ML20245K892
| ML20245K892 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/10/1989 |
| From: | Christoffer G, Creed J, Funk D, Madeda T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20245K886 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-295-89-22, 50-304-89-20, NUDOCS 8908210182 | |
| Download: ML20245K892 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000295/1989022
Text
_ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
.
.
.
U. S. NUCLEAR RECULA10R7 COMMISSION
REGION III
Reports No. 50-295/89022(DRSS); 50-304/89020(DRSS)
Docket Nos. 50-295; 50-304
Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690
Facility Name: Zion Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2
Inspection At: Zion Station
Inspection Conducted: July 10-18, 1989
1
Type of Inspection:
Routine, Unannounced security
Date of Previous Security Inspection: March 2-22, 1989
Inspectors:
9 bh11 /m
8[0N7
G. M' Christoffeb U
Date
Physical Security Inspector
% %n de
sh/n
T. Madeda
V
Date
PhysicalSecurityI[n]spector
- (-
" -
9ll o/E 1
D. E. Funk, Jr.
Date
Physical Security Inspector
Approved By:
$ hMW21 /ou
&//O/F7
J. R. Creed, CW ef U
Date
Safeguards Section
Inspection Summary
Inspection on July 10-18, 1989 (Reports No. 50-295/89022(DRSS);
No. 50-304/89020(DRSS))
Areas Inspected: Management Support, Protected and Vital Area Barriers;
i
Access Control-Personnel., Packages and Vehicles, Alarm Stations and
Communications; Power Supply; Testing; Maintenance and Compensatory Measures;
Training and Qualification and Previous Inspection Findings.
.
Enclosure Contains
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
Upon Separation This
s90s21ois2 s90sivo
Page is Decontrolled
ADOCK 05000295
Q
FDC
__ _
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
s
.
.
. -
Results:
The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas
inspected, except as noted below:
Access Control - Personnel: The licensee failed to restrict access to a vital
area to authorized individuals.
(See Section 5.c of Report Details)
physical Barriers - Vital Areas: The licensee failed to adequately maintain a
Vital Area Barrier.
(See Section 5.a of Report Details)
Management Support:
The licensee failed to report an event in the time limit
required by 10 CFR 73.71.
(See Section 5.b of Report Details).
Additional concerns were identified as noted below:
Audits: QA audits need to be more programmatic and increased QA surveillance
l
are necessary.
Management Effectiveness:
The management effectiveness of the security
j
program is weak.
1
'
Testing and Maintenance:
Increased attention appears required in the broad
area of work order management.
Inspection activities showed a decline in the management effectiveness as it
relates to the security program.
(Details: UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)
U losure Contains
Upon Separation ThisSAF
Page is Decontrolled
,
2
. _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - . _ . _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _