ML20238A855
| ML20238A855 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 08/25/1987 |
| From: | Forney W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20238A821 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-254-87-13, NUDOCS 8708310243 | |
| Download: ML20238A855 (1) | |
Text
F NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-254 As a result of the. inspection conducted on June 7, 1987 through August 1, 1987, and in accordance with the " General Policy and F ocedures for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the following violations were identified:
1.
lechnical Specification 3.12.C.3 requires the estab1'ishment of a twice per shift fire inspection when the cable spreading room sprinkler system is inoperable.
Contrary to the above, these fire inspections were not established and no dedicated area inspection _ occurred from June 12, 1987,.at 0000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> to June 16,1987, at 1605 hours0.0186 days <br />0.446 hours <br />0.00265 weeks <br />6.107025e-4 months <br /> with said sprinkler system inoperable.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
2.
Appendix B of 10 CFR 50 requires that measures be established that control the issuance of documents (e.g. procedures and drawings) and l
changes thereto.
Station procedure QAP 1270-1, Modification Program, requires that procedures and drawings be updated prior to placing the modified equipment back in service.
Contrary to the above, station electrical drawings and station procedure 00A 6900-3, 24/48 VDC System Failure for Unit 2 did not reflect the Scram Discharge Modifications, which were completed and approved for operation on May 1, 1985.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth Edison is required to submit to this Office within thirty days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:
(1) The reason for the violations if admitted; (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending your response time.
AUG 2 51987
}D1;A Mk-Dated W. L. ForneyT Chief v
Reactor Projects Branch 1 1
hB31 h{
G 5'
Ph4