ML20244E027

Submits List of Needed Util Preparation & Arrangements for Dcrdr Preimplementation & SPDS Audits on 860714-15.Tentative Agenda Encl

ML20244E027
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	06/24/1986
From:	Lainas G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Muller D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20244E030	List: ML20244E027 ML20245D668 ML20245D791
References
NUDOCS 8607010434
Download: ML20244E027 (9)

Text

-. - _ -

.y ;i-p

. u ,

A ./ puer q%, . UNITED STATES

~

• h E

i s e

I NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20665

%.....) . June 24,1986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Daniel R. Muller, Director BWR Project Directorate No. 2 Division of BWR Licensing FROM: Gus C. Lainas, Assistant Director Division'of BWR Licensing

SUBJECT:

DCRDR PREIMPLEMENTATION AND SPDS AUDITS AT PEACH BOTTOM The Electrical. Instrumentation and Control Systems Branch.(EICSB) and its

-consultant, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), plan to-conduct a two day audit of the Peach Bottom DCRDR and SPDS design on July 14-and 15, 1986. We plan to spend Monday, July 14, 1986, at the Peach Bottom main x ntrol room and remote shutdown p6nel. Tuesday, July 15, 1986, we plan to audit proposed actions to correct significant HEDs at the licensee's control room mock-up -in Philadelphia,- Pa. The audit has been discussed with lthe Project Manager, G. Gears, of your directorate and he has coordinated this effort with the Philadelphia Electric Company. Please request that the Philadelphia Electric Company make the following preparation and arrangements:

1. Review team personnel-(including contractors) knowledgeable-in the DCRDR tasks-should be available to discuss the review process and to respond to staff questions during.the audit.

2. Documentation of the DCRDR organization, process, and results to date should be available.

3. . Conference or office space should be available for the NRC staff's meeting with the Philadelphia Electric Co. and for the staff and its consultants to meet privately.

4 Access to the control rocm, the remote shutdown facilities, and the control room mock-up should be provided as necessary.

5. Clearance to bring camera equipment on site and to take photographs in the control room, at the remote shutdown facilities, and other areas that would assist in evaluating the DCRDR and SPDS should be provided.

Contact:

Ray Ramirez (EICSB/ DBL) x-242D4 C_.____ ~

'h>

.- 3

..4

./ Daniel R.-Muller .

i Enclosed is a tentative. audit agenda which.is provided for planning purposes

~

and a 1ist of audit team members.

Gus C. Lainas, Assistant Director' Division of BWR Licensing

/

Enclosure:

As stated R E C EI V E-D

)

cc w/

Enclosure:

M!d271986 .;

.G. Gears J. Debor (SAIC) 3 'i *T M.-Fineberg (SAIC) IG? E'A ,

T. O'Donoghue (SAIC) 4 i

1

L ^.

.[.

..o.'

ENCLOSURE TENTATIVE AGENDA PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW PRE-IMPLEMENTATION AUDIT

' Monday, July 14, 1986 AM 9:00 Arrive at plant, undergo access authorization process 9:30 NRC entrance briefing 10:00 Philadelphia Electric Co. briefing on the following items:

1. F8TA - Disr..'et plans and schedules for completing F8TA for secondary containment control and radioactivity

. control using Revision-3 of the EPGs.

2. Control Room Inventory - Discuss plans and schedules i for completing inventory based on identification of i new operator tasks and information and control requirements derived in 1. above.

12:00 Lunch i

PM a 1:00' 3. Describe plan used to coordirate control room improvements with other NUREG-0737 Supplement 1 Initiathes.

2:00 4. Describe plans and commitments for correcting HEDs.

Provide assurance that Priority 1 HEM and label and enhancement corrections will be implemented prior to the  !

startup following the next refueling outage.

3:00 Visit control room and remote shutdown panel and audit corrections made on chemical volume and control systern panel (s),etc.

4:00 Technical discussion 5:00 Exit Briefing 1..

l

\

t 1 6: /

, 7.t n' ' . - 2 -.

g

-Tuesday, July 15, 1986

- AM 8:00 Arrive at warehouse where control room mock-up is located.

8:15 NRC brefing on purpose of visit 8:30- Philadelphia Electric Co. discussion on ' control room retirements i

i 9:00 NRC audit of corrective action proposed for control room 12:00 Lunch 1:00 Meet with Philadelphia Electric Co. representatives at headquarters building to discuss DCRDR, 2:00 Philadelphia Electric Co. description of SPDS, status, and schedule. .

f 3:00 NRC Exit Briefing

?

NRC Audit Team: Ray Ramirez, NRC Joseph DeBor, SAIC Whit Hansen, COMEX

)

4 9

i

- t' s

. _ _ _ __._____,__._____.m.__.m_ _ _ _ __ . _ _ _ , . _ . ,

.- ,rr--

-,y.- -. ,,-n,-n,-

F

..O

' 4 ,'

4

.i 1

i i

i l

l ATTACHMENT 2 LIST OF MEETING ATTENDEES I

-N -1 . . - _ _.___,, __ D:

y

. O

t. . , ' .' ,

I; '

.a Detailed Control Room Design Review L

Pre-Implementation Audit l

Name Organization Title )

I stilliam Birely PEco Licensing Engineer I Tom Cabrey PECo CRDR Project Engineer

' Ralph Chidley Interlock Consultant Joseph DeBor SAIC Consultant Gerry Gears: NRC/NRR: Project. Manager Whitney Hansen Comex/NRC Consultant i

Michael J. Leahy PEco T&L Div (Former i

Ray Ramirez DCRDR P.E.)

NRC Sen. H.F. Engineer Tim Walker Interlock Consultant

' Jack Winzenreid PEco Site Staff Engineer

-l 1

J

_ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - - - - OI

v-~--w-- - - _ , __.

0 6

6 e

ATTACHMENT 3 TRIP PROCEDURE REVISION SCHEDULE C_- _ - - - - - - -- - - - _ - - - - 1

q- q

. - w e

- ir

..., d eb n

.s 6 e h

e e t f

B

/

cm set o

e 2

1 e

e n e d s 3 r ip -

a gr s

/

2 S c 1 1 pTt c Ut nj e 7 n

t n rr e

eo be 8

/

6 t

e  :

murP eC -

s

- l 1 t / l c _ f e 2 4 e i s , o tt t t e s e- k 2

/ i n 9 4

g n h y

D 9 g i

5 Gvt c 1 1 i n P 3 g,

1 ,

P t en p ee r 7 "

p p

et o 1 T a _

7 intecPr 2 / ,

/

a i

Mi-r e

v 2

4 N 3

/

0 1

)

,k .

n e

rat sn -s -- e l

ll e

4 ic 2

I 9 2 - dh - - 1 4 Wm e

e a,

/

t 2

V.

es n et c O 5 f n i

rito et c s 9 1

1 n I V,Nedoej j

eN e io tC r ege1 1 N 7 2

mar emn e

I 1 L 3 A

2 1

O P

Ce r RVP -

O 1

0 1

i i

sai nf -

r4 e

3 i

80

- NP 9 i

F la n

S V E g E - 4 t

ri n e

sas m-R s s 2 g

1 W

r 2 4

e r t e A,

/

0 4 4 pr r A, ef l E E 3 st s 1 4 1 Om . e ro isN. e oM r R L e t bul

( h e s s f is r A r s nsr e U U S R

I iat r e n e D l e

n e

I S

et pn r e -

es e-D D T G i

t n n ia C

E E <

C H l

- /

O S C it n

o ksg- a R e ns cu c 3 a t -

s in t

n P 4 I

ihi huo Cf hp r ys M 3 3

0 1 m TF

- ro A-,

s o

c e

e%

etn P R eret s dt r s r le r n su e.

l h

e I L e es en pne nC e

. s%c R R L r e ul In S (-

t -

t e o2-Dl F w

T

)

,n b

e \ s

_te t o 2. yer rt 1 ot 3 da ne -

0hs-1

.d 8 2 f h e s- 0 de - 2 s i c 2 neg L.

U1 t l 2 s 3

%. v,ect E d 3 T nt t s e c

/

t 5 4 e 9 d 1

eh y 2 c ran o

e n 1 3

r mje 9l f P Sp e it wo nj u e o s o 9- 4 le etnm 2 GtePr Hir 4 T s ee g 1 Pe e vPn -

e a 1 mmn rn- enI t

em 1 r mE 2

de n E n n

7

/

seS t t vo L

S e

tet s- _

r gve De n t

e le" l I e C 14 _D 6 ;6 r ) 8 0 r

i G / / _

C P 2 4 ,

- f f [ / _

0 o sf F /

s pe 0

• G 7 ei er2 T m3 vP toe f

• e t

nI oo f

A I

W L p y f R

t egt e

l l

I n

y e

(

y g B l i

Z ,

ll l l ll l

--~---v_ , _

t

. g .

.g

.h ENCLOSURE 3 ON-SITE HEETING TECNNICAL EVALUATION REPORT l

f t

1

\

j L

f I

C ____. _ . - . _ _ _ _ _ -Rl