ML22173A130

Bwd 2018 Ile ES-301-4 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist

ML22173A130
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	04/24/2018
From:	Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Exelon Generation Co LLC
Baker R
Shared Package
ML17164A335	List: BW180029, Bwd 2018 Ile Proposed Exam Submittal Letter ML22173A122 ML22173A124 ML22173A125 ML22173A127 ML22173A128 ML22173A130 ML22173A132 ML22173A133
References
Download: ML22173A130 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Braidwood Date of Exam: 5/29/18 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 Operating Test No. :2018 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* cH

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. cq ~ M

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. QJ? t?-- t~

3. Each event description consists of the following:

• the the the the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew expected operator actions (by shift position) 1/2 er ~

• the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. a ti- ~

~ ~

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ~

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

(1/2 9 ~

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. ~ C) ~

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d}, any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

ct 9-- ~

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with.Section D.5 of ES-301. 'cl u ~

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

d 'ti- ~

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)  !~ &~

~ e-- ~

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

~ Ct) ~

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. OJ 0 I~

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2} 2/ 2 /2 ~ t7- ~i':;

2. Abnormal events (2-4) 4/ 4 / 4 c:I:), u ~~

3. Major transients (1-2) 1/ 2 / 1 ~ V "'e~

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/ 1 / 2 cg, l7 tr~

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (?:. 1 per scenario set) 1/ 1 /0 9 tr ~

6. Preidentified critical tasks (> 2) 2/ 2 / 2 c.~ fr i>~

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.