ML22139A306
| ML22139A306 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 07/24/2019 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19161A059 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22139A306 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Q J
l...lG\\. c;~es Date of Examination: C7l I 2...s/ 2019 Initials Item Task Description a
b*
c**
- 1.
~,,.
11'Pr 441!_
w
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with
µ1p, ~~
CP R
Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
r,,IA_
I T
C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
fJ IP..,,ltr tj(A(Y T
E
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
l,c/1~ A>\\h' N}f N
- 2.
- a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of
~ ~
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major 5P\\)
s transients.
I M
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule M-l(JJ L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at
>ID A
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
- c.
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in I.A- ~-~-\\:)
Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including overlap).
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1)
The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed P.,JA co w
among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A (2)
Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
l"!A v\\ t\\
L (3)
No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
K (4)
The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
T (5)
The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H
tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R w
0
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
/J!A II~
u (1)
The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
!vii\\
G (2)
At least one task is new or significantly modified.
H (3)
No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.
- c.
Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of }/!fr "'~
CJ) applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
MA
- 4.
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual tJ,> ~ 'p~
plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G
~ ~J ~
E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
1/lk 14h ?~
E C.
R
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
Jd'r,- r>~ ~
A lfvt L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
SrO ~
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
M-- sro r?£
~.
PONeJN*m~;ga~~
Date
- a. Author t#lll'::1
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
C.
NRC's Chief Examiner (#) ~l ~~ W,1
- d. NRG Supervisor 0 1 t
- Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.