ML20236P002
| ML20236P002 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1987 |
| From: | Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236N971 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-312-87-19, NUDOCS 8708120185 | |
| Download: ML20236P002 (1) | |
Text
L APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Sacramento Municipal Utility District Docket No. 50-312 Rancho Seco License No. DPR-54 During an NRC inspection conducted on June 1-5,12 and 16,1987 a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) and IV.F.5 of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50 require that deficiencies identified as a result of drills and exercises be ce rrected.
Contrary to the above, the licensee had not corrected deficiencies initially identified during the 1986 Health Physics / Medical Drill, in as far as these deficiencies occurred again during the Health Physics Drill and the Medical Drill conducted in May 1987.
The deficiencies identified during the Health Physics Drill concerned the ability to perform emergency environmental sampling and pertained to the adequacy of procedures, equipment and training.
The deficiencies identified during-the Medical Drill related to the quality of medical care provided.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement VIII).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Sacramento Municipal Utility District is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include (1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the j
time specified in this Notics, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Consideration may be given to extending the response time for good caus shown.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGU Y COMMISSION Ross A. Scarano, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards j
Dated at Walnut Creek, California j
this ?Rth day of.Tuly 1987
{
9708120185 070728 PDR ADOCK 0500 2
G
- - m