ML21090A172

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Slides: Cimarron Environmental Response Trust - Facility Decommissioning Plan, Rev. 2
ML21090A172
Person / Time
Site: 07000925
Issue date: 03/23/2021
From:
Cimarron Environmental Response Trust
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML21091A190 List:
References
Download: ML21090A172 (25)


Text

CIMARRON ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE TRUST Facility Decommissioning Plan - Rev 2 DP SECTION 2 - FACILITY DESCRIPTION DP SECTION 3 - RADIOLOGICAL STATUS OF FACILITY DP SECTION 5 - ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Note: Information provided herein consists of partial or incomplete images and information taken from multiple other data sources. It is provided for summary purposes only and should not be relied upon as technically complete or comprehensive.

March 23, 2021

DP Section 2 -

  • Current/Future Land Use
  • Geology & Seismology
  • Surface Water Hydrology
  • Hydrogeology
  • Natural Resources Facility Description 2

890.0 900.0 910.0 920.0 930.0 940.0 950.0 9B0.0 970.0 (AMSL)

Site Geology 4

Independence From DP Figure 2-6 Cotleyvllle Bartlesville

^nca Clly Chei*>><<;Ve-A t ap lhi>>

Obm l l Highway 33^

Fat Smith jAmarjlfo.

Highway.33^.'

O'iJ'M N<<

I Childress Wichita Falls Denison Faults and Earthquakes > M3 Pldnvfew Color IH wy Lubbock

Frequency of Earthquakes > M3 6

u E

in "5

m v

E

  • 1000 900

- 800

£ 700 Seismic Events > 3.0 within a 200-Mile Radius From DP Figure 2-7 0)a 600 500 J3 c

as 400 300 200 100 I

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021*

a Magnitude >5.0 1

3 Magnitude 4.0 to <5.0 2

3 1

3 17 32 18 6

8 4

2 1

Magnitude 3.0 to <4.0 20 39 59 33 101 610 915 635 293 177 67 45 3

  • 0313 through Februsry 9, 2021

Indian Springs

.Cimarroff River From DP Figure 2-8 Gar Creek

.CimarfoniRiverj East Pond West Pond Cox Creek Drainage Divide Crescent Springs Surface Features

890.0 900.0 910.0 920.0 930.0 940.0 950.0 960.0 970.0 (AMSL)

IUDST0NE "A 13 5/

TM -17 TMW-9 J2W13 02W46 SANDSTONE "B*

SANDSTONE *C' Site Hydrogeology T

100 T

300 I

700 I

900 1,000 (FEET)

NORTH A

TRANSITIONAL ZONE UPLANDS SOUTH A'

1314 APPROX. SOUTHERN EXTENT OF TRENCH__ --

/ _

.V K v

  • v. *, k. u1
  • SANDSTONE A ALLUVIUM From Figure 2-5 2006 Conceptual Site Model APPROX. NORTHERN EXTENT OF TRENCH FORMER BAfl fMW AREA TRENCH 02W48 890.0 900.0 910.0 920.0 930.0 9 4 1 0 950.0 960.0 970.0 (AMSL)

t -t -----------

joriS From DP Figure 2-12 BsgBnnn Burial Area #l Groundwater Model Domain and Potentiometric Surface

Western Area Groundwater Model Domain and Potentiometric Surface

Western Area Groundwater Model Domain and Potentiometric Surface

Distribution Coefficients for Uranium 12 2006 Column Test Results

  • Alluvial Sand - 0.5 mL/g
  • Silt - 2 mL/g
  • Clay - 3.4 mL/g Values Used
  • Transition Zone - 3.0 mL/g
  • Alluvium - 2 mL/g
  • Sandstone - 3.0 mL/g Note: Detailed information on the determination and selection of Kd values used in the DP can be found in 7/5/2016 letter (ML20204A867).

13 Natural Resources -

Water Wells and Oil & Gas Wells

DP Section 3 - Radiological Status of Facility 14 Structures

  • All former processing buildings - released.
  • CERT Office continues to be used.
  • Routine surveys demonstrate that ongoing decommissioning activities don't impact the CERT Office.

15

  • There are no operating systems remaining on site.
  • Release surveys are conducted on equipment that may become contaminated during use.
  • Field equipment (e.g., excavators, loaders) that contacts subsurface material is pressure washed and surveyed prior to release from the site.
  • Two plastic tanks and one concrete slab have been identified as contaminated and retained on site.

Systems & Equipment

Surface &

Subsurface Soil Final status surveys Confirmatory surveys Ongoing surveys Burial Area #4 Subsurface soil in UP1

Surface Water BA 3 Injection Trench

From DP Figure 3-4 From DP Figure 3-3

[SUBAREA C1 1 SUBAREA'D)

TMW-34^

iSUBAREA'G)

SUBAREAC]

Note: In Burial Area #1 201 ug/L = DCGL 02W21 02W23

[SUBAREA O 02W22

[SU BARE/VO;

!sy BAR EABl 0?A-33<

(SUBAREA'N mv-05

[SUBAREAS

[SUBAREA^

(SUBAREA Note: In Western Area, f 1319B-5

[SUBAREA\\

131?C-2 1319B-4 r-£ 13198-1 11319A-3[^11-P327S 119 ug/L = DCGL G2W51 02W50 02W52t ?}::

(SUBAREA1!]

4S From DP Figure 3-1

[*¥*101/

T-70R l1335Al 1319C-3 Note: State Criterion for Nitrate = 22.9 mg/l 1327B Nitrate in Groundwater

From DP Figure 3-2

[133 5A*

11376] 1319C-3 (i; Note: State Criterion for Fluoride = 4 mg/L 1319C-2 1319B-4 1319B-1

[1327B]

1319B-3 1319B-2 Fluoride in Groundwater

DP Section 5 - Environmental Information Already Addressed

  • Land Use
  • Geology & Soils
  • Water Resources Negligible Impact
  • Transportation
  • Air Quality
  • Noise
  • Socioeconomic
  • Ecological Resources Addressed in This Presentation
  • Historical & Cultural Resources
  • Visual & Scenic Resources
  • Public & Occupational Health

22 Historical & Cultural Resources From DP Figure 5-6 R-01 (a) & (b) - Pu Plant R Warehouse R CERT Office R Diesel Pump R Diesel Pump R Diesel Pump R Corral & Cart Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of the Cimarron Environmental Response Trust Property (ML20253A33)

Visual & Scenic Resources 23

Public & Occupational Health 24 Public Exposure No measurable exposure to members of the public during construction or operation.

Worker Exposure Highest exposure is at resin vessels. At 1 from the fully loaded resin vessel calculated exposure rate is < 30 piR/hr.

Potential exposure from extractions* injection, water treatment, and waste packaging and shipping activities combined will be < 100 mrem/yr.

25 QUESTIONS??