ML22004A334
| ML22004A334 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 12/24/2021 |
| From: | Ratcliff P - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Administration |
| References | |
| 86FR62220 00007, NRC-2020-0277 | |
| Download: ML22004A334 (1) | |
Text
1/4/22, 11:07 AM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/d4a69b70-9c6c-42f6-90e8-474480669c1e blob:https://www.fdms.gov/d4a69b70-9c6c-42f6-90e8-474480669c1e 1/1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 1/4/22 11:07 AM Received: December 24, 2021 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. kxk-1n24-n50h Comments Due: January 03, 2022 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0194 NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0203 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-24407 Submitter Information Name: Philip Ratcliff Address:
- Salem, OR, 97302 Email:skazz999W@hotmail.com Phone:5039744858 General Comment I am opposed to the 80-year license sought by NextEra at Point Beach nuclear plant. The extreme license extension puts Lake Michigan, and points downstream drinking water supply for tens of millions at increasing risk, as from Unit 2s single worst embrittled reactor pressure vessel in the U.S. Old nuclear power plants should be retired and decommissioned, not given decades longer of operation. Do not extend the license of NextEra at Point Beach nuclear plant.
SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Phyllis Clark, Stacey Imboden, Mary Neely Comment (7)
Publication Date:
11/9/2021 Citation: 86 FR 62220