant financial interest; and an employee of a contractor will not be assigned the preparation of an evaluation for the servicing agency for any technical aspect of the work of another organization with which the individual has an employment relationship, or significant financial interest, or which is a competitor of an organization (other than the contractor who is the individual's regular employer) in which the individual has an employment relationship or significant financial interest.

(b) The contractor shall be responsible for informing employees that they are expected to disclose any incompatibilities between duties performed for the contractor and their private interests and to refer undecided questions to the contractor.

7. Dissemination of Project Information/Publication Requirements (a) Prior to any dissemination, display, publication, presentation, or release of papers, articles, reports, summaries, or abstracts developed under the NRG/servicing agency agreement, the servicing agency shall submit them to the NRC for review and comment. NRC shall have a review and comment period of at least [60] days, after which both an NRC and servicing agency representative at the lowest management level, shall attempt to resolve any differing viewpoints or statements which are the subject of NRC objection. If the matter cannot be resolved at that level, the issue shall be brought up to the next management level in both organizations until an agreement can be reached or it reaches the Office Director level. In the event resolution cannot be achieved , the NRC may direct the servicing agency to not publish the work as a NUREG/CR, but publish as a servicing agency report without the NRC office name or Contracting Officer's Representative (COR)'s name listed on the report, and with a Disclaimer conspicuously noted on the report, article, summary, abstract or related document that the servicing agency intends to release, display, disseminate or publish to other persons, the public or any other entities:

"The views expressed in this [paper, journal article, report, summary, or abstract] do not represent those of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission."

(b} The NRC and servicing agency agree to handle all cl.assified information provided or developed during the course of this project in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations governing the handling of such information. In the event NRC determines during its review and comment period that a draft servicing agency paper, article, report, summary, or abstract contains classified information regarding the work performed for NRC, NRC, in addition to commenting on the subject matter, shall also direct the servicing agency to direct an authorized classification authority to appropriately review, classify and mark the product, pursuant to nationally acceptable standards/guidelines. Under these circumstances, the Laboratory will either publish the work solely as a classified product pursuant to NRC direction, or not publish the work in any format. In cases where classification of the product is in dispute, NRC may consult with servicing agency's Office of Classification; however NRC retains the ultimate authority over the classification of the product.

(c) In addition, travel costs to present papers or reports developed under the NRG/servicing agency agreement may not lbe authorized if the NRC determines that presentation of the paper does not support the NRC program or project. Such determination will not affect payment of the contract work costs.

(d) The servicing agency contractor, to the extent it is permitted to and asserts copyright therein, grants a royalty-free, nonexclusive, irrevocable worldwide license to the Government to use, reproduce, modify, distribute, prepare derivative works, release, display or disclose the articles, reports, summaries, abstracts, and related documents developed under the Agreement, for any governmental purposes and to have or authorize others to do so.

8. Review and Approval of Reports The servicing agency shall comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement regarding the contents of the draft and final reports, summaries, data and related documents, to include correcting, deleting, editing, revising, modifying, formatting and supplementing and of the information contained therein . Corrective actions shall not be undertaken unless sufficient funding from NRC is available to cover the costs of the corrective actions. Performance under the agreement shall not be deemed accepted or completed until it complies with NRC's directions.

Identification/Marking of Sensitive Unclassified and Safeguards Information. The servicing agency shall comply with the requirements stated MD's 12.7 "NRC Safeguards Information Security Program as follows:

a) Classification Clause To the extent that the performance of work under this work order involves classified information, the following clause is applicable:

In the performance of work under this work order, servicing agency shall ensure that a servicing agency authorized classifier shall assign classification levels to all documents, material, and equipment originated or generated by the performing organization in accordance with classification guidance furnished by the Commission. Each subcontract and purchase order issued hereunder involving the generation of classified documents, material, or equipment shall include a provision to the effect that in the performance of such subcontract or purchase order, a servicing agency authorized classifier shall assign classification levels to all such documents, material, and equipment in accordance with classification guidance furnished by the NRC.

- When appropriate, the attached NRC Form 187, "Contract Security and/or Classification Requirements," is a part of this work order. It is the responsibility of the NRC office originating the work order to review the classification assigned and to refer any problems to the NRC Division of Security Operations (DSO), NSIR, for resolution.

b) Safeguards Information, Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information, or Unescorted Access to Protected and Vital Areas of Nuclear Power Plants To the extent that the performance of work under this work order involves Safeguards Information (SGI), the following clause is applicable:

In the performance of the work under this project, servicing agency shall assure that the Servicing agency shall mark and protect all documents, material, and equipment originated, generated, or received by the performing organization in accordance with the provisions of Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, its implementing regulations (10 CFR 73.21 ), "Protection of Safeguards Information: Performance Requirements."

Further guidance on the protection of Safeguards Information and examples of proper marking of cover; title page, and back cover are contained in NRC Management Directive (MD) 12.7,* "NRC Safeguards Information Security Program" and the NRC Guide to Marking Safeguards Information.

To the extent that performance of work under this work order involves unclassified controlled nuclear information (UNCI), the following clause is applicable:

In the performance of the work under this project, servicing agency shall assure that the Servicing agency shall mark and protect all documents, material, and equipment originated, generated, or received by the performing organization in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, its implementing serv1icing agency regulations, and servicing agency orders and guidance.

It is the responsibility of the NRC office originating the work to indicate whether the work will involve SGI or unescorted access to protected and vital areas of nuclear power plants. An NRC Form 187, "Contract Security and/or Classification Requirements," shall be completed to indicate such access.

c) Proprietary Information In connection with the performance of work under this work order, NRC may furnish for the servicing agency review, evaluation, or other use certain trade secrets or confidential or privileged commercial or financial information determined by the office to be exempt from public inspection or disclosure. A synopsis of such information must be submitted in writing to the servicing agency before reaching agreement with the office on the acceptance and use of the information. Up-to-date guidance on the protection of proprietary information used in reports prepared by the Servicing agency on proper marking of cover, title page, and back cover may be obtained from the NRC COR.

Proprietary or other privileged information may be provided by the office on an individual basis to servicing agency employees working as NRC consultants with the understanding that it shall be protected from disclosure and shall be returned to the office upon completion of the work.

Any such claimed proprietary data will be appropriately identified and marked as such. The use of proprietary information in reports prepared by consultants requires protection. Further information may be obtained from the NRC COR.

d) Other Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information (SUNSI)

Information other than safeguards, unclassified controlled nuclear, proprietary information, and pre-decisional information may at times be determined to be sensitive. The use of such information in reports requires the specific NRC designation and protection as prescribed by the NRC SUNSI policy. Further information may be obtained from the NRC COR.

9. Sensitive Information Work Efforts To the extent that the performance under this work order involves classified information, the following clauses are applicable:

Responsibilities. The servicing agency and the servicing agency contractor, if any, shall be responsible for safeguarding Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, and other National Security Information and for protecting it against sabotage, espionage, loss, and theft in accordance with applicable NRC and servicing agency security regulations and requirements.

- Transmission of Classified Matter. Except as otherwise expressly provided, serviciing agency or the servicing agency contractor shall, upon completion or termination of the work order, transmit to the NRC program office all classified matter in its possession or in the possession of any person under its control in connection with performance of this work order. If retention of any classified matter is required by servicing agency or the servicing agency contractor, servicing agency must obtain the approval of the NRC program office and complete a certificate of possession specifying the classified matter to be reta1ined.

Regulations. servicing agency and the servicing agency contractors shall be responsible for compliance with all applicable NRC and servicing agency security regulations and requirements.

Definition of Restricted Data. The term "Restricted Data," as used in this clause, means all data concerning (1) the design, manufacture, or utilization of atomic weapons; (2) the production of special nuclear material; or (3) the use of special nuclear material in the production of energy, but does not include data declassified or removed from the Restricted Data category pursuant to Section 142 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

Definition of Formerly Restricted Data. The term "Formerly Restricted Data," as used in this clause, means classified information related primarily to the military utilization of atomic weapons that can be adequately safeguarded as National Security Information, subject to the restrictions on transmission to other countries and regional defense organizations that apply to Restricted Data.

Definition of National Security Information. National Security Information is information that has been determined pursuant to Executive Order 13526 or any predecessor order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure and is so designated.

- Security Clearance of Personnel. servicing agency and servicing agency laboratories shall not permit any individual to have access to Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, or National Security Information, except in accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, Executive Orders 12968 and 10865, and servicing agency regulations or requirements applicable to the particular type or category of classified information to which access is required.

Safeguards Information Access. The servicing agency and servicing agency laboratories shall not permit any individual to have access to Safeguards Information, except in accordance with 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 73.22 and NRC Management Directive 12.7.

Liability. It is understood that the unauthorized disclosure or the failure to properly safeguard Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, or National Security Information that may come to the servicing agency or to any person under an NRC/servicing agency order in connection with work under the order may subject the performing organization, and its agents, employees, or subcontractors, to administrative sanctions and criminal liability under the laws of the United States. (See the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended [42 U.S.C.

2011et seq.], 18 U.S.C. 793 and 794; and Executive Orders 13526 and 12968.)

- Subcontracts and Purchase Orders. Except as otherwise authorized in writing by the Commission, servicing agency shall insert provisions similar to the foregoing in all subcontracts and purchase orders under this work order.

10. Stop-Work Order The NRC Program Office may, at any time, by written Order modification (NRC IAA Form 662) to the servicing agency, require the servicing agency to stop all or any part of the work called for by this work order for a period of up to 90 days after the order modification is delivered to the servicing agency, and for any further period to which the parties may agree. Any such order will be specifically identified as a "stop-work order" issued pursuant to this clause. Upon receipt of such an order, the servicing agency shall forthwith comply with its terms and take all reasonable steps to minimize the incurrence of cost allocable to the work covered by the order during the period of work stoppage.

Within a period of 90 days after a stop-work order is delivered to servicing agency or within any extension of that period to which the parties shall have agreed the office shall either:

- Cancel the stop-work order

- Terminate the work covered by this work order If a stop-work order issued under this clause is cancelled or the period of the stop-work order or any extension thereof expires, servicing agency will authorize the resumption of the work. An adjustment will be made in the delivery schedule or cost, or both, and the Order must be modified in writing accordingly. If a stop-work order is not cancelled and the work covered by the order is terminated in accordance with the terms of the GT&C section of the IAA, costs resulting from the stop-work order will be allowed in arriving at the termination settlement.

1,IMNO. OF INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT 1 NRC- HQ 1 4- T- 0026 I 2 2.0RDER NO. 3. REQUISITION NO. 14. SOLICITATION NO.

1 NRO 0180

5. EFFECTIVE DATE 6. AWARD DATE 7. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 06/ 25/201 4 1 06/25/2014 07/25/2014 TO 09/29/2017

8. SERVICING AGENCY 9. DELIVERTO ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BRAD HARVEY ALC : US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DUNS : +4: MAIL STOP T-7F27 PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNING DIVISION WASHINGTON DC 20555 SPEC IAL PROJECTS BRANCH CENWO-PM-S l(bX6) I 1616 CAPITOL AVENUE OMAHA NE 68102-4901 (b)(6)

POC TELEPHONE NO. l

10. REOUESTINGAGENCY 11 . INVOICE OFFICE US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ALC : 310 00001 ONE WH ITE FLINT NORTH DUNS : 040535809 +4 :

ACQU ISITION MANAGEMENT BRANC 11555 ROCKVILLE PI KE ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH MAILSTOP O3 - El7A 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE NRCIPACRESOURCENRCGOV ROCKVILLE MD 20852- 2738 ROCKVILLE MD 20852-2738 POC MICHAEL TURNER TELEPHONE NO. 301-2 8 7-92 81

12. ISSUING OFFICE 13. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Economy Act US NRC - HQ ACQUIS I TION MANAGEMENT DIVIS ION MAIL STOP 3WFN-05-C6 4MP

14. PROJECT ID WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001

15. PROJECT TITLE SEE BLOCK 18

16. ACCOUNTING DATA 2014 - X020 0- FEEBASED 25D00 5- l l 212- 1062 - 253A 17, 18. 19. 20. 21 . 22.

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Master IAA : NRCHQ13I030021 00001 Issuance of new Task Order No . 2 , 90 4, 745 . 60 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 , entitled , " Potential for Flooding at Nuclear Power Plant Sites Due to Dan Fail ure ."

Line Item Cei l i ng$2 , 904 , 74 5 . 60 Incrementally Funded Amount : $2 , 903 , 036 . 00 The pe rfo r mance p eriod for this t ask order is J ul y 25, 2014 - September 29 , 2017 .

Continued

23. PAYMENT PROVISIONS 24. TOTAL AMOUNT

$2 , 903 , 036 . 00 1

25a. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE (SERVICING) 26a. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE (REQUESTING) 7'?'../4.../4-4--.,........,,__

25b. NAME AND TITLE 125c. DATE 26b. CONTRACTING OFFICER 26c. DATE MICHAEL A. TURNER 1 08/ 05/ 201 4

IAANO IORDER NO PAGE NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 2 Consideration and Obligat i ons :

(a ) Authorized Cost Ceiling $2 , 904 , 745 . 60 .

(b) The amount presently obligated with respect to this task order is $2 , 903 , 036 . 00 . When and if the amount (s ) paid and payable to the USACE h ereunder shall equal the obligated amount , t he

~SACE shall not be obligated to continue p erformance of the work unless and until the NRC Contracting Officer shall increase the amount obligated with respect to this Agreement . Any work u nderta ken by USACE in excess of the obligated amount specified above is done so at USACE ' s so l e ris k .

The following documents are hereby made part of this Agreement :

(1 ) Statement of Work (Attachment No . 1)

( 2 ) USACE ' s proposal dated July 14 2014 , is incorporated by reference .

[ X] Fee Recoverable Work

[ ] Non-fee Recoverable Work The total amount of award : $2 , 904 , 745 . 60 . The obligation for this award i s shown in box 24 .

STATEMENT OF WORK NRC Agreement Number NRC Agreement NRC Task Order Number (If NRC Task Order Modification Modification Number Applicable) Number (If Applicable)

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 01 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-xxxx N/A Project Title Potential for Flooding at Nuclear Power Plant Sites Due to Dam Failure Common Cost Center Code B&R Number Servicing Agency 2013-20-1 1-4-212 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers NRC Requisitioning Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC Form 187, Contract Security and Classification Requirements 0 Involves Proprietary Information

~ Applicable

~ Involves Sensitive Unclassified 0 Not Applicable D Non Fee-Recoverable IX!Fee-Recoverable (If checked, complete all applicable sections below)

Docket Number (If Fee-Recoverable/Applicable) Inspection Report Number (If Fee Recoverable/Applicable)

To be provided in Letters of Technical Direction N/A Technical Assignment Control Number (If Fee- Technical Assignment Control Number Descrii ption (If Fee-Recoverable/Applicable) Recoverable/Applicable)

To be provided in Letters of Technical Direction To be provided in Letters of Technical Direction

1.0 BACKGROUND

By letter dated March 12, 2012 (ML12053A340), the NRC issued a request for information to its nuclear power plant (NPP) licensees, hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter. The 50.54(f) letter was issued in connection with implementing so-called lessons-learned from the 2011 accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant (M L111861807). The NRC Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1, and subsequent Staff Requirements Memoranda associated with Commission Papers SECY 11-0124 (ML11245A158) and SECY-11-0137 (ML11272A111), instructed t he NRC staff to issue requests for information to licensees pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). Enclosure 2 to the 50.54(f) letter requested licensees to perform, among other items, a flood hazard reevaluation using present-day methodologies and guidance.

The flood hazard reevaluation report should contain, among other items, evaluation of the flood hazards from streams and rivers, including potential dam breaches and failures.

Guidance for assessment of flooding hazards at NPP sites due to dam failure is provided in the following documents:

• NUREG-0800, "Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition" (SRP) o SRP Section 2.4.3, "Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) on Streams and Rivers" o SRP Section 2.4.4, "Potential Dam Failures"

• ANSI/ANS-2.8, "Determining Design Basis Flooding at Power Reactor Sites," and IAA_ UACE_ SOW_ TO9_ Generic_ r4 ( 1) .docx Page 1 of9

• JLD-ISG-2013-01, "Interim Staff Guidance for Estimating Flooding Hazards due to Dam Failure."

JLD-ISG-2013-01 states that in the case of dams and levees owned or operated by U.S.

Federal agencies, the Federal agency responsible for (i.e., owner or operator of) the dam should be involved in supporting the dam failure flood hazard evaluation. It is critical for the owner or operator of the dam to assist the NRC or its licensees when modifying the assumptions or methods used to develop the inundation maps for a specific area. If a Federally owned dam is identified as critical to the flooding reanalysis, the licensee should contact the NRC promptly. The NRC will act as the interface between these agencies and licensees.

The USACE has trained specialists who possess the in-depth knowledge and highly specialized experience needed to deal with the highly complex issues associated with dams and most of the dams of concern are built, operated, and/or regulated and by United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). It is for this reason that the NRC entered into an lnteragency Agreement (IAA) No. NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 with the USACE which has a staff of highly trained specialists who possess the knowledge, skills and expertise to address a variety of hydrologic issues associated with their dams and the potential impacts of dam failure on NPP sites.

The NRC has received letters from a number of its licensees requesting assistance in obtaining information on dams upstream of their NPP sites to complete the Probable Maximum Flood and Dam Failure Hazard Evaluations for the purpose of responding to the 50.54(f) letter. In lieu of providing the requested dam information directly to these licensees, the objective of this task order is to obtain technical expertise from USACE to assist the NRC in determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with the dams that may affect the safe reliable operation of these licensees' NPPs. This task order may also be used to obtain technical expertise from USACE in eva luating the consequences of dam failures for licensees that have not requested assistance from the NRC.

Task Order NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 (TO4) under lnteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 provides a mechanism for funding USACE's efforts to assist the NRC in beginning to determine the safety significance of hydrologic, structural, and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that may affect the safe reliable operation of one or more NPPs. Letters of Technical Direction (LTDs) issued under TO4 request t he development of an Engineering Screening Report for NPP site(s) which will (1) recommend those dams that should be classified as potentially critical per NRC guidance and (2) provide a recommendation on the methodologies for estimating the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) and Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) at the NPP site(s) and each of the potentially critical dam(s). TO4 also involves the development of a Proposal implementing the recommendations provided in the Engineering Screening Reports. The Engineering Screening Reports and corresponding Proposals developed under TO4 are then intended to serve as the basis for the LTDs developed under this Task Order.

2.0 OBJECTIVE The object of this task order is to obtain technical expertise from USACE to assist the NRC in determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with the operation and failure of dams that may inundate NPP sites. The primary deliverables for this project will be time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including associated Excel spreadsheets, for several locations in the vicinity of each NPP site specified in LTDs. A Technical Letter Report (TLR) documenting the development of the hydrographs will also be provided.

3.0 SCOPE OF WORK IAA_ UACE_SOW_T09_Generic_r4 (1).docx Page 2 of 9

Prepare hydrographs and predict the peak potential water surface elevations in the vicinity of the specified NPP sites resulting from dam operation and failure using the probable maximum flood guidance provided in SRP Sections 2.4.3 and 2.4.4, ANSI/ANS-2.8, and JLD-ISG-2013-

01. The NPP sites to be evaluated will be identified in subsequent Letters of Technical Direction (LTDs).

4.0 SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES The USACE should repeat the series of specific activities listed below for each NPP site as directed in subsequent LTDs:

Activity #1 - Develop Preliminary Hydrographs and Technical Letter Report The intent of Activity 1 is to develop the time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including associated Excel spreadsheets, at a number of locations in the vicinity of the NPP site(s) identified in the LTD. The hydrographs will be based on NRC guidance, the specific PMP and PMF approaches for the specified NPP site and the potentially critical dams identified in LTD.

• Develop and/or modify, as appropriate, site-specific PMP and PMF at the NPP site and at each of the potentially critical dams

• Develop, modify, and/or execute, as appropriate, hydrologic/hydraulic model(s) for various flooding scenarios, such as but not limited to:

o Maximum controlled releases o Sunny day failures o Seismic failures o Hydrologic (failures/no failures, as appropriate) with dam-specific and basin PMPs

• Generate preliminary time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs and the accompanying Excel spreadsheets at the requested locations.

• Document the hydrologic/hydraulic model and resulting hydrographs in a preliminary TLR following a format similar to that submitted for the Fort Calhoun and Cooper NPP sites under Task Order NRC-HQ-013-l-03-0021-T001.

This activity also includes providing USACE financial sup,port and NRC reports.

Activity #2 - Host Intermediate Technical Review Meeting(s)

The intent of Activity #2 is to host intermediate technical review meeting(s) to allow the attendees to review draft products such as preliminary hydrographs and TLR developed as part of Activity #1. The meeting is intended to provide the attendees an opportunity to ask questions, review assumptions, and confirm that the analyses are following the guidance of SRP 2.4.3, SPR 2.4.4, ANSI/AN-2.8, and JLD-ISG-2013-01 .

• Set up, host, and participate in multi-day meetings with the NRC, and optionally, other entities such as NRC's licensee(s), other agencies, and dam owners at either one of USACE district/division offices in the vicinity of NRC's licensees or at NRC's headquarters in Rockville, MD.

• Participate in additional technical meetings as specified in the LTD.

Activity #3 - Develop Final Hydrographs and Technical Letter Report IAA_ UACE_SOW_T09_Generic_r4 (1).docx Page 3 of 9

The intent of Activity #3 is to document the analysis results, including the final hydrographs and other information, as appropriate, in a final version of the TLR. Other information (such as river valley cross-sections), as identified in the LTD, should be provided as well. Calculation packages, including input and output files from computer model runs that support the key TLR conclusions, should also be provided.

Activity #4 - Participate in Presenting Results The intent of Activity #4 is to participate in a presentation of results to NRC staff and optionally, other entities such as NRC's licensee(s), other agencies, and dam owners, including responding to questions regarding the deliverables and results generated by this Task Order.

• Set up, host, and participate in a multi-day meeting with the NRC and optionally other entities such as NRC's licensee(s), other agencies, and dam owners in either one of USAGE district/division offices in the vicinity of NRC's licensee(s), or participate in such meetings at NRC's headquarters in Rockville, MD, or other locations in the DC metro area. A portion of these meetings covering non-FOUO material may be open to the public, requiring that the public be provided access to the meeting.

5.0 DELIVERABLES AND/OR MILESTONES SCHEDULE The following deliverables and milestones are applicable to each LTD:

Activity Deliverable/Milestone Description Due Date

1. 1 Develop Preliminary Hydrographs and Technical

• Preliminary hydrographs, Letter Report associated Excel spreadsheets, and

• Preliminary hydrographs and associated Excel spreadsheets preliminary TLR due 60 working days after receipt of

• Preliminary Technical Letter Report the LTD

• USAGE financial support activities and NRC

• Financial support and reporting reporting are ongoing activities

1. 2 Host Intermediate Technical Review Meeting(s)

• Intermediate Technical Review Meetings to be scheduled as needed

1. 3 Develop Final Hydrographs and Technical Letter

• Draft final hydrographs and Report TLR due 20 working days

• Final hydrographs and associated Excel after the last Intermediate spreadsheets Technical Review Meeting

• Calculation packages, including input and

• Final TLR, calculation output files packages, and other information due 10 working

• Other requested information days after receipt of NRC comments on the draft final TER

1. 4 Participate in Presenting Results

• To be scheduled as needed 6.0 TECHNICAL AND OTHER SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED IAA_ UACE_SOW_T09_Generic_r4 (1).docx Page 4 of 9

The work requires staff with expertise in the following are-as:

• Senior Hydrologic/Hydraulic Engineers (HE) on a part-time, intermittent basis with expertise in dam breach modeling and flood inundation analysis using the latest computer programs available in this field, such as the Hydrologic Engineering Center-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) and the Hydrologic Engineering Center-Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS).

• Senior Geotechnical Engineers (GE) and Senior Structural Engineers (SE) on a part-time, intermittent basis with substantial experience in seismological engineering principles, to serve as the Principal Investigator, with expertise in seismically-induced liquefaction analysis of rock fill dams and in computer modeling techniques, including finite element analysis techniques. In addition, this individual should have experience with dynamic seismic slope stability analyses of embankment dams.

• Program Manager (PM) and Programs Analyst (PA) on a part-time, intermittent basis to provide assistance in collaborating with the NRC in drafting the NRC's Statement of Work and USACE's technical and cost Proposal.

• Other expertise (such as geological or mechanical) on a case-by-case basis.

IAA_ UACE_SOW_T09_Generic_r4 (1).docx Page 5 of 9

7.0 ESTIMATED LABOR CATEGORIES AND LEVELS OF EFFORT The following level of effort estimate is anticipated:

Activitv Labor Cateaorv Estimated Labor Hours Dam Safety Program Manager 4,550 Hydraulic Engineer 4,550 Technical Geotechnical Engineer 0 Structural Engineer 0

1. 1 Special Projects PM 130 Task Order PM 130 Project Proarams Branch Lead Analyst 130 Management Proarams Branch Task Order Analyst 130 Programs Branch P2 Scheduler 65 Dam Safety Proaram Manaaer 288 Hydraulic Enaineer 288 Technical Geotechnical Engineer 288 Structural Engineer 288

1. 2 Special Projects PM 0 Task Order PM 0 Project Programs Branch Lead Analyst 0 Management Programs Branch Task Order Analyst 0 Programs Branch P2 Scheduler 0 Dam Safety Proaram Manaaer 1,560 Hydraulic Enaineer 1,560 Technical Geotechnical Enaineer 3,510 Structural Engineer 2,015

1. 3 Special Projects PM 65 Task Order PM 65 Project Programs Branch Lead Analyst 65 Management Programs Branch Task Order Analyst 65 Programs Branch P2 Scheduler 0 Dam Safety Program Manager 0 Hydraulic Engineer 192 Technical Geotechnical Engineer 192 Structural Enaineer 0

1. 4 Special Proiects PM 0 Task Order PM 0 Project Programs Branch Lead Analyst 0 Management Programs Branch Task Order Analyst 0 Programs Branch P2 Scheduler 0 TOTAL 20,126 The NRC expects to issue six LTDs under this task order.

IAA_ UACE_ SOW_ TO9_ Generic_ r4 (1) .docx Page 6 of 9

8.0 MEETINGS AND TRAVEL All travel requires written Government approval from the CO, unless otherwise delegated to the COR.

The following travel is anticipated for each LTD:

• For Activity #2, Host Intermediate Technical Review Meeting(s)

Two, three-day meetings at a USACE district/division office or NRC's headquarters in Rockville, MD, requiring three USACE personnel to travel long-distance to the district/division office and/or Rockville, MD. Depending upon the meeting location, the local geographic district team members may also necessitate local travel.

Other technical meetings as specified in the LTD.

• For Activity #4, Participate in Presenting Results Two, two-day meetings at a USAGE district/division office, NRC's headquarters in Rockville, MD, or another location in the DC metro area, requiring three USACE personnel to travel long-distance to the district/division office, Rockville, MD, or the DC metro area. Depending upon the meeting location, the local geographic district team members may also necessitate local travel.

Foreign travel for servicing agency personnel requires a 60-day lead time for NRC approval. For prior approval of foreign travel, the servicing agency shall submit an NRC Form 445, "Request for Approval of Official Foreign Travel." NRC Form 445 is available in the MD 11.7 Documents library and on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/forms/.

Foreign travel is approved by the NRC Executive Director for Operations (EDO).

9.0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS The servicing agency is responsible for structuring the deliverable to follow agency standards.

The current agency standard is Microsoft Office Suite 2010. The current agency Portable Document Format (PDF) standard is Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional. Deliverables must be submitted free of spelling and grammatical errors and conform to requirements stated in this section.

Status Reports The servicing agency must electronically submit a Monthly Letter Status Report (MLSR) to the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) with copies to the Contracting Officer (CO), Chris Cook (Chrisopher.Cook@nrc .gov) and the Office Administration/Division of Contracts to ContractsPOT.Resource@nrc.gov. If a project is a task ordering agreement, a separate status report must be submitted for each task order with a summary project status report, even if no work has been performed during a reporting period. Once NRC has determined that all work on a task order is completed and that final costs are acceptable, a task order may be omitted from the MLSR.

At a minimum, the status report must include the informat ion discussed in Attachment 1, Status Report Requirements.

10.0 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE IAA_UACE_ SOW_T09_Generic_r4 ( 1).docx Page 7 of 9

The estimated period of performance for this work from date of agreement award to September 29, 2017.

11.0 CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE The COR monitors all technical aspects of the agreement/task order and assists in its administration. The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the servicing agency performs the technical requirements of the agreement/task order; perform inspections necessary in connection with agreement/task order performance; maintain written and oral communications with the servicing agency concerning technical aspects of the agreement/task order; issue written interpretations of technical requirements, including Government drawings, designs, specifications; monitor the servicing agency's performance and notify the servicing agency of any deficiencies; coordinate availability of NRG-furnished material and/or GFP; and provide site entry of servicing agency personnel.

Contracting Officer's Representative Name: Brad Harvey Agency: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: Office of New Reactors Mail Stop: T-7F27 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-Mail: Brad.Harvey@nrc.gov Phone: 301 -41 5-41 18 Alternate Contracting Officer's Representative Name: Kenneth See Agency: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office: Office of New Reactors Mail Stop: T-7F27 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-Mail: Kenneth.See@nrc.gov Phone: 301-415-1508 12.0 MATERIALS REQUIRED Not applicable.

13.0 NRC-FURNISHED PROPERTY/MATERIALS The NRC will provide copies of the licensee request and submission information, along with the appropriate sections of the licensee's Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) that might have been referenced in the licensee's request.

14.0 RESEARCH QUALITY Not applicable.

15.0 STANDARDS FOR CONTRACTORS WHO PREPARE NUREG-SERIES MANUSCRIPTS Not applicable.

IAA_ UACE_SOW_T09_Generic_r4 (1).docx Page 8 of 9

16.0 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS References ANSI/ANS (1992), Determining Design Basis Flooding at Nuclear Power Plant Sites, ANSI/ANS Standard 2.8, American National Standards Institute/American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL.

USNRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2007), Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0800, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-co Ilection s/n uregs/staff/sr0800/ch2/.

USNRC (2013), "Guidance For Assessment of Flooding Hazards Due to Dam Failure," Japan Lessons-Learned Project Directorate, Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2013-01 ,

Revision 0, July 29, 2013, ADAMS Accession No. ML13151A153.

Access to Non-NRC Facilities/Equipment Not applicable.

Applicable Publications Not applicable.

Controls over document handling and non-disclosure of materials The deliverables provided by USACE under this task order may be classified as SUNSI (sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information). The deliverables may be stamped by the USAGE with For Official Use Only (FOUO) and/or contain a Do Not Distribute tag. Such deliverables will be handled as SUNSI materials under NRC's procedures.

IAA_ UACE_SOW_T09_Generic_r4 (1).docx Page 9 of 9

INTERAGENCY A GREEMENT r,IM NO.

IPA:E OF NRC- HQ 15-T- 0009 I 3 2.0RDER NO. 13. REQUISITION NO. 14. SOLICITATION NO.

NR0 0128

5. EFFECTIVE DATE 16. AWARD DATE 7. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 08/25/20 15 08/25/2015 08/25/2015 TO 08/24/2016

8. SERVICING AGENCY 9. DELIVERTO ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS US NUCLEAR RGULATORY COMMISSION ALC : 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE DUNS : + 4: ATTN BRAD HARVEY PROGRAM PROJECT PLANNING DIVISION MAIL STOP T-7F27 SPECIAL PROJECTS BRANCH ROCKVILLE MD 20852-2738 CENWO-PM-S l(b)(6) 1616 CAPITOL AVENUE I

OMAHA NE 68102-4901 POC TELEPHONE NO.

r )(6)

10. REQUESTING AGENCY I 11. INVOICE OFFICE ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ALC : 3100000 1 ONE WH ITE FLINT NORTH DUNS : 040535809 +4 :

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 11555 ROCKVILLE PI KE ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH MAILSTOP 03 - El7A 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE ROCKVILLE MD 20852-2738 ROCKVILLE MD 20852- 2738 PQC TELEPHONE NO.

12. ISSUING OFFICE 13. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Economy Act US NRC - HQ ACQUISI TION MANAGEMENT DIVISION MAIL STOP TWFN-5E0 3 WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001 14. PROJECT ID

15. PROJECT TITLE SEE BLOCK 18

16. ACCOUNTING DATA 2015 - X020 0- FEEBASED 25D005 4- 212- 1062 - 251B 17, 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Master IAA : NRCHQ13I030021 00001 Is suance of new Task Order No . 234 , 961 . 28 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 . entitled , "Review of Recommendation 2 . 1 Flood Re-evaluations as part of 50 . 54(F) Response "

Tota l Obligated Amount$234 , 961. 28 Incrementally Funded Amount : $234 , 961 . 00 The performance p eri od for this t ask order is August 25 , 2015 - August 24 , 2016 .

Continued . ..

23. PAYMENT PROVISIONS 124. TOTAL AMOUNT

$234 , 961 . 00 25a. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE (SERVICING) 26a. SIGNATURE OF GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE (REQUESTING) 7'?'../4.../4-.+-..,...,__,, __

25b. NAME AND TITLE I25c. DATE 26b. CONTRACTING OFFICER I26c. DATE MICHAEL A. TURNER 09/03/2015

IAANO IORDER NO PAGE NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 2 Consideration and Obligations :

(a) The Authorized Cost Ceiling for the work to

~ e accomplished under this task order , exclusive of the Optional Tasks identified in the attached s tatement of work is $234 , 961 . 28 .

(b) The amount presently obligated with respect to this task order is $234 , 961 . 00 . When and if t he amount(s) paid and payable to the USACE h ereunder shall equal the obligated amount , the USACE shall not be obligated to continue p erformance of the work unless a nd until the NRC Contracting Offi cer shall increase the amount obligated with respect to this Agreement . Any wo rk undertaken by USACE in excess of the obligated amount specified above is done so at USACE ' s sole risk .

Schedule of Required Tasks :

Moderate Complex Review Task 1 - Orientation Task 2 - Preliminary Technical Evaluation Report Task 3 - Final Technical Evaluation Report High Comple x Review Task 1 - Orientation Task 2 - Preliminary Technical Evaluation Report Task 3 - Final Technical Eva luat i on Report Total Authorized Cost Ceiling ..... $234 , 961 . 28 The Government may require the delivery of t he numbered line item identified in the Schedule as an option item, in t he quantity and at the cost stated in the Schedule . The Contracting Officer will issue a modification to the Agreement to authorize the optional task .

Schedule of Optional Tasks :

High Complex Review #1 ($1 26 , 906 . 96)

Task 1 - Orientation Task 2 - Preliminary Technical Evaluation Report Task 3 - Final Technical Evaluation Report High Complex Review #2 ($126 , 906 . 96 )

Task 1 - Orientation Task 2 - Preliminary Technical Evaluation Report Task 3 - Final Technical Evaluation Report Continued ...

IAANO NRC-HQ 15-T-0009 IOROER NO PAGE 3

The fo l lowing document is hereby made part of this Agreement :

(1 ) Statement of Work (Attachment No . 1)

[ X] Fee Recoverable Work

[ ] Non-fee Recoverable Work The total amount of award : $234 , 961 . 28 . The obligation for this award is shown in box 24 .

Version Control Date: November 1, 2014 STATEMENT OF WORK NRC Agreement Number NRC Agreement NRC Task Order Number NRC Task Order Modification Modification Number (If Applicable) Number (If Applicable)

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Project Title Review of Recommendation 2. 1 Flood Re-evaluations as Part of 50.54(f) Response Common Cost Center Code B&R Number Servicing Agency 1062 2015-25-11-4-212 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Principal Investigator (if known):

- Name

- Address

- Phone

- Email NRC Requisitioning Office Office of New Reactors (NRO)

NRC Form 187, Contract Security and Classification Requirements 0 Involves Proprietary Information

[gi Applicable

[gl Involves Sensitive Unclassified 0 Not Applicable D Non Fee-Recoverable [8]Fee- Recoverable (If checked, complete all applicable sections below)

Docket Number (If Fee-Recoverable/Applicable) Inspection Report Number (If Fee Recoverable/Applicable)

To be provided via Letters of Technical Direction Not Applicable Technical Assignment Control Number (If Fee- Technical Assignment Control Number Description (If Fee-Recoverable/Applicable) Recoverable/Applicable)

To be provided via Letters of Technical Direction To be provided via Letters of Technical Direction

1.0 BACKGROUND

By letter dated March 12, 2012 (ML12053A340), the NRC issued a request for information to its nuclear power plant (NPP) licensees, hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter. The 50.54(f) letter was issued in connection with implementing so-called lessons-learned from the 201 1 accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant (ML111861807). The NRC Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1 , and subsequent Staff Requirements Memoranda associated with Commission Papers SECY 11-0 124 (ML11245A158) and SECY-11 -0137 (ML11272A111), instructed the NRC staff to issue requests for information to licensees pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). Enclosure 2 to the 50.54(f) letter requested licensees to perform, among other items, a flood hazard reevaluation using present-day methodologies and guidance.

Page 1 of 8

Version Control Date: November 1, 2014 Licensee submissions documenting this reevaluation are referred to as Flood Hazard Reevaluation Reports (FHRRs). The FHRR should contain , among other items, evaluation of the flood hazards from streams and rivers and from dam breaches and failures.

NRC staff will prod uce a Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR based on the results of reviews performed by the staff and its contractors. The SA will document the NRC staff's review to ensure licensees have provided sufficient information in their FHRRs to be responsive to the 50.54(f) letter. The SA will also document whether each reevaluated hazard bounds or does not bound the current design basis flood elevation. Moreover, if the reevaluated hazard for all flood-causing mechanisms is not bounded by the current plant-specific design basis flood, the SA will document whether the licensee's FHRR provides appropriate input to the licensee's subsequent Integrated Assessment.

2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of this agreement is to obtain technical expertise from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) to assist the NRC staff in reviewing certain flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) in the FHRRs provided by NRC licensees in response to the 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012, Recommendation 2.1:

Flooding. The reviews performed under this task order will provide the basis for determining whether or not the licensees have provided sufficient information to be responsive to Enclosure 2 of the 50.54(f) letter.

The USAGE should ensure the FHRR responses meet present-day regulatory guidance and methodologies as specified in NUREG-0800, "Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR Edition" (SRP), Section 2.4.3, "Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) on Streams and Rivers," and Section 2.4.4, "Potential Dam Failures."

Review work covering the Interim Actions proposed by licensees in the FHRRs, should reevaluated flood height(s) be greater than their licensing basis flood height, is not within the scope of this agreement.

The primary deliverable of this regulatory review shall be a Technical Evaluation Report (TER) which will serve as input to the NRC's Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR. The TER shall include USACE's assessment of key factors reported by the licensees in their FHRR submittals, including sufficiency of information relative to the 50.54(f) letter, documentation whether each reevaluated hazard reviewed bounds or does not bound the current design basis flood elevation, and whether the licensee's FHRR provides appropriate input to the licensee's subsequent Integrated Assessment in cases where the reevaluated hazard is not bounded by the current plant-specific design basis flood. All information necessary to support the selected conclusion should be in the TER document. The TER should be written in a manner whereby a person with either non-nuclear technical background or non-technical background could understand the basis for the NRC staff's conclusions.

3.0 SCOPE OF WORK The USAGE must provide all resources necessary to accomplish the tasks and deliverables described in this Statement of Work (SOW).

Page 2 of 8

Version Control Date: November 1, 2014 The NRC will issue letters of technical direction (LTDs) to the contractor that will identify:

• the sites for which the USACE will review the FHRR

• the flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) to be reviewed for each assigned site

• site audits and/or meetings to be attended

• the format for the TE R

• guidance regarding developing Requests for Additional Information (RAls) 4.0 SPECIFIC TASKS The USACE must perform the following tasks for each assigned site:

Deliverable/

Task Milestone

1. Task Description Description Due Date

1. ORIENTATION 1.a Prepare for and participate in an Attendance by Within 10 working orientation/kick-off meeting with the NRC to individuals as days after receipt of discuss the scope of the work, expectations, designated by the an assignment to review a lii censee's and contract management NRG staff FHRR submittal

2. PRELIMINARY TER AND RAIS 2.a Review the appropriate portions of a licensee's A list of documents for Within 10 working FHRR submittal to determine if there is a need the ERR days after receipt of for an electronic reading room (ERR). If yes, the assignment to review a lii censee's generate a list of documents that should be FHRR submittal place in the ERR.

2.b If requested, participate in an Audit, which may As necessary: Date, time, and occur as webinar or as a visit to either the

• List of Information location of Audit TBD licensee's site or office, or at NRC's Needs headquarters in Rockville, MD. Prior to the

• Participation in an Audit, assist the NRC staff in developing a list Audit of Information Needs; after the Audit, assist the

• Input to the NRC staff in preparing an Audit Report. resulting Audit Report Page 3 of 8

Version Control Date: November 1, 2014 Deliverable/

Task Milestone

1. Task Description Description Due Date 2.c Complete review of the licensee's submittal Draft pT ER and RAls Schedule for draft and prepare a draft Preliminary Technical (several rounds of pTER and RAls to be Evaluation Report (pTER) addressing each RAIS may be provided as documented in the assigned flood hazard mechanism. The draft necessary)

LTD pTER should conform to a template which will be provided by the NRC. Identify issues and needs for additional or clarifying information by assisting with development of draft Requests for Additional Information (RAls). The RAls should follow guidance that will be provided by the NRC. Participate in conference calls and meetings as required.

2.d Incorporate NRC staff comments and finalize Final pTER Final pTER to be the pTER provided within 10 working days of receipt of NRC staff comments 3 FINAL TER AND TECHNICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT 3.a Review licensee's response to RAls to Draft FTER and Draft FTE R and determine if they adequately resolve the Technical Review Technical Review outstanding issues. Update analyses Document Document to be provided as discussed in the pTER based on the licensee's documented in the responses. Incorporate the review results into LTD.

the final TER (FTER) and generate a Technical Review Document which documents the basis for the key TER conclusions.

3.b Incorporate NRC staff comments and finalize Final FTER and Final FTER and FTER and Technical Review Document Technical Review Technical Review Document Document to be provided within 10 working days of receipt of NRC staff comments Task 2.a involves reviewing the licensee's submittal to ensure that it contains sufficient technical information, both in scope and depth, for the USACE to begin its detailed technical review. Any information insufficiencies should be identified, including a list of documents that should be placed in an electronic reading room. Electronic reading rooms are intended to serve the purpose of a "virtual" audit of the licensee's calculation packages and other non-docketed materials. The materials in a reading room can only be viewed; they cannot be printed or saved.

The contractor should use these reading rooms to fullest extent possible.

In the process of preparing the pTER as part of Task 2.c, it may become necessary to seek additional information from the licensee explaining or amplifying a particular matter. Audits and RAls are necessary when the information is not included in the submittal or cannot be reasonably inferred from the information available to contractor. The request for hard and Page 4 of 8

Version Control Date: November 1, 2014 electronic copies of any materials (e.g., input and output files, datasets, better quality figures etc.) will require a RAI.

5.0 DELIVERABLES AND/OR MILESTONES SCHEDULE The list of deliverables and the milestone schedule is provided in Section 4.0 of this Statement of Work.

6.0 TECHNICAL AND OTHER SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED All personnel performing work under this agreement shall have pertinent technical experience by discipline and technical area, including Principal Investigators and team members. It is the responsibility of the USACE to propose technical staff, employees, subcontractors or specialists who have the required educational background, experience, or combination thereof, to meet both the technical and regulatory objectives of the work specified.

The work requires staff with expertise in the following areas:

• Senior Hydrologic/Hydraulic Engineers (HE) to seNe as the Principal Investigator on a part-time, intermittent basis with expertise in dam breach modeling and flood inundation analysis using the latest computer programs available in this field, such as the Hydrologic Engineering CenterRiver Analysis System (HEC-RAS) and the Hydrologic Engineering Center-Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) as well as two-dimensional models such as FLO-2D and RiverFLow-2D.

• Senior Geotechnical Engineers (GE) and Senior Structural Engineers (SE) on a parttime, intermittent basis with substantial experi,ence in seismological engineering principles, with expertise in seismically-induced liquefaction analysis of rock fill dams and in computer modeling techniques, including finite element analysis techniques. In addition, this individual should have experience with dynamic seismic slope stability analyses of embankment dams.

• Program Manager (PM) and Programs Analyst (PA) on a part-time, intermittent basis to provide project management, including interfacing with the NRC.

• Other expertise (such as geological or mechanical) on a case-by-case basis.

The names and resumes of the key personal assigned to this task order should be submitted for review and approval by the NRC upon receipt of each Letter of Technical Direction.

7.0 ESTIMATED LABOR CATEGORIES AND LEVELS OF EFFORT The contractor should cost their proposal assuming that Letters of Technical Direction will be issued for two FHRR reviews that will be performed in FY16. It is expected that the two FHRR reviews will be for the Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island NPP sites. Options to conduct up to two additional FHRR reviews should also be included in the proposal. It is expected that these two additional sites could be the Arkansas and Columbia NPP sites.

8.0 MEETINGS AND TRAVEL Page 5 of 8

Version Control Date: November 1, 2014 For each assigned site review, the following travel assumptions should be considered in planning the work effort.

• Two (2), three (3) person , five (5) day trips to the site, licensee offices, and/or to NRC headquarters for a meeting or audit, if requested.

All travel requires written Government approval from the CO (Contracting Officer), unless otherwise delegated to the COR (Contracting Officer Representative). Travel in excess of the total number of person-trips must be approved by the CO; travel within the work scope limits will be approved by the COR.

Foreign travel for servicing agency personnel requires a 60-day lead time for NRC approval. For prior approval of foreign travel, the servicing agency shall submit an NRC Form 445, "Request for Approval of Official Foreign Travel." NRC Form 445 is available in the MD 11.7 Documents library and on the NRC Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/forms/.

Foreign travel is approved by the NRC Executive Director for Operations (EDO).

9.0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS The servicing agency is responsible for structuring the deliverable to follow agency standards.

The current agency standard is Microsoft Office Suite 2010. The current agency Portable Document Format (PDF) standard is Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional. Deliverables must be submitted free of spelling and grammatical errors and conform to requirements stated in this section.

Status Reports The servicing agency must electronically submit a Monthly Letter Status Report (MLSR) to the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) with copies to the Contracting Officer (CO) and the Office Administration/Division of Contracts to ContractsPOT.Resource@nrc.gov. If a project is a task ordering agreement, a separate status report must be submitted for each task order with a summary project status report, even if no work has been performed during a reporting period.

Once NRC has determined that all work on a task order is completed and that final costs are acceptable, a task order may be omitted from the MLSR.

At a minimum, the status report must include the informat ion discussed in Attachment 1, Status Report Requirements.

10.0 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The estimated period of performance for this work is one year from date of agreement award.

11.0 CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE The COR monitors all technical aspects of the agreement/task order and assists in its administration. The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the Page 6 of 8

Version Control Date: November 1, 2014 servicing agency performs the technical requirements of the agreement/task order; perform inspections necessary in connection with agreement/task order performance; maintain written and oral communications with the servicing agency concerning technical aspects of the agreement/task order; issue written interpretations of technical requirements, including Government drawings, designs, specifications; monitor the servicing agency's performance and notify the servicing agency of any deficiencies; coordinate availability of NRG-furnished material and/or GFP; and provide site entry of servicing agency personnel.

Contracting Officer's Representative Brad Harvey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of New Reactors Mail Stop: T-7F27 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-Mail: Brad.Harvey@nrc.gov Phone: 301-415-41 18 Alternate Contracting Officer's Representative Kenneth See U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of New Reactors Mail Stop: T-7F27 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-Mail: Kenneth.See@nrc.gov Phone: 301-415-1508 12.0 MATERIALS REQUIRED Prior to any purchasing any software exceeding $500, the USACE should contact the COR with any software requisition requests for approval. The software requisition request should clearly justify why the software purchase is necessary.

13.0 NRC-FURNISHED PROPERTY/MATERIALS The NRC will provide copies of the licensee FHRR submission information , along with the appropriate sections of the licensee's Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) that might have been referenced in the licensee's FHRR submittal.

14.0 RESEARCH QUALITY Not applicable.

15.0 STANDARDS FOR CONTRACTORS WHO PREPARE NUREG-SERIES MANUSCRIPTS Not applicable.

Page 7 of 8

Version Control Date: November 1, 2014 16.0 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS References

• March 12, 2012 50.54(f) letter. (ML12053A340)

Access to Non-NRC Facilities/Equipment Not applicable.

Applicable Publications Guidance for assessment of flooding hazards at nuclear power plant sites due to probable maximum floods on stream and rivers and due to potential dam failure is provided in the following documents:

• USNRC (2007), Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0800, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.

o Section 2.4.3, Revision 4, Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) on Streams and Rivers. (ML070730405) o Section 2.4.4, Revision 3, Potential Dam Failures. (ML070730417)

• USNRC (1977), Design Basis Floods for Nuclear Power Plants, Regulatory Guide 1.59, Rev. 2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC. (ML003740388)

• ANSI/ANS (1992), Determining Design Basis Flooding at Nuclear Power Plant Sites, ANSI/ANS Standard 2.8, American National Standards Institute/American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL.

• JLD-ISG-13-01 , "Interim Staff Guidance for Estimating Flooding Hazards due to Dam Failure." (ML13151A153)

• USN RC (2011 ), Design-Basis Flood Estimation for Site Characterization at Nuclear Power Plants in the United States of America, NUREG/CR-7046, Prepared by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.

(ML11321A195)

Controls over document handling and non-disclosure of materials The FHRR submittals provided by the licensees and the deliverables provided by the USACE under this task order may be classified as SUNSI (sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information). The USACE may be stamped by the USAGE with For Official Use Only (FOUO) and/or contain a Do Not Distribute tag. Such documents will be handled as SUNSI materials under NRC's procedures.

Page 8 of 8

From: (b)(6)

To:

Victor Bracl: campben. Andy: cook Christopher; !(b)(6)

Harvey.

Cc: l"::""::'::':'"---"""t-.,.J b)(6) I Hall. .....,.......,_ _ _ _ _ __

Subject:

[External_Sender] NRC

• USACE PgMP (UNCLASSIFIED)

Date: Friday, December 18, 2015 1:55:30 PM Attachments: REY01 FINAL NRC EP9MP** 201SDEC18 pdf REYQl FINAL NRC EP9MP .. 2015DEC18 Hjgh(jght.docx Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE l(b)(6)

Many apologies for the delay in responding on the task to incorporate language pertaining to the MMC and RMC in the NRC-USACE Program Management Plan.

Due to the multiple delays, the NRC team is provided an updated copy for determination if the document requires a rerouting for concurrence within NRC. The signature authority for the NRC remains with Bill Dean.

The WORD document has the added text highlighted in Yellow. The PDF is a clean version for your use .

There has been a significant change in staffing in Omaha. I have accepted a promotion to tJ1e position of Chief of the Programs Management Branch in Omaha District. I will be starting my new position on 28 Dec 15 in order to have a few days of transition wit11!(bX6) !Twill remain your point of contact for the signature of the PgMP. j1h)/fi) jwill be responsible for the NRC program.

I will be available during ... l(b_)(_6_

) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __,

!(b)(6)

HS Program Manager, Special Projects Branch USACE, Northwestern Division, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue, CENWO-PM-S Omaha, NE 68102 Desk: l'.b)(6)

Cell: . (b-)(6_)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____

Email:P"l Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE

m US Army Corps of Engineerst

~ U.S.NRC Uni1cd Su11c1 Nude-Jr Rc:gul:uory Cornmmlon Prottctiug P~ople mu/ 1ht E11viromn.t11t Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

Enterprise Program Management Plan (EPgMP)

Technical Assistance for Evaluation of Potential Flooding at Nuclear Power Plants Sites due to Dam Failure HQ US Army Corps of Engineers Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chief, Interagency and International Services Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Charles R. " Ray" Alexander, SES Regulation, William Dean, SES Date: _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ _ _ _ _ __

Table of Contents

1. General

a. Purpose

b. Updates to the Program Management Plan

c. References

d. Program Goal

e. Program Risks

2. Program Team

a. Management Approach

b. Roles and Responsibilities

3. Program Management

a. Communications

b. Scope of management

c. Schedule Management

d. Risk Management

e. Acquisition Management

f. Management Information Systems

4. Program Governance

a. Authorizations and Appropriations

b. Levels of Engagement

5. Financial Management

a. Transfer of Funds

b. Design Budget

c. Operational Financial Management Annex A. Organizational Charts, Nuclear Power Plant Sites and Points of Contact list Annex B. Glossary Note: HQUSACE Divisions are responsible for preparation and updates for their specific Annexes to each Enterprise Program Management Plan.

2

1.0 General

a. Purpose. This Enterprise Program Management Plan (EPgMP) establishes management concepts, principles, and procedures for s uccessfully executing USACE national technical support programs and requirements for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR). This EPgMP applies to all Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements related to assessment of post-Fukushima flooding hazards at nuclear power plant sites due to the potential fai lure of upstream dams for a variety of reasons.

b. Updates and Termination of the Enterprise Program Management Plan. This EPgMP shall become effective when signed by both NRC and USACE. Updates to the EPgMP will be managed by the HQUSACE National Program Manager (NPgM) to reflect significant changes in business processes, stakeholder requirements, internal and external factors, clarifications, and lessons learned. If required, the NPM will make updates to this EPgMP after coordinating with the appropriate proponent and stakeholders. Updates will be incorporated into the body of this EPgMP. Either party may terminate this EPgMP by providing written notice to the other party. The termination will be effective upon the ninetieth (90th) calendar day follow ing the notice, unless a later date is set forth. In the event of termination, NRC will continue to be responsible for all costs incurred by the USACE under this EPgMP and for the costs of c losing out or transferring any on-going contracts.

c. References. Following are references that apply across all programs. Please refer to specific annexes o r append ices for individual program references.

1) Management, USACE Business Process, ER 5-1-11 (PMBP). This regulation establishes policy and doctrine to accomplish all work performed by USACE.

https://team.usace.army.mil/sites/HO-MP/milcon/Shared%20Documents/ER%205- l -

l l ;%20PMBP%20with%2012%20Jan%202007%20Cover%20 Letter%20Update.pdf

2) USACE Enterprise Lessons Learned (ELL) The Enterprise Lessons Learned (ELL) program consists of people, processes, and tools that support USACE's collection, ana lysis, and implementation of validated lessons learned. It will help manage institutional knowledge and improve services to our customers.

https://apps.usace.army.mil/sites/ELL/SitePages/Home.aspx

3) Military Programs Operations Order ( MP OPORD): This OPORD provides annual guidance for executing USACE Mi litary Programs mission requirements.

https://team.usace.army.mil/sites/HO-MP/opord/default.aspx

4) Quality Management System (QMS): The Quality M anagement System is an enterprise-wide framework that describes USACE standard business processes.

https://apps.usace.anny.mil/sites/QMS/defaull.aspx

5) USACE Command Consolidated Guidance (CCG). The CCG represents the cun-ent blueprint for pursuing the USACE vision and strategy.

https://intranet.usace.anny.mil/hg/rm/Pages/ccg.aspx

6) Engineer Regulation, ER 5-1-9, Management - Assignment and Transfer of Project Responsibilities, 15 March 1996. T his ER establishes project brokering policy, guidance, and procedures 3

for all projects assigned to the US Army Corps o f Engineers (USACE) consistent with USACE management philosophy.

htlp://140.194.76. 129/p ublications/eng-regs/ER 5- 1-9/toc.htm

7) Engineer Regulation, ER 5 10, Corps-wide Areas of Work Responsibility, 30 September 1997.

http:/1140.194.76. 129/publicatio ns/eng-regs/ER 5 10/toc.htm

8) Engineer Regulation, ER 5-1-11, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Business Process

9) Memorandum (CEMP-ZB), Adherence to Mission Assignments and Alignment of Acquisitions with Missions- DIRECTORATE POLICY MEMORANDUM, 20 M ay 2013 https://team.usace.arm y.mil/sites/HO-MP/milcon/Shared%20Documents/Adherence%20to%20Mission%20Assignments--CEMP-ZB%2020%20May%2020 13.pd f

10) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, lnteragency Agreement NRC-HQ- 13-1 0021 Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated w ith Failure of Dams (September 24, 2013) l L) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Request for information letter to seismic, flooding and emergency preparedness (March 12, 20 I2) http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/flooding.html

12) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, prioritization of plants for completing fl ood hazard reevaluations (May 11 , 2012) http://www.nrc.gov/reacto rs/operating/ops-experience/ japan-dashboard/Oooding.htmJ

13) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, issued guidance for assessing flooding hazards due to dam failure (JLD -lSG-2013-01) (July 29, 2013) http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/flooding.html

14) Design-Basis Flood Estimation for Site Characterization at Nuclear Power Plants in the United States of America (NUREG/CR-7046) http://www.nrc. gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/n uregs/contract/ cr7046/

I 5) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800),

sections 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rrn/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/

16) American Nuclear Society (ANSI/ANS -2.8 1992), Determining Design Basis Flooding at Power Reactor Sites

d. Program Goal: The goal of this program is for USACE efforts to allow NRC to plan and develop guidance for safe operation of downstream nuclear power plants (NPP) . Work will include semen river system dams to determine potential for significant impact to downstream NPP in event of failu-re or certain conditions, delermine which failure modes are credible, evaluate failure modes for critical dams, develop hydrographs related to those dams and failure modes, estimate stage, velocity and d ischarge time-series in rivers near NPP under various flooding and fail ure scenarios, prepare an FOUO Technical Letter Report (TLR) for each NPP fac ility and brief find ings to NRC and Licensee(s).

4

e. Program Risks: R isk associated with the execution of the project requirements as identifi ed by the technical review will be ide ntified by the capabilities sourd ng district and outlined on the D istrict PMP.

2.0 Program Team.

a. Management Approach. USACE will work closely with Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR) representatives and other stakeholders to and achieve a collaborative partnership at all levels. USACE and NRC/NRR will coordinate policy changes and process improvements that may impact program execution prior to issuance. USACE Program Management will be in accorda nce with USACE Project Management Business Process, as described in ER-5-1-11 (Reference 1.c.1). USACE will execute the program through Major Subordinate Commands (MSCs) Centers, Geographic Districts and offices approved to support special initiatives. The Program Team approach is to embrace the goals and objectives stated in this EPgMP, establ ish a collaborative knowledge-sharing environmen t, and capture/apply lessons learned to the execution process.

b. Roles and Responsibilities.

I ) U.S. Army Corps of Eng ineers (USACE). USACE is a designated DoD Constructio n Agent per DoD 4270.5 for Military Co nstruction (MILCON) and has many technical capabilities that can support this partnership. Pursua nt of the Economy in Government Act (3 1 USC 1535) USACE will provide technical assistance to NRC/NRR to perform flood ing hazard reevaluations at the designated nuclear power plant (NPP) locations shown in Figure 1. USACE will employ capabilities not limited to; Technical Assistance and expertise in Dam assessments and safety. When exercising this agreement, the NRC/NRR will assume complete responsibilities for evaluati ng the needs for and implementing any regulatory actions for its licensees based on the results of the flood hazard reevaluations being performed by USACE. Specific projects w ill be identified by NRC/NRR and requested in writing through the National Program Manager (NPgM). HQUSACE' s NPgM will coordinate with the appropriate MSC or district Programs Director for required project execution.

(a) Headquarters USACE is respo nsible for enterprise-wide program management, program integration, policy development, and performance assessment. HQUSACE assigns a USACE National Program Manager (NPgM) to serve as the primary point of contact for program related issues, initiatives, and reports on program status.

(b) The National Program Manager for this partnership is the Omaha District. The National Program Manager is responsible for:

- Communicating w ith NRC/NRR and other national level stakeholders;

- Integrating the efforts of USACE Regional Business Centers and mission lines, a nd insure USACE business processes are fo llowed;

- Integrating the development of program resource/funding requirements;

- Ensuring timely a nd proper authority for work undertaken by USACE Regional Business Centers and districts;

- Managing and facilitating resolution of program issues;

- Providing fin anc ial manageme nt at the enterprise/program level;

-Ensuring that proper funding is issued to the Geog raphic Districts;

-Ensuring programmatic financial tracking reports are provided to NRC/NRR on a monthly basis, and provide other coordination as required for programmatic success.

5

o*

Figure 1 - NPP Locations where USACE is Providing Technical Assistance to the NRC/NRR in Performing Flooding Hazard Reevaluations (c) USACE Major S ubordinate Commands. MSCs manage the Regional Business Centers (RBC) to facilitate program execution and utilize technical resources and innovative practices through its districts. MSCs are responsible for vertical and horizontal coordination and integration, to drive regional excellence, and to ensure integration of Regional capability across Geographic Districts and centers of expertise is seamless. MSCs perform quality assurance of the geographic processes through periodic evaluations consistent with the USACE business process. This includes:

- Managing program execution and performance;

- Ensuring proper coordination between Geographic Districts and Centers of Expertise;

- Supporting resolution of programmatic issues among the vertical USACE team;

- Ensuring accurate and timely communication of program/project information in WebCMI, issues tracking, Current Working Estimates and d esign requests, and all upward reporting;

- Developing regional acquisition and execution plans, schedules, and resource requirements;

- Coordinating regional funding/scheduling require ments.

(d) Geographic Districts. The USACE Geographic District will normally be responsible for executing mission requirements within its area of responsibility. A mission requirement or project may be assigned to another district by the RBC in accordance with USACE policy ER 5-1-1 1 (reference paragraph 7.b.(1 )), and ER 5-1-9, Assignment and Transfer of Project Responsibil ities. PDTs may be made up of me mbers from across multiple organizations. Geog raphic district responsibilities typically include:

- Quality Management. The USACE Geographic District serves as the project manager and is responsible for day-to-day management of the technical assistance efforts including contract and quality administration and any other technical services provided.

- Proj ect management including identification of requirements for execution;

- Coordination with the stakeholders, MSCs and HQUSACE with interface through the NRC/NRR assigned PM;

- Complying with proj ect authorization and directives;

- Development of Project Budgets accounting for all PDT design; 6

- Financial management, metrics performance traclking and project reporting through established automated information systems such as P2, Resident Management System (RMS), Corps of Engineers Financial Management System (CEFMS).

The Geographic D istricts will execute all PM responsibilities, as well as the responsibility for the overall technical adequacy of the products produced as a result of the technical assistance for the proposed solutions to risk mitigation require ments. The distric t will conduct and document an independent technical review of all flooding hazard reevaluation and potential Dam failures by location as appropriate within their distTict boundaries. The focus of the work product is defining flood hazard. Any flood hazard identified as result ing from dam failure will rely o n existing dam safety products, and therefore the Geographic District will not require coordination with Risk Management Center on evaluating dam fai lure mechanisms.

The Geographic D istrict Proj ect Manager (USACE PM) chairs the technical assistance PDT and is responsible for the successful execution of their projects in accordance with this EPgMP, spec ific proj ect management plans and applicable policies. The USACE PM will develop a Proj ect Management Plan (PMP) for each project in coordination with other members of the PDT. The PMP establi shes the goals for the proj ect and identities PDT members, their roles, and their decision-making authorities. The PMP also establishes approved budget, schedule, acquisition method, and any special project requirements, including as referenced, the applicable change order management plan, financia.l management plan, etc. and any waivers required by this EPgMP during the life cycle of the project. It is updated by the District PM thro ughout the life cycle of the project.

e) Modeling, Mapping, and Consequences (MMC) Production Center. The USACE MMC Productio n Center was established as a national center of expertise charged with produc ing hydraulic models, inundation maps, consequence estimations, and detailed assessment reports follow ing USACE national standards.

The USACE National Program Technical Lead is responsible for:

- Serve as liaison between Geographic PDT and MMC leadership, and coordinating modeling efforts with MMC leadership;

- Review of all hydraulic models developed in accordance with MMC review standards to ensure all MMC standards are adhered to in development of hydraulic models used for flood risk assessment at NPP;

- Develop standard procedures in coordination with MMC leadership where work requirements may require deviation from MMC standard operating procedures.

The MMC Production Center is responsible for:

- Identifying personnel to assist each Geographic Distric t as needed to complete hydraulic modeling required as part of each evaluation;

- Serve as repository of all hydraulic models developed as part of the identified work effort.

2) Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of the N uclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR).

(a) NRC/NRR is responsible for the prioritization of the Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) sites that will be assessed for potential fl ood hazard. NRC/NRR provides policy, resource advocacy, and fi nancial 7

manage ment for execution of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation program requirements. This includes planning, programming, budgeting, and functional standards for Nuclear Power Plant facilities at risk.

NRC/NRR will provide project scope, direction, and funding for individual project sites and is the decision authority for program execution and for proj ect decisio ns that may be elevated by the proj ect teams.

(b) NRC/NRR is respo nsible for overseeing integration, and execution of public safety, rules, licensing, and oversight and incident response for the Nuclear Power Plants.

(c) NRC/NRR is responsible for defining the requirements yielded by the technical evaluations on potential dam fai lure and flood ing at to the NPP, Environmental Analysis Impac t Process (EAIP), wetlands, floodplain, etc.

3) The Technical Assistance Project Delivery Team (PDT): The TA PDT accomplishes all project executio n work that USACE is assigned. The District PM is the sole lead fo r the USACE TA PDT members and is responsible for coordination and oversight of the project from inception to completion. The PDT is comprjsed of members from the project user' s organization; NRC/NRR; and the associated district members as specified by geographical location. \

. Program Management.

a. Communications. The following meetings and reports are key communication components in the program management process.

1) Senior Executive Review Groups (SERGs): The intent of the SERG is to enhance national level communications, review program metrics, and d iscuss program issues and initiatives and areas for improvement. The NPgM will coordinate SERG meetings between HQUSACE and NRC/NRR senior representatives to review and d iscuss the Nuclear Regulatory Commission program requirements and as appropriate other mission lines. The SERG w ill be hosted by the HQUSACE Chief, Programs Integration Division. Participation includes representatives fro m HQUSACE, NRC/NRR, and others as required.

The SERG location will be at e ither HQUSACE or at NRC as coordinated before each SERG. Other program stakeholders may be cal led upon to participate as needed.

2) Line Item Reviews (LlRs): Requirements for LlRs wi ll be established in separate Annexes to outline requirements for respective mission as required.

3) HQ USACE will communicate openly and transparen tly with NRC on a regular basis. Routine coordination will include but not be limited to p hone calls, ema ils, and face-to-face coordinatio n meetings.

b. Scope of Management. The scope of this EPgMP includes all activity requirements deem necessary for strategic coord ination and program focus resolution in order to maintain the respective geographic MSC a nd project executing district timely with the delivery of the 8

project(s).

c. Schedule Management. The schedule of the requised mitigation strategies either in the form of project construction or simply an assessment will be determined by the project delivery team.

d. Risk Management. In coord ination with the PDT the respective dist:1ict PM will assess all risk associated with the nuclear power plant and project execution.

e. Acquisition Management. When required, the acquisition strategy will be defined by the proj ecl executing district.

f. Management Information Systems. The following systems will be used to compile, display and report program and project information.

1) Corps of Eng ineers F inanc ial Management System (CEFMS). CEFMS will be used for tracking, managing and reporting design and construction fund s. USACE will use CEFMS to identify unobligated balances and expiring funding. To the extent practical, Nuclear Regulatory Conunission project numbers w ill be included on all reports provided to the NRC/NRR.

2) Resident Management System (RMS). RMS is a USACE automated quality management and project contract administralion system. The system provides tools to plan and manage a project by integrating work specific requirements, corporate technical kno wledge, sched ule of required events and actual placement, project documentation, quality assurance functions, and management policies. RMS feeds proj ect contract data to Web CMI.

3) Web CMI. The USACE project management districts use Web CMI (P2) for the official project record. The USACE PM uses this scheduling and funding tool to plan and record all milestones.

Web CMT is a USACE internet-based information source that provides current and detailed data for all projects. Web CMI interfaces directly w ith RMS. The Internet address for the Web CMI is https://ppds. usace.army. mi1/ppds/home/

"* Program Governance.

a. Authorizations and Appropriations. The participation for this EPgMP between both agencies is pursuant the Economy Act (3 1 USC§ 1535). All required fund ing is based on a reimbursable basis from the N uclear Regulatory Conunission (NRC).

b. Levels of Engagement l ) HQ USACE Military Mission - Manages strategic communication with appropriate NRC designated officials in coordination with the National Program Manager.

2) National Program Manager - Manages the everyday interaction with NRC in order to ma intain clarity of intent and to further coordinate the planning and execution of requirements with the geographic district.

9

3) District Program Manager - Manages the everyday project tasks as required with NRC field contacts. Ensures that the projects or deliverables are provided timely and accurately.

5. Financial Management.

a. Transfer of Funds - All required funding w ill be provided in NRC Form 662 to the Omaha district. Funding will be disbursed appropriately to the geograp hicaJly project management d istrict.

b. Planning and Design !Budget - Any effort required for planning purposes as required by the technical assistance team will be funded on a reimbursable basis by NRC.

c. Operational Financial Management - All financial management required to meet this support task to NRC will be described in the project management district PMP. This plan will include but not limited to: Current Working Es timate, Contractor Claims, and Funds Revocation Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of' Contact a) The Directo r for the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will be Mr. B ill Dean effective October 1, 2014.

~ U.S.NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

~,...,,,-'*.t-

~ - -....i...ro..-

The Commission I-*- I!

I-= i i

nu ni

-- - bi -*- --

10

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation BIii Dean, Director Jennifer Uhle, Deputy Director for Program Manaoemem.

Reactor Safety Programs ..__ PolkY O.velOl)ment and An&l)'til SMrf Brian Hollian, Deputy Director for S ~ Abrnhom. Oire<:tor Eng ineering and Corporate Support I I I I ONblon of Oper~tmo Olvtsion of So1etY Systems DIVlsloo Of En<,lneeOflg DivisKN'I of Lk.ense Renewal Re iKtOf l k ensing Umolhy McGlnty, Dh'tcCOf JOOO lllblnskl, DlrtC10f C tulalOPf)el MIiiet, DiflClOC MICl,e._ Evans, Olftctot Rober1 Tay10f.Deputy Otrector M3:IY Jane Ron---Lee, Depu1y Director (Vacam) LGUlse Lund. Deputy DifectOf

(.Meting) Deputy Director o.puty Olrector IV&el fU)

I I I I Di't'isKll1 of Policy and Division of Risk DM16oo Of lnsp &

Ru ..mtiktng Jeipan UtsOflS Ltarntd OlvlSJon Aueumem Reolonst Suciport Lawrence KokaJko, Director J.Kk OaV1I, DlfectOf (Acting)

Joseph Giitter, Director S<:ott Monb. OirectOf Si'mJOn Lff, Oet>Uty OlrK tOf Allen Howe, Deputy Director ADy MOhsenl, Deputy 04fec1or Otputy Olre-ctor (Vacant)

Dts>tnY Director rvoc~u 11

Annex A

• Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) b) HQ USACE Organizational hierarchy for this requirement b.O QJ HQIJSACE

+-'

ro

,_ 1.TOS.lca

+-'

V)

QJ u

C 0

C ro QJ SOOtriW~

NoMAll.l!lllt l9 Of'll{jll*Cil>111CI N8'110flfl Pfo\)IMI M &l\lglM

-- -, I C

0

+-'

J u

QJ El X

LU Assigns projects based on geographic location Operational control 12

Annex A - Organizational Ch art and Points of Contact (continued) c) Natio nal Program M anager lnteragen cy Agreeme nt NRC*HQ-13* 1* 03-0021: Ev a luat in g the Potential for Floodina at Nuclear Power Plant Sites CUSTOMER Due to Dam Fa ilu re.

~uclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NWO- Program Manager !(b){6)

Monai** D*l'"to-<f*v custome.,,,co"""',n"'m._u-nka

- tM>

_ n_,..,

NWO- Program Technical Manager ~/b~/6)

~naces technkal communlcotkms, Ptovldes te,c nkal auid11nce i

FORT CIAHOUN / COOPER NPPs NWO- Program Analyst ~.. )(6,._j_ __

/..,b..

Manac:csMIPKI, re1<>u1dn1 and flr,1,ndal accounlln1 STAKEHOLDERS Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensees NWO- Pro)ect Manager ~(b)(~

M(IJMles ,ltc ,pec.iflf nuclear power p nl pro}tcts FARLEYNPP BEAVER VALLEY NPP SAM Technical Manager LRPTedlnlcal Mln!'ller i(h)/6) I l(b)(6) I PEACH BOTTOM / SUSQU(HANNA COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION

/ THREE MLE ISLAND NPPI 7t;)&r'Manar NWS1ID~r1Yar ger NWW Technical Manager

!(b)(6)  !

13

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) cl) Nuclear Power Plant Site, NRC Licensee, and USACE District Assignments USACE District Area of Nuclear Power Plant Site NRC Licensee Operations Fort Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District, Omaha, NE Omaha Cooper Nuclear Station Nebraska Public Power District, Brownville, NE Southern Nuclear Operating Complany, Inc.,

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Mobile Birmingham, AL Columbia Generating Station Energy Northwest, Richland, WA Seattle, Walla Walla Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc. Russellville, AR Little Rock, Tulsa Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Warrenville, IL Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Exelo n Generation Co., LLC, Warrenville, IL Baltimore Susquehanna Steam Electric Station PPL Susquehanna, LLC, Berwick, PA FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, Beaver Valley Power Station Pittsburgh Shippingport, PA Northern States Power Co. Minnesota, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Monticello, MN St. Paul Northern States Power Co. Minnesota, Wech, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant MN 14

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) e) POC List NAME Or~anization Phone Email Scott Flanders NRC/NRO 301-415-1634 Scott.Flanders@nrc.1wv Andy Campbell NRC/NRO 301-415-1634 Andv.Camnbelllmnrc.1wv Mahamed Shams NRC/.JLD 301-415-0501 Mohamed.Shams@nrc.g;ov Chris Cook NRC/NRO 301-415-6397 C hristo1>hcr.Cook(Q)nrc.!!ov Ken Erwin NRC/NRO 301-415-7559 Kenneth.Erwinlmnrc.2ov Brad Harvey NRC/NRO 301-415-4118 Brad.Harvev/al nrc.2ov Ken See NRC/NRO 301-415-1508 Kenneth.See(Q) nrc.e:ov Vic Hall NRC/JLD 301-415-2915 Victor.Halllmnrc.2ov (b)(6) USACENWD (b)(6) (b)(6)

USACENWD USACENWD USACENWO USACENWO USACENWO USACENWO HQUSACE HQ USACE HQ USACE 15

Annex B - Acronym Definition Acronym Definition AOR Area of Responsibility CCG Command Consolidated Guidance CEFMS Corps of Engineers Financial Management System COL Colonel COP Common Operating Picture CoP Community of Practice ELL Enterprise Lessons Learned EPgMP Enterprise Program Management Plan ER Engineer Regulation HQ Headquarters IAA lnteragency Agreement IIS lnteragency and International Support KO Contracting Officer LIR Line Item Review LTG Lieutenant General MILCON Military Construction MMC Modeling Mapping & Consequences Production Center MOU Memorandum of Understanding MP Military Programs MSC Major Subordinate Command NPP Nuclear Power Plant NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRO Office of New Reactors NRR Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NWD Northwestern Division NWO Omaha District OPORD Operations Order P.E. Registered Professional Engineer PDT Project Delivery Team PgMP Program Management Plan PM Project Manager PMF Probable Maximum Flood PMP Project Management Plan QMP Quality Management Plan RBC Regional Business Center RMC Risk Management Center RMS Regional Management System 16

Annex B - Acronym Definition (Continued)

SME Subject Matter Expert sow Statement of Work TBD To Be Determined TLR Technical Letter Report TO Task Order (amendment to Base IAA) us United States USAGE United States Army Corps of Engineers WBS Work Breakdown Structure WebCMI Web Corporate Management Information 17

m US Army Corps of EngineersE<

~ U.S.NRC Unh~d S11111c1 N udnr Rt:guluory Commlolon Prottttiug />1topll mu/ the E1111iro11me,1t.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

Enterprise Program Management Plan (EPgMP)

Technical Assistance for Evaluation of Potential Flooding at Nuclear Power Plants Sites due to Dam Failure HQ US Army Cor ps of E ngineers Nuclear Regulator y Commission Chief, lnteragency and I nternational Services Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Charles R. "Ray" Alexander, SES Regulation, William Dean, SES Date: _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ _ _ _ _ __

Table of Contents

l. General

a. Purpose

b. Updates to the Program Management Plan

c. References

d. Program Goal

e. Program Risks

2. Program Team

a. Management Approach

b. Roles and Responsibilities

3. Program Management

a. Communications

b. Scope of management

c. Schedule Management

d. Risk Management

e. Acquisition Management

f. Management Information Systems

4. Program Governance

a. Authorizations and Appropriations

b. Levels of Engagement

5. Financial Management

a. Transfer of F unds

b. Design Budget

c. Operational Financial Management Annex A. Organizational Charts, Nuclear Power Plant Sites and Points of Contact list Annex B. Glossary Note: HQUSACE Divisions are responsible f or preparation and updates for their specific Annexes to each Enterprise Program Management Plan.

2

1.0 General

a. Purpose. This Enterprise Program Management Plan (EPgMP) establishes management concepts, principles, and procedures for successfully executing USACE national technical support programs and requirements for the Nuc lear R egulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR). This EPgMP applies to all Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements related to assessment of post-Fukushima flooding hazards at nuclear power plant sites due to the potential fai lure of upstream dams for a variety of reasons.

b. Updates and Termination of the Enterprise Program Management Plan. This EPgMP shall become effective when signed by both NRC and USACE. Updates to the EPgMP will be managed by the HQUSACE National Program Manager (NPgM) to reflect significant changes in business processes, stakeholder requirements, internal and external factors, clarifications, and lessons learned. If required, the NPM w ill make updates to this EPgMP after coordinating w ith the appropriate proponent and stakeholders. Updates will be incorporated into the body of this EPgMP. Either patty may terminate this EPgMP by providing written notice to the other party. The termination will be effective upon the ninetieth (90th) calendar day follow ing the notice, unless a later date is set forth . In the event of termination, NRC will continue to be responsible for all costs incurred by the USACE under this EPgMP and for the costs of closing out or transferring any on-going contracts.

c. References. Following are references that apply across all programs. Please refer to specific annexes or appendices for individual program references.

I) Management, USACE Business Process, ER 5-1-1 1 (PMBP). This regulation establishes policy and doctrine to accomplish a ll work performed by USACE.

https://team.usace.army.mi 1/sites/H O-MP/mi lcon/ Shared%20Documents/ER%205 11;%20PMBP%20with%20 12%20Jan%202007%20Cover%20Letter%20Update.pdf

2) USACE Enterprise .lessons Learned (ELL) The Enterprise Lessons Learned (ELL) program consists of people, processes, and tools that support USACE's collection, analysis, and implementation of validated lessons learned. It w ill help manage institutional knowledge and improve services to our customers.

https://apps.usacc.army.mil/sitcs/ELL/SitePagcs/Homc.aspx

3) Mil itary Programs Operations Order ( MP OPORD): Thjs OPORD provides annual guidance for executing USACE Military Programs mission requirements.

https://team.usace.army.mil/sites/HO-MP/opord/default.aspx

4) Quality Management System (QMS): The Quality Management System is an enterprise-wide framework that describes USACE standard business processes.

https://apps.usace.army.mil/sites/OMS/dcfault.aspx

5) USA CE Command Consolidated Guidance (CCG). The CCG represents the current blueprint for pursuing the USACE vision and strategy.

https://intranet.usace.army.mil/hg/rm/Pages/ccg.aspx

6) Engineer Regulation, ER 5-1-9, Management - Assignment and Transfer of Proj ect Responsibilities, 15 March 1996. This ER establishes project brokering policy, guidance, and procedures 3

for a ll projects assig ned to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) consistent with USA CE management philosophy.

bttp://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-regs/ER 5-1-9/toc.htm

7) Engineer Regulation, ER 5-1-10, Corps-wide Areas of Work Responsibility, 30 September 1997.

http:// l 40. l 94.76.129/publications/eng-regs/ER 5-1-10/toc.htm

8) Engineer Regulation, ER 5-1-11, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Business Process

9) Memorandum (CEMP-ZB), Adherence to Mission Assignments and Alignment of Acquisitions with Missions- DIRECTORATE POLICY MEMORANDUM, 20 May 201 3 https://team. usace.an11y.mi l/sites/HO-MP/mi lcon/Shared%20Documents/ Adherence%20to%20Missi on%20Assignments--CEM P-ZB%2020%20May%202013 .pdf I 0) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Interagency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-1 002 l Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated w ith Failure of Dams (September 24, 2013)

11) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Request for information letter to seismic, flooding and emergency preparedness (March 12, 2012) http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/ japan-dashboard/tloodi ng.html

12) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, prioritization of plants for completing flood hazard reevaluations (May 11 , 2012) http://www.nrc.gov/reacto rs/operating/ops-experience/ japan-dashboard/ flooding.html I 3) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, iss ued guidance for assessing flood ing hazards due to dam failure (JLD-lSG-2013-01) (July 29, 2013) http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/ japan-dashboard/f1ood ing.htm1

14) Design-Basis Flood Estimation for Site Characterization at N uclear Power Plants in the United States of America (NU REG/CR-7046) http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/contract/cr7046/

15) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800),

sections 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collcctions/nurcgs/staff/sr0800/

16) American Nuclear Society (ANSVANS -2.8 1992), Determining Design Basis Flooding at Power Reactor Sites

d. Program Goal: The goal of this program is for USACE efforts to allow NRC to plan and develop guidance for safe operation of downstream nuclear power plants (NPP) . Work will include screen river system dams to determine potential for significant impact to downstream NPP in event of failure or certain conditions, determine which failure modes are credible, evaluate failure modes for critical dams, develop hydrographs related to those dams and failure modes, estimate stage, velocity and discharge time-series in rivers near NPP under various flooding and fai lure scenarios, prepare an FOUO Technical Letter Report (TLR) for each NPP facility and brief findings to NRC and Licensee(s).

4

e. Program Risks: Risk associated with the execution of the project requirements as identified by the tech nical review will be identified by the capabilities sourcing district and outlined on the District PMP.

2.0 Program Team.

a. Management Approach. USACE will work closely with Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/N RR) representatives and other stakeholders to and achieve a collaborative partnership at all levels. USACE and NRC/NRR wi ll coordinate policy changes and process improvements that may impact program execution prior to issuance. USACE Program Management will be in accordance with USACE P roject Management Business Process, as described in ER-5-1-1 I (Reference l .c. l ). USA CE will execute the program through Major Subordinate Commands (MSCs) Centers, Geographic Districts and offices approved to support special initiatives. The Program Team approach is to embrace the goals and objectives stated in this EPgMP, establish a collaborative knowledge-sharing environment, and capture/apply lessons learned to the execution process.

b. Roles and Responsibilities.

I) U.S. Army Corps of Eng ineers (USACE). USACE is a designated DoD Construction Agent per DoD 4270.5 for Military Construction (MTLCON) and has many technical capabil ities that can support this partnership. Pursuant of the Economy in Government Act (31 USC I 535) USA CE will provide techn ical assistance to NRC/N RR to perform flood ing hazard reevaluations at the designated nuclear power plant (NPP) locations shown in Figure I . USACE will employ capabilities not l imited to; Technical Assistance and expertise in Dam assessments and safety. When exercising this agreement, the NRC/NRR will assume complete responsibilities for evaluating the needs for and implementing any regulatory actions for its licensees based on the results of the flood hazard reevaluations being performed by USACE. Specific projects will be identified by NRC/NRR and requested in writing through the Natio nal Program Manager (NPgM). HQUSACE's NPgM will coordinate with the appropriate MSC or district Programs Director for required project execution.

(a) Headquarters USA CE is responsible for enterprise-wide program management, program integration, policy development, and perfonnance assessment. HQUSACE assigns a U SACE National Program Manager (NPgM) to serve as the primary poin t of contact for program related issues, initiatives, and reports on program status.

(b) The National Program Manager for this partnership is the O maha District. The National Program Manager is responsible for:

- Communicating w ith NRC/NRR and other national level stakeholders;

- Integrating the efforts of USACE Regional Business Centers and mission lines, a nd insure USACE business processes are followed;

- Integrating the development of program resource/funding requirements;

- Ensuring timely and proper authority for work undertaken by USACE Regional Business Centers and districts;

- Managing and facilitating resolution of program issues;

- Providing financia l management at the enterprise/program level;

-Ensuring that proper fu nding is issued to the Geographic Districts;

-Ensuring programmatic financial tracking reports are provided to NRC/NRR on a monthly basis, and provide other coordination as required for programmatic success.

5

Figure I - NPP Locations where USACE is Providing Technical Assistance to the NRC/NRR in Performing Flooding Hazard Reevaluations (c) USACE Major Subordinate Commands. MSCs manage the Regional Business Centers (RBC) to faci litate program execution and utilize technical resources and innovative practices through its districts. MSCs are responsible for vertical and horizontal coordination and integration, to drive regional excellence, and to ensure integration of Regional capability across Geographic Districts and centers of expertise is seamless. MSCs perform qual ity assurance of the geographic processes through periodic evaluations consistent with the USACE business process. This includes:

- Managing program execution and performa nce;

- Ensuring proper coordination between Geographic Districts and Centers of Expertise;

- Supporting resolution of programmatic issues among the vertical USACE team;

- Ensuring accurate and timely communication of program/project information in WebCMI, issues tracking, Current Working Estimates and design requests, and all upward repo11ing;

- Developing regional acquisition and execution plans, schedules, and resource requirements;

- Coordinating regional funding/scheduling requirements.

(d) Geographic Districts. The USACE Geographic District will normally be responsible for executing mission requirements within its area ofresponsibility. A mission requirement or project may be assigned to another district by the RBC in accordance with USACE policy ER 5-1-11 (reference paragraph 7.b.( l)), and ER 5- 1-9, Assignment and Transfer of Project Responsibilities. PDTs may be made up of members from across multiple organizations. Geographic district responsibilities typically include:

- Quality Management. The USACE Geographic District serves as the project manager and is responsible for day-to-day management of the technical assistance efforts including contract and quality administration and any other technical services provided.

- Project management including identification of requirements for execution;

- Coordination with the stakeholders, MSCs and H QUSACE with interface through the NRC/NRR assigned PM;

- Complying with project authorization and directives;

- Development of Project Budgets accounting for all PDT design; 6

- Financial management, metrics performance tracking and project reporling through established automated information systems such as P2, Resident Management System (RMS), Corps of Engineers Financial Management System (CEFMS).

The Geographic Districts will execute all PM responsibilities, as well as the responsibility for the overall technical adequacy of the products produced as a result of the technical assistance for the proposed solutions to risk mitigation requirements. The district will conduct and document an independent technical review of all floodi ng hazard reevaluation and potential Dam fa ilures by location as appro riate within their district boundaries. [he focus of the work producl is defining flood hazard. Any flood hazard identified as resulting from dam failure will rely on existing dam safety products, and therefore the Geographic District w ill not require coordination with Risk Management Center on evaluating dam failure mechanisms.

The Geographic District Project Manager (USACE PM) chairs the technical assistance PDT and is responsible for the successful execution of their projects in accordance with this EPgMP, specific project management plans and applicable policies. The USA CE PM will develop a Project Management Plan (PM P) for each project in coordination with other members of the PDT. The PMP establishes the goals for the project and identifies PDT members, their roles, and their decision-making authorities. The PMP also establishes approved budget, schedule, acquisition method, and any special project requirements, including as referenced, the applicable change order management plan, financial management plan, etc. and any waivers required by this EPgMP during the life cycle of the project. It is updated by the District PM throughout the life cycle of the proj ect.

e) Model ing, Mapping, and Consequences (MMC) Production Center. The USACE MMO Production Center was established as a national center of ex crtisc charged with_J>roducing hydraulic models, inundation ma s onscquence estimations and detailed assessme r o *ts follow ing USA C E national standards.

he USACE National Program Technical Lead is responsible for:

- Serve as liaison between Geographic PDT and MMC leadership1 and coordinating modeling efforts with MM C leadership;

- Review of all hydraulic models developed in accordance w ith MMC review standards 10 ensure a ll MMC standards are adhered to in development of hydraul ic models used for flood risk assessment at NPP;

- Develop standard procedures in coordination with MMC leadership where work requirements may require deviation from MMC standard operating procedures.

he MMC Production Center is resQonsiblc for:

- Identifying personnel to assist each Geographic District as needed to complete hydraulic modeling required as part of each evaluation;

- Serve as repository of all hydraulic models developed as patt of the identified work effort.

2) Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR).

(a) NRC/NRR is responsible for the prioritization of the Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) sites that will be assessed for potential flood hazard. NRC/NRR provides policy, resource advocacy, and financial 7

management for execution of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation program requirements. This includes planning, programming, budgeting, and functional standards for Nuclear Power Plant faci lities at risk.

NRC/NRR will provide project scope, direction, and funding for individual project sites and is the decision authority for program execution and for project decisions that may be elevated by the project teams.

(b) NRC/NRR is responsible for overseeing integration, and execution of public safety, rules, licensing, and oversight and incident response for the Nuclear Power Plants.

(c) NRC/NRR is responsible for defining the requirements yielded by the technical evaluations on potential dam fa ilure and flooding at to the NPP , Environmental Analysis Impact Process (EAIP), wetlands, floodplain, etc.

3) The Technical Assistance Project Delivery Team (PDT): The TA PDT accomplishes all project execution work that USACE is assigned. The District PM is the sole lead for the USACE TA PDT members and is responsible for coordination and oversight of the project from inceptio n to completion. The PDT is comprised of members from the project user's organization; NRC/NRR; and the associated district members as specified by geographical location. \

. Program Management.

a. Communications. The following meetings and reports are key communication components in the program management process.

I) Senior Executive Review Groups (SERGs): The intent of the SERO is to enhance national level communications, review program metrics, and d iscuss program issues and initiatives and areas for improvement. The NPgM will coordinate SERO meetings between HQUSACE and NRC/NRR senior representatives to review and discuss the Nuclear Regulatory Commission program requirements and as appropriate other mission lines. The SERG will be hosted by the HQUSACE Chief, Programs Integration Division. Participation includes representatives from HQUSACE, NRC/NRR, and others as required.

The SERO location will be at either HQUSACE or at NRC as coordinated before each SERO. Other program stakeholders may be called upon to participate as needed.

2) Line Item Reviews (LlRs): Requirements for LIRs will be established in separate Annexes to outl ine requirements for respective mission as required.

3) HQUSACE will communicate openly and transparently with NRC on a regular basis. Routine coordination will include but not be limited to phone calls, emails, and face-to-face coordination meetings.

b. Scope of Management. The scope of th is EPgMP inc ludes all activity requirements deem necessary for strategic coord ination a nd program focus resolution in order to maintain the respective geographic MSC and project executing district timely w ith the delivery of the 8

project(s).

c. Schedule Management. The schedule of the required mitigation strategies either in the form of project construction or simply an assessment will be determined by the project delivery team.

d. Risk Management. In coordination with the PDT the respective district PM will assess all risk associated with the nuclear power plant and project execution.

e. Acquisition Management. When required, the acquisition strategy will be defined by the project executing district.

f. Management Information Systems. The following systems will be used to compile, display and report program and project information.

1) Corps ofEngineers Financial Management System (CEFMS). CEFMS will be used for tracking, managing and reporting design and construction funds. USACE will use CEFMS to identify unobligated balances and expiring funding. To the extent practical, Nuclear Regulatory Commission project numbers will be included on all reports provided to the NRC/ NRR.

2) Resident Management System (RMS). RMS is a USACE automated quality management and project contract administration system. The system provides tools to plan and manage a project by integrating work specific requirements, corporate technical knowledge, schedule of required events and actual placement, project documentation, quality assurance functions, and management policies. RMS feeds project contract data to Web CMI.

3) Web CM I. The USACE project management districts use Web CMI (P2) for the official project record. The USACE PM uses this scheduling and funding tool to plan and record all m ilestones.

Web CM I is a USACE internet-based infom1ation source that provides cu1Tent and detailed data for all projects. Web CMJ interfaces directly with RMS. The Internet address for the Web CMI is https://ppds.usacc.anny.mil/ppds/home/

"* Program Governance.

a. Authorizations and Appropriations. The participation for this EPgMP between both agencies is pursuant the Economy Act (31 USC§ 1535). All required funding is based on a reimbursable basis from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

b. Levels of Engagement

1) HQ USACE Military Mission - Manages strategic communication with appropriate NRC designated officials in coordination with the National Program Manager.

2) National Program Manager - Manages the everyday interaction with NRC in order to maintain clarity of intent and to further coordinate the planning and execution of requirements with the geographic district.

9

3) District Program Manager - Manages the everyday project tasks as required with NRC field contacts. Ensures that the projects or deliverables are provided timely and accurately.

5. Financial Management.

a. Transfer of Funds - All required funding will be provided in NRC Form 662 to the Omaha district. Funding will be disbursed appropriately to the geographically project management district.

b. Planning and Design Budget - Any effori required for planning purposes as required by the technical assistance team will be funded on a reimbursable basis by NRC.

c. Operational Financial Management - All financial management required to meet this suppori task to NRC will be described in the project management district PMP. This plan will include but not limited to: Current Working Estimate, Contractor Claims, and Funds Revocation Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact a) The Director for the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will be Mr. Bill Dean effective October I, 20 l 4.

~ U.S.NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

~,...,,,-'*.t-

~ - -....i...ro..-

The Commission I-*- I!

I-= i i

nu nibi

=- u=*

I _[

I 10

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Bill Dean, Director Jennifer Uhle, Deputy Director for Program Manag,errte11t.

POiity Oewelopment !Ind Reactor Safety Progra.ms ~

A.n*1ytlt Stan Brian Holllan, Deputy Director for Sus.an Al>faMln. Olreclor Engineering and Corporate Support I I I I Divisloon or OW,..ating Ormion of S*fe'Y Sntem5 Otvi,ion of Enginttnng DMtion or Ltcense RtU-..Wlll Reactor ucens1no Tlmol.tly McGinty. Oirecu>* John Lobmskl, Ok*tc;tOf ROb+t'l Taylor,DE!puly OiftctOf Mary Ja~ Ross-LH, Chrl*lOl>Mf Miller. DkKt<>> Michele Evans, Ok"tcior (Acting) Deputy Difec1or Deputy Oifec1or (Vacanti LOUlse Lund, Deputy Olrecta,r Deputy Oireclor (Vac:aol)

I I I I OlvisiOo Of P olicy and OMsion ot Rit-k DMstoo of lnsp S Ruttmaking Japan Leooot-Ltarn.ct 01v~1on A11n1mttu ReoionM Suopon Lawnmce Koka;ltlo, Dvector Jack Davis. Director {ACUngJ Joseph Giitter, Di,ectOf SCott Morris. Director Aby MOhH-ni, Deputy Director Deputy Director (Vacant)

Samson Ltt, Dtputy OlrtctOf Allen Howe, O..,uty 011tctoe 0tpu1y Director (Veeono 11

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) b) HQ USACE Organizational hierarchy for this requirement b.O QJ cu

~

V'l QJ u

C:

cu C:

~

QJ 0

~

r------~------r------,------,-------r-------r-1 I I I I I I

---

,I I I I I I I I I C:

0 u

QJ X

w Assigns projects based on geographic location Operational control 12

Annex A - Organizational C hart and Points of Contact (continued) c) National Program Manager lnteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021: Evaluating th* Potantial for Floodin11 at Nuclur Powar Plant Sitas CUSTOM ER Due to Dam Failure.

~udear Reaulatory commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NWO - Program Manager -!..(..b}..,/6..,)..____.

Man11,, Ooy-to-d,v cu,tomer communiattkm, I

NWO . ProgramTechnical Manager ~ (bi (~

Monq,i technl,11 communkotion,, Provides ** n Irukloncc FORT ClAHOUN / COOPER NPPs NWO - Program Analyst -, (b)/6)

Monlli** MJPR,, mourolnc and rnonelal l<XlOUntlnc

! Man!'Pf STAKEHOLDERS Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensees NWO- Pro)ect Manager - !(b)(6)

Manacts ~te s~dfk nudear po\lltf plant proJea ,

I NWO Technical Manager (b)(6)

FARLEYNPP BEAVER VAUEY NPP SAM ProjKI Manage, (b)(6)

SAM Technical Manager (b)(6)

PEAat BOTTOM/ SUSQUEHANNA COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION

/TIIREE MILE lstAND MIi's NWS Pro eel Mana er b6 NWS Technical Manager llblW! J NWW Technical Manager

!(b)(6)  !

13

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) d) Nuclear Power Plant Site, NRC Licensee, and USA CE District Assignments USACE District Area of Nuclear Power Plant Site NRC licensee Operations Fort Calhoun Station Omaha Public Power District, Omaha, NE Omaha Cooper Nuclear Station Nebraska Public Power District, Brownville, NE Southern Nuclear Operating Complany, Inc.,

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Mobile Birmingham, AL Columbia Generating Station Energy Northwest, Richland, WA Seattle, Walla Walla Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc. Russellville, AR Little Rock, Tulsa Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Exelon Generation Co., LLC, Warrenville, IL Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Exelo n Generat ion Co., LLC, Warrenville, IL Baltimore Susquehanna Steam Electric Station PPL Susquehanna, LLC, Berwick, PA FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, Beaver Valley Power Station Pi ttsburgh Shippingport, PA Northern St ates Power Co. Minnesota, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Monticello, MN St. Paul Northern States Power Co. Minnesota, Wech, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant MN 14

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact ( continued) e) POC List NAME Organization Phone Email Scott Flanders NRC/NRO 301-415-1634 Scott.Flanders@nrc.1:wv Andy Campbell NRC/NRO 301-415-1634 A ndv.Camnbell(ii)nrc.11ov Mahamed Shams NRC/JLD 301-41 5-0501 Mohamed.Shams@nrc.gov C hris Cook NRC/NRO 301-415-6397 C hristooher.Cook@nrc.e:ov Ken Erwin NRC/NRO 301-415-7559 Kenneth.Erwin(ii)nrc.!!ov Brad Harvey NRC/NRO 301-415-4118 Brad.Harvev(a),n rc.!!ov Ken See NRC/NRO 301-415-1508 Kenneth.See@nrc.!!ov Vic Hall NRC/JLD 301-415-2915 Victor.Hall@nrc.!!ov (b)(6) USACENWD (b)(6) (b)(6)

USACENWD USACENWD USACENWO USACENWO USACENWO USACENWO HQUSACE HQ USACE HQ USACE 15

Annex B - Acronym Definition Acronym Definition AOR Area of Responsibility CCG Command Consolidated Guidance CEFMS Corps of Engineers Financial Management System COL Colonel COP Common Operating Picture CoP Community of Practice ELL Enterprise Lessons Learned EPgMP Enterprise Program Management Plan ER Engineer Regulation HQ Headquarters IAA lnteragency Agreement IIS lnteragency and International Support KO Contracting Officer LIR Line Item Review LTG Lieutenant General MILCON Military Construction MMC Modeling Mapping & Consequences Production Center MOU Memorandum of Understanding MP Military Programs MSC Major Subordinate Command NPP Nuclear Power Plant NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRO Office of New Reactors NRR Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NWD Northwestern Division NWO Omaha District OPORD Operations Order P.E. Registered Professional Engineer PDT Project Delivery Team PgMP Program Management Plan PM Project Manager PMF Probable Maximum Flood PMP Project Management Plan QMP Quality Management Plan RBC Regional Business Center RMC Risk Management Center RMS Regional Management System 16

Annex B - Acronym Definition (Continued)

SME Subject Matter Expert sow Statement of Work TBD To Be Determined TLR Technical Letter Report TO Task Order (amendment to Base IAA) us United States USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers WBS Work Breakdown Structure WebCMI Web Corporate Management Information 17

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[External_Sender) NRC Cost Breakout by TAC Date: Friday, January 29, 2016 5:08:59 PM Brad, As we discussed during our weekly teleconference this morning (29 Jan) here are the USA CE NRC program costs by TAC number that will be included in the Jan monthly MLSR.

TO I - $163.01 TO9 MF6598 - Peach Bottom 2 - $3,194.93 MF6599 - Peach Bottom 3 - $3,194.93 MFl 11 3 - Three Mile Island I - $5,724.06 TO26 MF3039 - Columbia - $9,958.37 MF3041 - ANOI - $20,237.37 MF3042 - ANO2 - $20,237.37 MF3286- Beaver Valley I - $ 1,209.85 MF3287 - Beaver Valley 2 - $ 1,209.85 Thanks, l(b)(6) l(b)(6) I Project Manager Army Corps ofEngincers, Omaha District Special Projects Branch 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, fil)TI 68)02-4]01 Phone* I. ~) 6) _

~!\ l(b)(6) I l(b)(6)

From:  !(b)(6)  !

To: Harvey. Brad; Cook. Christopher: NRO MLSR Resource: Dority. Dayna; See. Kenneth; ContractsPOJ Resource:

NRCIPAC Resource: Tumee: Michael Cc:

Subject:

[External_Sender] NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021: MLSR 20 October 2015 (UNCLASSIFI ED)

Date: Tuesday. October 20, 2015 11:42:24 AM Attachments: NRC Task Order Sep IPAC.pdf NRC-HO-13-1-03-0021 201soct.pdf NRC*USACE MLSR TO1 2015OCT.odf NRC-USACE MLSR JO4 2015Oct.pdf NRC-USACE MLSR J026 201socr pdf NRC-USACE MLSR J09 2015Oct.pdf C lassification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE For Your Review:

The attached documents are submitted for your review in accordance with the IAA NRC-HQ- 13-I-03-0021. Please provide feedback at your convenience.

NOTE: End of Year (EOY) deadlines create multiple !PAC invoices for the month of September. Therefore, two billing invoices are generated ( I - 20 Sep and 20 - 30 Sep). Due to unforeseen circumstances the closure of the CEFMS (Corps of Engineers Financial Management System) occurred on 5 Oct. Although the !PAC list the 5 Oct date, all expenditures for the NRC occurred no later than 30 Sep.

I. !PAC: Billing information by line item (task orders) for !AA. Summary infonnation by task order, current month, billed to date and authorized ceiling (NRC-HQ-13-l-03-0021_2015Oct and NRC Task Order_Sep_IPAC).

Note: This reporting period includes expenditures for TO #0 I, #09, and #26. TO #04 is provided as a courtesy copy.

2. MLSR NRC-HQ- 13-1-002 1 T O#0 1: Task order #01 summary information (NRC-USACE_ MLSR_ TOO I _201 SOCT). This summary report includes activities for Task 4 Presentation of Results in support of the planned fact-finding exchange with ACRS. HIGHLIGHT: Fact-Finding Exchange scheduled 21 - 22 October.

3. MLSR NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004: Task order #04 summary information (NRC-USACE_ MLSR_TO4_ 20 15Oct).

HIGHLIGHT: No Change from previous month.

4. MLSR NRC-HQ 14-T-0026: Task order #26 summary information (NRC-USACE_ MLSR_ TO26_ 20 l 5OCT). Attachments provided for Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello / Prairie Island NPP, Arkansas ANO, and Columbia NPP sites.

HIGHLIGHT: Work is complete for Farley, Beaver Valley and Monticello/Prairie Island.

5. MLSR NRC-HQ 15-T-0009: Task order #09 summary information (NRC-USACE_ MLSR_TO9_20 l SOct). This is the first MLSR for TO#09.

Please let me know ifl can be of further assistance l(b)(6)  !

IIS Program Manager, Special Projects Branch USACE, Northwestern Division, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue, CENWO-PM-S Omaha, NE 68 102

Desk:l(b)(6)

Ce ll: _

l(-b)...

Emai l.., (6-) - - - - - - - - - - - ,

Classification: UNC LASSIFI ED Caveats: NON E

Page 1 of 2 CIC #: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Accounts Of Billed Date: 20-Sep-2015 BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS (AR 37-1)

• 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009

• 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

• MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28202824 NO CHECK DRAWN 1484747

• 20-Sep-2015 Partial# 25 01-Sep-2015 Thru 20-Sep-2015 ,l * .,. "' JI .. . . .. .. ..... .. ,, . . ....

Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Billed Accounting Classification Billing Accounting Classification 031 NA X 0200.0000 2013 00 0000 00000000000 00000 31000001 $8,576.92 096 NA X 3122.0000 G6 08 2417 895 0WDNRC 96252 $85,241 .73 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 00 0000 NA 00000 31000001 $76,664.81 Line Item Moa ____ Description Eaid No Amount 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $21 ,948.62 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $7,230.02 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $46,590.17 00005 REIMBURSABLE - INSIDE FEDERAL GC WORK PERFORMED BY OTHER GOV AGENCIES $896.00 Subtotal: $76,664.81 2 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $107.63 2 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $28.49 2 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $211.03 Subtotal: $347.15 6 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $2,551.48 6 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $675.38 6 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $5,002.91 Subtotal : $8,229.77 Total Billed Amount: $85,241 .73 Less Amount Paid Via IPAC: $85,241 .73 Payment Due Date: 20-0ct-2015 Pay This Amount: $0.00 DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.333 v2.1.4

Page 2 of 2 CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS Billed Date: 20-Sep-2015 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28202824 NO CHECK DRAWN 1484747 20-Sep-2015 Partial# 25 01-Sep-2015 Thru 20-Sep-2015 Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount Funds Authorized: $4,270,251 .28 CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED Total Billed Amount: $2,557,673.26 I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as stated and Prev Billed Amount: $2,472,431.53 s hould be charged to the appropriation(s) and/or fund(s) as indicated above, or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated.

Current Billed Amount: $85,241.73 Total Flux Billed: $0.00 Prev Flux Billed: $0.00 Date: 20-Sep-2015  ! (b)(6)

Current Flux Billed: $0.00 Authorized Administrative or Certifying Officer DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.333 v2.1.4

Page 1 of CIC #: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Accounts Of Billed Date: 05-0ct-2015 BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS (AR 37-1)

• 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009

• 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

• MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28203391 NO CHECK DRAWN 1486093

• 05-0ct-2015 Partial# 26 20-Sep-2015 Thru 05-0ct-2015 ,l * .,. "' JI .. . . .. .. ..... .. ,, . . ....

Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Billed Accounting Classification Billing Accounting Classification 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 00 0000 NA 00000 31000001 $2,401 .75 096 NA X 3122.0000 G6 08 2417 895 0WDNRC 96252 $2,401.75 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $678.74 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $238.82 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $1 ,484.19 Subtotal: $2,401 .75 Total Billed Amount: $2,401 .75 Less Amount Paid Via IPAC: $2,401 .75 Payment Due Date: 04-Nov-2015 Pay This Amo unt: $0.00 Funds Authorized: $4,270,251.28 CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED Total Billed Amount: $2,560,075.01 I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as stated and Prev Billed Amount: $2,557,673.26 should be charged to the appropriation(s) and/or fund(s) as indicated above, or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated.

Current Billed Amount: $2,401.75 Total Flux Billed: $0.00 Prev Flux Billed: $0.00 Date: 05-0ct-201 5 l (b)(6)

Current Flux Billed : $0.00 Authorized Administrative or Certifying Officer DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.333 v2.1.4

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021

SUMMARY

INFORMATION BY TASK ORDER 20 October 2015 Submittal NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 031 NA X 0200.0000 2013 $ 347.15 199,497.87 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ 763 867.52 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 031 NA X 0200 .0000 2015 $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ 79,066.56 $1,588,479.85 IPACTotal,~ - - - - - - - - -.i-.......:,.$ _ 8;....7..;,;;6'--

4...;...

3._4~ 8 .-.

2 ...;;..

56 .;;...0;.,jp0"-7....;.

5....;;.

.o_1 Authorized l111teragency Agreement No. Line Item Number Billed to Date Ceilina NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 Line 2 $ 199,497.87 $ 247,686.00 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Line4 $ 763,867.52 $ 884,568.00 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Line 5 $1,588,479.85 $2,903,036.00 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Line6 $ 8,229.77 $ 234,961 .28 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 $2,560,075.01 $4,270,251 .28 Page 1

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 (P2#: 405160)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS Octoberr 20, 2015 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status 1.1. Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that may affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants.

1.2. NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvev@NRC.GOV 1.3. USACE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn : CENWO-PM-S (b)(6) 1616 Capitol Avenue, uIte 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program ~=!.lo<.1.,,- ......

Primary:

(b)(6)

Program Engineer:

Primary: l(b)(Bl 1.4. Agreement Period of Performance September 30, 2013 through September 29, 2017 1.5. Period for this Report September 1, 2015 through September 20, 2015

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table 1. Table 2 provides milestones and schedules for each task.

Table 1. Information on Individual Tasks for NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO #01 Task Activities Accomplished Activities Planned for Notes / Significant Task Description

1. this Reportinq Period Next Reportinq Period Issues Development of Hydrographs related to darns upstream of 1 Completed NA Fort Calhoun and Cooper Nuclear Plants Meeting Dates:

17 Dec 13 Licensees' 18 Intermediate Technical 2 Dec 13 G2G NA Review Meetings 23-24 Jan 14 G2G Technical Reporting 3 Completed NA Requirements USACE, NRC, and Additional clarity is Advisory Committee on Preparation for the sought to understand Presentation of results and 4 Reactor Safeguards Cx:tober meeting with the expectations of the updates.

(ACAS) paricipated in ACAS and NRC ACAS for the Cx:tober scoping calls. meeting.

2

Table 2. Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO #01 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Development of Hydrographs (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) 4-Nov-13 15-Nov-13 4-Nov-13 15-Nov-13 4-Nov-13 15-Nov-13 16-Dec-13 16-Dec-13 16-Dec-13 16-Dec-13 16-Dec-13 16-Dec-13 2 Intermediate Technical Review Meetings Government and Licensee Meetinq 17-Dec-13 17-Dec-13 Government to Government Meeting 20-Nov-13 20-Nov-13 3 Technical Letter Reporting Requirements Fort Calhoun Nuclear Power Plant and Cooper 15-Jan-14 17-Mar-14 Nuclear Power Plant 4 NRG HQ Presentation of Results / Updates Briefing for Licensees to address questions on 13-May-14 13-May-14 the Technical Letter Reoort Fact-finding session with NRG, AGRS 21-22 Oct 15

3. Travel No travel was completed during this reporting period, and no travel is planned for the next reporting period.

Table 3. Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period

~=~~t~d I Coordinated Start Travel I Purpose I

Location I Travelers I Date I End Date I Cost w/ NRC Completed this reporting period None Planned next reporting period None

4. Significant Issues No Issues at this time.

3

5. Financial Status Table 4 contains a summary of the financial status of the TO 01 to this agreement and Table 5 provides the amount of funds expended during the period and the total cumulative year to date.

The TAC Number for the funds expended is MF5194, NTTF R2.1 Flooding Project Management.

t-M~ .

• *** * * ** I o ...-..,,.~*~ ..1.*_*,*.:. **~

'Ii Mt ~* 1*~mm, Balance of Precent Balance of Funds Total Costs Cumulative Obligated Month Total Award E>q::>ended Funds Required Obligated to Incurred this Costs to Funds Year Amount($) (cum for Completion Date($) Report($) Date($) Remaining costs/obi) ($)

($)

Jul-14 247,686.00 247,686.00 3,008.88 197,503.67 79.7% 50,182.33 $50,182.33 May-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 212.86 197,716.53 79.8% 49,969.47 $49,969.47 Jun-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 1,119.98 198,836.51 80.3% 48,849.49 $48,849.49 Jul-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 278.73 199,115.24 80.4% 48,570.76 $48,570.76 Aug-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 35.48 199,150.72 80.4% 48,535.28 $48,535.28 Sep-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 347.15 199,497.87 80.5% 48,188.13 $48,188.13 4

Table 5. Financial Detail Report* Summary for NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021; TO 01 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 1 5 287 (2) Technical 2 11 1426 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 3 16 1713

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 211 .03 $ 1,212.28 $ 123,150.86 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 107.63 $ 618.28 $ 57,835.55 SUB-TOTAL $ 318.66 $ 1,830.56 $ 180,986.41 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ - $ -

(2) Material and Services Cost $ - $ - $ -

(3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL G & A Costs $ 28.49 $ 163.65 $ 18,511 .46 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 347.15 $ 1,994.21 $ 199,497.87

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 6 provides the monthly expenditures for the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 1. The planned (budget) expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $247,686 Funds Obligated to date: $247,686 Period of Performance: 30 Sep 2013 to 31 Mar 2016 5

Table 6. Monthly Ex-,ense Forecast - NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 TO #01 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1 $ 117 984.00 $ - $ 106 666.74 90.41%

2 $ 25 920.00 $ - $ 4180.50 16.13%

3 $ 89 796.00 $ - $ 84 233.10 93.80%

4 $ 13,986.00 $ 347.15 $ 4,417.53 31 .59%

TOTAL $ 247,686.00 $ 347.15 $ 199,497.87 80.54%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 1 is identified in Table 7. This plan is updated based on projected Task #4 activity during fiscal year 2015. The completion date is scheduled to be in the future at the discretion of the NRG.

Baseline $51,945.50 $ 64,905.50 $ 38,943.94 $24,339.56 $ 19,479.56 $ 12,986.38 $ 13,984.00 Actual Costs $ 33,895.64 $48,813.69 $ 32,757.88 $ 20,794.07 $ 16,949.56 $ 14,764.25 $ 13,958.70 Difference $ 18,049.86 $ 16,091.81 $ 6,186.06 $ 3,545.49 $ 2,530.00 $ (1,777.87) $ 25.30 Percenta e 65% 75% 84% 85% 87% 114% 100%

Baseline $ 6,495.19 $ 4,868.79 $ 3,100.00 $241,048.42 Actual Costs $ 9,248.20 $ 3,312.80 $ 3,008.88 $ 197,503.67 Difference $ (2,753.01) $ 1,555.99 $ 91.12 $ 43,544.75 Percenta e 142% 68% 97% 82%

Baseline $ 241,048.42 Actual Costs $ 197,503.67 Difference $ 43,544.75 Percenta e 82%

Baseline $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 1,537.58 $ 2,500.00 $247,686.00 Actual Costs $ 212.56 $ 1,119.98 $ 278.73 $ 382.63 $199,497.87 Difference $ 287.44 $ (619.98) $1 ,321.27 $1 ,154.95 $ 48, 188.13 Percenta e 43% 224% 17% 25% 81%

6

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-20-14-T-0004 (P2#: 443107)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS October 20, 2015 submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the development of technical and cost proposals for the implementation of individual task orders. The objective of the individual task orders will be the determination of the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that may affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants.

NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USAGE Information 1.1.1. Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S ~(b)(6) ~

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 1.1.2. Program Manager Primary: !,....

(b-)(6_) _ _ __

1.1.3. Program Engineer Primar : (b)(6l (b)(6)

Agreement Period of Performance September 30, 2013 through September 29, 2017 Period for this Report September 1, 2015 through October 5, 2015

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table 1. Table 2 provides milestones and schedules for each task .

Table 1. Information on lndlvldual Tasks for NRC-HQ-20-14-T--0004 within NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Task# Task Description Notes / Significant Issues Reporting Period Reoorting Period Familiarization of JLD-ISG-2013-01 and Licensee 1

Request and Submission of Information Activitv is complete.\

Farley (b)(?)(E). (b)(?)(F) NA Activity is complete. I (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

Columbia (b)(?)(E) (b)(?)(F) NA Activity 1s complete. 1 Arkansas (b)(7)(E), (b)(?)(F} NA Activity for preparation ot Peach Bottom Licensee Peach Bottom I iMI / Technical Review and NA recalled their Request for Susquehanna Scoping meetings is Information.

complete.

Activitv is complete.\

Beaver Valley (b)(?}(E), (b)(f)(F) NA Activity is complete!

Monticello / Prairie Island (b}(7)(E), (b)(?}(F) NA Table 1. Information on Individual Tasks for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 within NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 2 Technical Review Meetings Green Shading = Complete Technical Review Mtg at Farley Mobile District 18- 19 March.

Technical Review Mtg at Columbia Seattle District 26-27 March.

Technical Review Mtg at Little Arkansas Rock District 4-5 June.

Technical Review Mtg at Baltimore District 4-5 March.

Peach Bottom I iMI /

Omaha District participated Susquehanna in the Board of Consultants meeting on 29-30 July.

Technical Review Mtg at Beaver Valley Pittsburgh District 5-6 May.

Technical Review Mtg at St.

Monticello / Prairie Island Paul District 23-24 June.

2

Table 1. Information on Individual Tasks for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-ooo4 within NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 3 Scoping Meetings Green Shading = Co"l)lete Scoping Meeting at Mobile Farley District 29-30 Aoril 14.

Scoping Meeting at Seattle Columbia District 9-10 June 14.

Scoping Meeting at Little Arkansas Rock District 15-16 June 14.

Scoping Meeting at Baltimore Meeting has been cancelled.

District 24 April. Additional USAGE attendance as an Peach Bottom / TMI /

Scoping Meeting on 17 June observer for the March 24, Susquehanna 14 to include FERG and 2015 Board of Consultants Exelon. meetinQ.

Scoping Meeting at Beaver Valley Pittsburgh District 17-18 June 14.

Scoping Meeting at St. Paul Monticello / Prairie Island District 4-5 Aug.

Table 1. Information on lndlvldual Tasks for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-ooo4 within NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 4 Proposal Development Green Shading = Co"l)lete NRC concurrence received.

Farley Proposal finalized.

July 31 , 2014 Proposal Finalized. Non-Disclosure Agreement with NRC concurrence received.

Columbia BC Hydro open item on FOIA Dec 15, 2014 process remains. IAA with BurRec signed.

NRG concurrence received.

Arkansas Proposal finalized.

Dec 9, 2014 The work for the Peach Screening Report for Bottom and TMI projects are Peach Bottom / TMI / Susquehanna and the Peach complete. The USAGE will Susquehanna Bottom I TMI DRAFT assist the NRG with support Screening Report are final.

on the review of the FHRRs.

NRG concurrence received.

Beaver Valley Proposal finalized.

Sep 23, 2014 NRG concurrence received.

Monticello / Prairie Island Proposal finalized.

Cx:t 21, 2014 3

Table 2. Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 within NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Familiarization of JLD-ISG-2013-01 Farley - Mobile 10-Mar-14 11-Mar-14 Columbia - Seattle, Walla Walla, NWD 10-Mar-14 10-Mar-14 Arkansas - Tulsa, Little Rock 14-May-14 14-May-14 Peach Bottom - Baltimore 18-Feb-14 18-Feb-14 Beaver Valley - Pittsburgh 14-Apr-14 14-Apr-1 4 Monticello & Prairie Island 14-May-14 14-May-14 2 Technical Review Meetings Farley - Mobile 18-19 Mar 14 18-19 Mar 14 Columbia - Seattle, Walla Walla, NWD 26-27 Mar 14 26-27 Mar 14 Arkansas - Tulsa, Little Rock 4-5 Jun 14 4-5 Jun 14 Peach Bottom - Baltimore 4-5 Mar 14 4-5 Mar 14 Beaver Valley - Pittsburgh 5-6 May 14 5-6 May 14 Monticello & Prairie Island 23-24 Jun 14 23-24 Jun 14 3 Scoping Meetings Farley - Mobile 29-30 Apr 14 29-30 Apr 14 Columbia - Seattle, Walla Walla, NWD 9-10 Jun 14 9-10 Jun 14 Arkansas - Tulsa, Little Rock 15-16 Jul 14 15- 16Jul14 Peach Bottom - Baltimore 24-Apr-14 24-Apr-14 Beaver Valley - Pittsburgh 17-18 Jun 14 17-18 Jun 14 Monticello & Prairie Island 4-5 Auo 14 4-5 Auo 14 4 Proposal Development Farley - Mobile 28-May-14 27-Jun-14 Columbia - Seattle, Walla Walla, NWD 31 -0ct-14 12-Dec- 14 Arkansas - Tulsa, Little Rock 29-0ct-14 25-Nov-14 Peach Bottom - Baltimore 20-Feb-15 27-Jul-15 Beaver Valley - Pittsburgh 18-Jul-14 18-Sep-14 Monticello & Prairie Island 09-Seo-14 03-0ct-14

3. Travel Travel expenditures incu r in hi r rting period are for the participation in the Board of Consultants meeting for (b)(7)(E). (b)(?)(F) . The next planned travel will be for the next BoC meeting in December time rame.

Table 3. Travel Com Related Task: Purpose Coordinated w/ NRC 4

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: USAGE policy is that only USAGE will characterization of the risks of associated with USAGE dams and levees. The purpose of the interagency agreement with NRG is to allow the USAGE to characterize the risk of a dam failure or operational release instead of an outside entity. The analysis performed in accordance to the interagency agreement requires a thorough knowledge and understanding of USAGE operations and the USAGE dam safety characterization of risk for credible dam failure scenarios. Therefore, the Omaha District has been restrictive on the release / sharing of information that may be used by others for the purposes of characterizing the risk of a dam failure or operational release in a manner inconsistent with USAGE policy. To achieve enterprise wide alignment within USAGE will require engagement with HQUSAGE staff.

Issue 1 Status: This topic has been brought to the attention of the HQUSAGE staff. This issue item will be a discussion topic between the NRG and the USAGE. The goal is to obtain an understanding across districts working on the NRG program to have a consistent approach on the type of information that may be released. Ongoing.

5. Financial Status Table 4 contains a summary of the financial status of this agreement. The table is subdivided into two tables; one for each calendar year. Table 5 provides the amount of funds expended during the period and the total cumulative year to date. Note that Table 5 presents a summary by current month, current fiscal year (FY2015) and summary by total billed to date. No cost incurred this reporting period.

5

Table 4. 2014 Financial Status Report- Summary NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-GOai Balance of Balance of Funds Total Costs Cumulative Precent Month Total Award Obligated Funds Required Obligated to Incurred this Costs to Date E)<l)ended (cum 2014 Amount($) Funds for Completion Date($) Report($) ($) costs/obi)

Remainina ($ ) ($)

Jan Feb $113,296.00 $ 89,959.00 $ 7,640.62 $ 7,640.62 8.5% $ 82,318.38 $ 105,655.38 Mar $884,568.00 $436,959.00 $ 67,266.86 $ 74,907.48 17.1% $362,051.52 $ 809,660.52 Apr $884,568.00 $436,959.00 $ 47,479.44 $122,386.92 28.0% $ 314,572.08 $ 762,181.08 May $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 65,306.87 $187,693.79 21.2% $ 696,874.21 $ 696,874.21 Jun $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $132,828.73 $320,522.52 36.2% $ 564,045.48 $ 564,045.48 Jul $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $123,647.90 $444,170.42 50.2% $ 440,397.58 $ 440,397.58 Aug $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 70,271.05 $514,441.47 58.2% $ 370,126.53 $ 370,126.53 Sep $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 56,745.36 $571 ,186.83 64.6% $313,381.17 $ 313,381.17 0::t $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 42,461 .67 $613,648.50 69.4% $ 270,919.50 $ 270,919.50 Nov $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 50,097.94 $663,746.44 75.0% $ 220,821.56 $ 220,821.56 Dec $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 41 ,287.57 $705,034.01 79.7% $ 179,533.99 $ 179,533.99

• -L ,_ .. ~ 2015 Financial Status Report- Summary NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balanse el Balanse ef MeAlfl T-o1a1A>llafa

~

Olligalea te

,T-otal

__ Casis ...

Cufflulati'l0

• -*- ~ -

Pf:eeeAt I

Oeligatea J::unas Reeiuirna aG-1-e Ameunl ($) ~ lor Comialelion

~ Roiaort ($) f$t eosl&loel) -.....

. ..... , ** ':"1

~

! 884,568.00 $884,568.00 $- 27,858.78 $732,892.79 ~ $-151,675.21 $- 151,675.21

884,568.oo $884,568.00 $- 17,728.28 $750,621 .07 $-133,946.93 $- 133,946.93

~

~

.  :::884,568.00 $884,568.00 $- 7,329.18 $757,950.25 ~ $-126,617. 75 $- 126,617.75

. '"884,568.00 $884,568.00 $- 846.69 $758,796.94 ~ $-125,771.06 $- 125,771.06 l *

884,568.oo $884,568.00 $- -70.96 $758,867.90 ~ $-125,700.10 $- 125,700.10

,,,_  ! 884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ $758,867.90 ~ $-125, 700.10 $- 125,700.10 I ,I

! 884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ $758,867.90 ~ $-125,700.10 $- 125,700.10 A

884,568.oo $884,568.00 $- 4,999.62 $763,867.52 ~ $-120,700.48 $- 120,700.48

! 884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ $763,867.52 ~ $-120,700.48 $- 120,700.48 6

Table 5. Flnanclal Detall Report - Summary for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 0 647 2358 (2) Technical 0 898 3625 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 1545 5983

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ - $ 116,480.67 $ 441 ,761.71 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ - $ 54,296.23 $ 204,054.32 SUB-TOTAL $ - $ 170,776.90 $ 645,81 6.03 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ - $ -

(2) Material and Services Cost $ - $ 468.00 $ 2,124.36 (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ 2,599.78 $ 44,760.71 SUB-TOTAL $ . $ 3,067.78 $ 46,885.07 G & A Costs $ - $ 18,836.01 $ 71 ,166.42 DOE Fee (If Applicable) NA NA TOTAL $ - $ 192,680.69 $ 763,867.52

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 6.0 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for all of the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 4. The monthly planned (budget) cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table. Table 6.x will detail the monthly expenditures for each individual nuclear power plant sites. The Table 6.x will identify the individual nuclear power plant and the associated TAC # for license fee recovery.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $884,568.00 Funds Obligated to date: $884,568.00 Period of Performance: 30 Sep 2013 to 29 Sep 2017 7

Table 6.0. Cumulative Monthly ExDense Forecast - NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget 1 $ 225.523.00 $ - $ 231.619.08 102.70%

2 $ 209.504.00 $ - $ 119.024.47 56.81%

3 $ 267.024.00 $ - $ 182 898.60 68.50%

4 $ 182,517.00 $ - $ 230,325.37 126.19%

TOTAL $ 884,568.00 $ - $ 763,867.52 86.35%

Table 6.1. Peach Bottom, Susquehanna, Three Mle Island NPP Monthly Expense Forecast TAC# MF3288, MF3289, MF3993, MF3994, MF3995 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 36 309.00 $ - $ 42 739.46 11 7.71%

2.0 $ 27941 .86 $ - $ 11 649.50 41.69%

3.0 $ 41 465.83 $ - $ 92 050.06 221.99%

4.0 $ 38 325.83 $ - $ 61 435.07 160.30%

Total $ 144 042.52 $ - $ 207 874.09 144.31%

Table 6.2. Farley NPP Monthly Expense Forecast - TAC# MF3037, MF3038 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 24 494.00 $ - $ 35 814.20 146.22%

2.0 $ 32 462.71 $ - $ 17 557.88 54.09%

3.0 $ 38 026.00 $ - $ 14 231.40 37.43%

4.0 $ 10 807.00 $ - $ 6 730.80 62.28%

Total $ 105 789.71 $ - $ 74 334.28 70.27%

Table 6.3. Columbla NPP Monthly ExDense Forecast -TAC# MF3039 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 40 699.00 $ 40 303.57 99.03%

2.0 $ 56 755.60 $ - $ 30 329.68 53.44%

3.0 $ 59 334.1 7 $ - $ 26 448.55 44.58%

4.0 $ 37 841.83 $ 47 338.91 125.10%

Total $ 194 630.60 $ - $ 144 420.71 74.20%

Table 6.4. Beaver Valley NPP Monthly ExDense Forecast - TAC# MF3286 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 35 785.00 $ - $ 33 977.44 94.95%

2.0 $ 28 240.61 $ - $ 22 874.62 81.00%

3.0 $ 35 8 15.00 $ - $ 22 741.93 63.50%

4.0 $ 41 895.68 $ - $ 46 487.05 11 0.96%

Total $ 141 736.29 $ - $ 126 081.04 88.95%

8

Table 6.5. Arkansas NPP Monthly Emense Forecast

• TAC# MF3041, MF3042 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 52 482.00 $ - $ 42 770.87 81.50%

2.0 $ 35 287.61 $ - $ 19580.12 55.49%

3.0 $ 55 993.00 $ - $ 19 645.22 35.09%

4.0 $ 33 0 12.83 $ 44 461.53 134.68%

Total $ 176 ns.44 $ - $ 126 457.74 71.54%

Table 6.6. Monticello / Prairie Island NPP Monthly Ex i>ense Forecast

• TAC# MF3696, Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 35 754.00 $ - $ 36 013.54 100.73%

2.0 $ 28815.61 $ - $ 17 032.67 59. 11 %

3.0 $ 36 390.00 $ - $ 7 781.44 21.38%

4.0 $ 20 633.83 $ - $ 23 872.01 11 5.69%

Total $ 121 593.44 $ - $ 84 699.66 69.66%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 4 is identified in Table 7. The Spending Plan is updated to reflect the LTD T0 4-2b direction to the USAGE. The Spending Plan reflects a reduced effort to accomplish the tasks and the USAGE anticipates excess funds to be returned to the NRG upon completion of the remaining tasks.

Baseline $ 8,000 $ 68,000 $ 48,000 $ 66,000 $ 134,000 Actual Costs $ 7,641 $ 67,267 $ 47,479 $ 65,307 $ 132,829 Difference $ - $ 359 $ 733 $ 521 $ 693 $ 1,171 Percenta e 95.5% 98.9% 98.9% 98.9% 99.1%

Baseline $ 124,000 $ 7 1,000 $ 57,000 $ 43,000 $ 50,000 $ 42,000 Actual Costs $ 123,648 $ 70,271 $ 56,745 $ 42,462 $ 50,098 $ 4 1,288 Difference $ 352 $ 729 $ 255 $ 538 $ (98) $ 712 Percenta e 99.7% 99.0% 99.6% 98.7% 100.2% 98.3%

Baseline $ 28,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 1,000 $ - $

Actual Costs $ 27,859 $ 17,728 $ 7,329 $ 847 $ 71 $

Difference $ 141 $ 2,272 $ 12,671 $ 153 $ (71) $

Percenta e 99.5% 88.6% 36.6% 84.7%

9

Baseline $ - $ 6,000 $ 6,000 Actual Costs $ 5,000 Difference $ 1,000 Percenta e 83.3%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 8. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site.

Table 8. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

PFe!)c!FatieA ei a +ask QdeF PFepesal leF eualt.JatiA1 tl=le PeleAlial feF Fl988iAJ al tl=le T04-1 12,11 Q.£201 :l Jesept:i M.loaFley Nt.Jslear PlaAI Ct.Je tG Cam loailt.JF8 Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-1a 5/5/2014 Joseph MFarley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure

! - - ,...f, ...,

T -- r'\,.,, -

n ~ ----. ... 1 -- r-. -

• -"=--

.. n_.. __,.; ..,,1

-*- -* - n---.h

.,, ...-* .u--

T04-2 12,/191'2013 Qettem ,A,18miG PeweF SlatieA Ct.Je 18 Cam loailt.JFe

....... ,...,,..,"T"_ ,1,-

-- '. .... 11.

tl T04-2a 412:ll:1014

-

• tl Qettem, :illFee Mile lslaAd, aAd St.Jsqt.JeRaAAa ~ll.JGleaF 129'118F PlaAIS Ot.Je I8 Cam loailt.JFe Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-2b 9/19/2014 Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plants Due to Dam Failure Pre!)aratieA ei a +ask Qder Prnpesal ler e...alt.JaliA1 tl=le PeleAlial ler lol988iAJ al tl=le T04-3 :ll1:ll:1014 Gelt.Ji:Rt:lia GeAeFatiA1 StalieA ~ll.JGleaF i;!eu,eF i;!laAI Ct.Je 18 Cai:R loailt.JFe Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-3a 12/15/2014 Columbia Generating Station Nuclear Power Plant Due to Dam Failure PFepaFa~8A el a Task OdeF Prepesal l8F e>.<alt.JatiA1 tl=le PeleAlial feF lol988iAJ al tl=le T04-4 3121,12014

,0.FkaAsas ~lt.JsleaF GAe Sile Ot.Je le OaFA loailt.Jre Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-4a 10/6/2014 Arkansas Nuclear One Site Due to Dam Failure

- ~-- r.f ,.. T ... -1 ,-....,.J *- .... . ,..__ ,_

.. ... __ .,:_1 , __ - . __ _.: __ ...t .1.1...-

- n T04-5 :ll:1112014 -* - - - .,,

Valley Pe1118r Slali8A Sile Ot.Je le Oai:R loailt.Jre Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-5a 9/23/2014 Beaver Valley Power Station Site Due to Dam Failure PFepaFatieA el a +ask OdeF Prepesal 18F ie>Jalt1atiA1 IRe PeleAtial I8F loleooiA1 at Ille T04-6 :ll:ll,12014 MeAliGelle aAd PFaiFie lslaAd ~ll.JGleaF GeAeFaliA1121aAI Siles Owe le Oai:R loailwFe Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-6a 9/28/2014 Monticello and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Sites Due to Dam Failure Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at Susquehanna Nuclear Power Plant (NPP)

T04-7 8/14/2014 Due to Dam Failure 10

The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 9 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites. The costs for this reporting period are for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island.

TABLE 9. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 YES MF3038 Farley 2 YES MF3039 Columbia YES MF3041 ANO 1 YES MF3042 ANO2 YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 YES MF3995 Three Mile Island 1 YES MF3696 Monticello YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 YES MF3698 Prairie Island 2 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING PERIOD $ -

11

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-25-14-T-0026 (P2#: 447232)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS October 20, 2015 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in the determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that my affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants. A Technical Letter Report (TLR) documenting the development of the hydrographs will be provided. The NPP sites to be evaluated will be identified in subsequent Letters of Technical Direction (LTDs).

NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301 -415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USAGE Information 1.1.1 . Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S ( (b)(6) 1616 Capitol Avenue, uIte 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 1.1.2. Program Manager Primary: !(b)(6) 1.1.3. Program Engineer Primary: !(b)(6) I Agreement Period of Performance July 25, 2014 through September 29, 2017 Period for this Report September 1, 2015 through October 5, 2015

2. Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction Information on individual Letters of Technical Direction (LTD), including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley; Beaver Valley; Monticello / Prairie Island; Arkansas; and Columbia.

3. Travel Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction The travel information recorded for this task order is reported by individual LTDs in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley; Beaver Valley; Monticello / Prairie Island; Arkansas; and Columbia.

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with BC Hydro for the Columbia Generating Station site has taken much longer than originally projected and the delay has significantly impacted the PDT to proceed forward with analysis.

Issue 1 Status: The MASTER NOA between the USAGE and BC Hydro has been signed (25 May 15).

The individual NDAs for each team member authorized to work on the project will be distributed for signature. The documents have been uploaded to the Partner sharepoint site tor PDT use (19 Oct 15).

An internal PDT is scheduled for 23 Oct 15 and a follow-on call with the dam safety engineers at BC Hydro for 30 Oct 15 is scheduled. Ongoing

5. Financial Status Table "1 contains a summary of the financial status of this task order. The total costs incurred for this reporting period is the sum of the Bill No. 28201507 for 3 Aug - 1 Sep for a dollar value of $86,025.07 and Bill No. 2820181 Ofor 1 Sep 15 with a credit of $2, 133.40.

Table 1. Financial Status Report* Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2014 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Aug $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 17,569.74 $ 17,569.74 0.6% $ 2,886, 175.86 $2,886,175.86 Sep $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 21 ,716. 10 $ 39,285.84 1.4% $ 2,864,459.76 $ 2,864,459.76 Oct $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,195.60 $ 118,481.44 4.1% $ 2,785,264.16 $ 2,785,264.16 Nov $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 80,422.10 $ 198,903.54 6.8% $ 2,704,842.06 $ 2,704,842.06 Dec $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,555.41 $ 301,458.95 10.4% $ 2,602,286.65 $ 2,602,286.65 2

Table 1. Financial Status Report

• Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) c osts/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

J an $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $1 37,019.46 $ 438,478.41 15. 1% $ 2,465,267.19 $ 2,465,267.19 Feb $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $21 3,680.16 $ 652,158.57 22.5% $ 2,251,587.03 $ 2,251 ,587.03 Mar $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,500. 18 $ 867,658.75 29.9% $ 2,036,086.85 $ 2,036,086.85 Apr $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,835.27 $1 ,083,494.02 37.3% $ 1,820,251.58 $ 1,820,251.58 May $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,342.38 $1 ,185,836.40 40.8% $ 1,717,909.20 $ 1,717,909.20 J un $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $142,454.07 $ 1,328,290.47 45.7% $ 1,575,455. 13 $ 1,575,455.13 Jul $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 97,231.15 $ 1,425,521 .62 49.1% $ 1,478,223.98 $ 1,478,223.98 Aug $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 83,891.67 $1,509,413.29 52.0% $ 1,394,332.31 $ 1,394,332.31 Sep $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,066.56 $1 ,588,479.85 54.7% $ 1,315,265.75 $ 1,315,265.75 Table 2 provides the financial detail outlining the amount of funds expended during the reporting period, the current fiscal year (FY2015), and the total cumulative year to date. The financial data includes the following Letters of Technical Direction:

• LTD TO26 1 Farley Nuolear Power Plant (Mobile Distriot) 31Jul2014

• LTD TO26-1 a Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 06Apr2015

• LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant {Pittsburgh District). 23Sep2014

• LTD TO26-3 Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul District). 21Oct2014

• LTD TO26-4 Arkansas Nuclear One NPP (Little Rock / Tulsa Districts). 09Dec14

• LTD TO26-5 Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 15Dec14 3

Table 2. Flnanclal Detall Report* NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 33 1,039 1,083 (2) Technical 676 12,775 13,288 (3) Support (Bureau Reclamation) 8 527 527 TOTAL 717 14,341 14,898

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 48,074.36 $ 911,885.81 $ 937,297.94 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 22,627.36 $ 422,557.71 $ 432,667.71 SUB-TOTAL $ 70,701 .72 $1,334,443.52 $ 1,369,965.65 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ 896.00 $ 48,326.00 $ 48,326.00 (Bureau of Reclamation)

(2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ 15,524.80 $ 15,524.80 SUB-TOTAL $ 896.00 $ 63,850.80 $ 63,850.80 G & A Costs $ 7,468.84 $ 150,899.69 $ 154,663.40 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 79,066.56 $1 ,549,194.01 $ 1,588,479.85

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for work accomplished by the USAGE in the reporting period for Task Order 26. The cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in this table. The individual project letter status report for each LTDs issued is included in the attachments.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $2,904,745.60 Funds Obligated to date: $2,903,745.60 Period of Performance: 25 Jul 2014 to 29 Sep 2017 4

Table 3. Cumulative Monthly Exoense Forecast - NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1a s 1.683.915.60 s 21 814.98 s 1.154.831.00 68.58%

1b PMP/PI\F s 458.200.00 $ 42 437.84 s 275 475.90 60.12%

2 $ 315.600.00 $ - s 91 118.86 28.87%

3 $ 224.760.00 $ 14 813.74 s 67 054.09 29.83%

4 $ 221 ,270.00 $ - $ - 0.00%

TOTAL $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,066.56 $ 1,588,479.85 54.70%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 26 is identified in Table 4. The spending plan reflects the project schedu le delays and completion of tasks for Farley. These scheduling issues include: 1) signature of the Non-Disclosure Agreement for Columbia and 2) the impact of the May I June 2015 high water events and a levee failure at the Tulsa and Little Rock Districts.

Baseline $ 31,215 $ 47,021 $ 150,836 $ 130,000 $200,000 Actual Costs $ 17,570 $ 21,716 $ 79,196 $ 80,422 $102,555 Difference $ 13,645 $ 25,304 $ 71,641 $ 49,578 $ 97,445 Percentage 56.3% 46.2% 52.5% 61.9% 51.3%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,500 $ 251,800 $175,200 Actual Costs $ 137,019 $ 213,680 $ 215,500 $ 215,835 $ 102,342 $142,454 Difference $ 11 2,981 $ 36,320 $ 34,500 $ 34,665 $ 149,458 $ 32,746 Percenta e 54.8% 85.5% 86.2% 86.2% 40.6% 81.3%

Baseline $ 100,446 $ 115,100 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Actual Costs $ 97,231 $ 83,892 $79,066.56 Difference $ 3,215 $ 31,208 $ 20,933 Percenta e 96.8% 72.9% 79.1%

Spe nding Pla n (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,000 $ 17,630 Actual Costs Difference Percenta e 5

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site for Task Order #26, NRC-HQ-25-14-T -0026.

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Lett er of Technical Date S ubject Direction (LTD)

LTD T026-1 J1 Jbll 14 e>,ial.ialiGl'1 GI i;'.IGGQ ~~artls al tl:le JGS8f:)R M.i;'.arley ~JblGlear J;1Iar:il Qble tG Qam i;'.ailblr8 LTD T026-1a 6-Apr-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure LTD T026-2 23-Sep-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Beaver Valley NPP Due to Dam Failure LTD T026-3 21-0ct-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Monticello and Prairie Island NPP Sites LTDT026-4 9-Dec-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Arkansas Nuclear One NPP Site LTD T026-5 15-Dec- 14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Columbia Generating Station NPP Site 6

The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites for this reporting period.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 $ - YES MF3038 Farley 2 $ - YES MF3039 Columbia $ 3,650.96 YES MF3041 ANO1 $ 30,300.93 YES MF3042 ANO2 $ 30,300.93 YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 $ 1,648.46 YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 $ 1,648.46 YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 YES MF3995 Three Mile Island 1 YES MF3696 Monticello $ 5,758.41 YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 $ 2,879.21 YES MF3698 Prairie Island 2 $ 2,879.21 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING PERIOD $ 79,066.56 7

LTD 1026-1 Farley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 8

Table LTD -TO26-1.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-1 Farley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Delivery Team: Onaha and Mobile Districts Project Manager - J(b)(6)

Technical Manage l CENWO-PM-S CESAM-EN-HH Project Costs: $277,309 P2 447176 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Revised LTD issued 6 April 2015 Activity

1. 1a I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Accomplished this Reoortino Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Perform a\

(bX7XE) (bX7)(F) None. None. Work is complete.

Activity

1. 1b I Develop Preliminary Hydrooraphs and TLR Activities Accomplished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues Develop time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including Excel spreadsheets, at various locations in the vicinity of the Farley NPP site. Two Submissions: None. None. Work is complete.

Preliminary Draft and Pre-Final. The (b)(7)(E). (b)(7)(F)

Activity

1. 2 I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Accomplished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None. None. Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Accomplished this Rennrtina Period Activities Planned for Next Rennrtina Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Additional Information to be included at the

.ceauest of Southern Company: *

(b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

I 1) Flow nyarograpns ror the complete model None. None. Work is complete.

run. 2) Velocity hydrographs for the complete model run. 3) Spatial coordinates and projection for each cross section. 4) All cross section station and elevation points. 5) Left and right bank stations. 6) Manning's "n" values or roughness coefficients for the left overbank, channel and right overbank at each cross section.

1. 4 I

Activity Participate in Presentation of Results Meetinas Activities Accomplished this Reoortino Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 9

Table LTD T026-1.2. LTD 26-1 Farley* Travel Completed This Reponlng Pertod & Planned for Next Reponlng Pertod Related Actlvtty: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I Planned next reporting period I I I I I I I I I I Table LTD T0 26-1.3. Cu111.1latlve MonthlyExpenee-TLD T026-1 Farley, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percent:age vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1a $ 149,682.20 $ 130,871.20 87.43%

1b PMP/PMF $ 52,369.92 $ 36,942.43 70.54%

2 $ 21,376.04 $ 19,465.04 91.06%

3 $ 29,255.44 $ 16,112.04 55.07%

4 $ 26,455.72 $ . 0.00%

TOT AL $ 279,139.32 $ . $ 203,390.71 72.86%

10

LTD T026-2 Beaver Valley 11

Table LTD -T026-2.1. Project Status for LTD T026-2 Beaver Valley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliverv Team: Omaha a111d Pittsburgh Districts Project Managers l /hl/6\ I CENWO*PM*S!(b)(6) j CELRP-PM-PM Technical Lead -l(bl(6) ICELRP-EC-DH Project Costs: $450,476 P2 448945 Lm issued 23 Sep 2014 Ac:;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Accoll1)lished this Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Evaluate PMP and PMF for the Beaver Valley NPP site as v.ell as the (b)(?)(E), (b)(l)(Fl

( - v

• v*vt' 11yurograpns ca=u on the site-None None Work is complete.

specific PMP developed by the NRC's licensee, FENOC. Existing USAGE hydrologic and hydraulic models will be used to determine lhe PMF resulting from the Licensee's site-specific PMP.

Acti.,;ty I De\181op Preliminary Activities Accoll1)lished this Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR P.eoortina Period Reoortina Period Assess th.!(7)(E). (b)(7)(F) l,N\;ument ine anlyses in a prelirrinary drafl and pre-final TLR and hydroaraphs.1 None None Work is complete.

(bX7XE). (bX7XF)

Activity

1. 2 I Intermediate Technical Re-.;ew Meetinas Activities Accoll1)lished this Reoortina Period Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None None Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Accoll1)lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR =rtina Period = rtina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate.

Calculation packages, including input Archive files and closeout and output files from computer None Work is complete.

project.

modeling runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final subnission.

Activity IParticipate in Presentation Activities Accoll1)lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Funds are budgeted for presentation of results, if None None Presentation of Results Meetings needed.

12

Table LTD T026-2.2. LTD 26-2 Beaver Valley* Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Actlvhy : IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w / NRC Completed this reporting period INone I I I I I I Planned next reporting period INone I I I I I I Table LTD T0 26-1.3. Cu1TL1lative Monthly Expense - TLD T0 26-1 Beaver Vally, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percent.age vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Curoolative Budget(%)

1a $ 259,701 .20 $ 261 ,283.52 100.61%

1b PMP/PMF $ 66,074.00 $ 59,593.64 90.19%

2 $ 55,117.00 $ 45,232.83 82.07%

3 $ 35,523.00 $ 3,296.92 $ 36,585.16 102.99%

4 $ 34,061 .00 $ .

TOTAL $ 450,476.20 $ 3,296.92 $ 402,695.15 89.39%

13

LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island 14

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 Project Managers* l(b)(6)

Technical Manager I

USAGE Project Delivery Team: Omaha and St. Paul Districts CENWO-PM-S,!(b)(6)

CEMVP-EC-H l CEMVP-PM-A Project Costs: $514,370 Lro issued 31 July 2014 I

Activity Develop PMP/PMF for Prairie I stand Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1a NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period CbX7)(E). CbX7)(F)

Additional information, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, will be provided: \

None None Work is corrplete (b)(7)(E}, (b)(7)(F)

INO nyarograpns are neeaea ,or tnese cross sections.

Activity

1. 1b I Develop PMF Stage Hydragraphs Monticello NPP Activities Accorrplished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Develop a new HMS rrodel of the watershed in developing the PMP for the Monticello NPP site and route the resulting runoff to produce the PMF. A georeferenced HEC-RAS rrodel shall be developed in order lo produce a PMF stage hydrograph at the Monticello NPP site. Additional information, al the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, will be orolided: 1 None None Work is corrplete (b)(7)(E}, (b)(7)(F) l i\'O nyarographs are needed for these cross sections.

15

Table LTD *T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Delivery Team: Onaha and St. Paul Districts Projec_t Managers

• l(b)(6)

Technical Manager IGENW 0-PM* S~(b)(6)

GEMVP-EG-H I CEMVP-PM*A Project CosIs: $514,370 Lm issued 31 July 2014 Activity I H&H Model Coni:,arison and Site- Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1c Soocific PMP Corroarison Reoortina Period Renortina Period Work will be complete in Goni:,arison of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, September provided H&H models, describing any major differences between Xcel's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H&H modeling approach. Coni:,arison of the site-specific PMPs (provided by Xcel) by describing any differences in the rainlall depth, duration, and distribution between the basin-wide PMPs and None None the basin-wide PMPs used by the USAGE to develop its hydrographs. USAGE will develop hydrographs simlliar to Activities 1A and 1B by applying the PMPs and using USAGE's H&H models. The findings will be documented, coordinated, and a detailed comparison performed.

Intermediate Technical Review Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Ac;;ty I Meetings Reporting Period Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate None None Work is complete Technical Review meetings.

Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Ac:ty I Develop Final Hydrographs and TLR Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate. Calculation packages, including input and output files from computer modeling Provide final deliverables to NRC None Work is complete runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity I Participate in Presentation of Results Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 Meetinas Reoortina Period Rennrtina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of TBD Results Meetings Table LTD T026*3.2. LTD 26-3 Monticello / Prairie llland

• Travel Completed Ranortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: IPur pose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w / NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I Planned next rePOrting period I I I I I I I I I I 16

Table LTD T026-1 .3. Currulative Monthly Expense* TLD T026-1 Monticello, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Currulative Budget(%)

1A1B1C $ 410,631.20 $ 357,389.84 87.03%

2 $ 43,469.00 $ 13,540.72 31.15%

3 $ 24,607.00 $ 11,516.82 $ 14,356.89 58.34%

4 $ 35,663.00 TOTAL $ 514,370.20 $ 11 ,516.82 $ 385,287.45 74.90%

17

LTD T026-4 Arkansas Nuclear One 18

Table LTD -T026-4.1. Project Status for LTD T026-4 Arkan- NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Projoct Deli11iry Team: Omaha, Uttle Rock, and Tulsa Dls~lcts Project Manager. Ii~;~) jcENWO-PM-S:j th)la) t ESWL-PM Technical Manager ~ B) l CESWL-EC*H: l}i)(6) j CESWT-EC*HF Project Costs: $938,823 P2 449969 LTD issued 9 Dec 2014 Ac:ty I Develop PMP/PMF ActilAtles Acco"'l)llshed this Reporting Period Actl-.ities Planned for Next Reporting Period r-<<>tes I Significant Issues Compare H&H Models (Entergy) and Compare Site-Specific PMP. Final report cof1l)lete, combining report Describe any major differences segments for all dams into single report for between Entergy*s H&H modeling re\/iew and Compariso ... ..,......., ......,.. ,,....

approach and USACE's H&H ~ m USAGE andj(bX7)(E), (bX7)(F) modeling approach. Describe any (bX7)(E), (bX7) Dam Safely team me..~rw """ o,scuss lncorPortalon of comments to be received at the (F) dilferences*iff1h'f laH\laH*depth, ra1,,,.,,. onoJv* IS and complete this Section ITR meeting from NRC and Omaha District.

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7) duration, and distribution between the 104..........

• I omplete Report Section

....... basin-wide*PMFs *ce,11ergy)'*1tii<!'lfie"'

(F) dea1m~ lh1 uescri tion, foundation, geology etc .

basin-wide PMPs (USACE), Dewlop hydrographs by applying the PMPs tori ~~~~~* I (Entergy) using USACE's H&H Acti-.ity I Develop Prelninary Hvdrooranhs and llR Activities Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti1,1ties Planned for Next Reporting Period r-<<>tes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Evaluation of Iha PM P and PMF for (b)(?)(E t(~X!.L. the ANO sitel 0 I

W EMllOP H&H models (F) tor ANO rn,er basin. Evaluale the Milestone: Prelirrinary Draft TLR (bX7XE). (bX7XF) and hydrographs 25 September Prelirrinary Draft of the Technical Letter Report lncorportaion of comments to be received at the 15.

completed and subrritted for re-.iew. ITR meeting f,rom NRC and Omaha District. Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and hydrographs 24 December 15.

Pro-.de hydrographs for identified locations In the LTD 26-4.

Ac: ;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetioos Activities Accomplished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period r-<<ltes I Significant Issues Milestone: Flrsl ITR 27*29 Schedule, host, and participate In Prepare presentations for the p,e-lTR weblnar October 2015 lntern-ediate Technical Re1,1ew Coordinatio:n for the ITR n-eeting.

and meeting. Milestone: Second ITR week ol meetings.

r-<<lt proposed yet I

Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Acti,.ties Acco"'l)lished this Reporting Period Actl-.ibes Planned for Next Reporting Period r-<<>tes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Docun-ent findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include additional Milestone: Final TLR and information as appropriate. hydrographs 24 December 2015 I

Acti1,1ty Participate in Presentation Activities Accomplished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period r-<<>tes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinos Schedule, Host and Participate in lBD Presentation of Results Meetings 19

Table LTD T026-4.2. LTD 26-4 Arkansas

• Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reoortlng Period Related Actlvtty: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated WI NRC Completed this reporting period Planned next reporting period (b)(6)

Activity #2 1m meeting with the icensee Little Rock, AR 26-0ct-15 29-0ct-15 $5,000 Yes Table LTD T026-4.3. Cun*.llatlve Monthly Expense - TLD T0 26-4 Arkansas, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures tor the Activity Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Currulative Budget(%)

1 $ 476,997 $ 19,321 .50 $ 360,024.36 75.48%

PMP/PMF $ 196,785 $ 41 ,280.36 $ 152,188.04 77.34%

2 $ 130,846 $ 5,922.04 4.53%

3 $ 71,281 $ .

4 $ 62,914 $ .

TOT.AL $ 938,823 $ 60,601 .86 $ 518,134.44 55.19%

20

LTD T026-5 Columbia Generating Station 21

Table LTD-TO26-5.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-5 Columbia NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project D1 ivery Team: r ha, Seattle, and Walla Walla Districts; BurRec Technical Services Center Project Manager - (b)(6) CENWO-PM-S;!(br) E ENWS-PM-MEI Technical Manage ENVvS-EN-HH-HE (b)(6) I BurRec Project Costs: $530,544 P2 449739 LTD issued 15 Dec 2014 Ac;ty I Dewlop PMP/PMF Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Reoortinq Period Reoortina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Evaluation of the PMP and PMF for Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) Planning meeting with BoR Non-Disclosure A the Columbia NPP site,1 continues investigation of the for the purpose of required to obtainlCb)(7XE), (b)(7XF) I (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F) 1969 PMP/PMF development developing a work plan and documents. Assump~

lor1CbX7)(£), CbX7XF) I schedule. PMP/PMF studies lo (bX XE), *11 7

adopted for1CbX XE), (b)(7) I not be needed. The ar ner and is co,,'1-'a' " *~ :;1uuy ""' sharepoi nt site has been current data and established and each of the team methodology. Reclamation members are securing accounts.

began investigation and sensitivity analysis of the VIC model for use to help validate the PMF model run.

Individual NDAs are signed and have established individual I-PASS/DMZ accounts for access to the BC Hydro documents.

Activity I Dewlop Preliminary Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraphs and TLR Reporting Period Rei:1ortina Period Develop H&H models for the Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) TheJ~(7~ ldam safety Revised Schedule to be developed Columbia NPP watershed. Evaluate has address~"' ,..,~ c,~., stud,w "'"" ,.,ilure mode after review of the BC Hydro (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)

CbX7)(£), CbX7XF) L ins for l~~,2(£), (b) I analyses from BC Hydro documents.

............,...... ,,.,,.,...,,,,nmom nd relateCI tne ~tall are projected to be (F)

Positions to potential failure available for review. These modes. are needed for evaluation of the required potential failure modes.

Provide hydrographs for provided locations in the LTD.

Ac;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Rennrtina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in n/a n/a TBD Intermediate Technical Review meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Rennrtina Period Document data and analysis, n/a n/a TBD including the hydrographs, in a Final TLR. Package will include the calculation packages, including input and output files from the computer modeling runs supporting the key TLR conclusions.

I Activity Participate in Presentation Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Reoortinq Period Reoortina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in n/a n/a n/a Presentation of Results Meetings 22

Table LTD T026-5.2. LTD 26-5 Columbia

• Travel Completed Thia Renortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related ActlvHy: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting period Planned next reporting period Table LTD T 0 26-5.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - TLD T0 26-5 Columbia, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent.age vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1 $ 266,693 $2,493.48 $ 45,262.08 16.97%

1 PM P/PMF $ 113,966 $1,157.48 $ 26,751.79 23.4!7%

2 $ 54,733 $ 6,958.23 12.71%

3 $ 44,088 $ .

4 $ 52,169 $ .

TOTAL $ 531,649 $ 3,650.96 $ 78,972.10 14.85%

The recommendation is for t he planned budget to be re-evaluated now that the individual NDAs have been signed, the interaction with BC Hydro to exchange the information between agencies may begin.

The costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation are included in the table above and the sum total amount is recorded in Table 2 Financial Detail Report, as Other Direct Costs, Subcontractor Consultant Cost.

23

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 (P2#: 455162)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS October 20, 2015 submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective The object of the agreement, Review of Recommendation 2. 1 Flood Re-evaluations as Part of 50.54(f) Response, is for the USAGE to assist the NRG staff in reviewing certain flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) in the FHRRs provided by NRG licensees in response to the 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012, Recommendation 2.1: Flooding. This work effort will support the NRG with their Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR ..

NRG Project Manager Brad HaNey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USAGE Information 1.1.1. Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S d(b)(6) ~

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 1.1.2. Program Manager Primary: l(b)(B) I (b)(6) 1.1.3. Program Engineer Primary: (b)(6)

(b)(6}

Agreement Period of Performance August 25, 2015 through August 24, 2016 Period for this Report September 1, 2015 through October 5, 2015

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table A. Table B provides milestones and schedules for each task .

I  :.r::~:: ~-~:~.,~~,i~.-~:.*~:~~~~~,~--~~.;;;.~~~~-*.(iv. ~~.J :* ~i~,: ,:~;~~~~;,:_~;~: :J~~::~: : I Acti-.ties AccoOl)lished this Acti-.ties Planned for next Task Deliwrable/Milestone Description Issues/Challenges Reporting Period Reporting Period 1 ORIENTATION Receipt of the FHRR -.a DVD.

1.a Peach Bottom Participation in audit (webinar) on 10 Sep. Seek clarification if Receipt of re-.sed FHRR l.ia necessary.

1.b Three Mile Island email. Participation in audit (webinar) on 10 Sep.

PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL EVALIUATION 2 REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIO'JAL INFORMATION Need to secure access to the ERR.

2.a Peach Bottom Recuest to have ac cess to Identify additional information Review of documents and additional data as rel.iew of the data needs

• see table submitted on t 0 develop of a list of indicates the calculation packages Sep. information needs. for some of the HEC-HMS and 2.b Three Mile Island HEC-RAS models do not include FINAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 3

ANO TECHNICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT 3.a Peach Bottom 3.b Three Mile Island Table B: Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Milestones I Planned Date I Actual Date 1 Technical Orientation / Kick-Off Meeting Peach Bottom I 10-Sep-15 I 10-Sep-15 Three Mile Island I 10-Sep-15 I 10-Sep-15 2 Preliminary TEA & RAls Peach Bottom I 30-Nov-15 I Three Mile Island I 30-Nov-15 I 3 Final TEA Peach Bottom I I Three Mile Island I I 2

3. Travel Table C provides information on completed and planned t ravel for this task order. No travel expenditures have been incurred in this reporting period and none are projected for the next reporting period.

Table C. Travel Complete d This Reporting Pe riod & Pla nned for Ne xt Re porting Period Related Task: Purpose l ocation Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The USAGE team is in the process of acquiring the required software to evaluate the submittals of the licensee for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island. The software is in the process of acquisition and additional approvals are required for installation.

Resolution 1: The USAGE is monitoring the acquisition process to expedite the installation approval process.

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this agreement. Table 2 provides the amount of funds expended during the period, current fiscal year, and the total cumulative year to date.

Table 1. Flnanclal Status Report* Summary NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount ($) to Date ($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Sep $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961 .28 $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77 $ 226,731.51 3.5% $ 226,731.51 Oct Nov Dec 3

Table 2. Financial Detail Report* NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

( 1) Management 18 18 18 (2) Technical 44 44 44 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 62 62 62

2. Costs Labor Costs:

( 1) Direct Labor Costs $ 5,002.91 $ 5,002.91 $ 5,002.91 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 2,551.48 $ 2,551.48 $ 2,551.48 SUB-TOTAL $ 7,554.39 $ 7,554.39 $ 7,554.39 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ - $ -

(2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL $ - $ - $ -

G & A Costs $ 675.38 $ 675.38 $ 675.38 DOE Fee (If Applicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3.1 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for all of the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 9. The monthly planned (budget) cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table. Table 3.x will detail the monthly expenditures for each individual nuclear power plant sites and the individual nuclear power plant and the associated TAC# for license fee recovery.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $884,568.00 Funds Obligated to date: $884,568.00 Period of Performance: 30 Sep 2013 to 29 Sep 2017 4

Table 3.1. Cumulative Monthly Expense Forecast - NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1 s 19 378.00 s 4 256.83 $ 4 256.83 21.97%

2 s 172.172.04 s 3 972.94 $ 3 972.94 2.31%

3 s 43 411.24 $ - s - 0.00%

TOTAL $ 234,961 .28 $ 8229.n $ 8229.n 3.50%

Table 3.2: LTD T009-2 Cum,latlve Monthly Expense - Peach Bottom TIC MF6598 / MF6599 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage v s.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $ 2,233.67 $ 2,233.67 23.05%

2 $ 80,153.96 $ 1,986.47 $ 1,986.47 2.48%

3 $ 18,211 .36 $ . $ . 0.00%

TOTAL $ 108,054.32 $ 4,220.14 $ 4,220.14 3.91%

Table 3.3: LTD TO09-3 Cumulative Monthly Expense -Three Mile Island TIC MF1113 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $ 2,023.16 $ 2,023.16 20.88%

2 $ 92,018.08 $ 1,986.47 $ 1,986.47 2.16%

3 $ 25,199.88 $ . $ . 0.00%

TOTAL $ 126,906.96 $ 4,009.63 $ 4,009.63 3.16%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 9 is identified in Table 4.

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 5,961 $ 12,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 Actual Costs Difference Percenta e Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 12,000 Actual Costs Difference Percenta e

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site.

5

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

LTD T009*3 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Peach Bottom NPP Site LTDT009-2 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Three Mile Island NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites. The costs for this reporting period are for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF6598 Peach Bottom 2 $ 2,110.07 YES MF6599 Peach Bottom 3 $ 2,110.07 YES MF1113 Three Mile Island 1 $ 4,009.63 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING PERIOD $ 8,229.77 6

From: l(b)(6) l To: Harvey. Brad; Cook. Christopher: NRO MLSR Resource: Dority. Dayna: See. Kenneth; ContractsPOT Resource:

NRCIPAC Resource; Turner. Michael Cc:

Subject:

[External_Sender] NRC*HQ-13-1-0021: MLSRs 20 Apr 2016 Submission Date: Monday, April 25, 2016 6:03:45 PM Attachments: NRC Task Order Mar 2016 !PAC PDF NRC Task Order Apr 2016 JPAC Summary.pdf NRC-USACE MLSR T026 2016Apr.pdf NRC*USACE MLSR T09 2016Apr.odf Brad, Attached are the April 20 16 monthly reporting documents for the subject JAA.

I. !PAC: Billing information by line item (task orders) for !AA. Summary information by task order, current month, billed to date and authorized ceiling (NRC_Task_Order_Mar_20l6_IPAC and NRC_Task_Order_Apr_20 J 6_!PAC_Summary). Note: This reporting period includes expenditures for TO #09, and #26.

2. MLSR NRC-HQ 14-T-0026: Task order #26 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO26_2016Apr). Attachments provided for Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello/Prairie Island, ANO, and Columbia NPP sites.

4. MLSR NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009: Task order #09 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO9_2016Apr).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

!{b)(6)  !

l(b)(6) I ProJect Manager Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Special Projects Branch 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, NE 68102-4901 Phone: l(b)(6) l BB: l(b)(6)

Fax:

l(b)(6)

Page 1 of 2 CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Accounts Of Billed Date: 01 -Apr-2016 BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS (AR 37-1)

• 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009

• 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

• MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28209746 NO CHECK DRAWN 1566593

• 01 -Apr-2016 Partial# 32 01-Mar-2016 Thru 01 -Apr-2016 ,l * .,. "' JI .. ............... ,, ......

Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Billed Accounting Classification Billing Accounting Classification 031 NA X 0200.0000 2013 00 0000 00000000000 00000 31000001 $7,026.04 096 NA X 3122.0000 G6 08 2417 895 0WDNRC 96252 $39,583.72 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 00 0000 NA 00000 31000001 $32,557.68 Line Item Moa ____ Description Eaid No Amount 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $8,743.05 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $2,755.83 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $19,442.92 00005 REIMBURSABLE - INSIDE FEDERAL GC WORK PERFORMED BY OTHER GOV AGENCIES $1,615.88 Subtotal: $32,557.68 6 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $1 ,532.90 6 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $410.21 6 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $5,082.93 Subtotal: $7,026.04 Total Billed Amount : $39,583.72 Less Amount Paid Via IPAC: $39,583.72 Payment Due Date: 01-May-2016 Pay This Amount: $0.00 DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.971 v2. l.4

Page 2 of 2 CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS Billed Date: 01 -Apr-2016 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28209746 NO CHECK DRAWN 1566593 01 -Apr-2016 Partial# 32 01-Mar-2016 Thru 01 -Apr-2016 Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount Funds Authorized: $4,270,251 .28 CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED Total Billed Amount: $2,929,134.73 I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as stated and Prev Billed Amount: $2,889,551.01 s hould be charged to the appropriation(s) and/or fund(s) as indicated above, or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated.

Current Billed Amount: $39,583.72 Total Flux Billed: $0.00 Prev Flux Billed: $0.00 Date: 01 -Apr-2016

~

Current Flux Billed: $0.00 Authorized Administrative or Certifying Officer DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.971 v2. l.4

Date: 19-APR-2016 Custo mer Order Bill Print Error Messa ges Page:1 Bill Numbe r Error Messag e cobil_ipac.97 1 v2.1.4

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021

SUMMARY

INFORMATION BY TASK ORDER

~ .......

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 20 April 2016 Submittal "L~

031 NA X 0200.0000 2013

$ 209,283.03 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ - $ 763,867.52 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 031 NA X 0200.0000 2015 $ 7,026.04 $ 52,371.50 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 031 NA X 0200.0000 201 4 $ 32,557.68 $ 1,903,612.68 IPAC Total $ 39,583.72 $ 2,929,134.73 Authorized lnteragency Agreement No. Line Item Number Billed to Date Ceiling NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 T0#01 Line 2 $ 209,283.03 $ 247,686.00 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Line 4 $ 763,867.52 $ 884,568.00 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Line 5 $ 1,903,61 2.68 $ 2,903,036.00 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Line 6 $ 52,371.50 $ 234,961.28 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 $ 2,929,134.73 $ 4,270,251.28 Page 1

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 (P2#: 405160)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS April 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status 1.1. Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regu latory Commission (NRG) in the determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that my affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants. A Technical Letter Report (TLR) documenting the development of the hydrographs will be provided. The NPP sites to be evaluated will be identified in subsequent Letters of Technical Direction (LTDs).

1.2. NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvev@NRC.GOV 1.3. USAGE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S a(b)(6) ~

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Mana er:

Primary: (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Program En ineer:

Primar : (b}(6)

(b)(6) 1.4. Agreement Period of Performance July 25, 2014 through September 29, 2017 1.5. Period for this Report March 01, 2016 through April 01, 2016

2. Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction Information on individual Letters of Technical Direction (LTD), including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

3. Travel Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction The travel information recorded for this task order is reported by individual LTDs in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NOA) with BC Hydro for the Columbia Generating Station site has taken much longer than originally projected and the delay has significantly impacted the PDT to proceed forward with analysis.

Issue 1 Status: The MASTER NOA between the USAGE and BC Hydro has been signed (25 May 15). The individual NDAs for each team member authorized to work on the project will be distributed for signature. The documents have been uploaded to the Partner sharepoint site for PDT use (19 Oct 15). The NRG team members have submitted signed NDAs and they are with NWD for signature. CLOSED

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this task order. The total costs incurred for this reporting period is captured on the Line 5 of the Bill No. 28204245 of the IPAC DA Form 4445-R.

Table 1. Flnanclal Status Report* Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2014 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date ($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 17,569.74 $ 17,569.74 0.6% $ 2,886, 175.86 $ 2,886, 175.86 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 21 ,716.10 $ 39,285.84 1.4% $ 2,864,459.76 $ 2 ,864,459.76 Oct $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,195.60 $ 118,481.44 4.1% $ 2,785,264.16 $ 2,785,264.16 Nov $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 80,422.10 $ 198,903.54 6.8% $ 2,704,842.06 $ 2,704,842.06 Dec $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,555.41 $ 301 ,458.95 10.4% $ 2,602,286.65 $ 2,602,286.65 2

Table 1. Financial Status Report - Sumnary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulatil. Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $137,019.46 $ 438,478.41 15.1 % $ 2,465,267. 19 $ 2,465,267.19 Feb $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $213,680.16 $ 652,158.57 22.5% $ 2,251 ,587.03 $ 2,251,587.03 Mar $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,500.18 $ 867,658.75 29.9% $ 2,036,086.85 $ 2,036,086.85 Apr $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,835.27 $1,083,494.02 37.3% $ 1,820,251.58 $ 1,820,251.58 May $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,342.38 $1 ,185,836.40 40.8% $ 1,717,909.20 $ 1,717,909.20 Jun $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $142,454.07 $1,328,290.47 45.7% $ 1,575,455.13 $ 1,575,455.13 Jul $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 97,231. 15 $1,425,521.62 49.1% $ 1,478,223.98 $ 1,478,223.98 Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 83,891.67 $1,509,413.29 52.0% $ 1,394,332.31 $ 1,394,332.31 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,066.56 $1,588,479.85 54.7% $ 1,315,265.75 $ 1,315,265.75 Oct $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $109,520.92 $1,698,000.77 58.5% $ 1,205,745.83 $ 1,205,745.83 Nov $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 60,628.27 $ 1,758,629.04 60.6% $ 1,145,117.56 $ 1,145,117.56 Dec $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 52,852.79 $1 ,811 ,481.83 62.4% $ 1,092,264.77 $ 1,092,264.77 Balance of Total Costs Cumulatil. Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,645.49 $ 1,841,127.32 63.4% $ 1,062,619.28 $ 1,062,619.28 Feb $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,927.68 $ 1,871 ,055.00 64.4% $ 1,032,691.60 $ 1,032,691 .60 Mar $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 32,557.68 $1 ,903,612.68 65.6% $ 1,000,133.92 $ 1,000,133.92 Table 2 provides the financial detail outlining the amount of funds expended during the reporting period, the current fiscal year (FY2016), and the total cumulative year to date. The financial data includes the following Letters of Technical Direction:

• LTD TO26 1 Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 31 Jul2014

• LTD TO26-1a Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 06Apr2015

• LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant (Pittsburgh District). 23Sep2014

• LTD TO26 3 Monticello and Prairie Island ~J PPs (St. Paul District). 21 Oot201 4

• LTD TO26-3a Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul District) . 08Aug15

• LTD TO26 4 /\rl<ansas Nuclear Ono NPP (Little Rook/Tulsa Districts). 09Doo1 4 3

• LTD TO26-4b Arkansas Nuclear One NPP (Little Rock/Tulsa Districts). 29Jan16

• LTD TO26 5 Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/\A/alla \Nalla Districts). 15Dec14

• LTD TO26-5a Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 14Jan16 Table 2. Financial Detail Report - NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 51 1,008 2,091 (2) Technical 219 1,889 15,177 (3) Support (Bureau Reclamation) 0 4 659 TOTAL 270 2,901 17,927

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 19,442.92 $ 178,664.31 $ 1,115,962.25 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 8,743.05 $ 81 ,774.98 $ 514,442.69 SUB-TOTAL $ 28,185.97 $ 260,439.29 $ 1,630,404..94 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ 1,615.88 $ 22,007.13 $ 70,333.13 (Bureau of Reclamation)

(2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ 5,289.29 $ 20,814.09 SUB-TOTAL $ 1,615.88 $ 27,296.42 $ 91 ,147.22 G & A Costs $ 2,755.83 $ 27,397.12 $ 182,060.52 DOE Fee (If Applicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 32,557.68 $ 315,132.83 $ 1,903,612.68

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for work accomplished by the USAGE in the reporting period for Task Order 26. The cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in this table. The individual project letter status report for each LTD issued is included in the attachments.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $2,904,745.60 Funds Obligated to date: $2,903,745.60 Period of Performance: 25 Jul 2014 to 29 Sep 2017 4

Table 3. Cumulative Monthly ExDAnse Forecast - NRC-H0-25-14-T-0026 l'ercemage Expenditures for Task Expenditures Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative ,,,,,

1a $ 1 683,915.60 $ 20 982.37 $ 1,276 340.97 75.80%

1b PMP/PMF $ 458 200.00 $ 1.062.78 $ 343 564.21 74.98%

2 s 315 600.00 s 3.461.05 $ 118 824.83 37.65%

3 s 224 760.00 s 7.051 .48 $ 164 882.67 73.36%

4 $ 221 ,270.00 $ - $ - 0.00%

TOTAL $ 2,903,745.60 $ 32,557.68 $ 1,903,612.68 65.56%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 26 is identified in Table 4. The spending plan reflects the project schedule delays and completion of tasks for Farley. These scheduling issues include: 1) signature of the Non-Disclosure Agreement for Columbia and 2) the impact of the May I June 2015 high water events and a levee failure at the Tulsa and Little Rock Districts.

Baseline $ 31,215 $ 47,021 $ 150,836 $ 130,000 $200,000 Actual Costs $ 17,570 $ 21,716 $ 79,196 $ 80,422 $102,555 Difference $ 13,645 $ 25,304 $ 71,641 $ 49,578 $ 97,445 Percentage 56.3% 46.2% 52.5% 61.9% 51 .3%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,500 $ 251,800 $175,200 Actual Costs $ 137,019 $ 213,680 $ 215,500 $ 215,835 $ 102,342 $142,454 Difference $ 112,981 $ 36,320 $ 34,500 $ 34,665 $ 149,458 $ 32,746 Percents e 54.8% 85.5% 86.2% 86.2% 40.6% 81.3%

Baseline $ 100,446 $ 115,100 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Actual Costs $ 97,231 $ 83,892 $79,066.56 $109,520.92 $ 60,628 $ 52,853 Difference $ 3,215 $ 31 ,208 $ 20,933 $ (19,521) $ 29,372 $ 37,147 Percenta e 96.8% 72.9% 79.1% 121.7% 67.4% 58.7%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,000 $ 17,630 Actual Costs $ 29,645.49 $29,927.68 $32,557.68 Difference $ 60,355 $ 60,072 $ 27,442 Percenta e 32.9% 33.3% 54.3%

5

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site for Task Order #26, N RC-HQ-25-1 4-T-0026.

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

L:t:D :t:02& 1 3~ .h,11 ~4 eiral1,1aliGA gj l:lggd l=la.1ai:ds al ll:lg .IGSGflA ~4 l=a~l9',' f:>l1,1sl9a~ 12IaAI 1:),1,19 lg Oai:R l=aily~

LTDT026-1a 06-Apr-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure LTD T026-2 23-Sep-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Beaver Valley NPP Due to Dam Failure L:t:D :t:02& 3 2~ Gsl ~ 4 eiral1,1aliGA gj l:lggd l=la.;ai:ds al 11:19 MGAiis9llg aAd 12fai~i9 lslaAd ~11212 Sil96 LTD T026-3a 13-Aug-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Monticello and Prairie Island NPP Sites L:t:D :t:02& 4 OQ b19S 14 lsiral1,1ali8A el l=legd l=la.;afds al 11:10 .A,l'kaAsas ~J1,1slea~ GAe ~11212 Sile LTDT026-4b 29-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Arkansas Nuclear One NPP Site L:t:D :t:02& Ii Hi Oes 14 lsval1,1aliGA gj l:lggg l=la.1ai:ds al 11:19 Ggl1,1i:Rbia ~11212 Sile LTDTA26-5a 14-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Columbia NPP Site 6

The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites for this reporting period.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/ NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 $ - YES MF3038 Farley 2 $ - YES MF3039 Columbia $ 24,709.54 YES MF3041 ANO1 $ 3,924.07 YES MF3042 ANO2 $ 3,924.07 YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 $ - YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 $ - YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 YES MF3995 Three Mile Island 1 YES MF3696 Monticello $ - YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 $ - YES MF3698 Prairie Island 2 $ - YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 32,557.68 PERIOD 7

LTD 1026-1 Farley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 8

Table LTD -TO26-1.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-1 Farley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Deliverv Team: Omaha and Mobile Districts Project Manager - p )(6) icENWO-PM-S Technical Manage1 CESAM-EN-HH Project Costs: $277,309 P2 447176 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Revised LTD issued 6 April 2015 Activity

1. la I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco1r4>1ished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes I Significant Issues Perform al (bX7XE). (bX7XF) None. None. Work is complete.

Activity

1. 1b I Develop Preliminary Hydrographs and TLR Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Develop time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including Excel spreadsheets, at various locations in the vicinity of the Farley NPP site. Two Submissions: None. None. Work is complete.

Preliminary Draft and Pre-Final. The (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

Ac;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetings Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next Reoorting Period Notes I Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None. None. Work is complete.

meetings.

1. 3 I

Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco1r4>lished this andTLR Rennrtina Period Activities Planned for Next Rennrtina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Additional Information to be included at the request of Southern Company: *

(b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

11) Flow hydrographs for the complete model None. None. Work is complete.

run. 2) Velocity hydrographs for the complete model run. 3) Spatial coordinates and projection for each cross section. 4) All cross section station and elevation points. 5) Left and right bank stations. 6) Manning's "n" values or roughness coefficients for the left overbank, channel and right overbank at each cross section.

1. 4 I

Activity Participate in Presentation of Results Meetinas Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 9

Table LTD T026-1.2. LTD 26-1 Farley

• Travel ComDteted This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Actlvtty: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coord inated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next reporting period I I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. Cunilatlve Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-1 Farley, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1a $ 149,682.20 $ 130,871.20 87.43%

1b PMP/PMF $ 52,369.92 $ 36,942.43 70.54%

2 $ 21,376.04 $ 19,465.04 91.06%

3 $ 29,255.44 $ 16,112.04 55.07%

4 $ 26,455.72 $ . 0.00%

TOTAL $ 279,139.32 $ . $ 203,390.71 72.86%

10

LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 11

Table LTD -TO26-2.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deiiv,,rv T<>,.m: ""'*ha and Pittsburoh Districts Project Managers ~(b)/6) ICENWO-PM*S~(b)(6) I CELRP-PM-PM Technical Lead 1/b)(6) ICELRP-EC-DH Project Costs: $450,476 1-'2 448945 LID issued 23 Sep 2014 Ac:;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Evaluate PMP and PMF for the Beaver Valley NPP site as well as the (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

,-- -~

nyarographs basea on the site-None None Work is complete.

specific PMP developed by the NRC's licensee, FENOC. Existing USAGE hydrologic and hydraulic models Vlill be used to determine the PMF resulting from the Licensee's site-specific PMP.

Activity I D81181op Preliminary Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR P.eoortina Period Reoortina Period Assess tt1J "?)(E). (b X?)(F) aocument the anlyses in a prelirrinary draft and pre-final TLR and hydrographs.f None None Work is complete.

(bX7)(E). (bX7XF)

Ac::;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next P.eoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None None Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity D8118lop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate.

Calculation packages, including input and output files from computer Finalize project files. Work is complete.

modeling runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity IParticipate in Presentation Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoorti na Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None No action required.

Presentation of Results Meetings 12

Table LTD T026-2.2. LTD 26-2 Beaver Valley* Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period I

Related Actlvtty: Purpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period INone I I I I I I Planned next reporting period INone I I I I I I Table LTD TO26-1 .3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - TLD T026-1 Beaver Vally, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget(%)

1a $ 259,701.20 $ 263,982.10 101.65%

1b PMP/PMF $ 66,074.00 $ 62,121.31 94.02%

2 $ 55,117.00 $ 45,437.08 82.44%

3 $ 35,523.00 $ 40,773.62 114.78%

4 $ 34,061.00 $ -

TOTAL $ 450,476.20 $ - $ 412,314.11 91.53%

13

LTD TO26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 14

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Dl livecv Iearo- Jgha and St. PjYI Djstrjcts Project Managers (b)(6) CENWO-PM-Sl(b)(6) ~ CEMVP-PM-A Technical Manage CEMVP-EC-H _ _ _ _ _.,,_

Project Costs: $514,370 LTD issued 31 July 2014 I

Activity Develop PMP/PMF for Prairie Island Activities Acco"l)lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1a NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period (b)(l)(E), (b)(l)(F)

Addinonal information, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, \\ill be provided: 1.----l None None Work is complete (b)(?)(E) (b)(7)(F)

INO ff,n,

,,.m u,,'!'i:'IJ '"'t!l!!"'!l

_,,,,'lffl! l~ul!"l , ~!l"Pfl!

,~l'lffll

~w ffl"l u1'1!!"'1 1t:~!lS' u 1 uffl5\! .,crOSS sections.

Activity

1. lb I Develop PMF Stage Hydrographs Monticello NPP Activities Acco"l)lished this Reportng Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Develop a new HMS model of the watershed in developing the PMP for the Monticello NPP site and route the resulting runoff to produce the PMF. A georeferenced HEC-RAS model shall be developed in order to produce a PMF stage hydrograph at the Monticello NPP site. Additional information, at the request of the NRC's Ucensee, Xcel, \\ill be provided: I None None Work is complete (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

I No l..n""

y"'

o,r"og'~r"' ap~h"'s~a"'re .'.'.:-n

-:e:--:

e'::'

de:-:d:-:f:-

or:-:t:h:-e:s:-:-

e':'cross sections.

15

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliwrv Team: Omaha and St. Paul Districts Project Managersl~(b)(6)

Technical Manage I CENWO-PM-S, CEMVP-EC-H

!(b)IB) I CEMVP-PM-A Project Costs: $514,370 Lm issued 31 July 2014 Activity I H&H Model Coll1)arison and Site- Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1c Soocific PMP ColTl>arison Reoortina Period Reoortino Period Work wiU be complete in Comparison of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, September provided H&H models, describing any major differences between Xcel's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H&H modeling approach. Comparison of Jhe site-specific PMPs (provided by Xcel) by describing any differences in the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution between the basin-wide PMPs and None None the basin-wide PMPs used by the USAGE to dewlap its hydrographs. USACE will develop hydrographs similiar to Activities 1A and 1B by applying lhe PMPs and using USACE's H&H models. The findings will be documented, coordinated, and a detailed comparison performed.

Ac:;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetings Activities Accol1l)tished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next ReDQrting Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate None None Work is complete Technical Review meetings.

Activity

1. 3 I Develop Final

. Hydrographs and llR Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues Rennrtina Period Rennrtino Period Document findings in a Final llR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate. Calculation packages, including Repackage Iha deliverables for input and output files from compuler modeling Work is complele release to licensee.

runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity I Participate in Presenlation of Results Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 Meetinas Reoortina Period Rennrtino Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of None None Not required.

Results Meetings Table LTD T026-3.2. LTD 26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island

• Travel Completed Renortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next rePOrting period I I I I I I I 16

Table LTD T026-1.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - no T026-1 Monticello, NRC-HQ.25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budi:iet (%)

1A1B1C $ 410,631.20 $ 359,718.36 87.60%

2 $ 43,469.00 $ 13,540.72 31 .15%

3 $ 24,607.00 $ 17,605.09 71.55%

4 $ 35,663 .00 TOTAL $ 514,370.20 $ - $ 390 ,864.17 75.99%

17

LTD T026-4 Arkansas Nuclear One 18

Table LTD -T026-4.1. ProJect Status for LTD T026-4 Arkansas NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Delivery Team: Omaha, Litlle Rock, and Tulsa Districts Project Manager - ,. ,,,.., ICESWL-PM

" rNWO-PM-S;i ~ l ~~

Technical Manager- l /b)/6) LCESWL-EC- ; (6) ~ CESWT-EC-HF Project Costs: $938,"", r'~ **~=~

LTD issued 29 Jan 2016 Ac:t [ Dewlop PMP/PMF Acti1.1lies Accomplished this Reporting Period Ac1i.,;1ies Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Compare H&H Models (Entergy) and None None Work is complete.

Compare Site-Specific PMP.

Describe any major differences between Entergy's H&H modeling approach and USAGE's H& H modeling approach. Describe any differences In the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution belween the basin*¥Ade PM Ps (Entergy) and the basin-wide PMPs (USAGE).

Develop hydrographs by applying the PMPs (Entergy) using USACE's H&H models, Acth.ity [ Develop Preliminary AclilAlies Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,.ties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Ewluation of the PMP and PMF tor Ncne None Work is complete.

Iha * *~ " ,,~_,r, I

\DJ\!

models for ANO rt.er basin.

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) no\tae nyorograpns ror 1oenum,u locations In the LTD 26-4.

Ac::;ty [ lntemiedlate Technical Aclil.ilies Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,Aties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues Re1.1ew Meelinos Schedule, host, and participate In Ncne None Work Is complete.

Intermediate Technical Reldew meetings.

Acti1.1ty [ De\elop Final Hydrographs Acli1.1ties Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Dccument findings In a Final TLR Finalized the TLA. Pr01.ide responses 10 licensee requests for MIiestone: Final TLR and and hydrographs. Include additional additional information. hydrographs - 17 Mar 2016.

lnfom,allon as appropriate.

Acti1.1ly IParticipate in Presentation Acti1.1lies Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti.,;lies Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Schedule, Host and Participate in TBD Presentation of Results Meetings 19

Table LTD T026-4.2. LTD 26-4 .Arkansas* Travel Camnleted This Reportlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting peri od Planned next reporting period Table LTD T026-4.3. cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026*4 Arkansas, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent age Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 476,997 $796.66 $ 403,134.60 84.52%

PMP/PMF $ 196,785 $ 194,247.26 98.71%

2 $ 130,846 $ 24,787.48 18.94%

3 $ 71,281 $7,051.48 $ 90,391.92 126.81%

4 $ 62,914 $ .

TOTAL $ 938,823 $ 7,848.1 4 $ 712,561.26 75.90%

20

LTD T026-5 Columbia Generating Station 21

Table LTD-T026-5.1. Project Status for LTD T026-5 Colurri>la NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deli1,13ry Team: Omaha, Seattle, and Walla Walla Districts Project Manager -!(bX6)  !. CENWO-PM-S;!(bX6)  !. CENWS-PM-MEI Technical Manager - j(bX6) j, CENWS-EN-HH-HE Project Costs: $569,688 P2 449739 LTD issued 14 Jan 2016 ActilAty ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Dewlap PMP/PMF Notes / Significant Issues

1. 0 Reporting Period Reoorting Period Evaluation of the PMP and PMF for Held kick-ott meeting in Check-in teleconference to Non-Disclosure Agreement the Columbia NPP site1 Seattle. Began analysis. (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F) signed and documents shared (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

I with USAGE. Assumption that n " n , n , IC ~tucflieS for 1~~7XE), CbX7) !will not be neeaea.

ActilAty Dewlop Preliminary ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period De1.13lop H&H models for the Dam failure modelina for TLR (documenting failure Milestone: Preliminary Draft TLR Columbia NPP watershed. Evaluate CbX7XE). CbX7XF) I modes and modeling work) and hydrographs - 19 May 2016.

(bX7)(E). (bX7) (b)(7)(E), (b)(l)(l<) ~ s 95% (or more) - Preliminary Draft TLR is Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and (F) p ete. Draft hydrographs 75% complete. hydrographs

• TBD.

and other results are complete. TLR (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

ProlAde hydrographs for prollided locations in the LTD.

ActilAty Intermediate Technical ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 2 Re\/iew Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, host, and participate in Milestone: First ITR - 09 Jun Intermediate Technical RelAew 2016.

meetings. Milestone: Second ITR

• TBD.

ActilAty Dewlap Final Hydrographs ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Document data and analysis, n/a n/a Milestone: Final TLR and including the hydrographs, in a Final hydrographs - TBD.

TLR. Package will include the calculation packages, including input and output files from the computer modeling runs supporting the key TLR conclusions.

ActilAty Participate in Presentation ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reporting Period Reporting Period Schedule, Host and Participate in n/a n/a n/a Presentation of Results Meetings 22

Table LTD T026-5.2. LTD 26-5 Coluni>la

• Travel Corrmleted This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated WI NRC Completed this reporting period Planned next reporting period Table LTDT026*5.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLDTO26*5 Columbia, NRC-HQ-25*14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 266,693 $20,185.71 $ 118,634.71 44.48%

1 PMP/PMF $ 113,966 $1,062.78 $ 50,253.21 44.09%

2 $ 54,733 $3,461 .05 $ 15,594.51 28.49%

3 $ 44,088 $ .

4 $ 52,169 $ -

TOTAL $ 531,649 $ 24,709.54 $ 184,482.43 34.70%

The costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation are included in the table above and the sum total amount is recorded in Table 2 Financial Detail Report, as Other Direct Costs, Subcontractor Consultant Cost.

23

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 (P2#: 455162)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS April 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective The object of the agreement, Review of Recommendation 2. 1 Flood Re-evaluations as Part of 50.54(f) Response, is for the USAGE to assist the NRC staff in reviewing certain flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) in the FHRRs provided by NRC licensees in response to the 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012, Recommendation 2. 1:

Flooding. This work effort will support the NRC with their Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR.

NRC Project Manager Brad HaNey NRC/ NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USACE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S ~... (b_)(6_) _ .

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Manager:

Primary: l(b)(6)

Program Engineer:

Primary: !(b)(6)

Agreement Period of Performance August 25, 2015 through August 24, 2016 Period for this Report March 01, 2016 through April 01, 2016

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table A. Table B provides milestones and schedules for each task.

I lj'(_*;r*~~:;:J~-~~;~.~~ >\*:.~;~~,}~~(:~~;;/:~~~~:\:~.~~{;~.~;*~;;~::~:;;:,:~;~-~~~~:~-:~:*~ ~

1 ActMties Accomplishec this Actl\ities Plannec for next Task Deli,..,,rable/Milestone Description Issues/Challenges Reporting Period Reporting Period 1 ORIENTATION 1.a Peach Bottom Secure the Argus One Sofware lor use on the project. Completed 1.b Three Mile Island PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL EVALUATION 2 REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2.a Peach Bottom Completec final Gomez &

Sullivan while paper re\iew.

2.b Three Mile Island FINAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 3

AND TECHNICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT 3.a Peach Bottom Clarifiec input to the MFSHI Pro.Ide input to the audit table. report.

3.b Three Mile Island Table B: Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Technical Orientation / Kick-Off Meeting Peach Bottom 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 Three Mile Island 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 2 Preliminary TER & RAIS Peach Bottom 30 Nov 15 Revised 1 Dec 15 Revised Three Mile Island early Feb 16 3 Final TER Peach Bottom 3-Jun-16 Three Mile Island 2

3. Travel Table C provides information on completed and planned travel for this task order. No t ravel expenditures have been incurred in this reporting period and none are projected for the next reporting period.

Table C. Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Task: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The USAGE team is in the process of acquiring the required software to evaluate the submittals of the licensee for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island. The software is in the process of acquisition and additional approvals are required for installation.

Resolution 1: The USAGE has received and installed the required software to review the data submitted by the licensee. CLOSED.

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this agreement. Table 2 provides the amount of funds expended during the period, current fiscal year, and the total cumulative year to date.

3

Table 1. Financial Status Report

• Summary NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Sep $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77 3.5% $ 226,731,51 $ 226,731.51 Oct $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,525.87 $ 11 ,755.64 5.0% $ 223,205.64 $ 223,205.64 Nov $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 8,492.55 $ 20,248.19 8.6% $ 214,713.09 $ 214,713.09 Dec $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 12,11 3.91 $ 32,362.10 13.8% $ 202,599.18 $ 202,599.18 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961,28 $ 3,107.59 $ 35,469.69 15.1% $ 199,491.59 $ 199,491.59 Feb $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 9,875.77 $ 45,345.46 19.3% $ 189,615.82 $ 189,615.82 Mar $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 7,026.04 $ 52,371.50 22.3% $ 182,589.78 $ 182,589.78 4

Table 2. Flnanclal Detail Report* NRc-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Fiscal Year to Current Month Tota l to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 4 168 186 (2) Technical 63 212 256 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 67 380 442

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 5,082.93 $ 27,782.77 $ 32,785.68 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 1,532.90 $ 11,167.73 $ 13,719.21 SUB-TOTAL $ 6,615.83 $ 38,950.50 $ 46,504.89 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 (2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 G & A Costs $ 410.21 $ 2,891.23 $ 3,566.61 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 7,026.04 $ 44,141 .73 $ 52,371.50

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3.1 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for all of the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 9. The monthly planned (budget) cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table. Table 3.x will detail the monthly expenditures for each individual nuclear power plant site and the individual nuclear power plant and the associated TAC

1. for license fee recovery.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $234,961.28 Funds Obligated to date: $234,961.28 Period of Performance: 25 Aug 2015 to 24 Aug 2016 5

Table 3.1. Cumulative Monthlv ExDense Forecast - NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Pe rcentage Expe nditures tor Task Expenditures Activity# Pla nned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative

(%)

1 s 19 378.00 s 339.79 s 15 688.42 80.96%

2 s 172.172.04 s 6.686.25 s 35152.55 20.42%

3 $ 43 411 .24 $ . $ 1,530.53 3.53%

TOTAL $ 234,961 .28 $ 7,026.04 $ 52,371.50 22.29%

Table 3.2: LTD T009-2 cumulative Monthly Expense

• Peach Bottom TAC MF6598 / MF6599 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $254.84 $ 7,400.37 76.38%

2 $ 80,153.96 $4,285.60 $ 21 ,037.06 26.25%

3 $ 18,211.36 $ 1,041 .50 5.72%

TOTAL $ 108,054.32 $ 4,540.44 $ 29,478.93 27.28%

Table 3.3: LTDT009-3 CUmulatlve Monthly Expense* Three Mlle lslandTACMF1113 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $84.95 $ 8,288.05 85.54%

2 $ 92,018.08 $2,400.65 $ 14,11 5.49 15.34%

3 $ 25,199.88 $ 489.03 1.94%

TOTAL $ 126,906.96 $ 2,485.60 $ 22,892.57 18.04%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 9 is identified in Table 4.

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Basellne $ 5,961 $ 12,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 Actual Costs $ 8,230 $ 3,526 $ 8,493 $ 12, 114 $ 3, 108 $9,875.77 Difference $ (2,269) $ 8,474 $ 6,507 $ 2,886 $ 21,892 $ 20,124 Percenta e 138.1% 29.4% 56.6% 80.8% 12.4% 32.9%

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 12,000 Actual Costs $ 7,026 Difference $ 22,974 Percenta e 23.4%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USACE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site.

6

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-H0-25-15-T-0009 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

LTD T009*3 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Peach Bottom NPP Site LTDT009-2 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Three Mile Island NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites. The costs for this reporting period are for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-H0-25-15-T-0009 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF6598 Peach Bottom 2 $ 2,270.22 YES MF6599 Peach Bottom 3 $ 2,270.22 YES MF1113 Three Mile Island 1 $ 2,485.60 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 7,026.04 Pl=RlnD 7

From: !tbl/6)

To: Harvey. Brad; Cook. Christopher: NRO MLSR Resource: Dority. Dayna: See. Kenneth; ContractsPOT Resource:

NRCIPAC Resource; Turner. Michael Cc:

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) NRC*HQ-13-I-0021: MLSRs 20 Dec 2016 Submission Date: Thursday, January 05, 2017 3:36:29 PM Attachments: NRC Task Order Dec 2016 IPAC.pdf NRC Task Order Dec 2016 !PAC Summarv.pdf NRC*USACE MLSR T026 2016Dec.pdf NRC*USACE MLSR T09 2016Dec.pdf Brad, Attached are the December 2016 monthly reporting documents for the subject IAA.

I. IPAC: BiUing information by line item (task orders) for IAA. Summary information by task order, current month, billed to date and authorized ceiling (N RC_Task_Order_Dec_2016_1PAC and NRC_Task_Order_Dec_2016_1PAC_Summary). Note: This reporting period includes expenditures for TO #09, and #26.

2. MLSR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026: Task order #26 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO26_20 I 6Dec). Attachments provided for Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello/Prairie Jsland, ANO, and Columbia NPP sites.

4. MLSR NRC-HQ 15-T-0009: Task order #09 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO9_2016Dec).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

!(b)(6)

!(b)(6)  !

Project Manager Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Special Projects Branch I6 16 Capitol Avenue Omaha, NE 68102-490 I Phone: !{b)(6)  !

BB: (b)(6)

Fax:

(b)(6)

Page 1 of 2 CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Accounts Of Billed Date: 01 -Dec-2016 BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS (AR 37-1)

• 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009

• 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

• MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28220100 NO CHECK DRAWN 1678804

• 01 -Dec-2016 Partial# 40 01-Nov-2016 Thru 01 -Dec-201 6 ,l * .,. "' JI .. . . .. .. ..... .. ,, . . ....

Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Billed Accounting Classification Billing Accounting Classification 031 NA X 0200.0000 2013 00 0000 00000000000 00000 31000001 $546.34 096 NA X 3122.0000 G6 08 2417 895 0WDNRC 96252 $8,11 1.51 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 00 0000 NA 00000 31000001 $7,565.17 Line Item Moa ____ Description Eaid No Amount 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $1 ,161.63 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $393.80 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $2,398.99 00005 REIMBURSABLE - INSIDE FEDERAL GC WORK PERFORMED BY OTHER GOV AGENCIES $3,610.75 Subtotal: $7,565.17 6 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $167.08 6 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $45.11 6 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $334.15 Subtotal : $546.34 Total Billed Amount: $8,111 .51 Less Amount Paid Via IPAC: $8,111.51 Payment Due Date: 31-Dec-2016 Pay This Amount: $0.00 DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.405 v2.1.4

Page 2 of 2 CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS Billed Date: 01 -Dec-2016 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28220100 NO CHECK DRAWN 1678804 01 -Dec-2016 Partial# 40 01-Nov-2016 Thru 01 -Dec-2016 Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount Funds Authorized: $4,270,251 .28 CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED Total Billed Amount: $3,064,982.47 I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as stated and Prev Billed Amount: $3,056,870.96 s hould be charged to the appropriation(s) and/or fund(s) as indicated above, or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated.

Current Billed Amount: $8,111.51 Total Flux Billed: $0.00 Prev Flux Billed: $0.00 Date: 01 -Dec-2016  !(b)(6)

Current Flux Billed: $0.00 Authorized Administrative or Certifying Officer DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.405 v2.1.4

Date: 04-JAN-2017 Customer Order Bill Print Error Messages Page: 1 Bill Number Error Message cobil_,pae.4-05 v2. 1.4

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021

SUMMARY

INFORMATION BY TASK ORDER

~ ..........,

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 20 Decem ber 2016 Submittal

-~~

031 NA X 0200.0000 2013

$ 209,283.03 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ - $ 763,867.52 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 031 NA X 0200.0000 201 5 $ 546.34 $ 68,803.91 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ 7,565.1 7 $ 2,023,028.01 IPAC Total $ 8,111 .51 $ 3,064,982.47 Authorized lnteragency Agreement No. Line Item Number Billed to Date Ceiling NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 Line 2 $ 209,283.03 $ 247,686.00 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Line 4 $ 763,867.52 $ 884,568.00 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Line 5 $ 2,023,028.01 $ 2,903,036.00 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Line 6 $ 68,803.91 $ 234,961.28 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 $ 3,064,982.47 $ 4,270,251.28 Page 1

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ-13-/-03-0021 (P2#: 405160)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS December 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status 1.1. Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in the determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that my affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants. A Technical Letter Report (TLR) documenting the development of the hydrographs will be provided. The NPP sites to be evaluated will be identified in subsequent Letters of Technical Direction (LT Ds).

1.2. NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301-415-4 118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV 1.3. USAGE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S ~... (b_)(6_) _ ,

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program ~1_.1.W,~~ _ _ ,

Primary:

(b)(6)

Program Engineer:

Primary: (b)(6)

(b)(6) 1.4. Agreement Period of Performance July 25, 2014 through September 29, 2017 1.5. Period for this Report November 01, 2016 t hrough December 01, 2016

2. Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction Information on individual Letters of Technical Direction (LTD), including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

3. Travel Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction The travel information recorded for this task order is reported by individual LTDs in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with BC Hydro for the Columbia Generating Station site has taken much longer than originally projected and the delay has significantly impacted the PDT to proceed forward with analysis.

Issue 1 Status: The MASTER NOA between the USAGE and BC Hydro has been signed (25 May 15). The individual NDAs for each team member authorized to work on the project will be distributed for signature. The documents have been uploaded to the Partner sharepoint site for PDT use (19 Oct 15). The NRG team members have submitted signed NDAs and they are with NWD for signature. CLOSED

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this task order. The total costs incurred for this reporting period is captured on the Li ne 5 of the Bill No. 28204245 of the IPAC DA Form 4445-R.

Table 1. Financial Status Report* Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2014 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount ($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) c osts/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Aug $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 17,569.74 $ 17,569.74 0.6% $ 2,886, 175.86 $ 2,886,175.86 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 21 ,716. 10 $ 39,285.84 1.4% $ 2,864,459.76 $ 2 ,864,459.76 Oct $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,195.60 $ 11 8,481.44 4.1% $ 2,785,264.16 $ 2,785,264. 16 Nov $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 80,422. 10 $ 198,903.54 6.8% $ 2,704,842.06 $ 2,704,842.06 Dec $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,555.41 $ 301,458.95 10.4% $ 2,602,286.65 $ 2,602,286.65 2

Table 1. Financial Status Report - Sumnary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $137,019.46 $ 438,478.41 15.1% $ 2,465,267.19 $ 2,465,267.19 Feb $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $213,680.16 $ 652,158.57 22.5% $ 2,251 ,587.03 $ 2,251,587.03 Mar $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,500.18 $ 867,658.75 29.9% $ 2,036,086.85 $ 2,036,086.85 Apr $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,835.27 $ 1,083,494.02 37.3% $ 1,820,251.58 $ 1,820,251.58 May $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,342.38 $1,185,836.40 40.8% $ 1,717,909.20 $ 1,717,909.20 Jun $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $142,454.07 $1,328,290.47 45.7% $ 1,575,455. 13 $ 1,575,455.13 Jul $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 97,231. 15 $ 1,425,521.62 49.1% $ 1,478,223.98 $ 1,478,223.98 Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 83,891.67 $ 1,509,413.29 52.0% $ 1,394,332.31 $ 1,394,332.31 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,066.56 $ 1,588,479.85 54.7% $ 1,315,265.75 $ 1,315,265.75 Oct $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $109,520.92 $1,698,000.77 58.5% $ 1,205,745.83 $ 1,205,745.83 Nov $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 60,628.27 $ 1,758,629.04 60.6% $ 1,145,117.56 $ 1,145,117.56 Dec $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 52,852.79 $ 1,811,481.83 62.4% $ 1,092,264.77 $ 1,092,264.77 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,645.49 $1,841,127.32 63.4% $ 1,062,619.28 $ 1,062,619.28 Feb $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,927.68 $1,871,055.00 64.4% $ 1,032,691.60 $ 1,032,691.60 Mar $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 32,557.68 $ 1,903,612.68 65.6% $ 1,000,133.92 $ 1,000, 133.92 Apr $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 14,876.83 $1,918,489.51 66.1% $ 985,257.09 $ 985,257.09 May $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 26,928.36 $1,945,417.87 67.0% $ 958,328.73 $ 958,328.73 Jun $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,028.69 $ 1,974,446.56 68.0% $ 929,300.04 $ 929,300.04 Jul $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 22,559.44 $ 1,997,006.00 68.8% $ 906,740.60 $ 906,740.60 Aug $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 3,079.34 $2,000,085.34 68.9% $ 903,661.26 $ 903,661.26 Sep $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 629.85 $2,000,715.19 68.9% $ 903,031.41 $ 903,031.41 Oct $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 14,747.65 $2,015,462.84 69.4% $ 888,283.76 $ 888,283.76 3

Balance of Total Costs Cumulati1.e Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Nov $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 7,565.17 $2,023,028.01 69.7% $ 880,718.59 $ 880,718.59 Table 2 provides the financial detail outlining the amount of funds expended during the reporting period, the current fiscal year (FY2016), and the total cumulative year to date. The financial data includes the following Letters of Technical Direction:

• LTD TO26 1 rarley Nuolear Power Plant (Mobile Distriot) 31 Jul2014

• LTD TO26-1a Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 06Apr2015

• LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant (Pittsburgh District). 23Sep2014

• LTD TO26 3 Montioello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul Distriot). 21Oot2014

• LTD TO26-3a Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul District). 08Aug15

• LTD TO26 4 Arkansas Nuolear One NPP (Little Rook/Tulsa Distriots). 09Deo14

• LTD TO26-4b Arkansas Nuclear One NPP (Little Rock!Tulsa Districts). 29Jan16

• LTD TO26 5 Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 15Dec1 4

• LTD TO26-5a Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 14Jan16

• LTD TO26-5b Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 09Sep16 4

Table 2. Financial Detail Report- NRC-H0-25-14-T-0026 Fisca l Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 8 1,195 2,278 (2) Technical 26 2,376 15,664 (3) Support (Bureau Reclamation) 0 4 659 TOTAL 34 3,575 18,601

2. Costs Labor Cos ts :

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 2,398.99 $ 234,855.08 $ 1,172,153.02 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 1,161.63 $ 109,242.96 $ 541,910.67 SUB-TOTAL $ 3,560.62 $ 344,098.04 $ 1,714,063..69 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ 3,610.75 $ 47,194.89 $ 95,520.89 (Bureau of Reclamation)

(2) Material and Ser.ices Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ 8, 171.46 $ 23,696.26 SUB-TOTAL $ 3,610.75 $ 55,366.35 $ 119,217.15 G & A Costs $ 393.80 $ 35,083.77 $ 189,747. 17 DOE Fee (If Applicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 7,565.17 $ 434,548.16 $ 2,023,028.01

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for work accomplished by the USAGE in the reporting period for Task Order 26. The cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in this table. The individual project letter status report for each LTD issued is included in the attachments.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $2,904,745.60 Funds Obligated to date: $2,903,745.60 Period of Performance: 25 Jul 2014 to 29 Sep 2017 5

Table 3. Cumulative Monthly ExDAnse Forecast - NRC-H0-25-1 4-T-0026 Pe rcenta ge Expenditures for Task Expenditures Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative

(%)

1a s 1 683.91 5.60 s - s 1.352 846. 75 80.34%

1b PMP/PMF $ 458 200.00 $ 3,536.76 $ 364 504.04 79.55%

2 $ 31 5 600.00 $ - $ 126,088.90 39.95%

3 s 224 760.00 s 3.610.75 s 179 170.66 79.72%

4 $ 221 ,270.00 $ 417.66 $ 41 7.66 0.19%

TOTAL $ 2,903,745.60 $ 7,565.17 $ 2,023,028.01 69.67%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 26 is identified in Table 4. The spending plan reflects the project schedule delays and completion of tasks for Farley. These scheduling issues include: 1) signature of the Non-Disclosure Agreement for Columbia and 2) the impact of the May / June 2015 high water events and a levee failure at the Tulsa and Little Rock Districts.

Baseline $ 31,214 $ 47,020 $ 150,836 $ 130,000 $200,000 Actual Costs $ 17,570 $ 21,716 $ 79,196 $ 80,422 $102,555 Difference $ 13,644 $ 25,304 $ 71,640 $ 49,578 $ 97,445 Percents e 56.3% 46.2% 52.5% 61.9% 51.3%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-1.i.T-0026 Baseline $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,500 $ 251 ,800 $175,200 Actual Costs $ 137,019 $ 213,680 $ 215,500 $ 215,835 $ 102,342 $142,454 Difference $ 112,981 $ 36,320 $ 34,500 $ 34,665 $ 149,458 $ 32,746 Percents e 54.8% 85.5% 86.2% 86.2% 40.6% 81.3%

Baseline $ 100,446 $ 115,100 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Actual Costs $ 97,231 $ 83,892 $79,066.56 $109,520.92 $ 60,628 $ 52,853 Difference $ 3,215 $ 31,208 $ 20,933 $ (19,521) $ 29,372 $ 37,147 Percents e 96.8% 72.9% 79.1% 121.7% 67.4% 58.7%

Baseline $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,000 $ 17,630 Actual Costs $ 29,645.49 $29,927.68 $32,557.68 $ 14,876.83 $ 26,928.36 $ 29,029 Difference $ 60,355 $ 60,072 $ 27,442 $ 25,123 $ 8,072 $ (11,399)

Percentage 32.9% 33.3% 54.3% 37.2% 76.9% 164.7%

6

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Actual Costs $22,559.44 $3,079.34 $629.85 $ 14,747.65 $ 7,565.17 Difference $ 2,441 $ 21,921 $ 4,370 $ (9,748) $ (2,565)

Percents e 90.2% 12.3% 12.6% 295.0% 151 .3%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site for Task Order #26, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026.

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

L+D +02& ~ a1 Jyl 14 e>JaIYali9A 91 i;:I99d l,laiards at tl:te J9se?l:t M,i;:afley MYGleaf 12IaAt !}ye 19 Cam i;:ailY~

LTDT026-1a 06-Apr-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure LTD T026-2 23-Sep-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Beaver Valley NPP Due to Dam Failure L+D +02& 3  :.11 GGI 14 el/aJYali9A 91 i;;'.l99d l,la.:ards at 11:te M9AliGell9 aAd 12fai~ie lslaAd Ml212 Siles LTDT026-3a 13-Aug-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Monticello and Prairie Island NPP Sites L+D +02& 4 QQ OeG 14 euaIYali9A 91 i;;'.l99(l l,la.:ards al 11:te Al'!laAsas Ni.i;leaf GAe ~11212 Sile LTDT026-4b 29-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Arkansas Nuclear One NPP Site L+D+02& 5 Hi O8G 14 e>.GIYali9A 91 i;;'.l99d l,laiards al 11:te G9li.ml:lia ~11212 Sile LTDTA26-5a 14-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Columbia NPP Site LTDTA26-5b 09-Sep-16 Hydrographs and Inundation Maps in the Vicinity of the Columbia NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites for this reporting period.

7

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 $ . YES MF3038 Farley 2 $ . YES MF3039 Columbia $ 7,147.51 YES MF3041 ANO1 $ . YES MF3042 ANO2 $ . YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 $ . YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 $ . YES MF7430 Beaver Valley 1 $ 208.83 YES MF7431 Beaver Valley 2 $ 208.83 YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 $ . YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 $ . YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 $ . YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 $ . YES MF3995 Three Mile Isla nd 1 $ . YES MF3696 Monticello $ . YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 $ . YES MF3698 Prairie Island 2 $ . YES TM3032 Generic-AREVA $ . NO TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 7,565.17 PERIOD 8

LTD T026-1 Farley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 9

Table LTD -TO26-1.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-1 Farley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Deliverv Team: Onaha and Mobile Districts Project Manager - (b)(6) ICENWO-PM-S Technical Manag CESAM-EN-HH Project Costs: $277,309 P2 447176 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Revised LTD issued 6 April 2015 Activity

1. 1a I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco1r4>1ished this Reoortino Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Perform a PMP/PMF analysis for the Farlev NPP site andl (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) None. None. Work is complete.

Is required.

Activity

1. 1b I Develop Preliminary Hydrooraphs and TLR Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues Develop time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including Excel spreadsheets, at various locations in the vicinity of the Farley NPP site. Two Submissions: None. None. Work is complete.

Preliminary Draft and Pre-Final. The (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

Activity

1. 2 I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None. None. Work is complete.

meetings.

Activity I Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco1r4>lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Additional Information to be included at the request of Southern Company: *

(b)(?)(E), (b)(7)(F)

11) l"IOW hydrographs for the complete model None. None. Work is complete.

run. 2) Velocity hydrographs for the complete model run. 3) Spatial coordinates and projection for each cross section. 4) All cross section station and elevation points. 5) Left and right bank stations. 6) Manning's "n" values or roughness coefficients for the left overbank, channel and right overbank at each cross section.

1. 4 I

Activity Participate in Presentation of Results Meetinas Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 10

Table LTD TO26-1.2. LTD 26-1 Farley

• Travel Completed This Reporting Pe riod & Planned for Next ReDOrtlng Period Related Activtty: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC COIT1)1eted this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next reporting period I I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. Cun-.ilatlve MonthlyExpense-TLD T026-1 Farley, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Q026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1a $ 149,682.20 $ 130,871.20 87.43%

1b PMP/PMF $ 52,369.92 $ 36,942.43 70.54%

2 $ 21,376.04 $ 19,465.04 91.06%

3 $ 29,255.44 $ 16,112.04 55.07%

4 $ 26,455.72 $ . 0.00%

TOTAL $ 279,139.32 $ . $ 203,390.71 72.86%

11

LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 12

Table LTD -T026-2.1. Project Status for LTD T026-2 Beaver Valley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deli ,.,r, T<>,.m: "'"*ha a111d Pittsbur~h Districts Project Managers

• b 6) I CENWO*PM-S; ! b)(6)  ! CELRP-PM-PM Technical Lead *l(b 6 jLELRP-EC-DH Project Costs: $,,_,, ,'I, o r, '1'18945 Lm issued 23 Sep 2014 Ac:;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco11'1)1ished this ActilAties Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Evaluate PMP and PMF for the

<>00

, ~, v,.11"' " 0 P site as v.ell as the (b)(7)(E}, (b)(7)(F) u e...,up

" yurograpns ca= on the site-None None Work is complete.

specific PMP developed by the NRC's licensee, FENOC. Existing USAGE hydrologic and hydraulic models will be used to determine the PMF resulting from the Licensee's site-specific PMP.

ActilAty

1. 1 I De\181op Preliminary Hvdroaraohs and TLR Activities Acco11'1)1ished this ActilAties Planned for Next P.eoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Assess thel

__, 7)(E>, (bX7)(F)

IQ I I\ ll IQ ~ * .. , ..,...... * * ~

I prelirrinary draft and pre-final TLR and hydroaraphs.1 None None Work is complete.

(bX7)(E). (bX7)(F)

Activity

1. 2 I Intermediate Technical RelAew Meetinas Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Reoortina Period ActilAties Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None None Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR =rtina Period = rtina Period Document findings In a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate.

Calculation packages, including input and output files from computer Finalize project files. Work is complete.

modeling runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final subrrission.

Activity IParticipate in Presentation Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None No action required.

Presentation of Results Meetings 13

Table LTD T026-2.2. LTD 26-2 Beaver Valley* Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period I

Related Actlvhy: Purpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w / NRC Completed this rePorting period INone I I I I I I Planned next reporting period INone I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-1 Beaver Vally, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period cumulative vs. Budget(%)

1a $ 259,701 .20 $ 272,519.51 104.94%

1b PMP/PMF $ 66,074.00 $ 62,121 .31 94.02%

2 $ 55,117.00 $ 45,437.08 82.44%

3 $ 35,523.00 $ 40,773.62 114.78%

4 $ 34,061.00 $ 417.66 $ 417.66 1.23%

TOTAL $ 450,476.20 $ 417.66 $ 421,269.1 8 93.52%

14

LTD 1026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 15

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 Technical Manager I

USAGE Project Delivery Team: Onaha and St. Pat Djstrjcts Project Managers

• 1(b)(6) CENWO-PM-S, (b)(6)

CEMVP-EC-H

!CEMVP-PM-A Project Costs: $514,370 LTD issued 31 July 2014 I

Activity Develop PMP/PMF for Prairie Island Activities Accon,:ilished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1a NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period (bX7)(E). (bX7)(F)

Additional information, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, \\ill be provided:!

None None Work is complete (b)(?)(E). (b)(7)(F)

/ No nyorograpns are neeoea ,or tnese cross sections.

Activity I Develop PMF Stage Hydrographs Activities Accon,Jlished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1b Monticello NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period Develop a new HMS model of the watershed in developing the PMP for the Monticello NPP site and route the resulting runoff to produce the PMF. A georeferenced HEC-RAS model shall be developed in order to produce a PMF stage hydrograph at the Monticello NPP site. Additional information, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, \\ill be provided:1 None None Work is complete (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

I No nyClrographs are neecled tor tnese cross sections.

16

Table LTD -T0 26-3.1. Project Status for LTD T0 26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Delivery Team: Onaha and St. Paul Districts Project Managers '. l(b)(6)

Technical Manager I CENWO-PM* S!(b)(6)

CEMVP-EC-H ICEMVP-PM-A Project CosIs: $514,370 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Activity I H&H Model Comparison and Site- Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1c Soecific PMP ColTl>arison Reoortina Period Reoortino Period Work will be complete in Comparison of 1he NRC's licensee, Xcel, September provided H&H models, describing any major dilferences between Xcel's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H&H modeling approach. Comparison of the site-specific PMPs (provided by Xce~ by describing any dilferences in 1he rainlall deplh, duration, and distribution between 1he basin-wide PMPs and None None 1he basin-wide PMPs used by the USAGE to develop its hydrographs. USAGE will develop hydrographs simlliar to Activities 1A and 1B by applying the PMPs and using USACE's H&H models. The findings will be documented, coordinated, and a detailed comparison performed.

Intermediate Technical Review Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Ac:ty I Meetings Reoortino Period Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate None None Work is corrplete Technical Review meetings.

Activity

1. 3 I Develop Final

. Hydrographs and TLR Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate. Calculation packages, including Repackage the deliverables for input and output files from computer modeling Work is complete release to licensee.

runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in 1he final submission.

Activity I Participate in Presentation of Results Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 Meetinas Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of None None Not required.

Results Meetings Table LTD T026*3.2. LTD 26-3 Monticello / Prairie llland

• Travel Completed Renortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: IPur pose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w / NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next rePOrting period I I I I I I I 17

Table LTD T026-1.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense

• no T026-1 Monticello, NRCHQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budi:iet (%)

1A1B1C $ 410,631.20 $ 359,718.36 87.60%

2 $ 43,469.00 $ 13,540.72 31.15%

3 $ 24,607.00 $ 17,605.09 71.55%

4 $ 35,663.00 TOTAL $ 514,370.20 $ - $ 390,864.17 75.99%

18

LTD 1026-4 Arkansas Nuclear One (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 19

Table LTD -T026-4.1. Project Status for LTD T026-4 Arkansas NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Delivery Team: Omaha, Litlle Rock, and Tulsa Districts Project Manager -1/h\/g\ I CENWO-PM-S;~ ~1 I GESWL-PM Technical Manager 1/h" " ' 1CESWL-EC-0 /\/R\ ICESWT-EC-HF Project Costs: $938,0<CJ c"~ ***=*

LTD issued 29 Jan 2016 Ac:t [ Delo<llop PMP/PMF ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period ActilAties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Compare H&H Models (Entergy) and None None Work is complete.

Compare Site-Specific PMP.

Describe any major differences between Entergy's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H& H modeling approach. Describe any differences in the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution belween the basin-wide PM Ps (Entergy) and the basin-wide PMPs (USACE).

Develop hydrographs by applying the PMPs (Entergy) using USACE's H&H models.

ActilAty [ De"'llop Preliminary ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period Actil.ities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Ewluation of the PMP and PMF tor None None Work is complete.

the ANO sileJ \

. *'""' *1ue1,01op 7<>

moae1s mr A NO river basin.

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

ProlAde hydrographs for identified locations In the LTD 26-4.

Ac::;ty I lntemiedlate Technical ActilAties Accomplished th,s Reporting Period Acti,Aties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues Rel.law Meetinas Schedule, host, and participate In None None Work Is complete.

Intermediate Technical Reldew meetings.

Actility [ De\etop Final Hydrographs ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period Actil.ities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Document findings In a Final TLR Pr01,ded responses to licensee requests for None Work is complete.

and hydrographs. Include additional additional information.

lntomiatlon as appropriate.

Actility IParticipate in Presentation ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period Actilities Planned tar Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Schedule, Host and Participate in TBD Presentation of Results Meetings 20

Table LTD T026-4.2. LTD 26-4 .Arkansas* Travel Comnleted This ReDortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting period Planned next reporting period Table LTD T026-4.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-4 Arkansas, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent age Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 476,997 $ 403,818.36 84.66%

PMP/PMF $ 196,785 $ 194,247.26 98.71%

2 $ 130,846 $ 24,787.48 18.94%

3 $ 71,281 $ 92,957.91 130.41 %

4 $ 62,914 $ .

TOTAL $ 938,823 $ . $ 715,811 .01 76.25%

21

LTD 1026-5 Columbia Generating Station 22

Table LTD -T026-5.1. Project Status for LTD T026-5 Coluni>la NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Dr -..ery Team: b maha, Seattle, and Walla Walla Districts Project Manager * (b)(6) CENWO-PM-S j (b)(6) !CENWS-PM-MEI Technical Manage ENW S-EN-HH-HE Project Costs: $569,688 P2 449739 LTD issued 14 Jan 2016 ActilAty ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Dewlop PMP/PMF Notes I Significant Issues

1. 0 Reporting Period Reporting Period Evaluation of the PMP and PMF for None None Work is complete.

ActilAty Dewlop Preliminary ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Develop H&H models for the P repared Preliminary Draft None Milestone: Preliminary Draft TLR Columbia NPP watershed. Evaluate TLR. and hydrographs

• 19 May 2016.

(bX7J(E), (bX7J(F) Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and hydrographs

• 06 Jun 2016.

Provide hydrographs for prm11aea locations in the LTD.

ActilAty Intermediate Technical ActilAties Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 2 RelAew Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, host, and participate in IITR meeting. None Milestone: First ITR

• 09 Jun Intermediate Technical RelAew 2016.

meetings. Milestone: Second ITR

• TBD.

ActilAty Develop Final Hydrographs ActilAties Accomplished this Acti1.1ties Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Document data and analysis, Finalized draft final TLR. Finalize final TlR. Milestone: Final TLR and including the hydrographs, in a Final hydrographs - 15 Oct 2016.

TLR. Package will include the calculation packages, including input and output files from the computer modeling runs supporting the key TlR conclusions.

ActilAty Participate in Presentation ActilAties Accomplished this Acti1.1ties Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reporting Period Reporting Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None None Presentation of Results Meetings Table LTD T026-5.2. LTD 26-5 Colurmla

• Travel ConmlAted Thia Reoortlna Period & Planned for Next Re-rtlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting peri od Planned next reporting period 23

Table LTDT026-5.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense -TLDT026-5 Columbia, NRC-~25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%}

1 $ 266,693 $ 185,919.32 69.71 %

1 PMP/PMF $ 11 3,966 $3,536.76 $ 71 ,192.95 62.47%

2 $ 54,733 $ 22,858.58 41 .76%

3 $ 44,088 $3,610.75 $ 11 ,722.00 26.59%

4 $ 52,169 $ .

TOTAL $ 531 ,649 $ 7,147.51 $ 291 ,692.85 54.87%

The costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation are included in the table above and the sum total amount is recorded in Table 2 Financial Detail Report, as Other Direct Costs, Subcontractor Consultant Cost.

24

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ-13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 (P2#: 455162)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS December 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective The object of the agreement, Review of Recommendation 2. 1 Flood Re-evaluations as Part of 50.54(f) Response, is for the USAGE to assist the NRC staff in reviewing certain flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) in the FHRRs provided by NRC licensees in response to the 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012, Recommendation 2.1:

Flooding. T his work effort will support the NRC with their Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR.

NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/ NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USACE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S d(b)(6)  !

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Manager:

Primary: !(b)(6)

Program Engineer:

Primary: !(bl(6l Agreement Period of Performance August 25, 2015 through August 24, 2017 Period for this Report November 01 , 2016 t hrough December 01, 2016

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table A. Table B provides milestones and schedules for each task.

I lj'(_*;r*~~:;:J~-~~;~.~~Ii\*:.~;~~-~~~(:;.~;;/:~~~~:\:~ : .~~{;~.~=;*~:;~: ~.:~~.:~;}:~~t:~-~~:*~ ~

ActMies Accomplishec this Actl\ities Plannec for next Task Deli,..,,rable/Milestone Description Issues/ Challenges Reporting Period Reporting Period 1 ORIENTATION 1.a Peach Bottom Secure the Argus One Sofware lor use on the project. Completed 1.b Three Mile Island PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL EVALUATION 2 REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2.a Peach Bottom 2.b Three Mile Island FINAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 3

AND TECHNICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT 3.a Peach Bottom 3.b Three Mile Island Table B: Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Technical Orientation / Kick-Off Meeting Peach Bottom 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 Three Mile Island 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 2 Preliminary TER & RA IS Peach Bottom 30 Nov 15 Re1,1sed 1 Dec 15 Re1,1sed 1-Mar-16 Three Mile Island early Feb 16 3 Final TER Peach Bottom 24-Aug-16 9-Sep-16 Three Mile Island 2

3. Travel Table C provides information on completed and planned travel for this task order. No travel expenditures have been incurred in this reporting period and none are projected for the next reporting period.

Related Task: Purpose

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The USAGE team is in the process of acquiring the required software to evaluate the submittals of the licensee for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island. The software is in the process of acquisition and additional approvals are required for installation.

Resolution 1: The USAGE has received and installed the required software to review the data submitted by the licensee. CLOSED.

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this agreement . Table 2 provides the amount of funds expended during the period, current fiscal year, and the total cumulative year to date.

3

Table 1. Financial Status Report

• Sunmary NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulatiw Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Sep $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77 3.5% $ 226,731.51 $ 226,731.51 Oct $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,525.87 $ 11,755.64 5.0% $ 223,205.64 $ 223,205.64 Nov $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961 .28 $ 8,492.55 $ 20,248.19 8.6% $ 214,713.09 $ 214,713.09 Dec $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 12,113.91 $ 32,362.10 13.8% $ 202,599.18 $ 202,599.18 Balance of Total Costs Cumulatiw Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,107.59 $ 35,469.69 15.1% $ 199,491.59 $ 199,491.59 Feb $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 9,875.77 $ 45,345.46 19.3% $ 189,615.82 $ 189,615.82 Mar $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 7,026.04 $ 52,371 .50 22.3% $ 182,589.78 $ 182,589.78 Apr $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 2,135.47 $ 54,506.97 23.2% $ 180,454.31 $ 180,454.31 May $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 4,474.56 $ 58,981 .53 25.1% $ 175,979.75 $ 175,979.75 Jun $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,826.47 $ 62,808.00 26.7% $ 172,153.28 $ 172,153.28 Jul $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 1,082.56 $ 63,890.56 27.2% $ 171,07072 $ 171,070.72 Aug $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 2,191.75 $ 66,082.31 28.1% $ 168,878.97 $ 168,878.97 Sep $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 1,082.58 $ 67,164.89 28.8% $ 167,390.42 $ 167,390.42 Oct $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 1,092.68 $ 68,257.57 29.2% $ 166,297.74 $ 166,297.74 Nov $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 546.34 $ 68,803.91 29.5% $ 165,751.40 $ 165,751.40 4

Table 2. Flnanclal Detail Report* NRc-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Fiscal Year to Current Month Tota l to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 4 236 254 (2) Technical 0 281 325 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 4 517 579

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 334. 15 $ 38,292.80 $ 43,295.71 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 167.08 $ 15,844.83 $ 18,396.31 SUB-TOTAL $ 501 .23 $ 54,137.63 $ 61 ,692.02 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 (2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 G & A Costs $ 45.11 $ 4,136.51 $ 4,811.89 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 546.34 $ 60,574.14 $ 68,803.91

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3.1 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for all of the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 9. The monthly planned (budget) cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table. Table 3.x will detail the monthly expenditures for each individual nuclear power plant site and the individual nuclear power plant and the associated TAC

1. for license fee recovery.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $234,961.28 Funds Obligated to date: $234,961.28 Period of Performance: 25 Aug 2015 to 24 Aug 2017 5

Table 3.1. Cumulative Monthlv Exoense Forecast- NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Percentage Expe nditures tor Task Expenditures Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative

(%)

1 s 19 378.00 s 546.34 s 19 021 .40 98.16%

2 s 172.172.04 s - s 46 897.14 27.24%

3 $ 43 411 .24 $ - $ 2,885.37 6.65%

TOTAL $ 234,961 .28 $ 546.34 $ 68,803.91 29.28%

Table 3.2: LTD T009-2 cumulative Monthly Expense - Peach Bottom TAC MF6598 / MF6599 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%}

1 $ 9,689.00 $546.34 $ 10,291.86 106.22%

2 $ 80,153.96 $ 31,308.17 39.06%

3 $ 18,211.36 $ 1,718.92 9.44%

TOTAL $ 108,054.32 $ 42,772.61 39.58%

Table 3.3: LTD T009-3 Cumulative Monthly Expense

• Three Mlle Island TAC MFl 113 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $ 8,729.54 90.10%

2 $ 92,018.08 $ 15,588.97 16.94%

3 $ 25,199.88 $ 1,166.45 4.63%

TOTAL $ 126,906.96 $ 25,484.96 20.08%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 9 is identified in Table 4.

Table 4: S ending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 5,961 $ 12,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 Actual Costs $ 8,230 $ 3,526 $ 8,493 $ 12,114 $ 3,108 $9,875.77 Difference $ (2,269) $ 8,474 $ 6,507 $ 2,886 $ 21,892 $ 20,124 Percentage 138.1% 29.4% 56.6% 80.8% 12.4% 32.9%

Baseline $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 12,000 Actual Costs $ 7,026 $ 2,135 $ 4,475 $3,826.47 $1,082.56 $ 2,192 Difference $ 22,974 $ 27,865 $ 25,525 $ 11,174 $ 13,917 $ 9,809 Percenta e 23.4% 7.1 % 14.9% 25.5% 7.2% 18.3%

6

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 500 Actual Costs $ 1,083 $ 1,093 $ 546 Difference $ 3,917 $ 3,907 $ (46)

Percenta e 21.7% 21.9% 109.3%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USACE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site.

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direct ion (LTD)

LTDT009-3 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Peach Bottom NPP Site LTDT009-2 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Three Mile Island NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites. The costs for this reporting period are for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF6598 Peach Bottom 2 $ 273.17 YES MF6599 Peach Bottom 3 $ 273.1 7 YES MF1113 Three Mile Island 1 $ - YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 546.34 Pl=Rln[l 7

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad; Cook. Christopher: NRO MLSR Resource: Dority. Dayna: See. Kenneth; ContractsPOT Resource:

NRCIPAC Resource; Turner. Michael Cc: l(b)(6)

Subject:

[External_Sender) NRC*HQ-13-I-0021: MlsRs 20 Feb 2016 Submission Date: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:35:11 PM Attachments: NRC TaskOrder Feb 2016 !PAC pd[

NRC Task Order Jan 2016 !PAC.PDF NRC-USACE MLSR TOl 2016feb.pdf NRC*USACE MLSR T026 2016Feb.odf NRC-USACE MLSR T09 2016Feb.pdf Brad, Attached are the February 2016 monthly reporting documents for the subject IAA.

I. IPAC: BiUing information by line item (task orders) for I.AA Summary information by task order, current month, billed to date and authorized ceiling (N RC_TaskOrder_Feb_20 I6_1PAC and NRC Task Order_Jan_20 I 6_1PAC). Note: This reporting period includes expenditures for TO #0 I, #09, and #26.

2. MLS R NRC-HQ- 13-1-002 1 TO#0 I: Task order #01 summary information (N RC-USACE_MLSR_TO l_20!6Feb).

3. MLSR NRC-HQ 14-T-0026: Task order #26 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO26_2016Feb). Attachments provided for Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello/ Prairie Island, ANO, and Columbia NPP sites.

4. MLSR NRC-HQ 15-T-0009: Task order #09 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO9_2016Feb).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks, l(b)(6) I roJect anager Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Special Projects Branch 16 16 Capitol Avenue Omaha, NE 68102-4901 Phone: !(b)(6) I BB: l(b)(6)

Fax:

I

NRC-HQ-1 3-I-03-0021

SUMMARY

INFORMATION BY TASK ORDER

~ .......

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 20 February 2016 Submittal "L~

031 NA X 0200.0000 2013

~

423.75

.....liltl

$ 209,283.03 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ 763,867.52 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 031 NA X 0200.0000 2015 $ 3,107.59 $ 35,469.69 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ 29,645.49 $ 1,841 ,127.32 IPAC Total $ 33,176.83 $2,849,747.56 Authorized lnteragency Agreement No. Line Item Number Billed to Date Ceiling N RC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 T0#01 Line 2 $ 209,283.03 $ 247,686.00 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Line 4 $ 763,867.52 $ 884,568.00 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Line 5 $1 ,841 ,127.32 $ 2,903,036.00 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Line 6 $ 35,469.69 $ 234,961.28 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 $2,849,747.56 $ 4,270,251.28 Page 1

Page 1 of 2 CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Accounts Of Billed Date: 01 -Feb-2016 BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS (AR 37-1)

• 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009

• 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

• MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28207768 NO CHECK DRAWN 1535906

• 01 -Feb-2016 Partial# 30 04-Jan-2016 Thru 01 -Feb-2016 ,l * .,. "' JI ................. ,, ......

Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Billed Accounting Classification Billing Accounting Classification 031 NA X 0200.0000 2013 00 0000 00000000000 00000 31000001 $3,531.34 096 NA X 3122.0000 G6 08 2417 895 0WDNRC 96252 $33,176.83 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 00 0000 NA 00000 31000001 $29,645.49 Line Item Moa ____ Description Eaid No Amount 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $8,723.69 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $2,539.83 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $17,917.97 00005 REIMBURSABLE - INSIDE FEDERAL GC WORK PERFORMED BY OTHER GOV AGENCIES $464.00 Subtotal: $29,645.49 3 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $131.77 3 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $33.60 3 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $258.38 Subtotal: $423.75 6 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $926.65 6 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $236.23 6 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $1 ,944.71 Subtotal: $3,107.59 Total Billed Amount: $33,176.83 Less Amount Paid Via IPAC: $33,176.83 Payment Due Date: 02-Mar-2016 Pay This Amount: $0.00 DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.886 v2.1.4

Page 2 of 2 CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS Billed Date: 01 -Feb-2016 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28207768 NO CHECK DRAWN 1535906 01 -Feb-2016 Partial# 30 04-Jan-201 6 Thru 01 -Feb-2016 Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount Funds Authorized: $4,270,251.28 CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED Total Billed Amount: $2,849,747.56 I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as stated and Prev Billed Amount: $2,816,570.73 should be charged to the appropriation(s) and/or fund(s) as indicated above, or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated.

Current Billed Amount: $33,176.83 Total Flux Billed: $0.00 Prev Flux Billed: $0.00 Date: 01 -Feb-201 6  ! (b)(6)

Current Flux Billed: $0.00 Authorized Administrative or Certifying Officer DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.886 v2.1.4

Date: 22-FEB-2016 Custo mer Order Bill Print Error Messa ges Page:1 Bill Numbe r Error Messag e cobil_ipac.88 6 v2.1.4

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 (P2#: 405160)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS February 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status 1.1. Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that may affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants.

1.2. NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301 -415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvev@NRC.GOV 1.3. USACE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S d(b)(6) ~

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Mana er:

Primary: (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Program En ineer:

Primary: (b)(6) 1.4. Agreement Period of Performance September 30, 2013 through September 29, 2017 1.5. Period for this Report January 4, 2016 through February 1, 2016

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table 1. Table 2 provides milestones and schedules for each task.

Table 1. Information on Individual Tasks for NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO #01 Activities Accomplished Activities Planned for Notes/Significant Task Task Description this Reporting Period Next Reporting Period Issues 1 Development of Completed NA hydrographs related to dams upstream of Fort Calhoun and Cooper Nuclear Plants 2 Intermediate Technical Meeting Dates: NA Review Meetings 17 Dec 13 Licensees 18 Dec 13 G2G 23-24 Jan 14 G2G 3 Technical Reporting Completed NA Requirements 4 Presentation of results and Confirmed that the Revise ACAS-USAGE The ACAS may share updates documentation from the MOU on information the presentation October fact-finding exchange to cover full material with the full session and the TLRs ACAS committee. committee members may be shared with full provided no hard ACAS committee. copies are removed from the meeting facility.

2

Table 2. Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO #01 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Development of Hydrographs (b}(?)(E}, (b)(?)(F) Nov-13 Nov-13 Nov-13 Nov-1 3 Nov-13 Nov- 13 Dec-13 Dec- 13 Dec-13 Dec-13 Dec-13 Dec- 13 2 Intermediate Technical Review Meetings

-Government and Licensee Meeting Dec-13 Dec-13 Government to Government Meeting Nov-13 Nov- 13 3 Technical Letter Reporting Requirements Fort Calhoun Nuclear Power Plant and Cooper Jan-14 Mar-14 Nuclear Power Plant

- - .I -

4 NRG HQ Presentation of Results/Updates Briefing for Licensees to address questions on the May-14 May- 14 Technical Letter Report Fact-finding session with NRG, ACAS 21 -220ct15 21-22 Oct 15

3. Travel No travel was completed during this reporting period, and no travel is planned for the next reporting period.

Table 3. Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period

~=~tttd I Purpose Location Travelers Start I End Date I Travel I Coordinated I I I Date Cost w/ NRC Completed this reporting period None Planned next reporting period None

4. Significant Issues No Issues at this time.

3

5. Financial Status Table 4 contains a summary of the financial status of the TO 01 to this agreement and Table 5 provides the amount of funds expended during the period and the total cumulative year to date.

The TAC Number for the funds expended is TM3023, NTTF R2.1 Flooding Project Management.

Note that the IPAC DA Form 4445-R illustrates the expenditures for Task Order 01 in three separate Line Items: 1 - $1 ,618.38; 2 - $5,997.23; and 3 - $707.66 for a total of $8,323.27.

• ~* ~illll!JIII: Balance of Precent Balance of Funds Total Costs Cumulative Obligated Month Total Award Expended Funds Required Obligated to Incurred this Costs to Date Funds Year Amount($) (cum for Completion Date ($) Report ($) ($) Remaining costs/obi) ($)

($)

Jul-14 $247,686.00 $247,686.00 $ 3,008.88 $197,503.67 79.7% $50,182.33 $ 50,182.33 May-15 $247,686.00 $247,686.00 $ 212.86 $197,716.53 79.8% $49,969.47 $ 49,969.47 Jun-15 $247,686.00 $247,686.00 $ 1,119.98 $198,836.51 80.3% $48,849.49 $ 48,849.49 Jul-15 $247,686.00 $247,686.00 $ 278.73 $199,115.24 80.4% $48,570.76 $ 48,570.76 Aug-15 $247,686.00 $247,686.00 $ 35.48 $199,150.72 80.4% $48,535.28 $ 48,535.28 Sep-15 $247,686.00 $247,686.00 $ 347.15 $199,497.87 80.5% $48,188.13 $ 48,188.13 Oct-15 $247,686.00 $247,686.00 $ 8,323.27 $207,821.14 83.9% $39,864.86 $ 39,864.86 Nov-15 $247,686.00 $247,686.00 $ 875.13 $ 208,696.27 84.3% $38,989.73 $ 38,989.73 Dec-15 $247,686.00 $247,686.00 $ 163.01 $ 208,859.28 84.3% $38,826.72 $ 38,826.72 Jan-16 $247,686.00 $247,686.00 $ 423.75 $209,283.03 84.5% $38,402.97 $ 38,402.97 4

Table 5. Financial Detail Report - Summary for NRC-HQ-13-i-03-0021 ; TO 01 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 5 47 334 (2) Technical 0 39 1465, (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 5 86 1799

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 258.38 $ 6,597.63 $ 129,748.49 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 131 .77 $ 2,539.39 $ 60,374.94 SUB-TOTAL $ 390.15 $ 9,137.02 $ 190,123.43 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ - $ -

(2) Material and Services Cost $ - $ - $ -

(3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL G & A Costs $ 33.60 $ 648.14 $ 19, 159.60 DOE Fee (If Applicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 423.75 $ 9,785.16 $ 209,283.03

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 6 provides the monthly expenditures for the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 1. The planned (budget) expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $247,686 Funds Obligated to date: $247,686 Period of Performance: 30 Sep 2013 to 31 Mar 2017 5

Ta ble 6. Monthlv Exoense Forecast - NRC-H0-13-1-03-0021 TO #01 TM3023 t'e rcemage Expe nditure s for Ta sk Ex pe nditures Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative ,_,.

1 $ 11 7 984.00 $ . $ 106 666,74 90.41%

2 $ 25 920.00 $ . $ 4 180.50 16.13%

3 $ 89 796.00 $ . $ 84 233.10 93.80%

4 $ 13 ,986.00 $ 423.75 $ 14,202.69 101.55%

TOTAL $ 247,686.00 $ 423.75 $ 209,283.03 84.50%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 1 is identified in Table 7. This plan is updated based on projected Task #4 activity during fiscal year 201 5 and close out in fiscal year 201 6. The completion date is scheduled to be in the future at the discretion of the NRG.

Baseline $51,945.50 $64,905.50 $38,943.94 $24,339.56 $19,479.56 $ 12,986.38 $ 13,984.00 Actual Costs $33,895.64 $48,813.69 $32,757.88 $20,794.07 $16,949.56 $ 14,764.25 $ 13,958.70 Difference $ 18,049.86 $ 16,091.81 $ 6,186.06 $ 3,545.49 $ 2,530.00 $ (1,777.87) $ 25.30 Percenta e 65% 75% 84% 85% 87% 114% 100%

Baseline $ 6,495. 19 $ 4,868.79 $ 3,100.00 $ 241,048.42 Actual Costs $ 9,248.20 $ 3,312.80 $ 3,008.88 $ 197,503.67 Difference $(2,753.01) $1 ,555.99$ 91 .12 $ 43,544.75 Percenta e 142% 68% 97% 82%

Baseline $ 241 ,048.42 Actual Costs $197,503.67 Difference $ 43,544.75 Percenta e 82%

Baseline $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $

500.00 $ 3,500.00 $247,048.42 Actual Costs $ 212.56 $ 1,119.98 $ 278.73 $ 35.48 $ 347.15 $ 8,323.27 $207,821.14 Difference $ 287.44 $ (619.98) $ 221.27 $ 464.52 $ 152.85 $ (4,823.27) $ 39,227.28 Percenta e 43% 224% 56% 7% 69% 238% 84%

Baseline $ 500.00 $ 137.58 $ 138.58 $ 247,824.58 Actual Costs $ 875. 13 $ 163.01 $ 423.75 $ 209,283.33 Differe nce $ (375.13) $ (25.43) $ (285.17) $ 38,541 .25 Percenta e 175% 118% 306% 84%

6

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 (P2#: 405160)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS February 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status 1.1 . Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRG) in the determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that my affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants. A Technical Letter Report (TLR) documenting the development of the hydrographs will be provided. The NPP sites to be evaluated will be identified in subsequent Letters of Technical Direction (LTDs).

1.2. NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301 -415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvev@NRC.GOV 1.3. USAGE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S d_(b_)(6_) - -

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Mana er:

Primary: (b)(6)

Program i-u->.........,.........___,

Primary:

(b)(6) 1.4. Agreement Period of Performance July 25, 2014 through September 29, 2017 1.5. Period for this Report January 4, 2016 through February 1, 2016

2. Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction Information on individual Letters of Technical Direction (LTD), including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

3. Travel Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction The travel information recorded for this task order is reported by individual LTDs in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NOA) with BC Hydro for the Columbia Generating Station site has taken much longer than originally projected and the delay has significantly impacted the PDT to proceed forward with analysis.

Issue 1 Status: The MASTER NOA between the USAGE and BC Hydro has been signed (25 May 15). The individual NDAs for each team member authorized to work on the project will be distributed for signature. The documents have been uploaded to the Partner sharepoint site for PDT use (19 Oct 15). The NRG team members have submitted signed NDAs and they are with NWD for signature. CLOSED

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this task order. The total costs incurred for this reporting period is captured on the Line 5 of the Bill No. 28204245 of the IPAC DA Form 4445-R.

Table 1. Flnanclal Status Report* Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2014 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date ($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 17,569.74 $ 17,569.74 0.6% $ 2,886, 175.86 $ 2,886, 175.86 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 21 ,716.10 $ 39,285.84 1.4% $ 2,864,459.76 $ 2 ,864,459.76 Oct $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,195.60 $ 118,481.44 4.1% $ 2,785,264.16 $ 2,785,264.16 Nov $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 80,422.10 $ 198,903.54 6.8% $ 2,704,842.06 $ 2,704,842.06 Dec $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,555.41 $ 301 ,458.95 10.4% $ 2,602,286.65 $ 2,602,286.65 2

Table 1. Financial Status Report- Sunmary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount ($) to Date ($) for Completion Report ($) ($) cost s/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $137,019.46 $ 438,478.41 15. 1% $ 2,465,267. 19 $ 2,465,267.19 Feb $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $213,680.16 $ 652,158.57 22.5% $ 2,251 ,587.03 $ 2,251,587.03 Mar $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,500. 18 $ 867,658.75 29.9% $ 2,036,086.85 $ 2,036,086.85 Apr $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,835.27 $ 1,083,494.02 37.3% $ 1,820,251.58 $ 1,820,251.58 May $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,342.38 $ 1,185,836.40 40.8% $ 1,717,909.20 $ 1,717,909.20 Jun $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $142,454.07 $ 1,328,290.47 45.7% $ 1,575,455.13 $ 1,575,455.13 Jul $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 97,231. 15 $ 1,425,521.62 49. 1% $ 1,478,223.98 $ 1,478,223.98 Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 83,891.67 $ 1,509,413.29 52.0% $ 1,394,332.31 $ 1,394,332.31 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,066.56 $ 1,588,479.85 54.7% $ 1,315,265.75 $ 1,315,265.75 Oct $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $109,520.92 $ 1,698,000.77 58.5% $ 1,205,745.83 $ 1,205,745.83 Nov $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 60,628.27 $ 1,758,629.04 60.6% $ 1,145,117.56 $ 1,145,117.56 Dec $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 52,852.79 $ 1,811 ,481 .83 62.4% $ 1,092,264.77 $ 1,092,264.77 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,645.49 $ 1,841 ,127.32 63.4% $ 1,062,619.28 $ 1,062,619.28 Table 2 provides the financial detail outlining the amount of funds expended during the reporting period, the current fiscal year (FY2016), and the total cumulative year to date. The financial data includes the following Letters of Technical Direction:

• LTD TO26 1 forloy Nuoloar Power Plant (Mobile Distriot) 31 Jul201 4

• LTD TO26-1 a Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 06Apr2015

• LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant (Pittsburgh District). 23Sep2014

• LTD TO26 3 Montioollo and Prairie Island ~JPPs (St. Paul Distriot). 21 Oot201 4

• LTD TO26-3a Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul District) . 08Aug15

• LTD TO26 4 Arkansas ~Juolear One NPP (Little Rook/Tulsa Distriots). 09Deo14

• LTD TO26-4b Arkansas Nuclear One NPP (Little Rock/Tulsa Districts). 29Jan16

• LTD TO26 5 Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/\llJalla Walla Distriots). 15Deo1 4

• LTD TO26-5a Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 14Jan16 3

Table 2. Financial Detail Report - NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 116 909 1,992 (2) Technical 120 1,513 14,801 (3) Support (Bureau Reclamation) 0 4 659 TOTAL 236 2,426 17,452

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 17,917.97 $ 143,915.04 $ 1,081,212.98 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 8,723.69 $ 66,009.77 $ 498,677.48 SUB-TOTAL $ 26,641.66 $ 209,924.81 $ 1,579,890.,46 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ 464.00 $ 15,728.00 $ 64,054.00 (Bureau of Reclamation)

(2) Material and Ser.ices Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ . $ 4,665.82 $ 20,190.62 SUB-TOTAL $ 464.00 $ 20,393.82 $ 84,244.62 G & A Costs $ 2,539.83 $ 22,328.84 $ 176,992.24 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 29,645.49 $ 252,647.47 $ 1,841 ,127.32

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for work accomplished by the USAGE in the reporting period for Task Order 26. The cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in this table. The individual project letter status report for each LTD issued is included in the attachments.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $2,904,745.60 Funds Obligated to date: $2,903,745.60 Period of Performance: 25 Jul 2014 to 29 Sep 2017 4

Table 3. Cumulative Monthly ExDAnse Forecast - NRC-H0-25-14-T-0026 l'ercemage Expenditures for Task Expenditures Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative ,,,,,

1a $ 1 683,915.60 $ 19 808.07 $ 1,238 873.88 73.57%

1b PMP/PMF $ 458 200.00 $ 504.40 $ 342 331.54 74.71%

2 s 315 600.00 s 423.75 $ 112 860.45 35.76%

3 s 224 760.00 s 8.909.27 $ 147 061 .45 65.43%

4 $ 221 ,270.00 $ - $ - 0.00%

TOTAL $ 2,903,745.60 $ 29,645.49 $ 1,841 ,127.32 63.41%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 26 is identified in Table 4. The spending plan reflects the project schedule delays and completion of tasks for Farley. These scheduling issues include: 1) signature of the Non-Disclosure Agreement for Columbia and 2) the impact of the May I June 2015 high water events and a levee failure at the Tulsa and Little Rock Districts.

Baseline $ 31,215 $ 47,021 $ 150,836 $ 130,000 $200,000 Actual Costs $ 17,570 $ 21,716 $ 79,196 $ 80,422 $102,555 Difference $ 13,645 $ 25,304 $ 71,641 $ 49,578 $ 97,445 Percentage 56.3% 46.2% 52.5% 61.9% 51 .3%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,500 $ 251,800 $175,200 Actual Costs $ 137,019 $ 213,680 $ 215,500 $ 215,835 $ 102,342 $142,454 Difference $ 112,981 $ 36,320 $ 34,500 $ 34,665 $ 149,458 $ 32,746 Percents e 54.8% 85.5% 86.2% 86.2% 40.6% 81.3%

Baseline $ 100,446 $ 115,100 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Actual Costs $ 97,231 $ 83,892 $79,066.56 $109,520.92 $ 60,628 $ 52,853 Difference $ 3,215 $ 31 ,208 $ 20,933 $ (19,521) $ 29,372 $ 37,147 Percenta e 96.8% 72.9% 79.1% 121.7% 67.4% 58.7%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,000 $ 17,630 Actual Costs $ 29,645.49 Difference $ 60,355 Percenta e 32.9%

5

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site for Task Order #26, N RC-HQ-25-1 4-T-0026.

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

L:t:D :t:02& 1 3~ .h,11 ~4 eiral1,1aliGA gj l:lggd l=la.1ai:ds al ll:lg .IGSGflA ~4 l=a~l9',' f:>l1,1sl9a~ 12IaAI 1:),1,19 lg Oai:R l=aily~

LTDT026-1a 06-Apr-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure LTD T026-2 23-Sep-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Beaver Valley NPP Due to Dam Failure L:t:D :t:02& 3 2~ Gsl ~ 4 eiral1,1aliGA gj l:lggd l=la.;ai:ds al 11:19 MGAiis9llg aAd 12fai~i9 lslaAd ~11212 Sil96 LTD T026-3a 13-Aug-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Monticello and Prairie Island NPP Sites L:t:D :t:02& 4 OQ b19S 14 lsiral1,1ali8A el l=legd l=la.;afds al 11:10 .A,l'kaAsas ~J1,1slea~ GAe ~11212 Sile LTDT026-4b 29-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Arkansas Nuclear One NPP Site L:t:D :t:02& Ii Hi Oes 14 lsval1,1aliGA gj l:lggg l=la.1ai:ds al 11:19 Ggl1,1i:Rbia ~11212 Sile LTDTA26-5a 14-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Columbia NPP Site 6

The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites for this reporting period.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/ NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 $ - YES MF3038 Farley 2 $ - YES MF3039 Columbia $ 18,635.17 YES MF3041 ANO1 $ 4,750.23 YES MF3042 ANO2 $ 4,750.23 YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 $ 543.06 YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 $ 543.06 YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 YES MF3995 Three Mile Island 1 YES MF3696 Monticello $ 211 .88 YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 $ 105.94 YES MF3698 Prairie Island 2 $ 105.94 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 29,645.49 PERIOD 7

LTD 1026-1 Farley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 8

Table LTD -TO26-1.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-1 Farley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 Technical Manag I

USACE Project Deliverv Team: Omaha and Mobile Districts Project Manager - (b)(6) CENWO-PM-S CESAM-EN-HH Project Costs: $277,309 P2 447176 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Revised LTD issued 6 April 2015 Activity Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Develop PMP/PMF Notes I Significant Issues

1. la Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Perform a\

(bX7XE), (bX7XF) None. None. Work is complete.

Activity Develop Preliminary Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1b Hydrographs and TLR Reoorting Period Reporting Period Develop time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including Excel spreadsheets, at various locations in the vicinity of the Farley NPP site. Two Submissions: None. None. Work is complete.

Preliminary Draft and Pre-Final. The (b)(7)(E) (b)(7)(F)

Activity Intermediate Technical Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 2 Review Meetings Reoorting Period Reoorting Period Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None. None. Work is complete.

meetings.

Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Additional Information to be included at the request of Southern Company: *

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

11) Flow hydrographs for the complete model None. None. Work is complete.

run. 2) Velocity hydrographs for the complete model run. 3) Spatial coordinates and projection for each cross section. 4) All cross section station and elevation points. 5) Left and right bank stations. 6) Manning's "n" values or roughness coefficients for the left overbank, channel and right overbank at each cross section.

Activity Participate in Presentation Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 9

Table LTD T026-1.2. LTD 26-1 Farley

• Travel ComDteted This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Actlvtty: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coord inated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next reporting period I I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. Cunilatlve Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-1 Farley, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1a $ 149,682.20 $ 130,871.20 87.43%

1b PMP/PMF $ 52,369.92 $ 36,942.43 70.54%

2 $ 21,376.04 $ 19,465.04 91.06%

3 $ 29,255.44 $ 16,112.04 55.07%

4 $ 26,455.72 $ . 0.00%

TOTAL $ 279,139.32 $ . $ 203,390.71 72.86%

10

LTD T026-2 Beaver Valley 11

Table LTD -TO26-2.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliverv Team: Omaha and Pittsburrih Districts Project Managers -l(h\(6\ I CENWO-PM-S;i b}/6} i CELRP-PM-PM Technical Lead -t1hlltl\ 1CELRP-EC-DH Project Costs: $450,476 P2 448945 LID issued 23 Sep 2014 Ac:;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Evaluate PMP and PMF for the Beaver Vallev NPP site as well as the (b)(?)(E), (b)(7)(F)

I ~v*~*v,-

hydrograpns oasea on the site-None None Work is complete.

specific PMP developed by the NRC's licensee, FENOC. Existing USAGE hydrologic and hydraulic models Viii! be used to determine the PMF resulting from the Licensee's site-specific PMP.

Activity I Develop Preliminary Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR P.eoortina Period Reoortina Period Assess the.l.(7)(E). (bX7XF) document the anlyses in a prelirrinary draft and pre-final TLR and hydroQraphs. f None None Work is complete.

(bX7XE). (bX7XF)

Ac::;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next P.eoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None None Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate.

Calculation packages, including input and output files from computer Finalize project files. Work is complete.

modeling runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity IParticipate in Presentation Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoorti na Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None No action required.

Presentation of Results Meetings 12

Table LTD T026-2.2. LTD 26-2 Beaver Valley* Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period I

Related Actlvtty: Purpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period INone I I I I I I Planned next reporting period INone I I I I I I Table LTD TO26-1 .3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - TLD T026-1 Beaver Vally, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget(%)

1a $ 259,701.20 $165.59 $ 263,81 1.16 101.58%

1b PMP/PMF $ 66,074.00 $165.59 $ 62,121.31 94.02%

2 $ 55,117.00 $ 45,437.08 82.44%

3 $ 35,523.00 $754.93 $ 40,603.73 114.30%

4 $ 34,061.00 $ -

TOTAL $ 450,476.20 $ 1,086.11 $ 41 1,973.28 91 .45%

13

LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island 14

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Delivery Iearo* j gha and St. Paul Districts Project Managers* (b)(6) CENWO-PM-S, !(b)(6)  ! CEMVP-PM-A Technical Manager CEMVP-EC-H ........;._ _ __.

Project Costs: $514,370 LTD issued 31 July 2014

1. 1a I

Activity Develop PMP/PMF for Prairie Island NPP Activities Acco"l)lished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues (b)(7XE). (b)(7XF)

Additional Information, at the request o.,f..._ th_e_ _,,

NRC's licensee Xcel wiU be orovided:I None None Work is complete (b)(7)(E) (b)(7)(F)

I No l..,n""""

yrnr"og

'" "r"'

ap=lh i"'s-:a~re="'n~e~e".l" de~d:-:f':"

or'.":t:h:"e:':s~e cross sections.

Activity

1. lb I Develop PMF Stage Hydrographs Monticello NPP Activities Acco"l)lished this Reportng Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Develop a new HMS model of the watershed in developing the PMP for the Monticello NPP site and route the resulting runoff to produce the PMF. A georelerenced HEC-RAS model shall be developed in order to produce a PMF stage hydrograph at the Monticello NPP site. Additional information, at the request of the NRC's Ucensee, Xcel will be nrovirl<><l:,

None None Work is complete (b)(l)(E), (b)(?)(F)

,,__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___.ll'IO hydrographs are needed for these cross sections.

15

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Delivery Team: Omaha and St. Paul Districts Project Managers ;l(b)(6)

Technical Manager ICENW 0-PM-S,!(b)(6)

CEMVP-EC-H I CEMVP-PM-A Project Costs: $514,370 Lm issued 31 July 2014 Activity I H&H Model Coll1)arison and Site- Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1c Soocific PMP ColTl>arison Reoortina Period Reoortino Period Work wiU be complete in Comparison of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, September provided H&H models, describing any major differences between Xcel's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H&H modeling approach. Comparison of the site-specific PMPs (provided by Xcel) by describing any differences in the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution between the basin-wide PMPs and None None the basin-wide PMPs used by the USAGE to develop its hydrographs. USACE will develop hydrographs similiar to Activities 1A and 1B by applying the PMPs and using USACE's H&H models. The findings will be documented, coordinated, and a detailed comparison performed.

Ac:;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetings Activities Accol1l)tished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate None None Work is complete Technical Review meetings.

Activity

1. 3 I Develop Final

. Hydrographs and llR Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues Rennrtina Period Rennrtino Period Document findings in a Final llR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate. Calculation packages, including Repackage the deliverables for input and output files from computer modeling Work is complete release to licensee.

runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity I Participate in Presentation of Results Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 Meetinas Reoortina Period Rennrtino Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of None None Not required.

Results Meetings Table LTD T026-3.2. LTD 26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island

• Travel Completed Renortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next rePOrting period I I I I I I I 16

Table LTD T026-1.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - no T026-1 Monticello, NRC-HQ.25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budi:iet (%)

1A1B1C $ 410,631.20 $ 359,718.36 87.60%

2 $ 43,469.00 $ 13,540.72 31 .15%

3 $ 24,607.00 $423.75 $ 17,435.20 70.85%

4 $ 35,663 .00 TOTAL $ 514,370.20 $ 423.75 $ 390 ,694.28 75.96%

17

LTD T026-4 Arkansas Nuclear One 18

Table LTD -T026-4.1. ProJect Status for LTD T026-4 Arkansas NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Dellverv Team: Omaha, Litlle Rock, and Tulsa Districts Project Manager - 1 1 L .,n\ l rl'NWO-PM-S; jlh,~, (CESWL-PM Technical Manager -1/b)/6) I CESWL-EC-H;l()(fl) I CESWT-EC-HF Project Costs: $938,"", r'~ ***=*

LTD issued 29 Jan 2016 Ac:t [ Dewlop PMP/PMF Acti1.1ties Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,.ties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Compare H&H Models (Entergy) and Final report complete, combining report lncorportaioo of comments to be received at the Compare Site-Specific PMP. segments for all darns into single report for ITR meeting from NRC and Omaha District.

Describe any major differences re,;ew and Comparis: ) om of P~ (or ~rkans*1 between Entergy's H&H modeling '"'*~* ,.,_ USACE a (6X7XE), (6X7XF)

(bX7)(E), (b)(7) approach and _USACE.'.s..H&H . .......... 1............ ~ am Safety team mem rs wi7

... modeling a~oach. Describe any 10,scuss *ar : ~ad* a*rs and complete this

~h)(E).

(F)

(b)(7). differences In the ra,nfaH.l'.f!!Plh,............... sect,on..for ooralion:"aiid disl.ribution between section dealmg the basin-,,..de PMPs (Entergy) and geology, etc. for ~7XE),

!')!:~  ! I P,mplete report ion, foundation, the basin-wide PMPs (USACE). '

Develop hydrographs by applying the PMPs (Entergy) using USACE's H&H models, Acth,ty [ Dewlop Preliminary ActilAlies Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,.ties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Ewluation of the PMP and PMF for Preliminary Dralt of the Technical Letter Report lncorportaion of comments to be receiV8d at the Milestone: Preliminary Draft TLR (b)(7)(E), __ (b)(?L ,.,the ANO site!

....,.... '"'""'"""" / Ue"310p 70 I completed and submitted for re\liew. ITR meeting from NRC and Omaha District. and hydrographs - 25 September 2015.

(F) m mr A N< n~ r 1-,.,.,.in. Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F) hydrographs - 24 December 2015.

Still need to pro>ide hydrograph data In Excel formal and inunda1ion mapping.

no\tae nyorograpns ror 1oenum,u locations In the LTD 26-4.

Ac::;ty [ lntemiedlate Technical Actil.ities Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,Aties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues Re1.1ew Meetinos Schedule, host, and participate In Respond to licensee questions Identified during Milestone: First ITA

• 27-29 Intermediate Technical Reldew the ITR meeting. October 2015.

meetings. Milestone: Second rm - lBD.

Actility [ O....lop Final Hydrographs Acti1.1ties Accomplished this Reporting Period Actilities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Document findings In a Final TLR Completed draft final TLR. Finalize the TLR. MIiestone: Final TLR and and hydrographs. Include additional hydrographs - 17 Mar 2016.

lnfom,atlon as appropriate.

Acti1.1ty IParticipate in Presentation Acti1.1ties Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti.,;lies Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Schedule, Host and Participate in TBD Presentation of Results Meetings 19

Table LTD T026-4.2. LTD 26-4 .Arkansas* Travel Camnleted This Reportlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting peri od Planned next reporting period Table LTD T026-4.3. cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026*4 Arkansas, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent age Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 476,997 $1,769.87 $ 401,310.96 84.13%

PMP/PMF $ 196,785 $ 194,247.26 98.71%

2 $ 130,846 $ 24,787.48 18.94%

3 $ 71,281 $7,730.59 $ 72,910.48 102.29%

4 $ 62,914 $ .

TOTAL $ 938,823 $ 9,500.46 $ 693,256.1 8 73.84%

20

LTD T026-5 Columbia Generating Station 21

Table LTD-T026-5.1. Project Status for LTD T026-5 Colurri>la NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Delil.l3rv Team: Omaha, Seattle, and Walla Walla Districts Project Manager *J b)(6) b ~ENWO-PM-S;j (b)(6) !CENWS-PM-MEI Technical Manage ENWS-EN-HH* E Project Costs: $569,688 P2 449739 LTD issued 14 Jan 2016 ActilAty ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Dewlap PMP/PMF Notes / Significant Issues

1. 0 Reporting Period Reoorting Period Evaluation of the PMP and PMF for Held kick-ott meeting in Check-in teleconference to Non-Disclosure Agreement the Columbia NPP sitei Seattle. Began analysis. relAew fai lure modes and signed and documents shared (b)(?)(E). (b)(?)(F) I analysis to date. with USAGE. Assumption that new PMP/PMF stuclies for CbX7XE), r ill not be needed.

1h¥7\/'F\

ActilAty Dewlop Preliminary ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroar,inhs and TlR Reoortina Period Rennrtina Period De1,13lop H&H models for the Held kick-ott meeting in Check-in teleconference to Milestone: Preliminary Draft TlR Columbia NPP watershed. Evaluate Seattle. Began analysis. relAew fai lure modes and and hydrographs

• 15 Jul 2016.

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) analysis to date. Milestone: Pre-Final TlR and hydrographs

• 09 Sep 2016.

I V¥1UV IIJ - * -::,*-r-!1~ IUI JJIVVIUVU locations in the LTD.

ActilAty Intermediate Technical ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 2 RelAew Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, host, and participate in Milestone: First ITR

• 12 Aug Intermediate Technical RelAew 2016.

meetings. Milestone: Second ITR

• 07 Oct 2016.

ActilAty Dewlop Final Hydrographs ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoorting Period Reoortina Period Document data and analysis, n/a n/a Milestone: Final TlR and including the hydrographs, in a Final hydrographs

• 28 Oct 2016.

TLR. Package will include the calculation packages, including input and output files from the computer modeling runs supporting the key TlR conclusions.

ActilAty Participate in Presentation ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reporting Period Reporting Period Schedule, Host and Participate in n/a n/a n/a Presentation of Results Meetings 22

Table LTD T026-5.2. LTD 26-5 Columbla

• Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coord inated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period Planned next reporting period Table LTD T026-5.3. CUmulatlve Monthly Expense-TLD TO26-5 Columbla, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 266,693 $17,872.61 $ 83,162.20 31 .18%

1 PMP/PMF $ 113,966 $338.8 1 $ 49,020.54 43.01%

2 $ 54,733 $423.75 $ 9,630.13 17.59%

3 $ 44,088 $ .

4 $ 52,169 $ .

TOTAL $ 531,649 $ 18,635.17 $ 141,812.87 26.67%

The costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation are included in the table above and the sum total amount is recorded in Table 2 Financial Detail Report, as Other Direct Costs, Subcontractor Consultant Cost.

23

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 (P2#: 455162)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS February 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective The object of the agreement, Review of Recommendation 2. 1 Flood Re-evaluations as Part of 50.54(f) Response, is for the USAGE to assist the NRC staff in reviewing certain flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) in the FHRRs provided by NRC licensees in response to the 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012, Recommendation 2. 1:

Flooding. This work effort will support the NRC with their Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR.

NRC Project Manager Brad HaNey NRC/ NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USACE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S (b)(6) 1616 Capitol Avenue, u1te 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Manager:

Primary: !(b)(6)

Program Engineer:

Primary: !(bl(6)

Agreement Period of Performance August 25, 2015 through August 24, 2016 Period for this Report January 4, 2016 through February 1, 2016

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table A. Table B provides milestones and schedules for each task.

I lj'(_*;r*~~:;:J~-~~;~.~~ >\*:.~;~~,}~~(:~~;;/:~~~~:\:~.~~{;~.~;*~;;~::~:;;:,:~;~-~~~~:~-:~:*~ ~

1 ActMties Accomplishec this Actl\ities Plannec for next Task Deliverable/Milestone Description Issues/Challenges Reporting Period Reporting Period I ORIENTATION 1.a Peach Bottom Completec re\iew ol the FHRR Secure the Argus One Sofware lor information pro\ided on the use on l he project. Completed external drive.

1.b Three Mile Island PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL EVALUATION 2 REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2.a Peach Bottom NRG received the relatecl Re\iewed audit responses.

Recuestec Baltimore District Comolete draftl 101\t /\~I, 1b)(?)(F)

I (DJ\/ J\C:J, W/\t 1\f)

J A requc,, ,v, u re"ew of the white paper will be 2.b Three Mile Island

~ (?)(E), (b)(?)(F) submittec to the Baltimore District from Omaha.

FINAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 3

AND TECHNICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT 3.a Peach Bottom Clarillcatlon of input to the Re,,;ew ol template lor TEA.

MFSHI table 3.b Three Mile Island Table B: Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Technical Orientation I Kick-Off fv1eeting Peach Bottom 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 Three Mile Island 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 2 Preliminary TER & RA ls Peach Bottom 30 Nov 15 Revised 1 Dec 15 Revised Three Mile Island early Feb 16 3 Final TER Peach Bottom Three Mile Island 2

3. Travel Table C provides information on completed and planned travel for this task order. No travel expenditures have been incurred in this reporting period and none are projected for the next reporting period.

Table C. Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Task: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period Planned next reporting period

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The USACE team is in the process of acquiring the required software to evaluate the submittals of the licensee for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island. The software is in the process of acquisition and additional approvals are required for installation.

Resolution 1: The USAGE has received and installed the required software to review the data submitted by the licensee. CLOSED.

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this agreement. Table 2 provides the amount of funds expended during the period, current fiscal year, and the total cumulative year to date.

Table 1. Financial Status Report- Sunm1ry NRC-HQ-25-15-T-ooo9 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Sep $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77 3.5% $ 226,731.51 $ 226,731.51 Oct $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,525.87 $ 11,755.64 5.0% $ 223,205.64 $ 223,205.64 Nov $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 8,492.55 $ 20,248.19 8.6% $ 214,713.09 $ 214,713.09 Dec $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 12,11 3.91 $ 32,362.10 13.8% $ 202,599. 18 $ 202,599. 18 Jan $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,107.59 $ 35,469.69 15.1% $ 199,491 .59 $ 199,491.59 3

Table 2. Flnanclal Detail Report* NRC-HQ-25-15-T-ooo9 Fiscal Year to Current Month Tota l to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 26 132 150 (2) Technical 4 94 138 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 30 226 288

2. Costs Labor Costs :

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 1,944.71 $ 15,779.66 $ 20,782.57 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 926.65 $ 7,298.20 $ 9, 849.68 SUB-TOTAL $ 2 871.36 $ 23,077.86 $ 30,632.25 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 (2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Tra\-13I (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 G & A Costs $ 236.23 $ 1,862.06 $ 2,537.44 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 3,107.59 $ 27,239.92 $ 35,469.69

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3.1 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for all of the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 9. The monthly planned (budget) cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table. Table 3.x will detail the monthly expenditures for each individual nuclear power plant site and the individual nuclear power plant and the associated TAC

1. for license fee recovery.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $234,961.28 Funds Obligated to date: $234,961.28 Period of Performance: 25 Aug 2015 to 24 Aug 2016 4

Table 3.1. Cumulative Monthlv ExDAnse Forecast - NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009

...ercenli:1ge Expenditures for Task Expenditures Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative ,_,.

1 s 19 378.00 $ 1.001.94 $ 14 232.40 73.45%

2 $ 172,172.04 $ 1,766.84 $ 19 706.76 11.45%

3 $ 43 411.24 $ 338.81 $ 1.530.53 3.53%

TOTAL $ 234,961.28 $ 3,107.59 $ 35,469.69 15.10%

Table 3.2: LTD T009-2 Cumulative Monthly ExDense

• Peach Bottom TAC MRi598 / MRi599 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget(%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $543.44 $ 6,797.49 70.16%

2 $ 80,153.96 $1 ,619.00 $ 10,692.13 13.34%

3 $ 18,211.36 $338.81 $ 1,041.50 5.72%

TOTAL $ 108,054.32 $ 2,501.25 $ 18,531.12 17.15%

Table 3.3: LTDT009-3 Cumulative Monthly Expense* Three Mlle Island TACMF11 13 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget(%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $458.50 $ 7,434.91 76.74%

2 $ 92,018.08 $1 47.84 $ 9,014.63 9.80%

3 $ 25,199.88 $ 489.03 1.94%

TOTAL $ 126,906.96 $ 606.34 $ 16,938.57 13.35%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 9 is identified in Table 4.

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 5,961 $ 12,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 Actual Costs $ 8,230 $ 3,526 $ 8,493 $ 12,114 $ 3, 108 Difference $ (2,269) $ 8,474 $ 6,507 $ 2,886 $ 21,892 Percenta e 138.1% 29.4% 56.6% 80.8% 12.4%

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 12,000 Actual Costs Difference Percenta e

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USACE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site.

5

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-H0-25-15-T-0009 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

LTD T009*3 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Peach Bottom NPP Site LTDT009-2 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Three Mile Island NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites. The costs for this reporting period are for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-H0-25-15-T-0009 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF6598 Peach Bottom 2 $ 1,250.63 YES MF6599 Peach Bottom 3 $ 1,250.63 YES MF1113 Three Mile Island 1 $ 606.34 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 3,107.59 Pl=RlnD 6

From: lrb)l6)

To: Harvey. Brad; Cook. Christopher: NRO MLSR Resource: Dority. Dayna: See. Kenneth; ContractsPOT Resource:

Cc:

M£rlFCResource; Tumee: Michael

Subject:

[External_Sender) NRC*HQ-13-1-0021: MLSRs 20 Jun 2016 Submission Date: Thursday, June 16, 2016 5:24:00 PM Attachments: NRC Task Order May 2016 IPAC pdf NRC TaskOrder Jun 2016 !PAC Summary.pelf NRC-USACE MLSR T026 2016Jun.pdf NRC*USACE MLSR T09 2016Jun.odf Brad, Attached are the June 2016 monthly reporting documents for the subject IAA.

I. !PAC: Billing information by line item (task orders) for !AA. Summary information by task order, current month, billed to date and authorized ceiling (NRC_Task_Order_Jun_2016_JPAC and NRC_Task_Order_Jun_2016_1PAC_Swnmary). Note: This reporting period includes expenditures for TO #09, and #26.

2. MLSR NRC-HQ 14-T-0026: Task order #26 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO26_2016Jun). Attachments provided for Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello!Prairie Island, ANO, and Columbia NPP sites.

4. MLSR NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009: Task order #09 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO9_2016Jun).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

l(b)(6) I ProJect Manager Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Special Projects Branch 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, NE 68102-490 I Phone: !(b)(6) I BB: l(b)(6)

Fax:_

l(b)(6)

Page 1 of 2 CIC #: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Accounts Of Billed Date: 01-Jun-2016 BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS (AR 37-1)

• 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009

• 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

• MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28212890 NO CHECK DRAWN 1593281

• 01 -Jun-2016 Partial# 34 02-May-2016 Thru 01 -Jun-2016 ,l * .,. "' JI ................. ,, ......

Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT GG WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Billed Accounting Classification Billing Accounting Classification 031 NA X 0200.0000 2013 00 0000 00000000000 00000 31000001 $4,474.56 096 NA X 3122.0000 G6 08 2417 895 0WDNRC 96252 $31,402.92 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 00 0000 NA 00000 31000001 $26,928.36 Line Item Moa ____ Description Eaid No Amount 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $6,133.66 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $1 ,638.63 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $12,41 3.32 00005 REIMBURSABLE - INSIDE FEDERAL GC WORK PERFORMED BY OTHER GOV AGENCIES $6,742.75 Subtotal: $26,928.36 6 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $1 ,361 .62 6 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $392.57 6 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $2,720.37 Subtotal: $4,474.56 Total Billed Amount: $31 ,402.92 Less Amount Paid Via IPAC: $31 ,402.92 Payment Due Date: 01-Jul-2016 Pay This Amount: $0.00 DA Form 4445-R Approved by T reasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.062 v2.1.4

Page 2 of 2 CIC #: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS Billed Date: 01-Jun-2016 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28212890 NO CHECK DRAWN 1593281 01 -Jun-2016 Partial# 34 02-May-2016 Thru 01 -Jun-2016 Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT GG WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount Funds Authorized: $4,270,251.28 CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED Total Billed Amount: $2,977,549.95 I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as stated and Prev Billed Amount: $2,946,147.03 should be charged to the appropriation(s) and/or fund(s) as indicated above, or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated.

Current Billed Amount: $31,402.92 Total Flux Billed: $0.00 Prev Flux Billed: $0.00 Date: 01 -Jun-2016 I(b)(6)

Current Flux Billed: $0.00 Authorized Administrative or Certifying Officer DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.062 v2.1.4

Date: 15-JUN-2016 Custo mer Order Bill Print Error Messa ges Page:1 Bill Numbe r Error Messag e cobil_ipac.06 2 v2.1.4

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021

SUMMARY

INFORMATION BY TASK ORDER

~ .......

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 20 June 2016 Submittal "L~

031 NA X 0200.0000 2013

$ 209,283.03 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ - $ 763,867.52 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 031 NA X 0200.0000 2015 $ 4,474.56 $ 58,981.53 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 031 NA X 0200.0000 201 4 $ 26,928.36 $ 1,945,417.87 IPAC Total $ 31,402.92 $ 2,977,549.95 Authorized lnteragency Agreement No. Line Item Number Billed to Date Ceiling NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 T0#01 Line 2 $ 209,283.03 $ 247,686.00 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Line 4 $ 763,867.52 $ 884,568.00 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Line 5 $ 1,945,417.87 $ 2,903,036.00 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Line 6 $ 58,981.53 $ 234,961.28 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 $ 2,977,549.95 $ 4,270,251.28 Page 1

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 (P2#: 405160)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS June 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status 1.1. Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regu latory Commission (NRG) in the determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that my affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants. A Technical Letter Report (TLR) documenting the development of the hydrographs will be provided. The NPP sites to be evaluated will be identified in subsequent Letters of Technical Direction (LTDs).

1.2. NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvev@NRC.GOV 1.3 . USAGE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S (!(b)(6) l 1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Manager:

Primary: l(b)(6)

Program Engineer:

Primary: (b)(6)

(b)(6) 1.4. Agreement Period of Performance July 25, 2014 through September 29, 2017 1.5. Period for this Report May 02, 2016 through June 01, 2016

2. Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction Information on individual Letters of Technical Direction (LTD), including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

3. Travel Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction The travel information recorded for this task order is reported by individual LTDs in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NOA) with BC Hydro for the Columbia Generating Station site has taken much longer than originally projected and the delay has significantly impacted the PDT to proceed forward with analysis.

Issue 1 Status: The MASTER NOA between the USAGE and BC Hydro has been signed (25 May 15). The individual NDAs for each team member authorized to work on the project will be distributed for signature. The documents have been uploaded to the Partner sharepoint site for PDT use (19 Oct 15). The NRG team members have submitted signed NDAs and they are with NWD for signature. CLOSED

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this task order. The total costs incurred for this reporting period is captured on the Line 5 of the Bill No. 28204245 of the IPAC DA Form 4445-R.

Table 1. Flnanclal Status Report* Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2014 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date ($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 17,569.74 $ 17,569.74 0.6% $ 2,886, 175.86 $ 2,886, 175.86 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 21 ,716.10 $ 39,285.84 1.4% $ 2,864,459.76 $ 2 ,864,459.76 Oct $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,195.60 $ 118,481.44 4.1% $ 2,785,264.16 $ 2,785,264.16 Nov $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 80,422.10 $ 198,903.54 6.8% $ 2,704,842.06 $ 2,704,842.06 Dec $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,555.41 $ 301 ,458.95 10.4% $ 2,602,286.65 $ 2,602,286.65 2

Table 1. Financial Status Report - Sumnary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulatil. Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $137,019.46 $ 438,478.41 15. 1% $ 2,465,267. 19 $ 2,465,267.19 Feb $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $213,680.16 $ 652,158.57 22.5% $ 2,251 ,587.03 $ 2,251,587.03 Mar $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,500.18 $ 867,658.75 29.9% $ 2,036,086.85 $ 2,036,086.85 Apr $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,835.27 $1,083,494.02 37.3% $ 1,820,251.58 $ 1,820,251.58 May $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,342.38 $ 1,185,836.40 40.8% $ 1,717,909.20 $ 1,717,909.20 Jun $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $142,454.07 $1,328,290.47 45.7% $ 1,575,455.13 $ 1,575,455.13 Jul $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 97,231.15 $ 1,425,521.62 49.1% $ 1,478,223.98 $ 1,478,223.98 Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 83,891.67 $ 1,509,413.29 52.0% $ 1,394,332.31 $ 1,394,332.31 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,066.56 $1,588,479.85 54.7% $ 1,315,265.75 $ 1,315,265.75 Oct $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $109,520.92 $ 1,698,000.77 58.5% $ 1,205,745.83 $ 1,205,745.83 Nov $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 60,628.27 $ 1,758,629.04 60.6% $ 1,145,117.56 $ 1,145,117.56 Dec $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 52,852.79 $ 1,811 ,481.83 62.4% $ 1,092,264.77 $ 1,092,264.77 Balance of Total Costs Cumulatil. Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount ($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,645.49 $ 1,841,127.32 63.4% $ 1,062,619.28 $ 1,062,619.28 Feb $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,927.68 $ 1,871,055.00 64.4% $ 1,032,691.60 $ 1,032,691.60 Mar $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 32,557.68 $ 1,903,612.68 65.6% $ 1,000,133.92 $ 1,000,133.92 Apr $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 14,876.83 $ 1,918,489.51 66. 1% $ 985,257.09 $ 985,257.09 May $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 26,928.36 $ 1,945,417.87 67.0% $ 958,328.73 $ 958,328.73 Table 2 provides the financial detail outlining the amount of funds expended during the reporting period, the current fiscal year (FY2016), and the total cumulative year to date. The financial data includes the following Letters of Technical Direction:

• LTD TO26 1 Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 31 Jul2014

• LTD TO26-1 a Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 06Apr2015

• LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant (Pittsburgh District). 23Sep2014 3

• LTD TO26 3 Montioello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul Distriot). 21Oot2014

• LTD TO26-3a Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul District). 08Aug15

• LTD TO26 4 Arkansas Nuclear Ono NPP (Little Rock/Tulsa Districts). 0QDec14

• LTD TO26-4b Arkansas Nuclear One NPP (Little Rock/Tulsa Districts). 29Jan16

• LTD TO26 5 Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/\f\lalla 1Nalla Districts). 15Dec1 4

• LTD TO26-5a Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 14Jan16 Table 2. Financial Detail Report - NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Fiscal Ye ar to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 39 1,081 2,164 (2) Technical 133 2,084 15,372 (3) Support (Bureau Reclamation) 0 4 659 TOTAL 172 3,169 18,195

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 12,413.32 $ 197,984.05 $ 1,135,281.99 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 6,133.66 $ 90,980.30 $ 523,648.01 SUB-TOTAL $ 18,546.98 $ 288,964.35 $ 1,658,930.,00 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ 6,742.75 $ 32,693.88 $ 81 ,019.88 (Bureau of Reclamation)

(2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Tra-.el (Domestic) $ - $ 5,289.29 $ 20,814.09 SUB-TOTAL $ 6,742.75 $ 37,983.17 $ 101 ,833.97 G & A Costs $ 1,638.63 $ 29,990.50 $ 184,653.90 DOE Fee (If Applicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 26,928.36 $ 356,938.02 $ 1,945,417.87

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for work accomplished by the USAGE in the reporting period for Task Order 26. The cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in this table. The individual project letter status report for each LTD issued is included in the attachments.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $2,904,745.60 Funds Obligated to date: $2,903,745.60 4

Period of Performance: 25 Jul 2014 to 29 Sep 2017 Table 3. Cumulative Monthly Exoense Forecast- NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Percentage Expenditures for Task Expenditures Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative

(%)

1a $ 1 683.915.60 $ 22 084.51 $ 1.309 240. 77 77.75%

1b PMP/PMF $ 458 200.00 $ 3.913.15 s 349 738.01 76.33%

2 $ 315 600.00 $ - s 118 994.72 37.70%

3 $ 224 760.00 $ 930.70 $ 167 444.37 74.50%

4 $ 221 ,270.00 $ - $ - 0.00%

TOTAL $ 2,903,745.60 $ 26,928.36 $ 1,945,417.87 67.00%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 26 is identified in Table 4. The spending plan reflects the project schedule delays and completion of tasks for Farley. These scheduling issues include: 1) signature of the Non-Disclosure Agreement for Columbia and 2) the impact of the May / June 2015 high water events and a levee failure at the Tulsa and Little Rock Districts.

Baseline $ 31,215 $ 47,021 $ 150,836 $ 130,000 $200,000 Actual Costs $ 17,570 $ 21,716 $ 79,196 $ 80,422 $102,555 Difference $ 13,645 $ 25,304 $ 71,641 $ 49,578 $ 97,445 Percenta e 56.3% 46.2% 52.5% 61 .9% 51 .3%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,500 $ 251,800 $175,200 Actual Costs $ 137,019 $ 213,680 $ 215,500 $ 215,835 $ 102,342 $142,454 Difference $ 112,981 $ 36,320 $ 34,500 $ 34,665 $ 149,458 $ 32,746 Percenta e 54.8% 85.5% 86.2% 86.2% 40.6% 81 .3%

Baseline $ 100,446 $ 115,100 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Actual Costs $ 97,231 $ 83,892 $79,066.56 $109,520.92 $ 60,628 $ 52,853 Difference $ 3,215 $ 31,208 $ 20,933 $ (19,521) $ 29,372 $ 37,147 Percentage 96.8% 72.9% 79.1 % 121.7% 67.4% 58.7%

5

S ending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,000 $ 17,630 Actual Costs $29,645.49 $29,927.68 $32,557.68 $ 14,876.83 $26,928.36 Difference $ 60,355 $ 60,072 $ 27,442 $ 25,123 $ 8,072 Percenta e 32.9% 33.3% 54.3% 37.2% 76.9%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site for Task Order #26, N RC-HQ-25-14-T-0026.

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

L+D +02& ~ 3~ Jbll ~ 4 G>0Iblali9A gl ~lggg lclaiards al 11=18 Jgse~A M.~afley Nb1Gl8af ~laAI Obie lg Oam ~ailblf8 LTDT026-1a 06-Apr-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure LTD T026-2 23-Sep-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Beaver Valley NPP Due to Dam Failure L+D +02& 3 2~ GGI ~4 G>JalblaliQA GI ~IGGd lclaiards al 11:10 MGAliGellG aAd ~fai~ie lslaAd 1'>1~12 Siles LTDT026-3a 13-Aug-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Monticello and Prairie Island NPP Sites L+D +02&-4 OQ Oei:; 14 E;,,alblaliGA GI ~l9Gd lcla~ards al 11=18 ,A,fkaAsas l'>lblGlea~ GA8 t>J~~ Sile LTDT026-4b 29-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Arkansas Nuclear One NPP Site L+D +02& 5 Hi Qei:; 14 E;>,talbialieA el ~leed lcla;iards al ll=le Gelt,imeia 111~12 Sile LTDTA26-5a 14-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Columbia NPP Site 6

The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites for this reporting period.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/ NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 $ - YES MF3038 Farley 2 $ - YES MF3039 Columbia $ 25,997.66 YES MF3041 ANO1 $ 465.35 YES MF3042 ANO2 $ 465.35 YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 $ - YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 $ - YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 YES MF3995 Three Mile Island 1 YES MF3696 Monticello $ - YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 $ - YES MF3698 Prairie Island 2 $ - YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 26,928.36 PERIOD 7

LTD 1026-1 Farley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 8

Table LTD -TO26-1.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-1 Farley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Deliverv Team: Omaha and Mobile Districts Project Manager - ~(b)(6) icENWO-PM-S Technical Manage1 CESAM-EN-HH Project Costs: $277,309 P2 447176 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Revised LTD issued 6 April 2015 Activity

1. la I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco1r4>1ished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes I Significant Issues Perform a\

(bX7)(E). (bX7)(F) None. None. Work is complete.

Activity

1. 1b I Develop Preliminary Hydrographs and TLR Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Develop time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including Excel spreadsheets, at various locations in the vicinity of the Farley NPP site. Two Submissions: None. None. Work is complete.

Preliminary Draft and Pre-Final. The (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

Ac;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetings Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next Reoorting Period Notes I Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None. None. Work is complete.

meetings.

1. 3 I

Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco1r4>lished this andTLR Rennrtina Period Activities Planned for Next Rennrtina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Additional Information to be included at the reauest of Southern Comoanv: *

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

11) Flow nyarograpns ror tne complete model None. None. Work is complete.

run. 2) Velocity hydrographs for the complete model run. 3) Spatial coordinates and projection for each cross section. 4) All cross section station and elevation points. 5) Left and right bank stations. 6) Manning's "n" values or roughness coefficients for the left overbank, channel and right overbank at each cross section.

1. 4 I

Activity Participate in Presentation of Results Meetinas Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 9

Table LTD T026-1.2. LTD 26-1 Farley

• Travel ComDteted This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Actlvtty: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coord inated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next reporting period I I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. Cunilatlve Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-1 Farley, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1a $ 149,682.20 $ 130,871.20 87.43%

1b PMP/PMF $ 52,369.92 $ 36,942.43 70.54%

2 $ 21,376.04 $ 19,465.04 91.06%

3 $ 29,255.44 $ 16,112.04 55.07%

4 $ 26,455.72 $ . 0.00%

TOTAL $ 279,139.32 $ . $ 203,390.71 72.86%

10

LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 11

Table LTD -TO26-2.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliver~ Team: Omaha and Pittsbi Project Managers *J\~/4 6\ I CENWO-PM-S; r~(b ([

n;51cicts

! CELRP-PM-PM Technical Lead - !I K;ELRP-EC-DH Project Costs: $450,476 P2 448945 LID issued 23 Sep 2014 Ac:;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Evaluate PMP and PMF for the Beaver Vallev NPP site as well as the (b)(7)(E), (b)r7\IF\

• )Develop fiydrographs based on the site-None None Work is complete.

specific PMP developed by the NRC's licensee, FENOC. Existing USAGE hydrologic and hydraulic models Vlill be used to determine the PMF resulting from the Licensee's site-specific PMP.

Activity I Develop Preliminary Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR P.eoortina Period Reoortina Period I Assess ttie/(7)(£). (bX7)(F) oocument tne aniyses in a prelirrinary draft and pre-final TLR and hydrooraphs.I None None Work is complete.

(bX7XE}, (bX7)(F)

Ac::;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next P.eoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None None Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate.

Calculation packages, including input and output files from computer Finalize project files. Work is complete.

modeling runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included In the final submission.

Activity IParticipate in Presentation Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reoortina Period Reoorti na Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None No action required.

Presentation of Results Meetings 12

Table LTD T026-2.2. LTD 26-2 Beaver Valley* Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period I

Related Actlvtty: Purpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period INone I I I I I I Planned next reporting period INone I I I I I I Table LTD TO26-1 .3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - TLD T026-1 Beaver Vally, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget(%)

1a $ 259,701.20 $ 263,982.10 101.65%

1b PMP/PMF $ 66,074.00 $ 62,121.31 94.02%

2 $ 55,117.00 $ 45,437.08 82.44%

3 $ 35,523.00 $ 40,773.62 114.78%

4 $ 34,061.00 $ -

TOTAL $ 450,476.20 $ - $ 412,314.11 91.53%

13

LTD TO26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 14

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 Projec_t Managers* 1(b)(6)

Technical Manager I

USAGE Project Delivery Team: Onaha and St. Paul Districts CENWO-PM-S, !(b)(6)

CEMVP-EC-H I CEMVP-PM-A Project Costs: $514,370 LTD issued 31 July 2014 I

Activity Develop PMP/PMF for Prairie Island Activities Acco"l)lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1a NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period (bX7)(E). (bX7)(F)

Additional Information, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, will be provided: 1 None None Work is complete (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

I No hyctrograpns are neectect tor these cross sections.

Activity

1. lb I Develop PMF Stage Hydrographs Monticello NPP Activities Acco"l)lished this Reportng Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Develop a new HMS model of the watershed in developing the PMP for the Monticello NPP site and route the resulting runoff to produce the PMF. A georeferenced HEC-RAS model shall be developed in order to produce a PMF stage hydrograph at the Monticello NPP site. Additional information, at the request of the NRC's Ucensee, Xcel will be provided: I None None Work is complete (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

I No hydrographs are needed for these cross sections.

15

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE P,oj,o, O T~ ,_ T Project Managers * (b)(6)

Technical Manager Md &. Poo<

CENWO-PM* S,!(b)(6)

CEMVP-EC*H

""'°" I CEMVP-PM*A Project Costs: $514,3 O Lm issued 31 July 2014 Activity I H&H Model Coll1)arison and Site* Activities Acconl)lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1c Soocific PMP ColTl>arison Reoortina Period Reoortino Period Work ,.,;ube complete in Comparison of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, September provided H&H models, describing any major differences between Xcel's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H&H modeling approach. Comparison of the site-specific PMPs (provided by Xcel) by describing any differences in the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution between the basin-lMde PMPs and None None the basin*IMde PMPs used by the USAGE to develop its hydrographs. USAGE IMII develop hydrographs similiar to Activi ties 1A and 1B by applying the PMPs and using USACE's H&H models. The findings ,.,;11be documented, coordinated, and a detailed comparison performed.

Ac:;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetings Activities Acconl)lished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate None None Work is complete Technical Review meetings.

Activity

1. 3 I Develop Final

. Hydrographs and l lR Activities Acconl)lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues Rennrtina Period Rennrtino Period Document findings in a Final llR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate. Calculation packages, including Repackage the deliverables for input and output files from computer modeling Work is complete release to licensee.

runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity I Participate in Presentation of Results Activities Acconl)lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 Meetinas Reoortina Period Rennrtino Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of None None Not required.

Results Meetings Table LTD T026-3.2. LTD 26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island

• Travel Completed Renortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this repor ting period I I I I I I I Planned next rePOrting period I I I I I I I 16

Table LTD T026-1.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - no T026-1 Monticello, NRC-HQ.25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budi:iet (%)

1A1B1C $ 410,631.20 $ 359,718.36 87.60%

2 $ 43,469.00 $ 13,540.72 31 .15%

3 $ 24,607.00 $ 17,605.09 71.55%

4 $ 35,663 .00 TOTAL $ 514,370.20 $ - $ 390 ,864.17 75.99%

17

LTD T026-4 Arkansas Nuclear One 18

Table LTD -T026-4.1. ProJect Status for LTD T026-4 Arkansas NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Dellverv Team: Omaha, Litlle Roc,and Tulsa Districts Project Manager -1/h\/R\ I CENWO-PM-S;!~ \/~\ !CESWL-PM Technical Manager ~'"""' I CESWL-EC- / 16) l CESWT-EC-HF Project Costs: $938,o,, r'~ ***=*

LTD issued 29 Jan 2016 Ac:t [ Dewlop PMP/PMF Acti1.1lies Accomplished this Reporting Period Ac1i.,;1ies Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Compare H&H Models (Entergy) and None None Work is complete.

Compare Site-Specific PMP.

Describe any major differences between Entergy's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H& H modeling approach. Describe any differences In the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution belween the basin*¥Ade PM Ps (Entergy) and the basin-wide PMPs (USACE).

Develop hydrographs by applying the PMPs (Entergy) using USACE's H&H models, Acth.ity [ Dewlop Preliminary AclilAlies Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,.ties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Ewluation of'"° PMP and PMF tor None None Work is complete.

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7} the ANO sitel I

..,.,.,,.,.,., **, oe"81op 70 (F) ,u, ri~r basin.

(b)(7)(E), (b)(?)(F) no\tae nyorograpns ror 1oenum,u locations In the LTD 26-4.

Ac::;ty [ lntemiedlate Technical Aclil.ilies Accomplished th,s Reporting Period Acti,Aties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Re1.1ew Meelinos Schedule, host, and participate In None None Work Is complete.

Intermediate Technical Reldew meetings.

Acti1.1ty [ De\elop Final Hydrographs Acli1.1ties Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Dccument findings In a Final TLR Pr01.ided responses to licensee requests for None Work is complete.

and hydrographs. Include additional additional information.

lnfom,allon as appropriate.

Acti1.1ly IParticipate in Presentation Acli1.1lies Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti.,;lies Planned tor Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Schedule, Host and Participate in TBD Presentation of Results Meetings 19

Table LTD T026-4.2. LTD 26-4 .Arkansas* Travel Camnleted This Reportlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting peri od Planned next reporting period Table LTD T026-4.3. cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026*4 Arkansas, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent age Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 476,997 $ 403,818.36 84.66%

PMP/PMF $ 196,785 $ 194,247.26 98.71%

2 $ 130,846 $ 24,787.48 18.94%

3 $ 71,281 $930.70 $ 92,953.62 130.41%

4 $ 62,914 $ .

TOTAL $ 938,823 $ 930.70 $ 715,806.72 76.25%

20

LTD T026-5 Columbia Generating Station 21

Table LTD-T026-5.1. Project Status for LTD T026-5 Colurri>la NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliwry Team: Omaha, Seattle, and Walla Walla Districts Project Manager

• 1(b)(6)

Technical Manage b CENWO-PM-s ;gb)(6)

ENWS-EN-HH- E I CENWS-PM-MEI Project Costs : $569,688 P2 449739 LTD issued 14 Jan 2016 Actil.ity Acti1Aties Accomplished this Actil.ities Planned for Next Develop PMP/PMF Notes / Significant Issues

1. 0 Reporting Period Reporting Period Evaluation of the PMP and PMF for None None Work is complete.

Actil.ity Dewlop Preliminary Acti1Aties Accomplished this Actil.ities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Reoortina Period Reportina Period Develop H&H models for the Prepared Preliminary Draft None Milestone: Preliminary Draft TLR Columbia NPP watershed. Evaluate TLR. and hydrographs - 19 May 2016.

(bX7XE). (bX7XF) Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and hydrographs - 06 Jun 2016.

Prol.ide hydrographs for prol.ided locations in the LTD.

Actil.ity Intermediate Technical Actil.ities Accomplished this Acti1Aties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 2 Rel.iew Meetinas Reoortina Period Reportina Period Schedule, host, and participate in Pre-lTR meeting webinar - 26 Prepare for ITR meeting. Milestone: First ITR - 09 Jun Intermediate Technical Rel.iew May 2016. 2016.

meetings. Milestone: Second ITR - TB D.

Actil.ity Dewlop Final Hydrographs Acti1,1ties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reportina Period Document data and analysis, n/a n/a Milestone: Final TLR and including the hydrographs, in a Final hydrographs

• mid-July 2016.

TLR. Package will include the calculation packages, including input and output files from the computer modeling runs supporting the key TLR conclusions.

Acti1,1ty Participate in Presentation ActilAties Accomplished this Actil.ities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reporting Period Reporting Period Schedule, Host and Participate in n/a n/a nl a Presentation of Results Meetings Table LTD T026-5.2. LTD 26-5 Colum,la

• Travel ComnlAted This ReDortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlnn Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting peri od Planned next reporting period 22

Table LTDT026-5.3. cumulative Monthly Expense -TLDTO26-5 Columbia, NRC-~25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 266,693 $22,084.51 $ 150,850.75 56.56%

1 PMP/PMF $ 113,966 $3,913.15 $ 56,427.01 49.51%

2 $ 54,733 $ 15,764.40 28.80%

3 $ 44,088 $ -

4 $ 52,169 $ -

TOTAL $ 531,649 $ 25,997.66 $ 223,042.16 41 .95%

The costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation are included in the table above and the sum total amount is recorded in Table 2 Financial Detail Report, as Other Direct Costs, Subcontractor Consultant Cost.

23

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 (P2#: 455162)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS June 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective The object of the agreement, Review of Recommendation 2. 1 Flood Re-evaluations as Part of 50.54(f) Response, is for the USAGE to assist the NRC staff in reviewing certain flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) in the FHRRs provided by NRC licensees in response to the 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012, Recommendation 2. 1:

Flooding. This work effort will support the NRC with their Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR.

NRC Project Manager Brad HaNey NRC/ NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USACE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S (.... l(b_)(6_) _ .

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Manager; Primary: l(b)(6l Program En ineer:

Primar : (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Agreement Period of Performance August 25, 2015 through August 24, 2016 Period for this Report May 02, 2016 through June 01, 2016

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table A. Table B provides milestones and schedules for each task.

I lj'(_*;r*~~:;:J~-~~;~.~~ >\*:.~;~~,}~~(:~~;;/:~~~~:\:~.~~{;~.~;*~;;~::~:;;:,:~;~-~~~~:~-:~:*~ ~

1 ActMties Accomplishec this Actl\ities Plannec for next Task Deli,..,,rable/Milestone Description Issues/Challenges Reporting Period Reporting Period 1 ORIENTATION 1.a Peach Bottom Secure the Argus One Sofware lor use on the project. Completed 1.b Three Mile Island PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL EVALUATION 2 REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2.a Peach Bottom 2.b Three Mile Island FINAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 3

AND TECHNICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT 3.a Peach Bottom Continued de,..,,lopment of final Complete final technical technical evaluation report and evaluation report and technical re1aew document. technical re"ew document.

3.b Three Mile Island Table B: Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Technical Orientation / Kick-Off Meeting Peach Bottom 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 Three Mile Island 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 2 Preliminary TER & RAIS Peach Bottom 30 Nov 15 Revised 1 Dec 15 Revised Mar 16 Three Mile Island early Feb 16 3 Final TER Peach Bottom 03-Jun-16 Three Mile Island 17-Jun-16 2

3. Travel Table C provides information on completed and planned travel for this task order. No t ravel expenditures have been incurred in this reporting period and none are projected for the next reporting period.

Table C. Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Task: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The USAGE team is in the process of acquiring the required software to evaluate the submittals of the licensee for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island. The software is in the process of acquisition and additional approvals are required for installation.

Resolution 1: The USAGE has received and installed the required software to review the data submitted by the licensee. CLOSED.

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this agreement. Table 2 provides the amount of funds expended during the period, current fiscal year, and the total cumulative year to date.

3

Table 1. Financial Status Report

• Sunmary NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulati.e Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Sep $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77 3.5% $ 226,731.51 $ 226,731.51 Oct $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,525.87 $ 11,755.64 5.0% $ 223,205.64 $ 223,205.64 Nov $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 8,492.55 $ 20,248. 19 8.6% $ 214,713.09 $ 214,713.09 Dec $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 12,11 3.91 $ 32,362. 10 13.8% $ 202,599.18 $ 202,599.18 Balance of Total Costs Cumulati.e Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3, 107.59 $ 35,469.69 15.1% $ 199,491.59 $ 199,491.59 Feb $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 9,875.77 $ 45,345.46 19.3% $ 189,615.82 $ 189,615.82 Mar $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 7,026.04 $ 52,371.50 22.3% $ 182,589.78 $ 182,589.78 Apr $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 2,135.47 $ 54,506.97 23.2% $ 180,454.31 $ 180,454.31 May $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 4,474.56 $ 58,981.53 25.1% $ 175,979.75 $ 175,979.75 4

Table 2. Flnanclal Detail Report* NRc-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Fiscal Year to Current Month Tota l to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 11 189 207 (2) Technical 24 244 288 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 35 433 495

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 2,720.37 $ 31,771.80 $ 36,774.71 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 1,361.62 $ 13,220.07 $ 15,771.55 SUB-TOTAL $ 4,081.99 $ 44,991.87 $ 52,546.26 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 (2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 G & A Costs $ 392.57 $ 3,459.89 $ 4,135.27 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 4,474.56 $ 50,751.76 $ 58,981.53

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3.1 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for all of the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 9. The monthly planned (budget) cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table. Table 3.x will detail the monthly expenditures for each individual nuclear power plant site and the individual nuclear power plant and the associated TAC

1. for license fee recovery.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $234,961.28 Funds Obligated to date: $234,961.28 Period of Performance: 25 Aug 2015 to 24 Aug 2016 5

Table 3.1. Cumulative Monthlv ExDense Forecast - NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Pe rcentage Expe nditures tor Task Expenditures Activity# Pla nned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative

(%)

1 s 19 378.00 s . s 16 299.80 84.11 %

2 s 172.172.04 s 4.474.56 s 41151.20 23.90%

3 $ 43 411 .24 $ . $ 1,530.53 3.53%

TOTAL $ 234,961 .28 $ 4,474.56 $ 58,981.53 25.10%

Table 3.2: LTD T009-2 cumulative Monthly Expense

• Peach Bottom TAC MF6598 / MF6599 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $ 7,570.26 78.13%

2 $ 80,153.96 $3,203.1 3 $ 25,764.28 32.14%

3 $ 18,211.36 $ 1,041.50 5.72%

TOTAL $ 108,054.32 $ 3,203.13 $ 34,376.04 31.81 %

Table 3.3: LTDT009-3 CUmulatlve Monthly Expense

• Three Mlle lslandTACMF1113 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $ 8,729.54 90.10%

2 $ 92,018.08 $1 ,271 .43 $ 15,386.92 16.72%

3 $ 25,199.88 $ 489.03 1.94%

TOTAL $ 126,906.96 $ 1,271.43 $ 24,605.49 19.39%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 9 is identified in Table 4.

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Basellne $ 5,961 $ 12,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 Actual Costs $ 8,230 $ 3,526 $ 8,493 $ 12,114 $ 3,108 $9,875.77 Difference $ (2,269) $ 8,474 $ 6,507 $ 2,886 $ 21,892 $ 20,124 Percenta e 138.1% 29.4% 56.6% 80.8% 12.4% 32.9%

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 12,000 Actual Costs $ 7,026 $ 2,135 $ 4,475 Difference $ 22,974 $ 27,865 $ 25,525 Percenta e 23.4% 7.1% 14.9%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USACE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site.

6

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-H0-25-15-T-0009 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

LTD T009*3 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Peach Bottom NPP Site LTDT009-2 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Three Mile Island NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites. The costs for this reporting period are for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-H0-25-15-T-0009 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF6598 Peach Bottom 2 $ 1,601.57 YES MF6599 Peach Bottom 3 $ 1,601.57 YES MF1113 Three Mile Island 1 $ 1,271.43 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 4,474.56 Pl=RlnD 7

From: hbl(6)

To: Harvey. Brad: Cook. Christopher: NRO MLSR Resource: Dority. Dayna: See. Kenneth : ContractsPOJ Resource:

NRCIPAC Resource: Turner. Michael Cc:

Subject:

[External_Sender] NRC-HQ-13-1-0021 : MLSRs 20 Jan 2017 Submission Date: Thursday, February 23, 2017 1:47:55 PM Attachments: NRC Task Order Jan 2017 IPAC.pdf NRC TaskOrder Jan 2017 IPAC Summary.pelf NRC-USACE MLSR T026 2017Jan.pdf Brad, Attached are the January 2017 monthly reporting documents for the subject !AA.

1. IPAC : Billing information by line item (task orders) for IAA. Summary infom1ation by task order, current month, billed to date and authorized ceiling ( RC_Task_Order_Jan_2017 _!PAC and NRC_ Task_ Order_Jan_ 2017_IPAC _ Summary). ote: This reporting period includes expenditures for TO #26.

2. MLSR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026: Task order #26 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO26_2017Jan) .

Attachments provided for Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello/Prairie Island, ANO, and Columbia NPP sites.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

!(b)(6) l(b)(6)  !

ProJecf M anager Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Special Projects Branch 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, NE 68102-4901 Phone: !(bl(6l l BB: (b)(6)

Fax:

(b)(6)

Page 1 of CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Accounts Of Billed Date: 03-Jan-2017 BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS (AR 37-1)

• 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009

• 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

• MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28221333 NO CHECK DRAWN 1692775

• 03-Jan-2017 Partial# 41 01-Dec-2016 Thru 03-Jan-2017 ,l * .,. "' JI .... . .. .. ..... .. ,, ......

Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Billed Accounting Classification Billing Accounting Classification 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 00 0000 NA 00000 31000001 $2,680.58 096 NA X 3122.0000 G6 08 2417 895 0WDNRC 96252 $2,680.58 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $819.75 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $221 .33 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $1 ,639.50 Subtotal: $2,680.58 Total Billed Amount: $2,680.58 Less Amount Paid Via IPAC: $2,680.58 Payment Due Date: 02-Feb-2017 Pay This Amount: $0.00 Funds Authorized: $4,270,251.28 CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED Total Billed Amount: $3,067,663.05 I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as stated and Prev Billed Amount: $3,064,982.47 should be charged to the appropriation(s) and/or fund(s) as indicated above, or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated.

Current Billed Amount: $2,680.58 Total Flux Billed: $0.00 Prev Flux Billed: $0.00 Date: 03-Jan-201 7 (ifil]§i Current Flux Billed: $0.00 Authorized Administrative or Certifying Officer DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.475 v2.1.4

Date: 13-FEB-2017 Custo mer Order Bill Print Error Messa ges Page:1 Bill Numbe r Error Messag e cobil_ipac.47 5 v2.1.4

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021

SUMMARY

INFORMATION BY TASK ORDER

~ .......

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01

""1 20 January 2017 Submittal "L~

031 NA X 0200.0000 2013

- $ 209,283.03 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ - $ 763,867.52 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 031 NA X 0200.0000 2015 $ - $ 68,803.91 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 031 NA X 0200.0000 201 4 $ 2,680.58 $ 2,025,708.59 IPAC Total $ 2,680.58 $ 3,067,663.05 Authorized lnteragency Agreement No. Line Item Number Billed to Date Ceiling NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 T0#01 Line 2 $ 209,283.03 $ 247,686.00 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Line 4 $ 763,867.52 $ 884,568.00 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Line 5 $ 2,025,708.59 $ 2,903,036.00 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Line 6 $ 68,803.9 1 $ 234,961.28 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 $ 3,067,663.05 $ 4,270,251.28 Page 1

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 (P2#: 405160)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS January 20, 2017 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status 1.1. Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regu latory Commission (NRG) in the determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that my affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants. A Technical Letter Report (TLR) documenting the development of the hydrographs will be provided. The NPP sites to be evaluated will be identified in subsequent Letters of Technical Direction (LTDs).

1.2. NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvev@NRC.GOV 1.3. USAGE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S {!(b)(6) ~

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Mana er:

Primar : (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Program En ineer:

Primary: (b)(6)

(b)(6) 1.4. Agreement Period of Performance July 25, 2014 through September 29, 2017 1.5. Period for this Report December 01, 2016 through January 03, 2017

2. Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction Information on individual Letters of Technical Direction (LTD), including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

3. Travel Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction The travel information recorded for this task order is reported by individual LTDs in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NOA) with BC Hydro for the Columbia Generating Station site has taken much longer than originally projected and the delay has significantly impacted the PDT to proceed forward with analysis.

Issue 1 Status: The MASTER NOA between the USAGE and BC Hydro has been signed (25 May 15). The individual NDAs for each team member authorized to work on the project will be distributed for signature. The documents have been uploaded to the Partner sharepoint site for PDT use (19 Oct 15). The NRG team members have submitted signed NDAs and they are with NWD for signature. CLOSED

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this task order. The total costs incurred for this reporting period is captured on the Line 5 of the Bill No. 28204245 of the IPAC DA Form 4445-R.

Table 1. Financial Status Report

• Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2014 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date ($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Aug $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 17,569.74 $ 17,569.74 0.6% $ 2,886, 175.86 $ 2,886,175.86 Sep $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 21 ,716. 10 $ 39,285.84 1.4% $ 2,864,459.76 $ 2,864,459.76 Oct $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,195.60 $ 118,481.44 4.1% $ 2,785,264.16 $ 2,785,264.16 Nov $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 80,422.10 $ 198,903.54 6.8% $ 2,704,842.06 $ 2,704,842.06 Dec $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,555.41 $ 301,458.95 10.4% $ 2,602,286.65 $ 2,602,286.65 2

Table 1. Financial Status Report - Sumnary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $137,019.46 $ 438,478.41 15.1% $ 2,465,267.19 $ 2,465,267.19 Feb $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $213,680.16 $ 652,158.57 22.5% $ 2,251 ,587.03 $ 2,251,587.03 Mar $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,500.18 $ 867,658.75 29.9% $ 2,036,086.85 $ 2,036,086.85 Apr $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,835.27 $ 1,083,494.02 37.3% $ 1,820,251.58 $ 1,820,251.58 May $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,342.38 $1,185,836.40 40.8% $ 1,717,909.20 $ 1,717,909.20 Jun $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $142,454.07 $1,328,290.47 45.7% $ 1,575,455. 13 $ 1,575,455.13 Jul $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 97,231. 15 $ 1,425,521.62 49.1% $ 1,478,223.98 $ 1,478,223.98 Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 83,891.67 $ 1,509,413.29 52.0% $ 1,394,332.31 $ 1,394,332.31 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,066.56 $ 1,588,479.85 54.7% $ 1,315,265.75 $ 1,315,265.75 Oct $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $109,520.92 $1,698,000.77 58.5% $ 1,205,745.83 $ 1,205,745.83 Nov $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 60,628.27 $ 1,758,629.04 60.6% $ 1,145,117.56 $ 1,145,117.56 Dec $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 52,852.79 $ 1,811,481.83 62.4% $ 1,092,264.77 $ 1,092,264.77 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,645.49 $1,841,127.32 63.4% $ 1,062,619.28 $ 1,062,619.28 Feb $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,927.68 $1,871,055.00 64.4% $ 1,032,691.60 $ 1,032,691.60 Mar $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 32,557.68 $ 1,903,612.68 65.6% $ 1,000,133.92 $ 1,000, 133.92 Apr $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 14,876.83 $1,918,489.51 66.1% $ 985,257.09 $ 985,257.09 May $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 26,928.36 $1,945,417.87 67.0% $ 958,328.73 $ 958,328.73 Jun $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,028.69 $ 1,974,446.56 68.0% $ 929,300.04 $ 929,300.04 Jul $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 22,559.44 $ 1,997,006.00 68.8% $ 906,740.60 $ 906,740.60 Aug $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 3,079.34 $2,000,085.34 68.9% $ 903,661.26 $ 903,661.26 Sep $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 629.85 $2,000,715.19 68.9% $ 903,031.41 $ 903,031.41 Oct $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 14,747.65 $2,015,462.84 69.4% $ 888,283.76 $ 888,283.76 3

Balance of Total Costs Cumulati1.e Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated I Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining($)

($)

Nov $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 7,565. 17 $2,023,028.01 69.7% $ 880,718.59 $ 880,718.59 Dec $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903.746.60 I $ 2,680.58 $2,025,708.59 69.8% $ 878,038.01 $ 878,038.01 Table 2 provides the financial detail outlining the amount of funds expended during the reporting period, the current fiscal year (FY2016), and the total cumulative year to date. The financial data includes the following Letters of Technical Direction:

• LTD TO26 1 Farley Nuolear Power Plant (Mobile Distriot) 31Jul2014

• LTD TO26-1a Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 06Apr2015

• LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant (Pittsburgh District) . 23Sep2014

• LTD TO26 3 Montioello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul Distriot). 21 Oot2014

• LTD TO26-3a Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul District). 08Aug15

• LTD TO26 4 Arkansas Nuolear One NPP (Little Rook/Tulsa Districts) . 09Deo1 4

• LTD TO26-4b Arkansas Nuclear One NPP (Little Rock/Tulsa Districts). 29Jan*16

• LTD TO26 5 Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 15Dec14

• LTD TO26-5a Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 14Jan16

• LTD TO26-5b Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 09Sep16 4

Table 2. Financial Detail Report- NRC-H0-25-14-T-0026 Fisca l Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 9 1,204 2,287 (2) Technical 16 2,392 15,680 (3) Support (Bureau Reclamation) 0 4 659 TOTAL 25 3,600 18,626

2. Costs Labor Cos ts :

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 1,639.50 $ 236,494.58 $ 1,173,792.52 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 819.75 $ 110,062.71 $ 542,730.42 SUB-TOTAL $ 2,459.25 $ 346,557.29 $ 1, 71 6,522.. 94 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ 47,194.89 $ 95,520.89 (Bureau of Reclamation)

(2) Material and Ser.ices Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ 8, 171.46 $ 23,696.26 SUB-TOTAL $ - $ 55,366.35 $ 119,217.15 G & A Costs $ 221.33 $ 35,305.10 $ 189,968.50 DOE Fee (If Applicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 2,680.58 $ 437,228.74 $ 2,025,708.59

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for work accomplished by the USAGE in the reporting period for Task Order 26. The cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in this table. The individual project letter status report for each LTD issued is included in the attachments.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $2,904,745.60 Funds Obligated to date: $2,903, 745.60 Period of Performance: 25 Jul 2014 to 29 Sep 2017 5

Table 3. Cumulative Monthly ExDAnse Forecast - NRC-H0-25-14-T-0026 Pe rcentage Expenditures for Task Expenditures Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative

(%)

1a s 1 683.915.60 s 2.680.58 s 1.355 527.33 80.50%

1b PMP/PMF $ 458 200.00 $ - $ 364 504.04 79.55%

2 $ 315 600.00 $ - $ 126.088.90 39.95%

3 s 224 760.00 s - s 179 170.66 79.72%

4 $ 221 ,270.00 $ - $ - 0.00%

TOTAL $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,680.58 $ 2,025,290.93 69.75%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 26 is identified in Table 4. The spending plan reflects the project schedule delays and completion of tasks for Farley. These scheduling issues include: 1) signature of the Non-Disclosure Agreement for Columbia and 2) the impact of the May / June 2015 high water events and a levee failure at the Tulsa and Little Rock Districts.

Baseline $ 31,214 $ 47,020 $ 150,836 $ 130,000 $200,000 Actual Costs $ 17,570 $ 21,716 $ 79,196 $ 80,422 $102,555 Difference $ 13,644 $ 25,304 $ 71 ,640 $ 49,578 $ 97,445 Percents e 56.3% 46.2% 52.5% 61 .9% 51.3%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-1.i.T-0026 Baseline $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,500 $ 251 ,800 $175,200 Actual Costs $ 137,019 $ 213,680 $ 215,500 $ 215,835 $ 102,342 $142,454 Difference $ 112,981 $ 36,320 $ 34,500 $ 34,665 $ 149,458 $ 32,746 Percents e 54.8% 85.5% 86.2% 86.2% 40.6% 81.3%

Baseline $ 100,446 $ 115,100 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Actual Costs $ 97,231 $ 83,892 $79,066.56 $109,520.92 $ 60,628 $ 52,853 Difference $ 3,215 $ 31,208 $ 20,933 $ (19,521) $ 29,372 $ 37,147 Percents e 96.8% 72.9% 79.1% 121.7% 67.4% 58.7%

Baseline $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,000 $ 17,630 Actual Costs $ 29,645.49 $29,927.68 $32,557.68 $ 14,876.83 $ 26,928.36 $ 29,029 Difference $ 60,355 $ 60,072 $ 27,442 $ 25,123 $ 8,072 $ (11,399)

Percentage 32.9% 33.3% 54.3% 37.2% 76.9% 164.7%

6

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Actual Costs $22,559.44 $3,079.34 $629.85 $ 14,747.65 $ 7,565.17 $2,680.58 Difference $ 2,441 $ 2 1,921 $ 4,370 $ (9,748) $ (2,565) $ 2,319 Percenta e 90.2% 12.3% 12.6% 295.0% 151.3% 53.6%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site for Task Order #26, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026.

Table 5. Lette r of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Lette r of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

L+D +02& ~ a1 Jyl 14 e>JaIYali9A 91 i;:I99d l,laiards at tl:te J9se?l:t M,i;:afley MYGleaf 12IaAt !}ye 19 Cam i;:ailY~

LTDT026-1a 06-Apr-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure LTD T0 26-2 23-Sep-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Beaver Valley NPP Due to Dam Failure L+D +02& 3  :.11 GGI 14 El/alYali9A 91 i;;'.l99d l,la.:ards at 11:te M9AliGell9 aAd 12fai~ie lslaAd Ml212 Siles LTDT026-3a 13-Aug-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Monticello and Prairie Island NPP Sites L+D +02& 4 QQ OeG 14 euaIYali9A 91 i;;'.l99(l l,la.:ards al 11:te Al'!laAsas Ni.i;leaf GAe ~11212 Sile LTDT026-4b 29-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Arkansas Nuclear One NPP Site L+D +0 2& 5 Hi O8G 14 e>.GIYali9A 91 i;;'.l99d l,laiards al 11:te G9li.ml:lia ~11212 Sile LTDTA26-5a 14-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Columbia NPP Site LTDTA26-5b 09-Sep-16 Hydrographs and Inundation Maps in the Vicinity of the Columbia NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites for this reporting period.

7

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 $ . YES MF3038 Farley 2 $ . YES MF3039 Columbia $ 2,680.58 YES MF3041 ANO1 $ . YES MF3042 ANO2 $ . YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 $ . YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 $ . YES MF7430 Beaver Valley 1 $ . YES MF7431 Beaver Valley 2 $ . YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 $ . YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 $ . YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 $ . YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 $ . YES MF3995 Three Mile Isla nd 1 $ . YES MF3696 Monticello $ . YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 $ . YES MF3698 Prai rie Island 2 $ . YES TM3032 Generic - AREVA $ . NO TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING rr-- 1 JI

$ 2,680.58 8

LTD 1026-1 Farley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 9

Table LTD -TO26-1.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-1 Farley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Delivery Team: Onaha and Mobile Districts Project Manager - j (b)(6) ICENWO-PM-S Technical Manage CESAM-EN-HH Project Costs: $277,309 P2 447176 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Revised LTD issued 6 April 2015 Activity

1. 1a I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Accomplished this Reoortino Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Perform al (bX7)(E), (bX7XF) None. None. Work is complete.

Activity

1. 1b I Develop Preliminary Hydrooraphs and TLR Activities Accomplished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues Develop time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including Excel spreadsheets, at various locations in the vicinity of the Farlev NPP site. Two Submissions: None. None. Work is complete.

(b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

Activity

1. 2 I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Accomplished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None. None. Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Accomplished this Rennrtina Period Activities Planned for Next Rennrtina Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Additional Information to be included at the request of Southern Comnanv: *

(b)(?)(E), (b)(7)(F)

11) Flow nydrographs for the complete model None. None. Work is complete.

run. 2) Velocity hydrographs for the complete model run. 3) Spatial coordinates and projection for each cross section. 4) All cross section station and elevation points. 5) Left and right bank stations. 6) Manning's "n" values or roughness coefficients for the left overbank, channel and right overbank at each cross section.

1. 4 I

Activity Participate in Presentation of Results Meetinas Activities Accomplished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 10

Table LTD TO26-1.2. LTD 26-1 Farley

• Travel Completed This Reporting Pe riod & Planned for Next ReDOrtlng Period Related Activtty: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC COIT1)1eted this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next reporting period I I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. Cun-.ilatlve MonthlyExpense-TLD T026-1 Farley, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Q026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1a $ 149,682.20 $ 130,871.20 87.43%

1b PMP/PMF $ 52,369.92 $ 36,942.43 70.54%

2 $ 21,376.04 $ 19,465.04 91.06%

3 $ 29,255.44 $ 16,112.04 55.07%

4 $ 26,455.72 $ . 0.00%

TOTAL $ 279,139.32 $ . $ 203,390.71 72.86%

11

LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 12

Table LTD -T026-2.1. Project Status for LTD T0 26-2 Beaver Valley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliver~ Team: Omaha a111d Pittsburnh Di~trirt~

Project Managers ~(b)I ) ICENWO*PM*S~(b)(6) I CELRP-PM-PM Tec_ hnical Lead ~ b)(6) E ELRP-EC-DH Pro1ect Costs: 50,41 o P2 8945 Lm issued 23 Sep 2014 Ac:;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Evaluate PMP and PMF for the Beaver Valley NPP site as v.ell as the (b)(7)(E), (b)(7l(F) 1-v*v*vt' l'lydrographs baseo on the site-None None Work is complete.

specific PMP developed by the NRC's licensee, FENOC. Existing USAGE hydrologic and hydraulic models will be used to determine the PMF resulting from the Licensee's site-specific PMP.

Acti.,;ty I De\181op Preliminary Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR P.eoortina Period Reoortina Period Assess thlit7)(E). (bX7)(F)

I 1"""ument the anlyses in a prelirrinary draft and pre-final TLR and hydroaraphs.l None None Work is complete.

(bX7)(E), (bX7)(F)

Activity

1. 2 I Intermediate Technical Re-.;ew Meetinas Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Reoortina Period Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None None Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR =rtina Period = rtina Period Document findings In a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate.

Calculation packages, including input and output files from computer Finalize project files. Work is complete.

modeling runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final subrrission.

Activity IParticipate in Presentation Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None No action required.

Presentation of Results Meetings 13

Table LTD T026-2.2. LTD 26-2 Beaver Valley* Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period I

Related Actlvhy: Purpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w / NRC Completed this rePorting period INone I I I I I I Planned next reporting period INone I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-1 Beaver Vally, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period cumulative vs. Budget(%)

1a $ 259,701 .20 $ 272,519.51 104.94%

1b PMP/PMF $ 66,074.00 $ 62,121 .31 94.02%

2 $ 55,117.00 $ 45,437.08 82.44%

3 $ 35,523.00 $ 40,773.62 114.78%

4 $ 34,061.00 $ 417.66 $ 417.66 1.23%

TOTAL $ 450,476.20 $ 417.66 $ 421,269.1 8 93.52%

14

LTD TO26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 15

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Delivery Team: Omaha and St. Paul Districts Project Managers *1(b)(6) ICENWO-PM-S!(b)(6) I CEMVP-PM-A Technical Manager CEMVP-EC-H Project Costs: $514,370 LTD issued 31 July 2014 I

ActilAty Develop PMP/PMF for Prairie Island ActilAties Accon,:ilished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1a NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period CbX7XEJ, (bX7XF)

Additional mforrnat1on, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, \\ill be prolAded:I None None Work is complete (b)(7)(E) (b)(7)(F)

INo nydrographs are needed for these cross sections.

ActilAty I Develop PMF Stage Hydrographs ActilAties Accon,Jlished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1b Monticello NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period Develop a new HMS model of the watershed in developing the PMP for the Monticello NPP site and route the resulting runoff to produce the PMF. A georeferenced HEC-RAS model shall be developed in order to produce a PMF stage hydrograph at the Monticello NPP site. Additional information, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, \\ill be prolAded: \

None None Work is complete (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

I No 11yarograµ, ,s are needed for these cross sections.

16

Table LTD -T0 26-3.1. Project Status for LTD T0 26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Delivery Team:

Project ManagersJ b)(6)

Technical Manage 7 ~~n~;~:s1(1b~1~r1s CEMVP-EC*H ICEMVP-PM*A Project Costs: $514,370 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Activity I H&H Model Comparison and Site* Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1c Soecific PMP ColTl>arison Reoortina Period Reoortino Period Work will be complete in Comparison of 1he NRC's licensee, Xcel, September provided H&H models, describing any major differences between Xcel's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H&H modeling approach. Comparison of the site-specific PMPs (provided by Xce~ by describing any differences in 1he rainfall depth, duration, and distribution between 1he basin-wide PMPs and None None 1he basin-wide PMPs used by the USACE to develop its hydrographs. USAGE will develop hydrographs simlliar to Activities 1A and 1B by applying the PMPs and using USACE's H&H models. The findings will be documented, coordinated, and a detailed comparison performed.

Intermediate Technical Review Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Ac:ty I Meetings Reoortino Period Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate None None Work is corrplete Technical Review meetings.

Activity

1. 3 I Develop Final

. Hydrographs and TLR Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate. Calculation packages, including Repackage the deliverables for input and output files from computer modeling Work is complete release to licensee.

runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in 1he final submission.

Activity I Participate in Presentation of Results Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 Meetinas Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of None None Not required.

Results Meetings Table LTD T026*3.2. LTD 26-3 Montlcello / Prairie llland

• Travel Completed Renortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: IPur pose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w / NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next rePOrting period I I I I I I I 17

Table LTD T026-1.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense

• no T026-1 Monticello, NRCHQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budi:iet (%)

1A1B1C $ 410,631.20 $ 359,718.36 87.60%

2 $ 43,469.00 $ 13,540.72 31.15%

3 $ 24,607.00 $ 17,605.09 71.55%

4 $ 35,663.00 TOTAL $ 514,370.20 $ - $ 390,864.17 75.99%

18

LTD T026-4 Arkansas Nuclear One (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 19

Table LTD-T026-4.1. Project Status for LTD T026-4 Arkansas NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project D~

Project Manager -

maha, Little R~

CENWO-PM-S! l f:i)

~~ ;ulsa Lc~ strlcts ESWL-PM Technical Manager - CESWL-EC.HI j \ l CESWT-EC-HF Project Costs: $93 ,

LTD issued 29 Jan 2016 Ac:ty [ De"'3Iop PMPIPMF ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period ActilAtles Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Ccmpare H&H Models (Entergy) and None None Work is complete.

Ccmpare Site-Specific PMP.

Describe any major differences between Entergy's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H& H modeling approach. Describe any differences In the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution between the basin-wide PM Ps (Entergy) and the basin-wide PMPs (USACE).

De"'31op hydrographs by applying the PMPs (Entergy) using USACE's H& H models.

ActhAty [ De"'llop Preliminary ActilAlies Accomplished this Reporting Period Acth.ities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR 0

• F tor Ew.luation of *'- None None Work is complete.

(b)(?)(E),(~)(!.L the ANO sitef...... .. l 1'illi1e=...vlln' l,u e -*- ~-'

(F) 1,m

'"o

",a

'",e"' r,",,N i,s" """a'.. '""-

u river basin.

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

PrOIAde hydrographs for identified locations In the LTD 26-4.

Aclility [ lntemiedlate Technical ActilAlies Accomplished this Reporting Period Actl,Aties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 2 Re,,iew Meetinos Schedule, host, and participate In None None Work Is complete.

Intermediate Technical Reldew meetings.

Ac:;ty [ De\elop ~ :~:rographs ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,,ities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Dccument findings In a Final TLR ProlAded responses to licensee requests for None Work is complete.

and hydrographs. Include additional additional information.

lnfom,atlon as appropriate.

Acti"1ty I Participate in Presentation

1. 4 of Results Meetings ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,,ities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 20

Table LTD T026-4.2. LTD 26-4 .Arkansas* Travel Comnleted This ReDortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting period Planned next reporting period Table LTD T026-4.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-4 Arkansas, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent age Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 476,997 $ 403,818.36 84.66%

PMP/PMF $ 196,785 $ 194,247.26 98.71%

2 $ 130,846 $ 24,787.48 18.94%

3 $ 71,281 $ 92,957.91 130.41 %

4 $ 62,914 $ .

TOTAL $ 938,823 $ . $ 715,811 .01 76.25%

21

LTD T026-5 Columbia Generating Station 22

Table LTD -T026-5.1. Project Status for LTD T026-5 Coluni>la NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliwry Team: Omaha, Seattle, and Walla Walla Districts Project Manager

• 1(b)(6)

Technical Manage b CENWO-PM-S;!(b}/6)

ENW S-EN-HH-HE ICENWS-PM-MEI Project Costs: $569,688 P2 449739 LTD issued 14 Jan 2016 Actillity Actillities Accomplished this Actillities Planned for Next Dewlop PMP/ PMF Notes I Significant Issues

1. 0 Reporting Period Reporting Period Evaluation of the PMP and PMF for None None Work is complete.

Actillity Dewlop Preliminary Actillities Accomplished this Actillities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Develop H&H models for the P repared Preliminary Draft None Milestone: Preliminary Draft TLR r'nl11mhi::i NPP ,.,~10,c,hi:,rl i::,,.,1,,~,., TLR. and hydrographs

• 19 May 2016.

(bX7XE), (bX7)(F) Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and hydrographs

• 06 Jun 2016.

Prollide hydrographs for prm,1ded locations in the LTD.

Actillity Intermediate Technical Actillities Accomplished this Actillities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 2 Relliew Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, host, and participate in IITR meeting. None Milestone: First ITR

• 09 Jun Intermediate Technical Relliew 2016.

meetings. Milestone: Second ITR

• TBD.

Actillity Develop Final Hydrographs Actillities Accomplished this Acti1.1ties Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Document data and analysis, Finalized draft final TLR. Finalize final TlR. Milestone: Final TLR and including the hydrographs, in a Final hydrographs - 15 Oct 2016.

TLR. Package will include the calculation packages, including input and output files from the computer modeling runs supporting the key TlR conclusions.

Actillity Participate in Presentation Actillities Accomplished this Actillities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reporting Period Reporting Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None None Presentation of Results Meetings Table LTD T026-5.2. LTD 26-5 Colurmla

• Travel ConmlAted Thia Reoortlna Period & Planned for Next Re-rtlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting peri od Planned next reporting period 23

Table LTDT026-5.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense -TLDT026-5 Columbia, NRC-~25-14-T-0026 Expenditure s for the Activity Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%}

1 $ 266,693 $ 2,680.58 $ 188,599.90 70.72%

1 PMP/PMF $ 11 3,966 $ 71 ,192.95 6 2.47%

2 $ 54,733 $ 22,858.58 41 .76 %

3 $ 44,088 $ 11 ,722.00 4 $ 52,169 $ .

TOTAL $ 531 ,649 $ 2,680.58 $ 294,373.43 55.37%

The costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation are included in the table above and the sum total amount is recorded in Table 2 Financial Detail Report, as Other Direct Costs, Subcontractor Consultant Cost.

24

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad; Cook. Christopher: NRO MLSR Resource: Dority. Dayna: See. Kenneth; ContractsPOT Resource:

NRCIPAC Resource; Turner. Michael Cc:

Subject:

[External_Sender] NRC*HQ-13-I-0021: MLSRs 20 May 2016 Submission Date: Thursday, May 26, 2016 11:34:14 AM Attachments: NRC Task Order Apr 2016 !PAC pdf NRC Task Order May 2016 IPAC Summary 2016-05-25.pdf NRC-USACE MLSR T026 2016May.odf NRC*USACE MLSR T09 2016May.pdf Brad, Attached are the May 20 16 monthly reporting documents for the subject IAA.

I. !PAC: Billing information by line item (task orders) for !AA. Summary information by task order, current month, billed to date and authorized ceiling (NRC_Task_Order_Apr_ 2016_1PAC and NRC_Task_Order_May_2016_IPAC_Summary). Note: This reporting period includes expenditures for TO #09, and #26.

2. MLSR NRC-HQ 14-T-0026: Task order #26 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO26_20 16May). Attachments provided for Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello/Prairie Island, ANO, and Columbia NPP sites.

4. MLSR NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009: Task order #09 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO9_2016May).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

!(b)(6)

!(b)(6) I ProJect Manager Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Special Projects Branch 1616 Capitol A venue Omaha, NE 68102-4901 Phone: b 6 BB: (b)(6)

Fax:

!(b)(6)

Page 1 of 2 CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Accounts Of Billed Date: 02-May-2016 BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS (AR 37-1)

• 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009

• 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

• MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28211596 NO CHECK DRAWN 1580728

• 02-May-2016 Partial# 33 01-Apr-2016 Thru 02-May-2016 ......... . ................ ,, ......

Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Billed Accounting Classification Billing Accounting Classification 031 NA X 0200.0000 2013 00 0000 00000000000 00000 31000001 $2,135.47 096 NA X 3122.0000 G6 08 2417 895 0WDNRC 96252 $17,012.30 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 00 0000 NA 00000 31000001 $14,876.83 Line Item Moa ____ Description Eaid No Amount 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $3,071.66 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $954.75 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $6,906.42 00005 REIMBURSABLE - INSIDE FEDERAL GC WORK PERFORMED BY OTHER GOV AGENCIES $3,944.00 Subtotal: $14,876.83 6 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $690.72 6 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $1 76.09 6 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $1 ,268.66 Subtotal: $2,135.47 Total Billed Amount : $17,01 2.30 Less Amount Paid Via IPAC: $1 7,012.30 Payment Due Date: 01-Jun-2016 Pay This Amount: $0.00 DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.034 v2.1.4

Page 2 of 2 CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS Billed Date: 02-May-2016 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28211596 NO CHECK DRAWN 1580728 02-May-2016 Partial# 33 01-Apr-201 6 Thru 02-May-2016 Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount Funds Authorized: $4,270,251.28 CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED Total Billed Amount: $2,946,147.03 I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as stated and Prev Billed Amount: $2,929,134.73 s hould be charged to the appropriation(s) and/or fund(s) as indicated above, or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated.

Current Billed Amount: $17,01 2.30 Total Flux Billed: $0.00 Prev Flux Billed: $0.00 Date: 02-May-2016 M Current Flux Billed: $0.00 Authorized Administrative or Certifying Officer DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.034 v2.1.4

Date: 23-MAY-2016 Custo mer Order Bill Print Error Messa ges Page:1 Bill Numbe r Error Messag e cobil_ipac.03 4 v2.1.4

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021

SUMMARY

INFORMATION BY TASK ORDER

~ .......

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 20 May 2016 Submittal "L~

031 NA X 0200.0000 2013

$ 209,283.03 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ - $ 763,867.52 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 031 NA X 0200.0000 2015 $ 2,135.47 $ 54,506.97 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 031 NA X 0200.0000 201 4 $ 14,876.83 $ 1,918,489.51 IPAC Total $ 17,012.30 $ 2,946,147.03 Authorized lnteragency Agreement No. Line Item Number Billed to Date Ceiling NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 T0#01 Line 2 $ 209,283.03 $ 247,686.00 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Line 4 $ 763,867.52 $ 884,568.00 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Line 5 $ 1,918,489.51 $ 2,903,036.00 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Line 6 $ 54,506.97 $ 234,961.28 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 $ 2,946,147.03 $ 4,270,251.28 Page 1

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 (P2#: 405160)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS May 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status 1.1. Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regu latory Commission (NRG) in the determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that my affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants. A Technical Letter Report (TLR) documenting the development of the hydrographs will be provided. The NPP sites to be evaluated will be identified in subsequent Letters of Technical Direction (LTDs).

1.2. NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvev@NRC.GOV 1.3 . USAGE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S (l(b)(6) ~

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Mana er:

Primar : (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Program En ineer:

Primary: (b)(6)

(b)(6) 1.4. Agreement Period of Performance July 25, 2014 through September 29, 2017 1.5. Period for this Report April 01, 2016 through May 02, 2016

2. Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction Information on individual Letters of Technical Direction (LTD), including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

3. Travel Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction The travel information recorded for this task order is reported by individual LTDs in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NOA) with BC Hydro for the Columbia Generating Station site has taken much longer than originally projected and the delay has significantly impacted the PDT to proceed forward with analysis.

Issue 1 Status: The MASTER NOA between the USAGE and BC Hydro has been signed (25 May 15). The individual NDAs for each team member authorized to work on the project will be distributed for signature. The documents have been uploaded to the Partner sharepoint site for PDT use (19 Oct 15). The NRG team members have submitted signed NDAs and they are with NWD for signature. CLOSED

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this task order. The total costs incurred for this reporting period is captured on the Line 5 of the Bill No. 28204245 of the IPAC DA Form 4445-R.

Table 1. Flnanclal Status Report* Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2014 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date ($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 17,569.74 $ 17,569.74 0.6% $ 2,886, 175.86 $ 2,886, 175.86 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 21 ,716.10 $ 39,285.84 1.4% $ 2,864,459.76 $ 2 ,864,459.76 Oct $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,195.60 $ 118,481.44 4.1% $ 2,785,264.16 $ 2,785,264.16 Nov $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 80,422.10 $ 198,903.54 6.8% $ 2,704,842.06 $ 2,704,842.06 Dec $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,555.41 $ 301 ,458.95 10.4% $ 2,602,286.65 $ 2,602,286.65 2

Table 1. Financial Status Report - Sumnary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulatil. Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $137,019.46 $ 438,478.41 15. 1% $ 2,465,267. 19 $ 2,465,267.19 Feb $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $213,680.16 $ 652,158.57 22.5% $ 2,251 ,587.03 $ 2,251,587.03 Mar $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,500.18 $ 867,658.75 29.9% $ 2,036,086.85 $ 2,036,086.85 Apr $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,835.27 $1,083,494.02 37.3% $ 1,820,251.58 $ 1,820,251.58 May $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,342.38 $ 1,185,836.40 40.8% $ 1,717,909.20 $ 1,717,909.20 Jun $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $142,454.07 $1,328,290.47 45.7% $ 1,575,455.13 $ 1,575,455.13 Jul $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 97,231.15 $ 1,425,521.62 49.1% $ 1,478,223.98 $ 1,478,223.98 Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 83,891.67 $ 1,509,413.29 52.0% $ 1,394,332.31 $ 1,394,332.31 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,066.56 $1,588,479.85 54.7% $ 1,315,265.75 $ 1,315,265.75 Oct $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $109,520.92 $ 1,698,000.77 58.5% $ 1,205,745.83 $ 1,205,745.83 Nov $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 60,628.27 $ 1,758,629.04 60.6% $ 1,145,117.56 $ 1,145,117.56 Dec $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 52,852.79 $ 1,811 ,481.83 62.4% $ 1,092,264.77 $ 1,092,264.77 Balance of Total Costs Cumulatil. Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount ($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,645.49 $ 1,841 ,127.32 63.4% $ 1,062,619.28 $ 1,062,619.28 Feb $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,927.68 $ 1,871,055.00 64.4% $ 1,032,691.60 $ 1,032,691.60 Mar $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 32,557.68 $ 1,903,612.68 65.6% $ 1,000, 133.92 $ 1,000, 133.92 Apr $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 14,876.83 $ 1,918,489.51 66. 1% $ 985,257.09 $ 985,257.09 Table 2 provides the financial detail outlining the amount of funds expended during the reporting period, the current fiscal year (FY2016), and the total cumulative year to date. The financial data includes the following Letters of Technical Direction:

• LTD TO26 1 Farley Nuclear Pov,*er Plant (Mobile District) 31 Jul2014

• LTD TO26-1a Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 06Apr2015

• LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant (Pittsburgh District). 23Sep2014

• LTD TO26 a Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (~t. Paul District). 21 Oct2014 3

• LTD TO26-3a Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Pau l District). 08Aug15

• LTD TO26 4 Arkansas Nuclear One NPP (Little Rock/Tulsa Districts). 09Dec14

• LTD TO26-4b Arkansas Nuclear One NPP (Little Rock/Tulsa Districts). 29Jan 16

• LTD TO26 5 Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 15Dec1 4

• LTD TO26-5a Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 14Jan16 Table 2. Fl nanclal Detail Report* NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Fisca l Yea r to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 34 1,042 2,125 (2) Technical 62 1,951 15,239 (3) Support (Bureau Reclamation) 0 4 659 TOTAL 96 2,997 18,023

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 6,906.42 $ 185,570.73 $ 1,122,868.67 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 3,071.66 $ 84,846.64 $ 517,514.35 SUB-TOTAL $ 9,978.08 $ 270,417.37 $ 1,640,383..02 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ 3,944.00 $ 25,951.13 $ 74,277.13 (Bureau of Reclamation)

(2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ 5,289.29 $ 20,814.09 SUB-TOTAL $ 3,944.00 $ 31 240.42 $ 95 091.22 G & A Costs $ 954.75 $ 28,351.87 $ 183,015.27 DOE Fee (If Applicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 14,876.83 $ 330,009.66 $ 1,918,489.51

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for work accomplished by the USAGE in the reporting period for Task Order 26. The cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in this table. The individual project letter status report for each LTD issued is included in the attachments.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $2,904,745.60 Funds Obligated to date: $2,903,745.60 4

Period of Performance: 25 Jul 2014 to 29 Sep 2017 Table 3. Cumulatlve Monthly Exoense Forecast- NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Percentage Expenditure s for Task Expe nditures Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative

(%)

1a $ 1 683,915.60 $ 10 815.29 $ 1,287 156.26 76.44%

1b PMP/PMF $ 458 200.00 $ 2.260.65 s 345 824.86 75.47%

2 s 315 600.00 s 169.89 s 118 994.72 37.70%

3 $ 224 760.00 $ 1,631.00 $ 166 513.67 74.09%

4 $ 221 ,270.00 $ - $ - 0.00%

TOTAL $ 2,903.745.60 $ 14 876.83 $ 1,918,489.51 66.07%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 26 is identified in Table 4. The spending plan reflects the project schedule delays and completion of tasks for Farley. These scheduling issues include: 1) signature of the Non-Disclosure Agreement for Columbia and 2) the impact of the May / June 2015 high water events and a levee failure at the Tulsa and Little Rock Districts.

Baseline $ 31,215 $ 47,021 $ 150,836 $ 130,000 $200,000 Actual Costs $ 17,570 $ 21,716 $ 79, 196 $ 80,422 $102,555 Difference $ 13,645 $ 25,304 $ 71,641 $ 49,578 $ 97,445 Percentage 56.3% 46.2% 52.5% 61.9% 51.3%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,500 $ 251,800 $175,200 Actual Costs $ 137,019 $ 213,680 $ 215,500 $ 215,835 $ 102,342 $142,454 Difference $ 112,981 $ 36,320 $ 34,500 $ 34,665 $ 149,458 $ 32,746 Percentage 54.8% 85.5% 86.2% 86.2% 40.6% 81.3%

Baseline $ 100,446 $ 115,100 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Actual Costs $ 97,231 $ 83,892 $79,066.56 $1 09,520.92 $ 60,628 $ 52,853 Difference $ 3,215 $ 31,208 $ 20,933 $ (19,521) $ 29,372 $ 37,147 Percenta e 96.8% 72.9% 79.1% 121.7% 67.4% 58.7%

5

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-1 4-T-0026 Baseline $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,000 $ 17,630 Actual Costs $29,645.49 $29,927.68 $32,557.68 $14,876.83 Difference $ 60,355 $ 60,072 $ 27,442 $ 25,123 Percenta e 32.9% 33.3% 54.3% 37.2%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site for Task Order #26, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026.

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

L+D +02& ~ 3~ Jbll ~ 4 G>0Iblali9A gl ~lggg lclaiards al 11=18 Jgse~A M.~afley Nb1Gl8af 12IaAI Obie lg Oam ~ail1Jf8 LTD T026-1a 06-Apr-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure LTD T0 26-2 23-Sep-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Beaver Valley NPP Due to Dam Failure L+D +0 2& 3 2~ GGI ~4 G>JallJaliQA GI ~IGGd lclaiards al 11:10 MGAliGellG aAd 1'2fai~ie lslaAd 1'>11212 Siles LTDT026-3a 13-Aug-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Monticello and Prairie Island NPP Sites L+D +02&-4 OQ Oei:; 14 E;1,al1JaliGA GI ~l9Gd lcla~ards al 11=18 ,A,fkaAsas l'>l1JGl0a~ GA8 t>Jl212 Sile LTDT026-4b 29-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Arkansas Nuclear One NPP Site L+D +02& 5 Hi Qei:; 14 E;>,,al1Jali0A el ~leed lcla;iards al ll=le Gelt,imeia 1111212 Sile LTD TA26-5a 14-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Columbia NPP Site 6

The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites for this reporting period.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/ NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 $ - YES MF3038 Farley 2 $ - YES MF3039 Columbia $ 12,562.07 YES MF3041 ANO1 $ 1,157.38 YES MF3042 ANO2 $ 1,157.38 YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 $ - YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 $ - YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 YES MF3995 Three Mile Island 1 YES MF3696 Monticello $ - YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 $ - YES MF3698 Prairie Island 2 $ - YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 14,876.83 PERIOD 7

LTD 1026-1 Farley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 8

Table LTD -TO26-1.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-1 Farley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Delivery Team: Omaha and Mobile Districts Project Manager - J(b)(6) ICENWO-PM-S Technical Manage CESAM-EN-HH Project Costs: $277,309 P2 447176 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Revised LTD issued 6 April 2015 Activity Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Develop PMP/PMF Notes I Significant Issues

1. la Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Perform al (b)(7XE) (b)(7XF) None. None. Work is complete.

Activity Develop Preliminary Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1b Hydrographs and TLR Reoorting Period Reporting Period Develop time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including Excel spreadsheets, at various locations in the vicinity of the Farley NPP site. Two Submissions: None. None. Work is complete.

Prelirninarv Draft and Pre-Final. The (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

Activity Intermediate Technical Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 2 Review Meetings Reoorting Period Reoorting Period Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None. None. Work is complete.

meetings.

Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Additional Information to be included at the request of Southern Company: *

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) 11 ) Flow nyarographs for the complete model None. None. Work is complete.

run. 2) Velocity hydrographs for the complete model run. 3) Spatial coordinates and projection for each cross section. 4) All cross section station and elevation points. 5) Left and right bank stations. 6) Manning's "n" values or roughness coefficients for the left overbank, channel and right overbank at each cross section.

Activity Participate in Presentation Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 9

Table LTD T026-1.2. LTD 26-1 Farley

• Travel ComDteted This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Actlvtty: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coord inated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next reporting period I I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. Cunilatlve Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-1 Farley, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1a $ 149,682.20 $ 130,871.20 87.43%

1b PMP/PMF $ 52,369.92 $ 36,942.43 70.54%

2 $ 21,376.04 $ 19,465.04 91.06%

3 $ 29,255.44 $ 16,112.04 55.07%

4 $ 26,455.72 $ . 0.00%

TOTAL $ 279,139.32 $ . $ 203,390.71 72.86%

10

LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 11

Table LTD -TO26-2.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliverv Team: Omaha and Pittsburoh Districts Project Managers -l(h\(6\ ICENWO-PM*S~(b)(6) ~ CELRP-PM-PM Technical Lead

• l(h\/R\ r;ELRP-EC-DH Project Costs: $450,476 1-'2 448945 LID issued 23 Sep 2014 Ac:;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Evaluate PMP and PMF for the Beaver Valley NPP site as well as the (b)(7)(E), (b)(ll{_F)

IDeve,u11 11yurograpns oasea on the site-None None Work is complete.

specific PMP developed by the NRC's licensee, FENOC. Existing USAGE hydrologic and hydraulic models Vlill be used to determine the PMF resulting from the Licensee's site-specific PMP.

Activity I Develop Preliminary Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR P.eoortina Period Reoortina Period I Assess thel(7)(E). (bX7)(F) oocument tne aniyses in a I

prelirrinary draft and pre-final TLR and hydroQraohs. I None None Work is complete.

(b)(7)(E). (b)(7)(F)

\ Amu,up,., -

dam failure scenario Vlill also be included.

Ac::;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next P.eoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None None Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate.

Calculation packages, including input and output files from computer Finalize project files. Work is complete.

modeling runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity IParticipate in Presentation Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoorti na Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None No action required.

Presentation of Results Meetings 12

Table LTD T026-2.2. LTD 26-2 Beaver Valley* Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period I

Related Actlvtty: Purpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period INone I I I I I I Planned next reporting period INone I I I I I I Table LTD TO26-1 .3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - TLD T026-1 Beaver Vally, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget(%)

1a $ 259,701.20 $ 263,982.10 101.65%

1b PMP/PMF $ 66,074.00 $ 62,121.31 94.02%

2 $ 55,117.00 $ 45,437.08 82.44%

3 $ 35,523.00 $ 40,773.62 114.78%

4 $ 34,061.00 $ -

TOTAL $ 450,476.20 $ - $ 412,314.11 91.53%

13

LTD TO26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 14

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project De~ ha and St. Pal' Dictrio*c Project Managers - (b)(6)

Technical Manager CENWO-PM-S, (b)(6)

CEMVP-EC-H I CEMVP-PM-A Project Costs: $514,370 LTD issued 31 July 2014

1. 1a I

Activity Develop PMP/PMF for Prairie Island NPP Activities Acco"l)lished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues (b)(7)(E). (b)(7)(F)

Additional information, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, \\ill be provided:!

None None Work is complete (b)(7)(E) (b)(7)(F)

)No hyctrograpns are neectect tor these cross sections.

Activity

1. lb I Develop PMF Stage Hydrographs Monticello NPP Activities Acco"l)lished this Reportng Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Develop a new HMS model of the watershed in developing the PMP for the Monticello NPP site and route the resulting runoff to produce the PMF. A georeferenced HEC-RAS model shall be developed in order to produce a PMF stage hydrograph at the Monticello NPP site. Additional information, at the request of the NRC's Ucensee Xcel, \\ill be orovided: I None None Work is complete (b)(7)(E) (b)(7)(F)

I No hydrographs are needed for these cross sections.

15

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliwrv Team:

Project Managers '.l(b)(6) Tc~~n~~~:;,'1\rij(mjcts !CEMVP-PM*A Technical Manager CEMVP-EC*H Project Costs: $514,370 Lm issued 31 July 2014 Activity I H&H Model Coll1)arison and Site* Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1c Soocific PMP ColTl>arison Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Work wiU be complete in Comparison of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, September provided H&H models, describing any major differences between Xcel's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H&H modeling approach. Comparison of the site-specific PMPs (provided by Xcel) by describing any differences in the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution between the basin-wide PMPs and None None the basin-wide PMPs used by the USAGE to develop its hydrographs. USACE will develop hydrographs similiar to Activities 1A and 1B by applying the PMPs and using USACE's H&H models. The findings will be documented, coordinated, and a detailed comparison performed.

Ac:;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetings Activities Accol1l)tished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next ReDQrting Period Notes I Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate None None Work is complete Technical Review meetings.

Activity

1. 3 I Develop Final

. Hydrographs and llR Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Document findings in a Final llR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate. Calculation packages, including Repackage Iha deliverables for input and output files from computer modeling Work is complete release to licensee.

runs supporting key llR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity I Participate in Presentation of Results Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 Meetinas Reoortina Period Rennrtina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of None None Not required.

Results Meetings Table LTD T026-3.2. LTD 26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island

• Travel Completed Renortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next rePOrting period I I I I I I I 16

Table LTD T026-1.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - no T026-1 Monticello, NRC-HQ.25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budi:iet (%)

1A1B1C $ 410,631.20 $ 359,718.36 87.60%

2 $ 43,469.00 $ 13,540.72 31 .15%

3 $ 24,607.00 $ 17,605.09 71.55%

4 $ 35,663 .00 TOTAL $ 514,370.20 $ - $ 390 ,864.17 75.99%

17

LTD T026-4 Arkansas Nuclear One 18

Table LTD -T026-4.1. ProJect Status for LTD T026-4 Arkansas NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project DE iha, Little Rock, and Tulsa Districts Project Manager- CENWO-PM-S; j \I \ (CESWL-PM Technical Manager CESWL-EC-~ /KJ/6) !CESWT-EC-HF Project Costs: $93 ,

LTD issued 29 Jan 2016 Ac:t [ Dewlap PMP/PMF Acti1.1lies Accomplished this Reporting Period Ac1i.,;1ies Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Compare H&H Models (Entergy) and None None Work is complete.

Compare Sita-Specific PMP.

Describe any major differences between Entergy's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H& H modeling approach. Describe any differences In the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution belween the basin*¥Ade PM Ps (Entergy) and the basin-wide PMPs (USAGE).

De-clop hydrographs by applying the PMPs (Entergy) using USACE's H&H models, Ac1h,1y [ Dewlop Preliminary AclilAlies Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,.ties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Ewluation of thA PMP and PMF tnr None None Work is complete.

(b)(7)(E), (~l(!L the ANO site\

"f ue.,,,,,.,,., 70 I

(F) moaels for ANO ri~r basin.

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) no\tae nyorograpns ror 1oenum,u locations In the LTD 26-4.

Ac::;ty [ tntemiedlate Technical Actil,ties Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,Aties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues Re1.1ew Meetinas Schedule, host, and participate In None None Work Is complete.

Intermediate Technical Reldew meetings.

Acti1.1ty [ Dewlap Final Hydrographs Acti1.1ties Accomplished this Reporting Period Ac1i.,;1ies Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Dccument findings In a Final TLR Pr01,ded responses to licensee requests for None Work is complete.

and hydrographs. Include additional additional information.

lnfom,atlon as appropriate.

Acli1.1ly IParticipate in Presentation Acti1.1lies Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti.,;lies Planned tor Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Schedule, Host and Participate in TBD Presentation of Results Meetings 19

Table LTD T026-4.2. LTD 26-4 .Arkansas* Travel Camnleted This Reportlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting peri od Planned next reporting period Table LTD T026-4.3. cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026*4 Arkansas, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent age Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 476,997 $683.76 $ 403,818.36 84.66%

PMP/PMF $ 196,785 $ 194,247.26 98.71%

2 $ 130,846 $ 24,787.48 18.94%

3 $ 71,281 $1,631.00 $ 92,022.92 129.1 0%

4 $ 62,914 $ .

TOTAL $ 938,823 $ 2,314.76 $ 714,876.02 76.1 5%

20

LTD T026-5 Columbia Generating Station 21

Table LTD-T026-5.1. Project Status for LTD T026-5 Colurri>la NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 Project Manager

• 1(b)(6)

Technical Manage k

USAGE Project Deliwry Team: Omaha, Seattle, and Walla Walla Districts CENWO-PM-S: l!blIB)

ENW S-EN-HH-HE I. CENWS-PM-MEI Project Costs : $569,688 P2 449739 LTD issued 14 Jan 2016 Actil.ity Acti1Aties Accomplished this Actil.ities Planned for Next Develop PMP/PMF Notes / Significant Issues

1. 0 Reporting Period Reporting Period Evaluation of the PMP and PMF for None None Work is complete.

Actil.ity Dewlop Preliminary Acti1Aties Accomplished this Actil.ities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Reoortina Period Reportina Period Develop H&H models for the P repared Preliminary Draft None Milestone: Preliminary Draft TLR Columbia NPP watershed. Evaluate TLR. and hydrographs - 19 May 2016.

(b)(7)(E). (bX7)(F) Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and hydrographs - TBD.

r- ,vvovc ,,~*~s,*~,-"~ ,v, 1-1*vvovcv locations in the LTD.

Actil.ity Intermediate Technical Actil.ities Accomplished this Acti1Aties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 2 Rel.iew Meetinas Reoortina Period Reportina Period Schedule, host, and participate in None Pre-lTR meeting webinar - Milestone: First ITR - 09 Jun Intermediate Technical Rel.iew 26 May 2016. 2016.

meetings. Milestone: Second ITR - TB D.

Actil.ity Dewlop Final Hydrographs Acti1,1ties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reportina Period Document data and analysis, n/a n/a Milestone: Final TLR and including the hydrographs, in a Final hydrographs

• TBD.

TLR. Package will include the calculation packages, inc luding input and output files from the computer modeling runs supporting the key TLR conclusions.

Acti1,1ty Participate in Presentation ActilAties Accomplished this Actil.ities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reporting Period Reporting Period Schedule, Host and Participate in n/a n/a n/a Presentation of Results Meetings Table LTD T026-5.2. LTD 26-5 Colum,la

• Travel ComnlAted This ReDortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlnn Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting peri od Planned next reporting period 22

Table LTDT026-5.3. cumulative Monthly Expense -TLDTO26-5 Columbia, NRC-~25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 266,693 $10,131.53 $ 128,766.24 48.28%

1 PMP/PMF $ 11 3,966 $2,260.65 $ 52,513.86 46.08%

2 $ 54,733 $169.89 $ 15,764.40 28.80%

3 $ 44,088 $ -

4 $ 52,169 $ -

TOTAL $ 531 ,649 $ 12,562.07 $ 197,044.50 37.06%

The costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation are included in the table above and the sum total amount is recorded in Table 2 Financial Detail Report, as Other Direct Costs, Subcontractor Consultant Cost.

23

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 (P2#: 455162)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS May 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective The object of the agreement, Review of Recommendation 2. 1 Flood Re-evaluations as Part of 50.54(f) Response, is for the USAGE to assist the NRC staff in reviewing certain flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) in the FHRRs provided by NRC licensees in response to the 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012, Recommendation 2. 1:

Flooding. This work effort will support the NRC with their Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR.

NRC Project Manager Brad HaNey NRC/ NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USACE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S (b)(6) 1616 Capitol Avenue,- u..., -e-Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Mana er:

Primary: (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Program En ineer:

Primar : (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Agreement Period of Performance August 25, 2015 through August 24, 2016 Period for this Report April 01, 2016 through May 02, 2016

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table A. Table B provides milestones and schedules for each task.

I lj'(_*;r*~~:;:J~-~~;~.~~ >\*:.~;~~,}~~(:~~;;/:~~~~:\:~.~~{;~.~;*~;;~::~:;;:,:~;~-~~~~:~-:~:*~ ~

1 ActMties Accomplishec this Actl\ities Plannec for next Task Deli,..,,rable/Milestone Description Issues/Challenges Reporting Period Reporting Period 1 ORIENTATION 1.a Peach Bottom Secure the Argus One Sofware lor use on the project. Completed 1.b Three Mile Island PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL EVALUATION 2 REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2.a Peach Bottom 2.b Three Mile Island FINAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 3

AND TECHNICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT 3.a Peach Bottom Pro>idec unput to the audit Complete final technical report. Continued de,..,,lopment ol evaluation report and final technical evaluation report technical re"ew document.

3.b Three Mile Island and technical re.;ew document.

Table B: Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Technical Orientation / Kick-Off Meeting Peach Bottom 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 Three Mile Island 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 2 Preliminary TER & RAIS Peach Bottom 30 Nov 15 Revised 1 Dec 15 Revised Mar 16 Three Mile Island early Feb 16 3 Final TER Peach Bottom 03-Jun-16 Three Mile Island 17-Jun-16 2

3. Travel Table C provides information on completed and planned travel for this task order. No t ravel expenditures have been incurred in this reporting period and none are projected for the next reporting period.

Table C. Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Task: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The USAGE team is in the process of acquiring the required software to evaluate the submittals of the licensee for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island. The software is in the process of acquisition and additional approvals are required for installation.

Resolution 1: The USAGE has received and installed the required software to review the data submitted by the licensee. CLOSED.

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this agreement. Table 2 provides the amount of funds expended during the period, current fiscal year, and the total cumulative year to date.

3

Table 1. Financial Status Report

• Summary NRC-HQ-25-15-T--0009 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Sep $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77 3.5% $ 226,731,51 $ 226,731.51 Oct $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961 .28 $ 3,525.87 $ 11 ,755.64 5.0% $ 223,205.64 $ 223,205.64 Nov $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961 .28 $ 8,492.55 $ 20,248.19 8.6% $ 214,713.09 $ 214,713.09 Dec $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 12,11 3.91 $ 32,362.10 13.8% $ 202,599.18 $ 202,599. 18 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,107.59 $ 35,469.69 15.1% $ 199,491 .59 $ 199,491.59 Feb $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 9,875.77 $ 45,345.46 19.3% $ 189,615.82 $ 189,615.82 Mar $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 7,026.04 $ 52,371 .50 22.3% $ 182,589.78 $ 182,589.78 Apr $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961 .28 $ 2,135.47 $ 54,506.97 23.2% $ 180,454.31 $ 180,454.31 4

Table 2. Flnanclal Detail Report* NRc-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Fiscal Year to Current Month Tota l to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 10 178 196 (2) Technical 8 220 264 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 18 398 460

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 1,268.66 $ 29,051.43 $ 34,054.34 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 690.72 $ 11,858.45 $ 14,409.93 SUB-TOTAL $ 1,959.38 $ 40,909.88 $ 48,464.27 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 (2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 G & A Costs $ 176.09 $ 3,067.32 $ 3,742.70 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 2,135.47 $ 46,2TT.20 $ 54,506.97

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3.1 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for all of the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 9. The monthly planned (budget) cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table. Table 3.x will detail the monthly expenditures for each individual nuclear power plant site and the individual nuclear power plant and the associated TAC

1. for license fee recovery.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $234,961.28 Funds Obligated to date: $234,961.28 Period of Performance: 25 Aug 2015 to 24 Aug 2016 5

Table 3.1. Cumulative Monthlv ExDense Forecast - NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Pe rcentage Expe nditures tor Task Expenditures Activity# Pla nned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative

(%)

1 s 19 378.00 s 611.38 s 16 299.80 84.11 %

2 s 172.172.04 s 1.524.09 s 36 676.64 21.30%

3 $ 43 411 .24 $ . $ 1,530.53 3.53%

TOTAL $ 234,961 .28 $ 2,135.47 $ 54,506.97 23.20%

Table 3.2: LTD T009-2 cumulative Monthly Expense

• Peach Bottom TAC MF6598 / MF6599 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $169.89 $ 7,570.26 78.13%

2 $ 80,153.96 $1,524.09 $ 22,561.15 28.15%

3 $ 18,211.36 $ 1,041.50 5.72%

TOTAL $ 108,054.32 $ 1,693.98 $ 31,172.91 28.85%

Table 3.3: LTDT009-3 CUmulatlve Monthly Expense* Three Mlle lslandTACMF1113 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $441.49 $ 8,729.54 90.10%

2 $ 92,018.08 $ 14,11 5.49 15.34%

3 $ 25,199.88 $ 489.03 1.94%

TOTAL $ 126,906.96 $ 441.49 $ 23,334.06 18.39%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 9 is identified in Table 4.

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Basellne $ 5,961 $ 12,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 Actual Costs $ 8,230 $ 3,526 $ 8,493 $ 12,114 $ 3, 108 $9,875.77 Difference $ (2,269) $ 8,474 $ 6,507 $ 2,886 $ 21,892 $ 20,124 Percenta e 138.1% 29.4% 56.6% 80.8% 12.4% 32.9%

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 12,000 Actual Costs $ 7,026 $ 2,135 Difference $ 22,974 $ 27,865 Percenta e 23.4% 7.1%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USACE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site.

6

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-H0-25-15-T-0009 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

LTD T009*3 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Peach Bottom NPP Site LTDT009-2 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Three Mile Island NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites. The costs for this reporting period are for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-H0-25-15-T-0009 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF6598 Peach Bottom 2 $ 846.99 YES MF6599 Peach Bottom 3 $ 846.99 YES MF1113 Three Mile Island 1 $ 441.49 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 2,135.47 Pl=RlnD 7

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad; Cook. Christopher: NRO MLSR Resource: Dority. Dayna: See. Kenneth; ContractsPOT Resource:

NRCIPAC Resource; Turner. Michael Cc:

Subject:

[External_Sender] NRC*HQ-13-I-0021: MLSRs 20 Mar 2016 Submission Date: Friday, March 25, 2016 6: 16:17 PM Attachments: NRC Task Order Feb 2016 !PAC pdf NRC Task Order Mar 2016 !PAC Summary.pdf NRC-USACE MLSR T026 2016Mar odf NRC*USACE MLSR T09 2016Mar.pdf Brad, Attached are the March 2016 monthly reporting documents for the subject IAA.

I. !PAC: Billing information by line item (task orders) for !AA. Summary information by task order, current month, billed to date and authorized ceiling (NRC_Task_Order_Feb_ 2016_IPAC and NRC_Task_Order_Mar_2016_JPAC_Summary). Note: This reporting period includes expenditures for TO #09, and #26.

2. MLSR NRC-HQ 14-T-0026: Task order #26 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO26_20 16Mar). Attachments provided for Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello/Prairie Island, ANO, and Columbia NPP sites.

4. MLSR NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009: Task order #09 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO9_2016Mar).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Than.ks,

!(b)(6)  !

!(b)(6)

Project Manager Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Special Projects Branch 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, NE 68102-4901 Phone: !(b)(6) I BB: (b)(6)

Fax:

(b)(6)

Page 1 of 2 CIC #: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Accounts Of Billed Date: 01 -Mar-2016 BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS (AR 37-1)

• 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009

• 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

• MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28208573 NO CHECK DRAWN 1550900

• 01-Mar-2016 Partial# 31 01-Feb-201 6 Thru 01 -Mar-201 6 ,l * .,. "' JI ................. ,, ......

Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Billed Accounting Classification Billing Accounting Classification 031 NA X 0200.0000 2013 00 0000 00000000000 00000 31000001 $9,875.77 096 NA X 3122.0000 G6 08 2417 895 0WDNRC 96252 $39,803.45 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 00 0000 NA 00000 31000001 $29,927.68 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount 00005 CONTRACT - OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT TRANSP OF GOVT EMPLOYEES OR OTHERS, PERDIEM ALLOW IN TVL STATUS & 0TH INCIDENTAL TRVL EXP $623.47 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $7,022.16 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $2,312.45 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $15,306.35 00005 REIMBURSABLE - INSIDE FEDERAL GC WORK PERFORMED BY OTHER GOV AGENCIES $4,663.25 Subtotal: $29,927.68 6 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $2,336.63 6 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $618.96 6 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $6,920.18 Subtotal : $9,875.77 Total Billed Amount: $39,803.45 Less Amount Paid Via IPAC: $39,803.45 Payment Due Date: 31-Mar-2016 Pay This Amount: $0.00 DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.925 v2.1.4

Page 2 of 2 CIC#: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS Billed Date: 01 -Mar-2016 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28208573 NO CHECK DRAWN 1550900 01-Mar-2016 Partial# 31 01-Feb-2016 Thru 01 -Mar-201 6 Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount Funds Authorized: $4,270,251.28 CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED Total Billed Amount: $2,889,551 .01 I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as stated and Prev Billed Amount: $2,849,747.56 should be charged to the appropriation(s) and/or fund(s) as indicated above, or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated.

Current Billed Amount: $39,803.45 Total Flux Billed: $0.00 Prev Flux Billed: $0.00 Date: 01 -Mar-2016 CiEiiI Current Flux Billed: $0.00 Authorized Administrative or Certifying Officer DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.925 v2.1.4

Date: 11-MAR-2016 Custo mer Order Bill Print Error Messa ges Page:1 Bill Numbe r Error Messag e cobil_ipac.925 v2.1.4

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021

SUMMARY

INFORMATION BY TASK ORDER

~ .......

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 20 March 2016 Submit tal "L~

031 NA X 0200.0000 2013

$ 209,283.03 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ 763,867.52 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 031 NA X 0200.0000 2015 $ 9,875.77 $ 45,345.46 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 031 NA X 0200.0000 201 4 $ 29,927.68 $ 1,871 ,055.00 IPAC Total $ 39,803.45 $ 2,889,551.01 Authorized lnteragency Agreement No. Line Item Number Billed to Date Ceiling NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 T0#01 Line 2 $ 209,283.03 $ 247,686.00 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Line 4 $ 763,867.52 $ 884,568.00 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Line 5 $ 1,871,055.00 $ 2,903,036.00 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Line 6 $ 45,345.46 $ 234,961.28 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 $ 2,889,551.01 $ 4,270,251.28 Page 1

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 (P2#: 405160)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS March 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status 1.1. Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regu latory Commission (NRG) in the determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that my affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants. A Technical Letter Report (TLR) documenting the development of the hydrographs will be provided. The NPP sites to be evaluated will be identified in subsequent Letters of Technical Direction (LTDs).

1.2. NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvev@NRC.GOV 1.3 . USAGE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S d._ (b_)(6_l _,

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Manager:

Primary: !(b)(6)

Program En ineer:

Primary: (b)(6) 1.4. Agreement Period of Performance July 25, 2014 through September 29, 2017 1.5. Period for this Report February 1, 2016 through March 01, 2016

2. Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction Information on individual Letters of Technical Direction (LTD), including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

3. Travel Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction The travel information recorded for this task order is reported by individual LTDs in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello /

Prairie Island, Arkansas, and Columbia.

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NOA) with BC Hydro for the Columbia Generating Station site has taken much longer than originally projected and the delay has significantly impacted the PDT to proceed forward with analysis.

Issue 1 Status: The MASTER NOA between the USAGE and BC Hydro has been signed (25 May 15). The individual NDAs for each team member authorized to work on the project will be distributed for signature. The documents have been uploaded to the Partner sharepoint site for PDT use (19 Oct 15). The NRG team members have submitted signed NDAs and they are with NWD for signature. CLOSED

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this task order. The total costs incurred for this reporting period is captured on the Line 5 of the Bill No. 28204245 of the IPAC DA Form 4445-R.

Table 1. Flnanclal Status Report* Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2014 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date ($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 17,569.74 $ 17,569.74 0.6% $ 2,886, 175.86 $ 2,886, 175.86 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 21 ,716.10 $ 39,285.84 1.4% $ 2,864,459.76 $ 2 ,864,459.76 Oct $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,195.60 $ 118,481.44 4.1% $ 2,785,264.16 $ 2,785,264.16 Nov $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 80,422.10 $ 198,903.54 6.8% $ 2,704,842.06 $ 2,704,842.06 Dec $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,555.41 $ 301 ,458.95 10.4% $ 2,602,286.65 $ 2,602,286.65 2

Table 1. Financial Status Report- Sunmary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) cost s/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $137,019.46 $ 438,478.41 15. 1% $ 2,465,267. 19 $ 2,465,267.19 Feb $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $213,680.16 $ 652,158.57 22.5% $ 2,251 ,587.03 $ 2,251,587.03 Mar $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,500. 18 $ 867,658.75 29.9% $ 2,036,086.85 $ 2,036,086.85 Apr $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,835.27 $ 1,083,494.02 37.3% $ 1,820,251.58 $ 1,820,251.58 May $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,342.38 $ 1,185,836.40 40.8% $ 1,717,909.20 $ 1,717,909.20 Jun $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $142,454.07 $ 1,328,290.47 45.7% $ 1,575,455. 13 $ 1,575,455.13 Jul $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 97,231. 15 $ 1,425,521.62 49. 1% $ 1,478,223.98 $ 1,478,223.98 Aug $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 83,891.67 $ 1,509,413.29 52.0% $ 1,394,332.31 $ 1,394,332.31 Sep $ 2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,066.56 $ 1,588,479.85 54.7% $ 1,315,265.75 $ 1,315,265.75 Oct $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $109,520.92 $ 1,698,000.77 58.5% $ 1,205,745.83 $ 1,205,745.83 Nov $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 60,628.27 $ 1,758,629.04 60.6% $ 1,145,117.56 $ 1,145, 117.56 Dec $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 52,852.79 $ 1,811 ,481.83 62.4% $ 1,092,264.77 $ 1,092,264.77 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,645.49 $ 1,841 ,127.32 63.4% $ 1,062,619.28 $ 1,062,619.28 Feb $ 2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $ 29,927.68 $ 1,871,055.00 64.4% $ 1,032,691.60 $ 1,032,691.60 Table 2 provides the financial detail outlining the amount of fu nds expended during the reporting period, the current fiscal year (FY2016), and the total cumulative year to date. The financial data includes the following Letters of Technical Direction:

• LTD TO26 1 Farley Nuolear Power Plant (Mobile Distriot) 31 Jul2014

• LTD TO26-1a Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 06Apr2015

• LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant {Pittsburgh District) . 23Sep2014

• LTD TO26 3 Montioello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul Distriot). 21Oot201 4

• LTD TO26-3a Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Pau l District) . 08Aug15

• LTD TO26 4 Arkansas Nuolear One NPP (Little Rook/Tulsa Distriots). 0QDoo14

• LTD TO26-4b Arkansas Nuclear One NPP (Little Rock/Tulsa Districts). 29Jan1 6

• LTD TO26 5 Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/VValla 1Nalla Distriots). 15Deo14 3

• LTD TO26-5a Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 14Jan16 Table 2. Flnanclal Detall Report

• NRC-H0-25-14-T-0026 Fisca l Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 48 957 2,040 (2) Technical 157 1,670 14,958 (3) Support (Bureau Reclamation) 0 4 659 TOTAL 205 2,631 17,657

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 15,306.35 $ 159,221.39 $ 1,096,519.33 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 7,022.16 $ 73,031.93 $ 505,699*.64 SUB-TOTAL $ 22,328.51 $ 232,253.32 $ 1,602,218..97 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ 4,663.25 $ 20,391.25 $ 68,717.25 (Bureau of Reclamation)

(2) Material and Se'ces Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ 623.47 $ 5,289.29 $ 20,814.09 SUB-TOTAL $ 5,286.72 $ 25,680.54 $ 89,531.34 G & A Costs $ 2,312.45 $ 24,641.29 $ 179,304.69 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 29,927.68 $ 282,575.15 $ 1,871,055.00 Note: The January 20, 2016 MLSR reported $2,316.18 in domestic travel expenses. These expenses were for travel to the ANO intermediate technical review meetin held in Little Rock, Arkansas in October 2015. Of this total, $1,069.82 was for travel by (b)(6) who is currently serving a detail at the USAGE Northwestern Division office in Oma a. )(6) travel was inadvertently charged to the CGS project, but it was for the ANO project.

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for work accomplished by the USAGE in the reporting period for Task Order 26. The cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in this table. The individual project letter status report for each LTD issued is included in the attachments.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $2,904,745.60 4

Funds Obligated to date: $2,903,745.60 Period of Performance: 25 Jul 2014 to 29 Sep 2017 Table 3. Cumulatlve Monthly Exnense Forecast - NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 t"ercemage Expenditures for Task Expenditures Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative ,_,.

1a $ 1 683.915.60 $ 16 484.72 s 1.255 358.60 74.55%

1b PMP/PMF $ 458 200.00 $ 169.89 $ 342 501 .43 74.75%

2 $ 315 600.00 $ - $ 115 363.78 36.55%

3 $ 224 760.00 $ 13 273.07 $ 157 831 .19 70.22%

4 $ 221 ,270.00 $ - $ - 0.00%

TOTAL $ 2 903,745.60 $ 29 927.68 $ 1,871 055.00 64.44%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 26 is identified in Table 4. The spending plan reflects the project schedule delays and completion of tasks for Farley. These scheduling issues include: 1) signature of the Non-Disclosure Agreement for Columbia and 2) the impact of the May / June 2015 high water events and a levee failure at the Tulsa and Little Rock Districts.

Baseline $ 31,215 $ 47,021 $ 150,836 $ 130,000 $200,000 Actual Costs $ 17,570 $ 21,716 $ 79, 196 $ 80,422 $102,555 Difference $ 13,645 $ 25,304 $ 71,641 $ 49,578 $ 97,445 Percenta e 56.3% 46.2% 52.5% 61.9% 51 .3%

Spe nding Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,500 $ 251 ,800 $175,200 Actual Costs $ 137,019 $ 213,680 $ 215,500 $ 215,835 $ 102,342 $142,454 Difference $ 11 2,981 $ 36,320 $ 34,500 $ 34,665 $ 149,458 $ 32,746 Percenta e 54.8% 85.5% 86.2% 86.2% 40.6% 81.3%

Baseline $ 100,446 $ 11 5,100 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Actual Costs $ 97,231 $ 83,892 $79,066.56 $109,520.92 $ 60,628 $ 52,853 Difference $ 3,215 $ 31,208 $ 20,933 $ (19,521) $ 29,372 $ 37,147 Percenta e 96.8% 72.9% 79.1% 121.7% 67.4% 58.7%

5

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,000 $ 17,630 Actual Costs $ 29,645.49 $29,927.68 Difference $ 60,355 $ 60,072 Percenta e 32.9% 33.3%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site for Task Order #26, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026.

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

L+D +02& ~ 3~ Jbll ~ 4 G>0Iblali9A gl ~lggg lclaiards al 11=18 Jgse~A M.~afley Nb1Gl8af 12IaAI Obie lg Oam ~ail1Jf8 LTDT026-1a 06-Apr-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure LTD T026-2 23-Sep-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Beaver Valley NPP Due to Dam Failure L+D +02& 3 2~ GGI ~4 G>JallJaliQA GI ~IGGd lclaiards al 11:10 MGAliGellG aAd 1'2fai~ie lslaAd 1'>11212 Siles LTDT026-3a 13-Aug-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Monticello and Prairie Island NPP Sites L+D +02&-4 OQ Oei:; 14 E;1,al1JaliGA GI ~l9Gd lcla~ards al 11=18 ,A,fkaAsas l'>l1JGl0a~ GA8 t>Jl212 Sile LTDT026-4b 29-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Arkansas Nuclear One NPP Site L+D +02& 5 Hi Qei:; 14 E;>,,al1Jali0A el ~leed lcla;iards al ll=le Gelt,imeia 1111212 Sile LTDTA26-5a 14-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Columbia NPP Site 6

The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites for this reporting period.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/ NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 $ - YES MF3038 Farley 2 $ - YES MF3039 Columbia $ 17,960.02 YES MF3041 ANO1 $ 5,728.47 YES MF3042 ANO2 $ 5,728.47 YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 $ 170.42 YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 $ 170.42 YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 YES MF3995 Three Mile Island 1 YES MF3696 Monticello $ 84.95 YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 $ 42.47 YES MF3698 Prairie Island 2 $ 42.47 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 29,927.68 PERIOD 7

LTD 1026-1 Farley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 8

Table LTD -TO26-1.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-1 Farley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Delivery Team: Omaha and Mobile Districts Project Manager

• 1(b)(6) ICENWO-PM-S Technical Manage CESAM-EN-HH Project Costs: $277,309 P2 447176 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Revised LTD issued 6 April 2015 Activity

1. la I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Accomplished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes I Significant Issues Perform al (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) None. None. Work is complete.

Activity

1. 1b I Develop Prelimnary Hydrographs and TLR Activities Accomplished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Develop time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including Excel spreadsheets, at various locations in the vicinity of the Farley NPP site. Two Submissions: None. None. Work is complete.

Preliminary Draft and Pre-Final. The (b)(7)(E). (b)(7)(F)

Ac;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Accomplished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next Reoorting Period Notes I Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None. None. Work is complete.

meetings.

1. 3 I

Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Accomplished this andTLR Rennrtina Period Activities Planned for Next Rennrtina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Additional Information to be included at the request of Southern Company: *

(b)(7)(E). (b)(7)(F)

11) Flow nyarogr"'I'"" ,v, '"" ..,omplete model None. None. Work is complete.

run. 2) Velocity hydrographs for the complete model run. 3) Spatial coordinates and projection for each cross section. 4) All cross section station and elevation points. 5) Left and right bank stations. 6) Manning's "n" values or roughness coefficients for the left overbank, channel and right overbank at each cross section.

1. 4 I

Activity Participate in Presentation of Results Meetinas Activities Accomplished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 9

Table LTD T026-1.2. LTD 26-1 Farley

• Travel ComDteted This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Actlvtty: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coord inated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next reporting period I I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. Cunilatlve Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-1 Farley, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1a $ 149,682.20 $ 130,871.20 87.43%

1b PMP/PMF $ 52,369.92 $ 36,942.43 70.54%

2 $ 21,376.04 $ 19,465.04 91.06%

3 $ 29,255.44 $ 16,112.04 55.07%

4 $ 26,455.72 $ . 0.00%

TOTAL $ 279,139.32 $ . $ 203,390.71 72.86%

10

LTD T026-2 Beaver Valley 11

Table LTD -TO26-2.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Delivery Team: Omaha and Pittsburoh Districts Project Managers -l1h,1~, 1 CENWO-PM*Sl(b)(6) ICELRP-PM-PM Technical Lead i (b)(6) I CELRP-EC-DH Project Costs: :i,'lou,<110 i-.: 448945 LID issued 23 Sep 2014 Ac:;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Evaluate PMP and PMF for the Beaver Valley NPP site as well as the (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F}

1ueve,u11 11yurograpns oasea on the site-None None Work is complete.

specific PMP developed by the NRC's licensee, FENOC. Existing USAGE hydrologic and hydraulic models Vlill be used to determine the PMF resulting from the Licensee's site-specific PMP.

Activity I Develop Preliminary Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR P.eoortina Period Reoortina Period l Assess t~!!l (7)(E), (b)(7)(F) oocument the anlyses in a prelirrinary draft and ore-final TLR and hydroaraohs.\

None None Work is complete.

(bX7)(E). (bX7)(F)

Ac::;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next P.eoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None None Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate.

Calculation packages, including input and output files from computer Finalize project files. Work is complete.

modeling runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity IParticipate in Presentation Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoorti na Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None No action required.

Presentation of Results Meetings 12

Table LTD T026-2.2. LTD 26-2 Beaver Valley* Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period I

Related Actlvtty: Purpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period INone I I I I I I Planned next reporting period INone I I I I I I Table LTD TO26-1 .3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - TLD T026-1 Beaver Vally, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget(%)

1a $ 259,701.20 $170.94 $ 263,982.10 101.65%

1b PMP/PMF $ 66,074.00 $ 62,121.31 94.02%

2 $ 55,117.00 $ 45,437.08 82.44%

3 $ 35,523.00 $169.89 $ 40,773.62 114.78%

4 $ 34,061.00 $ -

TOTAL $ 450,476.20 $ 340.83 $ 412,314.11 91.53%

13

LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island 14

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs

""'CEP,..,, °'[ ~

Project Managers - (b)(6)

Technical Manager Project Costs: $51 ,

r ;rnd & ~j CENWO-PM-SJ b 6 CEMVP-EC-H rr*

for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 k EMVP-PM-A LTD issued 31 July 2014 I

Activity Develop PMP/PMF for Prairie Island Activities Acco"l)lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1a NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period (bX7)(E). (bX7)(F)

Addinonal information, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, \\ill be provided: I None None Work is complete (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

I l'IO nyorograpns are neeoeo tor tnese cross sections.

Activity

1. lb I Develop PMF Stage Hydrographs Monticello NPP Activities Acco"l)lished this Reportng Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Develop a new HMS model of the watershed in developing the PMP for the Monticello NPP site and route the resulting runoff to produce the PMF. A georeferenced HEC-RAS model shall be developed in order to produce a PMF stage hydrograph at the Monticello NPP site. Additional information, at the request of the NRC's Ucensee, Xcel, \\ill be orovid<a<l* ,

None None Work is complete (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

!No hydrographs are neeoeo ,or 111ese cross sections.

15

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliwrv Team:

Project Managers '. l(b)(6)

Technical Manager f ~~n~~~:;.'jl~,mjcts CEMVP-EC*H I CEMVP-PM*A Project Costs: $514,370 Lm issued 31 July 2014 Activity I H&H Model Coll1)arison and Site* Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1c Soocific PMP ColTl>arison Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Work wiUbe complete in Comparison of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, September provided H&H models, describing any major differences between Xcel's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H&H modeling approach. Comparison of the site-specific PMPs (provided by Xcel) by describing any differences in the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution between the basin-wide PMPs and None None the basin-wide PMPs used by the USAGE to develop its hydrographs. USACE will develop hydrographs similiar to Activi ties 1A and 1B by applying the PMPs and using USACE's H&H models. The findings will be documented, coordinated, and a detailed comparison performed.

Ac:;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetings Activities Accol1l)tished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next ReDQrting Period Notes I Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate None None Work is complete Technical Review meetings.

Activity

1. 3 I Develop Final

. Hydrographs and llR Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Document findings in a Final llR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate. Calculation packages, including Repackage Iha deliverables for input and output files from computer modeling Work is complete release to licensee.

runs supporting key llR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity I Participate in Presentation of Results Activities Accol1l)tished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 Meetinas Reoortina Period Rennrtina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of None None Not required.

Results Meetings Table LTD T026-3.2. LTD 26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island

• Travel Completed Renortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next rePOrting period I I I I I I I 16

Table LTD T026-1.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - no T026-1 Monticello, NRC-HQ.25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budi:iet (%)

1A1B1C $ 410,631.20 $ 359,718.36 87.60%

2 $ 43,469.00 $ 13,540.72 31 .15%

3 $ 24,607.00 $169.89 $ 17,605.09 71.55%

4 $ 35,663 .00 TOTAL $ 514,370.20 $ 169.89 $ 390 ,864.17 75.99%

17

LTD T026-4 Arkansas Nuclear One 18

Table LTD -T026-4.1. ProJect Status for LTD T026-4 Arkansas NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project D! i i~:::fha, Little Rock and Tulsa Districts Project Manager - CENWO-PM-S; \ i CESWL-PM Technical Manager b 6 , CESWL-EC-i jt\/6\  ! CESWT-EC-HF Project Costs: $93 ,

LTD issued 29 Jan 2016 Ac:t [ Dewlap PMP/PMF Acti1.1lies Accomplished this Reporting Period Ac1i.,;1ies Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Compare H&H Models (Entergy) and Final report complete, combining report lncorportaioo of comments to be receil'ed at the Compare Site-Specific PMP. segments for all dams into single report for ITR mealing from NRC and Omaha District.

Describe any major differences re1.1ew and Comparison run of PMF for Arkansas between Entergy's H&H modeling '""*-* ,.,_ uSACE and 1/'h V71r ~. l. !'h V71r ~ 1 m

(bX7XE). (bX7J approach a~~...U.$1\CE.'.s...H&H..... ....... .......... t,am Safely team members will (F) , .modoffng 8PfX08Ch. .Describe any . 1v**--** ,ail~(ll modo anars and complete this (bX7J(E). (bX7) differences In the rainfalldepth,..........sectlon.fo1 ......... ... Complete report (F) .. Cl\il~lioii, *and*a,stnbuiion between section dealmg loundalion, the basin-wide PMPs (Entergy) and geology, etc. for 7XE),

the basin-wide PMPs (USACE).

De-clop hydrographs by applying the PMPs (Entergy) using USACE's H&H models.

Ac1h,1y [ Dewlop Preliminary AclilAlies Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,.ties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Ewluation ol the PMP and PMF for Preliminary Dralt ol the Technical Letter Report lncorportaion of comments to be recei-ed al the Milestone: Preliminary Draft TLR the ANO I completed and submitted for re\liew. ITR meeting from NRG and Omaha District. and hydrographs

• 25 September (b)(7)(E),.(~)(?L *v*vove 70 2015.

(F) moaels for ANO ri~ r basin. Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and hydrographs - 24 December (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F) 2015.

Still need to pro1.1de hydrograph data In Excel format and inunda1ion mapping.

1.-roYae nyarograpns ror 1oenu..ou locations In the LTD 26-4.

Ac::;ty [ lntemiedlate Technical Actil,ties Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,Aties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Re1.1ew Meetinas Schedule, hos1, and participate In Respond to licensee questions Identified during MIiestone: First ITA

• 27-29 Intermediate Technical Reldew the ITR meeting. October 2015.

meetings. Milestone: Second rm - lBD.

Actility [ Dewlap Final Hydrographs Acti1.1ties Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti,.ties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Dccument findings In a Final TLR Pro,Aded licensee dell-erables and responses to Finalize the TLR. Milestone: Final TLR and and hydrographs. Include additional licensee questions. hydrographs - 17 Mar 2016.

lnfom,atlon as appropriate.

Acti1.1ty IParticipate in Presentation Acti1.1lies Accomplished 1his Reporting Period Acti.,;lies Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Mee1ings Schedule, Host and Participate in TBD Presentation of Results Meetings 19

Table LTD T026-4.2. LTD 26-4 .Arkansas* Travel Camnleted This Reportlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting peri od Planned next reporting period Table LTD T026-4.3. cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026*4 Arkansas, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent age Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 476,997 $1,026.98 $ 402,337.94 84.35%

PMP/PMF $ 196,785 $ 194,247.26 98.71%

2 $ 130,846 $ 24,787.48 18.94%

3 $ 71,281 $10,429.96 $ 83,340.44 116.92%

4 $ 62,914 $ .

TOTAL $ 938,823 $ 11,456.94 $ 704,713.1 2 75.06%

20

LTD T026-5 Columbia Generating Station 21

Table LTD-T026-5.1. Project Status for LTD T026-5 Colurri>la NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deli1.1ary Team: Omaha, Seattle, and Walla Walla Districts Project Manager *1(b)(6)

Technical Manage b

CENWO-PM-S; i(b)(6)

ENWS-EN-HH*HE I, CENWS-PM-MEI Project Costs: $569,688 P2 449739 LTD issued 14 Jan 2016 ActilAty ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Dewlap PMP/PMF Notes / Significant Issues

1. 0 Reporting Period Reoorting Period Evaluation of the PMP and PMF for Held kick-off meeting in Check-in teleconference to Non-Disclosure Agreement the Columbia NPP site1 Seattle. Began analysis. relAew fai lure modes and signed and documents shared (b)(7)(E), (b)(?)(F) analysis to date. with USAGE. Assumption that lnP.w PMP/PMF stuclies for (bX7XEl, r ill not be needed.

(bX7)(F)

ActilAty Dewlop Preliminary ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroar,inhs and TlR Reoortina Period Rennrtina Period De1.1alop H&H models for the Dam failure modelina for TlR (documenting failure Milestone: Preliminary Draft TlR Columbia NPP watershed. Evaluate (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) I modes and modeling work) and hydrographs

• 19 May 2016.

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7) (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) .... ~ .s 90% complete.

• address remainina Ic::r. Milestone: Pre-Final TlR and (F) ra ydrographs and other staff nncj* '~M ,Ml hydrographs

• TBD.

\UJ\f }\CJ, \U/\l)(F) results are complete. lLR (documenting failure modes 1ano aoaress siart positions and modeling work)

• most torl(b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

ISG staff positions ha\ been fplh, fort 1-'rovide hydrograpns tor provioea

\OJlf }\I:}, \0/\1 )(F)

I locations in the LTD.

ActilAty Intermediate Technical ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 2 RelAew Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, host, and participate in Milestone: First ITR

• 08 Jun Intermediate Technical RelAew 2016.

meetings. Milestone: Second ITR

• TBD.

ActilAty Dewlap Final Hydrographs ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 3 and lLR Reoorting Period Reoortina Period Document data and analysis, n/a n/a Milestone: Final TlR and including the hydrographs, in a Final hydrographs - TBD.

lLR. Package will include the calculation packages, including input and output files from the computer modeling runs supporting the key TlR conclusions.

ActilAty Participate in Presentation ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reporting Period Reporting Period Schedule, Host and Participate in n/a n/a n/a Presentation of Results Meetings 22

Table LTD T026-5.2. LTD 26-5 Colunilla

• Travel Co11111lated This Renortlna Period & Planned for Next Rel>Ortlna Period Related ActhAty: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated w/ NAC Completed this reporting period

~

Kickoff Meeting (NAC, USACE, Actility #2 Seattle, WA 19-Jan-16 21 -Jan-16 $623 Yes USBA)

Planned next reporting period Table LTDT026-5.3. Cumulatlw Monthly Expense

• TLDTO26* 5 Columbia, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 266,693 $15,286.80 $ 98,449.00 36.91 %

1 PMP/PMF $ 113,966 $169.89 $ 49,190.43 43.16%

2 $ 54,733 $ 12,133.46 22.17%

3 $ 44,088 $2,503.33 $ -

4 $ 52,169 $ -

TOTAL $ 531,649 $ 17,960.02 $ 159,772.89 30.05%

The costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation are included in the table above and the sum total amount is recorded in Table 2 Financial Detail Report, as Other Direct Costs, Subcontractor Consultant Cost.

23

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 (P2#: 455162)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS March 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective The object of the agreement, Review of Recommendation 2. 1 Flood Re-evaluations as Part of 50.54(f) Response, is for the USAGE to assist the NRC staff in reviewing certain flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) in the FHRRs provided by NRC licensees in response to the 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012, Recommendation 2. 1:

Flooding. This work effort will support the NRC with their Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR.

NRC Project Manager Brad HaNey NRC/ NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USACE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S (b}(6) 1616 Capitol Avenue,- u..., -e- oo Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Manager:

Primary: !(b)(6)

Program En ineer:

Primar : b 6 (b)(6)

Agreement Period of Performance August 25, 2015 through August 24, 2016 Period for this Report February 1, 2016 through March 1, 2016

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table A. Table B provides milestones and schedules for each task.

I lj'(_*;r*~~:;:J~-~~;~.~~ >\*:.~;~~,}~~(:~~;;/:~~~~:\:~.~~{;~.~;*~;;~::~:;;:,:~;~-~~~~:~-:~:*~ ~

1 ActMties Accomplishec this Actl\ities Plannec for next Task Deliverable/Milestone Description Issues/Challenges Reporting Period Reporting Period I ORIENTATION 1.a Peach Bottom Completec reliew ol the FHRR Secure the Argus One Sofware lor information pro\ided on the use on l he project. Completed external drive.

1.b Three Mile Island PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL EVALUATION 2 REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2.a Peach Bottom NRG received the relateo\

Comnl1>t0Jyslea~ 121aAI Dye IG Dam Faily~

LTDTO26-1a 06-Apr-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure LTD TO26-2 23-Sep-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Beaver Valley NPP Due to Dam Failure L+D +O:li 3 21 Gsl 14 l;iralYaliGA GI FIGGS l:la;;aizjs al Ille MGAliGellG aAS 12~ai~ie lslaAS l':>11212 Siles LTDTO26-3a 13-Aug-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Monticello and Prairie Island NPP Sites L+D +O:li 4 OQ Oes 14 l;iralYaliGA GI FIGGS l:la;;aizjs al Ille ,A ~kaAsas t,.Jyslea~ GAe l':>11212 Sile LTDTO26-4b 29-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Arkansas Nuclear One NPP Site L+D +O:li 5 Hi Des 14 l;iralYaliGA GI FIGGS l:la;;aizjs al 11:le GGIYR1l;iia f\11212 Sile LTDTA26-5a 14-Jan-16 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Columbia NPP Site LTDTA26-5b 09-Sep-16 Hydrographs and Inundation Maps in the Vicinity of the Columbia NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites for this reporting period.

7

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 $ . YES MF3038 Farley 2 $ . YES MF3039 Columbia $ . YES MF3041 ANO1 $ . YES MF3042 ANO2 $ . YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 $ . YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 $ . YES MF7430 Beave r Valley 1 $ 4,268.71 YES MF7431 Beave r Valley 2 $ 4,268.71 YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 YES MF3995 Three Mile Isla nd 1 YES MF3696 Monticello $ . YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 $ . YES MF3698 Prai rie Island 2 $ . YES TM3023 Generic - AREVA $ 6,210.24 NO TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 14,747.66 PERIOD 8

LTD 1026-1 Farley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 9

Table LTD -TO26-1.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-1 Farley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Deliverv Team: Onaha and Mobile Districts Project Manager - 1(b)(6) ICENWO-PM-S Technical Manage1 CESAM-EN-HH Project Costs: $277,309 P2 447176 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Revised LTD issued 6 April 2015 Activity I Activities Acco1r4>1ished this Activities Planned for Next Develop PMP/PMF Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1a Reoortino Period Reoortina Period Perform al (bX7XE). (bX7XF) None. None. Work is complete.

Activity I Develop Preliminary Activities Acco1r4>lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1b Hydrooraphs and TLR Reoorting Period Reporting Period Develop time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including Excel spreadsheets, at various locations in the vicinity of the Farley NPP site. Two Submissions: None. None. Work is complete.

Preliminary Draft and Pre-Final. The (b)(7)(E) (b)(7)(F)

Activity

1. 2 I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None. None. Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco1r4>lished this Rennrtina Period Activities Planned for Next Rennrtina Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Additional Information to be included at the r=uest of Southern Comnanv: *

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

11) l"IOW nyarograpns ror tne complete model None. None. Work is complete.

run. 2) Velocity hydrographs for the complete model run. 3) Spatial coordinates and projection for each cross section. 4) All cross section station and elevation points. 5) Left and right bank stations. 6) Manning's "n" values or roughness coefficients for the left overbank, channel and right overbank at each cross section.

1. 4 I

Activity Participate in Presentation of Results Meetinas Activities Acco1r4>lished this Reoortino Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 10

Table LTD TO26-1.2. LTD 26-1 Farley

• Travel Completed This Reporting Pe riod & Planned for Next ReDOrtlng Period Related Activtty: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w/ NRC COIT1)1eted this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next reporting period I I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. Cun-.ilatlve MonthlyExpense-TLD T026-1 Farley, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Q026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1a $ 149,682.20 $ 130,871.20 87.43%

1b PMP/PMF $ 52,369.92 $ 36,942.43 70.54%

2 $ 21,376.04 $ 19,465.04 91.06%

3 $ 29,255.44 $ 16,112.04 55.07%

4 $ 26,455.72 $ . 0.00%

TOTAL $ 279,139.32 $ . $ 203,390.71 72.86%

11

LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 12

Table LTD -T026-2.1. Project Status for LTD T026-2 Beaver Valley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliverv Team: Omaha a111d Pittsburgh Districts Project Managers -libl(6l I CENWO-PM-S;!1b)(6) !CELRP-PM-PM Technical Lead ~(b\{6\ ICELRP-EC-DH Project Costs: $450,476 P2 448945 Lm issued 23 Sep 2014 Ac:;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Evaluate PMP and PMF for the Beaver Valley NPP site as v.ell as the (b)(?)(E), (b)(?l/F)

IUeve,op nyorographs baseo on the site-None None Work is complete.

specific PMP developed by the NRC's licensee, FENOC. Existing USAGE hydrologic and hydraulic models will be used to determine the PMF resulting from the Licensee's site-specific PMP.

Acti.,;ty I De\181op Preliminary Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR P.eoortina Period Reoortina Period I Assess the! (7)(E), (b)(?XF) l UV\;ument ine an,yses ,n a prelirrinary draft and nr<>-"M' TI R and hydrographs.f None None Work is complete.

(bX7)(E), (bX7)(Fl Acti.,;ty I Intermediate Technical Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 2 Re-.;ew Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None None Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR =rtina Period = rtina Period Document findings In a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate.

Calculation packages, including input and output files from computer Finalize project files. Work is complete.

modeling runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final subnission.

Activity IParticipate in Presentation Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None No action required.

Presentation of Results Meetings 13

Table LTD T026-2.2. LTD 26-2 Beaver Valley* Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period I

Related Actlvhy: Purpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w / NRC Completed this rePorting period INone I I I I I I Planned next reporting period INone I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1 .3. cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-1 Beaver Vally, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Ac tivity# Pla nned Budget Period cumulative vs. Budget(%)

1a $ 259,701 .20 $8,537.41 $ 272,519.51 104.94%

1b PMP/PMF $ 66,074.00 $ 62,121 .31 94.02%

2 $ 55,117.00 $ 45,437.08 82.44%

3 $ 35,523.00 $ 40,773.62 114.78%

4 $ 34,061.00 $ .

TOTAL $ 450,476.20 $ 8,537.41 $ 420,851.52 93.42%

14

LTD TO26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 15

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Delivery Team: Omaha and St. Paul Districts Project Managers ~ CENWO-PM-S!1bX6) !CEMVP-PM-A Technical Manage CEMVP-EC-H Project Costs: $51 ,

LTD issued 31 July 2014 I

ActilAty Develop PMP/PMF for Prairie Island ActilAties Accon,:ilished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1a NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period CbX7XE). (bX7XFJ Additional mforrnatIon, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, \\ill be prolAded: I None None Work is complete (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) 1No nyorogr""' s are neeoea ,v, '"""" cross sections.

ActilAty I Develop PMF Stage Hydrographs ActilAties Accon,Jlished this ActilAties Planned far Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1b Monticello NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period Develop a new HMS model of the watershed in developing the PMP for the Monticello NPP site and route the resulting runoff to produce the PMF. A georeferenced HEC-RAS model shall be developed in order lo produce a PMF stage hydrograph at the Monticello NPP site. Additional information, at the request of the NRC's licensee,

'J(<'ol u,11 h<! n,n\Arl<><i; ,

None None Work is complete (b)(l)(E), (b)(?)(F) hydrographs are needed for these cross sections.

16

Table LTD -T0 26-3.1. Project Status for LTD T0 26-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Delivery Team: Onaha and St. Paul Districts Project Managers '. l(b)(6)

Technical Manager I CENWO-PM-S,!ib)(6)

CEMVP-EC-H ICEMVP-PM-A Project CosIs: $514,370 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Activity I H&H Model Comparison and Site- Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1c Soecific PMP ColTl>arison Reoortina Period Reoortino Period Work will be complete in Comparison of 1he NRC's licensee, Xcel, September provided H&H models, describing any major dilferences between Xcel's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H&H modeling approach. Comparison of the site-specific PMPs (provided by Xce~ by describing any dilferences in 1he rainlall deplh, duration, and distribution between 1he basin-wide PMPs and None None 1he basin-wide PMPs used by the USAGE to develop its hydrographs. USAGE will develop hydrographs simlliar to Activities 1A and 1B by applying the PMPs and using USACE's H&H models. The findings will be documented, coordinated, and a detailed comparison performed.

Intermediate Technical Review Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Ac:ty I Meetings Reoortino Period Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate None None Work is corrplete Technical Review meetings.

Activity

1. 3 I Develop Final

. Hydrographs and TLR Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate. Calculation packages, including Repackage the deliverables for input and output files from compuler modeling Work is complete release to licensee.

runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in 1he final submission.

Activity I Participate in Presentation of Results Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 4 Meetinas Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of None None Not required.

Results Meelings Table LTD T026*3.2. LTD 26-3 Monticello / Prairie llland

• Travel Completed Renortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w / NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I I I I Planned next rePOrting period I I I I I I I 17

Table LTD T026-1.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense

• no T026-1 Monticello, NRCHQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budi:iet (%)

1A1B1C $ 410,631.20 $ 359,718.36 87.60%

2 $ 43,469.00 $ 13,540.72 31.15%

3 $ 24,607.00 $ 17,605.09 71.55%

4 $ 35,663.00 TOTAL $ 514,370.20 $ - $ 390,864.17 75.99%

18

LTD T026-4 Arkansas Nuclear One (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 19

Table LTD-T026-4.1. Project Status for LTD T026-4 Arkansas NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Delivery Team: Omaha, Litlle Rock, and Tulsa Districts Project Manager ..11L\/I'.\ j CESWL-PM I CENWO-PM-st w,i~~~

Technical Manager -l 1h\l~\ I CESWL-EC-; /R) I CESWT-EC-HF Project Costs: $938,o~, r'~ ***=*

LTD issued 29 Jan 2016 Ac:t [ De"'3Iop PMP/PMF ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period ActilAties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Compare H&H Models (Entergy) and None None Work is complete.

Compare Site-Specific PMP.

Describe any major differences between Entergy's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H& H modeling approach. Describe any differences in the rainfall depth, duration, and distribution belween the basin-wide PM Ps (Entergy) and the basin-wide PMPs (USACE).

Develop hydrographs by applying the PMPs (Entergy) using USACE's H&H models.

Acth,ty [ De"'llop Preliminary ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period ActilAties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Ewluation of the PMP and PMF for None None Work is complete.

the ANO sitel I t * **--*, ue1,131op ""

'""'"'""' ,ur M N U river basin.

(b)(7)(E), (b)(?)(F)

ProlAde hydrographs for identified locations In the LTD 26-4.

Ac::;ty I lntemiedlate Technical ActilAties Accomplished th,s Reporting Period Acti,Aties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues RelAew Meetinos Schedule, host, and participate In None None Work Is complete.

Intermediate Technical Reldew meetings.

Actility [ De\elop Final Hydrographs ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period ActilAties Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Document findings In a Final TLR Pr01,ded responses to licensee requests for None Work is complete.

and hydrographs. Include additional additional information.

lnfom,atlon as appropriate.

Actility IParticipate in Presentation ActilAties Accomplished this Reporting Period Actilities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Schedule, Host and Participate in TBD Presentation of Results Meetings 20

Table LTD T026-4.2. LTD 26-4 .Arkansas* Travel Comnleted This ReDortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting period Planned next reporting period Table LTD T026-4.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense

• TLD T026-4 Arkansas, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent age Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%)

1 $ 476,997 $ 403,818.36 84.66%

PMP/PMF $ 196,785 $ 194,247.26 98.71%

2 $ 130,846 $ 24,787.48 18.94%

3 $ 71,281 $ 92,957.91 130.41 %

4 $ 62,914 $ .

TOTAL $ 938,823 $ . $ 715,811 .01 76.25%

21

LTD T026-5 Columbia Generating Station 22

Table LTD -T026-5.1. Project Status for LTD T026-5 Coluni>la NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Deliwry Team: Omaha, Seattle, and Walla Walla Districts Project Manager *I(b)(6)

Technical Manage b CENWO-PM-S; !(b)(6)

ENWS-EN-HH-HE F ENWS-PM-MEI Project Costs: $569,688 P2 449739 LTD issued 14 Jan 2016 ActilAty ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Dewlop PMP/PMF Notes I Significant Issues

1. 0 Reporting Period Reporting Period Evaluation of the PMP and PMF for None None Work is complete.

ActilAty Dewlop Preliminary ActilAties Accomplished this ActilAties Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Develop H&H models for the Prepared Preliminary Draft None Milestone: Preliminary Draft TLR Columbia NPP watershed. Evaluate TLR. and hydrographs

• 19 May 2016.

(bX7J(E), (bX7J(F) Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and hydrographs

• 06 Jun 2016.

Provide hydrographs for prm11aea locations in the LTD.

ActilAty Intermediate Technical ActilAties Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 2 RelAew Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, host, and participate in ITR meeting. None Milestone: First ITR

• 09 Jun Intermediate Technical RelAew 2016.

meetings. Milestone: Second ITR

• TBD.

ActilAty Develop Final Hydrographs ActilAties Accomplished this Acti1.1ties Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Document data and analysis, Finalized draft final TLR. Finalize final TlR. Milestone: Final TLR and including the hydrographs, in a Final hydrographs - 15 Oct 2016.

TLR. Package will include the calculation packages, including input and output files from the computer modeling runs supporting the key TlR conclusions.

ActilAty Participate in Presentation ActilAties Accomplished this Acti1.1ties Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetings Reporting Period Reporting Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None None Presentation of Results Meetings Table LTD T026-5.2. LTD 26-5 Colurmla

• Travel ConmlAted Thia Reoortlna Period & Planned for Next Re-rtlna Period Related Activity: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting peri od Planned next reporting period 23

Table LTDT026-5.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense -TLDT026-5 Columbia, NRC-~25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Reporting Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%}

1 $ 266,693 $ 184,825.62 69.30%

1 PMP/PMF $ 113,966 $6,210.24 $ 67,544.25 59.27%

2 $ 54,733 $ 22,858.58 41 .76 %

3 $ 44,088 $ 5,607.79 4 $ 52,169 $ .

TOTAL $ 531,649 $ 6,210.24 $ 280,836.24 52.82%

The costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation are included in the table above and the sum total amount is recorded in Table 2 Financial Detail Report, as Other Direct Costs, Subcontractor Consultant Cost.

24

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 (P2#: 455162)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS November 20, 2016 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective The object of the agreement, Review of Recommendation 2. 1 Flood Re-evaluations as Part of 50.54(f) Response, is for the USAGE to assist the NRC staff in reviewing certain flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) in the FHRRs provided by NRC licensees in response to the 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012, Recommendation 2. 1:

Flooding. This work effort will support the NRC with their Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR.

NRC Project Manager Brad HaNey NRC/ NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USACE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S d .....(b_)(6_) _ .

1616 Capitol Avenue, Suite 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Mana er:

Primar : (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Program En ineer:

Primar : (b 6 (b)(6)

Agreement Period of Performance August 25, 2015 through August 24, 2017 Period for this Report September 21, 2016 through November 01 , 2016

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table A. Table B provides milestones and schedules for each task.

I lj'(_*;r*~~:;:J~-~~;~.~~Ii\*:.~;~~-~~~(:;.~;;/:~~~~:\:~ : .~~{;~.~=;*~:;~: ~.:~~.:~;}:~~t:~-~~:*~ ~

ActMies Accomplishec this Actl\ities Plannec for next Task Deli,..,,rable/Milestone Description Issues/ Challenges Reporting Period Reporting Period 1 ORIENTATION 1.a Peach Bottom Secure the Argus One Sofware lor use on the project. Completed 1.b Three Mile Island PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL EVALUATION 2 REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2.a Peach Bottom 2.b Three Mile Island FINAL TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 3

AND TECHNICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT 3.a Peach Bottom 3.b Three Mile Island Table B: Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Technical Orientation I Kick-Off Meeting Peach Bottom 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 Three Mile Island 10-Sep-15 10-Sep-15 2 Preliminary TER & RA IS Peach Bottom 30 Nov 15 Revised 1 Dec 15 Revised 1-Mar-16 Three Mile Island early Feb 16 3 Final TER Peach Bottom 24-Aug-16 9-Sep-16 Three Mile Island 2

3. Travel Table C provides information on completed and planned travel for this task order. No travel expenditures have been incurred in this reporting period and none are projected for the next reporting period.

Related Task: Purpose

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The USAGE team is in the process of acquiring the required software to evaluate the submittals of the licensee for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island. The software is in the process of acquisition and additional approvals are required for installation.

Resolution 1: The USAGE has received and installed the required software to review the data submitted by the licensee. CLOSED.

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this agreement. Table 2 provides the amount of funds expended during the period, current fiscal year, and the total cumulative year to date.

3

Table 1. Financial Status Report

• Sunmary NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulatiw Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Sep $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77 3.5% $ 226,731.51 $ 226,731.51 Oct $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,525.87 $ 11,755.64 5.0% $ 223,205.64 $ 223,205.64 Nov $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961 .28 $ 8,492.55 $ 20,248.19 8.6% $ 214,713.09 $ 214,713.09 Dec $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 12,113.91 $ 32,362.10 13.8% $ 202,599.18 $ 202,599.18 Balance of Total Costs Cumulatiw Precent Balance of 2016 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($} to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining($)

($)

Jan $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,107.59 $ 35,469.69 15.1% $ 199,491 .59 $ 199,491.59 Feb $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 9,875.77 $ 45,345.46 19.3% $ 189,615.82 $ 189,615.82 Mar $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 7,026.04 $ 52,371 .50 22.3% $ 182,589.78 $ 182,589.78 Apr $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 2,135.47 $ 54,506.97 23.2% $ 180,454.31 $ 180,454.31 May $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 4,474.56 $ 58,981 .53 25.1% $ 175,979.75 $ 175,979.75 June $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 3,826.47 $ 62,808.00 26.7% $ 172,153.28 $ 172,153.28 Jul $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 1,082.56 $ 63,890.56 27.2% $ 171,07072 $ 171,070.72 Aug $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 2,191.75 $ 66,082.31 28.1% $ 168,878.97 $ 168,878.97 Sep $ 234,961 .28 $ 234,961.28 $ 1,488.55 $ 67,570.86 28.8% $ 167,390.42 $ 167,390.42 Oct $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961 .28 $ 1,092.68 $ 68,663.54 29.2% $ 166,297.74 $ 166,297.74 4

Table 2. Flnanclal Detail Report* NRc-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Fiscal Year to Current Month Tota l to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 8 232 250 (2) Technical 0 281 325 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 8 513 575

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 668.30 $ 38,206.19 $ 43,209.10 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 334. 16 $ 15,804.00 $ 18,355.48 SUB-TOTAL $ 1,002.46 $ 54,010.19 $ 61,564.58 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 (2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL $ - $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 G & A Costs $ 90.22 $ 4,123.58 $ 4,798.96 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 1,092.68 $ 60,433.77 $ 68,663.54

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3.1 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for all of the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 9. The monthly planned (budget) cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table. Table 3.x will detail the monthly expenditures for each individual nuclear power plant site and the individual nuclear power plant and the associated TAC

1. for license fee recovery.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $234,961 .28 Funds Obligated to date: $234,961.28 Period of Performance: 25 Aug 2015 to 24 Aug 2017 5

Table 3.1. Cumulative Monthlv Exoense Forecast- NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Percentage Expe nditures tor Task Expenditures Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget the Period Cumulative

(%)

1 s 19 378.00 s 1.092.68 s 18 475.06 95.34%

2 s 172.172.04 s - s 46 897.14 27.24%

3 $ 43 411 .24 $ - $ 2,885.37 6.65%

TOTAL $ 234,961 .28 $ 1,092.68 $ 68,257.57 29.05%

Table 3.2: LTD T009-2 cumulative Monthly Expense - Peach Bottom TAC MF6598 / MF6599 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budget (%}

1 $ 9,689.00 $1,092.68 $ 9,745.52 100.58%

2 $ 80,153.96 $ 31,308.17 39.06%

3 $ 18,211 .36 $ 1,718.92 9.44%

TOTAL $ 108,054.32 $ 42,772.61 39.58%

Table 3.3: LTD T009-3 Cumulative Monthly Expense

• Three Mlle Island TAC MFl 113 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative vs. Budaet (%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $ 8,729.54 90.10%

2 $ 92,018.08 $ 15,588.97 16.94%

3 $ 25,199.88 $ 1,166.45 4.63%

TOTAL $ 126,906.96 $ 25,484.96 20.08%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 9 is identified in Table 4.

Table 4: S ending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 5,961 $ 12,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 Actual Costs $ 8,230 $ 3,526 $ 8,493 $ 12,114 $ 3,108 $9,875.77 Difference $ (2,269) $ 8,474 $ 6,507 $ 2,886 $ 21,892 $ 20,124 Percenta e 138.1% 29.4% 56.6% 80.8% 12.4% 32.9%

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 12,000 Actual Costs $ 7,026 $ 2,135 $ 4,475 $3,826.47 $1 ,082.56 $ 2,192 Difference $ 22,974 $ 27,865 $ 25,525 $ 11 ,174 $ 13,917 $ 9,809 Percenta e 23.4% 7.1% 14.9% 25.5% 7.2% 18.3%

6

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Actual Costs $ 1,083 $ 1,093 Difference $ 3,917 $ 3,907 Percenta e 21.7% 21.9%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USACE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site.

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ.25-15-T-0009 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

LTDT009-3 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Peach Bottom NPP Site LTDT009-2 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Three Mile Island NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites. The costs for this reporting period are for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF6598 Peach Bottom 2 $ 546.34 YES MF6599 Peach Bottom 3 $ 546.34 YES MF1113 Three Mile Island 1 $ - YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING

$ 1,092.68 Pl=Rln[l 7

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad; Cook. Christopher: NRO MLSR Resource: Dority. Dayna: See. Kenneth; ContractsPOT Resource:

Cc:

r~~&}Ac Resoy rce;Jymer. Michael

Subject:

[External_Sender] NRC*HQ-13-1-0021: MLSRs 20 November 2015 (UNCLASSIFIED)

Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 4:57:00 PM Attachments: NRC Task Order Oct 2015 IPAC.pdf NRC-HO-13-1*0021 2015Oct Summary.pdf NRC*USACE MLSR TO1 2015NOV.odf NRC*USACE MLSR J04 201SNOV.pdf NRC*USACE MLSR J09 201SNOY pdf NRC*USACE MLSR JO26 201SNOV.pdf C lassification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE For Your Review:

The attached documents are submitted for yoLLr review in accordance with the IAA NRC-HQ-13-1-03-002 1. Please provide feedback at your convenience.

NOTE 1: The Bill No. 28204245 has several line items for Task Order 0 I (Fort Calhoun / Cooper N PP). The sum of the three lines items, # 1 - $1,618.38; #2 - $5,997.23; and #3 - $707.66, total of$8,323.27 for Task Order OJ.

Also, please note that with the organizational change for !(b)(6) I from the Omaha District office to the Northwestern Division office, that Departmental Overhead Costs and General and Administrative Overhead Costs are not present for his labor. If you have any questions please contact J(b)(6) I NOTE 2: The MLSRs are for work activity for multiple fiscal years. Therefore, please note that the information is presented for fiscal year 2016 and the cumulative for fiscal years 2014, 2015, and 2016.

I. IPAC: Billing information by line item (task orders) for !AA. Summary information by task order, current month, billed to date and authorized ceiling (NRC-HQ- 13-1-03-0021 _ 20 I 5Oct_Summary and NRC Task Order_Oct_2015_1PAC). Note: This reporting period includes expenditures for TO #01 , #09, and #26. TO #04 is provided as a courtesy copy.

2. MLSR NRC-HQ-13-1-0021 TO#0 I: Task order #0 I summary information (NRC-USACE_ MLSR_TO0 1_2015NOV). This summary report includes activities for Task 4 Presentation of Results in support of the October fact-finding exchange with ACRS.

3. MLSR NRC-HQ 14-T-0004: Task order #04 summary information (NRC-USACE_ MLSR_TO4_2015NOV). HIGHLIGHT: No Change from previous month.

4. MLSR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026: Task order #26 summary information (NRC-USACE_MLSR_TO26_2015NOV). Attachments provided for Farley, Beaver Valley, Monticello / Prairie Island NPP, Arkansas ANO, and Columbia NPP sites.

5. MLSR NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009: Task order #09 summary information (NRC-USACE_ MLSR_ TO9_ 20 I SNOV).

Please let me know ifI can be of further assistance.

~ects Branch USACE, Northwestern Division, Omaha District

1616 Capitol Avenue, CENWO-PM-S Omaha, E 681 02 Desk: l(b)(6)

Ce ll: ,,___ _ __.__ _ _ _ __

Email: ...

((b_J(_

6J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __,

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE

Page 1 of 2 CIC #: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS VOUCHER FOR TRANSFERS Accounts Of Billed Date: 02-Nov-2015 BETWEEN APPROPRIATIONS AND/OR FUNDS (AR 37-1)

• 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009

• 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE

• MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28204245 NO CHECK DRAWN 1497976

• 02-Nov-2015 Partial# 27 05-0ct-2015 Thru 02-Nov-201 5 ,l * .,. "' JI .. . . .. .. ..... .. ,, . . ....

Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Billed Accounting Classification Billing Accounting Classification 031 NA X 0200.0000 2013 00 0000 00000000000 00000 31000001 $11 ,849.14 096 NA X 3122.0000 G6 08 2417 895 0WDNRC 96252 $121,370.06 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 00 0000 NA 00000 31000001 $109,520.92 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $30,690.76 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $10,448.63 00005 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $68,381.53 Subtotal: $109,520.92 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $1 ,618.38 Subtotal : $1 ,618.38 2 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $1 ,864.73 2 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $476.16 2 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $3,656.34 Subtotal: $5,997.23 3 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $220.06 3 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $56.09 3 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $431 .51 Subtotal: $707.66 6 INHOUSE - LABOR DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD COSTS $1 ,095.90 6 INHOUSE - LABOR GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD COSTS $281 .06 6 INHOUSE - LABOR LABOR $2,148.91 Subtotal : $3,525.87 Total Billed Amount: $121 ,370.06 Less Amount Paid Via IPAC: $121 ,370.06 Payment Due Date: 02-Dec-2015 Pay This Amount: $0.00 DA Form 4445-R Approved by T reasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.550 v2.1.4

Page 2 of 2 CIC #: 99NAF NON-APPROPRIATED FUNDS Billed Date: 02-Nov-2015 8736 00008736 Customer Order Number:NRC-HO-13I030021 Mission Assignment No: USAGE FINANCE CENTER 31X200.320 ALC 31000001 USAGE FINANCE CENTER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 D.O. Voucher No. BU. Voucher No. Bill No. Paid By Check No. Collection Vou. No.

28204245 NO CHECK DRAWN 1497976 02-Nov-2015 Partial# 27 05-0ct-2015 Thru 02-Nov-2015 Billed Office (Mail To): Billing Office (Send Remittance To):

US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION USAGE FINANCE CENTER G6 CONTRACT ADMIN BR P 902 USAGE FINANCE CENTER CONTRACTING OFFICER OMAHA DISTRICT G6 WASHINGTON DC 20555 5722 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38054-5005 Line Item Moa Description Eaid No Amount Funds Authorized: $4,270,251 .28 CERTIFICATE OF OFFICE BILLED Total Billed Amount: $2,681 ,445.07 I certify that the above articles were received and accepted or the services performed as stated and Prev Billed Amount: $2,560,075.01 should be charged to the appropriation(s) and/or fund(s) as indicated above, or that the advance payment requested is approved and should be paid as indicated.

Current Billed Amount: $121,370.06 Total Flux Billed: $0.00 Prev Flux Billed: $0.00 Date: 02-Nov-2015 ljb)(6)

Current Flux Billed: $0.00 Authorized Administrative or Certifying Officer DA Form 4445-R Approved by Treasury For Use In Lieu of SF 1080 cobil_ipac.550 v2.1.4

NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021

SUMMARY

INFORMATION BY TASK ORDER 20 November 2015 Submittal NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 031 NA X 0200.0000 2013 $ 8,323.27 207,821.14 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ 763 867.52 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 031 NA X 0200.0000 2015 $ 3,525.87 $ 11 ,755.64 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 031 NA X 0200.0000 2014 $ 109,520.92 $1,698,000.77 IPAC Total,~ - - - - - - - - -.i---..- $ _ 12_1-/,,;;3'--

7-'-

0 .....;..

0~ 6 ,-.

2 ...;;..

68 .;;...1""'4_4....;.

5....;;.

.o....

7 Authorized l111teragency Agreement No. Line Item Number Billed to Date Ceilina NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO#01 Line 2 $ 207,821.14 $ 247,686.00 NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Line4 $ 763,867.52 $ 884,568.00 NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Line 5 $1,698,000.77 $2,903,036.00 NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Line6 $ 11 ,755.64 $ 234,961.28 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 $2,681,445.07 $4,270,251.28 Page 1

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 (P2#: 405160)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS November 20, 2015 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status 1.1. Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that may affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants.

1.2. NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvev@NRC.GOV 1.3. USACE Information Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S (b)(6) 1616 Capitol Avenue, uIte 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 Program Manager:

Primary: (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Program En in r:

Primar : (b)(6)

(b)(6) 1.4. Agreement Period of Performance September 30, 2013 through September 29, 2017 1.5. Period for this Report October 5, 2015 through November 2, 2015

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table 1. Table 2 provides milestones and schedules for each task.

Table 1. Information on Individual Tasks for NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO #01 Task Activities Accomplished Activities Planned for Notes / Significant Task Description

1. this Reportinq Period Next Reportinq Period Issues Development of Hydrographs related to darns upstream of 1 Completed NA Fort Calhoun and Cooper Nuclear Plants Meeting Dates:

17 Dec 13 Licensees' 18 Intermediate Technical 2 Dec 13 G2G NA Review Meetings 23-24 Jan 14 G2G Technical Reporting 3 Completed NA Requirements The ACAS may share Confirmation on the the presentation Conducted the face-to- sharing of the material with the full Presentation of results and 4 face fact-finding session documentation from the committee members updates.

with the ACAS and NRC. October fact-finding provided no hard copies session and the TI.A. are removed from the meeting facility.

2

Table 2. Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 TO #01 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Development of Hydrographs (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) Nov-13 Nov-13 Nov-13 Nov-13 Nov-13 Nov- 13 Dec-13 Dec- 13 Dec-13 Dec-13 Dec-13 Dec -13 2 Intermediate Technical Review Meetings Government and Licensee Meetinq Dec-13 Dec-13 Government to Government Meeting Nov-13 Nov-13 3 Technical Letter Reporting Requirements Fort Calhoun Nuclear Power Plant and Cooper Jan-14 Mar-14 Nuclear Power Plant 4 NRG HQ Presentation of Results / Updates Briefing for Licensees to address questions on May-14 May -14 the Technical Letter Reoort Fact-finding session with NRG, AGRS 21-22 Oct 15 21-22 Oct 15

3. Travel No travel was completed during this reporting period, and no travel is planned for the next reporting period.

Table 3. Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Start Travel I Coordinated

~=~~t=9d I Purpose I Location I Travelers I Date I End Date I Cost w/ NRC Completed this reporting period None Planned next reporting period None

4. Significant Issues No Issues at this time.

3

5. Financial Status Table 4 contains a summary of the financial status of the TO 01 to this agreement and Table 5 provides the amount of funds expended during the period and the total cumulative year to date.

The TAC Number for the funds expended is TM3023, NTTF R2.1 Flooding Project Management. Note that the IPAC DA Form 4445-R illustrates the expenditures for Task Order fvlonth "Tiilitl. ...

Total Award Funds Total Costs 01 in three separate Line Items: 1 - $1,618.38; 2 - $5,997.23; and 3 - $707.66 for a total of

$8,323.27.

Cumulative Precent Expended Balance of Obligated 10411 Balance of Funds Required Obligated to Incurred this Costs to Funds Year Amount($) (cum for Completion Date($) Report($) Date ($) Remaining costs/obi) ($)

($)

Jul-14 247,686.00 247,686.00 3,008.88 197,503.67 79.7% 50,182.33 $50,182.33 May-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 212.86 197,716.53 79.8% 49,969.47 $49,969.47 Jun-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 1,119.98 198,836.51 80.3% 48,849.49 $48,849.49 Jul-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 278.73 199,1 15.24 80.4% 48,570.76 $48,570.76 Aug-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 35.48 199,150.72 80.4% 48,535.28 $48,535.28 Sep-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 347.15 199,497.87 80.5% 48,188.13 $48,188.13 Oct-15 247,686.00 247,686.00 8,323.27 207,821.14 83.9% 39,864.86 $39,864.86 4

Table 5. Financial Detail Report* Summary for NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021; TO 01 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 32 32 319 (2) Technical 39 39 1465 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 71 71 1784

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 5,706.23 $ 5,706.23 $ 128,857.09 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 2,084.79 $ 2,084.79 $ 59,920.34 SUB-TOTAL $ 7,791.02 $ 7,791 .02 $ 188,777.43 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ - $ -

(2) Material and Services Cost $ - $ - $ -

(3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL G & A Costs $ 532.25 $ 532.25 $ 19,043.71 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 8,323.27 $ 8,323.27 $ 207,821.14

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 6 provides the monthly expenditures for the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 1. The planned (budget) expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $247,686 Funds Obligated to date: $247,686 Period of Performance: 30 Sep 2013 to 31 Mar 2016 5

Table 6. Monthly Exoense Forecast* NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 TO #01 TM3023 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1 $ 117 984.00 $ - $ 106 666.74 90.41%

2 $ 25 920.00 $ - $ 4180.50 16.13%

3 $ 89 796.00 $ - $ 84 233.10 93.80%

4 $ 13,986.00 $ 8,323.27 $ 12,740.80 91 .10%

TOTAL $ 247,686.00 $ 8,323.27 $ 207,821.14 83.91%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 1 is identified in Table 7. This plan is updated based on projected Task #4 activity during fiscal year 2015 and close out in fiscal year 2016. The completion date is scheduled to be in the future at the discretion of the NRC.

Baseline $51,945.50 $ 64,905.50 $ 38,943.94 $24,339.56 $ 19,479.56 $ 12,986.38 $ 13,984.00 Actual Costs $ 33,895.64 $48,813.69 $ 32,757.88 $ 20,794.07 $ 16,949.56 $ 14,764.25 $ 13,958.70 Difference $ 18,049.86 $ 16,091.81 $ 6,186.06 $ 3,545.49 $ 2,530.00 $ (1,777.87) $ 25.30 Percenta e 65% 75% 84% 85% 87% 114% 100%

Baseline $ 6,495.19 $ 4,868.79 $ 3,100.00 $241,048.42 Actual Costs $ 9,248.20 $ 3,312.80 $ 3,008.88 $ 197,503.67 Difference $ (2,753.01) $ 1,555.99 $ 91.12 $ 43,544.75 Percenta e 142% 68% 97% 82%

Baseline $ 241,048.42 Actual Costs $ 197,503.67 Difference $ 43,544.75 Percenta e 82%

Baseline $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 3,500.00 $247,048.42 Actual Costs $ 212.56 $ 1,119.98 $ 278.73 $ 35.48 $ 347.15 $ 8,323.27 $207,821.14 Difference $ 287.44 $ (619.98) $ 221.27 $ 464.52 $ 152.85 $ (4,823.27) $ 39,227.28 Percenta e 43% 224% 56% 7% 69% 238% 84%

Baseline $ 500.00 $ 137 .58 $247,686.00 Actual Costs $ 207,821.44 Difference $ 39,864.56 Percenta e 84%

6

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-20-14-T-0004 (P2#: 443107)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS November 20, 2015 submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the development of technical and cost proposals for the implementation of individual task orders. The objective of the individual task orders will be the determination of the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that may affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants.

NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USAGE Information 1.1.1. Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S ( (b)(6) 1616 Capitol Avenue, uI e 000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 1.1.2. Program Manager Primary: ....

l(b-)(6_) _ _ __

1.1.3. Program Engineer Primary: (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Agreement Period of Performance September 30, 2013 through September 29, 2017 Period for this Report October 5, 2015 through November 2, 2015

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table 1. Table 2 provides milestones and schedules for each task.

Table 1. Information on lndlvldual Tasks for NRC-HQ-20-14-T--0004 within NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Task# Task Description Notes / Significant Issues Reporting Period Reoorting Period Familiarization of JLD-ISG-2013-01 and Licensee 1

Request and Submission of Information Activity is complete. j Farley (b)(7)(E), (b){7)(F) NA Activity is complete. I (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

Columbia (b)(7)(E), \D)lfJ\r-) NA Activity is complete. \

Arkansas \DJ\/ )(t:.), (b)(7)(F) NA Activity for preparation of Peach Bottom Licensee Peach Bottom I iMI / Technical Review and NA recalled their Request for Susquehanna Scoping meetings is Information.

complete.

Activity is complete. I Beaver Valley (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) NA Activity is complete. 1 Monticello / Prairie Island (b)(7)(E), (b)(?)(F) NA Table 1. Information on Individual Tasks for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 within NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 2 Technical Review Meetings Green Shading = Complete Technical Review Mtg at Farley Mobile District 18-19 March.

Technical Review Mtg at Columbia Seattle District 26-27 March.

Technical Review Mtg at Little Arkansas Rock District 4-5 June.

Technical Review Mtg at Baltimore District 4-5 March.

Peach Bottom I iMI /

Omaha District participated Susquehanna in the Board of Consultants meeting on 29-30 July.

Technical Review Mtg at Beaver Valley Pittsburgh District 5-6 May.

Technical Review Mtg at St.

Monticello / Prairie Island Paul District 23-24 June.

2

Table 1. Information on Individual Tasks for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-ooo4 within NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 3 Scoping Meetings Green Shading = Co"l)lete Scoping Meeting at Mobile Farley District 29-30 Aoril 14.

Scoping Meeting at Seattle Columbia District 9-10 June 14.

Scoping Meeting at Little Arkansas Rock District 15-16 June 14.

Scoping Meeting at Baltimore Meeting has been cancelled.

District 24 April. Additional USAGE attendance as an Peach Bottom / TMI /

Scoping Meeting on 17 June observer for the March 24, Susquehanna 14 to include FERG and 2015 Board of Consultants Exelon. meetinQ.

Scoping Meeting at Beaver Valley Pittsburgh District 17-18 June 14.

Scoping Meeting at St. Paul Monticello / Prairie Island District 4-5 Aug.

Table 1. Information on lndlvldual Tasks for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-ooo4 within NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 4 Proposal Development Green Shading = Co"l)lete NRC concurrence received.

Farley Proposal finalized.

July 31 , 2014 Proposal Finalized. Non-Disclosure Agreement with NRC concurrence received.

Columbia BC Hydro open item on FOIA Dec 15, 2014 process remains. IAA with BurRec signed.

NRG concurrence received.

Arkansas Proposal finalized.

Dec 9, 2014 The work for the Peach Screening Report for Bottom and TMI projects are Peach Bottom / TMI / Susquehanna and the Peach complete. The USAGE will Susquehanna Bottom I TMI DRAFT assist the NRG with support Screening Report are final.

on the review of the FHRRs.

NRG concurrence received.

Beaver Valley Proposal finalized.

Sep 23, 2014 NRG concurrence received.

Monticello / Prairie Island Proposal finalized.

Cx:t 21, 2014 3

Table 2. Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 within NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Milestones Planned Date Actual Date 1 Familiarization of JLD-ISG-2013-01 Farley - Mobile 10-Mar-14 11-Mar-14 Columbia - Seattle, Walla Walla, NWD 10-Mar-14 10-Mar-14 Arkansas - Tulsa, Little Rock 14-May- 14 14-May-14 Peach Bottom - Baltimore 18-Feb-14 18-Feb-14 Beaver Valley - Pittsburgh 14-Apr-14 14-Apr-14 Monticello & Prairie Island 14-May-14 14-May-14 2 Technical Review Meetings Farley - Mobile 18-19 Mar 14 18-19 Mar 14 Columbia - Seattle, Walla Walla, NWD 26-27 Mar 14 26-27 Mar 14 Arkansas - Tulsa, Little Rock 4-5 Jun 14 4-5 Jun 14 Peach Bottom - Baltimore 4-5 Mar 14 4-5 Mar 14 Beaver Valley - Pittsburgh 5-6 May 14 5-6 May 14 Monticello & Prairie Island 23-24 Jun 14 23-24 Jun 14 3 Scoping Meetings Farley - Mobile 29-30 Apr 14 29-30 Apr 14 Columbia - Seattle, Walla Walla, NWD 9-10 Jun 14 9-1 0 Jun 14 Arkansas - Tulsa, Little Rock 15-16 Jul 14 15-16 Jul14 Peach Bottom - Baltimore 24-Apr-14 24-Apr-14 Beaver Valley - Pittsburgh 17-18 Jun 14 17-18 Jun 14 Monticello & Prairie Island 4-5 Auo 14 4-5 Auo 14 4 Proposal Development Farley - Mobile 28-May-14 27-Jun-1 4 Columbia - Seattle, Walla Walla, NWD 31 -0ct-14 12-Dec-14 Arkansas - Tulsa, Little Rock 29-0ct-14 25-Nov-14 Peach Bottom - Baltimore 20-Feb-15 27-Jul-15 Beaver Valley - Pittsburgh 18-Jul-14 18-Sep-14 Monticello & Prairie Island 09-Seo-14 03-0ct-14

3. Travel Travel expenditures incurred in this re orting period are for the participation in the Board of Consultants meeting for (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) The next planned travel will be for the next BoC meeting in December time rame.

Table 3. Travel Com Related Task: Purpose Coordinated w/ NRC 4

4. Significant Issues No issues.

5. Financial Status Table 4 contains a summary of the financial status of this agreement. The table is subdivided into two tables; one for each calendar year. Table 5 provides the amount of funds expended during the period and the total cumulative year to date. Note that Table 5 presents a summary by current month, current fiscal year (FY2015) and summary by total billed to date. No cost incurred this reporting period.

Table 4. 2014 Financial Status Report- Summary NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Balance of Funds Total Costs Cumulative Precent Month Total Award Obligated Funds Required Obligated to Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum 2014 Amount($) Funds for Completion Date ($) Report($) ($) costs/obi)

Remainino ($) ($)

J an Feb $113,296.00 $ 89,959.00 $ 7,640.62 $ 7,640.62 8.5% $ 82,318.38 $ 105,655.38 Mar $884,568.00 $436,959.00 $ 67,266.86 $ 74,907.48 17.1% $ 362,051.52 $ 809,660.52 Apr $884,568.00 $436,959.00 $ 47,479.44 $122,386.92 28.0% $ 314,572.08 $ 762,181 .08 May $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 65,306.87 $1 87,693.79 21 .2% $ 696,874.21 $ 696,874.21 Jun $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $1 32,828.73 $320,522.52 36.2% $ 564,045.48 $ 564,045.48 Jul $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $123,647.90 $444,170.42 50.2% $ 440,397.58 $ 440,397.58 Aug $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 70,271.05 $514,441.47 58.2% $ 370,126.53 $ 370,126.53 Sep $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 56,745.36 $571 ,186.83 64.6% $313,381 .17 $ 313,381.17 Cx:t $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 42,461 .67 $613,648.50 69.4% $ 270,919.50 $ 270,919.50 Nov $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 50,097.94 $663,746.44 75.0% $ 220,821 .56 $ 220,821 .56 Dec $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 41 ,287.57 $705,034.01 79.7% $ 179,533.99 $ 179,533.99 5

Table 4. 2015 Financial Status Report- Summary NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Balance of Funds Total Costs Cumulative Precent I\Aonth Total Award Obligated Funds Required Obligated to Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum 2015 Amount($) Funds for Completion Date($) Report($) ($) costs/obi)

Remainino ($) ($)

Jan $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 27,858.78 $732,892.79 82.9% $ 151,675.21 $ 151,675.21 Feb $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 17,728.28 $750,621.07 84.9% $133,946.93 $ 133,946.93 Mar $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 7,329.18 $757,950.25 85.7% $ 126,617.75 $ 126,617.75 Apr $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 846.69 $758,796.94 85.8% $125,771.06 $ 125,771 .06 May $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 70.96 $758,867.90 85.8% $ 125,700.10 $ 125,700.10 Jun $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ - $758,867.90 85.8% $ 125,700.10 $ 125,700.10 Jul $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ - $758,867.90 85.8% $125,700.10 $ 125,700.10 Aug $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ 4,999.62 $763,867.52 86.4% $ 120,700.48 $ 120,700.48 Sep $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ - $763,867.52 86.4% $ 120,700.48 $ 120,700.48 Oct $884,568.00 $884,568.00 $ - $763,867.52 186.4% $ 120,700.48 $ 120,700.48 Nov Dec 6

Table 5. Flnanclal Detail Report

• Summary for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 0 0 2358 (2) Technical 0 0 3625 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 5983

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ - $ - $ 441 ,761 .71 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ - $ - $ 204,054.32 SUB-TOTAL $ - $ - $ 645,816.03 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ - $ -

(2) Material and Services Cost $ - $ - $ 2,124.36 (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ 44,760.71 SUB-TOTAL $ - $ - $ 46,885.07 G & A Costs $ - $ - $ 71 ,166.42 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ - $ - $ 763,867.52

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 6.0 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for all of the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 4. The monthly planned (budget) cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table. Table 6.x will detail the monthly expenditures for each individual nuclear power plant sites. The Table 6.x will identify the individual nuclear power plant and the associated TAC # for license fee recovery.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $884,568.00 Funds Obligated to date: $884,568.00 Period of Performance: 30 Sep 2013 to 29 Sep 2017 7

Table 6.0. Cumulative Monthly Expense Forecast - NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1 s 225.523.00 s - s 231 .619.08 102.70%

2 s 209.504.00 s - s 119.024.47 56.81 %

3 s 267.024.00 s - $ 182.898.60 68.50%

4 $ 182,517.00 $ - $ 230,325.37 126.19%

TOTAL $ 884,568.00 $ - $ 763,867.52 86.35%

Table 6.1. Peach Bottom, Susquehanna, Three II.lie Island NPP Monthly Expense Forecast*

TAC# MF3288, MF3289, MF3993, MF3994, MF3995 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 36 309.00 $ - $ 42 739.46 117.71%

2.0 $ 27941.86 $ - $ 11 649.50 41.69%

3.0 $ 41 465.83 $ - $ 92 050.06 221.99%

4.0 $ 38 325.83 $ - $ 61 435.07 160.30%

Total $ 144 042.52 $ - $ 207 874.09 144.31%

Table 6.2. Farley NPP Monthly Expense Forecast - TAC# MF3037, MF3038 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 24 494.00 $ - $ 35 814.20 146.22%

2.0 $ 32 462.71 $ - $ 17 557.88 54.09%

3.0 $ 38 026.00 $ . $ 14 231.40 37.43%

4.0 $ 10 807.00 $ - $ 6 730.80 62.28%

Total $ 105 789.71 $ - $ 74 334.28 70.27%

Table 6.3. Columbia NPP Monthly Exoense Forecast - TAC# MF3039 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 40 699.00 $ 40 303.57 99.03%

2.0 $ 56 755.60 $ - $ 30 329.68 53.44%

3.0 $ 59 334.17 $ . $ 26 448.55 44.58%

4.0 $ 37 841.83 $ 47 338.91 125.10%

Total $ 194 630.60 $ - $ 144 420.71 74.20%

Table 6.4. Beaver Valley NPP Monthly Exoense Forecast -TAC# MF3286 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 35 785.00 $ - $ 33 977.44 94.95%

2.0 $ 28 240.61 $ - $ 22 874.62 81 .00%

3.0 $ 35 8 15.00 $ - $ 22741.93 63.50%

4.0 $ 41 895.68 $ - $ 46 487.05 11 0.96%

Total $ 141 736.29 $ - $ 126 081.04 88.95%

8

Table 6.5. Arkansas NPP Monthly Exoense Forecast -TAC# MF3041, MF3042 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 52 482.00 $ - $ 42 770.87 81.50%

2.0 $ 35 287.61 $ - $ 19580.12 55.49%

3.0 $ 55 993.00 $ - $ 19 645.22 35.09%

4.0 $ 33 012.83 $ 44 461.53 134.68%

Total s 176 n5.44 s - s 126 457.74 71.54%

Table 6.6. Monticello / Prairie Island NPP Monthly ExNnse Forecast - TAC# MF3696, Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Task# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1.0 $ 35 754.00 $ - $ 36 013.54 100.73%

2.0 $ 28 8 15.61 $ - $ 17 032.67 59. 11 %

3.0 $ 36 390.00 $ - $ 7 781.44 21 .38%

4.0 $ 20 633.83 $ - $ 23 872.01 115.69%

Total s 121 593.44 s - s 84 699.66 69.66%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 4 is identified in Table 7. The Spending Plan is updated to reflect the LTD T04-2b direction to the USAGE. The Spending Plan reflects a reduced effort to accomplish the tasks and the USAGE anticipates excess funds to be returned to the NRG upon completion of the remaining tasks.

Baseline $ 8,000 $ 68,000 $ 48,000 $ 66,000 $ 134,000 Actual Costs $ 7,641 $ 67,267 $ 47,479 $ 65,307 $ 132,829 Difference $ - $ 359 $ 733 $ 521 $ 693 $ 1,171 Percenta e 95.5% 98.9% 98.9% 98.9% 99.1%

Baseline $ 124,000 $ 71,000 $ 57,000 $ 43,000 $ 50,000 $ 42,000 Actual Costs $ 123,648 $ 70,271 $ 56,745 $ 42,462 $ 50,098 $ 41,288 Difference $ 352 $ 729 $ 255 $ 538 $ (98) $ 712 Percenta e 99.7% 99.0% 99.6% 98.7% 100.2% 98.3%

Baseline $ 28,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 1,000 $ - $

Actual Costs $ 27,859 $ 17,728 $ 7,329 $ 847 $ 71 $

Difference $ 141 $ 2,272 $ 12,671 $ 153 $ (71) $

Percenta e 99.5% 88.6% 36.6% 84.7%

9

Baseline $ - $ 6,000 $ 6,000 Actual Costs $ 5,000 Difference $ 1,000 Percenta e 83.3%

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 8. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site.

Table 8. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

PFe!)c!FatieA ei a +ask QdeF PFepesal leF eualt.JatiA1 tl=le PeleAlial feF Fl988iAJ al tl=le T04-1 12,11 Q.£201 :l Jesept:i M.loaFley Nt.Jslear PlaAI Ct.Je tG Cam loailt.JF8 Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-1a 5/5/2014 Joseph MFarley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure

! - - ,...f, ...,

T -- r'\,.,, -

n ~ ----. ... 1 -- r-. -

• -"=--

.. n_.. __,.; ..,,1

-*- -* - n---.h

.,, ...-* .u--

T04-2 12,/191'2013 Qettem ,A,18miG PeweF SlatieA Ct.Je 18 Cam loailt.JFe

....... ,...,,..,"T"_ ,1,-

-- '. .... 11.

tl T04-2a 412:ll:1014

-

• tl Qettem, :illFee Mile lslaAd, aAd St.Jsqt.JeRaAAa ~ll.JGleaF 129'118F PlaAIS Ot.Je I8 Cam loailt.JFe Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-2b 9/19/2014 Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plants Due to Dam Failure Pre!)aratieA ei a +ask Qder Prnpesal ler e...alt.JaliA1 tl=le PeleAlial ler lol988iAJ al tl=le T04-3 :ll1:ll:1014 Gelt.Ji:Rt:lia GeAeFatiA1 StalieA ~ll.JGleaF i;!eu,eF i;!laAI Ct.Je 18 Cai:R loailt.JFe Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-3a 12/15/2014 Columbia Generating Station Nuclear Power Plant Due to Dam Failure PFepaFa~8A el a Task OdeF Prepesal l8F e>.<alt.JatiA1 tl=le PeleAlial feF lol988iAJ al tl=le T04-4 3121,12014

,0.FkaAsas ~lt.JsleaF GAe Sile Ot.Je le OaFA loailt.Jre Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-4a 10/6/2014 Arkansas Nuclear One Site Due to Dam Failure

- ~-- r.f ,.. T ... -1 ,-....,.J *- .... . ,..__ ,_

.. ... __ .,:_1 , __ - . __ _.: __ ...t .1.1...-

- n T04-5 :ll:1112014 -* - - - .,,

Valley Pe1118r Slali8A Sile Ot.Je le Oai:R loailt.Jre Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-5a 9/23/2014 Beaver Valley Power Station Site Due to Dam Failure PFepaFatieA el a +ask OdeF Prepesal 18F ie>Jalt1atiA1 IRe PeleAtial I8F loleooiA1 at Ille T04-6 :ll:ll,12014 MeAliGelle aAd PFaiFie lslaAd ~ll.JGleaF GeAeFaliA1121aAI Siles Owe le Oai:R loailwFe Preparation of a Task Order Proposal for Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at the T04-6a 9/28/2014 Monticello and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Sites Due to Dam Failure Evaluating the Potential for Flooding at Susquehanna Nuclear Power Plant (NPP)

T04-7 8/14/2014 Due to Dam Failure 10

The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 9 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites. The costs for this reporting period are for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island.

TABLE 9. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0004 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 YES MF3038 Farley 2 YES MF3039 Columbia YES MF3041 ANO 1 YES MF3042 ANO2 YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 YES MF3995 Three Mile Island 1 YES MF3696 Monticello YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 YES MF3698 Prairie Island 2 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING PERIOD $ -

11

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-25-15-T-0009 (P2#: 455162)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS November 20, 2015 submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective The object of the agreement, Review of Recommendation 2. 1 Flood Re-evaluations as Part of 50.54(f) Response, is for the USAGE to assist the NRG staff in reviewing certain flooding hazards (such as flooding from streams and rivers and from potential dam failures) in the FHRRs provided by NRG licensees in response to the 50.54(f) letter dated March 12, 2012, Recommendation 2.1: Flooding. This work effort will support the NRG with their Staff Assessment (SA) of the licensee's FHRR ..

NRG Project Manager Brad HaNey NRC/NRR 301-415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USAGE Information 1.1.1. Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S d(iix6f7 1616 Capitol Avenue,'-suire'9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 1.1.2. Program Manager Primary: l,..,.,.

(b.,...,.

)(6""'"

) _ _ _....,

1.1.3. Program Engineer Primar : (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Agreement Period of Performance August 25, 2015 through August 24, 2016 Period for this Report October 5, 2015 through November 2, 2015

2. Information on Individual Tasks Information on individual tasks, including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in Table A. Table B provides milestones and schedules for each task .

I ~~:::J~; ;*,.:*f..y.~~;,;.~ ~v ~~ ~;::~:*:~~~J:t,~~ *~/ ~--~~~~~~:~~::: :~~::~t:;~)~:.::~* I Actlloities Accomplished this Activities Planned for next Task Deliverable/Milestone Description lssues/Chaienges Reporting Period Reporting Period 1 ORIENTAT10N 1.a Peach Bottom Continue to reloiew the FHRR Installation of the Argus One Secure the Argus One Sofware for Information proloided on the Software. use on the p,oject.

external drive.

1.b Three Mite Island PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL EVALUATION 2 REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NRG lo request FERG lo share the 2.a Peach Bottom

~ (b)(7)(E).

/ (b)(7)(F} ~'th Identify additional information Submit Request for 1i.n1., rnrecny. A request for a needs. Additional Information.

review of the l'klite paper was 2.b Three Mile Island submitted to the Battimore District from FERG.

FINAL TECHNICAL EVALUAT10N REPORT 3 AND TECHNICAL REVIEW DOCUMENT 3.a Peach Bottom Clarification of input to the Re-.4ew of template for TER.

MFSHI table.

3.b Three Mite Island Table B: Milestones and Schedules for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Milestones I Planned Date I Actual Date 1 Technical Orientation I Kick-Off Meeting Peach Bottom I Sep-15 I Sep-15 Three Mile Island I Sep-15 I Sep-15 2 Preliminary TEA & RA ls Peach Bottom I 30 Nov 15 Revised I Three Mile Island I 1 Dec 15 I 3 Final TEA Peach Bottom I I Three Mile Island I I 2

3. Travel Table C provides information on completed and planned travel for this task order. No travel expenditures have been incurred in this reporting period and none are projected for the next reporting period.

Table C. Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Task: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated w/ NRC Completed this reporting perlOd

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The USAGE team is in the process of acquiring the required software to evaluate the submittals of the licensee for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island. The software is in the process of acquisition and additional approvals are required for installation.

Resolution 1: The USAGE has received and installed the required software to review the data submitted by the licensee. CLOSED.

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of t his agreement. Table 2 provides the amount of funds expended during the period, current fiscal year, and the total cumulative year to date.

Table 1. Flnanclal Status Report

• Summary NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 with NRC-HQ.13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount ($) to Date ($) for Completion Report ($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($\

Sep $ 234,961.28 $ 234,961.28 $ 8,229.77 $ 8,229.77 3.5% $ 226,731 .51 $ 226,73 1.51 O::t $ 234,961 .28 $ $ 3,525.87 $ 11 ,755.64 5.0% $ 223,205.64 $ 223,205.64 Nov Dec 3

Table 2. Financial Detail Report* NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 26 26 44 (2) Technical 10 10 54 (3) Support 0 0 0 TOTAL 36 36 98

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 2,148.91 $ 2,148.91 $ 7,151.82 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 1,095.90 $ 1,095.90 $ 3,647.38 SUB-TOTAL $ 3,244.81 $ 3,244.81 $ 10,799.20 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ - $ -

(2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ - $ -

SUB-TOTAL $ - $ - $ -

G & A Costs $ 281.06 $ 281.06 $ 956.44 DOE Fee (If Applicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 3,525.87 $ 3,525.87 $ 11,755.64

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3.1 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for all of the tasks accomplished in the reporting period for Task Order 9. The monthly planned (budget) cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in the table. Table 3.x will detail the monthly expenditures for each individual nuclear power plant site and the individual nuclear power plant and the associated TAC# for license fee recovery.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $23 4,961.28 Funds Obligated to date: $234,961.28 Period of Performance: 25 Aug 2015 to 24 Aug 2016 4

Table 3.1. Cumulative Monthly Expense Forecast - NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1 $ 19 378.00 $ 1 536.15 $ 5 792.98 29.89%

2 $ 172.172.04 $ 1 337.68 $ 5.310.62 3.08%

3 $ 43 411.24 $ 652.04 s 652.04 1.50%

TOTAL $ 234,961 .28 $ 3 525.87 $ 11,755.64 5.00%

Table 3.2: LTD T009-2 Cum,latlve Monthly Expense - Peach Bottom TIC MF6598 / MF6599 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage v s.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $ 720.26 $ 2,953.93 30.49%

2 $ 80,153.96 $ 727.88 $ 2,714.35 3.39%

3 $ 18,211 .36 $ 326.02 $ 326.02 1.79%

TOTAL $ 108,054.32 $ 1,774.16 $ 5,994.30 5.55%

Table 3.3: LTD TO09-3 Cumulative Monthly Expense -Three Mile Island TIC MF1113 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1 $ 9,689.00 $ 815.89 $ 2,839.05 29.30%

2 $ 92,018.08 $ 609.80 $ 2,596.27 2.82%

3 $ 25,199.88 $ 326.02 $ 326.02 1.29%

TOTAL $ 126,906.96 $ 1,751.71 $ 5,761 .34 4.54%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 9 is identified in Table 4.

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 5,961 $ 12,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 30,000 Actual Costs $ 8,230 $ 3,526 Difference $ (2,269} $ 8,474 Percenta e 138.1% 29.4%

Table 4: Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Baseline $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 12,000 Actual Costs Difference Percenta e

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site.

5

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

LTD T009*3 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Peach Bottom NPP Site LTDT009-2 10-Sep-15 Site and Hazard Assignments: Three Mile Island NPP Site The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites. The costs for this reporting period are for Peach Bottom and Three Mile Island.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-15-T-0009 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF6598 Peach Bottom 2 $ 887.08 YES MF6599 Peach Bottom 3 $ 887.08 YES MF1113 Three Mile Island 1 $ 1,751.71 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING PERIOD $ :3,525.87 6

Monthly Letter Status Report Technical Support and Guidance- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lnteragency Agreement: NRC-HQ- 13-/-03-0021 Task Order No.: NRC-HO-25-14-T-0026 (P2#: 447232)

U.S. ARMY CORPS BUILDING STRONG OF ENGINEERS November 20, 2015 Submittal

1. Work Progress Status Agreement Objective Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. JCN: J4631.

Provide program and project management and engineering technical expertise assistance to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in the determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that my affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants. A Technical Letter Report (TLR) documenting the development of the hydrographs will be provided. The NPP sites to be evaluated will be identified in subsequent Letters of Technical Direction (LTDs).

NRC Project Manager Brad Harvey NRC/NRR 301 -415-4118 (Direct)

Brad.Harvey@NRC.GOV USAGE Information 1.1.1 . Mailing Address U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Attn: CENWO-PM-S ( (b)(6) 1616 Capitol Avenue, uI e 9000 Omaha, NE 68102-9000 1.1.2. Program Mana er Primar : (b)(6)

(b)(6) 1.1.3. Program Engineer Primar : (b)(6)

(b)(6)

Agreement Period of Performance July 25, 2014 through September 29, 2017 Period for this Report October 5, 2015 through November 2, 2015

2. Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction Information on individual Letters of Technical Direction (LTD), including work accomplished during this reporting period and work planned in the next reporting period is contained in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley; Beaver Valley; Monticello / Prairie Island; Arkansas; and Columbia.

3. Travel Information on Individual Letters of Technical Direction The travel information recorded for this task order is reported by individual LTDs in the individual project letter status report for the corresponding NPP identified in the LTD. For this reporting period, the following project letter status reports are included: Farley; Beaver Valley; Monticello / Prairie Island; Arkansas; and Columbia.

4. Significant Issues Issue 1: The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with BC Hydro for the Columbia Generating Station site has taken much longer than originally projected and the delay has significantly impacted the PDT to proceed forward with analysis.

Issue 1 Status: The MASTER NOA between the USAGE and BC Hydro has been signed (25 May 15).

The individual NDAs for each team member authorized to work on the project will be distributed for signature. The documents have been uploaded to the Partner sharepoint site tor PDT use (19 Oct 15).

The NRG team members have submitted signed NDAs and they are with NWD for signature. Ongoing

5. Financial Status Table 1 contains a summary of the financial status of this task order. The total costs incurred for this reporting period is captured on the Line 5 of the Bill No. 28204245 of the IPAC DA Form 4445-R.

Table 1. Flnanclal Status Report

• Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2014 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Aug $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 17,569.74 $ 17,569.74 0.6% $ 2,886, 175.86 $2,886,175.86 Sep $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 21 ,716.10 $ 39,285.84 1.4% $ 2,864,459.76 $ 2,864,459.76 Oct $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,195.60 $ 118,481 .44 4.1% $ 2,785,264.16 $ 2,785,264.16 Nov $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 80,422.10 $ 198,903.54 6.8% $ 2,704,842.06 $ 2,704,842.06 Dec $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,555.41 $ 301 ,458.95 10.4% $ 2,602,286.65 $ 2,602,286.65 2

Table 1. Financial Status Report - Summary NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 with NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Balance of Total Costs Cumulative Precent Balance of 2015 Total Award Funds Obligated Funds Required Incurred this Costs to Date Expended (cum Obligated Funds Month Amount($) to Date ($) for Completion Report($) ($) costs/obi) Remaining ($)

($)

Jan $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $137,019.46 $ 438,478.41 15.1% $ 2,465,267.19 $ 2,465,267.19 Feb $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $213,680.16 $ 652,158.57 22.5% $ 2,251 ,587.03 $ 2,251,587.03 Mar $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,500.18 $ 867,658.75 29.9% $ 2,036,086.85 $ 2,036,086.85 Apr $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $215,835.27 $1,083,494.02 37.3% $ 1,820,251.58 $ 1,820,251.58 May $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $102,342.38 $1 ,185,836.40 40.8% $ 1,717,909.20 $ 1,717,909.20 Jun $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $142,454.07 $1,328,290.47 45.7% $ 1,575,455.13 $ 1,575,455.13 Jul $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 97,231.15 $1,425,521.62 49.1% $ 1,478,223.98 $ 1,478,223.98 Aug $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 83,891.67 $1,509,413.29 52.0% $ 1,394,332.31 $ 1,394,332.31 Sep $2,903,745.60 $ 2,903,745.60 $ 79,066.56 $1,588,479.85 54.7% $ 1,315,265.75 $ 1,315,265.75 Oct $2,903,746.60 $ 2,903,746.60 $109,520.92 $1 ,698,000.77 58.5% $ 1,205,745.83 $ 1,205,745.83 Nov Dec Table 2 provides the financial detail outlining the amount of funds expended during the reporting period, the current fiscal year (FY2015), and the total cumulative year to date. The financial data includes the following Letters of Technical Direction:

• LTD TO26 1 Farley Nuolear Power Plant (Mobile Distriot) 31 Jul2014

• LTD TO26-1a Farley Nuclear Power Plant (Mobile District) 06Apr2015

• LTD TO26-2 Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant {Pittsburgh District). 23Sep2014

• LTD TO26 3 Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul District) . 21Oct201 4

• LTD TO26-3a Monticello and Prairie Island NPPs (St. Paul District). 08Aug15

• LTD TO26-4 Arkansas Nuclear One NPP (Little Rock/ Tulsa Districts). 09Dec14

• LTD TO26-5 Columbia Generating Station (Seattle/Walla Walla Districts). 15Dec14 3

Table 2. Flnanclal Detall Report* NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Fiscal Year to Current Month Total to Date Date

1. Direct Labor (Hours)

(1) Management 222 222 1,305 (2) Technical 721 721 14,009 (3) Support (Bureau Reclamation) 0 0 527 TOTAL 943 943 15,841

2. Costs Labor Costs:

(1) Direct Labor Costs $ 68,381.53 $ 68,381.53 $ 1,005,679.47 (2) Indirect Labor Costs $ 30,690.76 $ 30,690.76 $ 463,358.47 SUB-TOTAL $ 99,072.29 $ 99,072.29 $ 1,469,037.94 Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost $ - $ 48,326.00 (Bureau of Reclamation)

(2) Material and Services Cost (3) Computer Usage Costs NA NA NA (4) Travel (Domestic) $ - $ 15,524.80 SUB-TOTAL $ . $ . $ 63,850.80 G & A Costs $ 10,448.63 $ 10,448.63 $ 165,112.03 DOE Fee (If Aoolicable) NA NA TOTAL $ 109,520.92 $ 109,520.92 $ 1,s9a,ooo.n

6. Monthly Expense Forecast Table 3 provides the cumulative monthly expenditures for work accomplished by the USAGE in the reporting period for Task Order 26. The cumulative expenditures by the tasks are also identified in this table. The individual project letter status report for each LTDs issued is included in the attachments.

Authorized Cost Ceiling: $2,904,745.60 Funds Obligated to date: $2,903,745.60 Period of Performance: 25 Jul 2014 to 29 Sep 2017 4

Table 3. Cumulative Monthly Exoense Forecast - NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Task Expenditures Percentage Activity# Planned Budget vs. Budget Period Cumulative 1a s 1.683.915.60 s 37 912.24 s 1.192.743.24 70.83%

1b PMP/PI\F s 458.200.00 s 36 666.56 s 312142.46 68.12%

2 s 315.600.00 s 367.26 s 91 486.12 28.99%

3 s 224.760.00 s 34 574.86 s 101 628.95 45.22%

4 $ 221,270.00 $ - $ - 0.00%

TOTAL $ 2,903,745.60 $ 109,520.92 $ 1,698,000. n 58.48%

The Spending Plan for Task Order 26 is identified in Table 4. The spending plan reflects the project schedu le delays and completion of tasks for Farley. These scheduling issues include: 1) signature of the Non-Disclosure Agreement for Columbia and 2) the impact of the May I June 2015 high water events and a levee failure at the Tulsa and Little Rock Districts.

Baseline $ 31 ,215 $ 47,021 $ 150,836 $ 130,000 $200,000 Actual Costs $ 17,570 $ 21,716 $ 79,196 $ 80,422 $102,555 Difference $ 13,645 $ 25,304 $ 71,641 $ 49,578 $ 97,445 Percentage 56.3% 46.2% 52.5% 61.9% 51.3%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,500 $ 251,800 $175,200 Actual Costs $ 137,019 $ 213,680 $ 215,500 $ 215,835 $ 102,342 $142,454 Difference $ 11 2,981 $ 36,320 $ 34,500 $ 34,665 $ 149,458 $ 32,746 Percenta e 54.8% 85.5% 86.2% 86.2% 40.6% 81.3%

Baseline $ 100,446 $ 115,100 $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Actual Costs $ 97,231 $ 83,892 $79,066.56 $109,520.92 Difference $ 3,215 $ 31 ,208 $ 20,933 $ (19,521 )

Percenta e 96.8% 72.9% 79.1% 121 .7%

Spending Plan (CSP) for NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Baseline $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 60,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,000 $ 17,630 Actual Costs Difference Percents e 5

7. Additional Information The Letter of Technical Direction (LTD) information is captured in Table 5. Each LTD provides authority for USAGE to proceed forward on the specific NPP site for Task Order #26, NRC-HQ-25-14-T -0026.

Table 5. Letter of Technical Direction for NRC-HQ-2~14-T-0026 Letter of Technical Date Subject Direction (LTD)

LTD T026-1 31 Jl;ll 14 e>.iall;lali9A el l:leeGI l=lai!aFGIS al 11:18 Jese13t:1 M. l:aFley IIJw,leaF 12IaAI Ql;l8 19 QaJ:R l:aill;lF8 LTD T026-1a 06-Apr-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Joseph M.Farley Nuclear Plant Due to Dam Failure LTD T026-2 23-Sep-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Beaver Valley NPP Due to Dam Failure 1,,:1:C) :J02&-3 ~1 GGI ~4 e1ahaialieA el r;'.leeGI l=l~aFGls al IAe MeAtiselle aAGI 12FaiFie lslaAGI 1111212 ~iles 1

LTD T026-3a 13-Aug-15 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Monticello and Prairie Island NPP Sites LTD T026-4 09-Dec-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Arkansas Nuclear O,e NPP Site LTD T 0 26-5 15-Dec-14 Evaluation of Flood Hazards at the Columbia NPP Site 6

The Tracking Account Code (TAC) Number information is captured in Table 6 for each of the individual units of the Nuclear Power Plant sites for this reporting period.

TABLE 6. TRACKING ACCOUNT CODE (TAC) NUMBER FOR NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 NUCLEAR POWER COST FOR REPORTING FEE-RECOVERABLE TAC NO.

PLANT SITE PERIOD (YES/NO)

MF3037 Farley 1 $ - YES MF3038 Farley 2 $ - YES MF3039 Columbia $ 12,044.62 YES MF3041 ANO1 $ 45,086.01 YES MF3042 ANO2 $ 45,086.01 YES MF3286 Beaver Valley 1 $ 1,405.28 YES MF3287 Beaver Valley 2 $ 1,405.28 YES MF3991 Peach Bottom 2 YES MF3992 Peach Bottom 3 YES MF3993 Susquehanna 1 YES MF3994 Susquehanna 2 YES MF3995 Three Mile Island 1 YES MF3696 Monticello $ 2,246.87 YES MF3697 Prairie Island 1 $ 1,1 23.44 YES MF3698 Prairie Island 2 $ 1,1 23.44 YES TOTAL COST FOR REPORTING PERIOD $ 109,520.92 7

LTD 1026-1 Farley (NO EXPENDITURES RECORDED) 8

Table LTD -TO26-1.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-1 Farley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 Technical Manag I

USACE Project Deliverv Team: Onaha and Mobile Districts Project Manager - (b)(6) CENWO-PM-S CESAM-EN-HH Project Costs: $277,309 P2 447176 LTD issued 31 July 2014 Revised LTD issued 6 April 2015 Activity

1. 1a I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Accomplished this Reoortino Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Perform af (bX7XE). (bX7XF) None. None. Work is complete.

Activity

1. 1b I Develop Preliminary Hydrooraphs and TLR Activities Accomplished this Reoorting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes / Significant Issues Develop time-series stage, velocity, and discharge hydrographs, including Excel spreadsheets, at various locations in the vicinity of the Farley NPP site. Two Submissions: None. None. Work is complete.

Preliminarv Draft and Pre-Final. The (b)(?)(E), (b)(?)(F)

Activity

1. 2 I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities Accomplished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None. None. Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Accomplished this Rennrtina Period Activities Planned for Next Rennrtina Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Additional Information to be included at the request of Southern Company: *

(b)(7)(E), (b)(?)(F)

I 1) Flow hydrographs for the complete model None. None. Work is complete.

run. 2) Velocity hydrographs for the complete model run. 3) Spatial coordinates and projection for each cross section. 4) All cross section station and elevation points. 5) Left and right bank stations. 6) Manning's "n" values or roughness coefficients for the left overbank, channel and right overbank at each cross section.

1. 4 I

Activity Participate in Presentation of Results Meetinas Activities Accomplished this Reoortina Period Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of Results Meetings 9

Table LTD T026-1.2. LTD 26-1 Farley* Travel Completed This Reponlng Pertod & Planned for Next Reponlng Pertod Related Actlvtty: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated wl NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I Planned next reporting period I I I I I I I I I I Table LTD T0 26-1.3. Cu111.1latlve MonthlyExpenee-TLD T026-1 Farley, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percent:age vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Cumulative Budget(%)

1a $ 149,682.20 $ 130,871.20 87.43%

1b PMP/PMF $ 52,369.92 $ 36,942.43 70.54%

2 $ 21,376.04 $ 19,465.04 91.06%

3 $ 29,255.44 $ 16,112.04 55.07%

4 $ 26,455.72 $ . 0.00%

TOT AL $ 279,139.32 $ . $ 203,390.71 72.86%

10

LTD T026-2 Beaver Valley 11

Table LTD -T026-2.1. Project Status for LTD T026-2 Beaver Valley NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USAGE Project Der*--* T - * - * ~--ha a111d Pittsbi " ob Districts Project Managers * (b)(6)

Technical Lead *11~ /f,J I CENWO*PM-s ;J(b)(6)

ICl:.LRP-EC-DH l CELRP-PM-PM Project Costs: ~:, ,'Ito r, <148945 Lm issued 23 Sep 2014 Ac:;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Evaluate PMP and PMF for the Beaver Valley NPP site as v.ell as the (bX7)(E), (bX7)(F) 1-v*v*vt' 11yur uyrapns ca=u on the site-None None Work is complete.

specific PMP developed by the NRC's licensee, FENOC. Existing USAGE hydrologic and hydraulic models will be used to determine the PMF resulting from the Licensee's site-specific PMP.

Acti.,;ty I De\181op Preliminary Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1 Hvdroaraohs and TLR Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Assess thel. ?)(E). (bX?)(F)

I 1a~£"nt ine aniyses in a rrinary draft and ore-final TLR wdroaraphs.l None None Work is complete.

(bX7)(E), (bX7)(F)

Activity

1. 2 I Intermediate Technical Re-.;ew Meetinas Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Reoortina Period Acti.,;ties Planned for Next Reoortina Period Notes / Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate Technical Review None None Work is complete.

meetings.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR =rtina Period = rtina Period Document findings In a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate.

Calculation packages, including input Archive files and closeout and output files from computer Finalize project files. Work is complete.

project.

modeling runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final subrrission.

Activity IParticipate in Presentation Activities Acco11'1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Schedule, Host and Participate in None None No action required.

Presentation of Results Meetings 12

Table LTD T026-2.2. LTD 26-2 Beaver Valley* Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reporting Period Related Actlvhy: IPurpose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w / NRC Completed this reporting period INone I I I I I I Planned next reporting period INone I I I I I I Table LTD T026-1.3. Cu1TL1lative Monthly Expense - TLD T026-1 Beaver Vally, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percent.age vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Curoolative Budget(%)

1a $ 259,701 .20 $ 1,081.09 $ 262,364.61 101.03%

1b PMP/PMF $ 66,074.00 $ 1,081.10 $ 60,674.74 91.83%

2 $ 55,117.00 $ 204.25 $ 45,437.08 82.44%

3 $ 35,523.00 $ 444.11 $ 37,029.27 104.24%

4 $ 34,061 .00 $ .

TOTAL $ 450,476.20 $ 2,810.55 $ 405,505.70 90.02%

13

LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island 14

Table LTD -T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 Projec_t Managers* 1(b)(6)

Technical Manager I

USAGE Project Delivery Team: Omaha and St. Paul Districts cENW o-PM-s. lrb1r61 CEMVP-EC-H I CEMVP-PM-A Project Costs: $514,370 LTD issued 31 July 2014 I

Activity Develop PMP/PMF for Prairie I stand Activities Accorrplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 1a NPP Reporting Period Reporting Period (b)(l)(E), (b)(l)(F)

Additional information, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, will be provided:1 None None Work is corrplete (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

INo nyarograpns are neeaea tor tnese cross sections.

Activity

1. 1b I Develop PMF Stage Hydrographs Monticello NPP Activities Accorrplished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period Notes I Significant Issues Develop a new HMS model of the watershed in developing the PMP for the Monticello NPP site and route the resulting runoff to produce the PMF. A georeferenced HEC-RAS model shall be developed in order to produce a PMF stage hydrograph at the Monticello NPP site. Additional information, at the request of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, will be provided: I None None Work is corrplete (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F)

I No nyorographs are needed for these cross sections.

15

Table LTD *T026-3.1. Project Status for LTD T026-3 Monticello / Prairie Island NPPs for NRC-H0-20-14-T-0026 Projec_t Managers

• l(b)(6)

Technical Manager I

USAGE Project Delivery Team: Onaha and St. Paul Districts GENW 0-PM* S!(b )(6)

GEMVP-EG-H

!CEMVP-PM*A Project CosIs: $514,370 Lm issued 31 July 2014 Activity I H&H Model Coni:,arison and Site- Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 1c Soocific PMP Corroarison Reoortina Period Reoortino Period Work will be complete in Goni:,arison of the NRC's licensee, Xcel, September provided H&H models, describing any major differences between Xcel's H&H modeling approach and USACE's H&H modeling approach. Coni:,arison of the site-specific PMPs (provided by Xcel) by describing any differences in the rainlall depth, duration, and distribution between the basin-wide PMPs and None None the basin-wide PMPs used by the USAGE to develop its hydrographs. USAGE will develop hydrographs simlliar to Activities 1A and 1B by applying the PMPs and using USAGE's H&H models. The findings will be documented, coordinated, and a detailed comparison performed.

Intermediate Technical Review Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Ac;;ty I Meetings Reporting Period Reporting Period Notes/ Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Intermediate None None Work is complete Technical Review meetings.

Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Ac:ty I Develop Final Hydrographs and TLR Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include river valley cross-sections, as appropriate. Calculation packages, including Repackage the deliverables for input and output files from computer modeling Provide final deliverables to NRG Work is complete re lease to licensee.

runs supporting key TLR conclusions are to be included in the final submission.

Activity I Participate in Presentation of Results Activities Accomplished this Activities Planned for Next Notes/ Significant Issues

1. 4 Meetinas Reoortina Period Rennrtino Period Schedule, Host and Participate in Presentation of None None Not required.

Results Meetings Table LTD T026*3.2. LTD 26-3 Monticello / Prairie llland

• Travel Completed Ranortlna Period & Planned for Next Renortlna Period Related Activity: IPur pose I Location I Travelers I Start Date I End Date I Travel Cost I Coordinated w / NRC Completed this reporting period I I I I Planned next rePOrting period I I I I I I I I I I 16

Table LTD T026-1 .3. Currulative Monthly Expense* TLD T026-1 Monticello, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Expenditures Percentage vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Period Currulative Budget(%)

1A1B1C $ 410,631.20 $ 2,170.12 $ 359,559.96 87.56%

2 $ 43,469.00 $ 13,540.72 31.15%

3 $ 24,607.00 $ 2,323.62 $ 16,680.51 67.79%

4 $ 35,663.00 TOTAL $ 514,370.20 $ 4,493.74 $ 389,781.19 75.78%

17

LTD T026-4 Arkansas Nuclear One 18

Table LTD -T026-4.1. Project Status for LTD T026-4 Arkan- NPP for NRC-HQ.21>-14-T-0026 USACE ProJoct ~ liWCY Jcaro* kEha, Uttle Aock;!nd Tulsa Dls~lcts Project Manager b 6) CENWQ.PM-s*l uj"' iCESWL-PM Technical Manager *irWSl j CESWL*EC*H) )(6)  ! CESWT*EC*HF Project Costs: $938,823 P2 449969 LTD issued 9 Dec 2014 Ac:ty I Develop PMP/PMF ActilAtles Accolt'l)llshed this Reporting Period Actl-.ities Planned for Next Reporting Period r-<<>tes I Significant Issues Compare H&H Models (Entergy) and Compare Site-Specific PMP. Final report cofll)fete, combining report Describe any major differences segments for all dams into single report for between Entergy*s H&H modeling re\/iew and Comparison ....... nf o u c fnr ,..L ............

approach and USACE's H&H ~ USAGE andj(b)(7)(E). (b)(7Xf)

(bX7)(E), (b)(7) modeling approach. Describe any .. am Safely team mermerw v.1t1a,scuss lnc;orPortalon of comments to be received at the (F) ***-******** ....... d1lferences inme raJnfaildepth:

• a11ure '"""-'e analysis and complete this Section ITR meeting from NRC and Onaha District.

duration, and distribution between the Joq............... j Complele Report Section (bX7)(E). (bX7) t,asin.wide PMPs*(EnterrJY)ai\ll'!ne**** dealing with description, foundation, geology etc.

(F) basin-wide PMPs (USACE). Dewlop hydrographs by applying lhe PMPs for 1.(bX7XE),

(bX7)(F)

I (Entergy) using USACE's H&H Acti.ity

1. 1 I Develop Prelninary Hvdrooranhs and TLR Activities Accomplished this Reporting Period Acti1o1ties Planned for Next Reporting Period r-<<>tes I Significant Issues Evaluation of Iha ** * * .......

(b)(7)(E).~...(b)(?) ... .the At-0 site,! I

_ .. ilJ0"8IOP H&H models (F)  ! Vv'I uasin. Evaluate the Milestone: Prelirrinary Draft TLR (b)(7XE), (b)(7XF) and hydrographs 25 September Prelirrinary Draft of the Technical Letter Report lncorportaion of comments to be received at the 15.

completed and submitted for re.iew. ITR meeting f,rom NRC and Ona.ha District. Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and hydrographs 24 December 15.

Pro-.de hydrographs for identified locations In the LTD 26*4.

Ac:;ty I Intermediate Technical Re.iew Meetioos Activities Accomplished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period r-<<ltes I Significant Issues Milestone: Flrsl ITR 27*29 Schedule, host, and participate In Host ITR meeting and respond to licensee Respond to icensee questions identified during October 2015 Intermediate Technical Ae.iew quesuons. the ITR meeting. Milestone: Second ITR week of meetings.

r-<<lt proposed yet I

Acti.ity Develop Final Hydrographs Acti,.ties Accolt'l)lished this Reporting Period Actlvibes Planned for Next Reporting Period r-<<>tes I Significant Issues

1. 3 andTLR Document findings in a Final TLR and hydrographs. Include additional Consol idate the input lrom the technical team Continue to incorporate re\llewers comments into Milestone: Final TLR and information as appropriate.

into the Technical Letter Report. ~ating the TLR. hydrographs 24 December 2015 responses for release as redacted respones.

I Acti"1ty Participate in Presentation Activities Accomplished this Reporting Period Activities Planned for Next Reporting Period r-<<>tes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinos Schedule, Host and Participate in lBD Presentation of Results Meetings 19

Table LTD T026-4.2. LTD 26-4 Arkansas

• Travel Completed This Reporting Period & Planned for Next Reoortlng Period Related Actlvtty: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated WI NRC Completed this reporting period (b)(6)

Activity #2 lffi meeting with the licensee Little Rock, AR 26-0ct-15 29-0ct-15 Yes Planned next reporting period Table LTD T0 26-4.3. Cunailatlve Monthly Expense* TLD T026-4 Arkansas, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent age vs.

Activity# Planned Budget ReportlnQ Period Cumulative Budaet (%)

1 $ 476,997 $ 23,493.02 $ 383,517.38 80.410%

PMP/PMF $ 196,785 $ 34,871 .86 $ 187,059.90 95.06%

2 $ 130,846 $ 5,922.04 4.53%

3 $ 71 ,281 $ 31,807.13 $ 31,807.13 4 $ 62,914 $ .

TOTAL $ 938,823 $ 90,172.01 $ 608,306.45 64.79%

20

LTD T026-5 Columbia Generating Station 21

Table LTD-TO26-5.1. Project Status for LTD TO26-5 Columbia NPP for NRC-HQ-20-14-T-0026 USACE Project Delivery Team: O'naha, Seattle, and Walla Walla Districts Project Manager J b)(6) I* CENWO-PM-S;!(b)(6) !CENWS-PM*MEI Technical Manage CENWS*EN*HH-HE Project Costs: $530,544 P2 449739 LTD issued 15 Dec 2014 Ac;ty I Develop PMP/PMF Activities ACCOl'T1)Iished this Activities Planned for Next Reoortina Period Reoortina Period Notes I Significant Issues Evaluation of the PMP ,mi P~Ai: fnr Internal team is establishing Reviewing documents Non-Disclosure Agreement signed the Columbia NPP site.I new schedule. provided by BC Hydro. and documents shared with (b)(7)(E) (b)(l)(F) USACE. Assumption h:,f nAw PMP/PMF studies for (bX7XE). *11 (bX7J(F) not be needed.

Activity

1. 1 I Develop Preliminary Hydrooraphs and TLR Activities ACCOl'T1)lished this Activities Planned for Next Reoorting Period Reoorting Period Notes / Significant Issues Develop H&H models for the Internal team is establishing Reviewing documents Milestone: Preliminary Draft TLR Columbia NPP watershed. Evaluate new schedule. provided by BC Hydro. and hydrographs IBO.'

(b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F) Milestone: Pre-Final TLR and hydrographs IBO.'

• Non-disclosure issue has delayed project start and modeling. Indicated rnlestones will slip at least 6 months as of this date.

"ro111ae nyarograpns tor proviaea locations in the LTD.

Ac!;ty I Intermediate Technical Review Meetinas Activities ACCOl'T1)Iished this Rennrtina Period Activities Planned for Next Rennrtina Period Notes/ Significant Issues Schedule, host, and participate in Milestone: First ITR IBO' Intermediate Technical Review Milestone: Second ITR IBO' meetings. ' Non-disclosure delay; milestones will slip at least 6 months.

I Activity Develop Final Hydrographs Activities Accol'T1)lished this Activities Planned for Next Notes / Significant Issues

1. 3 and TLR Rennrtina Period Reoortina Period Document data and analysis, n/a n/a Milestone: Final TLR and including the hydrographs, in a Final hydrographs IBO' TLR. Package will include the "Non-disclosure delay; rnlestones calculation packages, including input will slip at least 6 months.

and output files from the computer modeling runs supporting the key TLR conclusions.

I Activity Participate in Presentation Activities Accol'T1)1ished this Activities Planned for Next Rennrtina Period Rennrtina Period Notes I Significant Issues

1. 4 of Results Meetinas Schedule, Host and Participate in n/a n/a n/a Presentation of Results Meetings 22

Table LTD T026-5.2. LTD 26-5 Columbia

• Travel Completed This Reaortlng Period & Planned for Next Reaortlng Period Related Actlvhy: Purpose Location Travelers Start Date End Date Travel Cost Coordinated w / NRC Completed this reporting period Planned next reporting period Table LT D T O26-5.3. Cumulative Monthly Expense - TLD TO 26-5 Columbia, NRC-HQ-25-14-T-0026 Expenditures for the Activity Expenditures Percent:age vs.

Activity# Planned Budget Re porting Period Cumulative Budge t(%)

1 $ 266,693 $11 ,168.0 1 $ 56,430.09 21 .16%

1 PM P/PM F $ 113,966 $71 3.60 $ 27,465.39 24.10%

2 $ 54,733 $ 163.01 $ 7,121.24 13.01%

3 $ 44,088 $ .

4 $ 52,169 $ .

TOTAL $ 531,649 $ 12,044.62 $ 91,016.72 17.12%

The Seattle team members have resubmitted a proposal for consideration that reflects the new schedule and potential incorporation of a kick-off Government meeting.

The costs incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation are included in the table above and the sum total amount is recorded in Table 2 Financial Detail Report, as Other Direct Costs, Subcontractor Consultant Cost.

23

From:

To:  ; see. Kenneth: Hall, Victor Cc:

Subject:

Externa en er DRAFT NR EPgMP UN IFIED Date: Friclay, September 25, 2015 3:40:10 PM Attachments: Draft NRC EPaMP -- 2015SEP25.pdf C lassification: UNCLASS.IFIED Caveats: NONE NRCTeam, This is the PDF of the Draft NRC EPgMP that incorporates recent HQUSACE comments received fronf(b}(6)7 Hb\(6\ I L__J

~ ls there a preference on signature of the document? As in NRC or HQUSACE first?

I battled with the page numbers and formatting of headers and footers this afternoon and I gave up to Microsoft Word!

The attachments are PDF files. Let me know if the links do not work.

l(b)(6)

HS Program Manager, Special Projects Branch USACE, Northwestern Division, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue, CENW0-PM-S Omaha, NE 68102 Desk: l(b)(6)

Cell: _ _ _ _ __.__ _ _ _ _....,

Email: !._

(b_)(6_l _ _ _ _ _ _ ___,

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE

m US Army Corps of Engineers"'

~ U.S.NR C Unht'd ~tatt1 NuclC'ar R,gul.uory Commlnlon Prott'1i11g J>eopl~ and tht Enviromntnt Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

Enterprise Program Management Plan (EPgMP)

Technical Assistance for Evaluation of Potential Flooding at Nuclear Power Plants Sites due to Dam Failure HQ US Army Corps of Engineers Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chief, Interagency and International Services Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Charles R. "Ray" Alexander, SES Regulation, William Dea n, SES Date: _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: _ _ _ _ _ __

Table of Contents

1. General

a. Purpose

b. Updates to the Program Management Plan

c. References

d. Program Goal

e. Program Risks

2. Program Team

a. Management Approach

b. Roles and Responsibilities

3. Program Management

a. Communications

b. Scope of management

c. Schedule Management

d. Risk Management

e. Acquisition Management

f. Management Information Systems

4. Program Governance

a. Authorizations and Appropriations

b. Levels of Engagement

5. Financial Management

a. Transfer of Funds

b. Design Budget

c. Operational Financial Management Annex A. Organizational Chart and Points of Contact list Annex B. Glossary Annex C. lnteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 Annex D. NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 Amendments Note: HQUSACE Divisions are responsible for preparation and updates .for their specific Annexes to each Enterprise Program Management Plan.

1.0 General

a. Purpose. This Enterprise Program Management Plan (EPgMP) establishes management concepts, principles, and procedures for successfully executing USACE national technical support programs and requirements for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR). This EPgMP applies to all Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements related to assessment of post-Fukushima flooding hazards at nuclear power plant sites due to the potential failure of upstream dams for a variety of reasons.

b. Updates and Termination of the Enterprise Program Management Plan. This EPgMP shall become effective when signed by both NRC and USA CE. Updates to the EPgMP will be managed by the HQUSACE National Program Manager (NPgM) to reflect significant changes in business processes, stakeholder requirements, internal and external factors, clarifications, and lessons learned. If required, the NPM will make updates to this EPgMP after coordinating with the appropriate proponent and stakeholders. Updates will be incorporated into the body of this EPgMP. Either party may terminate this EPgMP by providing written notice to the other party. The termination will be effective upon the ninetieth (90th) calendar day following the notice, unless a later date is set forth. In the event of termination, NRC will continue to be responsible for all costs incurred by the USACE under this EPgMP and for the costs of closing out or transferring any on-going contracts.

c. References. Following ru*e references that apply across all programs. Please refer to specific annexes or appendices for amendments to the Jnteragency Agreement.

I) Management, USACE Business Process, ER 5- 1-11 (PMBP). This regulation establishes policy and doctrine to accomplish all work performed by USACE.

https://team.usace.ru*my.mil/sites/HO-MP/milcon/Shared%20Documents/ER%205 1 I ;%20PMB P%20with%20 l 2%20Jan%202007%20Cover%20Letter%20Update.pdf

2) USACE Enterp1ise Lessons Learned (ELL) The Enterprise Lessons Learned (ELL) program consists of people, processes, and tools that support USACE's collection, analysis, and implementation of validated lessons learned. It will help manage institutional knowledge and improve services to our customers.

https://apps.usace.army.mil/sites/ELL/SitePages/Home.aspx

3) Mi litary Programs Operations Order ( MP OPORD}: This OPORD provides annual guidance for executing USACE Military Programs mission requirements.

https://team.usace.army.mi1/s ites/HO-MP/opord/default.aspx

4) Quality Management System (QMS): The Quality Management System is an enterprise-wide framework that describes USACE standard business processes.

https://apps.usace.army.mil/sites/OMS/default.aspx

5) USACE Command Consolidated Guidance (CCG). The CCG represents the cmTent blueprint for pursuing the USACE vision and strategy.

https://intranet.usace.army.mil/hg/rm/Pages/ccg.aspx

6) Engineer Regulation, ER 5-1-9, Management - Assignment and Transfer of Project Responsibilities, LS March 1996. This ER establishes project brokering policy, guidance, and procedures

for all proj ects assigned to the US Army Corps of Engineers (US ACE) consistent with USA CE management philosophy.

http:// 140.194.76.129/publicatio ns/eng-regs/ER 5-1 -9/toc.htm

7) Engineer Regulation, ER 5-1-10, Corps-wide Areas of Work Responsibility, 30 September 1997.

http:// I 40. 194.76.129/publicatio ns/eng-regs/ER 5 10/toc.htm

8) Engineer Regulation, ER 5 11, U.S. Army Corps of Eng ineers (USACE) Business Process

9) Memorandum (CEMP-ZB), Adherence to Mission Assignments and Alignment of Acquisitions with Missions- DIRECTORATE POLICY MEMORANDUM, 20 May 2013 https://team.usace.army.mil/sites/HO-MP/milcon/Shared%20Documents/Adherence%20to%20Mission%20Assignments--CEMP-ZB%2020%20May%202013 .pd f

10) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commjssion, Request for information letter to seismic, flooding and emergency preparedness (March 12, 2012) http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/flooding.html

11) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, prioritization of plants for completing flood hazard reevaluations (May 11 , 2012) http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/flooding.html

12) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, iss ued guidance for assessing flooding hazards due to dam fai lure (JLD-ISG-20 13-01) (July 29, 2013),

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/opcrating/ops-cxperiencc/japan-dashboard/flooding.html 13)Design-Basis Flood Estimation for Site Characterization at Nuclear Power Plants in the United States of America (NUREG/CR-7046) http://www.nrc. gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/ nuregs/contract/cr7046/

14) United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800),

sections 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0800/

15) American Nuclear Society (ANSI/ANS -2.8 1992), Determining Design Basis Flooding at Power Reactor Sites

d. Program Goal: The goal of this program is for USACE efforts to allow NRC to plan and develop guidance for safe operation of downstream nuclear power plants (NPP) . Work will include screen river system dams to determine potential for significant impact to downstream NPP in event of failw-e or certain conditions, determine which failure modes are credible, evaluate fail ure modes for critical dams, develop hydrographs related to those dams and fai lure modes, estimate stage, velocity and discharge time-series in rivers near NPP under various flooding and failure scenarios, prepare an FOUO Technical Letter Report (TLR) for each NPP facility and brief findings to NRC and Licensee(s).

e. Program Risks: Risk associated with the execution of the project requirements as identified by the technical review will be ide ntified by the capabilities sourcing district and outlined on the District PMP.

2.0 Program Team.

a. Management Approach. USACE wi ll work closely with Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR) representatives and other stakeholders to and achieve a collaborative partnership at all levels. USACE and NRC/NRR will coordinate policy changes and process improvements that may impact program execution prior to issuance. USACE Program Management w ill be in accordance with USACE Proj ect Management Business Process, as described in ER-5 l 1 (Reference l .c. l ). USACE will execute the program through Major Subordinate Commands (MSCs) Centers, Geographic Districts and offices approved to support special initiatives. The Program Team approach is to embrace the goals and objectives stated in this EPgMP, establish a collaborative know ledge-sharing environmen t, and capture/apply lessons learned to the execution process.

b. Roles and Responsibilities.

1) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). USACE is a designated DoD Construction Agent per DoD 4270.5 for Military Construction (MlLCON) and has many technical capabilities that can support this partnership. Pursuant of the Econo my in Government Act (3 1 USC 1535) USACE w ill p rovide technical assistance to NRC/NRR to perform flood ing hazard reevaluations at the designated nuclear power plant (NPP) locations shown in Figure 1. USACE will employ capabilities not limited to; Technical Assistance and expertise in Dam assessments and safety. When exercising this agreement, the NRC/NRR will assume complete responsibi lities for evaluating the needs for and implementing any regulatory actions for its licensees based on the results of the flood hazard reevaluations being performed by USACE. Specific projects w ill be identified by NRC/NRR and requested in writing through the Natio nal Program Manager (NPgM). HQUSACE' s NPgM w ill coordinate with the appropriate MSC or district Programs Director for required project execution.

(a) Headquarters USACE is responsible for enterprise-wide program management, program integration, policy development, and performance assessment. HQUSACE assigns a USACE National Program Manager (NPgM) to serve as the primary point of con tact for program related issues, initiati ves, and reports on program status.

(b) The National Program Manager for this partnership is the O maha District. The National Program Manager is responsible for:

- Communicating w ith NRC/NRR and other national level stakeholders;

- Integrating the efforts of USACE Regional Business Centers and mission lines, a nd insure USACE business processes are followed;

- Integrating the development of program resource/funding requirements;

- Ensuring timely a nd proper authority for work undertaken by USACE Regional Business Centers and districts;

- Managing and fac ilitating resolution of program issues;

- Providing fin ancial management at the enterprise/program .level;

-Ensuring that proper funding is issued to the Geographic Districts;

-Ensuring programmatic financial tracking reports are provided to NRC/NRR o n a mo nthly basis, and provide other coordination as required for programmatic success.

Figure I - NPP Locations where USACE is Providing Technical Assistance to the NRC/NRR in Performing F looding Hazard Reevaluations (c) USACE Major Subordinate Commands. MSCs manage the Regional Business Centers (RBC) to faci litate program execution and uti lize technical resources and innovative practices through its districts. MSCs are responsible for vertical and horizontal coordination and integration, to drive reg ional excellence, and to ensure integration of Regional capability across Geographic Districts and centers of expertise is seamless. MSCs perform quality assurance of the geograph ic processes through periodic evaluations consistent with the USACE business process. This includes:

- Managing program execution and performance;

- Ensuring proper coordination between Geographic Districts and Centers of Expertise;

- Supporting resolution of programmatic issues among the vertical USACE team;

- Ensuring accurate and timely communication of program/project infonnation in W ebCMl, issues tracking, Current Working Estimates and d esign requests, and all upward reporting;

- Developing regional acquisition and execution plans, schedules, and resource req uirements;

- Coordinating regional funding/scheduling requirements.

(d) Geographic Districts. The USACE Geographic District wi ll normally be responsible for executing mission requirements within its area of responsibility. A mission requirement or project may be assigned to another district by the RBC in accordance with USACE policy ER 5 11 (reference paragraph 7.b.(l)), and ER 5-1-9, Assignment and Transfer of Project Responsibilities. PDTs may be made up of members from across multiple organizations. Geographic d istrict responsibilities typically include:

- Quality Management. The USACE Geographic District serves as the project manager and is responsible for day-to-day management of the technical assistance efforts including contract and quality administration and any other technical services provided.

- Project management including identification of requirements for execution;

- Coordination with the stakeholders, MSCs and HQUSACE with interface through the NRC/NRR assigned PM;

- Complying with project authorization and directives;

- Development of Project Budgets accounting for a ll PDT design;

- Financial management, metrics performance tracking and project reporting through established automated information systems such as P2, Resident Management System (RMS), Corps of Engineers Financial Management System (CEFMS).

The Geographic Districts wi ll execute all PM responsibilities, as well as the responsibility for the overall technical adequacy of the products produced as a result of the technical assistance for the proposed solutions to risk mitigation require ments. The distric t will conduct and document an independent technical review of all flooding hazard reevaluatio n and potential Dam fa ilures by location as appropriate within their distTict boundaries. The focus is to determine the maximum flood level at the site fro m dam failure and the pro bable maximum flood (PMF).

The Geographic District Project Manager (USACE PM) chairs the technical assistance PDT and is responsible for the successful execution of their projects in accordance with this EPgMP, specific project management plans and applicable po licies. The USACE PM will develop a Proj ect Management Plan (PMP) for each project in coordination with other me mbers of the PDT. The PMP establishes the goals for the project and identifies PDT members, their roles, and their decision-making authorities. The PMP also establishes approved budget, schedule, acquisitio n method, and any special project requirements, including as referenced, the applicable change order management plan, financial management plan, etc. and any waivers required by this EPgMP during the life cycle of the project. It is updated by the District PM throughout the life cycle of the project.

2) Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC/NRR).

(a) NRC/NRR is responsible for the prioritization of the Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) sites that will be assessed for potential flood hazard. NRC/NRR provides policy, resource advocacy, and financial management for execution of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation program requirements. This includes planning, programming, budgeting, and functional standards for Nuclear Power Plant faci lities at risk.

NRC/NRR will provide project scope, direction, and funding for individual proj ect sites and is the decision authority for program execution and for project decisions that may be elevated by the project teams.

(b) NRC/NRR is responsible for overseeing integration, and execution of public safety, rules, licensing, and oversight and inc ident response for the Nuclear Power Plants.

(c) NRC/NRR is responsible for defining the requirements yielded by the technical evaluations on potential dam failure and flooding at to the NPP, Environmental Analysis Impact Process (EAIP), wetlands, fl oodplain, e tc.

3) The Technical Assistance Proj ect Delivery Team (PDT): The TA PDT accomplishes all project executio n work that US ACE is assigned. The District PM is the sole lead fo r the USACE TA PDT members and is responsible for coordination and oversight of the project from inception to completion. The PDT is comprised of members from the project user's organization; NRC/NRR; and the associated district members as specified by geographical location.

. Program Management.

a. Communications. The following meetings and reports are key communication components in the program management process.

1) Senior Executive Re view Gro ups (SERGs): The intent of the SERG is to enhance national level communications, review program metrics, and discuss program issues and initiatives and areas for improvement. The NPgM will coordinate SERG meetings between HQUSACE and NRC/NRR senior representatives to review and discuss the Nuclear Regulatory Commission program requirements and as appropriate other mission lines. The SERG will be hosted by the HQUSACE Chief, Programs Integration Division. Participation includes representatives from HQUSACE, NRC/NRR, and others as required.

The SERG location will be at e ither HQUSACE or at NRC as coordinated before each SERG. Other program stakeholders may be called upon to participate as needed.

2) Line Item Reviews (LLRs): Requirements for LIRs wi ll be established in separate Annexes to outl ine requirements for respective mission as required.

3) HQUSACE will communicate openly and transparently with NRC on a regular basis. Ro utine coordination will include but not be limited to pho ne calls, emails, and face-to-face coordination meetings.

b. Scope of Management. The scope of this EPgMP includes a ll activity requirements deem necessary for strategic coord ination a nd program focus resolution in order to maintain the respective geographic MSC and project executing distric t timely w ith the delivery of the project(s).

c. Schedule Management. T he schedule of the required mitigation strategies eithe r in the form of project construction or simply an assessment will be determined by the project delivery team.

d. Risk Management. In coordination with the PDT the respective district PM will assess all risk associated with the nuclear power plant and project execution.

c. Acquisition Manageme nt. When required, the acquisition strategy will be defin ed by the project executing district.

f. Management Informati.o n Systems. The fo llowing systems will be used to compile, display and report program and project information.

1) Corps of Engineers F inanc ial Management System (CEFMS). CEFMS wil l be used for tracking, managing and reporting design and construction funds. USACE will use CEFMS to identify unobligated balances and expiring funding. To the extent practical, Nuclear Regulatory Commission project numbers will be included on all reports provided to the NRC/NRR.

2) Resident Management System (RMS). RMS is a USACE automated quality management and project contract administration system. The system provides tools to plan and manage a project by integrating work specific requirements, corporate technical knowledge, schedule of required events and actual placement, project documentation, quality assurance functions, and management policies. RMS feeds project contract data to Web CMI.

3) Web CMI. The USACE project management districts use Web CMI (P2) for the official proj ect record. The USACE PM uses this scheduling and funding tool to plan and record all milestones.

Web CMI is a USACE internet-based information source that provides current and detailed data for all projects. Web CMI interfaces directly with RMS. The Internet address for the Web CMI is https://ppds. us ace.army. mi1/ppds/home/

"* Program Governance.

a. Authorizations and Appropriations. The participation for this EPgMP between both agencies is pursuant the Econo my Act (3 1 USC§ 1535). All required fund ing is based on a reimbursable basis from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

b. Levels of Engagement l) HQ USACE Military Mission - Manages strategic communication with appropriate NRC designated officials in coordination with the National Program Manager.

2) National Program M anager - Manages the everyday interaction with NRC in order to ma intain clarity of intent and to further coordinate the planning and execution of requirements with the geographic district.

3) District Program Manager - Manages the everyday project tasks as required with NRC field contacts. Ensures that the projects or deliverables are provided timely and accurately.

5. Financial Management.

a. Transfer of Funds - All required funding will be provided in NRC Form 662 to the Omaha district. Fund ing will be disbursed appropriately to the geographically project management district.

b. Planning and Design !Budget - Any e ffort required for planning purposes as required by the technical assistance team will be funded on a reimbursable basis by NRC.

c. Operational Financial Management - All financial management required to meet this support task to NRC will be described in the project management district PMP. This plan will include but not limited to: C urrent Working Es timate, Contractor Claims, and Funds Revocation

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact a) The Director for the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will be Mr. B ill Dean effective October 1, 2014.

JU.S.NHC

\__ __,,.....,_.,c- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory !Commission

"-'A*,,,.,_*-' IWE,,,;.,,,.,,._

.,,._0.-.,.....cl.tv I

I

--- ~1,t--1-- i

.._..-~ ._, ..

-- . ,_-==-"~~

I

-e I _L. I o _I= _I__

- -*-- - i .J.t

- -- I I ri l

t.=..:.

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation BIii Dean, Director Jennifer Uhle, Deputy Director for Proor,m Man3gemem.

Reactor Safety Programs Brian Holllan, Deputy Director for

- ~Icy O.veloi>me.nt and An.,_

t v,is Stoff SUjM1 Abroh&m, OH'ector Engineering and Corporate Support I I I I OIVltlon Of Soft(Y Svstemt 01v1,100 or Eoglnttnno 01vtl10n of ()pefcmno

[)jvitk>n of Ucenst Renewal RNCIOf lk.~ltl1~

Timothy McG1nty, Otrector John LUbtnskl, Director Ctwlllloph8f Mille!, Director Mlehe.. Evans, Dlfect0i1 ROOffl l1ytor,Oepu1y Dir.c-10, M.wy Joo* RoH-Lff, fA.ctk1gJ Deputy Director 0tpu1v Director IV&eano LOI.lift Lund. DflMY Dittc:10f DtPUtv 01re<:tor ivec,nl)

I I I I OM1ton of Pe>ek:y 11ml OIVltlOn 01 Ritk Olvlt.00 or lntP &

Rulemakln~ J apan Ltuons L.a1ned Olvltloo Assessment Reaionill SOOPOrl Lowrttltt KokajkO, Dlftctor JKk OaVlt, DlftetOf (Acthlg)

Jonph GillHH' Dhclor Sc.oft Mouls, OMICIOf AOy Mons.01, Otl)UIY ~rt(h)f Dtl)Utv Olr+c:tor (\IIC14'10

$81Hon Lff, o.t>Uly DkKlOf A.11$1 HO'd, Otputy Dhctor Deputy Director (Vac.ntJ

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) b) HQ USACE Organjzational hierarchy for this requirement tlO a,

+-'

...re

+-' CMIWM:1 V)

Mt. S(ow SIOCkW.

a, u

C re S<<llhA11tll'IIIIC.

"""'w"' No!lhAll.8!1110

...a, C

OiviS;ion

°"""" OiYiliorl 0

l!J r- ____T____ -r---- _T ____ -r------T----

1 I I I

-, I C

0

i u

' "_""_°'_"_

""., ( T~OI-~ I(--~~I(~-~~'~'I' I STP*dOI~

a, X

LU Assigns projects based on geographic location Operational control

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) c) National Program Manager l nteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021: Evaluating the Potential for Floodine at Nuclear Power Plant Sites CUSTOMER Due to Dam Failure.

~uclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NWO - Program Manager ~.. b,..l... )/_.

6.._

) _ __,

Maoalt::1i Oay--to-day Customer' communication:i.

NWO- Program Technical Manager ~(b)(6)  !

Mana1es te-chnkal communications, Pr'ovldes ttchnkal guidance FORT CIAHOUN / COOPER NPPs NWO - Program Analysd (b)(6)

M nage.s MIPRs, re-sourcing and fin 1)dal accounting

! NWO Project Manager (b)(6)

STAKEHOLDERS Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensees NWO-Project Manager ~(b)(6) I Manages ,lt e speciftt nudt-ar powe:t pi.int pro;ec:u NWO Technical Manager b 6 FARLEYNPP BEAVER VALLEY NPP SAM Pro eel Mana er b 6 SAM Technlc.il Manager b 6 PEAOI BOTTOM/ SUSQUEHANNA COLUMB IA GENERATING STATION

/THREE MILE ISIAND NPPS

Annex A - Organizational Chart and Points of Contact (continued) d) POC List NAME On!anization Phone Email Scott Flanders NRC/NRO 301-415-1634 Scott.Flanders@nrc.1.rnv Andy Campbell NRC/NRO 301-415-1634 Andv.Camobell@nrc.1mv Mahamed Shams NRC/JLD 301-415-0501 Mohamed.Shams@nrc.1.rnv Chris Cook NRC/NRO 301-415-6397 Christooher.Cook@nrc.2:ov Ken Erwin NRC/NRO 301-415-7559 Kenneth.Erwin(a)nrC,l!OV Brad Harvey NRC/NRO 301-415-4118 Brad.Harvev@Jnrc.2ov Ken See NRC/NRO 301-415-1508 Kenneth.See(a)nrc.2:ov Vic Hall NRC/JLD 301-415-2915 Victor.Hall@Jnrc.2ov (b)(6) USACENWD (b)(6) (b)(6)

USACENWD USACENWD USACENWO USACENWO USACENWO USACENWO HQ USACE HQUSACE HQUSACE

Annex B - Acronym Definition Acronym Definition AOR Area of Responsibility CCG Command Consolidated Guidance CEFMS Corps of Engineers Financial Management System COL Colonel COP Common Operating Picture CoP Community of Practice ELL Enterprise Lessons Learned EPgMP Enterprise Program Management Plan ER Engineer Regulation HQ Headquarters IAA lnteragency Agreement IIS lnteragency and International Support KO Contracting Officer LIR Line Item Review LTG Lieutenant General MILCON Military Construction MMC Modeling Mapping & Consequences Production Center MOU Memorandum of Understanding MP Military Programs MSC Major Subordinate Command NPP Nuclear Power Plant NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRO Office of New Reactors NRR Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NWD Northwestern Division NWO Omaha District OPORD Operations Order P.E. Registered Professional Engineer PDT Project Delivery Team PgMP Program Management Plan PM Project Manager PMF Probable Maximum Flood PMP Project Management Plan QMP Quality Management Plan RBC Regional Business Center RMC Risk Management Center RMS Regional Management System

Annex B - Acronym Definition (Continued)

SME Subject Matter Expert sow Statement of Work TBD To Be Determined TLR Technical Letter Report TO Task Order (amendment to Base IAA) us United States USAGE United States Army Corps of Engineers WBS Work Breakdown Structure WebCMI Web Corporate Management Information

Annex C- Interagency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 , MODIFICATION 1 Statement of Work Project

Title:

Potential for Nuclear Power Pl ant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams NRC Contracting Officer's Representative: Brad Harvey, Brad.Harvey@nrc.gov, (301) 415-4118 NRC Alternate Contracting Officer's Representative: Kenneth See, Kenneth.See@nrc.gov, (301) 415-1508 lnteragency Agreement No: NRC-HQ-13-I-03-0021 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Issuing Office: Office of Nuclear Reactor Reg1ulation Fee Recoverable: To be identified on specific task orders TAC No.: To be identified on specific task orders Docket Number: To be identified on specific task orders Agency: U.S. Army Core of Engineers Period of Performance: September 30, 2013 - September 29, 2017 BACKGROUND The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRA) is a major program office of the NRG that is responsible for the licensing and regulatory oversight of nuclear power reactors and nonpower research reactors in the civilian sector. NRR functions through a matrix organization which includes an Associate Directorate for Engineering and Safety Systems (ADES) made up of four divisions which provide technical expertise for the review of utility requested licensing actions and license amendments including quality assurance-related reviews; the development of generic communications to licensees and the nuclear industry which may take the form of generic letters, bulletins, or information notices; the development of regulatory bases for taking licensing actions and positions (e.g., providing input to regulations, regulatory guides , and industry codes and standards); the review of vendor topical reports that are not specifically linked to a licensing action; the resolution of generic technical issues that may form the regulatory bases for taking licensing actions; and positions and oversight of quality assurance at nuclear vendors and suppliers.

The Division of Engineering (DE), one of the divisions in Engineering and corporate Support, is responsible for performing safety reviews, evaluations and in-depth analyses of the civil, and mechanical aspects of licensees' applications for proposed nuclear power plant amendments and modifications to their operating license and for overseeing quality assurance at nuclear vendors and suppliers. The aforementioned reviews and analyses are performed under the cognizance of the Mechanical and Civil Engineering Branch.

The Mechanical and Civil Engineering Branch (EMCB) is responsible for evaluating issues and license amendments related to pressure boundary integrity as well as seismic qualification of piping, mechanical components and component supports. EMCB is also responsible for issues related to design and inspection of containments and safety related structures. EMC B's responsibilities also include geoscience

(geologic, seismologic, hydrolo,gic, meteorologic) as well as civil (geotechnical engineering and soil mechanics) issues.

The Hydrology and Metrology Branch (RHMB) in the Office of New Reactors is responsible for technical review of NRC's post-Fukushima activities related to flooding. By letter dated March 12, 2012 (ML12053A340), the NRG issued a request for information, hereafter referred to as the 50.54(1) letter.

The request was issued in connection with implementing so-called lessons-learned from the 2011 accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant (ML111861807). The NRG Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1, and subsequent Staff Requirements Memoranda associated with Commission Papers SECY 11-01 24 (ML11245A158) and SECY-11 -0137 (ML11272A111), inst ructed the NRG staff to issue requests for information to licensees pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f). Enclosure 2 to the 50.54(1) letter requested licensees to perform , among other items, a flood hazard reevaluation using present-day methodologies and guidance. The flood hazard reevaluation report should contain, among other items, evaluation of the flood hazards from streams and rivers, including potential dam breaches and failures. Guidance for assessment of flooding hazards at nuclear power plants due to dam failure is discussed in JLD-ISG-2013-01 {ML13151A153), which was published on July 29, 2013.

JLD-ISG-2013-01 states that in the case of dams and levees owned or operated by U.S. Federal agencies, the Federal agency responsible for {owner or operator of) the dam should be involved in supporting the dam failure flood hazard evaluation. It is critical for the owner or operator of the dam to assist the NRG or its licensees when modifying the assumptions or methods used to develop the inundation maps for a specific area. If a Federally owned dam is identified as critical to the flooding reanalysis, the licensee should contact the NRG promptly. The NRG will act as the interface between these agencies and licensees.

EMCB and RHMB do not have trained specialists who possess the in-depth knowledge and highly specialized experience needed to deal with the highly complex issues associated with dams. Specifically most of the dams of concern are operated, regulated and built by USAGE. It is for this reason that the NRG entered into an lnteragency Agreement {IAA) No. NRC-HO-13-1-03-0021 with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) which has a staff of highly t rained specialists who possess the knowledge, skills and expertise to address a variety of hydrologic issues associated with their dams and the potential impacts of dam failure on nuclear power plants.

The NRG expects to receive requests for assistance from several of its licensees in obtaining information on dams upstream of their nuclear power plants to complete the flooding hazard reevaluations associated with Enclosure 2 of the 50.54(1) letter. As an alternative to providing the requested dam information directly to its licensees, the NRG intends to obtain technical expertise from USAGE in a series of Task Orders under IAA No. NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 to assist the NRC in determining if failure of these dams could potentially flood the nuclear power plant sites. lnteragency Agreement NRC-HQ-13-1-03-0021 with the USAGE is for technical assistance on the Job Code J4631 for the project, Potential for Nuclear Power Plant Flooding Associated with Failure of Dams. This IAA is entered into under the Economy Act authority. The Reimbursable Work (Support for Others (SFO)) performed under the Economy Act allows the USAGE to accept orders and transfer of funds from other agencies to do their work. When the USAGE performs work for other agencies, it relies on the ordering agency (NRG) for the authority to do the work and the funding to do the work.

Work under this contract will be performed under Task Orders which will be discussed; agreed upon; and authorized as such work is identified as needing expertise from the USAGE. The procedures for processing task orders are found in Attachment 1.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this contract is to obtain technical expertise from USAGE to assist the NRG in determining the safety significance of hydrologic and geotechnical issues and other features associated with dams that may affect the safe reliable operation of downstream or nearby nuclear power plants.

KEY PERSONNEL WORK REQUIREMENTS On a task order basis, USAGE shall provide the services of staff personnel to perform work similar to that described below. Specific requirements will be defined in the task order Statement of Work.

• Estimation of stage, velocity, and discharge time-series in rivers near nuclear power plants under various flooding and dam failure scenarios.

• Set up, host, and participate in meetings between the USAGE, NRC, NRC's licensee(s), and optionally, other Federal agencies and dam owners regulated by other Federal agencies to allow the attendees an opportunity to discuss the watershed, review assumptions, and confirm the strategy for satisfying the 50.54(f) reevaluation as it pertains to dam failure. These meetings may be held in the vicinity of a USAGE district office near the licensee.

• Travel to NRC Headquarters to present the results of the updates, as necessary.

The schedule for completing each work assignment, Tasks and Subtasks, will be provided in the task order Statement of Work.

PROCEDURES FOR PLACING TASK ORDERS UNDER THIS INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT See Attachment 1.

LEVEL OF EFFORT The estimated level of effort (in hours) in professional staff hours over a four-year period apportioned by fiscal year is as follows:

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 TOTAL 0 30,963 1,272 1,272 1,272 34,779 The level of effort to perform each task order will be specified in the individual task order SOW.

DELIVERABLES Technical Reporting Requirements All reports are to be prepared in Windows 7 or compatible software and submitted electronically to the COR, with a copy to the NRC Contracting Officer.

Technical reporting requirements, including the Technical Letter Report formats, will be specified in each individual task order issued under this agreement.

Monthly Business Letter Report See Attachment 3.

MEETINGS AND TRAVEL For budget proposal purposes, use the following travel estimates for each request for assistance the NRC receives from its licensees:

• Four, three-person, two-day trips to a USAGE district office

• Two, two-person , two-day trips to US NRC headquarters in Rockville , Maryland.

The NRC expects to receive at least eight requests for assistance from its licensees.

NRC FURNISHED MATERIALS NRC furnished materials will be provided under each task order. If any proprietary information is provided by NRC, it must be safeguarded against unauthorized disclosure; other instructions on how to handle proprietary information will be provided in the task order.

Attachment 1 PROCEDURES FOR PLACING ORDERS UNDER THIS CONTRACT

1. When the need for a task order arises, the COR will contact the USAGE Principal Investigator (Pl) or Project Manager to discuss the general scope of the work requirements and determine the availability of personnel recommended by USAGE. If qualified personnel are available to perform the work, the Contracting Officer will request a proposal providing the task order statement of work (SOW ) to the USAGE Program Administrator or USAGE Program Manager.

2 If USAGE intends to submit proposed changes to the Statement of Work, a technical proposal describing the changes is to be submitted prior to development of a cost proposal. The name(s) and resume(s) of the individual(s) who will perform the work must be included with the technical proposal which should normally be submitted within five working days. The technical proposal must contain a detail explanation of any proposed changes in technical approach , level of effort, schedules and any other changes that are necessary to successfully perform the work in a more timely and economical cost to the government.

3. After the parties have reached agreement on the scope of the work, the personnel to be assigned, the schedule(s) and the costs, USAGE will then submit the cost proposal, expected with five working days after agreement is reached.

4. The task order will be authorized in writing by the Contracting Officer. The task order will include the agreed-upon SOW, state the cost ceiling established to complete the task order and specify the amount of funds obligated, either in full or incrementally to authorized initiation or completion of the work.

5. Each task order will be consecutively numbered and will include the NRC Technical Assignment Control (TAC) number; this number is needed for license fee billing purposes and/or for budget accountability purposes.

6. Usually within five working days after receipt of the task order, the Contracting Officer at USAGE, will acknowledge receipt and acceptance of the task order by having the N RC Form 173 signed in the space designated, and returning the NRC Form 173 electronically to the NRC Contracting Officer. In the event that USAGE requests a change to the agreed-upon scope, level of effort, cost, or period of performance prior to the signing of the NRC Form 173, the USAGE Program Administrator or USAGE Pl shall initiate discussions with the NRC Contracting Officer to reach a mutual agreement on the change.

7. In the event that a work scope or cost ceiling modification is required after acceptance of the task order, the individual (NRC or USAGE) requesting the modification shall initiate contact with the other to discuss the modification. The procedures in Items 2 and 3 above will be used to process modifications.

8. If it becomes necessary to stop work or terminate a task order, the NRC Contracting Officer will notify the USAGE Pl and the USAGE Program Administrator in writing.

9. In urgent situations, the NRC may require USAGE to start work before receipt of a request for proposal and written authorization of the task order. In such cases, upon written authorization from the NRC Contracting Officer, USAGE may begin work on the task order, assuming availability of personnel, agreement on the SOW, and the availability of obligated funds. When this accelerated procedure is used , USAGE will begin negotiating the term of a definitive task order with the NRC Contracting Officer by the target date mutually agreed upon. The written task order will be issued by the NRC Contracting Officer within five working days of completion of the negotiations. The other terms of this section will apply.

Attachment 2 Deleted

Attachment 3 Monthly Letter Status Report A monthly letter status report (MLSR) will be submitted by the 20th of each month to the COR. Each task order will identify the COR for that task order.

Note: If no work was performed during the period, a report (via E-mail) so indicating is to be subm itted to the distribution instead of the full report.

State the period of the report in which funds were expended, i.e., the dates the report covers which may not necessarily correspond to the first and the last days of the month.

Each report will include Sections I and II for each task order, and Section IV as applicable.Section IV will apply to task orders $1 00K and above, or as otherwise specified in the task order statement of work.

I WORK PROGRESS STATUS 1.a. Identification Information

- The JCN and title

- The principal investigat or and telephone number

- The COR and telephone number

- The alternate COR and telephone number 1.b. The period of performance 1.c. Financial Summary

- The authorized ceiling amount for the task order

- The total amount of funds obligated to date

- The total cost for the period

- The total cost for the fiscal year

- The total cost cumulative to date

- Percent of funds expended against obligated funds

2. Schedule/Milestone Information in the following format:

Planned Revised Actual Tasks Completion Date Completion Date Date Provide a The day, month The revised day, The day, brief and year sche- month and year month and summary duled for com- based on a change. year all of the pletion, or time- The reason for the of the work work; in- frame if a date change must be giv- is actually elude any is not known or en in the "Problem/ completed.

report or projected. Resolution" section travel. Below.

3. Work Performed During the Period This section should contain a clear, succinct discussion of the work performed on each task order during the period. As a minimum , these discussions should support the costs reported for the

period. Wording such as "worked on all tasks ," or "continued to work on Task 1.a." is not particularly useful and reduces the effectiveness of the monthly report as a management tool and for historical documentation .

Any travel taken during the reporting period should also be summarized in this section of the report.

Each travel summary should identify the person traveling, the duration of the travel , the purpose of the travel, and any work/accomplishments not reflected elsewhere.

4. Problem/Resolution All problems encountered during the period should be clearly and succinctly identified and stated.

Then , the resolution or the proposed solution should be briefly described. It should be clearly evident, from a reading of the description, who is responsible for solving the problem , should it still exist at the time the report is written .

- Notwithstanding the status of the problem at the time the MLSR is written , all problems should be recorded in the "Problem/ Resolution" section of the MLSR for documentation/historical purposes.

If the problem still exists in a subsequent month, in whole or in part, it should be described as it currently exists ; otherwise, it should be deleted from the report.

- Problem or circumstances that require a change in the level of effort/costs , scope, or travel requ irements are to be described in the MLSRs for documentation purposes but are to be dealt with separately in a letter addressed and sent to the COR.

5. Plans for Next Period Provide a brief description of the work to be performed/accomplished during the next reporting period . If a milestone is expected to be completed during the next report period, so state.

II FINANCIAL STATUS

1. Provide the total direct staff use (including subcontractor hours) and the amount of funds expended (costed) during the period and total cumulative year to date in the following categories for each task order:!.

Current Fiscal Year Total Month to Date To Date

a. Direct Labor (hours)

(1) Management xx xx xx (2) Technical xx xx xx (3) Support xx xx xx Total xx xx xx

b. Costs Labor Costs (1) Direct Labor Costs xx xx xx (2) Indirect Labor Costs xx xx xx Subtotal xx xx xx Other Direct Costs (1) Subcontractor/Consultant Cost xx xx xx (2) Material and Services Costs xx xx xx (3) Computer Usage Costs xx xx xx (4) Travel (a) Domestic xx xx xx (b) Foreign xx xx xx Total Travel xx xx xx Subtotal Other Direct Costs xx xx xx G&A Costs xx xx xx DOE Fee xx xx xx Total Reimbursable Costs xx xx xx Ill. Provide a summary table by task order as follows:

Fiscal Year Total Authorized Obligations Obligations Costs to Costs Tasks Cost Ceiling to Date Balance Date To Date xx $ $ $ $ $

xx $ $ $ $ $

IV MONTHLY EXPENSE FORECAST

For task orders valued at $100,000 or more, a forecast by Task will be prepared and included in the first MLSR and updated as applicable, e.g. , on a fiscal year basis or when there is a change in funding authorization.

For each Task, a budget is to be developed based on the agreed upon allocation of the level of effort among the Tasks. Separate expenditures for each Task will be reported in the MLSR against the budget using the following format:

Authorized Cost Ceiling : $ Funds Obligated to date: $ __

Expenditures Task Expenditures Percentage Tasks Planned Budget for the Period Cumulative vs. Budget

1. $ $ $  %

2. $ $ $  %

3. $ $ $  %

4. $ $ $  %

5. $ $ $  %

6. $ $ $  %

7. $ $ $  %

Total $ $ $  %

A monthly expense variance greater than 15 percent must be explained in the "Problem/Resolution" section.

From:  !{b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) NRC Program calendar Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 4:38:30 PM Attachments: NRUalendar 2016-02-16.odf Brad, Attached is a calendar that I started to track availability for the USACE RC program. It's a little different format than the previous version because I don't have the software thatl(bi (6) !used to create that one. Would it work for everyone there to mark it up in PDF with any known commitmen s, and for me to then incorporate them into the master version of the calendar?

Thanks, l(b)(6) l(b)(6) I Project Manager Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District Special Proj ects Branch 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, E 68102-4901 Phone: !(b)(6) I BB: l(b)(6)

Fax: _

NRC Calendar 2016-02-16 Tuesday, 16 February, 2016 14:44

February 2016 S.. Mo F~:itua,y 20:6 lu W~ f., ~* Si Su ~lo Ma<ch2016 Tu We flt ,, Sa 1 z 3 ~ s 6 1 2 3 ~ s 7

14 21 22 15 9

16 23 10 17 i,.

ll 18 2S

.}

~

26 13 20 Z7 '

13 20 1

14 21

• 9 10 15 16 !7 22 21 2~

11 18 2S l]

JI 26 28 29 27 21 29 10 il SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 31 Jan 1 Feb 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

- 13:00 Copy: CGS Webinar (Webinar/Teleconfere nee) -l(bl(~l I

- l (b)(6)

I 28 29 1 Mar 2 3 4 5 (b:(61 1 16-Feb-16 14:44

M*'th 20;.6 Aprl 2016 March 2016 Su Mo ?11 1

a we 1

T~

3 f ~

' 19 u

5 Su 3

Mo lu w, lh ff l

a s.

1 u

6 JI) 1 14 21 15 22 16 23

'l ID 17 24 11 a

ZS 26 10 17

" u\

11 11 19 13 20

' *~.c' 21 15 22 9

_Jj Z1 Z1 28 29 lO 31 24 25 2'li n 2S 29 30 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 28 Feb 29 1 Mar 2 3 14 5 I

- ~

• D Y (Ft Carso:1. CO) J 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I ,'h)(R) I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1-,

I-l(b)i6l I.

27 28 29 30 31 1 Apr 2 I{b)(6)-* 2 16-Feb-16 14:44

AprliZ0:6 Mil)' 2'll6 April 2016 Su Mo 1

?11 s

we Tn I

fJ l

I

~

2 Su I

Mo 2

9 lu 3

10 w,

II*

lh 5

)

ff 6

13 s.

7

-4 tD II 12 13 14 l.5 16 15 16 17 II 19 21) 2; 17 11 19 .tl 21 :U 23 22 2l le 2S 26 27 211 24 25 26 17 211 29 30 29 30 3J SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 27 Mar 28 29 30 31 1 Apr 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

- l(bl!6l IDY Philadelphia, PA) 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

~ All-day Meetings 1 I(b)(6)

-" 3 16-Feb-16 14:44

~20]6 Jur,e 2016 May 2016 Su Mo l 2

?11 3

we 4

Tn

,,s f

6

~

7 Su Mo lu w, 1

lh 2

ff 3

s.

~

D a

16 23 q 10 17 lJ 11 18 2S 19 26 B

.lll 27 14 21 21

~

12 19 u

20' 7 14 21 I

IS 22

~,

23 q 10 17 2A lJI 2S 29 30 31 26 n 28 20 30 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 1 May 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 l(b)(6) I 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

- - - l (bH61 L --

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 Jun 2 3 4 Merrorial Day '-foliday

-- 16-Feb-16 14:44 l1filE[ 4

.tu... 20:.6 1111, 2016 June 2016 Su Mo ?11 we l

a Tn

~ :o fJ 3

~

Su 3

Mo lu w, lh ff l

a s.

1 19

~

!.2 ll 20 1,

21 7

IS 22 16 23

1

u II 11 2S 10 17

" u\

11 11 19 13 20

' *~.c' 21 15 22 9

_Jj Z1 26 Z7 28 29 30 14 25 2'li 21 2S 29 30 11 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 29 May 30 31 1 Jun 12 13 4 l(tllifll I .

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

~ - ~ *uY (San Diego, CA) 26 27 28 29 30 lJul 2

!(b)(6) 5 16-Feb-16 14:44

kly2016 AUQ"512016 July 2016 S.. Mo l 4 lu

\

We rn 6 1 fJ l

a Sa 2

Su ~lo I i Tu 2

q We 3

10 l1 f l, fr 5

11 Sa

l 6

U) 11 12 u 14 lS 16 14 IS l6 17 ': . 19 .20

7 11 19 .20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 15 26 Z1

~ 2S 26 Z1 2& 29 'IO 28 29 30 n 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 26 Jun 27 28 29 30 lJul 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 Indeoendence Day

-foliday .

10 11 12 l3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

- 24 25 26 27 28 29

- 30 31 lAug 2 3 4 5 6

... --- 6 16-Feb-16 14:44

!(bl (6)

A.JQ16t20l6 Sept;f'!'be* 2016 August 2016 Su Mo l

lu l

We 3

fo

~

~]

5 Sa 6

Su 11.40 fu We In l

f<

2 Sa 3

2:

1

!.A

• 15 22

'l 16 ll 10 17 2<

II 1&

25 11

9 26 13 20 11 4

11 18 11 19

\

13 20 14 21 I a

s 22 9

16 23 10

~1 24 211 29 ]O 31 25 26 Z1 21 29 30 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 31 Jul lAug 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 Sep 2 3

!(b)(6) 7 16-Feb-16 14:44

~pte...-be< 20l6 OCto~ 2016 September 2016 S.. Mo Tu 6

We r, 1

a fr 2

q Sa J

Su ~lo Tu We fl, fr 1

Sa l

a

' 7 10

' 3 \

\ ~

!l u u 1' IS !6 17 9 10 ll 11 J 14 ':.S

B 19 20 21 22 21 24 16 17 11 l9 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 29 lO 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

](I 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 28Aug 29 30 31 1 Sep 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Labor Day Holiday 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 !Oct

!(b) (6) 8 16-Feb-16 14:44

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !{b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  ![b}(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (AUG 12, 2015--11:00 AM ET*-Conf# ~

Date: Friday, July 31, 2015 3:32:41 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: AUG-12-2015 (Wednesday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes; I Participant passcode:l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (AUG 21, 2015**11:00 AM ET*-Conf~ )

Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:52:19 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: AUG-21-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b\/6\ I Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press

• O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (AUG 28, 2015--11:00 AM ET*-Conf# ~

Date: Friday, August 21, 2015 1:01:00 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR OMAR MORRIS Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: AUG-28-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number: l(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode: l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press

• O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (JUL 31, 2015--02:00 PM ET--Conf~ )

Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 9:36:12 AM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: JUL-31-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 02:00 PM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6) I Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !{b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (SEP 11, 2015**11:00 AM ET-*Conf# ~

Date: Friday, August 28, 2015 12:44: 14 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: SEP-1 1-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 1 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (SEP 18, 2015**11:00 AM ET-*Conf# ~ )

Date: Friday, September 11, 2015 2:41:35 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR OMAR MORRIS Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: SEP-18-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvev. Brad Cc:  !(b)(6)

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender] Declined : [EXTERNAL] NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classi fi calion: CLASSlflED Caveats: NONE Brad, . - - - - - - ,

I'll bc fib)(6)

Thank~

{&Jon:

Caveats: NO E UNCLASS!FfED

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !{b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (OCT 02, 2015**11:00 AM ET**Conf#l(b)(6) I>

Date: Friday, September 25, 2015 12:16:49 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: OCT-02-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 1 hr Confirmation number: l(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode: l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad ~

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (SEP 25, 2015**11:00 AM ET-*Conf# (b)(6)

Date: Thursday, September 24, 2015 5:27:54 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR TYRONE BROWN Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: SEP-25-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes*

I Participant passcode:l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (OCT 02, 2015**ll:OO AM ET**Conf# m))

Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 7:49:51 AM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: OCT-02-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME

~

Duration:

Confirmation number:

Company: ~ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The followi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: !ib)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad l'1bi(6)"1

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (OCT 09, 2015**11:00 AM ET**Conf#~ )

Date: Friday, October 02, 2015 1:19:56 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR TYRONE BROWN Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: OCT-09-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:

To: Hacvev B@d Cc: l(b)(6)

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender] Declined: [EXTERNAL] NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classi fi calion: CLASSlflED Caveats: NONE Brad, . . . - - - - - - - - , ~

I' ll bc frb)(6) jbut (b) has lhis covered.

Thank!:"~.__...

W on:

Caveats: NO E UNCLASS!FfED

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) FW: NRC/USACE Status Phone call (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNC LASSIF IED Caveats: NONE Thanks Brad !

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NO E

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad Jih\iml

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (OCT 16, 2015**11:00 AM ET**Conf~ )

Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:07:11 AM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: OCT-16-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcodel(b)(6) j For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Sarvey. Brao

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

CLASS IFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (NOV 06, 2015--02:00 PM ET*-Conf~

Date: Friday, October 30, 2015 8:09:16 AM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: NOV-06-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 02:00 PM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (NOV 20, 2015--11:00 AM ET**Conf# ~

Date: Friday, November 06, 2015 6:21:46 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: NOV-20-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number: l(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press

• O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (OCT 28, 2015**05:00 PM ET**Cont#l(b)(6) p Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12: 19:40 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: OCT-28-2015 (Wednesday)

Call time: 05:00 PM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: l(b)(6)

To: Flaryey. Brao

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)/6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (DEC 04, 2015--11:00 AM ET-*Conf# l(b)(6) ~

Date: Friday, November 20, 2015 1: 12: 13 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: DEC-04-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (DEC 11, 2015--11:00 AM ET-*Conf# fifilifil)

Date: Friday, December 04, 2015 4:16:12 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: DEC-11-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode}(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number IUSA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: hb)(6l To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From: l(b)(6)

To: Sarvey. Brao

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !{b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (DEC 18, 2015--11:00 AM ET-*Conf#l{b)(6)

Friday, December 11, 2015 2:29:46 PM

!l Date:

R Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR TYRONE BROWN Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: DEC-18-2015 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:i(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number IUSA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:

To: Sarvey. Brao

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Declined : (EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (JAN 08, 2016** 10:00 AM ET--Conf# ~

Date: Monday, January 04, 2016 10:17:56 AM L_J R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR OMAR MORRIS Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: JAN-08-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 10:00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number: irbJ/6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:l(b)(6}

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !{b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : FW: NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

Date:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (JAN 29, 2016**10:00 AM ET--Conf# !(b)(6)

Friday, January 22, 2016 10:46:21 AM l

R Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR OMAR MORRIS Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: JAN-29-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 10:00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)  !

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad l7b1iml_

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (FEB 05, 2016**10:00 AM ET**Conf# ~

Date: Friday, January 29, 2016 5: 18:54 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR TYRONE BROWN Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: FEB-05-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 10:00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:

Company: l(b~%x.us J ucLEAR REGULATORY coM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number IUSA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The followi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !{bl/6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (FEB 19, 2016**11:00 AM ET**Conf# IIfilN[J)

Date: Friday, February 05, 2016 12:46:16 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: FEB-19-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)  !

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcodej(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number IUSA !888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conference. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad rm_

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (FEB 26, 2016** 10:00 AM ET**Conf# ~

Date: Friday, February 19, 2016 2:04:15 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR TYRONE BROWN Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: FEB-26-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 10:00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number IUSA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conference. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:

l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (MAR 04, 2016--03:00 PM ET**Conf# l(b}(6)l Date: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:19:05 AM L.:J R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: MAR-04-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 03:00 PM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad f7biIBi""l

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (MAR 10, 2016**10:00 AM ET**Conf#~

Date: Friday, March 04, 2016 4:45:30 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: MAR-10-2016 (Thursday)

Call time: 10:00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode: l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Declined : (EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNC LASSIF IED Caveats: NONE

~ d. I am scheduled for mandatory training Tues-Thurs. If al all possible, I will excuse myself for an hour or so lo sit in on the ca ll.

Classilicat ion: CLAS SIFIED Caveats: NO E

From:  !{b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (MAR 25, 2016**10:00 AM ET**Conf~

Date: Friday, March 18, 2016 11:26:48 AM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: MAR-25-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 10:00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number IUSA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: ilh\16)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

CLASS IFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

CLASS IFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED

From:

To:

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

CLASS IFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (APR 01, 2016--02:00 PM ET**Conf~ )

Date: Friday, March 25, 2016 11:33:22 AM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR OMAR MORRIS Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: APR-01-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 02:00 PM EASTERN TIME Duration: ({ hr Confirmation number: (b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (APR 08, 2016--11:00 AM ET**Conf#l(b)(6) I)

Date: Friday, April 01, 2016 3:21:49 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: APR-08-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode: l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (APR 15, 2016--11:00 AM ET**Conf#!(b)(6) b Date: Friday, April 08, 2016 12:15:46 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR TYRONE BROWN Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: APR-15-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (APR 22, 2016--11:00 AM ET**Conf# ~

Date: Friday, April 15, 2016 2:40:17 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: APR-22-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From: l(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

CLASS IFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (APR 29, 2016--11:00 AM ET**Conf#~

Date: Friday, April 22, 2016 2:54:41 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: APR-29-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted: [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call (UNCLASSIFIED)

CLASS IFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION : UNCLASSIFIED

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From:  !(b)(6)

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com Harvey Brad To:

Subject:

Date:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (MAY 06, 2016--11:00 AM ET--Conf# ! (b)(6)

Friday, April 29, 2016 2:57:46 PM l

R Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: MAY-06-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number: !tb)/6) I Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode: l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (MAY 16, 2016-- 11:00 AM ET--Conf~

Date: Friday, May 06, 2016 12:46:47 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: MAY-16-2016 (Monday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 1 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6)

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode}(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From:

To: Harvey. Brad

Subject:

[Extemal_Sender) Accepted : [EXTERNAL) NRC/USACE Status Phone Call

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (MAY 20, 2016-- 11:00 AM ET--Conf~ )

Date: Monday, May 16, 2016 12:44:42 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: MAY-20-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number: l(b)(6) I Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (JUN 24, 2016**11:00 AM ET--Conf~ )

Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 11:46:48 AM 'L..:...J R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR OMAR MORRIS Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: JUN-24-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 11 :00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6) ~

Company: NWX-0S UCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (SEP 01, 2016**02:00 PM ET**Conf#~

Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 6:09:58 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR MICHAEL HACKETT Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: SEP-01-2016 (Thursday)

Call time: 02:00 PM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode: l(b}(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number IUSA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conference. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (SEP 30, 2016**02:00 PM ET**Conf#~

Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 12:01:51 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

TROY MCNAIR Phone number: 1-301-415-7026 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: SEP-30-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 02:00 PM EASTERN TIME Duration: 1 hr Confirmation number:

Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:!(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (OCT 28, 2016**10:00 AM ET**Conf~ )

Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 1:54:33 PM R

Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR OMAR MORRIS Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: OCT-28-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 10:00 AM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number: l(b)(6) I Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode: l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press

• O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 800-857-8777.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .

From: norepHesplease@mymeetjngs com To: Harvey Brad

Subject:

[E~ternal_Sender] Conference Details (OCT 28, 2016**03:00 PM ET--Conf ~

Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:55:30 PM .. ~

R Your conference details are enclosed.

Meeting Information:

Leader: MR BRAD HARVEY Phone number: 1-301-415-4118

Contact:

MR OMAR MORRIS Phone number: 1-301-415-7027 Service level: Unattended Number of lines: Total=10 Dialout=0 Meet Me=10 Meet Me Toll=0 Call date: OCT-28-2016 (Friday)

Call time: 03:00 PM EASTERN TIME Duration: 2 hr Confirmation number:  !(b)(6) I Company: NWX-US NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM CRC:

Passcodes/Pin codes:

I Participant passcode:l(b)(6)

For security reasons, the passcode will be required to Join the conference.

Dial in numbers:

Freephone/

Country Toll Numbers Toll Free Number I USA I888-411-0721 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.

In-Conference Features:

All participants must use a touch- tone phone to participate in an Audio Conferen ce. The fo llowi1 are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference :

• Press *O operator assistance (small fee may apply)

• Press *6 mute/unmute individual line Selected Conference Features:

I Audio Tones A cancellation fee will be assessed per reserved line, in the event that the conference is not cancelled within 30 minutes prior to the scheduled start time.

An overbooking fee will be assessed for each unused, reserved line after the first 50 unused lines, per completed conference. There will be no fee assessed for the first 50 unused, reserved lines.

Leaders can schedule, modify or cancel a reservation by using Conference Scheduling Assistant, an online scheduling tool. To reschedule or cancel this reservation, click here.

For additional assistance, contact customer service at 866-900-1011.

The Conferencing Center would like to send you e-mail notes to keep you informed of new or enhanced products and services, conferencing tips, or special offers, etc. If you would prefer not to receive these messages, you may unsubscribe now Thank you .