ML20238A191

Notice of Violation from Insp on 870420-22 & 0818.Violation Noted:Util Did Not Have Procedure That Prescribes Type or Extent of Engineering Evaluations Required by Facility Tech Spec Paragraph 4.22.1.A.3

ML20238A191
Person / Time
Site:	Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date:	09/01/1987
From:	Harrison J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20238A183	List: IR 05000304/1987012 ML20238A180 ML20238A191
References
50-304-87-12, NUDOCS 8709090182
Download: ML20238A191 (2)

Text

,.

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-304 As a result of the inspection conducted on April 20-22 and August 18, 1987, ]

and in accordance with 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C - General Statement of Policy 4 and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions (1985), the following violations were )

identified:

1. 10 CFR 50,-Appendix B, Criterion XI, as implemented by CECO Topical Report CE-1-A, " Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Generating Stations", and CECO Corporate Quality Assurance Manual, Nuclear Generating Stations, " Quality Requirements", requires that test )

procedures include provisions for assuring that the test is performed under suitable environmental conditions, and that acceptance limits in applicable design documents are incorporated.

Contrary to the above, Procedure TSS 15.6.48, Revision 12, contains the following deficiencies: l

a. The allowable ambient temperature range for conducting functional ,

tests on safety) related hydraulic snubbers is not specified.

(304/87012-01A

b. The acceptance criteria for hydraulic snubber " locking velocity" does not account for the operating environment of the hydraulic snubber. (304/87012-018)

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1). l

/

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by Ceco Topical Report I 2.

CE-1-A, " Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Generating Stations", and ] >

CECO Corporate Quality Assurance Manual, Nuclear Generating Stations, l

" Quality Requirements," requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions of a type appropriate to the circumstances.

Contrary to the above, Ceco did not have any procedure that prescribes the )

type or the extent of the engineering evaluations required by Zion's J Technical Specification Paragraph 4.22.1. A.3. (304/87012-04)  ;

1 This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1). )

l Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1)correctiveaction ,

'1 8709090182 870901 i'

PDR ADOCK 05000304 G PDR l

n:~ - . . . y ,. .e,  : ., ,, . , , .

7,. l i

Notice of Violation 2 x

- +

. taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid i further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. I Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown, i 0 ' Ul W

-Dated 'J. J. Harrison, Chief Engineering Branch l

P.

t

_ - _ - _ _ _