ML20248J835
| ML20248J835 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 03/28/1989 |
| From: | Calvo J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20248J839 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8904170107 | |
| Download: ML20248J835 (7) | |
Text
_
g[
\\
UNITED STATES 7,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\\...../
HOUSTON-LIGHTING.&-POWER COMPANY
_ CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF. SAN ANTONIO CENTRAL POWER.AND LIGHT.COMDANY CITY 0F AUSTIN TEXAS l
J DOCKETNO.50-43 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT, UNIT 1 AMEN 0 MENT T0 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 7 License No. NPF-76 j
1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
l A.
The application for amendment by Houston Lighting & Power j
Company * (HL&P) acting on behalf of itself and for the City PublicServiceBoardofSanAntonio(CPS),CentralPowerand Light Company (CPL), and City of Austin, Texas (C0A) (the j
licensees) dated March 8, 1988, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act),
and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The facility will operate in conformity with the application, as amended, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commissiun; C.
There is reasonable assurance:
(i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.
The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and
]
E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
- Houston LighTiiIg & Pcwer Company is authorized to act for the City Public Service Board of San Antonio, Central Power and Light Company and City of Austin, Texas and has exclusive responsibility and control over the physical construction, operation and maintenance of the facility.
-8904170107 890328 PDR ADOCK 05000498 P
2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifi-cations as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and i
Paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-76 is hereby amended to read as follows:
2.
Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications. contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 7., and the Environmental Protection Plan contained.in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated in the license.
The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.
3.
The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O. &
Jose A. Calvo, Director Project Directorate - IV I
Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: March 28, 1989 i
-_._.__...__._.__-__._________.-___.__-_____-__-______-.-_______-_x-
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT,,N0.
FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. NPF-76 DOCKET N0. 50-498 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with
]
the attached pages. The revised pages are identified by Amendment number and contain vertical lines indicating the areas of change. The corresponding overleaf pages are also provided to maintain document completeness.
)
i Remove Insert l
3/4 3-75 3/4 3-75 3/4 7-18 3/4 7-18 l
l l
l 1
u-
_-______.-----,-----_--_-------_--------___--.-a_-----a
INSTRUMENTATION CHEMICAL' DETECTION SYSTEMS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.7 Two independent Chemical Detection Systems shall be OPERABLE with their Alarm / Trip Setpoints adjusted to actuate at the following concentrations:
a.
Vinyl Acetate
< 10 ppm b.
Anhydrous Ammonia /
-< 25 ppm l
Ammonium Hydroxide l
APPLICABILITY:
All MODES.
ACTION:
With one Chemical Detection System inoperable, restore the inoperable a.
system to OPERABLE status within 7 days or within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> initiate and maintain operation of the Control Room Emergency Venti-lation System in the recirculation mode of operation.
b.
With both Chemical Detection Systems inoperable, within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> initi-ate and maintain operation of the Control Room Emergency Ventilation System in the recirculation mode of operation.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3.7 Each Chemical Detection System shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by per-formance of a CHANNEL CHECK at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, an ANALOG CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST at least once per 31 days and a CHANNEL CALIBRATION at least once per 18 months.
i SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 3/4 3-75 Unit 1 - Amendment No. 7
+-
f INSTRUMENTATION i
3.3.3.8 (This specification number is not used.)
1 1
I O
1 1
l 1
l 1
i 1
1 SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 3/4 3-76
\\
I
., PLANT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued 1 Ai. least once per 18' months or (1) after any structural maintenance c.
on the HEPA filter or charcoal adsorber housings, or (2) following painting, fire, or chemical release in any ventilation zone communi-cating with the system by:
1)
Verifying that the makeup and cleanup systems satisfy the in place penetration and bypass leakage testing acceptance criteria of less than 0.05% for HEPA filter banks and 0.10% for charcoal adsorber banks and uses the test procedure guidance in Regulatory Positions C.5.a. C.5.c and C.5.d of Regulatory.
Guide 1.52,' Revision 2, March 1978, and the system flow rate is 6000 cfm i 10% for the cleanup units and 1000 cfm i 10% for the j
makeup units; 2)
Verifying, within 31 days a,fter removal, that a laboratory analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in accor-dance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52,
)
Revision 2, March 1978, meets the laboratory testing criteria
'of Regulatory Position C.6.a of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revi-sion 2, March'1978, for a methyl iodide penetration of less' than 1.0% when tested at a temperature of 30*C and a relative.
humidity of 70%; and 3)
Verifying a system flow rate of 6000 cfm i 10% for the cleanup units and.1000 cfm i 10% for the makeup units during system operation when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1980.
d.
After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoal adsorber operation, by verifying,'
within 31 days after removal, that a laboratory analysis of a repre-sentative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, March 1978, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C 6.a of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, March 1978, for a methyl i
iodide penetration of less than 1.0% when tested at a temperature of 30'C and a relative humidity of 70%;
e.
At least once per 18 months by:
L 1)
Verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks is less than 6.1 inches Water Gauge for the makeup units and 6.0 inches Water Gauge for the cleanup units while operating the system at a flow rate of 6000 cfm
- 10% for the cleanup units and 1000 cfm i 10% for the sakeup units; 2)
Verifying that on a control room emergency ventilation test signal (High Radiation and/or Safety Injection test signal), the system automatically switches into a recirculation and makeup air filtration mode of operation with flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks of the cleanop and makeup units; SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 3/4 7-17
'[
PLANT SYSTEMS F
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued) 3)
Verifying that the system maintains the control room envelope at.
a positive pressure of greater than or. equal to 1/8 inch Water Gauge at less than or equal to a pressurization flow of 2000 cfm relative to adjacent areas during system operation; 4)
Verifying that the makeup filter unit heaters dissipate 4.5 i 0.45 kW when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1980; and 5)
Verifying that on a High Toxic Gas test signal, the' system-automatically switches into a recirculation mode of operation by isolating the normal supply and exhaust flow within 5 seconds.
.l.
f.
After each complete or partial replacement of a HEPA filter bank, by.
J verifying.that the HEPA filter bank satisfies the in place _ penetration 1
and bypass leakage testing acceptance criteria of less than 0.05% in.
{
accordance with ANSI N510-1980 for a D0P test aerosol while operating 1
the system'at a flow rate of 6000 cfm i 10% for the cleanup units and 1000 cfm i 10% for the makeup units;.and g.
After each complete or partial replacement of a charcoal adsorber
. bank, by verifying that the charcoal adsorber bank satisfies the-in place penetration and bypass leakage testing acceptance criteria
_{
of less than 0.10% in accordance with ANSI N510-1980 for a halogenated J
hydrocarbon refrigerant test gas while operating the system at a flow rate of 6000 cfm i 10% for the cleanup urnits and 1000 cfm i 10% for
)
the makeup units.
1 SOUTH TEXAS - UNITS 1 & 2 3/4 7-18 Unit 1 - Amendment No. 7 L
.