ML20236A836
| ML20236A836 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1987 |
| From: | Mark Miller Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | James O'Reilly GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236A838 | List: |
| References | |
| IEC-77-15, TAC-65784, NUDOCS 8710230171 | |
| Download: ML20236A836 (2) | |
Text
I a
Distribution Docket Nos.:
50-424 and 50-425 i ocket File, FWitt D
g y 51987 NRC PDR ANotafracesco 1
Local PDR JKudrick l
Mr. James P. O'Reilly PRC System JWermiel Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations PD#23 Reading JCraig j
Georgia Power Company MDuncan CMcCracken P. O. Box 4545 MMiller SVarga i
Atlanta, Georgia 30302 SKirslis Glainas OGC-Bethesda
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
ACRS (10)
{
Subject:
Staff Acceptance of Technical Justification Regarding the Adequacy of Vogtle Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tank Zinc Coating (TAC 65784)
License Condition 2.C(8) of the Vogtle Unit 1 full-power license (NPF-68) dated March 16, 1987, states:
Prior to restart following the first refueling, GPC shall (1) replace the zinc coating in the diesel generator fuel oil storage tanks with a coating which does not contain zine or (2) by March 1,1988, provide an acceptable justification to the staff that the present fuel oil storage tank zinc-based coating will not affect the operability and reliability of the diesel generators over the life of the plant as specified in IE Circular 77-15.
By letters dated July 13 September 30, and October 15, 1987, Georgia Power Company (GPC) provided technical information in support of item (2) of the license condition. The staff has completed its review of these submittals and concludes that the zinc coating in the diesel generator fuel oil storage j
tanks will not affect the operability and reliability of the diesel generators.
Therefore, GPC has satisfactorily resolved the above license condition.
The staff's detailed evaluation is enclosed.
This evaluation also applies to Unit 2.
The Technical Specifications on the fuel oil regarding neutrali-zation number and mercaptan content shall remain in effect on Unit 1 and should be included in the Technical Specifications proposed for Unit 2 Sincerely,
\\9 8710230171 871015 lanie A. Miller, hoject Manager PDR ADOCK 05000424 Project Directorate 11-3 P
PDR Division of Reactor Projects, I/II
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES Of R/DRP-I/II PD#II-3/DRP-I/II PD#II-3/DRP-I/II PD#II-3/DRP-I/II
'sr7mac
- SKirslis
- MDuncan
- DHood, Acting PD 10/
87 10/15/87 10/15/87 10/15/87 NRR/ECEB NRR/ECEB NRR/SPLB NRR/SPLB NRR/SPLB
- FWitt
- CMcCracken
- JCraig
- JKudrick
- ANotafrancesco 10/09/87 10/09/87 10/15/87 10/15/87 10/15/87
l 4
a t
8(pa Mouq.
J jo,,
. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.n g
<t WASHINGTON, D C. 20555 -
h g.....,o
~
OCT j$,gg, Docket Nos.: 50-424 and 50-425 l
l Mr.. James P. O'Reilly Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 1
Atlanta, Georgia 30302 l
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Subject:
Staff Acceptance of Technical Justification Regarding the Adequacy.of Vogtle Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tank Zinc Coating j
\\
License Condition 2.C(8) of the Vogtle Unit 1 full-power license (NPF-68) 1 dated March 16, 1987, states:
l Prior to restart following the first refueling, GPC shall (1)-
i replace the zinc coating in the diesel generator fuel oil I
l storage tanks with a coating which does not contain zine or (2) by March 1, 1988, provide an acceptable justification to l
the staff that the present fuel oil storage tank zinc-based coating will not affect the operability and reliability of l
the diesel generators over the life of the plant as specified i
in IE Circular 77-15, i
l By letters dated July 13, September 30, and October 15, 1987, Georgia Power 1
Company (GPC) provided technical information in support of item (2) of the license condition. The staff has completed its review of these submittals and concludes that the zinc coating in the diesel generator fuel oil storage tanks will not affect the operability and reliability of the diesel generators.
Therefore, GPC has satisfactorily resolved the above license condition.
The l
staff's detailed evaluation is enclosed.
This evaluation also applies to Unit 2.
The Technical Specifications on the fuel oil regarding neutrali-zation number and mercaptan content shall remain in effect on Unit 1 and J
should be included in the Technical Specifications proposed for Unit 2.
1-Sincerely, 0.
l Melanie A. Miller, Project Manager Project Directorate II,
l Division of Reactor Projects, I/II
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page
~_
- - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _