ML22167A016
| ML22167A016 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades  |
| Issue date: | 01/23/2017 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17037C881 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22167A016 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4
- PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT Date of Exam: 2113 2120 2017 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 Operating Test No.:IJ'(C-~
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*<->
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, ~
~
~
but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
~
l&(o Riw
- 3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
~
~w the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event
~
the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
~
~
?itW
- 5.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete -~ ~
~.J evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
- 6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
~
~~
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
?:t{o Cues are given.
- 7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
~iS!) ~
~~
- 8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance
~\\J deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional
~
~
fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
7
- 9.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other
-~ '&£ ~..J,V..
scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
- 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
~
~
fV..\\J.
- 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable
~u.> ~
I~
rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified ~
~
~~
on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
~
~
~
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) i I 2 I 2 {z. ~
I~ 'y:i-\\J
- 2.
Abnormal events (2-4) 2 I "'f / 2 /"{ I~ '2-oA t-lW
- 3.
Major transients (1-2) jt 1 I j_ If ~
&e:, '(J,W
- 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)
- 2. I 2., I 21 2. ~
"e;te, ~CJ
- 5.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)
Ot c::, I ito ~
~
lJM
- 6.
EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 4 13 t ;J/'L ~
p.Cf?. ~\\OJ.
NOTE:. The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
3
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Operating Test Developed as part of Examiner Qualification.