ML20246E478
| ML20246E478 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 07/06/1989 |
| From: | Miller H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Hall D ILLINOIS POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20246E485 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8907120255 | |
| Download: ML20246E478 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000461/1989003
Text
__
__
- _
_ _ _
__
_ __-
_ _ _ - - _ - - -
p
..
. . -
- s ' (
-
h
6
W
JUL'6
1989
>-
L
Docket No. 50-461
Illinois Power Company
ATTN: Mr. D. P. Hall.
E
.
. Executive Vice President
'
L500 South 27th Street
Decatur IL' 62525
l'
Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter dated June 14, 1989, informing us of the steps you
.have taken to correct the~ violation that we brought to your attention in our
letter dated May 12, 1989.
,We-have reviewed your response to violation 461/89003-01 and consider the-
response acceptable for examples D and E.-
However, based on our telephone
h
conversations with Messrs. Holtzscher, Wilson, and others of your staff, on
June 29 and 30, 1989,~we understand that you will provide an amended response
by July 21, 1989, which addresses the following:
l
1.
Overall action taken by management to ensure or'substantially improve
procedural compliance at the Clinton Power Station.
'
s
2.
iAdditional action to be taken on the first example of the violation,
(461/89003-01A) to ensure that current revisions to documents are included
in MWR packages and that work is performed in accordance with them. We
understand that this amended response will include:
evaluation of a computerized system to track document utilization /
-
location to allow for periodic review and updating of their
currency.
l
a schedule for development and implementation of the new computerized
-
tracking system.
the procedures that will.be used in the interim
fore the
-
computerized system is fully implemented.
l
3. .
A clarification of the sequence of events involved with the second and
third examples of the violation, 461/89003-01B and 461/89003-01C, including
1
pertinent details that describe how procedural requirements were met.
Based on information supplied by telephone in the referenced conversations,
and acceptable additional clarifications, we will rescind examples B and C
of this violation. Please note that the information supplied in your response
and in'the telephone conversations was not consistent with the information
provided to the inspector and the inspection team during the inspection.
Adequate investigation and clarification of these issues by your staff at
that time could have avoided unnecessary discussions and paper work.
890712O255 890706
i(
FDR
ADOCK 05000461
O
FDC
O v,()]
___
.
.
,
-
.
,
Illinois Power Company
2
JUL 6
1989
l
Although the information provided in the response to the last example of the
violation, 461/89003-OlF, appears to differ from that supplied to the inspector
during previous discussions, we consider the response acceptable.
We will examine these matters further during a future inspection.
Sincerely,
[DRIGINAL SIGNED BY. HUBERT J. MILLER
H. J. Miller, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
cc:
J. S. Perry, Assistant
Vice President
R. D. Freeman, Manager,
Nuclear Station
Engineering Department
cc w/ltr dtd 06/14/89:
DCD/DCB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
Richard Hubbard
J.'W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public
Utilities Division
H. 5. Taylor, Quality Assurance
Division, Sargent & Lundy
Engineers
David Rosenblett, Governor's
Office of Consumer Services
Sheldon Zabel, Esquire,
Schiff, Hardin, & Waite
L. Larson, Project Manager,
General Electric Company
Chairman of DeWitt County
Illinois Department of
Nuclear Safety
D. Schopfer, Project Manager,
Sargent & Lundy Engineers
Y$
RI 'I
RI
RIII
RIIIr
RI
Y
UA5 Y
Ah
y
alker/jk
Ja
nski
Grobe
Cooper
Iiller
Rngh89
07/o
07
/89
07/5/89
07/05/89
07/gj789
07/05/89
_
-
1