ML22144A389
| ML22144A389 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 05/13/2019 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19220A200 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22144A389 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the NRC developed Written Examination Outline sent to the Facili ONLY Facility: Perry Nuclear Power Plant Date of Examination (Retake): TBD 2019
Item Task Description Initials
- 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) frt(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
w R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes an systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
T E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
N
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of s normal evolutions, instrun:ient and component failures, technical specifications, and major 1 transients.
M sess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mr f applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L withe compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one ew or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' it test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent da y s.
0 c. To the extent pos le, assess whether the oulline(s) conforms With the qualitative nd R quantitative criteria s cifred on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D in overlap). Section D.5, "Specific I ructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test," of ES-1 (including
- 3. a. Verify that the systems w
- e meets the criteri rm ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains t mber of contro -plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions A (2) Task repetition from the last limits specified on the form.
L (3) No tasks are duplicated from t K (4) The number of new or modified urns specified on the form.
T (5) The number of alternate-path, I diologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the R b. Verify that the administrative outli 0 ( 1) The tasks are distributed u (2) At least one task is y modified.
G (3) No more than o from the last two NRC h H
- c. Determine whether ther re enough different ouHines to test the projecte at no items are duplicated on subsequent da ys.
- 4. a. Assess whether ant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and plant exami on insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
re that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
Assess whether the exam frts the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
.........._ 1 Prir}tedJName/ Date
- a. Author '."..0<?,.~1"-"'..f'l.4( { * * (/-J.9~11
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) N/ NIA C NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column *c*; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.