Text

CP-2021-08-Public Forms
	ML21299A045
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	09/23/2021
From:	Heather Gepford; Operations Branch IV
To:	; Luminant Generation Co
References
	Download: ML21299A045 (30)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER

Chief: John Kirkland Facility: CP 8/19/2021Date of Written Exam:

U/I: Start of Op Test: 8/9/2021 9/23/2021End of Op Test:

Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility Due Date Description Date Complete Initials Notes

12/7/2020 11/19/2020Examination administration date confirmed For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made r for the facility to submit reference materials

1/11/2021 11/19/2020NRC examiners and facility contact assignedr

1/11/2021 11/19/2020Facility contact briefed on security and other requirementsr

1/11/2021 3/2/2021Reference material due for NRC prepared exams ES-201 Att-3r

1/11/2021 12/11/2020Corporate Notification Letter sent ES-201 Att-4 produced by CEr

1/25/2021 11/19/2020NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact ES-401-1/2 and ES-401-3r

3/8/2021 3/2/2021Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due ES-201-2, 201-3, 301-1, 301-2, 301-5, D-1r 3/22/2021 3/16/2021Operating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided ES-201-2 signed by CE & BC to facility licensee r 5/24/2021 5/26/2021Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and Exams prepared by the NRC are approved by BC reference materials due. r and forwarded for facility licensee review 5/31/2021 6/7/2021Peer review of written exam complete Document review on ES-401-9r

6/21/2021 6/10/2021Written exam and operating test reviews completedr Document review on ES-401-9

7/5/2021 6/14/2021Feedback approved by Branch Chiefr 7/5/2021 7/8/2021Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility licensee r 7/12/2021 7/12/2021Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396r

7/5/2021 7/5/2021On-site validation & 10% audit of license applicationsr

7/19/2021 7/12/2021Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed r

7/26/2021 7/21/2021Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due ES-201-4 prepared by LAr

8/2/2021 8/4/2021Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chiefr

8/2/2021 N/A N/ARequest facility licensee management feedback on the exam 8/2/2021 8/5/2021Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter waiver/excusal letters sent r (ES-201 Att-5) 8/2/2021 7/7/2021Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee r

8/2/2021 8/3/2021Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examinersr

8/9/2021 8/9/2021Administer Operating Testr

9/30/2021 8/20/2021Examiner's document op test results on ES 303'sr

10/13/2021 8/30/2021Post exam comments and graded exams received ES-403-1 to BCr 10/21/2021 8/30/2021Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC r grading completed 10/21/2021 8/30/2021Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated r 10/28/2021 9/7/2021Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam Signed ES 303's to BC grading completed r

11/4/2021 9/9/2021Branch Chief review of exam results completedr

11/11/2021 9/9/2021Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decisionr

11/11/2021 10/1/2021License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of resultsr

11/11/2021 9/29/2021RPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21r

12/2/2021 N/A N/AFinal Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review)21 days after proposed denial letters mailed.

12/9/2021 10/19/2021Examination Report Issuedr produced by CE

Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 11, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1

Rev. 9 password es1021 Kojak ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2

Facility: CPNPP Date of Examination: 08/09/2021

Item Task Description Initials a b* c**

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. J(. I1/4..µ.,

w b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with ~ ~ R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled. 'fl-'- I T C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. ~t- <<.pt-T E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. j~ 15{, "f/L N

2. a. Using Form ES-301 -5, verify normal evolutions, instrument that and component failuresthe proposed scenario sets, technical cover the specifications, required and major ~ number of J! /5(_

s transients. I whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M b. Assess in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule Jg..5 u mix of applicants, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at ~ 1.. L withoutcompromising exam integrityone new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the A least audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. T applicants' 0 C. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D and in j(l !:/4 fP Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including overlap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed J~ w among the safety functions as specified on the form. ()[ 'fJt A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form. L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s). K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form. T (5) The number of alternate-path, low -power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form. R. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1: fJ. 0 b are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. Jl ~ u (1) The tasks least one task is new or significantly modified. G (2) At repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations. H (3) No more than.one task is c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of Jf. of-f? applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual Yl ~,( 'P plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G J(L 6{ "#-whether the 1 O CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. E b. Assess N Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.,e_ rt-.µ E C. R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. je 61-1¥ A VL 5l r;Y£ L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). YL l;t vfr--

a. Author Jordan Rub v / 3/1/21 Prc2~~ Date

b. Fac ility Reviewer(*) Brian Edwards /,- '.., ) 't,5 3/1/21 c. NRC Chief Examiner (#),John 1.L,rk..la."'cr,{t.,{._.. M<'.!:.>.. _..-/ JZ0 Z2l

d. NRC Supervisor C,/* Gregory E. Werner / L -,_, {. '(.,{_/fl./U1.4A,

(/U V O'

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c" : the chief examiner's concurrence is required.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2

Facility: CPNPP 1 & 2 P-'fo~v? Date of Examinallon: 09/22/2021

Item Task Description Initials a b' c.. ,. a. Verify that the outllna(s) flt(s) the appropriate model In accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. tJ IA tJI~ "'/A w b. Assess whether the ouHlne was systematlcally and randomly prepared in accordance with fJ R Section D.1 of Es-401 or Es-401 N and v.tlether I au KIA categories are appropriately sampled. II\\ NIA "IA T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. NIA tJI/>.. "IA-T E d. Assess whether the Justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. NIA M(A tl/p. N

2. a. Using Form Es-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario se1s oover the required number of )i !JI nonnal evolutions, Instrument and component failures, technical speclflcatlons, and major ~

s lrensients. M b. I Assess llllhather there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of appllcants In accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule Yl,, L ¥.dthout compromising exam Integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at tf'- A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outllne(s) conforms with lhe qualltatlve and R quantitative criteria specified on Fonn ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and In JI.. ~ Seation 0.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,'" of E:5-301 0ncluding 'fl-overlap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form Es-301-2:

(1) The ouUlne(s) contains the required safety functions as specified number of control room and In-plant tasks on the form. ' distributed w among the from the last two NRC examinations Is wlttin the limits specified on the form. )I__ fl-A (2) Task repetition L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s). K (4) The m.rnber of new or modified tasks meals or exceeds the mlnlml.ll'ls specified on the form. T (5) The number of altemat81)81h, low-power, emergency, and radlologlcally controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the fonn. R Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Fonn ES-301-1: 0 b. A u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. Jf f)!- G (2) At least one task Is new or significantly modified. H (3) No more than one task Is repeated from ttie last two NRC licensing examinations. c. Determine whether there are enough different outBnes to test the projected number and mix of ~.I '{It-applicants and ensure that no Items are dupUcated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (Including probabilistic risk assessment and indMdual ~l

plant examination Insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. ~ #--

G whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.46 sampling is appropriate. llf ~~ ic,f.L E b. Assess N C. Ensure that KIA Importance ratings (except for plant-£peclfic priorities) are at least 2.5. \\(J ' '-I ~ e R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. \\IJ. 1 '! ~ A :JL ~ 1;p L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.,ljj

f. Assess whether the exam fits Iha appropriate Job level (RO or SRO). ~ ~ ;p?-,

a. Author ::>o 1'1 '/. /' -. ro1AA 12vl, Prino/ NtJ.,Slg - ~ r

fl ~, sfrti*

b. - "*rr;;:r FaclUty Reviewer (*) JJ.-w- <&~ /~

C. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Jo \\..-tt Jl1r "-{a k ~c{

a.4, - -./ '1 12

d. NRC Supervisor I I I...../

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examlnallon outlines.

# The independent NRC reviewer initials Items In column "c": the chief examiner's ooncurrence Is required.

Page 1 of 1 MAKE-UP CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-201-2 Examination O,utline Quality Checklist Rev. 0 ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6

Facility: CPNPP Date of Exam : 08/19/2021 Exam Level: RO SRO

Item Description Initial

a b

c*#

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicab le to the facility. J( 17-vJY-

(

2. a. NRG K/As a re referenced for all questions. bf,.

b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. Jt

C. Correct answer explanation and distractor analysis provided (ES-401, D.2.g) vµ-

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES - 401 Jl ?l pL

4 The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four RO or two SRO Jl questions were repeated from the last two NRG licensing exams, consult the NRR/NRO OL 6l,,PL program office).

5. Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate.

_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or _ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or :>l Qf-

t: examinations were developed independently, or ~

licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or _ other (explain).

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, Bank Modified New N/A N/A N/A at least 10% new, and the rest new or modified}; enter the 11/l actual RO/SRO-only question distribution(s) at right. 39/10 17/8 19/7 je_.µ-

7. Between 38 and 45 questions of the q u estions on the RO Memory C/A N/ A N/A N/A exam and at least 13 questions of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the :.>t IJ( comprehension/analysis level (see ES-401, D.2.c); enter 36/10 39/15 ~ the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of.

distractors.. \\q_ 9t,. -:flt-9. Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination {)t outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified. j {L #-,

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in Appendix B. J f.j:t__ ()f

. -~)}* The exam contains the requ ired number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is $__ (fi ~ correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

Date

9. Author :Tnrrkt~ 'l,h:7v;;; /::??) ~OZ(

f' ~ -*t=-- "7 '/_,f{_'2.o1.1 b. Facility Reviewer (*) 13r,t.i\\ EJv-1;rl s c. /4//rMJ NRC Ch ief Examiner (#) Jo~"' \\(,rk \\a.,,J )~ ~ { 7V ~_;;; 'if/2 /21

£~,,r~I (/ JU,. I fl/ _ _ R/-!ljJiJ-L d. NRC Regional Supervisor,,,,.,,, - - I II /1

Note:. The facility reviewer's initials or signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations.

# Independent NRG reviewer initials items in Column "c "; chief examiner concurrence is required,

CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-401-6 Written Exam Quality Checklist Rev. 1 ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3

Facility : CPNPP Date of Examination: 8/09/2021 Operatin Test Number: CP-2021-08

1. General Criteria Initials a b*

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sam lin r uirements (e.., 10 CFR.55.45, o erational im ortance, safet function distribution.

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination. c.

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce table limits.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent VJ /;L ah.I/

a licants at the desi nated license level. J(._ "/liv

2. Walk-Through Criteria a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of ste s, if a licable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a co is attached.

Date

a. Author 0 7 /-z..t / z. oz I

b. Facility Reviewer (*) "1 /i.t, /,,_.o'l-/

C. NRC Chief Examiner(#) JohY\\ rfa/21

d. NRC Supervisor 6e:rc ~jtJ/JdJ. J

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

# Inde pendent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

Page 1 of 1 CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-3 Operating Test Quality Checklist Rev. 1 ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist

d ev p

Facilitv: CPNPP 1 & 2 Date of Examination: 9/22/2021 Operating Test Number: CP-2021 08

1. General Criteria Initials a b" c#

a. The operating sam plini:i requirements test confomis with (e.a.* 10 CFR 55.45, o perational the previously approved outline; lm oo rtance, safetv changes are consistent funcHon dlsbibutlon). ~ " 'Mlh vJJ--

b. There Is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered Lit..~

during this examination.

c. The ope rating test shall not du plicate Items from the a oo llcants' audit test{ s). { see Section D.1.a. ) Jt.JI ~ "

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test Is within.YI.. " vfU--

acce otable limits.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent JL ' ip-a pplicants at the desio nated license level.

2. Walk-Throu gh Criteria - - --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as appllcable:

. initial conditions * . Initiating cues . references and tools, Including associated procedures . reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific ff . operationally designation if deemed to be time-aitical by the facility licensee :,_ {£- Important specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact aiteria and nomenclature
- system response and other exam Iner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- Identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, If a pplicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative vvalk-through "

ou11ines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance.YI. ~ criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those fomis and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria - - -

The assoclated simulator operating tesls (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Fann ES- )A 4( p-- 301-4 and a co py is attached.

Date

a. Author 9 {rs/zoz.1

~ K~ -0>-ze.z.1

b. Facility Reviewer e) 3~~ 1

c. NRCChlof... mlao,(#) Joh~ ll,rlb... J ~~ Cf/z,1/2 r

d. NRC Supervisor ~

The faclllty signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

# Independent NRC reviewer initial items In Column 'c"; chief examiner concurrenoe rea uired.

Page 1 of 1 MAKE-UP CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-3 Operating Test Quality Checklist Rev. 0 ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4

Facility: CPNPP Date of Exam: 8/09/2021 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 I 4 Operating Test No: CP-2021-08

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#-

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, YL 6<-

but it does not cue the operators into expected events.,pt-

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.,_JI__ I?.... "/Pl.

3. Each event description consists of the following:

the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated 6"
the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event :J_
the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew ~
the expected operator actions (by shift position)
the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. Jl (?~.p

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete _J_,$G.- ~

evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. {)£ Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. j_ ~ Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. J { ?'l. 1'L 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance l1 ~t deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fl/

fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. 9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. JfL l">t ~

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the ~(l ff. '%

form along with the simulator scenarios).

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable lJ( 1-;;1.. ~

rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified :l.

on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios)... (f- ~

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when J( ~ t,:,

possible. A

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. Je ~.,,µ,

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 / 2 / 4 / 3 V!._ ~ i,p

2. Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I 3 / 4 / 4 ::ll l;r--I~

3. Major transients (1-2) 1 / 1 / 2 / 2 1, IO 54- ~

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1/2/2/1 ~\\ l 5'-' I-#'

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (:!: 1 per scenario 0/0/1/1 J( I%- tJ!-

set)

6. Preidentified critical tasks (~ 2) 2 I 2 I 2 I 3 Jt t£- l'f)l-

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

Page 1 of 1 CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-4 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Rev. 2 ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4

Facility: CPNPP 1 & 2 Date of Exam: 9/22/2021 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 Operating Test No: CP-2021-08 M2~vp QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES lnlHals a b* o#

1. The lnlUal 00ndltions are realistic In that some equipment and/or Instrumentation may be out of service, k\\

but It does not we the operators Into expected events. t a IA:

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. _\\tl ti, ~

3. Each event description consists of the following:

the point In the scenario when It Is to be initiated Jf. j '11'
the malfuncUon(s) or conditions that are entered to Initiate the event
the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
the expected operator actions (by shift position)
the event termination point (If applicable)

4. The events are valld v.4lh regard to physics and thennodynamics. jf 6' w:£

5. Sequencing and timing of events Is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete Jl ~ ~

evaluation results commensmate with the scenario objectives.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so Indicates. tJ}A Operators have suffldent time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. NIA ltA Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling Is not altered. Jl "',,r,L

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 66.46(d}, any open simulator performance M deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional :i fL-fidelity ls maintained v.tllle running the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or slgnlflcanUy modified In accordance with Section D.6 of ES-301. \\(/ ~ L/rL

10. All form along with Individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified the simulator scenarios). using Form ES-301-6 (submit the..le " 1f/

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated In each of the applicable J<<. ( r,/tL raUng factors. {Competency Rati~ factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303--3.)

12. Each applicant wlll be significanHy Involved In the minimum number of transients and events specified J/l.. 4 v/1-on Form ES-301-5 {submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a simllar n1111ber of preldentlfied critical tasks across scenarios, when.JI.. ~ lfL-possible.

14. The level of difficulty Is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each aew position. Jtl.,,.,,. -#--

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes - - -

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2 _VJ ~, i&-,,,lltf.

2. Abnormal events (2-4) 5 / 3 / 4,J t fl

3. Major transients ( 1-2) 2 I 1 / 2 \\l ~ :p_

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2 \\e.. 1,, ~

5. Entry Into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (~ 1 per scenario set) 1 / O I 0 J[.N r/}L

6. Preidentlffed crittcal tasks (~ 2) /i/12 ' Ji ltll #-

The facility signature Is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. 3 J ~~ ~ ~ "L \\ ~ 7/,Wr-,

# Independent NRC reviewer lnlHa\\ Items In Column "c'; chief examiner conCU1T8nce required,,I/ U <<-t q.,0-2 1

Page 1 of 1 MAKE-UP CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-4 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Rev. 0 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist

Facility: CrN P? Date of Exam. 21 Exam Level: RO Item Description Initials

a b C 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading :,I- ;ttr ~

2. Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required tJ/A Nf;f rJ/A (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations) j{l /ft!.p-

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in J~

vjP!--

detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified rJ/1-\\ N/f,.J/,A

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of :.,( ;ti fil questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants

Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader q /7 ~ 0ZJ

b. Facility Reviewer(*) GJ/z/goz.1

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) <f /8/ 2 l

d. NRC Supervisor(*) ~ /

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required. ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

Facility: CPNPP 1 and 2 Date of Exam: 08/09/21 Operating Test No.: NRC

A E SCENARIOS P V P E CPNPP #1 CPNPP #2 CPNPP #3 CPNPP #4 L N (SPARE) T MINIMUM (*) I T CREW CREW CREW CREW O C POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T A T A N Y S A B S A B S A B S A B L T P R T O R T O R T O R T O R I U E O C P O C P O C P O C P RX 1 - 1 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 SRO-U1 I/C 4 4 8 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 3 2 2 1 TS 3 2 5 0 2 2 RX 1 - 1 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 SRO-U2 I/C 4 4 8 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 3 2 2 1 TS 3 2 5 0 2 2 RX 1 - 1 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 SRO-U3 I/C 4 6 10 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 3 2 2 1 TS 3 4 7 0 2 2 RX 1 - 1 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 SRO-I1 I/C 3 6 9 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 3 2 2 1 TS - 4 4 0 2 2 RX 1 - 1 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 SRO-I2 I/C 3 6 9 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 3 2 2 1 TS - 4 4 0 2 2 RX - - - 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 RO1 I/C 4 3 7 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 4 2 2 1 TS - - - 0 2 2

Page 1 of 3 CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-5 Transient and Event Checklist Rev. 2

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

Facility: CPNPP 1 and 2 Date of Exam: 08/09/21 Operating Test No.: NRC

A E SCENARIOS P V P E CPNPP #1 CPNPP #2 CPNPP #3 CPNPP #4 L N (SPARE) T MINIMUM (*) I T CREW CREW CREW CREW O C POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION T A T A N Y S A B S A B S A B S A B L T P R T O R T O R T O R T O R I U E O C P O C P O C P O C P RX - - - - 1 1 0 NOR - - - - 1 1 1 RO2 I/C 2 5 4 11 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 2 5 2 2 1 TS - - - - 0 2 2 RX - - - - 1 1 0 NOR - - - - 1 1 1 RO3 I/C 2 4 3 9 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 2 5 2 2 1 TS - - - - 0 2 2 RX - - - 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 RO4 I/C 5 4 9 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 4 2 2 1 TS - - - 0 2 2 RX 1 - 1 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 RO5 I/C 3 5 8 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 3 2 2 1 TS - - - 0 2 2 RX - - - 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 RO6 I/C 2 4 6 4 4 2 MAJ 1 2 3 2 2 1 TS - - - 0 2 2

Page 2 of 3 CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-5 Transient and Event Checklist Rev. 2

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

Page 3 of 3 CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-5 Transient and Event Checklist Rev. 2

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

Facility: CPNPP 1 and 2 Date of Exam: 09/22/ 21 Operating Test No.: NRC A E SCENARIOS P V P E CPNPP #1 CPNPP #2 CPNPP #3 L N (SPARE) T MINIMUM (*) I T CREW CREW CREW O C POSITION POSITION POSITION T A T A N Y S A B S A B S A B L T P R T O R T O R T O R I U E O C P O C P O C P RX - 1 1 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 SRO-U1 I/C 6 4 10 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 4 2 2 1 TS 3 3 6 0 2 2 RX - 1 1 1 1 0 NOR - - - 1 1 1 RO1 I/C 4 2 6 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 4 2 2 1 TS - - - 0 2 2

Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D -1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at -the -controls (ATC) and balance -of -plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for -1 basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the m inimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right -hand columns.

Page 1 of 1 MAKE-UP CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-5 Transient and Event Checklist Rev. 0 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

Facility: Date of Examination: 08/09/21 Operating Test No: CP-2021-08 CPNPP Applicants

SRO-U1 SRO-U2 SRO-U3

Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diag-2,3,4,5 1,2, 2,3,4,5 1,2, 2,3,4,5 1,2,3,4 nose Events,6 3,4,,6 3,4,,6,5,6,7, and Conditions 5,8 5,8 8

Comply With 1,2,3,4 1,2, 1,2,3,4 1,2, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 and Use,5,6 3,4,,5,6 3,4,,5,6,5,6,7, Procedures (1) 5,8 5,8 8

Operate Control Boards - - - - - - (2) Communicate 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 and,5,6,7 4,5,6,,5,6,7 4,5,6,,5,6,7,5,6,7, Interact 7,8 7,8 8,9

Demonstrate 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 Supervisory,5,6,7 4,5,6,,5,6,7 4,5,6,,5,6,7,5,6,7, Ability (3) 7,8 7,8 8,9

Comply With and Use Tech. 2,4,5 1,3 2,4,5 1,3 2,4,5 1,2,3,4 Specs. (3)

Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs.

Page 1 of 4 CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist Rev. 2 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

Facility: Date of Examination: 08/09/21 Operating Test No: CP-2021-08 CPNPP Applicants

SRO-I1 SRO-I2 RO1

Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diag-1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,4,5 2,3,5,6 nose Events 3,4,5,6,5,6,7, 3,4,5,6,5,6,7,,7,8,8 and Conditions 8 8

Comply With 1,3,4,5 1,2,3,4 1,3,4,5 1,2,3,4 1,2,4,5 2,3,5,6 and Use,6,5,6,7,,6,5,6,7,,7,8,8 Procedures (1) 8 8

Operate 1,3,4,5 1,3,4,5 1,2,4,5 2,3,5,6 Control Boards,6 -,6 -,7,8,8 (2) Communicate 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 and,5,6,7,5,6,7,,5,6,7,5,6,7,,5,6,7,,5,6,7, Interact 8,9 8,9 8,9 8

Demonstrate 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 Supervisory -,5,6,7, -,5,6,7, - - Ability (3) 8,9 8,9

Comply With and Use Tech. - 1,2,3,4 - 1,2,3,4 - - Specs. (3)

Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs.

Page 2 of 4 CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist Rev. 2 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

Facility: Date of Examination: 08/09/21 Operating Test No: CP-2021-08 CPNPP Applicants

RO2 RO3 RO4

Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diag-1,2,3,5 1,3,4,5 1,2,4,52,3,5,6 1,2,3,51,3,4,5 nose Events 2,6,7,6,8,9,7,8 2,6,7,7,8,8,6,8,9,7,8 and Conditions Comply With 1,2,3,5 1,3,4,5 1,2,4,52,3,5,6 1,2,3,51,3,4,5 and Use 2,6,7,6,8,9,7,8 2,6,7,7,8,8,6,8,9,7,8 Procedures (1) Operate 1,2,3,5 1,3,4,5 1,2,4,52,3,5,6 1,2,3,51,3,4,5 Control Boards 2,6,7,6,8,9,7,8 2,6,7,7,8,8,6,8,9,7,8 (2) Communicate 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3,41,2,3,4 1,2,3,41,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4 and,5,6,7 4,5,6,,5,6,7,,5,6,7,5,6,7,,5,6,7, 4,5,6,,5,6,7, Interact 7,8,9 8 8,9 8 7,8,9 8

Demonstrate Supervisory - - - - - - - - Ability (3) Comply With and Use Tech. - - - - - - - - Specs. (3)

Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs.

Page 3 of 4 CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist Rev. 2 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

Facility: Date of Examination: 08/09/21 Operating Test No: CP-2021-08 CPNPP Applicants

RO5 RO6

Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diag-1,2,3,5 1,2,4,5 nose Events 3,4,5,6,6,8,9 2,6,7,7,8 and Conditions Comply With 1,3,4,5 1,2,3,5 1,2,4,5 and Use,6,6,8,9 2,6,7,7,8 Procedures (1) Operate 1,3,4,5 1,2,3,5 1,2,4,5 Control Boards,6,6,8,9 2,6,7,7,8 (2) Communicate 1,2,3,4 1,2,3, 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 and,5,6,7 4,5,6,,5,6,7,5,6,7, Interact 7,8,9 8,9

Demonstrate Supervisory - - - - Ability (3) Comply With and Use Tech. - - - - Specs. (3)

Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs.

Page 4 of 4 CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist Rev. 2 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

Facility: Date of Examination: 09/22/ 21 Operating Test No: CP-2021- 08 CPNPP Applicants

SRO-U1 RO1

Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO

1 2 3 1 2 3 Interpret/Diag-1,2,3,4, 2,3,4,5, 2,4,5,6, nose Events 5,6,7,8 6,7 7,8 3,4,6,7 and Conditions Comply With 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4, 2,4,5,6, 1,3,4,6, and Use 5,6,7,8 5,6,7 7,8 7 Procedures (1) Operate 1,3,4,6, Control Boards - - 2,4,5,6,7,8 7 (2) Communicate 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4, and 5,6,7,8 5,6,7 5,6,7,8 5,6,7 Interact Demonstrate 1,2,3,4, 1,2,3,4, Supervisory 5,6,7,8 5,6,7 - - Ability (3) Comply With and Use Tech. 1,2,4 3,4,5 - - Specs. (3)

Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs.

Page 1 of 1 MAKE-UP CPNPP 2021 NRC ES-301-6 Competencies Checklist Rev. 0 IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule

From 08/01/2020 to 09/30/2021

Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational

Region: 4

# Candidates Exam Site / Docket # / Insp Rpt # RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned Week 08/08/2021 Comanche Peak / 05000445, 05000446 / 5 0 2  FB-OR-NFF Kirkland, John Doyle,Matthew 2021301 INITIAL Kirkland,John CAC #: 000500 LICENSE Osterholtz,Clyde EXAM Steely,Chris ADMINIS TRATION (EXAD) 09/19/2021 Comanche Peak / 05000445, 05000446 /  0   FB-OR-NFF Kirkland, John Bergeon,Bryan 2021301 INITIAL Hernandez,Nick CAC #: 000500 LICENSE EXAM ADMINIS TRATION (EXAD)