ML20235W991

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 870802-1003.Violations Noted:Failure to Prepare & Adhere to Procedures & Update Procedure Qoa 65900-3 at Place of Use for Temporary Rev
ML20235W991
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/15/1987
From: Forney W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20235W986 List:
References
50-254-87-19, 50-265-87-19, NUDOCS 8710190156
Download: ML20235W991 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ . _

1 1

I l

NOTICE OF VIOLATION I

Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-254 Docket No. 50-265 As a result of the inspection conducted on August 2, 1987 through October 3, 1987, and in accordance with the " General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2 Appendix C (1985), the following violations were identified:

1. Technical Specification 6.2 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix B require that detailed written procedures be prepared, approved, and adhered to for operation of the reactor.

Contrary to the above the following failure to prepare and adhere to procedures took place:

With Unit 2 in cold shutdown, a reactor scram occurred on August 17, 1987, at 2110 hours0.0244 days <br />0.586 hours <br />0.00349 weeks <br />8.02855e-4 months <br /> due to vessel low level. This occurred when the unit operator, without a procedure, attempted to control vessel level with the normal letdown path isolated. The technique which the operator used involved opening valves which are forbidden to be opened by the 4 Shutdown Cooling Startup and Operation Procedure. A contributing factor I was a failure of the Operating Engineer to provide adequate direction to the unit operator on how to maintain vessel level with the normal letdown path isolated.

l This is considered a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

2. l Technical Specification 6.2 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix B require that detailed I written procedures be prepared, approved, and adhered to for operation of the reactor.

Contrary to the above, on September 17, 1987, at 0547 hours0.00633 days <br />0.152 hours <br />9.044312e-4 weeks <br />2.081335e-4 months <br />, with Unit 2 at or near full power, an instrument technician failed to comply with a surveillance procedure, resulting in a reactor scram.

This is considered a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

1

3. 10 CFR 50 Appendix B requires that changes to procedures are distributed l to cnd used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed. '

QAP 300-27, the Operating Department Procedure Revision Training l procedure, requires a notice sheet to be inserted into control room

':opies of any QOA to alert operators if a temporary revision is in effect.

l l

Contrary to the above, a temporary revision to Q0A 6900-3, the 24/48 VDC System failure procedure, was placed into effect on September 21, 1987, but the notice sheet alerting operators of the procedure revision was i not inserted into the control room copy of Q0A 6900-3 until October 2, l 1987.

l 1

8710190156 071015 PDR ADDCK 05000254 G PDR

Notice of Violation' 2 This is considered a Severity Level V violation (Supplement 1).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth. Edison is required to submit to this Office within thirty days of the date of the letter transmitting'this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply,

including for each violation: (1) The reason for the violations if admitted; (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending your response time.

g o. ir. S7 - ,

Dated W. L. Forney, N Reactor Projects Branch 1 l

I l

t f

, i

_ - - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - )