ML20235Q709
| ML20235Q709 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/22/1989 |
| From: | Rossi C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Newton R WESTINGHOUSE OPERATING PLANTS OWNERS GROUP, WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235Q711 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8903030004 | |
| Download: ML20235Q709 (4) | |
Text
-
g
,6 k p, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
)
i r,,
l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\*****/ FEB 2 21989 Mr. Roger A. flewton Westinghouse Owners Group Wisconsin Electric Power Company j 212 W. liichigan Avenue i Milwaukee, Wiscons-in 53201-2909
SUBJECT:
WESTIliGHOUSE TOPICAL REPORTS WCAP-10271 SUPPLEMENT 2 AllD WCAP-102'71 SUPPLEMENT 2, REVISION 1, " EVALUATION OF SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCIES At:0 OUT OF SERVICE TlHES FOR THE ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES ACTUATION SYSTEN" >
Dear Mr. Newton:
We have completed our review of the subject topical reports submitted by the Westinghouse Owners Group by letters dated March 20, 1986 and May 12, 1987.
Enclosure 1 provides our Safety Evaluation Report (SER), which was prepared after reviewing the Technical Evaluation Report (TER attached to the SER) developed under contract by Brookhaven National Laboratory. We concur with the findings contained in the TER.
As noted in the enclosed SER, applicants for proposed Technical Specification changes for individual plants must:
- 1. Confirm the applicability of the generic analyses of WCAP-10271 Supplement 2 and WCAP-10271 Supplement 2, Revision 1.
- 2. Confirm that any increase in instrument drift due to the extended ST1s is properly accounted for in the setpoint calculation methodology. (Foradditional information on this issue, see letter from C. E. Rossi to R. F. Janecek, dated L Apr!1 27, 1988.)
I Enclosure 2 provides an acceptable format for proposed TS Changes based on !
WCAP-10271 Supplement 2 and WCAP-10271 Supplement 2, Revision 1. Our review 1 of plant-specific changes will consider the applicabilities of the topical l reports to the specific plant. !
Licensees and applicants are encouraged to propose changes to TS that are consistent with the guidance provided in the enclosures. Proposed license l amendments conforming to this guidance will be expeditiously reviewed by the '
NRC Pro,iect Manager for the facility. Proposed amendments that deviate from this guidance will reauire a longer, more detailed review. Please contact the Pro.iect Manager if you have cuestions on this matter.
l l
/
, SP gy 8903030004 890222 POR TOPRP EMVWEST Mk L PDC I l l
C __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
j
FEB 2 21989 I
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790, we have determined that the enclosed evaluation does not contain proprietary information. However, we will delay placing the evaluation in the Public Document Room for a period of ten (10) working days from the date of this letter to provide you with the opportunity to comment on the proprietary aspects only. If you believe that any information in the enclosure is proprietary, please identify such information line by line and define the basis pursuant to the criteria of 10 CFR 2.790.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, " Topical Reports Review Status," we request that the Westinghouse Owners Group publish accepted revisions of WCAP-10271 Supplement 2 and WCAP-10271 Supplement 2, Revision 1, both proprie-tary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions should (1) incorporate this letter and the enclosed Safety Evaluation Report including the Technical Evaluation Report, between the title page and the abstract and (2) include an - A (designe.ted accepted) following the report identification symbols.
l Should our acceptance criteria or regulations change so that our conclusions as I to the acceptability of the reports are no longer valid, the Westinghouse Owners Group and/or the applicants referencing these topical reports will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued applicability of the topical reports without revision of their documentation.
Sincerely, 0@ral Dg cd By Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational Events Assessment Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated gg[#
DISTRIBUTION:
Please see attached C [ N' AggM"
,#ymAf
- SEE PREVIOUS PAGE FOR CONCURRENCE
( f1EM0/J 0 RD AN/ W AV/ WC AP 10271/W0H L )
MM '7
~
2 T,I 67 %
- TSB:DOEA:NRR *TSB:00EA:NRR *C:TSB:D0EA:NRR *C:PRAB:NRR MLWohl:pmc RLEmch EJButcher RJBarrett 12/ /88 12/ /88 12/ /88 12/ /88
- C:SICB:NRR D20 RR SNewberry ER s' 1/ /89 [1//r89 \
l
FEB 2 21989 Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790, we have determined that the enclosed evaluation does not contain proprietary information. However, we will delay placing the evaluation in the public document room for a period of ten (10) working days from the date of this letter to provide you with the opportunity to comment on the proprietary aspects only. If you believe that an.y information in the enclosure is proprietary, please identify such information line by line and defire the basis pursuant to the criteria of 10 CFR 2.790.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, " Topical Reports Review Status," we recuest that the Westinghouse Owners Groups publish accepted revisions of WCAP-10271 Supplement 2 and WCAP-10271 Supplement 2, Revision 1, both proprie-tary and non-proprietary, within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted versions should (1) incorporate this letter and the enclosed Safety Evaluation Report including the Technical Evaluation Report, between the title page and the abstract and (2) include an - A (designated accepted) following the reports without revision of their documentation.
SLould our acceptance criteria or regulations change so that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the reports are no longer valid, the Westinghouse Owners Croup and/or the applicants referencing these topical reports will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued applicability of the topical reports without revision of their documentation.
Sincerely, Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational Events Assessment Office of fluclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated DISTRIBUTION:
TO~ ease see ai.tached (MEM0/ JORDAN /WAV/WCAP10271/WOHL)
TSA:CQ( plRR TSB:00E IAR C:TSB:00EA:NRR C:PRt l fj MLWbtl4.3 ;mc RLEmc 6 EJButcher RJBa 12/cg/88 12/8 88 12/4/88 12////8 C: h :NRR D:D0EA:NRR (N wverry CERossi
/ 88 12/ /88 w----_------_----_--__-----
C en/hitA t he/g FEB 2 21989 DISTRIBUTION:
FJMiraglia, NRR MLWohl, NRR WGKennedy, EDO !
LShao, NRR CHBerlinger DCrutchfield, NRR l ACThadani, NRR WDLanning, NRR CIGrimes, NRR FJCongel, NRR DOEA R/F RJBarrett, NRR JWRoe, NRR OTSB R/F SNewberry, NRR BKGrimes, NRR CERossi, NRR Central Files SAVarga, NRR Glainas,.NRR EJButcher, NRR GMHolahan, NRR RLEmch, NRR PDR l
l l
w - - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - . --