ML22004A360

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (31) of Virginia Davis on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
ML22004A360
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/01/2022
From: Davis V
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Administration
References
86FR62220 00031, NRC-2020-0277
Download: ML22004A360 (1)


Text

1/4/22, 3:21 PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/16518133-7a8d-4145-8565-ef781697f74f blob:https://www.fdms.gov/16518133-7a8d-4145-8565-ef781697f74f 1/1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 1/4/22 3:19 PM Received: January 01, 2022 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. kxw-5yh1-pemj Comments Due: January 03, 2022 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0194 NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0227 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-24407 Submitter Information Name: Virginia Davis Address:

Woodinville, WA, 98072 Email:ginny1218@yahoo.com General Comment Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Point Beach Nuclear Reactors (PBNP) and the draft generic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

For the general public concerned with the potential license extension for the two reactors at PBNP, participation is difficult and has obstacles to adequate public participation:

1. Common sense and seemingly logical thinking and expression by the general public is most often met with such concerns being relegated to some other part of the regulatory bodys apparatus, at some other time, so that instead of having a meaningful discussion of the important issues at hand, like reactor vessel embrittlement and additional high level waste being created on the shore of Lake Michigan, public concerns are channeled into a regulatory process gap that obscures the public voice. Our concerns regarding embrittlement dangers, climate change, truly renewable alternative energy options, and the economic impact related to Power Purchase Agreements somehow are seemingly irrelevant, as their purview is someplace else than this licensing proceeding.
2. The technological level for public participation is sadly lacking. Instead of the ease and convenience of the many Zoom like communication programs available today, the agency charged with being fully up to date in an important regulatory capacity asks the general public to anticipate in an antiquated two step communications process, which requires both an internet computer connection and an active telephone line for the hours long proceedings.

SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Phyllis Clark, Stacey Imboden, Mary Neely Comment (31)

Publication Date:

11/9/2021 Citation: 86 FR 62220