ML20236E276

Requests That Encl Evacuation Time Estimates for Emergency Preparedness Plan Be Forwarded to Regional Director,Fema & Region I for Review.Info Also Forwarded to Appropriate State & Local Agencies to Update Emergency Plan

ML20236E276
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	06/04/1987
From:	Bird R BOSTON EDISON CO.
To:	Ronald Bellamy NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20236E263	List: ML20236E260 ML20236E276
References
87-97, NUDOCS 8710290150
Download: ML20236E276 (33)

Text

]

. p' ; *

• q,. '.

g SOS 70W EDtSON

(

Executive Offices 800 Boylston Street Boston, Massachusetts 02199 Ralph G. Bird Senior Vice President - Nuclear June 4, 1987 BECo. Ltr. 87-97 Ronald R. Bellamy, Chief Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

,l Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 License DPR-35 Docket No.:

50-293

,+

i R

. s..

.1 is l

Dear Dr. Bellamy:

n L.-

Please forward the attached material to the Regional Director, FEMA,' Reg for review, in accordance with accepted procedure.

y Bycopyofthisletterthisinformettonisbeingtransmittedtoappro'pN, state and local agencies so that they may use it in updating sections M t f.4 47.

plans found to contain outdated material.

'o cp R

"t[

RGBlog

'?

}

Attachments cc: Messrs. Peter Agnes, Jr.

(with attachments)

Robert Boulay d'.

Thomas Rodgers Al Slaney Daniel Daly

.a David Vogler M

Joseph Costa gl

• Richard Levin

+

/

David Malagutt j

David Canepa Richard Johnson s

N1111am Lazarus

' ';4 8710290150 871021 ~

PDR ADDCK 05000293 F

PDR

~

7.-

,y

~

EVACUATIONTIMEESTIMATE AND BEACHPOPULATIONSHELTERING The following information resolves FEMA concerns involving an' updated'

' Evacuation. Time Estimate and the sheltering of beach populations within the-This information updates that presented in the 1981 Commonwealth of EPZ.

Massachusetts Radiological Emergency Response Plan and the 1985 Radiological Emergency Response Plans for the Town of Carver, Duxbury, Kingston, Marshfiel and Plyitooth.

I.

Evacuation Time Estimate A.-

Summary of the Issue-7 An Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) for the P11gria Nuclear.Powere

.M.

Station was performed in 1981. This ETE was based uponi.

Census data. An updated ETE should be prepared based' ~ "

.- dp J

~

bghp' c '

consideration of the most recent census data-(1980),'a~

fM;-i -

pattern analysis.and a population density analysts (with:a sunser beach and tourist populations).

]

j g.us.,

B.

SEco. ResDOnse

- em

[

!d.{,.f i,'

SECo. has contracted with KLD Associates (July 1986) to p updated ETE.

This firm is recognized nationally as an ex R;

providing evacuation time estimates and comprehensive traff,

~'

Their computer models have been validatedt u

management plans.

Mashington D.C. Intercity traffic flows and are presentlyi ~ntt FEMA as part of their Integrated Emergency Managemen i kyq.

Co. (Shoreham), Public Service of New m

$ae System (IEMIS).

7:M Island Light 1

( M ;=1). To odo Edison Co. (Davis-Besse) and Rochester GasEamd W 1

Their analytical work has been substantiated C

M?

Electric Co. (Ginna).

~,%

licMO by several ASL8 hearing panels.

While the final ETE report for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant;is. ;

.+f v scheduled for receipt by BEco. In June 1987 (ref 1), substantial' preliminary information was obtained during meetings and telephone The report's table of contentsi conversations with KLD in May.

(attachment 1) and summary of analytical methodology (attachment'2)(

Inforestion # :j:

are provided as the results of these discussions.ga L

available to the town and state emergency planning personnel. h M Table 1 provides comparative Evacuation Time Estimates for several' nuclear facility sites using conservative assumptions (see the Tabk The Pilgrim estimates are on the low side of the nors I footnotes).

and within the expected bounds for this population.

. = '

l..

i

.c Table l': C e arison of Evacuation Time Estimates Total Area.

Population

Site Population Sa. Miles Density ETE Davis Besse 74431 180 413 5:15 G1nna 57437 160 360 5:00 Shoreham 159959' 160 1000

.4:35 P11gris 106100 180 589 4:40 Assumptions:

1.

Total population is based upon a peak season scenario.

a ETE is based upon a simultaneous evacuation of J'

2.

The ETE reflects the planning bast's'of a rapidlyk) the entire EPZ.

s a.

3..

escalating accident.

4..The ETE's presented here reflect the use of*thePS:

a IDYMEV Model and comparable methodologies.;'..

e ThenewevacuationtimeestimatesforthePilgrimsitel'nIIt Thesesnumberm W there is 11ttle variance from the old estimates.includethe1 I.

varied time of day and year, and updated beach populationJd g

leille the new estimates are actually. lower, direct comparisons?

between the old vs.-new Pilgria ETE should be

~

L

', :;;3

'i become available.

..y BEco.recognizesthattheETEsmayneedtobeupdatedinthefutureP,j In order to do this, to remain current with population shifts.

arrangements have been made to procure the computer software and. ra data uhtch is specific to the P11 grim EPZ.

With this package, emergency planning personnel will also have the capability to graphically demonstrate evacuation s over the evacuation network, using animation techniques in l-user-interaction mode.

local and state emergency planning personnel so that they may.enterp data into the modeling process and maintain an accurate assessmen Evacuation Time Estimates in the future.

' l. * -

C.

Conclusion A new ETE has been generated using the most current population statistics (1980 census) and addressing recently identified issues that were outside the previous ETE work scope, (i.e., evacuation of

-The results beach population, and adverse weather condttions).

indicate that the updated statistics do not negatively affect evacuation planning which was done for the 1981 State and 1985 Town The original evacuation planning of these documents therefore plans.

remains valid.

The new ETE information is being incorporated into BECo. planning documents and BECo. will make the study avaliable to local and state emergency planning groups for inclusion into their plans.

A.f.b.

1?

m,

-

:i

'V N.

a'8 3

?:7 s - - - -

j..

i;. -

II. Shelterina'of Beach Populations A.

' Summary of' the Issue Transient beach / tourist populations need to be estimated and.

considered in emergency' planning for events.In which a shelter advisory.is recommended.

Shelter resources should be identified.to house these persons.

.\\

8.

SECo. Response Two elements are necessary for ensoring adequate planning for the sheltering of beach populations:':1):an estimate of the number of persons who will require sheltering and 2) identification of the facilities for sheltering that population.

j Estimates for the population requiring sheltering are contained in Section I, Evacuation Time Estimate of this submittal which discusses the ETE Report prepared by KLD Associates. Statistics for estlanting.

the beach population are presented in Section 2. Demand Estimations

. & ml:A

, 34 and Appendix H. Census Data of that report.

0 q

Sheltering of beach populations must consider beach /touristWW.[h population and populations of day workers in the region. Thslatteretre populationhasanindirecteffectonshelteringbeachpopulationsn#9

?'

>T because they will also occupy shelter space.

n Qi Estlantes for the beach / tourist population and the regional 4M l

y workers were taken from the KLD ETE Report and are presentedifn p

Tab Conservatively these numbers account for approximately'22,~922"ipfl?.g >

T

-2.people,distributedoverthefourtownswithrecreationalbeach'.areasg.$.

- Q.i$

w TABLE 2: Seacoast Area Populations (From KLD Associates ETE Study) 9, Day Norkers Tourists / Beach Population Total Number In Seacoast Renton of Pecolg_,

J_n_ Seacoast Renton n

T2m_

Plymouth 6754 6341 13095 Kingston 1116 1220 2336 i

Duxbury 516 6145 6661 660 830 l

Marshfield 170 l.

TOTALS 8556 14366 22922

,...t.

1. - -

In the early part of 1987,'BECo. contracted with Stone and Webster to conduct a comprehensive shelter study in the beach area (ref. 3).

Potential sheltering. capabilities of municipal and commercial buildings along the Massachusetts coastline within the ten-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) were identified.

The' towns in this region. from, north to south, are: Marshfield, Duxbury,: Kingston,- and ~

- Plymouth.

The coastline region shown is approximately one half' mile to one mile wide and is shown in Figure 1.

The first The study conducted by SNEC consisted of several steps.

step was.to contact various local, state, and federal organizations-to gather background information, including previous sheltering studies.

These organizations included.the Region 1 Office of'the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Massachusetts Civil-Defense Agency and Office of Emergency Preparedness (MCDA/0EP), and The Facility Survey Program (Ref. 4) the American Red Cross.

listings obtained from MCDA/0EP provided useful information for the

.I steiy.

The next step was to visit the Tax Assessors' offices at the town

' d. '

Available listings of all commerc141 4 propertiesandtax-exemptproperties(e.g.,municipalandfeb halls of the four towns.

s.

2' Maps were:obtsined?

buildings) in the study region were examined.

s.

field use..0f particular interest were the building addre's'srT: "<

1. i construction characteristics, and available floor space. Esch.'../ ' p$

building was then visually inspected to confirm the tax assessment M A list of potential shelters was developed freerthis2:Q information.

Information.

4.. Q;t c,

g Within the study region, Plymouth has.a total potentia.1 sheltering p M

?

2,370,000 square. feet in 164 public shelters; area of approximately 122,000 square feet in 22 public shelters; Duxbury has:

Kingston has 476,000 square feet in 60 public shelters; and Marshfield has 56.700' The number of persons.that'can ben square feet in 10 public shelters.

sheltered in a given area for a few hours can be estimated by dividing the potential sheltering area by a factor in the range of ten to twenty square feet per person.

The Fac111ty Survey Program-

.- 1 1

.(Ref. 4) uses ten square feet per person. Using this value, the

, areas given above indicate a pocential to provide short-term pubile-sheltering capacities'of 237,000 persons for Plymouth, 12,200 persons for Kingston, 47,600 persons for Duxbury, and 5,670 persons for Marshfield.

-Based upon the data available from~the SHEC Shelter Study, Table 3 indicates the percent of available~ shelter space needed to shelter beach / tourist and regional worker population.

l-C w artson of Shelter Capacity Versus Shelter Needs TABLE 3:

Total

-Potential 1 Needed Shelter of Total Capacity:

Shelter

1. of Persons Capacity:

E (Assuming Cay Morkers 10 Ft.1/ Person)

+ 8each/ Tourists

,Q[

Tgg at Plymouth 233,000 6

"'M' Kingston 12,200 19 Duxbury 47,600

.14 15:

Ug$

-Marshfteld S.670

))

.,.p i

i

,.t

b TOTALS 298,470 8

x, l

)

1 I

)

J 1

f <

Results of the SWEC Shelter Study, as summarized in Table 3, indicate:

that the Town of Kingston representing the worst case, would utilize only 19% of the total available space for sheltering beach and associated populations during an advisory. Other towns show significantly lower occupancy percentages, thus indicating a large surplus of sheltering capacity.

Per section A.3.8 of the 1981 Revision to the Massachusetts Radiological Emergency Response Plan, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts will evaluate which shelters of those identified warrant letters of agreement and make these arrangements to ensure their availability.

C.

Conclusion A shelter study was conducted to determine if adequate sheltering is The results, available for the beach and tourist population.

summarized in Table 3 above, indicate that on the average there is available approximately 12 1/2 times the shelter space required to shelter those persons which comprise the beach / tourist population.

This excess of sheltering capacity for even the most conservative population estimates demonstrates that adequate planning is possible for sheltering beach / tourist transient populations.

I III.

References _

Evacuation Time Estimate for the P11 grim Nuclear Power Station, 1.

KLD Associates, June 1987 l

Evacuation Time Estimate for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, 2.

HW4 Associates,1981 A Study to Identif_y Potential Shelters in the EPZ Coastline 3.

Realon of the P11 erie Nuclear Power Station, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation, April 1987 31, 1986, from Reception and Care Facility Listing as of May Facility Survey Program of the Federal Emergency Management 4.

Agency (1978 data).

\\ - - - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _

ATTACHMENT 1 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS SIe. _c_.t1911 T_it1e Paae 1.

INTRODUCTION 1.1 1-1 Overview of the Plan Update Process 1-1 1.2 Description of the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) 1.3 Preliminary Activities 1-3 1-5 2.

DEMAND ESTIMATION 2-1 Trip Generation; Permanent Residents; Seasonal Residents and Transients; Summer Residents; Tourists at Beaches, Parks and Historical Sites; Tourists at' Hotels and Motels; Tourists at Camps and Campsites; Estimation of Day-Trippers and Elimination of Double-counting; Employees; other Vehicles 3.

ESTIMATION OF HIGHWAY CAPACITY 3-l' Capacity Estimations on Approaches to Intersections; Capacity Estimation Along-3ll4j..

Sections of Highway; General Considerations; A :c...,

4.'

Application to Pilgrim EPZr Two-Lane Roads; "34 Freeway Capacity; Freeway Ramps; Fog; Link

,q Capacities

.t'

.9

.m 4,

4.

y, ;+

0M-ESTIMATION OF TRIP GENERATION TIME 4-10 Background; Fundamental Considerations;

/d Estimated Time Distributions of Activities Preceding Event 5; Time Distribution of the 4g Notification Process; Calculation of Trip Generation Time Distribution; Algorithm No. 1; Computed Time distribution of event k+1; Trip Generation Distributions for Week-end Scenarios; Trip Generation Distributions for Week-day scenarios; Snow Clearance Time Distribution 5.

DEMAND ESTINATION FOR EVACUATION SCENARIOS 5-1 6.

TRAFFIC CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT TACTICS, 6-1 7.

TRAFFIC ROUTING PLANS 7-1 8.

ACCESS CONTROL WITHIN, AND AT THE PERIPHERY A

OF, THE EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE (EPZ) AND DIVERSION ROUTES 8-1 Identification and Installation of Control Devices - _ - -

' TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)

-Section Title Pace 9.

EVACUATIO:4 TIME ESTIMATES (ETE) FOR GENERAL POPULATIOli 9-1 Discussi.on of'ETE; Example 1; Example 2;

'3 Example 3; Patterns of Traffic Congestion during Evacuation (Region 1, Scenario 1);

l Evacuation Ratest Summary of Evacuation i

Time Analysis

'j l

APPENDIX A - Glossary of Terms

.A-1 I

l APPENDIX B - Traffic Assignment Nodel B-1 i

APPENDIX C - Traffic Simulation Model: I-DYNEV C-1 APPENDIX D - Detailed Description of Study Procedure

[D- "..::

[r APPENDIX E - Supporting Data

".h'M APPENDIX F - Telephone' Survey Instrument

[.

I

,MN

,~ h ~

APPENDIX G - Tabulations of Telephone survey Data'

'6

':(

J f

APPENDIX H - 1980 Census-Data

,; 2l

. a i e:.l "L,y",

APPENDIX I - Traffic Management and Control Mj, j

'-s...

i 4')

APPENDIX J - Description of Evacuation Routes

.'TJ(1 n '.

l 3

t:i"^

APPENDIX K - Evacuation Route Maps

.E-1M,.z. #.4 nw.

p:.,7

.:l;W.

APPENDIX L - Access Control Idl1-7,-f i

r

^. i Ii

.%'Lf;

'QlW APPENDIX M - Estimated Traffic Demands at all Origin Centroids, Loading Rates and Origin-

h-~,'

i h><f.N.-

Destination Patterns M-1.

Q p

a$,. P APPENDIX N - Network Link Attributes N-1 ~

4 t

,[

M..M..

- yg

.47+-

• i

.,. W.

s

-Y

1. 4

. ~.

[.

ATTACHMENT 2 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ETE PROCEDURE 1

This attachment describes the activities performed in order to produce accurate estimates of evacuation times on the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) for-a nuclear power plant.

These steps accurately reflect the process used by i

KLD Associates to provide the ETE study for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.

3 l

Sten 1 The first activity is to obtain data defining the spatial distribution of population within the EPZ. Specifically, obtain the population in each of 160 cells of a polar grid which is centered at the nuclear station, and consists Transient population of 22.5* sections and rings spaced one mile apart.

F characteristics must also be estimated on the same basis.

.f 3,

}l4*-

,.. u,

,,,q W:fyl f;

%gl '

,r Stoo 2 g,..

The next activity is to examine a large-scale map of the EPZ.l.Th1 l

a l),

enables one to identify the access roads from each residential'!

f'.

l the adjoining elements of the analysis roadway network. Thisif R.."

necessary in order to assign generated trips to the correctilt 9

This map also enables one to represent the geometricsa 4

f l^ll network.

intersectiorisproperlyintermsoftheirnetworkconfigurationggq WL~

l yI,I il

.b I

lll,,

N1th this information absorbed, the next step is to conduct a physicah

~

l

~

The purpose of this surveyrisitisE

.rwh:. -

of the roadway system within the EPZ.

.m determine the necessary measurements of roadway length and of tie nude 66fW9 &;

f 9p;*p2h lanes on each link, the channelization of these lanes, whether or not?therei.g 1.Q were any turn restrictions or special treatment of traffic at intersections,V : @

.d?

andtogainthenecessaryinsightrequiredfor'estimatingrealisticvaluesfor$

(.j.N'h C

At each major intersection, take note of the trafficJ:

' Q b.'

roadway capacity.

control device which was installed.

In addition, determine whether or not,.

under emergency evacuation conditions, it would be possible-to employ paved-shoulders as an additional lane in the event such additional capacity was rj

,3

p: ' required.

,.. g%?P tn 4M[

Sten 4

' a. lv7p - ;

Withthisinformation,developtheevacuationnetworkrepresentationofthe?.jf

~

J-physical roadway system.

E

, l

\\

)

Steo 5 I

With the.ietwork drawn, proceed to estimate the capacities of each link and to locate the centroids where trips would be generated during the evacuation process and then enter the analysis network.

Step 6 Hith all the information at hand, it is time to perform the effort of creating the input stream for the Traffic Assignment Model.

This model was designed to be compatible with the Traffic Simulation Model used later in the project. In the sense that the input format required for one model was entirely compatible with the input format required by the other, thus avoiding dupitcation of This step in the procedure is labor-intensive.

Fortunately, this effort.

input stream need only be developed once; any changes made can be implemented quickly and at small cost. Thus, it is possible to execute these models on different scenarlos with very little effort needed to modify the basic input

}

stream to represent the specific attributes of each scenario.

J' N Steo 7 74gg After creating the input stream by using PREDYN, execute the Traffic'.h Y

Assignment Model. This computer program contains upwards of 1,000 diagnostic'7

?

W inconsistencies and any other improper input.

This diagnostic. softwares,. "'T.Q h;

produces messages which assist the user in identifying the source ofithe.:

'jg problem and guide the user in preparing the necessary corrections. O m

su n

e Stoo 8 Nith the input stream free of error, execute the Traffic Assignment Model.

1 The Traffic Assignment program is a very efficient software code.

Steo 9 The next activity is to examine critically the statistics produced by the This is a labor-intensive activity, requiring the Traffic Assignment program.

direct participation of skilled engineers who possess the necessary practical experience to interpret the results and to determine the causes of any problems reflected in the result.

Essentially, the approach is to identify those " hot spots" in the network It 153then which represent locations where congested conditions are extreme.

This cause can take many.

necessary to identify the cause of this cengestion.

forms, either as excess demand due to improper routing, as a shortfall of capacity, or as a quantitative error in the way the physical system was represented in the input stream. - - - _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _____

~

l The examl_ nation of the. Traffic Assignment output leads to one of two L

conclusions:

The results are as satisfactory as could be expected at this stage of f

l the, analysis process, or Treatments must be introduced in order to improve the flow of; traffic.

3 e-This decision ~ requires, of course, the application of the user's judgment based.upon'the results obtained in previous applications of the Traffic Assignment Model.and a comparison-of.the results of this last case with the previoc ones.

In the event the results are satisfactory, in the opinion of the user then the process continues with the exercise of the simulation model in Step 12. Otherwise, proceed to Step 10.

l Sten 10 There are many " treatments" available to the user'in resolvlag such problems.

These treatments range from decisions to reroute the traffic by rn.

I restrictions where they can produce significant Improvements.tn

~l f

y<>

changing the control; treatment at critical intersections so7ist

-:4

Improved service for one or more movements, or in prescribinglspec treatments for channelling the flow so as to expedite the movement if-along major roadway systems or changing the trip table. Suchi"tr s 4

tst

y taketheformofmodificationstotheoriginalinputstream(y~

x,

..n a

I E.

He then perform the modifications to the input stream, reflect 1 treatments described above. As indicated previously, such modif ttolns h - "

implementedquicklytotheextentthatmorethanoneexecutionlof; f.)

m ",

.p.3:[l program is possible in a single day.

4 0

]t,,

f?;

Stoo 11 T[

7, As noted above, the physical changes to the input stream must be implemented <

in order to reflect the changes in the control treatments undertaken in Step.

f

10. At the completion of this activity, the pr'ocess returns to Step Stuhere; the Traffic Assignment Model is once again executed.

Sten 12 The output of the Traffic Assignment Model includes the computed turn-movements for each link.

If the user is executing the Traffic Assignment and. #

theTrafficSimulationmodelsinasinglerun,thenthisdata-isautomatica11f,.E accessed by the latter model.

Ifthesimulationmodelisexecutedfseparately??g the user must modify the input stream for the Traffic Assignment model by.

- T.

beginning in the turn-movement data, using PREDYN.

f, c.

Sten 13 After the input stream has been debugged, the simulation model is executed to provide the user with detailed estimates,. expressed as statistical measures of effectiveness (MOE), which describe the detailed performance of traffic j

operations on each link of.the network.

l Sten 14 In this step, the' detailed output of the. Traffic Simulation Model is examined in order to identify once again the problems which exist on the network.

The results of the simulation model are extremely detailed and are far more accurate in their ability to describe traffic operations than those provided by the Traffic Assignment Model.

Thus, it is possible to identify the cause of the problems by carefully studying the output.

Again, one can implement corrective treatments designed to expedite the flow- ' '.;

of traffic on the network in the event that the results are considered to bet,

less. efficient than is possible to achieve. In the event'that(c 9

needed, the analysis process proceeds to Step 15. On[the Dy-results were satisfactory, then one can decide whether71t41 return to Step 8 to execute the Traffic Assignment Model

E the whole process, or to accept the final results as being; Nj be achieved within the reasonable constraints of budget and5.tl Generally, if there are no changes indicated by the activitt'is?

W Qt then we can conclude that all results were satisfactoryFandt R

Otherwise, we have tofri proceed to document them in Step 17.

In order to determine the effects of the changes implemented;1.nt c.c y

This determination: canton optimal routing patterns over the network.

g ascertained by. executing the Traffic Assignment Model.

' " ' ' y'h. g.

t 4.qp,,

9 p p.

M.$,

p..

f,hI Sten 15

..e.%.V NT T;y-This activity laplements the changes in control treatments or in the assignment of destinations associated with one or more origins in order to fp,,.,

These treatments.can also " 's,

1 laprove the flow of traffic over the network.

V

4.. 2, include the consideration of additional roadway segments to the extstings.

7.;

It analysis network in order to disperse the traffic demand and thus avoid the -

.M' focusing of traffic demand which can produce high levels of congestion.

\\

.r j

Sten 16 gk..,g Once the treatments have been identified, it is necessary to modify the!!nput h g

,en 3

At the completion of this effort, the procedure retu 3 /:

stream accordingly.

5

[

to step 13 to execute the simulation model once more.

r.p Stoo 17 I

The results!

The simulation results are then analyzed, tabulated and graphed.

}

are then documented, as required. l L_.

s-,

ATTACHMENT 3 SHELTER STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Section LIST OF. TABLES AND FIGURES INTRODUCTION APPROACH Initial Work Municipal Tax Records Visual Inspection Shielding Factors u.

fr' Residential Shelters 4-g'

'jp Large Special-Needs Factiftles

' \\g s

RESULTS l,-,

Public Shelters j'

Residential Shelters Jordan Hospital

i.,

f Plymouth County House of Correction g;j$..

.k S,

REFERENCES Y:

LIST OF TABLES Title Number _

Sample Shelter Survey Form 1

Plymouth - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 2

Kingston - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 3

Duxbury - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 4

Marshfield - Characteristics of Potential Public Shelters 5

l Residences with Basements 6

Sheltering Characteristics of Special-Needs Facilities

• 7 LIST OF FIGURES Map of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station EPZ Area 1

(showing shelter study region)

Jordan Hospital Sheltering Areas 2 - - -

~'

p,

\\

FIGURE 1 3

Y Qk g SHELTER STUDY REC 10N j

WARSHflELD

-/

139 t

13 EN8AOKE

's.

/

N 4

s

/-

N 14

/

f

/

14

/

t.\\ g 3RRET L_

4 s

anant Ar M ME

,A

,1

/ \\-d

/

/

Ol:

i

'6

\\

W y

t

1. k

\\

ATLANTICQ g'

\\

/

• [

iti:

,,4

,/

WW ji..

\\/

Amy,9fMF 1

Y

...s.-

N..*fSe OCEAN? *;

U r

N

' 's E0F

..i s

L-

\\

g Pt,YlMTH a

N

\\

-s

\\g CMVER

\\

\\

\\

N s

/

%g

-//

{

N i

N

,, L -

-g e

/

WMOM

(

/,

/

/

(/ W te I - _ _ _ _

)

(.

H0BILITYIMPAIRED The following information resolves a FEMA concern involving the Mobility This information updates that Impaired population within the Pilgrim EPZ.

presented in the 1981 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Radiological Emergency Response Plan and the 1985 Radiological Emergency Response Plans for the Towns of Carver, Ouxbury, Kingston, Marshfleid and Plymouth.

A.

Summary of the Issue _

Emergency Planning provisions for the mobility impaired (deaf and hearing impaired, transit dependent, handicapped) populations within the EPZ towns These populations need to be identifled and planning are inadequate.

performed to assure their safety during an emergency.

B.

BECo. Response _

Boston Edison has developed a special needs survey (attachment 1).which "'

3

~ ~ ' "

The surve was malled to more than 35,000 households in May, 1987.

.t s..

designed to identify the number of persons that were:mobtiftyjimia

@ME!.

(visual, hearing, handicapped, transit dependent), or in;need?of/ spec

~

As of 6/1/87 approximate 1yfi,200%

equipment to facilitate an evacuation.

persons have responded and indicated that some assistanc requestingdeafandhearingimpairedpersonscontactSEcobandemakes.cgg required.

Ty To ensure continued U,. T ^, p G

arrangements for emergency notification. identification of the noblit c

r U

D 1mplement an outreach program to periodically resurvey the area..

.(.,

.,j Survey responses by the public are being analyzed to determine the.

i

[.N measures that must be taken to ensure that the mobility impaired are?

adequately nottfled and supported should protective action recossendations

' T 4-

'a be made during an emergency.

BEco. is developing a computer database which w111 be used to track: names, p

N' Equipment to addresses, and special equipment provided to town residents.

be tracked includes Telecommunication Devices (TTDs) and telephone-amplification devices which will ensure that the hearing impaired are.

1 Additionally it is BEco.'s recommendation to the state that notified.

+,

televised EBS messages should incluoe closed captioned emergency instructions.

Procedures will be developed to document EECo. administration of the Oraft sections of town and state plans have mobility impaired program.

been submitted to them for their plans and procedures and await their revleu and comments. A synopsis of these follows.

1.

Physically Impaired A Ilst of physically impaired residents, compiled through the BEco.

survey, will be maintained by the Town Civil Defense 01 rectors at the Emergency Operations Centers.

Notification will be via the prompt Special public alerting system or previously determined means.

(ref. Area II, Operations Plan,Section V.H.3.c).

O_

-e ATTACHMENT 1 1

l SPECIAL NEEDS SURVEY

.n i

if you or someone who lives with you would need transportation e-or modification'7 #j he. assistance in,the event an evacuation order were given; please cosapletely fill [ouydjif"~

j{nturn'in the postage paid envelope N Q$,@;g 1

.s. q;3 m.,

N A g gestal,~549[h3~

g, :, ',

.j

^-

9 e

., e.

s,..

Visseuy Impekat7...........- [ ]

o g" '..

Hearing Impsked7........... [ ]

usedAmendmR

f., a i

wve -

MoldEty Isopahed?.......... [ ]

If yes,"' '

d4%

< <. v-anunwu Bedrkhism?................. [ ]

m4WoWWMA "r

a N*o o Other Mh?........... [ ]

8"""'

If yes, clarify Wookt you moodejideIn$"

h#

I the case of as BNeinielentI;,>.

3

-^p myA's.g; 3 gy.

'/qf.(.

p tQ;;

i r.

w;1 k.

^:

I g%s -

e 8 *.ie

,. y

. g'.I. '.'

J. 't I'

, f.a.?'*

'tm',

D E

Y e

I m

w

.A,.

C

=

I J

4 _

' (,

h. _

SPECIALFACILITIES m

(

]

The following information resolves a FEMA concern ~ involving Special Facilities.

within the EPZ. 'This information updates that presented in-the 1981 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Radiological Emergency Response Plan and the 1985 Radiological Emergency-Response Plans for the Towns of Carver, Duxbury, Kingston -Marshfleid and Plymouth.

j A.

Summary of the Issue The current State and Town plans do not adequately address sheltering or evacuation of special facilities (e.g. schools, day care centers, etc.).

Special factilties within the EPZ need to be' identified and detalled plans developed for their emergency response.

B.

BECo. Response Approximately 65 special facilities and 35 camps with

.n hon The.1dentif.1 book reviews, and contacts with professional agencies.

facilitiesweresurveyedinApril1987(Attachment 1)todeterminE?sechM 3-facility's present level of emergency preparedness, resources, p n

contact, and special sheltering or evacuation requirements whichtaust?

The results of the survey wereleval considered during an emergency.factittles categorized, and generic pl (e.g. schools,daycarecenters,summercamps, correctional-Inst 1tutlyns, M,,..

g.. m,. +g Meetings were held with each facility director to determine the need.for For facilities ver1 fled in possession of adequate v

site specific plans.

For fac111tles without plans, the plans, no further action was taken.

generic plans were modified to include specific information such'as factitty director comments, checklists, telephone numbers, an emergency response procedures.the first week of June 1987 (ref j The special facility survey results, particularly t Per made available to the town and state emergency planning agencies.

section A.3.8 of the 1981 Revision to the Massachusetts Radiological Emergency Response Plan, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts w these needs and obtain the necessary letters of agreement to ens support from the private sector.

MCDA Area II Operations Plan contains the provision for the state to provide special transportation arrangements for institutional 1 red during an emergency.

BECo. has procured five hundred tone alert rad This system will be ensure notification in the event of an emergency. supp tested and replaced when inoperable.

L - - -_

y

,n

.j.

t I

-The. effort to develop _'and improve plans:and procedures for special.

l

-facilities ls'an' ongoing process. Attachment 2 is the listing of those-facilities for which specific plans have been or are in the process of

~

.being developed.

A synopsis Of typical special facility emergency response. actions are provided by category as follows:

]

.I a..

Schools 1

Twenty-eight schools (attachment 2) were identified within the EPZ.as:

4 Following notification, the Superintendent of Schools of 5/22/87.

for each town notifies each Principal within his jurisdiction to take the' recommended protective action.

This would include implementation of early dismissal procedures, sheltering of students at schools or i

~'

evacuating students to a reception center. Procedures to accomplish these protective actions are being developed by 8Eco. and the appropriate' school officials and will be provided to each facility.

If additional resources are necessary, the' requesting principal (s):

will contact the superintendent in the appropriate' town who~will

,y, contact the Area II E0C. Area II will be responsible for

' ;p;.

coordinating any additional resource needs.

^4,

',w.[

_Dgy Care Centers

' b.

Twenty-one day care centers (attachment 2) were id 3 8 EPZ as of 5/22/87.

Following. notification,shelteringatDayCarej/3i 5.'

Centers would be accomplished according to estabitshed Emergencyi 1 y" '

In the event that an evacuation 1s-recommended, the Day.

i.

Procedures.

Care Center Director, or his designee, would be' contacted by the-Clvil Defense Director located at the EOC. The Day Care Center l

Director, under advisement of the Civil Defense Director, would I

initiate established emergency procedures to effect an evacuation and relocation to the appropriate Reception Center.

If additional resources are necessary, the requesting Day Care Center Director (s) w111 contact the Superintendent of Schools in the Area II v111 be appropriate town who will contact the Area II EOC.

responsible for coordinating any additional resource needs, c.

Summer Canos Thirty-five summer camps (attachment 2) were identified within the EPZ as of 5/22/87.

Following notification by the town civil defense director (s), camp directors will be instructed to either shelter or Should an evacuation be directed, cans personnel will be evacuate.

transported by camp owned buses or vans and private automobiles to The the nearest potential public shelter and/or reception center.

town civil defense director (s) maintains a list which identifies t potential public shelters. l

y d.

Ja11s and Detention Centers 1

There are two facilities which fit into this category.and both are located within the town of Plymouth.

These fac111tles are the Plymouth County House of Correction and the Massachusetts Correctional Institute in Plymouth.

They will be alerted of any a

emergency via tone alert radios.

The Director of each of the facilities will be notified by the Plymouth Police of a l

recommendation to shelter or evacuate and will take appropriate The procedures are being protective actions according to procedure.

developed by BECo. In coordination with the faclltty directors.

Reception for inmates, in the event of an evacuation, will be provided by the Massachusetts Correct!snal Institution in Transportation will be accomplished via buses and vans Bridgewater.

provided by each institution, with additional backup available from the National Guard.

The local jalls in each town do not need extensive planning because most prisoners are released after a few hours following posting of ball.

If further detention is necessary they are transferred to the county faellity.

j-$ll e.

Nursina Homes J.5 )f;f

,M There are twelve nursing homes located in the EPZ which w1ll-be-The nursingshome:

alerted of any emergency via tone alert radios.

director will receive notification of any emergency from.t s

director and will take the appropriate protective action accordingito s

The site specific emergency procedures are beingt

' ~ ;@fS procedure.

developed by 8ECo. with input from the facility director.1 In;the-W t

l event of an evacuation, residents who cannot be relocated.byc.

~.4' automobile will be moved by bus, ambulance, or other appropriate Ambulance transportation will be provided by the Fire vehicle.

Department and coordinated with the Health Director.

f,,

Hospitals _

Jordan Hospital is the only hospital in the EPZ and it will be In the event of an notifled of an emergency via tone alert radios.

emergency at P11gris Nuclear Power Station, the hospitalIf administrator would be nottfled by the Health Director.

evacuation is recommended, many of the patients would be evacuated by private automobiles or buses in coordination with the Health Intensive care and orthopedic patients who need Director.

life-support systems or special care in evacuation will be transported by the Fire Department Ambulance Service by ambulance or other appropriate vehicle and coordinated with the Health Director.

The protection factor afforded by hospltal building structures would, in many cases, be sufficient to allow shelter-in-place as aThis will be appropriate protective action. administrators in coordination with health officials..

4

^

If necessary, patients of Jordan Hospital would be evacuated to designated hospitals outside.the plume exposure pathway Emergency-Planning Zone. Specific facility procedures are being developed by BECo. in' concert with the hospital staff.

j C.

BEco.' Conclusion BECo. has established a program to identify special facilities within the EPZ and incorporate them into the emergency planning process. Adequate-emergency response' plans for each special facility nave either becn verified or have been or are being developed by BECo. in coordination'with The list of special facilities will be the special facility director (s).Each facility plan will be on file with MCDA and updated annually.

local EOC's, and will be periodically reviewed and updated.

D.

References Governor Winslow School, Marshfleid, Mass., Radiological Emergency -

k 1.

J.,..i > "

'N.e Response Plan.

ld.Y?Q

~

• }..

Manomet Elementary School, Plymouth, Mass., Radiological Emergenc % '

a -

2.

• N Response Plan.

. ;3 n

PilgrimManorNursingHome, Plymouth, Mass.,RadiologicalEm

.y l

e' 't,

rg..

)

3.

Response Plan.

J ;kl Camp Ming, Duxbury, Mass., Radiological Emergency

/

q u. e r> y t

4.

,n-jf.

5 3

s 4

t 4-i

c i r. v e..._ i n t.

l FACILITY NAME:

l TYPE:

.. L l LOCAll0N:

,i FACll!TY ADMINISTRATOR:

i BUSINESS TELEPHONE NUNSER:

HOME TELEPHONE IIUMBER:

1 ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR:

,8USIMSS TELEPHOIE INAMBER:

NorE TELEPHOIE IIWWER:

1.0 POPEATICII 1.1 MAXINN1 IESIDEIIT POPEAT1011 1.2 MAXIMWI STAFF POPW.ATICII 1.3 IANGER OF IIGI6-APSIP.ATORY PER50115 c iY :

1.4 ~ De VOU HAVE ANY MeansarTS TIIAT IESINE 7,

Ji SPECIAL ATTENTICIIIII AIIEVAC18ATMNI?

<(

1

• <r n*

1.5 IF SO, HOW MANV?

.. ;i..

9

- *;,;.: p

/c 1.6 PLEASE IDENTIFY TIEIIt MSPECTIVE SPECIAL ATTDMSIS

, 7, 'e n'

..'aaS 2

6.

.m 2

~

.* f f. ;9 s;,g 4'

.1

',k...

1... :y -

't a

rI,'f'

4. :e

• li?

- m, w

'7,'. u ',' a ',

'd ",l..

N%

q;g

. c ~-

- (

c J

)

2.0 EVACUATICII 2.1 DO YOU HAVE AII EVACUAT10II PLAIIT

.(

2.2 tREIE WOIRD IESIDENTS DE ELOCATEDT 84 I

^

w c;.

2.3 DO YOU HAVE A LETTER OF AGIEEfElfT WITH THAT FACKITYt 2.4 DO YOU FEEL THAT YOU HAVE ADESAATE IIES0WICES TO SUCCESSFULLY EMC AII EVACUAT100l?

If IIOT, PLEASE 80ENTIFY TMSE CONSTRAltlTS?

1 i i i

i

__._._____________._.___.______________________Q

n i

i 2.5 HOW LOII6 WOULO IT TAKE TO PREPARE THE RES10ENTS l-FOR AN EVACUATION AND HAVE THEM READY TO 80ARD I

Eft'R6EIICY VEHICLEST i

t s'

TIME NEEDED TO PREPARE (MlIIUTES)

DAY-Tiff NI6HT Tiff -

I At180LATORY IION-AtSULATORY SEDRIDGEII WDEEL CIAIR

- 3.0 TRANSPORTATICII li.,

3.1 000W MAIIY OF TIE FOLLOWIIIS VEDIBCLES 90 VOU NAVE AVAEABLE?

,,, vs. $,. y,p.

Y; f,

d

~

f,

??

OWII ^= M WE 5 *.ITE armer a mn e--*=.,,. yp.-.yc;

.{,

j g igTypt assaneers casarsyys u;;/

' " fj {"~

OIISES -

4'p ':-

A;'$,..

. ;;. 'j;

~%.

VAN 5 ytc, ryg

^;

.A d.;ts i

PM

! (,

AISLEAIICES i.y

+

g ).

l.5FT WANS 1 h.

t, PA N D

,v.

CARS

..pe} < -,

..e

• lN PERSONS

@h'.

-e eh 'T 6 -

M$;0

!??

d s;qw.

. Wl.s

^'W 3.2 IIgW ttANY ADDITIONAL VENICLES. IF Alff. WOIED SE IEEBED TO SERVICE TIE TOTAL POPULATIGII 0F Velst FACKITYT CGIISIDER TIE IEED TO SWPLY STAFF SWPIRT EMEN Als THE AVAILABILITY OF STAFF OWIED VDOCLES.

se,:

wr = rTypt capAcaTV -

1 y,

i' staaerg

.p V_Aase AfMEAIICES LIFT VAIIS PASSEIIGER c_ADC

/f

3,3 ARE P21VATE CONTRACTORS OR LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS USED TO l

L-SUPPLY BUSES?

i 1

IF S0. IDENTIFY AND INDICATE NUMBER OF BUSES SUPPLIED e

p' j

COMPANY.

gyr,6ER OF BUSES SUPPtlED i

4.0 IIOTiflCATICII 4.1 UPOII HOTIFICATl011, telAT OTER IINHVIOUALS WILL YOU CALL?

EAff TITLE Tra =_

... [..

_ =...

d j ;.

r;

.' p/

-dk;,^Y99 5.,

i 4

m,,,.7

a.,.i.

+, -

. :: 7

'; Cf Wi; f f,

'y[';;.;

,n

~:

F:M?

. i,9 r '..;.

.Q.

' ;..I;.,'hgk

' [4

'T

^

t' N

y.s 5 4. SIELTEltIIIS

,,;. 9 vgv tW 5.1 00 VOII HAVE A SHFATEltIIIS PLAIIT

.., p ~

.xg.

A ;?t... 6.e' -aTICII.

k[M' 6.1 IIOW flAIIT IISIVIBMALS III YOUIt STAFF WILL M IESPOIISIBLE FOR

.i IIMDENTIIIS TIE EFEIISENCY PLAIIT i

3

.s MAfE.

TITLE EfERAEMCY FtmCTNE MPIETE TS W

! - l

.. y, ATTACHMENT 2 SEECIAL FACIL111 Q l

)

DJXJ!URY l

Day Care Centers:

l 1

8errybrook School, Inc. (585-2307)

First Parish Nursery'(934-6532)

Good Shepherd Nursery School (934-6007)

Learn in Play Preschool (585-9048)

North Hill Country (934-5800) s,W Pied Piper Preschool (585-5070) 1-ia -

a.((,

7.3',

St. John's Nursery School (934-6523) 8 y@'

fk$_f ;

hi' Schools:

P.YY l

-[ [.:

Munch-Kin Montessori / Bay Farm Academy (934-7101) i:

y.L 3lW:.-

Ellison High School (934.-6541) f!M, ;

i Intermediate School (934-6521)

Chandler Street School (585-4318)

. Elementary School (lower) (934-6528)

Elementary School (upper) (934-5667)

Nursina Homes:

Duxbury House Nursing Home (585-2397)

Bay Path Nursing Home (585-5561) e d

CMEt11 Blairhaven (934-5123)

Camp Hing (837-6144)

May 22, 1987 i

~

SPECIAL FACll,ll,lES MARSHFIE.LD Schools:

Governor Hinslow School (837-2871)

Canos:

Camp Daniel Webster Camp Millbrook

?tfgi.f.

. ;.,,,, s

.:i.

, y,

.,: i-l ;

' ' * :f[<

lgj

. ',. g.

' ';t i i'

-i a May 22, 1987 o

+ '

SP.ECIALf6CIMIES PLYMOUTH Day Care Centers:

Cooperative Child Care (746-0612)

Happy l Day Nursery School (746-0812)

' Jack and Jill' Nursery (224-2526)

)

Kidsport, Inc. (747-4733)

Kinder Haus. Nursery School-(746-6038)

M; Seven Hills Nursery School (746-4275)

W1

'W:

.Mr

.'/ *?

Little People's Place (746-5989)

,. y i%

t Kinder College, Inc. (224-8753) q'zpf 94 Zion Christian Pre-School (746-3213) 00:7 J

's Methodist Nursery School (746-7063) g, Schools:

c.,

Pinewood School Montessori, Inc. (746-5127)

Hedge School (746-1140)

(St. Peter.'s Kindergarten)

Cold Spring School (746-0708) 2, Oak Street School (746-1661)

Mt. Pleasant School (746-1097) l Mest Elementary School (747-0435)

Plymouth Carver Intermediate School (746-8450)

I Federal 'rurnace School (746-5134) 130 Court Street (Pupil Personnel)

May 22, 1987 !

i SPECIALf3C1QIIES PMMOUTH Sch00151 (Continued)

Manomet Elementary School (224-3940)

Indian Brook School (224-6753)

South School (224-8186)

Nathaniel Morton School (746-6500)

Plymouth Carver Regional HS (746-4700)

.4

" f$

[.lJ['

Nursina Names:

'?$,'

Plymouth Nursing Home (746-2085)

,,l..

W..

Mayf1wer House Nursing Home (746-4343)

Y

'. i'T,..

Pilgrim Manor Nursing Home (746-7016) g.j, "O

Newfield House Convalescent Home (746-2912)

W

- 1;-

E.

Happiness House Rest Home (746-2982)

Beverly Manor Home (747-4790)

Jails:

Plymouth County House of Correction (746-0610)

Town of Plymouth Jail (746-1212)

Hospitain Jordan Hospital (746-2000)

May 22, 1987 - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - -

c.

'Sf1CIALfEIMIlf.S PLYMOUTH l

Ctajan Blueberry Hill (746-3708)

)

Indian Head Resort (888-3688)

Ellis Haven (746-0803)'

Sandy Pond Campground (759-9336)

]

. Pinewood Lodge Trailer Park (746-3548)

'.g::;b, '

ist Miles Standish SF (866-2526)

" '..W.xa M

N>,6;." -

Plymouth Rock K0A Campground (947-6435)

Camp Clark (888-2290) ih,.

fh,.

<N, 5

Camp Massasoit (888-6484)

Qi

,s 9..

• g,~I'*

_u Camp Squanto (224-2010)

. v;l(^-

,[

Camp Norse Boy Scouts (746-2256)

Pinewood Camp (224-3480)

., +.

.i Camp Bournedale (888-2634)

Camp Child (224-2080)

Camp Dennen (888-1939) j l

Baird Center (224-3041) j Hind in the Pines Girlscout Center May 22, 1987 - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - ___

.o,,

4 l

f l

l-SPECIALEACILLIIES -

l l

PLYMOUTH Cg_astsi (Continued)

' Camp Dorothy Carleton l

l Timberland - Cedarwood I

- Plymouth Recreation Center Camp H.M. Arthur Country Dance and Song Society of America l

, ;. t. '

a?.

I n..

s

'* 2:

. f.

Mi.(i

[,y.;p; '

Q '

TI 3

?..

1 l

i l

l r-I l

1 May 22, 1987 l \\

r

SPECIAL FACI 1JTlLS KIEGSION Day _ Care Centers:

i Growth Unlimited Preschool (585-5864) f Sunny Acres Schools:

Silver Lake Regional HS (585-6544)

~,6 Kingston Eles.entary/ Intermediate School (585-3821)

,Qff f 8ff..

Q.!g;g Sacred Heart Elementary School (746-2113) 6@

1 uc p,.

y/4'9/ '

Sacred Heart Junior / Senior HS (746-2374)

'A$g.

~ '_ i, ' ~ >.

th 0'

I.

Sacred Heart Pre - Primary School (746-0350) h; T.

t-

.3

.. j'[

~',};

ft 6l

.2 T'

' Nursing Homes:

n 5I>;.'i Provincial Residence (746-0570)

DET',

[(!\\;p((.

Evanswood Retirement Apts. (585-2576) sep.

Margaret M. Carter Vets Home (585-6028) 9,b

E

Meadowcrest Apts. (585-8028)

Blueberry Hill Rest Home (585-3657)

Q;tl Camps:

s.

Camp Misbannock (746-0790) 1 3 L May 22, 1987 t l

t.

/,.

4 s..

) ",

f,.

x,-

. SELCML FACll,U,{ES C EAfE Day Care Centers:

Captain Pal Preschool (866-5415)

- Cranberry Crossings (866-2400)

)

i Schools:

L, Governor John Carver School (866-5361)

. r. i w

• ')

Benjamin Ellis School (866-3348)

_..p$5

'E !

4 f-Q{.[" s

~;<id

' in,s

,c a :

.)El E p rsing Homes:

.{J.H V'

un:..

fr.;.

g.;;

Hilltop Nursing Home (866-4548) 1.2-Ud.

4:.

..,,:.)k

&\\

' Q' 1;*

.fN (t,

[J.

p

l[;,y Camps:

u! : -

79 y'!

(.;/ //' '

Camp Clear (866-4549)-

n $.&; '

v 77,.N.g,4q y -

ST.'., :

Web of Life Outdoor Education Center (866-5353)

E. '

.. -:. L.

x> e k.

' t v.q.s Cachalot Scout Reservation (295-2117)

v;,

i

c ; -

-9 l 4, s j

k h.E

Miles Standish State Forest (866-2526) amh

'!YjfES@E,' Shady Acres (866-4040) dyt : b' h, p.'.ir" Jarvio Concho (866-4511) s Pinewood May (866-3392)

Pine Acres Campground

?;;q.;

,.nl?.

v

., 'n :

..., -g j

l l

May 22, 1987 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _