ML20235N155

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments That Exemption Requested by Util Is Not Neccessary Since Policy Statement Not Considered Regulation.Util Proposed Method for Meeting Requirements of SECY-86-383 Seems Adequate
ML20235N155
Person / Time
Site: Millstone, Haddam Neck, 05000000, Fort Saint Vrain
Issue date: 03/09/1987
From: Asselstine J
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Zech
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20235N034 List:
References
FOIA-87-299 NUDOCS 8707170456
Download: ML20235N155 (1)


Text

- _-_-____ -

[ So UNITED STATES y ,, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{ .E W ASHIN GT ON. D.C. 20S$5 s.,...../

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER f arch 9,1987 l

l l

l MEMORANDUM T0: Chairnan Zech FR0ft: James K. Asselstine ". ..._ ._.

SUBJECT:

C0f1LZ-87 SECY-86-363 ENGINEERING EXPERTISE CN, SHIFT, NORTHEAST UTILITIES' HADDAM NECK Af1D MILLSTONE UNITS I & 2, AND FORT ST. VRAIN We should not grant Northeast Utilities an exemption since there is no regulation from rhich to exempt them. A licensee need not seek exemptions from a policy statement. It is my understanding that flertheast must ask for license amendments so tFat its proposal will be in accord with its tech specs and license comitments. Northeast Utilities' proposed method of meeting the STA " requirement" appears to be adeauate. I.would have no objection to the staff beginning whatever process is recessary to permit the company to change its license commitments se that it may irrplement tFe preposed SP0/STA prccram.

cc: Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Carr EDO SECY OGC i

nL lj G707170406 ' 870715

-299 PDR

%NG

__ ____ _