ML20234E960
| ML20234E960 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 09/17/1987 |
| From: | Edelman M, Farling R, Harvey R CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20234E950 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8709220582 | |
| Download: ML20234E960 (111) | |
Text
,
1 CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EFFECTIVE 9/16/87 PAGE 1 0F 1 SECTION TITLE REV. EFFECTIVE l PROG. NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM POLICY STATEMENT
- 7/21/87 I l l l PROG. i INTRODUCTION l l 7/21/87 l l l I I I l l 0100 ORGANIZATION l 13 1 9/16/87 l l
1 1 I I I l 0200 I QA PROGRAM 8 l 9/16/87 l ,
I I I I I l 0300 DESIGN CONTROL 6 l 9/16/87 l l l 1 0400 l PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL l 4 l 9/16/87 l I I I I l 1 0500 l INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAVINGS 8 l 9/16/87 l l l l l 6 9/16/87 ]
l 0600 l DOCUMENT CONTROL l l l ,
I I I I I l l 0700 l CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES 6 l 9/16/87 l 1 I I I d
l 0800 l IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIAL, PARTS & l l l l COMPONENTS 6 l 9/16/87 l l 1 l l 0900 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 7 l 9/16/87 l l l l l l 1000 l INSPECTION l 6 l 9/16/87 l l l 1 I I I 1100 l TEST CONTROL l 5 l 9/16/87 l l l l l l )i l 1200 l CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT l 6 l 9/16/87 l I I I I I l 1300 l HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING l 6 l 9/16/87 l 1 I I I I i l 1400 l INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS l 6 l 9/16/87 l {
l i I I I l l 1500 l NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS l 5 l 9/16/87 l l l I I I I l l 1600 l CORRECTIVE ACTION l 6 l 9/16/87 l l l 1 I I I l 1700 l QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS l 6 l 9/16/87 l I I I I I I 1800 l AUDITS l 7 l 9/16/87 I I
l APPEN-I l REGULATORY GUIDE AND STANDARDS REFERENCE INDEX I
l 8 I
l 9/16/87 I-l l ,
l DIX I l l l l ]
I I I I I I l APPEN- l DIVISION OF DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY l 0 l 8/07/78 l l
l DIX II l l l l l l l I I i l APPEN- l DEFINITIONS l 2 l 9/17/84 l l l DIX l l l l l III l l l l l l l I I l l PRN = PROGRAM REVISION 1
1 hDR K R
PO eOx 97 m PEAAY. OHIO d4o81 m TELEPHONE (216) 259 3737 m AooAESS to CENTEA ROAO f
~ Serving The Best Location in the Nation PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM POLICY The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company recognizes the need for a formal and comprehensive Nuclear Quality Assurance Program for the Perry Nuclear l Power Plant Unit 2 during the construction and/or indefinite period of delayed
- construction. This program is considered vital to the safety, security and well-being of the public, our customers, employees and shareholders. As agents for the ovners, we maintain ultimate responsibility for the development and implementation of a program that contributes to the safe and reliable j design, construction, extended maintenance, and operation.
It is the policy of this Company that such a program fully comply with the regulatory requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B; ASME Section III, Article NA 4000; ASME Section XI, Article IVA.1000, as applicable, and any additional regulatory guides, codes and standards which address quality assurance requirements that are set forth in the Safety Analysis Reports for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant.
An evaluation of the philosophy, policies and general requirements disclose that the ASME and CEI Quality Assurance Programs are completely compatible in scope, purpose and intent.
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company has the responsibility for the accumulation and retention of all required records and documentation. In addition, CEI is committed to ASME Section III, Article NA 3230, and has contracted with Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company as its authorized inspection agency. The inspection agency is granted access and freedom to the project to perform all required inspections and audits. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company agrees to comply with ASME Section III, Article NA 3270 by preparing, certifying and filing the required 7 N-3 Data Report. j Quality assurance is recognized as a most demanding function in terms of the '
interdisciplinary efforts that are required. Therefore, the program vill define specific individual and organizational responsibility and authority.
It vill also prescribe: procedures for compliance with regulatory requirements and establish appropriate guidelines for implementation of these procedures.
All Company and other associated personnel involved in or responsible for the quality of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 shall comply with this program. All Company personnel are responsible for implementation of t se j
portions of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Program pertinent to e r.spe _ 1ve .r..s of resp _ 1,111t,.
r The Senior Vice President,. Nuclear Group, is assigned the responsibility for assuring that the Nuclear Quality Assura*ce Program fs established and implemented. He shall periodically review the overall' effectiveness of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Program and has authority to administer corrective
- action to improve its effectiveness or-to avoid potential problem areas.
The Nuclear Ouality. Assurance Department Manager is responsible for assuring the' development of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.' He is responsible for assuring through audit, or-other quality assurance techniques, that established systems are implemented, adequate, and are in fact, effective !
methods which will provide management with confidence that we are proceeding- ,
according to plan. He is further responsible for verifying and. documenting !
. that we'have met all regulations, commitments and other established requirements with respect to safety-related activities, systems and equipment.
4 The Nuclear Quality Assurance Department has the responsibility to identify quality' problems, initiate, recommend or provide solutions and verify implementation:of solutions. To accomplish these tasks, the Nuclear Quality
- Assurance Department is hereby given the authority to stop unsatisfactory vork or control further processing, delivery or installation of nonconforming material pending resolution of identified quality related problems.
Any Company employee who at any time believes that The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company's Nuclear Quality Assurance Policy or Program is not
- being fully complied with has the right and indeed the obligation to so inform his_or her superiors of-any such deviatic,ns, including the right of direct appeal to upper management of the Company. l The Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program as described in this manual
' has my unqualified support. All differences of opinion concerning quality assurance which cannot be resolved by the Senior Vice President, Nuclear Group, and Vice President, Finance and Administrative Service Group, vill be referred to me for final resolution, i l l
iTt'7. F cl g nd hief Operating 0 ic Prfsident
^
Date. 04m, / 9M ' '
67 9' gggM EU i l
i
a-i 4
[ CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM INTRODUCTION The President'of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company directed the establishment of a formal and comprehensive Nuclear Quality Assurance Program for the design, procurement, manufacturing, construction, preservation maintenance, and testing of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant. i This manual, the " Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program," has been i developed to. provide a quality assurance program during construction / delayed J construction of PNPP Unit 2 which complies with the regulatory requirements of 1 10CFR50, Appendix B; ASME Section III, as applicable, Article NA 4000; and~
those regulatory guides, codes, and standards which address quality assurance requirements that are set-forth in the Safety Analysis Reports for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant.
A supplement to the Corporate Nuclear-Quality Assurance Program, and organized ';
to the 18 criteria, is the Project Administration Manual containing administrative policies and procedures applicable to all project activities.
Supplementing the Project Administration Manual to control activity-specifically related to the extended maintenance of Unit 2 equipment du.ing construction delay is the Project Maintenance Activity (PMA) program manual which addresses the coordinated responsibilities of Engineering, Quality Assurance, and the Project Work Organization. )
Subtiered to the Project Administration Manual is a series of procedure manuals which include procedures describing interdepartmental'or intercompany flow. These procedures avoid clerical details where such details are covered by intra-element instructions.
At the lowest level are instruction manuals. Such manuals are generated to y accommodate intra-element clerical details as required by procedures.
The instruction, procedure, and PMA manuals are interfaced, codified and controlled through a review process detailed in the Project Administration Manual to readily identify implementation of the Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program requirements and responsibilities.
Further, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company has contracted Gilbert ,
Commonwealth, Incorporated, as the project's architect / engineer, and General Electric Company as the supplier of the nuclear steam supply systems. Both of these organizations are required to have acceptable quality assurance programs meeting the full intent of 10CFR50, Appendix B. This corporate manual, project policies and procedures describe the interface between CEI and its agents, consultants, contractors, and vendors. The delegated work assignments are described herein with The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company maintaining ultimate responsibility for the project.
?'
g@Mbfj
- i. '
L i
.p-The President, having granted overall approval of this Corporate Nuclear i Quality Assurance Program Manual, has delegated to the Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department, the responsibility and authority for approval of manual seetions.
%h Senior Vice Pf6,ident, Nuclear Group ,
Vi Yd .
, * /- l Pr sident FinanSp and Administrative Se vice roup i
Date W, 1/, j q 17 0
i 1
.f 3- 9 '. k y
{u*'. : u ;
I
y PNPP.No. 6523 TITLE organization I N T E R F A C E S PREPARER' R. L. Harvey/V. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY REVIEWER Ihn[Im D4Ne / m a's Pro if APPROVERS b I
) I REVISION NUMBER 13 l 1
EFFECTIVE 9 / 16 / 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy .
1.I 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Requirements 1.2 i Requirements to Meet the Objective 1.2.1 I l Objective of the Perry Project 1.2.2 1 i Responsibilities 1.3 2
.GE Authorization 1.3.1 2 G/C Authorization 1.3.2 2 CEI Management Responsibilities 1.3.3 2 Nuclear Group 1.3.3.1 3 i Finance and Administrative Services Group 1.3.3.2 9 l REFERENCES SECTION PAGE 10CFR 50(Appendix B)
?t CWf s' , N#
This docurent is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
l
' Corporate. Nuclear Outlity Assuranca Program 0100 l Rev. 13 Effective 9 / 16 /87 Page 1 of 12
-J ORGANIZATION I 1
1.l. POLICY-L The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company has an organization for the Perry Nuclear Pover Plant which recognizes that quality is an interdisciplinary responsibility involving.many organizational elements. I To ensure the safe and reliable operation of the. Perry Nuclear Power j 7
! Plant,' quality assurance objectives of design, procurement, manufacture, J t installation, construction, maintenance,' and preoperational testing shall i be achieved through the coordinated efforts of all elements and individuals vhose activities influence quality. .
1 1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY REQUIREMENTS 1.7. Requirements to Meet the Objective In implementing the policy of The Cleveland Electric l Illuminating Company, organizational requirements shall be.
established as described herein for the Perry Project to achieve the objectives of design, procurement, manufacture, i construction, maintenance of Unit 2 throughout the extended
'I construction delay and preoperational testing, and as delineated on the organization chart appearing at the end of this section (Attachment 1). In this revision, Attachment 1
'i ' depicts only those organizations actively involved with the preservation of Unit 2 equipment and materials during'the period of extended construction delay.
.l.2.2 Objective of the Perry Project The overall objective of the Perry Project is to construct and place in service, on schedule at optimum cost and quality, a nuclear power plant consisting of two nominal 1,200 MV electric generating units. The Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) vill utilize General Electric Company (GE) Boiling Vater Reactors (BVR6) and the Mark III containment concept. The architect / engineer is Gilbert Commonwealth, Incorporated (G/C). !
l The material presented belov describes the administrative j policies that vill be employed during the design, licensing, "2 i procurement, construction, extended maintenance, and pceoperational testing of the PNPP to assure compliance with
<10CFR50, Appendix B).
i- During construction delay an extended maintenance program vill ;
preserve the integrity of equipmc.nt and material comprising l PNPP Unit 2.
I 1
Mi._-,_--_-----_______._____ . - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 0100 Rev. 13 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page 2 of 12' L 1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES' ,
5 overall coordination of PNPP activities is the responsibility of the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI). In this capacity, CEI has.
delegated major detail design responsibilities to both GE and G/C. The project also utilizes consultants working within the Project Organization for supplemental technical and clerical assistance.
1.3.1 GE Authorization GE'has the authority for the design, fabrication supply, licensing support, and start-up technical direction of equipment. comprising the BVR6 Nuclear Steam Supply System (NCSS) as described in Volumes I and II of the Technical Description dated. June, 1972, and design support for the Mark III~ containment concept. CE also has the authority for ~
fabrication of the initial fuel loads for unit one and two and to provide design hterface information. GE also has the authority for additional work as requested by CEI and agreed to by GE through contract amendments.
1.3.2 G/C Authorization G/C has the authority for the design of the plant including-the Mark III containment such that the GE NSSS properly interfaces with the remaining plant systems. G/C authorization also includes: licensing support, including preparation and
. administration of the safety analysis reports (FSAR) under the direction of CEI; design, including an independent design review; preparation of both equipment and construction specifications, drawings and contract packages to obtain proposals 'and evaluation of the technical aspects of equipment and construction package proposals. G/C also prepares test
{ specifications and procedures.
1.3.3 CEI Management Responsibilities Overall respc,nsibility for achievement of the Perry Project is that of the Senior Vice President, Nuclear Group. Reporting to I the Senior Vice President, Nuclear Group, is the Vice i President, Nuclear Operations Division, and the Manager of the ,
I Nuclear Quality Assurance Department. Reporting to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Division are the Managers of the Perry Plant Operations Department, Perry Plant Technical Department, and Nuclear Engineering Department.
Administratively, the Senior Vice President, Nuclear Group, reports to the President who reports to the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Procurement support, community relations (including off-site emergency planning and public information),
and providing generel administrative services for the Perry Project is the responsibility of the Perry Services Department.
The Manager, Perry Services Department reports to the Vice President, Finance and Administrative Group, who reports to the President.
( f) ; , i
d )
Corporate Nuclear Gunlity
.g Assurance Program 0100-Rev. 13 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page 3 of 12 i
- )
]
Accomplishment of the quality assurance policies described
~
l herein is a responsibility of the Manager, Nuclear Quality {
Assurance Department (NOAD). <
Accomplishment of the maintenan;e and preservation policies i described herein is the responsibility of the Manager, Nuclear ]
Engineering Department. )1 Accomplishment of the procurement. policies, administrative services, records. management, and procedure activities-described herein is a responsibility of the Manager, Perry u
Services Department.
The " team concept" has been established to ensure a systematic
, .l approach to the resolution of Unit'2 maintenance problems.
These teams are composed of representatives from section/ department directly involved in the activity.
- The equipment teams are composed of representatives from the NED. Design Engineers; Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (Procurement Quality Engineer); and Perry Services Department
~
(Buyer, providing team leadership).
..The contract teams have been established to ensure overall contractor performance, within budget, schedule, and quality requirements. The contracts teams are composed of representatives from the Nuclear Engineering Department, (Contracts Administrator providing team leadership, and Responsible Engineer) and Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (Mechanical / Civil Quality Engineer).
Qualifications for each CEI position listed above are delineated in Functional Position Descriptions or Qualification Sheets which are maintained by Perry Training Section or the responsible Department. i 1.3.3.1 Nuclear Group i I
The Nuclear Group is responsible for the coordination 1 jl of Unit 2 administration, engineering, quality, ,( '
technical and maintenance activities. The Nuclear.
Group consists of: The Nuclear Quality Assurance Department; and Nuclear Operations Division which is composed of the NED, PPOD, and PPTD.
I. Nuclear Engineering Department j l
The Nuclear Engineering Department is responsible for providing storage and maintenance requirements of Unit 2 equipment, l for resolution of engineering problems, and for ]
L physical construction, if necessary. J i
f '
bxn l
_ - - _ __________-__-_--_Y
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Progrcm 0100 Rev. 3 Ef fective /J g/ 87 Page 4 of 12 Four of the six department sections are invnived with Unit 2 preservation activities.
A. Nuclear Construction Services Section Nuclear Construction Services Section (NCSS) is responsible for the sequencing and administration of contracted construction activities, for completion and coordination of vork, for monitoring the contractors, progress in assembling documentation, and for providing support on an as-required basis to the Nuclear Operations Division in the preservation and maintenance of PNPP Unit 2.
This Section is composed of experienced construction and engineering personnel, who vill function as an integral part of the CEI, NED.
NCSS is responsible for administration of l contracted construction activities including the monitoring of the field activities of contractor personnel which have been procured for special assignment, limited scope work and for providing related administrative services.
B. The Mechanical Design Section The Mechanical Design Section is respon-sible for I&C, piping, and mechanical equipment along with the corresponding installation specification activities, and for defining storage / maintenance require-ments for the PMA program.
C. The Electrical Design Section The Electrical Design Section is respon- '
sible for electrical equipment and instal-lation specification activities, on-site conduit detailing effort, support of the ERIS installation and for defining storage / maintenance requirements for the PhA program.
bROV. . ,
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Pgogram 0100 )
Rev. 13 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 I Page H f 12 j i
D. The Engineering Project Support Section !
l The Engineering Project Support Section is i responsible for updating and maintaining I as-built drawings, for equipment qualifi-cation, for maintenance of the 0-List, and for procurement of equipment (spare parts). I l
II. Nuclear Quality Assurance Department Independent of other department is the Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (NOAD). This department has the authority and independence to plan and direct those activities affecting the overall quality program. ,
NOAD is assigned sufficient authority and i organizational freedom to identify quality problems; to initiate, recommend,_or provide solutions; and to prevent or control further processing, delivery, installation, or utilization of nonconforming items until properly resolved.
The Department consists of: Maintenance and Modification Quality Section; Operational ,
Quality Section; and Procurement and 1 Administration Quality Section.
The Quality Assurance Division of G/C has been l contracted by NOAD to provide personnel and quality assurance services in: evaluating prospective vendors; preparation of Quality Assurance specification requirements; revieving engineering specification; reviewing proposals; and providing assistance in the quality engineering and quality control functions of the NOAD. ]
The Quality Assurance Department of Raymond Kaiser Engineers (RKE) supplies personnel to ,
NOAD in areas such as: surveillance inspection activities; quality engineering; and technical and clerical support.
l NOAD.may employ other Quality Assurance Agents l
or delegate new responsibilities to G/C, RKE and existing QA Agents to assist with the implementation of the Quality Assurance Program.
I i
l q@O t,
I- !
l Corporate Nuclear Quality I Assurance Progrtm 0100 l l Rev. 13 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 I Page 6 of 12 l l
A. Maintenance and Modification Quality
. Section The Maintenance and Modification Quality Section is composed of: Hechanical/ Civil Unit; I&C Unit; Electrical Unit; and Quality Outage Planning Unit.
The Maintenance and Modification Quality Section is responsible for quality func-tions such as revieving quality assurance ;
programs, and contractor /PHA quality )
records establishing inspection require-ments, providing quality support for main -
tenance and preservation of Unit 2, reviewing and approving nonconformance reports, and performing surveil- .j lance / inspections and for maintaining the l quality assurance program descriptions in l the CNOAP and FSAR Section 17. I i
B. Operational Quality Section The Operational Quality Section is composed of the Nondestructive Examination Unit, !
Operational Support and Program Unit and Quality Audit Unit.
In support of the Unit 2 preservation, the Operational Quality Section is responsible for providing nondestructive examination support for the preservice and inservice inspection program.
The Quality Audit Unit is assigned responsibility for quality assurance audit functions, for the review and approval of test procedures of the Unit 2 test organization, for implementing nonconformance control procedures commencing with jurisdictional transfer ,
from contractors to PNPP, and for ensuring that NR's initiated subsequent to jurisdictional transfer are reviewed and approved. The Quality Audit Unit trains and qualifies audit personnel; plans and coordinates the internal audit program; conducts audits; tracks and follows up on audit findings; and performs trend analyses and special evaluations including the tL.1'yDN
Corporate Nuclear Ouslity Assurance Program 0100 Rev. 13 Effective 9~--/ 16 / 87
, Page U f 12
'[ evaluation of the Corporate Niiclear Dimlity i ; il Assurance Program ~ effectiveness. Internal audits are performed under the direction of the Quality Audit Unit, however, lead auditors and audit team members need not be members-of the Quality Audit Unit staff.
C. Procurement and Administration Quality Section The Procurement-and Administration Quality Section is composed of the Procurement' Ouality Unit and the Administration and Records Unit. The. Procurement and Administration Quality Section is responsible for implementing quality record requirements, tracking status of quality-related documents, coordinating agent services, coordinating reviews of procedural documents, administering department training and qualification programs, and preparing administrative reports. Procurement and Administration Quality Section is also responsible for- i coordinating agent services,. coordinating design, procurement, and manufacturing quality activities, such as review of purchase orders and contracts, and vendor QA Manuals participation in supplier preavard meetings,' conducting external (supplier) audits and performing receipt inspections of owner-supplied materials and '
equipment. Additionally, the section is responsible for inspections of the CEI varehouse compound.
III. Perry Plant Technical Department ;
The Perry Plant Technical Department is !
responsible for training, security and fire !
protection. ,
i Individual section/ unit responsibilities are as j
follows:
A. Perry Training Se: tion The Perry Training Section coordinates ;
training activities for PNPP personnel. l The Section is responsible for assessing training needs; identifying regulatory qualifications; experience and training requirements; analyzing jobs; and developing; implementing, cordu
\ ggh.
w .T.m
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 0100 Rev. 13 -Effective' 9 / 16/ 87' Page 8 of 12c
' coordinating training program 4 to maed needs and requireTnents. The Section is also responsible for measuring, evaluating and reporting training activities, 1- including training activities, including training effectiveness; and for developing l and maintaining standardized training records, including qualification and certification records.
B. Site Protection Section The Site Protection Section is responsible for directit.g training activities required to develop and maintain a qualified-security force,, and'for ensuring that all provisions of the PNPP Security. Plan are j implemented.
C. Technical Section -
The Technical Section is responsible for technical support and services related to fire protection.and fire prevention'for PNPP Unit 2.
D. Licensing and Compliance Section The Licensing and Compliance Section consists of Licensing Unit and Compliance Unit. The Licensing and Compliance
- activities are responsible for the coordination of all licensing with regulatory agencies. This includes the coordination of technical responses from other departments as required to fulfill the overall licensing objective. I
! IV. Perry Plant Operations Department
.i The Perry Plant Operations Department is responsible for warehousing and pre-operational *)
i testing activities. I i
The Department is organized into the Operations Section, Instrument and Controls Section, q Material Services Section, Maintenance Section, ;
i and Outage Planning Section.
4 l
l \
J
) ,
(1 i
i _1___ _
Corporate Nuclear-Quality Assurance! Program 0100 Rev. 13 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page 9 of 12-A. Instrument and Controls Section The Instrument and Controls Section is ;
responsible for establishing procedures to l adequately control PNPP-owned measuring and l test equipment.
B. Material Servi,ces Section The_ Material Services Section is responsible for ensuring that material, parts, and components in the CEI 1
warehousing compound are adequately y controlled.and identified.
C. Maintenance Section .
q Maintenance Section is responsible for maintenance of the operating plant and may perform maintenance on Unit.2 items upon request.
D. Outage Planning Section (Unit 2 Test Organization)
The Unit 2 test organization is responsible
'for implementing.the pre-operational and ;
acceptance test. program, administering -!
contractual requirements of contractors ,
and' consultants during pre-operational L
testing, establishing and approving measures and procedures to control test
, activities, and for establishing interface i measures between contractors and NOAD to effect corrective action.
1.3.3.2 Finance and Administrative Services Group I. Perry Services Department The Perry Services Department is responsible for ..
providing general administrative services for all organizations located at the PNPP. The department;is responsible for such activities as community relations, procurement support, records management, office facilities, procedures processing and control, forms management, and document control.
L ! The department is organized into the Community I Relations Section; Perry Procurement and Records Management Section and Document, Procedures,
, and Services Section, y
, tp?pDf.khwi{3 m
nm
Corporate Nuclear Quality.
Assurance Program 0100 Rev. 13 Effective 9 / 16/ 87-p Page 10 of 12 A. Communitv Relations Section The. Community Relations Section is responsible for emergency planning and all-
- l PNPP. interface with the local community includingLlocal residents, public officials, and the news media.
, 'B. Perry Procurement and Records Management-
! Section I The Perry Procurement and Records
~
.j Management Section is responsible for
- procuring all services, equipment,
[ materials, and supplies for the maintenance and preservation of Unit 2 and for
, developing and maintaining the records
- management system.
J' C. : Document, Procedures, and Services Seccion The Document, Procedures, and Services Section is responsible for preparation-assistance, review, approval, distribution and control,.and maintenance of all policies, procedures and~ instructions prepared to fulfill:the requirements,of the-CN0AP; typing and word processing functions; controlled distribution of quality documents (including dravings);
reproduction services; forms design and control; data entry processing; facilities
, maintenance; and office support services such as, supplies, mail cashier, and .
telecommunications.
1 i
flyM[t
m$"J.$"
o" n i N C RI D I
S OS R N I E E
E O NR N I EP T S I
GA E C
N ER I E P V O
q T
P N U E O D R
C mS I E I
N R A
E N R MP O
L E C C U I I H V T I t A
Z I j N
A E V y N
G l I
T N UR T
N NE D R
I i
A CE E S MER t
n M E C D I X I I R EF O S I I I E T P C A F E E R S H FO E P E
C C I E
I H V C
T r e (
A R t O
P &
R S R U ED P N T
O I
A O I R S F
F C E C A C
L A
C R
P .
I E- E L C BI t
I V
P r L H Y D N
& I E I D I
E S C E N R A 5 P N
I IN E F C I
V r '
D e
&"MQ$M' s
$ y*9 C1' I I
l I a uc u ue Z h#eou O t
5 4u a c#
t obuk O O o0 a>. Mw *u"w>* es ~esQ aMW ~ ou va
. e M
)
2" cgc y 9 T
E S
I 5WW ou N P I E
1 C L R T P
S O C I E D TE S R S N E ER E Y EP A P sis t nh EMESN C
T I C T T
R CR T O I N AOR A IR# Y r v a I A I I O IA I T G uod O N NCG N OE NC EN 4P 1
CL cl e NN R E AA t v d i e E & I N I T
TN LN T odb n
wo l _ G O N
oic f t k hs U
nPd iNe t An o
2f t l a e m
co t r ig oa nn si S z t da ut T F E T SE r i i o EC R CE I
nn Ct g s T N I NM T t I I I OC E dt ) C NA OAL e h l a at L E G y
ea N
T R dr c
a O on no U
- t P T
I N
V I
VS O N &ST I
C ,R -
A DO P C O S Ct R [, S SN E EDP E SI EN E C OM E EA C RT f N A EP R PE - IEN PVRU
- N U
S CI TE T N E T I VE N AR YR RA RIAC P R C E I N RN I R I A I T E S T .t L C
I l ,
E G
OA NN OoT N t A 0 CI N SL EA E NI P L SII E S E A
C S T ' R EO NN A I OO R A 1 R T E I TS N DNN E
0 I O T S E N N T
N T O N
O R
G
- A C
O P
OE R N D E I
L NEN Z E D S E C RT UC VR J' ECI CTN C SE E C $T C A P IGN NA U
A A R EL NC T L T E T I IU E CL ISE I I T I R I G I EE T OET A OiR O G O C I
E EN RA I NN l
N
/ PN OG L A
I C O
/ . R I N C
H A
R T
& A Q O U NP N O DA SQ O IA I P -
SQ S E N EL EU DN I EU N E R A PI N CA F T CA I C A N AT U TL I E TL S T I I A RY C L I I C N I I IR I l G I E
OT OT O'O E NA NY AT A N NY A"T N N R NS ES A R I C I A OE O L T U N N .R
- ,; _ Cam Lm
- o. C.7y.
yOch,ga~
g- ,. :*
)f*
}?
- V A I O 0 D C N F S SES 0 "ES E I E
C P
E E
C R C
O "PE
" AR P E P C NI I
N 1 R T V N RV R R R A E O SI N I -
1 R IIC E c I I R
0 Y OE N rNC S U R C N N S* ,T R NSEE Y I P A E T D T
,g E I N O T N
. 4llI
- ll1 i u N
O I
T T
N E
D T
& I N
E Ap IS SM ,S,S N G N Y EfERG I
C R p NEEO C I Y MO R Cp E R R I S oE N T I i R VR A MU I R S T
D T I
A n R UO CRV E E RA g P- P EP4 NA R I
N P ESE C O 5 N
I I E SE 9 D C F D E M
D A
C I
V ONS R
.f_I e
.e..D
.i~
"{.
C ub ~4g g-p g a. e g/
r
- C+ cL7 p2 m R, & N N
'~ UT L O I E IO A T C T R SN T
SE ER NY N N A YN N YN A OT O T O AA C T O E
L AM T G A
I II T LT ER E
T I I N E F I II LT C YR N I
AAC S LT AC U T A A R UE RI AC UE T
N !O UE H ILEP M EQS P
N QS I
I AO QS
T R
A H
C Y R
N G T N N L GO NP O N f A R IS N _
O RI art EE>M R CN I GO N
INIG ON N I PN RUO A T E CC I EO 'T I
T RI I I ESI L TUI , /
T LE A T S TC T E T RV T ll I CN R N AS NTC C UI A C HE C R C '
A NGN PE M A E L
~
U SE SE N NS .
Z E D E M EO R
O C .
I P
N I A
G -
R -
O N ,
T T
A N
O N E S N
E T
N ST O
I T S E C
R NND I
R D A NN LS O N A O L N NN T A I S A IIOOIS L OE R P TI ME I AE I C I T
NR O AO NI -
C E" I
E E TIE A RI T E T
EV C N C E R C AI R NOC C ME C"
U P. U RVP R RA A R PE MEP I R AE ES MS t
R E S I S S N
.C E N PDE O
EI -
C E OD P
T S &
A H _
- N RI I I SV V O
T
- t -
on P no e
c U rd ae y O T t a R L N
E L al h e G AO C P AN CG t d I E I ! , sg N TN I NT . nn oi H HC C IR CE i r t u E E ES T T ad P i U t s S nn a o gi rt oc _
n .
eu .
t f 2 o
] nAt eHi dP n U
sh k t f cio ow l n l5 N G bd o O ei T ,g I N & E d vt I el c N T AMN R CN NN GC N N O N d ou LC4EC E O T I I
A O R T I A I a v r h nt Il P 'N T A I OT IS I T Si s YHR RC A N RC T
C NLC EfE RE P A M PE S Y SE Cp S .
ET ED E R I o 1 P i l E R LC S P :
E I T N uO m " WCW - O N
M uc$=%**4 -
c N* uo g~ .b'C
- Ok i3I
.l
- > c. "U .>OCC wN$ s<n O u44 Ogc]o0<
ooaO $ubO .
D HgO uoG pZ c" u8uOO t
PNPP Noc-6533 T2TLE Quality Assuranco Program I N T E R F A C E S PREPARER R. L. Harvey/ V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY
- ASSURANCE PROGRAM 0 2 0 0 REVIEWER M [3o3d I d M Pr cedur ' Unit L
APPROVERS
-, _' A ]
}
s REVISION NUMBER 8 EFFECTIVE 9 / 16 / 87 1
CONTENTS SECTION PAGE-Policy 1.I 1 The CEI Quality Assurance Programs Requirements 1.2 1 Quality Program Documentation 1.3 2 Management Assesment 1.4 3 Resalution of Program Impasses 1.5 3 Indoctrination and Training 1.6 4 Control of the Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual 1.7 4 NRC Review of QA Program Changes 1.7.1 4 Figure 1 - Hierarchy of QA Program Documents 5 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE ANSI N45.2 ANSI N45.2.6 ANSI N45.2.23 Regulatory Guides 1.28, 1.58, l.14e-Society of Non-Destructive Testing - Training Course SNT-TC-lA Final Safety Analysis Report i ,
gq% a. .
This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
l l
Corporate Nuclsar Gunlity l Assurtnce Progrtm 0200 Rev. 8 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page I of 5 0UALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM -
1.1 POLICY The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company's Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program (CNOAP) for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 satisfies the requirements of <10CFR50, Appendix B; ANSI N45.2; and Regulatory Guide 1.28). Implementation of this program is mandatory for all CEI organizations involved in the design, procurement, manufacturing, construction, maintenance, inspection or testing of safety-related systems, structures or components. Upon acceptance of these systems, structures, and components by the Perry Plant Operations / Perry Plant Technical Department for start-up and operations, the operational quality assurance program shall be in effect.
The Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program encompasses all equipment, systems and structures, including nuclear fuel, which have been categorized as safety-related as delineated by the Safety Analysis Report (SAR), and Fire Protection Systems as defined by the Fire Protection Evaluation Report. The level of Quality Assurance activity applied to equipment in these classes vill depend upon the safety class, equipment complexity, intended function, and other quality, administrative and engineering considerations, i It shall be the responsibility of each department manager to ensure that all responsible project personnel are cognizant of the mandatory requirements of this manual and of the procedures which implement the program. The Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (N04D) shall also be responsible for confirming that responsible CEI departments, agents, consultants, contractors and vendors comply with the applicable requirements of this program.
CEI retains the responsibility fot the development, approval, application, administration, and control of the total Quality Assurance Program for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2. The program provides ;
for accomplishing activities affecting safety under suitably controlled conditions and in accordance with the program elements of procedures, instructions, specifications, and drawings.
~
1.2 THE CEI OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS The Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program requires:
1
- a. Identification of systems, structures and components to which the quality assurance program is applicable. (< Final Safety Analysis Report > (FSAR) Table 3.2). l t
- b. Control of the quality of design, engineering, and maintenance l I
activities.
- c. Control of the p.ocurement of materials, comp t n services. f l
1 I
_2____- _ _ - - _ , _ _ b
7 1
Corporate Nuclear Ouslity Assurance Progre.m 0200 Rev. 8 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 hge 2 of 5
- d. Control'of the fabrication of systems and components.
- e. control of the construction of structures, and the installation'of systems and components.
- f. Control of the inspections, examinations, and tests of components and systems, including those required by ASME Section XI.
- g. Control of quality-related systems, components, structures, and j maintenance activities until turnover to the appropriate )
preoperational Nst section or jurisdictional transfer. . ]
The objective of these requirements is to provide a high level of 'l confidence to ensure that the items or services provided satisfy ]
safety-related design requirements and the project applicable Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations.
In order to ensure effective implementation of the program, the fc11oving provisions have been established:
- a. A CEI management organization committed to quality, with responsibilities and authorities clearly established and documented.
- b. Qualified consultants and agents to design and assist in the i construction and testing of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant. ]
- c. Competent company technical personnel to develop and administer the necessary procedures for designing, purchasing, manufacturing, .
constructing, examining, and testing plant systems, structures and l components and for monitoring program compliance.
- d. A Quality Assurance organization, with sufficient organizational freedom and authority to inspect, audit, evaluate, and initiate corrective actions on activities and items affecting the quality of safety related systems, structures and components, and to report any deficiencies found.
- e. Contractors' and vendors' adherence to their contractual scope of vork, including PNPP approved procedures affecting Unit 2 l activities.
t
- f. A suitable work environment which includes management access, appropriate equipment, and adequate indoctrination and training to perform safety-related activities.
1.3 QUALITY PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION i This Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual is the primary '
corporate document describing the Nuclear Quality As.surance Program for the construction and maintenance phases of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2. Each of the eighteen cri*.tria of 10CFR50, Appendix B, and the responsibilities for the corresponding safety-related activities are addressed in the eighteen sections which comprise this Manual.
Corporate Nuclear. Quality Assurance Program 0200 Rev. -8 Effective 9 / 16 / 87
~
Page 3 of 5 The requirements of this program shall be implemented in accordance with d^ tailed procedure and instruction manuals, which are related through the hierarchy of documents illustrated in Pigure 1.
All procedures and instructions shall be approved and established, with training accomplished, prior to the start of the activities being controlled. Issuance, distribution, and revisions shall be controlled to preclude the use of obsolete documents.
Reference indexes demonstrating the Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program's address with respect to the guidelines provided by Regulatory Guides and American National Standards Institute (ANSI) are presented in (Appendix I>.
1.4 MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT Management assessment of program effectiveness shall be through regular and documented reporting channels on a month by month basis, and through a Quality Assurance Quarterly Evaluation.
An independent assessment of the program effectiveness shall be conducted annually.
In addition, the Nuclear Safety Review Committee (NSRC) has been designated to conduct regular review and evaluation of the QA Program for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) Unit 2. The committee shall advise the Senior Vice President - Nuclear Group on the adequacy of scope, implementation and effectivene.ss of the PNPP QA Program, and on CEI QA policy matters as they relate to PNPP.
The NSRC shall have an approved charter addressing membership, meeting frequency, authority and duties.
1.5 RESOLUTION OF PROGRAM IMPASSES Disputes arising from the interpretation of the Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program should be resolved at the lowest possible level.
The hierarchy of each project department provides for interf aces from department specialists through various levels of supervision. This organizational consistency should provide ample opportunities for problem ,
resolution through simple escalation.
Those conflicts which cannot be resolved at lover lo els shall be referred to the Manager, NOAD. The Manager, NQAD shall attempt to resolve the problem with the manager of the other concerned departtent, or escalate to the executive level, using the advice of the Nuclear Safety Review Committee Es appropriate.
\
Corporate Nuclear Gunlity l Assurance Program 0200 Rev. 8 Effective --9 / 16/ 87 Page 4 of 5 !
l 1.6 INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING )
s 1 The Perry Training Section is responsible for the development of an overall project training program, and shall plan, develop, schedule, conduct and document training program activities in coordination with supervisors of individuals to be trained. It is a Supervisory responsibility to ensure that personnel performing quality-related activities are suitably trained and qualified to perform their work.
The Nuclear Quality Assurance Department, through its audit program, shall provide the assurance that training is meaningful, adequate for the tasks to be performed, consistent, and in accordance with the following project regulatory requirements:
- a. Inspection and test personnel shall be qualified and certified to the requirements of < ANSI N45.2.6 as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.58).
- b. Nondestructive Testing personnel shall be qualified and certified to <SNT-TC-1A>. ,
- c. Auditors shall be qualified and certified to the requirements of
< ANSI N45.2.23 as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.146).
1.7 CONTROL OF THE CORPORATE NUCLEAR OUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL This manual was developed under the direction of the Manager, NOAD. It has been reviewed and approved by The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company's executive officers.
Distribution of'this manual shall be controlled by the Document, Procedures, and Services Section. All recipients of controlled manuals !
are responsible for the maintenance of their assigned manual. Proposed revisions shall be directed in writing to the Document, Procedures, and Services Section. All proposed revistons must be reviewed and concurred with by the. Document, Procedures, and Services Section prior to submittal for review and approval by the Manager, NOAD.
1.7.1 NRC Review of 0A Program Changes All changes to the Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program l Manual that reduce commitments in the OA program description '
previously accepted by the NRC must be submitted for NRC approval before they are implemented per 10CFR50.54(a).
Approval is considered granted upon receipt of a letter to that effect from the reviewing office of the NRC, or after 60 days from the date of submittal, whichever occurs first.
Changes to the CNOAP Manual that do not reduce ecmmitments may be made without prior NRC approval. Any such changes must t;e submitted to the NRC Region III office for information within 90 deys from the date of implementation.
\YO.f w
Corporate ~ Nuclear Quality
. Assurance Progrcm 0200 -
Rev. 8 Effective. 9 / J /E. ]
Page G f.5 ;
Figure 1 ,
Hierarchy of QA Program Documents
- i l
)
Cor-porate Nuclear QA Program Appendix I Reg. Guides \
\
/ Project ___
/ Administration i i
\
I
/
' \
Procedures % {-
/ \
/ (Single-digit volume numbers)-
\ ' -
I l-
.\ g j Instructions I (Two-digit volume numbers) !
. i Manuals j Project . Maintenance Activity I
(Unit 2) l g)fgM3E [<N"V "
J f
. . _ . . .J
PNPP No. 6523 4 I ' TITLE Design Control ! N T E R F A .C E S PREPARER R.L. Harvey/V.L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY r REVIEWER &;i, [ x N 4 / #d "
l Pro r'es Unit
)
APPROVERS 3[
Y j
~l 6 !
REVISION NUMBER l
EFFECTIVE 9 / 16 / 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.1 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Design Control Requirements 1.2 1
~ Safety Analysis Reports 1.2.1 1 Specifications 1.2.2 2 Drawings 1.2.3 3 l Design Interface Control 1.2.4 3 Reportable Deficiencies 1.2.5 3 Responsibilities 1.3 4 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE ANSI N45.2.11 10CFR50.55 (e) and 10CFR21 i
O ggqEnti +
1 This document is written in responce to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 t l
(10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
l
l i
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 0300 Rev. 6 Effective 9/ 16/ 87 Page 1 of 4 DESIGN CONTROL ,
1.1 POLICY l The design and design review of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 (PNPP) is provided by Gilbert Commonwealth, Incorporated (G/C) as the Architect / Engineer and General Electric as the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) supplier. Both organizations have been delegated total design authority and are required to have written procedures which meet the requirements of <10CFR50, Appendix B, and ANSI N45.2.11) in accordance with the CEI Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
CEI performs a design coordination function consisting of selected j reviews and a design control monitoring program. This function is the responsibility of the Nuclear Engineering Department, and the Nuclear Quality Assurance Department which are to perform these activities in accordance with approved, detailed procedures. These procedures shall assure that:
- a. Design activities are conducted in a planned and systematic manner.
- b. Perry Safety Analysis Report requirements have been appropriately addressed in design documents.
- c. Design requirements can be controlled and inspected and/or tested to specified acceptance criteria.
1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY DESIGN CONTROL REQUIREMENTS In addition to project management techniques, CEI design control objectives are met by maintaining various reviev and approval functions over Safety Analysis Reports, 0A Programs, Balance of Plant Design Specifications, and selected dravings.
1.2.1 Safety Analysis Reports The development, maintenance and control of the PNPP Safety Analysis Report (SAR) is a CEI, GE, and G/C licensing effort.
G/C, GE, and CEI are all responsible for input of SAR informa-tion while, G/C is responsible for production. CEI is respon- .
sible for approval and issue authorization. There are three distinct stages of SAR preparation and maintenance. They are prior to Construction Permit, Construction Permit until Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) docketing, and FSAR docketing until Operating License.
[
[ f .p't.W '
Corporate Nuclear Qunlity Assurance Progrtm 0300 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 l Page 2 of 4
/ )
Prior to a Construction Permit, the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR) is maintained via an amendment process.
' Amendments may be generated in response to NRC Requests for Information. Upon receipt of a Request for Information, the CEI Licensing Engineer requests G/C to initiate an amendment.
\ Draft Amendments are distributed to responsible CEI departments for review. After comment resolution with G/C, the amendment ;
is published, filed with the NRC, and distributed. i i
After receipt of a Construction Permit, the PSAR is maintained by SAR Deviations. As final, detail design evolves, variations from PSAR requirements may develop. These shall be documented on SAR Deviations and receive the same project review and approval as the PSAR. G/C shall prepare the SAR Deviation by their own initiations or CEI notification. Upon G/C approval, the SAR Deviation is forwarded to CEI for a reviev and approval by responsible departments and for a determination by the Licensing and Compliance Section (if approved) to issue as an SAR Deviation or for later inclusion in the FSAR or reviev vith the NRC for their approve before acceptance as an SAR Deviation.
The Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) is based upon the PSAR and SAR Deviations. Development, review, issue, and amendment to the FSAR is a~ accomplished via the PNPP Change Request process. FSAR changes are proposed by an identifying Section, evaluated per provisions of 10CFR50.59, approved for submittal at the General Supervisory level, and reviewed by knowledgeable organizations, including Licensing and Compliance Section, to ensure legal, regulatory and licensing requirements remain fulfilled.
1.2.2 Specifications Balance of Plant safety-related specifications generated by G/C as the Architect / Engineer shall be reviewed and approved by CEI Nuclear Engineering Department and Nuclear 0A Department. i Preliminary copies shall be controlled by correspondence, final copies and revisions shall be controlled (released to Perry Services Department) by documented Engineering 0A Releases.
Specification development, issuance, and affectivity shall be tracked by a status system. .
Changes to specifications, including engineering design change requests, shall be controlled in a similar, approved manner.
G/C shall also prepare test specifications for the balance of plant systems. These documents vill delineate test objectives, references, prerequisites (for tests), initial conditions, !
tests to be performed, and acceptance criteria for developing Preoperational and Acceptance Test procedures. These test l specifications shall be developed on a system basis, reviewed YWWh.
m , s. o.
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Progre.m 0300 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page H f 4 and approved by the section responsible for preoperational test performance and the Maintenance and H5dification Quality Section, as required, or its designated representative then utilized for the preparation of testing procedures.
CEI Nuclear Engineering Department receives controlled copies of General Electric (NSSS) specifications for information, interface considerations and reference for receipt, !
installation, testing and operational activities. GE shall also prepare test specifications for NSSS Systems which vill be utilized for the preparatica of testing procedures. !
1.2.3 Dravings Design information for Balance of Plant.(B0P) included in such ;
selected drawings as flow diagrams, one-line electrical diagrams, plant layout drawings, and some detailed design drawings are reviewed by CEI Nuclear Engineering Department for overall conformance to SAR requirements and CEI operating and engineering preferences.
These Engineering reviews shall be conducted and documented in accordance with written procedural requirements. They are 4 performed in addition to the independent reviews for plant criteria and design adequacy prepared by the originating organization (G/C or GE).
Balance of Plant drawings, used in lieu of specifications, shall be reviewed and approved by Nuclear Engineering Department and Nuclear Quality Assurance Department in accordance with approved procedures.
1.2.4 Design Interface Control Design interfaces shall be established and controlled by G/C and GE. Their systems of cross-discipline and inter-company reviews of design information is complemented by CEI Nuclear Engineering Department in the role of a project management group. Engineering reviews of specifications and selected drawings (including some vendor drawings) provide additional assurance to the control systems and procedures established by ,
G/C and GE.
1.2.5 Reportable Deficiencies All deficiencies found in design and construction of PNPP, which, were they to remain uncorrected, could adversely affect the safe operation of Unit 2 at any time throughout the expected life, shall be reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Current Federal Regulations delineate two categories of reportable noncompliance and two system requirements. These requirements are defined under
<10CFR50.55(e)> and <10CFR?l). ,
ym per %'*1% . e b L
l l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assuranca Program 0300 Rev. 6 . Effective 9/ 16/ 87 Page 4 of 4
^
Deficiencies which are significant within the meaning of.
10CFR50.55(e) shall be handled in accordance with detailed .
procedures. ; These procedures for the identification, !
' evaluation and reporting of Significant Deficiencies are
. interfaced, through contracturaliand program arrangements, with !
,our agents, contractors and vendors. .These arrangements -4 provide for open. reporting channels to the Nuclear Quality :l Assurance Department who, with Nuclear Engineering Department,. !
and, as necessary,' agent personnel, shall evaluate the condition to determine if they exceed the critaria provided by .
<10CFR50.55(e)> and'NRC supplemental guidance documents.
For deficiencies reportable within.. the meaning of: <10CFR2D, the CEI Nuclear Quality Assurance Program requires:
a.. -Inclusion in contracts or purchase orders of the Part 21 notification requirement to suppliers of safety-related q materials, parts, components and services.
- b. The posting of the' Part 21 requirements for project j personnel.
- c. Procedures for reviewing deficiencies in delivered or furnished components or services to determine if they exceed the criteria of 10CFR, Part 21.. j 1.3' RESPONSIBILITIES i
Department Managers are responsible for ensuring the. establishment and implementation of design control procedures as required by.this manual.
.i The General Supervisor, Document, Procedures, and Services Section, is l responsible for coordinating the review and approval of CEI design l control procedures.
The Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department, is responsible for 'I ensuring through audits the establishment and implementation of design l control procedures.
.\
Li p:u.p..Sb#s 1
.. . i
- NPP Ns. 6523 .
TITLE -Procurement Documsnt Control I N T E R F A C E S l PREPARER R. L.Harvey/V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSUR-ANCE PROGRAM 0 4 0 0 eIv;n1 fhd .
NaNs dA REVIEWER Ora Procedures Un'it APPROVERS -
[ . /'
e-
/
REVISION NUMBER 4 EFFECTIVE 9/ 16/ 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy l.I 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Procurement Document Control Requirements 1.2 i Responsibilities 1.3 2 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE I
t H)
,,p, amui.
'g.. Ca 3
This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 )
(10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
_______________--J
7 _,
Corporate Nuclear Quality L Assurance Program 0400 I
Rev.1 Effective 1/16 /87 Page 1 of 3 PROCUREMENT ~ DOCUMENT CONTROL 1 J 2, 1.1 POLICY i-Procurement'of material, equipment and services for safety class systems, structures and components on the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) Unit 2 shall be performed in'accordance with written policier and procedures and instructions. These shall establish methods for preparation, review, approval, and control of procurement documents and shall provide measures to comply with requirements of <10CFR50, Appendix B).
1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS CEI Nuclear Group and Perry Services Department shall establish detailed procedures and instructions to control the procurement of safety-related equipment, material and services. Heasures shall be established for the review, approval and release of procurement documents, and subsequent proposals, revisions or change orders. These reviews shall assure the inclusion of the applicable technical, quality, and commercial requirements in procurement documents prior to their use.
Procedures shall also be. established to monitor the procurement document control programs of the delegated purchasing responsibilities of GE (NSSS), Gilbert Commonwealth, Incorporated (G/C), Contractors and Vendors.
Professional' services of consultants and agents shall be procured by Perry Procurement and Records Management Section upon submittal of a requisition by the organization requesting the service. Professional service agreements shall be submitted to Procurement and Administration s Quality Section for determination of applicable Quality Assurance program requirements. If Quality Assurance program requirements have been determined to apply to the original agreement, changes to the agreement shall also be submitted to the Procurement and Administration Quality Section.
The measures established for the control of procurement documents shall include the following requirements: ,
- a. The sequence of actions for the preparation, review, approval, Y 4 ja L controlofprocurementdo.;umentsshallbedelineateq(
procedures. ,
g
- b. Procedures shall be established to accomplish the selection of proposed vendors and contractors, the evaluation of proposals, and the selection of a vendor or contractor for award of the work, whether equipment material or services. contracts or purchase orders for safety-related material, equipment or services shall be awarded only to approved vendors or contractors.
l Corporate Nuclesr Quality l Assurance Program 0400 l Rev. 4 Effective 9 / 16 /87 I
Page 2 of 3 1
- c. Qualified personnel shall review and concur with the adequacy of quality requirements to determine that the9 are correctly stated, inspectable, and controllable; that there are adequate acceptance I
criteria; and that procurement documents have been processed in accordance with established requirements.
- d. Review of procurement documents shall be documented to evidence their approval prior to their release.
- e. Vendor and contractor quality programs shall be reviewed and approved prior to initiation of the activities affected by their programs. '
- f. Procurement measures shall require that changes and revisions to procurement documents be subject tc the same control requirements as the original documents.
These aforementioned program requirements shall be implemented in a manner that assures procurement documents:
- a. Specify applicable <10CFR50, Appendix B> and codes or standards requirements which must be complied with, and described in, the vendor's or contractor's Quality Assurance Program.
- b. Specify design basis technical requirements, including applicable regulatory requirements, material and components identification requirements, drawings, specifications, codes and industrial standards, test and inspection requirements, and special process instructions be identified or referenced in procurement documents.
- c. Identify the documentation to be prepared, maintained, and submitted for reviev, approval and record information as applicable.
- d. Ider.tify those records which vendors or contractors shall retain, maintain, and control; and those records which the vendors or contractors shall deliver prior to use or installation of the item.
- e. Include rights of access to vendors or contractors and their subtier vendor and contractor facilities and records for source inspection and audits.
Procurement document control measures shall be audited by Quality organizations, and program effectiveness shall be evaluated by management at a specified frequency. yy gg Qpjl QTTg.9,6L>*'"~gV. A (p/d i
1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES Department Managers in the Nuclear Group shall be responsible for ensuring the establishment and implementation of procedures for review and approval in accordance with the requirements of this section, of procurement documents of safety class material and drawings, equipment, and services.
(
Corporate Nuclear Quality
. Assurance Program 0400. . .!
Rev. 4 Ef fective 9 /16 /3J7.,_ !
Page 3 of 3 ;
The Manager, Perry Services De'partment, shall'be responsible for ensuring the establishment of written procedures and instructions for processing all contracts and purchase orders.
The Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department, shall'be responsible for the establishment of procedures for the QA review of procurement-documents to assure they were prepared and processed in accordance with the requirements.of this manual.
t I
(
I I
e I
k i n .,
- .\ I Lu un :;, c
PNPP No. 6523 TITLE. Instructions, Procedures, I N T E R F A C E S
> and Drawings
> PREPARER R. L.Harvey/V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY 0 0 0 REVIEWER M4(h,Nf1 e -
/ 4[ ASSURANCE PROGRAM 5 ;
Pr
) Unit APPROVERS
] \
l l
l REVISI0h NUMBER 8 I
EFFECTIVE 9 / 16 / 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.1 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Instructions, Procedures and Drawings Requirements 1.2 'I !
Procedures and Instructions Established by Project Departments 1.2.I 1 Procedures and Instructions of Consultants, Agents, Contractors, and Vendors 1.2.2 2 Responsibilities 1.3 3 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE t% "
. 'g'.
- c. rJf,$(.M*8')
- s ti" By'" i t'
\ g{w
- This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulatic,'s, Title 10, Part 50 l (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program. '
1
- - - --- - o
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 0500 Rev. 8 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page M f 4 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRA7INGS 1.1 Policy i The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company requires that activities affecting quality of safety-class structures, systems, and components be prescribed in and accomplished by documented instructions, procedures, and drawings. Participants in the project shall be responsible for the preparation and use of appropriate documents which describe the control of their quality-related activities. These documents shall be developed as appropriate for the quality-related activity and its importance to safety. They shall include appropriate quantitative and qualitative acceptance criteria sufficient to verify that the activity has been satisfactorily accomplished. Before work is begun on a quality-related activity, the controlling documents shall be approved and personnel who perform the work shall be trained in their requirements.
CEI shall comply with the requirements for the establishment, issuance and. control of instructions, procedures, and drawings in accordance with
<10CFR50, Appendix B> and < ANSI N45.2>.
1.2 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Instructions, Procedures and Drawings Requirements The CEI Quality Assurance Program shall be delineated in policies, procedures and instructions developed by each department, and processed through the Document, Procedures,.and Services Section. Drawings as design documents are controlled as delineated in < Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 0600), " Document Control".
1.2.1 Procedures and Instructions Established'by Project Departments Procedures and instructions shall be established by each Project department to implement the following requirements:
- a. Activities affecting quality shall be described by an approved instruction, procedure, or policy.
- b. Instructions, procedures, or policies shall be developed, reviewed, approved and issued in accordance with this Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program manual and the detailed requirements specified by approved procedures.
- c. The Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (NQAD) shall review instructions and shall review and approve those procedures and policies which delineate the methods of {
complying with the requirements of 10CFR50, Manual and gd j the criteria specified by <10CFR50, Appendix B>.
g?6p9 3,,1 i w.
}
I
Corporate Nuclear Gunlity Assurance Progrcm 0500 Rev. 8 Effective 9/ 16/ 87 Page 2 of 4
- d. Each instruction, precedure, or policy shall describe the sequence of action to be accomplished and shall define the responsibilities and authorities of Project personnel performing the activity.
- e. Appropriate quantitative and qualitative acceptance criteria shall provide measures for determining the satisfactory accomplishment of important activities.
- f. Interfaces with other Company elements or other agent activities shall be clearly described.
- g. Instructions, procedures and policies shall be reviewed and approved, and identified project personnel shall be trained in their content, prior to performing quality-related work.
- h. Distribution of instructions, procedures and policies shall be adequately controlled to preclude the use of obsolete documents and shall be sufficiently complete to assure availability to responsible personnel.
- i. Vendor Instruction Manuals, or portions thereof, used for inspection, test or work activities affecting quality of safety-class structures, systems, or components shall be reviewed, approved, and issued by the Nuclear Engineering Department and issued by Information Control Unit (ICU) prior to use,
- j. Revisions to instructions, procedures, and policies shall be subject to program controls equivalent to those imposed on original issue documents.
- k. Documents which supplement the procedure system such as Special Project Plans and Record Expediting Action Plans (REAP's) shall conform to the requirements of this section.
l 1.2.2 Procedures and Instructions of Consultants. Agents, I Contractors and Vendors Those activities affecting quality which are performed by -I consultants, agents, contractors, and vendors shall be l delineated by instructions and procedures. NQAD shall i establish procedural measures to assure the following program control requirements are met:
- a. General Electric (GE) instructions, procedures, and drawing requirements shall be audited to assure compliance with <10CFR50, Appendix B). The Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) notification point program shall also verify the adequacy of GE subvendor instructions, procedures and drawings.
bc;G &, W o
l 1
___________________.______________________J
Corporate Nuclear Outlity Assurance Program 0500 Rev. 8 Effective 9/ 16/ 87 Page 3 of 4
- b. The Gilbert Commonwealth, Incorpo_ rated (C/C) Interface Manual for design engineering shall be reviewed and approved .
and detailed Design Control procedures shall be audited. I
- c. QA Agent manuals and/or plans shall be reviewed and. approved by NOAD, and detailed instructions and procedures shall be audited at specified frequencies.
- d. Vendor QA manuals; selected drawings; and special process, inspection, and test procedures shall be reviewed and approved by NOAD prior to releasing the vendor to fabricating safety-related components. Effectivcyyss and implementation shall be verified by audit or es.nciacturing surveillance programs.
- e. Contractor QA manuals, plans, selected drawings, instructions, and procedures shall be reviewed by NOAD and approved prior to releasing the contractor to start work.
Adequacy and implementation shall be verified by audit and inspection / surveillance programs.
1.3 Responsibilities Each project department shall be responsible for the preparation and implementation of instructions and procedures in accordance with the requirements specified in this Manual.
l Ihe General Supervisor, Document, Procedures, and Services Section, is responsible for ensuring through the review process, interface considerations in all program instruction, procedure, and policy I development. Document, Procedures, and Services Section shall ensure the development of detailed preparation, approval, and maintenance procedures l to control the development of CEI instructions, procedures, and policies.
The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for ensuring the QA review and approval of vendor QA manuals and procedures; and for establishing vendor audit and manufacturing surveillance programs; including those of GE NSSS and l nuclear fuel.
The General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance and Modification Quality -
i Section, is responsible for ensuring the OA review and approval of instructions, procedures, and the Project Maintenance Activity Manual.
The Section shall also be responsible for verifying, through inspection / surveillance, the adequacy and implementation of the Project Maintenance Activity for PNPP Unit 2 during the delayed construction phase. In addition, the Section shall be responsible for ensuring 0A review of project procedures and instructions, including confirmation of compliance with upper-tier documents.
U 4W
,. r p v. ., p } 0L *;&
y l\ ~
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 0500 Rev. 8 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 -
Page 4 of L 1.
The General Supervising Engineer, Operational Quality Section, is
- , responsible for ensuring through project interna-1 audits that established requirements for procedures, instructions, dravir.gs, and documents which supplement the procedure system are implemented-And effective, and that they provide adequate methods of accomplishing r.nd controlling quality-related activities.
E l
1 l
/
/
/
y! r ar5T!or! -p u
[pr*ce ra.. . .; ;
. a:
l
PNPP No. G523 TSTLE Document Control I N T E R F A C E S PREPARER R. L. Harvey/V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY REVIEWER kv M8/ d.
o uIresOnit APPROVERS -
v REVISION NUMBER 6 EFFECTIVE 9/ 16/ 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.1 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Document Control Requirements 1.2 1 Responsibilities 1.3 3 1
i l
REFERENCES SECTION PAGE ANSI N45.2 I
This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corpora +: Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, j l
l
Corporate Nuclesr Quality Assurence Program 0600 Rev. 6 Effective -9/ 16/ 87 Page U f 3 DOCUMENT CONTROL 1.1 POLICY Procedures shall be established and utilized to control those documents which specify, describe or evidence activities affecting the quality of the Perry Nuclear Iover Plant, Unit 2. These procedures shall be in accordance with the requirements of this manual and the criteria of
<10CFR50, Appendix B), and < ANSI N45.2>.
1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY DOCUMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS l Document control measures for t'he Perry Nuclear Power Plant consist of two tiers _of document control procedures.
At . the first tier, ' project document control procedures shall be established by the Document, Procedures, and Services Section to record the receipt, to naintain the status, and to control the issuance of designated project documents through the Information Control Unit. The Information Control Unit is designated through procedures and instructions as the project file for these designated documents, except for original commercial documents. Ultimate repository for the project documents vill be the Records Management System.
Procedures shall be developed to control and include, but not be limited to, the following documents:
i
- a. Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual l
- b. Procuremen*. Specifications
- c. Design Specifications
- d. Design change documents (requests and revision notices) l e. G/C Bills of Material
- f. Gilbert Associates Drawings
- g. General Electric Drawings ,
- h. Contractor Drawings
- 1. Vendor Drawings
- j. All project manuals, procedures, and instructions (e.g., OA, QC, policy).
- k. Vendor Instruction Manuals
Corporate Nuclear Qual'.ty Assurance Program 0600 '
Rev. 6 Effective 9 / ~~16 / 87 Page 2 of 3
.The second tier of document control measures shall consist of specific project elements' procedural address for those documents generated-or issued by the element. These procedures shall be developed-to control and include,.but not be limited to, the following documents:
- a. Project Correspondence
- b. Purchase Orders and Contracts
- c. Noncompliance Documents
- d. Quality Record Packages
- e. Audit, Surveillance, Inspection Reports
- f. NRC IE Bulletins i
- g. Safety Analysis Reports
- h. Preoperational Testing Procedures
- 1. Test Specifications
- j. Maintenance Procedures All procedures established for document control shall meet the following requirements:
- a. Review, approval and issue criteria for documents and their revisions shall be specified to assure adequate technical and quality requirements are met prior to issue,
- b. The individual or elements responsible for reviewing, approving and issuing documents and their revision shall be specified,
- c. Changes must be documented, approved and included in the appropriate revision document prior to being implemented.
- d. Revisions shall be reviewed and approved by the same organizations '
that performed the original review and approval or by other j qualified, responsible, and designated organizations. .,]
- e. Revisions shall be reviewed and approved by the same organizations that performed the original reviev and approval or by other qualified, responsible, and designated organizations.
- f. Document distribution must be sufficient to assure that the documents are readily available at convenient locations to project personnel prior to their commencement of work.
- g. Appropriate document transmittal and maintenance measures shall be incorporated in document control systems to prevent inadvertent use of voided, superseded or obsolete documents.
gM
s Corporate Nuclear Quality Assuranca Program 0600 Rev. 6 Ef fective '9 /16 / 87 Page 3 of 3
- g. Status indication measures shall be established for all controlled documents. Status lists or logs shall be maintained and be'made available to project personnel to identify the current revision levels of controlled documents.
- 1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES All Project Organization elements shall be responsible for developing and maintaining document control procedures for their activities which affect quality.
The Manager, Perry Services Department, shall be responsible for the !
development and implementation of the Information Control Unit's document l control measures. The General Supervisor, Document, Procedures, and '
' Services Section, shall be responsible for reviewing the document control pec:edures of other elements.
The Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (NOAD), is responsible for the review and approval of project documents for quality assurance requirements and document control measures. The Manager, Nuclear Quality- q Assurance Department, is responsible for evaluation of the project document control effectiveness-through audits and other QA techniques.
l l
e i
1 i
1 1
Ih[{hh i l
PNPP No. 6523 T8TLE. Control of Purchased Material, f- N T- E R F A' C E S Equipment, and Services j 1
PREPARER. R. L. Harvey/V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY
. ASSURANCE PROGRAM 0 7 0 0 REVIEWER c/.c;r, l[84,A grd; ro ures Unit t APPROVERS - l
.)
REVISION NUMBER 6 EFFECTIVE 9/ 16/ 87 !
i CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.! !
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company's Control of Purchased Equipment, Materials, and Services Requirements 1.2 l 1 Procurement Assurance Procedures Shall Require: 1.2.1 1 !
Manufacturing Assurance Procedures Shall Require: 1.2.2 2 Construction Assurance Procedures Shall. Require: 1.2.3' 4 Consultant / Agent Services Assurance Procedures Shall Require: 1.2.4 6 l Responsibilities 1.3 6 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE l
This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
, ....n n :3 e -l ry ; r:t y if p v, t. : s 3
I Corporate Nuclear Quality Assuranca Program 0700 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / ~~~
16 / 87 Page U f 7
~
CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES 1.1 POLICY The procurement controls of material, equipment, and services for the construction, extended maintenance and reoperation testing phases shall be performed in accordance with written policies and procedures. Quality Assurance measures shall' apply to the procurement of materials including spare parts, replacement parts, off-the-shelf-items, and consumables.
The procurement controls for spare and replacement parts shall be equivalent to those applies to the original procurement. Procurement of spare and replacement parts to requirements' differing from those of the original procurement vill be permitted provided a detailed design-evaluation is completed prior to procurement.
Appropriate measures shall be included to evaluate procurement sources, monitor the activities of consultants, vendors and contractors, and confirm that purchased items conform with procurement document requirements. The programs of all participants shall be in accordance t with the CEI Specifications, this CEI Nuclear Quality Assurance Program .
and <10CFR50, Appendix B>. l The general and specific requirements for. the Quah[y Assurance Program of all vendors and contractors, including their subvendors and subcontractors supplying safety-related material, equipment, or services are delineated by procurement documents. The procurement documents impose Quality Assurance Program requirements that are commensurate with the degree of complexity and the importance.to safety of the items and services being performed.
1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY'S CONTROL OF PURCHASED EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, AND SERVICES REQUIREMENTS The control of procured safety-related material, equipment, and services shall be provided by the CEI Nuclear Group and Perry Services Department (PSD) in accordance with established procedures. Quality Assurance procedures provide measures to ensure that CEI purchased material, equipment, and services conform to the specified requirements of procurement documents. These Quality Assurance measures consist of ,
various procurement, manufacturing, receiving, inspection and installation control procedures which shall be established to implement the following requirements.
1.2.1 Procurement Assurance Procedures Shall Require:
- a. Procurement documents and specifications are reviewed for technical requirements by Nuclear Engineering Department (NED).
' f Y\
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 0700 Rev. 6 Effective 9/ 16/ 87 Page 2 of 7 b; Procurement documents and specifications (including revisions) are reviewed by NED a5d Nuclear Quality
. Assurance Department (NQAD) to ensure that inspection and audit access,'nonconformance review, procedure and drawing approval, deficiency reporting, and other quality monitoring provisions are appropriately required.
- c. Approved listings of bidders identified by NED, NOAD, and PSD evaluations of the vendor / contractor's capability to i furnish' items and services of acceptable quality prior to )
the contract award,
- d. Documented technical and quality assurance evaluations of the acceptability of vendors / contractors to supply the item or service. The quality assurance evaluation shall be based on one or more of the following:
- 1. Review of performance histories which provide records of vendor / contractor's previous capability to provide similar products or services. l
- 2. Review of the vendor / contractor's capability to comply with the requirements of the specification iacludi ig the elements of <10CF"tSO, Appendix B),
applicable to the items and services requested.
- 3. A preavard survey of the vendor / contractor's facilities and QA program to deternine his capability to supply the items and services that meet-the design and quality requirements of the specification.
1.2.2 Manufacturing Assurance Procedures Shall Require:
- a. Provisions for the review, approval, and status tacking of j the vendor's drawings, QA Manual, and appropriate manufacturing and quality procedures prior to the releases to fabricate.
- b. Established manufacturing monitoring plans that delineate:
- 1. Hold and vitness points in the manufacturing process for specified reviews, inspections, verifications, and tests.
- 2. Approved supplier audits and/or surveillance plans to assure vendor compliance with specified and procedural quality requirements.
J
- 3. Established resolution methods between the vendor and l the appropriate design engineer and Quality Assurance ,
to maintain design control on those nonconformance i dispositioned as "Use-As-Is" or " Repair".
. c
i l Corporate Nuclear Quality
' Assurance Program 0700 Rev. 6 Effective 9/ 16/ 87 Page Tof 7
- c. Vendor record package requirement.s including package
' content, review and submittal conditions. Inadequate j records shall be sufficient cause to nonconform the items q furnished due to its indeterminate quality status. i
- 1. Record packages shall cc sist of documents that indicate compliance or noncompliance to the procurement specification and vendor quality program requirements. Examples include certified material test reports, inspection and test reports, nonconformance reports, nondestructive examination (NDE) results, and qualification and certification records.
- 2. Record package review requirements shall consist of a 100% vendor review and a sampling review by CEI/QA or I its agents t o an approved sampling plan and sample.
document paukage with acceptance and rejection j criteria. {
'I
- 3. Vendor record submittal plans shall be formalized and approved by the Procurement and Administration 0aality Section. Procedural measures shall be established to require either a complete record j]
package, with a certificate of compliance submitted 1 vith the delivery of items, or an approved i certificate of compliance with the record package to follow,
- d. Receiving inspection procedures shall be established to control receipt, and issue of vendor furnished items and to ensure:
- 1. The material, component, or equipment is clearly identified and that the identification and quantities correspond to the information on the quality !
records.
- 2. The item's handling, shipping, and storage maintenance requirements have been met by the vendor and maintained by the carrier. -
- 3. The item's qualit/ record package or compliance I certificate is complete, and has been reviewed and accepted by CEI/0A or its agents. ,
I
- 4. Items delivered which are not in compliance to receiving inspection requirements are documented in 4 accordance with the nonconformance procedure, tagged, segregated if possible, and prevented from being inadvertently issued for installation.
ggM
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurtnce Program 0700 Rev. 6 Effective '- 9/ 16/ 87 , Page U f 7 l
- e. A program of planned and systemat_ic audits and surveillance of vendor quality activities shall be established. For each vendor included in this program, a detailed audit and/or surveillance plan shall be established and implemented in accordance with approved surveillance and audit procedures. Scope of coverage and frequency shall be determined by the criticality of the furnished items and the evaluated results of vendor qualification analysis including preavard surveys and procedure preparation performance. Revisions to surveillance and audit plans shall be made as warranted by vendor performance.
- f. Measures for evaluating vendors' quality program effectiveness shall be established. Assessments of vendors' control of quality shall be made at a frequency and depth commensurate with the importance, complexity, and quantities of the items furnished. These assessments shall utilize the qualitative and quantitative information provided by vendor noncompliance documents, surveillance, inspection and audit report, receiving inspection, and testing records. Results of these evaluations shall be reported by OA to the project and CEI icanagement in accordance with Corporate management reporting .
requirements. Unfavorable vendor quality conditions or trends shall be appropriately corrected by increased monitoring of vendor quality control or by corrective action measures or both. 1.2.3 Construction Assurance Procedures Shall Require:
- a. Provisions for the review, approval and status tracking of the contractors' QA Manual, work, inspection, administrative, special process procedures, and selected drawings prior to issuing a release for construction,
- b. Measures for the required maintenance of CEI procured equipment and materials during storage, handling, erection, installation, and testing.
- c. Established NOAD quality control surveillance / inspection .
plans that delineate:
- 1. The techniques to be utilized to conduct surveillance / inspection activities on each contractor.
- 2. The hold points in the construction-installation sequence for specified reviews, inspections, and tests.
- 3. The surveillance / inspection documentation !
requirements for quality record -
i Corporate Nuclasr Quality Assurance Progrcm 0700 Rev. 6 Effective 9 --
/16 /87 4 Page U f 7 I I
- 4. Periodic surveillance / inspection plan requirement reviews by NOAD personnel t6 ensure their adequacy.
- d. Standardized construction site nonconformance control for the issuance., status tracking, and resolution of nonconformance issued by contractors or NOAD personnel.
- e. The establishment of a nonconformance " Review Board" consisting of representatives from the responsible design organization and Quality Assurance. All nonconformances dispositioned as "Use-As-Is" or " Repair" shall require Review Board Approval to maintain and ensure design control.
- f. Approved record package requirements, including package content, reviev and submittal conditions. Inadequate records shall be sufficient cause to document the contractor's work on a nonconformance report due to its indeterminate quality status.
- 1. Record packages shall consist of documents that indicate compliance to procurement specifications and contractor quality program requirements. Examples include cadveld and concrete test reports, NDE results, inspection and nonconformance reports, and as-built drawings.
- 2. Record Package review requirements shall consist of a 100% contractor review and a sampling review by the Maintenance and Modification Quality Section to an approved sampling plan with acceptance and rejection criteria,
- g. Planned and systematic audits of contractor quality activities shall be conducted in accordance with approved audit procedures. Scope of coverage and frequency shall be determined by the status and importance of the work being performed and the results of surveillance / inspection activities.
- h. Evaluations of contractor quality program effectiveness ,
shall be performed. Assessments of contractors' control i of quality shall be made at a frequency and depth { commensurate with the statu.s, complexity, and criticality i of the work being performed. These assessments shall utilize the qualitative and quantitative information provided by surveillance / inspections, audits, and nonconformance reports. Results of evaluations and trend analysis shall be reported by 0A to the project and CEI management in accordance with Corporate reporting requirements. Unsatisfactory status or trends shall be rectified by increased surveillance / inspection or immediate corrective action or both. pTjiN yn.i ggw @b5
Corporate Nuclear Quality- ! Assurance-Program 0700 l
~
Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 . i' Page 6 of 7 1.2.4 consultant / Agent Services Assurance Procedures Shall Require: a, ' Provisions for the review, concurrence or approval, and~ status tracking of QA. Manuals, Plans or Interface Manuals,- L' appropriate procedures and documents such as drawings, l special studies, reports, specifications, and system descriptions.
- b. Es'tablished monitoring provisions that delineate:
- 1. Consultant / Agent documents that require submittal for information, review, concurrence, or approval.
- 2. Consultant / Agent audit plans and schedules to assure 1- compliance with procedural quality. requirements.
- 3. Detailed responsibilities, authorities and interfaces between the consultant / agent organization and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company.
- 4. Status reporting and quality evaluation requirements. i
- c. ' Established resolution methods among consultants, agents, contractors, vendors, and CEI.
- d. Approved document control and correspondence control procedures.
- e. Approved-record requirements including package content, !
reviev, and submittal conditions,
- f. Planned and systematic audits of consultants' and agents' quality activities performed in accordance with approved audit procedures. Audit coverage shall be commensurate with the importance of the services provided. . Revisions to frequency and scope.of coverage shall be made as warranted by services performance,
- g. Evaluations of consultants' and agents' quality program effectiveness. Assessments shall be made at a frequency and scope commensurate with the services provided. -
Results of these evaluations shall be reported to CEI management in accordance with Corporate reporting requirements. Adjustments to the NOAD auht program and agents' procedures or immediate corrective action or both shall be made as necessary. q '1** y
$\
1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES MMm . The Manager, NOAD, is responsible for approving procedures implementing quality requirements for the control of purchased equipment, materials, and services; and ensuring through internal audits and program evaluation
Corporate Nuclear Quality i Assurance Program 0700 Rev. 6 Effeetive 9 / 16 / 87 Page Tof 7 techniques that procedures for the control of purchased eqttipment, material, and services are established, approved, implemented, and effective. He is also responsible for ensuring the performance of vendors through contractual administration and enforcement activities and for ensuring contractor performance through enforcement activities. The General Supervising Engineer (GSE), Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for the development and administration of special service agreements with quality assurance and nondestructive examination agents and consultants. Also responsible for the implementation of vendor audit and manufacturing surveillance programs, for the review of procedures to control purchased equipment, materials, services, and for the establishment of receiving inspection plans and procedures. The GS, Document, Procedures, and Services Section, is responsible for ensuring the review of Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance procedures and instructions for the control of procured equipment, material, and services. l The GSE, Technical Section, is responsible for ensuring the performance of fuel suppliers through contractual administration and enforcement activities. 9 l l The GSE, Nuclear Construction Services Section, is responsible for the ] administration of the contractual requirements of project contractors, j l l The GSE, Unit 2 test organization, is responsible for the administration j of the contractual requirements of contractors and consultants involved with the pre-operational testing phase during that phase. , a l l l e i l 1 1 f
PNPP No. 6523 T8TLE Identification and Control of I- N T E R F A C- E S Materials, Parts, and Components-PREPARER R. L. Harvey/V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY REVIEWER IN[drI/MT d rocedure's IJn'it 4 APPROVERS
)
REVISION NUMBER 6 EFFECTIVE 9 / 16 / 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.1 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components Requirements 1.2 1 Responsibilities 1.3 2 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE
.)
This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
Corporate Nuc1 car Quality Assurance Progrcm 0800 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 , Page 1 or 2 l I IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF HATERIALS, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS i l 1.1 POLICY j l I Heasures shall be established to provide for the identification and control of safety-related materials, parts, and components, including f consumables, off-the-shelf items, and nonsafety-related items which affeet the function of safety-related equipment. These measures shall , assure that incorrect or nonconforming items are identified and controlled in order to prevent their inadvertent installation or use at , the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2. Where required, by design documents, the system established shall provide traceability of components from the receipt of material through fabrication and testing. Verification shall include objective evidence of inspections and tests that product identification and control is maintained at various stages of manufacture, installation or erection, and preoperational test. Identification requirements shall be specified in the applicable design and procurement documents, dravings, procedures, and instructions used for the Perry Nuclear Pover Plant Unit 2. 1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS REQUIREMENTS Heasures shall be established to implement the following requirements:
- a. Establishing identification requirements during the generation of specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions.
- b. Identifying and controlling material, parts, and components, including partially fabricated subassemblies or subdivided materials, to preclude the use of incorrect or defective items,
- c. Identifying materials and parts important to the function of safety-related structures, systems, and components so that they can be traced to the appropriate documentation, including, but not limited to:
- 1. Specifications
- 2. DrawinD .
- 3. Procurement documents
- 4. Physical and chemical mill test reports
- 5. Nonconformance Reports
- 6. Inspection reports and checklists
- 7. Storage maintenance instructions . t
- 8. Nondestructive Examination (NDE) Reports [y L
- 9. Vendor Certificates of compliance t
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 0800 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16/ 87 Page 2 or 2
- 10. Varehouse Issue Tickets ,
- d. Spec {fying the location and method of identification so as not to affect the fit, function, or quality of the item being identified.
Identification may be on the item or on records traceable to the item.
- e. Verifying correct identification of materials, parts and components prior to release for fabrication, shipping, installation, and preoperational testing.
- f. Verifying the adequacy of item identification measures and maintaining those measures.
1.3 Responsibilities The Senior Vice President, Nuclear Group, is responsible for ensuring the establishment of measures which assure that identification requirements are incorporated into procurement documents specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. These measures shall include controls to prohibit or restrict the use of potentially hazardous / detrimental materials or instruments containing potentially hazardous / detrimental material that could cause contamination or affect the integrity of personnel, fuel, zirconium, carbon steel, stainless steel, or any surface within the entire Nuclear Steam Supply System. The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for the review of documents regarding procurement to ensure the inclusion of identification requirements. Inspection, surveillance, and audits shall be conducted of vendors to assure compliance with identification and traceability requirements. The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for the review of vendor's OA program manual to assure measures have been established for identification and control of items. Also ! responsible for verifying through inspections that items stored in CEI's I varehouse compound are appropriately identified and controlled. i l The General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance and Modification Quality l Section, is responsible for conducting surveillance / inspections of items issued to the field to assure compliance with identification and traceability requirements. Reviews of procedures shall be performed to assure steps have been taken for the identification and control of items. , The Manger, Perry Plant Operations Department (PP0D), is responsible for ensuring that material, parts, and components in the CEI warehousing compound are adequas21y controlled and identified. The General Supervising Engineer, Operational Quality Section, is responsible for assuring that audits shall be conducted to verify compliance with identification and traceability requirements. He is also responsible for the inspection and surveillance of PPOD and the Unit 2 test organization activities to verify compliance with n identification and traceability requirements, k i ggk
PNPP No. 6523 TITLE Control of Special Processes ! N T E R F A C E S I PREPARER R. L. Harvey/V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 0 9 0 0 REVIEWER rI&n hvich /f N Procedures" Unit APPROVERS
~-
)
J i REVISION NUMBER 7 1 EFFECTIVE 9 / 16 / 87 ; CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.I 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Control of Special Process 1.2 1 l Responsibilities 1.3 2 1 f REFERENCES SECTION PAGE ASME AWS SNT-TC-IA ASNI N45.2.1 ANSI N45.2.3 ANSI N101.4 - t. This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
1 l l Corporate Nuclscr Qu211ty Assurcnce Progrcm 0900 Rev. 7 Effective 9/ 16/ 87 Page G f 3 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES j 4 I j 1.1 POLICY l Special processes to be used during the manufacture, installation, i replacement, repair and inspection of equipment shall be established and ) controlled in accordance with approved procedures. Velding, casting, i electrochemical machining, explosive forming, heat treatment, special ! cleaning, nondestructive examination and other processes which require unusual care or close control shall be performed in accordance with appropriate written procedures. Procedures for special processes vill be ' established to meet the requirements of applicable codes and standards vhere available, or to meet the requirements of special process specifications which vill be produced for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP). All procedures shall be in accordance with The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) Nuclear Quality Assurance Program and
<10CFR50, Appendix B).
1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES , CEI procurement documents shall require contractors and vendors to ! establish measures that ensure control of special processes. Procurement I specifications shall require that special processes vill be accomplished l under controlled conditions and, as appropriate to the scope of work, I that appropriate provisions in the following codes, standards, recommended guides, and engineering requirements are met. 1
- a. <ASME> and/or <AVS) codes
- b. <SNT-TC-1A>
- c. < ANSI N45.2.l> ;
1
- d. < ANSI-N45.2.3>
- e. < ANSI-N101.4>
- f. Special design engineering requirements
- g. US/NRC Regulatory Guides as specified in the SAR ,
Heasures taken by the manufacturer or contractor to meet the requirements shall be described in written procedures or instructions. CEI shall ensure that procedures and instructions for the control of special processes are reviewed and approved by qualified personnel. Control of special processes shall be ensured by Nuclear Quality Assurance Department through surveillance / inspection and audit of manufacturing, maintenance and construction activities in order to assure compliance with procedures, specifications, codes, standards and guides.
. t I
l 1 i , [ Corporeto Nuclaer Outlity I l Assurance Progrcm 0900 i l Rev. 7 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 j ' Page E of 3 . Compliance is verified through reviev, surveillance, and audit by CEI or its agents. Qualification and certification of inspectors and operators who perform special process functions are verified through audits of certification records. Special process procedures shall include provisions for the following requirements:
- a. Procedures, equipment, and personnel performing special processes shall be qualified in accordance with applicable codes, standards, ,
and specifications. I
- b. Special processes shall be performed with qualified personnel in accordance with written process sheets, or equivalent, with provisions for recording evidence of verification,
- c. Filing and maintenance provisions for qualification records of procedures, equipment, and personnel associated with special processes shall be established and kept current at the manufacturing facility for vendors or the construction site for contractors.
During the Pre-operational Testing Phase, the control of Preservice i Examination and Test activities vill be in accordance with the provisions of the CNQAP manual as applicable to contractor and CEI personnel. 1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES The Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department (NED) and Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (NOAD), are responsible for the establishment of ; special process engineering and quality requirements in procurement t documents and the establishment of measures to ensure the control of special processes. They are also responsible for the establishment and approval of CEI special process procedures, and, where applicable, those procedures necessary to ensure that repairs and replacements performed by CEI and contractor personnel are conducted in accordance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The General Supervising Engineers (GSE's), NED, shall be responsible for revieving and approving Project Organization's special process procedurer and for coordinating this reviev vith Maintenance and Modification Quality and Operational Quality Section personnel. The GSE's, Maintenance and Modification Quality and Operational Quality Sections, shall be responsible for implementing special process control through surveillance / inspection prograns to ensure compliance. The GSE, Procurement and Administration Section, shall be responsible for reviewing and approving procurement documents to ensure the inclusion of the applicable special process requirements. He shall also be responsible for assuring through surveillance, audit, and program reviews 2 that vendor special process procedures are established and implemented in accordance with the requirements of this section. { .
j Corporate Nuclear Ouslity
-Assurcnco Progran 0900 .g Rev. 7- Effective 9 / 16 / 87 j Page 3 of 3
. The GSE's, Operations Quality Section and Procurement and Administration
.Section, are responsible for reviewing and approTring CEI special process 1 procedures to insure the-inclusion of applicable special process i re'quirements. They shall be responsible for assuring through inspection, -!
, surveillance, and program reviews that CEI'special process procedures are established and implemented.
l l O 4
')
1 PNPF'No. 6523 TITLE- Inspection I N T E R F A C E S PREPARER' R. L. Hsevey/V. L. Reese
. CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY REVIEWER $[/
~
9 7r7/C / 6 Poc'edu/esUnit APPROVERS , /[' / ) REVISION NUMBER 6 _ EFFECTIVE 1 / 16/ 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.I 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Inspection Requirements 1.2 1 Manufacturing Inspection 1.2.1 I Construction and Maintenance Inspection 1.2.2 2 Inspection Programs 1.2.3 2 Responsibilities 1.3 3 i I REFERENCES SECTION PAGE hh,f t This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program. l
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 1000 i Rev. 6 Effective 9/ 16/ 87 Page G f 3 INSPECTION _ l.1 POLICY A program for inspection shall be established by CEI to ensure that all safety-related components, systems, structures, and activities affecting those items meet required quality standards. The CEI Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (NOAD) either directly or through its agents, shall ensure the implementation of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) Unit 2 inspection program. This shall be accomplished by reviewing and approving the inspection programs of each vork-organization, by performing inspection and/or surveillance during manufacturing, construction, maintenance, preoperational testing, or preservice examination and testing, and by conducting a comprehensive ! audit program. Personnel responsible for implementing the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 inspection program shall meet the qualification requirements of < ANSI N45.2.6>. 1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS Inspection of components, systems, structures and their safety-related activities for the PNPP shall be conducted in accordance with the approved program by individuals who are organizationally independent from the personnel performing the work. Comprehensive inspection programs consisting of plans, procedures, instructions, and checklists shall be established for manufacturing, l construction, maintenance, preoperational testing, and preservice examination and testing activities by the Operational Quality Section l (005), Maintenance and Modification Quality Section (MMOS), and the Procurement and Administration Quality Section (PA0S). Design and procurement documents shall require that vendors and contractors establish appropriate inspection programs for their work and provide access for the NOAD inspection / surveillance program. I 1.2.1 Manufacturing Inspection i l The Procurement and Administration Quality Section shall j establish, within the Manufacturing Assurance Program, a -) manufacturing surveillance plan with CEI vendors and General l Electric as the Nuclear Steam System Supplier (NSSS). I Inspection point coverage shall be based upon specification requirements, manufacturing processes, complexity and criticality of the manufacturing requirements and , manufacturer's recommendations. Adjustments to frequency of inspection monitoring shall be made as varranted by period evaluation of the manufacturer's inspection program. These manufacturing hold and vitness points, and manufacturing surveillance of vendors and audits of General Electric NSSS, shall ensure control of manufacturing inspection.
l i Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 1000 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 i l Rev. 6 1 Page U f 3 -~ 1.2.2 Construction and Maintenance Inspection l The Maintenance and Modification Quality Section shall estab1Lish, within the construction assurance program, a Surveillance / Inspection Program to verify the work organization's compliance to quality requirements. This program activity shall be conducted in accordance with approved inspection planning documents developed for each vork organization, and consists of a number of techniques ranging from reinspection to verification of work organization's activities. The frequency and extent of surveillance / inspection shall be based on evaluations or previous surveillance / inspections, nonconformances, and audit trend results. The Procurement and Administration Quality Section shall implement a receiving inspection function. This program consists of established inspection plans for various types of receiving inspection requirements and checklists. 1.2.3 Inspection Programs Inspection Programs shall include but not be limited to the following requirements:
- a. Inspection programs shall be conducted in accordance with approved, detailed procedures, instructions and checklists which shall provide for:
- 1. The identification of the characteristics and activities to be inspected.
- 2. The identification of the individuals or groups responsible for performing the inspection.
- 3. The acceptance and rejection criteria for the inspection.
- 4. Descriptive instructions for performing the inspection.
- 5. The documentation requirements to evidence l manufacturing, construction, maintenance, inspection or test operations.
- 6. The inspection result evaluations and reporting requirements.
- 7. The inspector qualification requirements.
- 8. The specifying of necessary measuring and test equipment and the appropriate accuracy requirements. .
t? .
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 1000 Rev. 6 Effective 9/ 16/ 87 l Page 3 of 3
- b. Inspection procedures or checklists shall be used by inspection personnel when conducting inspections.
; Inspectors shall have access to necessary drawings, i
maintenance requirements and specifications. Inspection reports / checklists shall include the name of the inspector
' and the date of inspection, and shall be signed by the l
inspector. t
- c. Inspection personnel shall be provided with suitable equipment and tools, calibrated as necessary, and controlled to assure that accuracy requirements are satisfied and inspections are complete.
- d. Modifications, repairs, and replacements shall be inspected in accordance with the original design and inspection requirements, or comparable approved alternatives.
- e. Maintenance and modification procedures shall be reviewed by qualified personnel knowledgeable in QA to determine ,
a) the need for inspection, b) identification of l inspection personnel, and c) the method of documenting inspection results.
- f. Provisions shall be established for accumulating reviewing, and submitting inspection results for quality record.
1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES The Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department, is responsible for the . establishment of NOAD inspection plans and procedures and assuring through audits or other Quality Assurance management techniques, that inspection programs are effectively implemented. The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, shall be responsible for the inclusion of inspection program requirements in procurement documents and the approval of inspection j program procedures utilized in the manufacturing phase up to and ' including receiving inspection. The General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance and Modification Quality ; Section, shall be responsible for the review and approval of maintenance I inspection procedures, the implementation of the Surveillance / Inspection
. Program, and the periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the inspection i
' program for construction and maintenance activities. He is also ]a responsible for the inspection program for pre-operational testing, i
The General Supervising Engineer, Operational Quality Section, shall be responsible for the surveillance and inspection program for pre-service j testing and the surveillance program for the pre-operational test program. ] l {g @ $ ,I @ Ik 0 l I l _ _ _ _ _ - - - 1
PNPP No. 6523 TITLE %r cn n es.n , I N T E R F A C E S PREPARER- R.L. Harvey/V.L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY REVIEWER f/ Ab ! ~ ocedufe's' Unit
)'
APPROVERS ('/l
/
5 REVISION NtMBER _ EFFECTIVE 9 / 16 / 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1' .1 1 The CEI Company's Test Control Requirements 1.2 1 Responsibilities 1.3 2 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE i I
-i l pf @M ll 0
, h, : :
This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program. A
Corporata Nuclear Ouslity Assuranca Progrcm 1100 Rev. 5 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 ( Page U f 3 TEST CONTROL 1.1 POLICY A comprehensive test program shall be established to ensure that structuras, systems, and components perform satisfactorily in service. Testing of safety class and selected non-safety class structures, systems, and components shall be conducted in accordance with approved test procedures which incorporate the requirements and acceptance limits contained in design documents. The test program consists of vendor product tusts, contractor construction verification tests, maintenance tests, pre-operational tests, ASME Section XI preservice tests, and selected Initial Check-Out and Run-In (IC&R) and acceptance tests which require implementation of the Quality Assurance Program. These testing activities shall comply with the requirements of design and procurement documents and <10CFR50, Appendix B>. 1.2 THE CEI COMPANY'S TEST CONTROL REQUIREMENTS The control measures established for test programs shall include but not be limited to the following requirements:
- a. Equipment or system deficiencies identified during the course of testing programs shall be documented by nonconformance reports and/or approved test deficiency reporting procedures.
- b. Detailed and approved equipment turnover control methods.
- c. Adequate and appropriate test equipment.
- d. Completeness of item to be tested, and the use of calibrated and controlled test instrumentation,
- e. Certified test personnel.
- f. Suitable testing environmental conditions and prerequisites have been met, including, as appropriate, test equipment, cleanliness, temperature and, if necessary, humidity.
~
- g. Detailed and approved testing procedures and instructions, hold or vitness points for inspection by the Quality Assurance representative of the owner or contractor, (as required), and acceptance and rejection criteria.
- h. Provisions for appropriate data collection, review and record storage.
- 1. Procedures for documenting the test results and reporting these results to responsible and qualified personnel for evaluation and acceptance. g gQRMfdbc..ae
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 1100 q Rev. 5 Effective 9/ 16/ 87 Page 2 of 3 1
- j. Requirements and acceptance limits are contained in applicable i design and procurement documents, with procedures for ensuring that modifications, repairs, and replacements are tested in accordance with the original design and test requirements or by approved alternatives.
Specifications shall be prepared by responsible design organizations j delineating test requirements. Detailed test control procedures shall be ] ' established by Vendors, contractors, Unit 2 test organization and the Perry Plant Technical Department for all safety-related test activities, including preservice baseline testing required by ASME Section XI. Procurement documents identify and/or establish product tests to ensure that the manufacturer's product vill perform satisfactorily. Product tests include pump tests, valve leak rate tests, shop hydros, and continuity tests. These product tests are conducted by the vendor and monitored by the Procurement and Administration Quality Section. Construction and maintenance verification tests are static tests conducted by work organizations to ensure that components of a given system are installed and maintained in accordance with specifications, drawings, and manufacturing instruction manuals. These verification tests include hydrostatic, electrical continuity, and pneumatic tests.
, These tests are conducted at the construction site and the results reviewed under the direction of the Nuclear Construction Services Section and shall be monitored by the Maintenance and Modification Quality Section.
The Unit 2 test organization shall be responsible for implementing the e pre-operational and acceptance test program. This phase of testing iacludes the initial checkout and run-in tests such as stroking valves and bumping motors to verify proper installation and operation of individual components in a system. After initial checkout and run-in, pre-operational and acceptance tests shall be conducted to demonstrate the capability of systems and components to meet performance and design j criteria. The Perry Plant Technien1 Department shall be responsible for conducting l
! the ASME Section XI pump, valve, component supports and snubber test program.
The Nuclear Quality Assurance Department shall monitor the test
, activities of the Unit 2 test organization and the Perry Plant Technical Department through reviews and surveillance / inspection.
1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 1 The Manager, Perry Plant Technical Department, is responsible for developing, maintaining, and implementing detailed preservice test procedures and instructions for evaluating and reporting test results. I :
Corporate Nuclear 0uality Assurance Program 1100 Rev. 5 Effective 9 / 16 /_8]_ Page 3 of 3 The General Supervising Engineers, Nuclear Engineering Department. are responsible for the inclusion of test requirements in specifications and procurement documents and approval of maintenance test instructions. The Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department, is responsible for ensuring, through internal audits and program evaluation techniques, that ; procedures for the control of tests are established, approved,. ! implemented and' effective.
'the General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance and Modification Quality Section, is responsible for reviewing and approving Project ,
' Organization's test procedures and records, and ensuring, through inspection / surveillance, the adequacy of the test control program.
j- The General Supervisor, Unit 2 test organization, is responsible for the j establishment and approval of measures and procedures for controlling
, test activities in accordance with the requirements of this Manual; acquiring test specifications from the responsible design organization; developing, maintaining, and implementing detailed, initial checkout and run-in, pre-operational test and acceptance procedures; and evaluating and reporting test results.
The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for reviewing procurement specifications for test control criteria, reviewing and approving vendor test procedures and records, and' ensuring, through surveillance and inspections,-the adequacy of vendor test control. The General Supervising Engineer, Operational Quality Section, is responsible for reviewing and approving test procedures and records of the Unit 2 test organization and Perry Plant Technical Department's preservice test administrative procedures. Also responsible for ensuring through inspection / surveillance the adequacy of the Unit 2 test organi::ation and Perry Plant Technical Department test controls. The General Supervisor, Document, Procedure, and Services j Section, is responsible for ensuring through the procedures review J process, the review of the Unit 2 test organization administrative j 4 procedures. l
'1 I
l 1 1
\ w, P )
l W __ _
PNP P '. No . 6523 T!TLE Control o!! Measuring and Test f N T E R F A C E- 'S-Equipment PREPARER R. L. H!irvey/V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 1 2 0 0 REVIEWER b l/g; 7 M 4M /1/M:d/ Proceduresbnit
.D APPROVERS I/[ ' / l "J
REVISION NUMBER 6 EFFECTIVE 9 / 16 / 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.1 1 The Clevetland Electric Illuminating Company Control of Measuring and Test Equipment Requirements 1.2 1 Responsibilities 1.3 2 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE l l yh, ik
- This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
Corporate Nuclear Ouslity Assuranca Program 1200 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page G f 3 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 1.1 POLICY Measures shall be established to ensure that tools, gauges, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices used in activities affecting safety class structures, systems, and components be properly controlled,. calibrated, and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within specified limits. 1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS The CEI procurement documents shall require suppliers furnishing safety class equipment, materials and services-to maintain a program for the control of measuring and test equipment. The programs shall be implemented through the use of written procedures, and compliance vill be verified by the Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (FOAD) program review and approval, and through inspections, surveillance and audits. CEI Nuclear Group and agent personnel performing surveillance,. inspections, and tests shall establish detailed procedures for the control of their measuring and test equipment. Qualified firms may be employed to provide calibration services from their facilities. It shall be the responsibility of these firms to maintain and submit all documentation requested and to provide for control of their testing equipment in accordance with procurement documents that comply with this section of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Program. Requirements for each control program shall include inspection and verification of accuracy upon receipt of equipment, identification of all gauges and instruments, calibration and scheduled recall for calibration when due, and traceability to an accepted Standard. Procedures shall be established to implement the following requirements:
- a. To establish the calibration technique and frequency, maintenance, and control of all measuring and test equipment which is used in the
- measurement, inspection, and monitoring of safety-related components, systems, and structures (instruments, tools, gauges, fixtures, reference and transfer standards, and nondestructive test equipment).
- b. Identifying measuring and test equipment traceable to the calibration test data.
- c. Indicating status of calibration for each piece of measuring and test equipment, indicated by use of labels or tags indicating the date of the next calibration check.
t Corporate Nuclear-Quality Assurance Program 1200 Rev. 6- Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page 2 of 3
- d. Establishing calibration frequency for measuring and test equipment based on required accuracy, purpose, degree of usage, stability characteristics, and/or any other condition which may affect the measurement.
- e. Methods for determining the validity of previous measurements when the measuring and test equipment is found to be out of calibration.
Inspections or tests are repeated on items determined to be suspect. Such determinations to be documented in suitable form and reported immediately to responsible CEI personnel. t-
- f. Calibration standards shall have an accuracy range and stability which are adequate to verify that the equipment being calibrated is within the required tolerance. The tolerance of calibration standards shall be better than the tolerance of lover level calibration standards being calibrated.
Calibration of measuring and test equipment used for measuring, gauging, testing, inspection or control to determine compliance with design, specifications or other technical requirements shall be calibrated against standards that have an accuracy of at least four times the required accuracy of the equipment being calibrated. When this is not possible, standards shall have an accuracy that assures the equipment being calibrated vill be within required tolerance and that the basis of acceptance is documented and authorized by the supervisor of the calibrating organization.
- g. A status of all measuring and test equipment under the calibration program to be maintained.
- h. Utilizing references and transfer standards traceable to nationally recognized standards. Where national standards do not exist, provisions to be established to document the basis for the calibration.
- i. Methods of packaging, handling and shipping (where applicable) measuring and test equipment such that the accuracy is not impaired.
1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES The Manager, Perry Plant Operations Department, Nuclear Operations Division, is responsible for ensuring the establishment of procedures for the control of PNPP-owned measuring and test equipment. The Manager, NOAD, is responsible for ensuring the establishment of NOAD measuring and test equipment control procedures, the review and approval of the Nuclear Operations Division measuring or test equipment control procedures, and establishment of audit, inspection, and surveillance programs to verify compliance.
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 1200 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 ), Page 3 of 3 g The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for reviewing and approving procurement documents to assure inclusion of' measuring and test requirements, approving vendor measuring and test equipment control programs, and verifying compliance through inspections, surveillance and audits. The General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance and Modification Quality Section, is responsible for ensuring the proper use and control of measuring-and test equipment, and verifying compliance to approved procedures / instructions through surveillance / inspections.
.The General Supervising Engineer, Operational Quality Section, is responsible.for verifying Nuclear Group and work organization compliance to approved procedures for control of measuring and test equipment through program audits.
The General Supervisor, Document, Procedures, and Services Section, is responsible for ensuring through the procedures review process the Unit 2 test organization and NQAD control of measuring and test procedures. I f 1 i l 5
,(
m
.PNPP No. 6523 TITLE unna,4ne_ senrace preservation f N T E R F A C E S and Shipping PREPARER R.L. Harvey/V. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY REVIEWER rr [Is.Nda d Procedu'res' Unit APPROVERS 3 J
l REVISION NUMBER 6 EFFECTIVE 9 / 16 / 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.1 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Handling, Storage, and Shipping Requirements 1.2 1 Responsibilities 1.3 2 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE l l l
! L This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
Corporata Nuclcer Outlity Assure.nce Program 1300 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page G f 3 HANDLING, STORACE, PRESERVATION AND SHIPPING 1.1 POLICY l A program for controlling handling, storage, maintenance, and shipping shall be established to ensure that the integrity and quality of safety-related materials and equipment is not comprised. This program shall be in accordance with the requirements of this manual and ANSI N45.2.2 as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.38. Procurement documents shall include requirements for contractor and vendor handling, l preservation, storage, maintenance, cleaning, packaging, and shipping; and that procedures are prepared to provide control of the identified requirements. 1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING REQUIREMENTS Measures shall be established by suppliers, vork organizations, and the Nuclear Group to control the handling, storage, maintenance, and shipping 4 of safety-related materials and equipment. These measures shall include 1 but not be limited to:
- a. Appropriate storage facilities for maintaining equipment to specified environmental requirements.
- b. Equipment maintenance procedures which meet the requirements of specifications and manufacturer's instructions.
- c. Provisions for identifying, controlling, inspecting, and certifying handling equipment. ]
- d. Established storage procedures which include, as applicable, the j 1
following provisions:
- 1. Handling methods to avoid damage to equipment or personnel.
- 2. Application of slings, cables, and rigging fixtures ,
configuration. ) f
- 3. Manufacturer's capacity load ratings for lifting devices. ,
I
- 4. Type of equipment storage.
- 5. Environmental class of storage.
- 6. Special or additional instructions.
- 7. Documentation and records data,
- e. Provisions for inspections, surveillance and audits of handling, storage, and shipping activities. i gggMR s
(7 Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 1300 Rev. 6 Effective 9 /16 /87 Page 2 of 3 a l f. Procedures for documenting and reporting n5 compliances and l nonconformances'to handling, storage, and shipping requirements.
- g. Provisions for the storage of chemicals, reagents (including control of shelf-life), lubricants and other consumable materials which vill be used in conjunction with safety-related systems.-
1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES l The Manager, Perry Plant Operations Department, ,is responsible for ensuring the establishment of CEI procedures and their approval for controlling handling, storage, and shipping. The General Supervising Engineer, Unit 2 test organization, is. responsible for generation of procedures to cover special cleaning, flushing, etc. , commencing with the time of jurisdictional turnover to the Unit 2 test organization. ll The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for reviewing and approving procurement documents for vendors for handling, storage, and shipping requirements; for reviewing vendor QA program manuals'; for reviewing Perry Plant Operations Department handling, storage, and shipping procedures related to warehousing activities; and for verifying compliance through inspection, surveillance, audits and review of associated records. The Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department, is responsible for ensuring the establishment of CEI procedures and their approval for controlling handling, storage, maintenance and shipping. The General Supervising Engineers, Nuclear Engineering Department, are responsible for ensuring preparation of and implementation of field storage maintenance procedures for the control of handling, storage, maintenance and shipping. The General Supervising Engineer, Engineering Project Support Section, has responsibility for spare parts; the General Supervising Engineer, Electrical Design Section, has responsibility for engineered electrical equipment; and the General Supervising Engineer, Mechanical Design Section, has responsibility for engineered mechanical equipment. l The General Supervisor, Document, Procedure, and Services Section, is responsible for ensuring review, through the PNPP internal review process, of the Nuclear Group's handling, storage, maintenance and shipping procedures. The Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (NOAD), is responsible for the approval of procedures for handling, storage, maintenance and shipping and for ensuring through audit, surveillance and inspection that they are established and effectively implemented.
~ - - - _ - _ _ . _ _ _ .
t jJ Corporate tiuclanr Quality-Assurence Program 1300 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page U f 3 The General Supervising Engineer,-Maintenance an_d Modification Quality Section, is responsible.for reviewing and approving PNPP contractor handling, storage,-maintenance and shipping procedures;'and for verifying compliance through inspection, surveillance, and review of records. l O NORET!DilO!uY
PNPP No.~6523 i TITLE Inspection, Test, and Operating I N T E R F A C E' S Status PREPARER R. L. Harvey/V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 1 4 0 0 b[MdDE / d REVIEWER vte Procedures W t APPROVERS ,[ ' / REVISION NUMBER 6 EFFECTIVE 9 / 16 / 87 1 I CONTENTS SECTION PAGE l Policy 1.1 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Inspection, Test, and Operating Status Requirements 1.2 1 Responsibilities 1.3 2 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE f; y " This docurnent is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - . - - - - - - - - -. u
Corporate Nuclsar Ouslity ( ' Assurtnca Progr:m 1400 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page 1 of 2 INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS 1.1 POLICY A program shall be established to indicate the inspection, test, and operating status of safety and applicable nonsafety class structures, systems, and components. Status of safety and applicable nonsafety class structures, systems, and components shall be controlled in accordance with approved procedures. These procedures shall include the use of appropriate tags, markings, , lists, logs, diagrams, or other suitable means, to assure that required inspections and tests are satisfactorily completed, to prevent inadvertent bypassing of required inspections and tests, and to prevent inadvertent operations. 1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS REQUIREMENTS Procurement documents shall require that contractors, vendors, and agents provide adequate inspection, test, and operating status programs commensurate with their scope of vork. The Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (NOAD) shall administer the project status indicating measures and shall accomplish this activity through procedure reviews, surveillance, inspections, and audits. 1.2.1 In addition to these administrative measures, the CEI program for inspection, test, and operating status shall include detailed procedure requirements to maintain the status oft
- a. NOAD on-site surveillance and inspections, manufacturing assurance inspection points, and off-site verification of i supplier inspection, test, and maintenance activities.
- b. Other Nuclear Group programs for inspections, tests, and operations such as system structure, and component turnovers; and preservice examinations; and l pre-operational verifications and tests.
1.2.2 The requirements for an acceptable inspection, test, and
- operating status program include:
- a. Design and quality documents which address the requirements for_the identification of inspection, test, and operating status of structures, systems, and components.
- b. Procedures which include controls for the application and removal of inspection and velding stamps and other status indicators such as tags, markings, labels, and stamps.
Corporate Nuclear Quality; Assuranca Program 1400 Rev. 6 Effective 9/ 16 / 87
~
Page U f'2 s
- c. Established inspection and test i' requirements shall not be N bypassed or have the sequence altered, except by a revision to the inspection-or test procedure, or as detailed by approved Project Administration Procedures.
- d. Records on'the fabrication, installation, erection,: i maintenance, and associated inspections and tests, which.
shall reflect the operating status of systems, structures, ; and components. l
- e. Nonconforming, inoperative, or malfunctioning structures, _ .j systems.or components be identified.by documenting the 'l condition and appropriately tagging the item (s),-thereby.
preventing inadvertent use.
- \
1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES q Nuclear E.1gineering Department and Nuclear Quality Assurance Department Managers are' responsible for ensuring the establishment of. inspection,- test,'and operating procedures. Procedures shall provide for status indication measures which meet the requirements of this program. The Manager, Nuclear' Quality Assurance Department, is responsible for ensuring through audit, surveillance, inspection, and other Quality Assurance (0A) techniques that organizations participating in inspections-and tests comply.vith approved procedures, and that results reflect the
. status of inspections and tests.
The General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance and Modification Quality Section, is responsible for the review of procedures for the inclusion of inspection, test, and operating status provisions. The General Supervisor, Document, Procedures, and Services Section, is l responsible for ensuring,-through the procedures review process, that procedures previde for the interface and turnover of inspection, test, and operating status records to the Records Management System. The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality [' Section, is responsible for the reviev.and approval of design and procurement documents, review of vendor quality assurance manuals, and ~
. review and approval of vendor test procedures to ensure the inclusion of inspection, test, and operating status provisions.
NOTE: It should be noted that vendor quality assurance manuals are not formally approved, but are reviewed for general content and their relationship to requirements in the specification and all attachments. The General Supervising Engineer, Operations Quality Section, is responsible for the review and approval of the test ptocedures of the Unit 2 test organization to ensure the inclusion of inspection, test, and operating status provisions. r i ! L '
PNPP No. 6523 TITLE- Nonconforming Materials, Parts, 1 N T E R F A C E S or Components PREPARER R. L. Harvey/V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM i 5 0 0 f , REVIEWER /,* m [ / ,,, M b , Procedure 6Urlit APPROVERS
)
REVISION NUMBER 5 EFFECTIVE 9/ 16/ 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.1 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Nonconforming Materials, Parts, or Components Requirements 1.2 I Responsibilities 1.3 3 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE i r 4 This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
i Corporata Nuclect Gunlity i Assurance Program 1500 1 Rev. 5 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page U f 4 1 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS,-OR COMPONENTS , 1.1 POLICY . l Nonconforming materials, parts or components shall be controlled to 1 prevent their inadvertent installation and use. Nonconformance' Reports shall be used to identify materials, yrts, components, structures or systems which are not in compliance to the requirements of specifications, codes, drawings, and detailed installation or manufacturing program requirements. This shall include ' use of Nonconformance Reports on items the status of which is l indeterminate due to the lack of documentation. Administrative procedure .l noncompliance shall be identified by other appropriate methods such as surveillance or audit report findings. Control of nonconforming materials, parts, or components shall be accomplished in accordance with approved procedures. These procedures include measures for identification, documentation, segregation, disposition and notification to affected organizations. Disposition of I nonconformances is made by the organization that established the I governing requirements or by other qualified individuals or committees authorized by Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI). 1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS REQUIREMENTS The Nuclear Quality Assurance Department shall monitor the nonconformance control programs of each participant in the Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, periodically analyze Nonconformance Reports to observe the quality trend, and report to CEI management for review. Such analysis vill be based upon severity, the number, and frequencies of nonconformances, the causes of the nonconformances and the timeliness and adequacy of the reporting and resolution of nonconformances. CEI procurement documents shall require that contractors and vendors of safety-related materials, parts, or components have procedures controlling nonconforming conditions. The Nuclear Quality Assurance Department shall review and approve the , nonconformance control measures of vendors, contractors and agents, and shall verify implementation by surveillance, inspections and audits. Procedures shall be established to implement the following requirements:
- a. Identifying, documenting, segregating, reviewing, dispositioning, and notifying the affected organizations of nonconforming parts, materials, components, or services.
- b. Documenting the nonconformance, including at least the following: i
- 1. Description of the nonconformance. 1 l
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assuranca Program 1500 Rev. 5 Effective 9/ 16/ g . Page 2 of 4
- 2. Disposition of the nonconformance (repair rework, use-as-is or y scrap), all as defined by (ANSI N45.2;10).
- 3. Evaluation of the impact of identified conditions adverse to quality on the design and operability-of the plant.
- 4. Measures.to assure that the cause of the condition is determined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition.
- 5. Inspection requirements and any associated acceptance criteria that differ from those originally specified.
- 6. Signatures approving the disposition and verifying its implementation.
- c. Identifying and notifying, through established document control measures, individuals or groups to whom responsibility and authority has been delegated for approving the disposition of the nonconforming item.
- d. Identifying nonconforming items as discrepant, and where possible, segregating them from acceptable items until the discrepancy is J resolved.
- e. Prior to initiation of a pre-operational test on a safety-related structure, system or component, all nonconformances shall be evaluated for impact on further testing.
f ., Verifying acceptability of reworked or repaired material, parts, components, systems, and structures by reinspecting and retesting the item to the original criteria and acceptance levels, except where equivalent alternatives have been specified and approved. All inspection, testing, rework, and repairs shall be by approved procedures and the results shall be documented. Replacement items shall be- subject to the same, or better, inspection and test controls as the original items.
- g. Submitting Nonconformance Reports dispositioned "USE.-AS-IS" or
" REPAIR" for assessment and approval by the responsible design l authority and Quality Assurance prior to effecting the disposition. l The Responsible Organization shall assure GE and/or G/C concurrence
- l vhen the NR affects the GE and/or G/C scope of design or supply.
The indication of GE and/or G/C concurrence shall either be included on the NR form (e.g.: countersign line 11) or attached to it.
- h. CEI furnished items which are dispositioned " SCRAP" require CEI approval in order to initiate procurement of a replacement. l
- 1. Including, as part of the record package, copies of all nonconformance reports.
's i
l
Corporato Nuclear Ouslity Assurance Program 1500 Rev. 5 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page 3 of 4 1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES - The Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department, is responsible for ensuring the establishment of nonconformance control procedures, including review measures for those nonconformances requiring Engineering and Quality Assurance approvals. He is also responsible for ensuring that nonconformance trends are evaluated and reported to project and CEI management. The General Supervising Engineer, Operational Quality Section, shall implement nonconformance control procedures commencing with jurisdictional transfer from construction contractors to the Project Organization. Also responsible for ensuring that Nonconformance Reports initiated af ter jurisdictional transfer from construction contractors are reviewed.for significant deficiency deportability in accordance with
<10CFR50.55(e)> and <10CFR2D.
The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, shall also provide for the review and approval of procurement documents and specifications for purchased equipment and services other than construction, installation or erection work to assure that nonconformance control requirements are specified. He provides for the review of vendor Quality Assurance Manuals to assure the inclusion of nonconformance control requirements. He is responsible for verifying the implementation of nonconformance control systems at vendor facilities through surveillance and audit techniques and for documenting the results. He is responsible for ensuring that Nonconformance Reports initiated by vendors are reviewed for significant deficiencies in . accordance vith <10CFR50.55(e)> and <10CFR2D. j The General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance and Modification Quality Section, shall implement nonconformance control procedures for surveillance / inspection of work by on-site work organizations during the maintenance and construction phase. He is responsible for verifying and documenting the implementation of nonconformance systems through surveillance / inspection of the work organization's activities. He is responsible for ensuring that Nonconformance Reports initiated by contractors, and those initiated by the Project Organization during the construction and maintenance phase, are reviewed for significant deficiencies in accordance with <10CFR50.55(e)> and <10CFR2D. The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for logging and tracking Nonconformance Reports, and for reporting the current status of open Nonconformance Reports to l CEI Management. l The General Supervising Engineers, Nuclear Engineering Department, are responsible for providing engineering resolution of nonconformances. NOTE: Currently, dispositioning is being deferred until construction activity resumes. [ ..
r l Corporato Nucloer Quality Assurance Program 1500 . ( Rev. 5 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page U f 4 l
~
Any General Supervising Engineer responsible'for providing engineering h resolution of nonconformances is also responsible for obtaining concurrence of the appropriate design agent (s), GAI and/or GE,.When USE-AS-IS and REPAIR dispositions have been proposed. l l The Gilbert Lead Site Engineer is responsible for assigning appropriately ! qualified personnel to serve as members of the PNPP Review Board. These i individuals are responsible for assuring that USE-AS-IS and REPAIR dispositions which alter or modify plant design are acceptable deviations i from the original ~ design. i The General Supervising Engineers, Operational Quality, Procurement and , Administrative Quality, and Maintenance and Modification Quality j i Sections, are responsible for assigning appropriately qualified personnel l to serve as members of the PNPP Review Board. These individuals are responsible for assuring that suitable provisions of the PNPP Quality Assurance Program are invoked during the implementation of engineering resolutions of nonconformances.
PNPP No.'6523 TITLE Corrective Action I N T E R F A C E S PREPARER R. L. Harvev/V. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY REVIEWER 1,Um?W [ Procedu'res' Unit APPROVERS _. ! J REVISION NUMBER 6 EFFECTIVE 9/ 16/ 87 CONTENTS SECTIOW PAGE Policy 1.1 1 The. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corrective Action Requirements- 1.2 i Responsibilities 1.3 2 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE 10CFR 50.55(e) 10CFR 2I I { A, i This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix 8, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
Corporsta Nuclstr Quelity Assurance Program 1600 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page 1 of 3 ! CORRECTIVE ACTION , 1.1 POLICY Measures shall be established which ensure that conditions adverse to l quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances be promptly identified and corrected. In the case of conditions adverse to quality, the cause of the condition l shall be determined and appropriate action taken to preclude renetition. i The identification, cause, and actions taken to correct conditions ; adverse to quality are documented and reported to the appropriate levels of management. ! Significant conditions within the intent of <10CFR50.55 (e)> or <10CFR21) are reported to appropriate management levels within the affected organization and to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). I 1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS CEI procurement documents shall require that contractors, vendors, agents, and consultants establish corrective action measures to ensure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and corrected. The corrective action program measures for each project organization shall be established in QA manuals, planc, procedures, or instructions. These program measures shall be reviewed and approved by NOAD personnel ; and shall meet the following requirements: l
- a. Conditions adverse to quality shall be evaluated to determine the need for corrective action, and the evaluations shall be documented.
- b. Requests for corrective action shall include address of the action required to correct the adverse condition and to preclude continuation or recurrence. (
l
- c. Follow up activities shall be conducted to verffy implementation of '
corrective action and to close out corrective action documentation.
- d. Potentially reportable deficiencies, noncompliance, and defects, shall be evaluated to determine significance within the intent of {
<10CFR50.55 (e)> or <10CFR21> for reporting to the Nuclear l Regulatory Commission.
The NOAD shall verify compliance with corrective action measures through l audit, surveillance, and inspection of project organizations and other QA l evaluation and control techniques such as nonconformance trend analyses. l hh .
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 1600 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page T of 3 CEI corrective action measures shall meet these_ requirements and be established in: NOAD Audit and Surveillance programs PNPP Nonconformance control procedures NOAD Surveillance / Inspection program PNPP Pre-operational Test program NOAD Corrective Action Request and Stop Vork procedures Perry Services Department Contractor / Vendor Corrective Action procedures 1 ASME Section XI Inservice Inspection Program 1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES The Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department, is responsible for ensuring the establishment of QA corrective action measures and procedures establishing the appropriate interfaces with engineering and purchasing for effecting corrective action against contractors, work organizations, vendors, agents and consultants, resolving corrective action impasses with CEI Corporate management, and delegating stop vork authority to appropriate NOAD specialists and agents. He is also responsible for the documentation of corrective action measures from identification through verification. The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for revievir.g and approving procurement documents to assure adequate inclusion of corrective action requirements. He is also responsible for reviewing and approving vendor program measures for corrective action and for verifying, through surveillance / inspection and audit that corrective action has been implemented. The General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance and Modification Quality Section (MMOS), is responsible for verifying a work organization's corrective actions through surveillance / inspections. The General Supervising Engineer, Operational Quality Section, is - responsible for verifying implementation of approved Nuclear Group procedures and the adequacy of the work organization's corrective action through the performance of program audits. The Manager, Perry Services Department, is responsible for ensuring the establishment of commercial corrective action measures in procurement documents and in PSD procedures and instructions. The General Supervising Engineer, Nuclear Construction Services Secti is responsible organizations for establishing and MMOS interface for effecting correctiv to yk measures with co,p gh
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurancs Program 1600 Rev. 6 Effective 9 /g/ 87 Page U f 3
' .'; The General Supervising Engineer, Unit 2 test organization, is a responsible,.during the Pre-operational Test Phise, for establishing-di interface measures with contractors and Nuclear Quality Assurance Department.for effecting corrective action.
i e l h
PNPP No. 6533-TITLE Quality Assurance Records . I N T. E R F A C E S PREPARER R. L. Harvey/V. L.'.Reese COR?0 RATE NUCLEAR QUALITY
~ ~~
1 7 0 0 77 - REVIEWER hr- c l,7 ,. NQ ,,hgi 7,w. y AS3URANCE PROGRAM Pro'tedu es Unit ' ' APPROVERS f f . /,, ,j ,,
) -
REVISI0h WL)SER 6 EFFECTIVE 9/ 16/g CONTENTS _ _ SECTION PAGE f Policy 1.1 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company LQue.lity Assurance Records Requirs.sents 1.2 1 Responsibil.ities , 1.3 3 l 1 l REFERENCES SECTION PAGE
,i .
This document is written in response to the Code,of Federal Regule.tions, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix 0, and The Cleveland Elet.tric 111umf rating Compety Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
Corporate Nuclear Ouslity Assurance Program 1700 F.e v . 6 ~ Effective 9 /16 /87 Page G f 3' OUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS _ l
'l.1 POLICY-Measures shall be established for the orderly preparation, accumulation, filing, turnover, storage, and maintenance of quality' assurance records by all project participants.
Each of these~ individual record systems is to be established based on project administrative procedures or as specified in procurement documents. These systems shall be described and controlled by approved written procedures and instructions, adequately implemented, and verified l by Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (NOAD) through surveillance and audits, 1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY OUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS REQUIREMENTS 1.2.1 The accumulation of Quality Records during the design,
].. procurement, manufacturing, construction, maintenance and preoperational testing phases of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 is accomplished by two systems.
.l
- a. Upon completion of each contractor and vendor organization's safety-related activity, their QA Records shall be accumulated and shipped to the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 construction record file in accordance with procedures. Shipment procedure and schedule for each organization shall be as documented on an approved transfer plan. Detailed procedures shall be prepared for the receipt, handling, reviev, approval and storage of vendor and contractor quality records. j 1
- b. The accumulation of quality records generated by CEI, consultants, and agents shall be accomplished through approved procedures and transfer plans. Detailed procedures for their receipt, handling, review, and filing shall be established and approved prior to commencing transfer to permanent storage.
1.2.2 Measures shall be established for the ultimate collection and permanent filing of all quality records. These measures shall provide for the permanent file indexing and retrieval system, the microfilming of the records, and the record storage i facility. j l
. - \
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 1700 Rev. 6 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page 2 of 3 1.2.3 The' procedures established for the generation, collection, storage, and maintenance of the Perry' Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 Quality records shall meet the following minimum requirements:
- a. Sufficient' records'and documentation shall be maintained to provide evidence of the quality of items and/or the activity affecting quality.
- b. The following shall be considered part of construction quality assurance records:
- 1. . Results of reviews, inspections, surveillance, tests, audits and material analysis.
- 2. Personnel, procedure and equipment qualifications.
- 3. Specifications and drawings (including revisions and "as-builts").
- 4. Procurement documents (unpriced copies).
- 5. Calibration procedures and reports.
- 6. Noncenformance reports.
- 7. Corrective action reports. '
- 8. Unit 2 Project Maintenance Activity records,
- c. Approved systems for identifying and retrieving quality assurance records shall be established,
- d. Documented and approved measures shall be established for i complying with the applicable requirements of codes, i standards, and procurement documents regarding record transmittal, retention, and maintenance subsequent to completion of verk.
- e. Inspection and test records shall contain, as a minimum, the following: ,;
- 1. A description of the type of observation.
- 2. Evidence of completing and verifying the manufacturing, construction, maintenance, inspection, or test operation.
- 3. The date and results of the inspection or tert.
- 4. Information related to conditions adverse to quality. )
- 5. Inspector or data recorder id 1
l
Corporate Nuclear Outlity Assurance Program 1700 Rev. 6 Effective. 9 / 16 / 87 Page U f 3 -
- 6. Evidence as to the acceptability of the results. )
- 7. )
Action taken to resolve any discrepancies noted. j i
- f. Record storage facilities established hnd utilized to I prevent destruction of que.lity records by fire, flooding, theft and deterioration by environmental conditions such !
as temperature or humidity,
- g. Documented measures to assure retrievability of records !
and to preclude the.f r loss by such means as duplicate files, microfilming, etc. { 1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES l Each Department Manager is responsible for ensuring the establishment of procedures for the collection, maintenance and turnover of Quality l Records generated by their department, and their Department's agents and consultants. The Manager, NOAD, is also responsible for ensuring the review and approval of project quality record precedures and for establishment of an audit program to verify compliance. The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for the review and approval of procurement documents to assure inclusion of quality record requirements, the review and approval of vendor, CEI, consultant, and agent quality record programs, and the reviev and approval of vendor quality records. The General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance and Modification Quality Section, is responsible for the review and approval of contractor and PMA ; quality records. The General Supervisor, Perry Procurement and Records Management Section, is responsible for the development, with the NOAD, Perry Plant Technical Department, Perry Plant Operations Department, Perry Services Department, I and Nuclear Engineering Department of the overall plans for record accumulation, the final records indexing and retrieval system, and the microfilming operation. He is also responsible for the establishment of the record storage facility. .
'I i
PNPP No. 6523 TITLE Audits I N T E R F A C E S PREPARER R. L. Harvey/V. L. Reese CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY REVIEWER l[%34N / P cedu[esbnit
]
APPROVERS REVISION NUMBER 7 EFFECTIVE 9/ 16/ 87 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Policy 1.1 1 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Audit Requirements 1.2 1 , Responsibilities 1.3 2 REFERENCES SECTION PAGE I ANSI N45.2.12
.l y ghi i -
This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 1800 Rev. 7 Effective 9 /--16 / 87 Page Iof 3 AUDITS l.2 POLICY A comprehensive system of planned and systematic audits shall be established and folloved to ensure that quality requirements are implemented, adequate, and effective and to verify compliance to the Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program for Unit 2. The audit program shall encompass the design, procurement, manufacturing, construction, maintenance, installation, and testing of safety-related , materials, equipment, and~ structures by all Perry Nuclear Power l Plant (PNPP) Unit 2 participants. The Nuclear Quality Assurance 1 Department (NOAD) shall establish measures for implementing the overall audit program. NOAD may delegate some of the audit functions to 0A agents or establish programs for sharing of audit information, such as through Coordinating Agency for Supplier Evaluation (CASE). Such j delegated functions shall be audited by NOAD, and all audit reports shall I be reviewed to evaluate audit program effectiveness. PNPP audit programs l shall be implemented in accordance with written procedures which include: responsibilities assigned, audit frequencies, reporting criteria and levels of management to receive and assess audit findings as I required by <10CFR50, Appendix B). j l 1.2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY AUDIT REQUIREMENTS 1 The NOAD maintains the responsibility for the overall audit program and monitors all audit activity to ascertain program effectiveness. To verify that aspects of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Program are in ; compliance, NOAD shall establish audit plans and schedules for the , following project organizations: )
- a. CEI Nuclear Engineering Department (NED), Perry Plant Operations Department (PP0D) and Perry Plant Technical Department (PPTD), Perry Services Department (PSD), and Nuclear Quality Assurance Department (NQAD).
- b. Quality Assurance Agent (s)
- c. Design Agent (s) .
- d. Nuclear Steam System Supplier
- e. Nuclear Fuel Supplier
- f. Vendors 4((
- g. Contractors Procurement documents shall require, as appropriate for the scope of work, that contractors, vendors, agents and consultants establish audit programs.
Corporate Nuclear Quality Ascurance Program 1800 Rev. 7 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 ~ Page B f 3' i Measures established to implement audits'shall meet the following progrr.m n requirements:
.a. Performing audits'in accordance with pre-established.vritten procedures and checklists, utilizing qualified personnel'not having- i direct responsibilities in the area being audited. i
- b. . Rights of access of audit personnel to iarilities, documents, and personnel necessary in the planning and ,srformance.of audit::,.
Documenting audits in an acceptable form for review by' management
- c. i having responsibility in the areas audited.
- d. Management taking the necessary provisions for correcting !
deficiencies revealed by audits and. documenting the action taken,
- e. .Providing for reaudits in a timely manner of those' areas found-to be deficient to verify implementation of corrective action. 1
- f. Including in audits an objective evaluation of work area, activities, processes, items and the reviev of documents and records. -l g.- Including in' audits an objective evaluation of quality related I. practices, procedures, and instructions and the effectiveness of implementation.
- h. Analyzing and reporting audi- data to management to provide quality trends and a measure of effectiveness of the CNQAP.
1
- 1. Reviewing contractor and vendor QA programs to verify that provisions are included for auditing their suppliers' QA programs, procedures and activities. ,
- j. Adequate manpower, funding, and facilities to implement the audit i system.
1.3 RESPONSIBILITIES The Manager, NOAD, is responsible for ensuring the establishment and implementation of a formal audit program in accordance with .
< ANSI.N45.2.12) including measures for the conducting of audits of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Department. The Manger, NOAD, shall also provide for the training of CEI/0A audit personnel.
The General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance and Modification Quality Section (MMOS) is responsible for verifying the work organizations resolution of audit findings, i
i Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 1800 Rev. 7- Effective 9 / 16 / 87 Page 3 of 3 4 The General Supervising Engineer, Procurement and Administration Quality Section, is responsible for performing surveys arus for implementing the audit program for vendor activities, including NSSS and nuclear fuel suppliers, to verify compliance to the requirements of their approved program and CEI procurement documents. He is also is responsible for implementing programs for audits of suppliers, QA agents (including
} GAI/0AD and NUSAC), design consultants, and organizations who provide i
professional services. ( The General Supervising Engineer, Operational Quality Section, is responsible for implementing an audit program for Nuclear Group and work organization activities, including those of PMA, to verify compliance with the approved QA program and CEI procurement documents. The General Supervising Engineer's, NOAD, are responsible for follow-up-of discrepancies discovered during audit activities. Department Managers and Section General Supervisor's/ General Supervising Engineer's are responsible for ensuring that timely responses are made to audit findings and concerns, and that corrective actions committed to in these responses are implemented.
l l Corporata Nuclear Quality Assure Program l Appendix 1 l Rev. 8 Effective 9 / 16 / 87 PageIif2 ; REGULATORY GUIDE AND STANDARDS REFERENCE INDEX i REGULATORY ANSI GUIDE STANDARD TITLE REFERENCES
- 1.28 N45.2 Quality Assurance Progran Requirements CN-0200 (Design and Construction) (June 7, 1972).
1.30 N45.2.4 Quality Assurance Requirements for the PA-1001 Installation, Inspection. and Testing of Instrumentation and E:.ectric Equipment (August 1972)
, 1.37 N45.2.1 Quality Assurance Requirements for PA-1002 l
Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Vater-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants (March 1973) 1.38 N45.2.2 Quality Assurance Requirements for PA-1301 Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Vater-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants (Revision 2, May 1977) 1.39 N45.2.4 Housekeeping Requirements for PA-0206 Vater-Cooled Nuclear Power Plant (Revision 2, September 1977) 1.54 N101.4 Quality Assurance Requirements for PA-0901 Protective Coatings Applied to Vater-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants (June 1973) 1.58 N45.2.6 Qualifications of Nuclear Power Plant PA-1003 Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel (August 1973/ September 1980) 1.64 N4.2.11 Quality Assurance Requirements for PA-0301
, the Design of Nuclear Power Plants (Revision 2, June 1976) l 1,74 N45.2.10 Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions PA-0203 (February 1974) <
1.88 N45.2.9 Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of PA-1701 ; Nuclear Power Plant Quality Assurance Records (Revision 2, October 1976)
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assure Program Appendix 1 Rev. 8 Effective ~9 / 16/ 87 PageT~jf2
~
REGULATORY ANSI GUIDE STANDARD TITLE REFERENCES
- 1.94 N45.2.5 Quality Assurance Requirements for PA-1004 Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel during the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants (Revision 1, i April 1976) 1.116 N45.2.8 Quality Assurance Requirements for PA-1005 Installation, Inspection, and Testing g of Hechanical Equipment and Systems
, (June, 1976) 1.120 N/A Fire Protection Guidelines for Nuclear PA-0202 Power Plants (Revision 1, November 1977) 1.123 N45.2.13 Quality Assurance Requirements for PA-0401 Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants (Revision 1, July 1977) 1.144 N45.2.12 Requirements for Auditing of Quality CN-1800 Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants (for Comment, January 1979) 1.146 N45.2.23 Qualifications for QA Auditing FSAR Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants. Table 1.8-2 i
t , I f
- References are to appropriate 7ections describing Program address to the
) subjects indicated. References include operations phase documents where I appropriate. 1 i *CN - Refers to the Corporate Nuclear policy volume. l PA - Refers to the Project Administration Procedure volume.
Corporate Nuclear Quality i Assurance Program Appendix II Effective _8_/ 7/78 Page 1 of 11-DIVISION OF DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY t This table defines the division of responsibility between General Electric and CEI/GAI with respect-to the scope and detail design of the nuclear system and other plant systems and equipment for PNPP. The CEI/GAI interface is described-elsewhere in t.his Statement. Definitions P The Purchaser has. sole responsibility. ; 1 The principal responsibility lies with the Purchaser, but certain require-P1 ments which affect the safety or performance of the nuclear system will be furnished by General Electric. Design specifications and procedures prepared by the Purchaser will be made available to General Electric for review and comment. . l P2 The principal responsibility lies with the Purchaser, but General Electric may review and comment on the Purchaser's detail design including test specifications and test results to determine compatibility with General Electric's requirements. In additica, General' Electric may furnish infor-mation as indicated under P1, as appropriate. GE General Electric Company has sole responsibility. GE1 The principal responsibility lies with General Electric, but the Purchaser may furnish information on operating principles and procedures, general design guides or other plant requirements and may review and. comment. ; GE2 The principal responsibility lies with General Electric, but the Purchaser i may review and comment to determine basic compatibility with the Purchaser's responsibility. In addition, the Purchaser may furnish information as indicated under gel, as appropriate. Scope This denotes responsibility for supplying pertinent design criteria and Design engineering data required for the design analysis and calculations to establish the essential parameters and requirements for detail equipment and plant design. This includes the preparation outline and arrangement , drawings, specifications, piping and instrumentation diagrams, process flow diagrams, functional diagrams and heat balances. l l j' Detail This denotes responsibility for finalizing the equipment and plant design Design by performing the necessary analysis and calculations and by preparing the necessary drawings, specifications and instructions, such as detail con-struction and fabrication drawings, final arrangements and assembly draw-ings; purchasing, installation and testing specifications and operating instructions. i
b-Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program . Appendix II Effective 8/J/,78_ Page 2 of 11
~
I Scope Detail j Design Design j l I. Reactor Pressure Vessel and Internals i
')
A. Reactor pressure vessel (including limited shop GE1 GE2 i installed internals and bottom head appurtenances) j
~
B. Reactor pressure vessel head GE GE C. Vessel thermal insulation (except bottom vessel P1 P2 head) D. Vessel stabilizers (vessel to sacrificial shield) gel GE2 j I ' E. Reactor vessel internals (not shop installed) gel GE2 F. Refueling bellows (vessel to containment seal) P1 P2 G. Instrumentation GE GE H. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 I. Vessel pedestal and shield wall (sacrificial) P1 P2 J. Foundations P1 P2 i K. Seismic analyses (reactor vessel and internals) GE GE L. Seismic analyses (accommodation of vessel with P1 P2 internals) M. Containment cooling P1 P2 gel ' N. Feedwater sampling GE2 a II. Reactor Water Recirculation System A. Pumps and motors GE GE , B. Pump hangers and supports GE1 GE2 C. Recirculation piping and f". tings GE GE D. Piping suspension and restraints gel GE2 E. Valves GE GE F. Pump and piping thermal insulation PJ P2 G. Instrumentation hff GE GE H. Interconnecting wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 _-.-------.___________________a
i Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program , Appendix II Effective 8/ 7/78 Page 3 of 11 Scope Detail Design Design II. Reactor Water Recirculation System (Cont'd) I. Foundation and supporting steel P1 P2 J. Seismic analyses GE GE K. Cooling water P1 P2 L. Water sampling gel GE M. Containment cooling P1 P2 III. Main Steam Line A. Inside drywell (from reactor vessel ta second isolation valve outside primary containment)
- 1. Piping GE1 GE2
- 2. Instrumentation GE GE
- 3. Interconnecting wire, cable and tubing P1 P2
- 4. Thermal insulation Pl P2
- 5. Isolation valves GE GE
- 6. Safety and relief valves GE GE
- 7. Piping suspension system GE1 GE2
- 8. Piping restraints P1 P2
- 9. Seismic analyses GE GE
- 10. Foundations and supporting steel P1 P2
- 11. Drain lines P1 P2 B. Other steam piping P P C. Seismic analyses P1 P2 D. Turbine generator and steam bypass system P1 P2 E. Steam sampling P1 P2 .
F. Plant d-c power P1 P2 G. Plant air P1 P2 H. Containment drywell cooling P1 P2 IV. Control Rod Drive System A. Control rods ; i, GE GE B. Control rod drives GE GE o________
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Appendix II Effective 8/J/3 Page 4 of 11 Scope Detail ! Design Design ! IV. Control Rod Drive System (Cont'd) C. Control rod drive hydraulic system
- 1. Control rod drive feed pumps and motors GE GE
- 2. Hydraulic control unit GE GE
- 3. Scram discharge header P1 P2
- 4. Piping, hangers and valves P1 P2
- 5. Foundations and supports P1 P2 D. Instrumentation and readout GE GE E. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 F. Seismic analyses
- Pl P2 G. Cooling water Pl P2 H. Standby power P1 P2 I. Plant air P1 P2 J. Compartment ventilation, cooling and heating P1 P2 K. Containment cooling P1 P2 L. Containment accommodation P1 P2
)
V. Low Pressure Core Spray System A. Pumps and motors GE GE B. Piping, valves, hangers and thermal insulation Pl P2 l C. Foundations and supports P1 P2 D. Instrumentation GE GE E. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 F. Seismic analyses
- P1 P2 G. Compartment ventilation, cooling and heating P1 P2 H. Containment drywell cooling P1 P2
- Accommodation of GE supply "tg gggg$ -
1
- -- -- )
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Appendix II Effective 8/J/78 Page 5 of 11 [r - Scope Detail Design Design V. Low Pressure Core Spray System (Cont'd)
.'I. . Emergency equipment' cooling water P1 P2 J. Containment accommodation P1 P2 VI. 'High Pressure Core Spray System
.. A. Pumps and rotors GE GE B. ' Piping, valves, hangers and thermal insulation P1 ~P2 C. Foundations and supports P1 P2 D. Instrumentation GE GE Y
E. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1' P2
.F. Diesel generator GE GE G. Diesel' cooling water pump P1 P2 H. Diesel fuel storage tanks and transfer P1 P2 I. Motor control center GE GE J. Transfeimer GE GE K. Metal-clad switchgear GE GE L. Seismic analyses
- P1 P2 l
. M. Standby power Pl P2 N. Compartment ventilation, cooling and heating P1 P2
- 0. Containment drywell cooling P1 P2 i
P. Emergency equipment cooling water P1 P2 Q. Containment accommodation Pl P2
- Accommodation of GE supply
Corporate Nuclear Quality' Assurance Program Appendix II Effective J/ 7/78 l n Page 6 of 11 w L Scope Detail
. Design Design VII. Residual Heat Removal System A. Heat exchangers GE1 GE
-B. Pumps and motors GE GE C. Service water pumps and motors P1 P2 D. Piping, valves, hangers and thermal insulation Pl P2 E. Foundations and supports P1 P2 l l
F. Instrumentation (less service water GE GE ; instrumentation) G. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 H. Instrumentation for service water supply P1 P2 I. Seismic analyses
- P1 P2 J. Cooling water P1 P2 K. Standby power P1 P2 L. Compartment ventilation, cooling and heating P1 P2 M. Containment cooling P1 P2 N. Emergency equipment cooling water P1 P2 l
- 0. Containment accommodation Pl P2 )
i VIII. Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System A. Pump and turbine drive GE GE , B. Piping, valves, hangers and thermal insulation P1 P2 C. Foundations and supports P1 P2 D. Instrumentation GE GE E. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 F. Seismic analyses
- P1 P2
- Accommodation of GE supply !! l qi [!WgI '- " l
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ = . _ _ _- {.+ Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Appendix II Effective _8/J/78 i' , Page 7 of 11 t Scope . Detail Design Design i I VIII. Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System (Cont'd) G. Plant d-c power P1 .P2
. 1 Compartment ventilation, cooling and heating H. P1 P2 I. Containment cooling P1 P2 l
> J. Makeup water volume Pl P2 K. Emergency equipment cooling volume P1 P2
' L .' Containment accommodation Pi- P2. ;
I
-IX. Standby Liquid Control A. Storage tank GE GE B. Test tank GE GE C. Pumps and motors GE GE D. Piping, hangers and thermal insulation Pl P2 E. Explosive valves GE GE F. All other valves P1 P2-G. Foundations P1 P2 H. Instrumentation GE GE I. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 J. Sodium pentaborate solution Pl P2
~
K. Seismic analyses
- P1 P2 L. Water quality P1 P2 M. Containment accommodations P1 P2
- Accommodation of GE supply
; i
r Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program: Appendix II Effective ~8/'7/78 Page 8 of 11 Scope Detail Design Design
- X. Reactor Water Cleanup System A. Filter / demineralized'(including filter /deminer- GE GE alizer units, precoat tank, holding pump, .precoat pump agitators, post strainer and valves)
=
B. Regenerative heat exchanger GE GE C. Nonregenerative. heat exchanger gel- GE D. Cleanup recirculating pumps and motors GE .GE E. Piping, valves, hangers and thermal insulation P1 'P2 F. Foundations and supports P1 P2 G. Instrumentation GE GE H. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 I. All resins P1 P2
~ J... Seismic analyses
- P P K. Cooling water. P1 P2 L. Standby power P1~ P2 M. Containment cooling P1 P2 N. Makeup water volume P1 P2
- 0. Containment accommodation P1 P2 P. Water sampling GE1 GE XI. Tools and Servicing Equipment A. Fuel servicing GE GE B. Servicing aids GE GE C. Reactor vessel servicing GE GE D. In-vessel servicing GE GE
- Accommodation of GE supply gnre u s
i l' Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program l Appendix II Effective 8/ 7/78 Page 9 of 11 i Scope Detail l Design Design ' XI. Tools and Servicing Equipment (Cont'd) E. Refueling equipuent GE GE F. Storage equipment GE GE 1 G. Under-vessel servicing GE GE l H. All others P P I. Seismic analyses
- P1 P XII. Neutron Monitoring System i A. Sensors and signal conditioning instruments GE GE B. Sensor drive systems and tubing GE 'GE C. Interconnecting instrument wire and cable Pl P2 i D. Seismic analyses
- P1 P2 E. Plant d-c power P1 P2 F. 24-volt d-c system P1 P2 G. Containment cooling P1 P2 H. Containment accommodation P1 P2 XIII. Reactor Protection System A. Sensors and logic equipment GE GE B. Protection system M-G set GE GE C. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 D. Seismic analyses
- P1 P2 i E. Standby power P1 P2 F. Containment cooling P1 P2 l
- Accommodation of GE supply j
'V e q p , N,. d 1
gg@nbJ.%
)
Corporate Nuclear Quality l Assurance Program ! Appendix II Effective _8) J Q88 Page 10 of 11 Scope Detail Design Design 1 XIV. Feedwater Control System A. Flow nozzles gel GE B. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 C. Instrumentation gel GE D. Feedwater system (pumps, heaters and piping) P1 P2 E. Seismic analyses
- P1 P F. Feedwater sampling P1 P2
)
G. Plant air P1 P2' H. Containment cooling P1 P2 , XV. Process Radiation Monitoring System .; A. Elevated release point exhaust monitors GE GE i I B. Off gas radiation monitors GE GE C. Main steam line radiation monitors GE GE D. L quid process radiation monitors GE GE E. Jtactor building vent plus exhaust plenum GE GE F. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and tubing P1 P2 l G. Seismic analyses
- P1 P H. 24-volt d-c system P1 P2 P P
'I I. All others XVI. Computer - Nuclear Steam Supply System l
A. Equipment gel GE B. Interconnecting instrument wire and cable P1 P2 C. Programming gel GE D. Seismic analyses
- P1 P
- Accommodation of GE supply rr fd.$ ,
g@-@bs.'W' 1
.J
e 't Corporate Nuclear' Quality Assurance Program Appendix II Effective 8/l/78 Page ll.of 11 u.
, Scope Detail Design Design-XVII. Panels, Cabinets and Racks EA. Control and auxilia ry equipment room panels
- 1. Nuclear systemi gel GE
- 2. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and- P1 P2 tubing (external to panels)
# 3. Compartment ventilation, cooling and heating P1 P2
- 4. All-others P1 P2 B. Local panels and racks
- 1. Nuclear system GE GE
- 2. Interconnecting instrument wire, cable and Pl- P2 tubing (external to panels)
- 3. All others P P C. Seismic analyses
- P1 P2 XVIII. Leak Detection System i
A. Instrumentation GE GE B. Interconnecting instrument wire and cable Pl P2 C. Setsmic analyses
- P1 P2 1
D. Turbine building leak detection system P1 P ; XIX. Other Plant Systems and Equipment P1 P
- Accommodation of GE supply i
l I
;,,5 .
Corporate'Nuc1' ear. Quality.
, f . ' Assurance Program ii ,
Appendix III Rev. 2 Effective - 9 / 17 / 84' Page 1 of 4
~
DEFINITIONS Definitions of other words' utilized in the Corporate Nuclear-Quality.
' Assurance-Program are as defined by ANSI'N45.2.10 and the American Heritage Dictionary of.the English Language, copyright 1969, unless-otherwise specifically defined.
' APPROVAL -' Approval is general agreement or concurrence with programs,.
procedures, de igns, or other items. reviewed and does not relieve agents,-contractors'or vendors from entire responsibility.for-conformance with regulations, codes, specifications, standards, or- , contractual agreements. Approval is.the act of endorsing or 7; providing positives authorization, or both. AUDIT - An activity to determine through investigation the adequacy of-and adherence to established _ procedures and instructions, and the
~
effectiveness of implementation. BALANCE OF PLANT' The equipment,. materials, supplies, components, parts, appurtenances, and systems,.other than the Nuclear Steam Supply System and Nuclear Fuel. COMPLETENESS - Completeness of a record or document refers to the
'following:
- 1. All pages or parts physically present.
- 2. . Sufficient identification for. recognition of the item or activity to which the record or document applies.
- 3. Stamp, initials, signature, or.other authentication and dating by authorized personnel.
CONFORMED SPECIFICATIONS - A conformed Specification is a Revision of the Specification of Addenda thereto, which is written after the award of the contract to reflect services or equipment'actually purchased. CONSTRUCTION - Physically assembling, erecting, or installing components, systems, or structures. CONTRACTOR - An organization which has a contract to supply CEI with specified services or materials at the construction site. DISPOSITION - Resolution of the immediate actions required of a nonconformance item or procedure (e.g.: repair, rework, use-as-is, scrap). INSPECTION - Examination or testing to determine the conformance of materials, components, parts, systems, processes or structures to predetermined requirements. I g
a Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program l Appendix III Rev. 2 Effective 9 /17 / 8JL Page 2 of 4 . INSTALLATION - The' placing of parts, components, and equipment into their functional position and joining to the overall plant system. INTENT, LETTER OF - A Letter of Intent is a letter sent to the contractor or vendor indicating the owners' intention to ender into a contract with the contractor. ITEMS OF INTEREST REPORT - This is a weekly memorandum from each department manager to the vice president of the department's group. The memorandum consists of single paragraph summaries of significant department activities, occurrences and accomplishments. MANUFACTURER - An organization which provides finished parts or com-ponents for use. NEW SPEC - A computerized system which in part monitors specification status. ) NONCONFORMANCE (NONCONFORMING) - A deficiency in characteristic, documentation, or procedure which renders the quality of an item unacceptable or indeterminate. Examples of nonconformance include: physical defects, test failures, incorrect or inadequate documen-tation of deviation from prescribed processing, inspection or test procedures. NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT (NQAD) - That portion of the CEI organization which directs and controls the QA program. NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT MANAGER (NQADM) - The CEI staff member in charge of the NQAD who reports directly to the Vice President - Nuclear Group. l CORPORATI NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM (CNQAP) - The document which establishes the program of planned and systematic activities which ; provide assurance of quality during design, procurement, con-struction and test. OWNER - The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, agent for Duquesne Light Company, Ohio Edison Company, Pennsylvania Power Company, - Toledo Edison Company, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, owners of undivided interests in the Perry Nuclear Power Plant Project, Units 1 and 2, collectively referred to as the Central Area Power Coordinating Organization (CAPCO). PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS REPORT (PAR) - This is a formal monthly report from each department to the vice president of the department's group. This report details departmental activity and progress on project assignments; summarizes manpower and timekeeping information and general department progress; delineates costs, and identifies special problems.
$hbhmA. .
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program j Appendix III Rev. 2 Effective 9 / 17 / 84 w Page 3 of 4 q
~
4 Note: ~ Items of Interest and the PAR'are generated in'a j chain-like progression. For example, the supervisors j prepare both to report to their department manager. The 1 manager prepares department Items of Interest and PAR to ; report to the group vice president. The vice presidents i then report group Items of Interest and PAR to the
. President / Executive Vice President.
PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTS - Those documents such as the Purchase Order, f specification, Quality Assurance specifications, and others which 1 are a part of the legal agreement between CEI and the con- l tractor / vendor.
. QUALITY ASSURANCE - All those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that an item or a facility will perform satisfactorily in service.
l QUALITY ASSURANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE - A staff committee reporting l
- l. to the CEI Vice President - Nuclear Group'to review and evaluate j the QA Program.
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE - A member of the QA staff of CEI, GAI or other QA agent. QUALITY CONTROL - Those actions which provide a means to control and measure the characteristics of an item, process, facility to
. established requirements.
REPAIR - The process of restoring a nonconforming characteristic to a condition such that the capability of an item to function reliably I and safetly is not impaired, even though that item still may not conform to the original requirement. REWORK - The process by which a nonconforming item is made to conform to a prior specified requirement by completion, remachining, re-assembling, or other means, SCRAP - A disposition which is imposed for nonconformance when it is established that the discrepancy renders the item unfit for its intended use and it is either uneconomical or impossible to effect corrections such as " Repair" or " Rework." SUPPLIER - Any organization under contract to manufacture or provide I specific materials and components for use at PNPP. I SURVEILLANCE - A review or observation for the purpose of verifying that an action has been accomplished as specified. l l
.~ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - .
Corporste Nuclear Quality. Assurance Program Appendix III . _ Rev. 2' Effective 1/17 / 84 Page 4 of 4
~
USE-AS-IS' A disposition which may be imposed for a nonconformance when. it. can be ' established that the discrepancy will result in no adverse cvnditions end that the' item under' consideration will continue to moet all engineering functional requirements including performance, maintainability and fit. VENDOR - Same as supplier. 4 428/0/4/d1h
}{QR$5((!0!k b
._ 9}}