ML20235R706
| ML20235R706 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 02/21/1989 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235R695 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8903030397 | |
| Download: ML20235R706 (2) | |
Text
)
(
1 ff IC UNITEo STATES g/ g e(
g NUCLEAR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION
-y W ASWNGTON, D. C. M555 s, ~,
SAFETY EVAll'ATION EY THE OFFICE OF NUCLENr' REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO Ai!EK0 MENT h0. 25 TO FACILITY OPERAT!hG LICENSE NO. NPF-42 kCLF CREEK HilCLEAR OPERATlhG CORPORATION VOLF CREEK GENERATING STATIO_N DOCKET NO. 50-482 INTRODUCTION Wolf Creek Technical Specificatico 6.5.1, " Plant Safety Review Cc mittee (PSPC),' states that the PSRC shall function to advise the Plant hanager en l
all matters related to nuclear safety. Specification 6.5.1.2 lists the I
rnerrbers of the PSRC.
By letter dated November 21, 1988, the licensee proposed to amend Technicel Specification C.5.1.2 by adding the Nanager Nuclear Plant Engineering Wolf Creek as br. accitional nember of the PSRC.
EVALUATION The proposed arendment tc chbr,ge Technical Specification. 6.5.1.2 will acc the Manager huclur Plant Engineering Wolf Creek to the PSRC. The proposed change provides accitior.61 design engineering expertise to the PSRC. This change involves tre eriharictrnent to the PSRC 6nd thtrefore has no adverse effect on plant equiprtent or the technical qualifications of plant personnel.
In l
addition, the change does not involve any changes in organizational l
commi trntr.ts.
Based on the staff's review of that submittel, we find it acceptable.
Ei'VIR0htlENTAL CONS!DERATION The amencment ir.velves a change in administrative requirements. The Comission has previously issued a proposed fincing that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration 6r.c there has been r.c public ccrrrent on such finding.
Accordingly, the amendrent meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusionSt.tforthin10CFRSection51.22(c)(10).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.7?(b),
ro environrcrtal impact statement er envirt,r.ta:tel assessment need be prepared ir, ccnnection with the issuu.ce of the atendment.
1 8903030397 890221 -
^DR ADOCK 0500 A
~
l* CONCLUSION The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reescncLle essurance that the health and safety of the will r,ct be endangered by opercticn it, the picptsed manner, and (2) public such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or it the health and s6fety of the public.
Date:
Februa ry 21, 1989 Principal Centributcr: Douglas V. Pickett
[
i M
L
,