ML20217P722

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-277/98-01 & 50-278/98-01 on 980118-0318 & NOV Re Failure of Control Room Supervisor to Verify That Unit 3 Expected Alarm Was Ack
ML20217P722
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/01/1998
From: Anderson C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Smith E
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
Shared Package
ML20217P725 List:
References
50-277-98-01, 50-277-98-1, 50-278-98-01, 50-278-98-1, NUDOCS 9805070039
Download: ML20217P722 (4)


See also: IR 05000277/1998001

Text

,hh

4.

May 1,1998

Mr. D.'M. Smith, President

PECO Nuclear

Nuclear Group Headquarters

Correspondence Control Desk

P. O. Box 195

. Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-0195

' SUBJECT: ROUTINE INTEGRATED INSPECTION 50-277/98-01 AND 50-278/98-01

Dear Mr. Smith:

This refers to the inspection conducted from January 18 through March 14,1998, at the

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Delta, Pennsylvania. At.the conclusion of the

inspection, the inspectors discussed the findings with Mr. T. Mitchell, Mr. J. Doering and

others of your staff. The inspectors based these findings on independent observation of

activities, interviews, and document reviews.

During the eight-week period covered by this inspection, we noted that the plant

experience assessment group routinely presented industry events that occurred at other

nuclear power plants at the daily morning management meeting. Senior plant management

reviewed and discussed these events to obtain insights into potential problems that the

Peach Bottom station could encounter. These tsviews were proactive and provided

information that allowed the station to continue to improve performance.

We deterrnined that the replacement of the original source range monitor (SRM) and

intermediate range monitor (IRM) with a digital wide range neutron monitoring system

(WRNMS) was implemented appropriately with very good engineering support.

Within the area of plant support, we found that your staff continued to implement effective

environmental monitoring and meteorological monitoring progsams and that the

performance in these areas was very good. Your quality assurance personnel also

demonstrated good performance regarding the quality assurance audits of the REMP and

f

MMP.

/

'We' identified five violations of NRC requirements during this inspection. The first violation

!

- involved the failure of a control room supervisor to verify that a Unit 3 expected alarm was

acknowledged due to the fact that he was outside of his main control room work station

without temporary relief.

The next two violations were the result of operations personnel failing to perform technical

specification surveillance requirements for the verification of proper recirculation loop flow

during Unit 2 start-up on January 2,1998.

_

9905070039 980501

i

PDR

ADOCK 05000277

(,:g

e

eda

g

..

D. M. Smith

2

The fourth violation contained several examples of inadequate procedures and control room

operators failing to implement operations procedures which resulted in the unexpected trip

_

of the Unit 2 main turbine on January 1,1998. The procedures were inadequate since they

failed to restore the Electro-Hydraulic Control system to the slignment required for reactor

start-up. Also, operations personnel failed to adequataly implement procedures when they

j

did not recognize the abnormal main turbine status, position of the turbine control valves,

or the selection of the speed set for the EHC system for several shifts prior to the main

j

turbine trip.

We were concerned with the violations described above, especially the Unit 2 main turbine

trip, because they all showed weak oversight of the control room activities. We previously

documented in Inspection Report 50-277(278)/97-07where inadequate oversight of

operator activities contributed to a scram of the Unit 2 reactor during swapping of a station

battery charger.

j

The last violation resulted from Unit 3 exceeding the licensed power level up to 0.6%

between October 22,,1995 and January 21,1997. PECO Energy Company operated the

reactor at a steady state power level up to 100.6% of rated power. We were concerned

that your staff failed to recognize errors in the calibration of feedwater temperature

instruments even after deficiencies were identified with the equipment used to calibrate

these instruments. The inaccurate feedwater temperature instruments resulted in power

levels above the licensed limit for over 15 months.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter

and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

i

We appreciate your cooperation.

'

- Sincerely,

Original Signed By:

Clifford J. Anderson, Chief

Projects Branch 4

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket / License No. 50-277/DPR-44

50-278/DPR-56

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Violation

2. NRC Inspection Report 50-277/98-01 and 50-278/98-01

_

e

r C'

"

D. M. Smith

3

cc w/ encl:

G. Edwards, Chairman, Nuclear Review Board and Director, Licensing

,

j ,.

J. Doering, Vice President, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station

L

G. Rainey, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations

i

J. B. Cotton, Vice President, Nuclear Station Support

T.'Niessen, Director, Nuclear Quality Assurance

A. F. Kirby, Ill, External Operations - Delmarva Power & Light Co.

!

M. Warner, Plant Manager, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station

G. J. Lengyel, Manager, Experience Assessment

J. W. Durham, Sr., Senior Vice President and General Counsel

T. M. Messick, Manager, Joint Generation, Atlantic Electric

W. T. Henrick, Manager, External Affairs, Public Service Electric & Gas

. R. McLear , Powcr Plant Siting, Nuclear Evaluations

,

. J. Vannoy, Acting Secretary of Harford County Council

R. Ochs, Maryland Safe Energy Coalition

J. H. Walter, Chief Engineer, Public Service Commission of Maryland

- Mr. & Mrs. Dennis Hiebert, Peach Bottom Alliance

Mr. & Mrs. Kip Adams

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

i

State of Maryland

TMl- Alert (TMIA)

..

.

.

.

e

D. M. Smith -

4

Distribution w/encis:

Region 1 Docket Room (with concurrences)

H. Miller, RA/W. Axelson, DRA

C. Anderson, DRP

D. Florek, DRP

R.Junod,DRP

Nuclear Safety information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident inspector

PUBLIC -

Distribution w/encis: (Via E-Mail)

B. McCabe, OEDO

R. Capra, PDl-2, NRR

Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

M. Thadani, NRR

B. Buckley, NRR

R. Correia, NRR

F. Talbot, NRR

.DOCDESK

i

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ BRANCH 4\\PB9801. INS

To recolve a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without

attachment / enclosure

"E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure

"N" = No copy

OFFICE

Rl/DRP

l

Rl/DRP

,

NAME

AMcMurtray ((" /, / CAnderson cjo

DATE

04/3c/98

Q41.JHr

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

CltIf/