ML22004A363
| ML22004A363 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 01/01/2022 |
| From: | - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Administration |
| References | |
| 86FR62220 00034, NRC-2020-0277 | |
| Download: ML22004A363 (1) | |
Text
1/4/22, 3:31 PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/4539188e-cbc6-4e46-8552-8df9836adeb1 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/4539188e-cbc6-4e46-8552-8df9836adeb1 1/1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 1/4/22 3:31 PM Received: January 01, 2022 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. kxw-9pvk-tcil Comments Due: January 03, 2022 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0194 NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0230 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-24407 Submitter Information Name: Anonymous Anonymous
Email:popcomic@tampabay.rr.com General Comment
It seems that decision was made and then the report created to justify the already made decision. For example:
Environmental damage to the ecosystem in Lake Michigan related to intake of almost one billion gallons of Lake Michigan per day, and the discharge of over 900 million gallons of heated water (24 degree F above ambient lake temperature) daily from the reactors is not scientifically addressed in the draft EIS.
Alternatives Actions to be considered is completely inadequate for two
reasons: if the license at PBNP is not renewed, the alternatives considered do not include the use of wind power, either onshore or offshore, or energy conservation
climate change needs to be completely rewritten so that it is based on the most current data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Phyllis Clark, Stacey Imboden, Mary Neely Comment (34)
Publication Date:
11/9/2021 Citation: 86 FR 62220