ML20235U953
| ML20235U953 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 07/11/1986 |
| From: | Andrews R OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | Gagliardo J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| LIC-86-331, NUDOCS 8710140331 | |
| Download: ML20235U953 (2) | |
Text
- _ _
~
. fg-} Q Q % pjj Q g g g g g Q Q @ Q Q y @ Q Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney Omaha. Nebraska 68102 2247 402/536 4000 r- ~..
l July 11,1986
- l:,,
LIC-86-331 F""
1 JUL I 419 -
J J. E. Ga 111ardo, Chief j
"h Reactor Projects Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Tx. 76011 References
- 1. Docket No. 50-285
- 2. Letter NRC (J. E. Gagliardo) to OPPD (R. L. Andrews), dated February 18, 1986, (IE Report 50-285/86-02)
- 3. Letter OPPD (R. L. Andrews) to NRC (J. E. Gagliardo), dated March 20, 1986, (LIC-86-ll3)
- 4. Letter NRC (J. E. Gagliardo) to OPPD (R. L. Andrews), dated
~
May 5, 1986
- 5. Letter OPPD (R. L. Andrews) to NRC (J. E. Gagliardo), dated June 4, 1986 (LIC-86-242)
Dear Mr. Gagliardo:
Request for Additional Information IE Inspection Report 86-02 Omaha Public Power District (0 PPD) received the Reference 4 request for additional information based on our Reference 3 letter. A response to this request was provided in Reference 5.
Reference 5 also stated that an extensive review was being performed with respect to Request A of Reference 4.
This letter serves to provide the results of that review and therefore complete OPPD's response to the request for information.
If you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincprely,
/ $ Vh O QOQ$$$ $Ihh285 R. L. Andrews PDR O
Division Manager Nuclear Production RLA/me Attachment cc: LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae Ok h
1333 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.
/y Washington, DC 20036 1
Mr. D. E. Sells, NRC Project Manager l
Mr. P. H. Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector I
I 2 c_ 4 C 4,
unnw m.n oormunim
.sse4
- m..-
l'l<
l
- e r s
- ATTACHMENT Regarding Item a.,-describefthe' actions lyou have taken to' ensure other inspec-tions and/or surveillance; required by other license commitments are not dependent on an individual's memory..
OPPD's' RESPONSE l
- 'A memorandum was.sent to'the Managers and Supervisors within OPPD that have responsibilities relative to the Fort Calhoun Station. The memorandum-requested review of inspections, surveillance or other commitments to the NRC.
which are dependent _upon an' individual's memory.
Based on.the responses: received, no additional inspections and/or surveillance required by commitments'to the NRC were identified as being dependent on an individual's memory. - This indicates that OPPD does not have a generic problem in.this area.
i 1