ML20245J668
| ML20245J668 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 08/14/1989 |
| From: | Milhoan J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Campbell G ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8908180119 | |
| Download: ML20245J668 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000313/1989026
Text
,
.
,.
,.
. _..
.-_
--
,
,9 y
af-
[ Ip ,"g 3.[ '
,
,
,
'
'
4
7y
.
~
-
+
.
.w
,,
..
Y
,
'
>
.g.
m
. ,
,
g
- In Reply; Refer To: .
- %y
LDockets:?50-313/89-26-
,,
,
'
~50-368/89-26
s
,n'
>
-x
+
.;.
~
(Arkansas' Power & Light Company
i
"
.ATTNi Mr. Gene Campbell
'
.
X
Vice' President.. Nuclear
,
ug
7 ..
- 0perations
%,
P.O. Box 551
l.
.
,
Little Rock, Arkansas 72203
'- i
y
..
.
.
' Gentlemen:'
.
lThank you.'for your letteridated -July 21,1989, _in - response to our. letter-
.
'and Notice of; Deviation dated June 22, 1989. We have reviewed your reply and
,
.. find it responsive to the' concerns raised'in our Notice of Deviation. We will
review theLimplementat. ion of your cor/ective actions duping a future inspection
,,
(
t.,
'to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintained.
'
,
T ',.
,_
N
-Sincerely,
Driginal Signed By
'
J. L. Milhoan
6-
'
Ja'mes L. Milhoan, Director
7
4
'
< Division-of Reactor Projects
s
,
CC:
,
- Arkansas: Nuclear One '
'
ATTN:_'N. S.1Carns, Director.
Nuclear Operations
^
-P.O.. Box 608
Russellville,' Arkansas '72801
Arkansas' Radiation Control' Program Director
i
IRIV:RI':PSS*'
C:PSS*
AD:DRS*
D
ASingh/cjg
TStetka
JJaudon
JLMi]hoan
'
'
{(/ /89
-/L/89
/ /89
/ /89
ft
'
j. ,
' *previously concurred
o
.
MRS2nais SMS$p
Q
-
.Si
..,
..,
. ._. - - - _ _ _ _ . . _ _ - _ _ - _ -
.
. . -
.
1
Arkansas Power & Light Company
-2-
'
L
bec to DMB (IE01).
bec distrib..by RIV:
RRI.
R. D.' Martin, RA
RPB-DRSS
Section Chief (DRP/A)
Lisa Shea. RM/Al.F
RIV File
,
~ MIS System
.
.
RSTS Operator
ProjectEngineer(DRP/A)
C. Harbuck, NRR Project Manager-(MS:: 13-D-18)
C. Poslusny, NRR Project Manager- (MS:
13-D-18)-
.
A. Singh
"
.
T. Stetka
.
(
h
-
T
_ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ - _
_
_
__
_
._
.g
-
gn. w e _. : J d' FG,
~ ~ nl/
-
e
. . . -
r
,
Y(g)j{
Jlb 24 BW h;
t!q
e-
-
t
4
Q
M
.
.
' g. u '"'_
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
. -_
r
July 21, 1989
' " ~~~
'
OCAN078918
J. L. Milhoan, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Region IV.
611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000
Arlington, Texas 76011
SUBJECT:
Arkansas Nuclear One - Units 1 and 2
Docket Nos. 50-313/50-368
Response to Inspection Report
50-313/89-26 and 50-368/89-26
Dear Mr. Milhoan:
Pursuant to the provisions of 10CFR2.201, a response to the
deviation identified in the subject. inspection report is submitted.
Very truly yours,
-
-
,.
i. ; /
,
A
,
_,
'E. C. Ewing
General Manager,
Technical Support
and Assessment
ECE:PLC:sgw
enclosure
cc w/ enc 1:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Document Control Desk
Mail Station P1-137
Washington, D. C.
20555
i
f & ( j> {^ $ M
9
9
i a
e
o
4c,'
MEMBEA MfDOLE SOUTH UTILITIES SYSTEM
=
_-_. __ __ --
. _ _
]
-
'
OCANB78918
..
..
July 21, 1989
Page 2 of 4
Notice of Deviation
Based on the results of an WRC inspection conducted on June 5-9,
1989, a deviation from a commitment to the NRC was identified.
The
deviation consisted of failure to complete and implement the
Preventive Maintenance Program (PMP).
In accordance with the
" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement
Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the deviation is listed
below:
In a letter dated November 30, 1987, in response to Violation
313/8730-01; 368/8730-01, concerning an inadequate PMP for
safety-related components, the licensee committed to complete
and implement a new PMP by October 1988.
Contrary to the above, as of June 9,1989, the new PMP has not
been completed and implemented.
Deviation 313-368/8926-01
Response to Deviation 313-368/8926-01
(1) The reason for the deviation if admitted:
AP&L does admit that the Preventive Maintenance Program (PMP)
was not completed and implemented by October 1988.
The program
status for October 1988 was as follows:
Procedures for Preventive Maintenance:
Mech
Elect
Total
Required
207
193
450
850
Draft / Planned
185
163
285
635
Approved
146
107
108
361
% Complete (Draft)
89
84
63
74
% Complete (Approved)
70
55
22
42
Preventive Maintenance Engineering Evaluations:
Required
174
Draft / Planned
151
Approved
149
% Complete (Oraft)
86
% Complete (Approved)
85
Repetitive Tasks:
Mech
Elect
Total
Required
2039
2995
2216
7250
Draft / Planned
1435
2690
500
4615
Approved
898
1034
97
2035
,
% Completed (Draft)
70
89
22
63
l
% Complete (Approved)
44
34
4
28
l
i
l
!
l
c _ ___ _ _
_
i
- - - - - _ -
SCAN 878918
..
.
' '
.'#- - * ,e
i
July 21,1989
Pag 2 3 of 4-
The status through July 16, 1989, is as follows:
Procedures for Preventive Maintenance:
Mech
Elect
Total
Required
207
193
450
850
Draft / Planned
198
193
412
803
Approved
187
162
252
601
% Complete (Draft)
95
100
91
94
% Complete (Approved)
90
83
56
70
Preventive Maintenance Engineering Evaluations:
Required
174
Draft / Planned
164
Approved
162
% Complete (Draft)
93
% Complete (Approved)
92
Repetitive Tasks:
Mech
Elect
Total
Required
1700
3450
.2100
7250
Draft / Planned
1696
3450
1891
7037
Approved
1470
2653
979
5102
% Complete (Draft)
99
100
90
97
% Complete (Approved)
86
76
46
70
The completion of the project was delayed due to the following:
1.
Scope addition
- Vibration analysis
- Oil analysis
- Setpoint development
- Equipment configuration verifications
2.
Revisions to procedures after issuance required additional
resources.
The responsibility for execution of the program was transferred
from one group to another, and due to an oversight, AP&L failed
to notify NRC of our projected schedule overrun.
It is expected
l
that procedures will be revised or added based on addition of
equipment, maintenance history, and industry experience.
This
^should be part of normal naaintenance of the program and not part
of the development.
.
(
- - - . _ . - _ - - - _ - _ . - - - - . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ - _ - . - . - -
w
- _ _ - _ - .
. . . _ .
.-c %.
9CAN878918
'
,. 9 :::, r.
-
July.21, 1989
.
Page 4 of 4;
,
,
. (2) The corrective steps that have been taken and~the results-
- achieved:
1The program status was reviewed-and the scope defined.
A
completion .cate for safety-related. and other selected components
c
.
procedures wasLestablished. . A review of AP&L's outstanding NRC
commitments was performed.
The results identified three additional
commitments related to NRC inspection. reports which were not-
completed by.the expected'due date. These were' discussed
between Mrc Dwight Chamberlain of NRC Region IV' and Mr. Charles
Turk,: Acting Licensing Manager on July 17, 1989, and in followup
correspondence (SCAN 078917).
(3) The corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further
deviations:
The current method of tracking NRC commitments is being evaluated.
LIf an improved method is deemed necessary, actions will be
directed.toward implementing the changes.
The Preventive ~
Maintenance Program progress will be closely tracked and if
delays result, notification to the NRC will be provided.
~
(4) The date when- full compliance will be achieved:
By.0ctober 31, 1990, the preventive maintenance procedure for
the current scope of safety-related and other selected components.
will.he completed. . Implementation.of specific-preventive
maintenance procedures will be governed by the schedule
established as part of the. program. ..This date is based on
continuing with the current level of progress.
The evaluation
of the method for tracking NRC commitments will be completed by
October 15, 1989. This date will allow for identification of
the various management reports to be issued from the tracking-
system data.
,
m.___._
___mm.
~-
-..m_.
. _ _ _.
.s
..m_ _ - - . ._
_ _ - . . _ _ _ __ . _ _ _ _ _ _
-__-_..s_.____--___.__._m.._-___..__..-
________-__.__m______m_-._._____.__.___.__._____._._-__
-
-
-