ML23072A431
| ML23072A431 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07201032 |
| Issue date: | 03/13/2023 |
| From: | Holtec |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| Shared Package | |
| ML23072A426 | List: |
| References | |
| 5018102 | |
| Download: ML23072A431 (1) | |
Text
CoC Condition/Technical Specification Evaluation Form - CoC original Appendix A Page 1 of 29 CoC Condition/TS Identifier: ___A-1.1_______
- All LCOs also require an Applicability, Condition(s), Required Action(s), Completion Time(s),
Surveillance Requirement(s), and Frequency(ies). Refer to NUREG-1745 for additional guidance.
- In performing the risk insight evaluation above, the evaluator should think about subsequent changes to a relocated CoC requirement. Specifically, ask the question what is the likelihood and worst possible consequences of a future change to this requirement in the less conservative direction?
Requirement Appendix A Section 1.1: Definitions CoC Body Certified Design Section I. Technology No Section II. Design Features No Appendix A - Inspections, Tests, and Evaluations No Appendix B.
Technical Specifications Section 1 Definitions, Use and Application Yes Section 2 Approved Contents (Selection Criteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section 3 Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs)*
and Surveillance Requirements (SRs)
(Selection Criteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section 4 Administrative Controls No Risk Insight**:
Will removing this requirement from the CoC/TS result in A significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the cask FSAR?
No/A The possibility of a new or different kind of accident being created compared to those previously evaluated in the FSAR?
No/A A Significant reduction in the margin of safety for ISFSI or cask operation?
No/A Evaluation Summary Move to Appendix B Section 1 as it meets the criterion for inclusion in the new TS format (Use and Application).
Holtec Letter 5018102 Attachment 4 1 of 4
CoC Condition/Technical Specification Evaluation Form - CoC original Appendix A Page 2 of 29 CoC Condition/TS Identifier: ___A-1.2_______
- All LCOs also require an Applicability, Condition(s), Required Action(s), Completion Time(s),
Surveillance Requirement(s), and Frequency(ies). Refer to NUREG-1745 for additional guidance.
- In performing the risk insight evaluation above, the evaluator should think about subsequent changes to a relocated CoC requirement. Specifically, ask the question what is the likelihood and worst possible consequences of a future change to this requirement in the less conservative direction?
Requirement Appendix A Section 1.2: Logical Connectors: The purpose of this section is to explain the meaning of logical connectors.
CoC Body Certified Design Section I. Technology No Section II. Design Features No Appendix A - Inspections, Tests, and Evaluations No Appendix B.
Technical Specifications Section 1 Definitions, Use and Application Yes Section 2 Approved Contents (Selection Criteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section 3 Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs)*
and Surveillance Requirements (SRs)
(Selection Criteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section 4 Administrative Controls No Risk Insight**:
Will removing this requirement from the CoC/TS result in A significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the cask FSAR?
No/A The possibility of a new or different kind of accident being created compared to those previously evaluated in the FSAR?
No/A A Significant reduction in the margin of safety for ISFSI or cask operation?
No/A Evaluation Summary Move to Appendix B Section 1 as it meets the criterion for inclusion in the new TS format (Use and Application).
Holtec Letter 5018102 Attachment 4 2 of 4
CoC Condition/Technical Specification Evaluation Form - CoC original Appendix A Page 4 of 29 CoC Condition/TS Identifier: ___A-1.3_______
- All LCOs also require an Applicability, Condition(s), Required Action(s), Completion Time(s),
Surveillance Requirement(s), and Frequency(ies). Refer to NUREG-1745 for additional guidance.
- In performing the risk insight evaluation above, the evaluator should think about subsequent changes to a relocated CoC requirement. Specifically, ask the question what is the likelihood and worst possible consequences of a future change to this requirement in the less conservative direction?
Requirement Appendix A Section 1.3: Completion Times: The purpose of this section is to establish the Completion Time convention and to provide guidance for its use.
CoC Body Certified Design Section I. Technology No Section II. Design Features No Appendix A - Inspections, Tests, and Evaluations No Appendix B.
Technical Specifications Section 1 Definitions, Use and Application Yes Section 2 Approved Contents (Selection Criteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section 3 Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs)*
and Surveillance Requirements (SRs)
(Selection Criteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section 4 Administrative Controls No Risk Insight**:
Will removing this requirement from the CoC/TS result in A significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the cask FSAR?
No/A The possibility of a new or different kind of accident being created compared to those previously evaluated in the FSAR?
No/A A Significant reduction in the margin of safety for ISFSI or cask operation?
No/A Evaluation Summary Move to Appendix B Section 1 as it meets the criterion for inclusion in the new TS format (Use and Application).
Holtec Letter 5018102 Attachment 4 3 of 4
CoC Condition/Technical Specification Evaluation Form - CoC original Appendix A Page 6 of 29 CoC Condition/TS Identifier: ___A-1.4_______
- All LCOs also require an Applicability, Condition(s), Required Action(s), Completion Time(s),
Surveillance Requirement(s), and Frequency(ies). Refer to NUREG-1745 for additional guidance.
- In performing the risk insight evaluation above, the evaluator should think about subsequent changes to a relocated CoC requirement. Specifically, ask the question what is the likelihood and worst possible consequences of a future change to this requirement in the less conservative direction?
Requirement Appendix A Section 1.4: Frequency: The purpose of this section is to define the proper use and application of Frequency requirements.
CoC Body Certified Design Section I. Technology No Section II. Design Features No Appendix A - Inspections, Tests, and Evaluations No Appendix B.
Technical Specifications Section 1 Definitions, Use and Application Yes Section 2 Approved Contents (Selection Criteria)
A1 No A2 No A3 No Section 3 Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs)*
and Surveillance Requirements (SRs)
(Selection Criteria)
L1 No L2 No L3 No Section 4 Administrative Controls No Risk Insight**:
Will removing this requirement from the CoC/TS result in A significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the cask FSAR?
No/A The possibility of a new or different kind of accident being created compared to those previously evaluated in the FSAR?
No/A A Significant reduction in the margin of safety for ISFSI or cask operation?
No/A Evaluation Summary Move to Appendix B Section 1 as it meets the criterion for inclusion in the new TS format (Use and Application).
Holtec Letter 5018102 Attachment 4 4 of 4