ML20246F382

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Amend 30 to License NPF-39,revising Tech Specs to Permit Operation of Reactor W/One of Two Reactor Recirculation Loops in Svc Under Certain Specified Conditions
ML20246F382
Person / Time
Site: Limerick 
Issue date: 06/30/1989
From: Butler W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20246F384 List:
References
NUDOCS 8907130236
Download: ML20246F382 (39)


Text

  • %

y g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r,

j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20656

~ ' '

}'

l PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY l

DOCKET NO. 50-352

)

LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 1 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE

.i i

Amendment No. 30 License No. NPF-39 1.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Comission) has found that A.

The application for amendment by Philadelphia Electric Company (the licensee) dated November 4, 1988 as supplemented March 29, 1989, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Comission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; 8.

The. facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Comission; C.

There is reasonable assurance (1) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.

The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.

The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2.

Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-39 is hereby amended to read as follows:

Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A and-the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, as revised through Amendment No. 30, are hereby incorporated into this license. Philadelphia Electric Company shall operate the facility I

in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

8907130236 890630 PDR ADOCK 0500

{2, P

v4

-2 E

L 3.

This license amendment is effective within 30 days of its date of issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[

(

Walter R. Butler, Director Project Directorate I-2 l

Division of Reactor Projects I/II l

l At.tachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:

June 30, 1989

~

i l

l L

l.

r a

1 ATTACHMENT Ti) LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 30 FACILITY OPERATING LICFNSE NO. NPF-39 DOCKET NO. 50-352 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached pages. The revised pages are identified by Amendment number and contain vertical lines indicating the area of change. Overleaf pagos are provided to maintain document completeness.*

Remove Insert 2 2-1 i

2-2 2-2*

2-3 2-3*

2-4 2-4 B 2-1 B 2-1 B 2-2 B 2-2*

3/4 2-1 3/4 2-1 3/4 2-2 3/4 2-2*

3/4 2-7 3/4 2-7 3/4 2-8 3/4 2-8*

3/4 2-9 3/4 2-9*

3/4 2-10 3/4 2-10 3/4 2-10a 3/4 2-10a 3/4 2-10b 3/4 2-10b 3/4 2-10c 3/4 2-10c 3/4 3-59 3/4 3-59*

3/4 3-60 3/4 3-60 3/4 3-60a 3/4 3-60a 3/4 4-1 3/4 4-1 3/4 4-2 3/4 4-la 3/4 4-2 3/4 4-3 3/4 4-3 l

3/4 4-4 3/4 4-4 3/4 4-4a r

- - - _ - _ - _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _. = - _. - _. - - - - -..

.3

4 -

, ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 30 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-39 l

~

DOCKET NO. 50-352 Remove Insert 3/4 4-5 3/4 4-5 3/4 4-6 3/4 4-6*

8 3/4 1-1 8 3/4 1-1*

8 3/4 1-2 8 3/4 1-2 8 3/4 2 B 3/4 2-1 8 3/4 2-2 B 3/4 2-2 8 3/4 2-3 8 3/4 2-3*

B 3/4 2-4 8 3/4 2-4 8 2/4 4-1 B 3/4 4-1 B 3/4 4-2 8 3/4 4-2

.e

l 4

mwm--_-__________._ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ -. _ - _

J

  • V 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 2.1 SAFETY LIMITS THERMAL POWER, Low Pressure or Low Flow 2.1.1 THERMAL POWER shall not exceed 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER with the reactor vessel steam dome pressure less than 785 psig or core flow less than 10% of rated flow.

APPLICABILITY:

OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 and 2.

ACTION:

With THERMAL POWER exceeding 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER and the reactor vessel steam dome pressure less than 785 psig or core flow less than 10% of rated flow, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.1.

THERMAL POWER, High Pressure and High Flow 2.1.2.The MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR) shall not be less than 1.07 for two recirculation loop operation and shall not be less than 1.08 for single recirculation loop operation with the reactor vessel steam dome pressure greater than 785 psig and core flow greater than 10% of rated flow.

l-APPLICABILITY:

OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 and 2.

~

ACTION:

With MCPR less than 1.07 for two recirculation loop operation or less than 1.08 for single recirculation loop operation and the reactor vessel steam dome pressure greater than 785 psig and core flow greater than 10% of rated flow, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.1.

l REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE 2.1.3 The reactor coolant system pressure, as measured in the reactor vessel steam dome, shall not exceed 1325 psig.

APPLICABILITY:

OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1, 2, 3, and 4.

ACTION:

With the reactor coolant system pressure, as measured in the reactor vessel steam dome, above 1325 psig, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN with reactor coolant J

system pressure less than or equal to 1325 psig within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.1.

i LIMERICK - UNIT 1 2-1 Amendment No.M 30 J

2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 4

2.1 SAFETY LIMITS THERMAL POWER, Low Pressure or Low Flow l

2.1.1 THERMAL POWER shall not exceed 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER with the reactor vessel steam dome pressure less than 785 psig or core flow less than 10% of rated flow.

APPLICABILITY:

OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 and 2.

ACTION:

With THERMAL POWER exceeding 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER and the reactor vessel steam dome pressure less than 785 psig or core flow less than 10% of rated flow, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.1.

THERMAL POWER, High Pressure and High Flow 2.1.2 The MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR) shall not be less than 1.07 for two recirculation loop operation and shall not be less than 1.08 for single recirculation loop operation with the reactor vessel steam dome pressure greater than 785 psig and core flow greater than 10% of rated flow.

APPLICABILITY:

OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 and 2.

ACTION:

With MCPR less than 1.07 for two recirculation loop operation or less than 1.08 for single recirculation loop operation and the reactor vessel steam dome pressure greater than 785 psig and core flow greater than 10% of rated flow, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.1.

REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE 2.1.3 The reactor coolant system pressure, as measured in the reactor vessel steam dome, shall not exceed 1325 psig.

APPLICABILITY:

OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1, 2, 3, and 4.

ACTION:

With the reactor coolant system pressure, as measured in the reactor vessel steam dome, above 1325 psig, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN with reactor coolant system pressure less than or equal to 1325 psig within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and comply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.1.

LIMERICK - UNIT 1 2-1 Amendment No.M 30 L__.___-.__m_

SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS SAFETY LIMITS (Continued)

REACTORVESSELWAfERLEVEL 2.1.4 The reactor vessel water level shall be above the top of the active irradiated fuel.

1 APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 3, 4, and 5 ACTION:

With the reactor vessel water level at or below the top of the active irradiated fuel, manually initiate the ECCS to restore the water level, after depressurizing the reactor vessel, if required. Comply with the requirements of Specification 6.7.1.

A i

LIMERICK - UNI' 1 2-2

SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION SETPOINTS 2.2.1 The reactor protection system instrumentation setpoints shall be set consistent with the Trip Setpoint values shown in Table 2.2.1-1.

APPLICABILITY As shown in Table 3.3.1-1.

ACTION:

With a reactor protection system instrumentation setpoint less conservative than the value shown in the Allowable Values column of Table 2.2.1-1, declare the channel inoperable and apply the applicable ACTION statement requirement of Specification 3.3.1 until the channel is restored to OPERABLE status with its setpoint adjusted consistent with the Trip Setpoint value.

LIMERICK - UNIT 1 2-3

gl uo rE A

i s

55e g

gi OA5l L

+ m L

+iL RL s o

s s

i LV2l fA Wi%A WuB A p gp 55o s

L 1u oM x5M qA fM r c l

p A

/f R

8a

.R 8eR oR 7 g 8

Q8 c

'1 '1 2

%E 5 m8E 5RE E 5 g %

5 2f 0H 1H P

. %H 0 f 2 66%

6 1 o 2 T, 0 a1T 0tO A.

3T 1

}

1 1

227 4 A o

<H N >-

5 5 $

< 77-

>N tn d

R e

n E

m u

W u

o O

r r

P t

g s

k nn L

n c

oo S

A i

a ii T

M b

tt N

s R

h e

aa I

n E

t v

r vv O

o H

i D

o e

ee P

i T

w E

b w

l l T

se

' TR R

a o

ee E

il D

,fAE E

p S

Tva E

%oRW DW s

"8 "8 Nic T

9 O

4d EO e

l N

I ds A

5 mfP 5 e TP g h d

l g

//d O

O R

uo rE A

i c e u i

55e g

I P5l

+m L

+iL RL s n s f s

s i

T T2l f

Wi%A WuB A p i o

p 99o s

A E1 u o

x5M qA fM a

l x

l p

T S/f 8a

.R 8eR oR 7 g%

c 8

c 0

6

'0 '0 0

N 0

5.m6E 5RE E 3 E

P2f 5

1H P

. %H 0 66%

0.

M I 1 o 1

0a1T 0tO A.

8 3 1

225 5A 4T 1 1U R

o

- R T<

<~

<N N >-

5 >

< $ 5

<77-

>H 1T S

2N

.I 2

M EE LT BS n

AY o

TS h

i g

n t

N i

o a

O H

i r

I t

e h 3 e

h T

x a

p g

r g

C u

r o

i l

u i

E l

e H e s

H T

F p

p v

o n

O o

o e

l o

R n

o l

C

, i P

o n

p l

e h

l e

t r

w o

r g

e r

i R

t o

o n

u w i

v u

s O

u d

l o

s o e H e

s o

T e

t i

s L v

L o

P C

N e

n t

e l

l A

S o

a r -

a r

eC n

E r

i l

P V -

e r

w R

r o t

u l

t ut o

o t e

ea d

c d

e e n n a

ss d

t i l

ll e

r e

m v o o W

oa t

i n a au p i p

o e i i h

l Fwu n o c cc m

c m

D L t t g er C

oh o M s sr a

e a

a a i me eLS M

p pi l

r l

m r l

i H ut

- v e U Ucd C

dC a e o d l t l - h e g -

- ee ee e t s a oi ea c

g n x xrs w

sw t

a I

R VmhvVet l

n a u u

a o

gao e

S W e

scl ri a R l

l oi l

nil v

e e r ent al uw R

F F wB F

iBF i e l

l n n u gaiVosS r

t s

t l

e e i i s rrw rs e e n n

w h

wh a a s s L L s aTS pt eem r2 t

w o ogo g

gog r c s s e h onrda u T a o r rnl i

nli e s e e m m r

cl tt oP or go I i P t tiF H

iFH p n V V a a P

seaSC M

Nd u

ur r

o w e e ivo l

U e e e eu)

)

u))

n o r r t t l

Del e ei r m g N NDa b

Dab I

D o o S S l

LF nnOol sn Lr a t t e m ii t

Ae r c c n n w a bbpcu Nt e

a a i i y r rrian aa On v

.)

)

e e a a r c uurea Bv I I A a b1 2

c d R R M M D SabTTTRM T

C N

3 4 5.

90 1

U1 2 6

7 8 F

1 11 rE$ M EZw y*

ga3E 2P%* M U

\\

(

i

.g 2.1 SAFETY LIMITS BASES

2.0 INTRODUCTION

l The fuel cladding, reactor pressure vessel and primary system piping are the principal barriers to the release of radioactive materials to the environs.

Safety Limits are established to protect the integrity of these barriers during normal plant operations and anticipated transients. The fuel cladding integrity Safety Limit is set such that no fuel damage is calculated to occur if the limit is not violated.

Because fuel damage is not directly observable, a step-back approach is used to establish a Safety Limit such that the MCPR is not less than 1.07 for two recirculation loop operation and 1.08 for single recirculation loop operation. MCPR greater than 1.07 for two recirculation loop operation and 1.08 for single recirculation loop operation represents a conservative margin relative to the conditions required to maintain (bal cladding integrity.

The fuel cladding is one of the physical barriers which separate the radioactive materials from the environs.

The integrity of this cladding barrier is related to its relative freedom from perforations or cracking.

Although some corrosion or use related cracking may occur during the life of the cladding, fission product migration from this source is incre-mentally cumulative and continuously measurable.

Fuel cladding perforations, however, can result from thermal stresses which occur from reactor operation sipificantly above design conditions and the Limiting Safety System Settings.

Whlie fission product migration from cladding perforation is just as measurable as that from use related cracking, the thermally caused cladding perforations signal a threshold beyond which still greater thermal stresses may cause gross rather than incremental cladding deterioration.

Therefore, the fuel cladding Safety Limit is defined with a margin to the conditions which would produce onset of transition boiling, MCPR of 1.0.

These conditions represent a signi-ficant departure from the condition intended by design for planned operation.

2.1.1 THERMAL POWER, Low Pressure or Low Flow The use of the (GEXL) correlation is not valid for all critical power calculations at pressures below 785 psig or core flows less than 10% of rated flow.

Therefore, the fuel cladding integrity Safety Limit is established by other means.

This is done by establishing a limiting condition on core THERMAL POWER with the following basis.

Since the pressure drop in the bypass region is essentially all elevation head, the core pressure drop at low power and flows will alwa s be greater than 4.5 psi.

Analyses show that with a bundle flow of 28 x 10 lb/h, bundle pressure drop is nearly independent of bundle power and has a value of 3.5 psi.

Thus, the bundle flow with a 4.5 psi driving head will be greater than 28 x 103 lb/h.

Full scale ATLAS test data taken at pressures from 14.7 psia to 800 psia indicate that the fuel assembly criti-cal power at this flow is approximately 3.35 MWt. With the design peaking factors, this corresponds to a THERMAL POWER of more than 50% of RATED THERMAL POWER.

Thus, a THERMAL POWER limit of 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER for reactor pressure below 785 psig is conservative.

LIMERICK - UNIT 1 B 2-1 Amendment No.,T,' 30 3

l i

l i

{

?

SAFETY LIMITS l

BASES 2.1.2 THERMAL POWER, High Pressure and High Flow The fuel cladding integrity Safety Limit is set such that no fuel damage is calculcted to occur if the limit is not violated. Since the parameters which result in fuel damage are not directly observable during reactor operation, i

the thermal and hydraulic conditions resulting in a departure from nucleate boiling have been used to mark the beginning of the region where fuel damage could occur. Although it is recognized that a departure from nucleate boiling would not necessarily result in damage to BWR fuel rods, the critical power at which boiling transition is calculated to occur has been adopted as a convenient limit. However, the uncertainties in monitoring the core operating state and in the procedures used to calculate the critical power result in an uncertainty l

in the value of the critical power. Therefore, the fuel cladding integrity Safety Limit is defined as the CPR in the limiting fuel assembly for which more than 99.9% of the fuel rods in the core are* expected to avoid boiling transition consider'ing the power distribution within the core and all uncertainties.

TheSafetyLimitMCPRisdeterminedusingastatisticalmodelthatcombiriesl l

all of the uncertainties in operating parameters and the procedures tised to calculate critical power. Calculation of the Safety Limit MCPR is described in Reference 1.

i 1

I l

l 1

i i

Reference:

1.

" General Electric Standard Applicatic-for Reactor Fuel," NEDE-24011-P-A

)

(latest approved revision).

i I

LDERICK - LMIT 1 8 2-2 Amensment No. 7 AUG 14 '--

\\

J

3/4.2 POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS 3/4.2.1 AVERAGE PLANAR 1.INEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.2.1 All AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATES (APLHGRs) for each type of fuel as a function of axial location and AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE shall be within limits based on applicable APLHGR limit values which have been approved for the respective fuel and lattice types for two recirculation loop operation.

1 When hand calculations are required, the APLHGR for each type of fuel as a function of AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE shall not exceed the limiting value for the most limiting lattice (excluding natural uranium) as shown in the applicable figures for BP/P8X8R and GE8X8EB fuel types.

The limits shall be reduced to a value of C.89 times the two recirculation loop operation limit when in single recirculation loop operation.

APPLICABILITY:

OPERATIONAL CONDITION 1, when THERMAL POWER is greater than

  • or equal to 25% of RATED THE,RMAL POWER.

ACTION:

With an APLHGR exceeding the limiting value, initiate corrective action within 15 minutes and restore APLHGR to within the required limits within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> or reduce THERMAL POWER to less than 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER within the next 4 hourt.

SURVEILLANCE RE0VIREMENTS 4.2.1 All APLHGRs shall be verified to be equal to or less than the ' limiting value a.

At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, b.

Within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after completion of a THERMAL POWER increase of at least 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER, and c.

Initially and at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> when the reactor is operating with a LIMITING CONTROL R00 PATTERN for APLHGR.

d.

The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable.

LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 2-1 Amendment No.,X 30

ooo

  • y l1 O..

a, i

W f

o

.4

..l....4/..L l

8, e1 f

,o

...i...

g

[... 4..

t 2.

o

o. )

e M

m a

e M

..j.

I I

I i

l L

..L_.

i o

(.

e o

m o

oA o

i m

e wm

~

o 2o

~

[..

o a

m

)

e.

u

==w-

<w=w E

y>3e m

n 8m

.l.

F a=

=Wws xw e

M qa

.. L...N

/

o u

,=E=-

==

~

/

.__..._....T..

o i

n

=

s w

I o

a w et w 4

ao w

n wwkw

=a S >e= w w e

f o

o,

=e

a w

<o w

o

>x=w N.

< o w: a i.

T

,k

..i

=

w -

g

=3

=

a le o

- a o.

- o l

?.

o o

o

._. r 1

og -

4._

p.r;._.

.f.

(._

1 c,,

n e

e e

r-o

  • =t
  • A
  • 't (4;/MX)11Yti mVttNID.Wa{ W3NTI WNV'Id 2Ntt3AY WMEX%~

t tturotr<. UNIT 1 3/4 2-2

POWER DISTRIBUTED' JMITS 3/4.2.2 APRM SETPOINTS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.2.2 The APRM flow biased neutron flux-upscale scram trip setpoint (S) and flow biased neutron flux-upscale control rod block trip setpoint (SRB) shall be established according to the following relationships:

TRIP SETPOINT ALLOWABLE VALUE During two recirculation 5 < (0.58W + 59%)T 5 < (0.58W + 62%)T loop operation Sf5(0.58W+50%)T Sj5(0.58W+53%)T R

R During single recirculation S < (0.58W + 54%)T S < (0.58W + 57%)T loop operation Sf5(0.58W+45%)T Sj5(0.58W+48%)T p

R where:

S and S are in percent of RATED THERMAL POWER, RB W = Loop recirculation flow as a percentage of the loop recirculation flow which produces a rated core flow of 100 million lbs/hr, T = Lowest value of the ratio of FRACTION OF RATED THERMAL POWER divided by the CORE MAXIMUM FRACTION OF LIMITING POWER DENSITY.

T is applied only if less than or equal to 1.0.

APPLICABILITY:

OPERATIONAL CONDITION 1, when THERMAL POWER is greater than or l

equal to 25%'of RATED THERMAL POWER.

ACTION:

With the APRM flow biased neutron flux-upscale scram trip setpoint and/or the flow biased neutron flux upscale control rod block trip setpoint less conservative than the value shown in the Allowable Value column for S or S

as above determined, initiate corrective action within 15 minutes abb,adjustSand/or5 to be consistent with.the Trip Setpoint values

  • within6hoursorred0$eTHERMALPOWERtolessthan25%ofRATEDTHERMAL POWER within the next 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.2.2 The FRTP and the MFLPD shall be determined, the value of T calculated, and the mcst recent actual APRM flow biased neutron flux-upscale scram and flow biased neutron flux upscale control rod block trip setpoints verified to be within the above limits or adjusted, as required:

a.

At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, b.

Within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after completion of a THERMAL POWER increase of at least 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER, and c.

Initially and at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> when the reactor is operating with MFLPD greater than or equal to FRTP.

d.

The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable.

  • With MFLPD greater than the FRTP during power ascension up to 90% of RATED THERMAL POWER, rather than adjusting the APRM setpoints, the APRM gain may be adjusted such that the APRM readings are greater than or equal to 100% times MFLPD, provided that the adjusted APRM reading does not exceed 100% of RATED THFRMAL POWER and a notice of adjustment is posted on the reactor control panel.

LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 2-7 Amendment No.f, 30

l 1

\\

t POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS j

3/4.2.3 MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.2.3 The MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR) shall be equal to or greater than the MCPR limit shown in Figure 3.2.3-la (BP/P8X8R fuel), Figure 3.2.3-lb (BP/P8X8R fuel), Figura 3.2.3-Ic (GE 8X8E8 fuel) and Figure 3.2.3-1d j

(GE 8X8EB fuel) times the K, shown in Figure 3.2.3-2, provided that the l

end of-cycle recirculation bump trip (EOC-RPT) system is OPERABLE per Specification 3.3.4.2, with:

l (t,y,. Ig) z=

T

~I A

B where:

A = 0.86 seconds, control rod average scram insertion I

T time limit to notch 39 per Specification 3.1.3.3, l

B = 0.672 + 1.65[

.]b(0.016),

1 T

n N

I i

i=1 a

I t,y,,

$_y N t, g

n

\\

I NI i=1 I

i n = number of surveillance tests performed to date in cycle, Ng = number of active control rods measured in the ith surveillance test, tg = average scram time to notch 39 of all rods measured th in the i surveillance test, and Ny = 4.1.3.2.a. total number of active rods measured in Specification APPLICABILITY:

OPERATIONAL CONDITION 1, when THERMAL POWER is greater than or equal to 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER.

LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 2-8 AmenpPE:

nt No.

19 4 1989

l POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (Continued) i ACTION With the end-of-cycle recirculation pump trip system inoperable per a.

Specification 3.3.4.2, operation may continue provided that, within I hour, MCPR is determined to be greater than or equal to the MCPR t

l limit as a function of the average scram time shown in Figure l

3.2.3-la (BP/P8X8R fuel), Figure 3.2.3-lb (8P/P8X8R fuel),

Figure 3.2.3-Ic (GE8X8EB fuel) and Figure 3.2.3-1d (GE8X8EB fuel),

EOC-RPT inoperable curve, times the k7 shown.in Figure 3.2.3-2.

t b.

With MCPR less than the appitcable MCPR limit shown in Figures 1.2.3-la, 3.2.3-1b and 3.2.3-2, initiate corrective action within 15 minutes and 3

restore MCPR to within the required limit within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> or reduce THERNAL POWER to less than 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER within th 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.2.3 MCPR, with:

t = 1.0 prior to performance of the initial scram time measurements a.

for the cycle in accordance with Specification 4.1.3.2, or b.

I as defined in Specification 3.2.3 used to determine the limit within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> of the conclusion of each scram time surveillance test required by Specification 4.1.3.2, shall be determined to be equal to or greater than the applicable MCPR limit determined from Figures 3.2.3-la, 3.2.3-lb and 3.2.3-2.

a.

At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, b.

Within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after completion of a THERMAL POWER increase of at least 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER, and c.

Initially and at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> when the reactor is operating with a LIMITING CONTROL ROD PATTERN for MCPR.

d.

The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable.

LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 2-9 Amendment No.

19 I

APR 2 4 1989

4 1.44 c

1,44 1.42 -

1.42 1.4 0. -

1,40 1.38 -

1,33 OUT.E')C.RP_T., WM

1.4-

[ 1.3 2 -

t o2 1.32 1.30 -

i 1.30 1.28 -

EOC-RPT, ICF#

~ 1.28 wt 1.26 1.26 e

1.24-1.24

1.22 -

1.22 1.20 i

i i 1.20 0

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

l T

i 1

Note:

These limits apply. to Both Two Recirculation Loop and Single Recirculation Loop Operation.

DEFINITIONS:

ICF - INCREASED CORE FLOW (UP TO 105% RATED)

FH005 - FEEDWATER HEATING OUT OF SERVICE THROUGHOUT CYCLE (UP TO 60'F TEMP. REDUCTION; ACHIEVED BY REMOVAL OF FEEDWATER HEATER (s))

FFWTR - FINAL FEE 0 WATER TEMPERATURE REDUCTION AT END OF CYCLE (UP TO 60 F TEMP. REDUCTION: ACH7.EVED BY REMOVAL OF ALL 6TH STAGE HEATERS)

MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR) VERSUS t (P8x8R/BP8x8R FUEL) i (B0C TO E0C - 2000 MWD /ST)

FIGURE 3.2.3-la LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 2-10 Amendment No.Z9, 30

s

~

j 1.44

,44 1.42 -

1.42 ICF+ff g o C E P T g T g iC F--

1.40-g,4 g 1.38 - -WN 1.38 1.36-1.36 WITH EOC-RPT ' ICF+M '

+

1.34 -

1,34 e

$ 1.32 -

1.32 FLOW 1.30 -

p 3,3 o 1.28 1.28 1.26-1.26 1.24 -

~ 1.2 4

~

  • lNCLUDES FHOOS 1.22-1.22 1.20 i i 1.20 0

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

T Note:

These limits apply to Both Two Recirculation Loop and Single Recirculation loop Operation.

DEFINITIONS:

ICF - INCREASED CORE FLOW (UP TO 105% RATED)

FH005 - FEEDWATER HEATING OUT OF SERVICE THROUGHOUT CYCLE (UP TO 60 F TEMP. REDUCTION; ACHIEVED BY REMOVAL OF FEEDWATER HEATER (S))

FFWTR - FINAL FEEDWATER TEMPERATURE REDUCTION AT END-0F-CYCLE (UP TO 60 F TEMP. REDUCTION: ACHIEVED BY REMOVAL OF ALL 6TH STAGE HEATERS)

MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR) VERSUS I (P8x8R/BP8x8R FUEL)

(E0C - 2000 MWD /ST TO E0C)

FIGURE 3.2.3-lb LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 2-10a Amendment No. D, 30 l

1 44 1.44 1.42-1.42 1.40' 1.40 1.3 8 ~

1,33 1.3 8 ~

1.33 M cp. CF+

1.34 '

wiWOUT W 1.34 g

1.3 2 ~

1.32 1.30-1,3 o E'_gv W

  • 1.28 -

pgpT--

1.28 l

1.25 1.26 1.24" 1.24

  • lNCL.UDES PHOOS

{

1.22 -

1.22 1.20,

i i

i i

i i

i i 1.20 0

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.h 1

7 Note:

These Limits Apply To Both Two Recirculation Loop and Single Recirculation Loop Operation.

DEFINITIONS:

ICF - INCREASED CORE FLOW (UP TO 105% RATED)

FH005 - FEEDWATER HEATING OUT OF SERVICE THROUGHOUT CYCLE (UP TO 60"E TEMP.

REDUCTION; ACHIEVED BY REMOVAL OF FEEDWATER HEATER (S))

FFWTR - FINAL FEEDWATER TEMPERATURE REDUCTION AT END-OF-CYCLE (UP TO 60 F TEMP. REDUCTION; ACHIEVED BY REMOVAL OF ALL 6th STAGE. HEATERS)

MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MPCR) VERSUS t (GE8x8EB FUEL)

(BOC TO E0C - 2000 MWD /ST)

FIGURE 3.2.3-1c LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 2-10b Amendment No.19, 30 l

- o.*'

1.44 l g,44 1.42 -

1 42 1.40

___ _.cp c gun 3,4 o

-po@ EOC 1.3 s -

_1.3 s t

I 1 38 i

1.36 4

1 34 -

g p pT.KF M

" 1.34 b

1.3 2 ~

1.32

-w!TH EOCAM #

py,100%-Ftoo..,

- 3,3 o 1.30 1.28 1.28 1.26-1.26 i

i t

1.24 -

1.24

  • lNCLUDES FH005 1.22-1.22 1.20 4

e i

i i

i 1.20 0

C.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

7 i

i Note:

These Limits Apply To Both Two Recirculation Loop and Single Recirculation i

Loop Operation.

DEFINITIONS:

ICF - INCREASED CORE FLOW (UP TO 105% RATED)

{

FH005 - FEEDWATER HEATING OUT OF SERVICE THROUGHOUT CYCLE (UP TO 60 F TEMP. REDUCTION; ACHIEVED BY REMOVAL OF FEEDWATER HEATER (S))

FPWTR - FINAL FF9 WATER TEMPERATURE REDUCTION AT END-0F-CYCLE (UP TO 60 F TEMP. C Efl0N; %.HIEVED BY REMOVAL OF ALL 6th STAGE HEATERS)

MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (MCPR) VERSUS T (GE8x8EB FUEL)

(EOC - 2000 MWD /ST TO E0C)

FIGURE 3.2.3-1d LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 2-10c Amendment No.19, 30 l

-m__._________

2 TABLE 3.3.6-1 (Continued)

CONTROL 800 WITHDRAWAL BLOCK INSTALMEWTATION ACTION STATEMENTS l

ACT10N 60 Declare the RSM inoperable and take the ACTION required by Specification 3.1.4.3.

ACTION 61 -

With the neber of.0PERABLE channels one er more less than required by the Minisium OPERABLE Channels per Trip Function requirement, place at least one inoperable channel in the tripped condition within one hour.

ACTICN 62 With the number of OPERABLE channels less than required by the Minious OPERA 8LE Channels per Trip Function requimment, place the inoperable channel in the tripped condition within one hour.

ACTION 63 With the number of OPERA 8LE channels'less than requimd by the Minimum OPERA 8LE Channels per Trip Function requirement, initiate a rod block.

E With THERMAL POWER 133 of RATEp THERMAL POWER.

With more than one control red withdrawn. Not applicable to control rods removed per specification 3.9.10.1 or 3.9.10.2.

Thesa channels are not reeufred when sixteen or fewer fuel assemblies,

.sejacent to the $RMs, are in the core.

(a) The R8M shall be autenatically bypassed when a peripheral control rod is selected or the reference APD channel indicates less than 3S of RATED TMERMAL POWER.

(b) This function shall be autenstically byp: dred if detector count rate is

> 100 cps er the IRM channels are en range 3 or higher.

(c) This function is automatically bypassed when the associated IM channels are en rence 4 of higher.

(d) This function is autenatically bypassed when tne IM channels are en range 3 er higher.

(e) This funetten is autenatically bypassed when the IM channels are on rente 1.

LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 3*59 Asendment No. 4 mat i i *3A7

E EW W

WO l

O OP l

P P

u a

L f

f L

LA o

h a

A AM f

t M

MR s

o i

h R

8 RE n

w t

E 4

EH o

s i

H HT i

n E

w T

+

T s

s o

U D

p i

i L

3 D

3 W

DE c

v s

A 4

E 5

ET i

i

\\

7,

T 8

TA 5

d v

+f 3f A

+

5 AR 0

e i

E o

o R

.R 1

s 5l d

L W

+

W 0 A f

p 2a B

m m

f

.f o

x c

1c 5

A 6 u%

Wu%

o 8

5No

/s 2

W 6 m9 m9 5

6 8

0 1 e O

.i0 6i0

%4 1l i

A 1 A.1 A1l. /l L

0x1 i

6. a A. 3 u

x1 0

31 A.3 a L

a c

A

<i1 0 min >

>3 N<N>

N<fN>i fo S

T m

N um R

I O

i R

RE P

x E

EW T

a W

WO l

E m

O OP l

S P

P u

a a

L f

f N

L LA o

O h

h A

AM f

I t

t M

MR s

o T

i i

R RE n

A w

w E

EH o

s 2 T H

HT i

n N

T T

s o

6 E D

i i

M T 0

4 D

0 5

DE s

v s

3 U N 4

3 E

5 4

ET p

i i

R I

T TA c

d v

3 T O

+f

+

A

+

+

AR e

i S P o

R R

5 5l d

E N T W

W W

W f

0 2 a L

I E

m f

f o 1

s 1 c 5

B S

6u%

6 o

8 8

o p

/ s 2

A K 6 m6 6

6 5

5

.x e

8 1e T C P

.i0 n

0

.%2 0l

./l A. 5 0

0.

A41 A1A3 A1l A5a O

I 0x1 o0 1

L R n

a i

u c

B T o $m i t 1 5N>

5 1N>3 N<N>

N<fN>s i

a D

t r

0 a

e p

R r

p e

o e

o l

o L

p ap l

O o

p co p

R o

so n

u T

p o

pl o

t N

o l

U i

r O

o n

t a

C l

n

- o a

t o

i l

S n

i xt u

o t

ua c

S i

a l l r

e R

t d

l F u i

l O

a e u d

c c

a n

T n l

p c e

nr e

c i

I i u

m r p

oi r

s N

c a i m

rc p Sl Ol r*

l c

a t e e

U Rl Ml i d C e l

ur l

O u u

ce rd C

e g

Tf Ef R

es w

e No n

I G

O ra o es w

wni x Nt Nt T

i l

l a

o dt os e u Oo e

Ao e

I oB F

gi l

e e

i v

l Mn v

R n v

N w

nB F

ve s gt g i eF ie i e O

t w h i i l anan tl E r tl E r tl Me o

g sw h t a iiri aan G oeaa T oe aa gl l

i o

g ac Brer rco Ntl rc Atl rc N K anF H

gl i rs upu esr A caes I ca es O C ci nF H en wDoD pnt R ecpn D ec pn I

O sr i

pw o

owu t sow Et s ow T L pu r

oo l)

)

noe E epno M ep no C BUDa.

b u.

N D a b.

nD F1 2 IDN CDUID RDU I D I

M R

E U D R

U T

F O

.)

)

P R a1 2

b c Aa.

... O

.... N b cd S ab cd I ab cd P

I R

T 1 2

3 4

g(y,EZ-R[.8

>5E55 zP P i

ll

f n oo i

gtna w

n ic o

o ti

'l i

tf f

t ei a

sc E

d i

e U

e v

pp L

t e

iS A

a d

r V

r th w

t E

f o

ei L

o l

hw B

f T

A e

W 4

.nc O

1 1

L 1A1 A

) a L

Wd A

d ot e N on s u O w n l i i n I o o a i T l i nm o t A f t o i n T a i e t o N d i tb a C E e v a r ( M T t e l t U N a d us e 2 R I r cu s T O w rm i 6 S P f o i o N T o l cn n 3 I E f eo - S ri o 3 K 1 t t e C P 1 0 f c - m E O I 1 A.1 A on l u L L R u a l B B T <R1 N nf n o A o g v T 0 ik i 0 t c s e R co g nl e r L N ub h a O O f t h R I d c T T ao d s N A r e i O L s d d C U ar i C N o v m R W st o a I O ei r r C D i n p c E T ro s R U aM s / H v p s M S e c n E ng o T H on 7 l S C i a l Y T tR 0 a S I c g W nr o T e S ue t 3 N vr f w 1 A io E o d L tt D kP e o O eaa O c c t O l rr M oe u N C aea N g d t l O cpp RO ba e n I R som OI r r e T O pno TT de l C T UIC CI ev e a N CW AS rA b v U AO EO i F EL RF ee y u RF abc hh a q P Tt M E I ^ R T 6 7 ,gm% b*" g[ ,baM% 8. j' 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM 3/4.4.1 RECIRCULATION SYSTEM RECIRCULATION LOOPS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.4.1.1 Two reactor coolant system recirculation loops shall be in operation with: a. Total core flow greater than or equal to 45% of rated core flow, or b. THERMAL POWER within the unrestricted zone of Figure 3.4.1.1-1. l APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1* and 2*. ACTION: With one reactor coolant system recirculation loop not in operation: a. 1. Within 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />s: a. Place the recirculation flow control system in the Local Manual mode, and b. Reduce THERMAL POWER to 5,70% of RATED THERMAL POWER, and, i c. Reduce the Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Ge^neration Rate (MAPLHGR) limit to a value of 0.89 times the two recirculation loop operation limit per Specification 3.2.1, and, d. Limit the sped of the operating recirculation pump to less than or equal to 90% of rated pump speed, and e. Verify that the differential temperature requirements of Surveillance Requirement 4.4.1.1.5 are met if THERMAL POWER is < 30% of RATED THERMAL POWER or the recirculation loop flow in the operating loop is < 50% of rated loop flow, or suspend the THERMAL POWER or recirculation loop flow increase.
  • See Special Test Exception 3.10.4.
I i LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 4-1 Amendment No. 30 1 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM LIMITING' CONDITION FOR OPERATION (Continued) ACTION: (Continued) 2. Within 6 hour6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />s: Reduce the Average Power Range Monitor (APRM) Scram and Rod f Block, and Rod Block Monitor Trip Setpoints and Allowable ] Values, to those applicable for single recirculation loop operation per Specifications 2.2.1, 3.2.2, and 3.3.6, or I declare the associated channel (s) inoperable and take the actions required by the referenced specifications, and, 3. The provisions of Specification 3.0.4 are not applicable. 4. Otherwise be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. b. With no reactor coolant system recirculation loops in operation, immediately initiate action to reduce THERMAL POWER such that it is not within the restricted zone of Figure 3.4.1.1-1 within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, and initiate measures to place the unit in at least STARTUP within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. c. With one or two reactor coolant system recirculation loops in operation and total core flow less than 45% but greater than 39% of rated core flow and THERMAL POWER within the restricted zone of Figure 3.4.1.1-1: 1. Determine the APRM and LPRM** noise levels (Surveillance 4.4.1.1.3): a. At least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, and b. Within 30 minutes after the completion of a THERMAL POWER increase of at least 5% of RATED THERMAL POWER. 2. With the APRM or LPRM** neutron flux noise levels greater than three times their established baseline noise levels, within 15 minutes initiate corrective action to restore the noise levels within the required limits within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> by increasing core flow or by reducing THERMAL POWER. d. With one or two reactor coolant system recirculation loops in operation and total core flow less than or equal to 39% and THERMAL POWER within the restricted zone of Figure 3.4.1.1-1, within 15 minutes initiate corrective action to reduce THERMAL POWER to within the unrestricted zone of Figure 3.4.1.1-1 or increase core flow to greater than 39% within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />. " Detector levels A and C of one LPRM string per core octant plus detectors A and C of one LPRM string in the center of the core should be monitored. LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 4-la Amendment No. 30 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM' SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.1.1.1 Each pump discharge valve shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by cycling each valve through at least one complete cycle of full travel during each startup* prior to THERMAL POWER exceeding 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER. 4.4.1.1.2 Each pump MG set scoop tube mechanical and electrical stop shall be demonstrated OPERABLE with overspeed setpoints less than or equal to 109% and 107%, respectively, of rated core flow, at least once per 18 months. 4.4.1.1.3 Establish a baseline APRM and LPRM** neutron flux noise value within -the regions for which monitoring is required (Specification 3.4.1.1, ACTION c) within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> of entering the region for which monitoring is required unless baselining has previously been performed in the region since the last refueling outage. 4.4.1.1.4 With one reactor coolant system recirculation loop not in . operation, at least once pert 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> verify that: a. Reactor THERMAL POWER is i 70% of RATED THERMAL POWER, b. The recirculation flow control system is in the Local Manual mode, and c. The. speed of the operating recirculation pump is 1 90% of rated pump speed. d. Core flow is greater than 39% when THERMAL POWER is within the restricted zone of Figure 3.4.1.1-1. 4.4.1.1.5 With one reactor coolant system recirculation loop not in operation, within 15 minutes prior to either THERMAL POWER increase or recirculation loop flow increase, verify that the following differential temperature requirements are met if THERMAL POWER is < 30% of RATED THERMAL POWER or the recirculation loop flow in the operating recirculation loop is 1 50% of rated loop f b - a. < 145 F between reactor vessel steam space coolant and bottom-head Brain line coolant, b. < 50 F between the reactor coolant within the icop not in operation and the coolant in the reactor pressure vessel, and c. < 50 F between the reactor coolant within the loop not in operation and the operating loop. The differential temperature requirements of Specification 4.4.1.1.5b. and c. do not apply when the loop not in operation is isolated from the reactor pressure vessel.
  • If not performed within the previous 31 days.
    • Detector levels A and C of one LPRM string per core octant plus detectors A and C of one LPRM string in the center of the core should be monitored.
LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 4-2 Amendment No. ), 30 l 0 7 E N O Z D E 0 T 6 C I R T S E )D R E T N A U R i 0 ( 5 W 0 R E R O .I
!.'b;.-
C
s.,;.,,(J 3" ' f.'Ut"n s
..s .p5 B I .d
q i.,W"
.;
c.. s
!..IaG.b (
i..v4
.e
f. !f.H't!
P.
i '
.;.;i; E ;.. ' 'e j
0
s..
.o ..D N ;.. 'l 7f .1.
.Ep: O i.e"H. fj:r.V t
4 .*.. eo! s. ie; {;.~ .,*.D; e Z.vph 4 p.,. i,p.D: . :*y:. . ;.. D-I i.n [;:j! n s ) D u'.v"n -..;.!p s.c; gI ..;. i ; ; M *; E b..'.' h } .!'; )", 'a!.i4 j{ T ;G.n.
  • sh s -
  • .9. ;,.,:. * :-
, t. !.s. C:uI{ . ;qp iu-P i t... ;v*: @9'I :.v. f'yhol . :s
!s--
j .. H! 1 9, R '>:- S n. i,.!ep-!s;y "n 5. jl1,u. ! w .3 .'.{3" y .s T ,.ic . : ;U..s 0 E ;. c" e;:g-
U' 3
.'y R ;' I' :! .Ai m;.- i:. ..n *g....;*n .li;!. I4.;
ce
".
: c I-ea :
[. . d. .Ii. -. '.;.. = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 7 6 5 4 mosm e-mmioi <s=tj n t JE
. 2 a
t e o -reZmmena 8 Eq-wN4 #'w 2"Ra9u% m t I, REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM ~ '
  • JET PUMPS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.4.1.2 All jet pumps shall be OPERABLE.
APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 and 2. ACTION: With one or more jet pumps inoperable, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. SURVEILLANCE' REQUIREMENTS 4.4.1.2 All jet pumps shall be demonstrated OPERABLE as follows: During two recirculation loop operation, each of'the above required a. jet pumps shall be. demonstrated OPERABLE prior-to THERMAL POWER exceeding 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER and at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> while greater than 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER by determining recirculation loop flow, total core flow and diffuser-to-lower plenum differential pressure for each jet pump and verifying that no two of the following conditions occur when both recirculation loop indicated flows are in compliance with Specification 3.4.1.3. 1. The indicated recirculation loop flow differs by more than 10% from the established
  • pump speed-loop flow characteristics.
2. The indicated total core flow differs by more than 10% from the established
  • total core flow value derived from recirculation loop flow measurements.
3. The indicated diffuser-to-lower plenum differential pressure of any individual jet pump differs from the established
  • patterns by more than 10%.
  • To be determined from the startup test program data.
I l LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 4-4 Amendment No.30 i '-t y?. REACTOR COOLANT 5YSTEM SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued) b. During single recirculation loop operation, each of the above required jet pumps'shall be demonstrated OPERABLE at least once per g4 hours by verifying that no two of the following conditions occur: 1. The indicated recirculation loop flow in the operating loop differs by more than 10% from the established
  • pump speed-loop flow characteristics.
2. The indicated total core flow differs by more than 10% from the i established
  • total core flow value derived from single recirculation loop flow measurements.
1 3. The indicated diffuser-to-lower plenum differential pressure of any individual jet pump differs from established
  • single recirculation loop patterns by more than 10%.
c. The provisions of Specification 4.0.4 are not applicable provided that this surveillance is performed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after exceeding 25% of RATED THERMAL POWER and upon entering single recirculation loop operation. "To be determined from the startup test program data. LIMERICK'- UNIT 1 3/4 4-4a Amendment No. 30 j, c j .' * ~ .= 4 ' ' REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM RECIRCULATION PUMPS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.4.1.3 Recirculation pump speed.shall be maintained within: 5% of each other with core flow greater than or equal to 70% of a. rated core flow. b. 10% of each other with core flow less than 70% of rated core flow. - APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1* and 2* during two recirculation loop operation. ACTION: With the recirculation loop flows different by more than the specified l
limits, either:
Restore the recirculation loop flows to within the specified limit .l a. within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, or. b. Shotdown one of the recirculation loops within the next 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> and take the ACTION required by Specification 3.4.1.1. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.1.3 Recirculation pump speed shall be verified to be within the limits at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
  • See Special Test Exception 3.10.4.
4 LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 4-5 Amendment No. 30 j i i REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM IDLE RECIRCULATE'ON LOOP STARTUP LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.4.1.4 An idle recirculation loop shall not be started unless the temperature dif ferential between the reactor pressure vessel steam space coolant and the bottom head drain line coolant is less than or equal to 145'F, and: a. When both loops have been idle, unless the temperature differential between the reactor coolant within the idle loop to be started up and the coolant in the reactor pressure vessel is less than or equal to 50 F, or b. When only one loop has been idle, unless the temperature differential between the reactor coolant within the idle and operating recircula-tion loops is less than or equal to 50*F and the operating loop flow rate is less than or equal to 50% of rated loop flow. APPLICABILITY: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1, 2, 3, and 4. ACTION: With temperature differences and/or flow rates exceeding the above limits, suspend startup of any idle recirculation loop. 4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.1.4 The temperature differentials and flow rate shall be determined to be l within the limits within 15 minutes prior to startup of an idle recirculation i loop. i l LIMERICK - UNIT 1 3/4 4-6 i' 3/4.1-REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS 1 BASES l 3/4.1.1 SHUTDOWN MARGIN- 'A sufficient SHUTOOWN MARGIN ensures that (1) the reactor can be made subcritical from all operating conditions, (2) the reactivity transients associated with postulated accident conditions are controllable within acceptable limits, and (3) the reactor will be maintained sufficiently subcritical to preclude inadvertent criticality in the shutdown condition. Since core reactivity values will vary through core life as a function of fuel depletion and poison burnup, the demonstration of SHUTDOWN MARGIN will be performed.in the cold.. xenon-free condition and shall show the core to be subcritical by at least R + 0.38% a k/k or R + 0.28% a k/k, as appropriate. The 0.38% a k/k includes' uncertainties and calculation biases. The value of R in units of % a k/k is the difference between the calculated value of minimum shutdown margin during the operating cycle and the calculated sh.utdown margin at the time of the shutdown margin test at the beginning of cycle. The value of R must be positive or zero and must be determined for each fuel loading cycle. Two'different values are supplied in the Limiting Condition for Operation to provide for the different methods of demonstration of the SHUTDOWN MARGIN. The highest worth. rod may be determined analytically or by test.' The SHUTOOWN MARGIN is demonstrated by (an insequence) control rod withdrawal at the beginning of life fuel cycle conditions, and, if necessary, at any future time in the cycle if the first demonstration indicates that the required margin could be reduced as a function of exposure. Observation of suberiticality in this condition assures subcriticality with the most reactive control rod fully withdrawn. This reactivity characteristic has been a basic assumption in the analysis of plant performance and can be best demonstrated at the time of fuel loading, but the margin must also be determined anytime a control rod is incapable of insertion. 3/4.1.2 REACTIVITY ANOMALIES Since the SHUTDOWN MARGIN requirement for the reactor is small, a careful check on actual conditions to the predicted conditions is necessary, and the i l changes 'in reactivity can be inferred from these comparisons of rod patterns. L Since the comparisons are easily done, frequent checks are not an imposition on normal operations. A 1% change is larger than is expected for normal operation so a change of this magnitude should be thoroughly evaluated. A change as large as 1% would not exceed the design conditions of the reactor and is on the safe side of the postulated transients. LIMERICK - UNIT 1 B 3/4 1-1 REACTIVITY' CONTROL SYSTEMS BASES l 3/4.1.3 CONTROL RODS The specification of this section ensure that (1) the minimum SHUTDOWN MARGIN is maintained, (2) the control rod insertion times are consistent with I those used in the accident analysis, and (3) the potential effects of the rod drop accident are limited. The ACTION statements permit variations from the basic requirements but at the same time impose more restrictive criteria for continued operation. A limitation on inoperable rods is set such that the resultant effect on total rod worth and scram shape will be kept to a minimum. The requirements for the various scram time measurements ensure that any indication of systematic problems with rod drives will be investigated on a timely basis. Damage within the control rod drive mechanism could be a generic problem, therefore with a control rod immovable because of excessive friction or mechanical interference, operation of the reactor is limited to a time period which is reasonable to determine the cause of the inoperability and at the same time prevent operation with a large number of inoperable cont.rol rods. Control rods that are inoperable for other reasons are permitted to be taken out of service provided that those in the nonfully-inserted position are consistent with the SHUTDOWN MARGIN requirements. The number of control rods permitted to be inoperable could be more than the eight allowed by the specification, but the occurrence of eight inoperable rods could be indicative of a generic problem and the reactor must be shutdown for investigation and resolution of the problem. The control rod system is designed to bring the reactor subcritical at a rate fast enough to prevent the MCPR from becoming less than the fuel cladding safety limit during the limiting power transient analyzed in Section 15.2 of the FSAR. This analysis shows that the negative reactivity rates resulting from the scram with the average response of all the drives as given in the specifi-cations, provide the required protection and MCPR remains greater than the fuel cladding safety. limit. The occurrence _of scram times longer then those specified should be viewed as an indication of a systemic problem with the rod drives and therefor.e the surveillance interval is reduced in order to prevent operation of the reactor for long periods of time with a potentially serious problem. The scram discharge volume is required to be OPERABLE so that it will be available when needed to accept discharge water from the control rods during a reactor scram and will isolate the reactor coolant system from the containment when required. Control rods with inoperable accumulators are declared i.noperable and Specification 3.1.3.1 then applies. This prevents a pattern of inoperable accumulators that would result in less reactivity insertion on a scram than .has been analyzed even though control rods with inoperable accumulators may still be inserted with normal drive water pressure. Operability of the accumulator ensures that there is a means available to insert the control rods even under the most unfavorable depressurization of the reactor. LIMERICK - UNIT I B 3/4 1-2 Amendment No. 30 g C 3/4.2 POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS BASES 3/4.2.1 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE This specification assures that the peak cladding temperature (PCT) following the postulated design basis Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) will not exceed the limits specified in 10 CFR 50.46 and that the fuel design analysis limits specified in NEDE-24011-P-A (Reference 2) will not be exceeded. Mechanical Design Analysis: NRC approved methods (specified in Refer-ence 2) are used to demonstrate that all fuel rods in ~a lattice operating at the bounding power history, meet the fuel design limits specified in Reference 2. No single fuel rod follows, or is capable of following, this bounding power history. This bounding power history is used as the basis for the fuel design analysis MAPLHGR limit. LOCA Analysis: A LOCA analysis is performed in accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix K to demonstrate that ths permissible planar power (MAPLHGR) limits comply with the ECCS limits specified in 10 CFR 50.46. The analysis is performed for the most limiting break size, break location, and single failure combination for the plant. The Technical Specification MAPLHGR limit is the most limiting composite of the fuel mechanical design analysis MAPLHGR and the ECCS MAPLHGR limit. i 'Only the most and least limiting MAPLHGR values are shown in th'e Technical Specifications for multiple lattice fuel. Compliance with the specific lattice MAPLHGR operating limits, which are available in Reference 3, is ensured by use of the process computer. The MAPLHGR limits shall be reduced to a value of 0.89 times the two recirculation loop operation limit when in single recirculation loop operation. The constant factor 0.89 is derived from LOCA analyses initiated from single loop operation to account for earlier boiling transition at the limiting fuel node compared to the standard LOCA evaluations. LIMERICK - UNIT 1 B 3/4 2-1 Amendment No. 7, 30 I. >, j
POWER ' DISTRIBUTION ' LIMITS l :-
l-BASES l E l } 3/4.2.2 APRM SETPOINTS The fuel cladding integrity Safety Limits of Specification 2.1 were based J on a power distribution which would yield the design LHGR at RATED THERMAL l POWER. The flow biased neutron flux-upscale scram trip setpoint and flow biased neutron flux-upscale control rod block functions of the APRM instruments must be adjusted to. ensure that the MCPR does not become less than the Safety LimitMCPRorthat>1%plasticstraindoesnotoccurinthedegradedsituation.-l The scram and rod bTock setpoints are adjusted in accordance with the formula in this specification when the combination of THERMAL POWER and CMFLPD indicates -a higher peaked power distribution to ensure that an LHGR transient would not be increased in the degraded condition. 1 1 l LIMERICK - UNIT 1 B 3/4 2-2 Amendment No. 7, 3C l l' e* -g LIFT INTENTIMALLY SLANK 4 1 1 l LDERICK - WIT 1 8 3/4 2-3 Amendment No.7 A0g l' % l --m-m__. _ _ - __. -, _-. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS ~ ~ BASES 3/4.2.3 MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO The required operating limit MCPRs at steady-state operating conditions as specified in Specification 3.2.3 are derived from the established fuel i cladding integrity Safety Limit MCPR, and an analysis of abnormal operational I transients. For any abnormal operating transient analysis evaluation with the initial condition of the reactor being at the steady-state operating limit, it is required that the resulting MCPR does not decrease below the Safety Limit MCPR at any time during the transient assuming instrument trip setting given in Specification 2.2. To assure that the fuel cladding integrity Safety Limit is not exceeded during any anticipated abnormal operational transient, the most limiting tran-sients have been analyzed to determine which result in the largest reduction in CRITICAL POWER RATIO (CPR). The type of transients evaluated were loss of flow, increase in pressure and power, positive reactivity insertion, and coolant temperature decrease. The limiting transient yields the largest delta i MCPR. When added to the Safety Limit MCPR, the required minimum operating limit MCPR of Specification 3.2.3 is obtained and presented in Figures 3.2.3-la, 3.2.3-1b, 3.2.3-1c and 3.2.3-1d. { s The evaluation of a given transient begins with the system initial para-meters shown in FSAR Table 15.0-2 that are input to a GE-core dynamic behavior transient computer program. The codes used to evaluate transients are discussed in Reference 2. The purpose of the K factor of Figure 3.2.3-2 is to define operating f limits at other than rated core flow conditions. At less than 100% of rated flowtherequiredMCPRistheproductoftheMCPRandtheK[edduringaflow factor. The K factors assure that the Safety Limit MCPR will not be viola increase transient resulting from a motor generator speed control failure. The K factors may be applied to both manual and automatic flow control modes. 7 The K factors values shown in Figure 3.2.3-2 were developed generically and are app,licable to all BWR/2, BWR/3, and BWR/4 reactors. The K factors were f i derived using the flow control line corresponding to RATED THERMAL POWER at l rated core flow. For the manual flow control mode, the K factors were calculated such that f I for the maximum flow rate, as limited by the pump scoop tube set point and the corresponding THERMAL POWER along the rated flow control line, the limiting bundle's relative power was adjusted until the MCPR changes with different core flows. The ratio of the MCPR calculated at a given point of core flow, divided by the operating limit MCPR, determines the K. f LIMERICK - UNIT 1 B 3/4 2-4 Amendment No. I, 29, 30 l t l 3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM BASES 3/4.4.1 RECIRCULATION SYSTEM The impact of single recirculation loop. operation upon plant safety is asse.ssed and shows that single-loop operation is permitted if the MCPR fuel cladding safety limit is increased as noted by Specification 2.1.2, APRM scram and control rod block setpoints are adjusted as noted in Tables 2.2.1-1 and 3.3.6-2, respectively, and MAPLHGR limits are decreased by the factor given in Specification 3.2.1. Additionally, surveillance on the pump speed of the operating recirculation loop is imposed to exclude the possibility of excessive internals vibration. The surveillance on differential temperatures below 30% RATED THERMAL POWER or 50% rated recirculation loop flow is to mitigate the undue thermal stress on vessel nozzles, recirculation pump and vessel bottom head during the extended operation of the single recirculation loop mode. An inoperable jet pump is not, in itself, a sufficient reason to declare a recirculation loop inoperable, but it does, in case of a design-basis-accident, increase the blowdown area and reduce the capability of reflooding the core; thus, the requirement for shutdown of the facility witt: a jet pump inoperable. Jet pump failure can be detected by monitoring jet pump performance on a prescribed schedule for significant degradation. Recirculation pump speed mismatch limits are in compliance with the ECCS ,LOCA analysis design criteria for two recirculation loop operation. The limits will ensure an adequate core flow coastdown from either recirculation loop following a LOCA. In the case where the mismatch limits cannot be maintained during two loop operation, continued operation is permitted in a single recir-culation loop mode. In order to prevent undue stress on the vessel nozzles and bottom head region, the recirculation loop temperatures shall be within 50 F of each other prior to .startup of an idle loop. The loop temperature must also be within 50 F of the reactor pressure vessel coolant temperature to prevent thermal shock to the recirculation pump and recirculation nozzles. Sudden equalization of a temperature difference > 145 F between the reactor vessel bottom head coolant and the coolant in the upper region of the reactor vessel by increasing core flow rate would cause undue stress in the reactor vessel bottom head. The objective of GE BWR plant and fuel design is to provide stable opera-tion with margin over the normal operating domain. However, at the high power / low flow corner of the operating domain, a small probability of limit cycle neutron flux oscillations exists depending on combinations of operating conditions (e.g., rod pattern, power shape). To provide assurance that neutron flux limit cycle oscillations are detected and suppressed, APRM and LPRM neutron flux noise levels should be monitored while operating in this region. Stability tests at operating BWRs were reviewed to determine a generic region of the power / flow map in which surveillance of neutron flux noise levels should be performed. A conservative decay ratio of 0.6 was chosen as the bases for determining the generic region for surveillance to account for the plant to plant variability of decay ratio with core and fuel designs. This generic region has been determined to correspond to a core flow of less than or equal to 45% of rated core flow and a THERMAL POWER greater than that specified in Figure 3.4.1.1-1. LIMERICK - UNIT 1 B 3/4 4-1 Amendment No. 30 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM 1 BASES RECIRCULATION SYSTEM (Continued) Plant specific calculations can be performed to determine an applicable region for monitoring neutron flux noise levels. In this case the degree of conservatism can be reduced since plant to plant variability would be eliminated. In this case, adequate margin will be assured by monitoring the region which has a decay ratio greater than or equal to 0.8. Neutron flux noise limits are also established to ensure early detection of limit cycle neutron flux oscillations. BWR cores typically operate with neutron flux noise caused by random boiling and flow noise. Typical neutron flux noise levels of 1-12% of rated power (peak-to peak) have been reported for the range of low to high recirculation loop flow during both single and dual recirculation loop operation. Neutron flux noise levels which significantly bound these values are considered in the thermal / mechanical design of GE BWR fuel and are found to be of negligible consequence. In addition, stability tests at operating BWRs have demonstrated that when stability related neutron flux limit cycle oscillations occur they result in peak-to peak neutron flux limit cples of 5-10 times the typical values. Therefore, actions taken to reduce neutron flux noise levels exceeding three (3) times the typical value are sufficient to ensure early detection of limit cycle neutron flux oscillations. Typically, neutron flux noise levels show a gradual increase in absolute magnitude as core flow is increased (constant control rod pattern) with two reactor recirculation loops in operation. Therefore, the baseline neutron flux noise level obtained at a specific core flow can be applied over a range of core flows. To maintain a reasonable variation between the low flow and high flow end of the flow range, the range over which a specific baseline is applied should not exceed 20% of rated core flow with two recirculation loops in operation. Data from tests and operating plants indicate that a range of 20% of rated core flow will result in approximately a 50% increase in neutron flux noise level during operation with two recirculation loops. Baselim data should be taken near the maximum rod line at which the majority of operation will occur. However, baseline data taken at lower rod lines (i.e. lower power) l will result in a conservative value since the neutron flux noise level is ) proportional to the power level at a given core flow. I 3/4.4.2 SAFETY / RELIEF VALVES The safety valve function of the safety / relief valves operates to prevent j the reactor coolant system from being pressurized above the Safety Limit of I 1325 psig in accordance with the ASME Code. A total of 11 OPERABLE safety / relief valves is required to limit reactor pressure to within ASME III allow-able values for the worst case upset transient. Demonstration of the safety / relief valve lift settings will occur only during shutdown. The safety / relief valves will be removed and either set pressure tested or replaced with spares which have been previously set pres-sure tested and stored in accordance with manufacturers recommendations in the specified frequency. l l LIMERICK - UNIT 1 B 3/4 4-2 Amendment No. 30 1 _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _. __ -