ML20247Q057

Notice of Violation from Insp on 890802-0905,Violation Noted:Operator Stationed at Emergency Diesel Generator B Could Not Take Action Specified by Rev Due to Inadequate Procedure & Inadequate Training

ML20247Q057
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	09/20/1989
From:	Warnick R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20247Q056	List: IR 05000445/1989067 ML20247Q057
References
50-445-89-67, NUDOCS 8909280080
Download: ML20247Q057 (2)

Text

_ - - - - - - _ _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ _ _

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION TU Electric Docket: 50-445/89-67 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Permits: CPPR-126 Unit 1 During an NRC inspection conducted August 2 through September 5, 1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI states, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as deficiencies, are corrected.

By letter (TKX-89272) dated May 25, 1989, from William J. Cahill, Jr.

to the NRC, the corrective action for reportable deficiency (pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55[e]) CP-88-33, " Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)

Voltage. Output" was described. The corrective action included revising the system operating procedure to require an operator to take a certain, specified action during EDG shutdown to ensure EDG availability.

Centrary to the above, the measures established did not assure that deficiency CP-88-33 was corrected in that an operator stationed at the "B" EDG could not take the action specified by the revision to the procedure because of an inadequate procedure (the procedure used the wrong nomenclature for an indicating light) and inadequate training (the operator was not trained as to which indicating light to use).

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II)

(445/8967-V-01).

No reply to this Notice of Violation is required because the inspection showed that corrective action had been taken to correct l

89o928o0a0 spono PDR ADOCK 05000445 Q PDC t -

e 2

the violation and to prevent recurrence. We have no further questions regarding this matter.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

I?FO)a A Dated at Comanche Pt;ak Site this 20th day of September 1989 l

i

_ _ _.__ __________