ML20235L755

Request for OMB Review & Supporting Statement Re 10CFR51, Environ Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing & Related Functions. Estimated Respondent Burden Is 20,450 H

ML20235L755
Person / Time
Issue date:	09/30/1987
From:	Mcdonald W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
To:
References
OMB-3150-0021, OMB-3150-21, NUDOCS 8710050588
Download: ML20235L755 (13)

Text

.

. . . Pl)/(

'1"" " 8 3 Request for DMB Review "P " ""

s,~~ h - -C Im port t ru 'f

%- c ,m, s m- , ' " De cc* t w to um FF E3 Senc tmee copies o' t ts forrn the matena: to t+ rewewec, an: tc 1: 'e: >

e' UM - '29; 'ev+v, a c arpmv encu paperwt'* -tmer cc es oi ine U.cpc t:r.g sta'e e-t !c

.-a t9 <q, . L, ,

6,

. - . e -.  :- i. .s .<e u. ;;g E. Ott:eo' e o mat:r p : Regwa . . a'te r

,_ .1 - -- < -

y &, 3 - a ., ' 0" ;e d ff aNgere-t ric iucg r

,. ; s * - - -- . m. : . r"r:U t:" a: *:: Cr, A**vt er " cnet ra- Raw 320.

t.- ~

s , 4 s pe ri..: aw - 1. c W;~ v DL :::, .

P ARI L-Complete This Da". for Al. Reauests.

1 ;v; .m 4. . in L u-c r > r, a- 2.e.gecc,c w U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

.3_ _1_ 5 0 3 na e c ww e om m ues:, s ,egw . t rev t e s.c . ,e s, a..

Hazel Smith r 301 , 492-8972

4. T't.e c' m'or~ apo' cSec U ' + M* mi 10 CFR 51, Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Functions L. ,ep a:- r vw or c n- n y ra e ec :e unce: t tres Coce, n.~ w or inewtwe Orcer 42 ,

, 2201 (o) ,

E a."er e c en ,; , c c: z rN c 5 [ Fetera'agencPs er empicyee:

_. , im . . _ iam E [ Na, prof <t mstitot.cn:

e :3 - -

.: .x E a rmet o :t"+' 'o* r c' 7__ sman busmesses o orga c:aram PART U.-Compicte Tn:s Part Only if the Request is for OMB Review Under Executive Order 12291

7. %wat rm a --* v krw ?'

-- __ - __ . c' . h o r e a s w e d ._

E3yn c' t :r m*ye. enz;3%:* Type of review reQuestec Clawhca tion stage ordevetopment  : [ s.anca.:

a t.b r 1L P>oposed er drat 2 J Pending 2 -. t,o w 2 .._ Fms oe mierm 6r s . ,vt r r.o* rtoo .ai 3w Ernergency P p.

3 _=, F na. 0 mienm Sra: wmout pr:o' proscu 4 L".'u'a;Statutory or Nd. cia' deadore

9. Cf k acte anec:ec CFF

10. Does teen ec ' to-ta - epo t.r g o> reco<dm; 7 ea; <r er's M nw e C V5 appro.a' under the Pace wtn Reca:t,en Ac-anc 5 CF R ; E ~

[ ye [ N:

11. If a rnajo' rue is t*.ere a rega aton irroa:t anais's attachec? I [ vet 2 [ tic trNo? d,c of/E we ve tr.e a* a A s' 3 [ 'res 4 [ N:

Certification for Regulatory Submissions ir, sutm-tt n; tms recmt fu Cf/t *evew. the authorge: reg.aata , renta: an: t e : mc am off:c43 cc t:f, that the recadements o' E O 12291 anc any apr$ cab +

ov4, c.*ectw. r ave teen c r; ec # t hr t of e c' ; r4 pant c4;c c Qate

> g *. e ' . r s a ;b - ~ , % c n i

Date 87100505B8 870930 PDR ORG EUS g i

12. s OMb use orn o i nvu r t ws , . 4'. 'y ,na Standard Form 83 ;Rev 9H m N.4 c . ( y g o p.es-,-w n cyg 5 CFV ' 3:0 anc l C ,22%

l. . ..

S ART lit.-Cornplete This Part Only if the Request is for Approval of a Collection of infotrnation Under the Paperwork Reduction Act and 5 CFR 1320.

u Annael em D nmedt uses anmecree pum se e onen " Nuclear Facilities, Environmental Protection" 10.CFR 51 requires data from licensees and applicants in order for the NRC to make decisions concerning environmental protection.

- Ty c< o.r ~ ev n et w . w o n one; Informatro*i coinct or's not conta'nec on rutes

[ Eepr $4 asw 2 [ Eme rency wom ss>on(ceWare JNewc

o,tormattor collections contamed m rules 2] Erstq regentio-inc cnaye proposer C hv o' 'nte"d" on, come rFW 1 Enter cate of eroected or actua' recera, -

4 2 Nobce of propcsec ru'emawT(NPPM) A U #ePe# b?"sw Geg <ter pubhcation at tnis stage of rulemakirg 5 [ Orka . NoRt/ was prev.04y Dubbsnec B C Eme'fencs suomess'en(certif<atron at2?cc: Wnt". 00Mear) 15; Type of review re vested (c eecA only one) 1 O t4ew cohection 4 C Restatement et a n'eucusty aoprovec cotiectiori for which approva

2 @ Revision o' a currently approved collection nas exocec 3 C Extension cf tne espiration cate'of a currentit approved coliectior 5 O Existing conectror in use wtthout an OMB control number without an enarge 'n tne substante or in the methoc of cobect'on

6. Agency repcet ter~ %moens)Onctuce stancard;optrona! form nmbeis)) r l 22. Pu pose of .cormation conection tcheck as many as apply)

NA 1 s Amcabcn io'oenets 2w Freg am evah.atior

- 17, Annual report.ng or 0-sposure burden 3 [ gen,,,; pu, pose stat:st.cs I N'umoet o' respondents  !' 4 3 Reguiatory o comphane 2 Numbu of resDaases Der retpondent h _.,

5 ] Pet,g am osanrang or management 3 Totaf annua: remonses (rme 1 !!mes line 2l ' 6 L ; esearc+

4 rou 5 per respense 1,b 7 O Aucd 5 Total nours pne 3 tees Ime 4)  ! 20NO t

' 8. Annsa! record *eeping Durden i 23. F recuenc, of re:omeep.ng or reporting (eneck all that appy)

! Number of receroxeece's l 1 [ 4.raeeping 2 Annuai ncurs pee recordheepet  !  ! Reporttag 3 Tota! recordkeep;ng hours (/me J t,mes !me 2) I 2 3 On occas on 4 Recordkeepmg retentron perice i vears! 3C hew

19. Total annual burden  ; 4[ w %

20,450 i -

1 Requested (Isne 17 5 plus line 18 3) . r b U Qarte%

2 in current OMB inventory /2*b4U -

6 LJ Semi-annuah 3 D tfe"ence ttiro l less kne 2) ' l 7 U entwab Explanation of datterence e O Brenn,a1 1 l

14 Progra n change _.

9 J Otner(cese ibe) 5 Ad,ustment . -b2,U9U j 20 Curtent(most recent)OMB control number or comment nurnber  ! 24. Respondents cougat.o^ to compiy(check the strongestobifatson thatappi,es) 3150-0021 i , a veyntm

21. apuation date 2 U Required to obtam or retain a benefit 3 0 Vancatory

25. Ara the respondents primari'y educational agencies or mstitut ons or is the primary purpose of the co!!ection re!atec to Federal education programs? O yes ENo '

26. Does the agenc use $8mphng to select respondents or does tne agency recomtnend or p'escribe tne use of sampkng or statistical analysis l t>y respondents . C Yes 3 No 27, latory autnorit, for t 19ermation coliection CFR  ; of FR  ; or. other (specify). '

Paperwork Certification

% sd ntting tn.s request 'or CMB a:provat the agency head, tne semor official er an autnonzed representat've cert <fies that the recueements of 5 CFR 1320. the

%vacy Act, statisticot stancards or direct'ves and any other acrheable mformation ooscy airect ves have been comphed eth hgrature of program official Date ,

f n

igeature of agency read the senior c*t.;ff . Date William Mcdonald, Dite6t' rhrizdecre_ t ese?Mmi oi ra 1 n and Resources Managemlent l N' 3r> - / ~7 r

O GPO : 1994 0 - 453-776

- _ _ _ - _ - _ . - - - _ = _ - . _ . =

r i

SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR 10 CFR Part 51 Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions (0MB Clearance No. 3150-0021)

A. JUSTIFICATION

1. Need for the Information Collection The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) directs that, to the fullest extent possible: (1) the policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in NEPA, and (2) all agencies of the Federal Government shall comply with the procedures in Section 102(2) of NEPA except where com-pliance would be inconsistent with other statutory requirements. The regula-tions in Subpart A of 10 CFR Part 51 implement Section 102(2) of NEPA in a manner which is consistent with the NRC's domestic licensing and related regu-latory authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, and the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978, and the Commission's announced policy to take account of the regulations of the Council of Environmental Quality published November 29, 1978 (43 FR 55978-56007), voluntarily, subject to certain conditions.

Section 51.16(b) requires persons who wish to have proprietary information withheld from public disclosure to submit a request justifying the withholdings. This information is needed by NRC to determine if the applicant / licensee's reasons are valid and if the information qualifies for exemption from disclosure. The Offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) or Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards (NMSS) will begin review of the request within thirty days of receipt.

Should staff determine the request to be justified, disclosure is withheld.

Should staff determine the request to be unjustified, the Office of General Counsel (0GC) reviews the request and the applicant / licensee is notified within two weeks of the OGC review.

Section 51.45(a) requires certain persons to submit an environmental report.

These persons are license applicants or petitioners for rulemaking under the following:

Production and Utilization Facilities 51.50 Construction Permit Stage 1 ,

________m___ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _

51.53 Supplement to Environmental Report

- Operating License Stage 51.54 Manufacturing License Materials Licenses 51.60 Materials Licenses 51.61 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation License 51.62 Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste Licensed under 10 CFR 61 Rulemaking Petitioners 51.68 Petition for Rulemaking The environmental reports are submitted to NRR or NMSS for their use in prepar-ing a Draft Environmental Statement (DES). Subsequently, NRC staff prepares a Final Environmental Statement (FES). The Environmental Statements give detailed consideration to the environmental impacts associated with construction and operation of a proposed facility and assess impacts within the framework of the available alternatives. Wittout the information provided in the environ-mental report, NRC cannot evaluate environmental impact or prepare draft and final Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), as required by NEPA.

The NL. review of environmental reports normally begins within 30 days of the report's receipt.

All persons required to submit an environmental report must include in it cer-tain general information. Section 51.45(b) describes that information. The environmental report shall contain a description of the proposed action, a statement of its purposes, a description of the environment affected, and a discussion of the following considerations: (1) the impact of the proposed action on the environment, (2) any adverse environmental effects which cannot i be avoided should the proposal be implemented, (3) alternatives to the proposed action, (4) the relationship between local short-term use of man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity, and (5) any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources which would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented.

l Section 51.45(c) requires the inclusion of an analysis in the Environmental I

Report which considers and balances the environmental effects of the proposed action and the alternatives available for reducing or avoiding adverse environ-mental effects, as well as the environmental, economic, technical, and other benefits of the proposed action.

Section 51.60(b) requires each applicant to prepare an environmental report for the following types of actions:

(1) Issuance or renewal of a license or other form of permission for:

2 L __ - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - -

(i) Possession and use of s fuel fabrication, scrap recovery,pecial nuclear of or conversion material uraniumfor processingpur-hexafluoride and suant to 10 CFR 70.

(ii)' Possession and use of source meterial for uranium milling or produc-tion of uranium hexafluoride pursuant to 10 CFR 40.

(iii) Storage of spent fuel in an independent spent fuel storage installa-tion (ISFSI) pursuant to 10 CFR 72.

(iv) Receipt and disposal of radioactive waste from other persons pursuant to 10 CFR 61.

~

(v) Processing of source material for extraction of rare ~ earth and other metals.

(vi) Use of radioactive tracers in field flood studies involving secondary i

, and tertiary oil and gas recovery.

(2) Issuance of an amendment that would authorize or result in:

(i) A significant expansion of a site.

(ii) A significant change in the types of effluents.

(iii) A significant increase in the amounts of effluents.

(iv) A significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radia-tion exposure.

(v) A significant increase in the potential for or consequences from radiological accidents.

(vi) A significant increase in spent fuel storage capacity, in a license or other form of permission to conduct an activity listed in 51.60(b)(1) above.

(3) Termination of a license for the possession and use of source material for uranium milling.

(4) Amendment of a license to authorize the decommissioning of an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) pursuant to 10 CFR 72.

(5) Issuance of a license amendment pursuant to Part 61 authorizing (i) closure of a land disposal site, (ii) transfer of the license to the disposal site' owner for the purpose of institutional control, or (iii) termination of a license at the end of the institutional control period.

(6) Any other licensing action for which the Commission determines an environ-mental report is necessary.

Section 51.61 requires that each applicant for issuance of a license for storage of spent fuel in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) pursuant to 10 CFR 72 submit with its application an " Applicant's Environmental Report 3

- ISFSI License." The environmental report shall contein the general informa-tion specified in 51.45 and shall address the siting evaluation factors con-tained in subpart E, 10 CFR 72.

1 Section 51.62(a) requires that each applicant for issuance of a license for land disposal of radioactive waste pursuant to 10 CFR 61 submit with its application an " Applicant's Environmental Report License for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste." The environmental report and any supplement to the environmental report may incorporate by reference information contained in the application or in any previous application, statement or report filed with the Commission provided that such references are clear and specific and that copies of the information so incorporated are available in the NRC Public Document Room at 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. and in any public document room established by the Commission near the proposed land disposal site.

Section 51.62(b) requires that the environmental report contain the general in-formation specified in 51.45, shall address the applicant's environmental monitor-ing program required by 10 CFR 61.12(1), 61.53, and 61.59(b) and shall be as complete as possible in the light of information that is available at the time the environmental report is submitted.

Section 51.62(c) requires that the applicant supplement the environmental report in a timely manner as necessary to permit the Commission to review, prior to issuance, amendment or renewal of a license, new information regarding the environmental impact of previously proposed activities, information regarding the environmental impact of any changes in previously proposed activities, or any significant new information regarding the environmental impact of closure activities and long-term performance of the disposal site. j 1

In addition to license applicants, certain petitioners for rulemaking must sub- l sit environmental reports. Section 51.68 requires that petitioners for rule-i making who request amendments of 10 CFR Parts 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 40, or 70 '

concerning the exemption from licensing and regulatory requirements of, or authorizing general licenses for, any equipment, device, commodity, or other product containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material submit a " Petitioner's Environmental Report," which contains the general information specified in Section 51.45.

2. Agency Use of Information Part 51 of the NRC's regulations, specifies information and data to be provided by applicants and licensees so that the NRC can make determinations necessary j to adhere to the policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States, '

which are to be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended. The NRC completes its review of this information in approximately one year. When litigation is not involved, this review could be completed in approximately l six months.

3. Reduction of Burden Through Information Technology There is no legal obstacle to the use of information technology. Moreover, NRC encourages its use.

4

4. Effort to Identify Duplication The Federal Information Locator System (FILS) has been searched. No duralication was found. In cases where renewals or updates to environmental reports are required, reference to the previously submitted documents is acceptable; oniy l revised or new information is required of the applicant. Informaticr submitted l 'to other government agencies may be referenced.

5. Effort to Use Similar Information Information specified in 10 D P 51 is not required by other entities or regulations.

6. Effort to Reduce Small Business Burden Small business is not affected by 10 CFR 51 information collection requirements.

7. Consequences of Less Frequent Coliection This information is submitted by applicants and licensees when the requested action requires NRC to make a determination consistent with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended. Thus, the informa-tion is submitted as necessary for NRC to assess nonradiological safety (environmental) issues from the standpoint of protecting the health and safety of the public.

8. Circumstances Which Justify Variation from OMB Guidelines This information collectico does not vary from OMB Guidelines.

9. Consultations Outside the Agency When the proposed revision to 10 CFR Part 51 and related amendments to 10 CFR Parts 2, 30, 40,.50, 61, 70, 72, and 110 were published, the comments received were addressed in the preamble of the Federal Register Notice which published the Final Rule. Moreover, AIF and several' applicants were consulted for burden data.

10. Confidentiality of Information NRC provides no pledge of confidentiality for this collection of information.

11. Justification for Sensitive Questians i Part 51 information collections do not involve sensitive or private information.

12. Estimated Annualized Cost to the Federal Government The staff reviews vary in complexity (and in cost to Government) depending on the type of proposed action and the type of required NRC response b.e.,

Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)]. Cost estimates are summarized in the attached table.

5

m .

Wo applications for permits to construct nuclear power reactors, testing facili-

) ties, or fuel. reprocessing plants are projected for the near future; therefore, no costs pursuant to Section 51.20(b)(1) are expected.

With respect to Section 51.20(b)(2), the remaining environmental reviews for OL applications for_ power reactors are not currently scheduled for review.

Thus, NRC will not assume any cost for the preparation of EIS's during the next three years.

For nonpower reactor reviews covered by Section 51.20(b)(2) and (3), within the next 3 years, the staff anticipates the review of four (4) nonpower reactor renewals, two (2) research reactor power upgrades, four (4) decommissioning requests, and eight (8) HEU/ LEU Conversion requests. Estimated cost to the Federal government is based on the staff hourr, of about 6.228 (346 hours0.004 days <br />0.0961 hours <br />5.720899e-4 weeks <br />1.31653e-4 months <br /> / review x 18 reviews). Therefore, three year cost to the government is estimated to be $373,680 (6,228 hours0.00264 days <br />0.0633 hours <br />3.769841e-4 weeks <br />8.6754e-5 months <br /> x $60/ hour). Therefore, annual expenditures for nonpower reactor reviews would be 2,076 staff hours, and annual cost to the Federal governinent is estimated to be $124,560 (2,076 staff hours x $60/ hour).

Materials licenses vary in type, and cost of the Government review varies accordingly. The materials licensing actions which require EISs are identified in 51.20(b)(7)-13. Other actions, as identified in Section 51.21, may or may not require preparation of an environmental impact statement. The estimated annual cost to tne government for information collection and processing for materials license activities under Section 51.20 and 51.21 is approximately

$150,000 (500 hours0.00579 days <br />0.139 hours <br />8.267196e-4 weeks <br />1.9025e-4 months <br /> / application x 5 applications annually x $60/ hour).

No applications for manufacturing licenses are anticipated for this time frame. I The estimated total annual cost to the Government is $274,560 (cost for mate- j rials and nonpower reactor reviews) for 10 CFR Part 51 requirements covered by  ;

this supporting statement (also see attached Table).

13. Estimate of Industry Burden and Cost

a. Reporting Burden No new applications for permits to construct or licenses to operate nuclear power plants are projected over the r. ext three years. Therefore, no respondent burden is projected to result from 10 CFR 51.50, 51.51, 51.52, and 51.53 requirements over that time period. For the nonpower reactor reviews to be conducted during the same period, the burden on the licensees may be on the order of approximately 12,600 hours0.00694 days <br />0.167 hours <br />9.920635e-4 weeks <br />2.283e-4 months <br /> (18 anticipated reviews; approximately 700 hours0.0081 days <br />0.194 hours <br />0.00116 weeks <br />2.6635e-4 months <br /> each). Therefore, annual licensee effort is expected to be 4,200 hours0.00231 days <br />0.0556 hours <br />3.306878e-4 weeks <br />7.61e-5 months <br /> for technical efforts pertaining to dismantling, license renewals, ,

research reactor power upgrades, decommissioning requests, and HEU/ LEU l conversions.

No new applications for manufacturing licenses are projected over the next three years; therefore, no respondent burden is projected to result from 3 10 CFR 51.54 requirements over that time period.  !

The estimated total number of annual submittals for materials licensing activ-ities pursuant to Sections 51.60, 51.61, and 51.62 is 5 (approximately 16 for 6

1

~

I L

the next 3 years). The materials licensing activities for which submission of j environmental information may be required could span a wide range, including applications for independent spent fuel storage installations, uranium mills, fuel fabrication, UF6 conversion, remedial action, certain medical and indus-trial uses of radioisotopes, and commercial radioactive waste disposal by land burial. 4 For materials licensing actions under Sections 51.60, 51.61, and 51.62, the number of responses is an estimated average. For some categories of licensees, we expect that we may receive only one environmental report over a period of several years. For other categories, we expect we may receive several per year.

Similarly, the hours per response data represents a broad range of information burdens. The burden hours may range from as little as 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per submittal for some renewals or amendments, to as much as 15,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> per submittal for low-level waste burial applications, for example. Hence, the numbers do not necessarily represent the burden for a typical, or any particular, licensee, and the use of the numbers for that purpose is likely to be misleading. How-i ever, for the purpose of updating this statement, an average of 650 hours0.00752 days <br />0.181 hours <br />0.00107 weeks <br />2.47325e-4 months <br /> l has been used for each of the 5 applications anticipated annually. Therefore,

i. 3,250 hours0.00289 days <br />0.0694 hours <br />4.133598e-4 weeks <br />9.5125e-5 months <br /> (650 hours0.00752 days <br />0.181 hours <br />0.00107 weeks <br />2.47325e-4 months <br /> / action x 5 action requests) are anticipated for annual burden involving the materials area.

The NRC does not project information collection, within the purview of 10 CFR 51.68 because we are not aware of any proposed petitions for rulemaking which could be submitted to the NRC in the next three years.

b. Recordkeeping Burden Recordkeeping requirements are not specified in 10 CFR 51.

c. Estimated Industry Cost The cost to industry for nonpower reactor reviews is estimated to be $252,000 (4200 x $60). For the materiais area, the annual cost is estimated to be 5975,000 (3,250 hours0.00289 days <br />0.0694 hours <br />4.133598e-4 weeks <br />9.5125e-5 months <br /> x 5 applications = 16,250 hours0.00289 days <br />0.0694 hours <br />4.133598e-4 weeks <br />9.5125e-5 months <br />; 16,250 x $60 =

$975,000). Therefore, total industry cost is expected to be $1,227,000.

14. Reasons for Change in Burden The estimated burden for' industry has been reduced from 72,540 hours0.00625 days <br />0.15 hours <br />8.928571e-4 weeks <br />2.0547e-4 months <br /> to 20,450 hours0.00521 days <br />0.125 hours <br />7.440476e-4 weeks <br />1.71225e-4 months <br />. This reduction has been realized because during the previous OMB review, 13 OL applications for nuclear power plants were under consideration. Those reviews are now complete.

15. Publication for Statistical Use NRC does not publish information submitted in accordance with Part 51 for statistical use.

7

T f

} B. COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS I

l Information enllection provisions of Part 51 do not require the use of statistical methods.

Attached: Table l

l h

8 e

s t o$

o al t n( r c ma r e i ut et t f t nsvn t o snooe s s e E acgm 0 t ne 0 l y nos0 r ein6d a a mt e .e m eac1 r y m rmi5 e b u i rl t S d uo ,n e e y qf ,4 e d t or ens 5 a al tt rit .e m ma s i1 r i ut u l cm5 a e t nsd air b

_ snon rf e ,s E acI 0 e i p3 e 0 l nc 5 u l eer .v i gpo1l w sf5 a e ,v t sh s s

_ d ecn0l e

_ e hi o5 a u

_ t al n thi .c q wt1i mae) e

_ h a5 r r

_ iud s t nc e t nrr iii nm e s i. u h w l ou h

_ E ab( 0 s pi n 0 t n d n pt .

e eoacog t

_ d ti eN n a r at ss i h u

T N

E b

s i cu ceo osiw] u

,.n t

d t

_ f e s ro8 o e M 1 o e s s yal 6 c t E 5 gl f n ab ve . - a T y aaoo b1 e m A T r ru p t we 5l i e T R a en . s soh e b t l S A m vnoe ol t ed u s b P m Aanr 0 ce sno 0 e a G u b r[ ad T N R S d o s I F ndf s ,d i T C ae n2i R td o6 o t O 0 naei . v I P 1 el rt1 a P t d uii5 U - n rb ut o S nee uaqe ,t e erd) bt e p1 t d ns r 6 e a rror ee d .r m u e ph

• h rsn1 e i B ps( 0 T aia5h 0 t s

e

- n l i s a

- e oa l l t ar tt l pa nn e .

d mu n a pt eo ss l rs sye rAn mi ar ooo t mm e e et b u hfl 'C i no nf m rc o t nc R ror eon i u oh ii s N orf g o ur t n

w i hi sr) qt e t yd st vn stir esg hh o or eunos envE rna cg i t am h aeit h en( ot ii t t o s t n smE cCS h e p t er i l eaa i e s i - w i

r sif er l armc l rst fRt n r

c s

upn qoo b riri aeuol t n qf p baui 't t qnp o

iEi c

err m

na oh t

e eri seenp seae poe a D R pt E gria E rcR SfP t s as d e l

1 o ng 5

. n q 12 si

) 55 av en b . hl R o ( ,1 o i 6 1 5 05 C v ot 1 4 4 5 R n f c . . . .d Ni ne 1 1 1 1 n IS 5 5 5 5 a *

' e' I

_ c ma r

_ iutet 4 0 f t nsvn 2 o snooe 5 1 1

_ E acgm 00$ 0 $

_ y r

a

_ m m

u S d e y 0 0

- t or 0 0 al tt s 0, 0, ma s R n i ut u 2 E o 5 t nsd 5 i 7 snon 2 et 9 EacI $ h c $

t e s

_ y b ,

e d v

_ d eo e rb

_ t ea al n v 0

_ mae) 0 oe 5

_ i ud s 0 ce 2, t nrr 2, s snuh e( 6

_ E ab( 004 0 r 1 n as e n d no

_ r oi

_ u it

_ T b t c

_ N s ce .

E f e es)

_ M 1 o e s s 4

_ E 5 gl f n r5 y

_ T A r aaoo se .

T ru p ih1 e T R a en . s ht5 l S A m vnoe t o b P m A anr 006 0 d 5 a G u rf n T N R S ooa I F f T C s3 R

O 0 st5 P 1 nn .

P oe1 t i m5

'J - n t e S nee cr ,

erd) ei0 0 d ns ju5 5 rror u e ph 0 oq .

2, 0 re1 B ps( 007 0 P r5 3 g

n i s r s t n s soe s t a o w tf s ,

t n

e r

e i

t ei we n n f 2 n-eR e od 5 eR mop aiv mE c e . mE etO cve e i st n1 e r - i eR rsL et o5 rs itR l R iii .

unE ep r iu 't g pmt ,

iu 't c qe gpro qnn ob c14 qni n emsaA et eai C ue55 eaL o t rcr rc i

t r e 't S cpn l L dnac OU e cl t i u f sS o e g5 5

11. i s p cll i pae r ipc b n ipa i

r f ucswsn f pa r i , , f pi i sineL o iAf eor 03 iAr c c l eNON c u bt e55 c e s erpc ern m v . . ert e p o pi poa uR o11 poa D SfAL - - - SfM NE c55 SfM -

1 6

q 12 en 56 R o ,1 i 3 4 5 05 ot 5 5 5 6 f c . . .

.d ne 1 1 1 1 n IS 5 5 5 5 a i 7

rut et 4 f ensvn 7 o vnooe 2 A acgm 0 $

y -

i r l a . .

m ) )

m 0 8 u 6 6 0 S d .

. 0 e y 1 0,

1 t - or 5 5 al tt 7 ma i ut u s R n R n 2 E o t nsd i E o i

2, snon et et 1 E.acI h c t e 0 h c t e s s y y b ,

b ,

e e dv d v eo eo rb rb e es ea gl n v v 0 aae) oe oe 5 rud s ce ce enrr s s 4, vnuh e( e( 0 Aab( r 0 r 2 n 1 as as e n n d

r no no oi oi u it it T b -

tc t c N s ce ce E f e es es M 1 o e s s s E 5 gl f n r r T y aaoo se se A T r ru p ih ih e T R a en . s ht ht l

S A m vnoe t o t o 1 b P m Aanr 0 1 a G u rf rf T N R S oo oo I F f f T C s s R st st O 0 nn nn P 1 -

oe oe P t i m U - n i m t e t e S nee cr cr erd) ei " ei 0 d ns ju ju 5 rror oq oq 9,

ueph Bps (

re re P r 0 P r 3 s

t r f 2 n f e od g

6 e odd e . m . en st n1 es st u et ii pmse i5 r ,

ir 'r ueg et ii g pmn8 obl v1 qnn obi 6 cuao6 eoi cuk .

n - sic . rik sa1 o r 1 t a m5 i

t fo'ebt ee s 5 cim it e f

oee bl n

- p r as ,

f el r uo i

eoMn0 i pu eoRi r bt e6 c R bt t c m rc . er- m rc s uRoi1 poR uRoe e NEfL5 SfE NEfS D

s l

a t

o q T en y R o r i 6 8 9 a ot 6 6 6 m f c . . . m ne 1 1 1 u IS 5 5 5 S i a[

s*