ML20246E763
| ML20246E763 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1989 |
| From: | Durr J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Miltenberger S Public Service Enterprise Group |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8908300003 | |
| Download: ML20246E763 (15) | |
Text
, _ _
- _ _ _ - 7_
],
'{ , ,
g) $ Q o' n ^
','- h/ 4
. AUG _2 2 - 1999 -
~ Docket No.350-354
- m. :Public' Service' Electric & Gas Company
,* -ATTN: Mr.' Steven E. Miltenberger
! LVice President and
" E ,
Chief Nuclear Officer ivs Po'st; Office Box 236-Hancocks' Bridge, New Jersey 08038
- Gentlemen:
Subject:
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM TEAM INSPECTION
' This: letter is'.to inform you-that' the' NRC , intends 'to perform a ' team inspection '
-of your.maintenanceiprogram at the Hope Creek _ Nuclear Generating Station.on L0ctober-2,:1989 through October- 13, 1989, and to'. request your assistance in
- accomplishing this. task. The inspection'will focus on the performance of maintenance and whether components, systems and structures of-your plant are adequately-~ maintained and'prope'rly repaired so that they are available to perform their intendedL safety function.
. In~ order [for' us ' to. properly prepare _-for thez inspection and maximize the'onsite-time spent.in'_ observation of maintenance in~ progress, we; request that'you-
- furnish theireference material listed in the enclosure of this. letter. The-
~ team.: leader will be. contacting you shortly r_egarding the information that will be'needed prior;tolthe start of the inspection and to arrange a suitable date:
forfa' meeting to explain the inspection'and assessment methodology.
.A copy of thefdraft NRC Temporary _ Instruction 2515/97 " Maintenance' Inspection" Tis enclosed for your information and.to aid in the preparation' for _the inspection;
~ Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. _ If you have any questions iregarding this matter, please contact Leonard Cheung at (215) 337-5296 or Jacque Durr at (215) 337-5282.
Sincerely, Original Signed By:
P. K. Lapon Jacque Durr, Chief Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosure:
As stated 0FFICIAL RECG... COPY CHEUNG MPTI - 0001.0.0 !
08/17/89 )
AUG 2 21983
' Public Service Electric 2
& Gas Company cc w/ encl:
S. LaBruns, Vice President-Nuclear Scott B. Ungarer, Manager, Joint Generation Projects Department, Atlantic Eler.tric Company
'J. J. Hagen, General Manager - Hope Creek Operations L. A. Preston, General Manager - Licensing and Regulation R. Fryling, Jr., Esquire Licensing Project Manager, NRR Public Document Room (PDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
NRC Resident Inspector State of New Jersey bec w/ encl:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences) 2bnagement Assistent, DRMA (w/a-encl)
DRP Section Chief B. Clayton, EDO l RI:DRS[/
RI:DRS/f1 Antierson RI S l Cheung
- Du(fr 8//7/89 8//7/89 8/2089 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY CHEUMG MPTI - 0002.0.0 08/'.7/89
l; ;
- T -
- ym ,4- .
ENCLOSURE.
To aid us.in preparation for the maintenance inspection please provide us with the following documents, procedures and information in accordance with the designated numbers. If you do .not have the requested ' document or information,
-it_is~not necessary to. generate it to comply with this request. We recognize that'many of the documents. requested separately-may be' inclusive in a larger single. document. Please provide-three. sets of the requested documents. A member of our staff will contact you regarding the best method of transmitting the' documents to us.
Section 1-Description of General Plant Maintenance Activities 1-1 . Maintenance administrative procedures which describe your corrective, preventive and predictive maintenance activities.
1-2 Organization charts including the maintenance organization and plant wide organizations.
1-3 Procedures, charts and other documents which describe your Planning Department and its activities.
1-4 Documents which describe maintenance planning and scheduling meetings and status of maintenance reports.
1-5 Documents which describe the Maintenance and Operations interface during planning, scheduling, work start, work closecut.and post maintenance / functional testing.
1-6 Documents which describe your work control process: how a work order _is started,' planned, executed, completed, closed out and equipment-returned to service. Where contractors are used, how are they integrated into the process and controlled?
1-7 Documents which descr;be tre.ining and retraining of plant and contractor maintenance personnel including radiation protection specific training. (For maintenance activities only, do not include GET.)
1-8 Documents which describe interfaces and communications among the technical support, engineering support and the maintenance /I&C Departments.
1-9 Documents which describe maintenance work procedure establishment and control: Criteria as to when a procedure is to be used; initial writeup; reviews and approval; revisions; human factors reviews; QA reviews; requirements for conduct of work; troubleshooting criteria; work closecut; post maintenance testing and restoration of systems
J
' '^..
2-1-10 Description of methods by which maintenance performance is measured. Are performance indicators used? What are they? Who is informed of the results? Provide examples of periodic management reports that are used to assess maintenance performance.
11 Description of process for communications with vendors for technical services and'1atest technical information on equipment and systems installed at the plant, and interfaces with equipment and NSSS vendors for training, modifications and equipment replacement.
1-12 Documents which describe the preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance programs.
Which equipment is~ included?
How is maintenance frequency determined?
What is done with results of these maintenance actions.
1-13 Documents which describe management involvement in maintenance.
Are there goals set for the maintenance and I&C Departments?
Are these goals used in the performance evaluation of managers and supervisors?
Are these goals communicated to first line supervisors?
1-14 Documents which describe the Industrial Safety Policy and its-incorporation into the maintenance program (safety manual, safety training, safety audits, accident reporting and investigations.)
1-15 Documents which describe the interfaces between Maintenance and Health Physics in work planning, scheduling and actual performance of maintenance activities.
1-16 Indexes of department procedures.
cu. tion 2-Status of Plant and Contractor Personnel Who Perform Maintenance.
2-1 The number of craft personnel for el.ectrical, mechanical and I&C maintenance organizations. Please include foremen and the foreman to craft ratio.
2-2 The average years of experience for each individual and the turnover rate.
2-3 Description of shift work and work assignments. How do licensee supervisors decide on which craft or contractor is to perform what .
type of work? ?
Y5fds#3 Mfd &KifeT@lWffaIMPJWWff42HrRISE
.. J
]
3 1
Section 3-Status of Plant Equipment and Plant Maintenance l 3-1 What equipnent failures occurred during the last year of operations?
3-2 What equipment failures have been found during shutdown of plant, since and including the last refueling outage?
3-3 Describe maintenance and testing for diesel generators and IE electrical equipment.
3-4 What component failures present greatest risk from a probabilistic risk standpoint to the plant and how is this information utilized in establishing preventive and predictive maintenance?
3-5 What have been the areas of high maintenance activity on safety related and non-safety related equipment and components?
3-6 Provide the following status concerning Maintenance Work Orders (MWG).
Current total listing and status of MW0s, number in planning, number in final sign-off, number on hold for lack of parts, number on hold for engineering assistance, number available to be worked on Projected number of corrective MWO to be outstanding at start-up by priority Rate of completion of corrective MWO in terms of number completed / month and manhours expended (by craft)/ month for the past 12 months Current number of preventive maintenance work orders overdue Rate of complec.on of preventive MWO for the past 12 months Estimated manhours required to complete current preventive maintenance MW0s Number MW0s requiring rework over past 6 months 3-7 Provide five corrective maintenance procedures for work that is scheduled for the upcoming outage (e.g., MOVs, PRVs, Solenoid Operated Valves, Safety / Relief Valves, ECS Pumps, Batteries, Switchgear,etc.).
3-8 Provide five preventive maintenance procedures that are scheduled for the upcoming outage.
3-9 Provide your overall outage schedule.
, p* ** *"'% UNITED STATES
/t. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION sID WAsHINGTott. o. C. 20556
% <L)l I
% . . . .f.#NRC INSPECTION MANUAL Ot.pg TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION 2515/97 i
MAINTENANCE. INSPECTION 2515/97-01 PURPOSE .
This temporary tristruction (TI) provides guidance for conducting a perfor-w,nce-based inspection of an established and implemented maintenance process
- at all operating nuclear power stations. - -
2515/97-02 OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this TI is to determine whether all components, systems, and strnctures of nuclear power plants are adequately maintained so that they are as allable to perform their intended functions. Additionally, this TI should determine whether the maintenance process provides for the prompt repair of plant components, systems, and structures, as appropriate to
) their prescribed functions.
2515/97-03 BACKGROUND NRC has examined their nuclear pcwer plant maintenance programs and has found ..
a wide variation in their effectiveness. Inadequate maintenance has been a significant contributor to plant and system reliability . problems and, thus, is a safety concern. Analysis of operational events has shown that nuclear power plant components are not being maintained at a level commensurate with their importance to safety. -
This TI was developed to inspect and assess 'the effectiveness of maintenance at selected nuclear power plant sites. A Maintenance Inspection Tree (logic tree) will be used as guidance during these inspections to collate and present inspection findings. :The tree is intended to provide a systematic approach to the performance of the inspections and to ensure consistency.
2515/97-04 CONDUCTING TEAM INSPECTIONS The maintenance team inspections will be announced when the team leader prepares for the pre-inspection visit (Section 04.01) to the site. The full-scope inspection cycle will generally be of a 6-week duration, with the team leader possibly taking an additional 2 weeks to initially coordinate the
) inspection, gather information, and issue the final inspection report.
Issue Date: 11/03/88
- The 6 weeks of team effort should generally consist of I week of preparation, l' week of in-of fice inspection, 2 weeks of onsite inspection, and 2 weeks of documentation.
.'\ the regionalioffice. The sequence of the inspection effort will be determin?d by For example, the 2 weeks of onsite inspection may be consecutive or separated by I week of in-office inspection. {
Generally, the inspection team will be composed of the following six members:
one team leader (region) two reat. tor / project engineers (re one radiation specialist (region)gion) .
two engineers (HQ) f The team composition and/or the extent of effort for individual members may be adjusted by the region. For example, the extent of involvement of the radiation specialist may be less than 6 full weeks, as determined by the regional office. In addition, the regions may include involvement of the resident inspector (RI) to the extent that is normally covered by IP-62703 monthly examinations.. The RI should.be provided tiaining in the use of the logi.c tree by the appropriate team leader for this purpose.
The project manager (PM) will be generally involved with each inspection to the following extent:
be available to the team leader to facilitate contacts with the licensee . . ,
attend,1. to 2 days of the team preparation- . -o attend. final pre-exit team meeting
- g attend exi.t meetings The team will dete$nine what recent failures of significant equipment (probabilistic risk assessment (PRA)-identified, safety-related, or balance of plant (B0P) that affects safety-related and special interest items) have occurred and will inspect the licensee's maintenance activitiss to schedule, repair, and prevent further failure of that equipment. Other selective examinations of' equipment failures attributed to maintenance will be examined to determine. the - adequacy of- licensee corrective actions' an'd root-cause determinations of the. failures. .The inspection should be' performed following review of;thei elements of. the Maintenance Inspection Tree (working tree) and the additional insp,ectipn, Guidance Voluines I and II Iguidance separatelyprovided in the Maintenance distributed). This guidanceInspection should be used as an aid in determining adequacy and implementation of maintenanc.e activities and.to evaluate them. -The tree is also used as'a tool to provide uniformity in inspection structure and in the preliminary recording of the inspection results. It is important to stress that the tree does not drive the inspection, but it does represent. guidance on the areas of inspection.to be addressed, with inspection..results recorded on the tree to the extent completed. The tree consists of three major sections: (1) Overall Plant Performance, (2) Management Support of Maintenance, and (3) Maintenance Implementation.
The inspection requirements for Maintenance Implementation, which focus on the plant systems, components, test and surveillance data, and related activities, will receive the major portion (at least 80 percent, including
} direct observations of maintenance being performed) of the. inspection effort.
Issue Date: 11/03/88 2515/97
i It should be recognized that inspection results from the Maintenance l
! Implementation area will also provide input to the Management Support area. )
It is expected that portions of the Nanagement Support of Maintenance {
sections of the tree, especially the Management Commitraent and Management Organization sections, could be conducted by a single team member in a relatively short time.
The amount of inspection effort devoted to the individual subsections of the tree will be determined by the regional, office, taking into account ;
, recent inspection findings, time and staff limitations, and future inspec- 1 tions planned to cover specific areas.
The inspection is to determine the effectiveness of the total integrated maintenance process of the power reactor licensees. Therefore, the team inspection may be directed into areas for which explicit regulatory reautre-ments may not exist. Thus, the inspection is oriented toward analyzing the performance of maintenance activities rather than toward the identifi-cation of violations. A specific example of an area not subject to explicit requirements is the licensee's participation with the Institute of Nuclear l Power Operations (INPO). Review of licensee resolution of INPO activities '
shall be conducted in accordance with established policy and, thus, observa-tions in this area, when warranted, should be treated as -indicators of strengths or weaknesses.
Although the inspection may result in the identification of inadequacies that are not covered by explicit regulatory requirements, there is no intent to
" ratchet
- licensees. Individual findings that licensees are not following published NRC guides and industry guidelines do not necessarily indicate that s
) a program or area is inadequate. The goal of the inspe~ction effort is to .
emphasize the use of plant experience, test and surveillance data, recent
. component failures, PRA insights, and items of' interest in evaluating the licensee's maintenance process in terms of capabilities and perfomance, and to identify major strengths and weaknesses as they are related to safety .
significance. , . , .
04.01 Team Leader Preparation. A meeting should be planned and held with the licensee to describe the scope of the inspection and to obtain prelimin-ary review materials, such as the licensee's procedures for ' planning, conducting and assessing maintenance, as well as organizational charts, work schedules, equipment lists, component ~ failure data, completed work orders, and related quality control (QC) inspection , procedures.- The material.
obtained by the team leader from the licensee thould be distributed to the '
team members for their review. Following completion of the in-office review of the licensee's maintenance process, the' team leader will discuss the results of these reviews with the team members and factor them into the plan for the onsite inspection. ~
04.02 Inspection Preparation. In preparation for site inspections, the inspection team should review the elements of the Maintenance Inspection Tree to determine which areas may have received recent inspections, which areas may not be applicable, and which areas will be reviewed at the plant site.
The three major parts of mair.tenance (i.e., overall plant performance, management support of maintenance, and maintenance implementation) should be inspected to the degree required to provide a valid conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the licensee's maintenance program.
t 2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88
During the preparation phase. the team should select severa l compenents and/or Gystems for detailed inspec'tiori either through consideration of PRA insights, recent component ' fai,1ures in safety-related or BOP systems that {
affect saf ety, or selected _ equipment of heightened interest to the Co'cis-sion, such as check valves, moto'r-operathd valves, solenoid-operated valves, ard air systems. The PRA insights may be used to select components or activities whose potential failures are predicted to contribute most to the risk at that plant. At least one high-risk system should be included to '
verify that all performance related~ maintenance has been -accomplished.
including preventive maintenance. Recent, equipment failures provide a vehicle for review of 'various aspects ,of maintenance, including root-cause #
ena lysis, equipment hi story, corrective actions, and past maintenance (preventive or corrective). Inspection of failed equipment repairs or work
~
packages will provide the 'dpportuni,ty to examine the. adequacy of the inter-action of all licenssc fun'c neering analyses and trending.,tions' . supporting. maintenance, including engi-
, , , , , j. .
.,,v. . -
Review of performance 16dicator( de'ta . systematic assessment of licensee performance (SALP) reports, previous ,jnspection findings, licensee event reports (LEP.s), ' maintenance ,radiat. ion , exposure ' history, .and other direct measures may identify potential weak . areas".at that plant for which more detailed inspection maf be rsquired. . F..igure .I~ (Inspection Flowchart)
' depicts the initiators that ma' y*be' selected'to' enter the tr.ee. ,
During the preparation phase, prograr3 ; strengths at d.. weaknesses in certain areas may be recorded on the Maintenance Ipspection Tree (wprking tree). If
~
there are sufficient data to,provi'de :an fevaluption . rating .during the prepara-tion, the elements 'should be' rate.d' in ..accordance with . the Maintenance Inspection Guidance. However, telscted ' items' and, i.n particular, i.dentified
) weaknesses should.1be verified during . the..',onsite, .inspecpon,, even if an evaluation rat'ing is assigned during t.he,; ,' preparation. ~
04.03 Onsite Inspection. , ArJentran' ce l
see to detail the ' scope and schedule of the%eed.ng inspection,shall.Eeleid introduce thewith team the licen.
members, and establish the lj:ensee's contacts the inspection. The
~
team should obtain from the licensee the status of,for ongoing work applicable to the inspection oi' that may aff.ect the .performanceJof the inspection or the inspection s ched'ule'.
~
Schedules' and pl.ad 'for. t.he exitfmeetings and the interim meetingsjbetween the Team" leader *and[,licfn'seeimanagement shoul,d also be established during the . entrance ,me'eting;.,.._
Team members shall perf6rm,a detEiled wal,kdown inspebtion.of the plant on'the
~
first or second' dai on' dts"t'o observe,'. ths over' ll" a plant and, equipment material condition. Thl'%aTkdown s inspectiori, in , which the team should observe the condition . of ' #numeroug valvss , pumps,, . motors, .etc. , should include, but not be lim'ited to the following: ?
Condition of components Significance of tagged equip'me'rit] .
Housekeeping and environment Adequacy of labeling ,
Comparisons with drawings and/or pr;ocedures Status of annunciators This waltdown inspection may provide indications cf areas requiring further examination during the inspection.
(
Issue Date: 11/03/88 2515/97
. , :~ , . .
The onsite inspection should focus' on the direct' observation of. work in progress, including the following of licensee work with equipment in progress (e.g., tagouts, procedures, work packages, engineering support, materials, communications, testing, ' approvals, quality control holdpoints, etc.), significance of the maintenance backlog, rework. licensee assessment' of the performance of maintenance, work control processes, control of inter-faces, post-main?.enance testing, plant material condition., and maintenance
. facilities. , ,
On the basis ~ of the collected data, the team should determine the apparent t cause of any problems noted; that is, if the cause is related to the adequacy of procedures, work packages, qualifi. cation of personnel, management, engineering, etc. This analysis should provide entry into specific elements of the tree, which then becomes a tool to explore the suspected- causes and to assess effectiveness of the implementation of applicable elements. All areas listed need not be used in forming- conclusions for each element.
Furthermore, other areas of inspection selected by the team may be used for entry to tree elements.
04.04 Analysis. Using the inspection findings and results noted on the Maintenance Inspection Tree, the team should determine whether each of the areas inspected has been adequately implemented by the licensee and whether or not there is enough information to assign a rating. The Maintenance Inspection Guidance and Criteria previously provided also assists use of the ,
Maintenance Inspection Tree. The team will assign a rating to the applicable elements identified on the work sheets.
The team should assign an overall evaluation rating to each of the elements
\.
) inspected. When this analysis has been completed, an overall rating can be -
determined in accordance with the Maintenance Inspection Guidance and Criteria.
04.05 Exit Meeting. Before the final days of inspection, issues and .
findings should be reduced to definitive writing and then used to highlight ..
the presentation version of the Maintenance Inspection Tree (the Presentation Tree) and to complete the rating roll-up. The exit meeting should include a brief discussion of the preliminary inspection findings using the Presenta-tion Tree to depict inspection ,results in a sumnary fashion; however, the l licensee should be informed that the findings are preliminary until they are reviewed by regional management and the inspection report'is issued.
04.06 Report preparation. Because of the broad extent of the inspection,-
documentation -of inspection activities should begin early in the process to minimize the time required to complete the final report. The final report i should document the assumptions used, the ele 3ents inspected, the elements l that were not applicable, licensee strengths and weaknesses, and overall conclusions consistent with IMC-0610. The report should address elements of the tree to at least the depth of the tier with eight areas (e.g., Direct Measures, Management Comitment and Involvement, etc.).
04.07 Follow Up. Any ' unresolved findings identified during the inspection will be appropriately tracked and resolved by the regional office.
\
2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88 1
t - - - _ - - _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
f4-
[w e,..
g*,.. ,^
j& . .
3 i 2515/97-05' It!SPECT10tl REQtilREt1EliTS The inspMtion shall include selective examinations of the' aspects of main- ,--
tenance . listed in' Sections. 05.01 through 05.03,' including each of the' areas and ' related ' elements of licensee activities identified under the sections.
~
To the extent'possible, selective examinations should be based on observation of maintenance and equipment work activities in' progress, review of licensee-implementation. of maintenance procedures and controls, results of review .of selected documents (such as work packages, equipment test results, and engi-neering evaluations),Jand interviews with personnel).
05.01- Overall Plant Performance Related to Maintenance
- a. Direct Measures. The teaci shall conduct appropriate examinations of plant operability, equipment availability, and- plant material condition that can be directly related to the effective implementa-tion of a maintenance process., .
Before conducting the inspection of plant perfomance,'the inspector should review available plant information on (1) availability, (2) operability, and (3) reliability. Information on these items can be obtained from the plant's operating history. Other sources for obtaining the information are SALP reports, Performance Indicator Data, AEOD-Scram Studies, ESF Actuation
' Studies, Safety System Unavailability Studies, Technical Specification Violations, Monthly Operating Report : Data, and Capacity Factors from NUREG-0020. Data collection should be directed to those measures related to
- safety significant aspects of the maintenance -process. In addition, the inspector should conduct a detailed walkdown inspection of the overall plant
)i material condition to assess the effectiveness.of the licensee's maintenance -
f process to the extent that it .is reflected in plant. housekeeping and in the (-
external condition of equipment. The scope of the inspection should include examination of direct measures by using information gleaned from plant and equipment'for the following:
Historical data ,
Material condition 05.02 Management Support of Maintenanc~e .
- a. Management Comitment and involvement. The examination of management.
effectiveness concerning maintenance . should be directed to de.ter-mining the extent of corporate ;and ' plant management awareness and support of the maintenance and resolution.of wiintenance problems and should include examination of:
The application of industry initiatives #
' Extent of management direct participation in maintenance and in corrective actions (management vigor and example)
- b. Management Organization and Administration. The inspection of management organization and admin'istration controls should be directed to determining how the organization supports maintenance activities, what maintenance activity plan has been established, how the maintenance activity plan has been implemented, corrected, and !
' controlled, and the control of resources. The inspection should include examination ef:
Issue Date: 11/03/88 2515/97
- Program coverage for maintenance Policy, goals, and objectives for maintenance Allocation of resources Definition of maintenance requirements Performance measurement Document Control System for maintenance Maintenance decision process
- c. Technical Support. The areas that are to be selectively examined for
, the technicdl support organiE:,tions with regard to maintenance are as follows:
Internal and/or corporate communication channels Engineering control Incorporation of PRA into the maintenance process Quality control Incorporation of radiological controls into maintenance process Safety Review Comittees Regulatory documents ,
Examples of the applicable departments or organizations subject to this inspection are:
Engineering (nuclear,instrumentationandcontrol(I&C),
mechanical, electrical
- Quality Assurance (QA) , licensing, systems, etc.)
Quality Control (QC)
.)
- HealthPhysics(HP) -
Safety Fire Protection Operatior.s 05.03 Maintenance Implementation
- a. Work Control. The inspection of the work control process should be directed to work order documentation, equipment history, observation of testing in progress, planning and scheduling, and document review.
The inspection should include selective e~xamination of:
Review of maintenance in progress Work order control Maintenance of equipment records and history Job planning Work prioritization -
Maintenance work scheduling
. Backlog controls Maintenance procedures Post-maintenance testing Review of completed work control documents
- b. Plant Maintenance Organization. The inspection of the plant mainte-nance organization should be directed to how the organization supports maintenance activities, how the maintenance activities are controlled, implemented, and corrected, how personnel are controlled, how the organization establishes documentation, the effectiveness of.
2515/97 Issue Cate: 11/03/88
- 7 ~ .- e
,. ? "s...
[E the coordination and ' feedback lines of . communication between plant ,
nanagement ano craf t personnel. and the effectiveness -of interfaces '(
with other departments, especially operations. The inspection should '
-include selective examination of:
Control of plant maintenance activities Control of contracted maintenance
- Deficiency . identification, control, and corrective action system
- Maintenance trending -
Support interfaces c.: Maintenance Facilities, Equipment, and Materials Control. The fol-lowing are to be selectively ex' ..ed for the area of facilities, equipment, and material. controls, as well as .for their support of the ma htenance process:
^
- ' Maintenance facilities and equipment Material controls
- Maintenance tool and equipment control
- Control and calibration of measurement and test equipment
- d. Personnel Control. The foliowing areas of personnel. control are to be selectively . examined, . including consideration of staffing, training,'and qualification:-
s Staffing control Personnel training
) *
- Test and qualification process
(:
b
- Assessment of the current personnel control status
'2515/97-06 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .
The appropriate regional office will document the findings and the actions taken in an inspection. report.and, in addition to the ~ normal distribution, will forward one copy to the Director, Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation,sOffice of NRP,, and one copy to the , Director, Division of Reactor Safety, in.each of the other. regional offices.
2515/97-07 COMPLETION SCHEDULE Inspections should be scheduled so that they. are completed within 2 years of the issuance of this instruction. .
2515/97-08 EXPIRATION This. temporary instruction shall remain in effect for 24 months or until the inspections have been completed.
2515/97-09 NRR CONTACT Any questions regarding this temporary instruction should be addressed to (
A. T. Gody (301-492-1117). N.
Issue Date: 11/03/88 2515/97
ll. ~A*
Ii 2515/97-10 STATISTICAL DATA REPORTING L:
I for 766 or RITS input, the actual . inspection effort should be recorded a9ainst this TI, module number 25597.
2515/97-11 ORIGINATIllG ORGANIZATION INFORMATION l
11.01 Organization Responsibilities. The Performance and Quality Evaluation Branch of NRR will provide support and overall guidance for these inspec-tions.
11.02- Estimated Resources. Each inspection is planned for 6 weeks for 6 persons with 2 of the 6 weeks being direct onsite inspection (12 staff
- weeks) and I week in-office inspection, with expected additional effort by the team leader (a total of 38 staff weeks). This total includes prepara-tion, inspection and report writing. '
11.03 Parallel Inspection Procedures The inspection procedures that this TI may satisfy totally or in part are listed below. Where credit is taken, the inspection report should note the module number per IMC-0610. The region should make final determinations based on the scope and documentation of the inspection.
37701 56700 62704 37702 61700 62705 37828 CIP 61725
) 38701 62700 72701 83000 series 38702 62702 92700 CIP 41400 62703 CIP 92701 END 4
T 2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88
k j!
g.
.. y 9
.s .e .
r .
s m
v
- m to e m
t 1
=
e e i.g .
2
? T g e e
R
- n
- i T r
A h
r r
u n d H c t e d C e ,
t
. e
_ t t
e %,
.n._ a 1 p
e W
= O P
m" + _
1 md L
_ - =
_h r.
e e
n n o F m
- e. d r n
N
, r t
e o r
1 o
n i O I
M e T o C w E sd h .
e P mle e r S 1 lefi t
c N bn I E
R oe r
V U G PId .
I y F m"
mr ur y m" > > > > sr
) o s . o t s e n
e u R r e tma n.
~
t e r E o t
., mt ee t
t e
n le lu )s ) L p te.
ae t y vr l r oed I
T e n S
t S d r e
ine e f e Wn R a
- e. ..
rr ee b o m e t no r ,O t p n ;e O e la t
- n. e, e rb e ekr .eM. e A a-.
td.
T A
er ,.
e.
le v e6 e
n toO c
mo pw .os r e
S i
e s-I io e
o tw o n
ee pg it , S c e
c r
t eE sm em T n . s qS n n e
pe m
e I
e e.
t n n a eO a a Sw N.
I m.m 4 t
t sev eo mv t
e m
i n
tW e
t nP R
_.n
,(
s S t n
e t
n e
l e
d E r mke do eN ln n We
- t. m c( i E .
p o.
Cne a e
iN e
s e _ ,
_ M o
u o e R s ( T R R .
T T mr I > , >
RA M S .i 9 h t S
~ $ ,t n
- .S ma+r7 0% b$
O~
! .j,1flli ljll