ML20236G918
| ML20236G918 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 07/30/1987 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236G911 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-285-87-15, NUDOCS 8708040421 | |
| Download: ML20236G918 (1) | |
Text
_
APPENDIX B NOTICE OF DEVIATION Omaha Public Power District Docket: 50-285 Fort Calhoun Station License: DPR-40 i
Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on June 1 through July 15, 1987, a deviation of your commitments made to the NRC was identified. The deviation consisted of the failure to revise a surveillance procedure as stated in a licensee event report (LER).
In accordance with the " General Statement of i
Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the deviation is listed below:
1 The licensee issued LER 87-001 on February 7,1987, to describe an event where a Technical Specification limiting condition for operation was entered when safety-related equipment in redundant trains was concurrently out of service.
The equipment was inadvertently removed from service during performance of Surveillance Test Procedure ST-ESF-2.
In i
LER 87-001, the licensee stated that Procedure ST-ESF-2 had been revised to designate the responsibility for ensuring no equipment was inoperable to the shif', supervisor prior to performing the surveillance test.
In deviation from the above, the licensee did not revise I
Procedure ST-ESF-2 to reflect the designation of responsibility to the shift supervisor until March 20, 1987.
(285/8715-01)
Omaha Public Power District is hereby requested to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy.to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and if applicable, a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within l
30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply, should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Deviation" and should include for I
each deviation:
(1) the reason for the deviation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the 1
corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further deviations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
l l
Dated at Ar,lington, Texas, this 30 9 day of 1987 l
1 G
l
_ _ _ -