ML20236R119

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Request for OMB Review & Supporting Statement Re Occupational Exposure Record for Monitoring Period
ML20236R119
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/10/1998
From: Shelton B
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
To:
Shared Package
ML20236Q332 List:
References
OMB-3150-0006, OMB-3150-6, NUDOCS 9807210251
Download: ML20236R119 (12)


Text

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collectioriinstrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement, and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102,72517th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503

1. Agency / Subagency originating request L OMB control number U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission X

a.

3150- 0006

b. None
3. Type of information collection (check onel
4. Type of review requested (check one)
a. New collection X
a. Regular submission
c. Delegated X
b. Revision of a currently approved collection
b. Emergency Approval requested by (date):

l l

c. Extension of a currently approved collection
5. Will this information collection have a

,,y,,

  • U"
  • "" " I* P * ** "*
d. Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved substantial number of small entities?

X b.No l

collection for which approval has expired

e. Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved X a. Three years from approval date collection for which approval has expired Requested 6' expiratton date
f. Existing collection in use without an OMB control number
7. Title

" Occupational Exposure Record for a Monitoring Period"

8. Agency form number (s) (if applicable /

NRC Form 5

9. Keywords Nuclear Radiation Monitoring, Radiation Exposure, Dose Limits l
10. Abstract NRC Form 5 is used to record and annually report the results of individual monitoring for occupational exposure to radiation during a one-year period to ensure compliance with annual occupational exposure limits.

k

11. Atfected public IMark penmary with *P* and ett others that apply with *X*)
12. obligation to respond IMark svsmary with *P' end an others that apply with x*)

X

a. Individuals or households
d. Farms
a. Voluntary P
b. Business or other for-profit X
e. Federal Govemment
b. Required to obtain or retam benefits

{

X

c. Not.fooprofit institutions
f. state, Local, or Tnbal Government P
c. Mandatory

/.

13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden
14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden (in thousands of dollars)
a. Number of respondWs 5.986
a. Total annualized capital /startup costs 0
b. Total annual response.

671,171

b. Total annual costs to&M) o 3
  • . Percentage of these es sponses
c. Total annualized cost requested o

l' milected electronically o

sy,

d. Current OMB inventory o
c. Total anual hours requested 175,957 e Difference o
d. Current t. NIB inventory 139,568
f. Explanation of difference
e. Difference 36,389
1. Program change

' f. Explanation of Jfference

2. Adjustment
1. Program changa
2. Adjustment 36,389 0 h 15. Purpose of information collection
16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting (Check al/ that applyJ ye g (Afart primary with *P' and e# others that apply with *X*/

X

a. Recordkeepmg
b. Third-party disclosure

~

. Program planning or management T

. Re' porting e

c

s. Application for benefits
b. Program evaluation f, Research
1. on occasion
2. Weekly
3. Monthly
c. General purpose statistics T
g. Regulatory or comphance
4. overtertv
5. semi-annually X
6. Annually

,e

d. Audit
8. other (describe)
7. B nnially t

OII:

    • O
17. statistical methods
18. Agency contact toerson who can best answer questions regarding the in content or this submissions
N fb Does this information colI tghM gg 9

lo s I

!L Name:

Mary Lynne Thomas, RES 2

E Yes X No Pnone:

301-415-6230 I

10/95 OMB 83-1

,(

ca-w

l i

19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection ofinformation encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE:

The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3), appear at the end of the instructions.

The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatoryprovisions as setforth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, tSt the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions; (b) It avoids unnecessary duplication; (c) It reduces burden on small entities; (d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents; (c) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices; (f)

It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements; (g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3):

(i) Why the information is being collected; (ii) Use ofinformation; (iii)

Burden estimate; (iv)

Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and (vi)

Need to display currently valid OMB control number; (h) It was developed by an omce that has planned and allocated resources for the emcient and effective management and use of the information to be collected (see note in item 19 of the instructions).

(i)

It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and (j)

It makes appropriate use ofinformation technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

l l

l Date Signature o Senior Official or desigpeg

/.. A I

7 oym xm mes

l FINAL OMB SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR NRC FORM 5 (CLEARANCE REVISION)

(3150-0006)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RECORD FOR A MONITORING PERIOD Description of the Information Collection Part 20 Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 20), provides requirements to licensees who receive, possess, use, transfer, or dispose of byproduct, source, or special nuclear material or who operate a production or utilization facility under parts 30-36, 39,40,50, 60,61,70,72 or 76 for compliance with " Standards for Protection Against Radiation." One of the requirements stipulates that the occupational radiation exposure must be recorded by all licensees. Certain of these licensees listed in 10 CFR 20.2206(a) must report this expcaure to the NRC on an annual basis.

The NRC Form 5 is used to record and report the results ofindividual monitoring by a single licensee by year or employment period if it is less than a year. This form is a complete and detailed record of doses and intakes of radioactive materials.

Section 20.2106(c) requires all licensees to maintain records of the results of individual monitoring for occupational dose from radiation on NRC Form 5 or equivalent. In 10 CFR 20.2206(b) and (c) licensees are required to submit an annual report of the results of individual monitoring to the NRC on NRC Form 5 or on electronic media containing all the information required by NRC Form 5. In 10 CFR 19.13(b) individuals, for whom monitoring is required, must be informed of data contained in NRC Form 5. Section 20.2104(a)(1) requires licensees to determine occupational radiation exposure received during the current year to ensure compliance with the annual dose limits. Licensees are required to retain the records of occupational radiation exposure on NRC Form 4 (OMB Clearance Approval 3150-0005) or equivalent. Consequently, each dose period represented by an NRC Form 5 will be cross-referenced to the complete dose history on the NRC Form 4 for the individual.

The NRC uses the information submitted by licensees to monitor the effectiveness of radiation protection programs and procedures at licensees' facilities. This infonnation is maintained in the NRC's Radiation Exposure Information and Reporting System (REIRS). This database is the NRC component of a nationwide radiation worker registry which implements the Federal Radiation Protection Guidance for Occupational Exposure approved by the President on January 20,1987 (52 FR 2822-2834, January 27,1987). An analysis of this data is published annually in NUREG-0713, " Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors and Other Facilities," and is used by NRC, other govemment agencies, and licensees to follow dose-trends at licensed facilities.

1

I NRC encourages licensees to reduce the paperwork burden on themselves and on the NRC by l

transmitting this information electronically. Complete information is provided to licensees in Regulatory Guide 8.7, Revision 1, " Instructions for Recording and Reporting Occupational Radiation Dose Data," (RG 8.7) regarding the recommended format for that submittal. In addition, software has been developed, and is available from the Energy Science and Technology Software Center, P.O. Box 1020, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, phone 423-576-2606, for i

$100. For those licensees with Intemet access this software may be downloaded free of charge from the NRC's Web Page for Occupational Radiation Exposure at NRC Licensed Facilities at "http://www.saic.com/home/nrc_ rad". This software vustly reduces the burden of collecting'and maintaining information; allows licensees to analyze compiled data to improve i

radiation protection, to produce the completed NRC Form 5, and download this information to a disk for submittal to the NRC.

A.

JUSTIFICATION 1.

Need for and Practical Utility of the Information Collection in order to protect the health and safety of workers,10 CFR Part 20 requires all licensees to control occupational radiation dose to their workers. The NRC regulations require those licensees listed in 10 CFR 20.2206(a) to send NRC Form 5, or its equivalent, to the NRC annually. The NRC compiles and analyzes these reports to assess the effectiveness of I

radiation protection programs among its licensees.

I 2.

Acency Use of Information The NRC uses the information to ensure that licensees are complying with the appropriate regulations in a manner adequate to protect worker and public safety. The information is also k

used by the NRC to evaluate licensees' operations to ensure that they are meeting the requirements of theirlicenses.

3.

Reduction of Burden Throuah information Technoloav As of June 1997,130 (104 reactor sites + 26 materials licensees) of the 300 licensees who

)

reported electronically for 1996 used either the Radiation Exposure Monitoring and Information Transmittal (REMIT) software or their own method to record and prepare this information. The one hundred thirty licensees who submitted electronically submitted 163,181 reports versus the remaining 170 licensees (5 reactor sites + 165 materials licensees) who submitted 10,355 paper NRC Form 5s, for a total of 173,536 separate reports. This number accounts for duplicate reports for workers who may have worked for more than one licensee during 1996.

NRC encourages the use of any applicable information technology to produce and store information. NRC has published detailed instructions on the electronic transmission of the data contained in the NRC Form 5 to reduce the burden of reporting on licensees.

I 2

l

4.

Effort to Identifv Duplication and Use Similar Information The Information Requirements Control Automated System (IRCAS) was searched and no duplication was found. There is no similar information available to the NRC.

NRC Form 5 is the only source of complete monitoring information on the worker's current or most recent occupational dose. There is no similar information which can be readily used to satisfy the needs stated in item A.1.

5.

E iort to Reduce Small Business Burden The information required by NRC Form 5 is needed for the employees of small businesses as well as for employees of larger business firms. It is not possible to reduce the burden on small businesses and still meet the objectives stated in A.1.

1 6.

Consequences to Federal Proaram Activities if the Collection is not Conducted or is Conducted Less Frecuentiv Less frequent collection would mean that workers could receive occupational doses in excess of the limits in 10 CFR 20 if the doses were not reported annually.

7.

Circumstances Which Justifv Variation from OMB Guidelines Records associated with the NRC Form 5 must be retained for the life of the NRC license in i

order to permit an individual to receive a planned special exposure.

)

8.

Consultations Outside the NRC The NRC Form 5 is discussed each year at the Dosimetry Users Conference, with the most recent being held in Phoenix, Arizona, November 5-7,1997. The discussion focused on questions concerning electronic submittals, data entry, and recordkeeping and reporting requirements. An opportunity to comment on NRC Form 5 !nformation collection requirements was published in the Federal Reaister on Mmch 30,1003 (63 FR 15232). No comments were received.

9.

Pavment or Gifts to Respondents.

Not applicable.

10.

Confidentiality of Information This information is subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 and is only available through the NRC's Privacy Act System of Records, NRC-27, REIRS.

i l

3 i

i

l..

l 11.

Justification for Sensitive Questions NRC Form 5 specifies the use of the individual's name, social security number or other ID, date of birth, and sex. This information is necessary to ensure the proper identification of the individual.

12.

Estimate of Annual Burden Recordkeeping:

The requirement to obtain and maintain the information specified on NRC

)

Form 5 for each individual for whom monitoring is required in accordance l

with 10 CFR 20.2106(c) extends to all of the 109 reactor sites and all 5,877 materials licensees, for a total of 5,986 licensees. The total number of individuals monitored annually by all NRC licensees is 497,635 (162,646 monitored at reactor sites + 334,989 monitored at materials facilities). An average of 83 individuals are monitored by each ;icensee (497,635 individuals /5,986 licensees). Assuming one recordkeeper per licensee working at 0.33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> of clerical time to complete each individual's NRC Form 5, the annual recordkeeping burden is 163,957 hours0.0111 days <br />0.266 hours <br />0.00158 weeks <br />3.641385e-4 months <br /> (5,986 recordkeepers X 83 records /recordkeeper X 0.33 hours3.819444e-4 days <br />0.00917 hours <br />5.456349e-5 weeks <br />1.25565e-5 months <br /> / record). The annual cost associated with this burden is

$7,378,065 (163,957 hours0.0111 days <br />0.266 hours <br />0.00158 weeks <br />3.641385e-4 months <br /> X $45/ hour), (See Table 1).

Reporting:

The requirement in 10 CFR 20.2206(b) states that those licensees listed in 10 CFR 20.2206(a) are to report each individual's occupational radiation exposure annually. Approximately 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> is needed per licensee to review and authorize the annual submittal of the NRC Form 5.

This time includes preparing a cover letter and downloading the information to a disk, or preparing the paper NRC Form 5s for shipment.

In 1996,109 reactor sites and 191 materials licensees reported this information to the NRC. The annual burden to the reactor licensees is

~

4,360 hours0.00417 days <br />0.1 hours <br />5.952381e-4 weeks <br />1.3698e-4 months <br /> (109 reactor sites X 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br />) and the annual burden to materials licensees is 7,640 hours0.00741 days <br />0.178 hours <br />0.00106 weeks <br />2.4352e-4 months <br /> (191 materials licensees X 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br />).

The total burden for licensees required to report is 12,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> (7,640 hours0.00741 days <br />0.178 hours <br />0.00106 weeks <br />2.4352e-4 months <br /> + 4,360 hours0.00417 days <br />0.1 hours <br />5.952381e-4 weeks <br />1.3698e-4 months <br />). The cost associated with each of these burdens is

$571,160 (4,360 hours0.00417 days <br />0.1 hours <br />5.952381e-4 weeks <br />1.3698e-4 months <br /> X $131/ hour) for reactor sites and $955,000 (7,640 hours0.00741 days <br />0.178 hours <br />0.00106 weeks <br />2.4352e-4 months <br /> X $125/ hour) for materiallicensees (See Table 2). The total cost is $1,526,160 annually.

Total:

The total burden and costs for recordkeeping and reporting are 175,957 hours0.0111 days <br />0.266 hours <br />0.00158 weeks <br />3.641385e-4 months <br /> (163,957 hours0.0111 days <br />0.266 hours <br />0.00158 weeks <br />3.641385e-4 months <br /> + 12,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />) and $8,904,225 annually

($7,378,065 + $1,526,160).

13.

Estimate of Other Additional Cost.

Not applicable.

14.

Estimated Annualized Cost to the NRC 4

l l

NRC cost is incurred by inspectors reviewing the information on NRC Form 5, or its equivalent, and supporting records maintained by licensees. Annually,273 hours0.00316 days <br />0.0758 hours <br />4.513889e-4 weeks <br />1.038765e-4 months <br /> of inspection time is i

spent reviewing such records, at an average of 2.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> for each of 109 reactor sites. In addition,2,939 hours0.0109 days <br />0.261 hours <br />0.00155 weeks <br />3.572895e-4 months <br /> of inspection time is spent reviewing such records an average of 0.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> for each of 5,877 materials licensees. Annually, the total time spent reviewing these records is approximately 3,212 hours0.00245 days <br />0.0589 hours <br />3.505291e-4 weeks <br />8.0666e-5 months <br />. The annual cost for reactor inspections to review these I

forms is $35,763 (273 hours0.00316 days <br />0.0758 hours <br />4.513889e-4 weeks <br />1.038765e-4 months <br /> X $131/ hour) and the annual cost for materials inspections to review these forms is $367,375 (2,939 hours0.0109 days <br />0.261 hours <br />0.00155 weeks <br />3.572895e-4 months <br /> X $125/ hour). Annually, the total inspection cost is approximately $403,138. The annual NRC in-house printing costs for the forms is i

approximately $7. Therefore, the total cost to the NRC is approximately $403,145 annually (See Table 3). These costs are fully recovered through fee assessments to NRC licensees pursuant to 10 CFR Parts 170 and 171.

15.

Reasons for Chance in Burden Recordkeeping:

The previous clearance estimated a total of 6,710 licensees monitored 60 individuals each for a total of 132,858 hours0.00993 days <br />0.238 hours <br />0.00142 weeks <br />3.26469e-4 months <br /> for recordkeeping. The proposed clearance est; mates that a total of.5,986 licensees monitor 83 individuals each for a total of 163,597 hours0.00691 days <br />0.166 hours <br />9.871032e-4 weeks <br />2.271585e-4 months <br /> for recordkeeping for a burden increase of 31,099 hours0.00115 days <br />0.0275 hours <br />1.636905e-4 weeks <br />3.76695e-5 months <br />. The re-estimate is based on experience obtained from collecting and analyzing the data used to prepare the annual occupational exposure report, NUREG-0713.

Reporting:

The previous clearance erroneously indicated all 6,710 licensees, expending only one hour each, would report. The proposed clearance request estimates that 300 licensees, expending 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> each to submit data on approximately 83 individuals, will report. This burden recalculation is a result of experience obtained from collecting and analyzing the data submitted that is used to prepare the annual occupational exposure report. NUREG-0713.

16.

Publication for Statistical Use None.

17.

Reason for Not Disolavino the Exoiration Date.

Expiration date is displayed.

18.

Exceotions to the Certification Statement.

Not applicable.

B.

COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS l

Statistical methods are not employed in the collection of information.

1

)

5 1

h

_.-_.__-_-.-____-__,,._,-m.

O 4

4 TABLE 1 RECORDKEEPING INFORMATION COLLECTION BURDEN ASSOCIATED WITH NRC FORM S l

(

NUMBER OF NUMBER OF BURDEN ANNUAL ANNUAL COST RECORDKEEPERS RECORDS PER HOURS PER BURDEN

($45 PER RECORDKEEPER RECORD HOURS HOUR) 5,986 83 0.33 163,957 5

7,378,065 l

l l

l I

1 t

1 6

l

_a

TABLE 2 REPORTING INFORMATION COLLECTION BURDEN ASSOCIATED WITH NRC FORM 5 NUMBER OF BURDEN ANNUAL COST PER ANNUAL RESPONDENTS HOURS PER BURDEN STAFF HOUR COST RESPONDENT HOURS Reactors 109

'40 4,360 131 5 571,160 Materials 191 40 7,640 S

125

$ 955,000 Totals 300 12,000

$ 1,526,160 I

i 7

TABLE 3 ESTIMATED ANNUAllZED COST TO THE NRC FOR REVIEW OF REPORTS AND CONDUCT OF INSPECTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH NRC FORM 5 FORM 5 NUMBER OF STAFF STAFF HOURS NRC COST LICENSEES HOURS / LICENSEE R:: actors 109 2.5 273 35,763 Mittrials 5,877 0.5 2,939 367,375 NRC In-house Printing Costs 7

Tot:Is 5,986 3,212 5

403,145 l

l I

l 1

i l

l l

8

Y R

O Y

G

,T Y

E N

P F

Y

)

U I

E R

C R

S L

I U

N

,T C

D R

E A

E (u

D N

S n

O E

W L

F D

E E

o rv N

O Y

Y T

1 0

Y I

R A

8 L

M

)

C w

A L

o A

O S

t M

V S

I Y

O Y

N

)

N Y

T A

K IT

,7 E

U S

O C

E N

0 N

1 C.

S I

N E

E M

O G

D M

A E

E P

I 2

O 1

0 E

0 D

E I

N N

T T

l A

lC f

K A

E T

I I

N O

N u

C N

U I

M l

B E

MT T MC C S

S L

D R

1 9

A O O AO O H

H E

E IXM M

A A

N E

C X T T

L L

S P

A A

O OL L

MM M L

L M R O E

AIT T

O O

E D

I

(

M G R F L L T T

W W

Y O

8 F Y E E

E S

3 bc o

u E A G

)

p e N N E

D D D

D E

U I

t D he s

T A

C E O

O D

r t XD E

E C

e N

T e

S E

T PO F

S S

O Q

O F

E E

S N

Y my U

P ofw m D

N OS E

I S

c a

A N

t a

O E S E E

r h E

E E

V E

md a S

C Q

Q E

aOw E

D E E T

U U

Q u

L U

mBM O D Q I

I V

cm V

c U

R I

V I

U E

S OU E

A A

I E

M Q

E V

N B

o o s n V D L

L A

T E

e V

O E

E L

hol -

I Q AL N

N E

(R c s E GA o

S nm A

U NE S

n

)

u N

N E

,T

,T N

L T

n m

(

(

A E A

,T E

M W

l D N D A A

,er t d

Nt L

Q A

H S

t L D.T O E IU X

h s O

D E

e B

B N V

E L

O M

X m

C R

L L T A

X E

A O

O L

T S

B L

C C

E R

E a

K K

N E

m.

O S

E at nu y

l S

S T

M D

ng 1

1 I

Y

(

ot e i

l T

n cn 2

1 1

Y A

A r

o 1

nD u

dC5 D

N N

e A

D D

m E R F

r 2 c

t 0

S E E

of T

1 1

)

sm T

E 6

)5 I

C G

MOA M

)

p

(

P (S

S A R A

o n

R t a D

D T D L

(

(

(

a n E

T T

(C E

dr C

.r A

O D

D D

.E

.E

(

E P

O E

L D

E v

(

a M

W D

D n

m R

pa P

E E

E E

E B

E E

a R

E

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

I D

e a N

r n

ac s

TE 5

1 1

1 I

no D

8 7

6

~

0D ae s

O 4A a c da P R 4T s

h N

==

S O 0E R

d n

=

E E U GO re C

q o

V

+

I 9

TF T

u e

L 8

e s L

N YB a

a Y6 dn E

E s

O Y R ba

) T s e P

H o n A

p a P

o a v

E n

R da

!llilllljjll l

E

, [

8

.A 6

4 3

2

.1 9

9 8 7 p S" i T a n deIii 6

fnnE iC OPWCPSC aE MiE E E d m i m R" P tt dAdpe r E" b a C P n

n ecn p,rdy s

SPSO snt et f

hh efha n n n

dh TA t

lt l

"Mp eeante ssioc e

t Mft u

PI s e neh9ue h

n nhmo l

ot a

v NND hr tre4dr ie HDN t

e lie c

bha er e

elittn oe r

r

/

c d

Der S

E ot if ic i

a i

nseau t

t dt o

dk a uo obxmimmi as b,l" go ate a

OPWCPUI wh c ngnt e a a olea h

h D.

h r

u s

hmhnma iar D n e at d tg h ns ssemninafd I

e at e R" n tl e

l t

th a n e

e e e

d lh egeo e" n o e dp a r t e

=ST bc oeMsp "ip e

R Yeo ni be hAo a

=.

YT a

t t

i e" t

)

heeT N o

nr t

n Yhm i

rS d

nS o e s uir n

r c a

e eDr oiT feTioao nnhnf e

ut x

lPia=oP lo n

dc u i eti ity e

wfodf Y

d ka' n

f

  • n tht s sohni Lnn o nao mxrni C m Y n nb a

d c e I

pdr oh nmSNaiE wf u nal r

N fs go t

t or Desf uls l

it

)

t i

=M

, r e de ntc o

c r

oh S

n e s a dy c

  • R B

o hmhe tn eu e redfu

=

etie c o i

n m

er

,r i e l

a fc t

s u m' d i

T m

o t

l r

u n t

i abac f

fd u t e h %" w i n i e

n r

u ref R

t s s r-c if ot n

h ig m

iedndtah n

tdovh a

e ia i

h s

r a

sru l

s nho f

in e

r nr. r t

l U

9 daet cNc Roa lt e

er s e i

a oy s

ol C

e a

tt t

./ p o

sae ar da e

d aulab e

t se eo hsgnnie e s'f d,d a ing bh e o s

t r

b e

omir i p

ar s nTi nfn T

t e u y

pf p prgrR t o n c r

e hse u e

- i M de nbn tsn i e

u alaa r

smcmhd msr I

icp np ut tg d s s oo o

s yt e

r d

M

. n O

oi ai shkee s m n d

ie tn o

e a usr h

s d

e bo e

Nr u o

s r u e

N dale e :n i

r tsn e

oa e e er s

u a u i p lab r

,e n t

t b

e f

r N

f anoa=pt ehic+rd=ddm o

end S

. e s r s rut a o x e e e e d

r sta r

s i a w

m n m e

e f m,i mmf A

ta pn.s no n eme

==dWe at a

l,e o

t c

r o n iet (A

N Mh h

b e

b if tc abu ost tr r

d or e t

ro a

d r i n

h Mi e

e e

i whr ls c

s CtP te et w uteu d (i o

etso e

HCD

/c r

N r

a a s ce h

utrhheS y cro r

u "de edN m D

s u

o edarn ln h

r e

dOA eo ul eeo

=

r ryl lm oMD sr or E.

adednbty d ee e

/i b

r t

e m

tr a

ivro b

Dh x

k n nhn iu

%po ndo s

s a

s u no u d

n aPD r e Ys e

es e =C vdub a C dp R r

efm uulm lier sL T r

a I

o elP" "h ao! erat r e s.

Yr f

u r f t

e at cu d s s dp fna te mib h

b J" o sEI id e

t k

e i

o c Yp s

visS=o a

d a,e i b,r

(,r e h TO c

r s o t

i e

I o

b ao o e oEo s lonsr l hnd r

h e

ter Yo lr a e i

"d oO N df "fe

. n d e t. a e a e t.

t e

d r

f e

uN A l

L d OI 2

2 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 0

9 8

7 6 5 4

3 2

1 0

0 0

0 b F N 0

.C 8

A e

F n

t sN O R R t

iFE ot aE Phfi aC t

e r

Sfr r

nn o n n gon toe hnr l

bE E eE oE E

(

imE TE fE E

liS r ap S Am n C e

i M

E Se t

o h

n e it t

n Ert rn t

t Ehm e

ci fnaDnigtO mxt De het t

D st dt t

n t

e e

e ye e e e1t a

rt n

eg e

co d FA e

fr e e

r0r otr r

te nn r o i.E h

Meh t

or

. r r

sa r

)

r et

s. er iOT t

eteM sie

.Etrht t

i b h

r r

tr t

t sM mr Et e

c h

osh fCh m mh n e nRI r

sa e eeMxE a bp E 1at ih ft t

vl t

h h

h t

t et n

O o

a e

st t

rFe ta me a lh se mh e t

h e u cr.

. e s e

i

,n o e l

e e he e e r

s eh eM N 1l e

m

)E e

r vAwpncN aye tho xc e

d n ep r aRu X" t=y sa e ea t

a s n m5 P t

o l

n xh ey t

aieeT n=t nt n lpg x

d t

=m t

f t

n sa ep S d <o et io a

o o r

emd i n

r l

8 ye e a t a b

ho

)s E

t a m m el na m

e k

o e

t h

tt dr.

nal sl mw m

'e e

de eidv l

m tr c o n R

o d

p e

r d

u 1

a h

e hhme o a

uef lm t

ye e

atl

,x = f le T

e a

o G" tho k2a s

u rrg di 6 =o mf yit d

t r

t e

it s

d o

hi p

d I

r e

o ag e

sP N

f e e e

os e

?of s0a "er uS E

r t

f e

ne n ehoe da oc r

xd s

ui st fti Wd e

e a gn y0c oea mE N

b1n re a

d,d on t

e re o

r ap f

=u iv ff e

q c

F t

r r

s

=o tbe e gd ee e

ha o e c

e h o k

i0e rcc ns so e i eq '

ui q

Ioh hw T

m o

t n

"t oeten ao md r

s c v

r rt n1cl nr e a T

hMf u

ihe h-r t

mi a

u a r t w

e 2a sdr e e ayp ma T

a e gu d

gl I

t l

o jne.

al etmr

. e s

e s

v a

1e oe e na l

w d

4s d

a m

O v

e t e xo a

r d

r 1

rq n

a i e sF a0s adi s

n a e T

p gi ps s

oe e

e n cko t

v s

tt L

t i ir o a cfo n c o wsn ed n_

t i1 r

i

'* aq ai o

n

(

n u o

r( s

,e r -

dei H

r o

e n. boutcd e

n Oe c

c E

D l

,n,n i tDh r

nu

n. a E

c p

at teur e oti T

=

di l

e hr r

v n

t r

D eler v

e e ee e

(

i eh

, s Ch H

e e a

e nd mo l

1 a n q o

o

)

de ena s e A

pd f tp al Dt 5el t

d d

e E n er i

,Wt re d

brohl n

D i nt e

ia oi r

r teal d

1nt r n u

mr serei d.

ai n

(

r a e e

c u

t t

o etn nn E(T t

C v

)

r o

,Y ni 3dh t

ta e

o C J" B. ",n a

i r

no 7r a h

a ncf e

oer i

(

o sO T

D l

xd d

o t

r tindt tD E

E n mf ht i

es A o

,Vp r

f r

odiewm h

D u o o

d L

J p

"n t

e tn e

)

t t

r r

r e

h e

i s og p

cctiat e )E T. a s l

mt r

(

t d

e Ft o e t

t E

e C h

h n

l ael s

Narhhi sf

)

c c

iu f

o e r

e te o

n Retahn uo o

E e

e o

w r

Od 9ut oy r

e Ctetmt mr T

d o s s

h r

D d

r i

0sd fe e

nta o a s. a fe e

d -

en n

e el o H" t

fx ni a a i

oh h

e E

si l

t t

k u

h o

ra?

oB mgn h

ihhtrtih t

l,r l

)

l r

t t

GSRdn%9u I

= 1P 5

4 3

2 1

ey e ef lsg so 7r t

s meicr 4u snm aa N(1 A amt bai( a rh" nm R o9U s

de " diWP S f, " e F R o c m = 2 e (iy O W ct i

r0 ado o oniafF W1OGl9S n e etn Pdr ac o

xeO tgre 1

no; t

aSfMaEV ac I

v8T B rdou u

nm

e. ceuNH nrhe adncP t i f nd f

sa hm l

n a n bT o

s.

i DIS wcbra2hntfNT us c n a

anp n

e

=eU iN e

uf IE se e

, o,el uaT me e e =* C m );8 H csiR O i tim iO

, to I

t r

a T ha 1

i r

nE s nte oA 0T,dRe8 hiNeaohSE o w )e d ie 5sAs 0if l

c y N,al c

a6niucmDH tp o s c

5 I

b r

I a o rl em ax1 P e1R n uonn miin.

tnr S

,al eaN iso n

L daiVE n u r R gcfonPM r

I gc s aU a

hrcf 2 Y r

%miw.

cs c oohCt tl utsIR oeNf r

de

,s d s o

o Pj M a ueF i

e a

rd at S.

iet tos dnohD dt o

e U a n itL

,n a " R r e c,e cS v

sh

,2C:

Ldb D

at c

io r

r o cA afewau tUI n

h 3.C r

i 1F m andnt 9

r s l F

etS adb e

neP et f

DR ag e t N isdiJanhAS t

dt ia F ilaot

'd s R 4 2 t

an 55 a

mthulueLC oh4nio eeS bmh.

i 9R4 eNo rie 5

a grU si o

vt(

Ce=ucMA o efm L

te

=aic g rlt r

rofleU72 f

aiaG md 1

r o

ea o

d hi m i n n,al gm bg :

tg m essfoO 0U.

e chRd.S)9 a o

2uRt rbrOO r

a) loc akP 32 Lit sn t

i a a a0t e

n e

0aeron l

n aE i rs o e P

d a )r q F S e e e

(

aa ni v

o tn sC n

v e

5tcy ag R uNU uq bn a ye o

t e

t n

yhe arS 4S

,els giinNt)

R 8

u 5r dane (S aar Fo r

dr i meRsmctm ;h s OR

nuyyod, i

wih wet a

0 "Ns u e )3 I

h(

cT cnotf u d(E

,1 C 2huetac 5y V

E dria ot o

t

=p r

t ceT eynuAF n

ds e n ie

)

msi le f, A

0C np H ti 2

oaS 1acr eh2o e

na 0orie A

I d yo c

r usndrt) oe C

l d0mpr dPS i s cnin e ay 20 2t r

ie 3y ral 1mycal ee iRM oa nfuimm Mmni pedaye:

r ior 0

a N o

ln 07 0sa6s Y

o a rN2arzn mRth D

f oel r

i t gtim v o 4tRwc r

Wor nseh a

43 La 7e eit A

se sf D

r:R4y s fOA n dp o o

i ao t

0 c

r rn e

=pT 0,2 Sv R3mg ne C

ssnE A C1s o oVIN t eremta h

s e a 4

ta vm l

e ywgn nx 8

t r

u ntr a

aie ugd t

oi4s noh r

e D hh. bnhmDD ca saog e

a 0

T r lg (J o lsi ia f

i dt ut e

o ea a n S

ttette e

mio i

rhe e ss e 29 daTje atA msbreiui 0,3 ebuluf nc c R as elhtNT wy tn enohn t

i r

t tlal otat o v onn rn t

t hc h

coi e ty r o

T s E ea c

e n

a e t m e,n G O toinfeyn n

dmm n

4 r

lief 02 N u ey e l A

e wc x.

sn*t hns IR hugr B S hnaTto=m

(,5

,W ty,7 coCma ae yar 90 ar on td t

o otxtm s

ooa w

T r

a

S aa eieiNY hr vme a h

rny r

9 t

1ro e

o t

t e

E mc t

nF e

ai nt e

ed h

d nb n

WeC9o 9 s m ty M

c hoe u

c COO adt h

dob a

1 o

= h nt t

c t

ga=emmuR l

R N'"nsee m

=

ne y

eihr e p

em ei 92 nr o

misS E

e"dnt h

o bn 91 a N m )3di f

fn u ngud R

a lx o d rgs r

N o

sRn, e

=eisnMV ufe T

. e 1

t 2

s i O d

,d,cfet theI

)

h uc e

r eov e m

a e eaiei

,1 iC=ros s tg A rt ods te d r" e c TL t

t gmni n

i ra n r

g P =~ t ootmnt a

a nd Dx a io p

2 a

rwu E1 ettr o eIU hn sn nro ia ddt a

t t

i/o anpais x3 te r ny o eqm nON ata n ae on ao t

ou r

enhe e

,n b etaoh3 r

t gt i

cNT o

efne upl b: A n f

ene anl n

trp o

r d d

c,3 h

e e

i n=oi ye aeey v1 C

t c smd do Cy d v f n iuni i

r oe n nmrh u

e r e iiR eNo N

c b

t2 D

f nrmf o R" o o et tt ara d

D moenbcrde v

saRoh eRnl i

u gs~n i

e ct sg euN aiY d

t ad h

e3 c er scie o a u t

O,4 t

c s

4Cr n

o u

lch e

a a a a

x b tr c A 0 p-rmaae u neNFdP es(imnR t

p rudedC" von e

n e

s =b =d d

t n a

m *ceRovr ir o na em emtsN dn r

ka e

a s r

ben e tl riv ojntr Fy u D sgt x

e n

we%d=re m

eat sy n aC r2 aF25ay nd a

u a pgehe nctCmda dR ed o

r fe ta1o nE uc iy rr otae t

t s

pcfc0murF eti rnaF a

i a

a do upis ci 90 o od sA xlcf 2

Rt e7 l

i bp o o, ct =2 m

rtct soaoC5mytE wioat i

enat n 31 o n eaTwc r

a e n.

ht h esgfeMi 9(

ottn t

sr nhoiFo bhC a

io e tout t t

,7 o

,m o rnhih i

ea itc h

f l

o l

o f ly y s adsof sennRnrtT ss ajar n

enr

)

f ty llll ll