ML20217M703
| ML20217M703 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/31/1996 |
| From: | Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210N320 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-97-229 SECY-96-270, SECY-96-270-01, SECY-96-270-1, SECY-96-270-R, NUDOCS 9708250215 | |
| Download: ML20217M703 (67) | |
Text
____
n.
e p* * * %
1, f
POLICY ISSUE December 31, 1996 SECY-96-270 The Commissio(nersInformation)
EQB:
EBod:
James M. Taylor Executive Director for Operations Sjf,JECI:
OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS ANNUAL REPORT, FISCAL YEAR 1996 PURPOSE:
Ta provide the Commission with an annual report regarding the results of uvestigations completed by the NRC Office of Investigations (01) (reference SRM C0HJC 89 8, dated June 30, 1989). This is the eighth 01 annual report and addresses fiscal year 1996 (FY 96).
BACKGROUND:
,~
01 conducts investigations of alleged wrongdoing by individuals or organizations who are licensed by the NRC or have applied for NRC licenses or who are vendors or contractors of NRC licensees. OI is composed of four regionally based Field Offices remrting to 0I Headquarters. During FY 96 O!
reported to the Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Materials Safety, Safeguards, and Operations Support.
In FY 96 there were, on average, 30 special agents and 10 operational support staff assigned nationwide. The average experience of an 01 special agent in FY 96 was approximately 17 years in Federal criminal law enforcement. This experience was gained within the NRC and through 3revious service with such agencies as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, tie Drug Enforcement Administration. the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, the U.S. Secret Service, the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, the Naval Investigative Service, and various Inspector General offices within the Federal community.
SUMMARY
Since 1992, OI has been participating in the allegation management and review process to identify and develop potential wrongdoing issues at a much earlier stage. This initiative has eliminated much duplication of effort and has facilitated a closer working relationship between 01 and the technical staff.
l 82 5 970820 SAVAGE 97-229 PDR
Contact:
William D. Hutchison, OI 415 3484
/
LIMRED[bTRIBt7f0E I
4-+
'. + ^
nv's igat Inf tio :
Hav ku* ha ebnra.irad b Tdo C
iou c su ti t
re
{/vu Y$
2 It has also allowed 01 to more accurately and efficiently focus its limited investigative resources on critical safety related investigations.
The impact of this new process on the O! workload was a 224% increase in cases opened by FY 96, as compared to FY 92.
In the past few years 01 has been striving, through management, organizational and process related initiatives, to increase efficiency and productivity, and by doing so, to further improve our responsiveness to the technical staff and our other customers.
01 is continually evaluating the investigative program by setting outcome oriented goals and measuring results against these goals.
As a consequence of this constant analysis, OI has been able to make major improvements in critical areas of its operation. We are confident that we are indeed working smarter and that the impact of our efforts has been an enhanced contribution to the overall NRC regulatory mission.
The following are major 01 achievements during FY 96:
A long term goal of OI has been to complete investigations, on average, e
within 12 months.
In FY 96, 01 exceeded that goal for the 6th year by completing cases in an overall average of less than 8 months. More significantly, the average completion time for investigations of high safety priority was 9.9 months, and for those of high 3riority in which 01 substantiated or did not substantiate wrongdoing tie most complex investigations conducted by 01 the average time in process was 10.2
- months, To further focus on the timeliness issue. OI established a supporting o
goal of reducing the average number of cases which remained within its active case inventory for more than 12 months. As a result, during FY 95, 01 succeeded in reducing such older cases to 25% of the open case inventory, on average, and down still further to 13% of open cases during FY 96, Another goal which has been reached and exceeded over the past few years e
was to pursue significantly more investigations to a full conclusion based on the merits of the case, either substantiating or not substantiating wrongdoing. 01 was able to increase by more than 200%
the number of cases where such conclusions were reached between FY 94 and FY 96, while substantially fewer cases (a decrease of more than 70%)
were closed administrative 1y. More remarkably, the number of cases where 01 s)ecifically substantiated wrongdoing increased by 172% between FY 94 and Y 96. The fact that this was done with no decrease in caseload and without an increase in 0I resources or the number of hours worked fully supports the assertion that 01 is more effectively utili7.ing its resources to close more substantive safety related cases, Since FY 94, 01's goal has been to assimilate discrimination cases into o
the overall case inventory and to conduct such investigations independent of the Department of Labor.
Our success in meeting this goal is noteworthy: Discrimination cases, which represented 25% of the investigative inventory prior to.this policy change, rose to 42% of the
/
LIMI7fD DI5fR10 e to#0ced rd trib ted u si C.
nvdst ga v In o ti ay t
q J
(t)out nsu 'gt irect
, 01
=-
s 3-inventory as of FY 96, an 88% increase. Additionally, discrimination investigations brought to either a substantiated or unsubstantiated conclusion on the merits increased 554% from FY 94 to FY 96, while the time to complete such cases decreased by 73%.
INVESTIGATIONS OPENED / CLOSED:
A statistical sumary of investigations opened and closed during FY 96, and a detailed listing of closed cases are at Enclosure 1.
Cases Goened durina FY %:
01 opened 227 investigations in FY 96, and carried over 141 investigations from FY 95. Thus, the total number of investigations in the OI inventory during FY 96 was 368 cases, many of which contained multiple suspected wrongdoing violations.
Investigations opened in FY 96 are categorized by major types of alleged wrongdoing as follows:
Deliberate Material False Statements:
57 Discrimination and Retaliation:
96 (Harassment and Intimidation Cases)
Deliberate Violations of NRC Rules, Regulations, or License Conditions:
71 Other Deliberate Violations:
3 Cases Closed durina FY %:
01 completed 240 investigations in FY 96, which represents 65% of the total 368 investigations in the 01 inventory in FY 96. Of the investigations completed in FY 96, o
68 cases were closed after investigation substantiated one or more of the allegations of wrongdoing.
o 107 cases were closed after investigation did not substantiate wrongdoing, o
27 were closed where the evidence developed indicated that the safety significance did not-warrant expenditure of additional 01 resources, o
13 were closed due to the lack of a regulatory-violation or requirement.
o 1 investigation was closed where insufficient evidence of actual wrongdoing was developed during initial evaluation.
L TEDDIbRIBUT nfc at'on: May nbt be/re rod ed distr but d o si C
('bves igativ withou con ul i the ir ctor, OI V.,
4 o
8 were closed for miscellaneous administrative reasons, o
16 were assists to technical staff inspections.
The completed investigations are categorized by major types of alleged wrongdoing as follows:
Deliberate Haterial False Statements:
61 Discrimination and Retaliation:
105 Deliberate Violations of NRC Rules, Regulations, or License Conditions:
62 Other Deliberate Violations:
12 SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS:
NRC Enforcement Actions:
.There were 173 escalated enforcetr.en actions taken by the NRC in FY 96, which included civil penalties, orders, and notices of violation at or above severity level III. Of these,105, or 61%, were taken based upon findings provided by 01 investigations. The civil nalties proposed in FY 96 as a result of 01 investigations totalled $811, 00.
The following are examples of significant cases which resulted in enforcement action being taken by the NRC in FY 96:
Baltimore Gas & Electric Company An investigation disclosed that Baltimore Gas & Electric Company (BG&E) knowingly awarded a contractor em31oyee unescorted site access at its Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant even tiough it was aware that the employee had a criminal record and had presented security screening documents containing material false statements. The investigation further disclosed that the contractor employee was an illegal alien, had intentionally made false statements to screening personnel in his application, and had deliberately submitted fraudulent identification documents.
Based on the results of the investigation. BG&E paid a $50,000 civil penalty on January 30, 1996. On April 19, 1996, the NRC issued an order prohibiting the involved individual from engaging in NRC licensed activities for a period of 5 years.
Eastern Testing and Inspection, Inc.
An investigation disclosed that Eastern Testing and Inspection Inc. (ETI),
had deliberately directed at least one unqualified and untrained employee to perform radiography and that the ETI president and the radiation safety officer had generated inaccurate documents indicating that the em)loyee had been properly trained, tested, and certified to perform radiograply. The investigation also found that ETI did not complete the required source lbDDb186 MON rd trib e ou ide N C rgdued tg v
H
4
.s.
utilization records on 97 occasions, It was further determined that the
> resident of ETI threatened a former employee on two occasions because he 3elieved that the employee may have cooperated with the NRC, Based on the investigation, on March 29, 1996, the NRC issued an immediately effective order suspending ETI's license.
M)T Services, Inc.
An investigation determined that NDT deliberately used a radiographer untrained in NDT's emergency and operating procedures, which resulted in a disconnect event requiring the evacuation of a Sun Oil Refinery in Puerto Rico. Additionally, the radiation safety officer (RS0) and the president of NDT provided false documents regarding the training program.
NDT was fined
$15,000 by the NRC, and the president and the RSO of NDT were given orders prohibiting their participation in NRC licensed activities.
Crystal River Nuclear Plant An investigation and extensive regional inspection determined serious management errors and inaequate procedures which contributed to a pattern of Several ope' ators received unauthorized tests by control room operators.
r letters of reprimand, and Florida Power Corporation, the licensee, was assessed a $500,000 civil penalty, which was paid on September 9,1996.
Arizona Public Service Company An investigation determined that a former contract instrumentation and control (I&C) employee at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS) was discriminated against by not being rehired for a second outage because he reported safety concerns to the NRC.
In FY 95, in Federal District Court, the former I&C supervisor at PVNGS pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 1 year grobation, 75 hours8.680556e-4 days <br />0.0208 hours <br />1.240079e-4 weeks <br />2.85375e-5 months <br /> of comunity service, a $50 fine, and court costs for discrimination against an employee of a nuclear power plent." On March 7, 1996, based on the OI investigation, the NRC issued an order imposing a fine of $100,000 to Arizona Public Service Company.
Nadigan Amy Medical Center An investigation determined that a physicist directed a dosimetrist to include a constant value for iridium 192 in a computer program. This constant was incorrect and resulted in patient test plans and final treatment plans being incorrectly calculated from February 1994 until May 1995. The use of this inappropriate data resulted in five separate misadministrations to four different patients. The investigation substantiated that the physicist had deliberately violated NRC reporting requirements regarding misadministrations; had failed to perform contamination surveys or wipe tests of radioactive sources; and had provided false information on required survey records.
In FY 95, the NRC issued an Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities to the physicist. On May 20, 1996, the NRC issued an order imposing a civil penalty in the amount of $8,000 to the Department of the Army, Madigan Army Medical Center.
IMITADISAIBUTIO 1
N dA@$@Ssh"#"leec M I. D P D
- " '" *d
- 'd i
i 6-SouthTexasProject An investigation disclosed that a former Ebasco, Inc., electrician had been the subject of employment discrimination for protected activities related to his work at South Texas Project. On September 19, 1996, the NRC issued a civil penalty to the licensee in the amount of $100,000.
Federal Court Actions:
Of the 240 investigations closed in FY 96, 66 cases were referred to the Department of Justice (00J) for prosecutorial review. During FY 96, 01 supported seven Federal grand juries.
In addition. OI investigations resulted in two indictments, two convictions, and one guilty plea in Federal courts.
The following are significant cases involving 00J and Federal Court actions during FY 96:
National Circuits Caribe, Inc.
A joint investioation of thir. firm's activities was conducted by the EPA, FBI, and NRC, requiring extensive use of a Federal grand jury in Puerto Rico. As a result, the president of National Circuits was indicted for abandoning a gauging device containing byproduct material at the company facility in Fajardo, Puerto Rico. The indictment also charged the president with improper storage of hazardous wastes, an EPA violation. He was arrested by the FBI in October 1995. On June 6, 1996, in U.S. District Court, Baltimore, Maryland, he pleaded guilty to abandoning the gauge and was subsequently sentenced to 2 years probation,150 hours0.00174 days <br />0.0417 hours <br />2.480159e-4 weeks <br />5.7075e-5 months <br /> of community service, and a $100 fine.
Ball Memorial Hospital An investigation revealed that two Ball Memorial su>ervisory nuclear medicine technologists had administered greater than prescri)ed dosages of radiopharmaceutical to 3atients and also had instructed subordinate technicians to do so.
)atients' records of radiopharmaceutical dosages were falsified to create the appearance that the correct prescription had been administered. This investigation was referred to the United States Attorney's office for prosecution. The two former supervisory nuclear medicine technicians pleaded guilty to the above violations. On July 11, 1996, one.
technician was sentenced to 3 years probation and a $5,000 fine for violations of the Atomic Energy Act. The second technician was sentenced to 1 year probation and a $1,000 fine for violations of the Atomic Energy Act. On April 19, 1996. Ball Memorial Hospital paid a $300.000 settlement, based on a civil agreement with the U.S. Justice Department, for violations of NRC regulations and improper Medicare / Medicaid billings.
D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant An investigation disclosed that a contract insulator gained unauthorized access to the D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant in Bridgeman, Michigan, by falsifying information on a background _ questionnaire. The contract insulator was also TED ASTRMUTION IIIhst1 dative orma'10 :
ay hqt QbVeJ r uce or di ri e o i
C i
gthout cchsul i t 3 Di c or, OW v
7 found to have gained access to the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, Scribo, New York, and the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Spring City, Tennessee, by falsifying similar background questionnaires, On September 26, 1996, the contract insulator was indicted by a Federal grand jury in Grand Rapids, Michigan, on three counts of making material false statements, and 4-subsequently pleaded guilty.
TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS: shows the number of cases opened from FY 94 through FY 96. The overall decrease in cases opened during this period (9%) is, we believe, a general leveling off in case openings in comparison to past years, confirwing our prediction of last year and consistent with the stabilization'of the procedures adopted in 1992 for 01's new role in case development.
Future changes in investigative focus, priorities, and/or thresholds for acceptance 1
of cases by 01 notwithstanding, it is anticipated that the number of cases opened each year will remain at approximately the current level, It would also a> pear that the distribution of types of cases has stabilized to some degree. T1e trend begun in FY 93 following the policy revision for 0I to pursuediscriminationcpseswithoutregardtoDepartmentofLabor(DOL) proceedings, continues. clearly shows discrimination cases as the dominant type of investigation opened from FY 94 through FY 96, with deliberate violations of NRC rules, regulations or license conditions rising to second place in FY 95, and false statement cases coming in third by the end of FY 95. By the end of FY 96, discrimination cases had experienced a modest t
increase of 7% (from 90 to 96), violations of rules, regulations, or license conditions had increased by 13% (63 cases to 71 cases), and false statement cases had substantially decreased from the FY 94 level of 86 cases down to 57 cases (34%). The continuing dominance of discrimination cases is a result of the increased focus by 01 and the agency itself on such cases.
_, indicating the 3ercentage of the total inventory of cases opened in FY 94, FY 95, and FY 96, )y the type of case, further supports this trending analysis.
In FY 96 discrimination cases represented 42% of the cases 3 There was a 287% overall increase in the number of cases opened from FY 91 (70 cases) to FY 93 (271 cases), as a result of the implementation in March 1992 of the_ procedures which enabled OI to become involved with the technical staff in developing suspected wrongdoing issues at an earlier stage, effectively lowering the threshold for OI acceptance of investigations. The number of cascs opened began to decrease after FY 94 and continued through FY 95 and FY % (250 cases, 218 and 227 cases, respectively).
8 Prior to 1993, 01 in most instances awaited a review by the NRC technical staff of Department of Labor (DOL) actions to determine whether further 01 investigation was necessary or whether the NRC could take enforcement action based solely on the DOL findings. As of 1993, it became OI policy to open an investigation and conduct )reliminary investigative activities on discrimination cases without waiting for 10L results.
LIMMEDDIbBilT[0M i
P
.~
I 5I ti ja e I ormatiin: May t be epodQced r di r1 utec o tsi C
(\\w t yt)co ujti the ) ire or 01.
.g.
opened; violations of rules, regulations or license conditions accounted for 31% of the open case inventory; and false statement cases represented 25% of open cases. is a graph demonstrating the distribution of cases opened from FY 94 through FY 96 by cases involving reactor licensees: byproduct, source, and special nuclear materials licensees; and vendors to licensees. Since vendor cases represent only 3% of the open case inventory, the 42% decrease in such cases is not considered significant.
Of interest, however, is the fact that reactor cases increased 17% (144 to 169) and now represent 77% of the open caseload, while materials cases decreased 18% (62 to 51) and now represent 23% of open cases. These changes have resulted in a 77:23 ratio of reactor cases to materials cases, a change from the approximately 70:30 ratio in past years. This may well follow from the increasing dominance of discrimination cases in general (Enclosure 3), since there are significantly more discrimination cases at reactor sites than at materials licensee facilities. demonstrates the average monthly active case inventory in FY 96 of investigations in process for more than the OI goal of 12 months. There was an overall 54% decrease during FY 95 in the number of such cases, and, in FY 96, a 57% decrease. The FY 96 average of 16 ' cases open longer than 12 months was significantly below last year's average of 37, demonstrating the continuing success of 01's efforts to bring investigations to closure within the 12 month goal. shows that the number of closed cases developed to a point of either a substantiated or unsubstantiated conclusion on the merits increased by 207% from FY 94 to FY 96 (57 cases-in FY 94 to 175 cases in FY 96). These cases, upon which the technical and enforcement staff-can base a regulatory decision, are by far the most complex and lengthy investigations performed by
- 01. As mentioned in the summary, by closina this greater number of substantiated or unsubstantiated cases OI has demonstrated a significant improvement in the efficiency of the investigative process and a substantial impact on the regulatory process.
Although the total number of cases closed by 01 from FY 94 through FY 96 has remained fairly constant (an overall 6% decrease), there has been a 77%
decrease over this period in the number of cases administrative 1y closed due to higher priority investigations (115 cases in FY 94 to 27 cases in FY 96, as shown in Enclosure 6). These cases are routinely normal or low priority investigations and were closed in past years due to a need for 0I to use its limited resources on higher priority cases. This decrease in cases closed due to the need to focus resources on higher priority matters is directly attributable to 01 initiatives over the past few years.
More specifically, by streamlining the investigative process, 01 has im) roved efficiency to a point where OI is currently investigating-a greater num)er of normal or low priority cases without sacrificing higher priority investigations.
Another indicator of the success of OI initiatives to enhance the outcome of our efforts is a 70% decrease in the number of cases that were IMITbDISTRIBUTI In iga e In'orm ion: H r
uc or distr' i
RC 1
ut ns ti 19 the ir ctor.
I.
.g.
administratively closed after determining that there was no regulatory violation (45 cases in FY 94 to 13 cases in FY 96, as shown in Enclosure 6).
This reflects the heightened cooperation and coordination with the technical staff in determining the regulatory nexus prior to opening an 01 case, thus eliminating the need to commit 01 resources in a preliminary investigation to make such determinations. indicates the time cases were in process from FY 94 through FY 96.
The OI goal of closing investigations, on average, within 12 months has been surpassed consistently since FY 93. The overall number of months to complete cases decreased 7% during this period (from 8.2 months in FY 94 to 7.6 months in FY 96), As mentioned, the most significant cases which 01 investigates are high priority cases developed to a substantiated or unsubstantiated conclusion on their merits.
From FY 94 through FY 96, there was a decrease of 29t in the time to complete such complex cases (from 14.?9 months in FY 94 to 10.15 months in FY 96). This decrease in completion time was accomplished during a period where there was a 207% increase in the number of such cases developed to a conclusion, Together with the numerous case management initiatives which account for this decrease in processing time, a part of it can be attributed to a modification of 01 procedure which authorized field office directors to sign final reports on substantiated cases, thus eliminating the average six weeks it was requiring for review of such cases at headquarters. The overall decrease in time in arocess to case completion, and especially the decrease in time to conclude higi priority cases and provide that conclusion to the technical staff, further demonstrate 01's impact on the regulatory process and its success in focusing OI resources on substantive safety related investigations.
It might be well to note, however, that Management Directive 8.8, Management of Allegations, which contained revised criteria for prioritizing 01 investigations, was implemented in the third quarter of FY 96. The application of these new criteria within the existing case inventory resulted in an approximately 90% increase in the number of high priority cases open.
(Discrimination cases increased by 118% and non discrimination cases by 64%.)
High priority cases require more investigative hours due to their complexity, sensitivity, and safety significance.
If the number of high priority cases being investigated continues to increase, then the overall time to complete OI investigations may also increase. depicts the number of referrals of substantiated cases to the Department of Justice (D0J) between FY 94 and FY 96. Prior to FY 95, the number of referrals remained stable at approximately 25 per year.
In FY 95 referrals increased 116% from the previous year (from 25 cases to 54), and, in FY 96, increased again by 22% (from 54 to 66 cases). This increase was due to a continuing upward trend in cases where wrongdoing was substantiated. These substantiated cases represented 10% of the total closed case inventory in FY 94, 20% in FY 95, and, finally, 28% in FY 96.
l In the past the enforcement process was delayed when the technical staff deferred enforcement action on substantiated 01 cases while awaiting a prosecutorial evaluation by the Department of Justice (D0J). Changes in April hl.IMITE[D\\STRIBhTION Q
^
ave +tiga.i I or tio no beteprodced di tri t o s'd IRC itho t ns t gt Di ecto
\\1 J
10-1995 to the D0J referral process resulted in the staff being able to proceed with civil action in a more expeditious manner. The prior procedure was to make referrals in writing after issuing an investigation report. The revised i
referral process authorizes field office directors to make referrals by telephone or in person after com)letion of investigative field work. This revised process additionally aut1orizes the directors to accept telephonic or verbal declinations of prosecution from D0J and document them in the investigation report. This initiative has resulted in a reduction of the average time cases remained at D0J for evaluation from 3.8 months to 1.2 days.
A reduction which is especially noteworthy considering that during this period there was an overall 164% increase in the number of investigations referred to D0J (from 25 cases in FY 94 to 66 cases in FY 96), as shown in Enclosure 8. shows investigations closed from FY 94 through FY 96, with the trend generally paralleling the trend in cases opened.
However, by FY 96, cases involving deliberate violations of rules, regulations or license conditions had overtaken false statement cases. There was an overall decrease of 6% from FY 94 through FY 96 in cases closed (256 cases in FY 94, down to 240 cases in FY 96). This slight decrease can be attributed to a stabilization of the number of cases closed per year after the major change in the investigative process implemented in FY 92 (See Footnote 1), and efficiencies implemented since that time in the report writing format and elsewhere. The number of discrimination cases closed increased by 32% from FY 94 through FY 95 (84 cases to 111 cases), then modestly decreased by 5%
from FY 95 through FY 96 (111 cases to 105 cases), essentially corresponding to the overall decrease of 6% in cases closed noted above. 0 depicts a comparison of the >ercentages by types of investigations closed from FY 94 through Y 96. Not surprisingly, discrimination cases accounted for 44% of the closed case inventory:
violations of rules, regulations or license conditions represented 26%: and false statements accounted for 25% of cases closed. 1 indicates the relatively constant case specific working hours from FY 94 through FY 96 and shows the current ratio (73:27) of investigative to administrative time expended.
In achieving this ratio, 01 has once again surpassed its goal of a 60:40 ratio of investigative activities (field work, investigative travel, etc.) to administrative activities (allegation review process, writing the final investigation report, management review of the case, etc.) associated with a case.
Field agents spending more time on actual investigative duties rather than on administrative requirements is an additional factor contributing to improved operational efficiency.
INITIATIVES:
In FY 96, 01, together with the Office of Enforcement, provided the Comission with a plan to better focus resources on high priority 01 discrimination cases (SECY 96 199).
This plan is currently before the Commission for evaluation.
In the interim, 01 continued to pursue discrimination cases, with greater concentration on high priority discrimination cases in line with the 118%
LI I DISbBUTIOp NfC Investi a ive rmat on.
Ma'nothepep uc or istr' ut d o id r
g thout co ul ing Dire o. 01. \\ 1
11-increase in such cases as a result of the implementation of the HD 8.8 priority criteria.
It was projected that by the close of FY 96, 01 would have completed the upgrade of its entire management information system to be more user friendly and to provide useful management tools for administrative, statistical and investigative purposes at all levels of operation. This project has been delayed several months by an agency initiative to consolidate all outside contracts involving information systems. The upgrade of the 01 Hanagement Information System (0IMIS) is currently scheduled for completion in FY 97.
01 continues to evaluate and improve its efficiency, effectiveness and productivity in both operations and administration.
In furtherance of this effort, it is Ol's goal in FY 97 to establish and maintain, within the upgraded OIMIS, a continuing statistical data base, which will generate recurring reports to sup> ort and assist every level of management within 01.
This data base will be slared with the Agency Allegation Advisor, and the Office of Enforcement, where appropriate, to facilitate access to data on allegation related activity and investigative results.
It is anticipated that this expanded data base and the sharing of information will improve the agency's ability to trend and analyze the activities of licensees.
A team building seminar designed to improve cooperation and communication at all levels within 01 was developed in conjunction with the Office of Personnel in FY 95. The seeinar was conducted in two field offices during FY 96.
It is anticipated that the remaining field offices and Headquarters will have participated in the aminar by the close of FY 97.
In summary. OI has been successful in meeting its goals in FY 96.
However, we are cautiously optimistic for the coming fiscal year as we await the impact of escalated resource requirements in the area of discrimination cases.
Additionally, in light of the new organizational structure. 01 intends to assist in the overall agency integration of NRC regulatory efforts.
/
c
. Tay r ecutive Di ector for Operations
Enclosures:
1.
Statistical Summary Report and List of Closed Cases for FY 96 2.
Graph Investigations Opened 3.
Charts Comparison of Investigations Opened FY 94 FY 96 4.
Graph Cases Opened (Reactors /Haterials/ Vendors) 5.
Graph Active Inventory of Cases Open Longer than 12 Honths 6.
Graph Closed Cases by Category of Closure 7.
Graph Time in Process (Months) 8.
Graph D0J Referrals l
9.
Graph Investigations Closed l
- 10. Charts Comparison of Investigations Closed FY 94 FY 96 l
- 11. Graph Case Specific Work Hours i
1 LIMI/IDDISql31 or di t ibu id ut e
C i
s ot\\t 01.kv/eptdice i
Vnv s igat v Info tion May l
Wi ou c su in th D' rec or
/
/
J J
1
\\
i 12
. DISTRIBt! TION:
Commmissioners OGC OCAA lOIG OCA EDO
'SECY i
l I
LTb DI811tIBUTION N
k-: I e tiga iv In tio :
y o
b epro u d
di i
ted
-\\o si Cw ut c lti e
i or OI.
w r
,y r
- e :-
4 M-K&V n
O (A
C 30 m-4
. gem j
1 I
.NRC-1251314-90 0FFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS MANNIENT INFORMATION SYSTEM DATE:-12/12/96 STATUS OF CASES FOR TE PERIOD 10/01/95 - 09/30/%
CASES OPEN AT START OF THIS PERIOD:
141 CASES OPENED THIS PERIOD:
227 CASES CLOSED THIS PERIOD:
240
- SUBSTANTIATED-68 -
UNSUBSTANTIATED 107 LACK OF REGA.ATORY REQUIREENT 13 INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF net 0NE10 LNG 1
HIGER PRIORITY 27 TRANSFERS TO OTER REGIONS 1
OTER 3'
ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURES 4
.s ASSISTANCE TO STAFF 16 TOTAL CASES OPEN AT EIE) 0F THIS PERIOD:
128 CRIMINAL REFERRALS:
66
- SOURCE: ALLEGER /lefISTLEBLUER/INTERVENOR - 135 15tC (INSPECTUR/ TECH STAFF) - 37 LICENSEE / LICENSEE EMPLOYEE CONCERN PROGMM - 57 01 (SELF-INITIATED AIE) DEVELOPED BY 01) - 3 OTER GOVER10ENT AGENCIES - 8 m
G-b oISTRI O, 1 - t tyJ t
- 14 1
0 e gte t
1,
. m, t&
FOR TrE PERIOD 10/01/95 - 09/30/96 I
CLOSED CASE NLDSER ALLEGATION SOURCE FACILITY NME DATE/ RESULT DCJ ACTION AliFrsn HARASSENT.
A CONSTRUCTION PR000 CTS 04/30/96 / A M
j
(
19)* 027R INTIMIDATION. M DISGilMINATION EA NLDSERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-94-006R POTENTIAL HARASSENT M A
SALIM 1 04/30/96 / $
DECLINATION INTIMIDATION EA Nif6ERS: 96 176 OE ACTIONS: LETTER 12/11/96 1-94 014S ALLEED INCORRECT BADGt0UND A
WESTERN $1Td55. INC.
04/01/96 / T R
INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO MAIE YAKEE RELATED TO DFLOYEE ACCESS AUTN(RIZATION EA NtteERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION EA MtteERS: 96151 OE ACTIONS: PENDING l
1-94-053 POTENTIAL HARASSENT.
A SALEM 1 04/30/96 / 5 DECLINATION INTIMIDATION. AND DISCRIMINATION EA NW EERS: 96 177 OE ACTIONS: CIVIL PENALTY 580.000 1-94-059 POTENTIAL HARASSENT.
A FITZPATRICK 04/01/96 / U M
INTINIDATION M DISCRIMINATION EA NWSERS: NA OE ACTIONS: NO ACTION trae N!EastmAt
$INc7csur sr L = LICDEKUt!CDt5EE UPLDfEI CDIEDW PIOmpft
. FBI. 057tM5. STATE P(LIE)
- ==
l-
$ %"W %.
F - INVESTIGftf!VE A5515T4EI 10 STMF 0 - OTin LIMITEODISTRIB6[ ION T
OP IDE TING -
I 1.
(J\\1. - IG ION:
NOT RE
\\j/DIKTRIB' i
\\
U
-s
- -- m.
wm um NetlAL ItEPORT OF CLOSED CASES DATE: 12/17/96 FOR TE PERIOD 1C/01/95 - 09/36/96 l
CLOSED CASE IU eDt ALLEGATION SOURCE FACILITY IWE DATE/ RESULT DOJ E TIan 1-95 005 POTENTIAL DELIBERATE VIOLATION L
FITZPATRICK 02/13/96 / S DECLIIIATION OF SITE RADIATION PROTECTION PROCEDistES EA IpeutS: 96-096 OE ETIONS: MOV 05/02/%
96-097 INDIVIDUAL DD W O FOR INFORMATION
% -098 INDIVIDUAL LETTER 05/02/96 1 95 006 ALLEGED FAlltRE TO PROVIDE O
SALEM 1 12/22/95 / P la CupFLETE AND ACCIRATE INFWipMTION EA lueOtS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ETION 1 95-015 FALSIFICATION OF BADGt0UND L
niACKENHUT CORP.
12/28/95 / U Ist SEARCH INFORMATION SUBNITTED TO PDOESYLVMIA POER & LIGHT (PP&L)
EA IU SERS: IIA DE ACTIONS: 1:0 ETION 1-95-016 ALLEGED VIOLATION OF FITESS L
LIERICK 1 12/26/95 / R R
FOR DlfiY PROGRM EA litteERS: NA DE ETIONS: NO ETION 1 95-019 POTENTIAL HARASSENT AND A
INDIM POINT 3 11/20/95 / U let INTINIDATION EA MlSeutS: NA DE ETIONS; NO ETION 1 95-025 ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION FOR IIOT A
MINE NILE POINT 2 10/26/95 / U R
FOLLOWIIIG CHAIN OF Cup 0WID lAEM RAISIIIG SAFETY CONCERNS EA spects: NA DE ETIONS: NO ETION 1 95-026 ALLEGED DISCRIMIllATION AGAINST A
MILLSTONE 3 10/25/95 / P R
A EALTH PHYSICS TEOfflCIAN FOR RAISING SAFETY CONCERNS EA IUSERS: IIA DE ETIONS: NO ACTION 1-95-028 ASSIST TO IllSPECTION A
SHOREHAM 11/02/95 / F R
EA IUEERS: IIA DE ETIONS: 100 ETION LIMITED DISTRIBUTION INVESTIGATIVE INFORMATION: MAY IIOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISTRIBUTED OUTSIDE IftC WITHOUT CONSULTING THE DIRECTOR. 01.
___.._-m._
_.. =
AIBIUAL ltEPORT OF CLOSED CASES '
DATE: 12/17/M FOR TE PUtIOD 10/01/95 - 09/30/96 CLOSED
' CASE IRfeER
. ALLEGATION SolftCE FACILITY N8pE DATE/IIESULT DOJ ACTICII 1-95-029
- ALLEGED DELISDtATE SteMITTAL I
NIE MILE POINT 2 12/18/95 / 5 OECLIIIATION OF INACC15 TATE INF(fWt4 TION REQUIRED BY TECH SPECS EA IllfsDtS: 96-138 OE ACTIONS: LETTER 05/08/96 1 95 030 ALLEED FALSIFICATION OF ISIC I
EURGE ilASHINGTON UNIV.
08/29/96 / R let REQUIRED DOSAGE RECORDS EA IRfsDtS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-95-032 ALLEED SISCRIMlleATION AGAINST A
PIL9 TIM 1 04/19/96 / P R
A GA ENGIEER FOR OESTIONIlfG TE USE OF A IWl0ESS TESTER FOR A QA RECEIPT IIISPECTION EA NtfeDts: NA '
OE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1 95-034 ALLEGED FALSIFICATICII 0F T
CONSOLI*ATED NDE. INC.
06/21/% / R Ist l
REQUlltED TRAINIIIG CERTIFICATION EA IRfeDtS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-95-035 AsIwn DIScitIMIllATION AG4tilST A
MAIK YAls:EE 01/11/96 / P IEt A SR. IF & FAILiftE TO Plt 0 VIDE Ctf9LETE & ACCtstATF.
IIIFORMATION TO TE LitC EA IftfeDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-95 036 ALIEGED DISDtIMlleATION AGAIIIST A
IIInIAlg POINT 2 10/25/95 / U let
+
A QC Ilt5PECTOR FOR llEPGtTING SAFETY C01100515 EA Inf8Dts: liA -
DE ACTI0ltS: 100 ACTION l
1 95-038 ALLEGED V10ULTION5 0F LICDISE A
EASTERN TESTING & INSPECT 02/29/96 / 5 EVALUATION REQUIREENTS l
l EA IllfeDts: 96-085 OE ACT10ltS: ORDut 03/29/96 $USPENDIIIG i
i 1-95-039 ALLEGED DISCRIMIIIATION AGAlltST A
HOPE UtEEX 1 10/26/95 / U Ist MI NRC LICEllSED OPERATGt FOR RAISIIIG COIITROL ROOM MAf1NIIIG CONCERitS EA litfeDtS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTI0li LINIb!
Re at
=C oI.
f(asuGA igr is g o vt
ANNUAL REPORY OF "E CASES DATE: 12/17/96 i
FOR TE PERIOD 10/01/95 - 09130/96
}
CLOSED L
CASE NLDeER ALLEGATION SOURCE FACILITY NAE DATE/ RESULT 00J ACTION l
I i
1-95-040 ALLEED DISCRININATION AGAINST A
MILLSTUNE 3 06/19/96 / U R
h A SENIOR ENGIEER FOR RAISING SAFETY CONCERNS REGARMNG l
SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING EA NLMBERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION l
1 95 041 ALLEED DISCRININATION AGAINST A
SYNCOR INTERNATIONAL CORP 11/22/95 / U R
i TE RSO/ PHARMACIST FOR RAISING l
SAFETY CONCERNS EA Ml#eERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-95-042 ALLEED DISCRININATION AGAINST A
COMUSTION ENGINEERING 01/30/% / U R
ElFLDYEE FOR RAISING CONCERN 5 t
ABOUT TE BORIC ACID i
CONCENTRATION AT MILLSTONE
\\
EA NLDBERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-95-043 ALLEED DISCRINIMATION AGAINST A
IMUNDEDICS, INC.
12/31/95 / U R
A TECMICIAN FOR RAISING l
SAFETY CONCERNS r
EA EpeERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION M-f l
1-95-047 ALLEED DISCRININATION AGAINST A
HOPE CREEK 1 01/17/96 / P R
A CONTRACTOR FOR RAISING SAFETY CONCERNS RErWtDING RADIATION PROTECTION PRACTICES
\\
EA NileERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 4
l LIMITED DISTRIBUTION INVESTIG4TIVE INFORMATION: MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISTRIBUTED OUTSIDE NRC WITHOUT CONSULTING TE DIRECTOR 01.
f
ANNLIAL REPORT OF CLOSED CASE 3 DATE: 12/17/96 FOR TE PERIOD 10/01/95 - 09/30/96 CtDSED CASE lOBER ALLEGATION
$0tRCE FACILI1Y NM E DATE/itESULT DOJ ACTION 1-9}-048 ALLEGED FALSE STATDENT A
MILLSTONE 3 03/15/% / R int i
REGARDING SPENT FEL POOL
,' e EA NLIGERS: E DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION j
1-95-049 ALIEED DISCRIMIMTION AGAINST A
V. A.. DEPARPENT OF 03/15/M / P int 1
RSO FOR RAISING CONCERNS TO TE 13tC REGARDING RSO l
- REQLIIREENTS 1
l EA IRBGERS: 96-117 OE ACTIONS: CHILLING EFFECT LETTER 04/12/96 i
W 182 CIVIL PDIALTY $8.000 08/05/%
l W 357 IlOIVIDUAL LETTER 09/18/ %
)
\\
i 1-95 051 ALLEED DISCRIMIETION ACAINST A
SALEM 1 06/25/96 / U int AN OFFSITE SAFETY REVIEW i
ENGINEER FOR RAISING SAFEIY l
l CONCERNS
)
l EA NLSSERS: E DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION i
1-95-052 ALLEED DISCRIMIMTION OF QA A
SALEM 1 06/21/96 / P int CLERK FOR IDENTIFYING QA I
TRAINING RECORD DEFICIENCIES EA IS BERS: NA OE ACTIONS: NO ACTION I
f 1-96-001C3 INCOPFLETE AND INACCtptATE A
MILLSTONE 1 06/21/96 / 0 int INFORMATION ON VIOLATIONS REGARDING CU-29 CONTAlleENT ISOLATION VALVE i
^
EA NtfBERS: NA OE ACTIONS: NO ACTION
\\'
l I
MITED R STRIBUTION T
. MAY OR S I'
OUTSI TI DI I.
I j
NRC-125131A A-0FFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS PA;iE:
6 A M UAL REPORT OF CLOSED CASES DATE: 12/17/96 FOR TE PERIOD 10/01/95 - 09/30/96
)
CLOSED CASE IR9eER ALLEGATION 50tRCE FACILITY ME DATE/ RESULT DOJ ACTION 1-96 003 p l w n DISCRIMIIIATION AGAINST L
IlOIAN POINT 3 06/25/96 / U R
QUALITY SPECIALIST FOR RAISING CONCERitS RE RESIDUAL EAT REMOVAL PtBF 32 MOTOR EA NlpeERS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-96 006' POSSIBLE DELIBERATE I
SYNCOR CORP-04/19/% / P R
CONTAMI MTION OF SYNCOR DELIVERY PERSON WITH TECMIETILM-99M EA IllpSERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-%-009 :
All w n DISCRIMINATION KsAINST A
OYSTER CREEK 09/17/% / U R
A MAINTEllANCE ECHANIC FOR CONTACTING TE IRC REGARDING SAFETY CONCERNS (NFI)
EA MlpeERS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-%-01h SteMITTAL OF 1010l81 INACCLRATE L
MILLSTONE 1 07/16/96 / U Ist INFORMATION TD istC REGARDING MILLSTOE UNIT 1 UPDATED FINAL' SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT EA NLMBERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-96 011 ALLEGED DISCRINIllATION OF LEAD A
HOPE CREEK 1 07/17/96 / U let QA ENGINEER FOR RAISIIIG CONCERNS RE SEISM'C QUALIFICATIONS OF VARIOUS SITE EA NlseERS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 1-96 012 DISCRIMINATION AGAINST E ALTH A
SUSQUEHAltNA 1 07/31/96 / U Ist PHYSICS TE03flCIAN FOR RAISING CONCERN RE CONTROL OF RADI0 ACTIVE MATERIAL EA NigeERS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION
- REFERRED TO 00J OtRING FY 97.
n
/ \\
[
1ANITb DISTRIBlWTDu MAY BE OL IDE WI T
TE,t
[I.
INVESTIG4TI OfTI
=
m
,y
6 EEU=tE/La w w:
u annem REPORT OF CLOSED CASE 5 -
DATE: 12/17/96
.. FGt T E PERIOD 10/01/95 - 09/30/96-CLOSED CASE IRMist
. ALLEGATION SOURCE FACILITY IW E
'DATE/ RESULT-D0J ACTION 1-96-013 FALSIFICATION OF DOSE A
' EW BRITAIN GEERAL leSPI 09/30/96 / $
DECLINATION
' CALIBRATOR CONSTANCY RECSDS EA utfeERS: 96-396 ' OE ACTIONS:' PENDIIIG
.96-409 IleIVIDUAL 1-96-017 CISCRIMilt4 TION OF POST A
TDeLE UNIVERSITY 07/24/96 / U let DOCTORAL FELLOW FOR RAISING SAFETY CONCD515 REGdutDIIEi LABORATORY CONTAMilt4 TION EA InseERS: IIA DE ACTIONS: 110 ACTION 1-96 018 FALSIFICATICII 0F D0019ENTS 8Y
'A HADDM NECK 07/17/96 / F let A ColmtACTUR (IIFI) AfD FAllistE TO MAKE A 10 CFR PART 21 REPORT RE PRIMRitY C00UWIT EA 1RpeutS: IIA DE ACTIONS: 110 ACTION 1-%-026 ASSIST TO IltSPECTI0lt L
SUSQUDWetA 2 09/12/96 / F let EA IRfeutS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 2-93-032 ALLEED SLACKLISTIIIG OF A
NUCLEAR SUPPORT SERVICES 11/28/95 / U let IIISTRIDElli CollTit0L TEO911CIAff EA InseDtS: IIA DE ACTI0llS: 110 ACTIOlt 2-93-044R ALLEGED ASAlW010Elff 0F I
NATIONAL CIRCUITS CARIBE 01/31/96 / 5 GUILTY PLEA LICDISED MATERIALS EA IllfeutS: 96 048 CE ACTI0llS: ORDER 12/12/96 2-93-072R ALLEGED DEL 180 TATE USE OF I
NDT SERVICES. IIIC.
12/21/95 / S DECLINATICII LNIQUALIFIED RADIOWtAPERS EA IRpeDtS: 96-015 OE ACTI0ftS: IIIDIVIDUAL ORDER 07/16/96 (2)96-016 ALSO 96-017 IIIDIVIDUAL LETTER 07/16/%
96 018 PEleIIIG 94-029 CIVIL PDIALTY $15.000 7/16/96 - PAID 8/15/96 j
2-94-003 ALLEGED DISCRIMIIIATICII AGAINST A
TE ATLANTIC st00P (TAG) 11/08/95 / U let flSTittDENT COIITit0L TED#11CIAfl EA IRSEDtS: lea DE ACTIDIIS: RJ) ACTION
%vE lhrg i phiON:
y SE is I
InouT ING I
O.
_m i-..
' INIC 125131A-A :
' 0FFICE OF INUESTIGATIGIS
' PaE:.
3 asammt EPWT OF CLOSED CASES
. DATE: 12/17/95 FtR T E PERIOD 10/01/95.- 09/30/96
,l.
rtinrn i
. CASE IR9WER ALLEGATIM 50tmCE FACILITY IIAE DATE/Esta.T.L NJ ETIM q
12.M 01m' W188D FESE STATEfENTS AIS A
VDETLE l' 95/15/96 / A E-3 i
CDUEMF SY EMEIA MRER CiprNIY/5GEFCD AN ATitNEYS i
l EAIROWERS: Ibn.
- E ACTIONS: 100 ACTIWI L2-M 012R ALLEED DELIERATE WITNGLDIIIS A
VDETLE 1.
05/15/96 / A' IR
- t
' 0F ROOT CAII5E OF DIESEL ~
EEIEllATM TRIPS IN IMNCH 20 1990 SITE AIEA EDEINEIICY l
EA EfGERS: 114 E ACTICIIS: 110 ACTION t
'2-M-018 L ALLEED DtWtiftlil4TICII AGAllIST -
A
- ST LUCIE 1 01/31/96 / U m
- ELDIIIE StrERVISGt FtR
- III51STIE SI CINECT LEK l
- PltACTICES l'
EA MBOERS: IIA
. E ACTIONS: 110 ACTION 2 94-025S ~ ALLEED PROVISIGIl 0F '
A VOGTIE 1 85/15/96 / A ist INCiprLETE IIIFtWETIGI TO TE
_j
+
IRC IEGARDIIE DIESEL EIERATOR,
t OPERASILITY
- i
- t
- j '
EA EDERS:Im OE ACTICIt5: 110 ACTICII 1
J 2 94-0265
- irma DISCRINIIIATICII 0F
- A iMTTS BNt 1.
03/27/96 / U IR -
CGIT*JICT EffLDVEE Fim ItAI511E 4'
SAFETY CGEDlIIS IIEGARDIIIS
.i f
INTEGtATED LEAK RATE TESTIIIS l
EA IROSEltS: 114' OE ACTICIt5: 110 ACTIcil I
2-94-0365 ALLIED VIOLATICII 0F PLAllT.
L 2 CRYSTAL ltIVER 3 82/13/96 / 5 DECLINATION DES.WI BASIS l
EA 1R90EltS: 95-120 OE ACTicil5: LETTER 07/10/96 r
95-121 LETTER r
95-122 LETTER 95-123 LETTER.
'95-124 OPERATOR - LETTER 07/10/96
~
. LETTER
[
95-125 95 126 CIVIL PEIIALTY.
i l.
l i.
LEGTED DISTRAEUTION TIME. Ainmih.
p
- j(
STI IVE ION: W p
wi ICE
. MtC-125131A-A
'0FFICEd711VESTIGATIONS PAGE:
'9'
~
AINNML REPttT OF CLOSED CASES DATE: 12/17/96 FOR TE PERIOu 10/01/95 - 09/30/96 CLOSED CASE 4E#9ER ALLEGATION S0tftCE FACILITY NM E DATE/ RESULT D0J ACTION 2-94-038 As r wn EFLOYEE A
WATT 5 BAR 1 12/29/95 / U R
DISCRIMIRTION EA IKfGERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 2-94-039 ALLEEED EMPLOYEE A
WATTS BAR 1 12/19/95 / U R
DISCRIMIltATION EA NLSeERS. NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION-2 94-041 ALLEED DFLOYEE A
SEQUDYAH 1 04/30/96 / U R
DISCRIMIllATION EA IR2eDtS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 2 95-002 Ali N D FALSIFICATION OF L
GENDtAL ELECTRIC CD.
07/11/96 / P R
BI0 ASSAY TEST RESULT 5 EA N!990tS: NA-DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 2-95-003 -
DISCRIMIIIATION AGAINST A
SURRY 1 06/28/96 / U R
C0KTRACTOR EWLOYEE FOR REFUSAL TO BYPASS QUALITY CONTROL HOLD POINT (ELDIllG)
EA IR2eDtS: %239 DE ACTIONS: PENDING 2-95-005 DISCRIMillATION AGAINST A
BRUNSWICK 2 08/29/96 / P NR SECtRITY GUAltD FOR RAISING CONCDtNS RE RADIOLOGICAL CONTIt0LS DLRING STRUCTtRAL EA IkpeDtS: NA OE ACTIONS: 110 ACTION 2-95-006 ALLEGED FALSIFICATIONS A
S15tRY 1 10/25/95 / U R
REGMtDIIIG REQUALIFICATION EX#tS EA NLDSERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 2 95 008 ALLEGED DISCRin.flATION OF 18C A
ST LUCIE 1 07/31/% / U R
TEDWICIAsl FOR REPORTIIIG SAFETY C011CERNS EA NLOWERS: NA DE ACTIONS: 100 ACTION hT OR
. IDE W
DI I.
-I
letC-125131A-A 0FF'.E OF INVESTIGATIONS PAGE:
ID MINUfL REPORT OF CLOSED CASES DATE: 12/17/96 FOR TIL rYRIOD 10/01/95 - 09/30/ %
l CtOSEo CASE NIMIER ALLEGATION 50lRCE FACILITY NME DATE/ RESULT 00J ACTION 2 95-009 ALLEED FALSIFICATION OF A
TURBINE TECl981CIANS 10/27/95 / P NR ACCESS AUTHORIZATION DOC 18ENTS EA IllseERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 2-95-010 ALLEED EPFLOYEE A
WATTS BAR 1 12/15/95 / U Ist DISCRIMINATION BY RAYTEDN CONSTRUCTORS. IIIC.
EA MlfeERS: M DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION I
2-95-011 ALLEED FALSE STATEMENTS TD I
NUCLEAR CONTAINERS, INC.
06/28/% / U IR 11E lett s
EA NtteERS: 94-234 OE ACTIONS: NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE 09/18/96 2-95 013 Al'ND DELIBERATE I
SEQUDYAH 1 08/14/96 / P let O'Nr_NTION OF PROCEDURAL REQUI,YENTS Als FALSIFICATION OF WOFK LW DOCLBENTS EA IPJ eERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION l
2-95-014 ALLE. 9tSCRI6MATION AGAINST' A
BROWNS FERRY 1 02/26/% / U let BECHTEL Eh'W_t]t REGARDING STRUCTLRAL DESIGN ERRORS EA NtfeERS: E DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION l
I 2 95-015 ALLEED DISCRININATION OF A
WATTS BAR I 10/23/95 / U NR l
FORER QUALITY ASSLRANCE (OA)
EVALUATOR FOR REPORTING SAFETY CONCERNS REGARDING QA PROGRNG EA Nt9BERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 2-95-016 ALLEED FAILtRE TD FOLLOW L
CRYSTAL RIVER 3 02/23/% / U let PROCEDLRES BY CONTROL ROOM OPERATORS EA NLMIERS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 2-95-0165 FAILtRE TO FOLLOW PROCEDLRES L
CRYSTAL RIVER 3 05/28/96 / U let BY CONTROL R0(M OPERATORS WITH PRIOR 1010WLEDGE OR SANCTION OF LICENSEE MANAGEENT EA NlteERS: NA DE ACTION 3: NO ACTION g.
hdsn Ti (mTypR000Lu oisepunowr5 I
T i
T
E E
l g
Q s
==
a a
a s
a a
a s
s a
0 t
hl e
y e
e e
e e
e n
e a
El 8
s d
g g
!g E
B 5*
y
=)
a 1
s i
s j
Sg a
E?
e l
l E
l l
9 Bh.
7 E
5 E
E E
E ha h<
h<
ha h<
h
~
g-
~
88 e
a a
a a
a a
y E
%~
5 E
E 5*If5 w!l5*E Eg h
m
- $<t E
at w
w
,5 g
ia==w!'t!f*gg!*Ih*!!lsti$l*
se g=
gaa
[ll!n.
i iel 3
llen!I*lilll!":lesi,leugEllijllil i
II ele 8 I
IE 1
e ses s e s. i e
.=
g h
h' h
h h
h 4
a g
e e
e e
e e
e
~
~
~. -
~,
~
~
~
4
6 4
6 J
B I
I
.9 s
i i
fi 9.
1 i
i i
i i
i li
's i
i l
4 8
s 6
b 5
5 lgl?
e
~
l i
)
s i "I
i li i
i e
,!n g
St.
s_
=.
s.
s-5
~
y si
!=
e e
e e
.,p,a!.is.is.ise.i.!_,s i e%
s, a
a s
i, a
s.s s
ss a
w ass !
g a
15s I
$U$l5?.5gan$ h8 E '.
e ll g
lii ! illlilillil,1!allillilid!
<h 3 ?.
i h
h h
h h
h
(
s E
.v I.
-MC-12513IAO m
CASES TE.
/M FOR tie PDtIUD 10/01/% - 09/3t/M CLOSED
' CASE IW WEK ALLEGATION SOLECE FACI U TT NW E DAT N T DOJ ACTION 4
2-96-082 ALLEED CDYDRP OF INATTDITIVE A
MWW!IS 1 05/14/36 / U ist GuseID INCIODIT BY BWuts SECRITY IUNUERS
[
EA IMEDts: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 2-96-004 N1Nn DISDtDUIIATION MiAIIIST A
EONGIA STATE DIV/Dff/RES 03/29/96 / U Ist IIISPECTOR FOR PURSUING SAFETT CONCDWIS AT EONG1A TECH RESENICH REACT R r
EA NWEDts: NA GI ACTIONS: NO ACTION 2- % -007 ALLEED DISOtlpINATION AGAB!IST A
SEQUDYAH 1 06/I7/96 / U ist GuALITY Moment INSPECTt3t r
FOR RAISING SAFETY CONCDUE5 EA NLDWDts: NA E ACTIONS: NO KCTION 2-96-014 OISCRIMIIIATION AGAIIEST GUALITY A
inATT5 BAR 1 08/25/96 / U let ASSWIANCE EIIGIEER FR RAISIIIG
~
~ SAFETT CINICDut5 IEE CONSTRUCTION DEFICIDICIES EA IRfeutS: IIA DE ACTIONS: 110 ACTION 2-96-016 ASSIST TD STAFT ASSESSENT OF A
GA. TECH 08/07/96 / F let EONEIA TECH REACTOR SAFETY PNOWINI EA HlfEDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: 110 ACTION 3-93-036 ALLEEtLY Mi DFLOTEE OF A
CRNE-ALDYC0 01/16/96 / U let e
OtAIIE-ALDTCO ES DISCHNEED i
FOR IDDITIFYIIIG CDUllTDtFEIT VALVES AND ItECOMS EA IUeDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: 110 ACTION
[
3-94-003R ALLEEDLY 81sfT rALSELY L
BIN NUCLEAR TEOGIOLOGIES 03/01/96 / U Ist CDtTIFIED TIMT 4.citTRACT EN ET CRITERIA FINt UNESCORTED ACCESS TO LICDISED EA NUPSDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: 110 ACTI0li
?
fl,fESTihT(E 1 081: WT TR WI TI 1.
i
- w n n ru wrtn mm a
FOR TE PERICC 10/01/ 5 -.09/30/96
)
Ct0 SED CASE NtMIER ELEGATION SOURCE FACILITY NME DATE/ RESULT DCJ ACTION 3-94-0115 RLEED DELIBERTE VIOLATION I
UNIVUtSITY OF MI550tRI G2/01/96-/ U Ist OF MC LICDESE EGNWING DOT ltEliRA.ATIONS EA IUSDts: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 3-94-M5 DI50tIMI m TION AGAllEST A
BRAIDWOOD 1 06/30/96 / 5 DECLINATION SECLftITY PDtSONEL FOR RAISIIIG SAFEGUNIDS CONCDINS OtStIIIG ISIC Ilt5PECTION EA IpeDts: 96-364 OE ACTI0lt5: PDIDING 3 94-057~
ELEED MATERIAL FRSE L
NORTH EMORIAL EDICE CT 10/30/95 / 5 DECLIM TIGE STATD0lT EGNtDIIIG A MISAEplINISTRATION EA IRfsDts: 94-199 CE ACTI0ltS: LETTER 5/1/96 3-94-065 ALLEED FALSIFICATF18 0F DOSE L
EDICAL ARTS CENTER 10/12/95 / U int
^
CALIBRATOR TESTING RECORDS BY A CollTRACTGt AT EDICAL ART 5 CENTER EA IMEDts: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 3-94-067 ALLEED FALSIFICATION OF L
COOK 1 12/19/?S / 5 DWICTlelT BAOGt0UW IIIFGtMATION EA IRfsDts: 96-289 OE ACTIONS: PDIDIIIG 3-94-068 ALLEED MTUtIAL FALSE A
BRAIO INDUSTRIAL SVCS CD-12/14/95 / U Ist STATDetT EA IMEDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 3-95-007 ALLEED FALSIFICATION OF I
CLIllT0li 01/10/96 / 5 DECLIIIATIOlt BAD et0UW 50tEENING/IIFGUET10ll ItEGNtDING A CRIMINAL HISTGtY EA IUeDtS: 96-026 OE ACT10lt5: INDIVIDUAL ORDER 03/26/%
3-95-015 ALLEED HNtASSENT AIID A
LUCY LEE HOSPITAL 04/05/96 / P Ist DISCRIMINATIQI 0F All ALLEGER EA lueDts NA DE ACTI0lts: NO ACTION
[s f
\\
LFi 1 DISTRI b I \\
[ ' b( f Y Q REPRODUCED OR $
/\\
4
,g TI WT5I MTIVE I
l W
1 s
a a!
l E
g b
a a
a a
u.m N
m us s
s s
s s
s s
al s
I l
I Ba 5
a B
a B
B B
u As, s
8 1l l
l 41 r
i i
s i_
E 4-E 8
5 8
8 E
"")
' g5' 8
i i
E s ll 1
w Elg l?
6 E
3*l sg s
o s
g a
s a
E.
E<
Ea 8E -
E<
EE I
l E<
I<
e a
e ER a
52 R
s
'E E
E!
E E
!gs<ls'!E!ElE8w !
w !
- lslhl E ll' E
- d lw!3 w
w E
w
- !E I
E 55 lgg I g EW58l@s5*8l 8l!
8 $ is Ns!!!8Es si
!l R
ER l
Eg 8l; 3
-g g
gg
<dsg yg-g,
_c e
a a
C g"
ME5 h5 W 15 (5
5 WB 5
$$ (5 W! [5 3
4.
6"
~
5 i
i e
ei e
e i
e g
e
~%
5 5
as l
1 i
8 i
i a
e n
11 hla ii i
i i
i i
i
~
8l N
Q
%p 1
a
! ll i
i s
l 4
lii e!! i li i
i s_
l,_ s.
i s e 3
g.
s 4
'gg! g_s.
s.s.
9 a
a g*la llgw!".*g!gBelE E
a a
,gEEW
'$ W ggE wl.wAly!y gR h e ap l'Liili l'h=l'li l'L i ah, c! w w !g l ! ! l. lll i !
)f 8
- .li ll lil.Il-t.L.injiani l
ae h'
h h
N
-k h
h 5
h v-
~
~ C3.N W 1C7L D X M J -
PAE:
17
~
JWRIAL IEPWT OF rtfMn CASES DATE: 12/17/96 FR TIE PDtIOD 15/91/M - 99/30/96 CLOSED CASE InfGER ALLEGATIGI SomCE FACILITY IWWE DATE/RESIA.T '
003 ACnet 3-95-835 mtTsn DISCRINIIIATION AGAIIIST A
FUMI 2 01/19/96 / R R
SECMITY TRAINIE SPECIALIST FR IEPRTIE IIFWWWlTIGI TD IWIC SECMITY IIISPECTR EA IW E RS: IWL' E ACTIONS: NO ACTION
'3-95-836 MINn IELIEllATE VIOLATION I
IlWINIA DEPT. OF TIUWISPOR 67/03/96 / 5 WECLIa4TIOu 0F LICENSE CDWITION5 EA ImpWitS: 96-248 E ETIOIIS: CIVIL PDIALTY $2.50010/24/96 96-381 IlWIVIDuRL LETTER 10/24/96 3-95-037
. ALLEED DELISEllATE I
GWUSTIOil DIGIIEERING 11/17/95 / R Ist UllahlfletIZED SHIPEIIT OF CWITNEIRRTED SOER SLMllE TD 1
Me IAE.ICDISED FACILITY l
EA 18950t5: IIA '
E ACTIGIS: IID ACTIGE 3-95-038-ALLEED FAILME TD PUtFUlWI L
QUAD CITIES 1 01/30/96 / 5 UECLIIIRTION FITIESS T3t DiffY TEST 5 EA migElts: 96-037 E ACTIGIS: WITistNet ACTION 03/06/%
3-95-039 ALLEED DISCRIMINATIGI AGAIIEST A
CONTII0tTAL DISC CDItP.
01/10/96 / U Ift e
A F0lWUt DFLDTEE FWt itAISING i
SAFETY CSICDul5 IEGNIDINE l
DEFECTIVE Mt000 CTS EA Ill#EDts: NA E ACTIONS: 110 ACTIoll 3-95-040 MISREPIIESDITATION OF 1
EltCT-lOUtIAL EDICAL CE 01/08/96 / U let
' OWILIFICATICIIS DWlIIE LICDISE r
MenUIT MIOCESS
' EA IUM3ts: 5055 E ETIONS: IIOV 02/28/96 3 95-041 DISCRIMIIIATICII AGAllt5T A A
FUWII 2 01/26/96 / U Ist t
SIALITY ASSWIMICE SPECIALIST BY HIS SUPDtVISORS EA NWWUts: W952 UE ACTIOitS: PDWIIIG t
2-95-042 At1EED DELIODtATE FAIListE TO I
DAVIS-BESSE 12/05/95 / P ist FOLLOW PUUIT MtoCEIMIE -
EA NWW0ts: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ETION I
I Y
0FFICECF2NVESTIGA?h0N5 P
h WItC-15131A.A i
Af810AL REPORT OF CLCSED CASES DATE: 12/17/96 FOR TE PED 20010/01/95 - 09/30/95 l
\\
l I
i CtesED CASE NIJEER ALLE!ATION solstCE FACILITY M8ME DATE/REStLT DCJ ACTION v
l I
h t
3-95-043 AlIru n DELIBERATE FAILURE TO A
POIMT BEACH 1 07/10/96 / 5 DECLIMTIDN l
8 ColmlOL RADIQ4CTIVE II4TERIAL 7
AND Af f FWn CDVUt!!P GF-
[
CDWITIONS ADVDtSE TD SAFETY EA NtpeERS:-96-262 E ACTIONS: PENDING 96-284 INDIVIDUAL NOV 09/05/96 74
["
l
\\
j D-95-046 Attru n FALSIFICATION OF L
THORACIC /CARDIOVASC. INST 03/25/96 / 5 DECLIMTION r
j StstVET RECORDS i
EA IpeDts: 96-141 OE ACTIONS: MOV 05/16/96 3- % -001 ALLEED DISCRIMIllATION AGAIM5T A
DRESDEN 1 02/29/96 / R R
l A C00mtACT EALTH PHYSICS TEDetICIAN I
l EA MiseEPS: stA E ACTIONS: NO ACTIDII I
t 3-96-003 AL1EED DRUG USE BY REACTOR L
PRAIRIE ISUUID 1 05/24/96 / U R
OPERATORS Ale SUPERY150R5 EA IUSDts: IIA E ACTIONS: NO ACTION 3-96-005 ALLEED DELIBERATE L
BRAIDWOOD 1 03/25/96 / 5 DECLIMTION l
CONTAMIllATI0ld 0F LABORER *5 l
1 CLDIES l
I EA IUSDts: 96-128 K ACTIONS: LETTER 06/04/96, 96 132 INDIVIDUAL HOV 06/19/96 3-96-006 ALLEED DELIBERATE L
FERMI 2 04/24/96 / 5 DECLIMTION FALSIFICATIDII 0F WORK PACKAGE RECDRDS (GAS BOTTLES)
EA IUBERS: %-149 E ACTIONS: LETTER 08/15/96 f
N
('
rx
/\\
tIMEDDI57ittmA i
l kEST Ryy WI T
I.
VE OR
g aams W REPallT OF CLOSED CASE 3 DATE: 22/17/96 CDR TIE PERItB 10/01/95 - 09/30/96 CLC5ED
{
CASE IU SDt ALLEGATI0It SulAtCE FACILITY MN E DATE/ RESULT DOJ A;'TIDit t
3- % -007 ALLEGED DELIBERATE L
CAY 15-BESSE 06/18 G6 / 5 DECLIMTICII 84 FALSIFICATIDIl 0F DOEIICT
[
LIGHTS SLIEVEILUWICE RECDCS j
t EA speDts: 96-230 E ACTI0lG: PEEIE l
?
7J
\\.
s 3-96-009 ALLIGED FALSIFICATICII 0F L
BTRON 1 05/15/96 / 5 DECLIMTI0ll SLRVEILUWICE DOCWOTATIOil EA IUSDtS: %-218 E ACTIOltS: IEIVIDUAL IIOV 08/23/96 t
96-219, IEIVIDUAL NOV 08/23/96: ALSO 96-220 E V 07/31/96
{
I 76 EA MlpeDtS: 96-251 E ACTIOlis: LETTER 07/23/96 i
3-96-011 ALLEGED DISCRIMIMTI0lt /GAIIIST A
QUAD CITIE5 1 07/25/96 / U I.1 A GENERAL FORDWI FOR RAISIIIG A SAFETY CONCERif EA IMEDts: E E ACTI0lts: NO ACTIO!I 3-W OI2 ASSIST TD IltSPECTIOel REGARDING FERMI 2 06/28/96 / F R
l OIILLIIIG EFFECT AT FUtMI EA IUSDtS: E DE ACT10sts: NO ACTI0lt 3-E DI6 VIOLATI0li 0F RADIATIDII L
QUAD CITIES 1 05/15/96 / 5 DECLIMATI0lt PROTECTICII C0lmt0L PROCEDWtES OtRIIIG iMOLE 800Y FRISK w
EA IUSDtS: 96-224 OE ACT10fts: NOV 07/31/96 I
6
/'
[Ib ettvisurm I D
,r, Ec Ir
- u nG OR y g I
I y. r.
on:
a0T
RC-125131A[A
~
OFFICE OF INVEST M
~~
G-g AMERL EIPORT OF rt rmt CASES DATE: 12/17/96 FOR TIE PERIOD 10/01/95 - 09/3G/96 l
CLOSED CASE NtMIER A11EGATIt31 50tRCE FACILITY MPE DATE,1tESULT DOJ ACTION i
J+
i 3- % -020 tmAUTHORIZED ENTRY INTO A L
QUA3 CITIES 1 07/19/96 / 5 DECLImTI PROTECTED AREA EA MlMIDts: %-285 OE ACTIONS: INDIVIDUAL NOV 08/23/96 3 % -021 ASSIST TD IIISPECTION REGARDING A
HOECHST MARION ROUSSEL 06/27/96 / F R
RA01ATION SAFETY Pit 0 GRAM i
EA IR9eut5: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 3- % -022 DISCRIMIMTION AGAINST A
LASALLE 1 09/27/96 / U R
CONTRACTIR SECtRITY SIPDtVISOR FGt RAISIIIG CONCDuts RE PDtFORMAIICE OF SECLRITY EA meeDts: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 3 %-024 FALSIFICATION OF QLiALITY L
POINT BEADi 1 08/26/96 '/ P R
AS5iRANCE RECORDS EA mpeDts: 96-366 CE ACTIONS: PENDING 6
% -376 INDIVIOUAL NOV 11/14/96 3- % -025 VIOLATION OF LICDESE COICITION I
CLEVELAND CLINIC F0tmDATI 08/06/96 / 5 DECLIIIATICII i
37 EA ESSDtS: 96-289 OE ACTIONS: PDOING 96-296 PENDING
% -297 PDIDING 3- % -030 ASSIST TO STAFF /FALSIF. CATION A
AT&T MICRDELECTRONICS 06/12/96 / F R
j istC FORM 314 (CERTIFICATE OF
)
DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS)
I EA mpeDts: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION l
3- % -031 FALSIFICATIC2 0F SECLRITY L
DAVIS-BESSE 08/23/96 / P IIR 1
ACCESS IIIFtA% TION BY CONTRACT EA NLeeDts: %-330 CE ACTIONS: PENDING l
LIkkD DIksuTI 5
IVE r
TION.
OR IBiMff 00T5 1
h h,
1 I
CFEiHEFA '
MC Ch M
muumL REPORT OF mm1 CASES DATE: 12/17/96 FOR M PERIDD 10/01/95 - 09/30/96 CLOSED CASElapWDL ALLEGATION 50tstCE FACILITY IWE DATE/ RESULT DOJ ACTION 3-96-032 FALSIFICATION OF FIIIERTDI L
COOK 1 09/30/96 / R R
LOG 5 EA NigeDts: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 3-96 034 FAlltflE TO FOLLoli RACIATION L
ZION 1 09/16/96 / P R
PROTECTION PROCEDLptES BY A CONTMCTOR EA NLfsDtS: 96-374 DE ACTIONS: PENDING 4-92-0075 ALLEGED DELIBERATE FAlltstE TO I
UNC MINING & MILLING 09/17/96 / 5 R
C3 FLY WITH NRC ORDER EA IRpWDts: 93-170 CE ACTIONS: PDIDING 4-93-046 ALLEGED FALSIFICATI0ll DF W AC SOUTH TEIAS 1 02/26/96 / U R
RECORDS EA InseDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: IID ACTION 4-94-030 ALLEGED DISCRIMIIIATION FOR A
PALD VDtDE 1 11/30/95 / U R
ISSUING A CRITICAL REPORT IN 1989 EA NifeDt5: NA DE ACTIONS: 110 ACTION 4-94-035 ALLEGED HARA55pElli AfC A
SAll OIIOFRE 2 04/25/96 / U R
INTIMIDATICII FOR REPORTIIIG SAFETY CONCDtN EA IRfeDt5: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 4-94-037 DISCRIMIIIATION AGAIIIST FUlWER A
SOUTM TEIAS 1 05/31/96 / 5 DECLIleATIt31 EBASCO ELECTRICIAfl FOR RAISING SAFETY CGEUtit5 EA NtseDtS: 96-136 OE ACTI0liS: CIVIL PDIALTY $100.000 09/19/96 3
4-94-048 ALIIGED DELIEDtATE A
PETTIS VA IEDICAL CENTER 11/17/95 / P R
DISDtIMIllATICII BY MRilAGDEIIT FOR RAISIIIG RADIATIOlt SAFETY CONCDut5 EA lueDts: IIA DE ACTI0lts: NO ACTICIE i-
/\\
m
INIC-125131A-A 0FFIE OF IWWESTIGATIONS PsE:
22 Amu 8L REPORT OF CLOSED CASES DATE: 12/17/96 FOR TE PERICD 10/01/95 - 09/30/96 i
CLOSED CASE IUWER ALLEGATION-SolstE FACILITY NN E DATE/ESIAT D0J ACTION 4-95-004 Attun DISCRIMIIIATION AfC A
ARU NSAS 1 02/25/96 / R let TEMIIIATION FOR EFUSAL TO FALSIFY 1pNC STEPS (FIE Pft0TECTION SEALS)
EA IUeDts: 96178 OE ACTIONS: LETTER 09/06/96 4-95-005 ALLEED HARA55ENT AfD A
RIVER BEND 1 11/27/95 / 5 DECLIIIATION INTIMIDATION SY MNIAGEENT F3t IEEPORTIIIE QUALITY CONCDul5 EA fueDts: 95-281 OE ACTIONS: LETTER 03/26/96 95-235 IICIVIDUAL LETTER 03/25/%
4-95-007 ALLEGED DISutIMINATION AfC A
DIABLO CANYON 1 02/29/96 / U int t
FAILINtE TO PNOVIDE ACCLftATE IIIF0mATIG4 TO TE IstC (FOREIGil MATERIAL EILLUSION)
EA fueDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: 30 ACTION 7
4-95-010 '
ALLEED INTIMIDATION AfC COVER A
RIVER 808D 1 12/19/95 / U Irt UP OF QUALITY A55tstANCE 152E5 BY 04 MMIfGDOIT EA IUSDts: IIA CE ACTIONS: 110 ACTIDIE 4-95-011 ALLEGED L
COMNICE FEAft 1 11/15/95 / 5 DECLIMATION DISatIMIleATION/ItEVOCATICII 0F ACCESS FUK REPORTIIIG CDNCDtN TO IstC EA IUSDts: 95-271 OE ACTI0fts: LETTER 02/22/96 95-272 IICIVIDUAL LETTER 02/22/%(3)95-273 95-274 4-95-012 ALLEGED FALSIFICATIONICOVDtUP A
Y. A. EDICAL CTR.
10/26/95 / F Ist OF CONTAMIIIATION 5!stVEY RECDRD5 BY RACIATI0lt SAFETY OFFICEPJCHIEF OF IIUCLEAR EA IUeDts: IIA DE ACTI0lt5: NO ACTION 4-95-014 ALLEED 14I FOR IDDITIFYIIIE A
RIVER B010 1 12/29/95 / U In CONCDut5 TO SITE MANAGDOIT EA IUSERS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION
~
e n
~.
,e--
NRC-12513IA-A dFFI E OF IWVESTIGATIONS
~
~
~
~
PAGE:
23 mesuAL REPORT OF Mm CASES DATE: 17117/96 FOR TE PERIOD 10/01/95 - 09/30/95 CLCSED CASE Sp eER ALLEGATION SOURCE FACILITY IMME DATE/ RESULT DOJ ACTION 4 75-016 Ntrwn HEI FOR FILIE A DOL A
RIVER BE!C 1 12/28/95 / U R
3 CurLAINT EA IpeERS: E E ETIONS: NO ACTION 4-95-017 NIMn DISCRIMIMTION F3t A
SOUTH TEXAS 1 11/17/95 / U Ist IDENTIFYING CONCERits RELATED TD NUCLEMt TRAINING DEPARTENT EA IpeERS: NA E ETIONS: NO ACTION l
4-95-021 NtNn IUTENTIONAL FAIL 1RE TD I
WOLF CREEK 1 12/12/95 / P R
i PREPARE REQUIRED PRFORMMCE IWRDVEENT REOLEST c
EA lu eERS: NA OE ETIONS: NO ACTION i
7 I
- w 4-95-023 ALLEGED TAWTRIE WITH STEAM L
ARKNtSAS 1 10/27/95 / R let l
SAFETY VALVE SEAL WIRE i
EA IUSERS: NA DE ETIONS: NO ACTION 4-95-024 ALLEGED DISCRIMI M TION AGAIIIST L
SAN ONOFRE 2 10/02/95 / R Ist CONTRACT ELDER NO l
FALSIFICATION OF ELD FIT-LP EA IUSERS: E DE ETIONS: NO ACTION 4-95-025 ALLEGED DELIBERATE FAILIRE TD T
FOLEY CONSTRUCTION SERY 11/21/95 / 5 DECLIMTION i
l FILE IstC FORM 241 EA Ip eERS: 95-270 OE ACTIONS: CIVIL PEMLTY $1.000 02/29/96 j
f 4-95-026 NI M n DISCRIMIMTION FOR T
RIVER BOD 1 12/13/95 / U Ist RAISINE SAFETY CONCERNS MID FALSIFICATION OF A QUALITY ASSLRANCE REPORT EA IUSERS: NA DE ETIONS: NO ACTION i
l t-
,s 8
IBIC-125131A-A 0FFICE OF IIIWESTIGATIGIS pag:
h.
AINRist RE80RT OF CLOSED CASES DATE: 12/17/96' 4-Ftst TE FERIOD 10/91/95 - 09/30/96 l-CLOSED CASE N ALLuiATIIBI SOURCE FACILITY RAE MTE/ RESULT SOJ ACTIM 4-M-027 m wn ELIERATE USE OF L
letDIGffl Altff EDICAL CTR 11/21/M / 5 DECLINTIGI IRAPPINRtIATE DATA. IEESIA.TIIIG IN MISalgtINISTIIATIGI EA IRfGDtS: 96-004 OE ACTIONS: CIVIL PDIALTY $8.000 02/22/96 96-005 IISIVIDUAL LETTDt 02/22/96 4-95-028 ALLEED ELIMitATE FAIL 15E TO T
I1WUSTRIAL IIfftIIE. IIIC.
02/15/96 / 5 MCLInATIGI FILE IBIC FOINI 241 EA ElfGDtS: 96-065 GE ACTIONS: CIVIL PENALTY $1.500 06/06/96
'4-95-029 AtIND DELIERATE VIOLATICII T
latSHINETUR IIUCLEAR 2 10/27/95 / 0 Ist 1
i 0F (5115i TESTING MIOERNI EA 18580t5: IIA E ACTIONS: HD ACTION 4-95-030 ALLEED DISDtIMIaATIOlt AGAIIIST A
SOUTH TEXAS 1 04/25/96 / U R-Ft35ER ET INSTituCTOR SY STP i
~ pudenEEENT FOR EPtNtTIIE SAFETY rrimirrigIS EA InfGDtS: IIA E ACTICIIS: 110 ACTION t
4-95-032 ALLIED FALSE STATDOITS BY I
WASHINGTOIl NUCLEAlt 2 10/05/95 / P ist fille IdATDES 70 ISIC IIISPECTINtS EA IRBSDtS: IIA E ACTIONS: NO ACTI0lt 4-95-033 ALLEED DIECTItBI BY A
COIWWICE PEAlt 1 01/31/96 / U Ist SUPDtVISOR TO DISOgulE RA0hlASTE TAIK WITleUT SAfrLIIIS EA IRBSDtS: IRA E ACTICIES: NO ACTItBI 4-95-CM ALLEGED DELIBDIATE Dril0PDt L
DIAMOIC H TESTIIIG CtyrAflY 10/18/M / 5 MCLIIIATIGE RADIOGIAPY PitACTICES l
EA IESSDts: %-148 DE ACTIONS: CIVIL PDIALTY 03/05/96 95-231 INDIVIDUAL LETTER 10/25/95 6
4-95-035 ALLEED DELIBDtATE A
WATDtFINID 3 01/17/96 / P Ist i
FALSIFICATIOll 0F FIItE ETDI L
I i
1 EA IRDEDtS: 96-072 OE ACTi0stS: NOV 03/20/%
j
$1 m
f.
/
i TE3 0I I.
l
!WESTI f i g imnATf04: \\ f p 3E M
I 4
\\.
=W M Bi&AO C 1:
G$
NORUL 8tEPORT gr rtrK*3 CASES DLTE: 12/17/96
^
FOR TE PERIJD 10/01/M - 09/30/96 CLOSED CASCIR9eDt
- ALLEGATION
.N FACILITY IMPE DATEIRESULT DQJ ft.TIGE C-95-036 ALLEED DEL 18DIATE -
L PALD VDt0E 1 02/15/96 i S DECLTHATION FALSIFICATISI 0F IIES89ESE TEST FOR ALNetING DOSIETERS EA itfeERS: 96-082 GE ACTIONS: IIOV 04/23/96 4-95-037 ALIIEED DISDtIMIMTION AGAIIIST 4
MSHIIIGTON NUCLEAR 2 C2/06/96 / U IEC SDIIOR EAEIIESR FOR IIEPORTING SAFETT CGICDiluS EA IItpeEftS: M OC ACTIDIIS: NO ACTIOli 4-95-038 AUIED DELISUtATE FAILNtE TO I
D911T!t0It IIIT't. INC.
C2/15/Vs / 4 Ist FILE IstC FWpf 241 L
EA IRpeDtS: 96-061 OE ACTIONS: MOV 06/21/96 4-95-039-ALIIGED DELitutATE FAIUf!E TO T
BEMIS CONSTRUCTICII. Ilit.
11/3G/95 / 5 DECLIIIATION FIII IWIC FOIW4 241 1
2A InfsDts.95-276 UE ACTIDIES: CIVIL PEELTv $2.500 03/19/96 i
4-95-040 ALLEGED DISCRI1*IIIATION BY A
ESHINGICII IIULtIAR 2 04/15/96 /.U let 194MEEENT FOR REPORTIIIG SAFETY CDICDtitS EA M1eptS: IIA CE ACTICIES: 110 ACTION 4-95-041 AL11GED DELIEDtATE A
SAll DNOFRE 2 04/19/96 / U let FALSIFICATIJII 0F IIEllUlitED VERIFICATI0II RECORDS AND DISOtIMIIIATIOR EA InfSDts: IIA DE ACTIOCS: H0 ACTION 4-95-042 ALLEED DELI 80 TATE FAILLptE TD A
C#9E TECH 02/23/96 / 5 DECLIIIATIOII FILE IstC F0let 241 EA IR9eDtS: %-093 DE ACTIONS: CIVIL PDGALTY $1.500 06/06/%
4-95-043 ALLEED DELIBDtATE L
MSHIIIGToll NUCLEAR 2 01/31/95 / F 151 FALSIFICATION OF TIE CARDS BY GE SUPDtVISORS EXCEEDIIIG TEOfflCAL SPECIFICATION EA IRPeutS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTIDW t \\
[
vinEST[dugle:bjT kWo"yJs'qiNyM41y vihouT
' y p p.
A
MtC-125131A-A 0FFTG'Or WEd FAGE:
~26 '
~
AflNUAL REPORT Cf CLD5EU CASES DATE: 12/17/96 FOR TE PERIOD 10/01/E - 99/30/06
}
CLOSED CASE NUleER ALLEGATION SDLPCE FACILITY IWE DATE/ RESULT 00J ACTION 4-95-084 ALLEED DELIKRATE A
MiERFORD 3 02/08/96 / 1 KCLIhATION FALSIFICATION OF FIRE ETCH RECGtDS EA IpeDts: m OE ACTIONS: 180 ACTION 4-95-045 ALLEED DELIBERATE I
FRONTIER LOGGIE CORP.
01/30/96 / E R
FALSIFICATION OF MtC FORM 314 (CERTIFICATE OF CISPOSITION OF MTERIAL)
EA IGNEDts: 96-073 E ACTIONS: NOT 04/15/96 4-95-046 AldED DELIBERATE VI3LATION I
SAN ONOFRE 2 05/28/96 / U R
OF PLANT PROCEDURES A m FALSIFICATI(NI 0F REQUIRED RECORDS EA 3RSWERS: 96-214 E ACTIONS: NOV 05/28/96 4-95-047^
ALLEGED DISCRIMIllATION FOR A
M TERFORD 3 01/31/96 / U R
REPORTIE FIRE MTCH CONCERN 5 TD SITE PWIAGEENT EA laseDts: m OE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 4-95-048 ALLEED DCLIBEPATE FAILINtE TO I
ENSEL P5ELFS CONSTRUCTIO 11/17/95 / U R
FILE WIC FOR 241 EA inseDts: 95-275 OE ACTIONS: NDY 12/27/95 4-95-043 ALLEED KLIKRATE I
CDIOUBITY HOSPITA:-
01/3C/96 / 5 DECLINATION FAL5IFICATION OF 00$2 ADMINISTRATI0lt EA IMEDts: 96-056 OE ACTIONS: CIVIL PDIALTY $2.500 06/12/96
% -063 IICIVIDUAL le0V 06/12/%
4-95 Oc0 ALLEED DISCRIMIETION AGAINST L
CGWICE PEAK 1 02/15/96 / U R
ENGINEER 1 E STAFF BY SITE MANAGDOT EA lueDts: M DE ACTInits: NO ACTION i
P N t dITk0 DIS M
- % GA%
, rkm f
8E Q OR DQptl T5I I.
T T
I ~,
p.
I
l s
s s
E 4
5 g
5 B
i W
n a
n n
n 18 c
il :l li i
i I
.I
'b
, sl l
}
E E
v5 l
I h'
I 5
l
~
~
l k~h~
h i
n g
g R
/I ll c
,g'5.
i i
i 1
a S
d 8
i h
4 f(
l
!~ !" l' g
s a
a a
i" E~
,3 lE-E E
E E
E E
E "g-E' E8, 58 s E,I E
E E
a EW" E$E glwgw Ewifgwlbsl w ls g)
E
[w w
i 8
8 3
lsl,!slg agc g
s a
ge sa w u
s,_
=
E
.l_3la~
m 3,
3nl s
-l di.l 11.1 li ~lS i'l!. i'Ili s s
i al sei n
i 1:
ne esi.
i i
l a
e i
(
e s
g-e.
e e,
e e
e e
v
181C-125131A A 0FFIE OF IanESTIGATIONS PAst-28
'. ~
- EPORT OF CLCSED OtSES DATE: 12/17/96 FWt TE PDtIOD 10/01/ % - 09/30/96 l
nmrn CASE InfGDt ALLEGATICII 50tflCE FACILITY leRE DATE/8ESILT DOJ ACTIWI o-95-058 ALLEED ELIKilA1E NISCDMUCT L
RIVER 8001 04/23/96 / 5 ECLIIIATICE SY LICDESEE DFLDTEE REGNIDING
' SECWtITY ACCESS MmptIl4 TION EA InfEDtS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 4-M 059 ALLEED DELI 8EllATE VIOLATION L
C00pDt 05/29/96 / 5 DECLIIIRTIWI 0F PUTS 0MIEL ACCESS AUTHORIZATION PROCEDWE5 SY SECWtITY SOEDets EA InfEDts: 96-225 GE ACTIONS: IICIVIOURL IIOV 09/27/96 4- % 060 ALLEED DELIEDIATE VIOLATION L
EDheRR05 FIPELIE 10/31/95 / F let OF ISIC (8100t i DE ACTIONS: 110 ACTION 1
EA InfGDtS: IIA 4-95-061
- f wn ELIERATE FAILWlE TO A
H & H I-RAY SDtV-. IIIC.
02/26/96 / F ist numirT GUAftTDtLY FIELD AREITS AIS FALSIFICATIWI 0F IIEQUIItED RECORDS EA ImfWDtS: NA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 4-95-062 ALLEED DISDtIMINATISI AGAlltST A
nIATERFORD 3 08/07/96 / U Ist SECMtITY OFFICDt5 BY SITE SEcutITY MellAGDIElli FOIt TAULING TO IIIC EA In#GDtS: IIA E ACTIONS: 110 ACTION 4 %-063 ALLIED DISOtIMIIIATI0ld AGAIIIST A
C00 POL 08/07/96 / U Ist A OumLITY CDNTIt0L IIISPECTOR EA IIWWDts: NA E ACTIOlts: 110 ACTIOli i
4-95-064 ASSIST TO TECH STAFF /M I N D L
FWtT ST VRAIN 12/29/M / F let DISOtINIIIATICII AIS MIONGFlL TElW4111ATION OF COImtACTWt ilADIATICII PRDTECTICII
=
EA IRSEDts: IIA DE ACTICIES: 110 ACTION
['s
[
[-
[1.IMITED815TRI8d4
\\
r y
IVE I TION /mY BE' OR 15 n.
ugs.IstCy o
I,
- - =.
1
-1 i
1 L
Mg 5
<D a
s a
a a
a a
m gg 4
aI.I I
I I
I i
B a
s a
a s-E s
M g
L EP 0
q 8
s gil 5
a i
I l
r i
i
~
s e
El a
M 5
5 5
I is m
g-gl a
a a
a E
a s
E E<
E<
Es EE<
E<
E 5
8 !!
R
.s s-a a
s e
'E
'4 E E l1ll;jiillv!lllg$- l. p i,,1
,4 g
N5s Qs E
g g
EE P
lg
!5 !i,-
s s i,1 g
.s
- i. l i lg i i j,,l f
lg5 B
Ilsl.iglg. i.
g
+
he x
ie e
e e
f l
E I.
E I
E E
y a
g e
e e
y g
g g
v 1
4 4
e
(
- s i
=
a a
n i
A..
E i.
s i
-i s
n e
ji
~
3
'a s
.6
.E -
3
)
g
- 1 j
in i
s
~
gi i
e I
glgl l l
ll!
1 t'
l?
s s
i*l s
=s is
.s.
n.
jss.
s.
s 3-gsn
!es.
88
'lkl'-
8
.g a
a a
a s"
a g
~
55 5
588gE8 E
E E
'F,
!l5!l55
$ 3,EE * !
!! * !a
- lll*
S
- ls
-'e llel.ilil,p;,aln,i,u LI.Lli
,l 1
.iune;1
.*i t
s 81'I***1l'i'i'i
. i i
!l
_,. i i
i.
I i
s
(
t t
t t
t t
t e
r
ll!
$!l[, j!!
0 N
IG O
I 6
i I
9 G
I T
/
I T
A l7 T
A N
it1 C
n I
/
A I
L 2
L C
R R
R 1
3 C
R R
E 0
E D
B B
JE T
RA 5
U F
S U
U U
D T.
- /
/
/
/
/
/
/
W A
S 6 --
6 6
6 6
6 6
E E
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 DI
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
EM 3
0 6
8 0
8 8
5E 1
3 2
2 3
2 0
DT
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
LA 9
9 6
8 8
6 8
CD 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
tn I
W C
I s
I A
I J
L s
P 1
S L
K 1
S a
I E
E l
I A
l W
H 5
E S
i i
t P
A T
6 W
u 9
P T
D X
S
/
I i
E I
T GG E l
S0 Y
S NI T
p I
E3 T
n M
9 Y
II C
M U
S/
I I
I e
S SE u T
T A9 L
e E
hF/
1 D-A t
C E
C OD t
U S
K C9 I
u A
E W
PP S
O E
C f
C S
E F
s M
L I
I I
I L/
N mA N
C1 O
uU O
G C
T G
6 I
GDD I
I I
0 E
N T
NII T
T T
O 1
I 1
C IVV C
C C
N 1
O9 8
PT B 01 I
W L 5 T A A eII L A
A A A A
1 5
Y DSD 0
0 O-f.
t O
0 0
I rGt 5
I 1
1 N
1 PII 1
1 oPi P
7 1
t E
EID i
P S
5 S
S S
S S
I N
N I
I I
I I
IL N
l G
G G
O C
O O
S 0
RE O
I S
1 I
I I
I I
FI R
T T
E T
T T
F L
0ET T
T N E T
I C
C C
O N
C C
N A
C ODC C
t I
A A
W E
A INC A
I A
E A
I D
N IAR l
L E
LT E OE E -
l TAA T
C 0
A E A E
Tl E -
A C
BN D SIE G F
s E LWY f
F i
C L
D St O
O T O
E0 T Y T
lE ST N
L A
IUI IS-T5 I
S sri #
EnN I
I l
I E
.F VIE G
NOPl CgeA I
S IF C
ClY E
G VPR-GYT ED V
I E'
2 EYC 4 EIEP E
203 DtT A
E0 Ao T
T1 8 TTE 9 TT A
DT 466 GE GEG0 FNE T
I F
FTE TTO 0II A
AEI 333 A
A4 3 AIS 3 AIFR LL t
E G
0A A WrP 666 CS A NUAT A L
A G
5 EtETNWOE G
I2 It D
6 DWF f-G I
I lNI E
I I
OLT II I
999 l
I I
UeXE I
L gE 9 EC0 i
G 0O I
IFSS ImG l
W u
L I
i T!
A LG L
UE EF t
E G'
S EE G S OrN S
T1It S
AEGe S TT7 S
- LS I
1 l
t n
t N N0 AA n
A TG 5
t I
L D
ClAT D
ITIF D CZD D t
TuOS ISGI t
DtI t
C 0 DT D
INT D
iI i
ICT E
IIE S
DP s nHIA E E/SA S
IOCC W
E0KS I
nR 8 I
IAST S
FRD #
FIIM p ISTI S
W f aCWC S
rI 8
GELtUD E SIIf t
IOI ITFl R
OTtREG N SHV l
a 8 ECTU R cIUL I
I 0I I
I I
I I
I rE sL I
LE SNSP LTO I
I t L L
SC a
R L
A AODa A IOEE E A AUR A A sFEP A
A U
FGEI I
A LFEE E A0NA E
E FPVC E DC FAP E
mF E
A0D m
A 9
0 2
4-5 6
7 5-p 0
1 1
1 1
1 1
M 9
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 5'
6 6
6 6
5-E 6
6 9
9 9
9 2-S 9
9 A
1 '
C 4
4
. 4' 4
4 4
4 C'
IR
'1 1'
la
- I I4
-l
- jli,
- i /,I 4
i' 3'
i:
l
C3-[SHID O 16 C l:
A -t
~
ANNUAL REPORT OF CLOSED CASES -
DATE: 12/17/96 FOR T E PERIOD 10/01/95 - 09/30/96 i
CLOSED CASE IU SER ALLEGATION 50WtCE FEILITY NME DATE/RESLLT :
DOJ ETIGE 4-96-014 DISCRIMIIIATION FOR REPWITING A
PALD VDtDE 1 08/28/96 / U Ist SAFETY CONCDINS REGNIDING ELECTRICAL MAINTDIANCE DEPARTENT EA IUSDts: NA DE ETIONS: II3 ETION 4-96-021 DELISDtATE VIOLATION OF L
EEET FIELS NUCLEAP INC 07/19/96 / 5 DECLIIIATION PRDCEDWlES REQUIRING PDtSOIIAL pit 0TECTIVE EQUIPENT EA lueDts: %-068 OE ETIONS: LETTER 10/03/96 96-287 IEIVIDUAL IIOV 09/06/96 4- % -023 DISCRIMillATION AGAlltST F0190t A
DIABLO CAltYON 1 09/27/96 / U Mt CONTRETOR FOR PAST CSFLAINTS TD 00L EA IDEDtS: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 4- % -024 DELIBDtATE FAILWtE TO FILE 10tC A
RCBCD PROD. LOG-. INC.
09/24/96 / 5 DECLIIIAT10st FullM 241 EA NWEDts: 96-378 OE ACTIONS: PENDING 4 96-025 DELIBERATE FALSIFICATION OF L
PALD VDtDE 1 09/13/96 / 5 DECLIIIATI0lt INFOIIMATION PROVIDED BY CONTRACT DFLOYEES IN OltDER TO GAIN ECESS EA IURDts: %373 OE ACTIDItS: PDIDIIIG
% -394 INDIVIDUAL LETTER 11/21/96 96-395 IICIVIDUAL IIOV 11/21/96 4 96-027 DELIODIATE FAILiftE 10 FILE letC I
TESTIIIG LASS., INC-09/26/96 / 5 DECLINATI0lt FORM 241 EA lueDts: 96-447 OE ETIONS: PENDIllG 4-96-034 DISCRIMIIIAT1001 AGAlltST DESIGk A
WATDtFORD 3 08/26/96 / U Ist DIGIIEDt FOR IDDITIFYIldG SAFETY CONCDtits EA IMEDts: IIA DE ETIcets: NO ACTI0tt
,\\,,I N
4 \\
[s\\
/
\\
LIMITEthDISTRIBifTIh i
INVESTjGAT!VEJNFORMATION7 MAY NOT BF/REPR00l$ED OR DISTRIB p rEL C0ft5HL I
OI,
M 7CLD5ED CASES NTE M /96
~
asma FOR TIE PERIOD 10/01/95 - 09/30/96 CLOSED CASE IM80t ALLEGATION SOLPCE FACILITY NM E CATE/ItE5 ULT 00J ACTION I
4- % 038 DISOtIMIIIATION AGAINST A
SNI 040FitE 2 G8/29/96 / U NP MCHINISTS SY GDERAL R5tENNI FOR llEPORTINE SAFETY CONCERN 5 EA IUSDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: 110 ACTION 4 9G-039 DISCRIMINATION AGA!IEST A
50UTM TEIAS 1 09/13/96 / U Ist CONTRACTipt FOR PREVIOUS WISTLEBLOWING ACTIVITIES EA IRpWDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 5-93-011R ALLEED DFLOYEE A
PALD VDt0E I 12/20/95 / U Ist DISCItIMIIIATION EA NtteDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 5-93-012R ALLEGED Pit 00UCT SLESTITUTICII T
BRANDON SUPPLY CORP.
10/05/95 / U Ist OF VALVES SUPPLIED TD SONGS EA IRDWDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: NO ACTION 5-94-004 ALLEED DFLDEE A
PALO VDtDE 1 11/29/95 / P int DISCRIMIIIATI'ut EA IRfgDts: IIA DE ACTIONS: 110 ACTI0lt r
+
e
i e
e 4
R
-O e
m lii m
N e
8 v-m
i l
Investigations Opened f
FY94 - FY96 t
300 i
l r
i 1
m 250-
\\
c 250 O
218 cn 200-m t
e l
E 150-
~O R
W m
/
1994 1995 1996 Total Opened E oisenmination i
g!
j g False Statements P Other Violations of NRC Rules, Regulations, or License Conditions j
n j
i i
u.
_A..
,_+-
4 ai xs-s A.
m
..----.-. -+
___,_u._.
4
.4 sb..m_
m--
.___.m=
9 O
l t
t 4
I h
L 4
f 4
6 N
af O
f*
Ow CMM W
4 e
i s
_/
9 4
=
---~ '*-
. - ~.....
i i
IOVesti ations Opened 9
?
W 1995 i
l
/
l l
/
i tion (n.,4 1996 s,, (&-)
viora n,,, ' N R c n ug,,-
Wihinag; (A2?b);
"*9utation, un,,,
/
g~ein,,;c;,
l l
E!
i gj l
E m
te,I
?
Palse stay
' (25*s I
i
-*i 4
4__
M.
A
+
JaA+
_is32._*e
.m..e e 4 - e - mada.
._s.u
-4
.3l
._w.g4
-h,_4 4.
e44-_-.
_paA-4s.
.k
__4._ 44A-.Jaus,-
0 e
e f
e r
1 h
4 e
a f
e O
I 4
iw 2OFO MC 3D m
b i
e t
Q s
i 1
l
Cases Opened (Reactors /MaterialsNendors) j FY94 - FY96 l
i 200 '
I t
VO l
C e
150-o.
O i
l I
1 as i
e 1
U) i m.
100--
4 l
0 I
i o
l W.
- N.
e i
50-CJ Ja E
2
[
1 "z$
"":i b
- M:
0 0- f
~
=
1994 1995 1996 m
~
5 I
E ReactorCases(74%)
i-' Materials Cases (23%)
3 VendorCases(3%)
5 E
l i
4 9
9 4
h 4
4 2m f""
O Vs C
ll0 fTl (11
i Active inventory FY96 i
Cases Open Longer Than 12 Months j
i l
50 '
45-I
~
Average Inventont of Cases Open LoncerThan 12 Months in FY95 = 37 35-E 8
30-O l
o 25-E l
20-15-10-5-
9' 0-Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep g
l 0
i i
-'~,
+4
+--
a
.. = _
s,--a-n-A
..sm.----
a J
a x-.
L-
,s na a
N 2
O r"
O Ln C
3Cf M-r 4
h
+
9-t a
e s
5 edm 4
t f
i -
a
,w-
-.m-.
I
~
Closed Cases By Category of Closure l
180 '
175 160-O 140-i O
O 120-m 8
100-mo 9n 80-O J,,
hk @s$
1994 1995 1996 Substantiated or Unsubstantiated Cases Closed for No Regulatory Requirement 5
g Closed Due to Higher Priority Cases 3 Other Administrative Closures y
m e
a,e..u-a
.e--_
4
- g. -.,
....o...
--.a.sv
,a,a m.
,s a-a, u.a #s a a,.
m.4m>#.re,.s.um-4.g c a
._.-w%.w...-u..v_sw.usm-.._m._-.c
_x O
4 j..
!+
+-
I.
e e
T 4 d
i e
f I
N2 4
m f**
O tn C
D ff1
+
N 1
4 3
y 2.-
4 i
h
?,
(-
i d
h M
h E
4 4
4 k,'
i,
.i.
4
'I 4'
a
l l
l l
Time in Process l
New Investigative Process -
{ygg.{ygg 237% increase in Number of Cases Opened FY91-FY93
.l 11 '
i l
(
10-U t
9-8-
C.
7-o Q.
O 6-I m
1 5
5-C O2 4-
~
3-2-
1-g p
e e
e e
1994 1995 1996 8
5, 5l i
i l
l l
9 4
6 i
e 4
N
.1E nPO to C
- x3 M
CD D
6 5
7 4
1 J
1 DOJ Referrals I
FY94 - FY96 i
i 70 '
I i
l 60-o e
m 5
50-e cc
(
m 40-i m.
m m
i o
30-i O
l se y
20-s i
z l
l 10-l i
l l
1 n
4 u
o o
e i
1994 1995 1996 99,
o!
a!
.i i,
I i
Jt, A
d f
f 6
5 4
<W 2m FO (n
C JO TT1 W
9 9
9
- m.
f Investigations Closed FY94 - FY96 300 '
i l
250-256 259
.I O
240 1
- ya
.sn 200-E t
e l
E 150-l l
/
5 2
Q 1994 1995 1996 I
Total Closed E Discrimination mz'yf 3 False Statements in Other Violations of NRC Rules, Regulations, or Ucense Conditions
$l 0
i i
9 0
0.
e S
e b
W 2n.
FO Ln C23 m
a O
IOVestigagyOns c;Osegg
/
l 1995 Other (4%)
Violations of NRC Rules, i
Discrimination (43%)
Regulations, or Ucense Conditions (26%)
j i
FY 1994 l
Other (5%)
i Discrimination (33%)
Violations of NRC Rules, Regulations, or Licen Conditions (23%)
False Statements (27%)
j l
t i
FY 1996 Other(5%)
j False Statements (39%)
Violationb of NRC Rules, i
D.iscnmination (44%)
Regulations, or License Conditions (26%)
E i
P 8
5 m!
Ei i
False Statements (25%)
i
gay.-e3masm Jimx.m_',s..#
mes
,3--4 a%Jm-ame-A+m A..
m m3 m.
d
.stA e
d-
- era pa e.
m JM ei%@
hhe%ms#-*-=&*-whee Mew e--
en
[
4 9-I t
h 4
I O
f 4.
e I
d 4
+
}
I t
?
Y m
4 4
e.
3 i
B i
1 N2m FO to a
C 2M emit 6
t u
,w 4.-,,
-,q
.,4.y--,
il l
- ll!l;
,l!
l m
5
>s
)
a
)%
p 72 0
s
(
0 e
1 r,
n
(
io w
s
- a ru c
r
~
o a
is t
H e
in e
w m
s t,
d a
A C
s e
la o
s t
a n
o n
C T
i 4
1 699 1
s r
is uo H
~
V k
r6 o9 g3 Y
. 1 WF i L 59 c-9 i
f4 n
L.
1 i
c9 eY is pF S
i e
s
..r a
w i
- s. s C
4 99 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
O 6
5 4
3 2
1 W388sE2@I
-