ML22101A047

Submittal of Application for the Renewal of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit

ML22101A047
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	04/04/2022
From:	Brandon M DTE Electric Company
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NRC3-22-0002
Download: ML22101A047 (133)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:NRC3-22-0002 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

Reference:

Fermi 3 NRG Docket No. 52-033 NRG License No. NPF-95 April 4, 2022 10 CFR 50. 72(b)(2)(xi)

Subject:

DTE Electric Company Submittal of Application for the Renewal of the Fermi 3 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit On April 4, 2022, DTE Electric Company (DTE) submitted its application for the Fermi 3 NPDES Permit (Submission HP8-3ZRH-GOQVW) to Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE). The current permit (MI0058892) expires October 1, 2022. Section 3.0 of the Fermi 3 Environmental Protection Plan requires that DTE provide a copy of the permit application to the NRG at the same time it is submitted to the permitting agency. The purpose of this letter is to transmit the enclosed copy of the EGLE NPDES permit application. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact me at (313) 235-0443. Sincerely, Michael K Brandon, Manager Nuclear Development - Licensing DTE Electric Company

Enclosure:

Fermi 3 Michigan EGLE Wetland Permit Application

USNRC NRC3-22-0002 Page2 CC: Michael Dudek, NRG Fem,i 3 Project Branch Chief (Enclosure submitted electronically) Demetrius Murray, NRG Fem,i 3 Project Manager (Enclosure submitted electronically) Fem,i 2 Resident Inspector (w/o Enclosure) Andrea D. Veil, Director, NRG Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (w/o Enclosure) NRG Region Ill Regional Administrator (w/o Enclosure) NRG Region II Regional Administrator (w/o Enclosure) Supeivisor, Electric Operators, Michigan Public Seivice Commission (w/o Enclosure) Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy OWMRP, Radiological Protection Section (w/o Enclosure) Craig D. Sly, Dominion Energy, Inc. (w/o Enclosure) Kent Halac, General Electric (w/o Enclosure) Art Zaremba, Duke Energy (w/o Enclosure) Steve Franzone, Florida Power and Light (w/o Enclosure)

l'/'u- ,1,/;;//11> ll' ll;l0~ J:1!@/li:{~- 1J~}i:-;;-:::~ ~.-:-;:~--::::. ID=.E April 4, 2022 ,,~ ~-:

1'\\~~1~~'<\\\\~~~

ll\\ I\\\\'\\: ~'\\:,*, -. f, l 1 * \\ ', ', "'" 1 1\\\\\\ \\\\\\~~ .,\\ \\\\\\' I!\\,'* Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, Water Resource Division - Permit Section Industrial and Storm Water Permits Unit 525 West Allegan, PO Box 30457 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: NPDES Permit Renewal Application DECO - Fermi 3 Power Plant NPDES Permit No. MI0058892

Dear Sir or Madam:

In accordance with Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy Authorization to Discharge under NPDES Permit No. MI0058892, the DTE Electric Company (the Company) is submitting the attached application for the relssuance for the DTE Fermi 3 Power Plant (DECO - Fermi 3 Power Plant). The associated $750.00 application fee wlll be paid onllne at the time of the submittal of the appllcatlon. Comments Regarding the Appllcatton on MIWaters Faclllty

Description:

Fermi 3 Is not yet bullt and operational Outfall Information and Effluent Characteristics: Fermi 3 wlll operate In much the same manner as Fermi 2, with a similar cooling water cycle; therefore, Fermi 2 2014 NPDES Permit Renewal laboratory analyses are provided as expected/estimated data In support of this proposed discharge. If you have any questions relatlve to this appllcatlon or desire additional Information, please contact me at (248)207-7768 or via e-mall at marcela.orlandea@dteenerqy.com. Sincerely, DTE' Electric Company Marcela P Oriandea, PE, LEED AP Princlpal Environmental Engineer Environmental Management & Safety Enclosures Cc: Tarek Buckmaster - EGLE, Southeast Michigan District Mlchael Brandon - DTE Electric Company, Fermi 2 Power Plant

National Pollutant Discharge Elimin.ation System {NPDES) Industrial/Commercial Application Form {Reissuance) version 2.25 (Submission #: HP8-3ZRH-G0QVW, version 1) Details Submission ID HP8-3ZRH-G0QVW Status Draft Form Input Applicant Information Permit Number (Pre-populated) MI0058892 "APPLICANT'" refers to the entity legally responsible for the Information submitted with this appllcatlon, and for the permit that will result from It. DO NOT provide the name of an Individual. Contact information wlll be collected In another section.

Applicant Information Enter name of legal entity..:. Organization Name DTE Electric Company Phone Type Number Mobile 248.207.7768 Emall marcela.orlandea@dteenergy.com Fax NONE PROVIDED Enter address of legal entity..:. One Energy Plaza Detroit, Ml 48226 United States Facility Information Extension FACILITY DESIGNATED NAME (pre-populated) DECO-Fermi 3 Power Pit Faclllty Name 1 - Company Name DTE Electric Company Facility Name 2 - Division Name NONE PROVIDED Facllfty Name 3 - Plant Name DECO - Fermi 3 Power Plant Which of the followlng best describes this facility? Private Facility Location 41.9608,-83.2619 Site/Facility Location Address 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, Ml 48166 NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) code: 221113 SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) code: 4911

Is this facility a primary Industry? Refer to Table 1 of the Appendix to make this determination. Yes, this facility is a primary industry. CLICK HERE to view the AQpendix to the permit application Select all primary industrial categories that apply: Steam Electric Power Plants Enter the name of the Local Unit of Government (LUG) in which the facility Is located: Frenchtown Township Provide an e-mail address for an appropriate LUG contact, such as a clerk, who can be notified about the publlc notice period: clerk@frenchtownchartertwp.org Does the faclllty have an EGLE-certified operator at the appropriate level? NO Please provide an explanatlon: An EGLE-certified operators at the appropriate level will be assigned when the plant will be operational. The power plant is not built yet.. Contacts (1 of 3) Addltlonal Instructions for completing this portion of the appllcatlon are provided in the Appendix. Appendix to the Pem,it Application Contact Facility Contact DMR Contact Storm Water Operator Required Contact Types: At minimum the following contact types must be provided: Annual Permit Billing Contact; Application Contact; Facility Contact; DMR Contact; and Certified Operator

Contact Prefix Ms. First Name Last Name Catherine Gorski Title Senior Environmental Specialist Organization Name DTE Bectric Phone Type Business Number 313.389.7768 Email catherine.gorski@dteenergy.com Fax NONE PROVIDED Address Enrico Fermi Nuclear Plant 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 United States Certification Number(s) 1-15976 Certification Classification(s) Industrial Stormwater Operator Contacts (2 of 3) Extension Addltlonal Instructions for completlng this portion of the appllcation are provided In the Appendix. Appendix to tbe Peanit Application Contact Annual Permit Billing Contact Application Contact Required Contact Types: At minimum the following contact types must be provided: Annual Permit Billing Contact; Application Contact; Facility Contact; DMR Contact; and Certified Operator

Contact Prefix Ms. First Name Last Name Marcela Orlandea Title NONE PROVIDED Organization Name DTE Electrical Company Phone Type Number Mobile 248.207.7768 Email marcela.orlandea@dteenergy.com Fax NONE PROVIDED Address .One Energy Plaza Detroit, Ml 48226 United States Contacts (3 of 3) Extension Additional Instructions for completing this portion of the application are provided In the Appendix. AJ2pendix to the Pennit Application Contact Other Required Contact Types: At minimum the following contact types must be provided: Annual Permit Billing Contact; Application Contact; Facility Contact; DMR Contact; and Certified Operator

Contact Prefix Mr. First Name Last Name Michael Brandon Tltle NONE PROVIDED Organization Name DTE Bectric Company Phone Type Mobile Number 865.223.9555 Email michael.brandon@dteenergy.com Fax NONE PROVIDED Address One Energy Plaza Detroit, Ml 48226 United States Anti degradation Extension This part of the application enables the Department to determine whether you are seeking authorization for a change to your current NPDES permit that represents a new or increased loading of pollutants to the surface waters of the state. Select any/all that apply or select "None." E) None: I am not seeking any such changes to my current permit Additlonal Information Other Environmental Permits Provide the information requested in the table for any other federal, state, or local environmental permits in effect or applied for at the time of submittal of this Application, including, but not limited to, permits issued under any of the following programs: Air Pollution Control, Hazardous Waste Management, Wetlands Protection, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control, and other NPDES permits. Other Environmental Permits (Hit 'Add Row' for each environmental permit) Issuing Permit or Permit type: Agency: COC Number:

Issuing Permit or Permit type: Agency: COC Number: EGLE WRP032246 Part 301, 303, 325 v1.0 USACE LRE-2008-Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and 00443-1-S 11 Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. WATER FLOW DIAGRAM - Feani 3 Water Use Diagram & Suru,lemental lnfoanation,Rdf..: 03/03/2022 02:43 PM Comment NONE PROVIDED 'Surface waters of the state' means all the following: The Great Lakes and their connecting waters, all inland lakes, rivers, streams., Impoundments, open drains, wetlands, and other surface bodies of water within the confines of the state but does not Include drainage ways and ponds used solely for wastewater conveyance, treatment, or control. A storm sewer is not a surface water of the state. NARRATIVE - FeOTii 3 Narrative Water Use & Supplemental lnfoanation.p.df..:: 03/11/2022 10:32 AM Comment NONE PROVIDED MAP OF FACILITY AND DISCHARGE LOCATION - Site Plan Fig 2,1-4 ER Rev 2,pdf- 03/03/2022 02:50 PM Comment NONE PROVIDED Laboratory Services (1 of 2) Laboratory: DTE Fermi 2 Power Plant Laboratory To add additional laboratories, please use the "Add New" button at the bottom of this page, or select "Duplicate Section" to copy the laboratory Information and edit a portion of the fields. Laboratory Name DTE Fermi 2 Power Plant Laboratory Lab Type In-house Laboratory Laboratory Phone 734.586.1342

Laboratory Email Patrick.Snay@dteenergy.com Analyses Performed To be determined after the plant is built and operational Laboratory Services (2 of 2) Laboratory: Merit Laboratories, Inc. To add additional laboratories, please use the "Add New button at the bottom of this page, or select 11Dupllcate Section" to copy the laboratory Information and edit a portion of the fields. Laboratory Name Merit Laboratories, Inc. Lab Type Contract Laboratory Laboratory Street Address 2680 East Lansing Drive East Lansing, Ml 48823 Laboratory Phone 517.332.0167 Laboratory Email info@meritlabs.com Analyses Performed VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, Metals, Low Level Hg Water Source and Discharge Type

11. WATER SUPPLY INFORMATION Identify all water sources entering the facility and treabnent systems, and provide average flows. The volume may be estimated from water supply meter readings, pump capacities, etc. Provide the name of the source where appropriate (e.g., Grand River, Lake Michigan, City of Millpond, etc.).

Water Supply Name and Location of Average Volume or Type Source Flow Rate Surface Water Lake Erie 50 Intake Municipal Frenchtown Township 0.52 Supply Other: Precipitation 5 Precipitation I 2. WATER DISCHARGE INFORMATION Select all wastewater types discharged from this faclllty. Process Wastewater Sanitary Wastewater Regulated Storm Water Units MGD MGD Other: MGD/Event Identify water discharged by the facility and treatment systems, and provide average flows. If water is first used for one purpose and then is subsequently used for another purpose, Indicate the type and amount of the last use. For example, If the water is inltlally used for noncontact coollng water and then for process water, indicate the amount of process water. The.amount of water from sources should approximate the amount of water usage. If the amounts are different, provide an I atl exp an on. Discharge Type Average Flow Rate Units Process Wastewater 9125 MGY Sanitary Wastewater 365000 Other: GPD Regulated Storm Water 2.6 MGD Briefly explaln why the combined water from all sources does not equal the total approximate water usage, if applicable. NONE PROVIDED I 3. PRELIMINARY COOLING WATER QUESTIONS Does the faclllty use water for cooling purposes? YES Does or wlll the faclllty use a surface water Intake structure as a coollng water source for the facillty? Use of an intake structure includes obtaining water by any sort of contract or arrangement. with an Independent suppller If the suppller Is itself not a faclllty covered by the requirements of 40 CFR 125 Subparts I or J, except as provided in §125.91(c) and (d). YES I 4. WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY (WET) TESTS.

Have any acute or chronic WET tests been conducted on any dlscharge(s) or receiving water(s) in relatlon to this faclllty's discharge within the last three (3) years? This includes WET tests conducted for water treatment additive approval. NO Outfall Information and Effluent Characteristics (1 of 1) Outfall:001 Receiving water:Lake Erie I 1. OUTFALL INFORMATION Enter the outfall number (e.g., 001 ): 001 Outfall Description Main Outfall Enter the name of the receMng water: Lake Erie Outfall 41.9608,-83.2619 I 2. TYPE OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGED THROUGH THIS OUTFALL Type(s) of Wastewater Discharged (check all that apply to this outfall): Process Wastewater Stom1 Water - regulated

13. FLOW DEFINITIONS: A facility is considered to have a SEASONAL discharge if wastewater is treated AND STORED throughout a portion of the year and then discharged over a specified period or periods of days, weeks, or months. Batch process discharges are not seasonal discharges. Any facility that does not discharge seasonally is considered to have a CONTINUOUS discharge. Batch discharges are a type of continuous discharge.

Is the discharge continuous or seasonal? Continuous

What maximum dally flow rate are you requesting authorization to discharge from this outfall during the next five years? Enter a numeric value only based on the units Million Gallons Per Day. If the requested flow rate is less than 1,000 gallons per day; please enter a minimum of "0.001". 25 How often is there a discharge from this outfall (on average)? Hours per day: Days per year: 24 365 Does this outfall have batch discharges? NO I 4. PROCESS STR~MS CONTRIBUTING TO OUTFALL DISCHARGE The information requested below is used to determine the applicable federal regulations for this facility. For each industrial process at the facility, provide the name, the SIC or the NAICS code, and a brief description of the process. As part of each description, identify a reasonable measure of the facility's actual long-term daily production and average number of production days per year. In many cases, this is the average daily or average annual production rate from the last five years. Some federal regulations require that certain industries report different information, depending on the type of process. The Summary of Information to Be Reported by Industry Type, pages 10-11 of the Appendix, includes an abbreviated list of industrial categories and their specific Application requirements. If the industrial process does not have specific Application requirements and recent long-term production rates are not an appropriate measure of future production, report the expected annual production rate for the next five (5) years, or for the life of the permit. Appendix to the Permit Application PROCESS STREAMS CONTRIBUTING TO OUTFALL DISCHARGE Name of the SIC or

• process NAICS Describe the process and provide measures of contributing to the code:

production: discharge Closed-cycle Slowdown from the plant's closed-cycle condenser Cooling System 4911 cooling system cooling tower blowdown. Maxium total Slowdown expected discharge= 25 MGD. Processed Process radwaste from the plant floor drains and Radwaste System 4911 equipment drains. Maximum expected discharge Discharge (included in total above)= 0.2 MGD I 5. EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS - CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS Please confirm that you have read the statements above. I CONFIRM

Effluent Characteristics - Conventional Pollutants Conventional HOWARE Waiver Provide Rationale Here Pollutants RESULTS Information PROVIDED? Biochemical Oxygen Demand - five day LAB REPORT (BODS) Chemical Oxygen LAB REPORT Demand (COD) Total Organic Carbon LAB REPORT (TOC) Ammonia Nitrogen (as LAB REPORT N) Total Suspended LAB REPORT Solids Temperature, Summer LAB REPORT Temperature, Winter LAB REPORT pH LAB REPORT Total Dissolved Solids LAB REPORT Total Phosphorus (as LAB REPORT P) Fecal Coliform Waiver Bacteria NONE request not required. Waiver Escherichia coli NONE request not required. Total Residual Chlorine LAB REPORT Dissolved Oxygen LAB REPORT Oil & Grease LAB REPORT Please attach lab reports for conventlonal pollutants here. - Laboratory..An.al~pdf- 03/11/2022 10:04 AM Comment NONE PROVIDED I 6. EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS - TOXIC POLLUTANTS to Support Waiver Request Instructions: Carefully review each of the toxic pollutant groups below and respond as appropriate. For guidance concerning test procedures, see Part 11.B.2. of your NPDES permit. Tables 1 - 6, referenced below, are located in the Appendix.

CUCK HERE to open the Appendix to the Pean it Application Do you have analytical results of this type to report? NO Do you have analytical results of this type to report? NO Do you have analytlcal results of this type to report? NO Do you have analytical results of this type to report? NO ADDmONAL TOXIC AND OTHER POLLUTANT INFORMATION All existing industries, regardless of discharge type, are required to provide the results of at least one analysis for any chemical listed in Table 4 known or believed to be present in the facility's effluent, and a measured or estimated effluent concentration for any chemical listed in Table 5 known or believed to be present in the facility's effluent. In addition, submit the results of any effluent analysis performed within the last three years for any chemical listed in Tables 4 and 5. Do you have analytical results of this type to report? NO Water Treatment Additives Water Treatment Additives (WTAs) Approvals to use WTAs are authorized by the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy under separate correspondence. Issuance of a permit/COG does not authorize the use of water treatment additives. Written approval from the Department must be obtained prior to using water treatment additives at the facility. Water treatment additives (WTAs) include any material that is added to water used at the facility or to wastewater generated by the facility to condition or treat the water. Examples of WTAs include biocides, flocculants, water conditioners, pH adjusting agents, etc. Are any WTAs added to water used at the facility or to wastewater generated by the facility? YES Please list any WTAs currently In use, or will be used during the next permit cycle The following WTA to be used during operation: Biocide/Algaecide - Sodium Hypochlorite (15%) Corrosion Inhibitor - Sodium Silicate Scale Inhibitor/Dispersant Dehalogenation - Sodium Bisulfite

Approval Upload -WTA.pdf- 03/03/2022 02:52 PM Comment NONE PROVIDED APpendix to the Permit Application Cooling Water Intake Structures COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURES The withdrawal of cooling water removes and kills hundreds of billions of aquatic organisms from waters of the United States each year, including fish, sheltfish, fish eggs, and larvae. Aquatic organisms drawn through cooling water intake structures (CWIS) are either impinged (I) against components of the intake structure or get drawn into or entrained (E) in the cooling water system itself. Most impacts are to the early life stages of aquatic organisms. Due to the adverse environmental impact of I and E on aquatic organisms, US EPA has promulgated rules under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act to set national performance standards to minimize the mortality of aquatic organisms from I and E for new and existing industrial facilities. Section 316(b) requires that the location, design, construction, and capacity of CWISs reflect the best technology available (BTA) for minimizing adverse environmental impacts (I and E). All new or existing facilities utilizing a surface water intake structure to provide cooling water shall submit information for review as specified below. Please complete the following questions, compile the requested information, and submit the information as an attachment to this Application. The rules and requirements referenced below can be accessed at https:/lwww.micbigaILgQY[eQle.npdes. Under the Information banner, click on 316(b.) Cooling Water Intake Structure Guidance. Does or will the intake structure have a design Intake flow (DIF) rate (Instantaneous maximum) greater than 2 MGD AND does or will the facility use at least twenty-five percent of water withdrawn exclusively for cooling purposes? YES In accordance with the Final Rules promulgated by USEPA under 316(b) and effective October 14, 2014, existing facilities (Including those utilizing a closed-cycle recirculating cooling system) shall submit the information specified In 40 CFR 122.21 (r)(2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), and (8). Does this facility have an AIF greater than 125 MGD? NO Does this facility have a 1new unit' as defined under 40 CFR 125.92(u)? A 1new unit' may have its own dedicated cooling water Intake structure, or the new unit may use an existing or modified cooling water Intake structure. YES

In addition to submitting or updating the Information specified above for existing facilities, these facilities shall also submit the Information specified in §122.21(r) (14). Attach all Information required above for your facility. - Intake Structure Descrip:ti.Qn.pdf - 03/03/2022 02:52 PM Comment NONE PROVIDED Comments: contains preliminary information, previously submitted, to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 122.21 (r) and 40 CFR 125.86 for a new facility with a new cooling water intake structure. At least one (1) year prior to the start of operations, the Company shall submit a 316(b) demonstration to complete the submittal requirements of 40 CFR 122.21 (r) and 40 CFR 125.86. Storm Water Please confirm that you have read the definition of "Surface Waters of the State" above I Confirm Is the storm water from this facility discharged to a surface water of the state, either directly or through another conveyance such as a municipal separate storm sewer system? NOTE: If storm water is discharged to a municipal combined storm sewer system, a municipal wastewater treabnent system, or a privately-owned activated sludge treatment system, select "NO." YES To determine If this facility is engaged In a regulated 11lndustrial activity" as defined In 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14), carefully review the document available at: CLICK HERE or go to htt;ps://www.michigan..gov/documents/deq/wrd-isw-fed-sic 398366 7.Qdf Please confirm that you have rev.lewed the "Primary Activities & Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes" document referenced above. I Confirm Is this facility engaged in a regulated 11lndustrlal activity" as defined In 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)? To make this determination, click the link found above. YES Are any Industrial actMtles or materials exposed to storm water at this facility? YES Storm Water Discharge Receiving Waters Receiving Water Name: Lake Erie

I SWan Creek Receiving Water Name: Does this faclllty have an Industrial Storm Water Certified Operator who has supervision over the faclllty's Industrial storm water treabnent and control measures? NO Has a Storm Water Pollutlon Prevention Plan (SWPPP) been developed and implemented for this facility? NO For information go to the link below, then click on Industrial Program, then look under Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans. For more information click here This facility directly discharges storm water to a surface water of the state or MS4 from the following special-use area(s): Secondary containment structure(s) required by state or federal law Mtrll sto di a e as re d n secon ary con tal t tr ct nmen s u ures PLEASE IDENTIFY ALL MATERIALS STORED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES REQUIRED BY STATE OR FEDERAL LAW: No. 2 Fuel Oil Sodium Hypochlorite Mineral Oil Has a Short-Term Storm Water Characterization Study (STSWCS) Plan been approved by EGLE for this faclllty? NO Additional Information NONE PROVIDED Comment NONE PROVIDED PFAS "Surface waters of the state" means all of the following: The Great Lakes and their connecting waters, all inland lakes, rivers, streams, impoundments, open drains, wetlands, and other surface bodies of water within the confines of the state but does not include drainage ways and ponds used solely for wastewater conveyance, treatment, or control.

1. Is this faclllty known to have PFOS and/or PFOA present in wastewater discharged to surface waters of the state?

NO

2. Is this faclllty a landfill for solld or hazardous waste with a discharge of leachate to a surface water of the state?

NO

3. Is this facility a metal finisher that discharges wastewater associated with this activity to a surface water of the state?

NO

4. Is the discharge from the remediation of a contaminated site to a surface water of the state?

NO

5. Does the facility manufacture paper, corrugated paper, cardboard, paperboard, or packaging paper (coated or uncoated), and discharge wastewater associated with this activity to a surface water of the state?

NO

6. Does the faclllty conduct car washing as all or part of its operations and discharge car wash wastewater to a surface water of the state?

NO

7. Is this facility a commercial Industrial laundry that discharges wastewater associated with this activity to a surface water of the state?

NO

8. Is this facility a chemical manufacturer with a discharge of wastewater associated with this activity to a surface water of the state?

NO

9. Has Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF) ever been used at the facility for training or testing, or to respond to a fire emergency? Has AFFF ever been stored at this facility? If yes to either, please select "YES."

NO

10. Does this facility manufacture, formulate, or mix paints/pigments and discharge wastewater from these operations to a surface water of the state?

NO

11. Does this facility have a discharge from a leather or hide tanning/finishing operation to a surface water of the state?

NO

12. Does this faclllty perform carpet and/or upholstery cleaning and discharge wastewater from these operations to a surface water of the state?

NO

13. Is the facility a carpet, rug, or textlle manufacturer that discharges wastewater associated with this activity to a surface water of the state?

NO

14. Is this facility a centrallzed waste treater? Centrallzed Waste Treaters treat or recover metal-bearing, oily, and organic wastes, wastewater, or used material received from off site, and are regulated under 40 CFR Part 437.

NO

15. Does this faclllty apply a stain-, dirt-, water-, or fire-resistant coating and/or protectant, and discharge wastewater associated with this activity to a surface water of the state?

NO Other Information Comments (As needed) The following documents are attached to this application: - Cover Letter - Attachment 1-Fermi 3 Water Use Diagram & Supplemental Information - Attachment 2 - Fermi 3 Narrative Water Use & Supplemental Information - Attachment 3 - Site Plan Fig 2.1-4 ER Rev 2 - Attachment 4 - Laboratory Analyses - Attachment 5 - WTA - Attachment 6 - Intake Structure Description Additional Documents (As needed) Fermi 3 NPDES Peanit Renewal AilPlicat;on - cover letter.pdf- 03/11/2022 10:16 AM - Feani 3 Water Use Diagram & Supplemental lnformation.P:df..:: 03/1112022 1 O: 17 AM - Fenni 3 Narrative Water Use & Supplemental lnformation.pJ:Ji.= 03/11/2022 10:37 AM - Site Plan Fig 2.1-4 ER Rev 2,pdf- 03/11/2022 10:39 AM - Laboratory.Ao.a.l~pdf - 03/11/2022 10:39 AM - WTA,pdf- 03/11/2022 10:40 AM - Intake Structure Pescdm!Qn..pdf- 03/11/2022 10:40 AM Comment NONE PROVIDED Application Fee

Refer to page 2 of your existing NPDES permit to determine which appllcation fee applies to your facility. If the Annual Permit Fee Classification identified on page 2 of your existing NPDES permit Includes the word "Major (e.g., lndustrial-Commerclal Major, Municipal Major}, select "Major from the drop-down menu below. If the word "Major does not appear In the Annual Permit Fee Classification Identified on page 2 of your existing NPDES permit, select "Minor from the drop-down menu. Major ..... Please note, if you mistakenly select the incorrect fee, underpayments result in the application being administratively incomplete and if you over pay, refunds for the overpayment take additional time to process. Also, only pay the NPDES application fee one time: If you are prompted to pay when REVISING a previously submitted application, do not pay the application fee a second time.- Fee Amount 750 Attachments Date Attachment Name Context User 3/11/2022 - Intake Structure Description.pdf Attachment Marcela 10:40AM Orlandea 3/11/2022 - WTA.pdf Attachment Marcela 10:40AM Orlandea 3/11/2022 - Laboratory Analyses.pdf Attachment Marcela 10:39AM Orlandea 3/11/2022 - Site Plan Fig 2.1-4 ER Rev Attachment Marcela 10:39AM 2.pdf Orlandea 3/11/2022 - Fermi 3 Narrative Water Use & Attachment Marcela 10:37 AM Supplemental lnformation.pdf Orlandea 3/11/2022 - Fermi 3 Narrative Water Use & Attachment Marcela 10:32AM Supplemental lnformation.pdf Orlandea 3/11/2022 - Fermi 3 Water Use Diagram & Attachment Marcela 10:17 AM Supplemental lnformation.pdf Orlandea 3/11/2022 Fermi 3 NPDES Permit Renewal Application - Attachment Marcela 10:16 AM cover letter. pdf Orlandea 3/11/2022 - Laboratory Analyses.pdf Attachment Marcela 10:04 AM Orlandea 3/3/2022 - Intake Structure Description.pdf Attachment Marcela 2:52 PM Orlandea

Date Attachment Name Context User 3/3/2022 - WTA.pdf Attachment Marcela 2:52 PM Orlandea 3/3/2022 - Site Plan Fig 2.1-4 ER Rev Attachment Marcela 2:50 PM 2.pdf Orlandea 3/3/2022 - Fermi 3 Water Use Diagram & Attachment Marcela 2:43 PM Supplemental lnformation.pdf Orlandea

DTE Electric - Fermi 3 Nuclear Power Plant NPDES Permit NO. MI0058892 Renewal Application April 4, 2022 - Fermi 3 Water Use Diagram Figure 3.3-1, Fermi 3 Environmental Report, Rev. 2 (pages: 3-21 through 3-23)

Figure 3.3-1 water Use Diagram (Sheet 1 of 3) FH FH COlllEll!ATE ~ ~ PRl1ECWI ffl1EII rnRl,(E ~ IWBJ' - fflTDIU!EB (!EEIHET2) TO &IJITARY rtmM Dl!C!WIII! lJJ (!) ffi © © ~ *~1-1M COIBC!ER

5

© © DRFTOO ~ © E'#l'ORATDI

mli~

~ Fanni 3 3-21 Comb111ed License Apphcatlon EIU'l8!T - 1'I.OOI - WIIR'l'l =- IB:.PEl!DlC - TO IDRlE C0Lll1Y ll8IER l't'l1BI FElll,l3 8/,IITNII' ffl1EII OOll!!1I: use NOTf RI' n.an ~TCD l'llH MI.AIKJIID WJDI ~ "l..lM[ R::E II-EU J otrnm-RAIWSTE ffl1EII F!Qj 10(!) ~ .... lERUIE 1ffll W1E Revision 2 February 2011

Figure 3.3-1 water Use Diagram (Sheet 2 of 3) Value (gpm) Value(gpm) Value(gpm) Velue (gpm) Maximum Normel ,anlmum Normal Power Average Normal Awrege Shutdown Pov,,er Operation 1 openrt!on2 Power Openrtlon 3 Operation Flow Dncr1ptlon Discharged Radwate Dlecherged Radwate Discharged Ra~ Dlacharged ~ Total Makeup 'Miter Intake 34,264 23,780 2 Cooling Tower Makeup Water 34,234 23,750 3 Dem1nerahzer Makeup "'6iter 160 160 4 Nomial Power Heat Sink Drift & Evaporebon 17,124 11,682 5 Nomial Power Heal Smk Diicfiarge 17,110 11,868 e Auxiliary He11! Sink Drift & EV11poralion 0 0 7 AwoharyHeetSmkD~chaige 0 0 8 I nflc:NI lo Main Condenser 684,000 6Bo4,000 9 Total Plant Service Viiiter syilem Flow 40,000 40,000 10 Total Circulating IMiler System Flow 724,000 72-4,000 11 Inflow lo Condeniide 5toraiie 58 58 12 Iii/low to Station Ow 49 49 13 Outflow lo Equipment Drama 58 58 1-4 Outflow to Floor Drains B B 15 Outflow lo Laundry & Cheiiiil Dnma 2-4 2-4 18 Outflow lo Muicelleneoua Periodic Drama 18 18 17 I nflc:NI lo the Radwastii System 107 107 18 Lou m Solid Radwiate 2 2 19 Radwaate Dischargii {LiqUld Radwaste Lou) 105 105 20 Makeup Deinrieral1Z01" BICNJdowii 53 53 21 Total Discharge 17,215 11,973 22 Total Dnft & EveporatJon 17,12-4 11,882 23 Fire Protection - 30 30 24 Potable Wiler Duicluirge to Sewer 200 35 25 Domeatx:UIIM 200 35 28 Total D1icliaige lo Monroe County MIW8I" iyitem 253 BB 'Z7 Liqiid Radwaite Recycled stellon Wiler u -- Standby l..JqUld Control System Reactor Component Cooling Weter System Proceu Sempmg System proceu use HVACsya!em Ferml3 Combined License AppUcatlon 0 Liq uicl Waste SyA3!11 cherrncel edd1bon end Irie flualung Turbine Component Coolmg Weier System Awah&JY Boller System lsolebon CondenaerlPeaarve Contamment Coohng Pool 3-22 0 28,993 28,983 160 1-4,-488 14,-474 0 0 66-4,000 40,000 724,000 58 ,49 58 B 2-4 18 107 2 105 53 14,579 1-4,488 30 35 35 BB 0 Solid WaalB System for line flushing Chilled Waler Syatem Poat Acctdent Sampling station flushing 1,166 1,136 639 0 0 569 587 0 "40,000 0 232 196 232 30 95 71 ,428 9 419 211 987 569 30 47 47 258 0 Revision 2 February 2011

Figure 3.3-1 Water Use Diagram (Sheet 3 of 3) Flow Description 1 Total Makeup Water Intake 2 Cooling Tower Makeup Water 3 Demmerahzer Makeup Water 4 Noonal Power Heat Sink Dnft & Evaporabon 5 Normal Power Heat Sink Diacherge 6 Awohary Heat S111k Dnft & Evaporation 7 AwahllJ')' Heat Sink Discharge 6 lnllow to MaJn CondenMr 9 Total Plant SeMce Weter System Flow 10 Total C1rcule!Jng Water Sya1em Flow 11 Inflow to Condenute Slorege 12 Inflow to StellOn Uses 13 Outllow to Equipment Dnuna 14 Outflow to Floor Dre11111 15 Outllow to Laundry & ChemlCIII Drema 16 Outflow to MmceDaneoua Periodic Drams 17 Inflow to the Redwaste Syatam 16 Losa m Solid Radwan, 19 Radwaste D1SCharge (Liquid Radwaate Loss) 20 Makeup Dem1nerellzer Blowdown 21 TotalDiacharge 22 Total Dnft & EvaporatJon 23 Fire Protecbon Uses 24 Potable 'Miter Dmc:harge to Sewer 25 Domeabc Uaea 26 Total Dlacharge to Monroe County -r system 27 Liquid Redwaale Recycled 1 Summer months ~um) 2 'Milter months (Januarylrnln1mum)

3. Spnng end fell months (Average)

Ferm13 Combined License AppllcatJon Value (gpm) Value (gpm) Maximum Normal Power Nlnln-..m Normal Power Operatlon1 operatlort2 Recycled Radwata RecycledRadwuta 3"',26"' 23,760 34,23-4 23,750 3 3 17,124 11,862 17,110 11,866 0 0 0 0 684,000 684,000 40,000 40,000 724,000 724,000 58 58 49 49 58 68 8 8 24 24 16 18 107 107 2 2 0 0 1 1 17,110 11,888 17,124 11,882 30 30 200 35 200 35 201 36 106 105 3-23 Value (gpm) Awrage Normal Power OperatlonJ RecycledRadwute 26,993 26,963 3 14,486 14,474 0 0 66"',000 40,000 724,000 58 49 58 8 24 16 107 2 0 14,474 14,486 30 36 36 36 105 Value(gpm) Average Shutdown Operation RecycledRact-ta 1,166 1136 13 0 0 669 587 0 40,000 0 232 196 232 30 95 71 428 9 0 4 587 569 30 47 47 52 419 R8V1slon 2 February 2011

DTE Electric - Fermi 3 Nuclear Power Plant NPDES Permit NO. MI0058892 Renewal Application April 4, 2022 - Water Use Narrative and Supplemental Information Water Use Narrative (1 page) Section 3.3 - Plant Water Use, Fermi 3 Environmental Report, Rev. 2 (5 pages: 3-16 through 3-20) Section 3.4 - Cooling System, Fermi 3 Environmental Report, Rev. 2 (13 pages: 3-24 through 3-36) Section 3.6 - Nonradioactive Waste Systems, Fermi 3 Environmental Report, Rev. 2 (8 pages: 3-42 through 3-49)

DTE Electric - Fermi 3 Nuclear Power Plant NPDES Permit NO. MI0058892 Renewal Application April4,2022 Fermi 3 Water Use Narrative Fermi 3 Power Plant will be a dosed-cycle steam electric power generation unit with a net electrical output of approximately 1535 +/- 50 MWe. Lake Erle will provide water for cooling and operational uses. Potable water wlll be used as makeup water for the demlneralizer and for various station uses. Attad)ment 1 details the water uses, discharges and recycled flows. The predominant uses of Lake Erle water at the Fermi 3 Power Plant wlll be as cooling water In the Circulating Water System and In the Plant Service Water System. The maximum Intake has been calculated to be approximately 50 million gallons per day (MGD). A small portion of the intake water, 43,200 gallons per day (gpd), will be used in the Flre Protection System. The maximum daily discharge to Lake Erle, which includes cooling water and miscellaneous low volume wastes, has been calculated to be approximately 25 MGD. The low volume wastes will lnc,lude equipment drains and floor drains that wlll be treated In the plant's Radwaste System, with a calculated discharge of about 0.2 MGD. The low volume wastes that cannot be treated and discharged from the Radwaste System wlll be disposed of In accordance with applicable local, state and federal regulations. Approximately half("' 25 MGD) of the cooling and plant service water Is used consumptively and will be discharged as drift and evaporation via the cooling tower and reservoir. A detailed description of all plant water uses and discharges are contained In the Fermi 3 Combined License Applicatlon on pages 3-16 to 3-20, 3-24 to 3-36, and 3-42 to 3-49, all of which are attached.

3.3 Plant Water Use Fermi3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report Fennl 3 requires water for cooling and operational uses. Lake Erie provides water for plant cooling, Including the nonnal power heat sink (NPHS) and auxiliary heat sink (AHS). Subsection 3.3.1 discusses water consumption and discharges by the various plant components and systems, Including the NPHS, AHS, Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS), potable water and sanitary waste, demineralized water, and fire protection. Additionally, Figure 3.3-1 presents a water use diagram for Fermi 3 outlining normal plant power operating conditions as well as non-power/shutdown conditions. Subsection 3.3.2 discusses methods of water treatment used in the plant and discharged back to the receiving water body (I.e., Lake Erie). Plant service water treatment Is discussed in this subsection and also further discussed in FSAR Subsection 9.2.1. Makeup water Is also discussed in this subsection, as well as in FSAR Subsection 9.2.3. 3.3.1 Water Consumption Plant water systems discussed in this subsection Include the CIRC, PSWS, Station Water System (SWS), Potable Water System (PWS}, Sanitary Waste Discharge System (SWDS), demineralized system, and Fire Protection System (FPS). The CIRC, PSWS, SWS, and FPS share a common Intake from Lake Erle. Potable water Is being supplied for the deminerallzed system from the Frenchtown Township municipal water supply. The design of the intake structure is based on record low water levels for Lake Erle, thus even under these conditions plant operation is able to carry on normally. Under normal conditions, Lake Erie water levels remain relatively constant except during extreme seiche events. The intake structure is not designed for extreme seiche events. During extreme selche events, the water supply to the SWS could be degraded and the unit operationally controlled to limit makeup requirements. The Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) for Fanni 3, described in FSAR Subsection 9.2.5, contains a separate water supply for safety-related cooling. Lake Erie is not used for safety-related water withdrawal for Fanni 3. Therefore, a selche event will not affect a safety-related water supply for Fermi 3. This is discussed further in Subsection 3.4.2.1. The SWS provides makeup water to the NPHS and AHS cooling tower basins, and the FPS. The SWS is further described in FSAR Subsection 9.2.10. Various drains in the plant produce effluent liquid radwaste. This flow can either be treated and discharged to Lake Erie, or recycled. Slowdown from several sources, including both NPHS and AHS cooling towers; optional treated liquid radwaste, including chemical waste is combined and shares a common discharge to Lake Erie. The deminerallzed water waste Is discharged to the Fermi 3 SWDS. 3.3.1.1 Clrculatlng Water System and Normal Power Heat Sink The CIRC is used to remove the waste heat from the main condenser discharging to the NPHS. A more detailed description of the CIRC is presented In Subsection 3.4.1.1. During normal operation the NPHS may provide cooling to the AHS loads. Makeup water to the NPHS cooling tower replenishes water losses due to evaporation, drift, and blowdown. Figure 3.3-1 shows the water use (makeup, blowdown, evaporation, etc.) by the NPHS for Fanni 3. Figure 3.3-1 describes the flow rates for power and shutdown operations. Power operations are further subdivided into the 3-16 Revision 2 February 2011

Fermi3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report maximum heat load (expected during summer months), minimum heat load (expected during the winter months), and the average heat load (expected during the spring and fall months). The maximum makeup water flow Is approximately 34,000 gpm for the NPHS. The maximum blowdown from the NPHS cooling tower Is approximately 17,000 gpm, and the minimum blowdown Is approximately 12,000 gpm. The annual average blowdown flow is approximately 14,000 gpm. The maximum blowdown value represents the design condition, at the warmest temperatures. The minimum value represents winter conditions under the coldest temperatures, Which occur in the month of January. The average value represents the average of all monthly flows; this value would be representative of flows in the spring or fall months. Table 3.4-1 outlines the monthly variation in evaporation, blowdown and makeup flows. The blowdown is directed to an outfall that discharges into Lake Erie. 3.3.1.2 Plant Service Water System and Auxiliary Heat Sink The PSWS provides nonsafety-related cooling to the Reactor Building and Turbine Building systems. During operation of Fermi 3, PSWS cooling Is provided by either the NPHS cooling tower or the AHS cooling towers. While in shutdown condition, the PSWS is cooled by the AHS cooling towers. The AHS requires makeup water to replenish water losses due to evaporation, drift, and blowdown. Slowdown from the AHS is mixed with the NPHS cooling tower blowdown. The flow requirements for makeup flow for the PSWS are a maximum of approximately 1100 gpm. The makeup water requirements are included in the flow values stated in Subsection 3.3.1.1. A more detailed description of the PSWS is provided in Subsection 3.4.1.3. 3.3.1.3 Ultimate Heat Sink The ESBWR design has no separate emergency water cooling system. The UHS function is provided by safety systems integral and interior to the reactor plant These systems ultimately use the atmosphere as the eventual heat sink. These systems do not rely on cooling towers, basins, or coollng water intake/discharge structures external to the reactor plant. (Reference 3.3-1) 3.3.1.4 Potable Water and Sanitary Waste Discharge System The PWS and SWDS are designed to provide potable water supply and sewage treatment necessary for normal plant operation and shutdown periods. The source of the potable water supply is the Frenchtown Township municipal water system. The PWS is designed to supply up to 200 gpm of potable water during peak demand period with a monthly average usage of 35 gpm, as outlined on Figure 3.3-1. The Demineralized water waste and the effluent from the auxiliary baller are routed to the Fermi 3 SWDS. Sanitary waste is routed to the Frenchtown Township Sewage Treatment Facility. 3.3.1.5 Demlnerallzed Water The required flow for makeup water to the demineralization subsystem when using the option of discharging liquid radwaste to Lake Erie, is expected to be a monthly average of 160 gpm, with short term maximum flow expected to be 639 gpm during outages. The required flow for makeup water to the demineralization subsystem when using the option of recycling llquid radwaste is bounded by the makeup flow with liquid radwaste discharged to Lake Erie. The option to operate 3-17 Revision 2 February 2011

Fanni 3 Combined License Application Part 3: Envlronmental Report with liquid radwaste recycled supports zero discharge of liquid radwaste. The makeup water is supplied from the Frenchtown Township water line as depicted on Figure 3.3-1. Flows for various modes of operation, as well as liquid radwaste effluent are also outlined on this figure. 3.3.1.6 Fire Protection Fire protection water is provided to the FPS from onsite storage tanks that have makeup supplied from the SWS. After the FPS Is Initially filled, maximum usage Is about 30 gpm for activities such as maintaining the system filled and pressurized and periodic testing. 3.3.2 Water Treatment As outlined in Subsection 3.3.1, plant makeup water is taken from a common intake from Lake Erie. This intake is treated with sodium hypochlorite, a biocide/algaecide, thus disseminating to the appropriate water use systems. Sodium hypochlorite is used to eradicate the presence of biologicals in the systems, both in the form of plant life such as algae and animals such as zebra mussels and corbicula. During select periods In spring and fall, sodium hypochlorite levels are elevated to ensure the absence of zebra mussels. The SWS supplies makeup water to the PSWS, CIRC, and FPS. There are viable treatment options for mussel control in these systems, which include: chlorination and thermal shock treatment. The chlorination option will consist of isolation of the PSWS and elevation of chlorine levels within the PSWS for a specific duration of time. This will cause the eradication of any zebra mussel population within the system. Upon returning the PSWS to service, the chlorinated PSWS water will be combined with the much larger portion of blowdown from the NPHS, thus diluting the chlorine to acceptable discharge levels. The thermal shock treatment option would consist of raising the temperature of the CIRC to greater than 95°F for at least 60 minutes. This method Is less practical for the PSWS due to system thermal limitations. 3.3.2.1 Station Water System The SWS draws water from Lake Erie as the source of makeup to the plant. The SWS is described In FSAR Subsection 9.2.1-0. Makeup water to the plant is treated with a biocide, sodium hypochlorite, as it enters through the SWS pump house intake. Water treatment chemistry is provided in Table 3.3-1. 3.3.2.2 Circulating Water The CIRC provides cooling water for removal of the power cycle heat from the main condensers and transfers this heat to the NPHS. The CIRC is described in FSAR Section 10.4. Chemical additions are made to both influent and effluent flows. System chemistry control is provided by the incorporation of an Injection system at the inlet to the condenser that introduces a biocide, corrosion Inhibitor, and scale inhibitor. The necessity of using a biocide is outlined in Subsection 3.4.2.2. The corrosion inhibitor Is needed in order to reduce the effects of corrosion on the piping and condenser. The scale Inhibitor Is needed to reduce the build-up of scaling that could affect the efficiency of the condenser. Quantities and identification of these various chemicals are shown in Table 3.3-1. Discharge must also be treated before exiting to Lake Erie. Dehalogenation must occur in order to maintain qxldant within reasonable discharge limits. As discussed in Section 1.2, permits, e.g., 3-18 Revision 2 February 2011

Fermi3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification, will be obtained for the discharge from Fermi 3. Additionally, Section 5.2 provides a discussion on effluent limitations and permit conditions. 3.3.2.3 Plant Service Water System PSWS chemistry control is maintained in a similar fashion to that of the CIRC, i.e., with the addition of biocide, corrosion inhibitor, scale Inhibitor, as well as dispersant chemicals to break up sedimentation when lake water Is highly turbid. Water treatment chemistry is provided In Table 3.3-1. There are no expected changes to water treatment operating procedures based on seasonal variations. The PSWS is described in FSAR Subsection 9.2.1. 3.3.2.4 Potable Water and Sanitary Waste The potable water for the Fermi site Is supplied from the Frenchtown Township municipal water system. This water supply does not require any additional chemical treatment or additives. The sanitary waste system effluent is discharged to the Frenchtown Township Sewage Treatment Facility without addition of chemical treatments. FSAR Subsection 9.2.4 provides further description of the PWS and SWDS. 3.3.3 References 3.3-1 GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy, *ESBWR Design Control Document-Tier 2,* Revision 6, August 2009. 3-19 Revision 2 February 2011

Table 3.3-1 Chemical Additives for Water Treatment System/Injection Point Circulating Water System/ Cooling tower basin/ Station Water System Circulatlng Water System/ Makeup water line discharge Circulatlng Water System / Makeup water line discharge Clrculatlng Water System blowdown Ferml3 Combined License Application Chemical Bloclde/Algaecide - Sodium Hypochlorlte (15%) Corrosion Inhibitor - Sodium Silicate Scale Inhibitor/Dispersant Dehalogenatlon - Sodium Blsulfite 3-20 Approximate Usage 1200 gal/week Normal Power Operating Conditions/ Shutdown Conditions 400 gaVday 220 gaVday 175 gal/day Normal Power Operating Conditions/ Shutdown Conditions Normal Power Operating Conditions/ Shutdown Conditions Normal Power Operating Conditions/ Shutdown Conditions Revision 2 February 2011

3.4 Coollng System Ferml3 Combined License Appllcatton Part 3: Environmental Report Fermi 3 requires cooling water for the normal power heat sink in the CIRC and the auxiliary heat sink In the PSWS. Thermal energy is transferred via air or water through these heat sinks. Major system components include the intake and discharge portions. Subsection 3.4.1 gives a description of the various cooling water systems and the operational modes for Fermi 3. The NPHS is discussed in this section, as well as in Section 3.3 and Subsection 5.3.2. Discharge to the air is also discussed in this section, as well as in Subsection 5.3.3. Subsection 3.4.2 provides a description of the major components of the systems. Major components are contained within the intake structure and discharge piping. Further clarification of the Intake structure is provided on Figure 3.4-1 and Figure 3.4-2. Additional discussion on the impacts of the discharge can be found in Subsection 5.3.2 and Subsection 5.3.3. 3.4.1 Description and Operational Modes 3.4.1.1 Circulating Water System The CIRC provides cooling water during startup, normal plant operations, and hot shutdown for removal of power cycle heat from the main condensers and rejects this heat to the NPHS. The NPHS is comprised of a natural draft cooling tower. The main condensers contribute the majority of the heat to the NPHS with additional heat load introduced by the PSWS. The main condenser rejects heat to the atmosphere at a rate of approximately 9.883 x 109 Btu/hr during normal full-power operation. Water from the NPHS basin is pumped through the main condenser and then back to the cooling tower where heat, transferred to the cooling water in the main condenser, is dissipated to the environment (the atmosphere) by evaporation. As a result of the heat dissipation process, some water is evaporated. This results in an increase in the solids level in the NPHS cooling tower. To control solids levels or concentrations, a portion of the recirculated water is discharged. In addition to this blowdown from the CIRC, and evaporative losses, a small percentage of water In the form of droplets (drift) is lost from the cooling tower. Water pumped from Lake Erie via the intake structure is used to replace water lost by evaporation, drift and blowdown from the cooling tower. Slowdown water is returned to Lake Erie via an outfall into the lake (Subsection 3.4.2). A portion of the waste heat is thus dissipated to Lake Erie through the blowdown process. The maximum, minimum and average Fermi 3 blowdown flow rates from the CIRC during normal full power operation are provided in Figure 3.3-1. Table 3.4-1 provides the monthly values for evaporation, blowdown, and makeup for the NPHS. The maximum temperature of the blowdown after passing through the NPHS Is 86°F at the discharge to Lake Erie. The heat rejected to Lake Erie via blowdown Is estimated based on these maximum blowdown flow and temperature conditions (Subsection 5.3.2). During other operating modes, heat dissipation to the environment is less than the bounding values for the normal full-power operational mode for the NPHS, except 3-24 Revision 2 February 2011

Fennl3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report when the Turbine Bypass System (TBS) is in operation. In this condition, it is possible for the temperature of the discharge to rise to 96°F. 3:4.1.2 Station Water System The SWS draws water from Lake Erie through an intake bay into the pump house located on the west shore of Lake Erie. The SWS provides makeup water to various plant systems. For example, the SWS provides makeup water to the NPHS cooling tower basin for the CIRC and to the AHS cooling tower basin for the PSWS. The pump configuration consists of three 50 percent capacity Plant Cooling Tower Makeup System (PCTMS) pumps that supply makeup to the cooling towers, and two 100 percent capacity Pretreated Water Supply System (PWSS) pumps. The PWSS pumps are capable of supplying makeup to the FPS as well as the AHS in shutdown conditions. The PCTMS pump configuration allows for one pump to be out of service and the other two maintaining design flow. This is also discussed In Subsection 3.4.2.1 and FSAR Subsection 9.2.10. The AHS can be used in conjunction with the NPHS during normal power operation. However during certain shutdown conditions, heat rejection is performed entirely with the AHS. The AHS operates during startup, hot shutdown, stable shutdown, cold shutdown, and refueling. 3.4.1.3 Plant Service Water System The PSWS provides cooling water to the Turbine Component Cooling Water System (TCCWS) heat exchangers and the Reactor Component Cooling Water System (RCCWS) heat exchangers and rejects the heat back to the NPHS and/or the AHS during normal power operations. During shutdown conditions, the heat is rejected to the AHS. Further discussion of the PSWS can be found in FSAR Subsection 9.2.1. A simplified flow diagram is provided in FSAR Figure 9.2-205. Subsection 3.3.1.2 further discusses flows associated with PSWS, and Figure 3.3-1 outlines flow paths and values for maximum, minimum and average normal power conditions and average shutdown conditions. Chemical treatment of the PSWS is discussed in Subsection 3.3.2.3 and Table 3.3-1. 3.4.1.4 Ultlmate Heat Sink The Fermi 3 ESBWR design has no separate emergency water cooling system. The UHS function is provided by safety systems integral and interior to the reactor plant. This system ultimately uses the atmosphere as the eventual heat sink. These systems do not have cooling towers, basins, or cooling water Intake/discharge structures external to the reactor plant. 3.4.1.5 Discharges to Lake Erle Lake Erie is subject to liquid discharges during plant operation. Discharge from the heat dissipation system consists of blowdown from the CIRC and PSWS, as well as optional treated liquid radwaste. The thermal aspect of the discharge Is covered In this subsection. Section 3.5 and Section 3.6 complete the description of the discharge characteristics. The rate of discharge into Lake Erie is constant under normal full power operating conditions. The discharge Is approximately 17,000 gpm (Figure 3.3-1), with a maximum temperature of 86°F. Table 3.4-1 contains a summary of the monthly discharge temperatures. A discussion of thermal plume predictions Is contained in Subsection 5.3.2. The discharge pipe is fortified with riprap to reduce 3-25 Revision 2 February 2011

Ferml3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report the effects of scouring; additional discussion of scouring can be found in Subsection 5.3.2.1.2. The current NPDES permit for Fermi 2 (Permit No. MI0037028) was renewed in 2005 with an expiration date in 2009. As discussed In Section 1.2, permits, e.g., NPDES permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification, will be obtained for the discharge from Fermi 3. The discharge of chemicals that have been added to various systems as treatments such as biocide, corrosion inhibitor, and scale inhibitor are closely monitored in the NPDES permit, as well as the presence of metals and the temperature of effluent flow. Section 3.6 provides discussion and comparison to regulatory limitations on effluent flow from Fermi 3. 3.4.1.6 Discharges to AJr At the normal full-power design condition, the natural draft tower requires a maximum of 5.6 x 107 cfm of ambient air to dissipate about 10. 72 x 1 a9 Btu/hr of waste heat from the natural draft cooling tower at Fermi 3. Heat dissipated by the natural draft cooling tower includes contributions from the main condenser and the PSWS system. The heat load used for determining parameters associated with the natural draft cooling tower is conservative relative to the design heat loads (Reference 3.4-2). The cooling tower used at Fermi 3 provides the only plant effluents with a potential for influencing local meteorology. The effluent types of concern are commonly described as visible plumes (fog) and cooling tower drift. Cooling tower drift Is limited to no greater than 0.001 percent of the total tower water flow. Drift eliminators exist as a design feature of the natural draft cooling tower meant to reduce the volume of drift from the tower. These effluent types and their impacts on local weather are described in Subsection 5.3.3. In addition to the heat discharged to the air, auditory discharges are considered. The noise from the NPHS is primarily the result of water splash. The sound level is estimated as being between 55 and 60 dBA at 1000 ft. Subsection 5.3.4 also discusses the estimated noise levels from the NPHS operation. The noise generated by the AHS Is from water splash and fan motors. The sound level for the AHS is estimated at between 55 and 60 dBA at 1000 ft. (Reference 3.4-1) 3.4.1. 7 Operational Modes For the purposes of the design of the cooling systems, Fermi 3 Is based on an estimated capacity factor of 96 percent (annualized). This considers a 24 month fuel cycle combined with an assumed 30-clay refueling outage period. On a long term average, the heat load is 10.29 x 109 Btu/hr, which is 96 percent of the rated head load of 10. 72 x 109 Btu/hr. There are six modes of plant operation; normal full-power operation, startup, hot shutdown, stable shutdown, cold shutdown and refueling. These can be generally grouped into two predominant modes, normal full power operation and shutdown operation. During normal full power operation, the NPHS, or a combination of the NPHS and the AHS, handle the heat dissipation to the atmosphere. Under normal full power operation, the heat load Is rejected either entirely by the NPHS or by both the NPHS and the AHS. The AHS is capable of exchanging 2.98 x 1 a8 Btu/hr. During shutdown operations, approximately 4 percent of plant operation annually, the AHS handles heat dissipation to the atmosphere. 3-26 Revision 2 February 2011

3.4.2 Component Description 3.4.2.1 Intake System Fermi3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report The lake water Intake and makeup water system is composed of two main parts: a wet pit pump house structure. containing five vertical wet pit pumps, trash racks and traveling screens, and piping routed from the pump-house structure to the cooling tower basin and the plant. The SWS draws lake water via an intake bay (Figure 3.4-1 and Figure 3.4-2) from Lake Erie. This Inlet bay Is formed by two rock groins that extend 600 fl Into Lake Erie. The intake bay is periodically dredged to maintain appropriate operating conditions. At the inlet to the pump house structure a trash rack is positioned which is equipped with a trash rake. Trash collected from the trash racks is disposed of. There are three dual flow traveling screens arranged side by side to further prevent debris from entering the pump house. Aquatic organisms are first washed from the traveling screens using low pressure water spray. The remaining trash is then removed using high pressure wash spr:ays. Strainers are in place at the pump discharge and strainer backwash is directed back to Lake Erie. Strainer backwash is controlled to ensure that the limits of the applicable NPDES permit are adhered to. The SWS pumps take suction from an intake bay through the makeup water pump house. The three PCTMS pumps supply makeup water to the cooling tower basins. Each pump has capacity to supply 50 percent of the total flow requirements. Two pumps are no_rmally operated and the third is reserved for standby operation. This.ensures makeup flow can be delivered in the event that one pump is out of service. The two operating pumps are capable of delivering the maximum cooling tower makeup water requirement of approximately 34,000 gpm, (Figure 3.3-1 ). The two PWSS pumps supply makeup water to the FPS under normal power operating conditions. They are 100 percent capacity pumps capable of supplying the necessary makeup water to the AHS and FPS in shutdown conditions. The velocity of the water flowing through the dual flow intake traveling screens is approximately 0.5 fps at record low lake water levels, and no more than 0.5 fps under all operating conditions, as required by Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act. The mesh size on each traveling screen is 3/4-inch. Each screen is capable of handling approximately 20,000 gpm of flow. The flow is designed to be sufficiently low that fish are not caught or trapped against the traveling screens. Fish which have entered the intake bay to this point are free to return to the lake in the same way they came. The pump house Intake structure is sized such that the formation of vortices or other abnormal flow conditions that would interfere with the operation of the pumps is minimized. If fouling occurs, the screens are deaned by backwashing. The formation of frazil ice on the screens is prevented by the low intake flow rate and by recirculating warmed water that has been rerouted from the discharge. A profile view of the intake screens and pumps suction is shown on Figure 3.4-2. This system is designed such that the intake structure has a minimal impact on the wildlife present in Lake Erie. This Is consistent with good engineering design and environmental practices. 3-27 Revision 2 February 2011

Femii3 Combined License Appllcatlon Part 3: Environmental Report The addition of a biocide/algaecide, sodium hypochlorite, takes place as water enters the pump house structure. Once the water has passed through the trash rack and the traveling screens, a diffuser injects the biocide into the flow before the flow proceeds into the pump suction. Further chemical treatments are discussed in Subsection 3.3.2. The elevation reference in use at Fermi Is NAVD88. The elevation of the bottom of the intake bay at the entrance to the pump house is 559 ft. The record low level of Lake Erie water is 563'-11* and the record high level is 576'-6*. The elevation of the base of the bay at the location of the pump suction is 553 fl This is more than 10 ft below the record low water level for Lake Erie, thus pump suction should not be a concern. Impacts to SWS pump suction due to seiche events are discussed in Subsection 3.3.1. 3.4.2.2 Discharge System Dilution and dissipation of the discharge heat as well as other effluent constituents are affected by both the design of the discharge and the flow characteristics of the receiving water, in this case Lake Erie. Normal plant effluent flow from all sources (cooling tower blowdown, and optional treated liquid radwaste) Is approximately 17,000 gpm. The NPHS cooling tower blowdown is the major contributor to the total flow, 13nd its maximum return temperature is estimated at 86°F and the average temperature is 68°F. Table 3.4-1 contains the monthly discharge flow rates and the discharge temperatures (cold water temperature) to Lake Erie. Figure 3.4-4 and Figure 3.4-5 are used in the development of Table 3.4-1. The temperature rise across the main condenser is 31.2°F. The 4-ft diameter discharge pipe is located approximately 1300 ft Into Lake Erie to avoid recirculation. Another consideration in the length of the discharge pipe was to preclude the discharge plume from intruding on environmentally sensitive onsite areas (such as wetlands) during wind-driven rises in Lake Erie water level (seiche events). The pipe is buried In the bank as it is routed into Lake Erle where the discharge is located, below the water surface, see Figure 5.3-1. The pipe discharges through a diffuser, as described in Subsection 5.3.2.1.1.1. The analysis of the thermal plume that results from the discharge is discussed in Subsection 5.3.2.1. The analysis includes consideration of selche events. As discussed In Subsection 3.3.1 and Subsection 5.3.2.1, due to potential for the water supply to the SWS to be degraded during extreme seiche events, the unit could be operationally controlled to limit makeup water requirements. These selche events are relatively short-lived. As part of the operational controls in response to an extreme seiche event, the discharge could be reduced and or secured. For a total discharge flow rate of approximately 17,000 gpm, the exit Jet velocity is approximately 8.5 fps. The submerged Jet mixes rapidly with the ambient lake water, accompanied by a reduction of momentum and kinetic energy through turbulent action. The environmental impact of discharged heat on Lake Erie is discussed in Subsection 5.3.2. The use of cooling towers for Fermi 3 provides good engineering design and represents the best technology available under Phase I of Section 316(a) of the Clean Water Act and also acts to greatly reduce the thermal loading to Lake Erie. Discharges from the AHS are directed to the CIRC basin. As shown in Figure 3.3-1, the discharge from the AHS is small in comparison to the NPHS discharge (less than 5 percent). When the 3-28 Revision 2 February 2011

Fem,13 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report PSWS is operating without the CIRC operating, discharges from the AHS are controlled to ensure that the resultant thermal plume is bounded by the thermal plume from operating the NPHS. 3.4.2.3 Heat Dissipation System The main source of heat dissipation is the NPHS. The NPHS is a natural draft cooling tower, as shown on Figure 3.4-3. The AHS consists of two mechanical draft cooling towers. The AHS is further discussed in FSAR Subsection 9.2.1. Makeup flow to the NPHS cooling tower basin is supplied by the SV:JS through the intake structure located on Lake Erie. The NPHS is located approximately 2200 ft from the pump house intake structure. At the cooling tower basin, there are four CIRC pumps, each 25 percent capacity, which supply a total flow of 744,000 gpm. The flow is directed to the main condenser, and is then directed back to the cooling towers so that the heat can be rejected to the atmosphere. The cooling tower basin is located approximately 1100 ft from the main condenser. The NPHS cooling tower discharges water to the basin, which receives makeup from Lake Erle. Intake water temperatures from Lake Erie can be seen in Subsection 2.3.1, and meteorological data can be found in Section 2.7. Cooling tower performance curves for wet bulb temperature and evaporation, as well as wet bulb and cold water temperature are seen on Figure 3.4-4 and Figure 3.4-5. The information in Table 3.4-1 is developed using these cooling tower performance curves. The design of the heat dissipation system does not present any major departures from acceptable cooling system design practices, nor does it contain any additional components for consideration, beyond the NPHS in the form of a natural draft cooling tower. This system Is consistent with good engineering practices. The PSWS and AHS are discussed in FSAR Section 9.2 and FSAR Table 9.2-201. 3.4.3 References 3.4-1 Edison Electric Institute, "Electric Power Plant Environmental Noise Guidet New York, 1978. 3.4-2 GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy, "ESBWR Design Control Document - Tier 2," Revision 6, August 2009. 3-29 Revision 2 February 2011

Table 3.4-1 Monthly Coollng Tower Temperatures and Flows Wet Bulb Cold Water Evaporation Drift Blowdown Makeup Month Temperature ("F) Temperature ("F)

• Flow rate (gpm) Flow rate (gpm)

Flow rate (gpm) Flow rate (gpm) January 23.7 53.8 11875 7.2 11867.8 23750 February 25.7 55.3 12200 7.2 12192.8 24400 March 32.3 59.4 13100 7.2 13092.8 26200 April 42.6 66 14300 7.2 14292.8 28600 May 52.7 72.7 15400 7.2 15392.8 30800 June 61.7 78.4 16300 7.2 16292.8 32600 July 65.9 81.5 16750 7.2 16742.8 33500 August 65 80.8 16700 7.2 16692.8 33400 September 58.1 76.3 16100 7.2 16092.8 32200 October 47 68.8 14800 7.2 14792.8 29600 November 37.5 62.7 13750 7.2 13742.8 27500 December 28 56.6 12500 7.2 12492.8 25000 Cold Water temperatures are calculated based on ambient wet bulb temperatures, however the temperature of the discharge from the NPHS cooling tower basin wlli be maintained at 55"F or above. Fermi3 Combined License Application 3-30 Revision 2 February 2011

Figure 3.4-1 Station Water Intake Structure Fermi 3 Combined License Application 3-31 -~I I I I I I I I I I Revision 2 February 2011

Figure 3.4-2 station Water Intake Structure - Elevation View Ferml3 3-32 Combined License Applicatlon Revision 2 February 2011

Figure 3.4-3 9tlU.SUl"'OITc:a.i-Fermi 3 NPHS Cooling Tower ELEVATION OF TOWER 0 Combined License Application

• =

~T0P<,"IIIH(.8CMl l0ToP0fCUIIB 3-33 PreJimjna ry Dra wing 0 NUCLEAR FACILITY S.E. MICHIGAN POWER PLANT Revision 2 February 2011

Figure 3A-4 Cooling Tower Performance Curve Performance C!n'9 for ~* - 1..,1/ 1/1/ _),,.. ..,v vv vv ~ vv vv E I B vv vv vv ..,..v-vv vv ,v vv .,,..,,. v...- I.A .,,-7 _..,..Y V , Yv _/ n, ,/ 8 - // y" vv v' ./ )/ / Yv yV ..,o 7 ,/ _..,..7 ..,....,.. 7 / _/ / / .. / I/ Lv vv v ~v 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 76 'Net~("F) Ferml3 3-34 Combined l.JcenBa Applk:atlon v"' v"' v-"' v,,.. ./ ./ 76 BO SPX Cooling Tower Co. TRACS Vlll'Blon 04-AlJG-06 Natural Draft Co!IrterflrNI Cooing Tower Model 8600 ~.0-45< Dealgn Conditions. Flow Rate 7200000PM Hot Weier 114.BS"F ColdWeter 86.00"F Wet-Bulb 73.00-F Rel.Humidity 66% Curve Coodltloos: Range 2aaa*F Row Rate 720000GPM (100%DM!gnAow) e * *

• X 100 % RH 60%RH 60%RH 40%RH 20%RH Design Point Revision 2 February 2011

Figura 3.4-5 800 -400 200 Cooling Tower EvaporaUon Curves EnporatJon CUM! for Case 1 I/ V V ,/ V V V V,v V V,,.-",,..v I/ V / V,.,v L,,v I/,,.../v v, / I/ II,,,v,.. Vv V v,,.,.v I/ I/I; vv Vv vv VIVv /V v,.-V I// vv ..: v.12 ,, i:, :;t;- ~~ 1.,,"" vv V L,, 1/v V v!S V vv vv L,, V L,, ,... Y ,/ ,v,.,v / _,,.v L,,v L,, L,,v L, 1.,,Y L,, SPX Cooing Tow. Co. 1RACS v~ 11.02.04 Natural Draft Counler1low CoolngT~ Model 8600 292-e.04&< Deatgn Condllona; Flow Rate noooooPM Hot water 114.88°F Cold Watsr 86.00"F Wet-Bulb 73.00"F Rel.Humidity 66% Clne Coodlllona: Range 28.Be-F F-lcw Ra1e 720000GPM ( 100% De8lgr1 Flow} 0 100%RH 80%RH 60%RH 40%RH 20%RH 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BO X °"691Point We(Bufb if} Tme: 19:30-.54 Dale: 11-26-2007 Drawn By: JOO Fermi 3 3-35 Combined IJcense Application Revlelon2 February 2011

Flgura3~ Outfall Diffuser.Amlngement LAKE BOTTOM - I ______________ 1_ _________ _ ~ 16 4' FLOW DIRECTION Femi3 3-36 Combined Ucense ApplJcatlon Revision 2 February 2011

3.6 Nonradioactive Waste Systems Fermi3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report The nonradioactive waste from Fermi 3 is discussed in this section. Subsection 3.6.1 describes effluent wastes expected from the CIRC, PSWS, PWS, various drains within the plant, and other miscellaneous gaseous, liquid and solid effluents. The effluent from the SWDS is discussed In Subsection 3.6.2. Subsection 3.6.3 discusses other effluent streams from Fermi 3, including gaseous effluents, stormwater, various plant drains, and other waste. 3.6.1 Effluents Containing Chemicals or Blocldes This subsection discusses the CIRC, PSWS, PWS, and other chemically treated systems, and for completeness, the FPS. The flows associated with these systems are outlined on Figure 3.3-1. Effluent flow from the Fermi site must remain within the limits outlined by the NPDES permit, or other appropriate limits as specified by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. As d~ssed in Section 1.2, permits, e.g., NPDES permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification, will be obtained for the discharge from Fermi 3. There are four categories of water treabnent chemicals: biocide, algaecide, corrosion inhibitor, and scale inhibitor. Specific chemicals anticipated to be used are determined by site specific water conditions, based on a conservative determination. The amount of chemicals added per year in pounds is outlined in Table 3.6-1. Effluent chemical constituents from Fermi 3 are shown in Table 3.6-2. Values specified In the Fermi 2 NPDES permit Include Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Residual Chlorine (TRC). The TSS specified in the permit is 100 ppm as a daily maximum; the maximum concentration discharged from Fermi 3 (Table 3.6-2) is 15.9 ppm, well within acceptable permitting limits. The TRC specified in the NPDES permit is 38 ppb or less, the amount discharged from Fermi 3 is zero. The addition of sodium hypochlorite does introduce chlorine into the water; however the addition of sodium bisulfite nullifies the presence of the chlorine. Regardless of the water systems' sources or constituents, each constituent discharged to the environment would be limited (i.e., volume and concentration) by the NPDES permit as discussed in Section 6.6. The main body of water that receives effluent from Fermi 3 is Lake Erle. There is one discharge from Fermi 3 that includes the blowdown from the CIRC and PSWS, as well as optional treated llquid radwaste discharge. Effluent from these sources is in liquid form; no sludge disposal is necessary from these systems. The location and other details pertaining to this discharge Into Lake Erle are discussed in Subsection 3.4.2.2. In addition to the liquid discharge paths, discharge of some chemical constituents will be entrained in the fallout from the spray from the CIRC and PSWS Cooling Towers. This effect is discussed in Subsection 5.3.3.1. The current status of the water quality in Lake Erie, as well as other water sources in proximity to the plant, is discussed in Subsection 2.3.3. The ecology of Fermi 3 is discussed In Section 2.4. Ecology is of particular impo$nce due to the prevalence of zebra mussels in Lake Erie. They present an additional need for the use of biocides such as sodium hypochlorite. 3-42 Revision 2 February 2011

3.6.1.1 Clrculating Water System Fenni3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report The chemical treatment of the CIRC is discussed in Subsection 3.3.2.2 and Table 3.3-1. This system is treated with a bioclde, algaecide, corrosion inhibitor, and scale inhibitor. The blowdown from the CIRC Is also treated with dehalogenatlon. The effluent from the CIRC Is discharged to Lake Erie, as described in Subsection 3.4.2.2. The CIRC operates on two cycles of concentration under normal full power operating conditions; additional operating parameters of the CIRC are discussed In Subsection 3.4.1.1. Effluent chemical constituents discharged in the blowdown from the CIRC are shown in Table 3.6-2. 3.6.1.2 Plant Service Water System The chemical treatment of the PSWS is discussed in Subsection 3.3.2.3 and Table 3.3-1. This system Is treated with a blocide, algaecide, corrosion inhibitor, and scale Inhibitor. The effluent from the PSWS is discharged to Lake Erle. Chemical constituents discharged in the effluent from the PSWS are shown in Table 3.6-2. 3.6.1.3 Potable Water System The operation of the PWS is designed to supply water for domestic use and human consumption to Fermi 3. The source of the PWS is the Frenchtown Township Municipal Water System, and any chemicals present In the water are those added by the Frenchtown Township Water Treatment Facility. The water is treated to meet applicable drinking water standards; no additional onsite treatment Is provided. The water is discharged to the SWDS which is routed offsite to the Frenchtown Township Sewage Treatment Facility. 3.6.1.4 Fire Protection System The FPS receives no additional chemical treatment (makeup to the FPS is discussed in Subsection 3.3.1.6) and does not normally discharge any liquid effluent. 3.6.2 Sanitary System Effluents This subsection discusses the sanitary waste systems effluent, including quantities and treatment of the waste products, during construction and operation of the plant. Sanitary waste systems needed at Fermi 3 during construction activities include portable toilets supplied and serviced by an offsite vendor. There Is no sanitary waste system discharge Into the effluent stream. Permanent SWDS components at Fermi 3 include waste basin, wet well, septic tank, settling tank, wet well pumps, sewage discharge pumps and associated valves, piping, and controls. The SWDS is discussed in FSAR Subsection 9.2.4. The system is designed to accommodate 60 gallons/day/person for up to 840 people during normal power operation and 1140 people during shutdown operation. This design condition drives the flow values that are outlined on Figure 3.3-1. In addition to sanitary waste generated by domestic uses, the demineralized water waste and effluent from the auxiliary boiler are also routed to the SWDS. 3-43 Revision 2 February 2011

Fermi3 Combined License Appllcatlon Part 3: Environmental Report The effluent of the SWDS is sewage that is pumped from the septic tank to the Frenchtown Township Sewage Treatment Facility for ultimate disposal. The SWDS does not come into contact with any systems that may contain radioactive waste; however measures are In place to ensure that no radioactive waste could be transmitted offslte. Since the effluent from the SWDS is routed to a waste treatment facility, and not discharged to the environment, it is not necessary for the effluent to meet NPDES permit requirements. It is, however, necessary to meet the limits outlined In the Industrial/Non-domestic User Discharge permit with the Frenchtown Township Sewage Treatment Facility. Chemical treatments applied to the waste are those within the Frenchtown Township Sewage Treatment Facility, in keeping with the municipal sewage treatment standards. Further discussion of the chemical treatment of the SWDS can be found in Subsection 3.3.2.4. 3.6.3 Other Effluents This subsection discusses miscellaneous solid, liquid and gaseous effluents not addressed in Subsection 3.6.1 or Subsection 3.6.2. Gaseous effluents consist of exhaust from diesel generators, diesel-driven fire pumps, and the auxiliary boiler system (Aux Boller). Stormwater, various plant drains, and other wastes are also discussed in the following subsections. 3.6.3.1 Gaseous Effluents There are four main sources of gaseous nonradioactive effluent at Fermi 3, the standby diesel generators (SDG), ancillary diesel generators (ADG), Aux Boiler, and the diesel-driven fire pumps. The applicable regulations, permits, and consultation required by Federal, State, regional, and potentially affected Native American tribal agencies are addressed in Section 1.2. Proper maintenance and operating procedures, described in FSAR Section 13.5, assure that emissions are controlled consistent with system design to meet the standards from Section 1.2. There are two 17.1 MW SDGs that are expected to operate approximately four hours per month for each engine. The proposed SDG for Fermi 3 will meet emission standards for owners and operators listed In 40 CFR 60.4205 at the time of purchase. Emission standards for stationary compression ignition internal combustion engines with a cylinder displacement greater than 30 liters per cylinder are displayed In Table 3.6-3. The non-road diesel fuel used to operate the two SDGs will also be required by 40 CFR 80.510 to meet sulfur content levels of 15 ppm effective June 1, 2010. There are two 1650 kW ADGs that are expected to operate for approximately two hours every three months, for an annual total of 8 hours of operation for each engine. The manufacturers of the ADGs proposed for Fermi 3 wlll be required to meet emission standards listed In Table 1 of 40 CFR 1039.101 at the time of purchase. Tier 4 emission standards for compression Ignition internal combustion engines manufactured after the model year 2014 with a rating greater than 560 kW are displayed In Table 3.6--4. The non-road diesel fuel used to operate the two ADGs will also be required by 40 CFR 80.510 to meet sulfur content levels of 15 ppm effective June 1, 201 0. Fermi 3 has one package Aux Boller, rated at 50 tons of steam per hour (112 MBTU/hr or about 33 MW). The maximum expected operation on an annual basis is 30 days. Emissions are shown in Table 3.6-5, based on ASTM D-975 No. 2 fuel oil (Reference 3.6-1). 3-44 Revision 2 February 2011

Fennl3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report The fourth source of emissions at Fermi 3 are the two diesel-driven fire pumps. Each pump is approximately 200 kW and is expected to operate approximately 48 hours annually. The manufacturers of diesel-driven fire pumps proposed for Fermi 3 will be required to meet emission standards listed in Table 4 to Subpart 1111 of Part 60.4202(d) at the time of purchase. Emission standards for stationary compression ignition Internal combustion engines that are fire pumps with a maximum engine rating of 200 kW manufactured after 2009 are displayed in Table 3.6-6. The non-road diesel fuel used to operate the two fire pumps will also be required by 40 CFR 80.510 to meet sulfur content levels of 15 ppm effective on June 1, 2010. In addition to the gaseous effluents emitted from the aforementioned combustion sources, a natural draft cooling tower (NDCT) and two 4-cell mechanical draft cooling towers (Moen will emit solid particulates. The emission estimates of particulate matter for particle sizes of 10 and 2.5 microns (PM10 and PM2.s) from the operation of the proposed NDCT and 4-cell MDCTs are displayed in Table 3.6-7 along with design parameters that were used to derive the emission estimates. It Is conservatively assumed that the PM2.11 emissions are the same as the PM10 emissions from the cooling towers. The drift rates for the NDCT and 4-cell MDCTs are based on the values provided by the associated manufacturers of each cooling tower. Toe water flow rate to the NDCT, as specified in Figure 3.3-1, will be supplied at a maximum rate of 724,000 gallons per minute (gpm). Toe water from the basin of the NDCT will supply the makeup water to the 4-cell MDCTs at a maximum flow rate of 40,000 gpm. Section 5.3.3.1 states that the makeup water for the NDCT is expected to have a total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration of 420 parts per million (ppm) or 0.00042 grams of salt per gram of solution. The makeup water for the 4-cell MDCTs will be supplied from the NDCT basin; therefore, the TDS concentration for the 4-cell MDCTs is also expected to be 420 ppm. The emission rate (lb/hr) for particulates emitted from the cooling towers can be calculated by taking the product of the water flow rate, weight of one gallon of water, drift rate, and TDS concentration. For the purpose of providing a maximum bounded value for the emissions of particulates from the cooling towers, the calculations in Table 3.6-7 were developed for the operation of both the NDCT and 4-cell MDCTs simultaneously for an entire year at the maximum water flow rate. While this likely overestimates the emissions of PM10 and PM2.s from the operation of the NDCT and 4-cell MDCTs, it provides a maximum value for the assessment of impacts from the operation of the cooling towers. Therefore, the maximum hourly and annual emissions of PM10 and PM2.s from the simultaneous operation of the NDCT and 4-cell MDCTs are expected to be 1.93 lb/hr and 8.47 tons/year, respectively. Stationary combustion sources proposed for the operation of Fermi 3 will emit carbon dioxide (CO2). The following provides the estimated CO2 emissions and calculation methodology for the proposed standby diesel generators, ancillary diesel generators, diesel-driven fire pumps, and auxiliary boiler. Standby and Ancillary Diesel Generators and Diesel-Driven Fire Pumps In order to estimate the annual emissions of CO2 for the proposed standby diesel generators, ancillary diesel generators, and diesel-driven fire pumps, emission factors were obtained from Tables 3.3-1 and Table 3.4-1 of Reference 3.6-2. Toe total annual emissions of CO2 emitted from 3-45 Revision 2 February 2011

Ferml3 Combined License Application Part 3: Envlronrnental Report the standby diesel generators, ancillary diesel generators, and diesel-driven fire pumps ls calculated by taking the product of the emission factor, number of units, annual operating hours, and engine power rating. Auxiliary Boiler The estimated annual emissions of CCh from the proposed auxiliary boiler is calculated by taking the product of the emission factor, heat input, and the annual operating hours. The CO2 emission factor for the auxiliary boiler is 22,300 lb/103 gal as displayed in Table 1.3-12 of Reference 3.6-2. Dividing the emission factor (22,300 lb/103 gal) by the heating value of fuel oil (140 MBtu/1 ()3 gal), the emission factor becomes 159.29 lb/MBtu. The heat Input of the boiler is 112 MBtu/hr. Table 3.6-6-(A} provides the emission rates and estimated annual emissions of CO2 for each stationary source proposed for Fermi 3. Therefore, the estimated annual emission of CO2 from stationary sources during the operation of Fermi 3 is 7,734 tons per year. 3.6.3.2 stonnwater Stormwater, specifically flood and probable maximum flood (PMF) are discussed In FSAR Subsection 2.4.2 and FSAR Subsection 2.4.3. Stormwater from the Fermi 3 site drains to the North and South Lagoons, which are located north and south of the site respectively. Stormwater construction and operational Impacts are discussed in Chapter 4 and Chapter 5. 3.6.3.3 Various Plant Drains There are several drains at Fermi 3 including: equipment drains, floor drains, laundry and chemical drains, and other miscellaneous periodic drains. These drains are treated and the treated effluent joins the discharge from the CIRC and PSWS to be discharged to Lake Erie. Waste from the various plant drains that cannot be treated for onslte discharge are routed for handling as hazardous waste. 3.6.3.4 other Waste Low level mixed waste (LLMW) contains hazardous waste and a low-level radioactive source, special nuclear, or byproduct material. Hazardous waste is not necessarily LLMW; LLMW only includes hazardous waste that has been exposed to radioactive contamination. Section 5.5 provides a more detailed discussion of the environmental impacts that could result from the operation of the non-radioactive waste systems and the storage and disposal of mixed wastes. A summary of the hazardous waste generated at Fermi 2 for several years is shown in Table 3.6-8. Some examples of LLMW generated at Fermi 2 Include: Industrial oils and laboratory waste Rags/wipes Lead products Mercury products 3-46 Revision 2 February 2011

Ferml3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report Federal regulations governing generation, management, handling, storage, treatment, disposal and protection requirements concerning LLMW are contained in 10 CFR 10 and 10 CFR 40. Additional discussion of guidelines and standards pertaining to waste disposal is found in Section 1.2. Treatment of LLMW from Fermi 3 is handled in a similar manner as that of Fermi 2, with eventual offsite transportation and disposal by property licensed organizations. Fermi 2 is a Small Quantity Generator, as Fermi 3 will likely be. Further discussion of LLMW is provided in Section 5.5. Universal waste is also disposed of properly at Fermi 3. Universal waste includes: Batteries Light bulbs Computer monitors and equipment Handling of universal waste is done in accordance with State of Michigan regulations, with eventual offsite disposal by a properly permitted organization. Additional discussion of guidelines and standards pertaining to waste disposal is found in Section 1.2. When possible, materials are recycled with the proper facilities. Fermi 2 practices recycling when possible; Fermi 3 also recycles. Examples of Items recycled from the Fermi site include: Batteries Circuit Boards Recyclable lead Used oil is also recycled. The used oil program in use at Fermi 2 will be similarly implemented with Fermi 3. In this program the used oil from site is sent to St. Clair power station for power generation. In addition to mixed waste and universal waste, another form of waste that must be handled at Fermi 3 is the waste that is disposed of from trash racks and traveling water screens. The trash racks and traveling water screens of the SWS pumps are discussed in Subsection 3.4.2.1. Once the racks and screens are cleaned and the trash is present in the trash cart or trash basket, it Is necessary to dispose of the waste. This waste is disposed of offsite. 3.6.4 References 3.6-1

• Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils,* ASTM D 975, American Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 2007.

3.6-2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), *eompllation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42),* Fifth Edition, Vol. I., Tables 1.3-1, 1.3-12, 3.3-1, and 3.4-1, October 1996. 3-47 Revision 2 February 2011

Table 3.6-1 System Fermi3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report Chemicals Added to Liquid Effluent Streams Chemical Maximum Amount Average Amount Frequency of Concentration In Use Waste Streams CIRC/ SWS Biocide/Algaecide - 620,000 lb/year 620,000 lb/year Approximately Non-detectable, neutrallzed by sodium bisulfite Sodium Hypochlorite 4.5 hour/week (15%) CIRC Corrosion Inhibitor - 1,700,000 lb/year 1,400,000 lb/yearContlnuous Sodium Silicate CIRC Scale 830,000 lb/year 700,000 lb/year Continuous Inhibitor/Dispersant CIRC Dehalogenatlon - 650,000 lb/year 550,000 lb/year Continuous Sodium Bisulfite

• Fermi 2 NPDES permit 3-48 TRC<38ppb*

No~etectable, dissociates in system Non-detectable, dissociates in system Non-detectable, neutralizes sodium hypochlortte Revision 2 February 2011

Table 3.6-2 Effluent Chemical Constituents* Ion/Chemical As Max Cone. (ppm) Sodium Na 46.6 Calcium Ca 71.9 Magnesium Mg 17.4 Silica SID.! 19.9 Chloride Cl 61.3 Sulphate SO4 38.5 Potassium K 3.6 Scale Chemical 11.6 Inhibitor/Dispersant Bicarbonate Alk. CaCOa 167.8 TDS 428.5 TSS 16.0

• Based on 2 cycles of concentration 3-49 Fem,13 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report Avg Cone. (ppm) 34.3 71.9 17.4 19.5 42.5 38.5 3.6 11.6 167.7 397.4 16.0 Revision 2 February 2011

DTE Electric - Fermi 3 Nuclear Power Plant NPDES Pemilt NO. MI0058892 Renewal Application April 4, 2022 - Map of Facility Figure 2.1-4, Fermi 3 Environmental Report, Rev. 2

Figure 2.1-4 Fermi 3 Site Plan Fermi 3 Combined License Application 2-8 Revision 2 February 2011

DTE Electric - Fermi 3 Nuclear Power Plant NPDES Permit NO. MI0058892 Renewal Appllcation April 4, 2022 - Fermi 3 2022 Outfall 001 Laboratory Analyses Proposed discharge Data Is expected to be s1mllar to the discharge from Fermi 2 Power Plant TriMatrlx Laboratories Analytical Results for Fermi 2 2014 NPDES Permit Renewal V

December 19, 2013 DTE - Fermt-2 Attn: Ms. Mary Hana 6400 North Dooe Highway, 200 TAC Newport, MI 48166 Projec:b Permit ~I - Penni, 2013

Dear Ms. Mary Hana,

Enclosed IS a copy of the laboratory report for the followmg work order(s) received by T nMctnx L.aboratooes: Work Order 1312032 Received 12/03/2013 Dellulptlon Laboratory 5elVlces Tl1ls report relates only to the sample(s) as rece!Ved. Test resuts are 11 compliance with the requremenl5 of the Nabonal Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (tEL.AP) !fil/or one of the followrng certJflcabon programs: N::l./>SS DoD--B..AP/IS017025 ( #ADE-1542); Arkansas DEP Geor!lia EPO ( #EB7622-24); Il~nols DEP ( #200026/003059); L..ous@na DEP ( #83658); Midugan DPH ( #0034); Minnesota North CBrohna DNRE ( #659); Texas CEQ ( #T104704495-13-3); (#999472650); ls:iA Soll Import Permit (#P330-12-0J236), (#88-0730/12-QS6-0); Ronda DEP (#E87622-24); Kansas DPH (#E-10302); Kentucky DEi' (#0021); DPH (#491715); New York a.AP (#11776/48855); vtrg,ma 00.5 ( #460153/1622); W!sconsl1 DNR AA( qualrflcabon or narrabon of re!ll!s, 1ndtx!Jng sample acceptance reqt.11reme,l:s.nl test e,a:epborls to the above referenced

programs, IS presented m the StatEment of Data Quallfkabons and Pro)&I: Technical Narrative secbons of ttns report.

EstJmates of anaJybcal uncertambes and certd'lcabon doa.rnents for the test results cont,1r.ed Within this report are available l4J0!1 request. If you have 'Inf questloos or require further mformabon, please do not hesitate to contact me. Jenl"lfer L RJCe ProJed:Ole!rust Page 1 of 59 ThlS report shall not be reproduced, except U1 r~. Without wntten authonzabon of TnMatnx Labootones, Ioc. lnc!Mdual sample =b relate only to the sample tested 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512 616.975.4500 + Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnrratnxlabs.com

PROJECT TEOiNICAL NARRATIVE(*) Polychlortnated Blphenyls (PClia) by EPA Method 608 NalTlll:lve: Due to sample volumes, matrix spectlc cµilJty control (QC) was not performed on this batch. A blank and a Laboratory Control Sample make ~ the batch QC. Analysis: lffi'A-608 Sample/ Analyte: 1312032-14 Intake Composrte 1312032-15 001 Composite Page 2 ol' 59 This report shall not be reproduced, except 11 ful, wrthout wntten nuthonmbon r:L TnMatrnc Lllboratones, Inc IndMrual S8111)1e res1As relate only to the sampe tested 5560 Corporate ExchanQe Court SE

• Grand Rapids, M1 49512
• 616.975.4500 t Fax 616.9427463 + www.tnmatrodabs.com

PROJECT TECHNICAL NARRATIVE() Vol11tlle Org1111lc Compound by EPA Method 624 Narntlve: Sample was not preseived per 40 a=R Part 136.3,Table II: a ~ colected for Acrol0l1 must be pH adJusted to a range ex 4-5 or analyzed wrt:hln 3 days ~ collecbon. Analysis: USEPA-624 Sample/ Anatyte: 13 U032-o6 OutfaU 001 VOC Lab Composite 1312032-13 Intake VOC Lab Composte Page 3 ~59 This report $hall not be reproduced, except,n tu;, wrthout wntten authonzabon a( TnMatnx Laboratones, Inc. Incr,iwal sample resuls re!1lte only to the 5ample tested. 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE + Grand Rapids, MI 49512

• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

PROJECT TECHNICAL' NARRATlVE(e) Semlvolatlla Organic Compoundl by EPA Method 625 Namrtlve: Due to sample volumes, matnx spect!c quakty control (Q::) was not performed on this batch. A blank and a l.aboratO!)' Cortrol Smnple make up the batch QC. Analysis: USEPA-625 Sample/ Analyte: 1312032-14 Intake Composrte 1312032-15 001 OJrr4)osrte Paqe 4 of 59 This report 5liall not be reproduced, excO!pt 111 ru11, without wrtten authonzBbon or TnMatnx Laboratones, Inc. lnavlduaJ Sill1!)le ~ rel1lte ooly to the sample tested. 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand RaJllds, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

PROJECT TECHNICAL NARRATIVE(s) Tobll Meblls by EPA 200 Sertm Methods NalTlltlve:: The CRL recovery for lhs ana!yte was ou:side cl the laboratory cortrol hmrts. Analysis: USEPA-200.8 Page 5 r:# 59 3l09035-CRL2 Selenium This report mall not be ~. except in full, IOOthout wntten authonzllbon ex TnMatnx l.BboratoneS, Inc. lnavldual ~ resuR:s relate ooly to the $11mple tested 5560 Corporate ExchanQe Court SE

• Grand Raptds, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 516.942.7463
• www.tnmatrodabs.com

PROJECT TECHNICAL NARRATIVE(*) Phylcal/Chemlcal Panlmeters by EPA/ APHA/ ASTM Methods Na11'111:fv8l Toe CRL recovery for this arwyte was outside of the laboratory cortrol kmrts. Analysis: SM 5540 C-2011 31..0<\\037-c:RLI. St.rfactarts, MBAS Narnitlvm Toe MS or MSD recovery, but not both, was outside the control hmlt. The RPO lS wrthm the control hmit. Analysis: USEPA-351.2 Rev. 2.0 Sample/ Analyte: 1312032-15 001 Compos rte Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl N mitlvel The RL for the; analysis was elevated due to lllSllflaent sample volume or wetqht received. Analysis: USEPA-166411 Sample/ Analyte: 1312032-10 Intake Grab Day 2 HEM; OIi & Grease N11rratfve: A.C.U, stands for Apparent Color Uruts. Color IS pH dependent !OJ rts value increases proportionally with pH. Toe method requires that the pH rx the sample be deterrrnned and reported along wrt:h the A.C.U value. The sample pH was: 7.12. Analysis: SM 2120 B-2011 Sample/ Analyte: 1312032-14 Intake ComposrtB 1312032-15 001 Composite Color (Apparent) Color (Apparert) Narrative: Toe referenced method req1.11res analysis occur wrt:hJn 15 rTWlUtes of sample coll&IJon. Analysis was performed at the laboratory on 12-4-13.. Analysis: SM 4500-503 B-2011 Sample/ Analyte: 1312032-14 Inlllke Composrte 1312032-15 001 Composrte SUflte 51.ffite Namrtlve: The mg/L MBAS result reported should be W1Sldered n-g MllAS/L ( calrulated as LAS, molecular weigti: 320). Analysis: SM 5540 C-2011 Sample/ Analyte: 1312032-14 Intake Composite 1312032-15 001 Composrte Strlactants, MBA.5 Strlactants, MBA.5 Namrtlve: Dlstllabo11 p,ebeabue,t was not performed. Common llllBfenng ICJl1S were complexed by a lxifer soll.bon. Auoroborates ( t present) may restit 11 a low bias of the reported CUI ice, ti a boo. Analysis: SM 4500-f C-2011 Sample/ Analyte: 1312032-14 Intake Composite 1312032-15 001 Composrt:e Page 6 or 59 Aooncle Auonde nus report shall oot be reproduced, except in full, wrthout wntte, author1Zlltlon of TnMatnx Laboratones, Inc inavldual sample results relate only to the sample tested. 5560 Corporate Excnange Court SE + Grand R2lplds, MI 49512

• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

STATEMENT OF DATA QUAUFICATlONS Volatlle Organic Compounds by EPA Method 624 Q1.111llficatlon: Toe corresponding ocv for this analytical batch had a reaNerY exceeding the ~per control kmt rx the method. A poslbYe result for ttas analyte m Mf'/ associated samples 11re CO!lSldered estimated. Non-detectable resuts !R oot qualified. Analysis: USEPA-624 Sisnple/ Analyte: 1312032-{)6 1312032-13 Outfal 001 voe Lab ConlJOsrtE Irtake voe Lab ComJxlSlte Oiloroethane Oiloroethane Q1.111I lflcatlon: The cherrncal utilized to preserve this sample has the poterilal to degrade 2-dworoethyl vmyl ether ttnnqi polymenzabon or other rapid chemcal reacbon. The reporting ~mrt and/or any posrtrve result must be CDOS1dered esbmated. Analysis: USEPA-624 Sample: 1312032-{)6 1312032-13 Page 7 or 59 outfal 001 voe Lab Composrte In121ke VOC Lab Composrte T1ns repcrl sha! not be reproduced, except m M, without wntten authonzatlon of TnMatnx Lllboratones, Inc Inc!Mdual sample ~ relate only to the S!IITl]Xe tested 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

STATEMENT OF DATA QUALIFICATIONS Physlcal/Clemlcal Parameters by EPA/APHA/ASTM Methoda Qual lflcatlon: The foDowmg reported test methods and cmlyte(s) are excepbons to our NB>> Ftelds of Ac:creotatxln, or for which accredltabon is not required, applicable, or available. Analysis: EPA-351.2/4500-NH3G Analyte(s): Nrtrogen, Orgarvc Analysis: SM 4500-503 B-2011 Analyte(s): Slil'!te Page 8 oc 59 ThG report slull not be repro:luced, e,apt tn ful, without wntlen authonzz,t,oo rx T nMatnx Laboratone5, Inc lndviclu!II s:aIT4)le resuls relate only to the SIi~ test& 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand RaJ)lds, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.trnnatnxlabs.com

atent: Projed:: aient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matnx: Analyte Olloone, TotBI -...J (Fleld) Oxygen, Dluohed (l'lekl) pH (Field) Tmnpcatura "C (Field) Page g or 59 DT1! - Pennl-2 Permit Renewal - Ferm~ 2013 OutflllU 001 Grab Day 1 1312032-01 Wc!&IJWater ANALYTICAL REPORT Work Order. Desalptron: sampled: Sampled By: ReceJved: 1312032 LaboratorySeMces 12/2/13 13:00 J. Elsey U/3/13 17:00 Physlcal/Chemlcal Parameters by EPA/APHA/ASTM Methodll Anlllrtiall DRatlon Reallt RL una Factor Mllthod <0.20 D.20 mg/I. HAOH3167 7.!ll 0.10 mwL SM-aJO--OG 8.31 LOO pH lJnrtJ 5144500-/I "'2011 16.D 0.1 °C SM 2550 B To,s report shall not be reproduced, except 111 ful, without wnt:ten authom:llbon of TnMlltrtx Laboratones, loc. Ind1v,dll!II sample results relate ooly to the si,mple tested. Datallme AnafJzed l.2/02/13 13*00 12/02/13 13-00 12/02/13 13 00 U/02/13 13*00 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• F11X 616.942.7463 www.tnmatnxlabs.com QC lly Ba1l:h JAE 1313078 JAE 1313078 JAE 1313078 JAE 1313078

Cliert: Pro,ect: 01ent Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matroc Anlyte Page 10 of 59 DTI! - Fennl-2 Permrt: Renewal - Fermi, 2013 Outtnll 001 LLHg 1312032-02 waste Wat.er ANALYTICAL REPORT Worlc Order: Deso,pbon: Scwnpled: Sampled By: R.ecerved: 1312032 Labor.tory Services 12/2/13 12:44 J. 8sey 12/3/13 17:00 Total Metala by EPA 1600 Series Methods AulJtlall Raallt 7.84 RL U lt 2.50 ng/L Dilation l'llctor Method 5 IJSEPA-lli31£ Tins report shall not be reproduced, ~ m ful, without wntten aothonz2ltlon of TnMatnx Lllboratxmes, Inc lnavldulll ~ results relate only to the samp!e tested DBb!Tlme Analrzad By QC !latch U/f1'S/l3 12'43 MSH 131307 5 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Gram Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463 + www.tnmatnxlabs.com

Client: Project: Oient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matroc Anat,te Phenoha, Total ODme, Tomi - (Fleld) Oxygan,DIAolved(l'lmd) pH (Flald) Tmipen,tura "C (Fleld) Cyantle, Avaftable HEH; on &.Grease Page 11 of 59 DTE - Fennl-2 Permit Renewal - Fermi, 2013 Outfall 001 Grab Day 2 1312032--03 waste water ANALYTICAL Rf PORT Work Order. Descr1)bon: SiYnpled: Sampled By: Received: 1312032 Laboratory Sesvlces 12/3/13 12:35 J. Bsey 12/3/13 17:00 Physical/Chemical Parameters by EPA/APHA/ASTM Methods Amlytlcal Dllul:loll Result RL UDII: Factor Method <O.OSOO 0.0500 mg/I. USEP,t,-420 '4 <G.20 0.20 mg/l HACIHl167 6.89 0 10 mg/I. SM'4500-0G 8.56 1.00 pHUrots 5M 4500-tl B-201.1 19.0 0.1 "C SH 2550 B <2.0 2.0 uw'L lJSEPi\\ CV.-1677 <5.00 5.00 mg/I. USB'A-1664A TM report shal not be ~roduced, except in fuD, wrthout written authoru:llbon cl TnMatnx l.Bboratone5, Inc ~ sample results n!late only to the sample tested Datellma Analfzed 12/09/13 10.3'3 12/03/13 12 35 12/03/13 12.35 12/03/13 12:35 12/03/13 12.35 12/09/1312:J.O 12/1~0800 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Graoo Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.9427463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com QC By Batch l.HA 1313065 JAE 1313078 JAE 1313078 JAE 1313078 JAE 1313078 I.HA 1313173 WAH 1313184

OJent: Pro,Jecl:: Oien!: Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matnx: AnlllJte Mausy Page 12 ex 59 DTE - Ferml-2 Permit Renewal - Fenn!, 2013 0utfaJl 001 UHg Dupllcate 1312032-()4 Waste Water ANALYTICAL REPORT WorkOrder. Descnpbon: Sampled: Sampled By: ReceNed: 1312032 Laboratory ServlCes 12/2/13 12:47 J. Elsey 12/3/13 17 :00 Total Metals by EPA 1600 Serles Methods Alllllftlcal Remit 7.51 RL D.500 Dllutloa Ulllt l'adDI' Method ng/1. lJSB'll,-l63lE This reix,rt "1all not be ~- except m ful,..thout wntten authonzabon of TnMatnx Laboratone5, Inc. lnovlduaJ SIi~ results rei1Jte only to the Slllllple ~- Data Time QC AnalJnd lty Blltcb 12/0!il 13 12.01 HSH 1313075 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.9427463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

Client: Pro,Ject: aient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matroc ADalJbl Page 13 of 59 DTI! - Ferml-2 Permrt: Renewal - Ferrm, 2013 Outtall 001 Field Blank 1312032-0S waste Water ANALYTICAL REPORT WoricOrder:

== Description:== Sa'np!ed: Sampled By: Recetved: 1312032 Laboratofy 5ervlces 12/2113 12:41 J. 8sey 12/3/13 17:00 Total Metals by EPA 1600 Serles Methods AJllllytlcal Rsult <0 500 RL 0 500 DiJutlDn Ud l'actor M9thod USEPlr 16311! Tots report shal not be reproduced, except in f [jj, wd:hout wntten a<.thonzabon of TnMatnx Laboratones, Inc Inckvtdual 5:!111-.p!e results relate ooly to the sample tested. Datll Tlale QC Aulyzed By Batcb l.2/0!,13 1.2.05 HSM 1313075 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE Grand Rapids, MI 49512 616.975.4500 Fax 616.942.7463

• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

Client: Project: Cliert Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Urrt: Drlli:lon Factor. QC Batch: DTI! - Fennl-2 Pemnt Renewal - Fennl, 2013 OuttaJ1 001 voe Lab Composite 1312032-06 1 Wl!Ste Waler ug/L 1 1313145 ANAL YTlCAL REPORT Work Order. 1312032 J?escnpbOO: Laboratory Services Sampled: 11/3/13 12:35 Sampled By: J. Elsey Received: 12/3/13 17:00 Prepared: 12/6/13 7:00 Analyzed: 12/6/13 16:34 Analytlcal Batch: 3L.09003 -Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 624 Amlytlcal CAS Nalllber Analyta "-It 107--02-8 Acroleln <5.0 107-13-1 Acrykxutnle <LO 71-43-2 Benzene <LO 75-27-4 Bromodlch!orommhne <LO 75-25-2 Bromofonn <LO 74-83-9 BIQ110J1iethalie <10 56-23-5 CMbon Tetrachlonde <LO 108-90-7 Omo!Janzene <LO "75-00-3 Olloros:hane <LO 110-75-8 2-0lloroethyt Vinyl Ethe- <10 67-66-3 Chlorolbnn <10 7+87-3 Olloromethane <1.0 124-48-1 Dlbromochlorome <LO 75-3+3 1,1-D!dlb oe!haoe <LO 107-06-2 1,2-Dlchloroethane <LO 75-35-4 1,1-Dlduoethene <LO 542-75-6 1,3-DlchlorO!)lopeue (TolllQ <20 156-60-5 trllns-1,2-Dlchloroelhen <LO 78-87-5 1,2-Dlclioropropan <1.0 100-41-4 Ethytbenzene <LO 75-09-2 Methylene Ollonde <5.0 79-34-5 1,1,2.2-Tl!lraehlo, c.e:ha1,e <LO 127-18-4 Tetmchioroet11'!1l9 <LO 108-88-3 Toluene <1,0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Tnchloc oethc1 ie <1.0 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trdmroelhane <1.0 79-01-6 TndiloJoethel"' <1.0 75-01-4 Vlnyl Ollorlde <1.0 Contiooed Oil next page ~ Statement of Data QualJflcabons Page 14 of 59 Th15 ~ shlil not be ~uced, except 11 ful, Without written authorU!lbon of TnJolatnx ~. Inc IndMciJal sample results relate only to the sample tested. By: DLV By: DLV RL 5.0 LO 1.0 LO 1.0 LO LO LO LO 10 1.0 LO 1.0 LO LO 1.0 2.0 1.0 10 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 LO 10 1.0 1.0 1 0 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463 + www.tnmatnxlabs.com

Client: ProJed:: Oient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matnx: Urut: DIIU!on Factor. QC Batch: DTE - Ferml-2 Permit Renewal - Femu, 2013 Outl'all 001 VOC Lab Composite 1312032-()6 Wasre.Water ug/L 1 1313145 ANALYTICAL REPORT Work Order. 1312032 Desa,ptlon: Laboratoly 5eMces Sampled: 12/3/13 12:35 Sampled By: J. 8sey R.ece!ved: U/3/13 17:00 Prepared: 12/6/13 7:00 Analyzed: 12/6/13 16:34 AnBi'(t:Jcal Batch: 3L09003 ~olatlle Organic Compounds by EPA Method 624 (Continued) Surragams1 ~ 1,2~ TokJene-d/ ~ '"See SIMeme!1t r:l Data Quallflcabons Page 15 of 59 9'bt:awlry 98 99 96 9.J Cantral Utab 85-118 87-122 85-W 82-110 Thi$ report shal oot be reproduced, except Ul ful, wrthoot wrt1:en althorrzaboo,A TnMatnx Laboratones, Inc lnavldual SIIITiple ~ relate only to the sample tested By: DLV By: DLV 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand RaJ)lds, MJ 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

Olent: Projl!CI:: arent Sample ID: Lab Smnple ID: Matnx: Mercury Page 16 of 59 DTE - Fennl-2 Permrt: Renewal - Fermi, 2013 Fermi LI.Hg Trip Blank 1312032-07 Waste Water ANALYTICAL REPORT Work Order: Descnptlon: Sampled: Smnpled By: R.ecelved: 1312032 Laboratory Services 12/2/13 0:00 J. Bsey 12/3/13 17:00 Total Metnl11 by EPA 1600 Serles Methods AnlllJtlcal Raailt <0.500 RL Q.500 Dllutloa IJalt l'llctar Metllod ng/1. l.lSB'A-16JlE Tllls report 6hal not be reproduced, except,n full, without wntten althcmaboo of TnMatnx Laboratones, Inc Inc!tvioolsl sample resub relate only to the sample tested DalllTlme Analyzm QC By lllltcb 12/05/13 12:0!I M5M 1313075 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapid!;, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500 + Fax 516.942.7453 + www.tnmatnxlabs.com

Qient: Pr()Jed:: Oient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matnx: Analyts o-b--. Teal-., (F,elcl) Oxygen, Dluolved (l'lmd) pH (F1eld) Temperatun "C (Pleld) Page 17 of 59 DTE - Fennl-2 Permrt Renewal - Fermi, 2013 Inblb 6rab Day 1 1312032-0S Waste Water ANAL YTlCAL REPORT Wor1c Order.

== Description:== Sampled: Sampled By: Received: 1312032 Lllboratory Services U/2/13 12:25 J. Elsey 12/3/13 17:00 Phyalcal/Otemlcal Parameten by EPA/ APffA/ ASTM Methods AnlllJtlcal Dllutllln -.It RL Unit l'actor Metbod <0.20 D.20 mg/L HACH-11167 &.43 0.10 mg/I. SM 4500-0G 7.51 1 00 pH Units SH"'600--Ha.,2QJ1 5.0 0.1 "C SM 2550 B nus report !hall not be ~, except 111 Ml, wt1:hout wrtten atthomabon of TnMatm Laboratones, Inc. IndMdual,;ample results relate ooly to the "'rope tested DateTlme AnalJnd U/02/13 12'25 U/02/l312.25 U/02/]3 U*2S !2/02/1312:25 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com QC By Batch JAE 1313078 JAE 1313078 JAE 1313078 JAE 1313078

aient: PIO)ect: Oient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matnx: Aaalyta Merauy PacJe 18 of 59 DTE - Ferml-2 Permft: Renewal - Ferrru, 2013 IntalGIILLHg 131.2032-09 waste Water ANALYTICAL REPORT Work Order. Desaiptlon: Sampled: Sampled By: Received: Total Metals by EPA 1600 Series Methods Dilution 1312032 Laboratory 5erV1ces 12/2/13 12:02 J. Elsey 12/3/13 17:00 Analytlall Remit RL Unit l'actor Method 3.61 D.500 ng/l IJSffif,-1631E llns ~ !ihall not be reproduced, except,n ful, Without wntten authonzahon of TnMatnx Labonltones, Inc. IncbvwiJAI sample results relate only to the so~ tested. Datellme QC Analyzl!d By Batch 12/19113 10.56 HSH 1313536 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Raptds, Ml 49512 516,975.4500
• Fax 516.942.7463 www.trvnatnxlabs.com

aient: Pro)ed:: aJent Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matnx: Analyte Phenooa, Total Oilome, Total Reslduol (Field) Oxygan,. Dlnolftd (Field) pH (Field) T&npili twe "C (Flld) CyBrude. Available HEM; 01 &. Grease Page 19 of 59 DTI! - Ferml-2 Permit Renewal - Fermi, 2013 Inblke Grab Day 2 1312032-10 WBsteWf!t.er ANALYTICAL REPORT Work Order. ~boo: Sampled: Sampled By: Received: 1312032 Laboratory Services 12/3/13 12:00 J. 8sey 12/3/13 17 :00 Physk:al/Olemlcal Pllnuneters by EPA/APHA/ASTM Methods Analytical Dllatloa -It RL Unit l'actor Metbod <0.0500 D.0500 mg/L lJSEl¥,,'l204 <0.20 D.20 mg/L HAOJ-8167 7.56 0.10 mg/I. SM4500-0G 7.57 1.00 pH Units SH4500-Hll-2011 u.o 0.1 "C SM 2550 B <2.0 2.0 ug/1. USEPA CV.-1677 <5.10 5.10 mg{L 1 usaY.-1664A This report shaa not be ~. except In fij), vnthout wntten authonzabon of TnMatnx Laboratones, Inc. Inav,dual sz,mple results nelate only to the sarrpe tested Dlltallme Analyzed By 12/09/l31D39 LHA l.2,'03/13 12:00 JAE l2/D3/l3 12.00 JAE 12/00/13 12.00 JAE U/03/13 12*00 JAE l2/D9ll3 12.11 LHA 12/lCVlJ 06 00 WAH 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500 + Fax 616.942.7463 + www.tnmatnxlabs.com QC Batch 1313065 1313078 1313078 1313078 1313078 1313173 1313184

aient: Project: Olent Sl!mple ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Analyte Marcury Page 20 of 59 DTI! - Pennl-2 Pemut Renewal - Fermi, 2013 Inbllm LlHg Dupllcate 1312032-11 Wastewater ANALYTICAL REPORT Work Order: Desaipbon: Smnpled: Smnpled By: Received: Total Metala by EPA 1600 Series Methods Dllutloa 1312032 Laboratcxy 5ervJces 12/2/13 12:05 J. Elsey 12/3/13 17:00 Alalytlall Rnult RL Unit l'llctor Method 3.50 0.500 USEP,\\-163lE Tht5 report 5hal1 not be reprcduced, except rn r,JJ, wrthout wntten authormlbon r:I' T nMatrtx l.Bboratones, Inc. Inavlclual 5!1111ple result5 relate only to the,:ample tested. DateThne QC AaalJzed By Batch U/19/13 09'14 MSM 1313536 5560 Corpor.,re Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.97:5.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

t,.. TRIMATRIX f..,, L A B O R A T O Ir I E S aient: Project: Oient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matnx: Anlyte Hera.wy Page 21 of 59 DTE - Ferml-2 Pemut Renewal - Fenn1, 2013 Intaka UHg Reid Blank 1312032-12 wasre water ANALYTICAL REPORT Work Order: Descnpbon: Sampled: S!!mp!ed By: Rece!ved: 1312032 Laboratory Services 12/2/13 11:59 J. Elsey 12/3/13 17:00 Total Metals by EPA 1600 Serles Methods AnalJtkal ~ <0.500 RL D.500 Dllutloa Unit Factor Method ng/1. USEPA-1631E TJus report shal not be reproduced, ~ r, full, 1'111:hout wntten eutllcn2:abon <$ TriMatnx Laboratones, Inc lndMdual sample resuls relete only to the sample tested DateTIIIIII Aaalyzed QC 9y aatcb 1.2/05/13 12 19 MSM 1313075 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, Ml 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

t,.. TRIMATRIX f...,, L A B O R A T O R I E S ANALYTICAL REPORT a1ent: DTE - Pennl-2 Worlc Order: 1312032 Project: Permit Renewal - Femu, 2013 Descnpbon: Laboratory Services Oien!: Sample IO: IntaJae voe Lab eompoa11:a !anpled: 12/3/13 U:00 Lab Sample ID: 1312032-13 Sampled By: J. Elsey Matnx: Waste Wllter R.eceJved: 12/3/13 17:00 Urnt ug/L Prepared: U/6/13 7:00 Dtlutlon Factor. 1 Analyzed: U/6/13 17:03 QC Batch: 1313145 Analytical Batch: 3L09003

• Volatlle Organic Compounds by EPA Method 624 CASNumber AmdJ1e 107--02-8 Acroll!ln 107-13-1 Aaylomtnle 71-43-2 Benzene 75-27-'4 Bromodochloranene 75-25-2 Bianofoml 7+83-9 Bromomethane 56-23-5 Cmbon Telrachlonde 108-90-7 Ollorobenzene "75--00-3 O,loroethane 110-75-8 2-0lloroethyl Vlnyt Ether 67-66-3 Ollorofonn 7+87-3 Q-bomethane U4-48-1 Dtbromochloromelhne 75-34-3 1,1-lllchloroethane W7--06-2 1,2-0u:hloroethane 75-35-'4 1,1-Dlchlo.oetl e 18 542-75-6 1,3-Dlchk,i 01> opei., (Tolal) 156-60-5 lrll111-l,2-Dlchloroethe,e 78-87-5 1,2-DlddoiC41opa11e lOCHl-4 E!hytbenzene 75--09-2 Methylene Olloncle 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-TetJ achb uetla 18 127-18-'4 Tetrachloroethen 108-88-3 Toluene 71-55-6 1,1,1-Tnchloroethane 79-00-5 1,1,2-Tnchluruelhane 79-0Hi Trlchluroethene 75-01-'4

\\IJnyt Otlorlde Continued on next page

• See statemert of Data Qualifications Page 22 of 59 AaaJrtlcal Reallt

<5 0 <LO <1.0 <LO <LO <LO <1.0 <LO <1.0 <10 <LO <LO <LO <10 <LO <LO <2.0 <LO <LO <LO <5.0 <LO <1.0 <10 <1.0 <LO <LO <1.0 llllS report shal rot be reproduced, except 111 ful, wrthout wntlen al.thortzahon fX TnHatnx Laboratones, Inc Ind,vldual sample results relate only tu the sample ~ By: DLV By: DLV RL 5.0 LO 1.0 1.0 LO LO LO LO LO 10 LO LO LO LO 1.0 1.0 2.0 LO LO LO 5.0 LO LO 1.0 1.0 LO 1.0 1.0 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE Grand Rapids, MI 49512

• 616.975.4500 Fax 616.942.7463 www.tnmatnxlabs.com

ANALYTICAL REPORT aient: DTE - Fennl-2 Work Order. 1312032 ProJe(+/-: Permit Renewal - Fermi, 2013 Descnptlon: Laboratory Services Client Sample ID: Intake voe Lab Composite Sampled: 12/3/13 12:00 Lab Sample ID: 1312032-13 Sampled By: J. 8sey Matrtx: W~wat.er Received: 12/3/13 17:00 Umt: Ullfl Prepared: 12/6/13 7:00 Driubon Factor. 1 Analyzed: 12/6/13 17:03 QC Batch: 1313145 Analybcal Batch: 3L09003 ~olllltlle Organic Compounds by EPA Method 624 (Continued) ~ ~ 1,2~ T~ ~ '"See Statement of Daill Qualftltlons Page 23 rx 59 .. /leaniety 98 98 99 95 OJntrollitollR 85-118 87-122 85-113 82-110 T1llS report shall oot be reproduced, except m full, wtt:hout wntten authonzabon r:I: TnMatroc Laboratones, Inc. Inavidual 5llffij)le resub relate only to the sa,n~ tested By: DLV By: DLV 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.trfmatnxlabs.com

t.._ TRIMATRIX f...,,, L A B O R A T O R I E S aient: Pro]&I:: Otent Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Ma!rnc Urn: Ddubon FactDr. QC Batch: DTE - Ferml-2 Permit Renewal - Femu, 2013 Inblke Compositll 1312032-14 Wa&ewater llll/L 1 1313066 ANALYTICAL REPORT Work Order: ~ban: Sampled: Sampled By: Received: Prepared: Analyzed: Analybcal Batd1: 1312032 Laboratory 5eMceS 12/3/13 12:20 J. Elsey 12/3/13 17:00 lJ./6/13 7:31 12/13/13 3:08 3L13025 CASNmnber Polychlorlneted Blphenyls (PCBe) by EPA Method 608 AnalytlcaJ Remit 12674-11-2 1110+2&-2 11141-16-5 '69--21-9 126n-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5 Surro{1,,tst ~ Tt!lnlchbro-m-xy#t!fle Page 24 r:A 59 PCB-1016 PCB-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PC&-1248 PCB-1254 PCB-1260 "'Rllcoowy 86 71 CDnlrol Ulllla 45-n-f 27-126 <0.20 <D.20 <0.20 <D.20 <0.20 <0.20 <D.20 TIils report shall not be reproduced, except rn fuil, without wntten authonzabon r:i TnHatnx Labora\\OrteS, Inc Indtvlclual sample resub relate ooly to the sample tested By: AU( By: I>&. RL 0.20 D.20 020 0.20 D.20 0.20 D.20. 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• F11X 616.942.7463 + www.tnmatnxlabs.com

t_.. TRIMATRIX f..,,, L A B O R A T O R I E S ANALYTICAL REPORT aJent: DTE - Pennl-2 Work Order. 1312032 ProJe(i: Permtt Renewal - Femu, 2013 DesOlptJon: Laboratory Servtces Client Sample ID: Intake Compoalta Sampled: 12/3/13 12:20 Lab Smnple ID: 1312032-14 Sampled By: J. Elsey Matnx: WasteWatI!:I RecelVed: 12/3/13 17:00 Unit: ug/L Prepared: 12/5/13 8:00 ~ Al.I( Dtlltlon Factor: 1 Analyzed: 12/11/13 6:36 By: rN{J QC Batdl: 1313027 AnalytrcalBatr:h: 3L.11050 Semlvolatlle Organic Compounds by EPA Method 625 Anlllytlcal CASNuml,.,,- ADalyta Remit RL 83-32-9 Aao,a1:Ulieue <5.0 5.0 ~ Acenaphthyiene <5.0 5.0 120-12-7 ArtlYacene <50 5.0 92-87-5 Benzxline <50 50 56-55-3 Benzo(a)anthracelle <5.0 5.0 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene <50 5.0 205-99-2 B"'1Zll(b)l'a,oranl:ooie <50 5.0 207--0&-9 Bena:,(l<)lluorene <5.0 5.0 191-2+2 Benzo(g,h,l)per <5 0 5.0 Wl-55-3 4-llrrmopheny1 Phenyl Ether <5.0 5.0 85-6&-7 BLtyl Benzyt Phtha!ale <5.0 5.0 59-50-7 4-0im>-3-methytphenol <5.0 5.0 111-91-1 B<s(2-<:hloroethoxy)methane <5 0 5.0 111-44-4 Bls(2-chloroethyf) Ether <5.0 50 108-60-1 B~Etlle' <5.0 5.0 91-58-7 2-0,klrooaphthalen, <5.0 5.0 95-57-8 2-0lbuphenol <5.0 5.0 7005-TI-3 ~ Phenyl Ethl!r <50 5.0 218-01-9 Clllysena <5.0 5.0 53-70-3 Dlbenz(a,h)anthracene <5.0 5.0 &1-7+2 Dl-n-butyl Phlhalate <5.0 50 95-50-1 1,2-ll!chlorobenze <5.0 5.0 541-73-1 1,:H)U,lu obei id:i,e <5.0 50 106-46-7 1,-4-Dk:hlon:lben <5.0 s.o 91-9+1 3,3 '-Olchlorobei izkli.e <20 20 120-83-2 2,4-Dlchloropheno <5.0 5.0 &1-66-2 Dlethyt Pltha!ale <5.0 5.0 lO!Hil-9 2,+o,~ <5.0 5.0 131-11-3 Dlmethyl Phthalate <5.0 5.0 Cornooed on next page Page 25 of 59 This report shall rd: ~ reproduced, exc~t 111 fuD, Wl1.hout wrtten authonzabon rx TnMatnx Laboratones, Inc. IndM<:h.01 sample n!SUls relate in, to the sample tested 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tmnatnxlabs.com

,..,.. TRIMATRIX TT L A B O R A T O R I E S ANALYTICAL REPORT Olent: DTE - Fennl-2 Wor1c Order: 1312032 Pro)ed:: Permn: Renewal - Fermi, 2013 Descr¢1on: Laboratory 5ervJCes Client Sample ID: Intake Composite Sampled: 12/3/13 12:20 Lab Sample ID: 1312032-14 Sampled By: J. Elsey Matnx: WasteWFtar Recerved: 12/3/13 17:00 Urut ug/L Prepared: 12/5/13 8:00 ~ ALI( Dllt.iJon Factor. 1 Analyzed: 12/11/13 6:36 By: DWJ QC Batch: 1313027 Analytical Batch: 3U1050 Semlvolatlle Organic Compounds by EPA Method 625 (Continued) Analytical CASNumber Amlyta Rmult RL 534-52-1 4,~2-methylphenol <20 20 51-28-5 2,4-0f mrophenol <20 20 121-1+2 2,+osutrotoluene <5.0 50 606-20-2 2,6-0lrrtrotoklene <5.0 5.0 117-84-0 D1-n-octyt Phthalzlte <5.0 5.0 122-66-7 1,2-Dlphenylhydrame <5.0 50 117-81-7 Bl5(2-fllhytle, Phllmlate <5.0 50 206-14-0 Fluorar1thene <5.0 50 86-73-7 Flll0relll! <50 5.0 116-7+1 HelCBChlorobenze <5.0 5.0 B7-68-3 Hexachlorobutll<ien <5.0 50 77.J,7-4 ~ <5 0 5.0 61-n-1 fla<ach!oioethalll! <5.0 50 193-39-5 Incleno(l,2,3-al)pyrene <5.0 5.0 78-59-1 lS0IB)l000 <5.0 5.0 91-20-3 Naphthalene <5.0 5.0 96-95-3 N~ <5.0 5.0 100-02-7 +Ni!rqh!nol <20 20 88-75-5 2-Hltrophenol <5.0 5.0 62-75-9 N-Ntroso-<lunelhyne <5.0 5.0 86-30-6 ~ltroso-diphenyl <5 0 5.0 621-64-7 ~rrme <S.0 5.0 87-86-5 Pentllchloror,nenol <20 20 85-01-8 Phenanthrene <5.0 5.0 108-95-2 Phenol <5.0 50 129-00-0 Pyrene <5.0 5.0 120-82-1 1,2,4-Tr1c!L obei ize, te <5.0 5.0 88-06-2 2,4,6-Trdllorophonol <5.0 5.0 Continued on next page Page 26 of 59 Th!$ ~port !hall not be reproduced, except In fill, Without vmtten authonzabon ~ T nMatnx Laboratones, Inc. InclivdR!I sample resuts ~late ooly to the sample tested. 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Raptds, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: DTE - Fennl-2 Work Order. 1312032 Pro)ed:: Permrt Renewal - Fermi, 2013 Deso1ptton: Laboratory Sav!ces atent Sample ID: Intake Composite Smnpled: 12/3/13 12:20 Lab Smnple ID: 1312032-14 Sampled By: ]. Bsey Matnx: Waste wat.er R.eceM!d: 12/3/13 17:00 Umt: ug/L Prepared: 12/5/13 8:00 Drlubon Factor: 1 Analyzed: 12/11/13 6:36 QC Batch: 1313027 Analybcal Batch: 3L11050 Semlvolatlle Organic Compoundll by EPA Method 625 (Continued) CASNumbar SurrT,gam6: 2-fb:Jmphenol Pht!nol-d6 ~ 2-Fwlr:JIJf)henyl ,Z4,.i-Tnbmmophenol o-T~ Page Vof 59 '6R<<D_.y 40 2.i 80 81 56 lH CDntrol LialJts 18-74 12--#7 ~122 36-136 19-131 27-138 AnlllJtlcal Remit llus report shall oot be reproduced, except,n ful, witrout wntten authonzabon of TrtH.tnx llllxlratone5, Inc Indivdlld sample resub relate ooly to the samixe tested By: AU< By: DWJ RL 5560 Corporate Excnar;;,e Court SE

• Grand Raplds, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.9427463
• www.t:r!matnxlabs.com

+++ TR1t1~i:~r~ arent: Pro]ed: Oient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matroc Aaalyte Alamlnum Ant:mony Ar-,lc llartum Berylkum Boron Cadmli.m ClromaJm Cobat Copper Ircm Lmd Magnelum Ma~ Mo!ybdemffl Ndcel Selenun Sdver Thallum Tin Tbnrum Zinc Page 28 of 59 ANALYTICAL REPORT DTE - l'erml-2 Work Order: 1312032 Permit Renewat - Femu, 2013 Desa,pbon: l..aboratOfy SeMces Intallllll Composite Sampled: 12/3/13 12:20 1312032-14 Sampled By: J. Bsey wast.a water Received: 12/3/13 17:00 Total Meblls by EPA 200 Serles Methods Analytical DIiution Reailt RL Ulllt fllctor Method 0.65 o.oso mg/I. USEPA-200.7 <1.0 LO ug/L LISEPA-200 8 L1 1.0 ug/L USEPA-200.8 211 5.0 ug/l. US6',1,-200.8 <LO 1.0 ug/l US6'A-200 8 'D 20 ug/L USEPA-2008 <D.20 0.20 og/1. US6',1,-2C0.8 <10 10 ug/L USEPA-200.ll <10 10 ug/L IJSEPA-200.7 3.7 LO ug/1. IJSEPll,-200 8 1.0 0 010 mg/I. IJSEPll,-200.7 L2 LO ug/L US6',1,-2C0.8 11 0.50 mg/I. US6'A-200J D.031 0.010 mg/I. IJSEPll,-2007 <0.10 0.10 mg/I. IJSEPA-200.7 <5.0 50 ug/1. lJSEPlfr2CO 8 <1.0 LO ug/L llSEPA-200.ll <O.SO a.so ug/1. USEPA-200 8 <LO LO ug/L USEPA-200 8 <0.20 0.20 mg/L llSEPA-200.7 <010 0.10 mg/I. IJSEPll,-200 7 u 10 IJ!lll USl!Pf,-200 8 Tll!s report shall not be reproduced, except U1 ful, Without vrrtfb1 authcrization of TnMitnx 11Jboratones, Inc Inow:!uaJ s:arnple results relate ooly to the sampe tested Dab!Tlaw Aalllyzed By U/09/13 12. u Kl.V U/09/1313:27 MSM U/09/13 13:27 MSM l2/09l13 l3*27 MSM 12/09/13 13.27 HSM 12/1W13 10'19 MSM U/09/13 13:27 HSH 12/09(13 13.27 MSH U/09/13 U*U Kl.V 12/09{13 13*27 MSM 12/09/13 15 -1() OCD U/09/l313.Il HSH U/09/13 15.10 CKD U/09/13 U*U Kl.V 12,W1309.54 KLV 12/09113 13:27 MSH 12/09{ 13 13:27 HSH U/09/13 13*27 MSM 12/09(13 l3 X1 MSM 12,W13 09'54 KLV l.2/05ll3 09.54 KLV 12/09/l3 l3*27 HSH 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com QC Batch 1313073 1313011 1313011 1313011 1313011 1313011 1313011 1313011 1313073 1313011 1313073 1313011 1313073 1313073 1312991 1313011 1313011 1313011 1313011 1312991 1312991 1313011

+++ m1~i:~,~ Client: ProJect: Oient Sample IO: Lab Smnple ID: Matrix: Analylll Hard-lUICaC03 BOO, (5-Day) Bromide Cbemlcal 0xJgan DemaDd Color(~) Fl uorlde Surfamnts, MBAS Pb09pmrm, Total Rmldue, Df nolnd O 1llO" C Realdue, Smpo,nded SnHata Sulllde, Tcol Sul1'lte carbon, Tntal Organic Nltrogan, Ammonia Nltrogal, Nltnrta+ Nlrlte Nrtrogen, Organic Nitrogen, Total Kjeklahl Nitrogen, Iamgank: Page 29 of 59 ANAL YTlCAL REPORT DTE - Fennl-2 Work Order. 1312032 Pemwt Renewal - Fermi, 2013 Descr¢1on: Laboratory 5eMces Intake Composite Sampled: 12/3/13 12:20 1312032-14 Sampled By: ]. Elsey waste water Received: 12/3/13 17:00 Physical/Chemical Parameters by EPA/APHA/ASTM Methods AnalJtfal Dilution Reallt RL Ulllt Factor Method 147 2 mg/I. SM 2340 C-2011 <4.0 4.0 mg/I. SM5210S-2011 <0.50 o.so mg/l ASTMD12-16-o5 22 s.o ITl!IIL SM 5220 D-2011 15.0 5.00 A.C.ll SM 2120 S-2011 0.18 0.10 mg/l SH~C-201..1 <D.0250 0 0250 mg/l SM 5510 C-2011 0.148 0.0100 mg/l 5M4!00--PE-2011 190 so mg/l SM 2510 C-2011 25-7 33 mg/L SM 2510 D-2011 30 5.0 mg/l ASTMDi16-90(07) <D.020 0.020 mwL ..,1600-ilD-2011 <LO LO mg/I. SM"'fiiC0-5038-2011 3-6 a.so IT1IJ/L SM 5310 C-2011 0.079 D.050 mg/l SM ~ G-2011 0.48 0.050 mg/L SM~F-2011 <O.SO a.so IT1IJ/L !l'l<-!!ll2,'<500-M00 <0.50 a.so mg/l l.JSl!Yrl51 2 Alai, 2 0 D..56 0.050 mg/l [CALC] This report shal net be reproduced, except 111 ful, wrt:hout wntten authcnzatlon of TnM!ltnx Laboratones, Inc InckvK1u111...-nple results relate only to the 5ample tested DateTlme Anlllyzed By l2f06/l3 11*30 KAR 12/01/13 11:37 SKA l2/ll/l3 13:00 SU. l.2/0Vl.311.59 Sll 12/01/13 11*23 C>J:. 1.2/l.3113 W.10 SU. l.2/0'V13U*11 WAH 12/1W1310-09 KAR U/05/1313-00 WAH U/05/13 15*30 WAH 12/U/13 09*15 LHA 12/0fl13 15-28 WAH l.2/0'V13 13. SO oc. ~l.9-UI KAR l2/ll/l3 11

• 15 a.a 12/01/13 13-19 C>J:.

12/U/13 11:35 a.a 12/09/13 11.-15 a.a U/11/13 11.15 oc. 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Raptds, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com QC Batch 1313099 1313038 1313240 1313025 1313019 1313326 1313020 1313144 1313033 1313036 1313296 1313149 1313110 1313095 1313163 1313118 1313201 1313050

[CALC]

ANALYTICAL REPORT aiert: DTI!- F8ml-2 Work Order: 1312032 Projed:: Permit Renewal - Fenru, 2013 ~= Lllboratory 5eMces Oiert Sample ID: 001 Composite Sampled: 12/3/13 12:55 Lab Sample ID: 1312032-15 Sampled By: J. 8sey Matnx: Waste Wat.er Received: 12/3/13 17:00 Um: ug/L Prepared: 12/6/13 7:31 Dlll.tJon Factor. 1 Arayzed: 12/13/13 3:36 QC Batch: 1313086 Analyt!cal Batch: 3l13025 Polychlorlnated Blphenyls (PCBI) by EPA Method 608 CASNumber 1267+11-2 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5 Surrr,gale.: ~ Telmchlom-m-xylMe Page 30 of 59 AnlltJbi PC6-W16 PCs-1221 PCs-1232 PCs-lM! PCs-J..2,48 PCs-1254 PCS-1260 "6/leawery 73 64 01ntrol /.Jtllb 45-134 27-126 AnalJtla,1 ~It <0.20 <CUO <CUO <0.20 <0.20 <D.20 <0.20 Tlus report mal net t>,e reproduced, except,n lul, withotrt wrtten authonmion of TnMatrlx L.aboratones, Inc Indrvu:IU!II S!lmple r=ib r&ll:e only to the sample tested By: By: RL 0.20 0.20 D.20 cuo (U() (U() cuo Al.I( AS:. 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE + Grand Raptds, MI 49512 + 616.975.4500 + Fax 616.942.7463 + www.tnmatnxlabs.com

Olert: Project: Oient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matnx: Unit Dllubon Fector. QC Batch: CAS Numbm" 83-32-9 208-96-8 120-U-7 92-87-5 56-55-3 50-32-8 20S-99-2 207-08-9 191-24-2 101-55-3 ~7 59-50-7 111-91-1 111--1+4 108-60-1 91-58-7 95-57-8 7005-n-3 218-01-9 53-70-3 114-7+2 95-50-1 541-73-1 106-46-7 91-9+1 ~2 114-66-2 105-67-9 131-11-3 DTE - Perml-2 Permit Renewal - Fem11, 2013 001 Composite 1312032-15 waste water ll!l/L 1 1313027 ANALYTICAL REPORT Work Order: Descnpbon: Sampled: Sampled By: Received: Prepared: Analy2ed: Analybcal Batch: 1312032 Laboratory Servtces 12/3/13 12:55 J. Elsey 12/3/13 17:00 12/5/13 8:00 12/11/13 7:00 3L11050 Semivolatlle Organic Compounds by EPA Method 625 AnalJtlcal AnalytB Ramlt Acenaphthene <5 0 Acenaphthyteoo <5.0 Anthracene <5 0 Be!mdrr1e <50 BelZIJ(a)anthracene <5.0 Benzo(a)pyrene <5.0 BelZIJ(b)fkloranthene <5.0 Benzo(k)lluoonhena <5.0 Benzo(g,h,l)>e,y!ene <5.0 ~ Phenyl Ether <5.0 Butyl 6"1Z)'f Phthalate <50 4-0lloro-3-~ <5.0 B5(2-chklloetha,cy) <5.0 B15(2-dlloromhyl) Ether <5.0 B15(2--chloro!soprop Ether <5.0 2-0lloronaphthalene <5.0 2-0\\lorophenol <5.0 ~ Phenyl Ether <5.0 CIYysene <5.0 Dlbenz(a,h)anthracene <5.0 Df;HJUtyi Phthalall! <5.0 1,2-Dlc.hk> ube 12et,e <5.0 1,3-0!chlorollen <5.0 1,+oidllo ole12et11: <5.0 3,3, -Olcl>>orobenzll!le <20 2,Hllchlorophenol <5.0 D1ethy1 Phlhala!B <5.0 2,~ <5.0 Dmmhyt Phthlllate <5.0 Conllooed on next page Page 31 cl 59 Thi$ n!pcrt sh al not be n!pfoduced, ~ ,n full, Without wntten authonzabon of TnMatnx Uiboratones, Inc lndMdual sample resuft:s relate ooly to the i;ample tested. By: Al.I( By: r:mJ RL 5.0 5.0 5.0 50 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 50 5.0 50 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 20 5.0 5.0 50 5.0 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE t Grand RapKls, MI 49512 t 616.975.4500 t Fax 616.942.7463

• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

t.._ TRIMATRIX f...,, L A B O R A T O R I Ii S arent Project: aient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matroc Umt: Dnl1Jon Factor. QC Batch: DTI! - Ferml-2 Permit Renewal - Fennl, 2013 001Composlbl 1312032-15 Wasre water llll/L 1 1313027 ANAL YTlCAL REPORT Work Order: ~n: Sampled: Sampled By: Recerved: Prepared: Analyzed: Analybcal Batch: 1312032 Laboratory Services 12/3/13 12:55 J. Elsey 12/3/13 17:00 12/5/13 8:00 12/11/13 7:08 3L11050 ,Semlvoletlle Organic Compounds by EPA Method 625 (Continued) CAS NIIJllber 534-52-1 51-28-5 121-1+2 606-20-2 117-84-0 122-66-7 117-81-7 206-44-0 86-73-7 118-7+1 87-68-3 77-47"'4 67-72-1 193-39-5 78-59-1 91-20-3 98-95-3 loo-o2-7 88-75-5 62-75-9 86-JIHi 621-64-7 87-116-5 ~1-8 106-95-2 129-00-0 120-82-1 88-06-2 Conbnued on next page Pllge 32 of 59 Anafrtla,I Anlllyta Raallt 4,6-0attro-2~ <20 2,+Dulllrophenol <20 2,4-Df rwtrotoluene <5.0 2,6-Df ritrololuene <5.0 DHl-octyl Phthalale <5.0 1,2~ <5.0 Bls(2~ Phthalale <5.0 Fluoranthene <5 0 Fluorene <5 0 ~ <5.0 ~ <5.0 ~ <5.0 Hexad1loroethan <5.0 Indeno(l,2,3-a!Jpyrene <5.0 lsoj:tlorolle <5.0 NlljAthaleie <5.0 r<<robenzene <5.0 4-Nrtror,llenol <20 2-Nrtrophenol <5.0 N-N~ <5.0 N-Nrtroso-dphenytamne <5.0 N-N!buo-d-n-propy <5.0 Pel1tachk:topea.il <20 Phenanhrene <5.0 Phenol <5.0 Pyrene <50 1,2,+ Tnchbobe12eie <50 2,4,6-Tnchlorophernll <5.0 Thl5 ~ 5""11 not be reproduced, ~ 111 full, Without wntten althonzabon of Tr!Matnx Laboratooes, Inc !nmldual sanl)!e resuls relate ooty to the sample tested. By: AU( By: DWJ RL 20 20 5.0 5.0 50 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 20 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 20 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463 + www.tnmatnxlabs.com

Oient: Project: Oient Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: M!l!nx: Uri!:: DliutJOn Factor. QC Batch: DTE - Ferml-2 Permit Renewal - Ferrru, 2013 001 Composibl 1312032-15 Wast.a water UII/L 1 1313027 ANALYTICAL REPORT WorkOrc!er: Descnpbon: Sampled: Sampled By: Received: Prepared: Analyzed: Analytrcal Batch: 1312032 Laboratory ServK:es 12/3/13 12:55 J. Bsey 12/3/13 17:00 12/5/13 8:00 12/11/13 7:08 3l11050 Samlvolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 625 (Continued) AnllfJtlcal CASNumber !iurrrJgaa.: ~ Phenol-d6 IMrobenzene-d5 2-RnrolJfJhenYI 2,4,6-T nbromophenol o-Terpht!ny( Page 33 of 59 "Reawery 40 26 66 68 51 7'4 Cantml /./tab 18-7-f 12--#7 ~122 36-136 19-131 0-138 -It llll5 report shall not be reproduced, except In ful, without wntten authonzabon of TnM&nx Laboratones, Inc IndMdual S10llp!e resuls relate only to the sample tested By: AU( By: DWJ RL 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE + Grand Rapids, MI 49512 + 616.975.4500 + Fax 616.942.7463 + www.tnmatnxlabs.com

+++ TR1~7:~~~ aiert: ProJl!(i: Orerrt: Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: M!tnx: AnalJta A111111lau* Antuno!ly Ar-,!c llarlum ~m Boran Cadl!il.111 Olromm1 Cnbel: eopp... lnla Luci Magnslllm Manaa-MolytxlerlJm Ndcel Selenn.m SdYe" Thalil.111 Th Tilllrlum Zinc Page 34 of 59 ANAL YTlCAL REPORT DTI! - l"erm 1-2 Work Order: 1312032 Permrt Renewal - Ferm~ 2013 Desalpbon: Laboratory Services 001 Composltll Sampled: 12/3/13 U:55 1312032-15 Sampled By: J. Elsey Waste Weter Received: 12/3/13 17:00 Total Memls by EPA 200 Sarlea Methods Analytlcal Dllutloa Raallt RL Unit l'llclm Method 1.0 0.050 mg/L USEPA-200.7 <1.0 1.0 ug/1. USEPA-200 e 2.3 1.0 ug/1. 1 USEPA-200 e 46 5.0 ug/1.. USEPA-200.8 <1.0 1.0 ug/1. lJSEPA-200 8 46 20 ll!lf\\. USEPA-200 8 <0.20 0.20 ug/1. USEPA-2008 <W w ug/1. 1 USEPA-200 e <10 10 ug/1. 1 USEPA-200 7 7.1 10 ug/1.. USEPA-200 8 1.6 0.010 mwl-USEPA-200 7 2.1 1.0 ug/L USEPA-200 8 20 0.50 mg/L l.lSEI¥..-200 7 ll.047 o.ow mg/L USEPA-200 7 <0.10 0.10 mwL l.lSEPA-200 7 <5.0 5.0 ug/1. USEPA-200 8 <1.0 1.0 ug/1.. USEPA-200.8 <0.50 0 50 ug/1. USEPA-2008 <10 1.0 ug/1. 1 USEPA-200 8 <D.20 0.20 mg/I. USEPA-200 7 <D.10 0 10 mg/L USEPA-200 7 18 10 ug/1. UScPA-200 8 Tlll$ report shall not be reproduced, except., ful, without wntten authonzabon ofTnMatnx I.Jlooratones, Inc IndMOO!IJ 5ample results relate ooly to the si,mple tested. o.taTlme AnaJyzad 12/09/1312*16 l2/0SVl3 13.34 12/fYJl]31.3.34 U/!YJ/13 13.34 U/!YJ/13 J3*34 12/1~ 1020 12/09(13 13-34 12/09/13 13.34 l2/0SVl3 12.16 l2/0SVl3 13.34 U/!YJ/13 15.43 U/00/13 l3 34 12/00/13 15.43 12/09/13 12-16 ~ 09 58 12/09/l3 13.34 U/!YJ/13 13.34 12/(n/1313 34 U/!YJ/13 13 34 12/0!illJ 09. 58 l.2/0!,'1309.58 12/09/l3 l3 34 5560 Corporate Exchan,;ie Court SE

• Grar.d Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatrooabs.com QC By Bm:h ICLV 1313073 MSH 1313011 MSM 1313011 MSM 1313011 MSM 1313011 MSM 1313011 MSH 1313011 MSM 1313011 ICLV 1313073 MSM 1313011 aco 1313073 MSM 1313011 aco 1313073 ICLV 1313073 KLV 1312991 MSM 1313011 MSM 1313011 MSM 1313011 MSM 1313011 ICLV 1312991 ICLV 1312991 MSH 1313011

+++ m1~1~r~ ANAL YTlCAL REPORT aJent: DTE - Perml-2 Work Order: 1312032 ProJed:: Permt R.enewal - Ferm~ 2013 Descnpbon: L.aborat:Ofy 5eMces Oient Sample ID: 001 Composite Sampled: 12/3/13 12:55 Lab Sample ID: 1312032-1!5 Simpled By: J. Elsey Matnx: Waste.Warer Recerved: 12/3/13 17:00 Physlcal/Chemlc:al Parameters by EPA/APHA/ASTM Method8 Analytlcal DIiution Datl!Tlme QC Anlllf1e llaallt RL Unit Factor Method Allat,zed lty Batch Hard-*C.C03 248 2 mg/l SMn.JC-2011 12/06/lJ 14*30 ICAR 1313099 BOD, (5-Day) <4.0 4.0 mg/I. SH 5210 S-2011 12/0Vl-31131 SICA 1313038 Broonde <050 a.so rnwL ASTMD12'16-o5 U/11/13 13 00 SU. 1313240 a-Jcal Oxygu Damand 28 5.0 rnwL SM 5220 D-2011 12/01l13 14.Sll SU. 1313025 Calor(Appanm) 15.0 5.00 A.C.U. SM 2120 S-2011 12/0Vl-3 14'23 CK. 1313019 l'luorlde D.23 0.10 mwL 5H4500--FC-l011 12/13113 10 40 SLL 1313326 Sulfactllro, M BAS <0.0250 0 0250 rnwL SM 5540 C-2011 12/0'l/13 U* 15 WAH 1313020 Phoapban11, Total D.667 0.0100 mwL 51<'6>>-PE-2011 12/1W13 10.0SI !CAA. 1313144 Rmldae, Dlmahed @ 180" C 340 50 mg/I. SH 2540 C*2011 U/05/13 13:00 WAH 1313033 RMldae,Smpculed 59.4 5.0 ffl!j/1. SM 2510 D-2011 U/05/13 15.30 WAH 1313036 5ulflrta 49 10 rnwL 2 ASTMDS1H0(07) U/U/13 10.38 LMA 1313298 5ul1lde, Total <0.020 0.020 mg/l SH 4500-52 D-2011 U/06/13 15*31 WAH 1313149 Sutnte <LO LO mwL SM 45C0-50l 9-2011 11/0'\\'l.3 13 SO C,J,C, 1313110 C.rtioa, Tobll Orgaalc 5.3 0.50 rnwL SM 5310 C*2011 U/05/13 20.20 ICAR 1313095 N1trogml, Ammon* II.QIIII o.oso rnwL 'II 4!500--IIH3 G--2011 U/11/13 11

• 15 Q.B 1313163 Nltrogan, Nltnm+ Ntrtte D.87 0050 mg{L 5H 15Cn-N(B ll-2011 l.2/04(13 13-19 CK.

1313118 Nitrogen, 0rgllllk: D.51 a.so mwL ...... l512,'<500--NDG U/12/1314 35 Q.B 1313201 Nitrogen, Total l(Jaldahl D.59 0.50 rnwL l.lS!Pl't-3512~ 20 U/09/13 11*-S Q.B 1313050 Nltrogm, lDorganlc O.!MI o.oso mg/I. [CAI..C] U/11/13 11.:15 CK. [CAlC] Page 35 of 59 This report shall not be reproduced, except ITT full, wrthout wrtten authonzabon cl TnMatnx Laboratr.ne5, Ire. Inc!rvldual sample resuts relate only to the sample ~- 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Polychlorlnated Blphenyl (PCBs) by EPA Method 608 Son-pl Cone QC Batch: 1313086 608 Llqw!/LlqUld Exlracbon/USEPA-608 Method Blank Ur¢ ug/1. PCB-1016 PCB-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PCB-U48 PCB-1254 PCB-1260 SIJrrot1IIII¥: ~ T~xyiene Laboratory Control Sample Urlt: ug/1. PCB-U48 ~ ~ T~ Page 36 of 59 <0.20 <0.20 <D.20 <0.20 <0.20 <D.20 <0.20 0.600 0.552 Spol:a 'll, Rs:. 98 72 92 96 7CJ Central i.JmD Anlllyzed: RPO AnalybcalBetch: 45-1:H 27-126 Analyzed: Analybcal Batch: 38-158 .,,5-134 27-12.i Rl'D i.JmU RI. 12/13/2013 3L13025 D.20 0.20 D.20 0.20 D.20 0.20 D.20 12/13/2013 3l13025 D.20 This report shall not be reproduced, except m f ul, IWthout wntten authonzabon of T nMatnx L.aooratones, Inc lnovldual sample resub remte only to the sample tested 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxJabs.com By:ASC By: ASC

QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 624 1-¥e San1)le Spl:e Sp,lce Cc<trcl RPO Cone. Qty. - 'II, RIie. ~ RPO Llms RI. QC Blltch11313145 50300 Aqueous Purge & Trap/USEPA-624 Method Blank Urvt: ug/1. Aaoleln Acrytmtnle Benzelle BromodlcNoromel Bromofonn Bromomethane Carbon Telrachlonda Or\\JIOOE!llt!lle Olloroethaoo 2-ilioroothyt Vlnyl Ether OlJoroform Olloromethane Dbomochloromelhane 1,1-Dtchloroethane 1,2-Dtchtoroelhane 1, 1-Dlchloroethene 1,3-Dldooropropene (Total) trllru-1,2-0lch!oroelhene 1,2-0c!Dop,opa,,e

Ethyhrmn, Methylene Ollonde 1, 1,2,2-TetrachJoroethan Tet. aehloi oetheue Toluene 1,1,1-Tnchloroetrane 1, 1,2-TnclDoethane Tnchloroethene Vmyl 01lor1de

~ ~ ~ Tohent!-dl ~ Continued on Ai!XI: page Page 37 of 59 Analyzed: Aralytlcal Batx:h: <50 <1.0 <LO <LO <1.0 <LO <LO <1.0 <LO <10 <LO <LO <LO <1.0 <1.0 <LO <2.D <LO <LO <LO <5.0 <LO <10 <LO <LO <LO <LO <1.0 101 85-118 99 87-122 100 85-113 95 82-110 Tins report mall not be ~. except In lul, wtflout w"'1en aLihonzabon o( TnMatnx L!lbo<atones, Inc Indrvldual S!ll1lple resul:5 relate only to the sample tested. U/06[l/J13 3tD9003 50 LO LO LO LO LO 1.0 LO 1.0 10 LO 1.0 1.0 LO LO LO 2.0 1.0 1.0 LO 5.0 LO 1.0 1 0 LO LO 1.0 LO 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnrratnxlabs.com By: DLV

t TRIMATRIX f LABORATORIES QUAllTY CONTROL REPORT Volatlle Organic Compounct. by EPA Method 624 (Continued) I~ 5fflf.ole Splla Sp,lae Control RPO Cone cy.y. Rasul %Rec l.unJII RPO l..nmtl RL QC Batch: 1313145 (Contln!B) 50306 Aqueous Purge a Trap/USEPA-624 Laboratory Control Sample Analyzed: ~13 Unit: l9'L Anlllybcal Batch: 3l09003 Acro!e,n 40.0 44.5 111 48-146 5.0 Acry1cnlne 40.0 34.4 86 73-129 10 Benzene 40.0 39.7 99 &H19 1.0 Bromcxf dllu o, 1M!l:I..,,e 40.0 37.6 94 82-U4 1.0 Bromoform 40.0 34.8 87 65-123 LO Bcorru1ietilllie 40.0 45.0 113 55-142 LO carllon Totrachkmde 40.0 38.2 95 79-Ul LO 01lorobenzsle 40.0 38.0 95 84-118 1.0 OTloroethane 40.0 49,2 123 76-U4 LO Ollorofonn 40.0 39.1 98 82-119 LO OwJromethane 40 a 39.5 99 73-125 LO Dlbromoc:hloromet 40.0 34.11 87 7+Ul 1.0 1, 1 ~ 40.0 39.2 98 I0-118 1.0 1,2-Dochloroethane 40.0 37.8 95 81-122 LO 1,1-Dichloroelhene 40.0 42.6 107 77-123 LO 1,3-DK:hloropropen (Total) 80.0 65.5 82 81-116 20 trans-1,2-Dlchloroelhene 40.0 39.7 99 76-126 10 1,2-Dichloropropan 40.0 40.5 101 82-122 LO Elhyl)e,m,ne 40.0 38.2 96 87-119 LO Mflthylene O,londe 40 a 38.6 97 75-U9 50 1, 1;2,2-Tetradlloroethane 40.0 37.5 94 70-137 1.0 Telrkhloi oe!:hei te 40 0 38.4 96 81-117 LO Toli.1111\\e 40.0 38.5 96 85-118 LO 1, 1,1-Tnchloroelhane 40 a 39.8 99 81-122 1.0 1, 1,2-Trlc:hloroo,!han 40.0 37.9 95 83-Ul LO Trlchloroelheoe 40.0 39.9 100 82-119 1.0 Vinyl 01klr1de 40.0 42.1 105 77-123 LO SUrrogalzl6: ~ 103 85-118 ~ 97 87-122 Tooene-dB 101 85-113 +Brotrdkloroben 97 82-110 Page 38 of 59 This report 5lia!I not be reproduced, eia:ept 1n l'ul, wrthout wrtten authortzation o1 TnMatnx L.aboratones, Inc !naVldUlll 5ampfe resuls relate ooly to the sample te5ted 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE + Grand Rapids, MI 49512

• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com l!y: DLV

QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Semlvolatlle Organic Compounda by EPA Method 625 l>,ayte Sample Spke Spa Cortrol RPD Cooc. ~- - '11,R,c. l.arotl RPD lnntl R1. QC Batdn 1313027 625 LJqw!/LIQUKi Extracbon(USEPA-625 Method Blank Urwt: ug/1. Acen!lphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzkline Benzo(*)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene llenzo{b)flooranthena Benzo(k)!kJorant:hMe Benzo(O,h.J)per +Bromophenyt Phenyl Ether Butyl Benzy1 Phlhalate 4-0!loro-3-methytphslol °'5(2-dl!oroethmethlr,e B<s{2-dlloroethyi) Ether Bts(2-chJomsopr Biler 2-0ooronapirthalene 2-0ilorophenol +morophenyl Phenyl Ether O-ryROO Dlbent(a,h)anthraceoo Dt-n-t>utr1 Plthalatl, 1,2-Dlchlu obe11ze11e 1.,3-0chlorober 1,+Dtdilurobel 12e"' 3,3'-Dldllorobenzic 2,+DlchkJroinenol DI.thy! Phth!llatl! 2,+Dneltrytphenol Dlmethyi Phthalat!! 4,&-0mllro-2-mmhylr.henol 2,4-Dlnltropheno( 2,+omtrotoluele 2,6-0,rutrololuene DHHx:tyt Phlhalate 1,2-Dlphenyihydrame Bli(2-ethythexyt) Ptthalme Conbnued on r.ext page Page 39 rL 59 Analyzs!: Allalybcal Batch: <5.0 <5.0 <5 0 <50 <5.0 <5.0 <5.Q <5.Q <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <50 <5.0 <5.Q <5.Q <50 <5.0 <5.Q <5.Q <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5 0 <5.0 <20 <5.0 <50 <5.0 <5.D <20 <20 <5.0 <5.0 <5 0 <5 0 <5.0 Tll!S repcrt shae not be ~roduced, except n, fut, Without wntten authonzatlon of TnMatnx L.aboretones, Inc lndrvldual ~ results relate ally to the i.ample ~- 12/11/2013 31.11050 5.0 5.0 5.0 50 5.0 5.Q 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.Q 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.Q 5.0 50 50 50 5.0 5.0 20 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 20 20 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com By: DWJ

t TRIMATRIX f L A B O R.A T O R I E S QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Semlvolatlle Organic Compounds by EPA Method 625 (Continued) INByta Somplo S,,loe S,,loe CDntrol RPO Cone r:,,,. Rosult 'll,Rec, Lm,13 RPO LIIT1llll RI. QC Batch: 1313027 (Contln~ 625 Llqwd/1..Jqlld Extracbon/USEPA-625 Mathod Blank (Contln!NKI) Analyzed* 12/11/2013 Unt: uwl AnalybcaJ Batch: 3L11050 Fluoranthene <5.0 5.0 FalOrene <5.0 50 H""3dllolooetl2elle <5.0 5.0 He.ad,knol:Jullldiene <50 5.0 Heedllorocydopentadiene <50 5.0 Hemdlioroetlwle <50 5.0 lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyr8111 <5.0 5.0 Isophorone <5.0 50 Naphthalene <5.0 50 Nllrobenzene <5.0 5.0 +Nltrophelol <20 20 2-Nrtrophenol <5.0 50 N-Nrtraso-dmethytal!Wlll <5 0 50 N-Nltrooo-aphenylane <5.0 50 N-fl~ <5.0 50 PertachtoropMio <20 20 Phslanlhrene <5.0 50 Phenol <5.0 5.0 Pyrmill <5.0 5.0 1,2,4-Tnchlorobl!l1zen <5.0 5.0 2,4,6-Tnchlorophenol <5.0 5.0 ~ 2-Fwropht!nol 49 18-74 Phmol-d6 31 U-f7 NttJ~ 87 34-122 2-Flwroblpheny( !H ~136 2,,4~ T/1bl'OITIO(Jhenol 69 19-131 o-Telphenyl 98 27-138 Laboratory Control Sample Analyze:!: 12/11/2013 Unt: uwL AnaJybcat Batch: 3l11050 keiajAllheiM! 100 19.2 99 47-145 5.0 Conbrued on next page Page 40 of 59 Th'" report wa not be reproduo,d, except., ful, Without wntten euthortmbon of Tn Matnx L.alx>rntone5, Inc Inc!Mdual ~ resuls relate only to the.,,m~ tested 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, Ml 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnx.lalls.com Ely: lJWJ Ely' lJWJ

t TRIMATRIX f LABORAT0R,IES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Semlvolat:lle Organic Compound by EPA Method 625 (Continued) Im~ Sln"4]le Sp)z Sp)z Control RPO CDrc. (1:y. ResJl %~ l..l'nrto RPO LITU RI. QC B11tct11 1313027 (Continued) 625 LIQUid/1.lQuld Extracbon/USEPA-625 LabonltDry Control Sllmple (Continued) Analyzed* 12/11/2013 By: DWJ Und:*uwJ-Analytlcal Batch: 3L11050 Acenaphthylene 100 102 102 33-145 5.0 Anlhracene 100 99.3 99 27-133 5.0 Benzldlne 200 171 86 28-120 50 BalZO{n)llllthracale 100 96.B ry 33-143 5.0 Benzo(a)P'fl'M8 100 911..8 ry 17-163 5.0 Benm(b}flulnnthene 100 96.6 ry 24-159 5.0 ~l'wranthene 100 104 104 11-162 5.0 Benzo(g,h,,)pe,ylene 100 96.11 96 1-219 5.0 +a 011 q,he 1yl Phenyl B:her 100 83.0 83 53-127 50 BLtyl llenzyt PhthalBle 100 9&.3 98 1-152 5.0 +alioro-3-mel:hytphenol 100 93.9 94 22-147 5.0 1115(2-dwlroethoxy)melhane 100 100 100 33-184 50 B15(2-<illoroethy!) Biler 100 105 105 12-158 5.0 B!s(2-<illoraoopropyi) Ether 100 104 104 36-166 5.0 2-0,loronaphthalene 100 101 101 60-118 50 2~ 100 93.2 93 23-134 5.0 4-0>>orophenytPhelylBher 100 93.5 94 25-158 50 Otrysene 100 102 102 17-168 50 Dmelz(a,h)arrt:lncene 100 94.1 94 1-227 50 Dl-n-buty1 Phthalate 100 94.!I 94 1-118 5.0 1,2-Dlchloroben2ene 100 97.5 98 32-129 5.0 1,3-0lchlorobenzene 100 98.3 98 1-172 5.0 1,+-0ld1Jorob,men 100 100 100 20-124 50 3,3 '-Dldllorobenzldne 200 214 107 1-262 20 2,4-D,chb op,'tenol 100 97.4 ry 39-135 5.0 Dlethyf Phlhalm, 100 97.6 98 1-114 5.0 2,~ 100 9LO 91 32-119 50 Dimethyl 1'trthatate 100 96.5 96 1-112 5.0 4,6-0lrltro-2-methytphenol 100 100 100 1-181 20 2,4-Dntrophenol 100 7&.0 76 1-191 20 2,4-Dlmtrolxlluene 100 93.2 93 39-139 5.0 2,6-Dlralroto!uene 100 90.8 91 50-158 5.0 Dkl-octyi Pht:telllll, 11)0 95.2 95 +146 5.0 1,2-Dlpllenyl,ydmm 100 96.5 96 62-128 5.0 11!5(2~Plthalate 100 119.8 100 8-158 5.0 FkJoranl:herle 100 99.8 100 26-137 5.0 Continued Oil next page Page 41 of 59 T1llS report shan not be reproduced, except in full, without wrtten authoraabon of TnMatnx Labomtones, Inc. IndMClual sample rESUb relate ooly to the ~ tested 5560 Corporate Exchal')9 Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500 Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Semlvolatlle Organic Compounds by EPA Method 625 (Continued) 1-¥e Somple Spice Spl:e Ccnlrd RPO Cooc Qt¥. - '11,Rllc. l..lrntl RPO lE-.ti RI. QC Batch: 1313027 (Continued) 625 LJqUJd/LtQU1d Extracbon/USEPA-625 Laboratory Control Sample (Continued) Anafyzel. Unit: uwL AuorenO!! Hexachlo, oba IZd 18 ~e ~ Hll><IIChloroel: lndl!no{l,2,3-cd)pyrene i5oplorOne Naphthaielle Nltrobenzene 4-Nrtrophenol 2-Nilrophenol N-N lros:o-d mel:hylam ne N-N~ne N-Ntroso-d-n--pr Pel tadL opl lei tol Ph!rtanthrene Phenol Pyrm1e 1,2,4-Ti d 10 obeuze11e 2,4,6-Tnchlorophenol ~ 2-Rwrophenol Phenol-d6 Nl/robenzen,HJS 2-Fwroblphenyi Z,4~nibomcphmol o-T~y/ Page 42 oc 59 An!llytJcalBatr:h: 100 119..11 100 59-Ul 100 99.0 99 1-152 100 104 104 2+116 100 92.3 92 21-138 100 102 102 113 100 92.4 92 21-196 100 99.7 100 56-U9 100 103 103 21-133 100 119.2 99 35-180 100 29.1 29 1-132 11)0 99.7 100 29-182 100 59.7 r,o 22-87 100 82.2 82 45-110 100 101 101 1-230 100 BO.II 81 1+176 100 97.5 98 5+120 100 41.9 42 5-lU 100 95.11 96 52-115 100 95.1 95 4+142 100 119.11 90 37-1+1 57 18-74 38 J.2.-,17 89 .Jf-122 92 36-136 Bl 19-131 93 27-138 11ns report shall not be reproduced, except Ill ful, mthout wntten authonzabon of T nMatnx Laboratones, Inc Inavic!Ulll sample results relate only to the ~rrµe tested 12/11/2013 3ll10SO 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 so 20 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 20 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE t Grand Rapids, MI 49512

• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnrratnxlabs.com By: DWJ

+++ m1~i:~,~ QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Total Metal& by EPA 200 Serles Methc>d9 I~~ Sornplo si-Spl<e Ccnlrol RPO COnc. QO;y. - lJrul % Roe. I.Jmlts RPO Urnn Analyt:m Alimlnwn/USEPA-200. 7 QC Balx:h: 1313073 (200.2 Dlgl!Sbon) Arlllly21!!d: l2/09f2IJ 13 <0050 mw\\. l.ixxauy Cartrol 5emJM! 2.00 1.87 93 115-115 AnaJyt:e: AntlmonyfUSEPA-200.8 QC Batx:h: 1313011 (200.2 Dgesbon) Araly21!!d. l.2/09f]IJ 13 <1.0 uwt L""°'1ltD<y Caitrol Sompe 500 IS2..7 UQ'L 105 BS-115 Analyte: Anenk/USEPA-200.8 QC Batch: 1313011 (200.2 DIJmbO!l) Anlltyzed: 12/00{2013 MelhodBlwl< <1.0 L¢ l.ab;ntcry Cartrol ~ 50.0 51.l Lgl. 102 85-115 Analyte: Barfum/USEPA-200. 8 QC Batch: 1313011 (200.2 Digestion) Analyzed: 12/09/2013 <50 uwL Labo<auy Cootrol Sample 500 113.B ui.tL 107 85-115 Analyte: BerylDim/USEPA-200.8 QC Batch: 1313011 (200.2 Dlgesbon) Analyzed: 12/09/2013 <LO uir'L Labonllory catrol Sample so.a 47.4 uwL 95 85-115 Analyte: Boron/USEPA-200.8 QC Batch: 1313011 (200.2 Dlt;jl,stJon) Analyzed* 12/10/2013 <20 uwt 1..alxnto<y Caitrol Somjje 500 45-J LQ'l 90 BS-115 Analyte: Cadmlum/USEPA-200.8 QC Batch: 1313011 (200.2 Dlgesbon) Anlllyzed: 12/09/2013 Hothodllllnl< <020 Conbnuecl on next page Page 43 of 59 l11'S report slllJll not be reproruced, except,n ful, Without wntten authonzatlon rx T nMatnx L.abomone!, Inc lrlovldual ~ results relate only to the -imple ~- RI. By: KLV 0 050 o.oso By: MSH 10 10 By: MSH 10 LO By: MSH 50 50 By: MSH 10 10 By: MSH 20 20 By: MSM 0.20 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand R.,ptds, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.trnnatnxJabs.com

+++IB1~1~~ QUALilY CONTROL REPORT Total Metal by EPA 200 Series Methods (Continued) IQ:~ Sample Sim 5pR C0ntrcl RPO Cone. r,.y Rmu~ lht 'Mo Rlllc. i.JmJls RPO I.Jnum Analyta: Cadmlum/USEPA-200.8 (Continued) QC Ballx:h: 1313011 (Contmued) (200.2 Digestion) Analy,ed: 12/09/2013 LibcnDy Cortrol Sample 500 5L2 102 85-115 Analyta: Chromlum/USEPA-200.8 QC Batch: 1313011 (200.2 Dl}eSbon) Analyzed: 12/09/2013 Hotrodlllln< <10 to'L L.abJralory artrol Somple 500 43.8 uwL !18 85-115 AnaJyte: Cobalt/USEPA-200. 7 QI; Bmh: 1313073 (200 2 Dlgesbon) Analyzed: 12/09{1!J13 <10 uwL Wxn!ory Cortrol Somple 379 iqL 95 85-115 AnaJyte: ~/USEPA-200.8 QC Batch: 1313011 (200.2 Dogesbon) Analyzed: 12/09/2013 Hettmlllal'K <1.0 lO'l w.ntDfy Cortrol Smnple 500 47.11 uwL 95 85-115 Anlllyte: lron/USEPA-200. 7 QC Batth. 1313073 (200.2 Dlges!Jon) Analyzed: !2/09/2013 Mothod- <0.010 mwl-WxnlDry Cortrol Sample 0100 D.391 mwl-85-115 AnaJyte: Leed/USEPA-200.8 QC Batx:h: 1313011 (200.2 Dg,,stJon) Analyzed: 12/09/2013 MethodBlanl: <10 to'\\. Laboraay Control 5ample 500 50.3 to'\\. 101 15-115 Analyte: Magneslum/USEPA-200. 7 QC Ba!I:h: 1313073 (21J0.2 ~esbon) Analyzed: U/09/2013 Molhod- <0.50 Contlllued on next page Page 44 of 59 l1l1i report shall not be reproduced, except In full, Wlthotrt wrtten authonzabon of Tn Matnx Laboratones, Inc Inaw:h.01 sample results relate only to the sample ~- RI. By: HSH 0.20 By: MSM 10 10 By.Kl.V 10 10 By: HSH 10 10 By. CJ(D om.a 0010 By: MSH 10 10 By: CJ(D 050 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

+++ TR1~1:~.1~ QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Total Metals by EPA 200 Serleil Method9 (Continued) l~T~ Son"C)lo

Spa, 5j)M C0ntrol RPO COnc cy;y -

Ll!1t %Roe. Umb RPO L.mlJ Analyte: Mllgneslum/USEPA-200.7 (Cootmued) QC llab:h: 1313073 (Cmt!rued) (200.2 D,gesbon) Allaty,ed: U/09{1JJ13 l.abomory C0ntrol Sample 200 11.7 l!S-115 AnaJyte:: Manganeae/USEPA-200.7 QC Bald!: 1313073 (200.2 Digestion) Analyzed: U/09[2D13 -Blmlk <0010 mg/I. LaboRJlcry Control Sample 0100 11.378 mg/I. 85-115 Analym Molybdenum[IHPA-200.7 QC Batch: 1312991 (200.2 D,gesbon) Anaty,ed: ~13 Mollmlllank <O 10 mg/L l.alxoay Control Sample 0.100 11.422 mg/I. 106 85-115 Analyte: Nlcla!I/USEPA-200.B QC Batch: 1313011 (200.2 Dl!lesboo) Analyzed: 12/09/2013 Melhodlllmc <50 t¢ Lalxnmy Ccrirol ~ 500 47.0 t¢ 85-115 Anlllyt:e: Selenlum/USEPA-200.B QC Batch: 1313011 (21Xl.2 Dtgestion) Analyzed: 12/09(2013 <10 Lg'i. Labntay Control 5omple 500 411.11 LQ'1. 98 85-115 AnaJyt:e: Sllwr/USEPA-200.B QC B!ltch: 1313011 (200.2 Digesbon) Analyzed: 12/09/2013 <050 1¢ ~ Control Slm?e 500 51.11 t¢ 104 85-115 Analyte: 11111lllum/USEPA-200. B QC Blltch: 1313011 (21XJ.2 Dtgesbon) Analyzed: 12/09/2013 <10 Coobrued on next page Page 45 of 59 Thts report shall not be reproduced, except 111 t,J!, mthout wrltlel authonzabon of TnMatnx l.aboratone5, Inc Indivldulli smnple results re!!lte orly to the sample ~ RI. E!y:CICD 0.50 lly: KLV 0010 0.010 lly: KLV 010 010 By: MSM 50 50 E!y:MSH LO 10 By: MSH 0 50 050 Br MSM 10 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grar.d Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

t TRIMATRIX f LABORATORIES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Total Metala by EPA 200 Sertes Methods (Continued) l~T)1)0 Semple S!llloo Spol:e Centro! RPO Core. (1;y - lnl % Rec I.his RPO l.!mlb Analyte: Tlllllllum/USEPA-200.B (Contlroed) QC Balch: 1313011 (Cmmued) (200.2 Dlgesbon) Analym+/- U/09/2013 l.mlralory Cootrol ~ 500 411.8 100 85-115 Analyte: Tln/USEPA-200. 7 QC Batch. 1312991 (200.2 o,ge.bo<1) MIJlyzed: 12/05/2013 <020 mg/I. LaixxBtoryeaitrol511'1]1e 200 2.12 mg/I. 106 85-115 Analyte: Tlblnlum/USEPA-200. 7 QC Batch: 1312991 (200 2 D,gMIJon) Analyzed: ~13 <010 rr¢ LaboratD<y Ctrtrol Som,'e 0.-400 11.422 mg/I. 106 85-115 ~ Zlnc/USEPA-200.B QC Batch: 1313011 (200.2 D,gesbon) Analyze:!: 12/09f]JJ13 Melhodllllnl: <10 19'1. l.aooratory Ccntrol 5an1M 500 54.8 19'1. 101! 85-115 Page 46 of 59 This report Alai not be reprocluced, except 11 ful, without wntten aut:hcnzabon of TnMlltnx Laboratones, Inc lndMdual SZll1l)le resub relate only to the sample tested. RI. lly"MSM 1.0 l!y: ICLV 020 0.20 l!y: ICLV 010 010 l!y: M5H 10 10 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids,, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnrMtnxlabs.com

TRIMATRIX LABORATORIES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Total Metals by EPA 1600 Serla11 Methods I~~ ~ S!Jloi Spae Cootrol RPO Cox r:,;y - Und: %Rec UT"lt5 RPO l..aTubl Analyte: Merary/USEPA-1631E QC Batch. 131.3075 (1631E Dlgesbon) AM!yza:l: l2/05[1!J13 <0.500 r¢ <0500 nw'L <0500 nw'I-l.mlnllr.<y Callr0I ~ 4.00 4.103 r¢ 103 n-12.3 13UU2-m [~ 001 wtg] MalmSpolz 7 IKl 400 1L74 l'Q'l. 98 n-us MatmSpae~ 7 &13 4.00 ll.43 r¢ 90 n-us 24 QC Batch: 1313536 (1631E DlgstJon) Analyzed: 12/19/2013 <0500 nw'I-Melhodlllri: <0.500 r¢ <0500 nw'L Lalx>ralay Control 5om!)le 400 4.065 nw'I-102 n-m Page 47 of 59 To,s rep:irt shal not be repro:iuced, exc~ m ful, Without wntten ~ ofTnMatnx Laboratones, Inc lncrndual sample resub rmte ooly to the Sllmpe tested. RI. 8y: MSM D.500 0.500 0 500 D.500 2 SO 2.50 By: MSM D.500 0.500 0 500 0 500 5560 Corporate Exc:hanQe Court SE

• Grar.d Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463 www.tnrnatnxJabs.com

+++ TRl~1:~}~ QUALITY CONTR.Ol REPORT Physlcal/Chemlcal Paramete111 by f!IJA/ APHA/ ASTM Methods IQ;:Type Son1)le Sp):e Sploo Control RPO Cone Qty. Rm,Jlt Urvt 'M,R,c. Llmttl RPO Lara RL Analyte: BOD, (5-Dlly)/SM 5210 B-2011 QC Batch: 1313038,~ loorgan,c Prep) Aralyze:l: 12/04/2013 Ely: SKA Method Bllnl: <20 n¢ 20 lixnlDry Cailrol Sample 1118 1811 mw1-96 115-115 20 Analyte: Bromlde/ASfM D 1246-05 QC Batch: 13132'!0 (Method Speallc Prepllrabon) Analym:I: 12/11/2013 Ely: SU. <O 50 n¢ 050 L.atonmy Control 5om?" 500 5.20 n¢ 104 90-110 a so 1312D32-14 [InlaaC..-1:8] -Spike 0.304 2 50 2.83 mg/I. 101 81H20 a.so ~-- 0304 11.2911 mg/I. 3 20 0 50 AnaJyta:: carbon, Total Organic/SM 5310 C-2011 QC 8"tx:h: 1313095 (Method Speonc Preparabon) Analyzed: 12/05[1IJ 13 Ely: KAR <0.50 n¢ a so L.aborwxy c:art:rol Sllmple 2.00 2.24 mw1-1U 81-118 a so 1312032-14 ~ CDmp:llfta] MatnxSplloo 3.58 200 IL71 mg/I. 107 75-124 a.so HatnxSplce~ 3 511 2.00 5.M mg/I. 105 75-124 05 20 a so Analym 018Tllclll Oxygen Demand/SM 5220 D-2011 QC BBl:ch: 1313025 (5220 D COD Dogmll'.>n) Allalyzsl. 12/04/2013 By: SI.L <SO ~ so L.aooralD<y c:art:rol Sam pie 60.0 A.6 mw1-101 95-105 so Anlllyte: Color (Apparent)/SM 2120 B-2011 QC Batr:h: 1313019 (Method Speollc ~nmon) Aratyn,d. 12/04/2013 l!y:CAC <500 ACU 500 Lalxntory Control ~ 250 25.11 ACU 100 80-120 500 13121132-14 ~Compaob] DJploca!B 150 15.0 AC.U. a 20 5 00 Conbnued on next page Page~~59 nus report shall not be reproduced, except in ful, Without wntten authoraabon of TnMatnx labor!ltones, Inc. Indrvidual sample resuls relate only to the ~ tested. 5560 Corporate Excnarge Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxtabs.com

+++ m 1~i:J;lr~ QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Phyalcal/Ctemlcal Parameter9 by EPA/APHA/ASTM Ml!thoda (Continued) I~~ San1)IB Sple Spka Cmtrol RPO Cmc r,:y. - \\.ln,t 'II, Rec. l..rnrts RPO l..aru Analyte: Cyanide, Avallable/USEPA OIA-1677 QC Balch: 1313173 (Method Spealk: Prep;!lrabon) Analyzed: U/09(lo13 <20 L9'L L>ixlrmay CIJ'llrol sa,,1)1e 200 11..5 Lllr"L 1()8 82-132 1312032-lD [Intalm Qrab o.y 2] -sin <2.0 200 B.7 UQII. 103 82-130 sin llupDtl!I <2.0 200 21.l Lllr"L 1015 52-130 3 11 Analyte: Pluortde/SM 4500-F C-2011 QC Balx:h: 1313326 (M!!lhocl Specflc Preparation) Analym:I: 12/13/2013 <010 mg/I. l..ltxnayCIJ'llrol51!f!1)1e 2.00 LIIII mg/I. ll0-110 Analyte: ~

• CaC03/SM 2340 C-2011 QC Batth: 1313099 (M!!lhocl Speaflc Prepal ration)

Analym:I: U/06[lfJ13 <2 mg/I. l..abJnmy CIJ'llrol 5ample 86 3 17 mg/I. 101 92-110 ~CIJ'llrol~ 200 202 mg/I. 101 92-110 1.lll032-14 ~Clla1polbl] Hatnxsin 147 '400 5411 mwL 100 86-W ~ 147 147 mg/I. o 20 Analym HEM; 011 lk Grease/USEPA-1664A QC Batx:h: 13131114 (1661A Extracbon) An!llyzed: U/1CV2013 <500 rnwl L.ot<x--, CIJ'llrol ~ 400 37.5 mg/I. 7&-114 1312932-lll [0- 001 Q-ab Day 2] Duplalll <500 <500 mg/I. 18 Analyte: N ltrogen, Anvnonla/SM 4500-NH3 G-2011 QC Bairn: 1313163 ( 4500-NH3 B Ammorua Dl5t:JlabJn) Analym:I: 12/11/2013 Molhodlllori: <0050 Conllrued on next page Page 49 of 59 Tht5 report sh!III not be reprocluced, except,n full, wrtoout wrtten authonzabon of TnMatnx Laboratooes, Inc IndJVldual sample resuls relate ooly to the sample tested. RI. By:11'1A 20 20 20 20 Ely: Sil. 0.10 010 Ely' KAR 2 2 2 4 2 Ely. WAH 500 5.00 500 Ely: UB o oso 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE + Grand Rapids, MI 49512 616.975.4500 + Fax 616.942.7463 + www.tnmatnxlabs.com

• TRIMATRIX

,f LABORATORIES QUALITY CONTROl REPORT Physlcal/Chemlcal Parameterw by EPA/ APHA/ ASTM Methods (Continued) l~Type Sample Sp,lia SpR Control RPO Core r:,:, RMJtt Lot '!I, Rec. linols RPO linlll Analytel Nitrogen, Ammonia/SM 4500-NH3 G-2011 (Conbrrued) QC Batch: 1313163 (Conbruad) ( 4500-NH3 B Ammoma D151I11tion) Analyzed: 12/11/2013 L.aborabJ<y Coolrol Sen1Jle 1.00 D.IND 96 9(>-110 Analytel Nitrogen, Nltrata+Nlbfte/SM 4500-N03 F-2011 QC Batch: 1313118 (Genoral Inorgaoc Prep) Analyzed: 12/04/2013 MolhcdBlank <0.050 mw'- i.Jllxntory Caltrol 5orn?e o soo 11.524 mg/I. 105 90-110 Analyte: Nitrogen, Total IC,Jeldahl/USEPA-351. 2 Rev. 2.0 QC Batx:h: 1313050 (351.2 TICN Dl\\jestlon) Analyzed: 12/09/2013 Method Bien( <O 50 mg/I. Wxntory Control Sample 2 00 2.99 mg/I. 104 90-110 13120:U*lB [a01 Clxnpalltll] -Sp,b, o 594 200 2.87 rnw'I-114 90-110 Matrix 5p,lc!, Duplocata 0.594 200 2.80 mg/I. 110 90-110 20 Analyte: ~lcs, Total/USEPA-420.4 QC Batch: 1313065 (Hs:hod Speoftc Preparatkln) Analyzed: 12/09/2013 Msnx!Bln< <0.0500 mg/I. LBbnlDry Control Sample 0250 11.lM mQ'I. 106 90-110 Analyte: Phosphorua. Total/SM 4500-P E-2011 QC Batch: 1313144 (4500-P B Phosphorus ~) Analyzed: 12/10/2013 <00100 mg/I. LBbmiD<y Coolrol Somi;le 0500 0.784 mg/I. 98 90-110 Analyte: Residue, Dluolved @ 180° C/SM 2540 C-2011 QC Batch: 1313033 (Genenll lrD'garnc Prep) Analyzed: 12/05/2013 Method lllanlc <50 mg/I. l..aboralD<y Coolrol Somple 200 2111 mg/I. 85--115 Continued on next page Page 50 of 59 This report shol not be reproduced, ~ 111 ful, wrthout wntten authonzabon of TnMatrnc Laboratones, Inc IndMdual sample results relate only to the Rlmple ~ RI. By: a.e 0050 By: rx. 0050 o oso By: a.e 050 a.so a.so o 50 By: LHA 0.0500 00500 By: KAR 00100 00100 By: WAH 50 50 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatnxlabs.com

+++ m1~,:~~~ QUALITY OONTROI. REPORT Phyalcal/0.emlcal Paremetel'II by EPA/APHA/ASTM Methods (Continued) IQ:~ ~ S!]lz Spoke Control RPO Cone. r:,;.y, - lhu: '11,R,c. i.Jmbl RPO umn. Analytel Residue, Su9pended/SM 2540 D-2011 QC Baldi: 1313036 (Genen!I lnlr9"nic Prep) Analyzed: 12/05/2013 Mdhodlllmc <33 mwL L.ab:ntc,y cattn:,I S.mple 200 1911 mwL 95 88-104 Analyte: Sulfate{ ASTM D516-90 (07) QC Batx:h: 1313298 (General loorganlc Prep) Analyzed: 12/12f1Dl3 <50 mw'L L>ix>ratCJy Cootrol SI mple 200 21.7 mw'L 1011 88-112 Analyte: SuHlde, Tab11/SM 4500-52 D-2011 QC Balx:h: 1313149 (Method Spea1'1c Preparabon) Analyzed: 12/06(2013 Holhod Bionic <0020 mg/l. L.atoraay Control 5om;e 0336 11.3411 IT¢ 103 80-120 AnaJyte: SUlfttr/SM 4500-503 B-2011 QC Batx:h: 1313110 (Method Speollc Preparabon) Anlllyzed: 12/04/2013 MelhodBllnl: <l 0 mwl-Labonmy Ccrbol Sample 500 46.1 mwl-92 80-120 1.112032-15 [001 CO.poolbl] Hotn,cSpl:e <l 0 500 41.G mg/l. 82 76-101

Dupllcaa,

<10 <1.0 mg/I. 20 Analyte: SUrfactllnts, MBAS/SM 5540 C-2011 QC Batch: 1313020 (Method Spealc ~ration) Anatyz,!d: 12/04/2013 <D02SO mwl-l.l!oorlltD!y Ccrbol Sample 0l25 0120 mw'L 96 80-120 1312032-15 [001 Qxapaolb!I] Duphcate <0.0250 <D 0250 mg/l. 20 Page 51 of 59 This report "1a!I not be reprod~, except "' fijJ, wothout wntten authonzabon ex TnHatnx Lllboratones, Inc lnovldual Rll11)le resuis r&te ooly to the sampe tested. RI. By: WAH 3.3 248 By: LMA 5.0 5.0 By: WAH 0020 D.020 By: CK. 10 1.0 l 0 10 l!y:WAH 00250 0 0250 002SO 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.tnmatrodabs.com

~ TRIMAT RIX ~* L A 8 O A A T O R I £ Chain of Custody Record COCNo. 131U6E95 Pg _j_ of.!_ ORIGINAL -LABORATORY COPY. fELDISAMPlER '1.:251.2GU

,._,._ TRIMATRIX 5..~0CarporatoExcllangeCourtSE ...... LA.lO"-ATOAIEE Gf>Od Rapids, 1.41 4S512 Chain of Custody Record pnone !=>16) 975"4500 Fax (616) 942-7463 V\\WW,lri:natrixtabs.com ORIGl>IAL - lABORA TORY COPY - l'ElO/SAMPLER

COCNo, 1J1136195 Po _j_ of j_

~t:llt~ A NO(,lt~1-i Q Hfi0.>JM<2 C H,SO,oH<2 D tf-1 Ui.1 pHc2 E: N3(,Hpt1,.t2

• ~-

x: ~: ~: 2: ~= 1--'... * ......... TRIMATRIX S..'(;()CcrporataExct.angeGourt SE Chain of Custody Record COC No i31 136695 ......,. L A B O n It T o fl I E s Grand R3J)kfs. Ml -'9512 For la~ on1q Phone ~ 16) 975-500 Fax (6t6J 942-7463 Analyses Requested

~

/ www.ttlmatnxbbs.com Pg _j_ o1 _!_ ~= ~Nl1/4rl~al _ llw:1i[ lff_ H~il A A. :c rE~~ ~t,o; CM!cltrrc,eet No. l P.O No ..r:. en" .Q j... i:> C H':SO. ptt.c:C 8 ll; 8 ! ! 1 0 1* 1 Ms:1.iM f====-':=:~ ;::;--rr;;:.;;;;;;;;:;-------------;;,,"';::,;;:..,.=To;--.:;-----;.c.m, --; 'iJ ' 1l 'i_ ; i $? 11 U E ""°""" =.;;.;:,,,..;__;;c_:c;_ _________ ~ - ~-~.00 ~ (cor!MM't',1$) ti ii tO I g ~ = '§ B ~ 8 F ~~>9 .--,,,,..,.-'-~---- - ---~CnnladJR*roo1'*Q -~it:. ~ ~-~ ~ ~ l a. '°-... ~. G M&Ott iVOARo.m~, '-"':...e::::).-_-4'=======::....--------'-".::""'.:_:_""'°

..::. _ _ ____....... ---!~

.!>~ -~ ~ -~ -~ -~ -~ F1eldSam;,le lO "°""° ":;'°" ~ : :,....... 3 l1/23l:41 U !.~.L~.LU. 2 L'.L.... I "-" C""'""" ~ --~- -+...,...----- --- 1il! , ~ I _ ~ ar~:'.IIN* Sanl~--- OL/ I ww Intake Composte ~gJl~ZIW) JU:.> ' x 'ww' 1, 1 1 1 1 1

• 1 l 2 ; ~i J 1=+

E...3/+"'w , 001 composite ~<)lt/J/.L3 2,.,--('. x 1 WW 1 1 1 1 1 1 _,, 1 ' 2 : 2 i 3__1~l t .11., -r I j +----...........-- +-----+.L __.... - - - -+--.--, -,,-+--

• 1*-r-*1_ 1 ;--

1 I I i l I I*' I +--i i' _ I I 1 1 I v*** I I I 1!1 1-l i I I I I:: I 1-rt-------~-+-' -'-t---7----- ~!'f'IP'ldBt~:~ JCornrner.tl ~ _ _._ __ ____ 12RtM. _,,,,._., __ lllldTO'.JIOr;,-Ni>...., ~ ~1------fJL.l-!~-=---'!-.~

• ~--:J, J - *-,~ -__ :*v

, _..1J'l<<~t/1J I j'),;3 71/! ORIGINAL - lABORATORV COPY

• FIROIS/\\MPI.ER i:--*~;'

DTE: Fttrm1 ~m,1.A~Ccnv>OCit* C6C 11/Y..1! ~ 0 ~ E fl 15 ~ " ~ E: ; ~ ! ~

s J

f ~ ~ii !H l i :

• ~ u, !I; ffi

~ R ~- ! ~ ~ ~ z l!~ i.: 0 ~ ~ '" 8.. ~ ~ J..! i a 0 "' "' ~

SAMPLE RECEIVING / LOG-IN CHECKLIST p{'nooe CJ P'J'esent I intact D l',"""'1 >mA\\rbe.\\ Coafan1* Loe&t!On Oi1pat"5tif ! Top I M.idCf& I 8-otom C~rl~U,. i -11ken Vlav ,P LODMI k:11111,:,/9 ~--3 ~ D B3irJtd g i>vg z...:s ~ -1, 0 &i.Ala fA'o1J2~t~ 0 ~1Avgi..3cor.¢ttr:<lffl* Arte,ntne Terr-.penuure taken \\Ila; ~ Te1npera!ure Olsl\\:C: rTB) 0 _ 1.~ 11.....,,,..; -.: =~ Ac '1: ____ ZL . / _ /7 None O P,es.eni / lntJlct 0 ?-r~tNO'l\\tft~t\\ Cootan1 Location: _ [Xs:>011.d ! Top J Mid~ I 8otton'I Coola~'?'empcr~iure Taken Via,. ~ L.00$otk::e:IA"19:l4~ 0 ~ic. lA"'w 2..J-coitM1ttt 0 e,;.-. I~ I Av; 2-3 c<<1laf'W5 0 Nont:IJ.vg2.3~--rt Mema.., 1 *Te.mpera1ure T,-ken Vio1' r('J Tempa,1:tura ai.nt (iB) 0 f c,,,\\jlf,oll( ~~*C =NJ.!I ~al,.,-0, t'""'........ l;, J-:t. ~-* -1:£.*:::::::n - - ~ :-g: _ Av*r* Coolor 10 on CCC? \\.'OC Trip Bia, "'°"ived? Tl>ermometer l,)oed O Olg11al TMrmomele( (*5') 0 Olllo, (J __ D s.. -coo1e, tr,tOrmation Form Tim* ~n;tod-y Soall,: O N¢oe 0 Pf~-s&n.! I tntact 0 l"rese!ll l ll.A lrw> Ced>:M lo:abon; Oi'!""'cd I Top I M- / 8o1!a,, Coct,.r,t/T~ITl~!.ure T**~ V.J!I: 0 \\,.OOHlOIIA,,[12*3con',lmer1 0 S.,g;e:iQt,V.,02~QO.r~tlo.:1 Q Bue-tbe t A~2*l~irA!r.$ 0 NCY1elA~2-3CO.'\\l6'tMR At:em.te T emperAhJrW Taktn V,a: C T e~*turtt B1anK (l8 ) 0 'Ocl>!4i"""

COoler, C,,:,lody Seslv r;.,,,.

0 Presen, I inloel O PT-nlm\\ S 'K~ \\TM'e'\\ Cooll~t Location: Oispt<>ed I To~ I Micdlo I 8onx>m Coo!oJWTemper*t-,e T*~* Iii* 0 UIOHMIMV 2*"3.C:Cil'lra~ 0 Btli1Qe.Jk,fc /,*¥t2.;J:c::ctltaNn. 0 ~ 0 NO'-ltl.A.-.,g2.3toe'ltaihef'!. fbema1e T ernpersMe T den V,a* Q Temp,o,*I"" 6'aok (TB} CJ tC0111!J~.. A..-frilg-e *c 0 Cooler 10 on CCC? VOCTf.pSionk~ If.!nY shaded areas checked, complete Sample Recoivlng Non-Conformance and/or Inventory Form 0 0 A""l-.aJysi,.Reqv.1tlld'> Sa~ ID mat<ile* COC7 &tmp!lll Oat*,a_r)d Time mal~* ¢0C7 Cor,loJoe, type c>>rop!Oted 00 COC? , A:I =onta' or type, indicatod.are recei\\lM? Chec.k WA 0 0 ,,2{' Sample Preservation v':Y 0 No .cl Avereg~ u.n,Pla tempetatutt !Sli* C1 0 0 0 Was 1herm~ pre.wrvation r,quired7 It "Nd", Project Che.mist App!O'¥"al tntiaj1. _____ if -Ve,* Ccmp<r.ed Nori Con Coole<. Cont tnventc,y Fomi? COtnpfe!ad Sample Pnl:serv.:Jon. Varihca1ion Form? gsalT\\pJ&a ffltrnl~ preurved oorrec~? _JY'N<f. add.S orange tag? 2J R-tteei\\.'ed pr8-9flHMtd V0C S~ li7 0 MoOH O N.,SO, Check for Short Hold*Tlme Prep/Analyses 0 Bactoridogica! 0 -AirBtgs Al'lER HOURS QNL Y: 0 EnCo= I Me!honol -p~.. rved C0FIES OF CCC TO LAS AAEA(S) 0.,....,,,,,.ldohydo/,6,ldoh)'de NONE RECEIVEP A ,::,....,__ta;ged o<<1lain.!$ RECEIVED. COG< TO LA!!<Sl 0 Y*l>.>,<M'll!b>-1*9 eo 1~ ambc:n (SV Prc;,-Lab) Sample Condition Summa.ry Notos NIA Yes Page 55 of 59 A Broke,,c:on\\al,,_? ~ . ~Jiu _ir.-9 o: Incomplete labels? ): IDegiblo Wormoicn on lellels' ~ Low... otu~ rdCi!i'lt!d? ~ lt\\a:pptopri.at. t'L" ~ TriMatri,: contal:l)er* rec..l~d? Cl voe vi I iOX c:t,nbliMJ"-l hav. hH dsprJ? C) E>nra umpae bcstions f eon".l1~ no1 :.,~ en C ,<al f-l<'1r Goal M_*i?. ~.J* J _:3, Yes* / No This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written authorization of TriMatrix Laboratories, Inc. Individual sample results relate only to the sample tested. 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, Ml 49512
• 616,975.4500
• Fax 616.942,7463
• www.trimatrixlabs.com

SAMPLE RECEIVING/ LOG-IN CHECKLIST 'P VIOi'< °'°"'1/1':::;? ,(l/J, - ..;,//.:> ~ 3.:z. ~-~ ~~1 CN:l'Mt ~ -~

z!None O

?cs.er.t /Jnt~ P!eum/,;o, lnlil::i Coola,,t~O<;&\\lQr\\* Dil?)rm / Top I t,l,ddle / Setton, Ccol~turo T.a.hm 'i/.'4a: ~ LOD:Se;ltbtAVQ7-l:xint.,_I 0 Dl;Nftd lot I A,g a,3 "°"'"'""" 0 ei!AM / ~l(g:2'*3ecolair.tl Q l<b'ltlA*;,2*~~*~ Al~erna1e 'tempeuuure TJ1i<.en Vw ,,.P'T*mperawte stank (TBJ 0 1 C<><Uinet R~:J ~c ~::r~ Actuat -C fl 111.,- VlL.-,*y---:<-- 2,__f~:o _ A."'.,-,.9 Cool<lr iD on COC? 0 VOC Trio Blank reC4ived? Coolar Bo, Omer r.,,. Q N-O Ptuent, lnt*ct O Pre.Mint I N~ ln:Aet Coolant Loeaticrr I Ois;,erAd i Top i Middle / &com Coo1a!W'TeMpe~ture T*ken i/i1*. 0 UCMICl l "'-""-22.:-i~ Q e.tg.)td lc;.e I A,.'9 :i-3 Wlllin!f1 0 8ll,.,,.!\\;a / lo,,Y;.2.:)~5 ......,1w;2-3 _ _,. AAOtTia:t9 T8mpet'8h.trl: Tak.en Via o T.....,,...,. ** - (Tt!J D,c,,~, CotrKtton Factor 'C Aver~t'"'C 0 COOier I0onCOC? 0 VOC Tl'J9 hllk rwceived? Actual *c IR Gun (fZ02) lb.rmom*l*r Uwd 0 (l;gllol Thermomc1or (#5'4) 0 S..McMionolCoole< ln:am,*tton form C-oolff # c....,.;ys.. 1a, 0 CXMr (* ' Tfma a Pr**onlllr.tact a "'-.. "'"'°' tn= COolairu t.oelbon: ~-.ed I top I M.ddle / Soeom CooiantlT*ff'>.pellilt'Jr* T.k,en \\IJ*: a t-.1oo,,.,02-,--, 0 Bag;w,:i,::itlM;:2.'.3COl"lffllr,en; 0

B~.rit let-1Av-g2--3ec:w'l\\811WS 0

~-lOtlelA'i1'2--3-~"t Me.m11tt T*m;)t'.rature T~Qt.n Vi** D Temperature-Blank (TB) O 1COA1.lir.er -...!!'P~- CorreetiOn F*ctoo *c t ~:,_..,....,..., ~ft.~ .Average "'C 0 C<,ole, 10 on COC? 0 VOC Trip Btenk roooi,,ed? Coder t c;;.io.,Se.ii: 0 NDfl& O P,-.--.1/lrua.ct r..,. 0 l'rMam l Nc.tlntoct C.oiomL~n: ~ I Top I Mid& I Bonam CoownuT efli.para:ure Taken Via* 0 l-!Cof-"';li.3-0 ~diO& I A-.lg2-3CD"lt.tntR. 0 BIA.lt> /l\\>9.2-0-. 0 N0nil l ).Y-g2-SWl:.nel'f AJt.m*to l*ffl;IOfil!l.n' T a.ker, Via 0 Tem.p,ararure 9:a."l~ {TB) a,cor.-ta.in*r .!_'ltttfJI!~....__ TJl........, R~ I NMR.,,.~ Aver-age *c 0 Cool ID on COC7 VOC Tri9 Blan rec,'-17 If !ID( shaded areas checked, complete Sample Receiving Non-Confonnance a.nd/or Inventory Fonn Paperwork Received Yes

• NO

-? Den>>in of Custody n!cord{s)? ti No. lnJilited ay _____ _ p' R.-..a lor lab Si>JnodlD*...,.lme7 0 9;::,Shipping oocumomt a .-@ 2"'"' COC lnfor ma tlon-----======,-.---= MOIJ*i* Req.,cl.,.od, Sample ID mat:hu COC? Sam.,,. Doto aroj Time ma:chos COC? .COn'.a.,..- typo ~*ed Oil COC? ~ COf\\.t.a:.ner typH tndieated are recei~d7 Samplo Condition Summary NIA Y"s No 78robn, con:elnerst'tdl? ,.,E:J' Mi~et~ llbelo? ,,zf lliegJ>lo "*"""'-'tioo on lol>M? Check Sample :Preservation NII\\ Ves No O ,i:/'AveraQe..sampte tempera!ure ~ -- C? 0 a 0 Q Wi~ 0-iermaJ pt'IIMNabon re ed'? ~* o* Ptt,J<e: C~smiOI ""'"'""' lnllol$ ______ _ lf-YH' Compieto:I Non Con Cooler* Cord r:wentory FGnn1 Co.'l!plet.ed sv.,;,:,, Pte"'f\\'ltlon Vetlf""'llon Fotm? 11:1 Samples cl\\emica,y p._,_i =d>'? ) *...,,., Ad!lod <>r.ilJl>II to~? f;iY' P.e.oec\\-ed pte--~ VOC !.Oils? 0 IJ..OH O Na,SO. Check for Short Hold-Time Prep/AnalysH 0 8¥1enol0Qk:ol 0 /',Jr Bogs AFTER HOURS ONLY; O =-* 1 r,lmanoi Pre-~ COPIES OF coc TO lABJ\\REA(S) q..)'l>fmO-lde!l,de/Akl""yue NONE RECENED ef'\\ G,.. o-11_,; e<>nlaflll!rJ ~ ,RECEIVED, COCt T0 L>JliS) 0 Y-'111:0-tagged 1L *mber. (SV Prep.l..ab) Notes -<f. Lew v-* recaiwd'> 0 Tnp Blanlc reooived O Trip 8'a nol UIO<I on COC /6_ l~pro9flllt* or noo-TriMetrilC con:aine.rs received?

• R.ect"r\\'od (O*~..me), P*~

Do¥,,c:rod (O.telTi ) <S1 HO'Ul"Goef Met? /4 VOCvoals/TOXcon,.,n **h>**h<*d*p::Ococ?-=+--" 1/ /;?*3- !.5 '._ <t;.{ J:;-j-} :J, Yes / No Page 56 of 59 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written authorization of Tri Matrix Laboratories, Inc. Individual sample results relate only to the sample tested. 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.trimatrixlabs.com

SAMPLE. PRESERVATION VERIFICATION, FORM page __f__, of _L I

• f',b Stflp lot t/.

A~J-C'f, _____

• 00NOJ"/\\OJ11Sf;,Hf()RTliESECO~INER'IYP6S.

/ ~ ¢ HC37811$ Conl3iE!erType ~) 1 ___ 4 _---l--------'-13 __ 1 ____ 111-----1----+-- --+ --- c::J ---------l TllQ C<>l0f Lt B1u& 8i<Je an,,.,, ~ e 15

• o r.....

l'!bd Red Stripe -.....:'--'-'-"'--1--"C.=:--I*........ ******-*-... '----'--'-- t--

---

11--

Prewr.au,. N.>OH H,SO~ ~.

None, ExpoctedpH

>12___ <2 <2 - s:a-- COCU...tll

HNO,

<2 HN03 <2 Aqueous Samples: For each sarri;,le and container r,,pe, cllecl\\ the box If pH ls aooeptabte_ If pH is not COC LN a'4

---

* ----- - +-------1--

____ __,_ ___ _, acceptable for any sample COC l r,o#6 -- 11---- ----**t------1------1

• • • - --*--*****- - ---11-----1----
• -*- *--**--11----11-----

COCLnti"9 Comments COC IDf Adju$ted by. _____,. 00 NOT ADJUST ~H FoR-rHES!.\\ comNNERTYl"ES Date: C0111aine,Type...... s1_2~--** 13 3 6 ,s

• • • • • • • • • • • -*** -*---+---_c_---1----

f*~ Cow I.I-Blue 81U& B""'" Rfld .Ro,d Sl!ipe 1 __ Pr_;.e,;...sec..M> ..;.;;.,~*,..:.e--1 __ _c_Ncc*-=-Ott'-'-----l-- H.S 2 o-'-, ----ll---w,so _,_* --::--='- l----~I-EJcpecied pH >12 <2 N""" 6-8

HNO, HN~

<2 - <2 CocLn¥1 COOLN"6 cc;,c l'.,.., COCli:'*#11 CCCmotl<l Comments log 1., forms.xis - *Sam/>l<!_Preeer.e_ Vemica iOCl Page 57 of 59 container, record pH in box, and note on Sample Rece ving Checklist and on sample Receiving Non-Conformance Form. If approved by Projed Chemist, add a.cid. or base to the sample to achie'le the correct pH. Add up to, but do ool ei<ceed 2x the volume initially added at container prep (see table llelow for initial volumes used). Add orange pH tag to sample contal~r and record i/,formation requested. Record adjusted pH on this form. Do not adjust pH for eontainertypes 3, G, and 15. Co~lMrSJu Original Vot of (mLJ Pres.rva.ttve (mLJ Coma rType 5 NaOH 500 2.5 1000 ~-0 C<>n!alnel' Typo ~ H,SO, ,2s 0.5 250 t.O 500 2.0 - *-.. -~*-**-~ -- 1000 -0 c;otJWner T)'p6 13 Hi6(l, ~ 2.~ This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written authorization of Tri Matrix Laboratories, Inc. Individual sample results relate only to the sample tested. 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.trimatrixlabs.com

• • TRIMATRIX

..,..~LABOfl.ATORI ES SAMPLE PRESERVATION VERIFICATION FORM page _f_ of_/_ COC IO# /3/131.:,<pt;.S Ph Strip Lot t Adjusted bf. 00 NOT ADJUST pH FoR THESE CONTAINER TYPES ~ Date: HC378115 ~

• ri>e_ L~)

13 3 e 15 CJ Tagecior 1\\16 Biue BIWIO Green Red Red Slnl>t Preservativ-e NaOH H,SO, H,SO. HNo;* !'lone

HNO, Expected pH

>12 <2 <2 6-a <2 <2 COCline'f"I ,o.queous Samples: Foreach ...,.,_ ***'****-~ -* COCliMJ2 'iM'?!e al\\d ~ \\""{ '-'#~. check the box if pH IS COCL1nof3 aoceptsble, If pH rs not acceptable or any sample COCLint-._. /2'~ J contaifler, record pH in box. COC l.mo.S _/ a:nd note on Sample Receivlng Cheel(list and on coc........ Sample ReceM ng Non-COC in* *7 conformance Femi Jf -~ --- - app"'ved by Project cnemlst ax:.. ack:S a cid o r b.!se lo the we,... ~ sample to achieve !he cor,ect pH, Add Up to bdt do not cOOu-,oJ t: ,eXCeed 2l< !be vofunw inttraUy Commenb added al container prep (see table below for Initial volijmes used) Add orange pH tag to sample c:omainer and record i11formation requested. Record adjusted pH on thia COC ID# orm. no ustpH 0( ~ I>/- container types J. 6, and 15. DO NOT AOJ\\JST pH FOIi THESE CONTAINER TYPES Do t adj Oater ~ - T~ 5123 13 3 8 15 Teg Color U. Blue Blue Brown Green Re<! ReoS:npe Original Vol of P rewrvative ContaJner Size t<>OH H,60, H,.SO. Hone

HNO, HNO, (ml)

PtM.rvaliY* <2 <2 --~* - -

• • • • • <2.

tml) El/peeled pH >12 6~ <2 COC l..-.C*t 1 Contt.l!ltt( Type 5 N.00 ---.. *-~-* COC UM

• 2 500 25 C0C lintt'J 1000 5 0 COCl,,,....

Cor.i...,.TVJ)e 4 ll,50, cocu..-.~ 26 0.5 COCI.NoJl.0:li'{ PhStrfplollf 00 NOT 4QJUST pk fOfl HESECONT,'JN.ER,-,..PES 6 HC378115 Doi¢; Conta-Type 5/23 4 1~ 3 8 15 l'a;Q~***

---

G ;;,.;;

0 Lt Blue Blue 8"'1 Red RedSllir:e Pru@,vallv<t NaCl-! H2$04 H,SO,

HNO, HNO,

• .12*

<2 <2-- -. - - 6-.8 E*~pH <2 <2 COC.~lll / Aq1.1eous Sample$: For each

• __ 1/.

CCC'LJnb*l "8mlll'-l and Q'lntaiN>..c t-,;,e, cl?eck the box if pH is coc U....#l acceptable. !(pH is not ac:oeptable for any sample COCLlleU conta,ner, record pH in box, COC U,,.,115 and note on Sample Receiving Checklist and on COC l,,"!i Sample Receiving Non-COCLN * 'i COnfom,ance Form. If approved by Profect Chem.s1, COCl,t1,e -.e add acid or base to the --****~~- sample to achieve the correct COCLPo.S pH. Add up to, but do not cocu,,."o exceed 2x the volume initially Comme11ts added at container prep (see table below for initial volu~s used). Add orange pH tag to ssmp(e container and record ,rilonnatlori re<;uested. Record adjusted pH on this "c"'o"'c""io::--,-::-------------,---------,,------------------, torm. Do not adjust pH for co.miner types 3, 6., and 15. Conta1ne,Typl. Ta~C~ R.,._IM NaOI< >12 4 U Bk.e 8"""1

.,so, - ~--'

.,so ' --t,- <2 <2

---

+-----,-* -

COCl,rwPl COCU,,.M COC liMMl COCLJMn COCI.Jne"" PO NOT ADJIJST ~ FOR. THCSi OONTAINER TYPES 3 f> ~ G:ttr fl~ ReoSIJipe "'°""'

HNO, HNO, 6~

- <2 <2. Commems Log In Forms->10 - Silmpie_Pr... r;o_ Ve<iflcation Page 59 of 59 ~tSIU> Ong.l/\\lJ \\/01, ol !ml.I Pra.RN'lbYe h11lJ Container l',p,, 5 1-!aott ~ 25 IOCO u Cootainel Type 4 H,SO, 125 0.5 260 10 !IOO 2.0 1000

• .O con1a1-rypo 1a HiSOi fA\\11 u,

YergiQn: 3.0 This report shall not be reproduced, except in Full, without written authorization or Tri Matrix Laboratories, Inc. Individual sample results relate only to the sample tested. 5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE

• Grand Rapids, MI 49512
• 616.975.4500
• Fax 616.942.7463
• www.trimatrixlabs.com

DTE Electric - Fermi 3 Nuclear Power Plant NPDES Permit NO. MI0058892 Renewal Application Apr114,2022 - Water Treatment Additives Table 3.6-1, Fermi 3 Environmental Report, Rev. 2

Table 3.6-1 System CIRC/SWS CIRC CIRC CIRC Fenni3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report Chemicals Added to Liquid Effluent Streams Chemical Biocide/Algaecide - Sodium Hypochlorite (15%) Maximum Amount Average Amount Frequency of Concentration In Use Waste Streams 620,000 lb/year 620,000 lb/year Approximately Non-detectable, 4.5 hour/week neutralized by sodium bisulfite TRC < 38ppb* Corrosion Inhibitor-1,700,000 lb/year 1,400,000 lb/yearContinuous Sodium Silicate Non-detectable, dissociates in system Scale 830,000 lb/year 700,000 lb/year Continuous Inhibitor/Dispersant Dehalogenation - 650,000 lb/year 550,000 lb/year Continuous Sodium Bisulfite Non-detectable, dissociates in system Non-detectable, neutralizes sodium hypochlorite

• Fenni 2 NPDES pennit 3-48 Revision 2 February 2011

DTE Electric - Fermi 3 Nuclear Power Plant NPDES Permit NO. MI0058892 Renewal Appllcatlon April 4, 2022 - Intake Structure Description Section 3.4 - Coollng System, Fermi 3 Environmental Report, Rev. 2 (13 pages: 3-24 through 3-36)

3.4 Cooling System Fermi3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report Fermi 3 requires cooling water for the normal power heat sink in the CIRC and the auxiliary heat sink in the PSWS. Thermal energy is transferred via air or water through these heat sinks. Major system components include the Intake and discharge portions. Subsection 3.4.1 gives a description of the various cooling water systems and the operational modes for Fermi 3. The NPHS is discussed in this section, as well as in Section 3.3 and Subsection 5.3.2. Discharge to the air is also discussed in this section, as well as in Subsection 5.3.3. Subsection 3.4.2 provides a description of the major components of the systems. Major components are contained within the intake structure and discharge piping. Further clarification of the intake structure Is provided on Figure 3.4-1 and Figure 3.4-2. Additional discussion on the impacts of the discharge can be found in Subsection 5.3.2 and Subsection 5.3.3. 3.4.1 Description and Operational Modes 3.4.1.1 Circulating Water System The CIRC provides cooling water during startup, normal plant operations, and hot shutdown for removal of power cycle heat from the main condensers and rejects this heat to the NPHS. The NPHS is comprised of a natural draft cooling tower. The main condensers contribute the majority of the heat to the NPHS with additional heat load introduced by the PSWS. The main condenser rejects heat to the atmosphere at a rate of approximately 9.883 x 109 Btu/hr during normal full-power operation. Water from the NPHS basin is pumped through the main condenser and then back to the cooling tower where heat, transferred to the cooling water in the main condenser, is dissipated to the environment (the atmosphere) by evaporation. As a result of the heat dissipation process, some water is evaporated. This results in an increase in the solids level in the NPHS cooling tower. To control solids levels or concentrations, a portion of the recirculated water is discharged. In addition to this blowdown from the CIRC, and evaporative losses, a small percentage of water in the form of droplets (drift) is lost from the cooling tower. Water pumped from Lake Erie via the intake structure is used to replace water lost by evaporation, drift and blowdown from the cooling tower. Slowdown water is returned to Lake Erie via an outfall into the lake (Subsection 3.4.2). A portion of the waste heat Is thus dissipated to Lake Erie through the blowdown process. The maximum, minimum and average Fermi 3 blowdown flow rates from the CIRC during normal full power operation are provided in Figure 3.3-1. Table 3.4-1 provides the monthly values for evaporation, blowdown, and makeup for the NPHS. The maximum temperature of the blowdown after passing through the NPHS is 86°F at the discharge to Lake Erie. The heat rejected to Lake Erie via blowdown is estimated based on these maximum blowdown flow and temperature conditions (Subsection 5.3.2). During other operating modes, heat dissipation to the environment is less than the bounding values for the normal full-power operational mode for the NPHS, except 3-24 Revision 2 February 2011

Fermi3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report when the Turbine Bypass System (TBS) is in operation. In this condition, it is possible for the temperature of the discharge to rise to 96°F. 3.4.1.2 Station Water System The SWS draws water from Lake Erie through an Intake bay into the pump house located on the west shore of Lake Erie. The SWS provides makeup water to various plant systems. For example, the SWS provides makeup water to the NPHS cooling tower basin for the CIRC and to the AHS cooling tower basin for the PSWS. The pump configuration consists of three 50 percent capacity Plant Cooling Tower Makeup System (PCTMS) pumps that supply makeup to the cooling towers, and two 100 percent capacity Pretreated Water Supply System (PWSS) pumps. The PWSS pumps are capable of supplying makeup to the FPS as well as the AHS in shutdown conditions. The PCTMS pump configuration allows for one pump to be out of service and the other two maintaining design flow. This is also discussed in Subsection 3.4.2.1 and FSAR Subsection 9.2.10. The AHS can be used in conjunction with the NPHS during normal power operation. However during certain shutdown conditions, heat rejection is performed entirely with the AHS. The AHS operates during startup, hot shutdown, stable shutdown, cold shutdown, and refueling. 3.4.1.3 Plant Service Water System The PSWS provides cooling water to the Turbine Component Cooling Water System (TCCWS) heat exchangers and the Reactor Component Cooling Water System (RCCWS) heat exchangers and rejects the heat back to the NPHS and/or the AHS during normal power operations. During shutdown conditions, the heat is rejected to the AHS. Further discussion of the PSWS can be found in FSAR Subsection 9.2.1. A simplified flow diagram is provided in FSAR Figure 9.2-205. Subsection 3.3.1.2 further discusses flows associated with PSWS, and Figure 3.3-1 outlines flow paths and values for maximum, minimum and average normal power conditions and average shutdown conditions. Chemical treatment of the PSWS is discussed in Subsection 3.3.2.3 and Table 3.3-1. 3.4.1.4 Ultimate Heat Sink The Fermi 3 ESBWR design has no separate emergency water cooling system. The UHS function is provided by safety systems integral and interior to the reactor plant This system ultimately uses the atmosphere as the eventual heat sink. These systems do not have cooling towers, basins, or cooling water intake/discharge structures external to the reactor plant 3.4.1.5 Discharges to Lake Erle Lake Erie is subject to liquid discharges during plant operation. Discharge from the heat dissipation system ~nsists of blowdown from the CIRC and PSWS, as well as optional treated liquid radwaste. The thermal aspect of the discharge is covered in this subsection. Section 3.5 and Section 3.6 complete the description of the discharge characteristics. The rate of discharge into Lake Erie is constant under normal full power operating conditions. The discharge is approximately 17,000 gpm (Figure 3.3-1), with a maximum temperature of 86°F. Table 3.4-1 contains a summary of the monthly discharge temperatures. A discussion of thermal plume predictions is contained in Subsection 5.3.2. The discharge pipe is fortified with riprap to reduce 3-25 Revision 2 February 2011

Fermi3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report the effects of scouring; additional discussion of scouring can be found in Subsection 5.3.2.1.2. The current NPDES permit for Fermi 2 (Permit No. MI0037028) was renewed In 2005 with an expiration date in 2009. As discussed in Section 1.2, permits, e.g., NPDES permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification, will be obtained for the discharge from Fermi 3. The discharge of chemicals that have been added to various systems as treatments such as biocide, corrosion inhibitor, and scale inhibitor are closely monitored in the NPDES permit, as well as the presence of metals and the temperature of effluent flow. Section 3.6 provides discussion and comparison to regulatory limitations on effluent flow from Fermi 3. 3.4.1.6 Discharges to Air At the normal full-power design condition, the natural draft tower requires a maximum of 5.6 x 107 cfrn of ambient air to dissipate about 10. 72 x 109 Btu/hr of waste heat from the natural draft cooling tower at Fermi 3. Heat dissipated by the natural draft cooling tower includes contributions from the main condenser and the PSWS system. The heat load used for determining parameters associated with the natural draft cooling tower is conservative relative to the design heat loads (Reference 3.4-2). The cooling tower used at Fermi 3 provides the only plant effluents with a potential for influencing local meteorology. The effluent types of concern are commonly described as visible plumes (fog) and cooling tower drift. Cooling tower drift is limited to no greater than 0.001 percent of the total tower water flow. Drift eliminators exist as a design feature of the natural draft cooling tower meant to reduce the volume of drift from the tower. These effluent types and their impacts on local weather are described in Subsection 5.3.3. In addition to the heat discharged to the air, auditory discharges are considered. The noise from the NPHS is primarily the result of water splash. The sound level is estimated as being between 55 and 60 dBA at 1000 ft. Subsection 5.3.4 also discusses the estimated noise levels from the NPHS operation. The noise generated by the AHS is from water splash and fan motors. The sound level for the AHS is estimated at between 55 and 60 dBA at 1000 ft. (Reference 3.4-1) 3.4.1. 7 Operational Modes For the purposes of the design of the cooling systems, Fermi 3 is based on an estimated capacity factor of 96 percent (annualized). This considers a 24 month fuel cycle combined with an assumed 30-day refueling outage period. On a long term average, the heat load is 10.29 x 109 Btu/hr, which is 96 percent of the rated head load of 10.72 x 109 Btu/hr. There are six modes of plant operation; normal full-power operation, startup, hot shutdown, stable shutdown, cold shutdown and refueling. These can be generally grouped into two predominant modes, normal full power operation and shutdown operation. During normal full power operation, the NPHS, or a combination of the NPHS and the AHS, handle the heat dissipation to the atmosphere. Under normal full power operation, the heat load is rejected either entirely by the NPHS or by both the NPHS and the AHS. The AHS is capable of exchanging 2.98 x 108 Btu/hr. During shutdown operations, approximately 4 percent of plant operation annually, the AHS handles heat dissipation to the atmosphere. 3-26 Revision 2 February 2011

3.4.2 Component Description 3.4.2.1 Intake System Fermi3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report The lake water intake and makeup water system is composed of two main parts: a wet pit pump house structure containing five vertical wet pit pumps, trash racks and traveling screens, and piping routed from the pump house structure to the cooling tower basin and the plant The SWS draws lake water via an intake bay (Figure 3.4-1 and Figure 3.4-2) from Lake Erie. This inlet bay is formed by two rock groins that extend 600 ft into Lake Erie. The intake bay is periodically dredged to maintain appropriate operating conditions. At the inlet to the pump house structure a trash rack is positioned which is equipped with a trash rake. Trash collected from the trash racks is disposed of. There are three dual flow traveling screens arranged side by side to further prevent debris from entering the pump house. Aquatic organisms are first washed from the traveling screens using low pressure water spray. The remaining trash is then removed using high pressure wash sprays. strainers are in place at the pump discharge and strainer backwash is directed back to Lake Erie. Strainer backwash is controlled to ensure that the limits of the applicable NP DES permit are adhered to. The SWS pumps take suction from an intake bay through the makeup water pump house. The three PCTMS pumps supply makeup water to the cooling tower basins. Each pump has capacity to supply 50 percent of the total flow requirements. Two pumps are normally operated and the third is reserved for standby operation. This ensures makeup flow can be delivered in the event that one pump is out of service. The two operating pumps are capable of delivering the maximum cooling tower makeup water requirement of approximately 34,000 gpm, (Figure 3.3-1). The two PWSS pumps supply makeup water to the FPS under normal power operating conditions. They are 100 percent capacity pumps capable of supplying the necessary makeup wat~r to the AHS and FPS in shutdown conditions. The velocity of the water flowing through the dual flow intake traveling screens is approximately 0.5 fps at record low lake water levels, and no more than 0.5 fps under all operating conditions, as required by Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act. The mesh size on each traveling screen is %-inch. Each screen is capable of handling approximately 20,000 gpm of flow. The flow is designed to be sufficiently low that fish are not caught or trapped against the traveling screens. Fish which have entered the intake bay to this point are free to return to the lake in the same way they came. The pump house intake structure is sized such that the formation of vortices or other abnormal flow conditions that would interfere with the operation of the pumps is minimized. If fouling occurs, the screens are cleaned by backwashing. The formation of frazil ice on the screens is prevented by the low intake flow rate and by recirculating warmed water that has been rerouted from the discharge. A profile view of the intake screens and pumps suction is shown on Figure 3.4-2. This system is designed such that the intake structure has a minimal impact on the wildlife present in Lake Erie. This is consistent with good engineering design and environmental practices. 3-27 f Revision 2 February 2011

Ferml3 Combined License Application Part 3: Environmental Report The addition of a bloclde/algaecide, sodium hypochlorite, takes place as water enters the pump house structure. Once the water has passed through the trash rack and the traveling screens, a diffuser Injects the biocide into the flow before the flow proceeds into the pump suction. Further chemical treatments are discussed in Subsection 3.3.2. The elevation reference in use at Fermi is NAVD88. The elevation of the bottom of the intake bay at the entrance to the pump house is 559 ft. The record low level of Lake Erie water is 563'-1f" and the record high level Is 576'-6u. The elevation of the base of the bay at the location of the pump suction is 553 ft. This is more than 1 O ft below the record low water level for Lake Erie, thus pump suction should not be a concern. Impacts to SWS pump suction due to seiche events are discussed In Subsection 3.3.1. 3.4.2.2 Discharge System Dilution and dissipation of the discharge heat as well as other effluent constituents are affected by both the design of the discharge and the flow characteristics of the receiving water, in this case Lake Erie. Normal plant effluent flow from all sources (cooling tower blowdown, and optional treated liquid radwaste) is approximately 17,000 gpm. The NPHS cooling tower blowdown is the major contributor to the total flow, and its maximum return temperature is estimated at 86°F and the average temperature is 68°F. Table 3.4-1 contains the monthly discharge flow rates and the discharge temperatures (cold water temperature) to Lake Erie. Figure 3.4-4 and Figure 3.4-5 are used in the development of Table 3.4-1. The temperature rise across the main condenser is 31.2°F. The 4-ft diameter discharge pipe is located approximately 1300 ft into Lake Erie to avoid recirculation. Another consideration in the length of the discharge pipe was to preclude the discharge plume from intruding on environmentally sensitive onsite areas (such as wetlands) during wind-driven rises in Lake Erie water level (seiche events). The pipe is buried in the bank as it is routed into Lake Erie where the discharge is located, below the water surface, see Figure 5.3-1. The pipe discharges through a diffuser, as described in Subsection 5.3.2.1.1.1. The analysis of the thermal plume that results from the discharge is discussed in Subsection 5.3.2.1. The analysis includes consideration of seiche events. As discussed in Subsection 3.3.1 and Subsection 5.3.2.1, due to potential for the water supply to the SWS to be degraded during extreme seiche events, the unit could be operationally controlled to limit makeup water requirements. These seiche events are relatively short-lived. As part of the operational controls in response to an extreme seiche event, the discharge could be reduced and or secured. For a total discharge flow rate of approximately 17,000 gpm, the exit jet velocity is approximately 8.5 fps. The submerged jet mixes rapidly with the ambient lake water, accompanied by a reduction of momentum and kinetic energy through turbulent action. The environmental impact of discharged heat on Lake Erie is discussed in Subsection 5.3.2. The use of cooling towers for Fermi 3 provides good engineering design and represents the best technology available under Phase I of Section 316(a) of the Clean Water Act and also acts to greatly reduce the thermal loading to Lake Erie. Discharges from the AHS are directed to the CIRC basin. As shown In Figure 3.3-1, the discharge from the AHS is small in comparison to the NPHS discharge (less than 5 percent). When the 3-28 Revision 2 February 2011

Fermi3 Combined License Applicatlon Part 3: Environmental Report PSWS is operating without the CIRC operating, discharges from the AHS are controlled to ensure that the resultant thermal plume is bounded by the thermal plume from operating the NPHS. 3.4.2.3 Heat Dissipation System The main source of heat dissipation is the NPHS. The NPHS is a natural draft cooling tower, as shown on Figure 3.4-3. The AHS consists of two mechanical draft cooling towers. The AHS is further discussed in FSAR Subsection 9.2.1. Makeup flow to the NPHS cooling tower basin is supplied by the SWS through the intake structure located on Lake Erie. The NPHS is located approximately 2200 ft from the pump house intake structure. At the cooling tower basin, there are four CIRC pumps, each 25 percent capacity, which supply a total flow of 744,000 gpm. The flow is directed to the main condenser, and is then directed back to the cooling towers so that the heat can be rejected to the atmosphere. The cooling tower basin is located approximately 1100 ft from the main condenser. The NPHS cooling tower discharges water to the basin, which receives makeup from Lake Erie. Intake water temperatures from Lake Erie can be seen in Subsection 2.3.1, and meteorological data can be found in Section 2.7. Cooling tower performance curves for wet bulb temperature and evaporation, as well as wet bulb and cold water temperature are seen on Figure 3.4-4 and Figure 3.4-5. The information in Table 3.4-1 is developed using these cooling tower performance curves. The design of the heat dissipation system does not present any major departures from acceptable cooling system design practices, nor does it contain any additional components for consideration, beyond the NPHS in the form of a natural draft cooling tower. This system is consistent with good engineering practices. The PSWS and AHS are discussed in FSAR Section 9.2 and FSAR Table 9.2-201. 3.4.3 References 3.4-1 Edison Electric Institute, "Electric Power Plant Environmental Noise Guide," New York, 1978. 3.4-2 GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy, "ESBWR Design Control Document-Tier 2," Revision 6, August 2009. 3-29 Revision 2 February 2011

Table 3.4-1 Monthly Coollng Tower Temperatures and Flows Wet Bulb Cold Water Evaporation Drift Slowdown Makeup Month Temparatul'8 fF) Tampamul'8 ("F)

• Flow rate (gpm) Flow rate (gpm)

Flow rate (gprn) Flow rate (gpm) January 23.7 53.8 11875 72 11867 8 23750 February 25.7 55 3 12200 72 12192.8 24400 March 32.3 59.4 13100 72 13092.8 26200 April 42.6 66 14300 7.2 14292.8 28600 May 52.7 72.7 15400 72 15392.8 30800 JUJle 61.7 78.4 16300 72 16292.8 32600 July 65.9 81 5 16750 72 16742.8 33500 August 65 80.8 16700 72 16692.8 33400 September 58.1 76 3 16100 72 16092.8 32200 October 47 68 8 14800 72 14792.8 29600 November 37 5 62.7 13750 72 13742 8 27500 December 28 56.6 12500 72 12492.8 25000 Cold water temperab.Jres are calculated based on ambient wet bulb temperatures. however the temperab.Jre of the dlscharge from the NPHS cooling tower basin will be maintained at 55"F or above. Ferml3 Combined License Application 3-30 R8Vlslon 2 February 2011

Figure 3.4-1 Station Water Intake Structure Fermi 3 Combined License Application l! 3-31 Revision 2 February 2011

Figure 3.4-2 staUon Water Intake Structure - Elevation View Fermi 3 3-32 Combined l.Jcense AppUcatlon Revision 2 February 2011

Figure 3.4-3 NPHS Cooling Tower ELEVATION OF TOWER@ Fermi 3 Combined License Application E3 INSIOCBASECTSltfi.l. .... = .=====TCPCTll!JICIICNI TOTOPOfCUIIII 3-33 Preliminary Drawing 0 0 NUCLEAR FACILITY S.E. MICHIGAN POWER PLANT Revision 2 February 2011

Figure 3.4-4 Cooling Tower Perfonnance Curve Performance CUMI for ,_v l" ,_v l,Y v vv L,,v ,.,v L,,v

g _,

vi/ vv I,(.,, 8 ~ ,.,v L, I/ 1/L., 1..-v 1..- ,.,v ,,vv 1/L,, 1/L., 1.,,8 ,., I/.,.. vv vv L,,L., LY 1/v I/ vv I ,,v ,,v v"' --i,,vj / vv v"' !,,/ ,,, v,, L,, LL,, L, L, 1..- '** I,, t-:L.~ 60 62 64 66 6B 70 72 ~Bub("F) Femu3 Combbled License Application ,,v I/.,.. L,,1,., vv 1,1,, L.,.., L,,v (,/L., vv 1..- L,,L., vv l'sL., L,, 1,,v 1..-L., 74 76 3-34 vv 1/1/ vv V I, ,,v V vv I, 1.,,"' vv L.,L,, ,.,v 7B BO SPX Cooling TDW!II" Co. TRACS Version 04-AlJG-06 Natural Draft Coun!ar1low Cooing Tower Model 8600 292-6.0-45< Design CondJllons: Flow Rate nooOOOPM Hot water 114.BS"F Cold Water 86 OO"F Wet-Bulb 73.oo-F Rel Humidity 66% c~ Candrtloos: Range 2aBB"F Row Rate 720000GPM ( 100% Design Flow ) e X 100% RH BO%RH 60%RH 40%RH 20%RH Demgn Point Revision 2 February 2011

Figure 3.4-5 Coollng Tower Evaporation Curves Evaporation Cww for Case1 u V V V V y /,,."' V V ,/ / ,/ v.... v ,,.v v.... "°v vi,, V ,,"° V / v"' ,,.v / / LV ,_.,.v 1/v i,-Y I/ L., I/ Id'> L, I,., I/ I,., 1,,1,., SPX Cookng Tower Co. TRACS Vf3181on 11.02.04 Naual Draft Co!nerflow Cooling Tower Model 8600 292-6.1)-45,1 Deelgn Candlflona: Flow Rate 7200000PM Hot water 114.88"F Cold Warer 88.00"F Wut-Bulb 73.00"F Rel.HurM!Jly 66% CUMI Condltlooa: Range 28.BS"F Flow Rate 720000GPM V V v:r / _,,i-- 400 ( 100% l)es;Jl1 Flow) I/ /v 200 vv I/ I/ ', V/ 1/YV // VYV v/..-v

• ~i::;v

~~ ~ ~~ 10 20 Fermi 3 Combined License Application V V vv,,v 1/ V V 11,... / .,,v V V ll/ 'v V Vv vv I/ V V 30 40 50 Wet Bui, ("F) 60 70 80 e 0 *

• 0 X

100% RH 80%RH 60%RH 40%RH 20%RH De&lgnPoot Tine: 19".30:54 Date; 11-26-2007 Drawn By: JOO 3-35 R8Y1SIOO 2 February 2011

Flgure-3.4-6 Outfall Diffuser Arrangement LAKE BOTTOM __ !.~] ____________ j__~_ -- 16.4' FLOW DIRECTION Fermi3 3-36 Combined License Appllcation 16,.. Revuoon 2 February 2011}}