ML20235X709
| ML20235X709 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 02/16/1989 |
| From: | Knighton G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235X711 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8903130591 | |
| Download: ML20235X709 (5) | |
Text
__
I'.
f.
l *;.
7590-01 L
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. ET AL DOCKET NOS. 50-361 AND 50-362 NOTICE OF CONSIDERATION OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES AND OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Comission) is considering
, issuance'of amendments to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-10 and NPF-15 issued to Southern California Edison Company (SCE), San Diego Gas and Electric Company, the C,ity of Riverside, California and the City of Anaheim, California (the licensees), foi operation of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 located in San Diego County, California. The request for amendments was submitted by letter dated April 26, 1988 and identified as Proposed Change PCN-248.
The proposed change would revise Technical Specification 3/4.3.1, " Reactor Protective. Instrumentation." ThisTechnicalSpecificationdefines1)thenumber of channels of instrumentation required to be operable for each reactor trip functional unit, 2) periodic surveillance tests to verify operability, and 3) action to be taken if the minimum operability requirements are not met.
It also ensures that the various functional units of the reactor protective instruments-tion will detect abnormal conditions and initiate a reactor trip to mitigate the consequences of transients and accidents, consistent with the assumptions of the safety analyses. The proposed change would revise the frequency of the surveil-i lance tests of the Control Element Assembly (CEA) isolation amplifiers and the i
CEA Calculator optical isolators from 18 months to at least once per refueling
-interval.
$$0
$0!bk bbbb 1
P
I.
i Before issuance of the proposed license amendments, the Connission will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act) and the Connission's regulations.
By March 27, 1989 the licensees may file a request for a hearing with respect to issuance of the amendments to the subject facility operating licenses, and any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding must file a written request for hearing and petition for leave to intervene. Requests for a hearing and petitions for leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Connission's " Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings" in 10 CFR Part 2.
If a request for a hearing er petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel desisi.eted by the Ccomission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel will rule on the request and/or petition, and the Secretary or the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order.
As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the following factors:
(1) the nature of the petitioner's right under the' Act to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which lay
I be entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition should also identify the specific aspect (s) of the subject matter of the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been admitted as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of the Board up to fifteen (15) days prior to the first pre-hearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity requirements described above.
Not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the first pre-hearing conference scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions which are sought to be litigated in the matter, and the bases for each contention set forth with reasonable specificity. Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the amendments under consideration. A petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfies these requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, and have the
, opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.
A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene shall be filed with the Secretary of the Comission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC, by the above date. ifhere petitions are filed during the last ten (10) days of the notice period, it is requested that the petitioner or representative for the petitioner promptly inform the Commission by a toll-free
4
)
-4_
telephone call to Western Union at 1-(800)325-6000(inMissouri 1-(800)342-6700).
The Western Union operator should be given Datagram Identification Number 3737
(
l and the following message addressed to George W. Knighton: petitioner's name and telephone number; date petition was mailed; plant name; and publication date and page number of this FEDERAL REGISTER notice. A copy of the petition should also be sent to the Office of the General Ccunsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, DC 20555, and to Mr. Charles R. Kocher, Esq., Southern California Edison Company, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, P.O. Box 800, Rosemead, California 91770 and Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe, Attention: David R. Pigott, Esq., 600 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94111, attorneys for the licensees.
Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not be entertained absent a determination by the Comission, the presiding officer or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, that the petition and/or request should be granted based upon a balancing cf the factors specified in the 10 CFR2.714(a)(1)(1)-(v)and2.714(d).
If a request for hearing is received, the Comission's staff may issue the amendment after it completes its technical review and prior to the completion of any required hearing if it publishes a further notice for public coment of its proposed finding of no significant hazards consideration in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 and 50.92.
For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendments which is available for public inspection at the Comission's public
Document Room, 2120 L Street NW, Washington, DC, and at the General Library, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California 92713.
1 Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this16th day of February,1989.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
l George. Knight
. Director Project Directorate V Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects 1
. _ _