Text

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances. January-March 1987
	ML20236E653
Person / Time
Issue date:	09/30/1987
From:	; NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
To:	;
References
	NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I01, NUREG-0750-V25-I01, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I1, NUREG-750-V25-I1, NUDOCS 8710290301
	Download: ML20236E653 (41)
	v • d • e

_

1 NUREG-0750 Vol. 25 Index 1

- . . . . _ ~ .,m..,,. . - - . _ -. ,,y 7

,y I

j :- /'

4

. INDEXES;TO - 1 H

- > an .

c. /

o wJNUCLEARAREGUAA( annsa ma .~ ;R,m s.pepbs, e::e htCOMMISSIGNhlSSU mwaw%-q m Agg- ma,m ny ae ihW #m a, w u& n g w , e n;.~ a 4,hkf?$s&

Achm . t

'\ yg&

~ ,,.*

Q W[a.;m.s s

m

<m 9my n ? { e; sc s g y . -

e f &yh m,/+. .x:cy m n .e hh;h$h

& gd mye h;}:qa

,t' L

- 'wM -

r um = : s s %2 C a v g e h ; . a m<a.

y M;f M t yy'N,F SnuartE,; March...ym y,y.m p g&> g n e %yma q g 4 7 m y .3;ungaby ww s w ;;r wgm.,"p%!i%; Y < 8 kg;,r;O:.

Ly gg, w::w wynn

a y .: t

,,a.y :}! n: ;Wmc

, 'q. f p 6:nM %p;&p:g

, j s; gvHAR

- )

g.g;W < ,,:jQ Eg[g. ,'M .. y g ; g.n g, ,g; ?9;t;p%y

' ~ M:L ,~ e a- e@y ?m m g-; ,Y f,.h Y .; .f =3hifN %: Sky [.a yh hf h;} . .- wu ym se,&,

.l. 4 giJ p.~ %' .,*:g 4 ;. O a

a

). ;

s e*'5 s ~ 9d ..e

~% as.e.

~

il

,<d if 3.a ,

'A M F[ s . . L ko? ' ?, y i,;,ef

D . ' * '

..t

.> , l p '; e ,

-J 5 - +.% -

Yi- s' " ?.? P /: 'Q$

i S"; L,ft

~ :b -

iQ -- 4

,D t b > b!

3 _ p :,V, f' )w: [, .

a

"+

, cy g. n

, :- Q; , - '

age ey 3 ,,si; %..Q;'{ ; ; ::,?.

f "r ' * ". D g'-

e. , c, o: , ~y, t

+qr7,y.g (y"r;g;#,g v4.g

,. ~ . , . - - .

,w ge nn4%Qg: p .4 ,, .u 4% ;' x < q c -, as wf ,

5.2, .

,w, h,ig e , <4Q n h a.:.e n, ::e .

kp

.a g b[ - : kN h ;[ cN e, Wpm, s % . , s:;19. .t ' w &:ff am. > wyy 9 y-nf:nM' c.. v.2 w~ ~

- , . U3

, pg e a : '

m 4, rg . . r::w@ o.t 2 :

m gg >; , p q g m , p pp M:

_ y s a

{:p' ; * > b , %hg ggg.

.~, , a p .. m 3'] , pjj g:p4fgg'g:e j[n l L; w;jhpg[i n y;; - 1xW"by.g,gj i e w

>,pA;7 - a y[wd q w ;g.

W a.;;

gyyb;:p:;;,.,,_ . Wij ^ r . jggy5-y..nywn;w;y, mig m; api p; ,;g

~

8710290301 870930 PDR NUREG 0750 R PDR

l l

I i

'i l

l Available from P1 Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government, Printing Office Post Office Box 37082 *

. Washington, D.C. 20013 7082 A year's subscription consists of 12 softbound issues, !

4 indexes, and 4 hardbound editions for this publication.

Single copies of this publication

, are available from National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 6

1 Errors in this publication may be reported to the Division of Publications Services Office of Adniinistration and Resources Management U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 (301/492 8925) k _ _ . __ . _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ -

, ' e .

...).

.,ql j .

'.. o, ,

g+.,+.

s .- , .

y- . . , . .-. . : *, i .e o s,

,, .s , .

c . .-

.p ,.s .

,-e ,

@. ., m,, -

~g '. w , c '

- .. -s . , f.

... -:. .y *',,

.l\ .

. .s - s <- .

.,,.p.,,...a. c ,. .,

cq.+ .

, 7 .~ <,. a: ". . , .

,t f 'A ,'? 't -

, , , , . . es ,,

c. , , - ,n

.I . i* :..

e.. r .,.

. a;. i , .- *

.,..,.~{,

w-

s

'q' s

. ; i . *

[ 7, , I, %.' -[

f71.;,..J.' $

. , . *. [.- - .. .

s:. .

. .n . a a

,, , . m +, > , ,.-

r. ; ' , '.

r, NUREG-0750

. 7s. ~ : .;9,..a9., .. '*,

.q. ,=.g..s /..,..f.. .s ,

.g 4. i..- - :.

.c.

Vol. 25

. c. '....y. . ., p. vn IndeX l

' ' :.g , [t',fh, , 's,P ' ,, 2

. ,. '* j . f.;. p 6. ., q l 4.l A .

....-;9:

. , , ,,. . , t ,o...

,.m .., e.e o,

.u y,.4 i .'. - ,e g ' .*.w^'s b.>..,'_,.,

g , . . .

s, .l y

y *r 4 e . -e s ,

p. < ,7. y. . : .. :

,. INDEXES TO

;.V g ' fa , .

7.,

n .. . .?. ' e..

'r t '.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES J

7- . 4

.c.

. a. ..

... c,

.~. . .

I' p ,t

' . 1 January - March 1987

,y . .

-f'.. "'

s

i. e, ,.1 -

_. s. x..

s.1 - . :n , q . .

. r. , . .,

.s 3,. c.,: - - . .

W-e a y .

u. :

a.. , .

6. .. . ... .

-,.~... .

,c ,

1,. .8 .

- r t ~s .*.

fi

,'w

?; ,.:

6 3

, U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i g 4

- ) , , j .,f,., . ,

_s .V' s ., b %

6

'g a b

+ # #* ,, Sh g g.,

e ,

r r y .:.<

5 % 3 .f f a j

^

. g; 8 . .

yl;.- .

.i 3 - 6 ,

i

,,., e i,

y

-q - * .4, c e da . W

, a 4 i w s

4 9

's

m g g 0} . ,

e." d

,4.- ,k

\ .* *

b. g p #, w g' ,

9

^ <

, / ,, s k d,

.4 e ,

)

_ ________.m m___ _ _ . _ _

~~

'M N. [.3 , , , ,

, , . ,.j t-

. i ..

'i L,l' ,

, J -

y, ,'c ,

,t .

'a

r . ?'

l,,.q : ,r. ce ,.

)

- ,,,, .- = ,+ .,g

, .,4., ,

.w. .

y.,, e.' ,

J

~

Y7.:

,. 7 , . s .- -

c' . ;

.c ' 3 IV ,,

t. . . d' r , .. ).- ,

=

.o.;9, , 'w 2 . , ;. . "f;c <

o, o ,..' Foreword s'..6y>

, 3. 7_. ,

c . @ p r p,. ;';.

9 < ':7. ... x 4 ; . ; . '.k .W

. Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Ilcensing Appeal Panel (ALAB), the Atomic Safety and Licensing

. ; [,' d' ;;jl2 i.,, , / . .. '5; ll,1

'u t';',.

i! Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative law Judge (AU), the Directors' Decisions k'l i (DD), and the Denials of Petitions of Rulemaking are presented in this document.

3.

Ah*',p.? . $. ,, Y *,^ . . # mii These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.

3

,.s a.c.',','?" uL,

. . . v .

Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are:

'i ,

u..

v f *a "

, e Case name (owner (s) of facility)

- Full text reference (volume and pagination)

' '. w. , S Issuance numbx W' [a.

s.

Issues raised by appellants legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes) l Name of facility, Docket number

. '. f 4

' '. C ,

,'"* l J.i .3 Subject matter ofissues and/or rulings .

"l V .E, ; , ,

Type of hearing (for constmetion permit,operatinglicense,etc.) i

, *- s Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.). l l

j' nese information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats

,, ,,. , f-W > E< ., arranged as follows:

. "- ? :

1. Case NameIndex

. % . ,e

"

s l-

, s.

he case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the y ., ,

....,3 .

T , .

issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type ofissuance,

~

I *

docket number, issuance number, and full text reference.

,e - . y ,. , .

j. '

i

2. Digests and Headers .

'.3. '.t .

The headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows:

A g? -' the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAB),

the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law

. i Judge (AU), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for

Rulemaking.

.,y .. , ,' & ,'

Re header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility 7

name, docket number, type of hearing, date ofissuance, and type ofissuance.

s ne digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the

^

issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are

- , 1 .

L Y "

designated alphabetically.

~ , , ,

7 9 '

5

I.- g h 8' f 4' . ',., .

t a

, t J 71 '

y .q.,u r iii i

e '%;

i f,i f, ,

r.,

ej ,<

-4

n'R p,.

c, g ,

. 6.

.p m

t. ,

? ,

3

,'r( ! I '

, ,9

, & #, ., ,

7* '

A',

4-p a

.d, ., . -

'.s',

, . s. .

..i.,g* , 8; q ..,,.I.'4'

.. 3

.j'.. % sg , e

6 # **

.g

..,, , I E,,'"w* #". r,.

t.,,- / , . ..~,

, t. s 4 .2,.

3r

~... , _ . .

a ;,m- j '., .

- f

. 4 . % 4.**4,, ., - , a' f,f '

. .g . . . , ,

%,, , i

' 4 #

s , 5 ,N ij ; .

,s ., e - ,. w . , , ;. n . .

n,

. o . .. -

..- , s. . , 4, - s.r.w.. 1,..

q.,r .. , -

~.- .

.a's

. ,,. . - . ,e [ y[ " ej 5,[ f' *. ,'

~ ,. .

3. I.4 gal Citations Index '

+-

.- , ' J , f'". 4,f. l.e r,p ,'/.::3 '

....,. 9. . c.; c ..n. , , , ,

~ g - e

"~ae i . ., i' This index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or 4 e

~alphanumerical arrangements of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others. These -

...e

, , 1, a,s - ..s.... ,.

citations are listed as given in the issuances.' Changes in regulations and Statutes

(.4.A'4 s

,yv f , 1 V.x ', '

may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicability

'" 3 ^ ;.L ' ' '

] , u f."[ ' N .',

of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.

_,t , 'Q.

' _ i. , ->

The references : to cases,' regulations, statutes, and othen are generally p y 7.e ' a;-E, e f. ^?; ,. ,,,. ., ,JN ' ,

followed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular' Ln O T MW-+ s. .

' issuance. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text-r I,,/. . iI. . . . . W , n, s

',N 7.. 4 ?. y ' . ,.9.%, ,. : yj / f.

g, ,

refcrence. ~ , .

4 i.,.. .

J ,

h.

g% 5' s

' , , e .c . .

4. ' Subject ladex :

f; ' .,

k y, ,'

N' .', (,[ 3,u - -

r .

- Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues b ' 9; .

and subjects covered in the inuances. De subject headings are folbwed by

f. < gc*

I i .e 7,' .fJt a ' ?1 P.

phrases that give ' specific information about the subject, as: discussed in the ; "

p . ;f;g . ' ' f ' t.* '. .

issuances being indexed. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and "

the full text reference.

g 5 ,.

N". ~

, g, C.E

.2 p.ss b y,'.., [

5. Facilityladex P * 'y ;.6 -

^'

2

'p.,,,

' 4 ',.' i s -

'w'. 6;c : , -~ ,. 7N ~ . .-.m >

This index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from the 7' '

(,;

4 :e : ' l. .c

. issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, type of

. Issuance, issuance number, and full text reference.

[j], p., j' ^ . 4 T';

7 r -

4 . ,

4 g * * , .s .,,s- *

g. ,

.*'( a .s . ,', ,.

se 4

+

3,,, "P - , 9 a ,p 1,.

p.

p ".. . b.p e,. ; s

' 'gg g ,e . 'g

[ ,

k' .s ;F . . ,- ,, [# ;E '-

4 9 , ,, .

, , . .r , ., d

(* n' 'p,,.o . . . , ' -

f$'

,I'g

+

q

_+e p 11 4 , , 1 l'b ",;"l ,* . ---i _ f'l'L - *i

, ., , , gt p .

..m..., o y

f .,

c.; . .

N..vsQ m . .yhf ,,. ,S ,a.;M u; [.$ 4 .

z :, ' . ,; , v yt:

f, *

,, , .r ." '

4

, ..' ' , . ..y-' h+

, 1.' , t/^

% ; e1.. .

g;,3 s . T',s "..w,,

, ' o, j j ;. -}4;,a ? , * ,., y

2 ,, 7.;.,R , ' p

~

t . ,, avv.~ 2- ;y :.

, a; '

'v, : s . .:

"'~ J^,

g ; ., '? ' ' ,s ',di f.,\* .

., . / ,

n. , g . ,..c n

..t,.g, ..p* p * , r.

a a

,. g . u .

3 . . z . (. . o

- 6 c: . .2,4

, -'4..- , i iv *

a. . ,

4

.s,..'.

+

, ',f',.

g, , \

s f

, < < .u . , "- '

9 s.

. V .'

l

. 2.') ,

1 l r .* .s -

l

. * - i l , ,

t , .- .

s .

l- L. .

'Q

l l

CASE NAME LNDEX ADVANCED MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC SPECIAL PROCEEDINO; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PourryINO HRST PREIGARING CON"ERENCE; !%zet No. 3416055-SP (ASLBP No. 87 54541 SP) (BML No. 341908941) (EA 86155); AU Si1,25 NI;C 39 (1987)

BABCOCK & WILCOX REQUEST IOR ACHON; DllGCTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. 62.206; Dodes Na 70 364; DD-87 5, 25 NRC 260 (19',7)

~

CAROLINA POWER & UGilt COMPANY and NORTil CAROUNA EASTERN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY j OPERATINO UCENSE: ORDER; Docket No. 544040L; CU-87-1,25 NRC 1 (1987) l COMMONWEALTil EDISON COMPANY AND AD, UOITT WATER REACTORS l REQUEST IOR AC110N; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. 62.206; Docket Nm 54295, I 54373, S TN 50-454; DD 87 2, 25 NRC 121 (1987)

HJDRIDA POWER & UOllT COMPANY, et al OPERATINO UCENSE AhENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Disnussing Heanna Request); Docket No. 54389-OLA (ASLBP No. 87 54441-LA) (Spers Fuel Transfer Amaidment);

LDP 87 2,25 NRC 32 (1987)

GENERAL PUBUC IJHLTHES NUCLEAR CORPORA'nON, et al. I OPERATINO UCENSE AMENDhENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Oranting Usensee's Motion l for Termination of Proceedings); Docket Nos. 54289-OIAl,5428941A 2 (Sisam Orwretor l Plugstng Cnteria); LBP 87 6,25 NRC 114 (1987)

REQUEST IOR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. 62.206; Dodet Na 50 289 l

54320; DDwt? 3,25 NRC 245 (1987)

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, et al.

OPERATING UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 54424 01, 50425-04 AIAB 859,25 NRC 23 (1987) l IIURLEY MEDICAL CENTER j CIYlL PENAL 1Y; INTHAL DECISION; Docket Na 3041993,741396 (ucense Nos. 21 00338 02, (

$NM-1393) (EA 85-89); AU-87-2, 25 NRC 219 (1987) '

IJDNO ISLAND UGITHNO COMPANY OPERATINO UCENSE: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docka No. 543220L 5 (EP Exercise);

ALAB 861,25 NRC 129 (1987) h0CllAEL F. DIMUN, M.D.

SilOW CAUSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Disnussing Proceeding as Moot); Docket No. 3419378M, (ASLDP Na 87 548 01 SC); UIP-87 9,25 NRC 175 (1987)

PlHIADELPIIIA ELICTRIC COMPANY OPERATINO UCENSE; DECISION; Docket Nos. 54352 OL $4353-04 ALAB-857,25 NRC 7 (1987)

PORTIAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al ,

REQUEST IOR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. 6 2.206; Docket Na 50 344; DD 87 4. 25 NRC 253 (1987)

PUBUC CTT12TJi DENIAL OF PEITHON IOR RULEMAKINO; Docket Na PRM 5041; DPRM-871,25 NRC 49 (1987) 1

y__-_---- , __ _ _ _ _ _. - _ _ _

i j

p. ,

-,(

i 5 n

{

,g.

1 t .

j. CASE NAME INDEX '

SU .

' PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OP NEW HAMPSitIRE, et at .

5 -~ . OPERATING UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Docket Nos. 54M3 OL. 504M-OL (Offsite

'f . Emergency Planning); ALAB-858, 25 NRC 17 (1987); ALAB 860,25 NRC 63 (1987) -

- OPERATING UCENSE; DECISION; Docks Nos. 54443-OL. 54M4 OL (Offaiis Ernergency Planning);

AIAB-862,25 NRC 144 (1987) . ,

OPERATING UCENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Mass.'s Motion of January 12, 1987); Docket Nas. 50443-01 1, 54444-Otri (ASLBP Na 8247102 OL) (Onsiis Emergency . s

- Planning and Safety Issues): LBP 87 3,25 NRC 71 (1987) {

OPERATING UCENSE; PARTIAL INTTIAL DECISION; Docket Nos.- 54M3-OL 154M4 OL 1 { !

(ASLBP Na 82 47102 OL) (Onsue Emergency Planmns ed Safety issues); 13P-8710, 25 NRC l.

-l 177 (1987) .

RADIOLD0Y ULTRASOUND NUCU'AR CONSULTANTS, P.A.' .

- MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; DEOSION: Dodet Na 3412688 MIA (ASIEP l No. 87 54241 MLA); 12P-874,25 NRC 79 (1987) ;

. SEQUOYAH PUELS CORPORATION MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT; DEOSION (Authorizing Opsetion); Docket No. 448027-MIA ,

i (ASLBP No. 85 513-03 MLX LBP-87 8,25 NRC 153 (1987)

SOUri!ERN CAUIORNIA EDISON COMPANY, et at ;

REQUEST IOR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.IL 62.206; Docket Nos. 50 206,- g 54361,54362; DD'871,25 NRC 43 (1987) ['

TEXAS UITLTTIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al' OPERATING UCENSE: MEMORANDUM (Adequacy of Record: Errors and Samplingh Docket ;

'Nos. 54445 OL. 50-446 OL (ASLBP Na 79-43406-OLh LBP 871,25 NRC 29 (1987)

U.S ECOLD0Y, INC. - . .

_ y 1 SilOW CAUSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Ruling a Motions for Summary Disposition);

I - Dodat Na 27 39 SC (ASLBP No. 78-374-01 CrD; LBP 87 5,25 NRC 98 (1987)

.{ - VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Schedu!es for ibnher Faings

'[

and for Prehearing Conference); Dodet Na 54271 OLA (Ast3P No. 87 54742-LAh LBP 87 7,25 f<

NRC 116 (1987) 1 i g

t ;

i

, c.

-h l

i j

3 1

i i

DIGESTS ISSUANCE OF Tile NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

CU 871 CAROUNA POWER & UGifT COMPANY and NOKril CAROUNA EASTERN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY (Shearm ilams Nuclear Power Plant). Docket No. 544040L; OPERATINO UCENSE; hnuary 9,1987; ORDER The Commission authonzes issuance of a fuB power bcense by the NkC Staff for the Shearm J A '

liarri. nuclear facility based m (1) Canminion revmw d contested safety-related contenums nsolved in the remaining Licensing Board perual imtial dectsien not admimstratively (mahzed through Ccenmission appellate review, and (2) issues not omtested before the Ucensing Board but rused in interveners' effecnveness commeru, at various pubbe meeung presentations, and in a pending $ 2.206 peudon, all of which were resolved in favor of facihty operation.

B To provide grounds tw a delay of the effec'.iveness of a Licensing Board decisim authorizing issuance of a full-power hcense, an irnervenor's concerna regardmg a coc'- tad issue, such as manascment ecunpeumce, must challenge the Board's substanuve conclusims regarding the issue. Comments that are no more than speculation about the integrity of a rnember of the egeney's Staff respasible fa the oversight of unhty management competence are not sufficient C The Commissim's dacrmmauon to authonze facihty operanon, reached as a result of its immediate effectiveness rev ew of contested issues addressed in a Licensms Board partial imtist decision that subsequently e as affirmed by the Appeal Board, does ne foreclose a party fret fihng a petition for Commission revtew of the ments of the Appeal Board's decisim. See 10 C.F.R. 6 2.764(g).

D lasues interveners seek to raise outside of the formal adjudica ory proceeding that have been naolved either in Licensing Board, Appeal Board, or Comnussion ruhngs on contested matters, or through the Staff's analysis of 6 2.206 peuums, did not provide e basis for delsymg the Comnussion's authonzauon to the Directa of Nuclear Reacta Regulauon to issue a full power operstmg beense.

3

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS AIAB 857 Pl!ILADELPIDA ELILTRIC COMPANY (Limerica Generating Sution, Uniu I and 2), Docket Nos. 50 352-OL,50-353-OL; OPERATING LICENSE; January 2,1987; DECISION A The Appeal Board affinns, subject to censin confirmatory action by the applicant, the Ucensmg which emcarned Board's supplement to its third panial initial decision, LBP-8632,24 NRC 459 (1986),

the adequacy of the number of bus drivers available to evacuate chudren in two spect$ed school diatncts in the twent of an emergency at the Limerick facihty.

B Any factualinformadon pmvided to the boards should be in affidavit form.

C "Isnplenmaing procedures" that supplement emergency plans with details likely to change, such as telephone numbers, are not required for a " reasonable assurance" findmg. Louisiana Power and Light Co. (Waterford Steam Electric Staum, Unit 3), AIAB 732,17 NRC 1076, !!06-07 (1983).

D Whether a solution for an emergency planning defciency can be characterized as " permanent" or "irnerim" is not important. What is important from a regulatory and legal standpomt i. whether "there is reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures [e g., evacuation] can and wi!!,, vien in the event of a rheological emergency." 10 Cf.R. I50.47(a)(1). See also -3 Cf.R. I 50.47(b)(10).

E To reopen a record, certain entens must be satisned. Ses 51 Fed. Reg. 19,535,19,539 (1986) (to be codified as 10 C.F.R. 6 2.714).

F While an appheant has the ultimate burden of pmving reasonable assurance, it is not obliged to prove and reprove essendally unchallenged factual elements ofits case.

O Under 10 Cf.R. Part 50, Appendia E, (!Y, emergency response plana "shau contain information needed to demonstrate compliance with the standanfs desenbed in 6 50.47(b)."

11 10 Cf.R. 6 50.54(q) requuta a heensee to "fouow and numtain in effect emergency plans educh meet the standards in i 50.47(b) of this pan and the requirements in Appendia E to this pan." Changes to an energency plan that would decrease iLs effecuveness are permuted only pursuant to paar NRC approva!.

I An appbcant's commitment to s ausfy, through special provisions, the emergency planrung standards in 10 Cf R. 6 50.41(b) and 10 Cf.R. Part 50, Appendts E, must be formauy included in the pertinent emergency plans.

J 1mportant emergency planning informade must be readily available in the plans themselves to decisionmakers. ALAB-845,24 NRC 220,24849 (1986).

K Licensms boards must "' confront the facts'" and " *aruculate in reasonable detad the basis' for the course of action chosen;" they are not obliged, however, to refer specincaUy to every proposed 6nding Public Service Co. of New llampshire (Scabrook Station, Uruts 1 and 2), ALAB 422,6 NRC 33,41 (1977), aff*d, CLI 781,7 NRC 1. aff'd, New England Coahtion on Nuclear Pollution v. NRC,582 F.2d 87 (1st Cir.1978).

L Appeal boards may confme their review to "substandal assertions of Ucensing Board error "long review Island Ughtmg Co. (shoreham Nuclear Power Stauon, Unit 1), ALAB 832,23 NRC 135,143, pending, CU-8611,23 NRC 577,579 (1986).

AIAD-458 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSIURE, et al. (Seabrook Staum, Units ! and 2),

Dociet Nos. 50 4434L,50-444 OL (Offsite bnergency Planning); OPERATINO UCENSE; January 15, 1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A In this operstag bcense proceedms, the Appeal Board denies interveners' meticri for an urrne& ate stay of proceedings leadmg to heannas on the State of New flampshire's Radiological Emergency Response Plan.

i 5 ,

l 1

l

!- ~I p -

l.

I j

l i

l DIGESTS

, ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND UCENSING APPEAL BOARDS l B Appeal board will only enteruin a motion for directed cenincade of a licensing board scheduling .

ords where the complairung pany can show that the schedule deprives it of its nght to procedural due process. Houston Ushung & Power Ca (South Texas Project, Uniu I and 2), AIAB-637,13 NRC 367 f 1

37 4 71 (1981).

C Ucensing Bosed decision to enduct simultaneous proceedings does not necessarily deprive an f inservenor of its right to a fair haanng. j D %e provisions of 10 C.F.R.1783 governing requesu to suy the etTecoveness of a decision or ;

senon pending Sling of and a decision on an appeal or petition for review are not applicable to requesu for interlocutory review of a hcensing board scheduhng order.

E. An appeal boar (s stay authoruy is not hmited to circumstances in which 10 C.F.R. 2.788 cornes into play but may be esercised pursuant to the appeal bosni's general supervisory suiharity over licensing board r.-- as. See generally Philadelphia Electne Co. (Umerick 6eneranns Staden, Unit 1), ALAB.

335,23 NRC 267,270 (1986).

-F Mere commivnent of renowees to a hearing that may later turn out to have been unnecessary does l not justify intadocutory moview of a licensing board scheduhng order.

0- Requests la modi 5 cation of the haanns schedule should be directed in the Erst instance to the i licensing board. Cf. Pubhc Service Ca of New Hampshire (Seabrook Stadon, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-338, l 4 NRC 10,12 (1976).

ALAD-859 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, et al. (Vogtle Elecuic Generating Plant, Uniu 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 5M24-OL,54d25-OL; OPERATING UCENSE; January 21,1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER i

.A he Appeal Board rules, in response to the oral request of me Dunctor of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulauen, that a heense condition imposed by the Ucensing Board with regard to a maner over q j

which that Board no leger had jurisdiction was null and void and therefcre did not preclude issuance of a low power operating hcense, i D Under NRC case law, once the Ucensing Board issues a decision in which it disposes of a pariicular i i

issue on the mertu and a notice of sppeal from that decision is Aled, the Ucensing Board no leger has jurtsdicuon to act funher wah regard to that issue. See Metropoliun E& son Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Stanon. Unit No.1), ALAB.699,16 NRC 1324,1327 (1982).Junsdiction over that mauer rests with the Appeal Board.

C A bcense con & tion imposed by a licensing board wuh regard to a maner onr which that board has lost juns&ction is null and void. ,

D De Director of the Of6ce of Nuclear Reactor Regulation may issue a low. power operating license m the basis of a licensing board decision a decisions authorir.ing the issuance of an operaung becnse.10 C.FA H2.764(b).1764(f)(1)(i).

E Appeal Boards have les estabbshed authority to review sus spmte the entirety oflicensing board decisions, even where no appeal has been taken. See Offshore Power Systems (Manufacturing Ucense for Floanna Nuclear Power Planu), ALAB 689,16 NRC 887,890, a#'d on other grounds, CU.82 37,16 NRC 1691 (19821 F Appeal board sua spets renew authority can include the impositiori of license cmditions. See, e s., Sacramerso Municipal Utihty District (Rancho Seca Nuclear Generating Statim), A1AB 746,18 NRC ]

749 (1933).

O The following technical issues are discussed: Polymers; Dose rate effects.

ALAB.860 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW llAMPSIIIRE, et al. (Seabronk Stanon Units I and 2),

Docket Nos. 50 443-OL,50-444-OL (Offsite Emergency Planning); OPERATINO UCENSE; February 26, 1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER i '

A ne Appeal Board dmies interveners' monen for irmarlocutory review of a Ucensing Board's scheduling order concerruns the adju& canon of appbcant's peution for a waiver of the C<rnminion's naulation requiring a 14 mile plume Emergency Planning Zone for the Seabrook plant.

D Except u provided in the focanote to 10 C.F.R 1758, the terms of that section do not alter the Appeal Board's usual appellate authority, including the authority to ducct certificadon of bcensing board

, ruhnss.10 C.FA 1785.

l

. 1 6

l

c .

gin W~ w. p+ ,; M.. a em.1&-<dc,3 g . .

+m..c g xn *q.).,.y a . .wyA. ,

P, , ;

_~

+ .s. .

n, x+; - < -

. m .st : ..

(! h ;h '.. ,.

.. . / a. . ,

b WT w ) 4 /Qh$

~,/f vm*V..

j ,J ,., h;Qa[s[I';f m.y i s, j p -"? o "Ik) r L

, . I, . .

o' ' - - (+.

, s g. -

- s, , ~

. .m

q. g., -p ~aW,'.'ql+n.% J,.

-9 .;' .

. , n.r p

,a..pv we. . . s,;

e ,,

u , . ,

4 a .s< .,.: %. y. a+. e o ,,.. ..a.

v ti n-

.1 n.s . c ., .

s,

, .s . . ,g ~~.

w , ,

m.,.

c . . - .

k $; D .h. u ,. o a . n. ,Nb ' ,N,L ~ . ([,

kh:kS[h,s.p.

A

_ ,E ,

WC Ja ; ,5 9P Ff i.1"~ i..

4 + A(;rm ,y N 4(s, N p - e

7, %

e 3- o i

!r w, g ,.L aw D,, ** rsv . ; - a, .a.mt n ,h , . ad

+'.mJc .

g v g ec , ..

fl fe k $wd n . ~. /* j . d y , 7l' ,

N h %, _ . M.; M' w' j23d a

i DIGESTS h@ydNNhk[hhhN.g 2 ISsmCu mHE AM SAM AND UNSWO AMAl, BOARM '

hQQ$ Y,dM % A L V , Yo ? f I ,

,s!!'

SD$,)$.y$

J N 1 - [,-?.JM$^N,;1 ifl*p,h .4 m ;3. -C' 4licensing10board

[ dri4%

C.F.R. 2,758 does not upressly address what sole, if any, en appeal board may play while a i g;g.;t , ; r dMYMQ

,'f,, i 4C @; , .

has a secnan 1758 pannon befase it for considennen. Bm 10 C.F.R.1785 confers en the .

'_ l

i

.' 4 { . Appeal Bosnia au the authosity that the Canumssion would possess in opersung bunse ,

ggNyp,k g*n;]t W'% '1*,.M-[N i

% D- If the C- : desins to preclude er te linns the mercise of the Appeal Board's authosity in a -

parnculat proceeding,it must - and does - say so espuesty. Las Island Ushnas Co. (Shonham Nuclear -

@'S Q d..** % yg,'j7,ARf}f'A.lc.T * * , 'b. CJOf% 1. ,yh$,'% Power Stanon. 'Q Unit , d; g%M 1), ALAB.717,20 NRC 1097,1100 (1934). See also M , - Edisai Co. (thres .

M pp J

' ,'; }

Mile Island Nuclear Sinnen, Unit Nc61), AIAB485,16 NRC 449, d5152 (1982r .

E- Seedon 2.758 seveals no Canumanien inssaiin override asher elemanas of the Appeal heard's

%j rg.)ji w 4-4;,*y m -. V FQ' Q J 'l ; ;

(g.X ", , [y ji; '* Q 4 . Q .3 y ;-d ,

custcsaary appeuate jurisdiction, including he authority to disent the coniacenen of licensing board Salings .

in proper cbcumstances. See Carolina Power and Light Co. (Shoemn Hards Nuclear Power Plant), ALAB- -

l

. e ,, q f j/ '. ;w ,f. ,s f ;). . 1* D, ' .!

+ 837,23 NRC 525,54648 (1986). . ..

W ', .s (, s .oN- la p4 s.7v +g.g ,J-N, DeC 's Rules of Practice psehibit ireerloneary appeals fium Unensms Board schedulitig y % P must sansfy dm .r - far directed C, W., h h ,1 M rulings. Dua, a motion seeinns the Appeal Board's L._ '

j$,' e? gy ',gi p.N+ w LgV < ~~?'

cenincation. AIAB.858J25 NRC 17,20-21 (1987). .

In order to obtain discianonary freedocuiary misw of a Ucensing Board's scheduling order, de e, - >

O' 4' s ,

Il., [ . 31 ' O 3,', < . - '

v.; *

a complaining pony must demonstrate that the challenged schedule deprives it of procedural due pro-hpaQg,f4 h '# .

.*,f i . .

cess. AuB.858,25 NRC at 21.

\ .bX ',' NW & =m C t.M [i*'. ,

%b .

H _ Allegations of concerns that am pamatmo do not consntute an insnediau infringma of

- procedural rights and do not warrant an Appeal Bosni's interlocutory intrussen inse the Ucensing Board's -

., ,.r. ,.iy P.1. D,.oJ.S o %,. '"- '

cen&ict of a proceeding. . .

'p".]i.? 4 ALAB-861 - LONO !$ LAND UGHTING COMPANY (Shonham Nuclear Power Statien, Undt 1). Docket

m Y,.' " .) . c' 4 s,' Na 54322-OL 5 (EP Exercise); OPERATING UCENSE; March 2,1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -

"3 e . S ** ,

De Appeal Bosni denies a nuquest by the Federal Emersecy Management Agency (FEMA), a

,i A g.g ' 3' [ " ; W)S .- ^

^

non-pany to this operanns license proceeding, for interloculary review of pornons of a Licensing Board .

1. , ,4 [u .,

'.'...sp.;.

i

- - order a4nitting for lingstion two contendens challenging the adequacy of a complaud exercise of the r;q x ct. i, . .,

,, ,p g f / 'C .

applicant's emergency response plan for the Shoesham facility. .

B It is wou-settled that a non-party has the right to take an iramediate appeal from an omier grannns g%p-4-fr;/*[i d, e '> b , #'[A

.,d'V

'f f,, ; ef <7 4 t t i, l t- discovery against it. His is attnbutable to the fact ht, widi regard to a non-pany, such an onler has the '

O $,fQ g requisine degree of Analhy (i.e.,is not deemed inseriocutory). See Comm<mweshh Edison Co. (Zion Stanan,

,e-M .; O[!.9. . . . [$j

bME -1 ',b ' 4.4 Ee5

Units I and 2), A!.AB 116,6 AEC 254 (1973).

4!~

C same non-parnes to NRC licensing pmceedings - 1.e., states and other , _ , " bodies

.y ; g 0* ' s participants in the proceeding by vinue of 10 C.F.R.1715(c)- pensens biosd appellaw rights. FEMA's

, ,- p Q - . r *

?s N;- sole, however, in NRC peceedings is sui generis. Wheihar it is entitled to the same appellate rights as f jpd U>Tg . ,E , d[ * ,

e ;P beN,.- enjoyed by State and local governments invoking section 2.715(c) is thus an open and difficult question.

,4 y&y! k.v,x t .' y % 4,,f 7. " (% D ne general policy of the Comminion does not favor the singling out of an issue far appellate y*c 4 , y y . ; . 2- 4 j

eummanon dunns the cannnued pendency of the trial proceeding in which that issue came to the fore. Public g&' b 3; Ji g . , f Service Co. of New Hampshire (Seabrook Stanon. Units I and 2), AMB-271,1 NRC 478,443 (1975)-

Duected cenincati<m will be granted by an Appeal Board only whose the ruling below either: . (1)

,3 ';

y E

/; ,'y ,4 a; - * ,

> threatened the pany adversely affected by it with immediate and serious irreparable irnpect which, as a practical maner, could not be aDeviated by later appeal or (2) affected the basic structure of the proceeding

> h Q ' ,f ,f,6+,, ' : l,.,* in a pervasive or unusual manner. Public Service Ca of Indiana (Marbie Hill Nuclear Generating Station, 7 ; ,. E ,, i ,

[" 1.,,

W ' " , ,' < . # ' Units I and 2), AI.AB 405,5 NRC 1190,1192 (1977).

{,

r ' a . F The basic structure of en ongoing adjudication is not changed simply because the admission of a i q- - p .% > [J.%,b ]',4 'J ,b g . > , contenuen resuhn frorn a licenams board ruling that is important or novel, or may conflict with case law,

' e,\ilW.., K . , ,

policy or Commissian regulations. Metropolitan Edison Ca Ghree Mile Island Nuclear Stenon, Unit 1),

ALAB 791,20 NRC 1579,1583 (1934); Cleveland Electric Illuminanns Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant.

- K . ? '[q w . ,,e

' .) ,7 "'

9, V ; y * # . f ,, '*

\ p ,* ' Units I and 2), ALAB.675, !! NRC 1105,111213 (1982). Similarly, the mere fact that additional issues

- , (;; V,7 ,,'. f .=.a- e; , , must be litigated does not aber the basic structure of the pmceeding in a pervasive or unusual way so as to r M.. CO d *

,( w , ,

jusufy interlocutory review of a licensing board decision. Arizona Public Service Co. (Palo Verde Nuclear Genersung Stanan, Units 2 and 3), AIAB 742,18 NRC 380,384 (1983); Virginia Electne and Power

%( 7' ,,

i lf.77

( ,

4 0

Co. (Nonh Anna power Stanon, Units I and 2), ALAB 741,18 NRC 371,378 (1983).

The single excepnen to the general proscription assinst interlocutory appeals is provided by 10 QJn 6 y[ ,'f ~ .,' [ C

'. ," 'Y' N . C.F.R. 2.714a. Under that section, a pony may appeal from the acceptance or rejection of contention (s) at

t. .' 3,* ,7 ,

>3, y r, u *4 8 n. 4 Q .M. 'i e, $ h "

"* -]

4t.

p .a o yve 3 ' 9; ,, g-l e, _'4 3 7 4, J . NMs f.

4, , , c4. ? -

Q.i l gym

, s' \ l q ' *'

d'

'.y, p,t ', e

, , , J /

J' 7

,..'3 g)o . , . , ' %, .

.kI 6

' 2' ,

3, -

g ,-

, =g,

' h j , ,,% -c-.# i3 ,

"'

l' ., m ,

f"d 4 ,,

yN " js/ ? <.k [ r.. ,, +, ..

1 2

4

-w ,

(c t

{,

+ * -

.a 1 1

e.. 8% 1 4 %

,s J t -- --

__.._..______________________,______m_

r; c ,

= _ _ _

___ -- - - - ~

~T m

['- '_r. e. ,, .

i t* <

, p.3 % >

s 4 . . , , .

, s< :

,=

gj.

Cm g,j n.

n- ..* ,

7,p ; ,: , n ,

-;'y, lJ . s

^

r s

~; -

e

, , ,yst

,,- , e .r.

6

. . . ,p . t., ; . '

a1c..+- 'S ~M. ,n,,,s .c v- " y' , ", , : ,

w ;n.m ,.

e t ,

, t - .4 2-

.a ; ,' - *. . , ,, "q",,,',,

f * %) <4

6

M g .,,;

2

, %pN*v-ys 4,g<

t

,' h;" y.i

- L 4

..4. ~

1 . 3. - ,

,,4 . -

,y

,. , ty , ,7., , ; . g3 f,,., ,

s, a

's, ' i n n . %. y - <- ; .,, ' , 6 %

^

'/ , ' I ? ' ' '

.g h 4 ,. M; ;

,,, y.,,. p. .a q w .. . ; p. ,3., y { 6.,zv,:.,f.s) ,

.1 ,

/ ,'cLa,

, ;'4 ,v.4,2 y.

O .a Q;^ . , , , ?" .,

I- . v.

. DIGESTS - ~ v s -

. . 5 .l a. +d . .. "".,,.1.4. . . . ". 3- >

. ISSUANCE 8 0F Tite ATOMIC 8AFETY AND UCENSING APPEAL BOARD ' f ',g 6I 7,'8. C.' y.f 4, .2

,. ,< : n ,

s 7e x;3 >

. 9 ' y',u . , , .yy . .

gs i.g >

.u 5

s the Gueshold if, but only if, such scompiance or r iecnon comrolled the Ucensing Board's disposinon of h,(e < .M ,' .

'@

j the pennen for intervennon advancing the sentennen(s) 10 CIA 2.714a.

H a i ir ~: [,. ? ~.[g* \( ,'"

r i The consept of irsepsable injwy as developed by ou couns ceniamplaies ihat the injury must be both sensin and great, and must be actual and not theoreucal. Washington Meuopolitan Ama Transit Canm'n v. Holiday Tsum, Inc.,559 F.2d N1, N3 rL3 (D.C. Cir.1977). ' ,.

'~

I"* *e . lM"A

,g < 7; t,,, @

., c r '. 4

ck ~ U ' ,

, r. .

-1 4 e+ 7s - r4?

., 4 , ' '

t

' injury.More " _ " linganen espenas, even substannat and wuncoupable cost does not censniute irrepersWei 7'. ,'. ., 5 lC ,M (f , c /*

Edison Co. (nees Mile laland Nuclear Stenen, Unit 1), CU 8617,20 NRC 801,804 'M f (1984), truenna t'mers Power Co. (Madend Mant. Units 1 and 2), AIAB-395,5 NRC 772,779 (1977), ' ,

' % + oD .M. ' l ..: -

i .! ' /*4 h

'3 gaedns ' . ' - Beste v. Bennereaft,415 U.S.1,24 (1974)c . .

ALAB 862 FUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW IIAMPSIGRE,et at (Seebsoak Station, Uniis I and. 2),

?c 4./' V'\ ,,.[.,s:[ ' ' ,' N h 4- ", 1

' . 1* 1".C,i'. < W A. K : '

Decket 1937; DECISION Nes. 50443 OL,50 4440L (Offrise Emergency Manning); OPERATING UCENSE; March 30,'

l ##!

s

? ' '*

4' N . , ,.

]"i % ~ _.7 Q

-6 A' A ,. 1 1he Appeal Board affirns a Usensing Board order denying a,Uniied States Senator's pennon far - o s

u.

C 4 .- ,M t ' g. ? , , w( ' G ,'#. -Qi ';g 'a . .F.

m

. leave to perncipate in this operating licensing proceedung as a representenve of an "insensted state"pursuan to 10 Cf.R. 5 2.715(c). The Appes) Board, however, allows the Senater's penumpanon in the proceeding , ,,/ ~)' ;,3 ' *

" ' r,j ,f as an errucus cunas. y +

' ', [ ' *G " y I*i BL.. .

sW ,

,p,',.,

Persons making lienited appearances ase not parties to the proceeding and have no psaicipananal siglas in k beyond the offering of a wrinen er mal statement. Banher, that asismant is not part of the ;1 b'

<^ ,-

7'.'

.g .' 'sj ,.

9r,h t Y ofncial moord of the paceeding - 'g , p. T y3.v. p 'QJJ C_- '4 10 Cf.R. 2.715(c) was promuissied to carry eut the n - 2 directive ihat,in the furtherance - ' . 3.x.4;'*-. ,'. . ,. g ..s of cooperation between the t' ' ' .- and the sinies, en opponunity be provided to the representenves of

- ' s ' r ' ",- F , yO i*'W

. intensied states to participate in the adjudicenen of license applications. It is ressenaWe to assume that the

,F, ,,3 ,a.-

i !

- '. ~

A -

f legislanve centemplanen was that the concerned state, and not the NRC, would make the decision ,

respecting '* , ,,

who is to serve as he spokesman. gi ,g, ,

D _ . .

dy ;i .. N,,, Q' 4s ,,W u In contreet to a supresentanve of a governmental body who desias to perncipate without pany [$ .,%QI,'**Y ,.?

.- ;, [ Mj,'. ,

ensu,s under the aegis of 10 CIA 2.715(c), a poman seeking leave to intervene must (whether a private p, J y**" ? + M W .; 8.. ,!. 6 ,">9 *< , , ,

chinen er a public efncial) provids the Usensing Bosal with a list of the caisenuens he or she wishes to J lingate, tegenhor with a statement of the beeis fw them.10 Cf.R. 2.714(b). ip; ,' <#" . ' W.; ' '

.L p y.,'[- *y. fl-The Carmnission's Rules of Pucnos caplicidy refer only to the seeking of leave to Ale a brief

. { preclude .A',.g ,, f ' i' - %,. .

amicus euriae befase an Appeal Bossd er the Commission. But this cansadoration does not perforce , * ' p, df o Q

,-P

. the granting of leave in appropriate circumstances to Als briefs or enemoranda amicus curiae on issues of a * ~

~

' law or fact that onll temain for Ucensing Beard dispositiert #

, , , . s.

F. 1here is no real diffannce between an appellais brief amicus curiae and a brief or other submission

..,a..

/

y,. , "

presented to a trial tribunal that is cor.3ned to a discussion of (1) legal issues dat have been pasented to 8 that tribunal by ihe panies; and (2) faciual issues covered in evidentiary hearings. The ciudal factor is that,

., .t.8,, ,',, y , m. 4y +

sogantness of whose k Anes las brief, en amicus cudas necessarily takes the proceeding as k Ands it. 5&. ' 4 ,*1 i W~' <

." 4

k '-9(. N' ' , "' $J,',*(

0- 5 M'

An amicus curiae does not have the right to appeal adverse decisions. .

' " ' %J. * '-c

" ,9 . . ,}'

l ~ , i s - ;

D. ~

<..i,, ,,.

t-- ,... .. , + ' e*? - , : >/' ;

t .

z e#'. o - , , .

h ., M; .* p - * "

.., .j. $' s'-

N. .4 y ~9 s j

t " . , +. - *q .

. , , s . %. * ., 3 7

. ,w.

IwM4( -*.... _

i 4 2 m

,a ,'s.. - g:.; . [3 j. {

4..

,{.,"' [ .V .6 , [#; * ? I;-f o,

i 4 i

... ,f4'* . . + a ,< v y . . .} , .

s, s."

,,y . ,

gy * :% m,. i s 4 Y y ,1

{ V j, . -< ; v.*\

y~;s xg, Q ," - ;.e ,., y . ** a.w v rh*j1

,7 p*[ -Q l' .[4

. : 3,. e

., TY

'% 1 ..

,,,f."..aJ .a , W*.,* 8 %g'

, e

's

} M^ . , , co' *, * ., sA .;*.

i Q:lwl. d.i,Q

f }., L ' 9*l p{', ftl{ ,N ,,M ,

K

'q '

' 45e+ W t . {v,.:.g pm . s*g e .

m .; % 5'!, r (W-W d N 3 .>

' m *q*s.* ,&p.- k. .

,4 f f",s p' ,.: . .

,,,y t.. 's*; Y. y ., &, ,

',, ** ~% "

, ,F

,fN,- j,-g i

4,, ys,,j (f* .,, , me. -

4

. 4 g "*

.e, .t v .,s .f.'

J

. ;e . - .

'*s*a

. v. g ; 9,

.*p,M Y.i *N;,

,, .,.y- - .4 *e . .

, . 6 . q., .

<; , .:,1c's.

,e *1 *

( g. 4

.a u %

..n .

Y *\ s

.w\... gy

, Q 4

,g 3 s

.q

- ' b ' '

.,g. -

.v. , ., ej

.e ,, , , , s ., ,

'* - .w

. . <.~ y:

5

, ' ,. ..\

'Y, *,l 4

3

, ?.-.. t -

3, >

t , * ,

, - 7 3 n s.

( , <

,* , 4. - ',

4 a '

I ei 1( ,

- e 4 ., *

, q N

^*', *t ,

_ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ - - --- n*. '

DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAETY AND LICENSING BOARDS LBP-871 TEXAS UT!!JTIES E1ECTRIC COMPANY, et al. (Comande Peak Sisam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50445-OL,50 4460L (ASLBP No. 79-430L060L) OPERATINO UCENSE; January 7,1987; MEMORANDUM A The Board requested additional information concerning the adequacy c( a reinspecuan program that <elice in part on sampling that is designed to detect an error rate d at least 5% at the 95% level d er afidmee.The Board seeks tolearn the basis for concluding that a plant with jwt less than a 5% error rate LJ auained an adequate level of safety. It inquires intolow that rate cornpans to what mighs be espected from consciertims implementation of the qualuy assurance requirements of 10 CJA Pan 50, Appendia B, and hoe such an error rate impacts on fauh-tree analysis d the reliability of the AFWS.

B %e following technicalissues are discussed: Sampling, runspecuan by; Fauh-tros analysis, effect of construction ermrs on; Constmetim errors, rate to be expected LBP-f 7 2 FLORIDA POWER & UGiff COMPANY, et al. (St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 2),

Docket No. 50 389-OIA (ASIEP No. 87 544-01 LA) (Spent Fuel Transfer Amendment); OPERATING UCENSE AMENDMENT; January 16,1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A he iJcensing Board dismisses, for lack d standmg, the only hearing request in an operating license amendment proceeding and, accordingly, terminates the proceedag B Under 10 Cf.R. I 2.714(s), an intervendon petition must set forth with panicularity the paitioner's interest in the proceeding, how that interest may be affected by the resuhs of the proceedmg. and the speci6c aspect (s) of the proceedmg as to which the petidouer wishes to intervene. l C Residence more than 100 miles from a reactor site is nos sufftetent to establish a peuuener's intenst in a proceeding.

D A statemmt of a citizen's right or a civic duty to participate in a proceeding ocnstitutes a generalized snevance shared in substantially equal rnessure by all or a large class of cuizens and does not visuh in distinct and palpable harm suf5cient to support a petitioner's standmg.

E A petidoner who fails to meet the standmg requtternents of 10 Cf.R. I 2.714(a) could be penruned to intervens as a mauer of discation, assuming he tru the standards established by the Corrstussim fa such discreuenary intervention in particular, a petidoner would have to demonstrate how his panicipation would assist in developmg a sound record in the proceedag.

F Where the speru fuel pools of two facihties are to be shared, the requinrnents of Geners! Design Crtterim 5 become applicable. Dey must be analyzed by an applicant and evaluated by the NRC Staff.

G in the absence of a hearing on an operating license amendman, the Staff is not required to make l

the "no serious hazards consideration" nnding of 10 CJ.R. 6 30.92(c) See 10 Cf.R. I50.91. l LDP 87 3 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSIURE, et al. (Sastrook Staden. Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos.50-443-01 1,5044&OL-1 (ASIEP Nc6 8247102 OL)(Onsite Emersecy Planrang and l' Safety issues); OPERATING UCENSE; February 6,1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A The Ucensing Board denies the Canmonweahh of Massachuseus' mouen requesting that the Board admit a late-filed contentim, reopen the record in the onsite emergency planmng phase of this pr3ceeding.

j and either refrain from issuing any decision that might authorize the issuance d an operating license for operadon not in excess of 5% rated power or,if deciding to authorize the issuance of a low power hcenas, to condition the issuance of such a license upon the Appheants' compliance with 10 CJA 5 50.47(bX5) 9

, m,__ _ _ _- _- _ - - _ _- _-_ - _--

3

$ J 1

si q r

1 1

j

-i I

i DIGESTS

! , - ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND IJCENSING BOARDS l B in esder to deernene whscher to grant a monian to admit a Isre-61sd - t the Board must 2 eenader the Sve faaers set fanh in 10 C.FJL 62.714(aXI). With aspect to the Ibet facier, the movant must show good esuse for failing to Als ins -a=='6 in a ihnely manner.

C , Even if feweseble to the mesent, the second and founh faeroes in $ 2.714(a)(1) me accorded Isas t

' weight than faciase ene, ihme,'and Sve. Comenoownshh Edison Ca (Baidwood Nuclear Power Station, j Unias 1 and 2), CU.44 8,23 NRC 241,245 (1986); South Carehns Electric and Oes Ca (Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unas 1), ALAB442,13 NRC 881,895 {19811 D Wish suspent to the third faseer, the ensuunt must idanairy les prospective wunesses and : e=

their proposed espost sessimony. Baidweed, supra,23 NRC at 2*i-47 ,

E ;, ' Wish suspect to the SAh facier, the unevent must show that the adnesman of the lawaled _ ,

would not breeden the issues and delay the prossedug j F - The Cennussion has dissied hennens boards to see to is that the process moves along at en

_, peas, consistent with the demands of fairness. Sistement of 1%Iicy on Conduct of Ikonaing Proceedings, CU.818,13 NRC 452,453 (1981).-

O Pursuant to (1714(a)(1), the Board may only determine whether cr not to admit the late-$ led cornention, but may not at that time surunarily dispose of the contanhan in light of af6 dawns attached to apposing suspeans.

H .. It is well established in the C "s case law that the $rst facte is a crucial element in ,

the analysis of whosher a lawAlad contention aheuld be admitted, if the propean af a esmaenuen fails 'I to satisfy this enernent of the inst, it must make a "compelbng" showing with respect to the other four =

factors. Baldwood, supm,23 NRC at 244; Cincinnal Gee and Electric Co. (William H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1),13P-83 58,18 NRC 640,663 (1983); Mississippi Power and Ught Ca (Grand Gulf

'i Nuclear Sistien, Units 1 and 2), A1AB-704,16 NRC 1725 (1982).

I A metion to mopen a closed evidentiary mooni is governed by 10 C.F.R. 62.734.

LBP-87 4 RADIOIDGY ULTRASOUND NUCMAR CONSULTANTS, P.A. (Suontium-90 Appbcator),

Dasses No. 3&l2688 MIA (ASLBP Na 87 542-01 MLA); MATERIA 13 UCENSE AMENDMENT; )

' Pebsuary 9,1987; DECISION -

'A - In a meterials license pecesading where the C- authoniand an informal hearing, ths Prending Of5cer denies an Applicant's appeal and afErms the NRC Staff's denial of a sequested license amendment. -

B- The failure of a insterials lisenes applicant to mspond to quesuens posed by a Presiding Of5cer

- in itself eeund serve as a valid basis for denying en applicant's appeal frorn a Staff determmation to deny a license application.

C Ahhough a hearing based solely on wrinen submismans is she prefered method of proceeding in an informal psoceeding, a Presiding OlHcer may also be granted discretion to enertain " oral preserustiens."

D A psoposed therapeutic uns of bypeduct maiarial under 10 C.F.R. Part 35 mua also meet the cuitaria set fonh by the Canmismen in a February 9,1979 Statement of General Policy.

E Under the Cennusson's February 9,1979 Statement of General Policy, e proposed tharspouuc .

use of strontion-90 must be dernenstrated to be " safe ed effectiva" For nonrouune uses, the NRC Staff 1 makes such a daiermination aher consuhation with the NRC Advisory Commines en the Medical Uses af F- I*p"Under the Commassen's February 9,1979 Staunent of General Policy, the greater the potential '

hasard to a patient froen byproduct material or its oss by a physician, the mee NRC may elect to circumscribe

, suas that might enherwies

e regarded as within the discretion of a physician. The Policy Statemera Ands

!. shot the risk to passeus frun all therspeuuc uses d radioactive drugs "is not low."

O The following nedmicalissue le discussed: Therspoutic use af strontiwn-90 applicator.

l-LBP 87 5 - U.S. Ecol 40Y, INC. (Shefneld, Ilhnois I.aw44 vel Radiasctive Wame Disposa! Sua), Docket Na 27 39-SC (ASLBP Na 78 374-01-0Th $110W CAUSE; Febnasty 20,1987; MEMORANDUM AND

. ORDER

A . In this Memoranden and Order, the Ucensing Board denies Licermee's Motion for Summary Judgrnent as to the issues of "possesmen" of bunal waste and the right of the Ucenses to unilaterally terminate lis license without action by the Cemnusman.

It

)

m . ,

v,;

W . ,U,

E &

1 nL, t

e

,,', ..4 s<

c

)

, - ._ :,l * :as'lt,2 , w

- r s' ,

~

m ,,

c3 ,

3, +. . n, ', ej s

y . ,v c

..,, m. _ ,

,~

i A-

n. -

=

j, . , , a t

[y,{p(, , 6',, W I , ' g. ] e ,

0,c' i .

e . ,

, , , 'O.-~ . , . . ,

-r

,'?Qu , ,

, , - ir U a,,,

=

y .

~

n . pA,.

. ~ 7) .w :j.

O, w. ' -

DIGESTS jg;wg'l '

1 e

4]r; , f.i ,.c. . .e,, ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSINO BOARDS Q^%, ; , . . ', % , .,' .V 3i ..g .. h , , v , ,, * , .

. yN ., , . y : -3.. W ,4f; q gry 4 9 f ; ,j$, g .WM,: e B The issue of whether a licensee possesses buried nuclear waste is not dispositive of its responsi-g ; .4 r,

g , , "'..y. ,;y1 q %, v; ,,l bilines with respect to that weste. The concept of "posassaion" as it telates to source, byproduct, or special

- . j % ,g

't y A ;*', ,,.?4i .

nuclear material in this case pertains only to the crincal mass limitadon danned in 10 C.F.R. 6150.11(b).

" A licensee's responsibility for nuclear waste does not terminate with the burial of the waste.

/ ' ,, '.g.

kj. . .' t l l4 C t, > a,

.( "

V W .,' w , .. > D License language subjecting the licenses to "all other applicable rules, regulations, orders of the Atomic Energy Commission now or hereafter in effect" was irnended to bind the licensee to the type of aus

$ ,s 2! NC . f. J *

[,M,'( 47' A ' .;, }

". Q' ' stabilization and closure requirernants ulimately promulgated in 10 C.FJL Part 61.

j* '(y A license is a grant by the Nuclear Regalatory Comnussion "of the right to mgese in conduct that i ., E

,;,;$,,i j"' "- *,

7

,";,- ' o' would be improper without such a granL"'Dist right carries with it spectned obliganons set out in the form

' 't ' - cf regulations, of6cial guidance, and orders.

j ', . !

LDP-87-6 OENERAL PUBLIC UTILTTIES NUCLEAR CORPORATION, et al. (three Mile faland Nuclear

+( .'

- 'j Station Unit 1) Docket Nos. 50 289-OLA 1,54289 OIA 2 (Steam Generator Fluggmg Criteria); OPER-1.* - . . ' ;

. - ( .4" R ATING LICENSB AMENDMENT; February 27,1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Ucensing Board granu Licensee's motion for terminadon of proceedings with respect to c, , "

A i Technical Specification Otange Requesu 148 and 153.

Absent objections, the Board granu the moden to terminate proceedings.

1

., 8

,' , ', . e GP-87 7 VERMONT YANKEE NUCGAR POWER CORPORATION (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power sp. 'v, ,,

Stauon), Docket No. 54271-OIA (ASLBP No.87-547 02-1A); OPERATING LICENSE AhENDMEAT; v' , ,i - ' ,t .3 . ,

~

'l' 's February 27,1987; hEMORANDUM AND ORDER l( .A' .

, ,s' , . . , , ,

4 A in a spent fuel pool expansion proceeding which is to be subject to the hybrid hearing procedures i,6 .

in 10 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart K, the Ucensing Bosni considers the standing to intervene of various peduaners

.' '.1 ' -

s and estabhshes schedulsa for further 61ings and for a preheanns conferece.

[ g. ..g,' ' B Intervennon rules are the same for hearings involving hybrid proceduzes as for other proceedings. A s"

f~ pendoner for innervation must demonstrate standing; the specinc aspect (s) of the subject maner of the y r i

, o C < ,'

', + , i proceeding as to which the peudener wishes to intervene; and, prior to the first prehearmg conference, at F c 'i least one valid contention.

'f , '

' An orgeruzadon can establish standmg either as an organizadon or as a represersative of one or

. Ni p' - **

i. ,

a 7,

' i C

more of its members whose intereau may be affected. Residence of at least cme mernber in close proximity

' ' to the facility, standing alone, would esublish such representauve standmg. To do so, the orgaruzauan must p yf' , '

' ' < " ' .i ,

provide the name and address and represanution authertzad<m from at least one member with a sufEcient

i e' ," ,

interest in the proceeding.

Although a licensing board may grara innervation as a mauer of discretion, it need not consider

/ D

'r', *

, ]; h ,

,g ,

LDP 87 8 doing so where a ruty has not addressed the cntena governmg discretionary intervention.

SEQUOYAH FUELS CORPORATION (Sequoyah UF 6 to UFd Facility), Docket Na 44 8027-

's

(,

O - - n '

% M1A (ASLBP Na 85 513-03.ML); MATERIALS IJCENSE AMENDMENT; March 4,1987; DECISION

,f ,

..> , , ( , A After considering numerous Ehngs and conducting a 3 day oral heanng, the Prestding OfAcer authorizes the issuance of a license amendment permitung the operation of a facility to convert depleted y- q ,;

urantum hasanuaride to depleted uranium tetrafluide at the Applicant's Oore, Oklahoms plant. This

, 'e authoruadon is subject to four condiuens: Arst,in order to ensure that the automatic telephone emergency

?,j . , , ' '

nouncation system wsil(s.nction property, the Applicant is to venfy that all residences withm a 2 rrule radius a * '

p.

F'

. ..+ e

of the facility have telephones and make provisions acceptable to Staff to neufy any that do not; second, the I ' ' Appheans is to venty that all telephone numbers bated in its emergency response plan are accurate at each major esercise of the plan; third, the Applicant is to maintain the level of staf6ng cuthnod in iu testimony

Z ' m. , * . h . j, presented at the heanns and to promptly report any changes in the dunes of those individuals to Staff; and

, J. ' ' i= o

founh, Applicant's President and its Ocneral Man 8er are each to spend at least one full workday each

, 1 ,' '

4 U k., ' *

month at the facihty while it is in operation.

OP 87-9 MICHAEL F. DIMUN, M.D., (Dyproduct Materials lacense Na 37 13604 02) Docket No. 34 19378 ML (ASGP Na 87 548 01 SC); SHOW CAUSE: March 10,1987; MEMORANDUM AND

l'V >. '

ORDER y- , ,

A In a proceeding involving an Order to Show Cause why a bcense should not be revoked for-I.'> q '

nonpayment of a fee due the government, the Presidmg Of5cer disnusses the Licensee's heanns request as

* ,i moca and terrainstes the proceedmg, where the Ucensee pays the amounts due the governmers.

,- ,y &

,** 4' , ,

k' % 9 ,t

. e; ,

,,1 *4 '4

. ** f , . g . ~b5 ,

't e,' f .h

,, .- gg e,,

9 <

-c v

,Ts..

3

~f .* , , 'l e % s i ff [, , g ,

t . ,, .'

,* e

,,, 4

, ~) ,

- "" , n .

. -T p , 7 F= ', g '. t , , s 6

p}^*u 1 g . ,

s{

A

t 1 v .

, ,e y ..g, p.

s..

u ,

e c.,

g

,,,,s,-r '

., , 2 - Y, , < ,; ,

4

, j

-,.e C. . .

t o, - ,. ., .,

>- 23- s

. - , , , ,: >. . e. ,. , w.. .., .n,1 .

a...

t . .c.. : s..,

. .g

I

, ..g , ;

. , g '.

. , *.,r '

DIGESTS

J , .P. ,,* . 'NJ ::', ..

.155UANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAITTY AND LICENSING BOARDS +@-

4 . .,,(

9 a .

, .p g ,( , ' * ' ]

-.. v. .

. . . u .-

A,a LDP 8710 PUBUC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW IIAMPSIIIRE, et al. (Seabrook Station. Units I and n *. v. f . ).

.g - ,p ,w. ..+-

e s' ' ;

2), Docket Nos. 50443-OL 1,30444 OL 1 (ASLRP No, 8247102 01J (Onsiis Emergency Planrung and

, , ~ ,; , , . '.A ' ^.

)

A ..

Safety lasues), OPERATING UCENSE: March 25,1987; PARTIAL INmAL DECislON i ~! '

f' i' * .' '

o ;c.

The Ucensing Board authonaes issuance et a heense to operate Sesbmok Station, Unit 1 up ,

to 5% of reted power h resolves the three ensue emergency planning and safety consenuens relating to ,

(a) Apphcants' emergency classificauen and action level acheme, (b) electrical equipnent eni -d quahfication time duration, and (c) Applicarsa' safety psrammer display system. h authorises the issusace of

'i. . ! } y's _;. [% .,

3 , . ' - 3 ..

this low power bcense provided that, pnar to the issuance thereof. Appheants have assisfied one conatina 2, ',

.. 7 f * ",. ? y .?

imposed with respect to r -. (b), With suspect to contenuan (c), the Boani orders that, if a full- ,

.' ,,[ * . * *iJ s, M ~Y, power operating bcease is ultimately authanaed by the other Ucensing Bosni which is considering offsias 4

" O' emergency planning issues, poor to the issuance theseof. AppEcants unust have satisfied duas condnions. !

.( ,e ,'M ;" = ';

B * * , 4 NUREO 0737, Supplement 1, does not requis irnplementation cf requirements far the safety I

paramaser display systern prior to initial enticahty. However, to protect the pubhc henhh and safety, v

. . . . - - - .N , -

implernentation of certain SPDS requirements must be effected prior to operatimi at power levels above 5%

et rated power. 'f , ,.

,- , , , . .j C e', 'i, ,

- The followmg ischnicalissues are discussed: Emergency Classification and Acuan Level Scheme; Electrical Equipment L.u

/

. ,d . ; !

't Qualification; and Safety Parameter Display System. ' ' ' ,

s *

c. .! '

n- .

y. , p/ -

t, ,, ,

Y. , *

:.4 o

. %~,

, s, ~. .

+

s,,' o, a.

4 71 .7w. ,

w ,,,.

. s ..

b , a

'? q C ;.h.

A ,, . . . _ ' .

,y' 4 ' . 1.f 4 . e wp ,.

h,.. , ,.., . . , , . .

,, ,o .~.1..my

. ,?

r a ,

e

,' s -

g n ,ey .

. ) , 4 aa., 4 I - T .,e

i .

y

,F

? ,, t , .y e .. <

- .a.,.

4 s .. .,g - a I g- a 9 #'

N!, ,

.h., .- n

' ' [, . #

. ,&yt-

, y,~

e

s. 6 f .. --

J

.' > g.

g ,

y

. - , .h'

'7: 1

, . fe c .i 4 /

e, .%

3., j

, JS q

"J,.,

,l (h . =

<6 .

%4j

.J q . ,/ . -, )

$ b . p ,(

o t -u ) ,

.. $. , , j ' ' *

I ' 8 . ' & '

4 s.,

g . .g , ; , ,

)

g

, ',. .. ' , _,(%* . .- ,

,s 6

>n, m.y y :

)I *.

3-e... Hq

,,. 4*

r4 r ,f. 4 s. ,. - , , ,9 f "; ge 4 0 a. 4-

ef ,5 ,. T

- s ..

' f e ,',, %

..i e p** ,5 ? ,' .

E o .6 U -

c . p '.>,.O.'a 1

_2' , .- l. , :

A,., + , ' j -

4 x S Q . '. :# , ,d

. j; "%, ( ,. r

, ., . - y... .

s y 3 . . . .

Q ,

.Us s ~ ',

../

A.

i

,,'- ,3

..g=+-.).'

s e h ," ..

i J

L - .. ,

- * , . (.'

, (*.

4

, -. a *e**i g

* *j a

.,y,

' 3

e = , e e'

s

.k' A

, g .s

.n . ', ,

z. .a J j

DIGESTS 1150ANCES OF TIIE ADMINISTRATIVE IAW JUDGE AU-871 ADVANCED MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. (One fictmy Row, Geneva, Ohio 44041), Ducie Na 3416055-SP (ASIBP No. 87 545 01 SP) (BML No. 34-1908941) (EA 8615,5); SPEGAL PRO-CEEDIN0; January 14, 1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER fouDWING HRST PRElIEARING CONTERENCE AU.37 2 ITURIEY MEDICAL CENTER (One llurley Plaza, Rms, Michigan) Docket Nos. 3401993,74 1396 (Ucense Nos. 2140338-02, SNM 1393) (EA 45-89), CIVIL PENALTY; March 3,1987; INITIAL DECISION A In an Imtial Decisia, the Admirust-suve Law Judge sustains a civil peulty in the amount c(

$2500 imposed assinat se Ucenses by the laector ofInspectim and Enforcement for failure to comply wuh NRC requuemenu concerning the possesmon and use of a variety of nuclear materials in dugnosue and therapeuuc medicma B la this enforcement action, the NRC Staff and the bcensee, a community hosptal, had stipulaud to fourteen violauana of NRC requirement. N issue remainmg was whether e civil penalty should be imposed in accordance with the General Sutament d Pohey and Procedure for NRC Enfaceman Actions (10 C.F.R. Part 2, Appendra C), and in consideration of the safety signincance of the stipulated violadons. N Commissim's Pohey and Procedure for NRC Enforcemera Actions, by tu espress terms, must be followed by the administrative law judge in determming whether a civil penalty should be impceed, trutigated, or entindy renuued.

C When semal Seventy level IV violauons stemmma from ucensee's general failure to caert management oversight and control over iu radiation safety program are found, the Seversty level IV violations may be aggregated into a Seventy level 111 violauen and a civil penalty appropriate to the escalated violauen is unposed.

D Where the NRC Staff fails in its burden of proof with respect to scene of the charged violauons, se admuustrauve law judge cannot substitute his own judgment for that of the Director of inspecuan and Enforcement if does ao would mean irnposes a penalty a charges not specined in the Director's onier imposing the civil penalty, thus distinguishmg Atlantic Researds Cap., AIAB 594,11 NRC 841,84849 (1980X E As a mauer of fair notice and due process, a heensee in a civil penaby proceedmg must be tunely informed of the theory of the case agamat it, csung Goldberg v. Kelly,397 U.S. 254,271 (197u).

F W admuustrative law judge may not save the Dutctor of Inspection and Enforcement frorn a failed theory of the Director's case by subsututmg snother theory because the Duesta, not the adrnuustrouve law judge, has the burden of proof, and the hcensee is enutled to an imparual deciswnmaker.The function of the adjudicator may not be commingled with me funcum of me prosecutor, etung Wong Yang Sun v. McGrath, 339 U.S. 33,46 (1950).

I u

i DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF DikECTORS' DECISIONS !

DD-87-1 SOtJT1IERN CALITORNIA EDISON COMPANY, es s! (S 1ofre Nuclear Generating Stauen, Units 1,2, and 3), Dockst Nos. 56 206, 54 361. 50-362; REQUEST IOR ACf1ON; Januay 29, 1987; #.

DIREGOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 6 2.206 ,

A he Duector of the Office of Inspection and Enforcement riades a peudon of the City of Laguna Beach, Cahfornia (1%titioner), to extend the 14 mile radius of the emergency planning zone (EPZ) for the aj San Onofre Nuclear Generating Staden to include South bguna and bguna Beach, i B De bases for the acdon requested in the pedtion are concerns about the lack of emergency planmns f for bguna Beach, the topography of the South Orange County constime as it relates to the transporuuon -

network, and the effect on the residents of Laguna Beach as others who live to the smth drive through E j Laguna Beach as part of an evacuatim procedure. The petition also referred to the "recent circumstances f

. j in the Soviet Union" as a basis for recmsidens the emergency planrung tone issue for San Onofn. 3 C The current plume esposure EPZ for San Onofre is adequate, and Laguna Beach and South Laguna, which he outside the EpZ but within the pubbe educatica zone for San Onofre, are adequately addressed

[

z -

in the exuting emergency plans for Orange Coumy and the State of Califorrua. -- 7 D Reviews perforrned to date of the Chernobyl accident and the Chernobyl plant design have not identined any aspects of the accident that show a clear cut nesus to U.S. caranercial nuclear power planu. At E

this time,it is too early to determine whether any changes to current emergency plaruung reguladans will 2 be required. _'

DD 87 2 COMMONWEALTil EDISON COMPANY AND ALL UGifT WATER REAGORS (Zion Sta. L tim, Unit 1), Docket Na 54295; (Byron Nuclear puwer Sisticn, Unit 1). Docha No. 56373; (bsa!!e ?

County Station Unit 1), Docka No. STN 50454, REQUEST IOR AGION; February 10,1987; DIREC- L TOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 Cf.R. 6 2.206 I A The Duector, Of5ce of Nuclear Reactor Raauladon, dades an emergency relief peutim dated August 13,1986,and sponsored by a number of individuals.

D De peution sought suspension of the operating bcenses for the Zion Staden Unit 1, bSaue County Stadon Unit I, and Itymn Nuclear Power Staden Unit i factbt es of the Canmonweahh E& son Company (CECO) and other similady situated facilides due io alleged inadequacies in containment imegrated leak rate test (CILRT) practices. h was alleged that the testmg was at venance with the Commusim's requtremenu for a CIUtT, speci6cally 10 C.F.R. Part 50, Appendix J. h was aueged that there eere deficiencies in cornputer programs used dunns the teaung and that certain data were irnpropedy replaced by othsr data, aDegedly in violation of the Comrnission's requuemenu.

C The Duector determined that the alleganons russed in the petida concernma the applicauon of censin CECO cornputer pmgrams to contautinent leak rate testing at CECO facibues were unsubsunu-sted. Rather, based upe CILRTs conducted by CECO for iu LaSalle Zim, and Byron factbues, and the independent review and oversight of these tesu conducted by NRC inspectors, these facthues and others sundarly situated cnnform to the Commission's requuemenu with respect to contamment leak rate testang DD 87 3 GENERAL PUBUC tJTILITIES N'UCLEAR CORPORATION (three Mde Island Nuclear Stanon.

Uruu I and 2), Docket Nos. 50 289, 50 320; REQUEST IOR ACTION; March 6,1987; DIREGOR'S DECts!ON UNDER 10 Cf.R. 6 2.206 A De Acung Director of the Of5ce of Nuclear Reactor Regulatim denies a peution Eled by Randy Kmg in 1983 m behalf of the nice Mde Island Pubhc Interest Resource Center (Th0-PIRC) and others requesting that the Canmusion 'tah all work at TMI Uniu I and 2 iminedsately, save for enamienance 15 I

i l

l

h i

DIGESTS j ISSUANCES OF DIRECTORS' DECISIONS necessary for safety." TMI.PIRC based sta request on the al'esations of Richard D. Parks emcernes implementaum of the quahty assurance program and related areas at the Thee Male Island Nuclear Sladon, i Urut 2.

i DD.47-4 PORTLAND OENERAL ELECT 10C COMPANY, et at (Trojan Nuclear Plant), Docket No. 50 344; REQUEST IOR ACTION: March 5,1987; DIRECTOR'S DEQSION UNDER 10 C.F.R. $ 1206 A _

By Pounon dated Novenbar 3,1986, submitted pumuent to 10 C.F.a(. 6 2.206, John Arun, on behalf d Fceolaws On Board. Elaine Kelley, and Lloyd K. Maibet (Peuumera) retuested the Nuclear Regulatory Comnussim (NRC) to inautme a pmceeding to suspend the opersung hcense of the Trojan Nuclear Plant, to hold public heannes on such a proceedmg, and to susped imrnediaiely the opereung bcense for the Trob facihty pendmg campletion of such a peceeding. The Pettuoners alleged that the Pbrtland General Electne Canpany, the Licasses, failed to disclose the maputude and eaters d certain seismic design dancunews in the walla of the control buildmg and the turtane buildma, and diesel generator enclosures.

B The Director of the Oface of Nuctant Reacter Rasulatim denied Pa==s'sequests because the Pennoners raised technical issues that the licensee, the Staff, and other pasties ha&sencived in pr-a4ga

{ before the Atomic Safety and lleenams Boasd and the Atornic Safety and IJeaneng Apeal Board, and the l Pentionen had subminad no new informauen that would cause the Staff to aher its prevuma decisions.

C - The Nuclear Regulatory Cormuasion, having already considered and resolved the technicalissues that a paddoner raises, need not reconsider hose issues if the petidener pnmdes no new informatiert See

. Northern Indiana Pubbe Semco Co. (Bailly Oener:6ng Station, Nuclear.1), C1178 7,7 NRC 429,434 (1978), aff'd sub nom. Porter County Ospier of the Izaac Wahon League of Amasice v. NRC,606 F.2d 1363 (D.C. Cir.1979).

l DD-87 5 B ABCOCK & Wilf0X (Parks Township, Pennsylvania Facihty), Dodet No. 74364; REQUE3T l IUR ACTION; March 13,1987; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UhT)ER 10 C.F.R. 6 2.206 A The Director of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards denies peddona Eled by i

Fances L Munko and Mildred E. Chelko requesdna acuen with regard to the Babcock and Wilcom Parks Township facihty. The Peuuoners requested eat a proceeding be inaututed to rewas the licenas for the facihty and that the siis be cleaned up, and Ms. Gelko further requested that any other site that contained maiorial from previous activiues or heenses be cleaned up. De Peutimers had asaerted that present and past releases and residual coraanunanon from acdvines at the facihty posed a threat to their heahh and safety and,in addition, Ms. Munko asserted that smce the Licenses had teninated fuel production operidens at the facihty, dua canautuisd the end of plant life and necesattated decontaminanon of the facihty for release to unrestricted use.

B Where peutioners have not provided the factual basis for their request with the specincity required

,10 C.FA I 2.206, action need not be taken on their request.

C he Commission has determined that the NRC need not consider psychological imgret or mental i su1:ss to the public in exercving its agulatory responsibihties under the Atomic Energy Act.

j D he Supreme Court has held that the NRC need not consider psychologicalimpact or mental stress to the public under the National Enviremental Pohey Act (NEPAh E Absent any basis for apphcatie of fusancial protection under i 170, protection of ecenanic interests is not within the scope of the Atomic Energy Act.

16 l

l I

[

E _

f'

\

DIGESTS ISSUANCE OF DENIAL OF FETITION FOR RULEMAKING DPRM 871 PUBUC CNN. Dockst No. PRM 50-dl; January 14, 1987; DENIAL OP PEITnON FOR RU11MAKLNG A The Commusion denies a pennon for sulernaking subnuned by Public Citize. The Pannone requesta that, to comply with the mandais of the NRC Training Authorization $ 306 in the Nuclear Wasta Ptlicy Act of 1982, NRC adopt specine reguladoru er other regulatory guidance setting forth detailed mquirements for training and Ainess for duty c( nuctur power plant persenei. The dedal states that NRC is denying the peution, among other reasons, because it has determtned that the statuts does not cover Atness fa duty and with respect to training that it pmvides NRC with neaibility to issue the agulatory {

guidance in ths form of a policy stspnent B 5ecuan 30G (NRC's Training Authorizadon Secdon) of the Nuctur Wasta Policy Act of 1982 (NWPA) does not cwer Atness for duty. Therefors, NRC has not engaged in a rulemaking; noncaheless, the Commiss. ion has issued a policy statement on this subject C Secnon 306 of NWPA provides NRC with fisaibility to issue regulatory guidance on training and qua'incadon in the form of a policy statement; NRC does not have to engage in a rulanaking on this subject 17 I

1 i

i l

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Amencan Federation of Labor v. Kahn,472 F. Supp 88,91 A a4 (D.D.C.1979) baaa fw amicus cwise perucipauan at hcensing board level; AIAB-862,25 NRC 150 0907)

Arizona Pubhc Service Ca (Palo Verde Nuclear Generetans Station, Units 2 and 3), AIAB442, il NRC 380, 383-84 (1983) l appeals d herf ruhngs via discreuonary duected cerunceton; A1AB-861,25 NRC 134 35 (1987) '

Atlanne Research Corp., ALAB 594,11 NRC S41,8484 (1980) authority of presidmg ofAcer to independauly 6ssermme the basis for a pensky; AU47 2,25 NRC 224 (1987) f Atlanus Rasearch Corp., C1J40 7,11 NRC 413,419,4210990) l purpnse of civo penalues; AU-87 2,25 NRC 239 0987)

Boston Edam Co. (Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station) AIAB 816,22 NRC 46!,466 (1985) need for balancing of 6w factors when other pardes waive the tedness d the inserwnuan petitaan; ALAB 862,25 NRC 152 (1987)

Carohne Power and 13sht Ca (Shearon llania Nuclear Ptmr Plas), ALAB-837,23 NRC 525,54648 0986) (

appellaie junadiction to dunes cernAcation of licensing board rulings; AIAB460,25 NRC 67 (1987) I Carchna Power and Light Ca (Shearm 11 anis Nuclear Power Ptara), LBP 85 5,21 NRC 410 0985) deAnition of pnma facie; AIAB460,25 NRC 68 (1967)

Cincinnad Osa and Electne ca (William H. Zunmer Nuclear Power Stanan, Unit 1), IAP 83-58,18 NRC 640, 663 (1983) showing necessary a other factors fw eenission oflate Aled corsesuon when good cause is not shoen; ISP-87 3,25 NRC 76 (1987)

Oeveland Electr e Illununating Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2k AIAB-675,15 NRC 1105, 1112 13 0 982) strect on beste structure of a procemhns of admission of a contenden resuking fan a beenens board tuhng that conflieu with caselaw, policy or Correnissim reguladens; AIAB461,23 NRC 135 (1987) risveland Electric Illununanns Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2), ALAB-675,15 NRC 1105, ii13 14 (1982) cormutrnent d resources to a heanns that may turn can to be unnecessary as basis for interlocutory review; A1AB451,25 NRC 22 0987)

Oeveland Electric illuminaung Co. (Peny Nuclear Power Plant, Uniu I and 2), A!AB406,16 NRC 1754 0 982) appestabihty of rulings that simply admit sneiher earmanuen; AIAB ML,25 NRC 135 (1987) f Commonweshh Edaan Co. (Braidwood Nuclear Power SLedan, Uniu I and 2), C21868,23 NRC 24),245 '

0 986) meights given to Aw factors of 10 CER.1714(a)Ok IJP47 3,25 NRC 75 (1987)

Commonweshh Eason Ca (Bymn Nuclest Ibwer Station, Units i sad 2), AIAB 793,20 NRC 1591,161416 (1984) arvellate junsdaica to direct ceruncation of licensing board rutiner, AIAB460,25 NRC 67 0947)

Comanonweshh Edison Co. (Lon Statien, Uniu I and 2), AIAB !!6,6 AEC 258 0973) right of nonpany to appeal order granting dacovery against it; ALAB-861,25 NRC 133-34 (1987) ,

Conschdated Edson Co. of New York (Inean Point, Unit 2),IEP42 25,15 NRC 715,71819 (1982) (

responsibility for deciding who will represent an interested state; ALAB.862,25 NRC 149 (1961) 19 ,

4 l

f I

\

I

p- 4 ,

l-h~

~

f,

]

l 1

]

f LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX j CASES 2 1

Consumers Power Ca (Mulland Plant, Unas 1 and 2), AIAB-395,5 NRC 772,779 (1977) l deAninen of :_ , _ _ - injury; AIAB-861,15 NRC 138 (1987)

. Duke Power Ca (Caswba Nuclear Stauen, Unus 1 and 2), ALAB-687,16 NRC 460,464-65 (1982), av'd in

.1

- part on other smunds, CU-83-19,17 NRC 1041 (1983) d a, , ' of ruhnes that amply edenit another contenden; AIAB.861,25 NRC 135 (1987)

Flosids Power and Usht Ca (St. Imcis Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2),12P 87 2,25 NRC 32 (1987)

'i siandasd for discsummiery trent of innervenuan; 12P 87-7,25 NRC 119 n 2 (1987) i Goldberg v, Kelly,397 U.S. 254,271 (1970) j i

basis for prendes d5cer's d-han in civil penahy proceeding; AU-87 2,25 NRC 225 (1987)

Gulf Staess Utihaies Ca (Raver Band Sandon, Uniu I and 2), ALAB 317,3 NRC 175,17600 (1976) l

. eppeal sighas of 2.715(c) panscipenas; AIAB-861,25 NRC 183 (1987) ]

'j

.. Housion Ushung and Pbwer Ca (Allens Creek Nuclear Genersung Staden, Unit 1), AIAB-535,9 NRC 377, 393-97 (1779) 1 showeg necessary to estabhah organsaational manding; IEP-87 7,25 NRC I1819 (1987) 1 Houman Ushung and Power ca (Allens Creek Nuclear Genersung Stanon Unit 1), AIAB-635,13 NRC 309,

' 310 (1981) -

standasd for ducrenanary insarloemory revww of licensing beard ruhnss; AIAB-861,25 NRC 134 (1987)

Houston ushung and pbwer Co. (South Tesas Pioject, Uniu 1 and 2), AIAB 549,9 NRC 644,646-47 (1979) organiaauanal standans through the ietsreau of the erganiastian's enembers; IEP 87.7,25 NRC t il (1987) .

Houston Ughung and Power Ca (Scudt Teaas Project, Units I and 2), ALAB 637,13 NRC 367,370 (1981) standani for descrenanary interloctaery aview of licenans beard ruhnes; ALAB-80,25 NRC 134 (1987)

Heumon Ughsing and Power Ca (South Tenas Pmject, Units I and 2), AIAB-637,13 NRC 367,37471 (1981) showing necessary for duected ceni6cauca of scheduling order: AIAB-858,25 NRC 21 (1987) lang Island Ushung Ca (Jamesport Nuclear Power Sution, Units i and 2), AIAB 292,2 NRC 631,638 (1975) pesection of economic imereas; DI)37 5,25 NRC 265 (1987)

Img !aland Lighting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stadon, Unit 1), ALAB-780,20 NRC 378,38481 (1984) nght of nonpany to appsal order granung discovery against it; A1AB 861,25 NRC 133 (1987) long Island Lishung Ca (Shereham Nuclear Power Station, Una 1), AIAB-787,20 NRC 1097,1100 (1984) constremu en appeal board authonty when a licensing board has a 2.758 peution before it; AIAB-860,25

. NRC 67 (1987)

Img Island Ushting Ca (Shoreham Nuclear Power Stadon, Unit 1), ALAB 832,23 NRC 135,143, review pend 63 , CU-8611,23 NRC 577,5?9 (1986) j L 3 scope of appellate revuw s!!ssations oflicensing board error; A1AB.857,25 NRC 15 n.8 (1987) leuisiana Power and Ught Co. (Weierford Sisem Electric Stadan, Unit 3), AIAB 732,17 NRC 1076, !!0647 (1983) need for details of energency plan implernenting procedums to make leasonable assurance Anding; AIAB 857,25 NRC 11 (1987)

Metropohten Edison Co. (Thres Mile Island Nuclear Sution, Unit 1), ALAB-685,16 NRC 449,45152 (1982) consumants on appeal board authority when a licensing board has a 1758 posiden before it; AIAB 860,25 i

~ NRC 67 (1987)

Metropohten Edisen Ca (ntree Male Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1), ALAB 699,16 NRC 1324,1327 (1982) junedicuan to impose beenes eendations; AIAB 859,15 NRC 27 (1987)

Meuapolitan Edison Ca (Duas Mile taland Nuclear Stauen, Unit 1), AIAB 791,20 NRC 1579,1583 (1984) effect on basic suucture of a poceeding of admission of a contendon sesulting from a licensing board mhns that is impanant or novel; AIAB 861,25 NRC 135 (1987)

Meuopoluan Edison Ca (nues Mile Island Nuclear Staden Unit 1), CU-82-6,15 NRC 407 (1982) litigabihiy of psychological moss in NRC proceedings; DD 87 5,25 NRC 264 (1987)

Metropohtan Edison Ca (Thres Mile Island Nuciear Stanon, Unit 1), CU 82 31,16 NRC 1236,1238 (1982) lirmas of presiding of6cer's junsdiction in civil penalty proceeding; AU-87 2,25 NRC 224-25 (1987) l 2e !

- - _ . . _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - O

, , ,~; ,.A h

'4 ,

c,

j', 'r ',1 ' ? 'o'r .\ ut, r , e ,

7, *9 , Q - y,,- . , tv ,;.' < .

f ,,Y,

~~ *~ '

[f$,2 ., v L

le_.

L y, e

, s

.s. >

e -

4 q,

.a ~.,<- ..

q n'.

s- 1 3,

4

.m ," ', ..) e . Wlg

,, , , s . ,

'o

4 f : .7 ', s c e

, + -

u'

/, ; ;. ( iv * , p 4 (, g' , :, - ,

+

>Q , , ,, , ,

+ . .,. ...e s

. s- y.

] -

^

' -g, s v j s

'.pm c ,

r. >

n, ,

m gi: f ' ,"3 6 g, , g*

.. H,

, ; ,,;, b " ' . .

?q? ' - 1 LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX

,3%%y , N ,,y CASES 1-. c, ,o'z.. ~ 4 _ , ,~P F'di,

/ c i.3' . . % - i 3.<

VA*-

i . , ' : ; W ' ?p . .*),

4

'

f ('p[; % > -;L' N . % # [*- 'ja Metropolaan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Una 1), C1183-25,18 NRC SU,333 (1983)

,u ,

U '

,', d *, ar Q-/ .;.f ' ,+ .s " civic duty" as basis for standing to intervene; LEP-87-2,25 NRC 35 (1987)

yr.c , -

standard for discretionary grant of intervention; IEP 87 7,25 NRC 119 n.2 (1987) g, ' ,'

?3. '

7..'59 {. . Mstropolaan Edison Co. (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1), CU-84-17,20 NRC 801,804 (1984)

ty S

j ,"', y ..' ' g 3 ,.

fa4 dannition of irreparable injury; AIAB 861. 25 NRC 138 (1987)

', f ' . . a g}i,), ,. g w. *% Meuopolitan Edison Co. v People Against Nuclear Energy,460 U.S.166 (19t3) o, g, ' /(.,

~.

/ . f m y,Q

~

t.

t ,,',imy . 4, litigabGity of psychological stress in NRC proceedings; DD.87 5,25 NRC 264 (1987)

Mississippi Power and Ugh: Ca (Orand Golf Nuclear Station, Umts 1 and 2), ALAB 704,16 NRC 1725 (1982)

( ,4

. , R,4 *

l ahowing necessary on other faerus for admissim oflaternied contenuon when good cause is noi shown;

,.y" "i,

. , . . . . a v . , LBP 87 3,25 NRC 76 (1987)

Nonhern Indiana Public Service Ca (Bailly Generstmg Station, Nuclear 1), CU-78 7,7 NRC 429,434 (1978),

?-

1' I ',/ , - , .4 - aff'd sub nom. Porter County Chapter of the Izasc Walton League of America v. NRC,606 F.2d 1363

j, s *c , '

(D.C. Cir.1979)

's,, need to reconsider issues when no new information is provided; DD 87-4,25 NRC 258 (1987)

"! ,' s > *- Nuclear Advisors Inc.,2 AEC 196 (1962),2 AEC 254 (1963) h ,[ 3 ,' ,*': *

, , ,/ J ,

Possession of nuclear waste; LBP-87-5,25 NRC 106 (1987)

V ,

.,, .. , n, Oftshore Power Systcrns (Floating Nuclear Power Plants), AIAB 517,9 NRC 8,11 (1979) p/ .

1 standard for discretionary interlocutory review oflicensing board rulings; ALAB 861,25 NRC 135 (1987) sr : <c. ' Of' shore Power Syntans (Manufacturing License for Floating Nuclear Power P1aras), ALAB-689,16 NRC 887, J ,

a', , ,' '

890, aff'd on other grounds, C1182 37,16 NRC 1691 (1982) appeal board aua sponte authority to review decisions where no appeal has been taken; ALAB 859,25 ys G c., NRC 27 (1987)

.**p , ! PectAc Gas and Elecuic Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2), ALAB 653,16 NRC 55,72

< ~ * *.

, (1981), ansched to CU-8219, .16 NRC 53 (1982) i.. i

'6 ,

- dennition of prima facie; ALAB 860,25 NRC 69 n.19 (1987) r ".cC!<A+,, j' Pacinc Gas and Electric Co. v. Federal Power Comm'n,506 F.2d 33,38 39 (D.C. Cir.1974)

.,.m.

5 ' ' '

~*

,s

' d, j,i' .-

.4 '

Connusman views on and uses of policy statements: DPRM 871,25 NRC 59 (1987)

[ f y' ' . ,' , .** ,y Pennsylvania Power and Usha Ca (Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2), AIAB-593,11 NRC

+ 761 (1980) 4

, standard for discretionary interlocutory review of licensing board ruhngs; AIAB-861,25 NRC 134 (1987) r g,. ,

, y' Pennsylvania Power and U5h Ca (Susquehanna Stearn Electric Station, Uniu 1 and 2), AIAB-641,13 NRC

h 550, 552 (1981)

', - d" ; * ~, effect on baar suucture of a proceeding of admission of a contention resulting from a licensing board

'* ;d b, ' ' , -

ruhns that connicts with case law, policy or Commission regulations; AIAB-861,25 NRC 135 (1987) i !- , - hilroidpu l'lectric Ca (Limenck Generating Station, Urut 1), AIAB 833,23 NRC 257,261 (1986)

',- -5 m I interlocutory appeals whers alleganons are premature; AIAB 860,25 NRC 69 (1987)

' Philadelphia Electric Ca (Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1), AIAB 835,23 NRC 267,270 (1986) 4a . . ,

.+.

e ,'

scupe of appeal board stay authenty; AIAB 858,25 NRC 20 n.7 (1987)

E ,

J.' Philadsip,6 Elet.ric Ca (Lirnerick Generating Statim, Units 1 and 2), DD 85-11,22 NRC 149,154 (1985)

E - , " '

, specif ct:f required of 2.206 petitions: DD 87 5,25 NRC 263 (1987)

~ ,

, Portland Gerarel Electric Co. (Pebble Spnngs Nuclear Plant, Uniu I and 2), CU 76 27,4 NRC 610,61314

- (1976) y%~ * ' -

4 f * ,, y showing necessary to eatablish organizational studing; LDP 87-7,25 NRC 118 (1987) 4~ *." ,' , PortlanJ General ikettire (.4 (Pebble Spnnas Nuclear Plant, Uniu I and 2), CU 76-27,4 NRC 610,614 T,

8- ,,~

(1976)

,."",,,,/ .

, prosecuan of econonne interests; DD-87-5,25 NRC 265 (1987)

J'i ' * , Portland General Electne Co. (Pebble Springs Nuclear Plant, Uniu 1 and 2), C1176-27,4 NRC 610,614-17

' " - .' w. <

(1976) 4 standard for discretionary intervention: LBP 87 2,25 NRC 35 (1987); LBP-87 7,25 NRC 119 n.2 (1987)

g .t .* Project Management Corp. (Chnch River Dreeder Rasctor Plant), ALAB 330,3 NRC 613,615,rev'd on other "i grounds, CU 7613,4 NRC 67 (1976)

' 1' }l .

," ,," standard for grant of discreuanary interlocutory review; A1AB-861,25 NRC 135 (1987)

's , -i ,1,,'

.h', ,A * , = $

, [M g ' b; \

0 .a ' g ,,

,' % , u, 21

,..,. -6' , 4 -

. ,), . 1 3 - +

<; , ,m

, , .g;

crb8 , "(.,,g' ,

? ,e:

5

'i,h ob ,

i p', * = ,

p l' . p d

[3 at ,

, e4

=

_M________

[ . .

.i 4

j . , ,

' j

l. ,, 3, t , a

.' e i ,

. r .,. . ..

+

[ 9 a.,g, 3g?q ,7

, a- a, . .u ' ,

,p y ,1, ' l 1, :? ? ,Q' g

,;( ' a

,. , s

.y-l f- ,

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX ' , .

' i d, c' , .

CASES 7' *.',4-* , .4' ' " "

y , ,

, .y- ' * *

l

. t. ; 4

g. a

.v ,l F.3blic Service Co. of Indiana (Marble 11111 Nuclear Generadng Stauon, Units I and 2), AMB 316,3 NRC 167, ' -

170 (1976) [# ,' ' ' . .

4

+

' ' d, lindts of presi4ng of6cer's junsdiction in civil penahy proceeding; AU-87 2,25 NRC 224 (1987) +

.0 i

Public Service Ca of Indiana (Marble lhl! Nuclear Genersung Staden. Units 1 and 2), ALAB-322,3 NRC 328, ,

, . ,=

330 (1776) t, ,

, f ,, 3 - , 1 organizational standing through the interests of the organization's memberr, LBP-87 7,25 NRC 118 ,.'

(1987) f

.s -

- .'7,' i

', -y Public Service Co. of Indiana (Marble lhl! Nuc)mr Generating Stanen, Uniu I and 2), AMB-405,5 NRC

!!90,1192 (1977) , fy, , e, ... .,

? .

appeals ofinterlocutory rulings via discreuenary d2rected ceruncation; ALAB-861,25 NRC 134 0987) ,. .f , ,'1 ' "

standard for directed cenincadon; ALAB 858,25 NRC 21 (1987) s >* +

l'ublic Service Co. of New Hampshire (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2), ALAB 271,1 NRC 478,482 83 '

,, , , _, y. ,

(1975) ,

standard for directed certi6 cation of scheduhng orders; ALAB 858,25 NRC 20 (1987); ALAB-860,25 y' , , j NRC 68 (1987) sg "

Pubhc Service Co. of New flampshire (Seabrook Station, Units I and 2), AMB-271,1 NRC 478,483 (1975) .. <

Commission pokey on interlocutory appeals of single issues; ALAB-861,25 NRC 134 (1987) *;s i p Pubhc Service Co. of New flampshire (Seabrook Staden, Units I and 2), ALAB-338,4 NRC 10,12 (1976) ,] . ,. *y requests for modi 6 cation of beanng schedules; ALAB-858,25 NRC 22 0987) '

g , , ,

Pubhc Service Co. of New Hampshire (Seabrook Stauen, Units 1 and 2), ALAB-422,6 NRC 33,41 (1977), , 'jk aff'd, CU-781,7 NRC 1, aff'd, New England Coahtion on Nuclear Pollution v. NRC,582 F.2d 87 Ost *

e* : '

Cir.1978) licensing board responsibihty to detail the basis for tu decision; ALAB-857,25 NRC 1415 (1987) ,

~ * 'c. -

i

' Public Service Co. of New llampshire (Seabrook Station Uniu I and 2), AMB 838,23 NRC 585,592 0986) '

a. ;[ ;,c -!

standard for grant of discreuanary interlocutory review; ALAB-861,25 NRC 135 (1987)

~'._

7. .

o

, r ./

Public Service Electne and Gas Co. (Salem Nuclear Generating Statim, Unit 1), ALAB-588,11 NRC 533,536 4 ', , - ,r' w (1980). y-

' 'y' - . ,,

s standard for discredonary interlocutory review of heensing board rulings; AIAB 861,25 NRC 134 (1987) -.s i Puget Sound Power and Light ca (Skagit Nuclear Pbwer Project, Units 1 and 2), ALAB 572,10 NRC 693,694 d E4 i , s. 9-(1979) ' + ..'^

standard for discretionary interlocutory review of heensing board rubags; AIAB-861,25 NRC 135 0987) a . ,

m Puget Sound Power and Light Ca (Skagit/Itanfad Nuclear power Project, Uruts 1 and 2), ALAB-712,17 NRC '

81 0 983) a h, .

appealability of hcensms board rejecuan of a Lingle contention; ALAB-861,25 NRC 136 0987) ?.

Radiadon Technology, Inc., ALAB 567,10 NRC 533,546,547 (1979) g# - .

use of unheensed, but tramed, employee as head of nuclear pacemaker program; AU-87 2,25 NRC 230 0 987)

).

Reich Ge& Physical,Inc., AU 85-1,22 NRC 941 (1935) *

authorny of presiding of6cer to assign a penahy level n, .e severs than that assigned by a Dtructor; j ,

AU.87-2,25 NRC 224 (1987) ,

Rtich Geo Physical,Inc., AU 851,22 NRC 941,9510985) ' P,/

beensee authoruy to arbstrsrily determine that its employee is quahned for an NRC licensed position; !

AU 87 2,25 NRC 230 (1987) .c Renegousuon Board v. Dannercraft,415 U.S.1,24 0974)

d

~

^ j denmuon of irreparable injury; AIAB 861,25 NRC 138 (1987) ;"'

~

i. ' '

s Rochester Gas and Electric Corp. (Sterbng Power Project, Nuclear Unii Na 1), ALAB-507,8 NRC 5510978) ,

5:

possesnon of nuclear waste; LDP-87-5,25 NRC 106 0987) d 4-Sacramento Municipal Utihiy Distnet (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station), AIAB-746,18 NRC 749 ,, ii 4 f, ? ' f e * '. E ' 4;E 0 983) , % ~ ~ ,

appeal board authonty to impose beanse condiuons; AIAB 859,25 NRC 27 0987) '

g-South Carahna Electne and Gas Ca (Wrgl C. Summer Nuclear Sunon, Unit 1), ALAB-642,13 NRC 881,895 i,,'

r,1 ,,, ' 1

[ %

5 (1981) c p;2 '

weighu given to Sve factors of 10 C.F.R.1714(a)(1); LBP 87 3,25 NRC 75 (1987) ' (,, ' l

" e. d'/

3,_ ~

., .' , ; g",, '

;- : ,L wVj;m ... ,

N}y

, (s j '; '

22 z ,, *. *!

~

s ' ,1

~

e .a u

, (.r

,s n.

m ,,

e

+

' . q[\

- . y l

3 -

.. q N j * -

i s.

l

s. . . , .

. Ol .

w a'y c.hs- -

n -, . . .

j '* * :$ Q L:7.rs b ' ' ' O' W *

l V! L G eQ!.

&,,kL W W e;p & *_ :.h @q ,aJ,

-: GM n- ,

,1 s .. n -- -

ahs n ?;u,m c: .sy,,, ,

. p3, .n -

!w e J." Q 4, ; g, " q r m 3' A / s - Q . :

i [,, # .., -,,O

..,Q,1 m ,;e a n, ' ,4r 3 s %. l

e. .,

7.e.. , .w . .,

fe ' f' , , ,&f?o l L r f

&wwr. , m, _ ; o c

ugn:

.t j .&'~,

?- &f- y e /. s -

a.

w . . , . x. ; . wv p~ .,J+. .

.,:,.., ~

cs. . . , .-

s .

M ,e y ' ;. J *' , ? p .. .. <

n # .

5-

a. - 1 ' w' m

m g ,y g..o < ,f ; .w o. ngg m

, r,c gg,s. mf G .. e . %, %m.+,- %. . ,.c. _. _

- a, ,

, g..w.- : m. ya m .. . . . . u c-y.

?

: ..,,,n.-

. e .f. a

. . . v: utw $ :, g w. , y i-W, s.q . . ,

n_ c. ' ,3 o_n m.

La n .# ?, .*? .

.%%"*,c _l . , ;-

.,,+

,1,, e .y. ! .

z:.m , zgy . 9:, s, m. a.,. , n ,

p;/m, qc: ,

p .A,,8 p.4,h , n.. toy *. c >

.6 ~

f .4---

T MQ < M.;;",s MQ&a,w ajl '

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX -

s J. CASES KMM

, , g.( & . S.Ud ;, W,, p by . f j*% jp, t. j g

s)

n. ,,L W u % % 1

. .;.e+i y?Q n.'8 . Qj .qs'h ru l*n, fMyd,'.

r . j ". J~~' . souih Carolica Electric and Gas Ca (Virgil C. Sununer Nnekar stasian, Unit 1), ALAB 663,14 NRC 1140, -

,(Q. .

4

-m. w Crv. .- %,f* w : 9" 3 -v , . C yl.G.7O.c%,irNi, "W s, !!62 (1981) ' #

c,q4 v ,3g . .n .3g-3.... .o r._

s e.

. g, , 7, di standard for discredossey warlocutory review of licensing board rulings; A1AB 861. 25 NRC 134 (1987) ~ ' ,

my(,

f .

A ,Je ;g

Statement of Alicy on OcJuct cfI.loensing Proceedings. CLI.814,13 NRC 452,453 (1981)

,Q j ff p.4 i ' %g b ,g M ;y, . .,y W: s ,'i;',e ' 4 . licensing board nearity to sapedise , . . LBP 87 3.15 NRC 76 (1987) gj .

.$ j 9 , y.- , ,,

~

p. " ?; Toledo Edison Ca (Dms.Ba.se Nuclear Power Station. Unite 1,2 and 3), ALAB.385. 5 NRC 621. 628 (1W7) y .. p @ ,- "

Q , .C . .f Pgry p r g ' # denn' tion of irreptab!= invry; A1AB.461,25 hRC 138 (1987)

,3p .,n +

)j /p%33 : 1 Trenanuclear, Inc. 6e'. Applicatier.s for 14w-Farishes' Uransen Bapons to EURATOM Member Nations),

N ',o s b- f :p E;y &// . ,"i V O .'J' 7,, CU?7 24,6 NRC 525,531 (1977) , .

y

" 4 showing necesury to establish ergenintional sianahna; LBP.87 7,25 NRC 118 (1M7)

[,7 9!? R h A jd' ,, .

3, c b , (;

Union of Concerned Scientists v. NRC. 735 F.2d 1437,1444 44 (D.C. Cir.1984)

. j .' , secpe of allowabie litigauan on adequacy of emersoney esercises; ALAB.861,25 NRC 142 (1987)

(9*_,, .;.A- l'"

Virginia Electne and Power Co. (North Anna hwer Station, Unies 1 and 2), ALAB-522,9 NRC 54. 54 (1979) y : t *f ...

r.

- organizations standing on basis of member's rendense within class presunity to a facility; LBIA87 7,25

.)cq >

' NRC 118 (1987) . . ,

[Mf ,- ,. * ' ' : 7 ' "f - Virginia Doctric ar.d Power Co. (North Anna Power Station, U,iis 1 and 2), ALAS 741.18 NRC I71,378 j

!# ' O A , < j(J ', g, , j (1983) l Q" , . ig < r 1 qg, y .

effect of ad:nission of single contention an basic structure of a proceeding; ALAB-861,25 NRC 135 gj3 <

g(' r<s,~'. va . .p (1937)

(~

.bc >Q s ' * %," -

' Virginia Prtroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. FPC,259 F.2d 921,925 (D.C. Cir 1958)

&.7(t-y; . a , ' , ]y ;i. d dc6nicion 4 irreparable injury for purpose of absining interlocutory appeal; ALAB.861,25 NRC 138

, < a' ,e , r' '

.r' ,

(1c87) g' E

pl g g 7*' +,%* L , Washington Mettnpolitan Area Transit Comm'n v. Holiday Tours, ?nc., $59 F.2d 841,843 a.3 (D.C. Cir.1977) J

7 F. p~

dentution of irreparable irQury for purpoac of obtaining insarlocuiert appset; ALAB.861,25 NRC 137 4

j,r

+ s. g , t . 1 gg9g9) j G.s,,' YA jI - ' ? Wisconsin Oas Ca v. FERC. 758 F.2d 669,674 (D.C. Cir.1985) I i.@ * } ' W ^ ff!4(

? p, % d> ~ deArutim of breparableinjury for purpose of abiaming interlocutory appeal; ALAB.861,25 NRC 138 !

l o . . . = 1,y( , ' , y'-[' e , ,,9 M,g ,) .

. (1987) .

i,,; $ w . W+ Wur.: Yens Sun v. McGrath,339 U.S. 33. 46 (1950) f

,f'" j..

y-a

,g auhnty d posiding of6cer to save Direw from failed theory of his sees by substinusing another theory; AU 87 2,25 NRC 225 (1987) j i

p[4 4 u Yip v. Pagano,606 F. Supp 1566,1567 69 (D.NJ.1985)

. q i! . q,

.- ' f.

O

$, f a 1 .9 4q 4

e 4}

'. g

'S $ '

3 ..

- . basis for amicus cunne participation at heensing board level; ALAB-862,25 NRC 150 (1987) i j

s, .

p

,- -n .1 , .

'80 p- #

.e'

+ .

I 8,

. j 4 ES g yy

.' '* 't lA7.

>,. .P 3 5 'i *

)

,. .i

. y, ' . ,

, ~.

^ V. '~

p. . .,

( f

' ,4 a }

e.

, , d -

I 4 %

a, ,r 3 [e' . g ,' m4 ,

, v s T

i + : a..*,# Y 4 g

* , w ,

s. .

d* a

, 74*,

> 3

( ,* ,

e i

-,8' b

s. ,

6 ^ .'

y .. .

4 ,

5 + p ,, he = p .g. 4 e- 9.,

[.,- ,w M ,. ',.,',

i e

A h

)i .,4-+ s

-3 *

% .. f .

AQ# 7 E U

'*'. .W , (%

,'t',

, . , g,, 4. t, y ]'

>r - -

'4 c -

- + 3;- ,

23 n y e. .

. 1 , s o ,. . e e+

j

[ o~,+

4 I

g 'I u, ,

. fis,

. , s l t

g . J 5' $

c. .

~, .. ,

M I '

4 j, ,

n*s *

, j'. [, 4

.=e. g g _ '% y g, f w 'A, .- i *

. j,n J v ., . J,] ' . , .

f .[*' #

$$ , j

' /,* > .=

,i,j.

t + . __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

v 3;

LEG AL CITATIONS INDEX REC 1)LATIONS 1

- i

! C.F.R. 305.713, 305 76-5 )

Canrmssion views on and uses d policy statemenu; DPRM 871,25 NRC 59 (1987) l 10 CF.R 1205 violaues of NRC requimmanu for medical diagnosuc and therapeuuc usw of nuclear maienals.

AU-87-2,25 NRC 222,224 (1987) i 10 C FA 1205(f) scope of sedans that can be taken by presiding officer in civil penalty proceeding; AU 87-2,25 NRC 224 (1987) 10 C.FA 2.206 {

dernal of petition alleging inadeqvscies in computer program for conumment integrated leak rate test practices; D&87 2, 25 NRC 122 (1987) denial of peduon raising seismic design concerns; DD 87 4,25 NRC 254 (1987) denial of pention to catend plume EPZ; D&871,25 NRC 44-47 (1987) dernal of request for license suspension because of alleged emuminauen; D&87 5,25 NRC 261 (1987) denial of request for suspension of wont at TMI because of quahty assurance dancuncies; DD 87 3,25 NRC 245 (1987) forum fcr treaung issues ouuide the scope of matenals beense ammdment proceedmg; LEP-47 8,25 NRC 157 (1987) -

10 CF.R 1714 adnussion standards for contannons addresses adequacy of energency exercises; ALAB-861,25 NRC 141 (1987) 10 C.F.R.1714(a)

'f sundard for irservennon in proceedings involvmg hybrid procedures; 1.3P 87 7,25 NRC 118 (1987) standmg to mtervene in opersung hcense amendment proceedms; IEP 87 2, 25 NRC 34 35 (1987) 10 C.F.R. 2.714(aXI) nye facten to be addressed by late intervanor, ALAB-862,25 NRC 152 (1987) ]

Ave factor test for admission of late 41ed contenuon; UIP 87 3,25 NRC 74 76 (1987) ,

l 10 C.FA 1714(aXIXi)-(v) wtughu given ter, LDP-87 3,25 NRC 75 (1987) 10 C.F.R. 2.714(aX3) amendment of organiraum's peudon to imervene to estabbsh standirig on one of its memben; I

LEP-87 7,25 NRC 119 (1987) 10 CF.R 1714(b) f contenuen requuement for mtervenuon in proceedings involvmg hybrid procedures; LBP 87 7,25 NRC 118 (1987) 10 CF.R.1714a apphcabihty to directed ceruncanon of heensms board scheduhng ruhng; ALAB 860,25 NRC 68 n.12 l (1987)

I esception to prosenpuon against interlocutory appeals of licensma board orders; ALAB 861,25 NRC 134 35 (1987) 10 C.FA 1714s(b) appealabihty of bcensing board rejectim of a single centention; ALAB 861,25 NRC 136 (1987) 25 l

I l _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -

,. . - _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

f LEG R CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS 10 CFA 1714a(c) appealatmhty of hcensms board accepance of contenuons; A1AB 861,25 NRC 136 (1987) 10 CF.R. 2.715(s) pamapauanal rishu of posses mahng hmated appearance staternents; ALAB 862. 25 NRC 148 (1987) subrmssian of publac statemesa for informal matenals beense pmandmg; LSP 87 4,15 NRC 82 (1987) 10 CFA 1715(b) corsanuan requuerners for intervennon by pubbe official; ALAB 862,25 NRC 149 (1987) 10 C.F12.715(c) appeal righu of stae or 3 -- ' entines perncipenng under; ALAB.861,25 NRC 133 (1987) right of U.S. senata to perncipate in a prwmg under provisions of; A1A&862,25 NRC 146, 148 49 (1987) 10 CFA 1715(d) anucus perncipadon by pubbe of5cial at licanang board level; ALAB-862,25 NRC 150 (1987) i nme hmit for Sling anucus briefs; A1AB-362,25 NRC 151 (1987) l l

10 CFA 1718(1) .

cntens for directed omrtancenon of hemsing teard scheduling ruhngs; ALAB-860,25 NRC 68 (1987);

A1AB.861,25 NRC 134 (IM7) l standard for directed castiAostian of schedubng orders; ALAB-858,25 NRC 20 (1987) treatmos of FEMA patinen for leave la appeal licensing board acceptance of contentims; AIAB 861, 25 NRC 140 (1987) 10 CFA 2.720 dispositaan of ducovery requests Aled poor to designatim of administrative law judge; AU-871,25 NRC 40 (1987) 10 CFA 1730(f) appaslabihty of Econams board innerleanary oiders; ALA&861,25 NRC 134 (1987) appealabihty of heenang board scheduims orders; ALAB-858,25 NRC 20 (1987) 10 C.FA 1732 burden d poof in civil penalty proceedings; ALJ 87-2,25 NRC 224 (1987) 10 C.FA 1734 enteria for reaperung a record; ALAB-857, 25 NRC 13 (1987); LBP 87-3, 25 NRC 76 (1987) 10 CFA 1734(4)(1) standard for discrouenary grans of monan to reopen a record; 1RP 87 3,25 NRC 76 77 (1987) l 10 C.FA 2.744 disposition of discovery requests 61ed prwt to designatim of administranve law judge; AU $7-1,25 NRC 40 (1987) 10 CFA 2.758 defininen of prima facis., ALAB-860,25 NRC 68 (1987) 10 CF.R.1758 request for reducnan in sus of plume EFZ to I mile; ALAB 858,25 NRC 19 (1987) showing necessary far waiver of a esernpnan from regulanes; ALAB 860,25 NRC 65,66 (1987) 10 C.FA 1758(d)

Cznmissian authodty to duect further proceedags that it deans appmpnate; ALAB 860,25 NRC 70 (1987) 10 CFA 2.760s beenams board autharuy to raias issue of conformance c. spat fuel facihty with GDC 5; LDP-87125 NRC 36 (1987) 10 C.FA 2.764(b)

NRR Duector's autheruy to issus low power operanns hcense; ALAB-859,25 NRC 27 (1987) 10 C.FA 1764(f) basu far Commission desarminsuan of immediais effectiveness of bcensms board decision authonzmg full-power operanon; CLI 811,25 NRC 2 (1987) 10 CFA 1764(f)(1)0)

NRR Diew:ter's authenty to issue low-power opersung beaue; ALAB.859,25 NRC 27 (1987) 26

&. - ~

s

- e , n ;Y*

y{M{ W[4 :a ml?-O ,, ,4 , ,j m' v

m *Y',

-l *

i,,er s',. h J g [ , W

,% g # % . L (; p'? .y m .j --y' ,. s

. R' r

,'.fJ. .'

l 4

.W',:

g, ~/ G s 3 a 'ngy. * ; u . t .'

j ,, *. ,c %a w 't~-Y y.

.*~

n

g. ,W,. . - , .

4.., v -,

. g. > ,

' *,E A 1 i i t.n% ". "1 4ve'~Q n

, c. .

o ,; s. n .

?

.o +

x , . ,

m- ," . +

. e q.

f ';, Q s.1,,-L-:W'7 up n.c-W 1 ;&w. Wf m

, t g .~,

.r, ,

MQ 6 ,

- + G" % ' ' -

o n. . u, _

, , . m ;' '

'V,,.+ -.. <

.<5; ;

' l **

t yv. en,p y.

'. ** fA f Y' ,l

~

a,, * ,

.b '

.XQ::X.% < %[e,.,

g. f 9.3..v,,f"*/

. . c 7 u %.s pg

'n3.C .,

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX

.a, '

y, . REGULATIONS

@&p; &

1 M d ,.; y . , . . e~ 4"l+~ %d ".

Q'),fm % f. rl*aS pp , 7 ;yet

. -W u;

f '

~;g,...:-.

= y e ., .~r f g .t f k )y h , .,; f 9,[NbNy a , y<f;f((f b /

10 CFA 1764(g) .

. effaut of Comnussion daiernunsinon to sushense facility operadon on posidan for appellats review of '

f

' .r -

.7 .% .- g' :

g

y , sky 4 , y$ , . other perdal initial decision; CU 87-1, 25 NRC 4 n.3 (1987) .

A, 3 ry' , ;' '"M .

s .10 CFA 1785 appeal board authority to perform Comnuesian Aanctions; ALAB-860,25 NRC 67 (1987)

% M

j% , O j'7]<? ?,, " '^ d.d%,j * . ,7 xf b] 10 CFA 1785(b)(1) . ~ . '.

I.' Z T G ;..% d. ;c,,,i

, . , . , 3 ,.

f,, . . .,M4 **

=3 criieria for direcied ceriincedon of heensing board scheduling rulings; ALAB 840,25 NRC 68 (1987) -

. st=hd for discied cardAcadan af scWg onles; ALAB-858,25 NRC 20 (1987) ;

, . yJ * < -0 A iC 8, p ;; 9 4 ,. 10 CFA 1786 p*; ,

.j ' A. , f.)

.i,*

, effect .of C - desernunscion to authorire facility operation on petinan for appellate review of '

,4?- p . n other pestial inidal hewn: CU-871,25 NRC 4 n.3 (1987) ye ; .g,";., '; j'.

7. , ; 30 cpA 173 1 /j 7 . .

1 q

y n ,j '

applicability of stay requens to scheduling oniers; ALAB-858,25 NRC 20 (1987) forurn for seeking gay of decisica denying rescindment of suspensian order, AU-871,25 NRC 41 n.*

N/ ...

(1987) :- 1

. - . t , 10 CFA 1788(e) . i M gMd. ,

("1.., h ' . ey' f ;1 : , deonition of irspenble injury; ALAB-861,25 NRC 138 (1987) '

7 cf - 6 7 10 CFA Part A Appendix A. HI(b)

.w .,,e' .

.o pasticipadanal rights of pesans making limited appearance statemens; ALAB-86125 NRC 148 (1987) g # ', , .y ,0

,y a-~ < 9, '. ,a , , : 10 CFA Part 1 Appendia C "C* ' 4 ,

,, , , appropnaseness of assessed civil penahy; AU-87-2,25 NRC 213 (1987) characienzataan of procedural conual violations relative to reactor building polar crane: D487 3,25

,'., 4- '

L ,. NRC 250 (1987)

U,*<

,i' - -

F

m. eyp#4-

10 CFA 20.1(c) -

',, 3 ,

limits on radiation esposuse at uraniurn hema 8uoride conversion facility; LBP-87 8, 25 NRC 163 (1987)

-. > p , , .- , A e "

10 CFA 20.105(e)

% ' y[ [5,A

, [t['., O" A*

%* 1; 7s. linues on radiation esposum at uranuun benaduoride conversion facility; LBP 87 8,25 NRC 163 (1987) 9.p ' e . .< , : ' ,t- 10 CF.R. 20.201(b) p# +

4' M. y 4 y '. *' feihue of licenses to mainssin records of surveys for technedum-99 consaminatian; AU-87125 NRC

' { , Q' 1 a . ,

< U 236 (1987) 1 f' ,

j. g 10 CFA 20.202(a)(1) g

'D

- p '

r '

( {, ",- p saamption imm requirement for hospital raarses to wear radiation badges dunna brachytherapy; L y't AU-87 t 25 NRC 228 (1987) r

' . y% 10 CF.R 20.30120.304 e *. /A, : <C. 3o . r, a '

, 'M manner and conditions of radioactive waste disposal: LBP 87-5,25 NRC 101104 06 (1987) s

1l- s %- ; .l ?

- 10 CF.R. 20.302(b) (1961)

_S '

mf ownership of radioactive wesis burial sites; LBP-87 5,25 NRC 102 (1987)

F 10 CFA 20.401(b) l', m.

,, M , 4' . , failum of licensee to manuain records of survejs for technetium-99 contamination; AU 87125 NRC j

? ' y' , . , ,

M*" i 236 (1987) i

-A' + ,*

d 10 CFA Part 21 (1986)

,,, ~',/ . . , -

allegations of danciencies in reporting seismic design violations; DD 87-4,25 NRC 254 (1987) I

10 CFA 21.1 !

.Q,Q *S* -t

4 adequacy of licensee reporting of design dancimcies; DD87-4,25 NRC 258 (1987) s #- )

10 CFA 30.4(r)

W 1 '

[m

,e 7 , classiAcation of suuntuun 90 plaque applicator, LBP 87-4,25 NRC 86 (1987) 9', J , .,

i 10 CIA 3033

' /V , ' 14 - S licensabihty of strontium-90 fer use in plaqua applicator; LBP 87 4, 25 NRC 84,94, 96 (1987)

,* .g =

i

/:' , , , !O CFA 30.36,70.38 . ;

e , condidons on ternunation of licenses for fuel production facihties; DD-87 5,25 NRC 264 (1987) 4

' 10 CF.R. 30.41(c), 40.51(c), 70.42(c) 7.y

.;D ,<(

,y u , '" .

possession of nuclear wasia; LDP 47 5,25 NRC 106 (1987) .

.as , , a o

% ( ,. ?

y, I f

- ,. ~

a v; .L .

., , * , . .r .

C ;' ' '

r, *y w' - Yl >

7' le % , , . ,

y

- t. .

.k s-

c. o .

, a * .

k= 4 in

't] L,,

_., ,s ' A,

%3 g

'- 9 g

, 4 3

]

A -s r ,g,. %

t ,

) '

6 \. %I

% v- ,

' ..l'

,e

% ' i [. *9 py: 2 '

j , s =

3,

% .y r

rp 4 ,

f 'l

~ _ _ _ ,

s.

a ~ p a <

,' * .,; g . ,y ,

,f . ' $,

e

< f[. -}

6 '*

i ls

r ,:. .a . * ,.

4 ,

' 'N . f *"

, ' .kv c , s .

~

~. .m ,, ,

y g' 9 * ' 0

' t.

5 '

' . + a

, p

'48 *

P P**

g f %

9 B

, 4 a ,

y

, g ,. O

'} p%t .

e.

, y g o; :

a

, . , W ,'n ,

)7891( 06 CRN 52,178.MRPD

smargorp sti gnitnemaipmi yletauqeda scn si eesnecil a taht stcepsus ti nehw noitca noissimnaC

' )f(

1-

)7891( 602 CRN 52 ,45 05 AFC 01 01-78-PBL

! d ;ytefas ot aratropmi tnempiuqe lacirtcele fo noitacithauq latnemnorivne fo sdrocer nianriam ot deen

.c . *t

)i,(94 05 AF.C 01

- ."y.. '

)7891( 012 CRN 52 ,0178 PR1 ;snati ralinus fo gnitset yb noitac6ilauq latnemnormra fo ycauqeda i

)2()f(94 05 AF.C 01

>i .

)7891( 702 CRN 52

,0178 PB.1 ;ytefas ot tnanoptm tnumpu..e lacntcele fo nodacnhauq lanremtarivne no deriuqer sdrocer

.3 )d(94 05 .R.FC 01

)7891( 902 ,60-502 ,98 881 CRN 52 ,0178-PEI ;ytefas ot tnatropmi tnempiuqe lacntcele fo nodarud amu nonac$ilauq tnediccatrop .

' 94 05 .R.F.C 01

)7891( 4.n 02 CRN 52 ,858 BALA ;ZPE emulp fo noitarugifnoc dna ezia

)2()c(74 05 AFC 01

)7891191 CRN 52,858-BAIA ;elim 1 ot ZPE emulp fo ezis ni noitcuder rof tceuqer

, )c(74 05 .R.FC 01 4

)7891( 4.n 02 CRN 52,858-BALA :ZPE smulp fo noitarugAnoc dna ezis

? )7891( 21

'

CRN 52,758.BAIA ;mnetni ro uecnamrep sa seicneic6ed nalp ycnegreme gnaziretcarahc fic ecnac5ingis

)7891( 31 CRN 52

,758-BALA ;sdradnats gninnalp yfsuaa ot edasu era snoisivorp laiceps erehw snalp ycnegreme fo tnetnoc

)01()b(74 05 .R.FC 01

~

i

)7891( 77 ,37 CRN 52 ,3-78 P21 ;htiw ecnahpmoc nopu esnecil rewop-wol fo gninodidnoc

)5()b(7405 AFC 01

)7891(

391,19 091,381 CRN 52 ,01-78-PRI ;eneide level nauca dna nodacnissalc ycnegame fo ycauqeda

)4()b(74 05 AFC 01

)7891( 83.n 931 CRN 52 ,168.BAIA ;snalp ycnegreme a fo ytilibapac noitatnemelpmi dna ycauqeda no sgnidnif AMEF tuber ot seurap dnuseretni fo thgir i

)2Xs(74 05 AF.C 01 o )7891( 21 CRN 52 ,758-BALA ;mnemi rc tnenannep sa seicneic6ed nalp ycnegreme gniznetcaraid fo ecnac8ingis

)7891( 231 CRN 52,168-BAIA ;gnidan ecnarussa elbasecsser startsnomed ot shuser esicrexe ycnegreme fo ycauqeda

)IXa(74 05 AFC 01

)7891( 45 CRN 52 ,4 78.PEI ;09 muitnorts fo sesu deludehcs 9 )e(004 53 AFC 01

)7891(

53 432 CRN 52 ,2 78 UA ;secruos IV puorG no stset kael launnaunes mrofrep ot sesneeh fo muliaf

)i()5()b(4153 .R.FC 01

)7891( 69 ,49 ,38 CRN 52 ,4-78-PBL ,rotacilppa 09 muitnorts fo esu cuuepareht ot ythibacbppa

. i- 4153 ,3153 ,2153 .R.F.C 01

)7891( 18 CRN 52 ,4-78-PBL ;09 munnorts fo esu deludehcs

)7()T(00153 AFC 01

> )7891( 48 38 ,18 CRN 52 ,4 78 PDL ,,rotaci.lppa 09 muunorts fo esu cituepareht ot ytilibacilppa

' 00153 .R.FC 01

)7891( 532 CRN 52 ,2 78-UA ;sisab yden r a no seesuos ecnerefer ro noitarbbac yrotnevni ot eesnecb fo eruliaf

' * )2()f(4133 .R.FC 01 SNOIT ALLGE R

' XEDNI SNOITATIC LAGEL J

9 e

y%e;MQQQ,7)K, g u ,,e v.ww as w ,a. n m . N, %p%;; 7 n .

7m '.

~.m.~-

v i

.y.

.w

.n -

l 9 W t ,s elug,n'.

+ x .1 i

p,3 >n- 3s,4: w A-/y~%;y--,,+, ,e,,j~twv.

, , . r

,~ ' "-

1,

,#r g w-x , m. t m.

,4 ' * '

g w.. ;- Vs:' .yg.p+ ,. &-nU. & , ?s... ,

W;M. m,2 K,m, sy--

+

u ~

. v a ,,w- ,

s . .au. .. +

~ , ., }

3. ,.:.: , -

a- n ' '

= l

n, , ,& ..y. g. tlQ is}8 7 e. s%5 s wP y'y s s ?~

. :y

o s.

,y ' _ ' *

+ , ?, d g v/yp < q ~. ;s,.s . q,' ;d, y'wQ%,Q g= ,, g, > ,

s ,

a

, 8 , _-_

_ \

s c ,,y q, , , > ,{ e ; aeM*

u7 ' to f ,. r s e ., . t, -

lAwY,: a tn +.... w :** .V ..

2 r',1 a,e ,,3 sr -i=,. e y g, *, ,.

4 ., , .

gg., g.i . c' <yi

., ~ + , . ., (*v i,

s. .; f ;1 ye v,h , b:- N

, , g h, M c p ,N' nah h b k [yYf . LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX 2[d8/l

(@.%p f p+. , p ',i '.y' a, r%.

M .,_ ,Q< ,. g'M y . . REGULATIONS

.e q .,,.,3.. ;,. q , a 7 -

1 y,%f:q , ;;k% L,Q ut -

),N b.h', h G V s^ N.hM j. ' 10 CFA 50.54(q) ..

. '}'

. need for license condiaan whose special psevimens ass mads to sansfy enegency planung se=Le b

i3 b /kdTy . - lWy ;" g;%,'del 9, ' 7' : j.,gf 8 < 'Gj j q f " " ALAB-857. 25 NRC 13 (1987) q jg,7 y 4, G , ys 4- 10 C.F150.91 need for Staff to snake "no signincens basenis" Anding for shasing af spent fbal faalides; I.3P-87 2,25 -

G nJ f.,

.'".i N f.fQ f M ;e@ A ,,r" . pf y.;i p-NRC 36 (1987)

(SQ .'.g1.fg 6 g , ,$ m ?.3 yM ,

, ., .T 10 CFA 50.92(c) yj ..m-- ,4 ; , ;t.: /4 factors taken nio account in Staff "no mamAcant hazards canademnan" Anding an shesing of spas ibel facilities; GP 47 2, 25 NRC 35, 36 (1987) q' v M . . 9,1 . . - j "~

A r,, N./,x7'3'.*> 10 CFA Pan 50 Appendix A 0986) ;

' .4 W , cjf . -

o ,4 ,

,1 alleganans of seismic design danciencies in control building, turbine building and diesel generaser e y Q C ,,7 i ,,f,<i

. . enclosuns; DD 87 4,25 NRC 254 (1987) . l~

9 .

, ft.t ,-D [ 10 CFA Pan 50, Appendix A, GDC 1 and 4, and III, XI, and XVII .

y , . ; e ,. . q+-

',?- <

, -. ' qualiAcation time duration of electrical equipment impanant to safety; GP 37-10,25 NRC

.>. ~

7" ? ', *

. ." . 188 89, 205 4 6, 209 0 987)

J'g *

,' S * .. g ,

'

4

. j,,' 1,- ' 10 C.FA Pan 50, Appendix A. GDC 5 M 4 '.' ' " , f applicability to shared spent fuel facilities; GP 87-2,25 NRC 25 (1987) .

Q" R, . 9 ' Q ,: s

,.'1*i). j 10 CFA Pan 50, Appendia E, IV -

7p ,,g , . ' , '

"Ft+8 4,, y t* content of emergency plans where special provision ase made to sansfy planning standards; ALAB-857.

W' i.4 . ,.' : a- 25 NRC 13 0987)-

,Yh'Dl emergency exercias aquinrnents; ALAB-861,25 NRC 141 (1987) y 3, N q; ' v-74' -b

,Q ,f. '

., 10 CFA Part 50, Appendix E,IVE edequacy of emergency clasancanon and acnon level scheme; LBP 8710,25 NRC 183,191,193

,. i w C s

u. . y, -s

.f,? , .n e

a (g937) 1

' g.

' *1 y (it ' i 10 CFA Part 50, Appoidix J lI pq 3-} *w , }g cv e adequacy of ccmputer program for containment integrated leak nie seeing; DD 87 2,25 NRC 122,126

, . . 'M i ,

c p/ , -

Rg, , 0 987) - .

3. . ' c. 5.g , , . ;s,, .% ty e . ,; ., g.

. .,; - 10 CFA 51.28 -

,L: . Le . . , ,

f;W t Nl need for Indian Nation penicipation in scoping' process for a - of urenam

' y ; s',' *, .9.,, w. . -

J (r,f

. hemanuoside conversion facihty; LBP-87 8,25 NRC 168 (1987) +

p , 10 CF.R. 51.30 need for EIS on unnium henanuaride conversion facility; GP 87 8,25 NRC 168 0987)

"iI T* , ,.

i q 6 ', , , ' ,, ;y- ',2,- 1 10 CFA Pan 55 .

' if ' 7 ', 7 9 . - s proposed revision io, and neu14 tory guides related to; DPRM 871,25 NRC 55,60,61 (1987)

D* ir.' '# "w A /, 'a

"' ; 10 CF.R. Pan 61

.p q , , f %g* ; * , ,

j conditions for wahdrawal of heense for ndioscuve wame burial site OP-87 5,25 NRC 103 (1987)

1 g:F' ,

g;! ,' yi t "

i 10 CFA 61.l(s) (1986) -

applicability of Pan 61 to licenses already in effect; LBP-87 5,- 25 NRC 103 0987) 4,

.y - , 4 ( 'p" + e ,- .

'-[ i 10 CFA 61.16(b)0) j "y.,'

'#i l ' $ , *, applicability of entical mass limitanon to buried waste; MP-87-5,25 NRC 106 0987) 3 (- c .+ , ,. '., 10 CFA Pan 70

' need for plant decontamination after terminanen of fuel production operations; DD 87 5,25 NRC 264 s" s ' . . ,1 ( s /

E4 *'

,9 , (1987) 10 C.FA 71.5 s

O * ; . g'd,e P ,b 4 :. imptoper shipping procedures for nuclear pecamakers; AIJ 87 2,25 NRC 236 (1987) r; y

, ' , y >, '

'g.

^,q *r,'*'*.

i a

i 10 CFA Pan 100, Appendix A 0986) p.g , G a & '

ellegenens of seismic design danciascies in control butiding, turbine building and diesel generator

. 'g ' . I enclosures: DD47 4,25 NRC 254 0987)

A </4,. .i ,

e'

10 CFA Pan 100 Appendix A, III (c), (d) 0986) i.

{'

denmnon of Trojan facility's safe shutdown and operating basis canhquakes; DD.87 4,25 NRC 256 fV ..

, . nn.3 & 4 (1987) k N j , ,,

! e ..

. '# . u. s . s , ,,

k

w- $ f h,

=s - h- 45 . * ,

g #'

IN' s

, i '

t ,; ,4 ,. ,' 'k . % '. -..!

+

o v 4. ., . g,, r -, 4 p's 7, m

y,,y,' g .e. ,,

<< Q ' , .. . . d d, '

29

' (*l

9.c, ,

3 Q,6. , ,, +* 1

.* 4 ..1 IW 4, +*

, , 'fy ,

ft , , , j (h h ' , de a

[*v.I ~ , . ~ . n-

,q, s s[6 j ,

'\.

.4 p .+ Q '8 . t-

< c

,% ) 3 .,/ 4 ((~, g . v

, 3 . '

!L p a i

3

( 4 k

_4-

i LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX STATUTES Admmistrauve Procedun Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(AXI)(D) and (AX2XB))

Canmission views on and uses d policy statements; DERM-871,25 NRC 59 (1987)

Administrative Proceduie Act, 5 U.S.C. 556(d) ,

burden on NRC Staff in civil penahy proceedes; AU 87-2,25 NRC 224 (1987)

Atomic Energy Act,170 protecuan of econonne interests; DD 87-5,25 NRC 265 (1987)

Atomic Energy Act, 234, 42 U.S.C. 2282 violations of NRC requirements for medical diagnosde and therapeutic uses d nuclear matenais, AU 87 2,25 NRC 222 (1987)

Atomic Energy Act, 274(bX4) 42 U.S.C. 2021 (1984)

NRC authonty to transfer ngulatory responsibihues over buried nuclear waste to states; LEP 87-5,25 NRC 104 n3 (1987)

Atomic Energy Act, 2741,42 U.S.C. 20210) responsibihty for decidmg who will represent an interested state; ALAll-862,25 NRC 148 (1987)

Atomic Energy Act,42 U.S.C. 2014 (1984) .

classineation of waste products; lEP 87 5,25 NRC 101 (1987)

Ill Ann. Stat. S.II.A. ch. !!!.5,230.6 (Snuth flurd 1980) interpatation of the term " possess" u in nuclear waste; LBP 87 5,25 NRC 105 (1987)

Nuclear Weste Felicy Act of 1982 (NWPA),5306,42 U.S.C (10.226,19 Stat. 2201 at 226243.

Puh. J. Na 97 425 scope of coverage to 6 mess for duty of nuclear power plant personnel; DPRM 871,25 NRC 50-62 (1987)

Safe Dnnking Water Act Amendments of 1986,302 applicabihty w matonals license amendment proceedmg involving uranium hexanuaride converswa facibiy; LBP 87-8, 25 NRC 168 (1987)

I J

31

1 L

SUBJECT INDEX ACCIDFNTS poterusal for, at uranium hexanuaride convasion facihty; LSP-87-8, 25 NRC 153 (1987) uranium I,exanuaride cyhnder rupture; IEP-87-8,25 NRC 153 (1987) .

See also Chemobyl Accides AITIDAVTTS subrmssion of factual informsuon to boards in; ALAB-857,25 NRC 7 (1987)

AMENDMENT See OpernUns license Amendrrent AMICUS CURIAE appeal rights of; ALAB-862,25 NRC 144 (1987) parucipanon by U S. senator as; AIAB 862,25 NRC 144 (1987) nght to Als bnafs and rnemorands in egoing bcensing proceedings; ALAB 862,25 h7C 144 (1987)

APPEAL BOARDS authonty to impose bcense condinms, ALAB-859,25 NRC 2k (1987) directed ceru6 cation authority; ALAB 860, 25 NRC 63 (1987) junsdu:uon to direct ceruncrtion of heensinp board rulings; AIAB-860,25 NRC 65 (1987) knuts on authority of; ALAB-860,25 NRC 63 (1987) role while hcensms board has secuan 2.758 painon before it; AIAB460,25 NRC 63 (1987) stay authonty, scope of, ALAB-858,25 NRC 17 (1987) aus sporue senew authonty where no appeal has been inhen; A1AB-859,25 NRC 23 (1987)

APPEALS by ennnes panicipaune, under 2.715(c); AIAB 861,25 NRC 129 (1987) nonparty naht to; AIAB-861,25 NRC 129 (1987) of Staff dernal of materials license appheadon LBP 87 4,25 h7C 79 (1987) naht of snucus cunas ur, ALAB-862,25 NRC 144 (1987)

APPEA14 INTERIDCLTTORY Comnusson pahey on; A1AB 861,25 NRC 129 (1987) comrrunnent of tesources to heanns that may later turn out to be unneessaary as basis for, ALAB-858, 25 NRC 17 (1987) excepuen to prosenpuen assinst; AIAB-861,25 NRC 129 (1987) of schaduhng caders; A1AB-858,25 NRC 17 (1987); AIAB 860,25 NRC 63 (1987)

See also Review, huerlocutory APPLICANTS burden of proof on; A1AB 857,25 NRC 7 (1987)

ATOh0C ENERGY ACT htigabihty of psychological stress issues under, DD-87 5,25 NRC 260 (1987) prouction of economic interests under, DD 87 5, 25 NRC 260 (1987)

DRAC)fYTl!ERAPY penannel morutoring requiremonu dunng; AU-87 2,25 NRC 219 (1987)

BURDEN OF PROOF en applicarus; ALAB 857,25 NRC 7 (1987) in civil penalty proceedanas; AU 87-2,25 NRC 219 C*i, 33

'l

}

l 1 i

'l 1

]

1 q

y SUBJECT INDEX . ]

j CAB 12 INSULADON polymers, deyedenen frorn low level redannen; ALAB 859,25 NRC 23 (1987)

CAUBRATION SOURCES penahy for faDuse no inversary; AU47 2,25 NRC 219 0987) t CERT 1FICATION see Duested Cen=Aa==

CHARACTER AND COMPETENG et uranium besaguaride __ - facility beansees; 13P-87-8,25 NRC 153 0987)

OtBANOBYL ACEIDENT offess en anssaancy planens for U.S. sammescaal nuclear power plants; DD-87-I,25 NRC 43 0987)

QVIL PENALTIES .

.inaden af pseef an eherged violonens; AU47-2,25 NRC 219 0987) ,

for visionens of NRC seguisensens for pa.- mid om of := clear ma. rials si dia8nomic and !'

. ___ h AU-87 2,25 NRC 219 (1987)

]

QVIL PENAL'IY PROCBEDINOS fair monos and wh due process; AU-57 2,25 NRC 219 0987) {

respons%Guies of pesadas einser in; AU-87-2,25 NRC 219 (1987) I CONDrflONS .

ses t h Conduiens CONSTRUC110N erne sete aeospiabGay;IJP-871,25 NRC 29 (1987) 1 CON!AINMENT inuersted Isak reis inst, edequacy of computer progrens for DD 87 2,25 NRC 121 (1987)

CONTAMINADON See Radiciegical Cantanunanen l CONVENTIONS ednusman of, where suling is novel, imponent, or con 8 acts with case law; ALAB 861,25 NRC 129 l 0 987) !

CONTENTIONS, IATE-Ft12D I

' Ave faciers to be addressed for adrnission of; 12P 87-3,25 NRC 71 (1987) sumenary deposinen at ednusman mage; IEP 87 3,25 NRC 71 (1987)

DECONTAMINATION -

need far, when fuel peduction license is terminated; DD 87 5,25 NRC 260 (1987)

DEHCIFNCIES .

emergency planning, chasacierisanan ef; ALAB-857,25 NRC 7 (1987)

DIRECIED CERITI'ICATION of lienneing bosnl soms osder, mandard far; AIAB-858,25 NRC 17 0987) .

standani for grera af; ALAB 861,25 NRC 129 (1987)

DISCOVERY I requests for, prior to designation of edminisuntive law # des; AU 871,25 NRC 39 (1987) ~;

DOSB RA7E EFFECTS !

en XLPO polymess in ceble insulation; ALAB-859. 25 NRC 21 (1987)

DUE PROCESS affect of conduct of sanultaneous pmceedmes on; ALAB 858,25 NRC 17 0987) l l

.m - for civil penahy pmeendangs AU-87 2,25 NRC 219 (1987) 'l ECONOMIC INTERESTS j

' prosection afforded by AEA; DD 87 5,25 NRC 260 0987) ?

EITECT1YENESS of Uoenat8 Boesd decision to authorize issuance of operating license, standard for delay of; CU 871, i

25 NRC 1 (1987) l See also immediate Effectiveness Review E12CTRICAL EQUIPMDR poeiaccident envirmmental quahncation time duration; LBP 4710,25 NRC 177 (1987) 3d

! )

m 7 .,y ; ., . m .

g.Y, ;s tye ; gv o .ww . g 3 3 , , j3

. M'y s , , , .

y- -

S %yp p

. , , W;.;A . ,m.s , , , n

yf*g .4,,,&,',,,'ff, e 2 e t y'

, y, L. g a

QQ; ! ; y,QQ *' n,u.,* % (TQlg. 'n-~~',7 '

lr ,

( c s

',_ A_

gf 4. 9 c , e yes c s , . , ~ ,i d - ;D,o . !dd i ,*- - :/3 ?qv .. A, m..t l .- ? Y yM. V c: w ' '

4

> ptw s t ,i ..' .x. . n. . , , ..

,4. -

m m,

_? a

n,-3,;Q; w . u h;G' Q <'fi,"'*

+

3 %., v . v" Q' s, ~.F u, Y, y,>~

m ;l . t M?.Q~

c.%

, , , ,( . . .e w

> - + e <

(dio7 "gh*- o rs ,/4 .g. , , r' i .f _.# ,

6 ,'*

L7y;~ .- grm, y., ,. e . y. ,

.f,. , 4 -

s g ,,,4, , . d- . .; . m, .

re .

t,,,.- , ** .Ay > -m . ., a ;, v*..,

' y ;i,,.7,;A'.; ;p g'..y+ ,,9<c- ;, ,f.<......y+i -. , %, < ",,n?

I e.

q ! q 4 c y. 4 . , . , ,

7. . f "k .yt g y 3 *f J., .i > +- [. Q. ; 4 j gH.y u ty Qo ,y. , e a .,. ,s* ~ g ' ~ c. ,

M5 jhlb,, 7 *

\sM4' N,a f SUBJECT INDEX qq, ,9,, (og b .9. Q , ,* pr , . n

.. n n. :; e. w T O;ghx ; $l4a t . Q; wc 3uRy>u s

% 1 o,b. .53.f.,g.g

.. s.w , g} f a, Q.y rM " H q I

r. .

). ,, n2 .j:.. Mf

~f,t Q.Q.w' Jt,,%q-. .. m. ~

EMEROENCY CMSSIPICADON

}-

and aedon level scheme, edsspacy d for Seabrock! DP-8710, 25 NRC 177 (1987) l g V p %m,ry;* g"; q > y qch, N1 :j EMEROENCY EXERCISES '

$, 'sJ.$ g;f ,j$M, 'Jp,1,.Qh,j

@b [$ h e k v.gf; ' i. h . ' ' A 4 '

acope of "fhil pesticipation," for ressenable assurance Andings; ALAB-361,25 NRC 129 (1987) p , EMERGENCY NOI1PICAT10N 3 p /1;e45 ,1, rAcq , e fp /j- odespieoy d siaamatic telephanie systern far, LBP 87 8,25 NRC 153 (1987)

s. s. T 2" , s . . EMEROENCY PLANNING.

p rf,A 1 y i.] Q' Jt Q*j,.i n/D[;*5 O*l; charactensation of danciencies as permanent er inserim; AMB-857,25 NRC 7 0987) l H y A, ;- ap j ,

.j . EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONES V i.C ' N. ,, C ' ,, e 4') extension af, beyond .10 miles; DD 871,25 NRC 43 0987) j u ,, k.+,n.. W "~.;,i' r t. ' W' i Pl wne, reducuan in size of; ALAB 858,25 NRC 17 (1987) '

y s ; y 0, . f4 , / 1i EMERGENCY PMNS fE q'<* ( A- >

-;., ; d approval for changes in; ALAB 857,25 NRC 7 09t?) 1 C'j 1 y , , % e ,. g. ;< r '

.j inclusian of implemenung procedures in; ALAB-857,25 NRC 7 (1987) yi60. 1' 3 g' j inclusion of special provisions fcr complying with 10 C.F.R. 50.47(b) and Past 50. Appendia E; AMB 857,25 NRC 7 (1987) '

'My d. ,fi T. .k, .. 'a ' w

% a,.' !.,r

Tf , d P 'e 4

ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

',

N '. J ' l. S[i

$ jT '

.- at TMI-2; DD 87 3,25 NRC 345 (1987) s7W y.,

_ s t y_ for violadon of training seq -' . NRC discreuen to select; DPRM 871,25 NRC 49 (1987) y.M- ,,

4. + *

,e.. , , ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT !TTATEMENT

, T 'M r,

s , o 1 need far, for uranium heaa8ueriJe convession facility; LBP 87-8,25 NRC 153 0987) 3m M( ' . + t . --y : ,. .. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES g

,i. A f,.tC ,

,' ';f ~ g, *,ls 44,d. i, need to consider cumulative impsets of uranium hesanuaride conversion facility; LBP-87 8,25 NRC ' : )'

s 153 (1987)

I ? [,Q. + j Sg},c, y,.;, k, . ?, k 4. ENVIRONMENTAL QUAIJFICADON i,o.*

j s ,

y . po .wa-a time durstian for elesuical equipment; GP 8710,25 NRC 177 (1987)

. sr .

m. .Mw_- s r g.e , " ,

e -

y . c ,

g v.se

.n ,l. ,

/ e,7 ' . N, . EVACUADON -

Q3Tc 1,J

\ , 9.;, ' f"y . p' , J ' '

uns of applicant's employees as bus drivers during; ALAB 857,25 NRC 7 0987)

FAULTTREE ANALYSIS v f ,. ' ,

'*^ ' e .6 -

- applicabihty to reinspecuan by samphng; LBP 871, 25 NRC 29 (1987)

. M e, .

,* f, - g, 1 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

, 1 e <

' $A .

,"f, .Q responsibilities of; DD 871,25 NRC 43 (1987) ' j 7

y ? -

... .. -. , ' . ,; , fi <

_ .,, ; .right af, to appeal hcensing board order admining contendens challenging adequacy of emergency -1

- ;- f, , PI,p; p, ," ' j enescises; ALAB-861,25 NRC 129 0987) .

> .. . f * - J < .,

.a . , l FIRE PREVENTION -

,u 6 . .- , adequacy of, at unanium hemanuaride convesica facility; GP 87 8,15 NRC 153 0987)

5% e *' . ' -

IIEARINGS g'i ** j.

'a a

, 9 7 c , i' ' l involvirr hybnd procedures, intervenden in: LDP 87 7,25 NRC 116 (1987)

IMMEDMTE 8 EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW

+

w. =,'- , , 7,~ : , , '

, t t u i _ , ,,

J effect on poudane for review of ments of appeal boerd's decisian; C1J 871,25 NRC 1 (1987)

. */- INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT DIRECTOR

'q . ,, ' 3/, i q,1 4 s 3$ .. -

burdei on, in civil penalty proceedings; ALT-87 2,25 NRC 219 (1987) ]

Q,' fn h,,7 J

INSPECTION FEES j y

,1 .w - f M*

'/ J^; g, *( , '.,

r*

]

revocatice, of license for nanpsyment of; LBP 87 9,25 NRC 175 0987)

INSULATION

.)4 I

' - ^'

- m ; 4 .r

4 Ses Cable Insulation !

( M j ' ' , ., ' ,.y 9 '

INTERESE!D STATE l m

, - panicipadon by U.S. senstar as; AMD-862,25 NRC 144 0987)

' l

j . ,

, INTERVENTION ;

7,,4 m : , , , ,

i< , ., ;.. by a state; AMB 862,25 NRC 144 (1987) 1 gy . , . ,T, *y .u ,

discreuenary, standard far, LBP 871, 25 NRC 116 (1987) s w e,* -

discretionary, standards for LDP 87 2,25 NRC 32 (1987) i e, * ,.., ~ >';. ,4

, , s , petiuons, content of; 2P 87 2,25 NRC 32 (1987) i 1

o .

, i a. . % '.4 p n'I "I l

e ]e 4.- y" ' " i '., h 3 % e ,

j> f -

n.

l* .'- ,

1 ss * +

y 3 hwh. , 33 i '*.-

gf

, ~~,',,,o'y'~~

~~e** , N' ,gy s~~
) , ' 4 ,
. % bl
~~w. > aps .~~
g g , N ,.,
. /,lw- ' '
9'. e ,,e .'9
,t
~~g , t,, g 6 -..~~
~~, r (i w.j, 'y'~~
~~'* , * ,4~~
..v ..
^ v( '
~~f' j f,.'~~
., . ]
,i 4
SUBJECT INDEX s
-i a
residency requusmmts for; IEP 87 2,25 NkC 32 (1987) rules for beasings bivolving hybrid procedures; 2P 87 7,25 NRC 116 (1987)
IRREPARAB2 INERY '
for purpose of intadocutory appeal, concer; A1AB 861,25 NRC 129 (1987)
^ '
ISOTOPE COMMITIEES penahy for failure to rneet quarterly; AU-87 2,25 NRC 219 (1987) ,
NR23 DICTION sppellate, to direct certiAcanon of licenams board ruhnss; ALAB 860,25 NRC 63 (1987) - ,
for impoems beense condinons ,
LEAK RATE TESTINO s . ,
adequacy of computer programs for, DD-87 2,25 NRC 121 (1987)
UCENSE '
denninon; LBP-87 5,25 NRC 98 (1987) ,
UCENSE CONDr!70NS * .* '
for uranian hexanuaride convenian facihty; IEP-87 8,25 NRC 153 (1987) + '
Jterisdiction for irnposing; AIAB-859,25 NRC 23 (1987)
UCENSEES * -
of uromum hemanuaride conversion facihty, character and competence; IEP-87 8,25 NRC 153 (1987) responsibilines for buried nuclear waste; LDP 87-5. 25 NRC 98 (1987)
UCENSINO ,
scope of informanon required for, LBP.87 2,25 NRC 32 (1987) .
UCENSING BOARDS authority to irnpose license condinen whm it no longer has junsdicuan over the issue; AIAB-859,25 ,,
NRC 23 (1987) responsiWhty to detail basis of decision; AIAB-857,25 NRC 7 (1987) responsibihty to expedite proceedmas; LDP-87 3,25 NRC 71 (1987) '
UCENSING PROCEEDINGS >
expedaden of; LBP 87 3,25 NRC 71 (1987) sM--- n effect en due process; ALAB-858,25 NRC 17 (1987) t, UMr!ED APPEARANCE STATEMENTS panicipational nahts of parnes making; ALAB-862,25 NRC 144 (1987)
MANAGEMENT OVER$1Giff '
beenas emdition for uramum hemanuende amversion facihty; LBP-87 8,25 NRC 153 (1987)
MATERIALS UCENSE AMENDMENT ,
to allow conversion of uransum hemanneride to uranium tetranuande; IEP 87 8,25 NRC 153 (1987) , ,
MATERIALS IJCENSES ,
appbcabihty of Part 35 to therapeunc use of suentium-90 applicatcr; LBP-87-4,25 NRC 79 (1987) '
dermal of appeal from Staff determinsnan to day applicadon; LBP-87 4,25 NRC 79 (1987) ,
Leansee responsibihnes for buried nuclear waste; LEP 87 5,25 NRC 98 (1987) ,
NO SlONIFICANT HAZARDS DETERMINATION need for, in absence of heanns as opersung bcense amendmmt; ISP-87 2,25 NRC 32 (1987)
NOTICE OF IIEARING adequacy of; LDP 87 8, 25 NRC 153 (1987) e NCyTIFICATION ,,,
See Emersecy Nonacauen , ,
NRC STAFF - ,
responsibihiy for issuing low power heense; ALAB 859,25 NRC 21 (1987) '
NUCLEAR PACEMAKER PROGRAMS , ,
penalty for denciencies in: AU-87 2,25 NRC 219 (1987)
NUC2AR REACTOR REOULATION DIREC7VR basis for issuing low-power opersung bcense; AIAB 859, 25 NRC 23 (1987) (, ;,
er " #
(
34 e ,
o
, ' b g ,
v 4
o,-
~~, }e .N'.~~
t
. s
t, * - # x
' Y F O i
e . . , , , '.+ , - ' ;
- m n, ,
-z=, , -
7-z- - - -
~~j,u.p x~~
, .] f,.eptky x ta .;p .-
.,y , , s , -}
. :s . m , , , , ,, ,
n , _ .' ' j1.-
j r 4,.4 , L,;, y; > .*C y- ~.t
f ~ i , . ,, q .+,.'y,-t'+u, _l. '
mip..'e e t - . '- s.fs.-
r ,
.e, e%,;y<> '
+Yy'
. q) x. ~*psy. ,
- s' .
in . ' ' Vff a , , .u e
9
'-'*/ f f. T 4j. >
,p s ,' ; + .. s j a
.,,&z, v. -.. ,.
5,n. . +, ,s' c o- ;c , , ,
m'*
..w,'.9*n* '. m. ' . , ~'
L, q s ~rP. -r :n* s &
~~L,>~~
. %w,,..yw; yl
. y; @w:.~ ip %w., h, : 1p.
u 'e w, .a u
+ -
. . . a. % ..
c ..u . m %,:. n :+, ,
<;:- ....y ". o q ,a; z g.
' - + ,
g y,4.. ff ,4,,.4 , 'y,
,g ap , u . 7. .
+y, .c g ., - ,
.y ,, c . .j l
<m1M..n-
?? #
, . 's.j, .
~~'s . . ,, , .; . ;.', . ,e , ..~~
i
.,.j rl~ %
~~4 ,e ?).m, <-~~
~~,, q), ,2~~
~~,y .a~~
.mj . .b.A,' h **' _ fd i 2]
7,
.}f
's..p ';g,6 t
.2p. 7p.
SUBJECT INDEX I 4..s hti.,f-L.
7.f;p y-. $A gspot ./ c' ,g M. -
te
%Qu c,ycq,
., yJ,q,s.s e d > wsl@""a :' l i
y[t'y% '#. , ,.k?*,. .l
,t u. W@* j. L* .. , ,c. e4* '
v ,8 9 :
c,n_ , \ ;. v .,, * ,. *A ,. t. y! /v A oy..
y ,Tt y,.h ,p, g, " , cp - '
4 ...?.
.F #6le;. , %. . ;" i NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION
( J.k= /g%).'[ jpp, .7.5 dissneum to asleet enfensment assim for nolaccas invoinnt nuclear poww plant mi mains, t f . ; c* "
~~MJd4.j j.~~
% ,, . DPRM 871,25 NRC 49 (1987) -
[3 M+ ',4' .",hhMP '.M," 'N +
Y.h Saiibahy to issue nylasery pidence la form of a policy samenners; DPRM 87-1,25 NRC 49 (1987)
NUEEAR WASM
.e
.+ . . d. ,
,r, .. J, .s%. ,3 : y>
,, . , . JW i buried, ownssuhip of, LBP 47 5,25 NRC 98 (1987) -
~~7.p 6 ,9i . 7P~~
~~, e~~
, , $, r -y, yi { NUCLEAR WASH POUCY ACT
,e', .
',% a 8:ases of nuclear power plant ponennel for duty, requhements under: DPRM-871,25 NRC 49 (1987) .
& 4 ,, ,., y .
. Mi - 7 lt
, . ; l7 . 4 ;y. M, :
s, OPERAUNO BASIS EARTHQUAKE
- far Tsojem feidlity; DD-87-4,25 NRC 253 0987) ya,a *
..y, *'. . .4 OPERATINO UCENSE AMENDMENT
,nv,);
-yl
~
' . j,7 .
need for Staff "no serious heaanns senadenotica" Sading in absence of hasang on; LBP-87-2,25 NRC r
e ep- ,4 ( ., ,
, .t 5 r 32 0 987)
VrC' ,'# . '_ ,' '
s v" 4 - OPERAUNO UCENSE AMENDMENT PROCEEDINGS
4. i. .,,. 7- J ternunaeum of; LBP 87 4, 25 NRC 114 (1987) 4,, J' yna i i 'N .,, " ,NJ "
^
tJ q.j OPERAUNO UCENSES, PUU, POWER
? ?$ , - ; basis for delaying aushsmsasian far, CU-871,25 NRC I 0987) -
/. , . c. StaK : , '~, for issuing, ALAB-859,25 NRC D 0987)
.. r j , ' g,'.y- 'y?
>e w 9 ,. .
i
.e i
i i
,o..
t
'.o , PERSONNEL mensonas nquironnants ening brachytherapy; A!J-87125 NRC 219 0987) .i 1
. t 3 ,
N,,, r .A,.4 , yi 4 naciser power plani, training and 6enses for duty. aquinments far, DPRM-871,25 NRC 49 0987) !
'3
, %, 7' > '
L# c h y !;., . . stafans and ; " : at uranium hasaduonde coverman facility, adequacy of, LBP-87 8,'25 NRC )
,[ u; -
.,_ , - u.p ,
1 153 (1987)- l J7, , M,4 . . 1 a S POUCY STATEMENTS . . .j
' ; pf,Z ja
%' r, ,, 7. g ,C;.; C . , J. 3
. , , Canumsman views an and uses of; DPRM-871,25 NRC 49 (1987) -
, ,, replassey or mesuiary fasce of, DPRM 871,25 NRC 49 0987) j n ' ( pll* 'e y ,y}G m.
g' e
L y N, ,.
g iJ:. -[
~~c. POLYMERS XLPO, in esbis insulation. '~~
- fem low-level radiation; ALAB-859,25 NRC 23 (1987) .
l
.r ;- + ,'
fa , , < .
PRESIDING OPPICER
., 7 .;,, ,- , authority to entenam osal passentations in informal beanns: LBP-87 4,25 NRC 79 0987)
', [ , . .
i 4 .. responsElities in civil pensky psossedings; A!J 87125 NRC 219 0987)
'y ; M' >
,;4' J A n ie
%., J ,
PROOF p;<g, fq, -- ,, ,, ' '
See Burden d Paid
+'>s :O . , . ,
',r, -
g i
PROPERTY VALUES laagsbility of efects of opere P cn; DD-87-5,25 NRC 260 0987)
PSYCHOIDOMAL STRESS O j t. ,
,. j P,? , , '.,E < 4, ,
litigsbaisy of, in N2C prdags; DD 87 5,25 NRC 260 b987) ;
~ j+ ,,
+
y ' ;A- '
,, QUALffY ASSURANCE
' e
, , of recovery program at TMI-2; DD 87 3. 25 NRC 245 (1987) o N
a reinspection program, 4 y of; LBP 871,25 NRC 29 0987)
J JV. -
RADIATION BADOES s," i 3 ;,ju
'a ? , g ' , penahy for faihue to wear. AU 87 2,2? NRC 219 0987) i
'A " -.s.
<~. s
+ ,. . ,
, RADIADON SURVEYS J .' , , ', - ,s
~~1 4~~
.l pensby for faune to perform; AU-47 2,25 NRC 219 OM7)
M ~'.
,', RADIATION, IDW LEVEL
' f e g.l 3 , ,
.,' effect en XLPO polymese in cab's insulatiert; ALA8 859, 25 NRC 23 0987) 4 .
. f* o RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL SOURCES
$ . ^ ~ ; ,
Oroup VL penahy for failure to inventary and lenk test; AIJ 87 2,25 NRC 219 0987) 4 RADIOACnVITY
- ;,.y 3, ', ,';< '
in sad, limits on; DD 87-5,25 NRC 260 0987)
,H't., *
, Y*. RADIOLDOICAL CONTAMINATION f T:
( ; ,1 e i potential far, fiore dust in uranium hex 4Aucride convemon facility; 1.BP 87 8,25 NRC 153 0987)
.g ,
'A
> +
', ? ,r e:
e
. <a, ,.# . - ,
v;; ;.
~~i !-~~
ce . dl,s . " ' .4 y . ,
aww~ a , e',
c, , , ,,. ,
~~) - ,~~
s
, ,_, 3, p' , . *
, g e p+.
n' ,, ,
(* g " " 4
[ , ' ' ,'t +
4
.gc . .k 4 L
g k' *
'.f g . -f .*,
p 5* . 8' e.p ,f
-'4 f',I, ~ *.,', p z I
p
.- s e
p VI
,(
s 4 r
-, ,, m .-_
m, , , .y
~~w. = v % %fe,~~
, -+ '- - ,
' 2 W 2 c:: - ;t 4: e
.;Y ' ,
' +
),
, y 4 e
i y, s' w < . r. M . ,, r... e
, % p .t.:T * ? ' < ' .; .. .
> A*'4 ' '" ,
. k.
rM( *fsp; , ,g-y y, p_ y.q *
, .= , r y ,
[ r : ';. x
~ +
3- ,
y _
i s .
. .s
,y c ., ,
v: e
,,.y
?
SUBJECT INDEX : c. - 4 ,
Q
~ ,- - . ' ;, .
m+ , >. ,
ip k
. RECORD-8es Reapemns a Record
~~i i 9, , ,~~
~ '- e[
w REGULATIONS .
. . . , o, , . - ' *
L emergency planning, efect of Chernobyl occident on; DD-871,~25 NRC 43 0987) - .
b'*
. REGULATORY OUIDES , < ' #
' related to 10 C.F.R. Psa 55; DPRM-871, 25 NRC 49 (1987) i
' REOPENING A RECORD .
criteria for, AIAB 857,25 NRC 7 0987) -
- REVIEW '
~~See also knmediate E8ectiveness Review -~~
~~' REVIEW, APPELLATE scope of; ALAB-857,25 NRC 7 0987)'~~
~~' # * " i~~
~~REVIEW. INTERLOCUTORY . .~~
. , :D appbcability of to CF.R.1788 to, where myiew of scheduhng osder is requested; ALAB-858,25 NRC - - < l 17 (1987) . . - 4 <
^
discanenaryi standard for, ALAB 860, 25 NRC 63 (1987) ,., 4. -
See also Appeals, heerlocutory -' .
REVIEW, SUA SPONTE . . .
,g ,
whoss no appeal has been taken; ALAB-859,2$ NRC 23 (1987) ' ,
REVOCATION OF IJCENSE ,
' ' " ~
for nonpsyment of inspecnon fes; LBP 87 9,25 NRC 175 0987) ,
RULES OF PRACTICE . ' ,. , 4 appeal board directed cenincanon authoruy; ALAB-860, 25 NRC 63 (1987) . t.
, appeal board sole whins hcensing board has eacnon 2.758 peition before it; ALAB 860,25 NRC 63 ' .'
0 987) ,
' appeal righu of amicus curias; ALAB-862,25 NRC 144 (1987) - . .. ,,'.
. appent nights of ensines panimpating under 2.715M; ALAB-861,25 NRC 129 0987) '
applicabihty of 10 C.F.R. 2.788 to requesu for intelecutory review of scheduhng orden; AIAB-858,' <
f,* ? ,, *
25 NRC 17 (1987) .. _ . . . . t
~appucability of GDC 5, to sharing of spent fuel facGines: LBP-47 2,25 NRC 32 0987) ,
appucent's burden of proof; A1AB-857,25 NRC 7 (1987) - . . ,
- bees far denyvig apphcant's appeal from Staff desernunanon to deny materials license application; a, '
4 . .j LBP 87-4,25 NRC 79 (1987) . . .
C. " policy on interlocutory appeals; ALAB 861,25 NRC 129 0987) ,
-j of nsousses to hearing that may later turn out to be unnecessary as basis for interlocutory appeal; ALAB-858,25 NRC 17 0987) ,
, *
t d coment cf L . paunens; LBP 87-2,25 NRC 32 0987) 'I criteria for reopening a incont; ALAB-857, 25 NRC 7 (1987); 12P 87-3,25 NRC 710987) 4 - ,
l. *
- duected cenincanen, standsed for; A1AB-860,25 NRC 63 0957); ALAB 861,25 NRC 129 (1987) , '
l discreuen of presiding omcar to ornanain oral presenunons; LBP-87-d,25 NRC 79 0987) ,
- l
- discretionary ituervennen mandard; 12P 87-2,25 NRC 32 (1987); LBP-87 7,25 NRC 116 (1987) t f t
effect on basic structum of a proceedag of adnussion of contentum resuhing from licensing board < 4 - i ruhng that is novel, imponent, or connicu with case law; AIAB 861,25 NRC 129 (1987) /* .., , i
';]
exception to presenpnen asamst interlocuiery appeals; ALAB-861,25 NRC 129 0987)
Ave factors to be addressed for admission of late-Alad contendons; LBP 87 3,25 NRC 710987) ~ ' ', . i form for providing factual informanon to boards; ALAB 857,25 NRC 7 (1987) '
interlocutory appeals of scheduling orders; ALAB 858,25 NRC 17 0987) 't ,
e unervention by a suis; AIAB 862,25 NRC 144 0987) ,e .,
innervennon rules for headass involving hybrid proceduas; LBP 87 7,25 NRC 116 0987) ,. ar , .
, ,q irreparable injury concept; AIAB 861,25 NRC 129 (1987)
~~f. ;~~
~~O g (~~
- lenited appearance maiemens, peruespanonal rights of pernes making; ALAB-862,25 NRC 144 0987) ', .d' limiu on appeal board authonty; ALAB-860,25 NRC 63 0987)
motions for modincanon of hearing schedule; AIAB 858,25 NRC 17 0987) ,
i g
, ~',,< *
. f .b y,
u
, m' 1
34 p i e ,
~ > <.
~~# 8 I~~
i
!.... o q ,
. , 3 ,
4 L sf * *
, e
, s .s e v Q
6
%.* e , , .
A i; m g 4 L '
q e
- ; 4. ,y',s," g, d '. .o.
Le x . e p' , ', t ' ', ;,, , , , ,,
6 4
d
.E s. .,p3
~~u 1, -~~
s v 4. ,
l * :6, Ap ,. . , ,
i k, *
~~,q,- ,~~
Q
j
~~.. d t/ . g . ( l \ } _, , 6, Y .. - ;~~
~~n. .r' W '~~
< s.
y,,%. @. &g e: < ' n, a : - %:v~ * %' . -
.sm ,
. ,.- ,, t.. - 2,; -
'y q ?' ' ' Y ' F. . s + *,l ,a 73 3 .. <*
lt
s
-s ,
nw
. +.1 ,e . -
,s .z u . , ,
ng mn -n~~---
-l 7 ,,,a.p;ry ;g.,P 7(
qsM .gr .] % . ~
~~p . . . +<a> y~~
~~+ ',~~
~~p. .~~
N M.r : J~(.h%*k
.![ i
( , O. $ " '
i , s. hS.4,J.;.
N- p), vp V . -,-.:., 4I",d, n
, j W&g... .
m ,k. g
- , , m 1
% Ma, ~g h%.' :~ s ^ *.y ",,&.. r <:;,.. .r . r l i .,.1.. . s ? ,; ' < *. *
, V iw n([ aalj4 ifj ; y f
UN h [g" 4M,, S Q C j , ';y Oh. ' ,. < s W . ,,
)
a .t a '
m
$W'.
.v s
.gf;,~m., y*- wrv..g, Q4,;Jjy,
,m< p. .
A .f;p ....M ,
y u i Q; s; R.,~ay V v , .
tv
, , 4 r
y, , 2c .qw., 1n c o, . ,, . .
r, .
s ,
4 7 - 6 re ,s.A "' ; , ~ -.
.i
%w ;" ' JW , ,7 ' @, q ;Q"%9 [' 3'(
- g ,, p' ~
yyn v.s f' '.y . .y .
.x
. n ,

~~i B..m~~
. es q~ , v* e . . s ,i ,9 < 1 ,, - , . . ,.':
. 1 3s
,,e %s .w .- ;% y-L,.m."v 9 .ysU.
p S.f b ' y; s ;, 'sp; N 1 WM W boy,r$ J e l: ,
w 7 .)f,$ u ,
. SUBJECT INDEX
&- m:,W.qW.
, s.
t ' ",r 4 c.1.3 m .. ,,u1 Rh> M]r' *>P -
e m .y F
. + ns.r.' 'r&ff: f h *N.r,,, ,
p s w w.m 'e-.hA,. ,. ?.
i
^ .
bflE Y.Y; &;sf' .' : a<[h p, l
JN Y: N,'7 ps$ - .. ?P.,* $$', MM Q
~~ay , " . rf need fu Staff "no' serious hasanis -"" Anding in obsence of hessing on'opersians lisense ' '~~
?. ' f ;&4*t,. %, ugnt g m n pq S7,% N .g y g/* A L A', ";' ' /j
" f >*> c ml assaniastion standang en basis of radaiay of mesuber,12P 47-7,25 NitC 116 0987) j l
1 N **; Q j$f6 .[ff'.y % -T k,M6 'gW3 7c 5' },fiQ{ O.*&, residenee seq =- for 41-8 insesent is a pseseadmis; IJP 87 2,25 NItc 32 0987) l
.'risht of messuiy to appeal; A1AB-861,25 NRC 129 0987) o,. 4. < , M.7 .
~~j. scope of appellate review; ALAB-457,25 MitC 7 OM7)~~
[7o",,"1, 7,
.. D
. b,,
',,- n.j ()h [7,e,sW , fi1' (M s
.g ,
spacincity sopined of 2.206 peutions; DD.47-5,25 NRC 260 (1987) standes to inservens en basis of civio desy; IJP 87-125 NRC 32 0987)
.]
3 . qq , 1, , +
SAFE SHITTDOWN EARTHQU4KE
{
i'(o i .S ., . 6
~ . , .
3 i e' ;,l - 'y. $] for Trojan facility; DD 87-4,25 NRC 253 0987) w 7g ~a ,,'.[., Mg ,6
' SAFETY PARAMETER DISPLAY SYSTEM 2^$,g 2
. " w.th NUREG 0730 and sequiremanas for full poeer operation; 12P-8710,25 NRC 177
.j tM N, amv, j (1987)
~~,' SALP REPORTS~~
'- 1
" . . s eurrent TMI; DD 87 3,25 NRC 245 0987)
-[:. l'd 7 .g J .1,i;h . .
@ ((6,W SAMPLING W7 .;
.g n d ' *'.
,. f ,;
.- ' W .3 . reinspection by; 12P-871,25 NRC 29 0987) .
p I ., ; SCHEDUUNO
'"(d! *. i f'C .n-( r
./ E p't ' l"- J g
appeals of orden; AIAB-858,25 NRC 17 (1987); AIAB 860,25 NRC 63 (1987) j f* ' , s , ,( . . '
'- motions for mediAcanon of. ALAB 854,2$ NRC 17 0907) i t ,' , !4 .,'
~~_ SEISMIC DESIGN 1 ,~~
4
.y ,
w of Trojan conuel building, tusbine buildin$, and diesel saaretar a-4a l
m c i'. * '
p
~~NRC 253 (1987) .~~
, adequacy of; DDwa7-4,25 l 1
4 j '
x
~~. U,(4 'g7 - / of uranuun heaanueride conveman facility, adepacy of; Liss'-87-8,25 NRC 153 (1987) '~~
(4 m a S $,, ,, , t~ U -
SIGPMENT OF RADIOAC11VE MATERIALS d
, [ r ?.,. ( ,l W + , , j ;. % ,. A 4" i nedser ; violauens af ==tailand== far, AU 47 2,25 NRC 219 (1987) !
SHOW CAUSE PROCEEDINGS
@*,l . f,.[Q. ls *%4.']' Q ., * ..; ry, j i? .
g/ ..
'.j,,
i *
"A + svaunds for expedithig; A!J 871,25 NRC 39 0987)
. ~
~~krminauen en payment of fees osed by hoenses; 12P 87-9,25 NRC 175 (1987) s ..,.- +~~
STIE STABluZATION i i,;e,', ',n *
" i -- . .i ^
of nuclear weses burial site, licenses responsibilities; IJP 47 5,25 NRC 98 OM7) n.',.,
+ -as" -
~~L ,~~
SPENT FUEL FACILTTIES
[,'!g'up'}[a,i,
+a - .L -, - -
C ' :,
~~1. , 'l A.~~
sharing at; 1AP 87 2, 25 NRC 32 UM7)
SPENT FUEL POOL EXPANSION PROCEEDINGS
']
~~. . g.g ?s , r~~
} intervenuan rules; 12P 87 7,25 NRC 116 OM7)
I y, , A ,Q f. A, y .,' STANDING
~~g. J. d .. . ." -~~
~~civic duty as basis for, LBP 87 2,25 NRC 32 0987)~~
~~39 + ,~~
s 3, ,,
oraamassionat an basis of member's sus decy; LBP 87 7,25 NRC 116 0987)
>f M;J ' # :: , .
, ' ;, 4 STAYS i( ,
scope of appeal bossd suiherny; ALAB 858,25 NRC 17 0987)
, r ", .* y s
, STRONT!UM 90 PIAQUE APPUCATOR
~~4 ?aC y,, m ,3,,~~
4 e ,c -, , *6, .
i segulatory standards appliemble to thesapeuise use of; 12P-87 4,25 NRC 79 0987) s* *
~~SUMMARY~~
DISPOST!10N q l ,y, .
9' i ' f l , f . of laie41ed contenuens at ednusman state; 12P-87 3,25 NRC 710987)
'N ' f. ^ ' i ,'
f. TECIINETIUM 99m '
? ' [ "g f..,, , r t* x
,\' ' '
contaminated waste, failure to mainta a survey records ef; AIJ 87 2,25 NRC 219 0947)
TERMINATION OF PROCEEDINGS fur opersung license amendmans; IEP 874,25 NRC !!4 (1987)
(,, . ** y 77, , Ti(REE MILE ISLAND 4 . o i,
, M3 y. ,' ,
recovery program, concerns about 4.Acunciw in; DD 87 3,25 NRC 245 0987) l TRAINING 4 y<g4 . - , .v- .. '
and niness for duiy of nuclear power plant personnel. requirements for, DPRM t7-1,25 NRC 49 (iW7) 3-C*.
q .- ., , ,
a
~~o I v* (+* '~~
.h s- .g*, .a, ,' g. . fy
~
s ~
. ,7- ,; ; y*.
n *
,3 . v
..,p*'.. ' w . *
)$
g*a n,.
.c.e s ll s a "-r fQ
~~6. .~~
.N. . eD . s.? . 4, . . e,t, ,
g .4 E.g .
+ ai g -
7 ve , ,
4 ., 4 \. 'd d * * #
..i,%,' ,4, .p r .. '*
i , ?f-lg 7 h ' ,N.
} ,9 b
~~h. , % **.e, ) , W- '~~
i
~~b i e~~
a, , , , _ , _ _ _ _ , _ _ , , _ _ _ - _ _ _ . - _ _ . - - - - -
s'
=M 1
. .1 ' + , , ,
- i
't * *
~
, . , , . - .q, 4 4 3 1, T
(
s ,
e
~~r. .~~
. (- ..
4
,s
', [ tea ,,
s.y. *
.,:,y s,n : r -
tr 6, -
_ . * - .g , 'i(
. - ~
,1, , ; ,, ;3 ,
u (. 'J,:
t ., " .. p ^.: M , .. ,x ' m .
- .C ,- ,
~~3.c.4s i , .V,~~
-, , e . ,,,,.am ,
c
.,s,. >+:,
. ~- -. . ~ . > .
w +,. , ,
, ,. , C.w%t< 9 SUltJECT INDEX I, ..
~~A. ..[.i E ?. 9 * , - .~~
, 4 , .
-; g, s
, .. . , . < . . ,. -sy
~~,,+.<~~
e <,
o- . , ,.*
,..c.,<,
1 a ,, ,
4 ,, <. . , . -3 ." .
') ' '
Commission dasereuen to select enfossemars sciian for vioimiens involving: DPRM-871,25 NRC 49
~~(1987)~~
( m
'1 J'
far uraniwn haasAuorido convenien facihty employees, adequecy of; 12P 87-8,25 NRC 153 (1987) ,
q
. U.S. 82NATOR " * -
, c" "
sismas for penicipation in NRC ;- ;; ALAB-842,25 NRC 144 (1987) ,, e w. ,1 '
~
URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE . f. D ,
convenian to usanian tetra 6uands; LBP-87 8,25 NRC 153 (1987)
VIOLATIONS (y
[ ', },
~~f,f. ,~~
'+ . t. , m 0-aggregation of, escalation of seventy level for. AU 87 2,25 NRC 219 (1987) -
o
-c.. *
{, ,
s of training sequisements. NRC discionen to select enforoorrent action for. DPRM-871,25 NRC 49 " (- . ,. -i
-(1987) 3
/
',;j '
WASTE DISPOSAL . . ,
1;g- ,
deep well deposal of rafaneis; 12P'87 8,25 NRC 153 (1987) . =
.c ' ',.
licenses sospansibilities; LBP 87-5,25 NRC H (1987) , 4 ' >^
XENON-133 . .,i "1
,' a penshy far use in unauthensed roern; ALJ 87 2, 25 NRC 219 (1987) - i ', '
i *
. .i
'.A
~~p 4 g9 s~~
~~+ ',, N~~
~~, * *,)~~
1 4 aO"
',#[;.*,'.
4 4, , .
1.
- " .a. .a .,. : ..8' g r.
,$, *6 %
-.% ;,*j
,
~~y ,~~
~~3 * *y~~
,7 , .
e, ,e
, .j -
s-
$g 1* f* . -
9 .g. .g* j
.e ,
.e
. o
' e
, a y , ' s ' I
. 4 3% , . ,'- ,
~~'.1~~
~
~~, s A,' t , - *a a, ;~~
., . s si .
l , 6
. r.
+st q W q , .
-) ; - r i ~, ..
4,, ,,h,*o ,
. ' s
- , [
9
) "
km.
6 - -
' , ,e # '
t ,
, y
? . ..
s .. , ..., -
- 44 s .sj ~,.,, ./..p.y:
g, , J. y it- 4 pr ([e .e # *
, v4 P
+ . - ; ,
9
. .. (
e, g' 4
I
.4L ps ,,.'(
n* >
e s
. , , .i+ +1'}.; , , 4 2 s v .', - .
, =.7
., e o i . , ', ..\.a.**
,'[.1 , j , . i
, ,. e . es +
7 L , .
s,
' e / , 'g e ,
, .A. o
, _g . ". fI' N de ,
^',.,i m b 4 . p 3
~~#a e,~~
y' A
,,p}
t , . '%; y
, .s.
. f. ,
1 *
~~9 O, - 8 ,g~~
~~4 i~~
.b , ,.
% # +
1
f )
t-l I
I l
l FACILITY INDEX DYRON NUCIIAR POWER STATION, Unit 1; Docka No. 54373 REQUEST FOR ACTION; February 10, 1987; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.FA (2.206, DD 87 2, 25 NRC 121 (1987)
COMANCIIE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, Units I and 2; Docket Na 50-445-OL,5444&OL (ASLBP No. 79-434040L) .
OPERATING UCENSE; January 7,1987; MEMORANDUM; 12P 871, 25 NRC 29 (1987)
IIURLEY MEDICAL CENTER; Docket Na 3401993, 741396 (License Nos. 2100338-02, SNM 1393)
(EA 85 89)
I CIVIL PENALTY; March 3,1987; INTTIAL DECSION; AU.87 2,25 NRC 219 (1987) !
LASAWE COUNTY STATION, Unit 1; Docket No. STN 54454 #
l REQUEST FOR ACTION; February 10, 1987; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CF.R. 6 2.206; I I
DD-87-2,25 NRC 121 (1987)
LIMERJCK GENERATING STATION, Unna 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 54352-OL,54353 0L
[ !
OPERATING UCENSE; January 2,1987, DECISION; ALAB 857,25 NRC 7 (1987) -
{
PARKS TOWNSIUP, PENNSYLVANIA FACILTTY; Docka No. 74364 - 1 REQUEST FOR ACTION; March 13, 1987; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 51206, -
D!>87 5,25 NRC 260 (1987) ? )
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR OENERATING STATION, Uniu 1,2, and 3; Docket Nos. 54206, 54361, -
54362 REQUEST FOR ACTION; January 29, 1987; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 52206; DD-871,25 NRC 43 (1987)
SEABROOK STATION, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 54443 01, 54444-OL (Offsiis Ernersency Planrun8)
OPERATING UCENSE; January 15, 1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; AIAB.858,25 N7C 17 (1987)
OPERATING UCENSE; February 26, 1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ALAD 860,25 b1C 63 (1987)
OPERATING UCENSE; March 30, 1987; DECISION; AIAB462,25 NRC 144 (1987)
SEADROOK STATION, Uruts 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 54443 OL 1,54444-01-1 (ASLBP No. 82-47102-OL) (Onana Emersency Plannin8 and Safety Issues) f OPERATINO LICENSE; February 6,1987; MEMORANDUM MD ORDER; LBP 87 3,25 NRC 71 (1987)
OPERATINO UCENSE; March 25,1987; PAR 71AL INTDAL DECIslON; !.SP 8710, 25 NRC 177 (1987)
SEQUOYAll UF6 TO UF 4FACIUTY; Docket No. 4480'27-MIA (ASI.3P No. 85 513-03 ML)
MATERIALS UCENSE AhENDMEhT; March 4,1987; DECISION; 1.AP-87 8, 25 NRC 153 (1987)
SIIEARON llARRIS NUCIIAR POWER PLANT; Docket No. 54400-OL OPERATING UCENSE; January 9,1987; ORDER; CU 871, 25 NRC I (1987)
S!!EITIELD, ILUNOIS LOW. LEVEL RADIOACUVE WASTE DISPOSAL STTE; Docket No. 27 39 SC (ASIEP No. 78 37401 (TT)
SilOW CAUSE; February 20, 1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; LBP 87 5,25 NRC 98 (1987) 41
FACILITY INDEX SIIOREHAM NUCMAR POWER STATION, Unit 1; Dodet Na 50 322-015 (EP Exercise)
OPERATINO UCENSE: March 2,1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDG: A1AB-861,25 NRC 129 (1987)
ST. LUCIE NUCMAR POWER PLANT, Unia No. 2; Docka No. 5438941A (ASGP Na 87 54401 LA) (Spera Fuel Transfer Amendment)
OPERATINO UCFNSE AMENDMENT; January 16, 1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; IEP 87 2,25 NRC 32 (1987) 1MREE MILE ISLAND NUQ2AR STATION, Unit 1; Docket N.as. 542894LA-1. 50 2894tA 2 (Stearn Generator Mussing Cntaria)
OPERATINO UCENSE AMENDMENT; February 27, 1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; 2P 874,25 NRC 114 (1987) 1HREE MIM ISIAND NUCUAR STATION, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 50-289, 54320 REQUEST ICR ACTION; Mash 6,1987; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 62.206; DD'87 3,25 NRC 245 (1987)
TROJAN NUCEAR Pt. ANT; Docket Na 54344
{
REQUEST ICR ACTION: Maa:h 5,1987; DIREC10R'S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 52.206; DD874,25 NRC 253 (19t7)
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION; Ducket Na 54271 OLA (ASGP Na 87-547 021A)
OPERN11NO UCENSE AMENDMENT; February M.1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; ISP 87 7,25 NRC 116 (1987)
VGGILE E!ICTRIC OENERATING PLANT, Units 1 and 2; Docket Nos. 50 42401, 50425-OL OPERATINO UCENSE; January 21, 1987; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; AIAB 859,25 NRC D (1987)
ZION STATION, Unis 1; Docket Na 54295 REQUEST ICR ACTION; February 10, ll87; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CIR. 62.206; DD 87 2,25 NRC 121 (1987) 43 i
o u.5.covtangat palntinc ortIct:19st 181 677 6000e
_ _ _

ML20236E653

Text

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search