ML20236A664

Responds to Util 870520 & 0916 Ltrs Requesting Amend to Facility Physical Security Plan.Acceptance of Changes Recommended.Salp Evaluation Rept & Revised License Condition Encl.Safeguards Evaluation Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)

ML20236A664
Person / Time
Site:	Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date:	10/20/1987
From:	Randy Erickson Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TAC-65616, NUDOCS 8710230012
Download: ML20236A664 (3)

Text

, _ - - - _ __ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - . .- _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

Ee: 'hh.h .D3 OMW -.

, 'o s iDocket No. 50-344 N MEMORANDUM.FORi' George Knighton, Director l<gi DC122 A D 03 Project' Directorate V-Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V and Special Projects FROM: Robert A'. Erickson, Chief Reactor Safeguards Branch Division of Reactor-Inspection-and Safeguards SUDJECT: PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

'to TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT PHYSICAL SECURITY PLAN CHANGE 10 CFR 50.90 SUBMITTAL (TAC # 65616)

.This is in response to the May 20, and September 16, 1987 letters.from the Portland General: Electric Company (PGE) requesting an amendment to the Operating yghnseforTrojanNuclearPlant. 'We recommend that these changes be accepted.

Enclosed are a Revised License Condition (Enclosure 1) and a SALP Evaluation Report (Enclosure 2). The Safeguards Evaluation Report (SGER) 1s being withheld from public disclosure under the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21

, . .t .

si'ce n it contains Safeguards Information (Enclosure 3).

1' Robert A. Erickson, Chief

i. --

Reactor Safeguards Branch h.2]Q@ggy$$44 Division of Reactor Inspection l p PDR and Safeguards

Enclosures:

. . DISTRIBUTION:.. . , , ~ , , _ . , ,

1. Revised License Condition lDocket. File w/e,ncisD iv 2J Sy

2. SALP Evaluation Report Case File w/encls. 1, 2, 3 Lv 3. SGER JGibson w/encls. 1, 2, 3 L <

LLBush w/o encls.

l' cc: Region V, w/encls. 1, 2, 3 CBuracker w/encls. 1, 2 (2)

T. Chan, NRR w/encls. 1, 2 RAErickson w/o encls.

J. Lee, NRR, w/encls. 1, 2 RSGB rf w/encls. 1, 2 Sec rf w/encls. 1, 2 q, CONTACT:

Jane Gibson 492-8457 UPON REMOVAL OF ATTACllMENT Tills DDCUMENT IS:

DECONTROLLED

<IMeiunont Transmitted Ilorewith Containc SAMX;UARDS IN70mlATION OFC:R$GB :RSGB G :RS B 3: RSGB  :  :  :

.........,a ~ ..... .... .. ....... .... ................ ......... (

NAME:CBurbt! er :JGibson .

Bush :RAE ' on:  :  :

()h DATE tb /8h h/fh/8h jh/hh/8h /1/8h a n OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 4

- SE8EDS IFORMATON N I - .-- _ -.--.---- -- --------- - - - - - - - - - . .

, ;fi

-s 4' 3 4 ,. ,

e [bh - ,,

ENCLOSURE 1

?, ,; '

. Docket No. 50-344

, l 5

4

.7 PROPOSED LICENSE CONDITION -

l The1)censeeshallfullyimplementandmaintainineffectall

. t, 9 provisions of,the physical security, guard training and qualification and safeguards contingency plans previously approved by the Commission and all amendments.and. revisions to such plans made 4

l pursuant to tlic authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p). The i pla'ns,'which contain Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR s ,

j 73.21, are entitled: " Trojan fluclear Plant Security Plan," with

), i s ,.

j i

W revision submittdd through September 16, 1987; " Trojan Nuclear Plant

]

Security Force Training and Qualification Plan," with revisions subititt' ed through May 9,1986; and " Trojan Nuclear Plant Safeguards s

Contingency Plan," with revisions submitted through November 18, 1986.

\

.L N

l r

\

l i  !

1 i

I l

- h,

i. 1, s l V

]

\. l

\

( 5 $

\

\ '

(

. . .. ENCLOSURE 2 i '

Dscket No. 50-344

^

SALP EVALUATION REPORT TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT CRITERIA CATEGORY

1. Management Involvement and Control in Assuring Quality There was consistent' evidence of prior planning by utility- 1 (including corporate level) management. Responses-regarding safeguards matters were~ technically sound and consistent, demonstrating the existence of well developed policies and.

procedures for _ control of security related activities.

2. Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues From a Safety / Safeguards Standpoint Solutions to technical safeguards problems were sound, timely 1 and conservative, indicating a clear understanding of the issues.

3. Responsiveness to NRC Initiatives Resolutions were submitted promptly, and in most cases 1 were accerd.ble the first time.

4. Enforcement History N/A

5. Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events N/A

6. Staffing (Including Management)

Security Organization positions and responsibilities are 1 well defined. -The security staff is considered to be more than ample to implement the facility physical protection program.

i

7. Training and Qualification Effectiveness i i

The facility guard training and qualification plan is 1 effectively implemented on a continuing basis at all l 1evels of the security organization.

1 l

m__________ _ . - . - - - _ - - - - - - - J