ML20236A664
| ML20236A664 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/20/1987 |
| From: | Randy Erickson Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TAC-65616, NUDOCS 8710230012 | |
| Download: ML20236A664 (3) | |
Text
,
'hh.h
.D3 OMW Ee:
'o s iDocket No. 50-344 N
MEMORANDUM.FORi' George Knighton, Director l<gi DC122 A D 03 Project' Directorate V-Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V and Special Projects FROM:
Robert A'. Erickson, Chief Reactor Safeguards Branch Division of Reactor-Inspection-and Safeguards SUDJECT:
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
'to TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT PHYSICAL SECURITY PLAN CHANGE 10 CFR 50.90 SUBMITTAL (TAC # 65616)
.This is in response to the May 20, and September 16, 1987 letters.from the Portland General: Electric Company (PGE) requesting an amendment to the Operating yghnseforTrojanNuclearPlant. 'We recommend that these changes be accepted.
Enclosed are a Revised License Condition (Enclosure 1) and a SALP Evaluation Report (Enclosure 2).
The Safeguards Evaluation Report (SGER) 1s being withheld from public disclosure under the provisions of 10 CFR 73.21
,..t.
si'ce it contains Safeguards Information (Enclosure 3).
n 1'
Robert A. Erickson, Chief i.
Reactor Safeguards Branch h.2]Q@ggy$$44 Division of Reactor Inspection l
p PDR and Safeguards
Enclosures:
. DISTRIBUTION:..
.,, ~,, _.,,
lDocket. File w/,ncisD iv 2J Sy 1.
Revised License Condition e
2.
SALP Evaluation Report Case File w/encls. 1, 2, 3 Lv 3.
SGER JGibson w/encls. 1, 2, 3 L
LLBush w/o encls.
l' cc:
Region V, w/encls. 1, 2, 3 CBuracker w/encls. 1, 2 (2)
T. Chan, NRR w/encls. 1, 2 RAErickson w/o encls.
J. Lee, NRR, w/encls. 1, 2 RSGB rf w/encls. 1, 2 Sec rf w/encls. 1, 2 CONTACT:
q, Jane Gibson 492-8457 UPON REMOVAL OF ATTACllMENT Tills DDCUMENT IS:
DECONTROLLED
<IMeiunont Transmitted Ilorewith Containc SAMX;UARDS IN70mlATION OFC:R$GB
- RSGB G
- RS B 3: RSGB
()h
(
.........,a
~.........
NAME:CBurbt! er :JGibson Bush
- RAE '
on:
DATE tb /8h h/fh/8h jh/hh/8h
/1/8h n
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 4
a SE8EDS IFORMATON N I -.-- _ -.--.----
4' 3
4,.
-s
- fi e [bh ENCLOSURE 1
?,
. Docket No. 50-344 4
5 PROPOSED LICENSE CONDITION
.7 The1)censeeshallfullyimplementandmaintainineffectall
. t, 9 provisions of,the physical security, guard training and qualification and safeguards contingency plans previously approved by the Commission and all amendments.and. revisions to such plans made 4
pursuant to tlic authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p).
The i
pla'ns,'which contain Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR s
j 73.21, are entitled: " Trojan fluclear Plant Security Plan," with j
),
i s i
W revision submittdd through September 16, 1987; " Trojan Nuclear Plant
]
Security Force Training and Qualification Plan," with revisions subititt' ed through May 9,1986; and " Trojan Nuclear Plant Safeguards s
Contingency Plan," with revisions submitted through November 18, 1986.
\\
.L N
\\
r i
i I
l h,
i.
1, s
V
]
\\.
l
\\
( 5
\\
\\
(
ENCLOSURE 2 i
Dscket No. 50-344
^
SALP EVALUATION REPORT TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT CRITERIA CATEGORY 1.
Management Involvement and Control in Assuring Quality There was consistent' evidence of prior planning by utility-1 (including corporate level) management.
Responses-regarding safeguards matters were~ technically sound and consistent, demonstrating the existence of well developed policies and.
procedures for _ control of security related activities.
2.
Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues From a Safety / Safeguards Standpoint Solutions to technical safeguards problems were sound, timely 1
and conservative, indicating a clear understanding of the issues.
3.
Responsiveness to NRC Initiatives Resolutions were submitted promptly, and in most cases 1
were accerd.ble the first time.
4.
Enforcement History N/A 5.
Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events N/A 6.
Staffing (Including Management)
Security Organization positions and responsibilities are 1
well defined. -The security staff is considered to be more than ample to implement the facility physical protection program.
i 7.
Training and Qualification Effectiveness i
i The facility guard training and qualification plan is 1
effectively implemented on a continuing basis at all l
1evels of the security organization.
1 l
m__________
J