ML20246F970
| ML20246F970 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 05/01/1989 |
| From: | Morris K OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| LIC-89-433, NUDOCS 8905150153 | |
| Download: ML20246F970 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _
J fl)Jf ik f & Qff Q-l ' [ (([ }ll[j[
[ a, y,
[
Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney Omaha, Nebraska 68102-2247 402/536-4000 May 1, 1989 LIC-89-433 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Station P1-137 Washington, DC 20555
References:
1.
Docket No. 50-285 2.
Letter from NRC (L. J. Callan) to OPPD (K. J. Morris) dated November 7, 1988 3.
Letter from 0 PPD (K. J. Morris) to NRC (Document Control Desk)datedDecember9,1988(LIC-88-1089) 4.
LetterfromNRC(L.J. Callan)toOPPD(K.J. Morris) dated January 12, 1989 5.
Letter from OPPD (K. J. Morris) to NRC Document Control Desk) dated February 13,1989(LIC-89-179)
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
Request for Additional Information Concerning Clarification of Response to Notice of Violation 285/8837-01 Omaha Public Power District (0 PPD) responded to Notice of Violation 285/8837-01, Failure to Maintain Traceability of Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE) in Reference 3.
Reference 4 requested additional information needed to clarify our response. As stated in our response, OPPD based the conclusion that the conditions identified by the inspector were isolated events on prior reviews and interviews with individuals involved in use of M&TE.
OPPD had no evidence to the contrary at that time.
In Reference 5, OPPD committed to the review of 50 Surveillance Tests conducted between the dates of January 1988 and October 1988 to verify that test equipment used was properly calibrated and recorded in the Instrument and Control (I&C) shop logs, and to confirm that the cases identified were isolated.
In accordance with Reference 5, OPPD has completed its initial review of Surveillance Tests.
Contrary to the initial indication that this was an isolated case the review showed that addi+'onal measures need to be taken to ensure traceability of M&TE.
In response to this finding, and concurrent with other previously made commitments, OPPD developed a review plan to determine the scope of this problem as follows:
8905150153 890501 A
PDR ADOCK 05000285 V
.w s w.i impioumn m
opponunnu
s U. S Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC-89-433 Page 2 A.
Review additional Surveillance Tests B.
Review M&TE calibration records C.
Review M&TE Deficiency Reports D.
Review M&TE Procedures E.
Conduct interviews with Technicians from the Instrumentation and Control (I&C) group
.This plan will allow OPPD to determine the scope of the. problem and additionally the plan will be used as a basis for defining the corrective actions required to prevent recurrence.
After completion of the plan, and when the extent of the problem is known, OPPD will forward the identified corrective actions, along with a schedule for completion to the NRC. This will be submitted by June 15, 1989.
Pending the outcome of this review, OPPD has instituted the following compensatory actions:
A.
HeldanInstrumentationandControl(I&C)groupmeetingtodelineate the requirements of the involved procedures.
B.
Wrote and posted a memo to Instrumentation and Control (I&C) personnel specifying the logout of all'M&TE equi) ment.
C.
Contracted a full-time person responsi)le for issuing M&TE. This individual does not report to the Instrumentation and Control (I&C) group.
D.
Ordered double dutch doors to prevent general access to M&TE by Instrumentation & Control (I&C) personnel.
Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this matter.
l Sincerely, f
i
.,49 K. J. Morris
/ Division Manager Nuclear Operations KJM/jak c:
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae R. D. Martin, NRC Regional Administrator P. D. Milano, NRC Project Manager P. H. Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector a