ML20245K165
| ML20245K165 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 11/25/1986 |
| From: | Talley G SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20245K155 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-88-490 NUDOCS 8908180321 | |
| Download: ML20245K165 (4) | |
Text
_ _ - -
m __ _ _ _ _
November 25, 1986 i
Ross scarano, 1
Attached are the five items we promised to send you at the exit meeting 1.
A management summary data report for the period 9/84 - 7/86.
Please take care when quoting from this report as it contair.s more than badging drug tests.
Amanagementsummarydatagrlaphfortheperiod 9/84 - 7/86.
2.
It shows the total testing activity of all types during this period.
I have annotated on this graph the number of drug test failures experienced and whether these were the workers' first, second or third test failure.
l Arepresentativeexampleofl,managementrepo'rt'fromour
~
3.
electronic mail.
This and other similar repcrts eventually resulted in top management changing our program to
" unannounced" drug testing.I l
l 4.
A letter from Dr. Horn documenting the acceptability of the rehabilitation program selected by an employee.
This acceptance is a requirement prior to bringing an employee i
off 30 day suspension.
I Af ter December 1, these letters from Dr. Horr. Will also contain a recommendation regarding restoring unescorted PA
)
access privileges.
I have attached a copy of a form to be used c.fter December 1 which will record the manager's review of the results of the i
dependency assessment sessi6n, 5.
Statistics on how many siterprescreening positives (at l
20 ng/ml) for THC are confirmed by our indeptindent lab at j
the company-approved cutoff point of 50 ng/m:..
Gene Talley l
8908100321 890814 PDR FOIA gg PARRISHBB-490 PDR
n 1-vc muy ev vvv
~v lG Q
- h.-
h l*l. CAST: til:I. I VI.*lt Till s'UI.I.UWI Ng, I*Aq:c,s, gu;;
NAnc:
Ross Scarano l.
c FIRM /f4 CATION:
_NRC, Region V/ Walnut Creek, CA C3
?.,,,.
3 k
-[_.
PHONE It
_ n.i. eg egg qynn si g.
FRON:
'i'a NAME:
Gend Talley.
EXT:
89494
' TOTAL NUMBE' or PAGES
.D?dLUDING COVER $llEST' ^
9
-~
DATE:
November 26. 1986
- ** * ** * * * * ** *** **** e.... e... n e,** *** ******3 e**. e.
.......... o n e. e. n es ee ** **..
e Southern California TAison'a Tel'ecopier Inforetation e
Telecopier Telephones 714' :492.8303 Verification:
e 714=(92-7700 ext. (6799
- TYPet Cntaan $10 e
, Auema tic or Manual
- Loca, tion AMS Building, Receptionist D*gk If you do not receLVe e
All pages, ple as e ca.11 back as soon Possible 492-?700, ext. If6 7 9 9.
e as e
e eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegespeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee,weseeeems i
uo m wee,wes eeeeeee-e******** #
gc
. fi e c/
li y ';g g,,
bal clurec3-
'71U
- ' c ' *^
g r
J.. _ _ _
t As / Z>
h(e TOTRL TESTS SINCE 9/84 (17,000)
I
..e k
Ald]blb.
i!l$p\\j\\[h
(
\\
l ad s(lh{p u!,i[~~
c t
o--
l}:
- IUkjf!l sis ll(liMls@s #lf,
~@
lu T h
' 4 tits -
I7,267 T&lfa.Los-73f
~
mt ftl/w h,JlNkes3r lMit&,$g_r 703 As 7
~
l (9) From LGENE TALLEY 9/10/86 10:21AM (2066 bytes 29 in)
To HAROLD RAY, M1KE WHARTON, PETE ELLER
.cc: LORNA PIERCY subject: Drug Allegation Followup I contacted Dennis Schaefer on 9/10/86 to follow up on the drug allegation he had forwarded to Pete Eller on the 5,th.
The allegation calls the SONGS drug program largely ineffective and the alleger claims to have knowledge of cocaine and amphetamine use but mention ~s no names.
I Mr. Schaefer recounted the facts (essentially the same an Pete had recorded in his letter on this subject) and saidlhe believed the allegation lacked any sufficient basis for taking any action he could see.
I agreed but indicated that we want to be as responsive as we can to the possibility of improving our drug program.
Schuster on May oth, which I believe wor; ked out well.I repeated an offer we had nade to D I suggested that the alleger, who desired that his name not be revealed to site management, be rc-contacted by the NRC and offered the! option of contact.ing SCE Corporate security at (818) 302-1280 and arranging to meet privately to discuss the details of "rampent drug use within Health Physics, piperitters and Maintenance, up to middle management", with the promise of preserving confidentiality but allowing a trained interrogator to acuess whether there was any basis for us to take any further investigatory action beyond our normal investigative and behavioral observation activitics.
I He thought this was a good solution to an otherwise difficult allegation to respond to and said he would ensure that this offer was made to the alleger.
He also asked about a " hot line" for concerns on site.
I reviewed our Nuclear Safety Concerns program and told him about the drop boxes which we have placed around the site and periodic' ally advertise.
He said he wanted to remind the alleger about this program.
Unless I hear anything further on this alllegation, closed.
I consider the matter 9
e w
un e
_ _ -___- _________ - _ -