ML20237L011

Notice of Violation from Insp on 870701-10.Violation Noted: Procedure 21.00.02, Conduct of Shift Operators Inappropriate on Point of Status of Trainee on Shift & Did Not Provide Reasonable Guidance to Trainee Activities

ML20237L011
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	08/13/1987
From:	Miller H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20237K994	List: IR 05000341/1987027 ML20237K992 ML20237L011
References
50-341-87-27, NUDOCS 8708200044
Download: ML20237L011 (1)

Text

.

3 o ,

l NOTICE OF VIOLATION  !

Detroit Edison Company Docket No. 50-341 i c1 d

As a result of the inspection conducted on July 1-10, 1987, and in accordance I with 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C - General Statement of Policy and Procedure {

for NRC Enforcement Actions (1985), the following violations were identified: l 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V requires that activities affecting quality j be described in procedures appropriate to the circumstances, j 2

A. Contrary to the above, Detroit Edison Procedures P0M 22.000.10, " Shutdown  !

from Rated Power to Cold Shutdown," POM 22.000.12, " Reactor Heatup, l Ccoldown, and Temperature vs. Pressure Monitoring," POM 23.205, " Residual '

Heat Removal System," were not appropriate to the circumstances in that l they contained no information as to how or at what temperature to ,

maintain reactor coolant when the unit is in cold shutdown. ]

8. _ Contrary to the above, Detroit Edison Procedure 21.00.02, " Conduct of l Shift Operators," was not appropriate as it stood mute on the point of '

the status of a trainee on shift and did not provide reasonable guidance as to the trainee's activities.

f i

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

{

u Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this 1 office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) corrective action ,

taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid l further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. l Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown. )

l W h*'

Dated Hubert J. Miller, Director Division of Reactor Safety l

l l

8700200044 B70813 PDR ADOCK 05000341 Q PDR