ML20248G788
| ML20248G788 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 10/02/1989 |
| From: | Gallo R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Hukill H GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8910110029 | |
| Download: ML20248G788 (16) | |
Text
_
u:
I L
OCT E21989 L
' Docket No. 50-289 GPU Nuclear Corporation ATTN: Mr. H. D. Hukill-Vice President and Director of TMI-1 P.
0.~ Box 480 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Maintenance Program Team Inspection This letter is to inform you that the NRC intends to perform a team inspection of.your Maintenance Program at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1.
Based on discussions between you and Mr. T. Martin of this office, we under-stand that significant corrective and preventive maintenance activities will.be
- performed prior to' rather than during the outage scheduled to begin in January
.1990.
For this' reason, some of our inspection activities will take place prior to your. outage. The exact dates of the inspection will be determined by your maintenance schedules.
The inspection will focus on the performance of maintenance and whether compo-nents, systems, and structures of yo* ur plant are adequately maintained and f
4 properly repaired so that they are available to perform their intended safety i
)'
function.
In order for us to properly prepare for the inspection, to schedule the actual inspection dates, and to maximize the time spent in observation of maintenance in progress, we request that you provide a schedule of planned maintenance between now and the start of your outage and also furnish us-the reference material listed in the enclosure to this letter. Please note that we need your pre-outage maintenance schedule as soon as possible in order to plan our inspection dates. The team leader will be contacting you shortly to obtain the-information that will be needed prior to the start of the inspection and to arrange a suitable date for a meeting to explain the inspection and assessment.
methodology.
In addition, please provide to us the name and phone number of the person who will be your principle contact for this inspection.
A copy of the NRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97, " Maintenance Inspection" is enclosed for your information and to aid in the preparation for the inspection.
8910110029 891002 FDR ADOCK 05000289 O
\\\\
\\9
i i
GPU Nuclear Corporation 2
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Walter Baunack.at (215) 337-5175 or l
Robert Gallo at (215) 337-5291.
Sincerely, 1
Original Signed Ez
}ifft&
1 i
/
obert M. Gallo, Chief i
Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosures:
1.
Request for Material 2.
NRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97 Maintenance Inspection cc w/ enclosures:
T. G. Broughton, Operations and Maintenance Director, TMI-1 C. W. Smyth, Manager, TMI-1 Licensing R. J. McGoey, Manager, PWR Licensing E. L. Blake, Jr., Esquire TMI-Alert (TMIA)
Susquehanna Valley Alliance (SVA)
Public Document Room (PDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
NRC Resident Inspector Commonwesith of Pennsylvania bec w/ enclosures:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
DRP Section Chief R. Hernan, PM, NRR K. Abraham, PA0 Wayne Hodges, DRS Robert Gallo, DRS Jacque Durr, DRS W. Baunack, DRS N. Blumberg. DRS E. Wenzinger, DRP C. Cowgill, DRP DRS Files (2) 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY BLUMBERG/TMI-1 MTI/9/22/89 -
0002.0.0 09/22/89 wm m_.____.__.
GPU Nuclear-Corporation 3
l l '-
l bec w/o enclosures:
A. Gody, NRR J. Chung, NRR J. Dyer, NRR Management Assistant, DRMA l
l
)
v)
V DRS:RI ORS RI DRS:R B
ck/dmg Blumberg Gallo 9j9 ve apy l
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY BLUMBERG/TMI-I MTI/9/22/89 -
0002.1.0 09/22/89 1
\\
ENCLOSURE To aid us in preparation for the maintenance inspection, please provide us with the following documents, procedures, and information in accordance with the designated numbers.
If you do not have the requested document or information, it is not necessary to generate it to comply with this request. We recognize that many of the documents requested separately may be inclusive in a larger single document. Please provide three sets of the requested documents. A member of our staff will contact you regarding the best method of transmitting the documents to us.
Secticn 1 - Description of General Plant Maintenance Activities 1-1 Maintenance administrative procedures which describe your corrective, preventive, and predictive maintenance activities.
1-2 Organization charts, including the maintenance organization and plant-wide organizations.
1-3 Procedures, charts and other documents which describe your Planning Department and its activities.
1-4 Documents which describe maintenance planning and scheduling meetings and status of maintenance reports.
1-5 Documents which describe the Maintenance and Operations interface during planning, scheduling, work start, work closeout and post-main-tenance/ functional testing.
1-6 Documents which describe your work control process: how a work order is started, planned, executed, completed, closed out, and equipment returned to service. Where contractors are used, how are they inte-grated into the process and controlled?
1-7 Documents which describe training and retraining of plant and I
contractor maintenance personnel, including radiation protection specific training.
(For maintenance activities only, do not include GET).
1-8 Documents which describe interfaces and communications among the technical support, engineering support, and the maintenance /I&C Departments.
1-9 Documents which describe maintenance work procedure establishment and control: Criteria as to when a procedure is to be used, initial write-up, reviews and approval, revisions, human factors reviews, QA reviews, requirements for conduct of work; troubleshooting criterfa, work closeout, post-maintenance testing, and restoration of systems, l
I 2
1-10 Description of methods by which maintenance performance is measured.
Are performance indicators used? What are they? Who is informed of l-the reports that are used to assess maintenance performance.
1-11 Description of process for communications with vendors for technical services and latest technical information on equipment and systems l
installed at the plant, and interfaces with equipment and NSSS vendors for training, modifications, and equipment replacement.
l l
1-12 Documents which describe the preventive maintenance and predictive L
maintenance programs.
Which equipment is included?
How is maintenance frequency determined?
What is done with results of these maintenance actions?
1-13 Documents which describe management involvement in maintenance.
Are there goals set for the maintenance and I&C Departments?
Are these goals used in the performance evaluation of managers and supervisors?
Are these goals communicated to first line supervisors?
1-14 Documents which describe the Industrial Safety Policy and its incorpo-ration into the maintenance program (safety manual, safety training, safety audits, accident reporting and investigations).
1-15 Documents which describe the interfaces between Maintenance and Health Physics in work planning, scheduling, and actual performance of maintenance activities.
1-16 Indexes of department procedures.
Section 2 - Status of Plant and Contractor Personnel Who Perform Maintenance 2-1 The number of craft personnel for electrical, mechanical, and I&C maintenance organizations.
Please include foremen and the foreman to craft ratio.
2-2 The average years of experience for each individual and the turnover rate.
2-3 Description of shift work and work assignments.
How do licensee supervisors decide on which craft or contractor is to perform what type of work?
I
F 3
'Section 3 - Status of Plant Equipment and Plant Maintenance 3-1 What equipment failures occurred during the la.st year of operations?
3-2 What equipment failures have been found during shutdown of plar.t.
since and including the last refueling outage?
3-3 Describe maintenance and testing for diesel generators and IE electri-I cal equipment.
3-4 What component. failures present greatest risk from a probabilistic risk standpoint to the plant, and how is this information utilized in establishing preventive and predictive maintenance?
3-5 What have been the areas of high maintenance activity on safety-related and non-safety-related equipment and components?
3-6 Provide the following status concerning Maintenance Work Orders (MW0s).
Current total listing and status of MW0s, number' in planning, number in final sign-off, number on hold for lack of parts, number on hold for engineering assistance, number available to be worked on.
Projected number of corrective MW0s to be outstanding at start-up by priority.
Rate of completion of corrective MW0s in terms of number completed per month ana manhours expended (by craft) per month for the past 12 months.
Current number of preventive maintenance work orders overdue.
Rate of completion of preventive MW0s for the past 12 months.
Estimated manhours required to complete current preventive mainten-ance MW0s.
Number MW0s requiring rework over the past six months.
3-7 Provide five corrective maintenance procedures for work that is scheduled for the upcoming outage (e.g., MOVs, PRVs, Solenoid Opera-ted Valves, Safety / Relief Valves, ECS Pumps, Batteries, Switchgear, etc.).
3-8 Provide five preventive maintenance procedures that are scheduled prior to your next scheduled outage.
3-9 Provide your overall maintenance schedule prior to the outage.
i g***"*<,
UNITED STATES
/'t s'k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j, i M,1 wAsamoton. o. c 2oss6
\\ ~ &ffl NRC INSPECTION MANUAL
\\
Otpo TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION 2515/97 t
s IMINTENANCE. INSPECTION 2515/97-01 PURPOSE This temporary instruction (TI) provides guidance for conducting a perfor-mance-based inspection of an established and implemented maintenance process
- at all operating nuclear power stations.
2515/97-02 OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this TI is to determine whether all components, systems, and structures of nuclear power plants are adequately maintained so that they are available to perform their intended functions.
Additionally, this TI should determine whether the maintenance process provides for the
)
prompt repair of plant components, systems, and structures, as appropriate to their prescribed functions.
2515/97-03 BACKGROUND RC has examined their nuclear power plant maintenance programs and has found
- a. wide variation in their effectiveness.
Inadequate maintenance has been a significant contributor to plant and system reliability. problems and, thus, is 'a safety concern.
Analysis of operational events has shown that nuclear power plant components are not being maintained at a level coseensurate with their importance to safety.
This TI was developed to inspect and assess 'the effectiveness of maintenance at selected nuclear power plant sites.
tree) will be used as guidance during theseA Maintenance Inspection Tree (logic inspections to collate and present inspection findings. *.The tree is intended to provide a systematic approach to the performance of the inspections and to ensure consistency.
2555/97-04 CONDUCTING TEAM INSPECTIONS The maintenance team inspections will be announced when the team leader prepares for the pre-inspection visit (Section 04.01) to the site.
The full-scope inspection cycle will generally be of a 6-week duration, with the team leader possibly taking an additional 2 weeks to initially coordinate the inspection, gather information, and issue the final inspection report.
s Issue Date:
11/03/88
The:
weeks I weet of in-office inspection,f team ef fort should generally consist of I weet 2 weeks of onsite inspection, and 2 weeks of.
documentation.
The sequence of the inspection effort will be determined by Y
the' regional office.
consecutive or separated by 1 week of in-office inspection.For example I
Generally, the inspection team will be composed of the following six members:
- 4
_one team leader (region) two reactor / project engineers (region) o one radiation specialist (region) two. engineers (HQ)
The team composition and/or the extent of effort for individual members may be adjusted by the region.
For example, the extent of involvement of the radiation specialist may be less than 6 fdll weeks, as determined by the regional office.
In addition, the regions may include involvement of the resident inspector (RI) to the extent that is normally covered by IP-62703 L
monthly examinat, ions The RI.should. be.provided tiaining in the use of 'the logi.c tree by,the appropriate team leader for this purpose.
The project manager (PM) will be generally involved with each ins' ection to the following extent:
p be available to the team leader to facilitate contacts with the licensee attend.I. to.2 days of the team preparation-attend. final pre-exit team meeting
)
attend.exi.t meetings
'^
The team will determine what recent failures of si'gnificant 7 equipment (probabilistic risk assessment (PRA)-identified, safety-related, or balance of plant (B0P) that affects safety-related and special interest items) have occurred and will inspect the licensee's maintenance act'ivitids to schedule, repa,ir, and prevent further failure of that equipment.
Other selective examinations of ' equipment failures attributed to maintenance will be examined to determine. the - adequacy of licensee corrective actions ~ an'd root-cause detenninations of.the failures. The inspection should be' performed following review of. the' elements of. the. Maintenance Inspection Tree (working. tree) and the additional. insp,ectipn.'
Guidance Voluines I and II (guidance provided in the Hafntenance Inspection separately distributed).
This guidance shotrid be used as an aid in determining adequacy 'and implementation of maintenance activities and.to evaluate them.
The tree is also used as'a tool to previd'
^
uniformity.in inspection structure and in the preliminary recording of the e
inspec. tion results.
It is important to stress that the tree does not drive the inspection, but it does represent. guidance on the areas of inspection.to be addressed, with inspection..results recorded on the tree to the extent completed.
The tree consists of three major sections:
(I) Overall Plant
{
Performance, (2) Hanagement Support of Maintenance, and (3) Maintenance 4
Implementation.
The inspection requirements for Maintenance implementation, which focus on the plant sys tem.;, components, test and surveillance data, and related activities, will receive the major portion (at least 80 percent, including direct observations of maintenance being performed) of the inspection effort.
1ssue Date:
31/03/88 2-2515/97
{
11 should be. recognized tht inspection results from the flaintenance
.loplementation area will also provide input to the fiar,agement Support area.
L
'11 is. expected that portions of the Management ' Support of Maintenance sections of the tree, especia lly the Panagenent Commitment and Management 0 organization sections, could be conducted by a single team mecter in a relatively short time.
The amount of inspection effort devoted to the individual subsections of the tree will be determined by the regional. office, taking into account inspection findings, time and staff limitations, and future inspec-recent tions planned to cover specific areas.
The inspection is to determine the effectiveness of the total integrated maintenance process of the power reactor licensees.
Therefore, the team inspection may be directed into areas for which explicit regulatory require.
ments may not exist.
Thus, the inspection is oriented toward analyzing the performance of maintenance activities rather than toward the identifi-cation of violativas.
A specific example of an area not subject to explicit requirements is the licensee's participation with the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPD).
Review of licensee resolution of IMP 0 activities shall be conducted in accordance with establi3hed policy and, thus, observa-tions in this area, when warranted, should be treated as 4ndicators of strengths or weaknesses.
Although the inspection may result in th'e identification of inadequacies that are not covered by explicit regulatory requirements, there is no intent to
- retchet" licensees.
Individual findings that licensees are not following
)
published NRC guides and industry guidelines do not necessarily indicate that a program or area is inadequate.
The goal of the inspe'etion effort is to.
emphasize the use of plant experience, test and surveillance data, recent component failures, PRA insights, and items of interest in evaluating the licensee's maintenance process in terms of capabilities and perfomance, and to identify major strengths and weaknesses as they are related to safety 3
significance.
i 04.01 Team Leader preparation.
A meeting should be planned and held with the licensee to describe the scope of the inspection and to obtain prelimin-ary review materials, such a' s the licensee's procedures for ' planning, conducting and essessing maintenance, as well as organizational charts, work schedules, equipment lists, component failure data, completed work orders, and reltted quality control (QC) inspection procedures.-
The material.
obtained by the team leader from the licensee s,hould be distributed to the team members for their review. Following. completion of the in-office review of the licensee's maintenance process, the' team leader will discuss the results of these reviews with. the team meebers and factor them into the plan for the onsite inspection.
04.02 Inspection Preparation.
In preparation for site inspections, the inspection team should review the elements of the Maintenance Inspection Tree to determine which areas may have received recent inspections, which areas may not be applicable, and which areas ' ill be reviewed at the plant site.
w The three major parts of mair.tenance (i.e.,
overall plant performance, management support of maintenance, and maintenance implementation) should be inspected to the degree required to provide a valid conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the licensee's maintenance program.
2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88
During the preparation phase, the team should select several compenents a_nd/or systems for detailed inspec' tion. either through consideration of PRA insights, recent component failures in safety-related or B0P systems that
(
-affect safety, or selected equipment of heightened interest
- sion, tc the Cormnis-such as check valves, moto'r-operathd valves, solenoid-operated valves, and air sy s tems.
The PRA insights 'may be dsed to select components or activities whose potential failures are predicted to contribute most to the i
risk at that plant.
At least one high-risk system should be included to verify that all performance-r, e, lated ' ma,intenance has been. accomplished, including preventive maintenance.
Recent, equipment failures provide a vehicle for review of 'varibus aspects,of maintenance, including root-cause a na lys i s, equipment h is tory, correcti.ve actioris, and past maintenance (preventive or corrective).
Inspectio.n of failed equipment repairs or work packages will provide' the '6%orttinity'to examine the. adequacy cf the inter-action of all licensee fun'ctions^s, supporting, maintenance, including engi-neering analyses and trending." ~.,,',
~
p.
g
,,J....
Review of performance' 16dicator", data, systematic assessment of licensee performance (SALP) reports', previous (LERs), ' maintenance, rad,'iit. ion jnspection findings, licensee event reports expo'sure ' history,.and other direct measures may identify potentfal weak areas. 'at that plant for bMch more detailed inspection' maf be 're' quired.. F..igure 1 (Inspection Flowchart) depicts the initiators that ma' 'be'selectef fo~ enter 1the tr.ee.
y Durine the preparation phase, prograrg ; strengths and.. weaknesses in certain areas may be recorded on the Maintenance lyspection there are sufficient data to, provide an.evaluptt.on.ra,Tre~e (wprking tree).
If ting.durin.g the prepara-tion, the elements 'should bb' rated' in.accordance with the. Maintenance
)
Inspection Guidance.
However, selsefe'd ' items ~ and,1.n.particular, identified weaknesses should. be verified 'duryg, th.e..'pnsite.inspetion, even if. an evaluation rat'ing is assigned during th.e,preNiration,.
04.03 Onsite Inspection.. A.n'entran~ceYneedng shall.Ee"EeId.with the' 1.licen-
^
see to detail the ' scope 'and schedule of the ir.spection, fr.troduce the team
- membtrs, and establish team 'should obtain from the lic$ensee's contacts,for the inspection.
the 1 The ensee the status of. ongoing work applicable to the inspection 'of that may affect the,performan'c'e ~of 'the inspection or the inspection sched' le'.
Schedu'1es' u3 blani 'for'. t u
be established 'd. ur'ing the. en. trance,me'etinf...w.' lie interimmeetingsibetieenthe'TeamMleader"anP eeimanagiient shool,d also
/. '.'.../ i 4
m Team members shall perform 4a detailid wa.1,kdowo inspdtion.of 'the p'lant. oni g.
the first or 'secorid ' day on'* sNts' t'o observe', t'hs ove.rall.~ plant. and, equipment material conditioit.
ThTs%ahdown ' ins' ection, in.w.hich the team.should p
observe the condition of 7 tium ~erous #'.vaQs,f pumps,,.. motors,.etc.,
should include, but not be l'iciited to the following:
Condition of components Significance of tagged equip'me'n't' Housekeeping and environment Adequacy of labeling Comparisons with drawings and/or pro.cedures Status of annunciators This walldown inspection may provide indications cf areas requiring further examination during the inspection.
k issue Ca:e:
ll/03/M
-c-2515/97
)
c
~
The onsite inspection should focus o r, the. direct observation of work in
- progress, including the following of licensee work with. equipment its progress (e.g.,
tageuts, procedures, work. packages, engineering support, materials, communications, testing, approvals, quality control holdpoints, etc.), significance of the maintenance backlog, rework, licensee assessment of the performance of maintenance, work control processes, control of inter-faces, post-traintenance testing, plant material condition, and maintenance facilities.
On the basis of the collected data, the team should determine the apparent cause of any problems noted; that is, if the cause is related to the adequacy l
i of. procedures, work packages, qualiff. cation of personnel, management, engineering, etc. This analysis should provide entry into specific elements 1
of the tree, which then becomes a. tool to explore the suspected causes and to assess effectiveness of the' implementation of applicable elements.
All areas listed need not be used in foming conclusions for each element.
Furthermore, other areas of inspection selected by the team may be used for entry to tree elements.
04.04 Analysis.
Using the inspection findings and results noted on the Maintenance Inspection Tree, the team should determine whether each of the areas inspected has been adequately implemented by the licensee and'whether-or not there is enough information to assign a rating.
The Maintenance Inspection Guidance and Criteria previously provided also assists use of the Maintenance Inspection Tree. The team will assign a rating to the applicable elements identified on the work sheets.
\\..)
The team should assign an overall evaluation ' rating to each of the elements inspected.
When this analysis has been completed, an overall rating can be determined in accordance with the Maintenance Inspection Guidance and Criteria.
04.05 Exit Meeting.
Before the final days of inspection, issues and hfindingsshouldbereducedtodefinitivewritingandthenusedtohighlight the presentation version of the Maintenance Inspection Tree (the Presentation Tree) and to complete the rating roll-up. The exit meeting should include a brief discussion of the preliminary inspection findings using the Presenta-tion Tree to depict inspection.results in a summary fashion; however, the licensee should be informed that the findings are preliminary until they are reviewed by regional management and the inspection report 'is issued.
04.06 Report Preparation.
Because of the broad extent of the inspection. -
documentation mf inspection activities should begin early in the process to minimize the time required to complete the final report.
The final report should document the assumptions used, the elements inspected, the elements that were not applicable, licensee strengths and weaknesses, and overall conclusions consistent with IMC-0610.
The report should address elements of the tree to at least the depth of the tier with eight areas (e.g., Direct Neasures, flanagement Comitment and Involvement, etc.).
~
04.07 Follow Up.
Any ~ unresolved findings identified during the inspection will be appropriately tracked and resolved by the regional office.
B15/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88 i
l 2515/97-05 lf:5PECT10n REQUIREllEtiTS The inspec t ior. shall include selective examinations of the aspects of main-tenance listed in Sections 05.01 through 05.03, including each of the areas and related elements of licensee activities identified under To the extent possible, selective examinations should be based on observation the sections.
of raaintenance and equipment work activities in progress, review of licensee implementation of maintenance procedures and controls, results of review of selected documents (such as work packages, equipment test results, at:d engi-neering evaluations), and interviews with personnel).
05.01 Overall Plant Performance Related to Maintenance a.
Direct Heasures.
The team' shall conduct appropriate examinations of plant operability, equipment availability, and plant material condition that can be directl tion of a maintenance process.y related to the effective implementa-Before conducting the inspection of plant performance, the inspector should review available plant information on (1) availability, (2) operability, and (3) reliability. Information on these items can be obtained from the plant's operating history.
Other sources for obtaining the information are SALP reports, Performance Indicator Data, AEOD-Scram Studies, ESF Actuation Studies, Safety System Unavailability Studies, Technical Specification Violations, Monthly Operating Repor.t : Data, and Capacity factors from NUREG-0020.
safety significantData collection should be directed to those measures related to aspects of the maintenance process.
In addition, the inspector should conduct a detailed walkdown inspection of the overall plant
)
material condition to assess the effectiveness.of the licensee's maintenan f-process to the extent that it is reflected in plant housekeeping and in the
(-
external condition of equipment.
The scope of the inspection should include examination of direct measures by using information gleaned from plant and equipment for the following:
(
- . Historical data
~
Haterial condition 05.02 Hanagement Support of Haintenanc~e Management connitment and involvement.
The examination of sianagement.
a.
ettectiveness concerning maintenance. should be directed to deter-cining the extent of corporate ;and ' plant management awareness and support of the maintenance and resolution of ir.aintenance problems and should include examination.of:
The application of industry initiatives
~
Extent of management direct participation in maintenance and in
~
corrective actions (management vigor and example) b.
Management Organization and Administration.
The inspection of management organization and administration controls should be directed to determining how the organization supports maintenance activities, what maintenance activity plan has been established, how the maintenance activity plan has been implemented, corrected, and controlled, and the control of resources.
The inspection should include examination ef:
Issue Cate:
II/03/EE 2515/97
Program coverage for maintenance Policy, goals, and objectives fcr maintenance Allocation of resources Definition of maintenance requirements Performance measurement Document Control System for maintenance Maintenance decision process c.
Technical Support.
The areas that are to be selectively examined for the technical support organizations with regard to maintenance are as follows:
Internal and/or corporate communication channels Engineering control Incorporation of PRA into the maintenance process Quality control Incorpor6 tion of radiological controls into maintenance process Safety Review Comittees Regulatory documents Examples of the applicable departments or organizations subject to this inspection are:
Engineering (nuclear,instrumentationandcontrol(It,C),
mechanical, electrical Quality Assurance (QA), licensing, systems, etc.)
)
Quality Control (QC)
Health Physics (HP)
Safety Fire Protection Operations g 05.03 Maintenance Implementation a.
Work Control.
The inspection of the wyk control process should be directed to work order documentation, equipment history, observation of testing in progress, planning and scheduling, and document review.
The inspection should include selective examination of:
Review of maintenance in progress Work order control Maintenance of equipment records and history Job planning Work prioritization -
Maintenance work scheduling Backlog controls Maintenance procedures Pcst-maintenance testing Review of completed work control documents b.
Plant Maintenance Organization.
The inspection of the plant mainte-nance organization should be directed to how the organization supports maintenance activities, how the maintenance activities are controlled, implemented, and corrected, how personnel are controlled.
how the organization establishes documentation, the effectiveness of.
2515/97 Issue Cate: 11/03/6B
= - - -
y
[
l
. the_ coordination and feedbact lines of communication between plant canagement anc craf t personnel, and the ' effectiveness of interfaces-("
with other ' departnent s, especia lly operations.
The inspection. should l
include selective examination of:
Control'of plant maintenance activities l
Control of contracted maintenance Deficiency identification, control, and corrective action system Maintenance trending Support interfaces l
c.
Maintenance facilities, Equipment, and Materials Control.
The fol-lowing are to be selectively examined for the area of facilities, equipment, and material. controls, as well as -for their support of the maintenance process:
Maintenance facilit'fes and equipment.
Material controls Maintenance tool and equipment control Control and calibration of measurement and test equipment d.
Personnel Control.
The following areas of personnel. control are to be selectively
- examined, including consideration of
- staffing, training, and qualification:
Staffing control Personnel training f"
Test and qualification process
(
Assessment of the current personnel control status 2515/S7-06 REPORTitlG REQUIREMEllTS The' appropriate regional office will document the findings and the actions taken in an inspection report and, in addition to the normal distribution, will forward one copy to the -Director, Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation,.0ffice of NRR, and one copy to the Director, Division of
. Reactor Safety, in, each of the other regional offices.
2515/97-07 COMPLET10ft SCHEDULE Inspections should be scheduled so that they are completed within 2 years of the issuance of this instruction.
2515/97-08 EXPIRATI0t1 This temporary instruction shall remain in effect for 24 months or until the inspections have been completed.
2515/97-09 tiRR CONTACT Any questions regarding this tempora ry instruction should be addressed to A. T. Gody (301-492-1117).
Issue Date:
11/03/88
-8 2515/97
2515/97-10 STATISTICAL. DATA ' REPORTING for 766. or RITS i npu t,' the actual inspection effort should be recorded accinst this TI, module number 25597.
l 2515/97-11 ORIGINATitlG ORGANIZATION INFORMATION i
i 11.01 Organization Responsibilities. The Performance and Quality Evaluation Branch of HRR will provide support and overall. guidance for these inspec-tions.
11.02-Estimated Resources.
Each inspection is planned for 6 weeks for 6 persons with 2 of the 6 weeks being direct onsite inspection (12 staff weeks) and I week in-office inspection, with expected additional effort by the team leader (a total of 38 staff weeks).
This total includes prepara-tion, inspection and report writing.
11.03 Parallel Inspection Procedures The inspection procedures that this TI may satisfy totally or in part are listed below.
Where credit is taken, the inspection report should note the module number per IttC-0610.
The region should make final determinations based on the. scope and documentation of the inspection.
37701 56700 62704 37702 61700 62705
)
37828 CIP 61725 72701 38701 62700 83000 series 38702 62702 92700 CIP 41400 62703 CIP 92701
(
END l
I 2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88
- la' i' !
a
- o **
v
.t w.e '**
$g s'pP
~
l 7
T R
- g M "** bw A
r M.
T H
n C
e "t
t e
i.
F
,e W
4
= "
m O
P m"
+
1 s
o.
L o
F
= r-n.
n rn ne a
N r
t r
O n
T ie I
w T
e C
E sd P
mle o
S ef r
i 1
lbn N
t c
E o e I
R r
U d
G PI I
F m"
s m
mr
'F L"
I A7 e
)
e e
e o
s t
e n
e g
R n
tm o
e r
n E
o t
t c
r e
e l
t lu )s t.
- e n
1 t
d)
L p
4
- t e
o i
4 e ee l r t y v
o e nT w
se S
ne r.
it d
fs d
r Wn n
i m
f e
e a.
fe R
s.
r o
e P
O ie.
os n o n
b t
t o
t e,
rt e
tu ls L
w;.
e io, f
e k
e A
od s~
eO mo c
r S
T t
e t
r e.
c t:
pw ps e
e
~
w n
eo A
d.
oW a
.t e iw I
t o
n pc d.
ss c
c
.t TI P.~
tt t t
t m
n.
e en cS in.
a o
"A e
n n
n
-,e e
e e no t
N w
n in eO s
es o
te R
s n
I
- sm m
nt tP us c
l w
i e
e e
o (s t
t e
r ei t
E n
mk m
do eN e
fv n
h c
r eM c(
lo o
c o e h
l E
e Ch e
e e
r c
e
(
7 R
R P
M M
R e
T T
RA C S Q
t S NE EO X c*,o,ere. 0s85N l
lllll