ML22004A332
| ML22004A332 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 12/23/2021 |
| From: | Yarbrough J - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Office of Administration |
| References | |
| 86FR62220 00006, NRC-2020-0277 | |
| Download: ML22004A332 (1) | |
Text
1/4/22, 11:00 AM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/48cd2e54-feb8-4e9e-abef-ab3ad8425127 blob:https://www.fdms.gov/48cd2e54-feb8-4e9e-abef-ab3ad8425127 1/1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 1/4/22 10:59 AM Received: December 23, 2021 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. kxj-lrvl-mtah Comments Due: January 03, 2022 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2020-0277 Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2020-0277-0194 NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC; Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2020-0277-DRAFT-0202 Comment on FR Doc # 2021-24407 Submitter Information Name: Jim Yarbrough Address:
CA, Email:jyarbro2003@yahoo.com General Comment Regarding NextEra Energy and Point Beach, WI, and the matter of an 80-year operating license for NextEra Energy, there must be intervention and a hearing in this matter. I advise, having done my own research, that NextEra Energy NOT be given an operating license, unless they agree to safely shut down the Point Beach facility. The cost of nuclear is too high compared to solar and wind energy, the waste generated is multi-generational and very hazardous with no known, safe way to deal with it, and the risk of continued operation of that plant to Lake Michigan water quality and the safety of the people of the region represents a clear and present danger.
SUNI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 ADD: Phyllis Clark, Stacey Imboden, Mary Neely Comment (6)
Publication Date:
11/9/2021 Citation: 86 FR 62220