ML20236V041
| ML20236V041 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200003 |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1998 |
| From: | Joseph Sebrosky NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Liparulo N WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9807310257 | |
| Download: ML20236V041 (6) | |
Text
Ttt U F R I p
$d0.]
fpcra%
u UNITED STATES i
=
1 g-(
j
' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
,e WASHINGTON D.C. 30566 4001 l
o July 28,1998 Mr. Nicholas J. Liparuto, Manager Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Analysis j
Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division
{
Westinghouse Electric Corporation P.O. Box 355 j
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 l
I
SUBJECT:
RETURN OF PROPRIETARY MATERIAL TO WESTINGHOUSE DOCKETED i
UNDER THE AP600 DESIGN REVIEW
Dear Mr. Liparulo:
By Westinghouse letter NTD-NRC-95-4556, dated September 18,1995, you provided a status report on proprietary material submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to support the AP600 design review effort. This report was in response to an NRC letter dated August 11, 1
1995, to you which requested Westinghouse to determine if any of the AP600 submittals were:
)
(1) no longer considered to be proprietary under 10 CFR 2.790, or; (2) no longer current and applicable to the AP600 design.
As a result of this review, you identified a number of proprietary sub;.Jttats to be retumed to I
Westinghouse which you no longer considered necessary to support the AP600 design cer-tification effort. The primary reason you cited for recalling this proprietary material was that most of the documents and submittals have been superseded or revised by a later version.
Discussions with members of your licensing staff revealed that Westinghouse also believes that I
it is important to retract these documents to minimize the amount of proprietary material on the AP600 docket and reduce the chance that material outside of Westinghouse control could be inadvertently compromised. You have requested that this material be retumed even if the NRO has determined that the material is proprietary.
The NRC technical review staff has performed an assessment of the documents to be retracted to ensure that they are not relied on to support its safety determination relative to the AP600 review and are wholly superseded by later Westinghouse submittals which can support the staff's Ji safety determination independent of the retracted material. During discussions and a meeting with your staff, you were told that documents submitted in support of the AP600 app!ication are tI subject to the retention requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, Criterion 1, and will be retained for the lifetime of the application. By Westinghouse letter NSD-NRC-96-4689, dated g?j I
April 12,1996, you provided written confirmation thet all AP600 related proprietary documents, which have been identified for retrection, will be permanently retained by Westinghouse pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50. Based on your assurances that the retracted documents will be retained at Westinghouse, we are satisfied that an adequate mechanism exists for NRC retrieval and inspection of these documents if required.
)
i l
W fh Yv 9807310257 980720 PDR ADOCK 05200003 PM A
x
6 Mr. Nicholas J. Liparuto July 28,1998 As a consequence of this effort, and in accordance with your request, the staff has removed the proprietary documents listed in Enclosure 1 from the AP600 docket file and is retuming them to Westinghouse for your disposition or retention as necessary. The original document contained in the docket file is being retumed. NRC staff, contractors, or other parties who received intemal NRC distribution have been notified to destroy their copies. The staff notes that the forwarding letter and the letter requesting that the material be treated as proprietary information associated with the retracted material, along with any non-proprietary version of the submittal which have been placed in the Public Document Room, will remain on the docket.
I The staff will continue to evaluate other proprietary documents identified in Westinghouse letter j
NTD-NRC-95-4556 and return them as appropriate.
j I
Sincerely, original signed by:
Joseph M. Sebrosky, Project Manager 1
Standardize' ion Project Directorate Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No.52-003
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ partial enclosure:
See next page DISTRIBUTION w/ partial enclosure:
Docket File PDST R/F JRoe PUBLIC DMatthews TQuay WHuffman ACRS (11)
TKenyon JSebrosky DScaletti JNWilson MPSiemien,0-15 B18 DOCUMENT NAME: A: PROP _JUN.RTN I
. To,.env.. cop r of tha..oeum.nt, inae.t. in the box: *c copy without.et.chment/.ncio.ur.
r. copy with.et. chm.ntiencio.or.
N' e No cmy OFFICE PM:PDST:DRPM l OGC
. D D:PDST:DPRM l l
l l
NAME JSebroJky J (
MPSiemien Y$. TRQuay 4)2O DATE 06F 898 //
06/9 /98 OS/W/98 l
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY j
l 5
b Mr. Nicholas J. Liparuto Docket No.52-003 Westinghouse Electric Corporation AP600 cc:
Mr. B. A. McIntyre Mr. Russ Bell
' Advanced Plant Safety & Licensing Senior Project Manager, Programs Westinghouse Electric Corporation Nuclesr Energy Institute Energy Systems Business Unit 1776 i Street, NW P.O. Box 355 Suite 300 Pittsburgh, PA 15230 Washington, DC 20006-3706 Ms. Cindy L. Haag Ms. Lynn Connor Advanced Plant Safety & Licensing Doc-Search Associates Westinghouse Electric Corporation Post Office Box 34 Energy Systems Business Unit Cabin John, MD 20818 Box 355 Pittsburgh, PA 15230 Dr. Craig D. Sawyer, Manager Advanced Reactor Programs Mr. Sterling Franks GE Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy 175 Curtner Avenue, MC-754 NE-50 San Jose, CA 95125 19901 Germantown Road Germantown, MD 20874 Mr. Robert H. Buchholz GE Nuclear Energy Mr. Frank A. Ross 175 Curtner Avenue, MC-781 U.S. Department of Energy, NE-42 San Jose, CA 95125 Office of LWR Safety and Technology 19901 Germantown Road Barton Z. Cowan, Esq.
Germantown, MD 20874 Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott 600 Grant Street 42nd Floor Mr. Charles Thompson, Nuclear Engineer Pittsburgh, PA 15219 AP600 Certification NE-50 Mr. Ed Rodwell, Manager 19901 Germantown Road PWR Design Certification Germantown, MD 20874 Electric Power Research Institute 3412 Hillview Avenue Mr. Robert Maiers, P.E.
Palo Alto, CA 94303 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Radiation Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building 4
P.O. Box 8469 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469
i g
s AP600 Proprietary Gubmittals being returned to Westinghouse DATE OF COMMFNTS WESTINGHOUSE SUpMITTA[
2/28/92, RESPONSE TO 2/3/92 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ET-NRC-92 3670 FOR SCDAP/RELAP MODIFICATIONS INCLUDING OVERSlZED DRAWINGS 4/30/92, WCAP-13234, LONG TERM COOLING TEST SPEC. Note: This letter i
ET-NRC-92-3688 transmitted several reports only one of which is being sent back to Westinghouse 9/14/92 AP600 DRAWINGS j
ET-NRC-92-3722 9/14/92, PARTIAL RESPONSE TO 7/21/92 RAI ON AP600 TESTING ET-NRC-92-3750 PROGRAM
{
11/24/92, MATERIAL TO SUPPORT 12/9/92 MEETING:
ET-NRC-92-3775 PXS-T1P-001," SCALING ANAI.YSIS FOR OSU AP600 INTEGRAL SYSTEM & LONG TERM COOLING TEST" & "LONG TERM COOLING TEST ~
11/24/92, SPES-2 SCALING UPDATE INCLUDING TEST SCHEDULE AND ET-NRC-92-3776 DRAFT PXS-T1P-002 1/19/93, RESPONSE TO 6/22/92 NRC REQUEST CONTAINING 12 ET-NRC-93-3797 OVERSIZED DRAWINGS 1/29/93, AP600 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWINGS (RAl 471.1 ET-NRC-93-3807 RESPONSE) 2/18/93, MATERIAL SUPPORTING WESTINGHOUSE MEETING ON CMT ET-NRC-93-3823 TESTING FOR AP600 2/23/93, SPES-2 FACILITY DRAWINGS ET-NRC 93-3825 l
l 3/3/93, DRAWINGS FO't AP600 LONG TERM COOLING TESTS ET-NRC-93-3830 3/18/93, 27 OVERSIZE DRAWINGS IDENTIFYING AP600 RADIATION ZONES.
ET-NRC-93-3839 DRAWINGS ARE MARKED PROPRIETARY TO EPh' AND WESTINGHOUSE BUT WERE NOT SUBMITTED Wi1H AN AFFADAVIT 4/1/93, REACTOR VESSEL INTERNALS DRAWINGS AND TOPlCAL ET-NRC-93 3853 REPORTS I
Page 1 of 3 Enclosure
I J
I AP600 Proprietary Submittals being returned to Westinghouse DATE OF COMMENTS WESTINGHOUSE I
4/1/93, CORRECTED DRAWINGS FOR PASSIVE RHR SYSTEM (SEE ET-NRC-93-3854 ET-NRC-92-3722 DATED 9/14/92) 5/11/93, WCAP-13234 REV 1(SEE ET-NRC-92-3688 DATED 4/30/92)
ET-NRC-93-3883 5/24/93, FACILITY DRAWINGS FOR ADS PHASE B TESTS ET-NRC-93-3893 7/28/93, DRAFT OSU SCALING ANALYSIS REPORT ET-NRC-93-3933 (OSU-NE-9204) 8/16/93, PRELIMINARY THESIS OF l K HUHTIN!EMI (1990) l ET-NRC-93-3945
)
9/17/93, OSU FACILITY DRAWINGS ET-NRC-93-3969 j
9/24/93, WCAP-13856, "AP600 IMPLEMENTATION REPORT FOR ET-NRC-93-3974 REGULATORY TREATMENT OF NONSAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS" DRAFT PRA REVISION SECTIONS 10/8/93, DNB TEST MATRIX ET-NRC-93-3984 12/20/93, DRAFT SCALING ANALYSIS FOR AP600 CMT SEPARATE EFFECTS l
ET-NRC-93-4031 TESTING 2/15/94, DESIGN CHANGE DESCRIPTION REPORT NTD-NRC-94-4064 2/22/94, WCAP-13963: Scaling Logic for CMT Test NTD-NRC-94-4068 5/13/94, WCAP-13345 REV 3 (NOTE: THIS IS MARKED AS A NTD NRC-94-4133 NON-PROPRIETARY REPORT) 5/19/94 ADD;TIONAL INFORMATION ON SUPPORT OF WESTINGHOUSE NTD-NRC-94-4141 RESPONSE TO RAI 220.76 ON THE AP600 DESIGN 5/25/94, INFORMATION TO SUPPORT INDEPENDENT PIPING ANALYSIS l'TD-NRC-94-4146 u/15/94, 4NITIAL CONDITION DATA FOR SPES-2 MATRIX TEST 4 NTD-NRC-94-4164 Page 2 of 3
[
t f
3 AP600 Proprietary Submittals being returned to Westinghouse i
DATE OF COMMENTS WESTINGHOUSE SupMITTAj.
6/30/94, AP600 DESIGN CHANGE REPORT NTD-NRC-94-4175 7/15/94, INFORMATION TO SUPPORT INDEPENDENT PIPING ANALYSIS NTD-NRC-94-4200 9/21/94, TEST DESCRIPTION REPORT OSU V.ST SB9 (BLIND)
NTD-NRC-94-4300 LTCT-T2R-029 10/12/94, ADS PHASE B REVISED TEST MATRIX NTD-NRC-94-4313 10/14/94, DAY OF TEST REPORT FOR SPES-2 MATRIX TEST NTD-NRC-94-4321 11/30/54, LOFTRAN-AP PRELIMINARY VALIDATION REPORT (MT01-GSR-002)
NTD-NRC-94-4352 12/9/94, INFORMATION TO SUPPORT INDEPENDEf 47 SOIL STRUCTURE NTD-NRC-94-4357 ANALYSIS 12/9/94, QLR FOR SPES-2 MATRIX TEST S01511 ;"0-2 MATRIX TEST 12-NTD-NRC-94 4358 BLIND) 1/12/95, QLR FOR SPES-2 MATRIX TEST 13 NTD-NRC 95-4389 1/16/95, QLR FOR SPES-2 MATRIX TEST S1703 NTD-NRC-95-4392 2/9/95, AP600 MAIN STEAM LINE PS+CAEPIPE TIME HISTORY NTD-NRC-95-4400 I
l Page 3 of 3 l
l