ML20245B920
| ML20245B920 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 04/13/1989 |
| From: | Gallo R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Mroczka E NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8904260378 | |
| Download: ML20245B920 (15) | |
Text
, _ _ _ _. - - - _ _ _ _ - -
N..~.-
ja' >Mbo 1
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
j:
,y.
REGION 1 475 ALLENDALE ROAD -
KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406 April 13,1989
- Docket Nos. 50-245 50-336 50-423 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company ATTN: Mr. E; J. Mroczka Senior Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and Operations Group P. O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Gentlemen:
Subject:
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM TEAM INSPECTION This letter is to inform you that the NRC intends to perform a team inspection of your maintenance program at the Millstone site on May 30, 1989, through June 16, 1989, and July 5, 1989 through July 14, 1989, and to request your assis-tance in accomplishing this task. The inspection will focus on the performance of maintenance and whether all components, systems and structures of your. plant
- are adequately maintained and properly repaired so that they are available to perform their intended safety function.
The inspection team will consist of seven' members providing expertise in different areas.
In order for us to prepare for-the inspection and maximize the onsite time spent in observation of maintenance in progress, it will be necessary for the facility to furnish reference material listed in the enclosure to this letter.
l The team leader will be contacting you shortly regarding the information that will be needed prior to the start of the inspection and to arrange a suitable j
date for a meeting to explain the inspection and assessment methodology.
A copy of the NRC Temporary Instruction 2915/97 " Maintenance Inspection" is also enclosed for your information and to aid in preparation for the inspection..
j Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact Mr. Norman Blumberg at 215/337-5199.
Sincerely, Robert M. Gal
, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosures:
p[
1.
Reference Material 2.
NRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97, Maintenance Inspection 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY l
Dhh $$$h3 PDC
b;,,
y.c./
a p
4 LNortheast Nuclear Energy. Company -
~
'3' j?
i k
cc w/ encl:
W. D. Romberg, Vice President, Nuclear Operations-c-
S. E. Scace,. Station Superintendent-t L
~ D. 0.- Nordquist, Director of. Quality Services W
R; M.' Kacich, Manager, Generation Facilities Licensing
. Gerald Garfield, Esquire Public Document' Room (PDR) 3
. Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
F Nuclear: Safety 'Information Center (NSIC).
fi NRC Resident. Inspector.
State of Connecticut k
IU
'bec w/ enc 1:
[
Region I Docket Room (with; concurrences)
~
Management-Assistant, DRMA (w/o enc 1)
F' DRP Section Chief i
.J. Shediosky, SRI, Haddam Neck:
W. Raymond,. SRI, Millstone 3'
.M. Boyle, LPM, NRR-R. Bores, DRSS S. Pindale, RI, Beaver Valley.
D. - Jaffe, LPM, NRR i
i
'RI:DRSh'V
- /}4 RI:DRS RI:DR F
Caphton/djh Blumberg #
Gallo 4 /13 /89 4//3 /89 4//f/89 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
______.-_S______.-_________
_.___________..._m__...___
ENCLOSURE To aid us in preparation for the maintenance inspection please provide us with 1
-the following documents, procedures and information in accordance with the L
designated numbers.
If you do not have the requested document or information.
l
.it is'not necessary to generate it to comply with this request. We recognize that many of the documents requested separately may be inclusive in a larger single document. Please provide three sets of the requested documents. A l
member of our staff will contact you regarding the best method of transmitting the documents to us. Please provide the information for each of the units, I
except if it is' common and applies to all units, then only one set with three copies is needed.
Section 1-Description of General Plant Maintenance Activities 1-1 Maintenance administrative procedures which describe your corrective, preventive and predictive maintenance activities.
1-2 Organization charts including the maintenance organization and plant wide organizations.
1-3 Procedures, charts and other documents which describe your Planning Department and its activities.
1-4 Documents which describe maintenance planning and scheduling meetings and status of maintenance reports.
1-5 Documents which describe the Maintenance and Operations interface during planning, scheduling, work start, work closeout and post maintenance / functional testing.
1-6 Documents which describe your work control process: how a work order is started, planned, executed, completed, closed out and equipment returned to service. Where contractors are used, how are they integrated into the process and controlled?
1-7 Documents which describe training and retraining of plant and contractor maintenance personnel including radiation protection specific training.
(For maintenance activities only, do not include GET.)
1-8 Documents which describe interfaces and communications among the technical support, engineering support and the maintenance /I&C Departments.
1-9 Documents which describe maintenance work procedure establishment and control:
Criteria as to when a procedure is to be used; initial writeup; reviews and approval; revisions; human factors reviews; QA reviews; requirements for conduct of work; troubleshooting criteria; work closeout; post maintenance testing and restoration of systems.
1-10 Description of methods by which maintenance performance is measured.
Are performance indicators used? What are they? Who is informed of l
the results? Provide examples of periodic management reports that are used to assess maintenance performance.
s.
i 1-11 Description of process for communications with vendors for technical services'and latest technical information on equipment and systems-installed at the plant, and interfaces with vendors or NSSS for training, modifications and equipment replacement.
1-12 Documents which describe the preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance programs.
Which equipment is included?
How is maintenance frequency determined?
What is done with results of these maintenance actions. 13 Documents which describe management involvement in maintenance.
Are there goals set for the maintenance and I&C Departments.
Are these goals used in the performance evaluation of :nanagers and
. supervisors?
Are these goals communicated to first line supervisors and chiefs?
1-14 Documents which describe the Industrial Safety Policy and its incorporation into the maintenance program (safety manual, safety training, safety audits, accident reporting and investigations.)
1-15 Documents which describe the interfaces between Maintenance and Health Physics in work planning, scheduling and actual performance of maintenance activities.
1-16 Indexes of department procedures.
Section 2-Status of Plant and Contractor Personnel Who Perform Maintenance.
2-1 The number of craft personnel for electrical, mechanical and I&C
. maintenance organizations. Please include foremen and the foreman to craft ratio.
2-2 The average years of experience for each individual and the turnover rate.
2-3 Description of shift work and work assignments. How do licensee supervisors decide on which craft or contractor is to perform what type of work?
i l
Section 3-Status of P? ant Equipment and Plant Maintenance l
3-1 What equipment failtres occurred during the last year of operations?
)
3-2 What equipment failures have been found during shutdown of plant, since and including the last refueling outage?
l l
1 l
L ____
i
h 4
f 3-3 Describe maintenance and testing for diesel generators and IE electrical equipment.
3-4 ' What component failures present greatest risk from a probabilistic risk standpoint to the plant and how is this information utilized in establishing preventive and predictive maintenance?
i-3-5.What have been the areas of high maintenance activity.on safety related and non-safety related equipment and components?
3-6 Provide the following status concerning Maintenance Work Orders (MWO).
Current total listing and status of MW0s, number in planning, number in final sign-off, number on hold for lack of parts, number on hold for engineering assistance, number available to be worked on Projected number of corrective MW0s to be outstanding at start-up by priority Rate of. completion' of. corrective MWO_ in terms of number completed / month and manhours expended (by craft)/ month for the past 12 months Current number. of-preventive maintenance work nrdars nyardya I
Rate of completion of preventive MWO for the past 12 months Estimated manhours required to complete current preventive maintenance MW0s Number MW0s requiring rework over past 6 months 3-7 Provide five corrective maintenance procedures for work that is scheduled for the upcoming outage (e.g., NOVs, PRVs, Solenoid Operated Valves, Safety / Relief Valves, ECS Pumps, Batteries,
'Switchgear, etc.).
3-8 Provide five preventive maintenance procedures that are scheduled for the upcoming outage.
3-9 Provide your overall outage schedule.
1 l
l l
I
l L
l.
.f
"4 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g}
WASHWGTOM. o. C. 20555
\\/
NRC INSPECTION MANUAL oten l
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION 2515/97 MAINTENANCE. INSPECTION l
2515/97-01 PURPboE l
This temporary instruct;on (TI) crovides guidance for conducting a perfor-mance-based inspection of an estatilished and implemented maintenance process-at all operating nuclear power stations.
2515/97-02 OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this TI is to determine whether all components.
l systems, and structures of nuclear power plants are adequately maintained so that they are available to perform their intended functions. ' Additionally, this TI should determine whether the maintenance process provides for the prompt repair of plant components, systems, and s.tructures, as appropriate to their prescribed functions.
i 2515/97-03 BACKGR UND NRC has examined their nuclear power plant maintenance programs and has found a wide variation 'in their effectiveness.
Inadequate maintenance has been a significant contributor to plant and system reliability. problems and, thus, is a safety concern.
Analysis of operational events has shown that nuclear-power plant components are not being maintained at a level commensurate with their importance to safety.
This TI was developed to inspect and assess'the effectiveness of maintenance at selected nuclear power plant sites.
A Maintenance Inspection Tree (logic tree) will be used as guidance during these inspections te collate and present -inspection findings. :The tree is intended to provide a systematic approach to the performance of the inspections and to ensure consistency.
2515M7-04 CONDUCTING TEMI INSPECTIONS She raaintenence tem inspections will be announced when the team leader prepares for the pre-inspection visit (Section 04.01) to the site. The ful'l-scope 'nspection cycle will genasily be of a 6-week duration, with the team leader possibly taking an additional 2 weeks to initially coordinate the inspection, gatner inform 6 tion, and issue the final inspection report.
Issue Date:
11/03/88
?-
The 6 weeks of team effort should generally consist of 1 week of preparation, I week of in-office inspection, 2 weeks of onsite inspection, and 2 weeks of documentation.
The sequence of the inspection effort will be determined by the regional office.
For example, the 2 weeks of onsite inspection may be.
, ~
consecutive or separated by I week of in-office inspection.
Generally, the inspection team will be composed of the following six members:
one team leaderH(r'egion) two reactor /proje.ct. engineers (re one radiation specialist (region)gion)-
two enginee,rs (HQ) l The team composition and/or-the' ext.ent of effort for individual members may be adjusted by the region.
For example, the extent of involvement' of the radiation specialist may be less than 6 fd11 weeks, as determined by the
. regional office.
In addition, the regions may include
- involvement 'of the resident inspector (RI) to the extent that is normally covered by IP-62703 monthly examinat, ions.. The RI.should. be.provided training in the dse of 'the logic ~ tre.e.by the appropriate team leader ~ for this purpose.-
p m
The project manager (PN) will be generally involved with each inspection to the following extent:
be available to the team leader to facilitate contacts with the
-. licensee 4._
". attend,1.to 2 days of the-team preparation N
i.
6
-(:
attend / final pre-exit team meeting o'
^5
. attend /.exi.t meetings W
3.s The team "will.
determine what recent failures ~of significant 1squipment (probabilistic risk assessment (PRA)-identified, safety-related, or balance of plant (BOP) that.affects safety-related and special interest i.tems).have 2-occurred and will inspect the licensee's maintenance activ.itids to schedule, repair, and prevent further failure of that equipment.
0ther selective examinations ofc quipment failures attributed to maintenance,will be examined e
to. d.etermines the-adequacy of olicensee corrective actions' an'd 'r'ootacause determinations'of..the failures. qThe> inspection should be' performed'following review ~of thd.elemen,t's of. the'. Maintenance Inspection Tree (working tree) and the additional \\insipectipn;'
Guidance Voluine's I and II (guidance provided in the Maintenance Inspection separately distributed).6This guidance shou ~1d be used as an aid in determining adequacy and implementation of maintenance activities and to evaluate them. -The-tree is also used as'a ~ tool'to provide
{
uniformity <in inspection structure and ein the preliminary recordi.ng of the t
inspection results.
It is important to stress that the trec ~does not driv'e fhe irispeccion, but it-does represent. guidance en the areas of inspectiort to be afdressed, with. inspection.rcsults recorded on the tr(e to the extent completed.
The tree corsists of three major sections:
(1) Overall Plant Performance, (2) Hausgement Support of Maintenance, and (3) Maintenance implementation.
1 The inspection requirements for Nintenance Implementation, which focus on j
the plant syster..s, J.omponents, test and surveillance data, and related activities, will receive the major portion (at least 80 percent, including direct ob:,ervations of maintenance being performed) of the inspection effort.
1
)
1 Issue Date:
11/03/88 2515/97
- - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - -
+
j
,.s.
l i
It should be recognized that inspection results from. the Maintenance Implementation area.will also provide input to the Management Support area.
It -is expected that portions of. the Management Support of Maintenance sections of the tree, especially the Management Commitment and Management Organization sections, could be conducted. by a single team member in ~
I a
relatively short time.
The amount of inspection effort devoted to the individual subsections of the tree will be determined by the regional. office, taking into account recent inspection findings, time and staff limitations, and future inspec-
- tions planned to cover specific areas.
- de inspection is to determine the effectiveness of the total integrated 1
aintenance process of. the.. power reactor licensees.
Therefore, the team j
inspection may be directed.into areas for eich explicit regulatory require-ments may not exist.
Thus, the inspect on is oriented toward analyzing the performance of maintenance activities rather than toward the identifi-cation of violations.
A. specific example of an area not subject to explicit requirements is the ' licensee's participation with the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO).
Review of licensee resolution of INP0 activities i
shall be conducted in accordance w'ith established policy and, thus, observa-1 tions in this area,. when warranted, should be treated as 4ndicators of strengths or weaknesses.
~
]
l AltLGUsh thG insp6Ctiaa iQ issait iis tiis idsstifissi,I6n, uf inadequat.:ies i,iiai, are not covered by explicit regulatory requirements, there is no intent to
" ratchet" licen' sees.1 Individual findings that licensees a're not following published NRC guides and industry, guidelines do not necessarily indicate that a program.or area is inadequ' ate.
The goal of the irispe'ction effort is to,
emphasize the use of plant experience,' test' asfd ~ surveillance data, recent component failures, PRA insights, and items of interest in evaluating the -
licensee's maintenance process in terms of capabilities and performance, and to identify major strengths and weaknesses as they are related to safety significance.'
04.01 Team Leader Preparation'.
A meeting should be planned and held with
. the licensee to. describe the scope of the inspection and to obtain prelimin-ary review materials, such' ~s the licensee's procedures for ' planning, a
i conducting and assessing maintenance, as well as organizational charts, work schedules, equipmerit lists, component # failure data, completed work orders, and related quality control (QC) inspection, procedures.-
The material
)
obtained by 'the tean leader from'the licensee should be distributed to the i
team metters for their review.. Following. completion of the-in-office review
)
of the licensee's maintenance process, the team leader will discuss the results of these reviews with the team members and factor them intc the plan for the onsite irspection.
04.02 Inspection Preparation.
In preparation for site inspections, the
' inspection team sTould review the elements of the !!aintenance Inspection Tree to determine which areas may have received recent inspections, which areas may not be applicable, and which areas will'be reviewed at the plant site.
The three major parts of maintenance (i.e.,
overall plant performance, management support of maintenar.ce, and maintenance implementation) should be inspected to the degree requireo to provide a valid conclusion regarding the
+ effectiveness of the licensee *s maintenance program.
1 2515/97 Issee Date: 11/03/88 2
i During the preparation phase, the team sfould select severa l compenents l
and/or systems for~ detaile'd in'spectien' eithbr through consideration of 'PRA insights, recent. compatient, failures in ' safety-related or BOP systems that affect safety, or selected equipment of heightened interest to the Commis-sion, such as che'ck vahes,"moto'r-operatbd. valves, solenoid-operated valves, and air sy stems.
The PRA~ insights 'may be Osed to select components, or activities whose potential failures are predicted to contribute 'most to the risk at that plant.
At least, one high-r,isk. sy. stem should be. included to verify that all' performance,related.' ma,i.ntenance has been accomplished, including preventive maintenance.
Recent. equipment failures provide a vehicle for review 'of ' vari'6us aspects,of. maintenance, including root-cause analysis, equipment histery.,
correcti.ve a ction's, and past maintenance (preventive or corre.ctive).
Inspectio.n..of failed equipment repairs or work pachges will pr~ ovide th5%poftunity 'to examine the. adequacy of the inter-action of all licensse' fun'c.fions^s including engi-neering analyses. and treriding.E, (c. supporting' maintenance,
[,
c
....t Review of"perfor6ance" ifd'ibator[ da'ta,1systEna' tic 2ssessment of licensee performance '(SALP) intensnce 'ra'diition'jnspection findings, reports, previoui.
~
licensee event reports (LERs),ma exposure " history,.and other direct measures may-identify pote'ntTal weak.'are.als.?at that plant for which more S
detailed irispection' miy 'bb.'idiuired.... Ei (Inspection Flowchart) depicts the tiiitiatdrslthat may be" selected logure.1.1 l
' enter'.the.tr.ee.
During the. preparation phase, prograni.stre,ngths and., weaknesses in certain areas may De recoroea on tne tia1ntenance IpFki. ion Tree (working tree).
If there are sufficibrit dat'atopr'oViderdhleval,u the element's "sh'ould b'h~ rated' -in..ac,at(on', rat'ing.du' ring-the prepara-
- tion, cordance with. the fiaintenance Inspection Guidance? llow'sver $sidcNd'ite(ns' and, i.n.p'arficular,. identified weaknesses. sh'ouldT be verif'i'e'd 'duririg. th.b..'pnsite. inspection,
~
even if an
. evaluation rat'ing' if assigned. d.u,r;ing th,e,'pregra. tion.,
Onsite' In'spection., A'n%tran' dl5.eefi.ng ~shall.[e' heid:with the1.licen-
.04.03 c
see to detail the ' scope 'and' schedule' of the inspection, iritrgduce the team members, and establish the licensee's contacts for the inspection.
The team should obtain from the licensee,the status of.ongo,ing work applicable to the inspection 'oi'that' may affect ths.performanceJof. the.. inspection or the inspe'ction sche'dhld', -
Schidu1es' arid jil.aiA.' "for. thb exit.
~
~
interimimeeting'sibetkeen the7eanf11eader*,anifli.cEn'see(mana.' meetings and the genient should also reestablished'ddr;ingtheentrancemietingfi*_i,. '
, ; y.,..
y,.-
F
.r Team members shall perf6r.m4a deteiled wa.1,kdown. inspection of the plant on the 1
first or secorida dai cri' dts? t'o observe.'. t'h6 overall ~ plant and. equipment material conditibii.
ThTs%aTkdosn ins' ectiod, in, which the team.should p
observe' the coridition (of 'riumErous '; valves,, pumps','. motors,. etc., should include, but not' be l'iciited 'to the foll'6 wing:
Condition of components Significance of tagg6d equip'me'it[,
11ou se F.eep ing a r.d' ~env i rontren t Adequacy of labe' ling Comparisoris with drawirigs and/or procedures Status of annunciators
~
This walkdowr, inspection may, provide indications of areas requiring further examination during the inspection.
Issue Date:
11/03/88 2515/97
The onsite inspection should focus on the direct observation of work in
- progress, including the following of licensee work with equipment in progress (e.g.,
tagouts, procedures, work packages, engineering support, materials, communications, testing, approvals, quality control holdpoints, etc.), significance of the maintenance backlog, rework, licensee assessment of the performance of maintenance, work control processes, control of inter-fa ces, post-maintenance testing, plant material condition, and maintenance facilities.
On the basis of the collected data, the team should determine the apparent cause of any problems noted; that is, if the cause is related to the adequacy of procedures, work packages, qualification of personnel, management, engineering, etc. This analysis should provide entry into specific elements of the tree, which then becomes a tool to explore the suspected causes and to assess effectiveness of the implementation of applicable elements.
All areas listed need not be used in forming conclusions for each element.
Furthermore, other areas of inspection selected by the team may be used for entry to tree elements.
04.04 Analysis.
Using the inspection findings and results noted on the Maintenance Inspection Tree, the team should determine whether each of the areas inspected has.been adequately implemented by the licensee and whether or not there 'is enough information to assign a rating.
The Maintenance Inspection Guidance and Criteria previously provided also assists use.of the Maintenance Inspection Tree. The team will assign a rating to the applicable elements identified on the work sheets.
The team should assign an overall evaluation rating to each of the elements inspected.
When this analysis has been completed, an overall rating can be determined in accordance with the Maintenance
- Inspection Guidance and Criteria.
04.05 Exit Meeting.
Before the final days of inspection, issues and findings should be reduced to definitive writing and then,used to highlight the presentation version of the Maintenance Inspection Tree (the Presentation Tree) and to complete the rating ro-ll-up. The exit meeting should include a brief discussion of the preliminary inspection findings using the Presenta-tion Tree to depict inspection results in a summary fashion; however, the licensee should be informed that the findings are preliminary until they are reviewed by regional management and the inspection report'is issued.
04.06-Report Preparation.
Because of the broad extent of the inspection, documentation -of inspection activities should begin early in the process to minimize the time required to complete the final report.
The final report shodl6 document the assuntior,s ustd, the elements inspected, the elements that were not applicafle, licensee strengths and weaknesses, and ovcirall i
conclusions consistent with IMC-0610.
The report should address elements of the tree to at least the depth of the tier with eight areas (e.g., Direct Measures, flanagement Comrxitn'ent and Involvement etc.).
04.07 Followjuo.
Any ' unresolved findings identified during the inspection will be appropriately tracked and resolved by the regional office.
2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88
l 2515/97-05 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS j
l The inspection shall include selective examinations of the aspects of main-tenance listed in Sections 05.01 through 05.03, including each of the areas and related elements of licensee activities identified under the sections.
To the extent possible, selective examinations should be based on observation of maintenance and equipment work activities in progress, review of licensee implementation of maintenance procedures and controls, results of review of selected documents (such as work packages, equipment test results, and engi-neering evaluations), and interviews with personnel).
l 05.01 Overall Plant Performance Related to Maintenance l
a.
Direct Measures.
The. team shall conduct appropriate examinations of plant operability, equipment : availability, and plant material condition that can be directly related to the effective implementa-tion of a maintenance process.e Before conducting the inspection of plant performance, the inspector should review available plant information..on (1) availability, (2) operability, and (3) reliability, Information on thesefitems can'be.obtained-from the plant's operating history.
Other sources for. obtaining the information are SALP reports, Performance Indicator Data, AE00-Scram. Studies, ESF Actuation Studies, Safety System Unavailab.111ty Studies,. Technical. Specification Violations, Monthly Operat.ing Repor.ts : Data, and Capacity Factors from NUREG-0020. Data collection should be directed to those measures related to safety significant aspects 'of the maintenance process.
In ' ddition, the a
inspector should conduct a detailed walkdown. inspection:of the overall plant material condition to assess the effectiveness..of the licensee's maintenance -
process to the extent that it.is reflected ine plantt housekeeping and in the external condition of equipment.
The scope of the inspection should include examination of direct measures by using information gleaned from plant and equipment for the following:
Historical data Material condition 05.02 Management Support of Maintenanc'e a.
Management Commitment and Involvement.
The examination of oianagement.
effectiveness concerning maintenance. should be directed to de.ter-mining., the extent'. of cqrporate : and ' plant management. awareness and support.of the maint.enan:e and resoluticn of saintenhnce problens and should include examination of:
The application of' industry initiatives Extent of management direct participation in naiotenance and in corrective actions (management viger and example) b.
Management Organizatico and Administration.
The inspection of management organization and admin'istra tion controls should be directed to determining how the organization supports maintenance activities, what maintenance activity plan has been established, how the maintenance activity plan has been implemented, corrected, and controlled, and the control of resources.
The inspection should include examination of:
Issue Date: 11/03/88 2515/97
_________________--___a
e I
g 9.
Program coverage for maintenance Policy, goals, and objectives for maintenance Allocation of resources Definition of maintenance requirements Performance measurement
- - Document Control System for maintenance Maintenance decision process c.
Technical Support.
The areas that are to be selectively examined for the technical support organizations with regard to maintenance are as follows:
Internal and/or corporate communication channels
. Engineering control Incorporation of PRA into the maintenance proce.ss
' ' Quality control-Incorporation of radiological controls into maintenance process.
Safety Review Committees Regulatory documents Examples of the applicable departments or organizations subject to this inspection are:
4 Engineering (nuclear, instrumentation and control (I&C),
mechanical, electrical Quality Assurance (QA), licensing, systems, etc.)
Quality Control (QC)
HealthPhysics(HP)
Safety Fire Protection Operations 05.03 Maintenance Implementation a.
Work Control.-
Tha inspection of the work control process should be directed to work order documentation, equipment history, observation-of testing in progress, planning and scheduling, and document review.
The inspection should include selective e~xamination of:
. Review of maintenance in progress Work order control tiaintenance of equipment records and history Job planning Work prioritization Haintenarsce work scheduling Facklog controls Maintenance procedures l
Post-wainterance testing Review of completed work control documents b.
P_lant Maintenance Organization.
The inspection of the plant mainte-nance organization should ~be directed to hov the organization supports maintenance activities, how the maintenance activities are controlled, implemented, and correct' d, how personnel are controlled, e
i j
how the organization establishes documentation, the effectiveness of.
l l
2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88
i the coordination and feedback lines of communication between plant management and craft personnel and the effectiveness of interfeces with other departments, especially operations.
The inspection should j
include selective examination of-i Control of plant maintenance activities Control of contracted maintenance Deficiency identification, control, and corrective I
action system Maintenance trending i
Support interfaces I
c.
Maintenance Facilities, Equipment, and Materials Control.
The fol-lowing are to be selectively examined for the area of facilities, equipment,..and material. controls,. as well.as for their support of the maintenance process:
Maintenance facilities and equipment Material controls Maintenance tool and equipment control Control and calibration of measurement and test equipment 4
d.
Personnel Con' trol.
The following areas of personnel _ control are to be selectively
- examined, including consideration of
- staffing, training, and. qualification:
,..s.
Staffing control Personnel training
,+.
Test and qualification process Assessment of the current personnel control status 2515/97-06 REPORTING REQUIREMEllTS
/
The appropriate regional office will document the findings and the actions taken in an inspection. report,and, in addition to the normal distribution, will forward one. copy to the Director, Division of Lice 1see ' Performance and Quality. Evaluation,,0ffice of:NRR, and one copy to the.. Director, Division of Reactor Safety, in, each of the other.. regional offices.
2515/97-07 COMPLETION SCHEDULE Inspections should be scheduled so that they are completed within 2 years of the issuance of this instruction.
2515/97-08 EXPIRATION This. temporary instruction shall remain in effect for 24 months or until the inspections have been completed.
2515/97-09 flRR C0flTACT Any questions regarding this temporary instruction should be addressed to A. T. Gody (301-492-1117).
Issue Date: 11/03/88 2515/97
i 2515/97-10 STATISTICAL DATA REPORTING
'for 766 or RITS input, the actual inspection effort should be recorded against this TI, module number 25597.
2515/97-11 ORIGINATING.0 ORGANIZATION INFORMATION 11.01 Organization' Responsibilities. The Performance and Quality Evaluation Branch of. NRR will provide support and overall guidance for these inspec-tions.
t
(
11.02 Estimated Resources.
Each inspection is planned for 6 weeks for 6 persons with 2 of the 6 weeks being direct onsite inspection (12 staff weeks) and 'I week in-office inspection, with expected additional effort by
. the team leader (a total of 38 staff weeks),
This total includes prepara-tion, inspection and report writing.
11.03 Parallel Inspection Procedures The inspection procedures that this TI may satisfy totally or in part are listed below.
Where credit is taken, the inspection report should note the module number per 'IMC-0610.
The region should make final determinations based on the' scope and documentation of the inspection.
37701-56700 62704 37702 61700 62705 37828 CIP 61725 72701 38701 62700 83000 series 38702 62702 92700 CIP 41400 62703 CIP 92701 END i
3 l
i l
2515/97 Issee Date:
11/03/88 2
q]<\\4111l 4!i 1
=
w m
=,
et eg v
ei.
iw s.b e m oP
- l T
R e
- n e
A a,
r ei T
AD r
H n
e t
l C
l t
n e
g e
f W
p
.i O
e P
n
&F a
1 L
ec o
F n
n rn ne o
N r
t r
O n
T lo I
M TC ru E
mle e.
P sd eo S
1 let r
it r
N bn I
E o e R
r s
U d
G PI I
F m"
s ur mr ur L"
)
s e
s s
n e
g R
t n
m.
tm e
e r
n E
o r
e e
l r
n J) i l
t.
n e i
t s d)
L p
te a
rt e
io loe l r y
e s I
int a
fS d
n lee ty S
ins c
f t
a n d
e r
O e
8vn d
R v
t P
e a
rn d.
ee e
n o n
r t
e e
J r
le, o
L nt O
i s
k I
en v
eO mo tH M
A ni T
fds
. n, e
rb e
e e
c r
S e
e w6 e,
r<
t eC e
iem A
d.
o c
pw p$
e e
We d,-
I i n.
tu e,
ee sS c
c ob T
pc
~
I W.
n.,
in eC i1 sn 1
e
- S n
n n
pe m
oe no f
N P
emw nW o
c su t
v I
nr e
te R
eF n
1 ld e
S s
i e
4 e
P cS a
e e
e r
t 1
e nA eN E
ir i(
1 d
v n
ldW r-r r
t.
oe e(
1 h
e e
ia c
c E
c-e.
c r
p t
e R
s
(
1 h
R P
M M
e e
~
t
{
,I T
&7 5
1l.
PRA I
OSI 9h S
meRS 7mC an 8Em iI l,